HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 Staff Report BOCC 7.3.95O
A-x VJtE*B PD
PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAIIF COMMENTS
I
REOUEST:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
s ITE I)TA
WATER
SEWER:
ACCESS:
I.LA NS TO C
B
tII.
BOCC 7-3-95
An exemption from the definition of
subdivision.
Jerry and Patricia Green
Atract of land located in a ponion of Section
30, T5S R90W of the 6th pM; located
approxirnately l/2 mile northwest of the Town
of New Castle, approximat ely l/2 mile north
of County Road 245.
54.56 acres
Existing well and 2 city taps
ISDS
Easement from Tlrree Elk Run Subdivision
A/R/RD
EtI IVE
The site is located in District A - Town of New castle urban Area of Influence asdesigrrated on the Garfield County Cornprelrensive Plan Management Districts, Map.
II. DES CRIPT'IO N OF'TH E PRO POSA I,
A Site Description:
-
The site is acljacent to the Tlree Elk Run Subdivision,approxirnately ll2 mile north of County Roacl 245. The property currently includes
l:l*ol|,[f} H'JJ-"'lE'-ire
sotitl,east conrer ortnl pio1,",ty A vicinity map
ftqieot Description: The applicant is proposing to split the 54.56 acre parcel into
:xJ-liiffi ;i:, : Tit ii::il'rfi yJi Jj ; I j j' : st . ..*.,1, x* *r,x"rthe applicant is attacherl on llage - G-
A' $trbdivisioil Regtrlations. section 8.52 of the Garfielcl county subdivisionRegtrlations state that "No mrrr" tlton.a tohtl of'f our (4) lrts,-pttrc.cls, ;r,tnro"t" -. lrr"i,)liL,rtits toill Ln "rn,rbJ,fr,rm,Ltnlt p,o-r"ol, ,ts"llt,lt'ptlrceliuu" Jn""riL"i,l,, ii,"-)"*rrt" ,f ,i,(-),rrf inlr! aountg "lnrl ur,l Ru"o,nlur'" offi"u on.'1,r,rr,,,rrg'], rg7a, orr! i, not a przft ot' a,n"rrrrl"r! ",rLrliuiriu.r; l,rrru"uor,,ury.po'r""l tu L'n rl;r;rlirl [r, "."*ri,i" irrO r" "pl;t Ly u
Lrreuentin.T joint rlse ,rf'll," TrroSrosar! lrocis,-uu,! il,ui!;u;";on occL*_i ,rinng tl,u p:,,rLl;" rlinl,iof-,rny o, nuLrrrul,loul,,ru,
",r,"1,7ur,.o1" 1t,"r"Lu "rr,rt.,l ^,,-rg, i, tl,o rli"",roi',"r 4 rtr" Boorrl,n"l Lc "r,n"irtnruJ Lr't lttuc Luun
"rorrbrl Lg ntJ,ny,tio, ,u,rr,",nrrrrrr! ,o rir" Jo,rr, (,1)'Lr, por"nl,
i ntc re st rrr rtruulli r, y7 tt n i t I i m i I o t i tt, tt I I ti,ui s " r,s, 1J i
"u
lrlu ;
2 ID
o a
The parent parcel, as it existed in J of 1973, has been split numerous timesanu
o^l>
through the exemption process. hr the l19 acre parcel was divided ilto 3(three) two acre tract s, a slx acre tract, and the rema rnlng I07 acres (Bill and HelenDavis). In the 107 acre tract was firrther divided into two (2) tracts ofI02.806 and 4.1 94 acres. [t appears the 54+ acre tract was created by recording 35+cleeds that did not require subdivision review Therefore,no exemption parcels canbe created wit hout using natural splits.
Tlre property is tlivided by a ridge that separates the two exemption parcels a+€q+it
access from tlre existing parcel. [n staffs opinion,sectiolr 8.52 (lratur.al divi olr only allows for one parcel to tre created by the ridge
rJ ?ijB. Zonitg. 'l-he exernpti oll I)arcel are consistent with the required two (2)acrestnulimum lot size for tlre A/R/RD Zotre Distdct
c' Legal Access' Dtte to tlre ridge, access must be obtained Ilom the Three EIk RrurSrrbdivisiorl' An agreement for access has been srbrnitted, and an access easementis showr on the recorded final plat.
D. Water and Sewer. The property has obtained twNew Castte lsee tetter no,, si*" Rippy ou rurn 2f"fi,:'ilrl:ilrffi,?l?Jjeach parcel with a, ISDS Soil conriliior. oi, ,ii" site (#07) Ton.ifluents) have severeconstraints foi IS?l due to clepth to bedrock and slow percolation rates. Staffwouldsuggest that the following plat note be requirecl:
"Soil conditions olt the site rnay require engineered septic systems. Sitespecific percolatiort tests at tlre tinre of building p.,-,r,i, subrnittals shalldetennine sllecific ISDS neecls on the site.,,
E' State and LQcal Health stanclarcls. No State or Local health standards are applicableto the application, witlt the exception of coloraclo Department of Health ISDSsetback standards, wlrich s,o,l. be verifiecl Uy r,, "rgin".r.F' Drainagg' No clrainage easenrellts appear llecessary, but should be confirmecl by theapplicants engineer.
G' Fire Protectior. A retter fi'onr the Fire District is attacrred on page - I .
H' Easements' Any reqtrired easements (drainage, access, utilities, etc..) will be requiredto be shown on tlre exemption plat.
I' School hnpaqt Fees TIle applicant will be required to pay the $200.00 impact fbe perlot prior to the approval of the final plat.
J' Nattrral f{azards' Tlre project is located with in a, area identifiecl as having moclerateto severe constraints for ISDS, due to depth to bedrock and slow percolation rates.staffwotrld stlggest that the proposed plai note addresses these constraints.
ry. SUGGESTED FINDINGS
I ' Tltat proper posting and public notice was providecl as reqtrired for the meeting beforethe Board of Cotrnty Comrnissioners.
2' That the rneeting before the Board of courty cornrnissioners was exlensive andcom;rlete' that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were s*bmitted and that allinterested parlies were heard at tltat meeting.
I
-2 -
o
That for the above stated and other reasons, the proposed exemption is in the best
interest of the health, safety, rnorals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of
the citizens of Garfield Courrty.
o
J
V. RECOMMENDATION
That only ONE lot be approved based on the natural split, and that approval is based on the following
conditions:
That all representations of the applicant, either within the application or stated at the
meeting before the Board of Coturty Cornmissioners, shall be considered conditions
of approval.
A Final Exernption Plat shall be subrnitted, indicating the legal description of the
property, dimension and area ofthe proposed lot, access to a public right-of-way, and
any proposed easements for setbacks, drainage, inigation, access or utilities.
That the applicant shall have 120 days to present a plat to the Commissioners for
sigrrature from the date of approval ofthe exemption.
That the applicant shall subrnit $200.00 in School Impact Fees for the creation of the
exemption parcel.
5. That the following plat note shall appear on the Final Exemption Plat
"Soil conditions on the site may require engineered septic systems. Site
specific percolation tests at the tirne of building permit submittals shall
detennine specific [SDS needs on the site."
Control of noxious weeds is tlre responsibility of the propefty owrer
That only one ( l) lot is approved using the natural split provision in Section 8.52
Atorta A P@A4{
z1 ,5-o I
2
3
4
6.
7.
t 3 -
oo
245 RA?
ur/
sfcrw
25
-f HREE' Et K .<
Sv6DtVtStot/
E7.K ffiEX XE olL,
/ois.!
*--'
GREf A) E EX EfiPTI ON
fA Rc'F L
C*'-TLE
VAILilHl{ql
M.
lVfl,Y CASnLI
t-
@L0s/00 RI'fi
VICilVITY MAP
lrrffi'
ATTACIIMENl' II R II
2
/
a2
oo
tlR€e trLN R,,rJ
TqbDtvt5torl
' al6 4orrr.l
I tt<ttoN 25
tar I
LDaAqD f\tue
till!/*,tr'
t__
rld Ct*rc(,a.nb! rO
I
f-ru srtrt! 6'eut te'Fhf<cLt-
'Pn*t ot Lors I a^rt,2,5LLx,D/130, -fS5
R.1c>t..t, 'Fz,at1 ]AL,'?nc,e 3ol
, 54.5L k*ts t
oL.f I
-fL,o Ne') Lafl!
= 13.'15 *:vt,i
i/lill.
fti
.ih$
il!r w i-f
E
Ll:t
ffj'
Attl 7a
lh'I t5r Na
tl. r,C
lt
Lcr /--Vtyt< lttplzt
: it,i I . .i 1."Irtts. hj'\ 1i,,.1r.:,r tt\Nt olt '' Z)i /t7
I b L,; lrttli/.U)
//t\-T> '::, rrT-l Tli,a 24I
Cou*, {.Xrr,,-t -,rnt Sr\c:.-rtrl fr,6p
ul (.*,i,(R
3t)
tsurl
Nr &8rrixaEmu! 3D
-JC
ci$F
-
:fALE /"-2oo'
oo
Applicants are requesl_ing that three (3) Iots be created outof a 54 - 56 acre parcet wtricrr they own. one ]ot, the easterry 28 . 0oacres, approximately, is the site of the Applicants, residence.Appricants wish to create two (21 additionar'tuilding tots on thervesterly half of the parcel as shown on Attachment ,,A,,. Each ofthe two fots wirt be approximatery 13.15 acres, more or ress.Appricants have two chirdren, a marfied son..,a a^rghter, to whichthese parcels wirr be conveyecl for single famiry buirding sites.The intended usage, lot siz6, etc., meets the zoning requirementsof Garfield county. The two westerry rots are naturalry separatedfrom the easterry 28.00 acre parcer, t-, a steep, high ridge runninggenerally norttr ancl south across the pioperty. This ridge preventsnormal access to the two vresterly rotl from ihe p..".r on the east.Conseguently, access to the two 10ts ancl alr utilities wiII beprovided from the west through an agreement with the Three Elk Runsubdivision - This Agreement 1s inclrldeA herewith as Attachment ,'G-1"- Because of this agreement, the two exemption rots on the westend of tl're Exemption parcel, whicrr .r. adjacent to saidsul:division, wirr have the same rights , obrigation,-'r"""a"r-i"t;;;=and benef its as the other rots *itni., l_he subdi vision. Theagreement provides for road and utirity access, and a drainageeasement/ across the boundary between Lot 6 ancl Lot B of thesubdivision wl-rich wirt serve the two exempt rots on the west sicieo.r the Exempt parcer. Access, drainage, u.,a "tiiiC- access, acrossthe vresternrnost exemption ]ot wirt )re provided to the a<1 jacentexemption rot jtrst to the east. water and fire protection havebeen approved and will be the same for the two westernmost exemptl-ots as for tl-re l-ots througl-rout the Three lll k Run subdivision.Irges that implement the Agreement (Attachment ,'G-1,,) and fees forthe school rnpact pee wirr be paicl u'pon approvat of this exemption.An easement deecl f rom the subdiviLl on ov/ner:s has alreacly beenapproved (Exhibit "A" to tl"re Attachment ,,G--1,,) and wirr be signedand derivererl upon payment of the fees specif j eci in the Agreement.
ATTACIIMENT 'IJJII
NARRATIVE EX PLATN I NG EXEMPTION REOUEST
-6 a2
to
TOWN OF NEW CASTLE
"Burning Mountain"
1 BBB
Telephone (303) 984-231 1 Box 90, New Casile, Colorado 81647
April27, 1995
Mr. Thad Green
6l8l 335 Road
New Castle, CO 81647
l)ear'l'lrad
'l'he Board ol-lilrslees of tlre l'owrt ol'Ncw castle approvcrl your requesr. for two (2) water taps onyoLlr parcel of land north of New Castle at the'rowriCouncil rneetirig on April lg, 1995.
Tap fees and recoltpment fees would be requirecl to be paid to the Town in compliance with the EIkcreek water System agreenlent anct Town orclinances. In acrdition to the tap fees, a water tapagreenlent nrust be executed with the J'ow, specilyi,g thc terms olconnectionind water fees.
If yotl have any lttrllter questiorts or neerl acltlitional inlbrr-rration, please l.eel free to call rown I-Iall
Sirrce rcly,
Stcve I(ippy
Mayclr, 'l'orvrr of'New Castle
SR/pj
AT"]'ACIIMIiN'I " (:.- 2 "
@ S.,rintert on recycle(t paper
?7-
a o
Board
Ross Tslbott - Chalrmau
Wllllau MonCovcr
Sean Mello
Tom Volght
Gordon Wltzkc
Burning Mountains
frire Protection District
Box 236
silt, co s1652
Don Zordcl - Chlcf
Sau Ccrlsc . Asslsl ChIe
May 2, 199_5
1'o Wlront it May Concern
Tlris is to infonn you tltat the parcel of Iand owned by Thad W. Greene, situated in Iots land zof Section 30,Township 5 South, Range 90 west of the sixth Princlpal Meri<Iian, county of Garfield, state of colorado isin Bunting Mountains Fire protection District.
'l-his Ietter neitlrer approves or <lisaPprovc.s of the subdivision exemption until a more detaited plat is.submitted_
'l'hank you
Dorrald L. Zo
Disrrict Chief
A'lT1iCIII,IENT.,, F,,
DZnis
e 7
)l
United States Department of the Interi --:.i,. ..:..'ri --.li -i. -!
o][i::
'lh''!,\;
L-.J:i, !
olu}t fi,fr 19$I,
BUREAU OF IAND MANAGEMENT
Glenwood Springs Resource Area
50629 Highway 6 and 24
P.O. Box 1009
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602
June 21, 1,995
t,**{^ft{ft#.-ry#JFffY
1785s
(7-880)
Mr, Mark Beang?ffleld County planning Deparrmenr109 8th Street - Suite iO: -
Gl-enwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Dear Mr. Bean:
rn response to your request for comments regarding the proposed Greenesubdivj-sion Exemption i mile northwest of s6w c."Lt., r-ofier ihe followingstaLements for your scheduled July 3, rs9s,-p"b1ic meetirrg.--rh" entirenorthern and eastern boundaries of the 54.55'acre tract is adjacent to publiclands administered by this office. current uses on the BLM incl-ude wildrifehabitat and dispersed recreatj-on such as rr"rrJing.
1 ' ownership of -land adjacent to BlM-administered public l-and does not grantthe adjacent landowner(=i ..y special risha;-;; privileges for the use of thepublic 1ands.
2' The adjacent public land is-not currently permitted for livestock grazing.The proponent should be aware of the ro""fi"il Ii p.op".ty boundarj-es to ensureno encroachment occurs on public 1and. should any fence construction beconsi-dered along the privale/BLM- boundary, irr" i"r". standards shourd allowfor easy pa="-gi by big g-*"---rrri-= offile "-., p.o-ri-de additional- informationregarding fence standaids upon request.
3 ' Adjacent public land is open- to- hunting and other dispersed recreationactivities ' The proponents should be awari trr.t ir,.,rrting and other recreationuses are allowed on BlM_administered ]and.
4' Any roads, trails, paths, or utillties (water, er-ectric, phone orotherwise) crossing BLM wourd require right-o[-way (Row) permits from thisoffice' An environmental assessment repoit would be completed as a part of theROW permitt j_ng process.
5. The proposed subdivision 11es wlthin deer criLical winter range.Encroachment of homesites and people_on big-;;; winter ranges can have adeleterlous effect on game herd populationl ind hearth. a.ri*ir= currentlywintering on the privaLe lands riri u" ai=pr"".d to adjoining public andprivate lands ' Habitat condj-t.ions on much of the big game winter range inthis area is considered unsatisiactory.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment. ff there are any questions, pleasecontact Jim Byers of this oftice at 945_234L.
Sincerely,
'A:fuk*na4;
Area Manager