HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.0 Denied Meeting Minutes'o ! .,j !.;'i . 8, | :':2 o
(:. 1-r{, lc,l ,]:r !,.r'i-ice ,i,d i:,. 1:-iiav l,:1..r'i;:,.'rrt) to the Pl;r.nir,g !''-'r ;.r-'i-t'r;nt ;'l"ior to
i. , '-,:;,ce of ihe 9-:.c ief Lrse lc:'n,it.
4. Tl:e ;. pl ,,-.,-rt -=he l1 sul:nit g.,,ici,:.rce of iheir 1e;a1 right of entr"y to any
-.:- -., rte lai,,l r-r.c-s?d Ly '.he elec'rr,icaf ir Et::-:r, ission l-ine to the Plartning Dela::'":iierrt
:,r,."r to tie F..rb-Ijc ;iear,trrg i,,ith '.he i,c.r'd of Courrty Cc;missior:ers.
5 T|:e :,et-,ltit is:.ued Ler"eurr,ler sh:11 extend c,nly to the 'l ocation an'C oper.ation
c,f at 69KV tre:rsinission l-ine (t,uift to 115 KV sta:riarCs) and r-he 'errPorary stagrrtg ar'€a '
6. Any disturharrce to existing vr:getation resulting frc'm d jsrrantling of the
old rine sha1f be ::evegetated as per the i-'e';egetat ion plan for. -.ire rer'r p:"'rpcsal '
? mL^ --.licant must receive rhis Special Llse Per"mit i^'ithin one year of itsl. )it= c!]L
.- ---- I --.1 -r\r'.- . - ..'ia\;a _L allc c .J - io: t zaT l-on .
:ar:,;::a -i':^:n seco:-.ded rhe rnotion.
ilc,t i on :al'r':. ed ::r;an ilrrcusly.
EOTSROSO SUBDIVT S] ON//I]}]AL PLAT
GPI}{D \IALI,EY RUFSL POWER I,INES,INC. /SPECIAI, USE PERMIT
1"1s. Bo-,rman reviewed the reouest to construct a 25 Kv el-ectric distribution l-ine
to serve the Sal-t Creek Mining 6on,p-ry coal mine and various ranchers in r"restern
G,r field County. The location of llu- f ine wifl- be f.om the Fruita subst'rtjon in l{esa
Cc-,r:nty to the saft cr,eek 1"1 ining company coaf mine in Garfield County'
John Bare) l-,epresenting the Gl^and Valley Power Line Cornpany' Itoted two changes
in the application for ttre pcwen line. The iirst change ilas construction wjl] coruirence
ar,ound }lovember 1, 1,982, rather than October 1. Also, the staging aleas' instead of
1.1r. si:;--,.;:r-,i-evrc-,.ed tl:e r..-qurjst for 10.10 acres to be civjded irito t+6 l-ots in
,i,e iifle Vlilage Scr,th S,,bdiujsion. Iie s.ated that, of the conditions of a:pr'oi'a1
!crr, ?r'e:liri irary F1at, the developer is still lacking the Colorado Ceological- Sur:\'ey
iettel indicat.ing the-i r cc;,cer,ns have been reeso:,ably met and l'!r. Color'cso is also
lecking the;Er,:enrent for water bei-i',een the City of Rifle or the South l'Jetr"o District
a--rd appr'ovaf f:.,om the Division of \'la-rer Reso'urces of that sour'ce.
r,1r. Coto.r,oso s-Lat?d -rhe schcof district has agreed to coll-ect the $ZOO'00 per lot
fee at the issuing of each individual t'r:i,lcling pc:"mit.' I'ir'. colorcso went,on to state
tl're City of R-Lf1e expects him to pay the tap fees to cohnect orrto the system' The
iletr"o District ,"fusLd to give him rhe minutes irom their :neet'ngs concerning the
Col-c::oso project without a.(500.00 depcsit. He feels he has done euerirtlilg he can
-e o n,?€t the county l-ecui::.:me-rrts and is askir]g the cor'r:rty not to rab-r e the propcsal
i,ut eirher deny it or apPr'cve it --ith conoitions'
1,1r. Cotc,l.cso stared he had no probt ems with widening -.he par'I< enirance to 7 frret
arrd rniff a-] so get a lerter from the coiorado Geological Survey.
l"lr. Atoertson felt the Comaission must table this P:-opcsaf or deny it, because
-ii:e cc,rditions of Fr"el.minar-y Pian approval have not been met.
1.1r. Zwick stared he had inet wi.h .he county atror.rrey l'egar'c.rrg rhe colo:'cso ;u]-o ject,
a:rC l,ad decided that -.abt ing of the lr.oi,osa] v;as actual iy a colven.errce l-o rire appiicant
to ,.;et the coroitions of preliminary Plan. However, 3-irrce the aoolicant'does not
.,.:;r,t this r:oitv€niel'1ce, he is entitled to a Cecision by the Pf ar'nirrg Cor'ni"sion '
1.1r. Str.irger reccnmended the conmission table the decision.
3ar-l,ara Lorah felt tabling the decision for the Color'oso Subdivision was
a:,;.:'opriate rather than denYing it.
ie1e.{lber,tson moved to recolrnend to the tsoar'd of Corrnty Cc'-rnissioners thbt they
:able the Cofor.cso Sub,lir.isicn and:-efer the proposal back to the Planning Cor'mission
fcr -,tein coi:sideration until- all conditions of the Prefimrnar"y P] an have been met'
ard iircluding the f ol ior.'ing concerns:
T.Thedeve.loperisproposingtoF;VeVillageh,ay32feetwide.TheCoStestimate
;:-'cr'-dedasp'artoftheSubdivisionJnF't'cvenreirtsAgreementshouldprobablyidentifyti e off s,lte ir:pr'overrents separately '
2. The i;,pr.overents to County P.oad 320 ar'e not noted in the final p1 ans nor
ite;nized in the Sub'division Inpr'oveirents Agreenent'
3. A pocket par.k is p.,.o.rid.d as required. Ho',"ever, the access to the park is
only 4 feet vride. This should be ii]crea-sr:d to 7 fc-et to permit safe bicycle access'
The costs of impr.overirerits to the park shoufd be included in the Subdivision T'-rprovenents
Agreement.
4. A Homeownerrs Associarion rvif 1 be foL:iired to naintain the pank '
S. To date, a letter from the Colcrado Geolcgical Survey has not been received
per the condition of Pre-Iirninaly Plan.
6. Garfield County School Dis',.rict RE-2 has ag::eed to accept school fees as lots
are sold. It is not cfear in the schoo]- districtrs fetter how to nonitor the deposits
to ensul'e paiment.
7. The devetopen has not provided evidence of a legal- r".'ater suppty or the lequir"ed
ap;r'cval fl-om the Division of ltrater Reso':r'ces'
B. The Subdivision Tr,provements Agreernent and Hoineo1^-ller's Assocj-ation docurnents
:r,u::t be app:,oved by the County Atto::ney prion to finaf plat appr'cval'
Barbara Lorah seconded the motion'
I'iotion carried unanimcuslY.
q.?al
').
o
thjrd c.rndititrn s']rcr.ild rr,ad ftncc r-atrrt-r il-:.-,n a 6t pri'.'.rcy f.'r,cer ,ri-rd "scrc'ent'slro,ld be
c.} .;:-rged to,,Scp.:r.,ite|1. lle ielt tl-re fourth cc,i,ditjr.,n:,llci:]d be deletr:d.
i,ick ilartin;:lc;ved to a;'';rrove the Flif1e Service ?::rk ?L:D Luxt change ameni;:'ent uith
the f 5,f foi.'irlg ttrr-ee corlditio:'ls:
l. That tlle irlteriol vc'ad rritl'rln tile PLlD be pai'ed r"ithin a three 'vcar time frame;
2.Tl-ratlairguagebearldedtotlleeffectthate:llsLc,i-ageareassllall.beobscurred
by a 6, c,paque f ence and that all outside Storag,e t,e naintained in a dustf ree cc,ndition
b; the use ef uasl;ed grarrel or paving
3. A fence be installed ,iorlg lhe north boun,iary of tlre proPerty to saParate the
cLrtr:rer-ciaI/;.r,lusrria1 uses t^:ithi-n tt-,ie pLrD f r:om the re-. j dentialiy zttned parcel to the north'
!-l-la',. Bci,'1es seco:'lotd the lotion'
( nn-l I ".'as raken of rhe voting -e':n'rers:
Tl-ip,o: )'es; tsor^'1es: v'::si liartin: 'res; )1ack1e'vt )'"='
iiotlon carr j.ed unailiir'ous1y '
colCIRo SO SUBDIVISION/PR ELIMINARY P1AT
o
paul ]lar-irj-.ro re,jer.:ed the request fcir a subcir:isi,on of 10.10 acre into 46 single
f aini 1y 1ots, located w j thin Rif 1e Yillage South' He asked ]'1r ' coloroso for the pr:oof
.,f p,rllication and the return receipts'
iir. colc,roso submitted tlle certifjed return nrail receiPts' hor';ever' had not received
the proof of publication frorn the nerespaper as of yet'
j.ir. 11:itnino stated ttrat the proof of publication submi113f uould be a condition of
Lpprc,rial. He titen i.rent on to UriLf ly revilto the proposal ' He i-roted that slnce the last
p1:=r.ining Co,:rn,l sslon hearing for Coloioso, Rif1e }''a pro*lsed to serve the Coloroso
Sub.ivi sion \;ater, if sonethlng could not be r,,.rked out r"i th F-if 1e )letro;'olitan District'
lie listed the cc,nditions of the sketch plan and tl:e mltigations by the develc'per
since sketch Plan aPProrzal'
Af lan Bor.,le s asked I'ir. ilai'rnino unat he had i n nin<i f or the inproveirents to count'v Road
320.
i1r. Iiannino replied that I1-r. tscr"1b1', the County R'oad Supervi sor would have to address
thls ccndition.
Djck Liartin asked. if the Soard of c;:unty cc,-,.rnissicrei:s i!']ou1d go along r'.ith 50t rights-
- a .,^.,UI \'dJ.
Lir. )lannino stated that the si-etch plan uas alreadl approved r^dth 50'right"-6f-rr:a]'
3obColorososubrnittedacopyofihemiilutesfromtheRiflePlanningComrqission
st,atingtlreiruillingnessao.nr-ru\'raiertoColoroso'HestatedthatRifle)letropolitan
Disrrict had nailed a bill to )1r. col0roso for the hand delivery of additional inforrnation
to the Division of i'later Resources. ^c )- -.^i^nl.ir. coloroso asked the Planning coimnissj'on to make some sort of decision tonight regardin
hi s -si:}dir,,ision, r.'hether 1t u.as approval or denial' Tabling his proposal 1ef t hls hands
tled.
iir. I,iannino advised the plaaning cor,rnission that to recoremend denjaI rras inappropriate
unt il such tiure as the Division of lrrater Resources recon:rends f or the county to do so'
Djck }lartin rnoved to aPPro\ze the prei-iilinary plat of coloroso subdivision with the
fo11cu;-ng":::'i;:"31r.r.n", cor:rir ro i,pro'e,.rents, (us deterrnjned acceptable by the Board
c,f county con;nissioner-s) on \ir11age Dr..,," in their subdivisiolr I:npi-o\Tements '\greement
1',ri or to f inal plat sul'rn j-ttal'
/ ^^ -.-.+.----.i2. That the developer colrrnit to irrrprorTefllents (as eletermined aCCeptable by the Board
of county conrmi ss joners) on co.,nty rora izo (to trvo i,tei-sections addressed in the traf f ic
circulation plan subnittal by the developer) 1n their subcrivisions rmprovements Agreement
prior to final Plat submittal',
3. That the proposed park (Lot A) be redesigned as a pocket park and labeled
as ttTract Att.
4. That a Home o^,ners Associate be formed to be resPonsible for the park area and
;naintenan;fo:l::":ora. be developed ro rhe ciry of Rifle's road srandards (50'R'o'Lr' with
32 f oot parred curb and gutter streets with s jdlr"alk) and that the de,eloper cor.rnit to this
in the Subdivision I6ploveinents Agreement as submittal of fii-ral plat'
6. Developer submit a lett"i fro* the colorado Geological Survey lndicating that the
Gcological Survly ts concerns have been reasonabl-v met '
T.DerlefoPerPayafeeof$200.00perresidelrtiallottotheRE_2SchoolDistrict
at f iiial Pl at aPProval '
S.Theapprovalofprelimlnaryplatiscon<]itionaluponproofofpublicationbeing
subinjtted prior to final plat subnittal'
g.Thatthedeve]operPursueUaterbytheCityofRifleortheRiflei.lelropolitan
Distr'ct and the Dit,ision of l.iater Resources approve that source prior to submittal of
final p1at.
John TriPP sectinded the motion'
A po1l rres taken of the voting nembers:
Tripp: )'es; l'1ack1 ey: yes; Bowles: yes; and }lartin: yes'
Ilotion carried unanimouslY'
e i.,,; j ,: r-S Ot-l
'. r :i . ;S,"i: ',i
a
I
c
.
,.'1, n l'cilaY
;\'en,e Star-buck
) rrold Iinckley, Chairman
e rb,e ra l-ct^ah
ihn Tripp
F]RST ] IiI'1 ON THt /IGiI,iDA:
Davi s Iarrar revi el';ed
ut'il'ity transn'rission I jne
up Farachute Creek to Uni o
te :;po) a rJ s ta ci ng are as du
,'tl,ll ,n RY ?5 , )t,i'2
e request for a sp
l,r ,1..j. - 'ct:..r';;:-,.'-;r
Ot "'r|!r''-.''"'t'
T.r-r-y 3l. t.n, Pl:rrner
Stc';e 1r.,'j ck, isst. County Attor'ney
Lisa l{iI Iians, Rr-:cot-ding Secretaty
o
l-he rreet'ir! \rdS called to orcjer b3' Chajt^nian Arnold ll;ckley, at 7:05 Fl'1
The fi r^st order of bus jness h,as to approve the rnjrrutes from past meetirrgs. The January 11
i.jnutcs i.ere corrected b.y.iohn Tripp, recarding hte ce'scrjrrt'ion for the Co'loroso Subdivision.
la'le Alher-tson i:,a,ie a nrotion to dppl-cve'uhe.)arrL;at^y 11, r982 n',inui.es: as corrected.
:d:'i,.i-a Lcrah secorri?d '5a i:rotion. The lrroljon cor-rjed ui-,orlji,cusly.
lale Alberrson ri-;acie a irrgt'ion t.o appr^ove the reirair,inq ur'apDrcvi:d lljnutes of Decerrber 14,
S:r,t;,:,1 ;:y ?8, and Aucust 31, 1981.
Joirn Tri pp seconded the niotjon; j t car^ri ed ';ri6r,irr'.'lrsly'
Publ ic Service Coi,-ria 1.v_, _S2e_c1a1ecial use p
Use Perm'it.
t
L ermi t t o-construct a 230/ 345 KV
fr-om exjsting structu res approxirnately 1 mile soutneast of Parachute
n and Colony s'ites.He a"lso brei f 1y rvent over the request for
ri no cons truct'i on.A site review \,ias taken since the last Plann 'ln0
Coin;1 iss ion irreeiing.
Dave i-ici,,ar-d Jnd Larry,Ke'ith, of Publ ic Servi'ce Company went over a visual presentation
of the location of the lilre and types of structures that rvill be used. Larry Kejth told
the Flanning Coirmission that sincL the last Plarrning Comi-irission meeting on Januar-v 11, there hav
l;een 3 changes to the application i,'hich are as fo'llorr's:
1) Iniread of tvro iingte circuit ?30/345 volt l-ines as is pt-opcsed, the I jne rv'il I be
one ciouble cjrcuit 230/345 volt I jne lhat i,rcu'ld be constr^ucted now, and an acidjiional double
c'ircui'u ?30/345 volt line ihat rvould be construcied as the 'loads develop.
Z) instead of the cjouble circu'it 230 volt line froin the Davis Srvitching Station to the
Colon5i'Berrch Sustatjon, jt will consjst of a single cjrcujt 230 volt line.
3) instead of thiue staging areas that r^rere pronosed jn the Sectjon 5.03.08, paqe 37
of the appl.ication, Public Seiviie will 'lirn'it this to one 35 acre staojnq area and hat'e corrplete
a sep,arate Special Use Fermit appf ication, as the Planning Staff has reouested-
i.ir. Farrar read the staff recommendation for approval contjngrent upon Co'lorado Ute's
iri|-i,ji-:\,.,d.l of the 138 KV transmissjon ljne and the proposed sharing of facilitjes with Publjc
Serv'ice Coirpany. Th js reconinenCation woul d be v'ierr'ed d j f ferently j f Col clqdo Ute were to
reanply to the- county for the 138 KV transmission line that they have withdrai'vn-
l.lr. Farrar then read a letter from l"ir. Grant Knicht, tr'ho ot,lns the property rvhere Public
Serv.ice'is p,ropcsing to cross the river urith the transmjssion line. I'1r. Kniqht is ooposino this
il CV e.
Dave ijoi.;ard sajd that Publjc Servjce'is in the Drocess of ti"yino to neootiate rvith Mr.
l(n i gh t.
Dale Alhertson syrilpathjzed irjth l'1r. t(night arrd felt that maybe Publ ic Servjce CoFrpany
shou'ld trry to relocate the ljne crossino the river.
it r,.,is decjded that pSC should keep trying to negotiate vrjth l'1r. Knjcht and if this fa'iled,
the County Cornm'issi oners vroul d rr;ake the cjecisi on for Publ ic Serv'ice and I'lr- Kni oht.
l',irs. Lorah asked how Public Service intended to build the lirres.
Larry Keith said that anything they cou'1rJn't get to by road, then hel'icopter corrstruction
would be used.
Da'le Albertson noved to reconmerrd approval of tne nq/345 KV utility line Speciai Use
pc-rmit by publ"ic Service Company arrd also the Special Use Perniit for the tenioorary sta-q'ino
area for constructjon rvjth the tondjt'ion that the Pub'l ic Service Conipany neootiate urith the
landcr,rner, [,,1r. Grant Knight as opposed to condenrttation and t''ith the contjnqency of Colorado
Ute,s wj."hdrav;al for the 138 KV uiitity transrnjssjon ljne because they vri11 now be sharing
facil'ities rvith Public Service.
Earbara Lor-ah seconced the motion. A poll yras taken of the voting nter,,bers tv'ith the follo"in
rcsults: John Tripp: yes; Barbara l-orah: yes; Arnold l'lackley: yes; Da'le l"lcPherson: yes;
Dale A.l5ertson: yes. I'iotion cat'ried unatrinrous'ly.
SEC0f{D iTEM 0N THE AGTNDA: Colot"oso Subdi vis'ion, Sketch Plan.
I,1r. Farrar revi e,,red the-6Toio.o-SuUdi vls:-onlrequelT for 49 sinq'le farnily lots on apDox-. '
irately 10 acres, located rvjthjn Rifle Viliag,e South Subdjvis'ion aFproxinately l rnile southivest
of Rifle on C0uniy Road 320. He'irrtroduced Sharon Schu;nan, i^epresent'inq Bob.Coloroso, tvho
\..as in the nospi ti1. I'lr. Farrar then r-ead the recom,rendat'ions of aoproval vijth cond'it'ions
I jsted i n the minutes from .lanuary 11, 1982. He mentioned that ihe r^oad l'rncrovements to
'irillage Drive should not be on a Lost-per-lot basis but on the basis of nol much road the
sr'lbdi vi sion actualiy imoacted.
Courrty Road 32"0 hias mentjoned by 1,1r. Farrar, who said that l-eonard Rowlby, from the
!cunty Road arrd Bri c'ge Deoartrnent, wi l1 go out to the road and pi npoi nt spots on the road
i.i,at -need improven,cni. Mr. Farrar sajd that the road jmp|^overirents would be asked of Countly-
side Subdivision, as rvell as Coloroso.
1,1s. Schurnan sajd that the burden of fjnance on irnprovingr County Road 320 should fall on
evelJone vrho impacts'it, not just these two slnall subdjv'is'ions.
)
.; S i', el
. 1-,i-'lL' l.
(
e i,ossibility of rari.larrd ,'.rQ,,.n ft-om-co'lcrcso Suhdjiision
, lrr.. iie siid tt-ut tirjs r;.,igirt l'e acccii:lisl'ed if
f-v'ay to 50'. -t,', Irrd.Y lr:3\'e an ur'f'uilc"f;'le lot i'hich can
ll tiis can be fur-ther discussed at pr-e1 ir,ir,ary nlat.
cks on tlre lots. I:e had ta'lked wj"h Fud i'1j'lner, coutrty
o Corriinjss-ion n;eetjnc! arrd l'ir. 14iIrrer irrierl,t^eted tre reculatiorrs
on 2 str-eets has trvo front yarcis ar,d t",-,+-i,er than have tvro
e rea r ya rd arrd one s i de Ya rd.
ivii.ion"r,.r. djscussed next. The olar-rnirrq staff iS propcsinC
tely sr'zed asphal t rnat, curb, and c,utter and s jdervalk. It
suUiivis'ion and the Coloroso Subcit,ision should have the
if only for a safet.v r.ason-
i.,,oUld ser,d Cc'utl L)^j''s'i de Suhdivis.i cn cet'elolers a let'"er
ld rrot be a c'lirplele sur-[rrise at'.iieir oreliirrinai^y o]at'
rU ; C,O
,.,'.S Ce
i: r'te si''s. t-oiah asl:ed [,avis if he
:,at-,rg ir-is foct, so that it l'rou
i'lr'. Iari^ar assrrred here ihat
A !rr-i,l-t,ldlJ access',vds discu
'1,.;0 r- "i;r locat-iorls v/ere d'iscusse
l.cir,g oif of Villace Drive, elin,'i
l.l;i-er arrd ser';er vrill be disc
iale Albertson r'ade a nrotion
9 cci-,,.ji j- j ons:
i ) Tha t the ques ti ons on \'i a
?) That the Coloroso Subdiv
Village Dr^ive tr'ith CourrtrJside Su
3) That CountY Road 320 be
4) That sorire provision for
acici t: on to adressr,ent of school
5) That all lots on tne Pre
crli d seitacl(s are corlsici ered.
6) That the street withjn t
50' R.C.l.l. and asphalt mat street
suhcj'i vi s i on regul ati'ons.
7) That if the ConestoEa Pr
Col o r'cso Subcii vi s i on be referred
8) Frovision for access be
;oining Cortestoga oroject.
9) That an a'lternate access
,- i'ocess i'ri th the Ci tY of Ri f I e, t
Tne r=roti on \','as seconded bY D
,Jchn TriPP: -ves; Dale Alber
Ar"riold iirckleY: -Yes.iioti on carried unanirrcuslY.
THIRD iTLi'l CN THE AGEiiDA:
Terry Bcl"tl,an reviev;ed
cach, approximatelY 6 nri I e
Rex Cof fii,an, l"cPres errti ng
The 5 acre tract tvi I I
the ccncern of the Planni n
any nevJ parcel created. B
i,les ter-n Ra i I road , perPetua
aCCeSS permi tS, tl^reSe Can
vrent on to saY that the Ca
to this sect'ion in the zotr
o
r^. F;r^r^ar^ i-irin i eni'ionr:d tl'r
I ;,s a school;ss..'ssi-itttlt ta
r o irad to t^ii Ccn tlre riqh t-oj cs a tot-lot. Hot';ever, a
r. Iarr acidre:sed the sei.ba-tor^, sitrce the last P'larrrlill
l:,.,s: Any 1ot that ft'orrts
a r-cis , the I of r,roul d have on
he right-of-v,,aY in the subd
t r i ght-of-v;ays wi th atjequa
c,led that the Countr^Yside
i :e right-of-i,a1's, ihough,
. irs
.S
irc
f),- er- _ -
t. iIU
V '.rl\.'-
ie l'rould ,j
s s r:d ; ';l',a t
d, orre beirt
riat'ino l-ot
0
is
g
No
ihi s.
, t^rirere to locatad it .in
"i-le
sul'cjivision'
on be r:..!r3p i,alf of ihe sub'jjvision, r'he otirer
. ?0.
ussed at prel'ir:ri riarY P'lat.-lo--opiove Coloros"o Subd'iv'is'ion Sketch Plan rvith the fo'lloi';irto
ter and server serv'ice be resolved at prel imjnary o1at.
iiion ne r equi red to share j n the costs of improvet'rtents to
bdivision based onthe'irroact to V'i 11age Drive'
addressed for improveinents at prelim'inar'-v p'1at'
piir,fand ded'icatjon bre addressed at orelinrinary nlat'in
d'istrict ir,,oaci-s.
ljnrjnaty plat have an ap,propriate build'ino site when easements
he subcijvisjon be cieveloped to ut'f,an,--rnsity stanciards rvith
s. sideivalk, curb, and outier rvjII be requjred as per coutrty
oject continues process.inq through the cit.y of Rifle, the
to the citY for revieu'.
nade io Lhe east, to prcvide a secot-,ciary i'ccess to tne ad-
route off of Tauchenhauoh be addressed throuoh a review
he cotrntv atrd the aPPlicant.
ale l"'icPherson, and a poll tr'as takcn bll tl-re recording secretary'
lron, yes; Birbara Lorah: -ves; Dale l'icPherson: yes; and
D:and Donna Bal dvli n, E xennti on Reques t.
e req uest to sP'lit a 0 acre tract into 2 tracts of 5 and 15 acres
s soutlreast of Gl ent^tood Sorj nos on H'i ghr'ray 82. She j ntroduceC
the Baldwins.
i ncl ude tne exi s ti ng horne on the prooertY.t''is. Bovtrran s ta ted
g staff is that the z o rri ng resol uti cns cal I for Per;'etua1 access for
e cause access for thes e parce'ls crosses the Denver arrd Rio Grande
I access cannot t-,e guaranteed. Even thouqh D & RG RR grants
be revoked for no cause tvith only 30 days n oti ce. l'1s. Boi'rman
rf iel d CountY Boa rd o f Conrm'i s s i on ers It av e reo uested dI diTreI]dl€l-lt
ing i'esolutions,to nrake excePt"ion jn those cas es i nvol vi ng
access across an existi ng rai 1t'tay
Barbara Lorah r,roved to recomiriend approval to the county comrn'iss j otrers of the Bal dvri n
e>rerption request rvith the ccndillon il ut no fuiir,.i exemptions be oi^anted to th'is parcel '
John Tri pp seconded the motj on. A po1 I r,ras taken rvj th the fol'1oi'ri ng resul ts:
John Tripp: yes; Barbara io.uf,t ' yu.; Arrrolcl l'iackley: l/es; Daie l"lcPherson: yes; and
Dale Albertson: yes. The nrotion carried unanirously.
F0uRTH lTi14 0N THE AGil,lDA: l'1itche11 creek P.U-D. Sketch Plan'
t,ir. Farrar revie'ed he r"eidi't-=a.'ig ti,gle riiri-lr-units on 42.c8 acres located jn
ljest Gl errr,,ood on county Roads tio and 132 along'1,'litchel l" creek. He r.'entjoned that part of tne '
land js stjll orrned by Dr. Allan-Bowles. He iitroduced Harold Dentcin, from Denton and
lssoc'iaies,
"'rho
rvould be presenting the P'U'D'
i.lr. Denton gave a vi sual pr-ei6ntation, shovring igcation and lots proposed for the parcel '
lte s t.a ied that the road goi ng through the 22 lots ioul d be aspl-,al t mat and ihe road qoino
t_hrough the 7 toii world be irrip ana seai sjnce ln. impact.js rquch less on thjs road' The-y
..,culd both be private roads, and ma-intairred by a hon,ectvner's associaijon'
llr^s. Lorah asked why he v;ants to keep these roads pri vate rather ihan have the county
laintain them since they lrieet county specifications' ller set of lotsl-tcrold Denton replied that th'is rv.rs rnai n1y fqr^_ pri vacy reasons. Tlle sma
iil-e very private and ihe rcad runs lhrough the'middle of tLem' He felt that the o\^rners would
l;ant ir,oie pri vacy than county mai titenance rvoul d qi ve
Dal e l,lcphersorr had a problern wi th the 7 lots totvards the north of the parcel , because
)
tl
l;:r,'is r,;d tl're cc'nditio:ts of rr1,; lciral for the tt","'{O SCr*ri:r fic.n the CitY of
I a
F.l f I e ;;ri i-:r.tt e's.
Earb asked if the city of Ri f I e rr':al1y \r'3r-rts this t1'pe of deVelrs'i';;rr'nt'
Davis said they are comfortable r;ith it; if t'Irr:y r"ere to ann€'x, the city del'elopnent
standards would already be in p1ace. Ihe cliy's cc'nditions 'rust be folloued to obtajn
lrater and seuer.
Tom sturrer felt the cc.nditions uere fair, except that a P-U.D. is ui:acceptable'
He felt that convenants t,'ere a better way to restrict uses on the property'
Earl felt that it r",as inappropriate to enforce a P'U'D' upon a developer' but
the derreloJ;er nrrst address the impact on -uhe county road'
Dale Alhartson,.asn't clerr. i'hy the pr-oject can't have Rlflets zoning conditions
ir.;.65u6 on it sinc€ Rifle wil-1 be ailn':::ing it'
..iter o: sc.:.:=,sion, it -ras agieed that it \;as l'cssi'o1e to S'o alleao to l-e strict
ce\r€1,:,pii.nt 1e ci,npl), \,rith R.if tI's zc-,ning as 1c,ng as it 'rlS Ct:rslstant with tite coiint)'r s
L(,rr(>.
I,orb felt tl:at tlre dr:r:in;ge shouJ.d be atldressed at Prelimin;'r-v Plat'
Ilale ilcPLrer.son rrC.r:ur':i-rded a1'prc'va1 of Lhe sketch p1;'n uith tlre folloujng condi t jrirs:
1. flat an adc-qr.rate adcess plan be presented at 1,r-e1i;rirrar:,v pl at shouing col lr::ctor
r-eac,ds and 1i;'i'.ed access poi-nts to the Property'
2. That tl-re parcel be sen,ed by Rifle city \^:ater and S€\r'€r and neet all of the
ci ty requiren:eilt s for that serrri ce'
3.T]rattheradiationhazardbeaddressedatpreliminaryplat.
4. ThaL the irrigarjon tlitch be addressed at preliminary plat'
5. That l-he co:triitions for access requcsted by the State Highuay Depariment be
net at PretrininarY Plat
6. Tha t the county road to the north of the p::operty be 'addressed for ir']provernents
a t pre1lr:rii-rarY Pl at .
I.]ale Albertson seconded the motion. It carried unaniroously'
I(rURilt lTEll oN I]iE AGENDA: Coloroso Subdiwision, sketch PIan,',
Davis revier.'ed the request for 49 single f'*ify lots on 10'01 acres' located in Rifle
\ril-l-age South Sr:bdi.,,is jon Lz mile south of Fj f 1e' HL then read letters from Rlf 1e Planning
lapar-tnent statirrg oPpcsiti on due to Lhe inconsi stancy r^'j th city standar-ds ' tsob
Colorcso, det,elop€r, Ilrcot. onecl that John FC'i"erS, ie"ioper of ConesLosat has abandoned
his project aojoining the Coiorcso project. j'ie felt rhe cit)'I uas being unfair by
.-.f.ing io .r*.* his project just because Pouers had abandoned'Conastoga'
ArnoldsaidthatCountyRoad320hastrvocriticalCornerSalready.T'i-reimpact
from this Project raust address road inprovements'
TinkGarell,ensineer,illustratedtheproblemArnoldhadpointedout'Hefeltthe
solution isn' t difficult
Dale Albertson mentioned that L'ater has stiIl not been Proven on thj-s project'
colorcso said that the Rifle village South I'ietro is responsible to provide L'ater
to this project. ]'ir. Ho]mes informed hiur that jf sisk and Reynolds did not hold their
agreeiient, he could sue them'
;syis said that the Rifle \ii11age South had not shor"n proof of r'-ater yet' This
r.ri 1l be adclressed at Preliminary Plat'
coloroso felt ihat the plarrning Connissj on cor-rld not deny him based on the liater
prttblem because he had net his ,.q,i..o.nts by getting t1-re agreement with Rifle \ri11age
Scuth to Prorzide ljater
DavissaidthattheyhadnotprovidedtheproofthattherelnasUater.
A site review uas schc.duled for Tuesdav' January 5' 1982 at 3:45 P'I1'
F1 FIH lTEll oN IHE AGEMA: Consideration of propcsed county sign or<iinance'
Davis revjewed the prelirninary plans for a Garfield Ccunty Sign Code' He ran
through the different t1'p., of signs, and plans to enforce: nerr'rulings' The basic
idea is to try to avoid a situation like the new '84' li:r]ber sign' That sign w1ll be
reduced to meet the City of Glenu'ood Springs' sign code'
Dick i'lartin asked if the Holiday Inn sign r,,ould be 1n r,iolation.
Davis felt that it r^:ou1d'
A r;ork session L,as scheduled to review the plans for a sign code for JanuarY 5' 1982'
Tuesday after the site review for the Coloroso Subdivision'
l'leeling uas adjourned.
/-U'*-LJ/