Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application-Permit
I Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office:970·945·8212 Fax: 970·384-3470 Inspection Line: 970·384-5003 Building Permit No. Parcel No: 2393-082-05-020 Locality: _________ Pinyon Mesa SubdisionJ_Eiling 1, Lot 20 Job Address: ____ 18j_uniper Hill Lane Glenwood Springs, CO_§J§QL ____ _ Use of Building: ___ S_ifpwelling on unfinished basement w/patios & attached garage Owner: Pinyon Mesa Development, Inc. Contractor: ___ __:S:c.:k:Lyv"-"ie_w_Homes, LLC Fees: Plan Check: $ 1,486.78 Septic: ·-·~····"-~"~~--- Bldg Permit: $ 2,?§~3!i-Other Fees: 933.07 Total Fees: $ 4!707_~_()_ Clerk: I},~--Date: 3/t '7/~!?__ __ I FIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPL!CA 1, .o8 81h Street, Suite 40!, Glenwood Springs, Co 8!60! Phone: 970-945-8212 I Fax: 970-384-3470 I Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 www.garfield-county.com assessors office 970-945-9134) Authoritv. l11is application for a Building Penn it must be signed by the Owner of the property, described above, or an authorized agent If the signature below is not that of the Owner, a separate letter of authority, signed by the Owner, must be provided with this Application. Legal Access. A Building Penn it cannot be issued without proof of legal and adequate access to the property for purposes of inspections by the Building Department. Other Permits. Multiple separate pennits may be required: (I) State Electrical Penn it, (2) County ISDS Pem1it, (3) another permit required for use on the property identified above, e.g. State or County Highway/ Road Access or a State Wastewater Discharge Pem1it. Void Permit. A Building Permit becomes null and void if the work authorized is not commenced witl1in 180 days of the date of issuance and if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of ISO days after commencement. CERTIFICATION I hereby certifY that I have read this Application and that the information contained above is true and correct. I understand that the Building Department accepts the Application, along with the plans and specifications and other data submitted by me or on my behalf(submittals), based upon my certification as to accuracy. Assuming completeness of the submittals and approval of this Application, a Building Pennit wil! be issued granting pem1ission to me, as Owner, to construct the structure(s) and facilities detailed on the submittals reviewed by the Building Department. In consideration ofthe issuance of the Building Permit, I agree that I and my agents will comply with provisions of any federal, state or local law regulating the work and the Garfield County Building Code, ISDS regulations and applicable land usc regulations (County Regulation(s)). I acknowledge that the Building Pcnnit may be suspended or revoked, upon notice from the County, if the location, construction or use of the struchu-e(s) and facility(ics), described above, are not in compliance with County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. l hereby grant pcnnission to the Building Department to enter the property, described above, to inspect the work. I further acknowledge that the issuance of the Building Pennit does not prevent the Building Official from: · the correction of errors in the submittals, ifany, discovered after issuance; or (2) stopping constmction or use oftlle structure(s) or faci!ity(ics) if such is in violation · law. STAFF USE ONLY Special Conditions: Adjusted Valuation: -:)~o 1'10z~ Plan Check Fee: f 1!-J~L.' Permit Fee: :3 :'5"' '2.. "Z.. <n Manu home Fee: Total Fees:· i--{/07 ISDS Fee{;5 Balance Due's 31il3 ~ BP No & Issue Date: to'f),<Dj 3{1'1./•S' ;J/fl ISDS No & Issued Date: Setbacks{ OCC Group: Cons! Type: BLDG DEPT: PLNGDEPT: ~ 1---: L, \L \.. -APB ~~-bJF1~----,.~.,1,::=!'-Et-ll.....:;: &'-''V;...,::Y' __ _ AP ~0\lALl. .- ~~ DATE The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: 1) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements including guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit. OWNER VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Address Date ..oP..:;in'><y-"o'-:n..::;Mc;;;e:.;s-::,a .;:D..::ev-"e"'l o::Jp:::m:.:e:::cn:::.t.,..=.:t:+.=c"-' ___ Subdivision 18 Juniper Hill Ln. · 1 Lot/Block C:3:7./1;';8:'7,/2:;.;0:-;;0:;:8-===,.-------~~Contractor Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Basement: Unfinished Square Feet Valuation Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Total Valuation Garage: Valuation Crawl Space Valuation Decks/ Patios 1800 sf 1418 sf sf sf X $74.68 3218 sf 1678 sf X $41.00 sf X $33.68 572 sf X $18.00 sf X $9.00 Pinyon Mesa ~t.JoJ • -A k~.j f 20 Skyview Homes 240,320.24 68,798.00 10,296.00 0.00 Covered Open 384 sf X $24.00 :. '1' ';t II. .0'0 180 sf X $12.00 .::: ) It. o • 0'!> Valuation Commercial Type of Construction: Occupancy: Valuation Total Valuation sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X -11,376.00 0.00 330,790.24 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. TWO (2) SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS & TWO (2) SITE PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTEDFOR ALL APPLICATIONS. c'J1e_ Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. I Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. I. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a 'copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes v' 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do apply. J Yes ---- 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the l.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties streams or water courses? Y es_-1"--'f'\-- 4. Does the site p7an · dicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes __ ~-- 2 5. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your right to use a private easement/right of way; A County Road and Bridge permit; a Co lorado Dept of Highway Permit, including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any combination. You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. See phone book for other ag~9cies Y es._J-z-.,'--'-·--- 6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordan~with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes V . _ __,,__ __ 7. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances ry.quired between wood and earth? Yes V No ----- 8. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? / Yes V No ____ _ 9. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? ./ Yes __ c__ __ _ I 0. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof constructio~ Yes __ _:V:__ __ _ II. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters 9r joists or trusses? Yes __ ...:.V ___ _ 12. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and ~ams? Yes v ---'----- 13. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roo/ (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes _____ _ 14. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model ansj Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes V No.~~v/~~-r-- §fui ()()}-pcbd OJ} ~. 3 15. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? / Yes ______ No __ ...;.v ___ _ 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes V 17. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation fer all habitable rooms? Yes. _ __,V:__ __ _ 18. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes V No _____ _ 19. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on ~=:=&b hvt MQth. ~ 20. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes / 21. Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will be accepted without it, but you run the risk of the HOA bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either revocation or substantial modification of the plans. Yes / 22. Will this be thyonly residential strucmre on the parcel? Yes v' No Ifno-Explain: ______ _ 23. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes / 24. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? Yes ./ 4 25. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes V 26. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone district~ Yes. ____ ~v ________ _ 27. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes / 28. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the applicationpfthese changes? Yes _ _,v ___ _ 29. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes / 30. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes / No ____ _ 31. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 re-in~ection fee? Yes '1/ ----''----- 32. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection .ru:iJ!Lto receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building?/ Yes ---'---- 33. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an ~gent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes ____ 'l/~----- 5 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable irJ,spection. '!es \1' · 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permi! application? '{our attention in this is appreciated. '!es. __ __:V,__ ___ _ 36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? / '{ es (please check with the building department about this requirement) 37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuancp of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? '!es _-£_,_ __ 38. Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the tap fees have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuance of a Certificatyof Occupancy? '{ es _ _:V:__ __ _ I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of ' my ability. Signatur Date Phone@1/Jil£2::51tlt0 (days); "St.A.d'YL-{. .e (evenings) ProjectName;l:(l'\~Dn tv\e:,Q..... }gJ.Je.Jc ~1&--oJI.M.-<::\ ProjectAddress:/dJf@ /8 ~d J.}Ji/Lo.nc. &lenwoCd SfYurjj ,to gJ~DI 6 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST ApplicantQ 1 ,..c;i\.J t\0-5Pt I f>' 1"""" I (4A- Building ~Engineered Foundation __.lLDriveway Permit G.i<fk- _Lsurveyed Site Plan ~ Septic Permit and Setback~ L/ Gradeffopography 30% 4ach Residential Plan Review List ¥Minimum Application Questionnaire _£subdivision Plat Notes .t&:.tFire Department Review 'LV aluation Determination/Fees ~ed Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker 4Attach Conditions ~pplication Signed /Plan Reviewer To Sign Application J Parcel/Schedule No. ~40# Snow load Letter-Manf. Hms. ___£Soils Report GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning _Lrroperty Line Setbacks ~30ft Stream Setbacks ~oodPlain ~ilding Height __..LL:Zoning Sign-off _boad Impact Fees ~HOA/DRC Approval ~Gradeffopography 40% -t,.L.Planning Issues ~Subdivision Plat Notes April 10, 2008 Skyview Homes 1024 Centre Avenue Building E, Suite 100 Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 Re: Ponderosa, Douglas, Lodgepole -Pinyon Mesa Garfield County, Colorado Project No. 28026 Gentlemen: Weeks & Associates, Inc. Structural Engineers It has come to our attention Detail 3 for counterforts shows void form in the footing. However, there is no minimum dead load required for the soil recommendations per the Geotechnical Report by Yeh and Associates, project number 27-362, therefore the void form should not be used. If I can be of further assistance please contact me. Sincerely, Weeks & Associates, Inc. Connie J. Schneider, E.I.T. Staff Engineer Weeks & Associates, Inc. 4700 S. College, Suite #I Fort Collins, CO 80525 (970) 225-2422 April 8, 2008 Skyview Homes 1024 Centre Avenue Building E, Suite 100 Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 Re: Ponderosa -Pinyon Mesa Garfield County, Colorado Project No. 28026 Gentlemen: Weeks & Associates, Inc. Structural Engineers It is our understanding the vertical distance between the top two horizontal #4 rebar reinforcing in the basement foundation wall and the horizontal #4 rebar directly below was 25" instead of 18" as shown on the Foundation Details. Based on design loads, the 25" horizontal rebar spacing is acceptable. If I can be of further assistance please contact me. RECEIVED APR 1 0 2008 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & PlANNING Weeks & Associates, Inc. 4700 S. College, Suite #1 Fort Collins, CO 80525 (970) 225-2422 03/20/2008 05:37 9702252522 WEEKS ASSOCIATES PAGE 01/02 Weeks & Associates, Inc. March 21, 2008 Skyview Homes 1024 Centre Ave., Bldg E, Suite 100 Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 Re: Ponderosa-Pinyon Mesa Garfield County, Colorado Project No. 28026 Gentlemen. Structural Engineers It has come to our attention the garage and porch areas at the referenced project were excavated to the basement footing elevation therefore increasing the height of the foundation walls to 8'-0". It is our opinion the footing sizes shown on the foundation plan dated February 8, 2008 are adequate for the design loads. We do recommend adding #4 vertical and horizontal rebar spaced at 36" on center to the foundation walls provided each side of the foundation wall is backfilled concurrently to about the same height. Enclosed is the revised garage foundation wall detail showing the recommended reinforcing. If we can be of further assistance please contact us. Sincerely, Weeks & Associates, Inc. J~;:::~ ~ ~-~ Staff Engineer APR 1 0 2008 Weeks & Associates, Inc. 4700 S. Colle:ge Avenue, Suite #l, Fort Collins, CO 80525 Phone 9701225-2422; Fax 970/225-2622 May 1S, 2008 Skyview Homes 1024 Centre Ave., Bldg E, Suite 100 Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 Re: Pinyon Mesa Garfield County, Colorado Project No. 28026 Gentlemen WEEK& AS50GlATE5 No. 6562 P. iE a2102 Weeks & Associates, Inc. Structural Engineers The folloWing are my recommendations for attaching the base and cap of the adjustable steel columns to wood, steel and concrete. The base plates may be attached to the oonoret11 pads with (2)-3/8" diameter Red-Head or equivalent fasteners or with (2) powder actuated fasteners. The caps and/or bases of the steel columns may be attached directly to the steel beams with either a 1" fillet weld on two sides or (2) powder actuated f1uteners. The base and/or cap plates may be attached to wood beams or wood sill plates with (2}-3/8" X3" diameter lags or (2)-3 5/B" long Ledgerlok screws. At the oondltlon on the Ponderosa plan where the column cap plate meete the column ba11" plate at the main floor the plates should be boltwd together with (2)-3/8" diameter machine bolts and ths column should be stabilized with blocking at the main floor level, If I can be of further Week.~&. Associate.<, Inc. 4700 So~th College Ave .• Suire I Port Collins. CO 80525 (970} 225-2422 May. 23. 2008 3:26PM Skyview Developments May 21,2008 Skyview Homes 1024 Centre Ave., Bldg E, Suite 100 Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 Re: Pinyon Mesa Garfield County, Colorado Project No. 28026 Gentlemen No. 6794 P Weeks & Associates, Inc. Structural Engineers I have addressed the following items for the house models at the referenced subdivision. The steel angles supporting the stone consist of L4x4x1f4" anchored with 518" diameter wedge anchors a minimum of 5 Y2" into the concrete foundation wall a maximum of 24" on center. The steel angles and the angle attachment are adequate to support up to 20' of the stone veneer being used in the subdivision. The steel floor support beams may be anchored in the beam pockets with treated lumber blocking wedged between the web each side and the edge of the concrete beam pocket. Beams flush in the floor system should be blocked at the ends between adjacent floor joists. If 1 can be of further assistance please contact me. ryG. Weeks, P,E. S ructural Engineer Weeks & Associates. Inc. 4700 South College Ave., Suite I Fort Collins, CO 80525 (970) 225·2422 No. _:~!? b g 1'\/L _ j . ~ Assessor's Parcel No.t1--3'13 ~ 68~ 4 OS ~o ~o c.f1 e,.. f I~ Date 3( J 1/Dfr ()} . , BUILDIMG PER~IT CARD . ~ .;to JobAd ress lg C}tb,..,t~e-,·f/dJDtv>.~ftirG~/~o/ ~~~&;-,/ Owner ' ~. r .~· Address /'f>d..<./ ~~e.,. ,to Phone f1_7D·Cf8"'! -~Mo • qt .(..QiL,.A (() Contractor '<t.£c__ Addres~ 4-<1 ~ · <(os'J:"i:Phone # ']J..'O -Jol:r$82¥ (}pd< Setbacks: Front Rear RH . LH Zoning ___ _ S/(6YlllM~~ ~v:>(p~NSPECTIONS . SoilsT;~t-~~~~ Weatherproofing cz-'-/...s--p?g Footing .&·~ ~ ~ . ..f).s Mechanical ....:r--z.z-o_! --:"' _ Foundation~ LJ-<(;-015 IAI'PE Electrical Rough (State) ~ .. -'Z-:;:; ·-0 7 Grout . -Electrical Final (State) ?'"-Z. CJ-~ . Underground Plumbing L, ~ ·1 -o £ ~1:>\ Final ?:z(_').:.qJ? /Checklist ComQieted? )ft=s5?'4l Rough Plumbing S -;;;:: 7-0 6 · Certificate Occupancy #1 -=lt;;:::O~::,~I."J:'-=-:=------ Framing "'>-·;;;?."l:!zfl~~ Date IS'&~ci ct·;..2.:ao Insulation ~;,z;? --'Dfi~ Septic System # __,_IJ=-Il(J..t'lf-.:... _______ _ Roofing Date ----------- Drywall (P-/cg_--cr<ff ¢~ Fitlal G~s Piping ~-Z-7.....-c:>JS fZv Other ~ -e/.D. .. of" (}.~ 7-3/~6&ft1.} NOTES --r I G:p /& z -7/s-:.. ;so.:s (continue on back) 1.-.._ ____ _ COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at CJ/I:f S:AGL Permit No. ,/tJ g & :Z. I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: • J z ~II for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date 57-/2 --~----L--------- 20 0 g Building Inspector ------------------------------- Phone (970) 945-8212 COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at CY I <71: S As--£ /lf4:A PocJ X.J:? Permit No. / C/8? &: I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: ~II for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970·384-5003. Date db- Building Inspector ~~~~~-_!.~:2:::~":=:=,.!__ ______ _ Phone (970) 945-821 COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at / K ~A.);/£;{ 6/1 L C.. L.AJ Permit No. /?J 8? 3 I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: U/A:ot/£0 /E.A/1/:s lih/ &Af S!TZ G-As /?re A.kLrt?s ..;s;77fA/P£f? /AJ E-<t.SIZAte&r AAI o w .K'A G i:. , 7£/1'1/'/2:.~ /£_{2 tV/dlf7o~0 ;Jl) 75AfT/S? p 1¥"¥ 1/iiG-A'Y :Gtsl £'/1/0S _s:o, ?-llAtL ~r Re-lnspection J3.,d.s£Pf ,c-q--- 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date ,s;-= Z 7 20 0 ;5 Building Inspector ;;:2k t(U~~ , Phone (970) 945-8212 COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: )(call for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must b.e inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date .?· £o8' 20 ____ _ Building Inspector <l?u-d22?~ Phone (970) 945-8212 INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT J.. GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO ~~~ .. e ~ue~~-~~ ..... Zoned Ar~~;;~;;~;~··········Permit No .. lQK.foR ............. . !.9In consi~ration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. UseS/~ ot\IAM. hrt~'t-~~ P!~oL~ d.i$-'f,. Address or Legal Description • f;;, : This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From Tbe Street Until Final Inspection. ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING- WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspections Call384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado APPROVED DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD :ei~~e ~A/oiev "T~ .. ..--~ b.uCc IF PLACED TSIDE -co'"vlR WITH CLEAR PLASTIC Geotechnical Investigation Lots 20, 27, 28, 42 and 48 Pinyon Mesa Garfield County, Colorado Project No. 27-362 January 15, 2008 · Prepared for: Skyview Developments Attn: Angela Tourney 1024 Centre Avenue Suite 100, C & D Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 Prepared by: Yeh and Associates, Inc. 170 Mel Ray Road Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-384-1500 Fax: 970-384-1501 Lots 20, 27, 28, 42 and 48 Pinyon Mesa Table of Contents Project No. 27-362 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ....................................................................................... 1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 SITE CONDITIONS .................................................................................................................. 1 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .................................................................................................. 1 SITE DEVELOPMENT .............................................................................................................. 2 FOUNDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................. 3 . BELOW-GRADE WALLS ......................................................................................................... 4 SLABS-ON-GRADE ................................................................................................................. 4 SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE ..................................................................................................... 4 SURFACE DRAINAGE ............................................................................................................. 5 LIMITATIONS ........................................................................................................................... 5 Figure Site Location ........................................................................................................................... 1 Test Hole Locations ................................................................................................................ 2 Appendices Test Hole Logs ....................................................................................................................... A Laboratory Test Results ................................ : ....................................................................... B Lots 20. 27, 28, 42 and 48 Pinyon Mesa PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY Project No. 27-362 This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation for five proposed single-family residences on Lots 20, 27, 28, 42 and 48 at Pinyon Mesa Subdivision in Garfield County, Colorado. The location of the subject sites are presented on Figures 1 and 2. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for design and construction of single- family residences on the subject lots. The field investigation consisted of drilling one exploratory test hole within the building envelope on each lot. Samples of the subsurface materials were collected and returned to our laboratory for testing. The results of our field and laboratory programs were evaluated to develop recommendations for building foundations and surface and subsurface drainage. This report summarizes the information obtained during our investigation and presents our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residences will be one to two-story wood framed structures with or without basements. For non-basement structures, foundation excavations will likely be on the order of 3 to 4 feet deep. For basement structures, foundation excavations will likely be on the order of 8 to 10 feet deep. We anticipate the main level floor will be structurally supported. Foundation loads will likely be on the order of 1,000 to 3,000 pounds per linear foot. The lots included in this investigation are presented on Figure 2. SITE CONDITIONS Pinyon Mesa is located south of Glenwood Springs, Colorado and more particular, about one mile up and on the south side of County Road 114 from the intersection of Highway 82. The subject lots were vacant within a developed subdivision. Lot 27 had an existing stock pile covering the majority of the building envelope at the time of investigation. Vacant lots are located around the subject lots. Lots 20, 27, 28, 42 and 48 were situated on the eastern half of the subdivision. Streets were paved and utilities have been installed. The site sloped down to the west at grades of about 4 to 13 percent, becoming steeper around Lot 42. The building envelopes on Lots 20, 42 and 48 were partially cleared of scrub and the entire site was covered with snow at the time of this investigation. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS An exploratory test hole was drilled within the building envelope on each lot. The test holes were drilled to depths between 25 and 35 feet. Modified California and split spoon 1 Lots 20, 27, 28, 42 and 48 Pinyon Mesa Project No. 27-362 samples were collected at specified depths. California samples were collected using a 2-inch I. D. sampler driven into the subsoils with a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows needed to drive the sampler constitutes the blow count. For example, a value on the log (Appendix A) of 24/12 indicates the sampler was driven 12 inches with 24 blows of the hammer. The blow count can be used as a relatively measure of material stiffness or density. Split spoon samples were obtained in the same manner, but with a 1.5-inch I.D. The collected samples were transported to our laboratory where they were examined and classified. Laboratory tests included moisture content, dry density, swell/consolidation, grain size analysis and Atterberg limit testing. Generally, the subsoils encountered in our test holes consisted of silt and/or clay. Lot 20 terminated on very dense gravel, cobble and boulders. Lot 27 had an existing stock pile covering the majority of the building envelope. The fill (stock pile) consisted of clay materials and was approximately 8 feet in height. Lot 42 had a silty sand layer between the clay and clay- silt layers. Bedrock was not encountered to the maximum depths explored. The silt and clay samples tested had 54 to 78 percent fines (passing NO. 200 sieve) with liquid limits on the silt being non-liquid and non-plastic. The silty sand had 38 percent fines. Five silt and clay samples generally exhibited low consolidation (-0.2 to -1.8 percent) with one sample exhibiting moderate consolidation of -3.5 percent when wetted under an applied pressure of 1,000 psf. The laboratory test results are presented in Appendix B and are summarized in the Summary of Laboratory Test Results table. Groundwater was not encountered during drilling, and the subsoils were slightly moist to moist. We believe variations in ground water conditions can occur. The magnitude of the variation will be largely dependent upon local irrigation practices, the duration and intensity of precipitation, site grading changes, and the surface and subsurface drainage characteristics of the surrounding area. SITE DEVELOPMENT We understand cuts of about 3 to 4 feet from existing grade may be necessary to reach foundation level for crawlspace construction and 8 to 1 0 feet from existing grade for basement construction, with the exception of Lot 27, where we assumed the 8 feet of stock piled material would be removed prior to construction. Fill placement should be minor. Areas to receive fill should be stripped of vegetation, organic soils and debris. The on-site soils free of organic matter, debris and rocks larger than 6 inches can be used in fills. Fill should be placed in thin, 2 Lots 20, 27, 28, 42 and 48 Pinyon Mesa Project No. 27-362 loose lifts of 8 inches thick or less, moisture conditioned to 0 to 3 percent above optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum standard Proctor dry density (ASTM D 698). Placement and compaction of fill should be observed and tested by a geotechnical engineer. FOUNDATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of our subsurface investigation, we judge these lots as low collapsible risk overall and therefore believe the residences can be supported on footing foundations placed on the natural soils or properly compacted fill. Based on our experience and laboratory test results, we believe there is a low risk of consolidation and therefore a low risk of foundation movement provided the following recommendations are followed. The following design and construction details should be observed for spread footings placed on the natural soils or properly compacted fill. 1. Foundations should be constructed on undisturbed, natural soils. Loose, disturbed soils encountered at foundation level should be removed and replaced with compacted fill or the foundation should be extended to undisturbed soils. 2. Footing foundations can be designed for a maximum allowable soil pressure of 2,000 psf. The design pressure may be increased by 1/3 or as allowed by local code, when considering total loads that include wind or seismic conditions. 3. Continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of at least 18 inches. Foundation pads for isolated columns should have a minimum dimension of 24 inches. 4. Resistance to sliding at the bottom of the footing can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.30. Passive pressure against the side of the footing can also be considered for the sliding resistance if it is properly compacted. Passive pressure can be estimated based on an equivalent fluid density of 300 pcf for a level backfill. 5. Grade beams and foundation walls should be reinforced to span undisclosed loose or soft soil areas. We recommend reinforcement sufficient to span an unsupported distance of at least 10 feet. 6. The soils below exterior footings or exterior edges of slabs should be protected from freezing. We recommend the bottom of footings be constructed at least 3 feet below finished exterior grade or as required by local municipal code. 7. All foundation excavations should be observed by a representative of the geotechnical engineer prior to placement of concrete. 3 Lots 20, 27, 28, 42 and 48 Pinyon Mesa BELOW-GRADE WALLS Project No. 27-362 Crawlspaces or basements are planned below the main level for these residences. Foundation walls that extend below grade should be designed for lateral earth pressure where backfill is not present to the same level on both sides of the wall. For walls that can deflect or rotate about 0.5 to 1 percent of the wall height, the wall can be designed for "active" earth pressure conditions. For a very rigid wall where negligible deflection can occur, an "at-rest" lateral earth pressure condition can be used. Typically, below-grade walls for residences can rotate under normal design loads, and this deflection results in acceptable performance. If on-site soils are used as backfill, we recommend using an equivalent fluid density of 45 pcf for design of below grade walls. This value assumes that some minor cracking is acceptable. If negligible deflections are desired, a higher equivalent fluid density of 60 pcf should be used for design. These equivalent densities do not account for sloping backfill, surcharges or hydrostatic pressure. SLABS-ON-GRADE Based on our investigation, garage and driveway slabs will likely be underlain by silt and clay soils. We believe there is a low risk of poor slab-on-grade performance due to collapsible soils. The on-site soils, free of organics and debris, are suitable to support lightly loaded slabs- on-grade. Slabs should be separated from all load bearing walls and columns with expansion joints that allow vertical movement. Control joints should be used to reduce damage from shrinkage cracking. All fill below slabs should be compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum standard Proctor dry density within 2 percent of optimum moisture content. SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE Groundwater was not encountered during our investigation. Surface water typically flows through permeable wall backfill and collects at the backfill and natural soil interface resulting in saturated foundation soils and/or wet crawlspace conditions. To reduce water accumulation outside foundation walls and reduce moist crawlspace and basement conditions, a foundation drain could be installed around the exterior of the foundation walls. Drains could be installed in crawlspace areas after completion of construction, if groundwater develops. If groundwater or highly saturated soils are encountered during foundation excavation on these lots, we should be contacted for additional recommendations. 4 Lots 20, 27, 28, 42 and 48 Pinyon Mesa Project No. 27-362 A typical drain should consist of a 4-lnch diameter, perforated pipe encased in free draining gravel. The gravel should be% to 1.5-inch washed rock with less than 5 percent fines. The drain should be provided with a gravity discharge such as a sump pit where water can be removed by pumping or be daylighted. The pipe should be sloped at a minimum of 1 percent and should be installed 12 to 18 inches away from and parallel to the footing foundation. The bottom of the pipe should be at least 2 inches below the bottom of footing level at the high point. Crawlspace areas should also be provided with adequate ventilation. SURFACE DRAINAGE Surface drainage is crucial to the performance of foundations and flatwork. We recommend the ground surface surrounding the building be sloped to drain away from the structure. We recommend a slope of at least 6 inches in the first 10 feet for landscape areas and a minimum slope of 1 percent for paved areas. Backfill around foundations should be moisture conditioned and compacted as recommended in the SITE DEVELOPMENT section. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge beyond the backfill area. LIMITATIONS The analyses and recommendations presented in this report are based upon our data obtained from the borings at the indicated locations, field observations, laboratory testing, our understanding of the proposed construction and other information discussed in this report. It is possible that subsurface conditions may vary between or beyond the points explored. The nature and extent of such variations may not become evident until construction. If variations appear, we should be contacted immediately so we can review our report in light of the variations and provide supplemental recommendations as necessary. We should also review the report if the scope of the proposed construction, including the proposed loads, finished elevations or structure locations, change from those described in this report. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless Yeh and Associates reviews the changes and either verifies or modifies the conclusions of this report in writing. The scope of services for this project did not include, specifically or by implication, any environmental or biological (e.g., mold, fungi, bacteria) assessment of the site or identification or prevention of pollutants, hazardous materials or conditions or biological conditions. If the owner is concerned about the potential for such contamination, conditions or pollution, other studies should be undertaken. 5 Lots 20, 27, 28, 42 and 48 Pinyon Mesa Project No. 27-362 The report was prepared in substantial accordance with the generally accepted standards of practice for geotechnical engineering as exist in the site area at the time of our investigation. No warranties, express or implied, are intended or made. The recommendations in this report are based on the assumption that Yeh and Associates will conduct an adequate program of construction testing and observation to evaluate compliance with our recommendations. YEH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Keith E. Asay Staff Engineer 6 Not to scale Site Location Project 27-362 Figure 1 APPENDIX A TEST HOLE LOGS b "l g fu ~ ! Lot20 Lot27 Lot28 Lot42 Lot48 ~~--------------------------------------------------,-------------------------------------------------~ '" <I~ ~ l' j ~ YEH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS Pinyon Mesa ~~~::~::===-----------------------------------------------~P~ro~je~~~N~u~m=b~e~r.~2~7~-3=62~--------------------------------F~ig~ur_e_N_o_._A_-1~ l,jyEH AND ASSOCI)..-.. 3, INC. Project: Pinyon Mesa ..41· GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS Project Number; 27-362 Legend for Symbols Used on Test Hole Logs Sample Types D Modified Callfomia Sampler. The symbol24/121ndicates that 24 blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 ihches was used to drive 2-inch I. D. sampler 12 inches. • Split Spoon Sampler. The symbol50/3indicates that 50 blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches was used to drive 1.5-lnch 1.0. sampler 3 inches. Other Symbols t Indicates practical drill rig refusal. Soil Lithology ~~ Clay, silty, slightly sandy, soft, moist to very moist, brown (Fill). IJ]] Slit, slightly sandy, very stiff, slightly moist to moist, brown (ML). ~ Clay, silty, slightly sandy, stiff to very stiff, slightly moist to moist, brown (CL). ~ 6...\,j Gravel, cobble, small boulders, very dense, slightly moist, brown (GP). ~ Clay-Silt, slightly sandy, silty, very stiff, slightly mo.lst, brown (CL_ML). OIJ Sand, slightly silty, slightly gravelly, medium dense, slightly moist, brown (SM). NOTES: 1. The test hole was drllled on December 13, 2007 using 4-lnch continuous fllght auger. 2. Groundwater was not encountered during this Investigation. 3. Subsoil descriptions are subject to explanations within the report. Figure A-2 APPENDIXB LABORATORY TEST RESULTS. 2.0 !Graph 1 ~ ~ 0.0 • +' '-' l ~ ._!., -2.0 WATER ADDED = ,g .. .., :c:l "' ~ "' -4.0 u -6.0 0.1 1 10 100 Applied Normal Pressure, ksf 2.0 1Graph2 ~ ~ 0.0 :f '-' 1 -::!:: -2.0 WATER ADDED ~ .. .., :c:l "' "' = -4.0 "' u -6.0 0.1 1 10 100 Applied Normal Pressure, ksf Graph Boring .~!~ Moisture Swell(+) I SWELL/ . (ft) Content Consolidation(-) Soil Description CONSOLIDATION Number Number (%) (%) GRAPH 1 Lot20 4 93 7.0 -3.5 Silt, sandy (ML) By: KEA 2 Lot28 9 94 7.9 -1.1 Clay, sandy (CL) By: RDJ !Job No: 27-362 .Mesa Figure B-1 YEH&: A iSIJCIATES. INf 2.0 Graph 1 ~ 0.0 ,.:::. ---r-;t, r-l - -2.0 WATER ADDED ~ " "C ·~ -C> :g C> -4.0 u -6.0 0.1 1 10 100 Applied Normal Pressure, ksf 2.0 1Graph2 ::!: • 0.0 ,.:::. ;t, -~ ~ 8 -2.0 = WATER ADDED C> 'C " "C :::1 C> ., = -4.0 C> u -6.0 0.1 1 10 100 Applied Normal Pressure, ksf Graph Boring Natural Dry Moisture Swell(+) I SWELL/ Number Number Depth (ft) Density (pet) Content Consolidation(-) Soil Description CONSOLIDATION (%) (%) GRAPH 1 Lot42 9 90 8.1 -0.2 Clay, sandy (CL) Drawn By: KEA 2 Lot48 4 91 7.7 -1.8 Clay, sandy (CL) Checked By: RDJ Job No: 27-362 Project Name: Pinyon Mesa Figure B-2 YEti& A oSf U :IATI<:S. lNt. 2.0 !Graph 1 ::R c 0.0 ¢ I WATER ADDED ;;:.._ .._!., = -2.0 ·~ 01 "" := Q "' = Q -4.0 u -6.0 0.1 1 10 100 Applied Normal Pressure, ksf 2.0 !Graph 2 ::R c 0.0 ¢ =-" jl: ~ 8 -2.0 = ~ ~ := Q ; -4.0 Q u -6.0 0.1 1 10 100 Applied Normal Pressure, ksf Graph Boring Natnr~l~~ Moisture Swell(+) I SWELL/ I Iff Content Consolidation(-) Soil Description CONSOI,.IDATION Number Nnmber (%) (%} GRAPH 1 Lot48 14 91 8.0 -0.9 Clay, sandy (CL} IUrawnBy: KEA 2 . By: RDJ 'Job No: i'f-362 Piiiy{u~ ortame; Figure B-3 YEH&A 'j;!()('J A 'rES. Tl\11" ·~ YEH & ASSOCIATES, INC Summary of Laboratory Test Results Project No· 27-362 Project Name: Pinyon Mesa Sample Location Grain Size Analysis Atterberg Limits Water Swell(+)/ Moisture Test Depth Sample Content Dry Density Gravel Sand Fines Soluble Consolidation (-) Location (It) Type (%) Lot20 4 CA 7.0 9 CA 5.9 Lot27 19 CA 7.9 Lot28 9 CA 7.9 14.0 CA 8.4 Lot42 9 CA 8.1 19 CA 3.7 Lot48 4 CA 7.7 9 CA 7.1 14 CA 8.0 CA-Ind1cates Modified Califorma sample NL -Indicates non-liquid NP -Indicates non-plastic (pet) >#4 <#200 LL PL PI Sulfate under 1,000 psi (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) 93 54 -3.5 85 64 NL NP NP 82 71 94 73 -1.1 99 75 90 78 -0.2 117 38 91 64 -1.8 86 72 0.058 91 60 -0.9 Soil Description Silt, sandy (ML) Silt, sandy (ML) Clay, sandy (CL) Clay, sandy (CL) Clay, sandy (CL) Clay, sandy (CL) Sand, silty (SM) Clay, sandy (CL) Clay, sandy (CL) Clay, sandy (CL) 03/20/2008 05:37 9702252522 1/2">' X 10" A.B. @ 4'-0" o.c. 1 /2" EXP. JT. MAT'L 4·" CONCRETE SLAB w;w.w.F. 6 X 6 W1.4 x W1.4 WEEKS ASSOCIATES #4 HORIZ. STEEL @ 36" o.c. GARAGE 1 /2" = #4 @ 36" o.c. FULL HEIGHT VERT! CAL STEEL #4 X 30"1 DOWELS !!:.J @ 36" o.c. 2-#4 CONT. NOTE: BOTH SIDE OF FOUNDATION WALL TO BE BACK FILLED EVENLY FOUNDATION WALL DETAIL 1. -0" SI<WIEW HOMES ' 'i' "' ' CXJ APR 1 0 ZOOS PONDEROSA MODEl PINYON MESA SUBDIVISION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO PROJECT NO. 26026 MARCH 21. 2008 WEEKS & ASSOCIATES PAGE 02/02 Parcel Detail Page 1 of3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information AssessorLTrea,surer Property Search I ~~or Subset Qym I Asses.sor Sa!eJ> Search Clerk 8? Recorder Reception Search Parcel Detail I V iilue Qetail I Sat~;s DetJJ.il I Residential/Commercial Imp~ent Detail La.Ild Demil I Photographs I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II 2007 Mill Levy I I 011 II R044405 II 239308205020 II 60.843 I Owner Name and Mailing Address [PINYON MESA DEVELOPMENT INC [253 SIL VERLODE DRIVE [ASPEN, CO 81611 Assessor's Parcel Description (Not to be used as a legal description) [SECT,TWN,RN0:7-7-88 SUB:PINYON MESA [PUD, FLO 1 LOT:20 PRE:R111957 [PRE:R041066 BK:995 P0:534 BK:995 [P0:529 BK:982 P0:103 BK:873 P0:93 [BK:873 P0:379 BK:842 P0:458 BK:775 [P0:165 BK:691 P0:709 BK:650 P0:574 IBK:646 P0:579 BK:633 P0:851 BK:575 [PO: 173 BK:545 P0:99 BK:545 PO: 110 [BK:512 P0:767 BK:510 P0:815 BK:510 [P0:805 BK:454 P0:503 BK:450 P0:257 [BK:438 P0:569 BK:418 P0:1 BK:417 jP0:600 BK:409 P0:220 BK:1498 P0:270 [BK:1354 P0:600 BK:1230 P0:697 [BK:1230 P0:691 RECPT:734762 IRECPT:734760 RECPT:734759 BK:1932 http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce1Nurnber=239308205020 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2/20/2008 Parcel Detail IPG:l95 RECPT:724453 BK:l932 PG:l94 I IRECPT:724452 BK:l893 PG:363 I jRECPT:716948 BK:l825 PG:99 I jRECPT:703003 BK:l825 PG:l09 I jRECPT:703007 BK: 1825 PG: 107 I /RECPT:703006 BK:1825 PG:104 I IRECPT:703005 BK:1825 PG:101 jRECPT:703004 BK:l561 PG:412 /RECPT:646682 BK:1498 PG:271 jRECPT:63207 BK:1498 PG:270 jRECPT:632806 I Location I Physical Address: 1\CARBONDALE I I Subdivision: \\PINYON MESA PUD, FLG 1 I I Land Acres: l!o I Land Sg Ft: \114,592 I I Section II Township II Range I 7 Jl 7 II 88 I 2007 Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Assessed Value I I Land:\\ I Improvements: II I Total: 1\ lrl =====S=al=e=Da=te==:: I .· Sale Price: I 27,580\l oil 27,580\\ Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 Buildings: Number of Commllnd 0 Buildings: No Building Records Found 8,oool 0 8,oool http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce!Number=239308205020 Page 2 of3 2/20/2008 Parcel Detail Tax Information Tax Year II Transaction Type II Amount I 2007 II Tax Amount II $486.761 Top of Page Assessor Database Search OptiO!lll I Treasurer Databa,ite Search 0J)tions Clerk & Recorder Database Search Qptions Page 3 of3 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright© 2005 -2008 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Go_odT]lms __ Software. http:/ /www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce1Nurnber=239308205020 2/20/2008