The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1.0 Applicationoo PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMITTAL COLOROSO SUBDIVISION GARFIETD CoUNTY, COLORADO Section 4.00 PLAN REeUIREMENTS 0F SUBD, Departing property linesand owners of record: ften e.Street, block, 1ot layoutwith proposed easements: ISIS,ION REGULATIONS Paragraph 4.02 prelirninary plan Re qu i rements Item d. 4.0?"0L Preliminary plan ftem a. Final plat Requirements, see Sheet 1 of g Item b. llorth arrow, graphic scaie,and date see sheet 1 of g Item c. Boundary lines and descrip-tion of subdivision: see sheet 1 of g see sheet 1 of 8 Gattached list I tem ften f tem I tem i tem f. g. h. i. j. Street names: Lot areas: Topographic map: Common open space: Park site and road ease-ment dedication, Lots ilAil and |tBtr:see sheet 1 of 8 see see see see see sheet 1 of 8 sheet 1 of 8 sheet 1 of 8 sheet 5 of 8 sheet 1 of 8 Item k. 1). z). Name of Subdivision:see sheet I of g Names and addresses of record Owners; Robert D. Coloroso 30412 rr. s. HiRif1e, Colora Dawn M. i{o1mes 233 Railroad Aye.Rif1e, Colorado 91650 Mortgagees (none) Names of Subdivider; Robert D. Coloroso 30412 U.S. Highway 6Rif1e, Colorado 81650 Firm Preparing prelimi_nary plans ; T.V. GAREL, Consulting Engineers and.Land Surveyors 29L9 Applewood Street GranC Junction, Colorado gl"S01 2,42-9564" 3). Names and addresses of adjacent property Owners: See attached List 4). Summary of intended usage byacrage: see sheet 1 of g 5). Proposed terms of dedication:. To be determined by County of Garfield 6). Same as presently filed for RifleVillage South Subdivision 7) . -Presently Zoned [Residential/tini ted/Urban Density; see sheet 7 of g forbuilding envelopes for critical 1ots. 8). Not applicable 9). Total proposed off-street parking: 9Z spaces ay6 81650 ghw do PRELININARY PLAIQUBMITTAL. O COLOROSO SUBDIVISION, Continued Paragraph 4.02.02 Vicinity Sketch plan: Paragraph 4. 0Z.AS physical fnformation: ftem a, G.eology, See Sheet S of g, TopographicM"p for cross section of nearbcft f,ittrofogyand the stratigraphy of overlying ""io"iSridatedmaterials and 1evel of ground'waier. ftem b, Soil descrription! See Sheet 3 of g rtem c, vegetation, lands have been historically util izedas yi"gg, graTing and browsing for she-ir andpartially irrigated for pastuie land-s; ind nostrecently since October of 1964 been a patt of aresidential subdivision. Item d, Wild1ife, not applicable Paragraph 4.a2.a4 Grading and Drainage plan:see sheet 5 of g ftem a, Revised contours: See Sheet 4 of g Item b, Cross sections, Not applicable f tem c, Street profi.les ancl cross_sections of pavement : see sheet 4 0f g f tem d, Drainage Stud.yi See Sheets Z thru sThe proposed subdivision is not sicuated. withinany ninor or major drainge channels, anJ onlya ygry sma11 area outside the subdivision istributory to the proj ect 1and.s: Paragraph 4. AZ.06 Utility plan rtem a- water supply : see sheet 6 of g for proposed.distribution system. See attached Submittafrom the Rifle Vi11ag rtem b. sanitary sewage 3i;:l;i: ror Items lJ See Sheet 6 of 8 for proposedcollection system See attached Subm.ittal Infornationfrom the Rifle Village South MetroDistrict of Items 1) --and Z) . Underground Wiring; See Utility Section on Sheet 6 of8 for location and attached Letterfrom Public Service Conpany ofColorado Page Two See Sheet 2 of 8 1 e t Info:rmation South Metrohru 5) Item c. oo PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMITTAL COLOROSO S{JBDIVTSION NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS Lot 1. Block I (2L77 -Z}L-00-004) Angnes T. Pratt 0285 Yiilage DriveRifle, Colorado 81650 Lot 43 B 1 o c Cook, Doug 27653 High (2177 -202-0s-042) " and Beta F. tq 24 Jk 1as C way 6 Space 1405Rifle, Colorado Lots 4L and 42. Block s (2L77-202-0s-041) Gene A, StanekRifle, Colorado i,ots 37 . 38 , 39. € 40:BLock 5,(2177-?0?-0s-035) Loy, Gordon and Linda M. 10991 - 320 RoadRif1e, Colorado 81550 Lots 35 and 36 , Block 5.(2L77 -202-0s-035 6 034) l1l9gi9", James R. and Heinrich, Mark D.0392 Village DriveRifLe, Colorado 81650 Lots 33 and 34, Blcck s (2L77 -202-0s-031 & 052),' MattingLy, Charles E.9418 - 320 RoadRif1e, Colorado 81650 7,10 Acre Tract to West of pr operty (2L77 -202-00-011) CtRourke, Richard Kerry 81590 East Maplewood DiiveEnglewood, Colorado Lots Z0 and ?L Reynolds, Carl L.6 & 24 Trailer park Space 5P.O. Box 411Rif1e, Colorado 81650 Land North of Pro perty Anderson, S.W. and Lola Marie0016 RerningtonRif1e, Colorado 816S0 Land to East of Pro perty Powers, John P. PoO. Box 726Rif1e, Colorado 81650 Block 8 (2177-202-01-020 & 021) iXap llnlt No. o SOIL CIARACTERISTICS Depth to Bedrock Texture Surface 3Subaoll :Substratun :Unlfled/AASHO Claeelflcarlon :Perneablllty (below 2 feet) :Percent Coarse Fragments(gravel, cobble, stone) 3 So11 Reacrton (ptl) :Shrfnk-Swell potentlal :Potentlal Frost Actlon(aurface) :Flood Hazard Hydrologlc Group ;Corrosivity - Steel :Concrete g DEGREE & KIND OF LIUITATIONS(9 1" Sllght, M ia Modetrare,S ls Severe) Septlc Tank Absorptlon Flelds Sewage Lagoona Sanltary Landfill - Trenctr - Area Shallorr ExcavatLons Dwelllnga w/baaenents w/o basements ,'1,Local Roada and Streete SUITABILITT AS A SOURCE OF"... Dally Cover for Landflll Topsoll Sand Cravel Roadf11L OTHER SOIL TEATUR}IS,,'':-' ai '" ' I j l 1 il ,'. .,,.i' ] r-: I ' 't ,'ANVANCIl COPY STIRJECT TO CIIANG}I''NOT TO BR lISfiD f N nJ,,i;r.' r'' Ot,l- U, INt .^,: (' O !,tap Unlt !{o._ {I -_ Fluvonts, nearly lovol SOIL CHANAETERISTICS Depth to bed.roek Texture Surface Subsotl Su.butreitrrm Unlfled Clansiflcatlon 3 deop O tcxtrre s arid depth highly variabLo anCstr"ttj.fiod Permeabllity (belov 2 feet) :Pereent co&r6e fragrnents :(graveI, cobhle, stone)Salinity (UCxfO: @ ZroCJ : S:rtnk-ewe1l- potentlal : Potenti"al frost-actlon (uurface) : flood. Hazard iFrequont Hyd"rologic Group :Corroslvlty Steel. :Iiigli Concrete il,iorierato to IIi6h DEGREE & KIISD OT' I,IMITATI{)NIJ(o fs Slight, M ie l4oc1ei..ate, $ ia $evere) Septlc Tenk Absorptlon I'ielde ! Sovoro Li:nitations for all stoted Sewage Lagoons Sanltary Landftll Treneh Jtrrea ShaLLov Excavations D,rellings v/besenonte w/o be.*r:inente SffiTABITITY AS A SOUHCII [,]i'.n. Topsotl Sand Gravel BoadflL]. ?{ny be goori sorrrco of sa.nd and grnvol s!!n'!rnT T0 CHANG STIB.'ECT fi) E}IANCE. NOT f,-1 BE US["O IN PIACI OT OII.SITE IIfIMSTIGATION. E.NOT TO BE rlcE.D f N PLACE OF OI,I-.STTF' TIl17NATT^^S?^rI fTt Map Unit 1o.10D o SOIL CHARACTERISTICS Depth to bedrock Texture Surface Subsoil SubsLraLum Unified Cl"assification Permea bi 1i ty Pereent coarse fragmenLs(greater thaq 3 inches )salinity (Ecxt oi @ z5oC)pH (surface) Shrink-swell potential Pot.enLial frost-;rcLion (:;Lrnlace)Flood Hazard Hydrologic GroupCorrosivity SLeef (uncoated )Concrete More than 60 inches Loam Cray 1oa.m Lo;rrrt lvll, cr, i{oderate 5.6-7.8 Lor.v to mod.erate Low Nclrrc B Hish Ivloderate Slope Slope Steep slope Slope Low st.rength, Low r;trcr4;th, Low strength,slope Ii'air Slope tr'air Low strer:gth Umuited Unsuited Faj-r Small stones, slope o DEGREE & KIND OF LIMITATIONS(0 is Slight, M i_s ModeraLe, S is Severe) Septic Tank Absorption Fields : M Sewage Lagoons : S Sanitary Landfilf Trench :OArea : M Shallow Excavations Dwellings w,/basernents w,/0 baselnents Local fioads & Streets SUTTABILITY AS A SOURCE OF... Daily Cover for Landfill FoadfilI Sand Gravel Topsoil (. ,,y M IYI .M M slope slope t **-- . q'l ra.I ECT TO CHANGE.NOT TN I.F IISED II'l PLACE oF nrr_ar".D Tlttrr^h-^ - -- - o o F Uni t No. X?IBC -IOIL CitAitACTERIS?ICS Depth to bedrock Texturc Surrface Subsoil Substratum Unified Classifica tion Permeability Percent coarse fragments(grcater thaq 3 inqhes)Salinity (Ecxros e zSdci-'pH (sur.face )Shrink-swell. pot.ential PoLenLial frost_acLion (surl.ace)FLood Hazard Hydrologic GroupCorrosivity Steel (uneoated) Concrete More than 60 inches Loa.m 91"r, silty clay loamU.l-ay Loam, silty clay Ioa.rn5tr-M1, dl,, cH Sfow 0 7.9 to above 9.0llir.h Low Rare D Eigh Moderate DEGRTE & KIND OF LTMITATTONS' (O is Slight, U is-llo;;;;;", Septic lank Absorption Fiefds S is Severe) .o-u :MSewage Lagoons Sanitary Landfill Trench Area Sha1.l".,rr i^cava tions Dwe]I j n;,:r W,/basemenLs w,/0 basemenls Loeal Boads & Streets SUITABILITY AS A SOURCE OF... Daily Cover for LandfilI RoadfilI Sand lravel opsoil (, .3" Percs s1ow1y Slope Too clayey Too clayey Shrink-sweLl_ Shrink-swe11 Low strength .tr'air Too clayey Iair Shrink_swel], Low strength Unsuited Unsulted. Poor &cess a1ka1i, too clayey PI 0 IVI l) oU D 1_. N6? ta ^^ ao COLOROSO SUBDIVISIONA replatting of a portion of Block 8, Rifle village south subdivision,Garfield County, Colorado ANALYSIS OF OFF-SITE ROAD CAPABILITIES SERVtrCING THE PROPOSED PROJECT A Review of the Desi Ca bil i of Existi Roads and Hi hwa s of HighwaysReport, Nov. 27, lg74 Average Annual DailyTraffic Volume (Design Capability) 27 ,700 vehicl es/day 3,300 to 5,600 vehicles/day 6,150 to 7,700 vehicles/day 1,000 to 1,500 vehicl es/ day ty Road 320 fromtached map for points) Source of Data:. Colorado DepartmentOi1 Shale Task Force Description of Roadway Increment fnterstate Highway 70, Silt to Igr_t Rifle, a-seperat6d 4 lanehlghway, as_phalt paved, LZ ft.1an99,,10 foot shouldeis, con-trolled access: State--Higtrryry 13, from juctionof S.H. 326 to lio Blanio , Z-Iane,asphalt paved, lZ foot 1anes, 4 fL.snould.ers , curving al ignment Y.!. Highway 6, Silr to Rifte,Z-Lane, asphalt paved, LZ footIanes, 6 foot shoulders: County Road along piceance frorn Rio Blanco Store to S2-1ane, asphalt paved., LZ4 foot shoulders, curving reekC .H fo a1 B AnaInt 1. lysis of the Dei gn Capabi . 64,of 1anes, ignnent: lity of Counersection rtArt to Flag Point 9 (See at Road and Road wa Characteristics General Standard of Count 60 feetRoadway Right-of trlay:Pavement Width iLane Width: Shoulder width, Minimum radius of curve,Pavement Type:Sight distances: centerl ine : eet eet eet eet asphal t adequate 60 feet 24 feet LZ feetvaries from 4 feetto 18 feetasphalt MatStraight 2I 15 4f2f6f0f a.Based-upol th: ,ggy" design-criteria, the AverageAnnual Daily Traffic capa6itities-r",hJ be as i8iror=; 16,000 Vehicles /day 5,750 VehicLes/day 13,400 Vehicles /day 1,440 Vehicles/hour a. Ph sic a1 Characteristics 2 (1.) Theorectical Maximum DailyTraffic Volume: (2). Practical Average AnnualDaily Traffic Volune at anatrerage traffic flow speedof 40 miles per hour: having a peak Daily TrafficVolume Capability 6f Z.Sstimes average annual daily: having a Maximum Hourly TrafficVolume Capability of ZSeo of th;Average Annual niify: Pg:lgl_4na1ysis of Existing county Road szo from rntersection"A", (F1ag Point 3) to IntErsectiirn ,,Br', (F1;;-iioini' zl . Roadway Right-of-Way Width:Pavement Width: Lane Width: Shoulder Width: Pavement Type: A1 ignment : COLOROSO SUBDIVISI ID Continued Page two a. Physical Char acter is t ic s 6.? percent+2.2 percent1,450 feet1,450 feet Res idential90 '< Passenger, 10 % Commercial50 MPHb. Existins De sisn Cao abilitv of Roadway = 3. . Average Annual Daily of Stand.ard X C1 X C2 X Cg where C1 = 0.90 for Traffic Mix C2 = 0.86 for 4 foot shoulder width Cg = 0_.72 for entering residential trafficfrom abutting property = 5,750 Veh. /day X 0.9 X 0.96 X O.7Z = 3,2L4 Vehicles/day (av. annual day) Maximum hourly Capability = gOj vehicles/hour P::igl_Analysis of Existing county Road szo from IntersectionrrB'r (F1ag Point 7) ro Flag"poi"i b ai;;ry to project Lands)a. Physical Cha racteristics o B.z. Maximum Grade Maximum Grade Change, Sag:Passing Sight Distince: - Minimum Sight Distance:Abutting Property Use:Character of- Traific: Present Speed Limit: Roadway Right-of-Way Pavement Width Lane Width: Shoulder Widrh: Pavement Type: A1 ignment: Minimun Curve Radius: Minumum Sight Distance on curvedue to ground obstruction: Minimum Passing Distance: Maximum Passing Distance :Maximum Grade: Maxinum Grade Change, crest:Abutting property [s6:Character of- Traific: Present Speed Limit: 60 24 IZ 6 760 fee tfeet fee t fee tasphalt curyedfeet feet feet feet percent percentrural and BLM pas senger commercial MPH degrees fee tfeetfeet feet degreesfeet to Southfeet none MPH or lessper hour 350 800 1r400 L.2- 1.0 90 eo 10 '6 40 4. P b. Existins Desi gn Cao abilitv of Roadway Average Annual Daily Traffic Capability =Daily standard x ct x cz = 5750 x 0.9 = .5,175 veh./day Maximurn Hourly Capability = LrZgS veh./hoursical Descri tion 0f Exist Road Intersections a.fntersection trArr at Flag point s Central Angle of Curverl 9gRadius of Centerline of Curve: 15Sight Distance Due To Obstructions:L20Pavement Width. ?,4Shoulder lrlidth: 0Intersec!irg Road Centerline;Angle with Road 320: g3Centerline Off-set: SsWidth of intersecting road.: 16Traffic Control: Curve Speed: 10Traffic Flow Capability: 600 COLOROSO SUBDIVIS'Q oContinued.Page Three B. 4 sical Descri tion of Existin Road Intersec tions b fntersection 'rBr at Flag point 7 Central Angle of Curve: Badius of Centerline of Curve:Sight Distance Due to Obstruction,54 grade change at crest:Pavement Width:Shoulder Width:fnterseclirg Road Centerline;Angle with Road 3ZO:Centerline Off-set:Width of intersecting road:Traffic Control: " Curve Speed:Traffic Flow Capability: 64 degrees60 feet 350 feet24 feet0 feet one side 81 degrees 20 feet Z0 feet none 15 MPH or less 500 per hour C, Physical Desc ription of Potential Impr ovements of Road fntersections 1.fntersection rtArr At Flag point 3 Central Angle of Curve:Radius of Centerline of Curve:Pavement Width: Number of Lanes: Lane Width: llglrl_Distance Due to 0bstruction:Shoulder trridth:Intersecting Road to West.Angle 6r rnier=ec;i;;,Centerline off-set:Width of intersection road:Traffic Control: 3Traffic Flow Capability Thru fntersectionalong Road 3ZA:or, Average Annual Daily Volume Capability: 2 Intersection rB'r At Flag point T Central Angle of Curve:Radius of Centerline of Curve:Pavement Width: Number of Lanes: Lane l{idth: Shoulder Width:fnterseclirg-Road to East, Road 332;Angle of Intersection:Centerline off-setWidth of intersecting Road:Traffic Control: " Curve Speed:Sight Distance on Curve:Traffic Flow Capability Th::u IntersectionAlong Road 320:or; An-Average Annual Daily Volume Capa-biliry of : 3 L2 150 0 90 degrees43 feet 36 feet with 4t s idewalks feetfeet feet, Curb degrees feetfeet Stop Signs vehicles/hour vehic Les / day 90 50 24 -w ay 720 ,280 ? egrees eet eet LZ feet0 feet, curb degrees feet feet Stop Sign on Road 332 ZO MPH 400 feet 930 Vehicles/hour 3,720 Vehicles/day 64 100 36 3 90 0 24 d ff Design capability of Road 320 would be linited by rntersection ?'A,or equal to a average annual daily tiarri.c vorum6 ;f z,zgo vetricreiper day. D, Deternination of Contributine Traffic Volumes Traffic Counts or Traffic Surveys were not completed on Road sz1.Traffic volumes wi11. bu-projected on the basis of terminalfacilities of contri-uutiis iesidential and .ororui.irr develop-ments serviced by Road. szd as aeveropea in the roiiowing Tablenumber One" - a l{ 0) O co FA o io N x (d T, o o u1 € li a) a rna x(d 'd 0) r..fo t< o @ FO C\I O C\I GI GI x (d\, o) N ],J O) ot< 0) ra a N c! h o O) c! t-l r\ e\t x Cd.d o o c! >. (dro c a) xxx(d .ct cd.o€'d\\\ aotnts *oo0) €s<t \o x(! "o q) \oc! x$ c) \o ro @\oIn c{c! O r+ c) o rlJ o)o U) I&><rI]t! udr6!o E a AA O l-r Fl li5.o F] ZZ V (N FtDo o o z2o O O .rt:rrl U fi U Ip a xtrtro O .rr b0(n (d .Fr Cd .rl E"u F o t-{ c!C)v GImo +J t(, (ta OFQgi u: (,<5F] lrgiE F. 3.Oatr( o, Ei \r -IF<zF t-r,:COr.1 F{Qrv Eo t< roC)v a{roo +.) cdaOio OOdr- I G) l-i U 'F.l b0>trho OFI(r(d \o rn GI 14 fa n,'t3 (dcdoo&d ()X+J+rd Ot{CJAr oL'(aFoo00v tqZ rtYo(Ja O)lNv o VI o\o 5 FQ r-lI'\ A aatr.ti,cI-.c\E\.\on _*ooo tr\ @ C\rLn ri Fl aQA\\\ ooa \O f\ CN<+ Fi Fl a o LN\o rn @ tr o O @ ra @ t}l.h o .F{ x (d a x Fl J4 (B a)A L C!a c o b0 (d ti 0) \oco th F\ O (\I C\T Crl Fira (\ \o@rn 6\o o, tt) U) u1 rn ra @ V) o +) U Eoq tr Dr o 0) o U llqr (d trF. rd o) +) Uo o $r& 0) U) (d oli U H c! r+ .t.') ot+l +r qr .r.l .,-l I t)t-r iJ +Jogtr{JC!CdOr-{ 5E o.r l-,>PLnoo OFI Orocrd oou+r.Fi JI>1, c)trdoOOlr t/)o(.)oo>frUcdouofri < Fq v)dc) +J(/)lr o\o!r) oo <l fa \o }O C\) a c{ c\rO) r-{ O) bo @ LN F\Ot a O.b0> (d .Fl Fi nd F{.o.il=)<a og!-l +J .Fl o&a Cd U) o bc Cd 0) bo CBF JZa<F{FF- r1 r-iO*fZFrI]D =a F Hz z- F*a x, tI] Ao E (n rr1z Flo U H r& H 1IlF Fl CJFl L) aFrH2zztJ]>aatlj.ZadoIrlA-AFop(L,OifU<oad,z r}tll (,>zoFr U)d ci rrlg-1 F ZHHHD(DZA hl (9 l-,Zt-- zu) E< itl FCDQH -H.zx(/)=Iq IlI& F.92(tr*IOfrr O. rllU. li. d,: rrl(4 --- 5}!{cr{ Fz rqd,2tqA t- *1o;IJ rI1 GI !O & FZ () L) F (n Fz tJ] =u)aeq 1Il .J L)i, rit! tr{ F. F T-I (Jzzz Fl -1 tqprc, od rll HF fr{zo ,l] Ht!apa d,3z fJioc rqd,FtllL)FA rLl =F)=ozd E zaHz E F{ E-2oU trio z E- Fl FA F EIzo &tll FA z r! Fl m F. o COLOROSO SUBDIVISION, Continued o Page Five Do Determination of Contributin Traf fic Vo,lumes a.rncrease rn Projected Traffic volumes By proposed. Actions Number of cars per Single Family Dwelling Unit: 1.5 Number of trips per work day per car: 4.0 Number of trips per day per unit: 6.0 Number of commercial trips @ ZO%: L.z Total Trips per Work Day: Total trips per week = 5Plus z Total tripg per week per unit:Average Trips per Dayi 43.5 trips 6 "2 trips per day b. 36 7 x 7.2 =x 3.75= 8,271 veh./dayAt Point 3;285 rreh. /da v 11,015 veh./day E. Estinated Cost O f Pot ential Improvements a. Intersection "Art 1at.L trips trips.5 trips = 2.59 percent of traffic d" rncrease due. to developnent of 6g additional unitsin Rifle village south^= 68 l-q., ;;t;;ie;ti";;-: 4zz tripsfor average aniual daily traffic "oi"i" at point g. Increase due to the d.evelopment of the remainder of platted.lots in Rifle village soutir subdiviiio" = 5s x 6.2 = s4L tripsfor average annual Ea:.ry iraffic volurne at point g. Increase due to development of CONESTOGA: At Point Z: 1r100 units x 6.2 trips/day/unrt = 6,g20trips for average annual aaity trafficvolune. At Point 4: 400 units x 6.2 trips/day/unit = 2,4g0trips for average annual''d.ail-y trrifi.volume. Total Projected volume at point z : g rzLl vehicl es/dayTotal Projected volume at point i : 11,015 vehicl es/d,ay l-I9P9rtional Traffic volume Due To Actions under cOloRos0SUBDIVISION: At Point 7 z Zg5 veh"/<ia = 3.47 percent of trafficv Excavtion, -Fi11 Q Grading,Base Materialasphaii -p""ur!rt, 9yrb,gutter, sidewalks,Storm sewer, Storm inlets.Traffic contiols ?? 33 84 36 Q.Yn.fn.f ach ds.@$t.G $t.0$2 @ $r 0c0r0s01013e13 u.yds. @ $10./ydons g $f2./ton 3.50/yd.g./ft. 0. / ft. ,200 /unit 2,200 "3.960. 2,940. 2,990. 2,600. 3,600. 500. $ Estimated Cost of Construction:Engineering: Contingencies: Tdtal Estirnated project Cost: fntersection ttB?r $18,680. 3,600. 4r456. q.yds. ds e$SOn.ft.0 $26,736. 000. 680. 150" 000. 480. Excavation, fill 6 grading,Base materialAsphali -pr""i3"t, uoncrete Box Culvert,Vertical Curbs, 1, 4, 3, 6, @ $3.o"/Yd $s .01 100 c 590 t900 s2av 160 1 u. yds . @ $1 0. /yd.$ons G $12./ton 50 ft.Total Estimated Cost of Construction:Engineering: Contingencies: Total Estimated projeCt Cost: )15 J 3 310. 000. 662. b. $ 21 .972. Ela o oCOLOROS0 SUBDIVISION, Continued Page Six Proportional cost of rntersection rmprovementsColoroso Subdivision"to rntersection rrA'r rotal Estimated project cost: $ zT r0a0.Proportion of Calculated Traffic Volumes: Z.5g% Proportional share of Improvement Cost: $ 699. rntersection rrB, Total Estimated. project cost: $ ?2r000. Proportion of calculated Traffic volumes z s.47% Proportional share of Inprovement Cost: $ 765. Total Projected Proportional cost of Intersectionrmprovements Allocated to coloroso subdivision: $ r 1462. SUMMARY: Provided Tproposed sIntersecti some other developn Road 320 r-mprovements. en aughenbaugh Boulevard is extended as shown on theIcetch plans of the CONEST0GA DEVEL0PMENT, theseon Impro-vements would not be necessary, itthoughtyp-e of intersection would be providbi with t[et of the Taughenbaugh Boulevard- Extension and lf-o_yi4q9 Taughenbaugh Boulevard is not extended because theCoNESTOGA DEVELOPMENT does not occur, the exisii"g intersectionshave suff icient traf f ic f 1ow capabil i,ties to accornod.ate thepresent planned actions. t o MTNUTES CONT|Nt0 City Attorney Carter was .direct.ecl to contact theto determine when they will begin the 19Bl audit Mr' Kelley Meyer stat'ed that the city should be responsi-ble for acquiring additj_onar landsfor Highway I3/Rai1road Avenue, not the individuaL owner/cleve.l_oper. He felt that theChevy Addition was not being assessed its "fair share".of rrrwaf'r:. I"1r. I\4eyer state thatit would not' be a problem to reserve l-and for future wideni.g or tnu highway, and nobuilding would occur within 10 feet of the rigt-,i-or-r.y. He suggested the City reimbursehim for the cost of the land being reserved- City Attorney carter stated that the reserved:il:":i;l: i:-ff"t onlv ror excess parkins, noL parkins ro meer Ciry requiremenrs. ro draw up an .r:::_::l'iniln"Xf;i;",:::,::"::;::..lilrh.ti;.r:;:.:ri;:i]i*:::::., the amounr ro be determined by rhe planning ;;;;:, which ^uy not be buirt on bur onlyused for excess parking:n aaaition ro "ir;;;;;ins requi.";";;;. seconded by Councirman;:i:;:ir:"u.::"::i*j"i:.::i.';:l:]'"'r""i"u-Io"' Acrams, Anderson, Arkinson, samson, rucker, Discussion followed concerning t-he surnmit Avenue road improvements and concerns from Mr.rischer' Actinq city t'tanagei Lessner stated that a curb is to be provided to clrawdrainage away from the Fischer property. Rifle City Counc Page 3 May 5, l-9g2 audj-ting firm, for t-he city. Dalby, Wendland & Co., il:;";,'i;;l:tt decl-ared the meetins recessed. ar r-0:35 pM. to recorvene ar B:00 p.r.r RECESSED I'{EETING 8: 0O Pt"l MAY 6, lg}2 The council persons of May 6, I9B2 at g:00 p.M Atkirrson, Grace Tucker, DaIe Terrell. the City of Rif1e, Stat.e of Colorado, rnet in recessed session on' The fo1l0wing members were present: Robert Adams, JerryGeorge llitchelf. Absent were Richard Anclerson, Michael Satnson, Mayor t'{itchel-I asked the Rifre vilrage south Metro Di-strict for a logical reason whythey requested an executive sessio., ritr, cifv-aJ,rrr.ir. Mr. John Hand, chairman of theDistrict Board' stated the reason is to tar-k about a pot.entiar- r-ease agreement in theBeaver Creek water system ancl dual metering. councirman Adam" *o,rua to go into executive:;::,,,;.3i,l,ii_iX;",:";::i:: :L.;[:i:H: atifn.o,, and on rolr car] the rolrowins vored Councilman Samson arrived. at B: l_O pM man Terrell arrived at g:25 pM. Councilman Adams moved Samson- On roII cal-lTerrell, MitchetI. Councilman Anderson arrived at g: 20 plr, and Counclf_ to reLurn to regular session at g:40 pM. Seconded by Councilmanthe following voted aye: Adams, Anderson, Atkinson, samson, Tucker, Mayor t"titchell- reported that a proposal was made to the Rifle village south Met.ro District;:::;il':: ;H*:1";":l';:.lT"ii:; ;'i.";;";iaer ,re n'ono'.. and return ro councild 1 M?yor t'litcheIr told Mr' Robert Cororoso that one way or another he wourd be providedwater service' brtt alternatives wourd not be avail-able untir .ra.. the response from the3::::j'i;..'i; :;:";:::.il:T::;:;:;:"*.1;:j;"x1.: :i:i::i. o, rune 3 - i.,o. Mi,chellthe citv wourd provide it and tne proper.r"r"I.u be annexeu ,;:;"::"il;ffi:'.lt:1.;"iiii."Councifman Anderson moved that the cilv alto-iuy -r,a administration meet with Mr. colorosoand draw up a pre-annexation agreement, stating that if the Rifr-e Village south MetroDistrict would be unable to provide water to-thu Coloroso p.op"rty, the City wi]_L providethe service' seconded by councirman aaam",-"r,a on ro11 ..ir ir.ru followj_ng voted aye:Adams' Anderson Atkinson' samson, Tucker, ancl Mitchelr councilman Terrell was out of, the chambers. t-.-- Representatives of Bookcr-iff puD and sundance Center puD stated that they would wait untiri[i[:^,;:;:]"::.iJi: ::;:i::. abour i-,"-,".". siruarion in sourh Rirre. councilman ;;r:i:, ;*:r'i:::;r:;rj":: #*:rl Ii:'[ iii:, il'": Hs;:;: i -:i:*. :x":}l;", Ufi January 14, 1982 Garfield County Planning Commission 2014 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Gentlemen: o Rifle Viltage South Metropolitan District is currently supplying domestic water service to-tots in the nine Village South Subdivision. There are p-resently 43 connections served from an intereoinected spring and Anderson Well #2 h;t"d in NW* NWt Section 20, Township e Soutfr, -Range 93 lVest. lVater from gris vrellis purchaJed, under contract from S.W. And.erson, who holds a decree for this well. c;pt enclosed. Pumping performed when the well was first used indicated a p6tential supply of aUoul 5 cfs. I am informed that the weU can proOuced 4S0 gpm 1i.-O-cfs) upon demand. A 6'r diameter pipe distribution system serles the subdiviiion includil9 the_proposed Colorosa and Reynolds Subdivisiors(49 t 22 lots respectiveli). Th9-Djstrict currently fr* " -jravel filtration box, chlorination facility and about 26,000 gallons at storage. The master water supply plan for the District shows the following: 1' T."TXS"$lt;,:fi'11. Decree 1.0 crs abs, B'eG crs cond'. August 1960.b. An[erson WeIl #2, Decree 1.5 cfs abs, 3.46 cfs cond. August 1960. The distriet under its eurrent regrrlations ean and does req-uire dedication of water rights which ittach to the lan{-within--the District which seeks development. They can be summarized as follows: a. Last Chance Dilch. Owneri of land within the district have the following interest: Minoriti Stockholders 254 shares 4'485 cfs' Formeriy Mclearus 3?0 shares 3' 68 cfs' Other interests 420 shares 4'502 cfs' 1Z.i-6-67ffi Dedication of these rights would provide adequate early priority right (May 5, 1888) for augementatl-on' -b. Ciirkson Ditch. Priority tZe, epril 15, 1944. 12cfs. Property ownershiP about 65 Acres. e. J.F. Pierce Ditch - no adjudication d. w.A. skelton Ditch - Priority claimed september 10, 1894 Adiudication Pending for 10 cfs. e. Siciehi1 Ditch, prior{ty 119BB - April. 1, 1900 - waste a drainage' Priority Priority Pige 2 . Garfield County planning CommissionJanuary 13, 1g8Z . 3' A water tre':rsmission main of 10.0 MGD capacity to serve an ultimatepopulation of 22,000 persons (or the equirilenti rr.,, a principalsupply souree in the N* of Section. ZO;to.a terminal storage near.the' airport 4' Storage reservoirs of appropiate size located generally near thesource of supply, near tne mia point and. at the terminus. Phase I of the Master plan is now in existancePhase II is construetion of the t"ri i"""ement of the transmission main toT.angenbaugh Blvd. and. a 500,000 gaxo; ."J".roi, near tlus pointPhase III may be construction?r " .""Jnd tran"riirio, main, developmentof additional supply and, a second storage tant<.other phases as directed by d;1'h pJtt""r, and demand. The district now has the funding capability to proceed with constructionand implementation of phase II. bv t"vuEEu vrtLrr surlsLrucu Rifle vlfl1qg south l\{etrpolitan District also furnishes sewer service to theDistrict' An 18" interceptor main starts east of Tangenbaugh Blvd. on AirportRoad' and delivers. sewag" to the Districtts treatment'ruorks at ttre westernend of the district, soulh of Interstate-io."a adjacent to the colorado River.The'present treatment rryorks consist of a rii,000 gallon/day aerated. lagoonsystem, to whieh 151 residential ana ccmm"""irr units (151 EQR) are connected.Additional taps have been sold- b"ilgiil-i-ir-. -"ormitted capacity of the plant toThe 808 limit rvhich requires plannin-f Fo"-L"p.nsion to begin. This 1imit wasreached on January 8, 1982, il9^1 =lt"-"ppritation is curr?nuy being preparedfor construction to proceed in 1982. It ii-".rti"ipatea ttai-ih" "orriltea tapswill not require seriice until Je81. T;;-;"; have been paid'"in]"a;;il#,'li-ru .money is in hand to proceed forthwith.- 'v veErr r/qr At present connected Ioads, the treatment plant is non-discharging, butoperates under a NpDES permit which,n".i L-" ""r,"*ed by July, 19g6. Thedistriet has a certified oplrator As you can see, the District l.-rg1ls vigorously to keep up rvith demandson its systems, and has the financial abilit] to-do so ivithout need of grants. Il""j.o"d of Directors are committed to ruiniung ttris .uriIiii.n, and '*iir: -' t + r , I V ward. F. Carp ter P.E. - L.S. ..4 71,a-o o IN THE DISTRI T COI,'RT TN A}ID FOR WATER DIVTSTON NO. 5 STATE OF COLORADO Appllcatlon No. U-131O RULTNG OP REFEREE F- | t_ t: t:)IN vr'A'l'li.( uilJ-i,i iDivliou l..jir. .r . uEc 7 ?fi72 i STATE OF coLoRAOs I QJI l..t -'.;.. *:... L'.[.x :.t/. ! ! iWrTrtIl CLi.lrl : IIN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATIOIY } FOR WATER RIGHTS OF SA.I.IUEL ) h'C\OIFOW A.\DERSON fN THE COITRADO )RI1ER XN GARPIELD COUNTT ) OY Oei,r.;y The aborre entltlod matter havlhg baen referred to the underslgnod as water Referee for water Division No. 5r state of cororado, by the Hater Judge of sald court on the r2th day of July, Lgz2r ln accordance with ArticLe 2I of Chapter l4gr Col.orado Ravlsed Statutee 1963, as amended (chapter 373 S.L. col'o. ]969)r knorn as The water Rlghts Determlnation and administration Act of 1969. And the r:ndersigmcd F.efc-:ee having made such inveetigations ag ara necessary to dete::nlne whether or not the statenents in ttre application are true and having beconre futly .advlsod wlttr respect to ttro subject natter of the appricatlon does hereby rrajce ttre fotloring deteTudnatl.on and rulrng as tha Referee ln thls matterr to_tiit: l. Ihe statements 1n the applicatlon are t:iuo. 2' The name of the Etructure ls Anderson well No. 2. 3' The. narna or arurt*rt and address ts: Sanuer Hoodrow AndersonrRoute l, Box I4O, Riflel Colorado. 4- The source of the water is a welr having a deptlr of 12 feet. 5. The weII is locared in the NW l,/4 ttw l/4 of Section 2O, I,- 65.rR' 93I{' of the 6th P.M" at a lrcint whence ttre Nort}rwest Gornero!- said, section 20 bears N. oi"3o. I{. 5gg feet. 6. The proposed rise of the rrater ls dornestlcr irrigation aod allother beneficial uses. 7' The date of initlation of appropriatlon is August 1960. 8' The anount of vater clalmcd rs: Absolute - r.o cr:bic foot pcrsecond of tinral conditionar - 3.g6 cJi.-ro.a po. "".oid, of tine. 9' The well ls not reglstered ln tho offlce of tho statc Engrueer. 1O; The applicant has applied 1.O cublc foot of hrater per second oftirne to tlre above useSo 11.Appllcant lntends to enlarge the facillty and appry an adrritional i;33.*ac fear of vater pir "".ond of tlne to the abovo bencficiar .)o o The Referee does thorefore concludo that the abovo ontltled application should be granted and that an absolute d,ecree for 1.0 cubtc foot of water Per second of tirne and a conditlonal decree for 3.96 crrbtc feet of water Per secDnd of tlme la hereby awarded to the anderson liell No' 2 for dorrestic, irrlgatlon and all other benoflcial purposos, wlth appropriation data of Augr:st 311 1960, subJoctT howsvsr, to all earllor prlority rights of othergr and to the intogratJ.on and tabulatlon by t5e Division.Engir:eer of such prlorltleg and changes of righte in accordanco with laH. As to the 3.96 ctrble feet of water per second of time conditlon- arly awardedl an Application for a Bienniar Finding of Reasonable Dlllgence sharl be filed ln June of 19?4 and in June of every socond calendar year crereafter so lon<j as the claimant deslres to malntain the conditlonar nater right' or until a deterrninatlon has been rnade that the conditlonal water right has becone an absolute water :lght by reason of the coropletion of tlre appropriation. rt ls accordingly oRDERED that this ruling shal1 be flled, witlr c:e water clerk and shall beconp effecLive upon such filingl sr:bJect to Judicial review pursuant to sectron 14g-2r-2o cps 1963 as 'amended (1971). rt is further oRDEnED that a copy of this ruling sharl be filed witjr thc appropriate Divielon Englneer and tjre state Engineer. day o Done at the Clty of Glenwood Sprlngsr Colorado, t/4L.;rlreir t Le72. thls /Z 4 BY THE REFEREET w Rc eree Divislon No. SSt,at6 of Colorado ij: p;ote=L r.eg f1lsd 1n tl'i:r n,1tto; il:u f,ori.lrinB rtrl1:"r: ls corllrnod O:: t,i.:oTdd. Ond tS nirdc the Juu.;oont cnd Docroe of tht8 ootrltr t{rtf tslatod:*,r,/ or Judgo o) P.O. Box 64O GARFIELD COUNTY COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 109 8th Street Suite 300 Glenwood Springs, Colorado gl60206110 Phone 945-91 5O September 2gt lgg4 II: Robert Coloroso 191]2Hishway6 &24RrrLe, CO g165O Re: Coloroso Subdivision Dear Bob: The purpose of_ this 1etter is to confirm our telephone conversationor tate in resards to-tr,e-ini"irrJi";i;;;;b-;; ifl="pr"liminary planapproval for youf deveropm-ent, th; coiioo"o-"iubdivision, ind.theimprovements requirea - ' il' - th; -'caiiiera . county -io"ur rmprovementDistrict rgg{:i. -i" you have-point"a;;i to-mer .youE properryfronts onto viltage piir"l'*hi;; i!,=u"-roud i'crui"o in the Loca,rmprovement Disr;ici' --iia :i":*i.oi"rty.owner, yoi will be requiredto make pa'menrs i["i"roi"l _ *nut iouliiy- i" ars6 i"i"rr"a ro in rhe?;:::llti3, ;5. af!,;;ii--ir tt"-piIiiilin.'v pran ioi you, developmenr on septenber-24, .Lg84, r had, the opportuni.ty to speak to the Boardof counrv co,;is;ioi"i"' auoui -i[i; matf,er. rf,; specific quesrionwas whetherp. i,,., - -;i;.!h"i!Is::i" ",i:: ji;i:"f *ii:ili;, ;:, ;ft :":lL -,. i,u:specifications for the-r,oca:. irpi"J"rJrrt nr"iii.t.--A" you are wellawarer other parts of ,Iglr -aeveiopnent are--required to have anasphalt mat. - -t' accordance with--f,y ,""ori"nii|ion, the Boardapproved a thip and sear "riii"" "tn- virrage Drive. The Boardmembers agreed-*itt -yoo iiut it ,ouia be foori"rr"-to- instarr a chipand seal surface aia t["n require-ioir -as a condition of subdivisionimprovement, ro iip-iip iiilt suftace ind'' instatt an-asptrart mar.The Boardrs approval 0f a chip and sea]. surface appries only tovitrlage Drive -and aoes .lgt- .pp+v ii rhe ilr;;io, roadways of yourdevelopment (Rod r{ay iij-sf,otg""-6iii"i.. rn _regards to theser theconditions of Resotirtion Io. 6z_zoi-"iiir appry.tr hope this clears up any question you may have had about th'smatter' trf it does notl-nowever, pr"is" d6-iot"''il"Iiaua" to contactme or ltark Bean in ttre pepirtmeni 6i-o"i"ropment. v.'y 9ryty yours, /%trhz-Eail G. RhodesGarfield County Attorney ccs Board of County CommissionersMark Bean, couity prin"",