HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 Application•
•
EXEMPTION PROPOSAL
FOR A THREE LOT SPLIT
6et: 7u�.y cuuc nca a ��.vtiKgt,k
2/96 * Jowell Exemption Proposal * Terry and Matt Harrington * (970) 963-2447
• TABLE OF CONTENTS
•
•
A. INTRODUCTION
Cover letter: Exemption request letter
Letter appointing Terry and Matt Harrington to represent owners
Petition for exemption
Owners, Representatives, and Consultants; Names and numbers of our support team
Exemption check list
Garfield County letter scheduling April 1, 1996 the date for the county hearing.
Public notice
B. MAPS
Legal Property Description
Sketch of subject property showing proposed lot split
Map of Roaring Fork Valley
Assessors map of the area
Vicinity Map
Soil Survey Map, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service
Topographical Map, U.S.G.S.
Flood Plain Study Map, by Analytical Surveys for Garfield and Mesa Counties
C. DEEDS OF OWNERSHIP & ADJACENT OWNERS
Applicant's Warranty Deed showing ownership
Warranty deed dated January 29, 1972 showing proof land is in same configuration
Adjacent property owners within 200 feet of the proposed exemption
Contacts for Notification for ditches and easements.
Current Title Commitment, schedule B, section 2
Recorded documents to suppliment the exceptions on schedule B, section 2
D. SOIL REPORT
Soils information from US. Department of Agriculture Soils Conservation Service
for a subdivision exemption, Assisted by Dennis Davidson
E. WATER, SEWER, & LEGAL ACCESS
Proposal for legal and adequate physical water supply
Proposal for adequate method of sewage disposal
Copy of Collins Drilling Well Test Results and Letter
From Paul Bussone regarding water
Copy of application for Basalt Conservancy Water District to augment water
Copy of application to the State for Well Permits
Copy of State Water Rights Case #W-1256
Letter from Gamba and Associates Engineering regarding septic and land use
Copy of Application for Legal Access
F. LETTERS
Fire Protection plan approval from Fire district
2/96 * Jowell Exemption Proposal * Terry and Matt Harrington * (970) 963-2447
•
•
TERRY & MATT HARRINGTON
79 Ute, Carbondale, CO 81623
(970) 963-2447
February 23, 1996
To: Garfield County Commissioners
RE: Jowell Property Exemption
17605 Highway 82, Carbondale, Colorado
To whom it may concern:
We, Terry and Matt Harrington, on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Jowell are requesting an exemption to
divide their nine plus acre parcel of land into three lots for the reasons stated below:
1. The division would be the highest and best use of the property.
2. The divided property would conform more closely to the neighboring
properties and their current configurations.
The land is flat with three terraced parcels. Parcel "A", closest to the frontage road, will be two
acres, an almost square configuration. Parcel "B", has the well and the existing home which is
perched high overlooking the meadow below. It will be an "L" shaped four plus acre parcel,
approximately 1 1/4 acre rectangular parcel on the mesa and a 3 three acre parcel extending to the
river with approximately 146' of river frontage. Parcel "C" will be approximately 3 acres also
with 146' of river front. The division lines have been drawn to allow all of the parcels at least one
acre outside of the flood plain. The River parcel, "C", has two adequate building sites sufficient
distance away from and above the flood plain, one above the ditch in the meadow, the other a
more private site in the trees below the ditch. The natural contour of the land lends itself well to
the configuration we have chosen.
The $300. Application fee has been paid by Mr. and Mrs. Jowell in December 1995. All taxes
have been paid, there are no special assessments, and the $200. School fee will be paid upon
approval of the exemption.
Bob Noone of Delaney and Balcomb will be our attorney overseeing this process. We believe
that this package is complete, however if you have any further questions, feel free to call us. We
look forward to working with you.
Sincerely,
• , �l
Asiz-
Terry
an att Harrington
Yek
•
•
Terry and Matt Harrington
79 Ute, Carbondale, CO 81623
(970) 963-2447 or (970) 925-7301
February 19, 1996
To Garfield County Planning and Zoning
109 8th Street
Glenwood Springs, CO
To whom it may concern:
I state that Terry and Matt Harrington and their attorney will be acting on my behalf
concerning the petition for exemption on our property at 17605 Highway 82, Carbondale,
CO 81623.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Arthur (Ja and Elke Jowell
17605 Highway 82, Carbondale, CO 81623
(970) 963-0364
•
•
. ,r letter from the governing boll sewer tiYtilc.m 15
g y stating a willingness to serve; and
I I. Narrative explaining wily exemption k being requested; and
I. I1 shall he,(Icrtlonr;trafed Ih;II Ilse parcel existe(I;Iscii:scribed on January I, 1973
or Ihc; parcel ns it exists presently i,; 'me ol'not more Ih in three parcels creased
from ;l I;llger pilll.'CI ;I;; It exl:;le(1 on .Jilllllill' 1, 1973.
J. A y;31 0.00 lie, must be submitted wits) Ihc
1'clilioncr
1vI;Iilillg Address
rb 0 0.d2a ii e. G p
C:ily Stale
(`t 7 o) ci - U -3 (, 4--
111iI7ORfi'I'III: 1,0ARD OI COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
GARFIlil.l) COUNTY, COLORADO
1.'.I 'I:I:I'ION_C:olLl;XI;fYI1 .1:1oN
Pursuant to C.R.S. (1973) Section 30-28-101 (10) (a) - (d) as amended, and the
Subdivision I2el;rlliltiuns of Garlield County, Colorado, adopted April 23, 1984 Section 2:20.49,
Ilie undersignc(1 _ G(Ur^ r _�pWC?. /I ail<( F/SCh 11 ..i0.we /1
.. _respectfully petitions
the hoard of Comity Commissioners oIGar(ielcl County, Colorado, to exempt by Resolution
the division of 9. 0q _;rete Iraq or lan(I into 3
tracts of approximately -
ircres each, more or less, from the definitions of "subdivision" and
"subdivided land" as the IernlSare used and (Ielined in C.R.S, (1973) Section 30-28-101 (10) (a)
- (d) and the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations for the reasons staled below:
• Gia Mai qG bori.0 properf-ies 6u.r(Q(,, f Gv(A Ju�« �a et!AsX.� �Cte
S[JI1MI'ITAI. R1 Q1iIRI;ivI fiN'I'S:
An application which satisfies the review criteria must be submitted with all the following
g
�t/3
A, Sketch neap ata minimum scalc of 1 =20(r showing the legal description of the
property, dimension and area olaII I)1;;orticpnralc interests 10 becreate(I, access
to a public right -0I' -wiry, and ally proposed casements for drainage, irrigation,
access or utilities;
13. Vicinity neap at a minimum scale oI 1" 2000 showing elle general topographic
and geographic rel;ltion of' he proposed exemption to the surrounding area
wit hill two (2) miles, fur which a copy or Li S.C.S. quadrangle map may be used.
C. Copy of the deed showing ownership by the applicant, or a letter from the
properly owner(s) it Oilier' (Ilan the applicant; and
1). Nantes an(I addresses of owners ell rccor(I of I;lnd immediately adjoining and
within 200 feel ()Idle proposed c,xCInplion, Mineral owncrsand lesseesofminer-al
owners of record of Ilse property to he exempted, ;Ind tenants of any structure
proposed for conversion, and
Ii. Iividence oI' the soil types and characteristics of each type; and
Proof' I'• sof of Ieg,ll ;Ind a(I((lu;Ile source of domestic miler for encl.) lot created,
method ol'scwilgc disposal, ;II d Iettei ol'itpplov;Il of fire protection plan from
appraprialC lire (lisIFILI; il11(1
G. II'conneclion Io;Icommunityof'nllrnicipal water orsc•
' is
Telephone Num ber
•
•
EXEMPTION
APPLICABILITY
The Board of County Commissioners has the discretionary power to exempt a division of land
from the definition of subdivision and thereby from the procedure in these Regulations,
provided the Board determines that such exemption will not impair or defeat the stated purpose
of the Subdivision Regulations nor be detrimental to the general public welfare. The Board
shall make exemption decisions in accordance with the requirements of these regulations.
Following a review of the individual facts of each application in light of the requirements of
these Regulations, the Board may approve, conditionally approve or deny an exemption. An
application for exemption must satisfy, at a minimum, all of the review criteria listed below.
Compliance with the review criteria, however, does not ensure exemption. The Board also may
consider additional factors listed in Section 8:60 of the Subdivision Regulations.
A. No more than a total of four (4) lots, parcels, interests or dwelling units will be created
from any parcel, as that parcel was described in the records of the Garfield County
Clerk and Recorder's Office on January 1, 1973, and is not a part of a recorded
subdivision; however, any parcel to be divided by exemption that is split by a public
right-of-way (State or Federal highway, County road or railroad) or natural feature,
preventing joint use of the proposed tracts, and the division occurs along the public
right-of-way or natural feature, such parcels thereby created may, at the discretion of
the Board, not be considered to have been created by exemption with regard to the four
(4) lot, parcel, interest or dwelling unit limitation otherwise applicable;
B. All Garfield County zoning requirements will be met; and
C. All lots created will have legal access to a public right-of-way and any necessary access
easements have been obtained or are in the process of being obtained; and
D. Provision has been made for an adequate source of water in terms of both the legal and
physical quality, quantity and dependability, and a suitable type of sewage disposal to
serve each proposed lot; and
E. All state and local environmental health and safety requirements have been met or are
in the process of being met; and
• F. Provision has been made for any required road or storm drainage improvements; and
G. Fire protection has been approved by the appropriate fire district; and
H. Any necessary drainage, irrigation or utility easements have been obtained or are in the
process of being obtained; and
I. School fees, taxes and special assessments have been paid.
(The School Impact Fee is $200.00 for each new lot created).
PROCEDURES
A. A request for exemption shall be submitted to the Board on forms provided by the
Garfield County Department of Development/Planning Division. Two (2) copies of the
application maps and supplemental information shall be submitted.
•
•
•
•
B. The Planning Division shall review the exemption request for completeness within eight
(8) days of submittal. If incomplete, the application shall be withdrawn from
consideration and the applicant notified of the additional information needed. If the
application is complete, the applicant shall be notified in writing of the time and place
of the Board of County Commissioners meeting at which the request shall be
considered. In either case, notification shall occur within fifteen (15) days of submittal.
C. Notice of the public meeting shall be mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested,
to owners of record of land immediately adjoining and within 200 feet of the proposed
exemption, to mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners of record of the land
proposed for exemption, and to tenants of any structure proposed for conversion. the
exemption site shall be posted clearly and conspicuously visible from a public right-of-
way with notice signs provided by the Planning Division. All notices shall be mailed at
least fifteen (15) and not more than thirty (30) days prior to the meeting. The applicant
shall be responsible for mailing the notices and shall present proof of mailing at the
meeting.
D. At or within fifteen (15) days of the meeting, the Board shall approve, conditionally
approve or deny the exemption request. The reasons for denial or any conditions of
approval shall be set forth in the minutes of the meeting or in a written resolution. An
applicant denied exemption shall follow the subdivision procedure in these regulations.
•
•
•
OWNERS, REPRESENTATIVES,
& CONSULTANTS
963-0364 ARTHUR (JACK) and ELKE JOWELL Owners
17605 Highway 82, Carbondale, CO
963-2447 TERRY and MATT HARRINGTON Owner's Representatives
925-7301 79 Ute, Carbondale, CO 81623
945-6546 DELANEY & BALCOMB Bob Noone Attorney
818 Colorado Avenue, Glenwood Springs 81601
945-6777 RESOURCE ENGINEERING, INC. Paul Bussone
909 Colorado Ave, Glenwood Springs 81601
Have application in by March 1, for Meeting Mon. March 11
945-2550
GAMBA AND ASSOCIATES,
Civil Engineering, Land Surveying
Box 1458, Glenwood Springs 81602
Nathan Bell
963-3852 LINES IN SPACE Marge
0067 Glenwood Avenue, Carbondale, CO 81623
963-2812
COLLINS DRILLING
P.O. Box 0516, Carbondale, CO 81623
Thursday 2/22 9 a.m. at the property
Mike and Bill Collins
963-8577 PEAK APPRAISAL SERVICE SUSAN EBERT
0024 Deer Run, Carbondale, CO 81623
945-5665 STATE WATER DIVISION
Glenwood Springs, CO
(303) 866-3581 " JUDGE
DWIGHT WHITEHEAD
REINER HAUBOLD
2/96 * Jowell Exemption Proposal * Terry and Matt Harrington * (970) 963-2447
• J0wELL PROPERTY EXEMPTION
•
•
Check list
1. Sketch map of the property.
2. U. S.G. S. Quadrangle map showing topography and geography of the
property and the surrounding 2 miles.
3. Letter appointing Terry and Matt Harrington to represent the current owner
Copy of the deed showing ownership of the applicant.
4. Names and addresses of land owners within 200 feet of proposed exemption.
5. Soil types and characteristics of each.
6. Proof of legal and adequate source of domestic water:
a. Copy of application for Basalt Conservancy Water District
b. Copy of Collins Drilling Well Test results showing volume of 25+ csf/minute
c. Copy of Water Well Permit Application to State
d. Copy of State Water Rights Case #W-1256
7. Method of sewage disposal proposed for each lot.
8. Letter of Fire protection plan approved from appropriate fire district.
7. Narrative why exemption is being requested.
8. Warranty Deed dated January 29, 1972 of property in current configuation.
9. $300. fee has been paid.
10. Lots created will have legal access to a public right of way
Any necessary drainage, irrigation and/or utility easements have been
obtained or are in the process of being met.
11. All state and local environmental health and safety requirements have been met.
12. Taxes, and special assessments have been paid and
A school fee of $200. per lot will be paid upon approval
13. Letter from Schmueser, Gordon, Meyer; Surveyors and Engineers
discussing logical lot lines and adequate septic system, and any necessary easements.
2/96 * Jowell Exemption Proposal * Terry and Matt Harrington * (970) 963-2447
•
•
•
MAPS
Legal Property Description
Sketch of subject property showing proposed lot split
Map of Roaring Fork Valley
Assessors map of the area
Topographical Map
Flood Plain Map
2/96 * Jowell Exemption Proposal * Terry and Matt Harrington * (970) 963-2447
17605 Highway 82 Legal Description
A tract of land situated in Lots 7 and 8 in Sec. 33, Tp. 7 S., R. 87 W.,
6th P.M. described as beginning at a point in the southerly right-of-way
fence line of Colorado State Highway No. 82 from whence the SE Corner of
Sec. 33, T. 7 S., R. 87 W., 6th P.M. bears S. 63°29'28" E. 4,926.225 feet;
thence S. 02°29'02" E. 315.139 feet;
thence S. 02°58'W. 122.612 feet;
thence S. 02°49'42" W. 370.576 feet to the south line of said Lot 7;
thence S. 546.67 feet to the south line of said Lot 8;
thence S. 89°08' W. 292.170 feet along the south line of said Lot 8;
thence N. O1°15' E. 1,446.215 feet to the southerly right-of-way fence
line of Colorado State Highway No. 82;
thence S. 72°09'58" E. 285.270 feet along the southerly right-of-way fence
line of Colorado State Highway No. 82 to the point of beginning.
a
From : TERRY THOMPSON-HARRINGTON
PF NE N . : 303 9b3 2447
Md r. 13 19% 12: OBPM PO4
Cu 0 (1) n
r , -S 4_3
c•1
(U . to C
V (1) -
N V 1 (1
0
IJ, 9 n
0 C1 r
04 4--
C
C O C
0.r_i.—+
(-) (_) cr
0
c n1 —I
r4 O
CD N O
0. r1
-Is
10 c+ 'S O
In V O —4
3
r* ID - if
cD
• O '7
O
-1
1%
0)
0-
S
J .
v)
n
o (1) N
e •-S (Ti_
d� cn O
O(1.) —h
Ui 0
0 n'
!-]i
a a o
C (o o-
0_ -t, .
0
0 c -f-
❑, . . -h
(-+ 3 O
(D (D O
-h
O 0 -h
9
c -f
w
(D
(D
0 —`
� 1
S
Aqh!
17
m1
JQ
•
0 r
1
x c
jzz
AIN10) 319N3
AI\ 103 0131t81,9
N
WHITE RIVER
NATIONAL FOREST
1
1
ttl
2
N
This soil survey map was compiled by the U. S. Department of
Agriculture, Soii Conservation Service, and cooperating anonrioc
•
a'-•
i
0�
00
•
too°
••
•1
A
• I
0
0 1, c011IM.if
US&.s f —L�o�r
R
6
6
e 2
G5, 5
P g
ita
14 !El
.1111.4
8g-"
z 8 g
aE ` 6
g C Y Y E£
7.3 1310
CELL .
't8i; 2V111.611i
Y w �� ~� 3 x _ N
g a -SSE 8 E s'
if
1�i o
rv^ i
9
A
f
0
0-
0
00
—1
O.
0
0
0
DARA,ELO & MESA COUNTIES. COLORADO
18
•
14, 4,41•1•14.1 00 *4*0
000411 0 000' 41, ot 0) My, 141 IWO Doio.O. ”00 .40,••• 0009,
-1-
.4-
8.
43—.423—
J
)
(44 1'
000 ',if 61
-•'' LI_
7:.
. 11 • .' .t.", ,..._ CI: ,
..-1 ./..,/ ..,' ....
,--- ., ) -.'....; j .• 11' '
/
..#'
Jr_ . '-.--;---1----,4t-'.-...--4, ':- I \ )
Ii,L,--,..-- ---
1, 8" — ---- ,s.,,,,,;„. /7 7 '''•1'
- / • I -4A..,V25.3.1
\ ,......... J,14Y f 41-'t ‘. — 1 —1 14/
1
'' 9 L.,:_. )_: ....:.........:%1..7. ' ' '4' .. \‘:‘
, ....1 -.4%.---- „ .., --N
i "-'..Zt—"-7'7 ''.----•
'' 1" 7. !.'' \ i • • - .._i.,•,...,.
i ,L 7— ,..,?,__1` ..0,/ ..
V
7 — ` .T.
....__ •
..—...... ,.r.„,..,-,-.-,....... •
I ))1 ''\ L--. ...._.L. -.1-i1.1.':::::.:71',3-';—'-- 7 ' i':. :4••••.:''
--...,j,.,..........2:7",/ __ —1/.i.k...-1—,:,../
.... — ......
.10.... / ,• C, ';' .*:,.^....t'' 7-- .,r
...r,t,„/ /:/f,' •
/9/1
/P!'
'1
', ' =
•=-:-!-•;;.7
t ;
110
;
''Z's • V
;1Z
) :7
C t r
47,1'
0
I
\ •
•,/
/
="0
•
•
•
DEEDS & OWNERS
Applicant's Warranty Deed showing ownership
Warranty deed dated January 29, 1972
List of property owners within 200 feet of property
cam-.
� gear)..- Z
e.3"2 c=t�ct 7n B a ylz®k64.0, 2 i
2/96 * Jowell Exemption Proposal * Terry and Matt Harrington * (970) 963-2447
e ska9 19
ReenrdTi;'j
ed at�' )1.1!xiI .. M..
Reception ai"a
1,,,s I1r.rn, this 7ht h day of ,t,IRU..t , 1113,
between ASPFli CrV.T[ I X TITICIACT. CUSP/oh., INC,
n rnrp.'tP?inn rt.'. era miser,
and n•;i•tinr, node? and by cirtae r,f the lavas of the Stare of Co1.01•^do
of t.h'e first part, and Arthur F. end Elko II. ,law!.."
60X /7ft. Atrpl, GO. d/`/ 2
of +he f aunty of Garfield
t rd State nf f`nlnrain, of the second part:
WlTNi•:SR17i'1: That the said party nf the first part, f r and in rnn-
11^t..
�rnrder. (i-�•
Irl,rra tTA�tP
Stab Doe. re.
Pidrrstion of the sum 11:7 Wt.IARS ($10.00) and other gond craft valuable
I,
consider
to It in hand paid hr the anid parties of the strand part, the• receipt w•h,•renf la hereby ronfesa.d and acknowladtred,
hen grant.•d, bargained, Poll end conveyed and by theme presents does grant, bergaln, Pell, convey and ennflrm unto
the said /sortie' of the second part, net in tenancy In common hut In Joint tenn,wv, the survivor of them, their sulgna
and the heirs and &matgrta of Mach survivor forever, all the fnllnwing deaeritsod lot or parrot of land, serrate, lying
and being in the county nf Garfield and State of Colorado, to wit.
A tract of land situated in Lots 7 rent; 3 in Section 33, Tcxanshin 7 South, Range 87
6th P M. described as beginning at a point in the Southerly right-of-way fence lin
Colorado ;tate Highway Nc. 32 from whence the SI: Corner of Section 33, Township 7
Range 67 West, 6th P.I. bears S 63'29'28" E. 4,926.225 feet ; thence S 02°29'02 ' E.
feet; thence S 02'58' W. 122.612 feet; thencQ S 02°49'42" W. 370.576 feet to the -
of said Int 7; thence S 546.67 feet to the South line of said Lot 8; thence S 89°
292.170 feet along the South line of said Lot 8; thence ii 01°15' C. 1,446.215 feet
Southerly right-of-way fence line of Colcracb State ilighway No. 82; thence S 72°09
285.270 feet along the Southerly right-of-way f.eice line of Colorado State
to the point of Beginning.
TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditament.' and appurtenances thertuntn belonging, or in anywise
appertaining, and the reversion and reversions. remainder and remnindera rents, issues and profits thereof: and all
the estate., right, title, intoe.+t, claim arid remand whatsoever of the said part,' of the first part. either in law or
equity of, in and to the above bargain premises, with the herelbtamente and appurtenaneen.
TO HAVE AND TO f1OLi) the said premises above bargained and denerihed, with the appurtenances, unto the
mid parties n( the second part, the survivor nf tnem, their assigns, and the heirs and assigns of such survivor for-
ever. And the said party of the firs: part, for itself, its Murressora and assigns, dors rovenent, grant, bargain and
agree to and with the surd parti.s of the second part, the survivor of them, their assigns and the heirs and assign.'
n! such survivor, that at the time nr the ensealing and delivery of these prenente, it is well seized of the premises
above ennveyed. as of mond, sure. •erfeo., ahantute and indefeasible estntn of inheritance, in law, in fee Pimp,", and
has good right, full power and lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form
aforesaid, an.: that the same are tree and clear frvm all former anyi p grants, bargains, solea lie!}, times, at-
srasments and encumbrances of whate%er kind or nature sn!ver. �l LIEl' zeneral taxes for 1983 payab
1931.; oil, gas and other minerals, as reserved in Book 225 at Page 148; the lien o.
certain deed of trust to the Public Trustee of Garfield County, Colorado recorded.:
481 at Page 683-685 as Reception No. 270801, securing a promissory note, payment o:
by its terms has been and by this instrument is hereby assured by the parties of tl
part, the present principal balance being $ 49,224.46 ; and SUBJECT TO rights -o:
�asemtnts for roads, ditches, canals, reservoirs, pipelines and utility lines, inc'
and ttc above bargained premise., in the s"uiet and !vac's: '• rossensron of the said parties of the second part, the
survivor of them, their assigns and the heirs and ensigns of sus h survivor, against all and every person or none
lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part thernn(. the said party of the first part shall and will WARRANT
AND tORI'VER (rFFNNU,•
iN WITNESS WTIFREOF, The said party of the first part has caused its corporate name to be hereunto subs
Scribed by its Vice - President and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed, attested by ':.t
Secretary, the day and year first nhnve written.
A.Sr'E:i7 CHATEAUX MORTGAGE CCMA 7Y, INC.,
a Colorado Corporation
Attest •
rt-
I^ STATT; OF COs. 'T`A,�U'p
.. �%le�•^ iIL
County of
av)3Yte forrgning instrument tray acknowledged t.•fnr, nor this
• 1� ,by NELIGH C. COATES, .Jr.
• JOHN r)ILWN
A: Pi'2d CtItATEAUX I UP.'IT f1GE CUIPANY , I i IC . ,
: ~ ( My notarial commission expires
t, Witness cry hand and of
t'
.:t -cd. iiy OCdreS 19:
Pt W-' ',
A
3
V of - rwrdeat
day of �s. V J ,
as Vice- President and
31 Secretary of
/ corporation.
of lest„`.
h,
315.139
th line
' 1,r.
t� the
58" C.
•b.82
e in
that
Booty l`'.
which'
second
and
Y.
ailing:'?.
�o[nt on
Reverse)
Nnurt Pa1,lk
72/ G Nye.**
4,n. r r• a. '/lsp /
Recordedat....3' ...... 'dock..p •..-.Y...... June 2.:....1`�.7?.......:::.�...:..::....
Reeeptlon
TM DEED, Made this
19 72 ,between
MARGARET C
RECORDER'S STAMP
of the County of Garfield . • and State, of Colorado,,of the second part:
WITNESSETH, that the said part y : of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of
Ten Dollars and other, good and valuable considerations DOLi*R8,
to the said part y of the first part in hand paid by the said parties of the second part, the receipt whereof is ,
hereby confessed and acknowledged, ha 8 granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does
grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto the said parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns forever, not
in tenancy in common but in joint tenancy, all the following described lots or parcels of land, situate, lying and
being in the' Comity of ' 'Garfield : and State of Colorado, to wit:`:
A tract of land situated in Lots 7 'and 8, in Sec. 33, T. 7 $., R. 87'4., of the
6th P.M. described as beginning at a point. in the southerly right-of-way fence
line of Colorado State Highway No. 82, being the NW. corner. of Tract "B", from
whence the. SE Corner' of Sec. 33,..T.' 7-3., R. 87 W. of the 6th P.M. ' bears S.
'63°291,2$" E..'a'*distance of 4,926.225 feet;''thenice S. 02°29'02" E.' a distance of
,:315.139 'feet along` the westerly line. of Tract -"B'; , thence S." 02°58' W. a distance
of ' 122.612 feet along the West line of Tract "B!; thence S. 02°49'42" W. a ` die
•Nance of' 370.576 feet''along the` West line of�'Tract-."B" to the', South ,line of, above.
U4,1 17 ,t
L,hence S. a distance of 546.67 feet along' the West line' of. Tract`"B" to
"the South:line :of above, Lot 8; thence'S. 89°08' W. a distance of; 292.170 feet..
',agoing -the South -line of said Lot 8; thence N. O1°15° E. a distance'of 1,446.215
fee to
theaoutherly.righti.of;-way..£ence,• ; line of; CoI,orado ;State Highway No. 82;
thence Si 72°09'58" E. `a distance sof 285.270''feet along the southerly right -of
way`„fence ' line". of 'Colorado State Highway No;' 82' to the NW Corner of Tract "B",
the point of beginning and containing 9.1747 acres, more or less. Together with
.25 of cated
to the �Q�, e -v'T-\ tQv� :ter
Distrix `
Exceptt of -
way asICE ie_T-t C T i f7h (i on e__ Cie_ rd ClGLtd3L n'�2easterf 7 acr"
shown' •
land t Fri(2- ,s ca?cc�c`t ty I Y fi
€_ QS e- Cur revit e rtC�gvi-ca:c io of
e of
the sa is'
made e . ! 110- V h 11C4S ylei l v1 C ill C `i 'Jii *e irl u OV \, he
land bJ J
l s'; No ' noi- S1)'d i v t Ckc, A Since. .
(' ( 1 1 be '
used u - I e Se(Onci I-A:A. f1 C7( ,,,, v ie� Cl��, a c\eC\ . raril
while � �
2. ' NoI con-
struer i'e.-�cde5 '*0 ill 1r f l A. s rK\ Ck. Yl ace --ss
3. No' in-
tained V\Clji l " y GY) err r \Cack-k-i. ckl't1- • vent
the gr:
4. No biliboards;or eigns`Shalt' be,placed''ensaid premised or any part t ereof,
except ; signs' that:'advertisie'' the..property for sale`"or 'rent.
5. No part ofsaid'property shall be'used for business .or commercial purposes
and there shall be. no more than one building .:site .for : each . two acres 'and only one
detached, stogie familyF dwelltn _o .p1> iy e e aag noppertaining thereto}shall be
erected an
ani:One building site,: c'e t ilia t o sht prevent. the erection'
of a guest house or a.barn for, owners' borsee. •
TOGETHER with, all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or' in anywise
01.9,, f�tn€nr, alfa the Ifo sed . raion , tum.. k and"rim sodas, mite, fames and profits thereof; and
ail 4160 cetet+e, right, title, tater et, elaha rad dewmn4 mer of the said., part y of the first part, either is
lac► pr equity, of, in and to the above bargained preaelees, with the horedltamgnte,e;nd appurtenances.
to $AVE `AND TO HOILft the said premises above bargained }and "
second with ZM fappm'aiannces� unto the ,
{ea o If `ma i, J1
f'rtX413_ .. 1 as v q f 114,
aw14W/ '{ ii �r1ti1�1e ilnot piirt for
herselfy her . ezeci o '4ed P,. $ s 1 r; t
r r
or: n a to
and i�lth tbi's ld paries oftbs taseond pay ' r; gym j' � �> °,
of these `prbeenla, 'she LS at the ,time o! the eneali atma de$�rory
. ' well seised of the pxemiiet abon0.conveyed. ns of good, sure, perfect; ibsoleta,
and indefeasible estate'of inheritance in law. life" simple, and has•:good right, full power and lawful authority'
to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same In manner and form aforesaid, and 'that the 'iame are free ,and clear from
all former and other grants, bargains, plea, liens, taxes, issessment and incumbrances of aha nd or nett"
,aoeve�r..,eubject to, patent .restrictions -and reservations# prior mine ' eservationa
•exieting• eae'ements and rights -of -wan `,taxcea: for.:1969 and •eubnequenre,,,¢
and, the above bargaine4`premlaes in the quiet and peaeeable possession of the said .`Parties :of the second part, their
heirs and assigns; against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming or to slain the whole or any part thereof,.
the saidparty x.4 the Bret part: shall and
:will'.WARRAI!.i . r R DEFEND...40 (A-
l
� (Al -
Signed,
signed, Sealed and Delivered in the Presence of
o-�.Ortib°:�'fileIMt
•
ADJACENT OWNERS
The following is a list of owners with immediately adjoining properties and
properties within 200 feet of the proposed exemption:
#11 Kelly and Janice Gessele
17607 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
#12 Lloyd and Joanne Schmitt
17665 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
#16 Howard and Penita Hammond
P.O. Box 650
17537 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
#9 Steve and Christina Davis
17499 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
#1 Bruce and Diane Baldridge
17430 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
#2 James Longstrech
P.O. Box 28029
El Jebel, CO 81628
17694 Highway 82
#31 Donald, Howard & Cheryl Raphael
51 Badger Court
Carbondale, CO 81623
ACROSS THE RIVER:
Cole Aspen Corporation
210 AABC - PP
Aspen, CO 81611
2/96 * Jowell Exemption Proposal * Terry and Matt Harrington * (970) 963-2447
Order Number: 95024162 C-3
•
•
•
SCHEDULE A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A tract of land situated in Lots 7 and 8 in Section 33, Townshi
7 South, Range 87 West, 6th P.M. described 4s beginning at a
point in the Southerly right-of-way fence line of Colorado State
Highway No. 82 from whence the SE Corner of Section 33,
Township 7 South Range 87 West, 6th P.M. bears S 63 degrees 29'
28" E. 4,926,225 feet;
thence S 02 degrees 29'02" E. 315.139 feet;
thence 5 02 degrees 58' W. 122.612 feet;
thence S 02 degrees 49'42" W. 370.576 feet to the South line of
thence S 546.67 feet to the South line .,f said Lct 8:
thence 5 89 degrees 08' W. 292.170 feet &tong the South line of
thence N 01 degrees 15' E. 1,446.215 feet to the Southerly right
line of Colorado State Highway No., 82;
thence S. 72 degrees 09'58" E. 285.270 feet along the Southerly
fence line of Colorado State Highway No. 82 to the point of
Beginning.
P
COUNTY OF GARFIELD
STATE OF COLORADO
said Lot 7;
said Lot 8;
-of-way fence
right-of-way
JlIIL'I/ULL' IS
Section
Order Number: 95024162 C-3
EXCEPTIONS
�he policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the
satisfaction of the Company:
1. Rights or claims of parties in possession, not shown by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortag,, in area, encroachments, and any ,facts which a correct
survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law
and not shown by the public records.
S. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public
records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof, hut prior to the date the proposed insured acquires
of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this conimitment.
6. Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents, o,- an act authorizing the issuance thereof;water rights, claims or title to water.
7. Any and all unpaid taxes and assessments and any unredeemed tax sales.
8. The effect of inclusions in any general or specific water conservancy, fire
protection, soil conservation or other district or inclusion in any water
service or street improvement area.
Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore
therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises
hereby granted, as reserved in United States Patent recorded May 8, 1895 in
Book 12 at Page 363 as Reception No. 18378, (as to Lot 7).
10. Right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United
States, as reserved in United States Patent recorded May 8, 1895 in Book 12 at
Page 363 as Reception No. 18378 (as to Lot 7) .
11. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore
therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises
hereby granted, as reserved in United States Patent recorded November 22, 1958
in Book 312 at Page 383 as Reception No. 203490 (as to Lot 8).
12. Right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United
States, as reserved in United States Patent recorded November 22, 1958 in Book
312 at Page 383 as Reception No. 203490 (as to Lot 8).
13. Reservation of an undivided 1/2 interest in all oil, gas and other mineral
rights, as reserved by Vera 5. Herin and Rudolph Herin, in the Deed to Charles
0. Farris and Agnes B. Farris recorded November 15, 1950, in Book 255 at Page
148 as Reception No. 174108, and any and all assignments thereof, or interests
therein.
•
Continued on next page
Continuation of Schedule B - Section 2
Order Number: 95024162 C-3
411p. Right-of-way for public highway as disclosed by right-of-way map filed
September 5, 1936 as Document No. 125078.
15. Right-of-way and Easement granted to Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Company to
construct, operate and maintain its gas pipeline and appurtenances over,
through, under and across the property as granted by instrument recorded
October 19, 1961, in Book 337 at Page 241, Document No. 215444.
16. Right-of-way for the Basin Ditch over and across subject property as disclosed
by map and statement recorded June 7, 1887 in Book 9 at Page 512.
17. Restrictive covenants as contained in Deed recorded June 29, 1972, in Book 432
at Page 384, Document No. 254318 and in Deed recorded February 9, 1973 Book 440
at Page 451, Document No. 256975, including, but not limited to the following:
1. No structure of a temporary nature or trailer house or
mobile home shall be used upon any site a said premises
at any time as a residence, except temporarily while
permanent residences are being erected.
2. No building shall be placed on said premises by means of
other than new construction.
3. No animals, livestock or poultry of any kind shall be kept,
raised or maintained for commercial purposes; provided that
this restriction shall not prevent the grazing of cattle,
sheep or horses.
4. No billboards or signs shall be placed on said premises or
any part thereof, except signs that advertise the property
for sale or rent.
5. No part of said property shall be used for business or
commercial purposes and there shall be no more than one
building site for each two acres and only one decached
single family dwelling or private garage appertaining thereto
shall be erected on any one building site, except that this
shall not prevent the erection of a guest house or a barn
for owners' horses.
•
18. Road easement and right-of-way as now located and in place from Colorado
Highway 82 as contained in Deed as recorded June 29, 1972 in Book 432 at Page
384, Document No. 254318 and in Deed recorded Aught 29, 1983, in Book 634 at
Page 278, Document No. 345147.
19. Right-of-way for Patterson and Cummings Ditch.
20. Any questions, dispute or adverse claims as to any los.g or gain of land as a
result of any change in the river bed location by other than natural causes, or
alteration through accretion, reliction, erosion or avulsion of the center
thread, bank, channel or flow of waters in the Roaring Fork River lying within
subject Land; and any question as to the location of such center thread, bed,
bank or channel as a legal description monument or marker for purposes of
describing or locating subject lands.
•
Continued on next page
•
•
•
Continuation of Schedule B - Section 2
Order Number: 95024162 C-3
NOTE:
Pursuant to Senate Bill 91-14 (C.R.S. 10-12-122) Notice
is hereby given that:
a) The subject real property may be located in a
special taxing district;
b) A certificate of taxes due listing each taxing
jurisdiction shall be obtained from the County
Treasurer or the County Treasurer's authorized
agent;
c) Information regarding special districts and the
boundaries of such districts may be obtained
from the County Assessor or the County Treasurer.
•
•
•
CONTACTS FOR NOTIFICATION
FOR DITCHES AND EASEMENTS
Numbers on left refer to numbers on title commitment stating rights recorded against the
property:
9. Right of the Proprietor of a vein or lode to extract or remove his ore...U.S. Patent
May 8, 1895,Book 12, Page 363, Reception No. 18378, (as to Lot 7).
10. Right of way for ditches or canals...U.S. Patent
May 8, 1895, Book 12, Page 363, Reception No 18378 (as to Lot 7).
11. Right of proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore... U.S. Patent
November 22, 1958, Book 312, Page 383, Reception No. 203490 (as to Lot 8).
12. Right of way for ditches or canals, U.S. Patent
November 22, 1958, Book 312, Page 383, Reception No. 203490 (as to Lot 8).
13. Reservation of an undivided 1/2 interest in all oil, gas, and other mineral rights...
2)kii< November 15, 1950, Book 255, Page 148, Reception No 174108
Reserved by:
Vera S. Herin and Rudolph Herin In the deed to: Charles 0. Farris and Agnes B. Farris
2/96 * 1u, " . ,tmption Proposal * Terry and Matt Harrington * (970) 963-2447
•
* 14. Right of way for public highway as disclosed by right of way map filed
September 5, 1936 as document No. 125078.
15. Right of way and Easement granted to Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Company to...
October 19, 1961, Book 337, Page 241, document No 215444.
KN Energy 945-8617, or 800-563-0012
16. Right of way for the Basin Ditch over ... subject property as disclosed by map...
June 7, 1887, Book 9, Page 512.
Jean Blue, 0404 County Road 104, Carbondale, CO 81623
18. Road easement and right of way as now located from Colorado Hwy. 82 as...
June 29, 1972, Book 432, Page 384, Document No. 254318. and in Deed recorded
August 29, 1983, Book 634, Page 278, Document No. 345147
19. Right of way for Patterson Cummings Ditch.
Dr. Dewel, c/o Alpine Animal Hospital
17776 Highway 82, Carbondale, CO 81623
* This be deleted from title commitment, due to changes in the property configuration
since this recording the highway no longer runs through the property.
2/96 * Jowell Exemption Proposal * Terry and Matt Harrington * (970) 963-2447
•
•
•
SOIL REPORT
Soils information from
U.S. Department of Agriculture Soils Conservation Service
of the subject area
for Mr. and Mrs. Jowell and their Subdivision Exemption,
Assisted by Dennis Davidson
2/96 * Jowell Exemption Proposal * Terry and Matt Harrington * (970) 963-2447
•
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
SANITARY FACILITIES
Jowell
PAGE 1 OF 3
12/8/95
(The information in this report indicates the dominant soil condition but does not eliminate the need for onsite
investigation)
1
Map symbol ; Septic tank Sewage lagoon Trench
and soil name i absorption , areas sanitaryArea j Daily cover
sanitary , for landfill
fields i i landfill landfill
' I
' 1
' I
I.J. 1
1 1 I
. I
Atencio ;Severe: ;Severe:
poor filter ; seepage ;Severe: ;Slight ;Poor:
I too sandy f
, , seepage,
too sandy,
small stones
' ' I
Aieltine ;Severe:
;Severe: ,
poor filter seepage Severe: Severe: ;Poor:
seepage,
,
too sandy i seepage i seepage
' I too sandy,
.2. ,
small stones
1 1
Redrob
;Severe: 1
,Severe:
: wetness, ; seepage, ;SseerSevere: ;Poor:
poor filter ; wetness 1 pa.ge � seepage, ; seepage,
1 1
I y
I ; toosandy
' wetness , too sandy,
42; ; small stones
1I
1 ,
Fluvaquents 'S 1 1
'evere; ;Severe; ; 1
Severe:
' flooding, I � � ,Severe: ;Poor:
seepage,
wetness, ; flooding, ; seepale9 ; flooding, ; seepage,
Door filter wetness g I seepage, too sandy,
wetness ; wetness
small stones
54: . I
, 1 1
Grotte ;Severe: 1 i
;Severe: 1
percs slowly, Severe: ;Severe: ;p
, slope
;Poor:
slope . 1 slope i slope small stones,
I '
1 . ; slope
•
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULIUNE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
•
Endnote -- SANITARY FACILITIES
SANITARY FACILITIES
PAGE 2 OF 3
12/8/95
This report shows the degree and kind of soil limitations that affect septic tank absorption fields, sewage lagoons,
and sanitary landfills. The limitations are considered "Slight" if soil properties and site features generally are
favorable for the indicated use and limitations are minor and easily overcome; "Moderate" if soil properties or site
features are not favorable for the indicated use and special planning, design, or maintenance is needed to overcome or
minimize the limitations; and "Severe" if soil properties or site features are so unfavorable or so difficult to overcome
that special design, significant increases in construction costs, and possibly increased maintenance are required.
This report also shows the suitability of the soils for use as daily cover for landfills. A rating of "Good" indicates
that soil properties and site features are favorable for the use and good performance and low maintenance can be
expected; "Fair" indicates that soil properties and site features are moderately favorable for the use and one or
more soil properties or site features make the soil less desirable than the soils rated "Good"; and "Poor" indicates
that one or more soil properties or site features are unfavorable for the use and overcoming the unfavorable
properties requires special design, extra maintenance, or costly alteration.
SEPTIC TANK ABSORPTION FIELDS are areas in which effluent from a septic tank is distributed into the soil through
subsurface tiles or perforated pipe. Only that part of the soil between depths of 24 to 72 inches is evaluated. The
ratings are base on soil properties, site features, and observed performance of the soils. Permeability, a high
water table, depth to bedrock or to a cemented pan, and flooding affect absorption of the effluent. Large stones
and bedrock or a cemented pan interfere with installation. Unsatisfactory performance of septic tank absorption fields,
including excessively slow absorption of effluent, surfacing of effluent, and hillside seepage, can affect public health.
Groundwater can be polluted if highly permeable sand and gravel or fractured bedrock is less than 4 feet below the
•base of the absorption field, if slope is excessive, or if the water table is near the surface. There must be
nsaturated soil material beneath the absorption field to filter the effluent effectively. Many local ordinances
require that this material be of a certain thickness.
SEWAGE LAGOONS are shallow ponds constructed to hold sewage while aerobic bacteria decompose the solid and liquid
wastes. Lagoons should have a nearly level floor surrounded by cut slopes or embankments of compacted soil. Lagoons
generally are designed to hold the sewage within a depth of 2 to 5 feet. Nearly impervious soil material for the lagoon
floor and sides is required to minimize seepage and contamination of ground water. This report gives ratings for
the natural soil that makes up the lagoon floor. The surface layer and, generally, 1 or 2 feet of soil material
below the surface layer are excavated to provide material for the embankments. The ratings are based on soil
properties, site features, and observed performance of the soils. Considered in the ratings are slope, permeability, a
high water table, depth to bedrock or to a cemented pan, flooding, large stones, and content of organic matter.
Excessive seepage due to rapid permeability of the soil or a water table that is high enough to raise the level of sewage
in the lagoon causes a lagoon to function unsatisfactorily. Pollution results if seepage is excessive or if floodwater
overtops the lagoon. A high content of organic matter is detrimental to proper functioning of the lagoon because it
inhibits aerobic activity. Slope, bedrock, and cemented pans can cause construction problems, and large stones can
hinder compaction of the lagoon floor.
SANITARY LANDFILLS are areas where solid waste is disposed of by burying it in soil. There are two types of landfill,
trench and area. In a trench landfill, the waste is placed in a trench. It is spread, compacted, and covered daily
with a thin layer of soil excavated at the site. In an area landfill, the waste is placed in successive layers on the
surface of the soil. The waste is spread, compacted, and covered daily with a thin layer of soil form a source away
from the site. Both types of landfill must be able'to bear heavy vehicular traffic. Both types involve a risk of
groundwater pollution. Ease of excavation and revegetation need to be considered. The ratings in this report are based
•
•
•
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
Endnote -- SANITARY FACILITIES --Continued
SANITARY FACILITIES
PAGE 3 OF 3
12/8/95
on soil properties, site features, and observed performance of the soils. Permeability, depth to bedrock or to a
cemented pan, a high water table, slope, and flooding affect both types of landfill. Texture, stones and boulders,
highly organic layers, soil reaction, and content of salts and sodium affect trench type landfills. Unless otherwise
stated, the ratings apply only to that part of the soil within a depth of about 6 feet. For deeper trenches, a
limitation rate "Slight" or "Moderate" may not be valid. Onsite investigation is needed.
DAILY COVER FOR LANDFILL is the soil material that is used to cover compacted solid waste in an area type sanitary
landfill. The soil material is obtained offsite, transported to the landfill, and spread over the waste.
Soil texture, wetness, coarse fragments, and slope affect the ease of removing and spreading the material during wet
and dry periods. loamy or silty soils that are free of large stones or excess gravel are the best cover for a
landfill. Clayey soils may be sticky or cloddy and are difficult to spread; sandy soils are subject to soil
blowing. After soil material has been removed, the soil material remaining in the borrow area must be thick enough
over bedrock, a cemented pan, or the water table to permit revegetation. The soil material used as final cover for a
landfill should be suitable for plants. The surface layer generally has the best workability, more organic matter than
the rest of the profile, and the best potential for plants. Material from the surface layer should be stockpiled for use
as the final cover.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 1 OF 2
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE 12/8/95
SOIL FEATURES
Jowell
Bedrock ; Cemented pan Subsidence ; , Risk of corrosion
Potential ,
Map symbol '
' ;frost action; Uncoated '
and soil name Depth ;Hardness; Depth Kind Initial Total
steel ; Concrete
13:
Atencio
In In
>60
Aieltine >60
92:
Redrob
>60
42:
Fluvaquents >60
54:
Grotte
•
>60
In In
1 ,
1 ,
1 ,
:Low ;Moderate
;Low ;Moderate
I ,
I ,
;Low :High
1
;High ;High
;Low ;High
Low
Low
;Low
;Low
;Low
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
•
Endnote -- SOIL FEATURES
SOIL FEATURES
PAGE 2 OF 2
12/8/95
This report gives estimates of various soil features. The estimates are used in land use planning that involves
engineering considerations.
Depth to bedrock is given if bedrock is within a depth of 5 feet, The depth is based on many soil borings and on
observations during soil mapping. The rock is either "Soft" or "Hard". If the rock is "Soft" or fractured, excavations
can be made with trenching machines, backhoes, or small rippers. If the rock is "Hard" or massive, blasting or
special equipment generally is needed for excavation.
Cemented pans are cemented or indurated subsurface layers within a depth of 5 feet. Such pans cause difficulty in
excavation. Pans are classified as "Thin" or "Thick". A "Thin" pan is less than 3 inches thick if continuously
indurated or less than 18 inches thick if discontinuous or fractured. Excavations can be made by trenching machines,
backhoes, or small rippers. A "Thick" pan is more than 3 inches thick if continuously indurated or more than 18
inches thick if discontinuous or fractured. Such a pan is so thick or massive that blasting or special equipment is
needed in excavation.
Subsidence is the settlement of organic soils or of saturated mineral soils of very low density. Subsidence
results from either desiccation and shrinkage or oxidation of organic material, or both, following drainage.
Subsidence takes place gradually, usually over a period of several years. This report shows the expected initial
subsidence, which usually is a result of drainage, and total subsidence, which usually is a result of oxidation. Not
shown in the report is subsidence caused by an imposed surface load or by the withdrawal of ground water throughout
an extensive area as a result of lowering the water table.
4111
Potential frost action is the likelihood of upward or lateral expansion
of by
segregated ice lenses (frost heave) and the subsequent collapse of the soilthe andsoil losscofsstd
rengtheonormation thawing.ofFrost
action occurs when moisture moves into the freezing zone of the soil. Temperature, texture, density, permeability,
content of organic matter, and depth to the water table are the most important factors considered in evaluating the
potential for frost action. It is assumed that the soil is not insulated by vegetation or snow and is not artificially
drained. Silty and highly structured clayey soils that have a high water table in winter are the most susceptible to
frost action. Well drained, very gravelly, or very sandy soils are the least susceptible. Frost heave and low soil
strength during thawing cause damage mainly to pavements and other rigid structures.
Risk of corrosion pertains to potential soil -induced electrochemical or chemical action that dissolves or weakens
uncoated steel or concrete. The rate of corrosion of uncoated steel is related to such factors as soil moisture,
particle -size distribution, acidity, and electrical conductivity of the soil. The rate of corrosion of concrete
is based mainly on the sulfate and sodium content, texture, moisture content, and acidity of the soil. Special
site examination and design may be needed if the combination of factors creates a severe corrosion environment. The steel
installations that intersect soil boundaries or soil layers is more susceptible to corrosion than steel in
installations that are entirely within one kind of soil or within one soil layer. For uncoated steel, the risk of
corrosion, expressed as "Low", "Moderate", or "High", is based on soil drainage class, total acidity, electrical
resistivity near field capacity, and electrical conductivity of the saturation extract.
acidity, and amount of sulfates in the saturation extract.
For concrete, the risk of corrosion is also expressed as "Low", "Moderate", or "High". It is based on soil texture,
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
•
BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT
Jowell
PAGE 1 OF 2
12/8/95
(The information in this report indica'. .he dominant soil condition but does not eli ,te the need for onsite
investigation)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
'SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
• BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT
PAGE 2 OF 2
12/8/95
Endnote -- 8UILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT
This report shows the degree and kind of soil (imitations that affect shallow excavations, dwellings with and without
basements, small commercial buildings, local roads and streets, and lawns and landscaping. The limitations are
"Slight", "Moderate", or "Severe". The limitations are considered "Slight" if soil properties and site features are
generally favorable for the indicated use and limitaions are minor and easily overcome; "Moderate" if soil properties
or site features are not favorable for the indicated use and special planning, design, or maintenance is needed to
overcome or minimize the limitations; and "Severe" if soil properties or site features are so unfavorable or so
difficult to overcome that special design, significant increases in construction costs, and possibly increased
maintenance are required. Special feasibility studies may be required where the soil limitations are severe.
SHALLOW EXCAVATIONS are trenches or holes dug to a maximum depth of 5 or 6 feet for basements, graves, utility lines,
open ditches, and other purposes. The ratings are based on soil properties, site features, and observed performance of
the soils. The ease of digging, filling, and compacting is affected by the depth to bedrock, a cemented pan, or a very
firm dense layer; stone content; soil texture; and slope. The time of the year that excavations can be made is
affected by the depth to a seasonal high water table and the susceptibility of the soil to flooding. The resistance of
the excavation walls or bands to sloughing or caving is affected by soil texture and the depth to the water table.
DWELLINGS AND SMALL COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS are structures built on shallow foundations on undisturbed soil. The load
limit is the same as that for single-family dwellings no higher than three stories. Ratings are made for small
commercial buildings without basements, for dwellings with basements, and for dwellings without basements. The ratings
are based on soil properties, site features, and observed performance of the soils. A high water table, depth to bedrock
•or to a cemented pan, large stones, slope, and flooding affect the ease of excavation and construction, Landscaping
and grading that require cuts and fills of more than 5 or 6 feet are not considered,
LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS have an all-weather surface and carry automobile and light truck traffic all year. They
have a subgrade of cut or fill soil material, a base of gravel, crushed rock, or stabilized soil material, and a
flexible or rigid surface. Cuts and fills are generally properties, site features, and observed performance of the
soils. Depth to bedrock or to a cemented pan, a high water table, flooding, large stones, and slope affect the ease of
excavating and grading. Soil strength (as inferred from the engineering classification of the soil), shrink -swell
potential, frost action potential, and depth to a high water table affect the traffic -supporting capacity.
LAWNS AND LANDSCAPING require soils on which turf and ornamental trees and shrubs can be established and
maintained. The ratings are based on soil properties, site features, and observed performance of the soils. Soil
reaction, a high water table, depth to bedrock or to a cemented pan, the available water capacity in the upper 40
inches, and the content of salts, sodium, and sulfidic materials affect plant growth. Flooding, wetness, slope,
stoniness, and the amount of sand, clay, or organic matter in the surface layer affect trafficability after vegetation
is established.
NONTECHNICAL SOILS DESCRIPTION REPORT
Jowell
Map
Symbol
13
Soil name and description
Atencio-Azeltine complex, 3 to 6 percent slopes
This map unit is on alluvial fans and terraces. This
unit is 60 percent Atencio sandy loam and 30 percent
Azeltine gravelly sandy loam.
The Atencio soil is deep and well -drained. It formed
in alluvium derived dominantly' From sandstone and
shale. The surface layer is iy loam 10 inches
thick. The subsoil is sandy clay loam 10 inches thick
NONTECHNICAL SOILS Dr 'IPT10N REPORT
Jowe.
Map
• Symbol
Soil name and description
This deep, somewhat poorly -drained soil is on alluvial
valley floors, low terraces, and flood plains. It
formed in mixed alluvium derived dominantly from
sandstone and shale. The surface layer is loam 14
inches thick. The next layer is stratified stony loam
6 inches thick. The underlying material to a depth of
60 inches is stony and very cobbly loamy sand and sand.
Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is
low. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches for
water -tolerant plants but is limited to depths between
20 and 40 inches for non -water -tolerant plants. Runoff
is slow to medium, and the hazard of water erosion is
slight to high on the steeper slopes. A high water
table is at a depth of 18 to 48 inches year-round.
This soil is subject to brief periods of flooding in
May to July. Ice jams also cause flooding during
prolonged cold periods in winter.
42 ; Fluvaquents, 0 to 10 percent slopes
This broadly defined unit consists of deep, somewhat
poorly drained soils on flood plains and alluvial
valley floors. Fluvaquents are stratified and vary
widely in texture and depth to sands, gravels and
cobbles. The surface layer is loamy sand to fine sandy
loam and silty loam to clay loam. The underlying
layers are generally sandy loam or loam stratified with
sands, gravels, and cobbles. In some areas, gravels
and cobbles are on or near the surface. Permeability
varies from rapid to moderately slow. Available water
capacity above the water table is very low or low.
Rooting depth is 60 inches or more for water tolerant
plants. Runoff is slow to medium. Erosion hazard is
slight to high. The water table fluctuates between
depths of 0.5 and 2 feet, during spring and summer.
These soils are subject to brief, occasional flooding
late in spring and early in summer.
54 ; Grotte gravelly loam, 25 to 65 percent slopes
•
WI S,p„ Tatum iso ally sandy loam. The
jlower part to a depth of 6r ,s is very gravelly
sand. In some areas the sl, a layer is gravelly or
cobbly. Permeability is moderate to a depth of 30
inches and rapid below this depth. Available water
capacity is low. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches
or more. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of water
erosion is slight tdo moderate.
The Azeltine soil is deep and well -drained. It formed
in alluvium derived dominantly from sandstone and
shale. Permeability is moderate in upper part, and
rapid below a depth of 16 inches. Available water
capacity is very low. Effective rooting depth is 60
inches or more. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of
water erosion is slight to moderate.
•
•
•
92 ; Redrob loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes
NONTECHNICAL SOILS DF' ,ION REPORT
Jowe.
Map
• Symbol
1
1
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
Soil name and description
This deep, well -drained soil is on mountain
side -slopes. It formed in alluvium and colluvium
derived dominantly from sandstone. The surface layer
is gravelly loam 4 inches thick. The next layer is a
gravelly clay loam 3 inches thick. The underlying
material to a depth of 60 inches or more is very
channery clay loam. Permeability is moderately slow.
Available water capacity is moderate. Effective
rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is rapid,
and the hazard of water erosion is very high.
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
Jowell
PAGE 1 OF 3
12/8/95
(The information in this report indicates the dominant soil condition but does not eliminate nate the need for ons; to
•
- --------------------------------
Map symbol ; Roadfill---------------------------------- -
Sand - ------ -- ---
and soil name Gravel
� Topsoil
'1 1
1 I ----------------------- '-----------------------
• , 1
Atencio ;Good 1
1 1
1
;Probable
;Probable
;Poor:
1
I
1 1
' 1 small stones,
1
'area reclaim
Azeltine 1 '
;Fair:
;Improbable: ;Probable
large stones
small stones Poor:
I
too sandy,
I I ' ; small stones,
' ; area reclaim
92: 1 I
1
' I 1
Redrob
I 1
,Fair: ;Probable '
large stones,1 ;Probable ;Poor:
wetness 0 ; too sandy,
small stones,
I 1
1 1 ; area reclaim
42: I
1 I 1
f uvaquents ;Poor: I I
1
wetness ;Probable ;Probable ;Poor:
I 1
• 1
1
too sandy,
' '; small stones,
I 1
54:
1 1 area reclaim
1
1 1 I
Grotte---------- I 1
;Poor: 1
;improbable: 1
, slope ;Improh?hle: ;Poor:
excess fines
excess fines ; sma!! stones,
I
1 1
1 , area reclaim,
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
•
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
PAGE 2 OF 3
12/8/95
Endnote -- CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
This report gives information about the soils as a source of roadfill, sand, gravel, and topsoil. The soils are rated
"Good", "Fair", or "Poor" as a source of roadfill and topsoil. They are rated as a "Probable" or "Improbable"
source of sand and gravel. The ratings are based on soil properties and site features that affect the removal of the
soil and its use as construction material. Normal compaction, minor processing, and other standard construction
practices are assumed. Each soil is evaluated to a depth of 5 or 6 feet.
Roadfi.11 is soil material that is excavated in one place and used in road embankments in another place. In this report,
the soils are rated as a source of roadfill for low embankments, generally less than 6 feet high and less
exacting in design than higher embankments. The ratings are for the soil material below the surface layer to a
depth of 5 or 6 feet. It is assumed that soil layers will be mixed during excavating and spreading. Many soils have
layers of contrasting suitability within their profile. The report entitled Engineering Index Properties is also available
and it provides detailed information about each soil layer. This information can help determine the suitability of each
layer for use as roadfill. The performance of soil after it is stabilized with lime or cement is not considered in
the ratings.
The ratings are based on soil properties, site features, and observed performance of the soils. The thickness of
suitable material is a major consideration. The ease of excavation is affected by large stones, a high water table,
and slope. How well the soil performs in place after it has been compacted and drained is determined by its strep th (as
inferred from the engineering classification of the soil) and shrink -swell potential. g
Soils rated "Good" contain significant amounts of sand or gravel or both. They have at least 5 feet of suitable
•watematerial, a low shrink -swell potential, few cobbles and stones, and slopes of 15 percent or less. Depth to the
r table is more than 3 feet
Soils rated "Fair" are more than 35 percent silt- and clay -sized particles and have a plasticity of less than 10.
They have a moderate shrink -swell potential, slopes of 15 to 25 percent, or many stones. Depth to the water table is 1
to 3 feet.
Soils rated "Poor" have a plasticity index of more than 10, a high shrink -swell potential, many stones, or slopes of
more than 25 percent. They are wet, and the depth to the water table is less than 1 foot. These soils may have
layers of suitable material, but the material is less than 3 feet thick.
Sand and gravel are natural aggregates suitable for commercial use with a minimum of processing. Sand and
gravel are used in many kinds of construction. Specifications for each use vary widely. In this report only
the probability of finding material in suitable quantity is evaluated. The suitability of the material for specific
purposes is not evaluated, nor are factors that affect excavation of the material. The properties used to evaluate
the soil as a source of sand or gravel are gradation of grain sizes (as indicated by the engineering classification
of the soil), the thickness of suitable material, and the content of rock fragments. Kinds of rock, acidity,and
stratification are given in the soil series descriptions. Gradation of grain sizes is given in the Engineerin Index
Properties report.
9
A soil rated as a "Probable" source has a layer of clean sand and gravel or a layer of sand or gravel that contains
up to 12 percent silty fines. This material must be at least 3 feet thick and less than 50 percent, by weight, large
stones. A11 other soils are rated as an "Improbable" source. Coarse fragments of soft bedrock, such as shale and
siltstone, are not considered to be sand and gravel, g
•
•
•
•
.U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
PAGE 3 Of 3
12/8/95
Endnote -- CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS --Continued
Topsoil is used to cover an area so that vegetation can be established and maintained. The upper 40 inches of a soil
is evaluated for use as topsoil. Also evaluated is the reclamation potential of the borrow area. Plant growth is
affected by toxic material and by such properties as soil reaction, available water capacity, and fertility. The ease
of excavating, loading, and spreading is affected by rock fragments, slope, a water table, soil texture, and thickness
of suitable material. Reclamation of the borrow area is affected by slope, a water table, rock fragments, bedrock,
and toxic material.
Soils rate "Good" have friable loamy material to a depth of at least 40 inches. They are free of stones and cobbles,
have little or no gravel, and have slopes of less than 8 percent. They are low in content of soluble salts, are
naturally fertile or respond well to fertilizer, and are not so wet that excavation is difficult.
Soils rated "Fair" are sandy soils, loamy soils that have a relatively high content of clay, soils that have only 20
to 40 inches of suitable material, soils that have an appreciable amount of gravel, stones, or soluble salts, or
soils that have slopes of 8 to 15 percent. The soils are not so wet that excavation is difficult.
Soils rate "Poor" are very sandy or clayey, have less than 20 inches of suitable material, have a large amount of
gravel, stones, or soluble salts, have slopes of more than 15 percent, or have a seasonal water table at or near the
surface. The surface layer of most soils is generally preferred for topsoil because of it organic matter content.
Organic matter greatly increases the absorption and retention of moisture and nutrients for plant growth.
Date: 12/08/95
Name: Jowell
Reason(s): Soils Information
Assisted by: DENNIS DAVIDSON
Type: Individual
Comment
Provided soils for a subdivision excemption. Aspen area Survey the
land located just west of the garfield co line. Yalonda Perau picked
up the information. 963 3300
•
Map symbol Shallow ; Dwellings ; Dwellings ; Small
and soil name excavations
without , with ; commercial
basements basements buildings
13: . .1 1
Atencio ;Severe: ;Slight ;Slight ;Moderate:
cutbanks cave slope
Azeltine 'Severe: :Moderate: :Moderate: :Moderate:
cutbanks cave ; large stones ; large stones ; slope,
1 ; large stones
92:
Redrob ;Severe: ;Severe: :Severe: ;Severe:
cutbanks cave„ flooding ; flooding, ; flooding
' wetness ; wetness
1 1
4 1 1 1 i
'
42: � 1 1 11
Fluvaquents ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe:
cutbanks cave„ flooding, ; flooding, ; flooding,
' wetness ; wetness ; wetness ; wetness
;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ;Severe:
slope ; slope ; slope ; slope
'
54:
Grotte
Local roads ; lawns and
and streets ; landscaping
Slight ;Moderate:
droughty
Moderate: ;Severe:
large stones ; droughty
Moderate: :Moderate:
wetness, ; wetness.
flooding, ; droughty
large stones
Severe: :Severe:
wetness, ; wetness
flooding,
frost action
;Severe: :Severe:
slope ; slope
•
ORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
1313 SHERMAN ST., RM. 818, DENVER CO 80203
phone - info: (303) 866-3587 main: (303) 866-3581
RESIDENTIAL
III
Name of applicant
(Note: You may also use this forrn to apply for
eview instructions prior to completing form
1. APPLICANT INFORMATION
livestock watering)
Arthur F. & Elke H. Jowell
Mrhr
City
Addrr/o iviatt & Terry i-(arrin,;- on
79 Ute
Carbondale CO 81623
Telephone Number GnchEe aro code)
zip code
(97n)9- 2447 or 925-7301
2. TYPE OF APPLICATION (check applicable box(es))
72 Construct new well
❑ Replace existing well
O Change (source) aquifer
O Other:
❑ Use existing well
❑ Change / Increase Use
❑ Reapplication(emp.ed pemrt)
3. REFER TO (if applicable)0
Water court case t
N/A
Permit s
Verbal t
-VE-
N/A
Monitonng hole acknowledgment 1
MH-
Well name or 1
Harrington Well
A
. LOCATION OF WELL 1
County Carbondale, CO
Garfield
ISection
605 Highway 82
Quarter/quarter Quarter
NW y.
33
Township N or S
7 0 ❑
Distance of well from section lines
Range E or W
87 ❑
SW /4
Prinopal Meridian
6th
2200 ft. from ❑NlaS 4590 ft. from MEOW
Well location address, if drf e,a t from aooGcant address (if apps -wt
ame as Applicant
For rewaceme;t well. only • distance ant dtrecuon from old well to new well
I
feet direction
5. TRACT ON WHICH WELL WILL BE LOCATED
A. You must ch¢ck Pro one of the following - see instructions
Subdivision:s Name FiarrjIICrt-gyp
Lot no. A Block no. Filing/Unit
_I 0 County exemption (attach copy of county approval &
Name/no. Tract no.
I 0 Mining claim (attacn copy of deed or survey) ---
1 Name/no.
1 0 Other 'attach legal description to application)
i
B. STATE PARCEL
ID# lcrico nal):
r acre. in tract D. Are you the owner of this
property?
2.0 L7, YES 0 NO (if no - see instructions/
E. Will this be the only well on this tract?
ZYES 0 NO (if other wells are on this tract- see instructions)
Water Well Permit Application
Must be completed in black ink or typed
6. USE OF WELL (check appropriate entry or entries)
See instructions to determine use(s) for which you may qualify —
ID A. Ordinary household use in one single-family dwelling
NO outside use)
0 B. Ordinary household use in 1 to 3 single-family
dwellings:
Number of dwellings: One
12 Home garden/lawn irrigation, not to exceed 1 acre:
area irrigated 5,000 ® sq. ft. 0 acre
MT Domestic animal watering - (non-commercial)
❑ C. Livestock Watering (on farm/ranch/range/pasture)
7. WELL DATA
Maai.nun paanpvp rat.
15
Total
Arraal amain to M wtMLawn
0.7
acre-feet
S0
feet
Aqui}
Roarin
a
Fork Alluvium
8. TYPE OF RESIDENTIAL SEWAGE SYSTEM
EKSeptic tank / absorption (each field
❑ Central system
District name:
❑ Vault
Location sewage to be hauled to:
❑ Other (attach copy of engineering design)
9. PROPOSED WELL DRILLER (optional)
Name
Licensed Colorado Driller
licrne raanbr
10. SIGNATURE of applicant(s) or authorized agent
The making of false statements herein constitutes perjury
in the second degree, which is punishable as a class 1 mis-
demeanor pursuant to C.R.S. 24-4-104(13)(a). I have read
the statements herein, know the contents thereof and state
that they are true to my knowledge.
Must be orsyiia.r signature
f2 A4 ' Date
Tide
Owner
OPTIONAL INFORMATION
USGS map carne
Office Use Only
map M Surface elev.
DIV
CO
WD
BA
USE MD
Form GWS -44 (11/95)
bORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
1313 SHERMAN ST., RM. 818, DENVER CO 80203
phone - info: (303) 866-3587 main: (303) 866-3581
•RESIDENTIAL*(Note: You may also use this form to apply for
Review instructions prior to completing form
•
1 APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name of applicant
Arthur F. & Elke Jowell
natt & Terry Harrin ton
7.9 Ute
City State
Carbondale CO 81623
Zip code
Telephone Number anclude area code)
(.21112.6V-14.447
2. TYPE OF APPLICATION
❑ Construct new well
❑ Replace existing well
❑ Change (source) aquifer
O Other:
925-7301
(check applicable box(es))
livestock watering) Water Well Permit Application
Must be completed in black ink or typed
6. USE OF WELL (check appropriate entry or entries)
See instructions to determine use(s) for which you may qualify —
El A. Ordinary household use in one single-family dwelling
outside use)
fl B. Ordinary household use in 1 to 3 single-family
dwellings:
Number of dwellings:
D Home garden/lawn irrigation, not to exceed 1 acre:
area irrigated 5,000 El sq. ft. 0 acre
C} Domestic animal watering — (non-commercial)
❑ c. Livestock watering (on farm/ranch/range/pasture)
® Use existing well
O Change / Increase Use
O Reapplicationca>ep:sal permit)
one
7. WELL DATA
Maximum pumping rata
15
gpm
Annual amount to be Withdrawn.
3.
REFER
TO (if applicable)0
Water court case S
W-1256
Total depth
44 feet
Permit
Unpermitted
Aquifer
0.7
acre-feet
Roaring Fork Alluvium
8. TYPE OF RESIDENTIAL SEWAGE SYSTEM
Verbal 1
-VE-
Monitoring hole acknowledgment it
MH -
Well name or 1
Nettles Well 17605 Highway 82
4. LOCATION OF WELL Carbondale, CO
County Quarter/quarter Quarter
Garfield NW y.
IT/Septic tank / absorption leach field
0 Central system
District name:
❑ Vault
Location sewage to be hauled to:
816 2 C 0 Other (attach copy of engineering design)
9. PROPOSED WELL DRILLER (optional)
SW %a
Section
33
Township N or S
Range E or W
7 ❑ KJ 87 ❑
Distance of well from section lines
Principal Meridian
Name
Existing Well
6th 10. SIGNATURE of applicant(s) or authorized agent
1,853 ft. from ❑ N 7 S 4571 ft. from i E ❑ W
Well location address, if different from applicant address (if applicable)
Same as Applicant
For replacement wells only - distance and direction from old well to new well
feet direction
5. TRACT ON WHICH WELL WILL BE LOCATED
A. You must one of the following - see instructions
®
Proposed Subdivi ion: Name Harrington
Lot no. B Block no. riling/Unit
❑ County exemption (attach copy of county approval & survey)
Name/no. Tract no.
O Mining claim (attach copy or deed or survey)
Name/no.
❑ Other (attach legal description to application)
The making of false statements herein constitutes perjury
in the second degree, which is punishable as a Bass 1 mis-
demeanor pursuant to C.R.S. 24-4-104(13)(a). I have read
the statements herein, know the contents thereof and state
that they are true to my knowledge.
OPTIONAL INFORMATION
Date
3// r ?,(-3
USGS map name
DWR map no. 1 Surface elev.
B. STATE PARCEL
ID# lcptionap:
• C. a acres in tract D. Are you the owner of this property?
4.1 AYES 0 NO (if no - see instructions/
E. Will this be the only well on this tract?
1YES 0 NO (if other wells are on this tract- see instructions)
Office Use Only
DIV
CO
WD
BA
USE MD
Form GWS -44 (11/95)
1
:1.,ORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
1313 SHERMAN ST., RM. 818, DENVER CO 80203
phone - info: (303) 866-3587 main: (303) 866-3581
RESIDENTIAL (Note- You may ,
evjew instructions rior to COrr ' Ain form
SO use
this forth to apply for
1. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Nam of applicant
City
State
Carbondale CO 81623
2. TYPE OF APPLICATION
Za Construct new well
❑ Replace existing well
❑ Change (source) aquifer
❑ Other:
925-7301
(check applicable box(es))
❑ Use existing well
❑ Change / Increase Use
❑ Reapplication(„q,;d pa+nn)
five -stock watering)
Water Well Permit Al
Must be com, feted in black ink�or a' d
6. USE OF WELL (ick appropriate entry or entries)
See instructions to determine use(s) for which you may qualify –❑ A.
Ordinary household use in one single-family dwelling
(ND outside use)
❑ B. Ordinary household use in 1 to 3 single-family
dwellings:
Number of dwellings: One
ri Home garden/lawn fm
irrigation, not to exceed 1 acre:
area irrigated 5,000
Dom ® sq. ft. 0 acre
Domestic animal watering — (non-commercial)
0 C. Livestock watering (on farm/ranch/range/pasture)
7. WELL DATA
Mazrnrarr pumping rata
15
Annual amount to b. withdrawn
0.7 acre-feet
Well risme or A
Harrington Well C
LOCATION OF WELL 7. 15 Hi•hwa 82
tyCarbondale, Cp Quarter/quarter
Garfield
NW X
Range E or W
87 ❑ El
ft. from ❑ N as 4,545
Quarter
SW Y4
Principal Meridian
6th
ccl Roarin• Fork Alluvium
8. TYPE OF RESIDENTIAL SEWAGE SYSTEM
Q<Septic tank / absorption leach field
❑ Central system
District name:
❑ Vault
Location sewage to be hauled to:
O Other (attach copy of engineering design)
ft_ from E
Same as A••licant
,-or replacement wells only - distance arc direction from old well to new well
feet
5. TRACT ON
A. You must
Propos ec
Subdavision:
Lot no. C
no. rlhng/Unit_
i
County exemption (attach copy of county approval & survey)
Name/no.
0 Mining claim ( Tract no.
attach copy or deed or survey)
Name/no.
I�—
0 Other (attach legal description to application)
B. STATE PARCEL
1D# (optional):
WHICH WELL WILL BE LOCATEDection
one of the following - see instructions
Name H��y i perl nr,
Block
Licensed Colorado Driller
10. SIGNATURE of applicant(s) or authorized agent
The making of false statements herein constitutes perjury
in the second degree, which is punishable as a class 1 mis-
demeanor pursuant to C.R.S. 24-4-104(13)(a). I have read
the statements herein, know the contents thereof and state
that they are true to my knowledge.
creel in tract
OPTIONAL INFORMATION
Office Use Only
D. Arethe ou ...
Y owner of this property;
;YES 0 NO (ifno_
EWili this be the onlysee instructions)
well on this tract?
)YES 0 NO (if other wells are on this tract- see instructions)
DIV
CO
WD
BA
USEM
D
Form GWS -.t 111c'
•
SCHENK, KERST & deWINTER, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SUITE 310, 302 EIGHTH STREET
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601
TELEPHONE: (970) 945-2447
TELECOPIER: (970) 945-2977
JOHN R. SCHENK
DAN KERST
WILLIAM J. deWINTER, III
March 22, 1996
Ms. Terry Harrington
600 E. Main Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Jowell/Basalt Water Conservancy District Contract
Dear Terry:
I attach three Water Allotment Contracts, each of which is for 0.7 acre foot per year of
storage water of the Basalt Water Conservancy District, for Parcels A, B and C which you
propose to establish by subdivision exemption. Due to your decision to apply for three separate
contracts, I am only able to provide you one Contract which bears original signatures on behalf
of the District with respect to each parcel. I am providing two additional copies of each Contract
to which is attached a photocopy of the District's signed Order. The Jowells should sign all three
copies of each Contract and have their signatures notarized. You can then retain the copy with
• the District's original signatures and one photocopy and return one copy with Jowell's original
signatures to me in the envelope provided.
•
As you know, you have paid the $300.00 application fee for one Contract. An additional
$300.00 application fee is required with respect to each of the two additional Contracts which
shall not be deemed effective until the application fees have been received by the District.
You will note that the Order on each Contract contains specific conditions upon which the
Contract Application has been granted. Let me know if you have any questions regarding these
conditions.
You will be receiving a statement of contract charges from the District in the near future.
Let me know if you have any questions regarding the Contracts or the procedure for completing
the same.
DK/pd
Enclosures: Three Water Allotment Contracts
Self-addressed Envelope
Copy of the District's signed Order
xc: Resource Engineering Inc.
Very yours,
II AMC\B W CIYJO W IT1\ I W IRI NOT. L7R
KERST
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
APPLICATION FOR STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT
Issuing authority
application
date
IInstructions:
• - contact the Department of Highways or your local government to determine your issuing authority.
- contact the issuing authority to determine what plans and other documents are required to be submitted with your
application.
- complete this form (some questions may not apply to you) & attach all necessary documents and submit it to the
issuing authority. Submit an application for each access requested.
- if you have any questions contact the issuing authority. Please print or type
1) Pr perty owner (Permittee)
rt 10 v ell s- tIk 1/. � o t�;e 1(
2) Applicant
-lei'rL a/ -ii /�7a ` i/r fry4/p 7ii�
street addres city,
7c? Gly A.rho/24/e
street ddress, city,
/'7 O5 flly4w/ F2- �ar%ti?4/,,,
state & zip
Clara di. F/113 _
Phone #
41/3 -03&V
state & zip Phone #
C ancary//e_ Co P4,23 (916963 2941
3) Address of property to be served by permit (if known)
4) Legal description
co my
�atfe"�
of property:
subdivision block lot section township range
144ile_ I. 1 7.r 6 i 3 1 7 So'M 1 West"
e
5) What state highway are you requesting access from?
07 /QA kiA7 g /-;-.Q /1 /a q e_ is ) az
rile
s97
6) What side of the highway?
ON XS OE OW
7) How nany feetproposed access from tb4 nearest mile post cr cross street? C a ,i L/
cerci /�� /TLUc/ �2 fi^ontnfe': y5,,,�,h
!O J 5:57
feet (N S�W ) from Mlle,
mocker l r Gt/e4 f'%jetin d g2-venta L
. ge_ nt 4
Check here if
8) you are requesting a ✓ .3S
0 new access 0 temporary access 0 improvement to existing access g change in access use
9) What is the approximate date yo intend to begin construction?
�D ('?/9 L?/- j/ ./s -7`//-77e-•
10) Do you have knowledge of any State Highway access permits serving this property, of for adjacent properties in which you have a property interest.
eyes ', no If "yes°' - what are the permit number(s)? and/or, date
permit
Does the property owner own or have any interests in any adjacent property?
0 yes g- no If "yes" - please describe:
12)
Are there existing or dedicated public streets, roads. highways or access easements bordering or within the property?
yes 0 no If "yes" - list them on your plans and indicate the proposed and existing access points.
13) If you are requesting commercial or industrial access please indicate the types and number of businesses and provide the floor area square
footage of each?
business square footage business square footage
I
I
14) If you are requesting agricultural field access
-
how many acres will the access serve?
15) If you are requesting residential development access, -
type number
what is the type (single family, apartment, townhouse) and number of units?
of units type number
of units
7
,1i11 /� j--Q:1%►j/I t� exist) csv
-2-,,/o/z
1/67-7.4./ 1
l
1
16) Provide the following vehicle count estimates for vehicles that will use the access. Leaving property then returning is two counts. Indicate
your counts are peak hour volumes 0 or average daily volumes — / Z '–
#
if
of passengers cars and light trucks
-s_
# of multi unit trucks
# of other vehicles
of single unit vehicles in excess of 30 ft
# of farm vehicles (field equipment)
Total Count of All Vehicles
17) Check with the issuing authority to determine which of the following documents are required to complete the review of your application.
(plans should be no larger than 24" x 36")
a)Highway and drivewaye) Property map indicating other access, bordering roads and streets.
9 Y plan and profile. 1) Proposed access design,
b) Drainage plan showing impact to the highway right-of-way. g) Parcel and ownership maps including easements.
c) Map and letters detailing utility locations before and after h) Signing and striping plans.
devetopment in and 'along the right-of-way. Trgff r control plan
d) Subdivision, zoning, or development plan. j) Proof of liability insurance
If o
an access permit is issuedt� yo it will state the terms and conditions for its use. Any changes in the use of the
permitted access not consistent with the terms and conditions listed on the permit may be considered a violation of
the permit.
!I THE APPLICANT DECLARES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN THE SECOND DEGREE, AND ANY OTHER
APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, THAT ALL INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS FORM AND
SUBMITTED ATTACHMENTS ARE TO THF REST nl= T-4PIR VMntnn Gnrc Toy A Alm est-,...-.. e- ••_�
'plicant signature
)i/A, •/?i/27/-,//4 "7L)
If the apWcant is not the owner of the propert we require this application also to be signed by the property owner or
their legally authorized representative (or other acceptable written evidence). This signature shall constitute
agreement with this application by all owners -of -interest unless stated in writing. If a permit is authorized, the
property owner will be listed as the permittee.
Date
l90
Property owner signature
Y 1 �i�2it.i
Previous editions trey be used until $ugptles er•+�hau wte f
•
d //
?4cces.
i
N
/\A''
M M 11
Zir
n fik )1b
(
j•
CD O m N
C++ • -s cn
O
--b
•
•
•
Terry and Matt Harrington
79 Ute, Carbondale, CO 81623
(970) 963-2447 or (970) 925-7301
March 20, 1996
Colorado Division of Water Resources
Department of Natural Resources
1313 Sherman Street, Room 818
Denver, CO 80203
To whom it may concern,
We are purchasing the property at 17605 Highway 82, Carbondale, CO. With the owners
permission we are in the approval process of dividing this 9 plus acre parcel into 3 single
family home sites through the Garfield County Exemption process. We have made
application to Garfield County and our review hearing is scheduled for April 1, 1996 for
preliminary approval. See attached "Petition for Exemption" and "Proposed lot split
diagram."
An existing home on the property is served by an existing well. We propose to dig two
additional wells to provide household water for the newly created parcels. Each well will
be augmented by a contract with Basalt Water Conservancy District in the amount of 0.7
acre feet per year which provides an adequate legal water supply for a single family home
each with 5,000 square foot of lawn and garden irrigation (see attached). We are
requesting that the State of Colorado grant permits for two additional wells allowing 15
gallons per minute each, and legally permit the existing well for its historical use in the
same amount.
There is evidence of adequate physical water supply as provided by the attached letter
from Paul Bussone of Resource Engineering.
If you have any questions feel free to call us at 963-2447 or Paul Bussone at 945-6777.
Thank you for your consideration. We look forward to your reply.
Sincerely,
T
rry ang Matt Harrington
cc: Paul Bussone
Fax: 945-1137
•
•
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Region 3
STATE OF COLORADO
222 South Sixth St., Room 317
Grand Junction, CO 81501-2769
(303) 248-7208 Fax No. (303) 248-7254
STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT INFORMATION AND BILLING
To: Permittee: Arthur F. Jowell
Address: 17605 Hwy 82
Carbaondale, CO 81623
Date: March 21, 1996
Permittee: Please review both sides of the attached State Highway
Access Permit (form #101) and all attachments.
NOTE: IF YOU FAIL TO SIGN AND RETURN THE ATTACHED ACCESS PERMIT
WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS LETTER, THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION WILL CONSIDER THE PERMIT VOID.
If you choose not to act on the permit:
- return the permit unsigned.
If you wish to appeal the terms and conditions of the permit:
- refer to the back of the Access Permit for an explanation of
appeal procedures.
If you accept the permit, please:
- sign the Access Permit on the line marked "PERMITTEE". Your
signature confirms your agreement to all listed terms and
conditions.
- provide a check or money order made out to the jurisdiction
named on the next line for the amount due.
CDOT $ 50.00
Make check or money order payable to Amount due
- return all copies and attachments of the Access Permit along
with your payment back to the Colorado Department of
Transportation at the address noted below.
The Department of Transportation will process and return to you a
validated (signed and recorded) copy of your Access Permit.
DO NOT BEGIN ANY WORK WITHIN THE STATE RIGHT OF WAY WITHOUT A
VALIDATED ACCESS PERMIT. USE OF THIS PERMIT WITHOUT TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT VALIDATION SHALL BE CONSIDERED A VIOLATION OF STATE LAW.
If you have any questions, please call: Charles I. Dunn
Phone: 970-248-7234
Return Access Permit to: Colorado Department of Transportation
222 South 6th Street, Room 317
Grand Junction, CO 81501-2769
The transmittal to you of the Access Permit form for your approval
constitutes final action by the Colorado Department of Trans-
portation pursuant to section 43-2-147 C.R.S., as amended.
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT
SH No/MP/Side: azx/ov.aao/xicxz
Local Jurisdiction: Garfield
Dist/Section/Patrol: 03/32/16
DOT Permit No.: 396044
Permit Fee: 50.00
Date of Transmittal: 03/21/96
E PERMITTEE;
Arthur F. Jowell
17605 Hwy 82
Carbaondale, CO 81623
APPLICANT:
Terry & Matt Harrington
79 Ute
Carbondale, CO 81623
Arthur F. Jowell - (970) 963-0364 Terry & Matt Harrington - (970)
is hereby granted permission to construct and use an access to the state highway at the location noted below.
The access shall be constructed, maintained and used in accordance with the terms and conditions of this permit,
including the State Highway,Access Code and listed attachments. Tht(s permit may be revoked by the issuing
authority if at any time the permitted access and its use violate any of the terms and conditions of this permit. The use
of advance warning and construction signs, flashers, barricades and flaggers are required at all times during access
construction within State right-of-way in conformance with the MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL
DEVICES, Part VI. The issuing authority, the Department and their duly appointed agents and employees shall be held
harmless against any action for personal injury or property damage sustained by reason of the exercise of the permit.
LOCATION:
On the south side of State Highway 82 Frontage Road, a distance of 1500
feet east from Mile Post 17; 17605 Hwy 82 Frontage.
ACCESS TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO:
PERCENT
Single -Family Detached Housing (4 Each) 100.00 °s
OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
SEE ATTACHED SHEET(S) FOR TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1
MUNICIPALITY OR COUNTY APPROVAL
Required only when the appropriate local authority retains issuing authority.
By (X) Date Title
Upon the signing of this permit the permittee agrees to the terms and conditions and referenced attachments contained
herein. All construction shall be completed in an expeditious and safe manner and shall be finished within 45 days from
initiation. The permitted access shall be completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the permit prior to
being used. The permittee shall notify Mike Moore
with the Colorado Department of Transportation In Basal t at 970-927-3137
at least 48 hours prior to commencing construction within the State Highway right-of-way.
The person signing as the permittee must be the owner or legal representative of the property served by the permitted
access and have full authority to accept the permit and all it's terms and conditions.
Permittee (X) Date
This permit is not valid until signed by a duly authorized representative of the Department.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION , STATE OF COLORADO
By (X) Date Title Access Cnnrdi nat-nr
(Date of issue)
COPY DISTRIBUTION:
Required; Make copies as necessary for; Previous Editions are Obsolete and will not be use
1. District (Original) Local Authority Inspector CDOT Form #10
2. Applicant MTCE Patrol Traffic Engineer 7/9
3. Staff ROW
1our,i) TO: Arthur F. Jowell
Jnzh1 2
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Access
is permitted as constructed.
2. This permitted access
in the Application is only for the use and purpose state(
A and Pe
3 It is the res
livestock resfroponsbility of the Pe
this accesskentering the State Permittee rtight-of-way
prevent all
this location. Any livestockthat
docent rt at
highway shall be the that does enter the
sole responsibility of the
4 drainage raina
Nodrge from this site shall
Highway travel lanes, enter onto the
detain all drainageThe Permittee ma State
y in excess of historical be required to
flows on site.
WATER, SEWAGE &
ACCESS
Proposal for Legal and Adequate Physical Water Supply
Proposal for Adequate Method of Sewage Disposal
Copy of Collins Drilling Well Test Results
Letter from Paul Bussone regarding water
Copy of Application for Basalt Conservancy Water District
to Augment Water
Copy of Application to the State for Well Permits
Copy of State Water Rights Case #W-1256
Letter from Gamba and Associates regarding septic placement
and land use
Copy of Application for Legal Access
2/96 * Jowell Exemption Proposal * Terry and Matt Harrington * (970) 963-2447
• PROOF OF LEGAL AND ADEQUATE
PHYSICAL WATER SUPPLY
•
•
PROPOSAL: To service the proposed newly created parcels with
household water we are proposing to dig 2 additional wells. All
three wells will be augmented by a contract with Basalt Water
Conservancy District in the amount of 2.1 acre feet per year which
provides an adequate legal water supply for 3 single family homes
each with 5,000 square foot of lawn and garden irrigation. The
well will be permitted by the State of Colorado for 15 gallons per
minute each.
Evidence of adequate physical water supply is provided by the
attached letters from Collins Drilling and Resource Engineering.
2/96 * Jowell Exemption Proposal * Terry and Matt Harrington * (970) 963-2447
•
•
•
METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL
PROPOSAL: We are proposing a separate and private septic and
leach field for each of the two additional lots located as far away
from the flood plain line as possible.
See topographical map and letter from Nathan Bell of Jerome
Gamba and Associates, surveyors and engineers.
2/96 * Jowell Exemption Proposal * Terry and Matt Harrington * (970) 963-2447
•
L.\ c
c
nede,„,,, ea.
1'houuc 96:3.2012 Pham 945.4079
1'.O. 11nx 0516
I:nrhnnthilo, (:eilurvulu 11162,t
:4;4_ .p c-
� J t
1
•
fe,
„-,_
44
eC
� c> C_5,id I ?C
(-' t1
--1 ,-L-le.ef/ /
C.• F`�/� n3 r'//1.11
•
•
•
FROM : COLL I N DRILLING `< PUMP
F .HJr .E NO. . '970 9,^F 401 q -
�1 rI,_.1-�. 1019R1; C'� 51AM P1
COLLINS DRILLING INC.
PO Box 0516
Carbondale, Colorado 81623
963-2812 • 945-4070
2 x/7..-121)
7/A--17eZ: .5. -Wer
1/G1
4/./le_.,"1"2/1':('"/ c -V/5 , -v
)-2:4:1
■ aaa■
aaaa■.
■ aaa■
aaaaa
■��■ E N G 1 N
Matt and Terry Harrington
79 Ute
Carbondale CO 81623
•
•
RE: Jowell Property Water Supply
Dear Matt and Terry:
Resource Engineering, Inc. has, at your request, investigated the potential for providing a water
supply for three single family homes on a 9.1 acre tract of land in Garfield County. The property
is currently owned by Arthur and Elke Jowell and is located in the NW1/4 SW'/4, Section 33,
Township 7 South, Range 87 West, 6th P.M.
The Jowell residence exists on the property and is served by the Nettles well which is a decreed
water right (Case No. W-1256). The well is 44 feet deep and the static water level before pumping
was 12'0". The well was recently pump tested by Collins Drilling, Co. at a pumping rate was 15
gpm for a duration of 4 hours. A total drawdown of only 5 inches was observed which stabilized
after one minute of pumping. Recovery occurred immediately upon completion of pumping
according to the Collins data. The total amount pumped was 3,600 gallons which is equivalent
to at least 3 days of water demand during the summer irrigation season and 10 days supply during
the winter.
Based upon the above information and our experience with other alluvial wells in this area,
including some with much greater pumping rates and total demand, we believe that the Nettles well
will continue to provide an adequate water supply for the single family home.
Similarly, we believe that two more wells of equal capacity and yield can be developed on this 9.1
acre property sufficient to serve two additional single family homes each with up to 5,000 square
feet of lawn and garden irrigation. Well permit applications have been submitted to the Colorado
Division of Water Resources for three wells on the property, each for one single family home. The
wells are supported by an approved water service contract with the Basalt Water Conservancy
District in the amount of 2.1 acre feet and 45 gpm (0.7 acre feet and 15 gpm each). We expect
the State Engineer's office (SEO) to issue well permits within 60 days. In accordance with the SEO
memorandum dated March 20, 1992; Subject Implementation of House Bill 92-1008; 600 foot
waivers are not required for these wells.
In summary it is our opinion that both a legal and physical water supply can be developed on the
Jowell property for the three proposed single family homes.
Sincerely,
E ENGINEERING, INC.
S. B; ssone, P.E.
Water Resources Engineer
PSB/mmm
593-1.0 thwatsup.593
Enclosures
Consulting Engineers and Hydrologists
909 Colorado Avenue ® Glenwood Springs, CO 81 601 N (970) 945-6777 N Fax (970) 945-1137
APPLICATION FOR WATER ALLOTMENT CONTRACT
BASALT WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT
1. Applicant's Name(s):
Arthur F. and Elke H. Jowell
Address:' 17605 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
Telephone Number: (970) 963-0364 or (970) 925-7301
2. Type of land use (development) proposed for water allotment contract: (i.e. single
family home, subdivision, gravel pit, etc.)
3 Single family homes
3. Legal description of property on which District's water rights and/or Ruedi Reservoir
contract water shall be used; Quarter Quarter, Section, Township, Range (attach
map)*:
Lots 7 and 8 in Section 33, T7S, 287W, 6th P.M.
4. Elevation zone of property X 6-7,000 ft. 7-8,000 ft. 8-9,000 ft.
• 5. Name and legal description of water supply diversion point(s); include Quarter Quarter,
Section, Township, Range, bearing and distance from nearby Section corner. (Identify
if well, spring, pipeline, etc.) If diversion point is a well, please provide the State Permit
No. N/A
•
An existing unpermitted decreed well.
Case Number W-1256
6. Has Applicant applied with the Water Court for water rights, change of water rights
and/or a water right plan for augmentation? x yes no; If yes, what is the
Water Court Case No, t•.-1256
7. Proposed waste water treatment system: (please check)
Tap to central waste water treatment facility
X Septic tank/leachfield system
Evapotranspiration system
Other:
8. Proposed use of water: (please check)
Domestic/Municipal (single family home(s),duplex(s),condominium(s),
mobile home(s), apartment, hotel). Please complete page two of this
application.
Commercial (office, warehouse, restaurant, bar, retail). Please complete
page three of this application.
Industrial (gravel pit, manufacturing). Please complete page three of this
application.
Agricultural (crop irrigation, stock watering). Please complete page four
of this application.
Date on which the county or other applicable governmental entities approved the land use for
which you seek legal water servicepending*subd.11NetePeopf'6ft` fig' ution or other
documentation evidencing such approval should be submitted with application.
Pending Subdivision Exemption.
The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the District's form Water Allotment contract and
agrees that this Application is made pursuant to the term and conditions thereof,
Dare
Basalt Water Conservancy District
Water Allotment Application
Page Two
Please complete this page if you checked domestic/municipal use on Page 1, No. 8.
DOMESTIC/MUNICIPAL WATER USES
In -House
Single-family residential home(s), Number of units: -3-
Duplex(s) Number of units:
Condominium(s) Number of units:
Hotel/Apartment Number of units (rooms):
Mobile Home(s) Number of units:
Irrigation (lawns, parks, open space)
Total area to be irrigated 15,000 sq. ft. or acres
Type of irrigation system: (please check)
Sprinkler
• Flood (irrigation ditch)
•
•
Domestic stock watering (cattle, horses)
Number of animals:
-C-
Period of use (months):
Other domestic/municipal uses not listed:
•
•
•
This page will be replaced with a
LETTER FROM
GAMBA AND ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS
addressing the following:
This is a logical way to divide the property.
The method of sewage disposal.
Adequate septic system and position of placement.
Any necessary drainage, irrigation, and/or utility easements.
State and Local Environmental and Safety Hazards
2/96 * Jowell Exemption Proposal * Terry and Matt Harrington * (970) 963-2447
i um
COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
1313 SHERMAN ST., RM. 818, DENVER CO 80203
phone - info: (303) 866-3587 main: (303)866-3581
tENERAL PURPOSE
lurlease note: other forms are available for specific uses including • residen
Review instructions prior to completing form
1. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name of applicant
Arthur F. & Elke H. Jowell
Mailing Address
17605 Highway 82
cay
Carbondale
Zo Coot
81623
Tale>,riona rxmba rrrtcJuda ares todt)
(970) 963-0364 or 970 925-7301
2. TYPE OF APPLICATION (check applicable box(es))
O Construct new well
❑ Replace existing well
❑ Change (source) Aquifer
O Other:
Water court case 8
W-1256
Well name or 8
C:1 Use existing well
f7 Change or Increase Use
❑ Reapplication )expired perm,t)
Permit 8
Unpermitted
Monrtoring hole acknowledgment 8
MH -
Water Well Permit Application
tial, livestock, monitoring/observe, gravel pits, registration of old wets)
Must be completed in black ink or typed
6. USE OF WELL (please attach detailed descnptioo)
0 INDUSTRIAL Q OTHER: Domestic use,
O COMMERCIAL 3 single family
0 MUNICIPAL dwellings with
O IRRIGATION irrigation
0 FEED LOT — number of head :
7. WELL DATA
Marna,* Pu+npinp rota
15+ gpm
44 feet
Aciuter
Roaring Fork Allu
. LAND ON WHICH GROUND WATER WILL BE USED
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (may be provided as an attachment):
same as #5, see attached for
metes and bounds description
Ilf used for crop
rngatwn. attach scaled map that shows irrigated area.)
C. Owner
Applicant
D. Lett any other welt or wtter right- used on this land:
0.25 cfs Patterson & Cummings Ditch
Nettles
4. LOCATION OF WELL
Courcy
Garfield
Townstap N or S
7 O E3
Quarter/quarter
NW
Range E or W
87 p
Distance of well from secoon fines
1853 ttfrom DN®S 4571
Web loeamn address, if dfforem horn apPYoant odcyua Gf apoficaolet
Same as Applicant
Quarter
cl, agent
10. SIGNATURE of applicant(s) or authorized
The making of false statements herein constitutes perjury
in the second degree, which is punishable as a class 1 mis-
demeanor pursuarrt to C.R.S. 244-104(13)(a). I have read
the statemerrts herein, know the contents thereof, and state
that they are true to my knowledge.
For tilr>•rit walla oNy . durum* and drecoon horn sad weal
to new *ea
feet
5. TRACT ON WHICH WELL WILL BE LOCATED direction
(A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (may be provided as an attachment;:
Lots 7 & 8, Section 33, T7S, R87w
.6th P.M. (see attached)
B. STATE PARCEL
D# (optioned).
in tract D. O
9.1
Applicants
E. Will this be the only well on this tr11rt?
Z YES C NO (if otner wells are on this tract, see in
stroct:ons)
OPTIONAL INFORMATION
Office Use Only
DIV
CO
WD
BA
USE(S) MD
''`VS.45 (17,/9z.
.,
•
IN Tif;', DT:;TRICT COURT IN AND FOR
WATER DJ VI CTGN NO. 5
STATE 0P COLORADO
IN THE MATTER OF THE
APPLICATION FOR
WATT';ii RIGi1TS OF
PAUL 0. NETTLES
IN Till. ROARING FORK
RIVER OR ITS TRIBUTARIES
TRIBUTARY INVOLVED:
IN GARFI ELD COUNTY
CASE NO. w- 1256
•Y_,___,•...__ V.v._# aMN.n\ vim.. nHn...
r PiTE OF C-
-4214¢). - •, ;
RULING OI'' THEREFEREE'
AB SOLUTE DECREE FOR
UNDER GROUND WATER RIG1iT3
And the Referee having made the investigations required
by Article 21 of Chapter 148, C.R.S. 1963, as amended does hereby
make the following ruling, to wit:
This application was referred to the Water Referee of
Water Division No. 5 on the 12th day of July ,
1. Name of Applicant Paul 0. Nettles
Address Route 1, Box 112-D
Carbondale, Colorado
2. The name of the structure is Nettles Well.
3. The Legal description of the structure is: The well is located
in Lot 7, Section 33, T. 7 S., R. 87 W. of the 6th P.M.
at a point whence the Southeast Corner of said Section 33
bears S. 67056, E. 4932.03 feet,
4. The depth of the well is 44 feet.
5. The date of initiation of appropriation is October 7, 1963..
6. The amount of water claimed is 0.033 cubic foot per
s7. The use of the water is domestic�c,ond of time.
8. The State Engineer's er number is none.
g
9. The Priority date is October 7, 1963.
10. The date of the application was June 30, 1972.
It is the ruling of the Referee that the statement3.in the
application are true and that the above described water right is
approved and granted the indicated priority; subject, however, to
all earlier priority rights of others.
It is accordingly ordered that this, ruling shall become
effective upon filing with the water Clerk, subject to Judicial review
as provided by law.
Done rit the: City of Glenwood Springs, Colorado this;
day of , 197
10 protcot vas filed in thin r t.'tc;•
Th.) foregoing ruli,r, is confirr.,od
a:, approved, and is made the
Juu,sment and Decree of this court.
Datod: QQ
____ /71 /f23
Water Judgo
eit<'r R<,: 'rc'o
writ�ir Divi.:;ion No. 5
`i t:r tl' Of Color:ldcl
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGI YS
APPLICATION FOR STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT
Issuing authority
application acceptance
date
Instructions:
-contact the Department of Highways or your local government to determine your issuing authority.
ircontact the issuing authotity to determine what plans and other documents are required to be submitted with your
application.
- complete this form (some questions may not apply to you) & attach all necessary documents and submit it to the
issuing authority. Submit an application for each access requested.
if you have any questions contact the issuing authority. Please print or type
1) Property owner (Permittee)
Arl-kur F.. Jowell Jowell
2) Applicant
40:4 of F. Jocva. lI i` Ak. e If Ja we- Il
street address, city,
17&05 flh
state & zip
�nlnfvi,/n /t 7.2
0'
street address, qity, .
(7b 0.5 Il y 4-t gz-
s173e & zip
It t3
t in r
Phone a
a-7 rl (7L.2 /t -7o
This page will be replaced with a
Phone a
A.-, .. ,) / .s
SHARED WELL AGREEMENT
2/96 * Jowell Exemption Proposal * Terry and Matt Harrington * (970) 963-2447
LETTERS
Fire Protection plan approval from Fire district
Schmueser, Gordon, and Meyer; Surveyors and Engineers
discussing:
Logistics of lot line placement
Method of sewage disposal
Adequate septic system and placement
Any necessary drainage, irrigation, and/or utility easements
Letter addressing state and local environmental health and
safety requirements.
2/96 * Jowell Exemption Proposal * Terry and Matt Harrington * (970) 963-2447
•
02/29/96
13:19 1 ARBO`IL'HLE FIRE DISTRICT y 3E13 963 34- H0,799 ;-99 PO2
Carbondale & Rural Fire Protection District
300 Meadowood Drive
Carbondale, Colorado 81623
Phone (970) 963.2491
FAX (970) 963.0569
February 29, 1996
Mark Bean
Garfield County Planning Department
109 8th Street
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: Jowell Subdivision Exemption 17605 highway 82,
Dear Mark,
1 would like to offer me following comments regarding lire protection for the Jowell property located
at 17605 Hwy 82,
• Access to the property off Old Highway 82 appears to be adequate. Any new driveways should be
according to Garfield County Road Standards to insure adequate access fdr emergency vehicles on
a year round basis.
•
Water for fire protection. would be supplied with water carried on the fire apparatus, which is
approximately 7000 gallons.
Response time to the property for both lire and medical emergeroies is approximately 10-15 minutes
with first response coming from the Station No, 1 located in Carbondale.
The District will require the payment of development impact fees in the amount of S. ;5.00 per lot,
for a total of $470.00 as approved by the Cra.rfield County Commissioners. This payment is due prior
to the recording of the final plat.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
it!
Bill Gavette
Fire Marshal
•
•
This page will be replaced with a
LETTER FROM LOUIS MEYER
of
SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER
CIVIL ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS
addressing the following:
This is a logical way to divide the property.
The method of sewage disposal.
Adequate septic system and position of placement.
Any necessary drainage, irrigation, and/or utility easements.
2/96 * Jowell Exemption Proposal * Terry and Matt Harrington * (970) 963-2447
•
•
•
This page will be replaced with a
LETTER ADDRESSING
STATE AND LOCAL
ENVIRONMENTAL
HEALTH AND SAFETY
REQUIREMENTS
2/96 * Jowell Exemption Proposal * Terry and Matt Harrington * (970) 963-2447
•Cl ondale & Rural Fire Protection District
300 Meadowood Dr.
Carbondale, Colorado 81623
Phone (970) 963-2491
FAX (970) 963-0569
December 5, 1995
Arthur F. & Elke H. Jowell
17605 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
RE: Subdivision Exemption for property at 17605 Highway 82
The property at 17605 Highway 82 is served by Carbondale & Rural Fire Protection District.
Response time to the area is approximately 10-15 minutes with first response coming from Station
No.1 in Carbondale.
Water supply for fire protection to the property is currently limited to water carried on fire
apparatus (approximately 5,000 gallons).
If you have any questions feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
ill Gavette, Fire Marshal
J.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
• •
SANITARY FACILITIES
Jowell
PAGE 1 OF 3
12/8/95
(The information in this report indicates the dominant soil condition but does not eliminate the need for onsite
investigation)
Map symbol
and soil name
Septic tank
absorption
fields
13: 1 ,
1
Atencio ;Severe: 'Severe:
poor filter ; seepage
1
Sewage lagoon ; Trench
areas ; sanitary
landfill
1 ,
;Slight
Severe: ;Severe:
seepage ; seepage
1
Azeltine ;Severe:
poor filter
1
92:
Redrob ;Severe:
wetness,
poor filter
Area
sanitary
landfill
Daily cover
for landfill
Severe:
too sandy
;Severe:
seepage,
too sandy
Severe:
seepage,
wetness,
too sandy
Severe:
flooding,
seepage,
wetness
Severe:
seepage,
wetness
42:
Fluvaquents ;Severe: Severe:
flooding, seepage,
wetness, flooding,
poor filter wetness
54:
Grotte ;Severe: Severe:
percs slowly, ; slope
slope
1
1
Poor:
seepage.
too sandy,
small stones
Poor:
seepage,
too sandy,
small stones
Severe: Poor:
seepage, ; seepage,
wetness too sandy,
small stones
;Severe:
flooding,
seepage,
wetness
1
Severe: ;Severe:
slope ; slope
Poor:
seepage,
too sandy,
small stones
Poor:
small stones,
slope
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
SANITARY FACILITIES
Endnote -- SANITARY FACILITIES
•
PAGE 2 OF 3
12/8/95
This report shows the degree and kind of soil limitations that affect septic tank absorption fields, sewage lagoons,
and sanitary landfills. The limitations are considered "Slight" if soil properties and site features generally are
favorable for the indicated use and limitations are minor and easily overcome; "Moderate" if soil properties or site
features are not favorable for the indicated use and special planning, design, or maintenance is needed to overcome or
minimize the limitations; and "Severe" if soil properties or site features are so unfavorable or so difficult to overcome
that special design, significant increases in construction costs, and possibly increased maintenance are required.
This report also shows the suitability of the soils for use as daily cover for landfills. A rating of "Good" indicates
that soil properties and site features are favorable for the use and good performance and low maintenance can be
expected; "Fair" indicates that soil properties and site features are moderately favorable for the use and one or
more soil properties or site features make the soil less desirable than the soils rated "Good"; and "Poor" indicates
that one or more soil properties or site features are unfavorable for the use and overcoming the unfavorable
properties requires special design, extra maintenance, or costly alteration.
SEPTIC TANK ABSORPTION FIELDS are areas in which effluent from a septic tank is distributed into the soil through
subsurface tiles or perforated pipe. Only that part of the soil between depths of 24 to 72 inches is evaluated. The
ratings are base on soil properties, site features, and observed performance of the soils. Permeability, a high
water table, depth to bedrock or to a cemented pan, and flooding affect absorption of the effluent. Large stones
and bedrock or a cemented pan interfere with installation. Unsatisfactory performance of septic tank absorption fields,
including excessively slow absorption of effluent, surfacing of effluent, and hillside seepage, can affect public health.
Groundwater can be polluted if highly permeable sand and gravel or fractured bedrock is less than 4 feet below the
base of the absorption field, if slope is excessive, or if the water table is near the surface. There must be
unsaturated soil material beneath the absorption field to filter the effluent effectively. Many local ordinances
require that this material be of a certain thickness.
SEWAGE LAGOONS are shallow ponds constructed to hold sewage while aerobic bacteria decompose the solid and liquid
wastes. Lagoons should have a nearly level floor surrounded by cut slopes or embankments of compacted soil. Lagoons
generally are designed to hold the sewage within a depth of 2 to 5 feet. Nearly impervious soil material for the lagoon
floor and sides is required to minimize seepage and contamination of ground water. This report gives ratings for
the natural soil that makes up the lagoon floor. The surface layer and, generally, 1 or 2 feet of soil material
below the surface layer are excavated to provide material for the embankments. The ratings are based on soil
properties, site features, and observed performance of the soils. Considered in the ratings are slope, permeability, a
high water table, depth to bedrock or to a cemented pan, flooding, large stones, and content of organic matter.
Excessive seepage due to rapid permeability of the soil or a water table that is high enough to raise the level of sewage
in the lagoon causes a lagoon to function unsatisfactorily. Pollution results if seepage is excessive or if floodwater
overtops the lagoon. A high content of organic matter is detrimental to proper functioning of the lagoon because it
inhibits aerobic activity. Slope, bedrock, and cemented pans can cause construction problems, and large stones can
hinder compaction of the lagoon floor.
SANITARY LANDFILLS are areas where solid waste is disposed of by burying it in soil. There are two types of landfill,
trench and area. In a trench landfill, the waste is placed in a trench. It is spread, compacted, and covered daily
with a thin layer of soil excavated at the site. In an area landfill, the waste is placed in successive layers on the
surface of the soil. The waste is spread, compacted, and covered daily with a thin layer of soil form a source away
from the site. Both types of landfill must be able to bear heavy vehicular traffic. Both types involve a risk of
groundwater pollution. Ease of excavation and revegetation need to be considered. The ratings in this report are based
•
•
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
s •
SANITARY FACILITIES
Endnote -- SANITARY FACILITIES --Continued
PAGE 3 OF 3
12/8/95
on soil properties, site features, and observed performance of the soils. Permeability, depth to bedrock or to a
cemented pan, a high water table, slope, and flooding affect both types of landfill. Texture, stones and boulders,
highly organic layers, soil reaction, and content of salts and sodium affect trench type landfills. Unless otherwise
stated, the ratings apply only to that part of the soil within a depth of about 6 feet. For deeper trenches, a
limitation rate "Slight" or "Moderate" may not be valid. Onsite investigation is needed.
DAILY COVER FOR LANDFILL is the soil material that is used to cover compacted solid waste in an area type sanitary
landfill. The soil material is obtained offsite, transported to the landfill, and spread over the waste.
Soil texture, wetness, coarse fragments, and slope affect the ease of removing and spreading the material during wet
and dry periods. Loamy or silty soils that are free of large stones or excess gravel are the best cover for a
landfill. Clayey soils may be sticky or cloddy and are difficult to spread; sandy soils are subject to soil
blowing. After soil material has been removed, the soil material remaining in the borrow area must be thick enough
over bedrock, a cemented pan, or the water table to permit revegetation. The soil material used as final cover for a
landfill should be suitable for plants. The surface layer generally has the best workability, more organic matter than
the rest of the profile, and the best potential for plants. Material from the surface layer should be stockpiled for use
as the final cover.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 1 OF 2
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE 12/8/95
SOIL FEATURES
Jowell
Bedrock Cemented pan ; Subsidence ; Risk of corrosion
_; Potential
Map symbol ; ;frost action; Uncoated ; ~y
and soil name Depth ;Hardness; Depth Kind ;Initial; Total ; steel Concrete
In In In
In
13:
Atencio >60
Azeltine >60
92:
Redrob ' >60
42:
Fluvaquents >60 ---
I
54:
Grotte >60
;Low
;Low
;Low
;High
;Low
Moderate
Moderate
High
Low
Low
Low
;High ;Low
1
;High ;Low
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE •PAGE 2 OF 2
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE 12/8/95
SOIL FEATURES
Endnote -- SOIL FEATURES
This report gives estimates of various soil features. The estimates are used in land use planning that involves
engineering considerations.
Depth to bedrock is given if bedrock is within a depth of 5 feet. The depth is based on many soil borings and on
observations during soil mapping. The rock is either "Soft" or "Hard". If the rock is "Soft" or fractured, excavations
can be made with trenching machines, backhoes, or small rippers. If the rock is "Hard" or massive, blasting or
special equipment generally is needed for excavation.
Cemented pans are cemented or indurated subsurface layers within a depth of 5 feet. Such pans cause difficulty in
excavation. Pans are classified as "Thin" or "Thick". A "Thin" pan is less than 3 inches thick if continuously
indurated or less than 18 inches thick if discontinuous or fractured. Excavations can be made by trenching machines,
backhoes, or small rippers. A "Thick" pan is more than 3 inches thick if continuously indurated or more than 18
inches thick if discontinuous or fractured. Such a pan is so thick or massive that blasting or special equipment is
needed in excavation.
Subsidence is the settlement of organic soils or of saturated mineral soils of very low density. Subsidence
results from either desiccation and shrinkage or oxidation of organic material, or both, following drainage.
Subsidence takes place gradually, usually over a period of several years. This report shows the expected initial
subsidence, which usually is a result of drainage, and total subsidence, which usually is a result of oxidation. Not
shown in the report is subsidence caused by an imposed surface load or by the withdrawal of ground water throughout
an extensive area as a result of lowering the water table.
Potential frost action is the likelihood of upward or lateral expansion of the soil caused by the formation of
segregated ice lenses (frost heave) and the subsequent collapse of the soil and loss of strength on thawing. Frost
action occurs when moisture moves into the freezing zone of the soil. Temperature, texture, density. permeability.
content of organic matter, and depth to the water table are the most important factors considered in evaluating the
potential for frost action. It is assumed that the soil is not insulated by vegetation or snow and is not artificially
drained. Silty and highly structured clayey soils that have a high water table in winter are the most susceptible to
frost action. Well drained, very gravelly, or very sandy soils are the least susceptible. Frost heave and low soil
strength during thawing cause damage mainly to pavements and other rigid structures.
Risk of corrosion pertains to potential soil -induced electrochemical or chemical action that dissolves or weakens
uncoated steel or concrete. The rate of corrosion of uncoated steel is related to such factors as soil moisture.
particle -size distribution, acidity, and electrical conductivity of the soil. The rate of corrosion of concrete
is based mainly on the sulfate and sodium content, texture, moisture content, and acidity of the soil. Special
site examination and design may be needed if the combination of factors creates a severe corrosion environment. The steel
installations that intersect soil boundaries or soil layers is more susceptible to corrosion than steel in
installations that are entirely within one kind of soil or within one soil layer. For uncoated steel, the risk of
corrosion, expressed as "Low", "Moderate", or "High", is based on soil drainage class, total acidity, electrical
resistivity near field capacity, and electrical conductivity of the saturation extract.
For concrete, the risk of corrosion is also expressed as "Low", "Moderate", or "High". It is based on soil texture.
acidity, and amount of sulfates in the saturation extract.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PAGE 1 OF 2
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE 12/8/95
BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT
Jowell
(The information in this report indicaihe dominant soil condition but does not elite the need for onsite
investigation)
Map symbol Shallow
and soil name excavations
13:
Atencio
Azeltine
92:
Redrob
42:
Fluvaquents
54:
Grotte
1 411 1 1
I I
Dwellings , Dwellings Small
without 1 with ; commercial
basements
basements , buildings
t ,
,Severe: ;Slight
cutbanks cave
1
I ,
;Severe: ;Moderate:
cutbanks cave ; large stones
I ,
I '
1
I ,
Severe: :Severe:
cutbanks cave,: flooding
wetness
I ,
I ,
;Severe: :Severe:
cutbanks cave,: flooding,
wetness ; wetness
1 ,
I ,
;Severe: ;Severe:
' slope ; slope
I ,
I ,
;Slight
;Moderate:
slope
Moderate: !Moderate:
large stones ; slope,
large stones
:Severe:
flooding
:Severe:
flooding.
wetness
:Severe:
slope
;Severe:
flooding,
wetness
;Severe:
flooding,
wetness
;Severe:
slope
Local roads ; Lawns and
and streets landscaping
Slight
Moderate:
large stones
;Moderate:
droughty
:Severe:
droughty
Moderate: :Moderate:
wetness, ; wetness.
flooding, ; droughty
large stones
Severe: :Severe:
wetness, ; wetness
flooding,
frost action
1 1
I ,
:Severe: ;Severe:
slope ; slope
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
Endnote -- BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT
•
BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT
•
PAGE 2 OF 2
12/8/95
This report shows the degree and kind of soil limitations that affect shallow excavations, dwellings with and without
basements, small commercial buildings, local roads and streets, and lawns and landscaping. The limitations are
"Slight", "Moderate", or "Severe". The limitations are considered "Slight" if soil properties and site features are
generally favorable for the indicated use and limitaions are minor and easily overcome; "Moderate" if soil properties
or site features are not favorable for the indicated use and special planning, design, or maintenance is needed to
overcome or minimize the limitations; and "Severe" if soil properties or site features are so unfavorable or so
difficult to overcome that special design, significant increases in construction costs, and possibly increased
maintenance are required. Special feasibility studies may be required where the soil limitations are severe.
SHALLOW EXCAVATIONS are trenches or holes dug to a maximum depth of 5 or 6 feet for basements, graves, utility lines,
open ditches, and other purposes. The ratings are based on soil properties, site features, and observed performance of
the soils. The ease of digging, filling, and compacting is affected by the depth to bedrock, a cemented pan, or a very
firm dense layer; stone content; soil texture; and slope. The time of the year that excavations can be made is
affected by the depth to a seasonal high water table and the susceptibility of the soil to flooding. The resistance of
the excavation walls or bands to sloughing or caving is affected by soil texture and the depth to the water table.
DWELLINGS AND SMALL COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS are structures built on shallow foundations on undisturbed soil. The load
limit is the same as that for single-family dwellings no higher than three stories. Ratings are made for small
commercial buildings without basements, for dwellings with basements, and for dwellings without basements. The ratings
are based on soil properties, site features, and observed performance of the soils. A high water table, depth to bedrock
or to a cemented pan, large stones, slope, and flooding affect the ease of excavation and construction. Landscaping
and grading that require cuts and fills of more than 5 or 6 feet are not considered.
LOCAL ROADS AND STREETS have an all-weather surface and carry automobile and light truck traffic all year. They
have a subgrade of cut or fill soil material, a base of gravel. crushed rock, or stabilized soil material, and a
flexible or rigid surface. Cuts and fills are generally properties, site features, and observed performance of the
soils. Depth to bedrock or to a cemented pan, a high water table, flooding, large stones, and slope affect the ease of
excavating and grading. Soil strength (as inferred from the engineering classification of the soil), shrink -swell
potential, frost action potential, and depth to a high water table affect the traffic -supporting capacity.
LAWNS AND LANDSCAPING require soils on which turf and ornamental trees and shrubs can be established and
maintained. The ratings are based on soil properties, site features, and observed performance of the soils. Soil
reaction, a high water table, depth to bedrock or to a cemented pan, the available water capacity in the upper 40
inches, and the content of salts, sodium, and sulfidic materials affect plant growth. Flooding, wetness, slope,
stoniness, and the amount of sand, clay, or organic matter in the surface layer affect trafficability after vegetation
is established.
NONTECHNICAL SOILS DESCRIPTION REPORT
Jowell
Map
Symbol
Soil name and description
13 ; Atencio-Azeltine complex, 3 to 6 percent slopes
This map unit is on alluvial fans and terraces. This
unit is 60 percent Atencio sandy loam and 30 percent
Azeltine gravelly sandy loam.
The Atencio soil is deep and well -drained. It formed
in alluvium derived dominantly rom sandstone and
shale. The surface layer is �y loam 10 inches
thick. The subsoil is sandy clay loam 10 inches thick
1
uvci MAI/Will, u y sanay loam 4 inches thick. The upper 6
inches of the substratum is lly sandy loam. The
lower part to a depth of 60 s is very gravelly
sand. In some areas the su e layer is gravelly or
cobbly. Permeability is moderate to a depth of 30
inches and rapid below this depth. Available water
capacity is low. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches
or more. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of water
erosion is slight to moderate.
The Azeltine soil is deep and well -drained. It formed
in alluvium derived dominantly from sandstone and
shale. Permeability is moderate in upper part, and
rapid below a depth of 16 inches. Available water
capacity is very low. Effective rooting depth is 60
inches or more. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of
water erosion is slight to moderate.
92 ; Redrob loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes
•
•
NONTECHNICAL SOILS DES•ION REPORT •
Jowell
Map
Symbol
Soil name and description
This deep, somewhat poorly -drained soil is on alluvial
valley floors, low terraces, and flood plains. It
formed in mixed alluvium derived dominantly from
sandstone and shale. The surface layer is loam 14
inches thick. The next layer is stratified stony loam
6 inches thick. The underlying material to a depth of
60 inches is stony and very cobbly loamy sand and sand.
Permeability is moderate. Available water capacity is
low. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches for
water -tolerant plants but is limited to depths between
20 and 40 inches for non -water -tolerant plants. Runoff
is slow to medium, and the hazard of water erosion is
slight to high on the steeper slopes. A high water
table is at a depth of 18 to 48 inches year-round.
This soil is subject to brief periods of flooding in
May to July. Ice jams also cause flooding during
prolonged cold periods in winter.
42 ; Fluvaquents, 0 to 10 percent slopes
This broadly defined unit consists of deep, somewhat
poorly drained soils on flood plains and alluvial
valley floors. Fluvaquents are stratified and vary
widely in texture and depth to sands, gravels and
cobbles. The surface layer is loamy sand to fine sandy
loam and silty loam to clay loam. The underlying
layers are generally sandy loam or loam stratified with
sands, gravels, and cobbles. In some areas, gravels
and cobbles are on or near the surface. Permeability
varies from rapid to moderately slow. Available water
capacity above the water table is very low or low.
Rooting depth is 60 inches or more for water tolerant
plants. Runoff is slow to medium. Erosion hazard is
slight to high. The water table fluctuates between
depths of 0.5 and 2 feet, during spring and summer.
These soils are subject to brief, occasional flooding
late in spring and early in summer.
54 , Grotte gravelly loam, 25 to 65 percent slopes
• •
NONTECHNICAL SOILS DE1ION REPORT
Jowel
Map
Symbol
Soil name and description
This deep. well -drained soil is on mountain
side -slopes. It formed in alluvium and colluvium
derived dominantly from sandstone. The surface layer
is gravelly loam 4 inches thick. The next layer is a
gravelly clay loam 3 inches thick. The underlying
material to a depth of 60 inches or more is very
channery clay loam. Permeability is moderately slow.
Available water capacity is moderate. Effective
rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is rapid.
and the hazard of water erosion is very high.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE PAGE 1 OF 3
12/8/95
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
Jowell
(The information in this report indicates the dominant soil condition but does not eliminate the need for onsite
investigation)
Map symbol ; Roadfill
and soil name
13:
Atencio
Good
Probable
Sand
Azeltine ;Fair: :Improbable:
large stones '
small stones
92:
Redrob ;Fair: :Probable
large stones,
wetness
I '
I '
I i
42:
Fluvaquents ;Poor: ;Probable
wetness
I '
I '
' I
' I
54:
Grotte 'Poor: ;Improbable:
slope ; excess fines
I ,
, ; I
Gravel Topsoil
I I
' I
I I
I '
;Probable ;Poor:
small stones,
area reclaim
I I
I I
;Probable ;Poor:
I
I too sandy,
I
, small stones,
area reclaim
' I
;Probable ;Poor:
I
I too sandy.
I .
small stones,
area reclaim
I I
I I
I i
;Probable ;Poor:
too sandy,
I small stones,
,
I area reclaim
;Improbable:
excess fines
:Poor:
small stones.
area reclaim,
slope
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
Endnote -- CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
•
PAGE 2 OF 3
12/8/95
This report gives information about the soils as a source of roadfill, sand, gravel, and topsoil. The soils are rated
"Good", "Fair", or "Poor" as a source of roadfill and topsoil. They are rated as a "Probable" or "Improbable"
source of sand and gravel. The ratings are based on soil properties and site features that affect the removal of the
soil and its use as construction material. Normal compaction, minor processing, and other standard construction
practices are assumed. Each soil is evaluated to a depth of 5 or 6 feet.
Roadfill is soil material that is excavated in one place and used in road embankments in another place. In this report,
the soils are rated as a source of roadfill for low embankments, generally less than 6 feet high and less
exacting in design than higher embankments. The ratings are for the soil material below the surface layer to a
depth of 5 or 6 feet. It is assumed that soil layers will be mixed during excavating and spreading. Many soils have
layers of contrasting suitability within their profile. The report entitled Engineering Index Properties is also available
and it provides detailed information about each soil layer. This information can help determine the suitability of each
layer for use as roadfill. The performance of soil after it is stabilized with lime or cement is not considered in
the ratings.
The ratings are based on soil properties, site features, and observed performance of the soils. The thickness of
suitable material is a major consideration. The ease of excavation is affected by large stones, a high water table,
and slope. How well the soil performs in place after it has been compacted and drained is determined by its strength (as
inferred from the engineering classification of the soil) and shrink -swell potential.
Soils rated "Good" contain significant amounts of sand or gravel or both. They have at least 5 feet of suitable
material, a low shrink -swell potential, few cobbles and stones, and slopes of 15 percent or less. Depth to the
water table is more than 3 feet
Soils rated "Fair" are more than 35 percent silt- and clay -sized particles and have a plasticity of less than 10.
They have a moderate shrink -swell potential, slopes of 15 to 25 percent, or many stones. Depth to the water table is 1
to 3 feet.
Soils rated "Poor" have a plasticity index of more than 10, a high shrink -swell potential, many stones, or slopes of
more than 25 percent. They are wet, and the depth to the water table is less than 1 foot. These soils may have
layers of suitable material, but the material is less than 3 feet thick.
Sand and gravel are natural aggregates suitable for commercial use with a minimum of processing. Sand and
gravel are used in many kinds of construction. Specifications for each use vary widely. In this report only
the probability of finding material in suitable quantity is evaluated. The suitability of the material for specific
purposes is not evaluated, nor are factors that affect excavation of the material. The properties used to evaluate
the soil as a source of sand or gravel are gradation of grain sizes (as indicated by the engineering classification
of the soil), the thickness of suitable material, and the content of rock fragments. Kinds of rock, acidity, and
stratification are given in the soil series descriptions. Gradation of grain sizes is given in the Engineering Index
Properties report.
A soil rated as a "Probable" source has a layer of clean sand and gravel or a layer of sand or gravel that contains
up to 12 percent silty fines. This material must be at least 3 feet thick and less than 50 percent, by weight. large
stones. All other soils are rated as an "Improbable" source. Coarse fragments of soft bedrock, such as shale and
siltstone, are not considered to be sand and gravel.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
•
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
Endnote -- CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS --Continued
•
PAGE 3 OF 3
12/8/95
Topsoil is used to cover an area so that vegetation can be established and maintained. The upper 40 inches of a soil
is evaluated for use as topsoil. Also evaluated is the reclamation potential of the borrow area. Plant growth is
affected by toxic material and by such properties as soil reaction, available water capacity, and fertility. The ease
of excavating, loading, and spreading is affected by rock fragments, slope, a water table, soil texture, and thickness
of suitable material. Reclamation of the borrow area is affected by slope, a water table, rock fragments, bedrock,
and toxic material.
Soils rate "Good" have friable loamy material to a depth of at least 40 inches. They are free of stones and cobbles.
have little or no gravel, and have slopes of less than 8 percent. They are low in content of soluble salts, are
naturally fertile or respond well to fertilizer, and are not so wet that excavation is difficult.
Soils rated "Fair" are sandy soils, loamy soils that have a relatively high content of clay, soils that have only 20
to 40 inches of suitable material, soils that have an appreciable amount of gravel, stones, or soluble salts, or
soils that have slopes of 8 to 15 percent. The soils are not so wet that excavation is difficult.
Soils rate "Poor" are very sandy or clayey, have less than 20 inches of suitable material, have a large amount of
gravel, stones, or soluble salts, have slopes of more than 15 percent, or have a seasonal water table at or near the
surface. The surface layer of most soils is generally preferred for topsoil because of it organic matter content.
Organic matter greatly increases the absorption and retention of moisture and nutrients for plant growth.
Date: 12/08/95
Name: Jowell
Reason(s): Soils Information
Assisted by: DENNIS DAVIDSON
Comment
Type: Individual
Provided soils for a subdivision excemption. Aspen area Survey the
land located just west of the garfield co line. Yalonda Perau picked
up the information. 963 3300
1
•
• .
Jowell/Harrington 4/1/96
This property is nearly 9.1 acres in size and is located approximately four miles east of Carbondale
south of the State Highway 82 frontage road. The land slopes gently from the frontage road to the
Roaring fork river and portion of the property do lie within the designated 100 year floodplain. Two
irrigation ditches cross the tract, the Patterson Cummings ditch is located on the northern portion of
the tract and the basin ditch is located on the southern portion. Vegetation is primarily pasture
grasses with a number of cottonwood trees located near the river. There is an existing single family
residence on the tract and the property is home to a number of domestic animals.
Adjacent land uses are predominantly residential, with a limited amount of agricultural land uses
located in the vicinity.
The applicants are proposing to divide, by exemption, the 9.1 acre tract into three parcels of 2, 3 and
4 acres each. Parcel B would consist of the existing home and staff assumes the other parcels would
be developed as single family homesites.
The present owners obtained the property in 1983, from a previous owner who acquired the property
in 1972, and it appears the property has remained in its present configuration since 1972. Therefore,
based on this analysis, the proposal complies with Section 8:52 of the subdivision regulations.
(i1
The property is within the A/R/RD zone district and all proposed lots are in excess of the two acre
minimum lot size requirement.
The water supply for the proposed lots would be individual wells and there is an existing well on what
would be Parcel B. This existing well is being late -registered with the division of water resources and
is also the subject of a water rights decree. All three wells are the subject of Basalt water
Conservancy district augmentation contracts, which have been issued. It is staffs understanding that
only the new, proposed wells are the wells that must be covered by the Basalt contracts as there is
already a water right decree for the existing well. Additionally, as these contracts have been issued,
staff is confident that the division of water resources will issue well permits. The existing well has
been pump -tested and appeared to pump 25 GPM with minimal drawdown and, furthermore, the
individual who conducted the pump -test indicated there should be no problem obtaining a physical
supply from the new wells, nor would neighboring wells be harmed. Staff concurs with this analysis.
The method of waste water treatment is proposed to be individual sewage disposal systems.
According to the SCS, there are severe constraints to ISD use, generally due to the soil being a poor
filter. When used for building site development, constraints vary between slight and severe. The
applicants have engaged the services of an engineer to determine feasibility and design of septic
systems, and -basically draws the conclusion that ISD systems would be feasible.
Access to the 3 proposed parcels is specified to be a new access along the western property line, for
which application has been made. There is an existing access along the eastern property line that also
provides, at least partial access, to a neighboring parcel, east of the applicant's property. In the event
the proposed access is not granted, the applicants have applied to the state to amend the existing
permit to include the proposed uses. No matter what access is approved, it would be necessary to
designate and record easements across what would be parcel a to parcels b and c. Staff recommends
a favorable response from the state and access easements be recorded prior to the authorization of
an exemption plat.
The Carbondale and rural fire protection district has responded, indicating the property is within its
district and that response time is estimated to be within 10 to 15 minutes. The district also requests
a total of $470 in impact fees be paid to the district prior to the recording of an exemption plat. Staff
recommends a plat note to address wildfire mitigation.
The southern portion of the property is impacted by the designated, 100 year floodplain of the roaring
fork river, generally south of the basin ditch. The majority of the floodplain designation is for flood
fringe, which may be built upon with the issuance of the appropriate permits. At this time, staff is not
aware of any plans to develop in this area. ,Staff would recommend a plat note to address the
limitations caused by the floodplain designation.,,
• •
Staff has received comment regarding two existing easements across the property. Staff has not seen
the actual easements regarding the Basin Ditch or the rocky mountain natural gas pipeline easement;
however, as conditions of approvaa it should be required that the applicants adhere to the provisions
of the specific easements. It does not appear that either easement would constrain the proposed lots
to the point they could not be built upon. All additional easements would also be required to be
shown on an exemption plat.
Arlrlitinnalh� the npui lute rraatPrl by thic nrnruncal n7nnlrl ha cnhiPrt to navina tha cehnnl imnart fpi
AND-(4e7cA
%b1 L_ mac. "✓ ,s CAL' 41.:= D C' ii-!( s �.Cl°ZLo�I
LL �1,c' SLA-rl,jl','(-'j �v
Ac' ✓ (� 714 (.. P a a (c.
L' o") friI> rr.l (aiLy4•nwicJ^1/ sTAEF 26 C,u
6 C I -4 L AP Pt -LL --,A70 v.
,
LJs-r- Cv
'011(.4 S
QOM
G� t AP . bVJ9 A0g<PkVipp
A TO\ �
0 w citl-- 1 cit91n t.,(is/)
tLAR176
Cw17k/.604) Ao».
f 1 o ol'``.,s rt,gS24s5
K31I- 4:c1A-AVC.5i\VOV61) mut/ ytt,c-r.
M c- (\J o / ) D A -c•4_, 6
s
i
•
Mr. Mark Bean, Director
Garfield County Building and Planning
109 - 8th Street, Suitt3303
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Dear Mark Bean:
i -
•s f ^e. •� rr
MAR 1 '8 1996P
1111
,•y
Mr. Jean M. Blue
0404 Road 104
Carbondale, Colorado 81623
March 18, 1996
Re: Jack and Elke Jowell
Subdivision Exemption
The Basin Ditch flows through parcel B and C of this subdivision
exemption. This is a large irrigation ditch that requires large pieces
of equipment and men, more than once during the irrigation season, for
cleaning and maintenance of the ditch. Since this requires sufficient
room to operate the equipment, we feel that the following problems need
to be addressed to insure our continued water and easement rights.
1. The plat of the subdivision exemption should include a
designated ditch easement of 40 feet, 20 feet each side of the
center line of the Basin Ditch as it now exists.
2. The plate should include wording that no structures or pipes
be put into or over the Basin Ditch without prior approval of Jean
Blue.
• •
Carbondale & Rural Fire Protection District
300 Meadowood Drive
Carbondale, Colorado 81623
Phone (970) 963-2491
FAX (970) 963-0569
February 29, 1996
Mark Bean
Garfield County Planning Department
109 8th Street
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: Jowell Subdivision Exemption - 17605 Highway 82.
Dear Mark,
-MR-D-44996
I would like to offer the following comments regarding fire protection for the Jowell property located
at 17605 Hwy 82.
Access to the property off Old Highway 82 appears to be adequate. Any new driveways should be
according to Garfield County Road Standards to insure adequate access for emergency vehicles on
a year round basis.
Water for fire protection would be supplied with water carried on the fire apparatus, which is
approximately 7000 gallons.
Response time to the property for both fire and medical emergencies is approximately 10-15 minutes
with first response coming from the Station No. 1 located in Carbondale.
The District will require the payment of development impact fees in the amount of $235.00 per lot,
for a total of $470.00 as approved by the Garfield County Commissioners. This payment is due prior
to the recording of the final plat.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Bill Gavette
Fire Marshal
ROCKY
MOUNTAIN
NATURAL GAS
COMPANY
A SUOSIOMgVOFgVQF
YE�E �'
March 8, 1996
•
Mark Bean
Director, Planning Dept.
Garfield County
109 8th Street, Suite 301
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
• Rocky Mountain
401 27th Street
P.O. Box 670
Glenwo
(303) 9
Natural Gas Company
, CO 81602-0670
1996
Re: Arthur and Elke Jowell Subdivision Exemption
Dear Mr. Bean:
We are in receipt of the "Public Notice" for the Jowell
subdivision exemption. The only concern that we have is that our
transmission pipeline runs through, mainly Lot A, the proposed
subdivision. Said pipeline right-of-way has a total width of 50'
- 25' on each side of the pipeline as -built and in place today.
One of the clauses in the easement reads: The Grantors shall not
build or construct nor permit to be built or constructed any
building over or across said pipeline. We only wish to insure
that whoever buys the effected lots knows about the pipeline and
the associated building restrictions.
Thank you for your time. Please contact me at the address or
phone listed above if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Thomas E. Boita
Process Leader
TEB/jlk
U:3/22/1996 17:33 3939270077
ALL 6-H ADGER
• •
PAGE 01
WRIGHT & ADGER, LLP
Attorneys Law
P.O. Box 646
Basalt, Colorado 81621
ALLEN H. ADDER BASALTD?FICE FACSIMILE
TELEPHONE (970) 927-9090 FACSIMILI3
(970) 927-0077
FACSIMILE COVER LETTER
TO: GARFIELD COUNTY PLANNING
DEPARTMENT
FACSIMILE #: (97Q) 945-77 _
FROM: Allen H. Adger FACSIMILE #: (970)-927-0077
DATE: 3/22196 TIME:
4:20pm
OUR CLIENT: Gess _7 p MATTER: Hamrincrtort application
TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES: 1 (INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE)
IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL Op' THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL 303-927-9090 AS
SOON AS POSSIBLE. THIS FACSIMILE MACHINE IS A BROTHER 600.
Planning Department:
I called today to request copied of certain documents on the
Harrington Petition for eXemption. They are 1) shared well
agreement 2) copy of easements reflected on Highway Access Permit
3) Letter from Louis Meyer 4) Letter addressing Environmental
Health Requirements 5) any other itiformation provided in the last
week by applicants.
I am reviewing the application on behalf of Kelly and Jan
Gessele, neighbors. Please contact me at 927-9090 concerning this
request.
Form No.
GWG-25_w
APPLICANT
OFFICE OF THE STA ENGINEER
COLORADO DIVISIOIM.F WATER RESOURCES
818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203
(303) 866-3581
ARTHUR F & ELKE H JOWELL
MATT & TERRY HARRINGTON
79 UTE
CARBONDALE CO 81623-
(970) 963-2447
PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL
•
LIC
WELL PERMIT NUMBER 046570 -
DIV. 5 CNTY. 23 WD 38 DES. BASIN MD
Lot: C Block: Filing: Subdiv: HARRINGTON
APPROVED WELL LOCATION
GARFIELD COUNTY
NW 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 33
Twp 7 S RANGE 87 W 6th P.M.
DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES
1610 Ft. from South Section Line
4545 Ft. from East Section Line
ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT
CONDmONS OF APPROVAL
1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of the
permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another
owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action.
2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless
• approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump
Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18.
3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2) for the construction of a well, appropriating ground water tributary to the
Roaring Fork River, as an alternate point of diversion to the Basalt Conduit, on the condition that the well shall be
operated only when the Basalt Water Conservancy District's substitute water supply plan, approved by the State
Engineer, is in effect and when a water allotment contract between the well owner and the Basalt Water
Conservancy District for the release of replacement water from Ruedi Reservoir is in effect, or under an approved
plan for augmentation. BWCD contract #3.3.5.268.
4) The use of ground water from this well is limited to ordinary household purposes inside one (1) single family
dwelling, the irrigation of not more than 5,000 square feet of home gardens and lawns, and the watering of
domestic animals. All use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for
augmentation is in effect.
5) The maximum pumping rate shall not exceed 15 GPM.
6) The average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated shall not exceed 0.7 acre-foot (228,095 gallons).
7) A totalizing flow meter must be installed on this well and maintained in good working order. Permanent records
of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division
Engineer upon request.
8) The well must be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit.
9) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit numbers) name o the h
case number(s)appropriate.e aquifer, and court
as The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these
markings. r
O\NNER'S
cGPY
APPROVED
JD2
State Engineer
Receipt No. 0398277C
DATE ISSUEEM AY 161996 By
EXPIRATION DATE
✓>-
MAY 16 1997
Fcr r i r ivo: OFFICE OF THE ST4ig ENGINEER
GWS -25 COLORADO DMSIO • F WATER RESOURCES
818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203
(303) 866-3581
APPLICANT
ARTHUR F & ELKE H JOWELL
MATT & TERRY HARRINGTON
79 UTE
CARBONDALE CO 81623-
(970) 963-2447
PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL
•
UC
WELL PERMfT NUMBER 046569
DIV. 5 CNTY. 23 WD 38 DES. BASIN MD
Lot: A Block: Filing: Subdiv: HARRINGTON
APPROVED WELL LOCATION
GARFIELD COUNTY
NW 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 33
Twp 7 S RANGE 87 W
DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES
2200 Ft. from South Section Line
4590 Ft. from East Section Line
6th P.M.
ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT
CONDmONS OF APPROVAL
1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of the
permit does not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another
owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action.
2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless
approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump
Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18.
3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2) for the construction of a well, appropriating
Roaring Fork River, as an alternate point of diversion to the Basalt Conduit, on the condition that the well hallthe be
operated only when the Basalt Water Conservancy District's substitute water supply plan, approved by the State
Engineer, is in effect and when a water allotment contract between the well owner and the Basalt Water
Conservancy District for the release of replacement water from Ruedi Reservoir is in effect, or under an approved
plan for augmentation. BWCD contract #3.3.5.266.
4) The use of ground water from this well is limited to ordinary household purposes inside one (1) single family
dwelling, the irrigation of not more than 5,000 square feet of home gardens and lawns, and the watering of
domestic animals. All use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment contract or a plan for
augmentation is in effect.
5) The maximum pumping rate shall not exceed 15 GPM.
6) The average annual amount of ground water to be appropriated shall not exceed 0.7 acre-foot (228,095 gallons).
7) A totalizing flow meter must be installed on this well and maintained in good working order. Permanent records
of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division
Engineer upon request.
8) The well must be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit.
9) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court
case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these
markings. j - 9(,
APPROVED
JD2
State Engineer
Receipt No. 0398277B
I „oL- i-‘ 0 L,,..,)
),,,y
DATE ISSUED MAY 16 1996
By
EXPIRATION DATE MAY 16 1997
t
• •
DITCH IMPROVEMENT AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into this day of April, 1996 by and between TERRY
and MATTHEW HARRINGTON ("Grantors") and JEAN M. AND DEE BLUE (the
"Grantees").
RECITALS
A. Grantors are purchasing approximately 9.09 acres of land more particularly described
in Exhibit A, attached and referred to herein as the "Parcel A".
B. Grantees are the owners of a neighboring parcel of land comprising approximately 374
acres, more particularly described in Exhibit B, attached hereto and referred to herein as "Parcel B",
as well as water rights decreed to the Basin Ditch.
C. A portion of the Basin Ditch is located on property to be owned by Grantors upstream
of Parcel B.
D. Grantors anticipate the potential need for the placement of improvements in or on the
Basin Ditch where it crosses Parcel A and desire to convey to Grantors an easement to continue
without interference their historic use, maintenance and operation of the Basin Ditch across Parcel
A.
E. Grantees desire to consent to all such necessary and reasonable improvements in or
on the ditch upon the following terms and conditions:
NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
1. Responsibility With Respect to Work Involving the Basin Ditch. Grantors shall bear
100% of the cost involved with any work which they undertake associated with the Basin Ditch on
the Parcel A and shall pursue such work diligent; to completion. Prior to the commencement of any
work involving the Basin Ditch, Grantors, shall present Grantees with plans and specifications for such
work and a schedule for the completion of such work so that Grantees may assure themselves that
the contemplated work will not violate any of Grantors' obligations with regard to the Basin Ditch.
Grantees shall have 15 days after receipt of said plans to review and approve said plans which
approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If Grantees fail to respond within said 15 days, consent
to the work as proposed shall be presumed. In the event of disapproval, the parties shall thereafter
meet and resolve any issues. No work performed by Grantors on the Basin Ditch, while in progress,
shall diminish the flow of water available to down -stream users of the Basin Ditch during the
irrigation season. Furthermore, upon completion of any work by Grantors associated with the Basin
Ditch on Parcel A, the Basin Ditch shall at a minimum be physically able to carry and deliver a
minimum of 45 cfs of water.
• •
Ditch Improvement and Easement
Agreement
Page 2
2. Conveyance of Easement Deed. Upon their purchase of Parcel A, Grantors shall
survey the Basin Ditch where it crosses Parcel A and shall execute and deliver to Grantees an
easement deed conveying an easement measuring 20 feet on either side of the centerline of the Basin
Ditch for the carriage of water and the operation and maintenance of the Basin Ditch.
3. Operation and Maintenance of The Basin Ditch. Grantees shall have the right to go
upon the easement for the Basin Ditch to be conveyed to Grantees under this Agreement and to
operate, clean and maintain the Basin Ditch as they have historically done.
4. Survival of Terms/Entire Agreement. All of the terms in this Agreement are intended
to benefit Parcel B and burden Parcel A, shall constitute a covenant running with the title to both
Parcels A and B, and shall survive the exchange of the deed provided for in paragraph 3 above. This
Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties related to the subject matter
contained herein, and supersedes all prior agreements between the parties with respect hereto. All
terms of this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, and
their respective representatives, successors and assigns.
6 Interpretation. This Agreement is made under and is to be construed and enforced
in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado. In the event there is ever a question about the
meaning or interpretation of this Agreement, it is the intention and understanding of the parties that
Grantees shall incur no shortage of water when needed by virtue of the development of Parcel A.
8. Notices. Notices hereunder shall be provided to the parties as follows:
If to Grantors:
Terry and Matthew Harrington
17650 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
If to Grantees:
Jean M. and Dee Blue
0404 County Road 104
Carbondale, CO 81623
or such subsequent addresses as each party shall designate in writing to the other from time to time.
2
• •
Ditch Improvement and Easement
Agreement
Page 3
This Agreement is hereby entered into this)/ day of April, 1996.
44/1-/A/Ly (1"'"7/0
Terry I irfir gton
v:
an M. Blue
L- L'
ee Blue
3
411 Exhibit A
LEGAL DESC RJPTZON
A tract of land situated in Lots 7 and 8 in Section 33, Township
7 South, Range 87 west, 6th P.M. described as beginning at a
point is the Southerly right-of-way fence lime of Colorado State
Highway No. 82 from whence the SS Corner of Sectio 33,
Tow4ship 7 South Range 87 West, 6th P.M. bears S 63 degrees 29'
28' S. 4,926,225 feet;
thence 5 02 degrees 29'02= E. 315.139 feet;
thence S 02 degrees 58' W. 122.612 feet;
thence S Q2 degrees 49'42" W. 370.576 feet to the
thence S 546.67 feet to
thence S 89 degrees 08•
thence N 02 degrees 15
line of Colorado State 1righway No., 82;
thence S. 72 degrees 09'58' S. 235„270 feet
fence line of Colorado State Highway No. 82
Beginning.
South line of
the South line of said Lot 8:
W. 292.170 feet along the South line
S. 1,44 6.215 feet t
COUNTY OF GARFIELD
STATE OF COLORADO
said Lot 7;
of said Lot 8;
o the Southerly right-of-way fence
along the Southerly right-of-way
to the point of
• Exhibit B 411
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR SUNNYSIDE RANCH
JEAN M. BLUE
0404 ROAD 104
CARBONDALE, COLORADO
Section 25, Township 7, Range 88:
Government Lot Acres
1 34.0
2 23.0
5 17.25
6 10.85
7 6.0
8 39.65
9 47.33
10 51.23
11 56.11
14 9.84
15 17.31
16 5.43
Section 36, Township 7, Range 88:
2and3 20.50
Lot splits in 25-7-88
Lot splits in 25-7-88
Lot splits in 25-7-88
2.020
31.370
2.00
Total Acres 373.89, more or less
ROCKY
MOUNTAIN
NATURAL GAS
COMPANY
A SU6s OIARV OF
ENEIMV
March 8, 1996
Mark Bean
Director, Planning Dept.
Garfield County
109 8th Street, Suite 301
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
•
Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Company
401 27th Street
P.O. Box 670
Glenwo CO 81602-0670
(303) 9 861''
MAR 3
Re: Arthur and Elke Jowell Subdivision Exemption
Dear Mr. Bean:
We are in receipt of the "Public Notice" for the Jowell
subdivision exemption. The only concern that we have is that our
transmission pipeline runs through, mainly Lot A, the proposed
subdivision. Said pipeline right-of-way has a total width of 50'
- 25' on each side of the pipeline as -built and in place today.
One of the clauses in the easement reads: The Grantors shall not
build or construct nor permit to be built or constructed any
building over or across said pipeline. We only wish to insure
that whoever buys the effected lots knows about the pipeline and
the associated building restrictions.
Thank you for your time. Please contact me at the address or
phone listed above if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Thomas E. Boita
Process Leader
TEB/jlk
0
0
0
N
0
0
c}4
0
0
•
•
S89"08'00 W 292.17
March 25,1996
TO: Garfield County Commissioners
108 9 Glenwood Springs
Garfield County,Colorado
81602
RE: Lot Split Exemption at Jowell Property -17605 Highway 82
Dear County Commissioners,
As an adjacent property owner of the proposed Jowell Exemption,
questions have been raised if all requested submittal requirments
concerning pertanent data addressing an updated map from the
Corp of Engineers defining the 10 and 100 year flood plain as
it presently exists to Lot C.My property upstream has eroded
and formed a major headcut and rechannelized the Roaring Fork
River to flow directly on the North side and strip all vegetation
to protect the river bank from further erosion.
Possibly a request for a 1041 study should be in order for lot C
targeting the impacts of sewage disposal conventional system vs
advanced waste mechanical treatment due to a high ground water
table.
Access points to the property has not been shown and the applicant
has indicated 6 traffic counts,in reality 5 properties andthere
friends would be using the egress on and off the service road,impactinc
the integrity of the existing road.
The building sizes are an unknown and placment of a septic system
on Lot A shall affect my domestic water well as well as Mr. and Mrs.
Hammonds on the other side of the Jowell residence.
The general consensus of the neighbors affected by the proposed lot
split .is'of a negative response,sighting loss of existing river views,
potential health hazards,setting precedent for higher density on
traditional 4 to 10 acre ]ots,traffic and dust problems,and generally
changing the character of the neighborhood.
As a matter of public record,let it be known that Jan and
Kelly Gessele are against the proposed lot dissection in
its present submitted form to the Commissioners,I believe
more infomation must be addressed to the board before any
consideration for approval of this exemption is finalized.
Yours Truly,
Kelly and Jan Gessele
17607 Hwy:82
Carbondale,Colorado 81623
• •
April 1, 1996
To: Garfield County Board of Commissioners
From: Joseph B. & Gerry L. Zamora
17453 Highway 82
Carbondale, Colorado 81623
Re: Jack & Elke Jowell Property
17605 Highway 82
Carbondale, Colorado 81623
Recently we were advised that there is a proposal to subdivide the Jowell property into
three parcels. The following are our concerns:
1) Approximately one week ago we were requested to sign a statement waiving our
rights to object to the issuance of a well permit for the Jowell property. We
received no documents to support their theory that this would in fact not have an
affect on our water supply and yet their intention is to add two new wells to the
property. As there is a possibiltiy that this project could could have an impact
on our water supply we feel we should have the opportunity to review the projected
plans for the sites as to the location of the wells as well as the size of the homes
that are being proposed.
2) It is our impression that the building site to the rear of the property is in a flood
plain and will require an elaborate septic system. We feel that we have a right
to review the plans for that system as if it is inadequate there is the potential of
contamination to our wells.
3) It is also our concern that subdividing this property into acreage that is not in
context with the surrounding properties may change the existing land use of our
area and encourage further exploitation of our neighborhood. This could also
have an impact on the density of our wildlife.
4) Because of the short notice we have not had the opportunity to consult with our
attorney in order to review the projected development. We have not been
furnished a copy of the appplication and have not been advised of any restrictions
governing the size of the homes to be built on these sites.
As these factors could have an impact on our property we would like to request that you
allow us additional time and delay your decision.
h B. & Terry L. Zamora
•
April 1, 1996
County Commissioners
Garfield County
Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Re: Arthur & Elke Jowell Application
for Subdivision Exemption
Greetings:
As adjoining property owners at 17527 Highway 82, we would like to express our
concerns and objections.
1. Will the drilling of two new wells affect the quantity and quality of our water?
Our well is 14 feet from the west property line; the water table on this part of the
property is approximately 9 feet.
We have a real concern about location of another well as well as the location of
a septic system.
2. The lower parcel of property which benches down and levels off to the river, where
the water table is about one foot especially when the Basin Irrigation Ditch is
running, is a real concern. It will have to have an "engineered" sewer disposal
system. Does this mean we will be looking at a "mound" - or hearing a
bubbling/gurgling monster that covers up the tranquil sound of the running river?
3. The effect of two additional houses - with children - pets - and "normal" living
noises will have an adverse effect on the wildlife in this area - deer, foxes, eagles,
owls, etc.
4. Everyone in the neighborhood bought these parcels of property as agriculture -
we have livestock, open space and access to the Roaring Fork River.
5. This is an "exemption" which means they do not have to abide by regulations for
subdivisions.
Does this mean we will have 20 people and cars living in one house? Or one
"house" converted into several apartments? Or noisy, rowdy parties down by the
river??
We believe that everyone should have the right to do with their property as they see fit,
but not at the expense of their neighbors or their neighborhood.
• •
We have appeared before the Garfield Planning & Zoning on two separate occasions to
voice our objections to high density building in our neighborhood (which were under
Subdivision Regulations). Both times they were withdrawn or denied because of
neighborhood objections.
If this "Exemption" is allowed, it will set a precedent as to the development of other
properties in this area and lead to high density, high traffic, and general destruction of
the rural tranquility of this neighborhood.
We paid top dollar for this privilege and pay high taxes to continue to live here.
We urge you not to grant an exemption and destroy what the rest of us have worked
hard for.
Respectfully,
Howard H. Hammond
Benita A. Hammond
1/
c ;%
•
JEROME GAMBA & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS
113 9TH STREET, SUITE 214
P.O. BOX 1458
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602-1458
PHONE: (970) 945-2550 FAX: (970) 945-1410
March 27, 1996
Terry Harrington
79 Ute Ave.
Carbondale, Colorado 81623
970-963-2447
Re: Site Investigation for Parcel Located at 17605 Highway 82 Frontage Road;
Carbondale, Colorado 81623
Dear Mrs. Harrington:
In accordance with your request, Jerome Gamba & Associates, Inc. conducted a site
investigation of the parcel of land located approximately 1.5 miles east of Catherine's Store
on the south side of Highway 82. The site investigation was performed on March 20,
1996. The purpose of the investigation was to determine the feasibility of dividing the
parcel into three lots and providing each lot with a septic system. We did not conduct a
survey of the site, but from maps and plans provided by you, we were able to determine
the approximate location of the proposed lot lines and possible septic system locations.
The following report discusses our findings and our recommendations for the site.
Beginning at the Roaring Fork River at the south end of the site, the topography of the site
consists of a series of three benches running up to the Highway 82 Frontage Road. The
first bench being the lower bench is approximately 5 feet above the river level at the time
of the investigation and consists of the land between the river and the Basin Ditch. The
second bench being the middle bench is approximately 6 feet above the first bench and
includes the land between the south edge of the Basin Ditch and a retaining wall just south
of the existing residence. The third bench being the upper bench is approximately 8 feet
above the second bench and includes the land between the retaining wall and the north
edge of the property.
A man-made pond exists on the middle bench of Lot B, and a pit had been excavated on
the middle bench of the adjacent property to the east. In both cases, ground water was
found approximately four feet below the existing ground surface.
Jowell/Harrington Subdivision Exemption
March 27, 1996
Page 1 of 3
• •
The site is approximately 1450 feet long and 292 feet wide with the long direction running
generally north and south. The proposed lot lines provide a lot of approximately 2 acres
along the north boundary (Lot A), a lot of approximately 4 acres in an L-shaped
configuration (Lot B), and a rectangular lot of approximately 3 acres in the south west
section of the Parcel (Lot C). The existing residence is located on Lot B.
The Lot lines as proposed divide the Parcel along some existing natural boundaries and
provide a division of the land which mitigates the impacts to the adjacent Tots. We would
however recommend that the lot line running north and south between Lots B and C be
moved to the east to provide more middle bench area for Lot C.
An approximate location of the 100 Year Floodplain was determined for the site using the
Colorado River and Tributaries FLOOD PLAIN STUDY maps (see FIGURE 1). Only a portion
of the lower bench is located within the 100 year floodplain.
Lot A is located completely on the upper bench. The existing residence along with the
existing well and septic system are located on the upper bench section of Lot B. The
remaining undeveloped portion of Lot B contains a section of both the middle and lower
benches. Lot C is located on the middle and lower benches.
According to the Colorado Department of Health (CDOH) and the Garfield County ISDS
regulations, the topography, groundwater conditions, and the proximity to adjacent wells
and septic systems easily facilitates the construction of a single-family residence, domestic
well, and septic system on Lot A.
As stated above, Lot B contains the existing house, well, and septic system. Further
development or improvements on Lot B are not anticipated.
With the relocation of the lot line between Lot B and Lot C as recommended above, Lot C
would have adequate area (approximately 0.5 acres) of developable land for the
construction of a single-family residence and septic system on the middle bench which is
not within the floodplain. There is also buildable area within Lot C located on the lower
bench. If the building site on the lower bench is within the floodplain, a special use permit
would be required.
The general septic system design we would recommend for the two new residences would
consist of a septic tank, a dosing or pumping chamber to regulate the outflow, and a
leaching bed using infiltrator units. These designs would be prepared in accordance with
the Colorado Department of Health and Garfield County ISDS regulations. In accordance
Jowell/Harrington Subdivision Exemption
March 27, 1.996
Page 2 of 3
JEROME GAMBA & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS
• •
with these regulations, at the time of design, the ground water table would have to be
determined under the proposed leaching areas and incorporated into the design. Similarly,
percolation tests and soil profiles would have to be performed within the proposed leaching
areas. ISDS design criteria state that the leaching surface of a leachfield be a minimum of
4 feet above the mean high ground water table. The design criteria also states that the
soil material between the leaching surface and the groundwater table have a percolation
rate no faster than 20 minutes per inch in order to adequately filter and treat the septic
effluent. These design criteria may require the construction of Wisconsin Mound type
leach fields and/or the importation of adequate filtration material.
As stated above, the lots as proposed would provide adequate area for the construction of
septic systems, domestic wells, and single-family residences which would comply with all
applicable state and county regulations. If you have any questions, please call.
Sincerely,
Jerome Gamba & Associates, Inc.
,,,,) ,.1-&
Nathan Bell, Design Engineer
Attachment: FIGURE 1
S:\96484\INSP-RPT.WP6
Michael Gamba, P.E. 28036
Jowell/Harrington Subdivision Exemption
March 27, 1996
Page 3 of 3
JEROME GAMBA & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS
• •
DITCH IMPROVEMENT AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into this day of April, 1996 by and between TERRY
and MATTHEW HARRINGTON ("Grantors") and JEAN M. AND DEE BLUE (the
"Grantees").
RECITALS
A. Grantors are purchasing approximately 9.09 acres of land more particularly described
in Exhibit A, attached and referred to herein as the "Parcel A".
B. Grantees are the owners of a neighboring parcel of land comprising approximately 374
acres, more particularly described in Exhibit B, attached hereto and referred to herein as "Parcel B",
as well as water rights decreed to the Basin Ditch.
C. A portion of the Basin Ditch is located on property to be owned by Grantors upstream
of Parcel B.
D. Grantors anticipate the potential need for the placement of improvements in or on the
Basin Ditch where it crosses Parcel A and desire to convey to Grantors an easement to continue
without interference their historic use, maintenance and operation of the Basin Ditch across Parcel
A.
E. Grantees desire to consent to all such necessary and reasonable improvements in or
on the ditch upon the following terms and conditions:
NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
1. Responsibility With Respect to Work Involving the Basin Ditch. Grantors shall bear
100% of the cost involved with any work which they undertake associated with the Basin Ditch on
the Parcel A and shall pursue such work diligently to completion. Prior to the commencement of any
work involving the Basin Ditch, Grantors shall present Grantees with plans and specifications for such
work and a schedule for the completion of such work so that Grantees may assure themselves that
the contemplated work will not violate any of Grantors' obligations with regard to the Basin Ditch.
Grantees shall have 15 days after receipt of said plans to review and approve said plans which
approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If Grantees fail to respond within said 15 days, consent
to the work as proposed shall be presumed. In the event of disapproval, the parties shall thereafter
meet and resolve any issues. No work performed by Grantors on the Basin Ditch, while in progress,
shall diminish the flow of water available to down -stream users of the Basin Ditch during the
irrigation season. Furthermore, upon completion of any work by Grantors associated with the Basin
Ditch on Parcel A, the Basin Ditch shall at a minimum be physically able to carry and deliver a
minimum of 45 cfs of water.
• •
Ditch Improvement and Easement
Agreement
Page 2
2. Conveyance of Easement Deed. Upon their purchase of Parcel A, Grantors shall
survey the Basin Ditch where it crosses Parcel A and shall execute and deliver to Grantees an
easement deed conveying an easement measuring 20 feet on either side of the centerline of the Basin
Ditch for the carriage of water and the operation and maintenance of the Basin Ditch.
3. Operation and Maintenance of The Basin Ditch. Grantees shall have the right to go
upon the easement for the Basin Ditch to be conveyed to Grantees under this Agreement and to
operate, clean and maintain the Basin Ditch as they have historically done.
4. Survival of Terms/Entire Agreement. All of the terms in this Agreement are intended
to benefit Parcel B and burden Parcel A, shall constitute a covenant running with the title to both
Parcels A and B, and shall survive the exchange of the deed provided for in paragraph 3 above. This
Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties related to the subject matter
contained herein, and supersedes all prior agreements between the parties with respect hereto. All
terms of this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, and
their respective representatives, successors and assigns.
6 Interpretation. This Agreement is made under and is to be construed and enforced
in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado. In the event there is ever a question about the
meaning or interpretation of this Agreement, it is the intention and understanding of the parties that
Grantees shall incur no shortage of water when needed by virtue of the development of Parcel A.
8. Notices. Notices hereunder shall be provided to the parties as follows:
If to Grantors:
Terry and Matthew Harrington
17650 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
If to Grantees:
Jean M. and Dee Blue
0404 County Road 104
Carbondale, CO 81623
or such subsequent addresses as each party shall designate in writing to the other from time to time.
2
i •
Ditch Improvement and Easement
Agreement
Page 3
This Agreement is hereby entered into this day of April, 1996.
Terry Harrington
Matthew Harrington
Jean M. Blue
Dee Blue
3
Exhibit A
LEGAL DER:RD: ON
A tract of land situated la Lots 7 and 8 in Sectioz2 33, Township
7 South, Range 87 west, 6th P.M. described as beginning at a
point in the Southerly right-of-way fence line of Colorado State
Highway No. 82 from whence the SE Cotner of Section 33,
Township 7 South Range 87 West, 6th P.M. bears S 63 degrees 29'
28° E. 4,926,225 feet;
thence S 02 degrees 29'02' 8. 315.139 feet;
thence S 02 degrees 58' W. 122.612 feet;
thence S 02 degrees 49'42" W. 370.576 feet to the South line of said Lot 7;
thence 5 546.67 feet to the South line of said Lot 8:
thence S 89 degrees 08' W. 292.170 feet along the South line of said Lot 8;
thence N 02 degrees 15' E. 1,446.215 feet to the Southerly right-of-way fence
line of Colorado State .highway No., 82;
thence S. 72 degrees 09'58' E. 285,270 feet along the Southerly right-of-way
fence line of Colorado State Highway No. 82 to the pont of
Beginning
COUNTY OF GARFIEL.D
STATE OF COLORADO
411 Exhibit B
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR SUNNYSIDE RANCH
JEAN M. BLUE
0404 ROAD 104
CARBONDALE, COLORADO
Section 25, Township 7, Range 88:
Government Lot Acres
1 34.0
2 23.0
5 17.25
6 10.85
7 6.0
8 39.65
9 47.33
10 51.23
11 56.11
14 9.84
15 17.31
16 5.43
Section 36, Township 7, Range 88:
2 and 3 20.50
Lot splits in 25-7-88
Lot splits in 25-7-88
Lot splits in 25-7-88
2.020
31.370
2.00
Total Acres 373.89, more or less
• •
DITCH IMPROVEMENT AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into this day of April, 1996 by and between TERRY
and MATTHEW HARRINGTON ("Grantors") and JEAN M. AND DEE BLUE (the
"Grantees").
RECITALS
A. Grantors are purchasing approximately 9.09 acres of land more particularly described
in Exhibit A, attached and referred to herein as the "Parcel A".
B. Grantees are the owners of a neighboring parcel of land comprising approximately 374
acres, more particularly described in Exhibit B, attached hereto and referred to herein as "Parcel B",
as well as water rights decreed to the Basin Ditch.
C. A portion of the Basin Ditch is located on property to be owned by Grantors upstream
of Parcel B.
D. Grantors anticipate the potential need for the placement of improvements in or on the
Basin Ditch where it crosses Parcel A and desire to convey to Grantors an easement to continue
without interference their historic use, maintenance and operation of the Basin Ditch across Parcel
A.
E. Grantees desire to consent to all such necessary and reasonable improvements in or
on the ditch upon the following terms and conditions:
NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
1. Responsibility With Respect to Work Involving the Basin Ditch. Grantors shall bear
100% of the cost involved with any work which they undertake associated with the Basin Ditch on
the Parcel A and shall pursue such work diligently to completion. Prior to the commencement of any
work involving the Basin Ditch, Grantors shall present Grantees with plans and specifications for such
work and a schedule for the completion of such work so that Grantees may assure themselves that
the contemplated work will not violate any of Grantors' obligations with regard to the Basin Ditch.
Grantees shall have 15 days after receipt of said plans to review and approve said plans which
approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. If Grantees fail to respond within said 15 days, consent
to the work as proposed shall be presumed. In the event of disapproval, the parties shall thereafter
meet and resolve any issues. No work performed by Grantors on the Basin Ditch, while in progress,
shall diminish the flow of water available to down -stream users of the Basin Ditch during the
irrigation season. Furthermore, upon completion of any work by Grantors associated with the Basin
Ditch on Parcel A, the Basin Ditch shall at a minimum be physically able to carry and deliver a
minimum of 45 cfs of water.
• •
Ditch Improvement and Easement
Agreement
Page 2
2. Conveyance of Easement Deed. Upon their purchase of Parcel A, Grantors shall
survey the Basin Ditch where it crosses Parcel A and shall execute and deliver to Grantees an
easement deed conveying an easement measuring 20 feet on either side of the centerline of the Basin
Ditch for the carriage of water and the operation and maintenance of the Basin Ditch.
3. Operation and Maintenance of The Basin Ditch. Grantees shall have the right to go
upon the easement for the Basin Ditch to be conveyed to Grantees under this Agreement and to
operate, clean and maintain the Basin Ditch as they have historically done.
4. Survival of Terms/Entire Agreement. All of the terms in this Agreement are intended
to benefit Parcel B and burden Parcel A, shall constitute a covenant running with the title to both
Parcels A and B, and shall survive the exchange of the deed provided for in paragraph 3 above. This
Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties related to the subject matter
contained herein, and supersedes all prior agreements between the parties with respect hereto. All
terms of this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, and
their respective representatives, successors and assigns.
6 Interpretation. This Agreement is made under and is to be construed and enforced
in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado. In the event there is ever a question about the
meaning or interpretation of this Agreement, it is the intention and understanding of the parties that
Grantees shall incur no shortage of water when needed by virtue of the development of Parcel A.
8. Notices. Notices hereunder shall be provided to the parties as follows:
If to Grantors:
Terry and Matthew Harrington
17650 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
If to Grantees:
Jean M. and Dee Blue
0404 County Road 104
Carbondale, CO 81623
or such subsequent addresses as each party shall designate in writing to the other from time to time.
2
•
Ditch Improvement and Easement
Agreement
Page 3
This Agreement is hereby entered into this day of April, 1996.
Terry Harrington
Matthew Harrington
Jean M. Blue
Dee Blue
3
II/ Exhibit A •
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A tract of land situated la Lots 7 and 8 in Section 33, Township
7 South, Range 87 West, 6th P.M. described as beginning at a
point is the Southerly right-of-way fence line of Colorado State
Highway No. 82 from whence the SE Corner of Section
Town0hip 7 Scnzth Range 87 West, 6th P.M. bears S 63
28' S. 4,926,225 feet;
S 02 degrees 29'02' E. 315.139 feet;
S 02 degrees 58' W. 122.612 feet;
5 02 degrees 49'42• W. 370.576 feet to the South
S 546.67 feet to the South line of said Lot 8:
S 89 degrees 08' W. 292.170 feet along the South
thence N 02 degrees 15' E. 1,446.215 feet to the Southerly
line of Colorado State Ftigbway No., 82;
thence S. 72 degrees 09'58' S. 285.270 feet
fence line of Colorado State Highway No. 82
Beginning_
thence
thence
thence
thence
thence
33,
degrees 29'
line
I izte
COUNTY OF GARFIELD
STATE QF COLORADO
of said Lot 7;
of said Lot 8;
right-of-way fence
along the Southerly r.igbt-of-way
to the point of
111 Exhibit B •
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR SUNNYSIDE RANCH
JEAN M. BLUE
0404 ROAD 104
CARBONDALE, COLORADO
Section 25, Township 7, Range 88:
Government Lot Acres
1 34.0
2 23.0
5 17.25
6 10.85
7 6.0
8 39.65
9 47.33
10 51.23
11 56.11
14 9.84
15 17.31
16 5.43
Section 36, Township 7, Range 88:
2and3 20.50
Lot splits in 25-7-88
Lot splits in 25-7-88
Lot splits in 25-7-88
2.020
31.370
2.00
Total Acres 373.89, more or less