HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 Staff Reporto I
PROJECT NAME:
OWNER:
LOCATION
SITE DATA:
WATER:
SEWER
ACCESS:
ZONING:
PROJECT ]NFORMAT]ON AND STAFF COMMENTS
Chipperfiel-d Estates (Sketch Pl-an)
Ken Mattingley
4408 331 Road
silt, c0 81652
A portion of the llnla of Section 34,
Township 6 South, Range 92 West of the
6th Principal Menidian.
Approximatei-y 414 miles south of Silt
along County Road 331.
63.9 acres to be divided into 9 lots
and 1 tract.
Individual wells
Indavldual septlc
F::om County Road 326 and County Road 331
A/R/RD
ADJACENT ZON]NG:
]. RELATIONSH]P TO THE COMPREHE}'ISIVE PLAN:
The proper:ty is Iocated in District C-Rural Areas/Minol Envir:onmental
Constraints. The Comprehensive Plan encourages fanm and ranch land to
remain in active use and nesidential development to occur near urban areas.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL:
A. Site Description: The site slopes moderately to the north. The vegetation
consists of grasses and some cedar tlrees.
B. Pnoject Desc:ription: The pnoposal is to divide 63.9 acnes into 9 lots and
1 tract. The prop"oty r"= prurlously divided by exemption into two lots (5 acres
and 58.9 acres). The 58.9 acre.parcel is proposed to be redivided into 9 lots.
]II. MAJOR CONCERNS AND ISSUES:
A. Arrschool- bus easement'r is noted on the westenn edge of lots B and 9. The
deveJ-oper. should. addness the purposes of the easement and constluction of
impnovements.
B. The light-of-way for County Road 331 should be noted on subsequent plats.
C. parcel 1 access directly onto County Road 326. The County Road Supervison
must appnove of the driveway location prion to submittal- of the Preliminary Pl-at.
D. The subdivision road should be named.
E. The subdivision road should inte:rsect County Road 331 at a right ang1e. The
point of intensect]on does not appear to have good sight distances due to the
curvatune of the noad and gnade. The County Road Supervisor should approve
this l-ocation prioi: to going to the Board of County Commissioners.
F. The subdivision ::oad divides Par:cel 8. AlI of the a:rea south of the subdivision
noad shotild be included in Parcel 7.
G. The subdivision road system is essentially a long cul-de-sac- The centet:
of the souther turn around in approximately 1400 feet from the inte::section with
County Road 331. The nonthenn turn around is appnoximately 1030 feet fnom 331-.
This sont of road system typicalty presents problems for fir:e protection. The
developer shou.l-d address these .orr.Lrrr= with the fire depantment. An alter:native
may be the construction of two shopter roads coming off of County Road 331,
North:
South:
EaSt:
West:
A/R/RD
A/R/RD
A/R/RD
A/R/RD
Page 6
to
appropriately spaced with adequate sight distances.
H. The soils map and tables of soils suitability required pen section 4.01.01
B-2 of the subdit,ri"io., regulations have not been submitted. These should be
submitted pnior to review by the Boar:d of County Commissioners. It is anticipated
that the proposed large lots will have an acceptable building site. A note should
be placed on subsequent ptats staling engineer:ed sewage disposal systems may be required
I. The standard county right-of-way width is 60 feet'
J. The County Road Supervisor wilf determine the road surface finish p::ion
to submittal of the P::Ltiminary PIat. Chip and seal- has been requir:ed in
the past if the develope:: proposes public roads, county maintaj.ned.
K. The devel-oper will be nequi::ed to p::ovide fine pnotection facilities per
the subdivision r:egulations. A fire proteetion plan should be prepared by
the applicant and appr"oved by the fine distr"ict pnior to submittal of the
Pre.l-iminany Plat. (The applicant has agreed to comply with the roequirements of
the Sil-t Fire Pnotection District. )i'- s"lai"ide'" in the a"-"" (inctuding the Mattingrey Exemption) have been
i:equired to submit $1000.00 for: each new lot for the impact to the Silt Bridge.
M. The substance of the waten augmentation plan should be submitted to and ap-
pr.oved by the Division of Water Resounces p:rior to submittal of the Pneliminary
Plat.
]V. FINDINGS:
A. The meeting with the Planning Conrnission was extensive and complete, that
pa:tinent facti, matters and issues were submitted and that inte::ested par:ties
wene hea::d at the meeting.
V. PLANNING COMM]SSION
The planning Commission necommended approval- of the Sketch Plan on July L4r 7982
with conditions A thr:ough M, above, with the exp:ress understaridr'-ng that the
Planning Commission has serious r.esenvations about the precedent which may be
set by approval.
Page 7