HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 Applicationm
Subdivision Applicati
)o Page 1 of 9
GARFIELD COUNTY
Building & Planning Department
1OB 8th Street, Suite 201
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Telephone: 970.945. 8212 Facsimile:
970.384.3470
$J EtrCE$\'ED
.ip,hi ;{ 0 /ilc3
: /j,riiIELD COUIV i y
riilLiirJG & PLANNING
Subdivision Application Form
GENERAL INFORMATION
(To be completed by the applicant.)
) Subdivision Name:Hurlr E x rt n i)L,LoT d{tL
D Type of Subdivision (check Ane of the following types):
Sketch Ptan K Pretiminary ptan _ Final plat
) Name oJ Property Owner:6hn P, nw -lntlrc(- tn, CnRoit1frt<
F Address:3Ll6 €. rlr+fu,c 0*tue--Telephone:7 -Or a
F City 5i /-*state: OC Zip code: @FAx':!S 7b'-461
F Nanrc ofAp-plieant_ (rl qthei than qwre_r):
F Address:Telephone
State: Zip Code: _ FAX:
o {rt4-
Telephone 1q<) -,t.f"01
F City:Czf e n ". mz{ Silr.f state: C.C zip Cooe:f,1L,) FAX: 4q+1411
Bocky /houn +A
'rA'>eer"y rlto b\g-7183
F Address:Telephone:d2A5 - ,)-6(!q
) City:&rFte-state: C'-O Zip code:f<ii.ii5|CFpx:b)5 3q tL
) Name of Planner:
) Address:Telephone
> City State: Zip Code: _ FAX:
) Name of Engineer. Cf > -11lttt'hQ'tc;
F Address: ,)34 C en -E* D*tt,e-
)
http: / /garfield-county.comlbuilding_and_planning/forms a. . . L/24/2003
o
and the County Surveyor has signed the Final Plat in Mylar form, it will be scheduled at
the next BOCC meeting to be placed on the consent agenda with a request to
authorize the Chairman of the BOCC to sign the plat.
Once the Final Plat is signed, it is then recorded by the County Clerk in the Clerk and
Recorder's Office for a fee of $11 for the first sheet and $10 for each additional sheet
thereafter. This fee shall be paid by the applicant. This act of recording the signed Final
Plat represents the completion of the Garfield County Subdivision Process.
Please refer to the specific language in the Final Plat portion (Section 5:00) of the
Subdivision Regulations for specific timelines and additional responsibitities required of
the applicant to complete the Final Plat process.
Please Note: This information presented above is to be used as a
general guide for an applicant considering a subdivision in Garfield
Gounty. lt is highly recommended that an applicant either purchase
the Garfield County Zoning Resolution and Subdivision Regulations
or access them on.line at:
htto://www. qarfield -cou ntv.comlbu i ldinq and planninq/i ndex.htm
in order to ascertain all the necessary requirements for each of the
three steps including Sketch Plan Review, Preliminary Plan Review,
and Final Plat Review.
I have read the statements a the uired attached information
which is and accu
0 C9
of Date
Last Revised: 1 1 121 12002
o
8
oo
a o
a/a ut l8t y €{;
I
GENERAL INFORMATION continued
F Location of Property:Section 34 Township 5 5r,,Range 9'e 'uF Practical Location / Address of Property:"fhD ,asc't Ron&
F Current Size of Property to be Subdivided (in acres):Irl "(.t 3
D Number of Tracts / Lots Created within the Proposed Subdivision
.i.JL Lc.11t
F Property Current Land Use Designation:
1. Property's Current Zone District: A ll
2. Comprehensive Plan Map Designation:
Proposed Utility Service:2 \-ec4 A\<_
F Proposed Water Source:we t\ [e rz,n,1 A t\n L"&
D Proposed Method of Sewage Disposal:t)eptlC
P Proposed Public Access VIA:tu € u-r \ 8.''r'P]Nfl L RC
) Easements Utility:c+
Ditch: 'la,
D Total Development Area (fill in the appropriate boxes below):
F Base Fee of $200 paid on
) Plat Review Fee of $50 paid on
2
o
Vicinity htaf
Nina's'Exemptlon Lots t & 2
of
Hufrt Exernetisn Lot I
o
r
I
34
2
34
5
35
67
o
a
54
)2
56
55
4030
)67
t'
11
40
VALLE Y
=NOl;
24
€"6
I
34
34
55
56 57
34
OITCH
o o
No n-Te c hnic al D e s criptio n s
Soil Survey Area: 683 RIFLE AREA, COLORADO, PARTS OF GARFIEL
h r LYn f,rnd l anrTltmrnd
Map unit: 3 Arvada loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes
Description Category: SOI
This deep, well-drained soil is on fans and high terraces. This soil formed in highly
saline alluvium derived from sandstone and shale. The surface layer is strongly
alkaline or very strongly alkaline loam about 3 inches thick. The subsoil is silty clay
loam about 14 inches thick. The substratum is silty clay loam to a depth of 60 inches.
Permeability is very slow, and available water capacity is moderate. Effective rooting
depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the eroslon hazard is moder
ate.
Map unit: 40 Kim loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes
Description Category: SOI
This deep, well-drained soil is on alluvial fans and benches. This soil formed in
alluvium derived from shale and sandstone. The surface layer is loam about 17 inches
thick. The underlying material is loam to a depth of 60 inches. Permeability is moder
ate, and available water capacity is high. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more.
Runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is moderate.
Thursday, June 12, 2003 Page I ofl
o
John P. & Janice Ild- Cardinale
348 E. Vista Drive
Silt, CO., 81652
876-s669
Garfield County Building and Planning
Senior Planner
Tamara Pregl
o
June 20,2003
Dear Tamara,
Please let me know ifthis meets some of the infonnation needed. Thank You.
. & Janice M. Cardinale
In response to the letter date June 5,2003
Vicinity Map Attached
Land Use Breakdown
1. Currently Agricultural shall remain Agricultural. Future Zoningas Residential.
We shall continue to meet the Assessors requirements to remain Agricultural.
2. Development area of 12,000 sq ft per lot
3. Proposal for 2 lots. One lot 6+ acres, the other 8+ acres.
4. Proposed for 2 units.
5. Non-residential floor sprrce proposed is 1500 sq ft
6. One dwelling unit for each structure
7. Parking for Two car garage,3 added spaces and parking for one (1) RV per each
lot and each unit the same.
8. A minimum of 1200 sq ft per unit not to exceed 2800 sq ft per unit, per lot.
USDA Soil Conservation Report Attached
Lnpact Statement - No lakes or rivers on this site.
Topography is flat in hay and alfalfa with a very slight slope.
Source of Utilities - Electric at lot line along Jewell Lane (259 Road)
Propane instead of Natural Gas.
Phone line along Jewell l,ane at lot line.
Satellite Dish for television service
RECEI\IED
JUN 2 U 2OO3
"ffifijE?s,trffi*
o o
Fonrr l\lo-
15 7t.f -ZA
APIjLlcA}$T
.i!$Bj fifisi*sfli
OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER
COLORADO DIVIS;OI{ OF WATER RE$OURCESl'llr SeflhEnniil gl!S., 13tJ $f*mrsil $1., Ilr-*!er, Drlund,r 0Ilioi
kL- i SIarJr; Fiiig; $rrhdi,r: HUN|liliitlPTl(.tH
JOHw IT & JANltrE t I CAR{}lslAlf
S4B E VISTA DR
stLT, CE gr$5e-
{s?0} 87e5cf,E
APPR-0VE_p -V,.' E L L LCr C ATlil N
GA,RFIELI} COI..INTVNtY 1/4 $ll,1,' 1H $eciinn 34.
TonnsHp s S fre,tgs Bz fr Sixtt p-l'Jt
pJg-rnNCEs rft ot r $EcTro
2$30 Ft, f,r"orn $quth Section l"iqe
6.{i0 Ft. lrorn \,'Jest Section Li;re
Ultd.e8orclN,4.rt 3-
HorEilig: Easting:
IVEL!- PERruIIT NUilqBEB
Drv. 5 wD3$
o5?
0ES. ftA$il..l t.ilf
tssuAFdE FgRtutl" D{IEE NQT OS},JFERJII'}"ATER RtG!,iT
FQ tg.BlT,[S"Hg Of _Ap-FB0!lAr_
1) This rrell sh{ll bo used, ir* such a u'sy es to ceusfl r,s mftterl8i lnlury tfi fle;slififi ,/,{.lsd lShiE. Ths issuance of this pennit
dset ,.4t s-esur€ lh4 aspliCarrt that rec injury \{,lll ocs,.rr ts anatFrsr 1.E,stEi, v$tar rigirt or prenlude snolh*r +iqlr*r of ar vested
'arater right hom seekir:g rsliaf in E c,i.-il eourt r*sllon.
3l Th& fronp,Fuclipn of thls $*ll $hall Uc in comp.r{iance with {he'rqJpte; Yrlsll ConsLruch'rn Rulea t ilCft '{{tl-t, unle$B apF}i:rrrai
6f fl vartancc ha$ b6ar: Sren{eri by the Stata Bcarc, of Er.anrlnrB nf \ryater !!'*ll fionstfl.lulhrt {tr-,.C Pump ln5letiati;)rt
Conlrflctor$ 4n accofi{gr1s6 with F.uls 10.
3l Appro.ed Fui-au,llnt t0 CH.$ :r7"S0-137t2) lor lin: usa of a* exisHng v,eil parmitbad under,aS.SSS-F {e'rrp\ed}, afrpmpriallrtg
gruund rvatatr irihuhary to lhs Calarado Rlver, ss En. fiiterrrpt* piirlt sf rjtiittr$iqrr tJ rihe Jqvi',tanche C€nEI ar.r{ $iphcia. on the
oondiilon {hsl lil$ Y/e,rl shf,ll ile trp+rutcd ur:lylthun rhe t'das,t 0:rr.idg Wstar Cenrelvanrl Dirkidn sshsL{uif r.Ble{ $ug}ply
plan. Bpprilrdsd by {he Siate EE inser. ie in etfr*t, End $,hF$ ir &'i}l*r all$tn)cni sfifitfilet ir{::t.reun the nsll ou;rior end tha Ws€t
D-ivi*s lrystur C&nBallran+y $i$lflet f 0r th$ r(H*irsE of tt.lplecE flenl irqtRr trom Ruedi Reaenoir [x hr effest. cr L!-.rdBv an
EEBa$,ed plan for eugmentatirn. tirBWOP eontst{, #Sdt53{NYl{$1ib}.
41. Trw'asa of grr*,.rnd rxeter {rc:n this r',e;ll it' lifiiled lil ordkrilr} houri(i}$ld puipisss insitia tvrro (2} airigle famlly dwEt$rigs,
tFrs iftigatiert ol nut fiore fen 24,0fr0 Equsra feet of hfifir* gaii,iifru *nd lavins, *nt! tft& $1utudil$ 0[ up ki t0
nsn-cornynE dEl drmestlr E']llnills- frli q++ ul l!:!s vrrrll will bs Gurtsil6..j unleas the '//EtBr allsunant crn:ract ar e p{en for
auqfie$liflis.r} i$ in *fh)$t"
$l Ttre macimum pumFir{ rata of thie *ell e.hall nai exc*ed 1S $F,!1,
S] Th* ovef*ge anr,Ufil arn06:ilt 0l $ru.und water tc Ee appmpriei*d ehsil r,nt exneed t .{; *ire.ree{ t46#, fI+ 0i!1sn$}.
Vt The u'trnrr *heil mark tha rs+!l ln fl n*n*picuou$ slace wi['r r+all pem-lii numbsrisl, name cf th* aquifer" snrl cc;Jrt ofl$e
aurnbB{E} 8E spprepriete" The serer shnlt tBke nf,08*sary m,}ails altd precartisns t6 presewe the.sa rna,*ings.
8l This vre,ll must b6 iscetad not riure tham lS0 fest fm*r the locf,tkrn sgefliled 0/r rhl& S*rmit.
9, A totallr.'n$ f.l3\r melcr must be instBllad afi ihii rwll and mainleined in gord urorklng srder, Fenrrfine*t reennfr datl
d;ueesianr must h3 raEini8lfled by lhe wEl[ fiwnBt {.reDcrd+.d at les*iifi$i}itlu} uml suimitM lo the Division Enpinaar r.pen
rEsusryc *t*&u
Bttite Engir"*cr
F,PFRCIVEF
JST}
NATE
o o
t-:--
Decembqr?7. 1996
UsePlmrsr
Nrnm llrurt lras ffiDsultcd mE rsear-disg &iw*ay pcmirs fot &tee log ftst h6 ie creating
bI. ,$uhdh&ifir E+@tio$ *n,IeuirflLanp {Road 259}. Norut har cxphhed that thsn tdiE
hs EEsc drivc*'a3rs, onr far each lot, off+f Jswell lsre directh into thc Wcst cnd of asnil
lot.
,, I,lrarcinrpectd the prrorBErfg na hqt.+ dfiElmbsd r&p[sight Citrffices for alt tluee
drftmgs}E r$i$ bc a{oquate, Cuh*t* will adrfuess ttc e rquir,omcnts.
Sia* tlrc house locoiatlr arE nff 1.er knov*q thc or.rct ftxnticnrfor each drh'crmy ir notyet
kroum. E prefrr to irxrc the {rhswsy pernriu to &c Iot brryErs in ordff to hnve dircsr
csnr*steild nxith{rclpnicsrrsporsibl*ftrfosfitugtionofthe&fuemuyg
$fuc+re8.
ffiBld
o
HT.INT SL]BDTVISION E,YEMPTION
LOTS l, ? and3
LOCATION & ACCESS: The lots are located immediatety East of and adjacent to
County Road #259(Jewell Lane) and a little more than a quarter mile North of County
Road #233(Silt Mesa Road). Access will be directly off of County Road #259.
ACREAGE: Each lot contains 14.4 acres more or less, the vast majoritv of which is
irrigated pasture i hay ground.
IRzuGATION WATER RIGHTS: The water rights are from Silt Water Conservancy
District (SWCD). Lot #1 has 2l acre feet, Lot #2 has 26 acre feet Lot #3 has 26
acre feet. Buyers will be responsible to insgall a divider box, and ditch frcilities
to irrigate their lot.
\!T,LLS: Well permix along with West DMde Water Conservancy District contracts for
augmentation are in place for each lot. Lot #l has a drilled well in place. The sustained
yield based on a four (4) hour pump test lvas determined to be ffieen(l5) GPlv{. The well
does not include a pump.
CONSTRUCIION CONDffiONS: Soil conditions or high ground water may require
engineered septic systerns and building foundations. Site specific percolation tests at the
time of building permit submittal shall determine specific individual sewage disposal
system(ISDS) needs on the site.
PERNIITS: Buyers will be responsible to obtain all government required permits for
conslruction of driveways and improvements. This could include Federal permits relating
to wetlands.
PROTECTIVE COVENANTS: The lots will be subject to the attached protective
covenants.
o
o o
PROTECTIVT, COVT,NANTS FOR LOTS I,, 2 ANd 3,
HLTNT EKEMPTION PLAT
Whereas, Norman H. Hrurt and Virginia E. Hrurt as the fee owners of Lots l, 2 and
3 as shown on the nHunt Exemption Plat" filed for record in the Clerk and Recorder's
office of Garfield Cowrty, Colorado as Rec. No desire to place
certain restrictions on the use of said lots for the benefit of themsefues rnd their respective
grantees. successon and assigns in order to maintain the attractiveness, character and value
of said lots.
Therefore, Norman H. and Virginia E. Hunt for themsefues and their respective
grantees, successors and assigns do hereby declare that all persons who may hereafter
purchase, lease, own or hold any of Lots 1,2, and 3 of said Hunt Exemption PlaL shall
own and hold said land subject to the following restrictions, covsnants. and conditions all
of which shall be desrned to run with ttre land and to enure to the bcnefit of and be binding
upon the owner, its respective grantees, successorc and assigns.
1. .{Na\L{.LS. No more than two (2) dogs will be allowed for each residential
rurit and the dog(s) shall be required to be confned within the owner's property botutdaries,
with enforcement prolisions allowing for the removal of a dog(s) from the area :ui a final
remedrv, in worst cases.
2. FIREPLACES. No open hearth solid-fuel fireplaces will be allowed . One (1)
new solid-fuel burning stove as detrned by C.R.S. 25-7-10L, et. seq., and the regulations
promulgated thereunder, will be allowed in:my dwelling unit. All dwelling rurits wiil be
allowed an unrestricted number of natrual or propane gas burning stoves and appliances.
3. LIGIITf,\G. All exterior lighting shall be the minimum amount necessary and
shall be directed inward. towards the interior of the subdivision, except that provisions marv
be made to allow for safetv lighting that goes be.vond the propertv boundaries.
4. MOBI E HOME STRUCTIIRES. Mobile Home type structures tue permitted
only as a temporary residence while constnrction of the permanent dwelling is in process
and so long as a Counry Permit allowing such ternporary occupancy is in ef[ect. The
mobile home structure must be removed from the lot upon County permit expiration.
5. MINIMUIvI RESIDENCE SIZE. The minimum living area size of the primary
residence shall not be less than 1200 sq. ft. on one floor lwel measured on the outside
walls exclusive of open porches, garages and carports.
6. PARKING OF MOTOR VEHICLES. Parking of Motor Vehicles that are not
in operating condition and currentty licensed shall be in a covered building that shields
them from view by neighbors and those using public roads.
o
NW 1/4 ot the SW 1/4 of Section 34 T5S, R92W of the 6th pM
Garfield County Colorado
ltf Ctm.a tc.l6 ,.. ft'. Rtr7. ath l.t,,cal I aE tiF q.A aE, ,.t 1:h
H unt Exempti ofPtat
hti t/tlondI c@.t..fa6 ta, Its, RtaJ, at r.a,dla plF. u,il^ .tr.E ar
00 lL vad. tutmml /ot SiL Arap Caruf
I
* tJ/1_f,ffi s..ttf,i tt. fi|, aut, ctl p.n-,aana t ilErff. E|^ .&4 t{1 tS til?t,
2.d C.itb? t/ta cw,ma t ala r,{F y(l alh ..t trs. rrtr. t{[ tI-ts toalt,
lmi
t,r,
JECT PROPERTY,B:q;
I
ao
CJ
=q
:Uo
Fg.
+
arr
Crt(o
noe
'\-r
to'
t,:,
dI
rl
|qq
tr'
' ,Ut-r,lci
SJ ,/la w Srot{or l{, fr4 ,atJ, a,P.l.
S.a ? aL tLB .+ 6 a/J ffbt. .tGt a lj
th.l ,a.airla O+.^.n{ OaLrt6,
t
I
Lot 2
t 4.42 acrQs
S., slAr.r. .o6G tO tlJt6 lE t ai(
tl;
rI
l"
I
W.abr. lm,
t ae tt.6t'J /-l___r--r.rli? ii- -
Lot 3
14,43 tr,c4es
-- s.t eatilu ow ro tLl,}on aa, ,o(nt
,O f tttt .ffi. lw,riair.l iFf.ain diarA.
*+
I
s, ffi ol$tt- t., forr, *alr.a.r l.I.la,d, f dtcld gl!,r al.r, cnl Orfft lr da un,taA
xna.
,dtsfrarr4"d rd -5.4t
o o
GwrJie ld Coilnty
.lune 5, 2003 BUILDII{G & Ptr.4,ryN hYG DEPARTfrIENT
lohn F and Janice M Cardinale
348 East Vista Dri'=.'e
Silt. CO 81652
R.,E: oollunt Exernption l,ot 1" Sketch Plen
Dear Mr and Mrs. Cardinale-
I have received the supplernental infolrnation submitted to our ofhce on lr{ay 30. 2003. As -v-ou may not
know, Fred Jarman. the pianner onginally assigned to the project, is no longer with the County I will be
rhe planner working on your application.
trn reviewing rhe supplemental informatisn submitted, it appears thaf some items that w'ere outlined in Mr
Jannan's letter dated February 7, 2003, and per Garlieid County Subdivision Regulations. section 3:30,
have not been subrnified. The application therefore remains incomplete and our depanment will not be
able to prclcess the subrnission any further until the following infomration has been provided. I have
attached a copy of lvlr. Jarman's lerter tbr your reference
Pursuant to section 3:32 of Subdivision [legulations. "T'he Slwtr:h I'hn shcill be ut tt scale af rnt less
th*t 1".-2A$", arul shall contsitr, at aminimum, the"following inJorrutfion, relrresenledgraphicullv
0r &s a msp note:
(H.) l'iciruty rnapJrom az t/.Ii(].1'" qua&angle al a scale af 1"., 2CIG0'depictrng the kxutron a.f
streels, highway.s ancl acliqcefil utility systefir.r wilhin u minimum tf one-half (l 2) mile of
the propo,sed sabr.livtsion and shuwing the natwral tbairwge unrrses far strear'ns.flow'irtg
througlt the protrxtsed saMivisionwith the limils of tributary, fireas show,n where
reasonctble.
It is unclear es to the scele of the vicinity map. In rddition, pleme identify strt€ts / roads or
highways within u Vz mile of the proposerl subdivision.
l,ancl use brealulox,n including:
l. Existing zoning urul proposed zoning clunges, if applit'able;
2. 'fotal developtnent srea:
"i" Total nunber of bts proposed;
1" T'otal number of dwelling units praposed;
i. Total area of proposed ntnt-residential flcnr sryce,'
fi. T'otal nurnber of individual tfuelling units prolxtsedfor euch structure,
7. I"otal mtmber of proposed off-street ptarking stpaces: wxl
8. '[btal progi,sed density.
TIre ahove-mentioned land use bneekdown, l(X-S), should be rlclineeted on [he Sketch Plen.
10,9 (th \trter, Suite 2$l Glenvt'r"toi Sptring:;, L'rtlorudo 81601
$70) 945-sll: (ti70) 285-7972 F-ax. (970) .384-3.1/'{i
{r)
o o
Cardinale
Page2
z. As noted in Fred's letter, according to Section 3:40 of the Subdivision Regulations' the following
supplemental information shall be zubmitted with the Sketch PlarL
C. U.S.D.A. Soil Conservarion Service soil desigrutiow, with interprerdtion tables attached:
The Soils rnd Foundation Investigrtion prcpercd by CTl^/Thompson does not eddrrcss this
requircment. Pleese submit the soil designations for the subject property elorrg with the
intirpretation tables. You nrey obtein this informetion from Mt. Sopris Soil Consenation
District or BookCliff SoiI Conscrurtion Districto both locetcd in Glenwood Springs.
D. Statement assessing the impact o! the proposed svMivisian on the lahes, streams ard
topograPltY of the site:
please provide r generel written strtemcnt regerding lakcs rnd strcrms within or
immediately adjacent to the subiect propcrty.
G. Anticipated saurce of electricity, natural gas, telephone atd cable 7.9'. service,s:
Plerse provide r writtcn strtement regerding rnticipated source of electricity, neturel gas,
telcphone end ceble TV services. You may went to contrct the following entities to see if
they provide selrice to the sitc: Public Service Compeny, US West Communicrtions' end
AT&T Ceble Sewices.
Section 3:22 of the Garfield County SubdMsion R.egulations states that if the application is deemed
technically non-compliant, you shall be notified in writing of the additional information needed and the
application shall be iuspended in the review process until such information is provided. T'hus, this
application has been suspended in the review process. You may request a conference with me not later
than ten (10) working days after receipt of this letter if you are in need of further information. The
applicant shall have six (O) months after the date of this letter to remedy the deficiencies noted herein'
otherwise the application will be considerecl terminated.
Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely
Tamara Pregl
Senior Planner
USGS MisceLlaneous tta Studies Map MF-2331:ic... Page 1 of 2'"5'
U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-2331
Geologic Map of the Silt Quadrangle, Garfield
County, Colorado
Ay Ralph R. Shroba and Robert B. Scott
Version 1.0
NOTE: This map supersedes Open-File Report 94-0696.
This map is presented in Portable Document Format.
Adobe Acrobat Reader 4.0'" is reguired to view it.
If you wish to download Acrobat Reader 4.0 free of charge, click here.
* nfi*
ffijl-{,'i'lY['tr t.l,F#Fffi-
'"t '',Ll_il"l -
Ij-
1.,
rsl
i.JE*
FHg
].].l. ]iJa-.i.,.*,-,1,:,-:::-- ,E " *",1'-- I -'{i::"**
ffi:= *i -lP^:H:.* *i':":*.*ri:i!'e'6.+..?tr 5?+-f9*'*"."-*' * --*.(iF_.],.,1,_
ij!..,--*., K -..*--^,iL-.- l._-
ili]-*- q:!"!i@,,,r
Bsutui{!, .ffi
,tr-*l#-""".'* ; ;.(t!.-_ JFF
.t:- +:ffi(Ll'-,*
il.'i*"*."-
rt
rHas:*pmr*?rlffi wtffi r'.*
.; .* -"-g-, ;*dr-.,{F,{,r",, fr
l}:i,' ' 'f.ff
Li, ..." i-,,..r,{:iB:. -
PDF files for viering and printing:
Map PDF file (2. B MB)
Pamohlet PDF file (160 KB)
t{etadata files:
!{q!_qde_t-e rq IE{!_!e!Ee! -(30 KB)
http: / /pubs.usgs .gov/mf /200L/mf-2337/
ffi
Ixiiii*llF-
6/ t8 / 2003
o o
USGS Miscellaneous
Metadata in format (39 KB)
Archive filea:
GZIPPED TAR archive of Arclnfo fi1es, metadata. etc. (3 MB)
zIPPED archive of Arclnfo files me tadata. etc- (3 MB)
ZIPPED archj-we of georeferenced imaoe files of base mao (4 MB)
The online edition of this publication consists of a diEital database, described in the
accompanying metadata, and a PDF file for the map sheet, which may be used to vier"r and print
the nap. The publication also includes a 31-page pamphlet that contains interpretive text, a
fufl description of map units, and a llst of references cited. A high-resolution plot of this
nap is for sale by lnformati-on Services, U.S. Geological Survey (I--888-ASK-USGS).
y-E-DepElj!-ent of the &ter!o_l
U.S. GeoJ-oqicaf su,.vev
This page is <URL: http: //pubs. usgs. gov/mt / 2OOl /nf -2331/index. htmL>
Last Modified Friday, 23-r'Iar-2001 10:05:25 EsT
website Maintained by : Tracy Roudebush
USGS Accessibility statement
USGS Privac v Statement
tt Studies Map MF-2331: nU,ic... Page 2 of 2
oov/mt /'l.l)tJ L / trrt-'4 3 J L /b / t8 /'2ua 3
BBCE.IVED
ltAY '3 u ?00j '
ffi'*B'n3$Y.&
SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION
NINA'S EXEMPTION, LOTS 1 AND 2 OF
HUNT EXEMPTION, LOT 1
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
CTL/THOMPSON, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SCOPE
This report presents the resutts of our sgil5_4nd-lqgdg_ti9l,_f nVqslig_qligl_fer
Nina's Exemption, bots,1-and,2,=q.f,thg-Hunt Exemptibh, Lot 1 in Garfield County:,
Colorado. A sihgle'famity resi-de1Cd j;..to be-eonstructed on each lot. We conductgd
the investigation to :eval.uat*,tt *.ir:6=urface conditions. at the site' and prov14e
foundation recommendations for.the proposed buildings. Our report was prepareil
l1
from data developed U_qiing our.field:exploration, laboratory testing, engineering.-;:
analysis and 'our.'e.'xperience,,ryi!.tl similar conditions.---This report includes:_a
description of the.suUsurfafe "on[ition. found in our exploratory borings, our
opinions and recomrnenddlions.for design criteria for redommended foundation a'nd - - _
floor systems, ind geotechnicat and.construction criteria for details inftuenced by
the subsoils. The reeafllmenJations contained in this report were devetoped based
on our understanding of the cong_truction as,currenfly pla
significantly from the descriptions contained herein,-we-
nned, lf plans will differ
-should be contacted to
adjust our recomqggdatio-ns og necessary
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
subsurface conditions in our exploratory borings consisted of a
surficial layer of organic sandy clay ,,topsoil,, above sandy clays
underlain by clayey sands. The clayey sands were underlain by
gravels at our TH-3 location. Free ground water was found at 3 feet
in our TH-1, TH-2 and Profile 1 and at 4 feet in our TH-3 at the time of
drilling.
we recommend the residences be constructed on building pads
elevated above the adjacent ground. The top of the building pad
should be at least 3 feet above the existing ground surface.
The residences can be founded on footings placed on ,,sta,bilized,,
sandy clays and clayey sands. See SITE PREpARATTON AND
EARTHWORK and FOUNDATION sections.
1
2.
3.
MR. JOHN P. CARDINALE
NINA'S EXEMPTION, LOTS 1 ANO 2 OF
HUNT EXEMPTION, LOT 1
CTL/T GS.3897 1
4.
5.
We judge potential differential movement of slabs-on-grades
supported by densely compacted structural fill will be low.
Surface drainage should be degigned to prov-ide for rapid femoval of
surface water away from the residences.'
SITE CONDITIONS
--'= =-'Nina's Exemption Lots 1 and 2are located in tlre Silt Mesa area of 'Garfield
County, Colorado. Jewel Lane is along the west property boundary. A high voltage
transmission line and irrigation canal are along the north property bounclHry. Lot 1
is to the west of Lot 2. The site has been used for irrigated pasture.' Ground
surfaces are comparativelyflatwith g€ntle grades down to tlle south at l6Ss than 4
percent. Several small irrigation ditches (1 to 2 feet deep and several fe-et wide)
cross the site. A stock pond-approximately 75 feet by 50 feet is in thesouth central
part of the site. An incised drainage on the order of 6i 5 feet deep trends down to
the southEast aeross ttre Site bdtWeen-L- Ott1 ahd 2. Vegetafion e onsl5tS of $-raS5eE
and weeds with some brush and small trees along the drainage sides. .:
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
We were told that one or two story wood frarne single family residences are
to be built. No basements are planned. The lower level floors may be constructed
as slabs-on-grade or living area floors -may be structurally supported by the
foundation with crawl space below. Foundation loads are expected to vary between
1,000 and 2,500 pounds per lineal foot of foundation wall with maximum interior
column loads of 20 kips. We anticipate maximum excavation depths on the order of
3 feet deep to install foundations and utilities. Excavations below ground water are
not recommended. lf the construction will differ significantly from the descriptions
MR. JOHN P. CARDINALE
NINA'S EXEMPTION, LOTS 1 ANO 2 OF
HUNT EXEMPTION, LOT 1
CTL/T GS.3897 2
above, we should be informed so that we can provide new recommendations and/or
design criteria, if necessary. :
GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS
The site is situated in a broad tow lying valley at the south flanks 9f the Gr:and
-tHogback. The site is underlain by undifferentiated surficial deposits of euaterlary
aged alluviym an(- colluvium,:The_qesur.ficial deposits consist of sandy claysand
clayey sandswith-gravel lenses. The solts were deposited by debris/mu.d flow and
sheetwash from the Grand Hogback to the north.
Flash Floodinq and Debris/Mud Flow
The drainage that crosses the site is subjecf to periodLc flash ftoods and
debris/mud flows--We qualitatively rate the degree of risk from flash flooding and
d eb ris/mu'ct-fl ow-as-mod erate; nVeb efievsflas h-florrfandTorm-gdTloreon t
of 1 to 2feet deep-can be expected. Mitigation can be with site grading to ensure
channelization and conveyance of flash flood and debris/mud fl6w around and away
. from the proposed residences. ln addition, the site has ground water neai the ground
surface that can be expected to raise to the ground surface during the irrigation
season or during periods of high precipitation. We recommend the residences be
placed on building pads elevated above the adjacent ground. We recommend the top
of the building pad elevation be at least 3 feet above existing grade. The elevation
should also be at least 2 feet above the 100 year flood elevation.
Radiation
We performed a radiation screening of the site. Our screening involved
obtaining spot readings at and around our exploratory boring tocations.
Measurements were taken with a Ludlum lnstruments, lnc. Model No. 1g Micro-R-
MR. JOHN P. CARDINALE
NINA'S EXEMPTION, LOTS 1 AND 2 OF
HUNT EXEMPTION, LOT 1
CTL/T GS.3897 3
Meter. Measurements were taken from the various soils occurring at the site. Our
measurements ranged from 11 :to 15 microroentgens per hour. Our experience
indicates these measurements are'consistent with normal background radiation in
the region and are not,cause for concern. -
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Subsurfa-ce conditions at the site were investigated by -drilligg lglr (4)
exploratory borings, two (2) profile borings and six (5) percolation borings with an
all-terrain drill r,ig at the approximate locations shown-on Figure 1. Drilling- was
directed by our engineering geologist who logged the soils encountered in the
borings and obtained samples. Samples obtained in the fietd were returned-to our
laboratory where field classifications were checked and typicalsamples selected for
testing. Graphic logs of the soils encountered in our exploratory borings are shown
on Figure 2.
Our exploratory borings penetrated a 1 foot thick surficial_layer of or-ganic
sandy clay "t6psoil" above 1 to 5 feet of soft to very soft, moist to wet, sandy e lays
above loose to very loose, wet clayey sands. The sands were underlain by dense to
very dense, wet, silty to sandy gravels with cobbles at 16 feet deep in our TH-3. Free
ground water was found 3 feet deep at our TH-1, TH-2 and Profile 1 locations and at
4 feet deep at our TH-3 location at the time of drilling. Three samples of the soils
were selected for Atterberg limit and percent passing the No. 200 sieve. A sample
of sandy clay had a liquid limit of 25 percent, plasticity index of 12 percent and 70
percent silt and clay size particles. A sample of the clayey sand had a liquid limit of
19 percent, a plasticity index of 6 percent and 37 percent silty and clay sized
particles. Laboratory test results are presented on Figures 3 and 4.summarized on
Table l.
MR. JOHN P. CAROINALE
NINA'S EXEMPTION, LOTS 1 AND 2 OF
HUNT EXEIVIPTION, LOT 1
CTL/T GS.3897 4
SITE PREPARATION AND EARTHWORK
Excavations at this site should be limited to approximately 1 foot above the
w3ter tabfe. We envision site preparation will consist o{ stripping the;urfic'1a]
"topsoil" layer approximately 1 foot deep and constructing a fill pad witt_r ajinished
surface elevation at least 3 feet higher than existing grade (see Figur e.12l.tryigation
;urface drainage trom Ueing':: -' - . :-:-
directed towards the bu_ildiRgs or fill pads. Excavations for the foundat-ioi and
utilities can be accomplis!9d.using conventional, heavy-dutyexcavation equ.ipment.
Excavation sideswill need to be slo-ped or braced tt meet local, state an.('iOa"r"t
-safety regulations. We believe the clays will classity a" fyp" B soils and the sands. , .-:.-::
as Type C.,based on OSHA standards governing excavations. Temporary stopes
above ground water.should b,e no steeper than 1 to"1 (horizontal to vertical).in Type
B soils and no stee[er than 1.Q to (horizontal.to vertical) in Type C soils.
:_:_:Excavations below g19u1d_,water can be expectg._L,o slough and flatten uf + to t
(horizontal to vertieal) or flatter.
Soils removed from an excavation should not be stockpiled at the edge of the
excavation- We'iecommend the excavated soils be.placed at a diqtance frorn the top
of the excavation equal to at-least the depth of the excavation.
t
-,
We recommend the residences be placed on building pads elevated abovethe
adjacent ground. We recommend the top of the building pad elevation be at least 3
feet above existing grade. The elevation should also be at least 2 feet above the 100
year flood elevation. The fill should extend horizontally at least 5 feet beyond the
building footprints. Fill may be needed outside of the building pads to achieve
subgrade elevations for access drives and exterior concrete flatwork. Areas to
receive fill or bear slabs-on-grade should be stripped of vegetation, topsoil or other
deleterious materials. The resulting surface should be moisture conditioned and
compacted. soft areas can be stabilized as discussed below.
MR. JOHN P. CARDINALE
NINA'S EXEMPTION, LOTS 1 AND 2 OF
HUNT EXEMPTION, LOT 1
cTL/T GS.3897 5
Fill can consist of the on site clays and sands free of organics, debris or other
deleterious materials. We suggest the owner consider importing a granular fill such
as a "3 inch minus pit run" to consiruct the building pads. Our experience is that.it
is easer to achieve the desired moisture content and density wlth the granular soils.
Fill should be placed jn maximum 8 inch thick loqse lifts at 2 percent below to 2
percent above optimum moisture content. Structural fill b-elow floor slabs should be
compaeted to at least 9-8 percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM
D 698). Fill placed outside-the building footprints should be compact"d 19 at leistg5
percent of ASTM D 698. P-lacement and compaction of fill should be observed and
tested by a representative of our firm during c.onstruction. - . ,,-.-
The recommended foundation is footings on q'stabilized" soils -(see
FOUNDATION section).' The clays can be stabilized by crowding & to 12 inch
diameter rock into the soft soils to develop a firm surface bn which to place footings
or below slab fill.
- - -Free-grsund water-w-as-foxnd in-our-exploratory bor:ings-at 3 {o.A{eetielow-
the existing ground surface during our field investigation. Depending upon.gut
depths and the time of-yeai water will Iikely be present and enter excavations atthis
site. lf free ground water is encountered, we recommend excavations be sloped-to
sumps where water can be removed by pumping.
FOUNDATION
Our exploratory borings penetrated soft to very soft clays and loose to very
loose clayey sands at footing elevations. Footings should not be placed on these
soft or loose soils. The buildings can be founded with footings bearing on the
"stabilized" soils as discussed above under SITE PREPARATION and EARTHWORK.
Footings bearing on the stabilized soils may experience 1 inch of total settlement
MR. JOHN P. CARDINALE
NINA'S EXEMPTION, LOTS 1 AND 2 OF
HUNT EXEMPTION, LOT 1
CTL/T GS.3897 b
and differential settlement of about 1/z of the actual totat settlement. Footings for the
building can be designed and constructed with the following criteria.
Footings on stabilized soils - (see srrE PREPARATTON and
EART+lwoRK)can be designed for a maximum allowable soil beaiing
pressure of 500 psf. Material loosened during the excavation oi
forming process should be removed from-fo-oting ar,eas or compacted
prior to placing concrete. -i
continuous:wall footings should, have a minimum width of at least 24inches; Foundation= ior isolated columns shourd have minimum
dimehsions of 30"inches by 30 inehes. Larger sizes may be r:equiied,
depending upon foundation toads, '- '
Grade beams,and foundqtioir wall; !noulo re werl reinforced, to[r and
bottom, to span undisclosed loose or soft soil pockets.,..* We
recorn mend.reinforcement s uffic ient to spa n a n u ns uppo rted d istan ce
of at least 12feet. Reinforcement should te designed'by the rtru"irJ
engineei considering the effects of"'iateral toads on wall performance.
4. The soils under exterior footings Etrould be pro tected frorn freezing.
We recommbnd the bottom of footings be cons tructed at a depth of at
1
2
least 36 inches below finished rad'es foi fros t rotection. The local
tre-fih.
The completed foundation excavation Sh-o_Uld be inspected hy a
repiesentative of our firm prior to placing forms to confirm that
subsoils are as anticipated and suitable for support of designed
footings.
Backfill along foundation walls and should be moisture conditioned
and compacted.
FLOOR SYSTEMS AND SLABS-ON.GRADE
Because of the presence of ground water nearthe ground surface and the risk
of damp or wet crawl space conditions we recommend slab-on-grade floors. Based
on our laboratory test data and our experience, we believe slab-on-grade
construction can be supported by densely compacted, structuralfill builtwith the on-
6
7
MR. JOHN P. CARDINALE
NINA'S EXEMPTION, LOTS 1 AND 2 OF
HUNT EXEMPTION, LOT 1
CTL/T GS.3897 7
site soils or imported granular material with low risk of differential movement and
associated damage. Performan.ce of slab-on-grade floors will likely be good,
provided the subgrade soils belowslabs are compacted with a heavy, sheepsfoot
compactor prior to concrete placement. If fill below floor slabs is not constructed
with a granular materialthen we'recommend a 4 inch thicktayer of 3t4inch diarneter
washe{rock-belowfloorslabstobreakcapillaryriseofgroundwater. Toreducethe
accumulation of water, we recommend the below slab drain gravel be incorporated
a
into an interior foundation walt drain. The drain should consist of a 4-inch diameter
open'.1olnt or slotted PVC pipe encased in "free draining gravel" such as 3/4 inih
diameter washed concrete aggregate. The drain should lead to a positivt grrrity
outfall ,or a sump to be mechanically pumped. A typical foundation drain -deta'! i9
shown on Figure 5. ':j
'We recommend the following precautions for slib-on-grade construclion at
this site. These precautions will not prevent movernent from occurring, they tend to
reduce damage if slab movement occurs.
Slabs should be Separated from exterior walls and interior bearing
members With a slip joint which allows free vertical movement of the
slabs.
Underslab plumbing should be eliminated where feasible. Where such
plumbing is unavoidable, it should be pressure tested for leaks before
the slab is constructed. Plumbing and utilities which pass through
slabs should be isolated from the slabs. Gas and water lines leading
to slab-supported appliances should be provided with flexible
couplings
1
2
4.
MR. JOHN P. CAROINALE
NINA'S EXEMPTION, LOTS 1 AND 2 OF
HUNT EXEMPTION, LOT 1
CTUT GS.3897
3 Exterior patio and porch slabs should be isolated from the building.
These slabs should be well-reinforced to function as independent
units. Movements of these slabs should not be transmitted to the
residence foundations.
Frequent control joints should be provided to reduce problems
associated with shrinkage and curling. Our experience indicates
panels which are approximately square generally perform better than
rectangular areas. We advocate use of an additiOnaljoint about 3 feet
away from and parallel to foundation walls
8
1
il
ii
I
flA
.N
I
1
a
l
j
:
PERCOLATION TESTING
We performed percolation testing in the three (3) percolation borings on each
lotatthe approximate locations shown on Figure 1. Our percolation borings were
each approximately 3 feet deep and bottomed in sandy-clays, or clayey sands.
Summary logs of our piofile borings and percolation-borings are shown on Figure
2. we pre-soaked our percolation borings tor r day:prior to performing'our
percolation tests. Standing water from the pre-soaking was in our percoiation
borings P'1, P'2, P-+ 1nU, P-5 afterapproximat ely 24hours, No standing water:-.fro-m
the pre'soaking was in percolation borings p-g orp,O after approximately"24 hours.
Percolation test results are shown on Figures 6.through 11. Our percolation tesii:ng
resulted in percolation rates that varied between 5 min/inch and 20 min/inch. .State
and County Regulation require that in cases where ground water is within 8 feet of
the ground surface the septic system be designed by a professional engineer
qualified in septic system design.
Surface drainage is critical to the performance of foundations, floorslabs and
concrete flatwork. We recommend the following precautions be observed during
construction and maintained at all times after the residence is completed:
wetting or drying of the open foundation excavation shoutd be
avoided.
The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the buildings should
be sloped to drain away from the buildings in all directions. we
recommend providing a slope of at least 12 inches in the first 10 feet
around the buildings, where possible. ln no case should the slope be
less than 6 inches in the first 5 feet.
Backfill around the exterior of foundation watls should be moisture
conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and
2
3
:
MR. JOHN P. CARDINALE
NINA'S EXEMPTION, LOTS 1 ANO 2 OF
HUNT EXEMPTION. LOT 1
CTLiT GS.3897 9
EE
4.
compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698)
maximum dry density.
Roof downspouts and drains should discharge welt beyond the limits
of all backfill. Splash blocks and downspout extensions should be
provided at all discharge points. We specifiCally recommend against
burying downspout discharge pipes because it lndreases the pottjntial
for subsurface wetting near the foundation.
Landscaping should be carefully designed to minimize irrigation.
P_!.q.4_ts used near foundation walls should be limited to those- with low
moisture requirements; irrigated grass should not be located within 5
feet of the foundation. Sprinklers should not dlsg,harge within-S feet -
of .the foundation and should be directed away from the building.s.
E
LIMITATIONS
Our exploratory borings were located to obtain a reasonably accufate picture
of subsurface conditions. Variations in the subsurface conditions not indicated by
our boring s will occur. We should observe the completed foundation excavations
.to confirm the soils are as anticipated from our exploratory borings and suitable for
.
support of the designed footings. ::,-
Our report was based on conditions disclosed by our exploratory borings,
engineering analysis and our experience. Criteria presented reflect our
understanding of the proposed construction. We should be advised if construction
plans differ significantly from the descriptions herein to permit us to re-evaluate our
conclusions and recommendations.
This investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of
care and skill ordinarily exercised by engineering geologists and geotechnical
engineers currently practicing under similar conditions in the locality of this project.
No other warranty, express or implied, is made. lf we can be of further service in
MR. JOHN P. CARDINALE
NINA'S EXEMPTION. LOTS 1 AND 2 OF
HUNT EXEMPTION. LOT 1
CTLiT GS.3897 10
discussing the contents of this report or in the analysis of the influence of the
subsoil conditions on the design..of the structure, please catl.
CTL/TI-IOMPSON, INC
Wilson L. "Liv" Bowd
Engineeri Geolog
John ec
Bra-nc
LB:JM:
(5 copies nt
ORE
a
a
It
i
tA
P
't
t
MR. JoHN P. CARDINALE
NINA'S EXEMPTION, LOTS ,I AND 2 OF
HUNT EXEMPTION, LOT 1
CTL/T GS.3897 11
4
3'
2
0
4
-o
a
D.
><
lIJ
szo
6a
IJJ
0-
=oo -3
-4
7
-8
-s
0.1
Somple of SAND, CLAYEY (SC)
APPLIED PRESSURE. KSF
IU
NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT=
NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT=
1.0
102
24.6
100
PCF
%FTom TH.2 AT 3 FEET
Swell Consolidation
Test Results FrG 3JOB NO. GS-3897
-1
-2
z'o
6
a-
Lx
UJ
szo
6o
UJ
L
=o_a
-4
-5
-o
-8
-9
-tt
-12
-'13
-14
-15
-lo
0.1
APPLIED PRESSURE . KSF
10
NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT=
NATU RAL MOISTURE CONTENT=
100
96 PCFso3 x
Somple of CI-AY, SANDY (CL)
From TH.4 AT 3 FEET
Swell Consolidation
Test Results Frc 4
t FN
.--t " -.-
-l-..--i--
.. -.-.-'-.-- -- -- --- i...--.'-.
C URE D ETO
f.....
JOB NO. cs-s897
EE
SLOPE
PER REPORT
BACKFILL
(coMPosmoN AND
COMPACNON PER REPORT)
BELOW GRADE WALL
REINFORCING STEEL
PER STRUCTURAL'
DRAWINGS
FOOTING OR PAD
ENCASE PIPE IN WASHED CONCRT|E
AGGREGATE (ASTM C33, NO. 57 OR
67). EXTEND GRAVEL I-ATERALLY TO
votD (WHERE APPLTCABLE) AND TO
BOTTOM OF SI.AB_ON_GRADE FLOOR.
NOTE:
DRAIN SHOULD BE AT LEAST 4 INCHES
BELOW BOTTOM OF FOOTING AT THE.
HIGHEST POINT AND SLOPE DOWNWARD.._--..-.
TO A POSITIVT GRAV Y OUTLfI OR TO
A SU[/P WHERE WATER CAN BE :
REMOVED BY PUMPING.
SI-OPE
'PIR
PROVIDE POSITIVE SLIP JOINT
BETWEEN SLAB AND WALL.
FLOOR SLAB
sL0?E IE
SLOPE TO ORAIII
4,, MINIMUM
E'' MINIMUM
OR BDI'OND 1;1
SLOPE FROM BOTTOM
OF FOOTING.
(WHICHEVER IS GREATER)
4_INCH DIAMEI'ER PERFORATED
DRAIN PIPE. THE PIPE SHOULD
BE LAID IN A TRENCH WITH A
MTNTMUM 1/8 INCH AND 1/4 INCH
DROP PER FOOT OF DRAIN.
lnterior
Foundation
Watrl Drain
No. GS-3897 Fig, .,:
PERCOLATION TEST
DATE: 05/01/03
WATER IN BORING AFTER 24 HOURS
X YES NO
DEPTH TO,WATER
CHANGE'
IN WATER
DEPTH
(rNcHES)
-*.PERCOLA.
TION RATE
(MrN/rNCH)START OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
END OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
TIME AT
START OF
INTERVAL
TIME
INTERVAL .
(MTNUTES)
DEPTH
(rNcHES)
LE
BER
5.75 31:00 15 _ __*18.0-23.75 ",la
P-1
218.75 7.s1:15 1'5.-_11.25
J23.5 4.751:30 15 18.75
2.0 B23.5 -25.51:45 15
27.5 2.0 I2:00 15 25.5
5.75 31514.75 20.52:15
420.5 24.0-J.C2'.30 '15
b26.5 2.52"45 15 24.0._
1.0 151s26.5 27.53:00
I
. *-+5- ----,27-5,, --..8,o E-
51 1029.5 . 31.013:30 .-15
52+6-3.03:45 15 18.s
1.5 1021.5 23.04:00 15
1.0 1523.0 24.04:15 15
1225.25 '|..254:30 15 24.0
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS
ite #1
No. GS-3897 Fig. 6
PERCOLATION TEST
DATE: 05/01/03
WATER IN BORING AFTER 24 HOURS
X YES NO
PERCOLATION TEST RESU LTS
Site ite #1
E AT START OF SATURATIoN: 12:00 Pm
RATION AND PREPAR,ATION
04130103
CHANGE
IN WATER
DEPTH'-
(TNGHES)
DEPTH TO WATER'
INCHlNc
PERCOLA.
TION RATE
(MrN/rNCH)END OF.INTERVALSTART OF
INTERVAL
TIME.AT-
START OF
INTERVAL
. .TIME
INTERVAL
(MiNurES)
DEPTH
(rNcHES)HOLE
ER
3s.251:00 20.7515.51539
35.515.751510.251:15
J5.521.2515.751:30 15
72.523.751521.251:45
101.525.2523.752:00 15
121.2526.525.252:15 15
151.027.515lb. f,2:30
53.019.75 22.752:45 15
1s1.023.751522.753:00
3:'15 25:7523.75{5
200.7526.525.753:30 15
151.026.5 27.53;45 15
121.2528.751527.54:00
200.7528.75 29.54:15 15
2A0.7530.2529.54:30 15
Fig.7Job Nci. cS-3897
PERCOLATION TEST RESI.I LTS
t Site Site #1
WATER IN BORING AFTER 24 HOURS
PERCOLATION TEST
DATE: 05i01/03
YES NO
ME AT SIART OF SATURATION: 12:00 pm
RATION AND PREPARATION
TE:04130103
DEPTH TO WATER
DEPTH
(TNCHES)
TIME AT
START OF
INTERVAL
TIME
INTERVAL
(MTNUTES)START OF
INTERVAL'
(INCHES)
END,OF ..
INTERVAL
flNCHES)
_i-
CI.{ANGE
IN WATER
DEPTH .:
(rNcHES) '
PERCOLA.
TION RATE
(MrN/rNcH)
HOLE
UMBER
42.0 1;00 15 21.25 24.5 3.25P-3
1:15 8.5 19.0 tr 0.5 I
1:30 15 19.0 24.0 5.0 3
1:45 15 -'10:75 -.20.75 10.0 2
2:00 15 20.75 24.25 3.5 4
2:15 15 11.25 21.0 9.75 2
2:30 15 21.0 24.5 3.5 4
2:45 15 18.25 23.75 5.5 3
3:00 15 12.5 20.5 8.0 2
- --3{5-- - -., -. . '.1! ,20"5 - J4i ___-3.5.,-.. ,..--4
3:30 15 24.0 25.25 1.25 12
3:45 15 25.25 26.5 1.25 12
4:00 1s 26.5 28.25 1.75 I
4:15 15 28.25 30.0 1.75 I
4:30 15 20.25 23.25 3.0 5
Job No. cS-3897 Fig.8
PERCOLATION TEST
DATE: 05/01/03
WATER IN BORING AFTER 24 HOURS
YES NO
SAIURATION AND PREPARATION
DATE: 04/30/03
TIME AT START OF SATURATION: 12:00 Pm
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS
'' Eas t Site ite #
riot-e
NUMBER
DEPTH
(rNcHES)
TIME AT
START OF
INTERVAL
TIME
INTERVAL
(MTNUTES)
DEPTH TO WATER
CHANGE
IN WATER
DEPTH
(rNcHES)
RCOLA-
TION RATE
'lrvttrultucn;START OF
INTERVAL
(TNCHES)
END OF
INTERVAL
INCH
P-4 42.0 1:00 '15 13. s 19.0 5.5 J
1:15 15 19.0 22.0 3.0 5
1:30 15 22.0 24.75 2.75 6
1:45 15 11.25 16.0 4.75 J
2:00 15 16.0 21.75 s.75 J
2:15 15 21.75 24.25 2.5 6
2'.30 4r lt+. /.c 27.0 2.7 5 b
2:45 15 21.25 24.25 3.0 5
3:00 15 24.25 25.5 1.25 12
1a -25;5 2&0 2.5 .b
3:30 15 28.0 30.5 2.5 6
3:45 15 '19.75 22.25 2.5 o
4:00 15 22.25 24.25 2.0 I
4:15 15 24.25 26.75 2.5 b
4:30 15 26.75 29.25 2.5 b
Job No. GS-3897
Fig.9
S:d*3..'f;r
;L:1''
lr
SATU RATION AN D PREPARATION
oATE; 04/30/03
TIME AT STARI OF SATURATTON: 12:00 pm
PERCOLATION TEST
DATE: o5/01/03
WATER IN BORING AFTER 24 HOURSX YES NO
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS
East Site Site #2
DEPTH TO WATER
HOLE
NUMBER
DEPTH
(rNcHES)
TIME
INTERVAL
(MtNUTES)
TIME AT
START OF
irurenvRl START OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
,,END.OF
INTERVA.L
(INCHES)
cHANGE
IN WATER
DEPTH
(TNCHES)
::=
.-_PERCOLA.
.TioN RATE
. .(MrN/tNCH)
P:5 44.0 15 17.2s 24.5 7.25 2
1:15 24.s 27.75 3.25 5
1:30 15 -.7.2s 18.25 11.0 1
1:45 1s 18.25 23.75 5.5 3
2:00 15 23.75 28.25 4.5
2:15 15 25.0 27.75 2.75
Z" JU 4aIJ tt.t5 Jl.r/C 4.0 4
2:45 15 14.2s 22.0 7.75 2
3:00 15 22.0 24.25 2.25 7
l:45 _1j,-24-2s 27J5 3-5
3:30 15 27.75 31.5 3.75 4
3:45 15 20.0 23.0 3.0 c
4:00 15 23.0 25.25 2.25 7
4:15 15 25.25 28.5 3.25 5
4:30 15 28.5 31.5 3.0 5
Job No. cS-3897 Fig. 10
PERCOLATION TEST
DATE: 05/01i03
WATER IN BORING AFTER 24 HOURS
YES X NO
SAIU RATION AND PREPARATION
PATE: 04/30/09
TIME AT START OF SATURATION:12:00 pm
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS
r-.. fast Site Site
CHANGE
IN WATER
DEPTH
(rNcHES)
DEPTH TO WATER
--PERCOLA-
NCHESINC
TION RATE- (MrN/rNcH)END OF
INTERVAL
START OF
INTERVAL
TIME AT
START OF
INTERVAL
TIME
INTERVAL
(MTNUTES)
DEPTH
(rNcHES)
llOLEl
NUMBER
35.518,0'l,5 12.542.0 1:00P-6
b20,5 2.518.01:15 15
53.2523.751;30 AE 20.5
514.25 3.011.251:45
43.7514.25 18.02:00 15
72.2520.25-2:15 15 18.0
h23.0 2.7 520.252:30 15
101.523.0 24.52;45
151.025.53:00 15 24.5
7226J5- 1-25 '' -25-5-, 3:15-l5
121.2528.01526.753:30
1229.25 1.2528.03:45 15
151.029.25 30.254:00 15
I2.023.754:15 15 21.7s
151.024.7523.754:30 15
Job No. GS-3897 Fig. 11
SUBJECI fill /*J Cn', Su"(rn
JOB NO.GS38q
CTL/THOMPSON, INC.
CONSU LTI NG GE.OTECH N ICAL
AND MATERIALS ENGINEERS
, f -ZZ-oj
,oee / o, /
N
a
,a-
\DATE
BY:
ri
i;
lli:i
,i;;
.ilj
I
-'l'
i:
:I
t--__. .- -:,-_;-.--
I
a_t
...,-..:-....... ....-.
rj
t-
I
,l
['N *.
" ll i
I
,
I
I
I
rl
S*
oo
tvt
t
\4
G
ci2
-$
,oh
I
t
-.1
J
F I(.)
{
(rJ
-t
Ih,
CDonzo
UJ (o $(,t H!Jr
OJI(.)
N
1.,G
}\,o,
'ur
NIor
?-zo;3qd-ipnzmr
r9
Ol o(D
(o
ao oN
o7t9o{qa15
ar
5 Po
a
-€xmsr t-
rD l\,
C'T
-Es<ts
-r 6
-l--{mvEmvo
tr
;a
A)N
1l
-(a6'9-Eoio-
:3 g?
I.i-frl
-<trmLJ
Qa
htr
1tE
BF
s
{c)
(,{{o (.,
OJ
-!b*>
8E:E-86
o
E
'a
zo
or
at>lz\0
c)r-
m
ae
o
F
'a
zo
ar
aI
t--ot
@q)
l!o
--l
oz
Zo
!q
a
Eg
o
€o
='(o
A}
!)
0l-o
=,oo
6-o
o
-o
o
ro
tn
{
IDr
aC
=
=n
o
11r
tD
o_7
{ov
{rfl
ct){vm
.u)Cr{
U,
t-o
@zI
oa.tt@
c.D-{g)(o
(D
o
SCr'dI: 1'= 1Q0 TH-2
Wt
OrProflle 1 jooP:.2
o.c
-3
(9
'o L
Mr. John p. CardlnaloNhrt E(.rflptbn
Job No. GS-9897
Approxi'mate
Locations of
Exploratory
Borings
1
TH-1:o
O
Fis
AUVNNNS
A
T
f
(ac 'Hc)
'ur*oJq .+er\ .esuep fuea o+ esuep Wt'elqqoc q1;n {puos o1 {11s .l.ADrC Eg
(cs) 'u,uolq 'len
'esoo; fuel o1 esool .Ielo;c ,puos
iiionr .1los Area Sl'i"Jffi:,l"lrij A
(ro1
'uaorq IJDp 'lslour .+,os .uollop6ea Flpuo's+ooJ q11lr lolc ,(puos c1uo6.rg El
zt/2
:zt /r
A
zt/s
Z
:GN3C31
t
a
A.A
I sllloJd
edo;eau3
6u;p11ng 1setrtr
n
=
9-d z-d l-d Z-HI I-HI
Z58g-Sg 'oN qof
o
REcEflffiffiffi1lJffitfii:,'i"mffi'i:;3Joor
of the new buildins across the sneet
MAY 3 U 2OO3
,ffiEtlfffiHlHru find out to whom we can go to comprete and address the
remaining points the pertain to these sections.
Secifically Section 3:40 C,D, E, and G.
I think we can do a statement to explain point G from Section 3:40 ourselves.
And we can address point I from section3:32ourselves as well.
Anything that we can do ourselves to address any missing points please find ou1
o
1;1* C1 L fo*fl60n
1t/'- (r*G u"g.r ry>
kb* \
b^Lrq.,^1. r- /-*""*\h
CU .F Yo^ *"^*-
O* *It-'^ s
1 0
rl
IN\.t
yo &43 ?
"T {
o o
Gaffield Cou nty
trl I"f t t, fi t n' G rS P/--.1 rYrtr?:t{? lrfrl,lfr ltfg.rl,T
Fcbnu4: 7,:#{13
John P, und J;irtice jr.l- Cardinalc
34S Esst Visra Drlr'e
$ill et) f,16(1
ftB: trIlunt Exrrrl-rtiou t.nt l" $ket*h fl*n
Dsnr fui:, nnrtr h.frs- C*rdinnle.
I rutt nritingthis lctt*r rugtrdi*g the applicatian you sr.lhmititd t(r our dq)anrnenc rcgnrdiag thc t{unr
Excmptiont+t ! Siru,sh illa$- Atdds tirnc th* Shulch PIor appiicar,ion doesnur inciutlutrllrcquired
infsrms*on p*r fiarfietd County Sukiivisinu K*guiadons. Thc applic*tion is therefore dffiDred
inc{}tnpletc and our dtp*rtment u'ili nor he ;rhlc t.t prrrrluss the sutxnissjon a!r. frrthcr until rhe
fuXlnwing islirrm*tinn hac hee& proltdcd,
$pecifimlty' ]uw tpplisnli+n rvilI nnr [:e deetued coraplete urrti! 1-ulr har.e specilically adrlr*sr*l
each pplnt brduw prusu*nl lo ,scctjon 3 :3t{l\ g, C, D. E, ond I) and Secrion S:+O1C. p. e, and (i} uf
tlt* (iarfield tlsulg' Subdivir.icn Ruguiiuions of l$*+, as arucndcd.
lit*tion 3:32
Iirs.5h#Iul, /'i*a s*s// ht m a tr;al* tt{nat {*w thxtr | " Jil#', finri slrsJl canrtrifi, ar a rni$mum, thc
Jirlloning in{grrmaliull, r.egr+r}alrrr.rr/ graphi*ally ar as $ ffiilp fiatq::
P r upu *u d rame rry'rlre su$dirf.rfun;
fuir:orirnr. $,tlilldenfes mw{ legal datitriptiott q{ the praiwt :
,bhrrer'. adtlrvs"ras ani;thunt fitt$thtrs *{the *wner(s}. tEltticant,r). plonngr{s) ntul
trrrglheer/,t1,'
/JuIu r.rflsfurfr:Jl rnap gn'eprn'glioru, rurgl .tcufti
Topa#,uplry u{ the ptagoserl rlr&r#r'rvr"an rlrox,r'4g, *t tr minlmurn, Jit"s (jt _litttt.-wntfiEtrt,far tet7.ttifi'n"i.th sn overa,l{ awrag,e slope aj"lf-mthcm firefit}pcrc$fi ft{fu6)
arcdat a rninimwn t*nJb+l {lt}} r.o*rours..for terrahwithnn ur.eraf//nerogeslope o/
oucr r$,{rn+. pert:cnl (J[Mt, {:d}x#orJrs d$\tluped $y intry:lwfattml ql'i".LS.G.S
tq t**drungle 6.rrulfl rrr.r ore nece;rlclrlrr.-
{.rixd usc fireel*duiffi facirrfihg.
I " J'xr.lfr?grrniaradra.{fir#prr.r.rdlormg drrm.grs. fi'a6r5r/irc#/e..J. frlujr{er,*Ingrnreiltilr*s;
3. Iulut nttniter a"l'lars propose$;
'I, t\*rtt numher o/-riu.clJnrg rnils prcr.arrsed.
i- ilbrrrl fi'ea +-lpn?trrlrr.s d nun-reildct$fs! fiaar space;
,r l],1 8r't'r .ftieel. Slrrre J#/. 6jemr,6od,Springs, C o l$twtie,il j $U !
{93flj 9dj-8fi'.? /gi.} .?,C..r-?yL? .F*.u l0rflJ .lg.{-J+,ry
A
.8,
(:.
D
E.
f.
o o
ti: fatai nufibcr u,/'rrt/rvlr/uu/ t*r,u/Jing wd!,r prupuwd.Jbr vwh striltttttc;i'Itlf+rirnlrrser uj'prop+sd o.l"{:.yIrre/,rxnJkr'ng.rytac.rE an./Al" Trilu!ytrutrtrnedc{er.Eir-.t,-
litrtion -l:.ltl
In t.rr:ir*'Jitra {rr Jtrrc.S&elc,,, .rllrm rmrrp, lhr Jilllcnting :;uppltment*l infitr*tutitttt.r}rd/ }e.r&}#, itted ln
4rrrpllic arrri"itr rErfftr:n.firrlri.
f- L:S.fl.r{, ,Ipi/ ("onscn'*fiulr S'.Jn,rt:c .rzriJ c'csigncrticrmr, rutr! inltrureruliun tl/.,/rs
ilttae:lttri,l:
l]. .\'I{irsli?sr?l $,i'.relrr-rrg IIre r'atprnr'l rll'r/re ,uropnserf nr[rdi,,,lsir]5 on tllr, Ifltr,-5. slrrtrr,rs flne f
tapograplry aJ' t frc s ite :E Slal*ntenl .,r.r?,1-.1:ir?fj"J*,{calierl rutiittlicn hoturcls tu] L,!c $rr.r;C. rlllfiet'paled.rrxrr*e qfrfi:rrrucir1.l 'noturul gas- telephonc ant{ coble ]l tr{ xrn'ices"-
ilirtnts !.rnil'ir.le tlttu' i{urns *x $oon fls Fossible if1.ou rvisl'rlrlurappllcation to he rsr-ie*lisd in atin:dr,
ffirrliner. Pl*sie dn m,t hffiikre to call rue ifyou ha'e an! queriions.
5iraccrci3,,
I"red Jarrnan- Iienior lllcnner
i$70.s45.8}12i
-l