Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- Permit1 1 Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Skeet Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, GO Si sat - Phone: (970)945-8212 Fax: {970)384-3470 Project Address 7840 CR 115 CARBONDALE, CO Permit NO BLCO-12-10-:1665 Psnn:t Type: Cort [tterclal Building. Wotk`cfasslficakon: New ,r:: -: Peri( Status: Acte Issue Date: 12/612010 Expires: 06104/2011 Parcel 110. Subdivision Section Township Range 218735300057 Owner information Address Phone Cell I Public Service Company of Colorado1800 Lorimer ST Denver CO 303-571-7972 Contractor(s) Phone Primary Contractor Advanced Grading Specialists (303)467-1187 Yes Proposed Construction 1 Details Hopkins Sub Station North retaining wall FEES DUE Fee Commercial Building Fee Total: Amount $645.56 $645.56 Valuation: Total Sq Feet: $ 25,000.00 0 FEES PA 1D Inv Total Paytype Amt Paid Amt Due Inv # BLCO-12-10-20727 $ 0.00 Inv # BLCO-12-10-20728 $ 645.56 Check # 3054 $ 0.00 $645.56 $ 0.00 Required Inspections: Far Inspections call : 1(888)868-5306 Inspection IVR See Permit Record Building Department Copy Monday, December 6, 2010 2 L rr 01/3 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 81h Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, Co 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212 / Fax: 970-384-3470 / Inspection Line: 888-868-5306 Vi .r'ulrl I 4-, ti inuc,,,;`4:-31,-.\--,,o 1xPar1 No: (this inform q r b csc ut978949_134) Ok 6 ` 1- 2 Job Address: (if an addre has n bi n assign 1 ovide Cr, l lwy or Street Name & City) and legal description 7 C-0,1:1 / 3 Lot o: Block No: Subd.l Exemption: 4 Owner: (property owner) �j MailingAddress:4:::;• Total Fees: 695,6-6 Alt l'h; [� �/ 5 Contractor: �r Mail;ng A dress: :� 4` � - �+ / Alt Ph� ;5)75 6 Architect / E gineer: Mailing Address: Ph: Alt PI1: 7 Sq. Fl. o Building: Sq. Ft. or Acres of Lot: ....---r I lcight:� No. of Floors: 8 Use of Building: NI. t,' I L \ p1t.t n5 soh siu�o+) 9 Describe Work: 0, 11. 4c- k)•°-'- \ - C& -V''' O-1.., ')-A-,) I(.ii i 1i f 10 Class of Work: 2#lew ❑ Alteration ❑ Addition II Garage: ❑ Attached. ❑ Detached Septic: o ISDS ❑ Community Pcg12 Driveway Permit:Owners -'Ti valuation of Work: $ 5 (O ---,..("D Authority. flus application for a Budding Permit muni be signed by letter of authority, signed by the Owner, must be provided Legal Access. A Building Permit cannot be issued without proof of legate NOTICE 1 the °Whet of the property. described above, or an authorized agent. IFdte signature below Is not that elflike Owner, a separate with this Application. and adequate access to the property for purposes of inspections by the Building t)eputrncnl. , Electrical Permit, (2) County 1505 Permit, (3) another permit required for use on the property identified above, e.g State or Discharge Permit. autlorieed is not commenced within IRO days oldie date 01 -issuance and if work is suspended or abandoned fora period of 180 CERTIFICATION contained above is Irue and correct. I understand Thai the Building Departmcni accepts the Application, along with lire Aims based upon my certification as to accuracy. a Building Permit will be issued granting permission to hie., as Owner, to coast mei Ilse structure(s) and facilities detailed on s, and my agents will comply with provisions of any federal, state or local law regulating the work and are Garfield County Building Rcgulationts)). I acknowledge that the Building Penni' may be suspended or revoked, upon notice from the County. if the location, are not in compliance with Caunly Regulation(s) or any other applicabk law. described above, to inspect the work. 1 further acknowledge that die issuance oldie Building I'ennit docs riot prevent the flimsy, discovered after issuance; ur 12) stopping construction or use of the structure(s) ur racility(ics) if such is in violation work by the Building Department do not whatnots art acceptance of responsibility or liability by Ilse County of errors, omissions compliance with federal, state and Local Taws and County Regulations rest with me and my authorized agents, including without THE NOTICE & CERTIFICATION ABOVE: Other Permits, Multiple separate permits may be required; ( I) Slate Courtly 1lighwayl Ruad Access or a Stoic Wastewater Void Periuitt, A Building Permit becomes null and void if the work days after cormeneemcnt. I hereby certify that I have read this Application and that the information and specifications and other data subnutled by inc or minty behalf (submittals), Assuming wwpleteness of the submittals and approval of this Application, the submittals reviewed by the Building Department In consideration of the issuance oldie Building Permit, 1 agree that 1 Code. ISDS regulations and applicable land use regulations (County construction or use of the structure -Is) and lkcitity(ies), described above. I hereby grant permission to the Building i epartrnent to enter the property, Building Official kiln: (11 requiring the correction of errors in the submittals, ofCounty Regufa:IMO) or any other applicable law. Review of this Application, including submittals. and inspections ofthe or discrepancies. As the °oiler, 1 acknowledge that responsibility for limitation my architect designer, engineer midi or builder. 1 HEREBY A NOW! .EDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND OWNER SIGNATURE DATE P1 v1 l -(o- to -SO5L (us.SG STAFF USE ONLY Special Conditions: Adjusted Valuation: i rVODr �L! 26— Plan Check Fee: 23-y, e// PermitFee 394 `�S Manu home Fee: Misc Fees: �� �s ISDS/Fee: r-- Total Fees: 695,6-6 Fees Paid: (0145.54) Balance Due: IIP Na & Issue Dale: ISDS No & Issued Date: a(o-1665 Pits. Setbacks: �.-S.j"/ %Q OCC Group:I (,L Const Type: E 6 Zoning: BLDGDEPT: /3/4,/,';‘, I'I.N -' D1':111• APPROVAL • IDA'IT APPROVAL DA'i'E Building Plan Review Description of Work: Hopkins Sub Station North retaining wall Bin #: Location Address: CARBONDALE, CO General information Contacts Case Manager; David Bartholomew Plan Case Number: BLDG -12-I0-6672 Parcel: 218735300057 Application Date: 12/06/2010 Owner: I'ublic Service Company of Colorado Applicant: Public Service Company of Colorado Applicant Phone: 303-571-7972 Email: Building PlanninglZoninq ✓ Engineered Foundation i Property Line Setbacks '1+ Driveway Permit 30ft Stream Setbacks '/ Surveyed Site Plan Flood Plain AJ/4 Septic Permit and Setbacks Building height Gradeffopography 30% Toning Sign -off VAef Attach Residential Plan Review List 4)//1 Road Impact Fees /!i Minimum Application Questionnare HOAIDRC Approval / Subdivision Plat Notes Gradeffopography 40% ,i/p r ,. Fire Department. Review Planning Issues / Valuation DeterminationlFees Subdivision Plat Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker General Comments: Attach Conditions f, Application Signed Plan Reviewer To Sign Application /11 ParcellSchedule No. !(� 40# Snowload Letter - Manu. Homes Soils Report I V,q/a,40-1 25 Oaa a ci ;uhlfie1 ) r, t /- -Pe 39, z$ `ice ref z•ry• .3l —b • .JAL I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand, and answered these questions to the best of my ability. N Signature Date Phone3C 3 ti0029 {days} L)g.273 (evenings) Project Naive: Project Address: Nate: r�,�lyRn/I s On any of these questions you may be required to provide this information. If required information is not supplied, delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of the permit. *If you have answered "Not necessary for this project" on any of the questions and it is determined by the Building Official that the information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, please expect the following: A. The application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review. B. Delay in issuance of the permit. C. Delay in preceeding with construction. b pm inrepcomm,lun24 i O 7 l'age1ot1 Mark E Davis From: "Ramos, Vincent C" 'Vincent.Ramos@xcelenergy.com> To: <agsmark©hotmaii.com> Cc: "Simpson, Don" Don.Simpson@XCELENERGY.COM>; "Ferguson, Bernadette" ‹bernie.ferguson@xcelenergy,com>; "Sanders, George W' George.W.Sanders@xcelenergy.com>; "'Rodney Quinn"' <RQuinn@gswc.us> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 1:31 PM Subject: Hopkins Retaining Wall permit approval 12/3/2010 Dec. 6. 2010 9:4 AM Sating & Land UgKts N .0$87 December 6, 2010 Garfield County Building Depailment Attention; Dave Bartholomew Dear Dave; This will confirm that Richard Croisant of Advanced Specialty Grading, is authorized to sign and receive documents pertaining to the ongoing project at Xcel Energy's "Hopkins Substation. Advanced Specialty Grading is a subcontractor• performing Civil work for Xcel, Re_ard , 4 r -0040 0 5 dens 'it et-' Tanager Xcel Energy 303-294-2725 G&ech HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81801 Phone: 970-945-7958 Fax: 970.945-8454 honeoL honeotech.com Earthwork Compaction Testing Report Client: Advanced Grading Specialists Job No.: 110367A Day: Wednesday Attn: Mark Davis Date: 1015111 13291 West 58th Avenue Page: 1 of 2 Arvada, Colorado 80002 Xcel Hopkins Electric Substation Expansion, County Road 115, 3.8 Miles Northeast of CMC Spring Valley Campus, Garfield County, Colorado Project: Report No.: 31 Weather: Clear, calm, dry Temperature: 56° at 11:00 am Earthwork Contractor: Advanced Grading Services (AGS) Equipment Used: Description of Earthwork Tested: Verbal Communication: Grader, smooth drum roller Class 6 aggregate base course surface layer on 69 Yard south entrance and loop road, and north entrance, north side and northeast roads was tested for compaction. Results were acceptable. Jason and Mark with AGS were informed of our test results. Placement and Compaction Procedure: Not observed by HP Geotech. Lift Thickness: Max. Rock Size: 3/4" Compactor(s) Used: smooth drum roller Moisture Conditioning: Number of Passes: Nuclear Gauge Moisture/Density Test Results Test No. Location Depth or Elev. Field Ory Density (pcf) Field Moisture Content % Field Comp' (%) Min. Comp. Req. (%) Proctor Lab No. 1 30' east of south gate Base grade 132.4 4.3 97 95 203-10 2 80' east of south gate Soso grade 136.1 3.4 100 95 203-10 3 150' east of south gate Base grade 134.2 3.9 98 95 203-10 4 69 Yard east intersection Base grade 131.9 4.3 97 95 203-10 5 100' south of 69 Yard east intersection Base grade 134.2 4.0 98 95 203-10 6 69 Yard center of south road Base grade 129.6 4.3 95 95 203-10 7 69 Yard SW road, 30' N of SW curve Base grade 131.3 4.1 96 95 203-10 Proctor Sample Reference: Lab No. Method Description Max. Dry Dens. (%) Opt. Moist. (%) 203-10 ASTM © 698 Class 6 aggregate base course, Lafarge Powers Pit 136.6 6.8 THIS REPORT FRES'=NTS OPINIONS AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVAOlONS:F FILL PLACSINENT, YUE HAVE RELIED ON THE CONTRACTOR TO CONTINUE APPLYING THE RECOMMENDED COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND MOISTURE TO FILL DURING THE TIMES WI-IEH OUR OBSERVER ISNOT OBSERVING OPERATIONS. THE NUCLEAR DENSOMETER METHOD OF TESTING WAS USED IN SUBSTANTIAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D 6938. Distribution: Advanced Grading Specialists - Mark Davis (agsmark@hotmai€.cam) Garfield County—Jim Wilson {iwilsonvoaarfie1d-county.com) Thomas J. Westhoff, CET James Parker, PG, EIT Field Technician Reviewed By .� �H P C^ tech HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81650 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Earthwork Compaction Testing Report Client: Advanced Grading Specialists Attn: Mark Davis 13291 West 58th Avenue Arvada, Colorado 80002 Project: Job No.: 110367A Day: Wednesday Date: 1015111 Page: 2 of 2 Report No.: 31 Xcel Hopkins Electric Substation Expansion, County Road 115, 3.8 Miles Northeast of CMC Spring Valley Campus, Garfield County, Colorado Nuclear Gauge Moisture/Density Test Results Test Na. Location Depth or Elev. Field Dry Density (pd) Field Moisture Content (%) Field C°� p' { ) Min' Comp. Req_ (%) Proctor Lab No, 8 69 Yard SW road, 30' S of W intersection base grade 130.0 3.3 95 95 203-10 9 North entrance road, 30' E of north gate base grade 131.8 3.9 96 95 203-10 10 North entrance road, 110' E of north gate base grade 131.0 5.6 96 95 203-10 11 36' E of center of E side of transformer base grade 130.1 5.8 95 95 203-10 12 12' N of center of N side of transformer base grade 135.8 3.3 99 95 203-10 13 9' W of center of W side of transformer base grade 131.6 5.2 96 95 203-10 14 North road, 100' E of E side of transformer base grade 129.9 5.8 95 95 203-10 15 North road, 200' E of E side of transformer base grade 131.4 3.7 96 95 203-10 16 North road, 340' E of E side of transformer base grade 132.9 4.2 97 95 203-10 17 North road, at NE corner base grade 130.1 4.7 95 95 203-10 18 East road, 100' S of NE corner base grade 130.2 3.8 95 95 203-10 19 East road, 180' S of NE corner base grade 132.7 4.2 97 95 203-10 Proctor Sample Reference: Lab No. Method Description 203-10 (108470F) ASTM D 698 j Class 6 aggregate base course, Lafarge Powers Pit THE NUCLEAR DENSOMETER METHOD OF TESTING WAS USED IN SUBSTANTIAL ACCORDANCE WITH RSTM D6938. Distribution: Advanced Grading Specialists - Mark Davis (acsmarkahotmail.com) Garfield County - Jim Wilson (1wilsonOaarfield-countv.com) Max. Dry Dens. (pot') Opt. Moist. (%) 136.6 6.8 Thomas J. Westhoff, CET James Parker, PG, EIT Field Technician Reviewed By Gtech HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81801 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hogeo@hoaeotech.com Earthwork Compaction Testing Report Client: Advanced Grading Specialists Job No.: 110367A Day: Wednesday Attn: Mark Davis Date: 9/7111 13291 West 58th Avenue Report No.: 30 Page: 1 of 2 Arvada, Colorado 80002 Xcel Hopkins Electric Substation Expansion, County Road 115, 3.8 Miles Northeast of CMC Spring Valley Campus, Garfield County, Colorado Project: Weather: Cloudy, calm, light rain Temperature: 52° at 9:30 am Earthwork Contractor: Advanced Grading Specialists (AGS) Equipment Used: Cat C5433 vibratory smooth drum roller Description of Earthwork 230 Yard and south and east perimeter roads were tested at aggregate base Tested: course grade. One test area was initially slightly below specification. After additional compaction an acceptable re -test was obtained. Final tests indicated acceptable compaction was obtained. Proctor value referenced is from the same source sampled for another project. Verbal Communication: Jason and Mark with AGS were informed of our test results. Placement and Compaction Procedure: Not observed by HP Geotech. Lift Thickness: Max. Rock Size: Compactor(s) Used: vibratory smooth drum roller Moisture Conditioning: Number of Passes: Test No. Location Nuclear Gauge Moisture/Density Test Results Depth or Elev. Field Dry Density (pct) Field Moisture Content v�v Field Comp. (%) Min. Comp. Req. (%) Proctor Lab No. 1 230 Yard, center of south side base grade 135.6 1 5.8 99 95 203-10 2 230 Yard, SW area base grade 131.6 5.5 96 95 203-10 3 230 Yard, SE area base grade 131.0 1 4.9 96 95 203-10 4 230 Yard, center base grade 129.8 1 4.9 95 95 203-10 5 230 Yard, center of west side base grade 132.5 1 4.9 97 95 .203-10 6 230 Yard, NW area base grade 132.3 5,6 97 95 203-10 Proctor Sample Reference: Lab No. Method Description Max. Dry i Opt. Dens. (%) Moist. (%) 203-10 (108470F) ASTM D 698 Class 6 aggregate base course, Lafarge Powers Pit 136.8 6.8 THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS AS A RESULT OF OUR OaSERVATIONSOF FILL PLACEMENT, Vv HAVE REL#Eo ON THE CONTRACTOR TO CONTINUE APPLYING 771E RECOMMEND COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND MOISTURE TO FILL DURING THE TIMES WEN OUR OBSERVER IS NOT OBSERVING OPERATIONS. THE NUCLEAR OENSOMETER ME7HOD OF TESTING WAS USED IN SUBSTANTIAL ACCOROANCE WITH ASTM O 8838. Distribution: Advanced Grading Specialists - Mark Davis (acsmark{u�hotmalI.com) Garfield County -- Jim Wilson (JwilsonCAgarfield-county.con j Thomas J. Westhoff, CET James Parker, PG, Ell' Field Technician- Reviewed By HP 5020 County Road 154 Geotech Ftiono:Glenwood -945gs, Colorado $1650 Phone: 970-945 ?988 Fax: 970-945-8454 HEPWORTH-PAWLAI[ GEDTECHN1CAL hpgeo@hpgeniech.cam Earthwork Compaction Testing Report Client: Advanced Grading Specialists Job Na.; 110367A Day: Wednesday Attn: Attn: Mark Davis 13291 West 581h Avenue Date: 917111 Arvada, Colorado 80002 Report No.: 30 Page: 2 of 2 Project: Xcel Hopkins Electric Substation Expansion, County Road 115, 3.8 Miles Northeast of CMC Spring Valley Campus, Garfield County, Colorado Nuclear Gauge Moisture/Density Test Results Test No. Location Depth or Elev, Field Dry Density (pcf) Field Moisture Content (%) Field Comp" (%)(%) Min. Comp. Req. Proctor Lab No. 7 230 Yard, center of north side base 132.4 5.3 97 95 203-10 8 230 Yard, center of west 113 _grade base grade 127.9 5.6 94 95 203-10 8A Retest of 118 above base grade 130.3 5.6 95 95 203-10 9 230 Yard, center of east 113 base grade 133.6 5.4 98 95 203-10 10 230 Yard, NE area base 131.0 5.6 96 95 203-10 11 230 Yard, center of north 113 _grade base grade 130.1 5.8 95 95 203-10 12 230 Yard, center of east 113 base grade 131.4 4.8 96 95 203-10 13 230 Yard, 20' west of center base grade 131.6 5.2 96 95 203-10 14 230 Yard, center of south 113 base grade 130.7 5.4 96 95 203-10 15 230 Yard pecornter erroad at SW ase grade 134.1 5.9 98 95 203-10 1S 230 Yard perimeter road, south side base grade 133.6 5.2 98 95 203-10 17 230 Yard perimeter road at SE corner base grade 131.3 5.2 96 95 203-10 18 230 Yard Pers teeter road, east ode 136.1 5.0 100 95 203-10 19 230 Yard perimeter road, east side, north of center base grade 132.3 5.2 97 95 203-10 20 230 Yard perimeter road at NE corner base grade 133.0 6.3 97 95 203-10 Proctor Sample Reference: Lab No. Method Description Max. Dry Dens. (pcf) Opt. Moist. (%) 203-10 (108470F) ASTM 0 698 CIass 6 aggregate base course, Lafarge Powers Pit 136.6 6,8 THE NUCLEAR DENS0METER METHS 0' TESTING WAS USED IN SUBSTANTIAL ACCORDANNCEWETH ASTM 06935. Distribution: Advanced Grading Specialists - Mark Davis (aismark@hotmail.com) Garfield County - Jim Wilson (iwilson(a7garfield-countv.com) Thomas J. Westhoff, CET James Parker, PG, EIT Field Technician Reviewed By HEPWORTH•PRWLAK GEQTECHN1CAL Client: Project: 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 8160Y1 Phone: 970.945.7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hp rmo(c hpge atech. com Earthwork Compaction Testing Report Advanced Grading Specialists Job No.: 110367A Attn: Mark Davis 13291 West 58th Avenue Report No.: 28 Arvada, Colorado 80002 Xcel Hopkins Electric Substation Expansion, County Road 115, 3.8 Miles Northeast of CMC Spring Valley Campus, Garfield County, Colorado Day: Date: Page: Thursday 8/11/11 1 of 1 Weather: Partly cloudy, light breeze, dry Temperature: 88° at 3:45 pm Earthwork Contractor: Advanced Grading Specialists (AGS) Equipment Used: Description of Earthwork Tested: Verbal Communication: Grader, Cat C8433 vibratory smooth drum roller South road subgrade was tested with acceptable compaction results. Jason with AGS was informed of our test results. Placement and Compaction Procedure: Not observed by HP Geotech. Lift Thickness: Max. Rock Size: Compactor(s) Used: vibratory smooth drum roller Moisture Conditioning: Number of Passes: Nuclear Gauge Moisture/Density Test Results Test No. Location South Road Subgrade Depth or Elev. Field Dry Density (Pcf) Field Moisture Content Field Comp' (%)(%) Min. Comp. Req. Proctor Lab No. 1 North lane, 50 feet north of 69 transformer subgrade 110.6 16.2 100+ 95 338-10 2 South lana, 50 feet north of 69 transformer subgrade 107.2 15.5 100 95 338-10 3 Road centerline at Column Line 5/115 subgrade 110.4 16.2 100+ 95 338-10 4 Road centerline at Column Line 6/115 subgrade 105.1 14.2 98 95 338-10 Proctor Sample Reference: Lab No. Method Description Max. Dry Dens. (%) Opt. Moist. (%) 338-10 ASTM © 698 Lean Clay with Sand 107.8 17.3 THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS A$ A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATIONSOF FILL PLACEMENT, WE HAVE RELIED ON THE CONTRACTOR TO CONTINUE APPLYING THE RECOMMENDED COMPACTIVE EFFORT ANO MOISTURE TO FILL DURING THE TIMES WHEN OUR OBSERVER 15 NOT OBSERVING OPERATIONS. THE NUCLEAR DENSOME TER METHOD OF TESTING WAS USED IN SUBS TANTL4L. ACCORDANCE WTH RUM 0 6&3S. Distribution: Advanced Grading Specialists - Mark Davis (aasmark8,hotmail.com) Garfield County — Jim Wilson (iwilsonauarfleld-countv.com) Thomas J. Westhoff, CET James Parker, PG, EIT Field Technician Reviewed By H P5020 GeOt eCh HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Earthwork Compaction Testing Report Client: Advanced Grading Specialists Job No.: 110367A Attu: Mark Davis 13291 West 58th Avenue Report No.: 29 • Arvada, Colorado 80002 Project: Xcel Hopkins Electric Substation Expansion, County Road 115, 3.8 Spring Valley Campus, Garfield County, Colorado County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970.945.8454 hDeeofthI geotech.com 81801 of 1 of CMC Day: Friday Date: 8/12/11 Page: 1 Miles Northeast Weather: Clear, light breeze, dry Temperature: 68° at 10:15 am Earthwork Contractor: Advanced Grading Specialists (AGS) Equipment Used: Cat 140H grader, Cat CS433 vibratory smooth drum roller Description of Earthwork South road subgrade was tested with acceptable compaction results. Tested: Verbal Communication: Jason with AGS was informed of our test results. Placement and Compaction Procedure; Not observed by HP Geotech. Lift Thickness: Max. Roc( Size: Moisture Conditioning: Compactor(s) Used: vibratory smooth drum roller Number of Passes: Nuclear Gauge Moisture/Density Test Results Test No. Location South Road subgrade Depth or Elev. Field Dry Density (pcf)% Field Moisture Content Field Comp.Req. (%)(ti/o) Min. Comp, Proctor Lab No. 1 North lane, fig yard, Column Line 7/115 subgrade 93.8 24.7 100 95 005-11 2 Read centerline, 30' W of end of curb subgrade 95.0 23.4 100+ 95 005-11 Proctor Sample Reference: Lab No. Method Description Max. Dry Dens. (%) Opt. Moist. (%) 005-11 ASTM D.698 Fat Clay 93.4 25.2 THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS AS A RESULT OF OUR OSSERVATBONSOF COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND MOISTURE TO FILL DURING THE TIMES WHEN THE NUCLEAR DENSOMETER METHOD OF TESTING WAS USED IN SUBSTANTIAL Distribution: Advanced Grading Specialists - Mark Davis (agsmarkna,hotrnall.com) Garfield County — Jim Wilson (IwilsonaLoarfietd-countv.com) FILL PLACEMENT, WE HAVE RELIED ON THE CONTRACTOR TO CONTINUE APPLYING THE RECOMMENDED OUR OBSERVER IS NOT DESERVING OPERATIONS. ACCORDANCE WTH ASTM 0 6S3e. Thomas J. Westhoff, CET James Parker, PG, EIT Field Technician Reviewed By Gtech HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgegp hpge ote c h. com Earthwork Compaction Testing Report Client: Advanced Grading Specialists Job No.: 110367A Day: Friday Attn: Mark Davis Date: 4122111 13291 West 58th Avenue Report No.: 14 Page: 1 of 1 Arvada, Colorado 80002 Xcel Hopkins Electric Substation Expansion, County Road 115, 3.8 Miles Northeast of CMG Spring Valley Campus, Garfield County, Colorado Weather: Partly cloudy, windy, dry Temperature: 50° at 4:30 pm Project: Earthwork Contractor: Equipment used: Advanced Grading Specialists (AGS) Grader, smooth drum roller Description of Earthwork Southeast perimeter road footprint and south wall subgrade was tested with Tested: acceptable results. Verbal Communication: Jason with AGS and Mike with Great Southwestern were informed of our test results. Placement and Compaction Procedure: Not observed by HP Geotech. Lift Thickness: Max. Rock Size: Compactor(s) Used: vibratory smooth drum roller Moisture Conditioning: Number of Passes: Nuclear Gauge Moisture/Density Test Results Test No. Location Depth or Elev. Field Dry Density (pct Field Moisture Content Field Comp. (%) Min. Comp. Req. (%) Proctor Lab No. 1 2 Southeast perimeter road 3' below footprint, 50' NE of road SE curve subgrade South wall subgrade, center of wall wall subgrade 106.3 105.4 19.7 18.5 99 98 95 98 3 Southeast perimeter road footprint, 100' NE of road SE curve 2' below subgrade 103.9 20.7 96 Proctor Sample Reference: 95 338-10 338-10 338-100 Lab No. Method Description Max. Dry Dens. (%) Opt. Moist. (%) 338-10 ASTM D 698 Lean clay with sand 107.8 17.6 THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATIONSOF FILL PLACEMENT, WE HAVE RELIED ON THE CONTRAC Tort TO CONTINUE APPLYING THE RECOMMENDED COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND MOISTURE TO FILL DDRINCTHE TIMES WHEN DUR OBSERVER IS NOT OBSERVING OPERATIONS. THE NUCLEAR ❑ENSOMI= I ER N.ETHOD DF 1 ESTING WAS USED IN SUBSTANTIAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D 6936_ Distribution: Advanced Grading Specialists - Mark Davis tagsmarkPhotmail.comj Garfield County — Jim Wilsontiwilson@cLartield-county.comj Thomas J. Westhoff, CET James Parker, PG, FIT Field Technician Reviewed By Gtech HEPWORTH-PAWLAIS GEOTECHNICAL Earthwork Client: Advanced Grading Specialists Attn: Mark Davis 13291 West 58th Avenue Arvada, Colorado 80002 Protect: 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hlxleo(5 hpgeotech_com Compaction Testing Report Job No: 110367A Day: Date: Report No.: 13 Page: Monday 04/12/11 1 of 1 Xcel Hopkins Electric Substation Expansion, County Road 115, 3.8 Miles Northeast of CMC Spring Valley Campus, Garfield County, Colorado Weather: Partly, cloudy, breezy Temperature: 37° at 9:30 am, 45° at 2:30 pm Earthwork Contractor: Advanced Grading Specialists (AGS) Equipment Used: 315 Cat Trackhoe, Cat 433C smooth drum roller, Cat 433C pad foot roller Description of Earthwork Tested: Two site visits were made today for testing transformer pad containment wall backfill. Morning tests indicated compaction below specification with moisture contents 3 to 7% above optimum. Backfill was removed and replaced and afternoon re -tests met compaction specifications at about 3% below optimum. Verbal Communication: Brian with AGS was advised of our test results. Placement and Compaction Procedure: Not observed by HP Geotech. Nuclear Gauge Moisture/Density Test Results Test No. Location Transformer Pad Containment Walls Exterior Backfill Depth or Elev. Field Dry Den Oct)sity F1eld Moisture Content % Field Comp. p' ) Min. Comp. Req. (%) Proctor Lab No. 1 By east wall stairs 1' below Grade 104.4 24.2 94 95 338-10 2 North wall, 10' from northeast corner grade 100.5 23.5 93 95 338-10 3 North wall, 20' from northwest corner grade 99.5 21.5 92 95 338-10 4 West wall, about center of wall 1 below grade 102.4 20.1 95 95 338-10 1A Retest of #1 above, by east wall stairs 1' below grade 95.2 22.3 100+ 95 005-11 2A Retest of #2 above, north wall, 10' from northeast corner grade 94.1 21.5 100+ 95 005-11 3A Retest of #3 above, north wall, 20' from northwest corner grade 93.1 21.7 100 95 005-11 4A Retest of #4, west wait about center of wall 11 below grade 92.9 22.0 99 95 005-11 Proctor Sample Reference: Lab No. Method Description Max. Dry i Opt. Dens. (%) Moist. (%) 338-10 ASTM D 698 Lean Cly with Sand 107-8 17.3 005-11 ASTM D 698 Fat Clay 93.4 25.2 THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATIONSOF FILL PLACEMENT, WE HAVE RELIED ON THE CONTRACTOR TO CONTINUF. APpLYIN(;'rHE RECOMMENDED _ COMPACT:VE EFFORT AND MOISTURE TO FILL DURING 1HE TIMES WHEN OUR OBSERVER IS NOT O$SERVING OPERATIONS. THE NUCLEAR DENSOML1ER METHOD OF TES11NG WAS USED IN SUBSTANTIAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D 6938. Distribution: Advanced Grading Specialists - Mark Davis (artsmark(r hatmail.com) Garfield County Jim Wilson (jwilson(Eigarfield-caunty.com) Chris McFarland Thomas J. Westhoff, CET Field Technician Reviewed By Gtech KEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs. Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hp q e<o(ud h oQ a otec:h . Corn Earthwork Compaction Testing Report Client: Advanced Grading Specialists Attn: Mark Davis 13291 West 58th Avenue Arvada, Colorado 80002 Xcel Hopkins Electric Substation Expansion, County Road 115, 3.8 Miles Northeast of CMC Spring Valley Campus, Garfield County, Colorado Project: Job No.: 110367A Report No,: 15 Day: Date: Page: Thursday 4128111 1 of 1 Weather: Partly cloudy, windy, dry Earthwork Contractor: Equipment Used: Description of Earthwork Tested: Verbal Communication: Temperature: 57° at 4:30 pm Advanced Grading Specialists (AGS) Grader, loader, Cat CS 433C smooth drum roller, Cat CP 433C pad foot roller Southeast perimeter road embankment was tested with acceptable compaction results with moisture contents were about 4 percent above optimum. Jason with AGS and Mike with Great Southwestern were informed of our test results. Placement and Compaction Procedure: Not observed by HP Geotech. Lift Thickness: Max. Rock Size: Compactor(s) Used: vibratory smooth drum roller Moisture Conditioning: Number of Passes: Nuclear Gauge Moisture/Density Test Results Test No. Location Depth or Elev. Field Dry Density (pc{') Field Moisture Content 'A(%) Field Comp. Min. Comp. Re CA) Proctor Lab No. 1 Southeast perimeter road, 100' NE of road SE curve rough subgrade 102.8 22.1 95 95 _ 338-10 2 Southeast perimeter road footprint, 50' NE of road SE curve 1.5' below subgrade 102.9 21.6 95 95 338-10 Proctor San ple Reference: 1 Lab No. 338-10 Method Description ASTM a 698 Lean clay with sand Max. Dry Dens. (%)- 107.8 Opt. Moistt.(°I°) � 17.6 THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPIRIONSAS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATIONSOF FILL PLACEMENT. WE HAVE RELIED ON THE CONTRACTOR TD CONTINUE APPLYING THE RFCOLIMENDED COW PACTIVE EFFORT AHD MOISTURE TO FILL DURING THE TIMES WHEN OUR OBSERVER IS NOT OBSERVING OPERATIONS. IHE NUCLEAR DENSDMETER METHOD OF TESTING WAS USED IN SUBSTANTIAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D 6939. Distribution: Advanced Grading Specialists - Mark Davis (agsmarlc(a?hotmail.com) Garfield County —Jim Wilson (jwiison{c�garfield-county.com) Thomas J. Westhoff, CET James Parker, PG, EIT Field Technician Reviewed By H P5020 County Road 154 7 Glenwo9prings, Colorado 81601 Phone: Springs, Geotech S Fax: 970-945-8454 HE•PWORTH- PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL rOpeaCc?hA4eotech.coln Earthwork Compaction Testing Report Client: Advanced Grading Specialists Job No.: 110367A Day: Wednesday Attn: Mark Davis Date: 1126111 13291 West 58th Avenue Report No.: 9 Page: 1 of 1 Arvada, Colorado 80002 Project: Xcel Hopkins Electric Substation Expansion, County Road 115, 3.8 Miles Northeast of CMC Spring Valley Campus, Garfield County, Colorado Weather: Clear, calm, dry Temperature: 24° at 11:00 am Earthwork Contractor: Advanced Grading Specialists (AGS) Equipment Used: Cat 315D Trackhoe, Wacker RT remote control double drum roller Description of Earthwork Drainage swale outside fence at north side of substation had been excavated Tested: to subgrade and was being compacted. Test in compacted subgrade area indicated acceptable compaction. Verbal Communication: AGS operator, Bart with Great Southwestern, and Mike with Xcel were informed of our test results. Placement and Compaction Procedure: • Observed by HP Geotech. Lift Thickness: native subgrade Max. Rock Size: 114" Moisture none Conditioning: Compactor(s) Used: Wacker RT remote double drum roller Number of Passes: not observed Nuclear Gauge MoisturelDensity Test Results Test No. Location Depth or Elev. Field Dry Density f) (Pc Field Moisture o(%) Field Comp. Min. Comp. Req.Lab !0 Proctor No. 1 Drainage swale north of substation north fence subgrade 105.9 12.5 , 98 90 338-10 Proctor Sample Reference: Lab No. Method Description Max. Dry Dens. go) Opt. Moist. (Io} ` 338-10 ASTM D 698 Lean clay with sand 1 107.8 17.3 THIS REPORT PRP.SFNTS OPINIONS AS A RESULT OFOUR OBSERVATIONSOF COMPACTIVE EFFORT AND MOIST UNE TO FILL DURING THE TIMES WHEN THF NUCLEAR DEN$OMETER METHOD OF TESTING WAS USED IN SUBSTANTIAL Distribution: Advanced Grading Specialists - Mark Davis (agsmarkRhotmaii,com) Garfield County - Jirn Wilson jwilsonia,aarfield-county.com) FILL PLACEMENT, WE HAVE RELIED ON THE CONTRACTOR TO CONTINUE APPLYING THE RECOMMENDED OUR OUSEKVEH ES NOTOBSERVING OPERATIONS. ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM U sm. Thomas J. Westhoff, CET James Parker, PG, EIT Field Technician Reviewed By Geatec� H EPWORTH Client: Advanced Attn: Attn: 13291 Arvada, Project; Compaction Substation Expansion, Garfield County, 500 Glenwood Phone: Fax: 970-945-8454 hoge-4@hooeotech.com Testing Report Job No.: 110387A Report No.: 7 County Road 115, 3.8 Miles Colorado Temperature: 20° County Road 154 5945-79, Colorado 970.945-7s85 81601 1 of CMC H h - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Earthwork Grading Specialists Mark Davis West 58th Avenue Colorado 80002 Xcel Hopkins Electric Spring Valley Campus, Day: Date: Page: Northeast at 2:00 Monday 1/10/11 1 of Weather: Partly cloudy, calm, dry pm Earthwork Contractor: Advanced Grading Specialists Equipment Used: trackhoe Description of Earthwork We performed density testing in two locations at rough subgrade on the Tested: transformer pad. Results indicated 95 percent compaction at about 3 percent above optimum moisture. Soil temperature measured 35 degrees at the time of testing. Verbal Communication: Advanced Grading Specialists foreman was informed of our test results. Placement and Compaction Procedure: Not observed by HP Geotech. Lift Thickness: Max. Rock Size: Moisture Conditioning: Compactor(s) Used: Number of Passes: Test No. Nuclear Gauge Moisture/Density. Depth or Elev. Field Dry Density {pcf} Test Results Moisture Content % Location Transformer pad area below void forms Meld Field C smp. (%) Min. Comp. Req. (%) Proctor Lab No. 1 10' east of middle of west side of pad subgradeRough 102.7 20.5 95 95 338-10 2 5' south of rrriddpaedof north side of Rous ode 101.9 20.9 95 95 338-10 Proctor Sample Reference: Lab No. Method Description Max. Dry Dens. (%) Opt. Moist. (%) 338-10 ASTM D 698 lean clay with sand 107.8 17.3 THIS REPORT PRESENTS CUMPACTIVE EFFORT 1HE NUCLEAR DENS Distribution: Advanced Grading Garfield County OPINiOir'S AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATJONSOF FILL PI ACt MF_NT, AND MOISTURE TO TILL DURING IIIL TINES WIILN OLER OBSERVER IS DILE 1ER TAE rtiC}O CA- I ES IJNG WAS USED IN SUBSTANTIAL AGCOROANCS Specialists - Mark Davis (agsmark(hotmail.com) — Jirn Wilson tjwilson{r Barfield-cnunty.com) WE HAVE RFL[}O ON THE CONTRACTOR TO CONTINUE APPLYENG THE RECOMMENDED NOT OBSERVING OPERATIONS. WITH ASTM R 6336. Orgill Thomas J. Westhoff, CET Justin Field Technician Reviewed By H �� � HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Earthwork Compaction Testing Report Client: Advanced Grading Specialists Job No.: 110367A Attn: Mark Davis 13291 West 58th Avenue Report No,: 8 Arvada, Colorado 80002 Project: Xcel Hopkins Electric Substation Expansion, County Road 115, Spring Valley Campus, Garfield County, Colorado 6020 County Road 154 Ph n Springs, Colorado Phone;e: 87 970-945.7988 Fax; 970-945-8454 hnoeo@hooeotech.corrt 81601 1 of CMC Day: Thursday Date: 1(13111 Page: 1 of 3.8 Miles Northeast Weather: Partly cloudy, calm, dry Temperature: 34° at 4:30 pm Earthwork Contractor: Advanced Grading Specialists (AGS) Equipment Used: Wacker RT walk behind double drum roller Description of Earthwork Containment Pit #4 area at south side of new transformer pad was tested at Tested: subgrade elevation with acceptable compaction results. Verbal Communication: Brian with AGS and Bart England with Great Southwestern were informed, Placement and Compaction Procedure: Not observed by HP Geotech. Lift Thickness: Max. Rock Size: Moisture Conditioning: Compactor(s) Used: Wacker RT walk behind double drum roller Number of Passes: Nuclear Gauge MoisturelDensity Test Results Test Location Depth or Elev. Field Dry Den y sitNo. Fiel Mo sture Content o/a Field Comp.Req. Min. Comp. (%) Proctor Lab No. 1 Containment Pit #4 area subgrade 105.5 19.6 98 98 338-10 Proctor Sample Reference: Lab No. Method Description Max. Dens, 107.8 Dry (%) Moist. Opt. (%) 17.3 338-10 ASTM D 698 Lean clay with sand THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATIONSOF COMPACTWVE EFFORT AND MOISTURE 70 FR.; DURING THE TIMES WHEN THE NUN FAR DENSOMETER METHOD OF TESTING WAS USED IN SUBSTANTIAL Distribution: Advanced Grading Specialists - Mark Davis (agsmarkcfahotmail.com) Garfield County—Jim Wilson (Jwilson(garfield-county.com) FILL PLACEMENT, WE HAVE RELIED ON THE CONTRACTOR 7o CONTINUE APPLYING THE RECOMMENDED OUR OBSERVER IS NOT 08 SEWVIWG OPERATIONS ACCORDANCE OATH ASTM 0 5938. Thomas J. Westhoff, CET James Parker, PG, EIT _ Field Technician Reviewed By Laboratory Proctor Compaction Test Report 95 92.5 Dry density, pcf N co V 7 3 \\_,f ! _ Tom... `"'--T^— V LAVfor Sp.G. = 2.55 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 Water content, % Test specification: ASTM D 698-91 Procedure A Standard Elevt Depth Classification Nat Moist, Sp.G. LL Pi % > #4 °% No.200 IJSCS AASHTO CL A-7-6(16) 2.4 42 19 0,0 84 TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Maximum dry density = 92.4 pcf Optimum moisture =25.4 Lean Clay with Sand Project No. 110367A Client: Advanced Grading Specialists Project: XceI Hopkins Substation Expansion, County Road I 15, Garfield County, Colorado Date: 11-18-10 O Location: Sediment Basin Sample Number: 336-10 Remarks: See Figure IA For Gradation Results Figure 1 Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Glenwood Springs, Colorado Tested By; cm Checked By: TJW PERCENT FINER 100 90 80 70 60 60 40 30 20 10 0 Particle Size Distribution Report o 0 0 0 0 8 N 7 Y M N .— _ al ,1 # Ntk # 4k # 41 ak 41 PERCENT FINER SPEC.* PERCENT PASS? (XNO) ! I 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 #16 • -"•111•1 1 4apllIllIllIlIllMll r I I #50 92 #100 87 4200 84 1 1 1 - I I I ! 1 1 1 I I I F - I 1 1 I € --1 11 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I-- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 1 i ° 1 I 1 1 I 1 ! I 1 € 1 1 1 J- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 I I € 1 ! ! -i ! 1 1 I ! r I 11 1 € i 1 1 € i 1 1 r 1 € r i 1 1 I ! 1 1 I! 1 1 1 € 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I_ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 I l I 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 100 10 1 0 1 0.01 0.001 (,RAIN SIZE - mm. % +3" % Gravel Coarse Fine % Sand Coarse Medium Fine Fines Silt Clay 0 0 0 1 5 10 84 SIEVE SIZE PERCENT FINER SPEC.* PERCENT PASS? (XNO) f4 100 #8 100 #16 99 #30 97 #50 92 #100 87 4200 84 (no spec:Elution provided) Location: Sediment Basin Sample Number: 33G-10 Matenal Description Lean Clay with Sand Atterberg Limits PL= 23 LL= 42 P1= 19 Coefficients D85 0.0904 D60= D50= D30= D15= D10;-- Cu= 10=Cu= Cc= Classification USCS= CL AASHTO= A-7-6(16) Remarks See Figure 1 For Standard Compaction Results Date: 11-18-2010 Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc, Glenwood Springs, Colorado Client: Advanced Grading Specialists Project: Xccl Hopkins Substation Expansion, County Road 115, Garf eld County, Colorado Project No: 1 10367A Figure lA Tested By: CM Checked By: T,1W Laboratory Proctor Compaction Test Report --_---- 117 112 t o :. 1 s - ., 107 c� N C N Q 102 I 11 , ZAV for 97 Sp. G. 2.75 92 12.5 15 17.5 20 22.5 25 27.5 Water content, % Test specification: ASTM D 698-91 Procedure A Standard EIev/ Depth Classification Nat. Moist. Sp.G. P. L°lo l,. P€ '% > #4 a No.200 USCS AASHTO CL A-7-6(18) 42 24 0.0 79 TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Maximum dry density ==107.8 pcf Optimum moisture = 17.3 % Lean Clay with Sand Project No. 110367A Client: Advanced Grading Specialists Project: Xcel Hopkins Substation Expansion, County Road 115, Garfield County, Colorado Date: 11-18-10 o Loc.: Transformer Pad Area, 5' Below Exsisting Grade Sample No.: 338-10 Remarks: See Figure 2A For Gradation Results Figure 2 Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Glenwood Springs, Colorado Tested By: CM Checked By: TJW PERCENT" FINER 100 90 00 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Particle Size Distribution Report r' .S .4 n r s 1 S 1 I i 1 r 1 I I I 1 1 ! i *f - *f —1 -1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 100 10 1 GRAIN SIZE - mm. 01 0.01 0.001 % +3" % Gravel % Sand % Floes 0 Coarse 0 Flea Coarse Medium Fine Silt Clay 4 5 15 79 SIEVE SIZE PERCENT FINER SPEC!' PERCENT PASS? (X= -NO) #4 100 #8 100 #16 98 #30 96 #50 92 #100 87 #200 79 (no specification provided) Location: Transformer Pad Area, 5' Below Exsisting Grade Sample Number: 338-10 Material Description Lean Clay with Sand Atterberg Limits FL= 18 LL= 42 P1= 24 Coefficients 085= 0.1265 D60= DSfi= 03o D15= Di 0' Cu= Cc= Classification USCS= CL AASHTO= A-7-6(18) Remarks See Figure 2 For Standard Compaction Results Date: 11-18-2010 Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Glenwood Springs, Colorado Client: Advanced Grading Specialists Project: Xcei Hopkins Substation Expansion, County Road 115, Garfield County, Colorado Project No: 110367A Figure 2A Tested By: CM Checked 13y: TJW Particle Size Distribution Report c c i• 4 m ,S s 2 0 0 0 0 S-7 a n •- I n ai al 10 10 10 # 'ii 1 100 - - 2" Screened Roc1c 111 i 1 M. 1 } 90 LII I1 1 1 1 1 -+ - - - 80 I € 1 I . Il !i 1 1 ! 1 1 70 W 1 [ 1 i 1t 1t 1 1 1 1 1 60 I-- 1 1 1 1 € 1 4 G I1 1 1 50 U I 11t 1111 II 1 1 1 w 40 il 1 1 1 1 1� t 1 1' 1 1 1111 30 1 1 1i1 1 1 t t 1 11 ! 11111 20 10 1 1 1 E 1 1 `i-Ii'Ji!!iL 1 1 1 1 t t1 1 1 1 1 1! ' n 100 10 1 GRAIN SIZE - mm. 1E 01 0-0] 0.001 +3„ %Coarse % Gravel Y. Sand % Fines Fine Coarse Medium Fine Slit Clay 0.0 17.6 80.0 1.3 0.6 0.2 0.3 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC? PASS? Rderial Description 517E FINER PERCENT (X=NO) Blended 2" Minus Screened Rock 2" 1 112" .75 I00.0 100.0 82.4 6.5 100.0 - 100.0 75.0- 100.0 Atterberg [units .375 ##4 #8 2.4 1.2 0.0 -10.0 PL-- LL= P1= Coefficients #16 #30 #50 #100 #200Classification 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.4 0,0 - 5.0 D85= 21.0862 DB0= 15.5219 D50= 14.1671 D3O= 11.8018 D15= 10.2909 D10= 9.8315 Cu- 1.58 Cc- 0.91 USCS= GP AASHTO= Remarks 2" screened Rock Location: Site Stockpile Sample Number: 344-10 Date: 12-14-10 Hepworth-Pawlak Inc. Glenwood Springs, Colorado Client: Advanced Grading Specialists Project: Xcel11opkins Substation Expansion, County Road 115, Garfield County, Colorado Project No: 110367A Figure 5 Tested By: CM Checked By: JP