HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 Staff Report,oo
OWNER
ENGINEER:
LOCATION:
SITE DATA:
I^IATER:
SEWER
ZONE DISTRICT:
PROJECT INFOR}TATION AND STAFF COMMENTS
COI,OROSO SUBDIVISION (Flnal Plat)
Dawn M. Holmes and Robert D. Coloroso
T.V. Garel
Rifle Village South Subdlvision south of
the Clty of Rlfle
10.10 acres to be dlvided lnto 46 lots
Undetermined at this time. (Either City
of Rlfle or the Rlfle Metropolitan DisErict)
Rlfle Village South Metropolitan District
Rlr/uo
I. MAJOR CONCERNS AND XSSUES:
A. The Prelimlnary Plan was approved on August 9, 1982. The conditions of approval
were as follows:
1. That the developer cournlt to improvements (as determlned acceptable by the Board
of County Commissioners) on Vlllage Drive in thelr Subdivislon Improvements
Agreement prior to final plat submlttal.
2. That the developer commlt to lmprovements (as determined acceptable by the Board
of, County Commissioners) on County Road 320 (to two intersecti.ons addressed ln
the trafflc circulation plan submittal by the developer) in their Subdivislon;
Improvements Agreement prior to final plat submittal.
3. That the proposed park (Lot A) be redeslgned as a pocket park and labeled as "Tract
Att.
4. That a Home Owners Assoclatlon be formed to be responsible for the park area and
maintenance thereof.
5. Interior roads be developed to the Cl-ty of Riflers road standards (50t R.0.W.
with 32t paved curb and gutter streeEs wlth sldewalk) and that the developer
cornnit to this in the Subdivision Improvements Agreement as submlttal of final
plat.
6. Developer submit a letter from the Colorado Geologlcal Survey indicati.ng that the
Geological Surveyrs sonc€rns have been reasonably met.
7. Developer pay a fee of $200.00 per residential lot to the RE-2 School DlstricE at
final plat approval.
B. The developer pursue water by the City of Rifle or the Rifle Metropolitan Dlstrict
and the Divlsion of Wat.er Resources approve that source prior to submittal of final
plat.
B. The developer is proposing to pave Village Way 32 foot wide. The costrestimate
provlded as part of the Subdivision Improvements Agreement should be probably identlfy
the off site improvements separately.
C. The improvements Lo County Road 320 are not noted 1n the final plans nor itemized in
the Subdlvision Improvements Agreement.
D. A pocket park'ls provided as requlred. However, the access to the park is only 4 feet
w1de. This should be increased to 7 feet to permit safe bicycle access. The costs
of improvements to the park should be included in the Subdlvlsion Improvements Agreement.
A Home Owners Association w11l be forndd to maintaln the park.
Item A. (5) above has been conplled with.
G. To date, a letter from the Colorado Geological Survey has not been received per
condition A. (6) above
H. Garfield County School District Re-2 has agreed to accept school fees as lots are
sold. See letter, page 44 . It is noL clear in the school distrlctrs letter how
to monltor the deposits to ensure payment.
I. The developer has not provided evidence of a legal water supply or the required
approval form the Division of Water Resources.
J. The Sr,rbdivision Improvements Agreement and Homeowners Assoclation documents must
E
F
Page 10
o o
be approved by the county Attorney prlor to final plat approval.
IV. FINDINGS:
A. The developer has noE compl,ied with the conditions of approval of the Prellmlnary
Pl-an.
V. RECOMMENDATION:
Table until- such time all- conditlons of Ptel-imlnary Plan approval have been met.
Page 11