HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 Application'RECEIVED FIB
222002
PRELIMINARY PLAN
FOR
CLARK SUBDIVISION
OWNER AND APPLICANT:
John and Susanne Clark
3523 County Road 103
Carbondale, Colorado 81623
(970)
PLANNER:
Sundesigns Architects
901 Blake Ave.
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
(970) 945-2201
ENGINEER:
Nathan Bell P.E.
Gamba & Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 1458
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602
(970) 945-2550
February 18, 2002
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
CLARK SUBDIVISION
February 18, 2002
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION: 3
SECTION 4:50 A: SUBDIVISION NAME 3
SECTION 4:50 B: MAP INFORMATION 3
SECTION 4:50 C: PROPERTY BOUNDARY 3
SECTION 4:50 D: NAMES 3
SECTION 4:50 E: VICINITY MAP 3
SECTION 4:50 F: ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS 3
SECTION 4:50 G: STREET, BLOCK AND LOT LAYOUT 4
SECTION 4:50 H: PROPOSED EASEMENTS 4
SECTION 4:50 I: LOT SETBACKS 5
SECTION 4:50 J: LAND USE BREAKDOWN 5
SECTION 4:50 K: TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS 5
SECTION 4:50 L: OPEN SPACE 5
SECTION 4:50 M: PUBLIC DEDICATIONS 5
SECTION 4:50 N: ROADWAY DESIGN 5
SECTION 4:50 0: EXISTING EASEMENTS 5
SECTION 4:60 A: TERMS OF RESERVATIONS OR DEDICATIONS 5
SECTION 4:60 B: PHASING 5
SECTION 4:60 C: EVIDENCE OF ACCESS 6
SECTION 4:60 D: NON -SINGLE FAMILY OFF-STREET PARKING 6
SECTION 4:60 E: HAZARDOUS AREAS 6
SECTION 4:60 F: RADIATION HAZARD 6
SECTION 4:60 G: TITLE COMMITMENT 6
SECTION 4:60 H: SECTION SURVEY 6
SECTION 4:70 A: GEOLOGY 6
SECTION 4:70 B: SOILS 6
SECTION 4:70 C: VEGETATION 6
SECTION 4:70 D: WILDLIFE 7
SECTION 4:80: DRAINAGE 7
SECTION 4:91: WATER SUPPLY PLAN 8
SECTION 4:92: SANITARY SEWAGE DISPOSAL PLAN 8
SECTION 4:94: TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS 8
APPENDIX A- TITLE COMMITMENT
APPENDIX B- USDA SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE SOIL SURVEY INFORMATION
APPENDIX C- WILDLIFE MITIGATION PLAN
APPENDIX D- DRAINAGE STUDY CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX E- WATER SUPPLY PLAN
APPENDIX F- GEOLOGIC EVALUATION AND PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
APPENDIX G- INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
APPENDIX H- MINERAL RIGHTS OWNERS
APPENDIX I - VEGETATION MAP
G:\98749-01\PRELIMINARY PLAN.doc
2
CLARK SUBDIVISION
February 18, 2002
INTRODUCTION:
Clark Subdivision Sketch Pan was reviewed by the Garfield County Planning and Zoning
Commission on March 1, 2001.
Clark Subdivision is located on Garfield County Road No. 103. The parcel of land contains
approximately 52.27 acres that will be divided into four lots. The layout of these lots shall be
according to the Sketch Plan presented to the Garfield County Planning Commission and shall
conform to the Preliminary Plat provided with this submittal.
SECTION 4:50 A:
The name of this subdivision is "Clark Subdivision"
SECTION 4:50 B:
SUBDIVISION NAME
MAP INFORMATION
The date of preparation of the Preliminary Plat, a graphic scale, the basis of bearing, the symbol
designating north, and certification by a Registered Land Surveyor are all provided on the
Preliminary Plat included with this submittal.
SECTION 4:50 C: PROPERTY BOUNDARY
The boundary line labels, survey ties and a legal description of the proposed subdivision are
provided on the Preliminary Plat included with this submittal.
SECTION 4:50 D: NAMES
The names, addresses and phone numbers of the owners/applicants, planners, and engineers
are on the covers of this document and the Preliminary Plat. The mineral owners of record are
attached in APPENDIX H.
SECTION 4:50 E: VICINITY MAP
A vicinity map showing the area within a one half -mile radius of the proposed subdivision is
provided on the Preliminary Plat.
SECTION 4:50 F: ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS
The names of all adjoining property owners of record as found in the Garfield County Assessor's
Office are indicated on the Preliminary Plat. The names and addresses are also included below
for convenience.
Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
Joel H. Gilbert
PO Box 35
Carbondale, CO 81623-0035
BK 765 PG 483
G:198749-01\PRELIMINARY PLAN.doc
3
CLARK SUBDIVISION
February 18, 2002
Lee Ann Eustis and Leslie Eustis Hallowell
PO Box 238
Carbondale, CO 81623-0238
BK 1224 PG 932
Richard and Peggy Piffer
3447 County Road 103
Carbondale, CO 81623-9638
BK 582 PG 939
Connie Calaway
3402 County Road 103
Carbondale, CO 81623
BK 939 PG 443
M.D. and Anita Sampels
1445 Ross Ave. Ste. 3200
Dallas, Tx 75202-2785
BK 1287 PG 808
Arnold and Chi -Chi Jacobson
7 Red Wing Lane
Carbondale, CO 81623-8821
BK 1287 PG 808
Edgell Franklin Pyles
3120 County Road 103
Carbondale, CO 81623
BK 1287 PG 808
Cedar Ridge Farm, LLC
3059 County Road 103
Carbondale, CO 81623
BK 1286 PG 162
SECTION 4:50 G:
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
STREET, BLOCK AND LOT LAYOUT '
All lots in this subdivision will be accessed by private driveways as shown on the Preliminary
Plat. Consequently, there are no public streets within the development. The area of each lot is
provided on the Preliminary Plat.
SECTION 4:50 H: PROPOSED EASEMENTS
All proposed and defined easements for the subdivision are shown on the Preliminary Plat.
G:\98749-01 \PRELIMINARY PLAN.doc
4
1
1
1
1
1
CLARK SUBDIVISION
February 18, 2002
SECTION 4:50 I:
LOT SETBACKS
Proposed building envelopes are shown on the Preliminary Plat. All proposed building
envelopes adhere to the lot setbacks allowed within existing zoning.
SECTION 4:50 J: LAND USE BREAKDOWN
The proposed land use will be for single family homes, in compliance with the existing and
future ARRD zoning (agricultural rural residential density). The Parcel contains approximately
52.27 acres that is proposed to be divided into 4 lots with the ability to construct a primary
residence and an Accessory Dwelling Unit of not more than 1500 square feet. This provides an
average density of 6.53 acres per dwelling unit.
SECTION 4:50 K: TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS
The existing topography is depicted on the Existing Conditions Map with a 2 -foot contour
interval. The topography was created from a topographic field survey performed by Gamba &
Associate's, Inc. and is based on an arbitrary local vertical datum.
SECTION 4:50 L: OPEN SPACE
Due to the extremely low density of this subdivision, this development does not propose to
provide any common open space.
SECTION 4:50 M: PUBLIC DEDICATIONS
Due to the extremely low density and somewhat remote location of this subdivision, this
development does not propose to make any dedications to the public.
SECTION 4:50 N: ROADWAY DESIGN
All Lots in this subdivision will be accessed by private driveways from Garfield County Road 103
as shown on the Preliminary Plat. Consequently, there are no public streets within the
development.
SECTION 4:50 0: EXISTING EASEMENTS
Existing easements of record are provided on the Preliminary Plat.
SECTION 4:60 A: TERMS OF RESERVATIONS OR DEDICATIONS
The certificate of dedication and ownership is included on the Preliminary Plat.
SECTION 4:60 B: PHASING
The proposed construction of improvements and platting of lots for this subdivision will not be
phased.
G:\98749-01 \PRELIMINARY PLAN.doc
5
CLARK SUBDIVISION
February 18, 2002
SECTION 4:60 C: EVIDENCE OF ACCESS
All Lots within the subdivision shall use private driveways to access Garfield County Road 103.
Lot 1 and Lot 2 will share an access point onto the County Road which is already in existence.
Lot 3 and Lot 4 will share a common access onto the County Road for which an Access Permit
will be procured from the Garfield County Road and Bridge Department.
SECTION 4:60 D: NON -SINGLE FAMILY OFF-STREET PARKING
There will be no off-street parking on this development except the parking that will serve single
family residences.
SECTION 4:60 E: HAZARDOUS AREAS
The Geologic Evaluation and Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for the site was performed
by CTL/Thompson, Inc. of Glenwood Springs, Colorado. A copy of the report is included as
APPENDIX F.
SECTION 4:60 F:
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
RADIATION HAZARD i
Radiation hazard issues are addressed in the report by CTL/Thompson, Inc. included as
APPENDIX F.
SECTION 4:60 G: TITLE COMMITMENT
A title commitment for the property to be developed is attached with this submittal as
APPENDIX A.
SECTION 4:60 H: SECTION SURVEY
A subdivision of a section was not required or completed for this subdivision.
SECTION 4:70 A: GEOLOGY
The Geologic Evaluation and Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for the site was performed
by CTL/Thompson, Inc. of Glenwood Springs, Colorado. A copy of the report is included as
APPENDIX F.
SECTION 4:70 B: SOILS
A copy of the Native Cooperative Soil Survey Map prepared by the USDA Soil Conservation
Service is included in this report as APPENDIX B. The information from the Soil Survey Map
has been provided on a map entitled "S.C.S. SOIL INFORMATION" also included in APPENDIX
B
SECTION 4:70 C: VEGETATION
The types and extent of the vegetation are shown and defined on a map entitled "VEGETATION
MAP" provided in APPENDIX I.
G:\98749-01\PRELIMINARY PLAN.doc
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
CLARK SUBDIVISION
February 18, 2002
SECTION 4:70 D: WILDLIFE
The Division of Wildlife was contacted regarding concerns for wildlife on this property. A wildlife
evaluation is attached as APPENDIX C.
SECTION 4:80: DRAINAGE
The following report addresses the storm runoff associated with the proposed subdivision. Due
to the low density of the project, the impacts of the improvements on the historic runoff will be
minimal.
The drainage pattern on the parcel trends primarily towards the western boundary which is
defined by the Park Ditch. The overall topography of the property is hills and ridges with dry
swales between that act as channels and carry runoff to the west. The only significant off-site
drainage to the site is across the northerly boundary, and this is intercepted by a natural swale
and conveyed westward off the site before it reaches any of the proposed developed areas. The
southerly boundary is adjacent to Garfield County Road 103 and a natural channel, which will
intercept any potential off-site drainage from the south and divert it westward before it reaches
the proposed developed areas. Off-site drainage from the east is negligible due to the
topography.
The parcel was divided into 5 drainage sub -basins (A through E) as defined on the Drainage
Map in APPENDIX D for the purpose of calculating the onsite runoff. The TR -55 hydrology
model was used to calculate the pre -developed and post -developed peak runoff flows for a 100 -
year storm event in the area. A 100 -year, 24-hour precipitation of 2.6 inches for the area was
identified using the NOAA ATLAS 2 as provided by the U.S. Department of Commerce. It was
also assumed that each proposed building envelope will contain on average a maximum
primary residence footprint of 3000 square feet and a 1500 square foot accessory dwelling unit
footprint for a total of 4500 square feet of impervious area. Also, included in the post -developed
flow calculations was an estimated 12,000 square feet of lawn area for each lot. The potential
driveway for each Lot was assumed to be gravel for the purposes of post -development runoff.
Sub -basin A includes a portion of the existing residence and a portion of the proposed building
envelope for Lot 2. The calculated pre -developed peak runoff for Sub -basin A is 9.07 cubic feet
per second (cfs) with the post -developed flow being 9.05-cfs. Sub -basin B contains a portion of
the existing residence and a portion of the proposed building envelope for Lot 4. The calculated
pre -developed peak runoff for Sub -basin B is 4.87-cfs with the post -developed flow being 4.84-
cfs. Sub -basin C was calculated with improvements for Lot 2 and Lot 4. The calculated pre -
developed peak runoff for Sub -basin C is 6.61-cfs with the post -developed flow being 6.71-cfs.
Sub -basin D contains the proposed improvements for Lot 3 and a portion of the proposed
improvements for Lot 4. The calculated pre -developed peak runoff for Sub -basin D is 3.02-cfs
with the post -developed flow being 3.10-cfs. Sub -basin E was calculated with a portion of the
improvements for Lot 2. The calculated pre -developed peak runoff for Sub -basin E is 2.96-cfs
with the post -developed flow being 2.98-cfs.
The peak runoff rate for Sub -basins A and B decreased for the post -developed condition due to
the lower rate of runoff associated with the additional lawn area which negated the increased
G:\98749-01\PRELIMINARY PLAN.doc 7
CLARK SUBDIVISION
February 18, 2002
rate of runoff from the additional impervious area. The increased rate of runoff for Sub -basins C,
D and E is negligible and is within the level of accuracy associated with the TR -55 methodology.
We do not propose any drainage mitigation due to the negligible difference between the pre -
developed and post -developed flow rates.
All drainage calculations are provided in APPENDIX D.
SECTION 4:91: WATER SUPPLY PLAN
A water supply plan was prepared by others and is included with this submittal as APPENDIX E.
SECTION 4:92: SANITARY SEWAGE DISPOSAL PLAN
All parcels will utilize individual sewage disposal systems (ISDS), the design for which will be
addressed at the time of building permit application. The use of ISDS was addressed in the
report prepared by CTL/Thompson, Inc. included as APPENDIX F.
Also included in this report is a copy of the Gamba & Associates, Inc. Operation and
Maintenance manual for (ISDS) as APPENDIX G.
SECTION 4:94: TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS
The project proposes to create four lots, one of which will incorporate the existing residence. It
is also proposed that each lot will have a primary residence with an Accessory Dwelling Unit.
This configuration has the potential to create a maximum of an additional seven (7) residences.
The Trip Generation manual by the Institute of Transportation Engineers gives an ADT of 9.55
for single-family detached housing. The ADT of 9.55 times the seven potential additional
residences produces a total newly generated ADT of 66.85.
G:\98749-01 \PRELIMINARY PLAN.doc
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I APPENDIX A
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
TITLE COMMITMENT
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2- 8-02; 12:22PM;Robert M. Noone, P. C
;9709455570 # 2/ 7
Old Republic National Tide Insurance Company
ALTA COMMITMENT
Our Order No. GWZ38154
Schedule A Cust. Ref.:
Property Address:
1. Effective Date: January 09, 2002 at 5:00 P.M.
2. Policy to be Issued, and Proposed Insured:
'TBD" Commitment
Proposed Insured:
TBD
3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is:
A Fee Simple
4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in:
JOHN CLARK AND SUSANNE CLARK
5. The hind referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
SEE ATTACHED PAGE(S) FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION
2- 8-02;12:22PM;Robert M. Noone. P.0 ;9709455570 # 3/ 7
ALTA COMMITMENT
(Exceptions) Our Order No. G W238154
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed
of to the satisfaction of the Company:
1. Rights of claims of patties in possession not shown by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in arca, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and
inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and
not shown by the public records.
Defects, liens encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or
attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for
value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commihnent
6. Taxes and assessments not yet due or payable and special assessments not yet certified to the Treasurer's office.
7. Any unpaid taxes or assessments against said land.
8. Liens for unpaid water and sewer charges, if any.
9. DEED OF TRUST DATED FEBRUARY 19, 1997, FROM JOI3N CLARK SUSANNE CLARK TO THE
PUBLIC TRUS iuE OF GARFIELD COUNTY FOR TBE USE OF CHASE MANUATTAN MORTGAGE
CORPORATION TO SECURE TIE SUM OF $547,300.00 RECORDED FEBRUARY 24, 1997,
IN BOOK 1010 AT PAGE 1 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 504956.
10. THE EFFr cT OF INCLUSIONS IN ANY GENERAL OR SPECIFIC WATER CONSERVANCY, FIRE
PROTECTION, SOIL CONSERVATION OR OTHER DISTRICT OR INCLUSION IN ANY WATER
SERVICE OR STREET IMPROVENIEVT AREA.
11. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO 1DCTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE
THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT rHL PREMISES
AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED NOVEMBER22, 1894, IN 1300K 12
AT PACE 337 AND DECEMBER 30, 1893 IN 1300K 12 AT PAGE 264 AND RECORDED JULY
26, 1917 IN BOOK 92 AT PAGE 306 AND RECORDED MAY 3, 1921 IN BOOK 112 AT
PAGE 535
12_ RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE
UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED NOVEMBER22,
1894, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 337 AND DECEMBER 30, 1893 AND RECORDED DECEMBER
30, 1893 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 264 AND RECORDED JULY 26, 1917 IN BOOK 92 AT
PAGE 306 AND RECORDED MAY 3, 1921 IN BOOK 112 AT PAGE 535
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ALTA COMMITMENT
(Exceptions) Our Order No. GW238154
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed
of to the satisfaction of the Company:
13. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND EFFECTS OF RESOLUTION 13Y IHE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMIVIISSIONERS FOR GARFIELI) COUNTY, RESOLUTION NUMBERS 81-287 AND
81-288, RECORDED OCTOBER 7, 1981 IN BOOK 582 AT PAGE 937 AND IN 1300K 582
AT PAGE 939.
14. RESERVATIONS OF PERPETUAL NON -PARTICIPATING ROYALTY OF 1/32 OF ALL OIL, GAS
AND OTHER MINERALS WHICH IS OR MAY I3E IN, UPON OR THAT MAY BE PRODUCED
FROM SUBJECT PROPERTY AS RLSERVF]) BY CHARLES P. RENFTLE AND LMA RENFTLE,
ALSO KNOWN AS IMA MAE RENFTLE IN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED MARCH 25, 1966 IN
BOOK 375 AT PAGE 50.
15. EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE CABLE 10.00 FEET IN WIDTH RESERVED BY
NORMAN E. SHERWOOD, JR. AND MARY N. SHERWOOD IN DEED RECORDED AUGUST 9,
1972 IN BOOK 434 AT PAGE 96.
i6. AGREEMENT AND CONVEYANCE OF EASEMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 11, 1931 IN BOOK 565
AT PAGE 282 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 311891.
17. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY FOR THE PARK DITCH.
18. ANY BOUNDARY DISCREPANCY DUE TO TI -IE LOCATION OF FENCE LINES AND THE ElfFECT
OF ANY RIGi1T, TITLE OR INTEREST THAT MAY BE CLAIMED DUE TO ANY SAID
DISCREPANCY.
2- 8-02; 12:22PM;Robert M. Noone, P.0
;9709455570 # 4/ 7
2- 8-02; 12:22PM;Robert M. Noone, P.0 ;9709455570 # 5/ 7
LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY
DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS
Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-122, notice is hereby given that
A) The subject mal property tray be located in a special taxing district
B) A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction may be obtained from the County
Treasurer's authorized agent
C) The information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may he obtained from
the Board of County Cotmnissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the County Assessor.
Note: Effective September 1, 1997, CRS 30-10406 requires that all documents received for recording or filing
in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom
margin of at least one half of an inch. The derk and recorder may refuse to record or file any document that
docs not conform, except that, the requirement for the top margin shall not apply to documents using forms
on which space is provided for recording or filing information at the top matgln of the document
Note: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 3-5-1, Paragraph C of Article VII requires that "Every
title entity shall be responsible fur all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording
whenever the tide entity conducts the closing and is responsible for recording or filing of legal
documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Land Title Guarantee
Company conducts the closing of the insured transaction and is responsible for recording the
legal documents from the transaction, exception number 5 will not appear on the Owner's Tide
Policy and the Lenders Policy when issued.
Note: Affirmative mechanic's Lien protection for the Owner may be available (typically by deletion
of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Conunittnent from the Owner's Policy to be
issued) upon compliance with the following conditions:
A) The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which
includes a condominium or townhouse unit
B) No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material -men for purposes of
constntclon on the land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months.
C) The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un -tiled
mechanic's and material -men's liens.
D) The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium.
E) If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased
within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage
for unrecorded liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial intffonnation
as to the seller, the builder and or the contractor, payment of the appropriate premium fully
executed Indemnity Agreements satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements
as may be necessary after an examination of the aforesaid information by the Company.
No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured
has contracted for or agreed to pay.
Note: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given:
A) That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise
conveyed from the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party
holds some or all interest in o11, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and
B) That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the
surface owner's permission.
This notice applies to owner's policy commitments containing a mineral severance instrument
exception, or exceptions, in Schedule B, Section 2.
Nothing herein contained will be deemed to obligate the company to provide any of the coverages
referred to herein unless the above conditions are fully satisfied.
Fon DI.SrLRE
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2- 8-02; 12:22PM;Robert M. Noone, P. C
;9709455570 # 6/ 7
JOINT NOTICE OF PRIVACY POLICY
OF
LAND 11'11.E GUARAN1Et., COMPANY AND LAND TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND
OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Title V of the Gramm -Leach -Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any financial institution, directly
or through its affiliates, from sharing nonpublic personal information about you with a
nonaffiliated third party unless the institution provides you with a notice of its privacy policies
and practices, such as the type of information that it collects about you and the categories of
persons or entities to whom it may be disclosed. In compliance with the GLBA, we are providing
you with this document, which notifies you of the privacy policies and practices of Land Title
Guarantee Company and Land Title Insurance Corporation and Old Republic National Title insurance
Company.
We may collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources:
Information we receive from you such as on applications or other forms.
Information about your transactions we secure from our tiles, or from our affiliates or others.
Information we receive from a conswner reporting agency.
Information that we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real
estate agent or lender.
Unless it is specifically stated otherwise in an amended Privacy Policy Notice, no additional
nonpublic personal information will be collected about you.
We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our customers or former
customers to our affiliates or to nonaffiliated third parties as permitted by law.
We also may disclose this information about our customers or former customers to the following
types of nonaffiliated companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or with whom we
have joint marketing agreements:
'x Financial service providers such as companies engaged in banking, consumer finance,
securities and insurance.
'x Non-financial companies such as envelope sniffers and other fulfillment service providers.
WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU 'Willi
ANYONE FOR ANY PURPOSE THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMr1TED BY LAW.
We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to
know that information in order to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical,
electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your
nonpublic personal information
2- 8-02;12.29PM;Pobert M. Noone, P.0 ;9709455570 # 1/ 2
Our Order No. GW238154
LEGAL DEEM Ff CN
A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN LOTS 1, 2, 13 AND 14 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 7
SOUTH, RANG 88 WEST OF TFIE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERmIAN, LYING EASTERLY OF THE
CENTERLINE OF A DITCH KNOWN AS PARK DITCH, SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF
SAID SECTION 13 AND NORTHERLY OF 1'1-ir, NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF A COUNTY
ROAD AS CONSTRUCTED AND IN PLACE, SAID PARCEL OF LAND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON 1'HE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 13 WHENCE THE
QUARTER CORNER COMMON TO SECTIONS 12 AND 13 IN SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE BEARS N.
84 DEGREES 16' 22" W. 210.00 FEEL ; THENCE S. 84 DEGREES 16' 22" E. 1136.81
FEET ALONG TI -IE NORTHERLY LINE O1' SAID SECTION 13; THENCE S. 00 DEGREES 51' 37"
E. 307.00 MEI; THENCE S. 66 DEGREES 31' 14" E. 238.75 F'r E l; THENCE S. 01
DEGREES 12' 32" E 298.30 1{'r;F:1 TO A PO1N'T ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID
COUNTY ROAD; THENCE S. 66 DEGREES 35' 14" W. 76.90 FEET ALONG THE
NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID ROAD; THENCE S. 49 DEGREES 09' 17" W.
41.61 FEET ALONG 1HN NORTHWESTERLY RIGH'1-OF-WAY INE OF SAID ROAD; THENCE S.
18 DEGREES 05' 29" W. 98.50 F . -I ALONG I'11E NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
SAID ROAD; THENCE N. 86 DEGREES 10' 03" W. 106.62 FET; THENCE S. 01 DEGREES
13' 12" E. 966.14 FEEL ALONG 1'HE EASTERLY LINES OF SAID LOTS 13 AND 14 TO A
POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID COUNTY ROAD; THENCE ALONG THE
NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID ROAD 33.92 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO
THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 701.89 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S. 54
DEGREES 08' 37" W. 33.91 F'1;LT; 1'E1L NCE 161.79 FEET ALONG THF ARC OF A CURVE TO
THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 331.40 1I, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S. 69
DEGREES 30' 49" W. 160.19 FEET; THENCE S. 83 DEGREES 30' 00" W. 172.00 FEET;
THENCE 205.03 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT,. HAVING A RADIUS OF
1096.16 FEET, IDE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S. 78 DEGREES 08' 30" W. 204.73 FEET;
THENCE S. 72 DEGREES 47' 00" W. 88.00 FEET; THENCE 134.55 FEET ALONG THE ARC
OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1044.57 FEET, THE CHORD OF WHICH
13EARS S. 76 DEGREES 28' 25" W. 134.46 FEET "TO A POINT IN THE CENTER OF SAID
DITCH; THENCE ALONG THE CENTER OF SAID DITCH N. 02 DEGREES 53' 08" E. 96.14
FEET; THENCE N. 39 DEGREES 23' 09" W. 143.24 FEET; THENCE N. 27 DEGREES 01'
44" W. 142.09 FEET; THENCE N. 18 DEGREES 20' 39" W. 70.39 FEET; THENCE N. 26
DEGREES 39' 52" W. 157.36 FEET; THENCE N. 10 DEGREES 49' 10" W. 116.53 FEET;
THENCE N. 52 DEGREF.S 13' 39" W. 95.46 FEET; THENCE N. 64 DEGREES 12' 36" W.
116.10 FEET; THENCE N. 21 DEGREES 16' 33" W. 67.58 1'd; THENCE N. 05 DEGREES
28' 32" W. 109.40 11±'I; THENCE N. 01 DEGREES 31' 14" W. 294.00 t+'Ek.T; THENCE
N. 73 DEGREES 54' 25" E. 138.94 FEET; THENCE N. 12 DEGREES 03' 17" W. 139.33
FELT; THENCE N. 14 DEGREES 07' 35" W. 322.35 FELT; THENCE N. 09 DEGREES 41'
43" W. 57.78 r'L+L'1; THENCE N. 21 DEGREES 25' 52" E. 97.27 FEE!; THENCE N. 34
DEGREES 58' 50" E 179.02 FEET; 'THENCE N. 26 DEGREES 17' 50" W. 76.58 FELT;
THENCE N. 16 DEGREES 07' 31" W. 40.35 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF
SAID SECTION 13, THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
BUT EXCEPTING THEREFROM 1'HL PARCEL DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN GOVERNMENT LOTS 13 AND 14, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 7
SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, GARFIELD COUNTY,
COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT 1'HE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13, A BRASS CAP MONUMENT
FOUND IN PLACE; THENCE S. 50 DEGREES 30' 24" W. 1669.13 /IEEE TO A POINT ON THE
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2- 8-02; 12:29PM;Nobert M. Noone. P. C
;9709455570
# 2/ 2
Our Order No. GW238154
LLDeal PT1CN
EASTERLY LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 13, THENCE S. 01 DEGREES 13' 12" E.
304.40 WET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF GOVERNMITIT LOTS 13 AND 14; THENCE S. 88
DEGREES 46' 48" W. 100.00 FEET; THENCE N. 01 DEGREES 13' 12" W. 314.60 FEET;
THENCE S. 85 DEGREES 23' 47" E. 100.52 FEE T TO 113E TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
AND, TOGEFIIER WITH, BUT WITIIOUT WARRANTY, A 20 FOOT ACCESS EASEMENT DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
A PARCEL OF LAND 20.00 FEET' WIDE, LYING ADJACENT TO AND 10 NET ON EITIIER SIDE
OF TEL FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
BEGINNING AT A BRASS CAP MONUMENT FOUND IN PLACE, BEING ME NORM QUARTER
CORNER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL
MERMAN, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO; THENCE S. 49 DEGREES 12' 45" E. 1762.73
FEE!. TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; 11iENCE N. 89 DEGREES 38' 41" E. 32.23
FEET; TI-WNCE N. 73 DEGREES 18' 19" E. 74.07 FEET TO A POINT OF TERMINATION ON
THE EXISTING CENTERLINE OF COUNTY ROAD #103, SAID POINT BEARS S. 51 DEGREES 50'
05" E. 1828.73 r EET FROM THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13.
AND TOGETHER WITH A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN GO VERNMENT LOT 5, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,
RANGE 88 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO, MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORITIEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13, A BRASS CAP MONUMENT
FOUND IN PLACE; THENCE S. 58 DEGREES 31' 24" W. 1384.34 rEr:1 TO A POINT ON THE
NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 5 AND THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF -WAY LINE OF
COUNTY ROAD #1103, THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID COUNTY ROAD #103, 1'HE FOLLOWING COURSES AND
DISTANCES; THENCE 41.73 FEET ALONG. THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A
RADIUS OF 239.50 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09 DEGREES 58' 59" (CHORD BEARS S. 20
DEGREES 39' 59" W. 41.68 YEET); THENCE S. 15 DEGREES 40' 30" W. 5.49 FEET;
THENCE 218.03 FET ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO TETE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF
345.97 FEEL, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36 DEGREES 06' 25" (CHORD BEARS S. U2 DEGREES
22' 43" E. 214.44 FEET); THENCE S. 20 DEGREES 25' 55" E. 38.33 FEE( THENCE
LEAVING SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE S. 64 DEGREES 02' 03" W. 104.66 l El;
THENCE N. $5 DEGREES 23' 47" W. 19.49 FEET TO A POINT ON f'HE WESTERLY LINE OF
SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 5; THENCE N. 01 DEGREES 13' 12" W. 346.48 >i'EH1 ALONG SAID
WESTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 5; THENCE S. 86
DEGREES 10' 03" E 115.07 'FEET ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT
5, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
COUNTY OF GARFIELD
STATE OF COLORADO
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
APPENDIX B
USDA SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
SOIL SURVEY MAPS AND INFORMATION
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
106
Soil Type Description
t
1
10' PRIVATE
TELEPHONE
`-- EASEMENT
BK434,PG96
LC
891,8
20.47
O
z
1-
w
w
V")
35
U
Z;
—r
VJj
Wr
z
Q J
u�
0m
N Y
jQ Z
Ct
dr
M
W J
Z
1°u
35 Empedrado loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes
$5 Morval loam, 6 to 25 percent slopes
95 Showalter-Morval complex,15 to 25 percent
106 Tridell-Browsto stony sandy loams, 12 to 50
CO
>-
co
z
0
11
N
7
CO
1—
Q
D
""c8,4
>-
OD
0
S
U
P
1
CO
O
a
O
uJ
w
36 Soil Survey
This unit is used as hayland or for crops. It is well
suited to hay and pasture. Grasses and legumes grow
well if adequate fertilizer is used. If properly managed,
the unit can produce 5 tons of irrigated grass hay per
acre annually.
The potential plant community on this unit is mainly
western wheatgrass, needleandthread, prairie
junegrass. mountain big sagebrush, and Douglas
rabbitbrush. Other plants that characterize this site are
muttongrass, Letterman needlegrass, common
snowberry. Utah serviceberry. and antelope bitterbrush.
The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is
about 1,500 pounds per acre. If the range condition
deteriorates, mountain big sagebrush, Kentucky
bluegrass. Douglas rabbitbrush, and annual weeds
increase in abundance.
This unit is well suited to alfalfa and small grain
crops. It has few limitations. Maintaining crop residue
on or near the surface helps to control runoff and soil
blowing and helps to maintain tilth and the content of
organic matter. If properly managed, the unit can
produce 90 bushels of barley per acre annually.
This unit is suited to homesite development. The
main limitations are the shrink -swell potential and the
moderate permeability. The shrink -swell potential can
be minimized by thoroughly prewetting foundation
areas. The moderate permeability can be overcome by
increasing the size of the absorption field.
This map unit is in capability subclass IVe, irrigated
and nonirrigated. It is in the Deep Loam range site.
35—Empedrado loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes. This
deep, well drained soil is on fans and upland hills. It
formed in alluvium and eolian material. Elevation is
6,500 to 9.000 feet. The average annual precipitation is
about 15 to 18 inches, the average annual air
temperature is 40 to 44 degrees F, and the average
frost -free period is 75 to 95 days.
Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 5
inches thick. The subsoil is clay loam about 35 inches
thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is clay
loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 38 inches
and calcareous below that depth.
Included in this unit are small areas of soils that are
similar to the Empedrado soil but have a darker, thicker
surface layer. Also included are small areas of soils that
are similar to the Empedrado soil but are silt loam or
silty clay loam throughout. Included areas make up
about 20 percent of the total acreage.
Permeability is moderate in the Empedrado soil.
Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting
depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the
hazard of water erosion is moderate.
This unit is used as hayland or for crops. It is well
suited to hay and pasture. Grasses and legumes grow
well if adequate fertilizer is used. If properly managed.
the unit can produce 4 tons of irrigated grass hay per
acre annually.
This unit is well suited to alfalfa and small grain
crops. It is limited mainly by the slope in some areas.
Limiting tillage during seedbed preparation and
controlling weeds help to control runoff and erosion. All
tillage should be on the contour or across the slope. If
properly managed. the unit can produce 75 bushels of
barley per acre annually.
The potential plant community on this unit is mainly
western wheatgrass, needleandthread. prairie
junegrass, mountain big sagebrush, and Douglas
rabbitbrush. Other plants that characterize this site are
muttongrass. Letterman needlegrass, common
snowberry. Utah serviceberry, and antelope bitterbrush.
The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is
about 1.500 pounds per acre. If the range condition
deteriorates, mountain big sagebrush, Kentucky
bluegrass, Douglas rabbitbrush. and annual weeds
increase in abundance. These plants are dominant
when the range is in poor condition; therefore, livestock
grazing should be managed so that the desired balance -
of the preferred species is maintained.
This unit is suited to homesite development. The
main limitations are the shrink -swell potential and the
slope. The shrink -swell potential can be minimized by
prewetting foundation areas. The slope is a
management concern if septic tank absorption fields are
installed. Absorption lines should be installed on the
contour.
This map unit is in capability subclass IVe, irrigated
and nonirrigated. It is in the Deep Loam range site.
36—Empedrado loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes.
This deep, well drained soil is on fans and upland hills.
It formed in alluvium and eolian material. Elevation is
6,500 to 9,000 feet. The average annual precipitation is
15 to 18 inches, the average annual air temperature is
40 to 44 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is
75 to 95 days.
Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 5
inches thick. The subsoil is clay loam about 35 inches
thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is
clay loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 38
inches and calcareous below that depth.
Included in this unit are small areas of soils that are
similar to the Empedrado soil but are silt loam or silty
clay loam. Also included are small areas of soils that
are similar to the Empedrado soil but have a darker,
thicker surface layer. Included areas make up about 15
percent of the total acreage.
Permeability is moderate in the Empedrado soil.
60 Soil Survey'
condition deteriorates. Kentucky bluegrass, rubber
rabbitbrush, and annual weeds increase in abundance.
The suitability of this unit for range seeding is fair. The
main limitation is the slope. In areas where brush is
removed by prescribed burning or by chemical or
mechanical methods, the hazard of erosion may
increase.
If this unit is used for homesite development, the
main limitation is the slope. The slope is a management
concern if septic tank absorption fields are installed.
Absorption lines should be installed on the contour.
Access roads should be designed to control surface
runoff and help stabilize cut slopes.
This map unit is in capability subclass Vle,
nonirrigated. It is in the Mountain Loam range site.
83—Monad fine sandy loam, 25 to 50 percent
slopes. This deep, well drained soil is on mountainsides
and fans. It formed in alluvium and colluvium derived
dominantly from sandstone and shale. Elevation is
7.800 to 9,300 feet. The average annual precipitation is
18 to 20 inches. the average annual air temperature is
38 to 42 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is
60 to 75 days.
Typically, the upper part of the surface layer is
grayish brown fine sandy loam about 2 inches thick.
The lower part is grayish brown loam about 9 inches
thick. The upper 26 inches of the subsoil is sandy clay
loam. The lower 23 inches is clay loam.
Included in this unit are small areas of Forsey soils.
Included areas make up about 15 percent of the total
acreage.
Permeability is slow in the Monad soil. Available
water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60
inches or more. Runoff is rapid. and the hazard of water
erosion is severe.
This unit is used mainly as rangeland. It also is used
as wildlife habitat.
The potential plant community on this unit is mainly
bluebunch wheatgrass, prairie junegrass. big bluegrass,
mountain big sagebrush. and mountain snowberry.
Other plants that characterize this site are slender
wheatgrass, lanceleaf rabbitbrush, and Saskatoon
serviceberry. The average annual production of air-dry
vegetation is about 1,500 pounds per acre. If the range
condition deteriorates, Kentucky bluegrass, rubber
rabbitbrush, and annual weeds increase in abundance.
The suitability of this unit for range seeding is poor. The
main limitations are the slope and stony areas. The
slope limits access by livestock. The limited accessibility
results in overgrazing of the less sloping areas.
This unit is poorly suited to homesite development.
The main limitation is the slope.
This map unit is in capability subclass Vile,
nonirrigated. It is in the Mountain Loam range site.
84—Morval loam, 1 to 6 percent slopes. This dee
well drained soil is on alluvial fans. It formed in alluvia'
derived dominantly from basalt. Elevation is 6,800 to
8,000 feet. The average annual precipitation is 14 to 1
inches, the average annual air temperature is 42 to 4
degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 85 to
days:
Typically. the surface layer is brown loam 7 inches'
thick. The upper 12 inches of the subsoil is clay loam.
The lower 4 inches is loam. The substratum to a depth
of 60 inches or more is loam. The soil is noncalcareo
to a depth of 19 inches.
Included in this unit are small areas of Tridell and
Showalter soils. Included areas make up about 15
percent of the total acreage.
Permeability is moderate in the Morval soil. Availab
water capacity also is moderate. The effective rooting
depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and th
hazard of water erosion is slight or moderate.
This unit is used as rangeland, as hayland, or for
crops. The potential plant community is mainly
needleandthread. western wheatgrass. muttongrass.'
prairie junegrass, and big sagebrush. Other plants that
characterize this site are bluebunch wheatgrass and
mountain muhly. The average annual production of ai
dry vegetation is about 1,500 pounds per acre. If the
range condition deteriorates, cheatgrass and Kentucky
bluegrass increase in abundance.
This unit is well suited to hay and pasture. If prope
managed, it can produce 3 tons of irrigated grass hay
per acre annually. The main limitations are a short
growing season and the hazard of erosion on the
steeper slopes.
This unit is well suited to irrigated crops. It is limite
mainly by the short growing season and the hazard of
erosion on the steeper slopes.
This unit is well suited to homesite development. The
main limitation is a moderate shrink -swell potential.
This map unit is in capability subclass IVe, irrigate
and nonirrigated. It is in the Deep Loam range site.
85—Morval loam, 6 to 25 percent slopes. This I
deep, well drained soil is on alluvial fans. It formed in
alluvium derived dominantly from basalt. Elevation is
6,800 to 8,000 feet. The average annual precipitation
14 to 16 inches, the average annual air temperature i
42 to 44 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is
85 to 95 days.
Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 7
inches thick. The upper 12 inches of the subsoil is clay
1
1 Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado 61
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
loam. The lower 4 inches is loam. The substratum to a
depth of 60 inches or more is loam. The soil is
noncalcareous to a depth of 19 inches.
Included in this unit are small areas of Tridell and
Showalter soils. Included areas make up about 15
percent of the total acreage.
Permeability is moderate in the Morval soil. Available
water capacity also is moderate. The effective rooting
depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the
hazard of water erosion is moderate.
This unit is used as rangeland. The potential plant
community is mainly needleandthread, western
wheatgrass, muttongrass, prairie junegrass, and big
sagebrush. Other plants that characterize this site are
bluebunch wheatgrass and mountain muhly. The
average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about
1,500 pounds per acre. If the range condition
deteriorates, cheatgrass and Kentucky bluegrass
increase in abundance.
This unit is poorly suited to homesite development.
The main limitations are the shrink -swell potential and
the slope.
This map unit is in capability subclass Vle,
nonirrigated. It is in the Deep Loam range site.
86—Morval loam, 25 to 40 percent slopes. This
deep. well drained soil is on alluvial fans. It formed in
alluvium derived dominantly from basalt. Elevation is
6,800 to 8,000 feet. The average annual precipitation is
14 to 16 inches, the average annual air temperature is
42 to 44 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is
85 to 95 days.
Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 7
inches thick. The upper 12 inches of the subsoil is clay
loam. The lower 4 inches is loam. The substratum to a
depth of 60 inches or more is loam. The soil is
noncalcareous to a depth of 19 inches.
Included in this unit are small areas of Tridell and
Showalter soils. Included areas make up about 15
percent of the total acreage.
Permeability is moderate in the Morval soil. Available
water capacity also is moderate. The effective rooting
depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is rapid, and the
hazard of water erosion is moderate or severe.
This unit is used as rangeland. The potential plant
community is mainly needleandthread, western
wheatgrass, muttongrass, prairie junegrass, and big
sagebrush. Other plants that characterize this site are
bluebunch wheatgrass and mountain muhly. The
average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about
1,500 pounds per acre. If the range condition
deteriorates, cheatgrass and Kentucky bluegrass
ncrease in abundance.
This unit is poorly suited to homesite development.
The main limitation is the slope.
This map unit is in capability subclass Vile,
nonirrigated. It is in the Deep Loam range site.
87—Morval-Tridell complex, 12 to 50 percent
slopes. This map unit is on alluvial fans and
mountainsides. Elevation is 6,800 to 8,000 feet. The
average annual precipitation is 14 to 16 inches, the
average annual air temperature is 42 to 44 degrees F,
and the average frost -free period is 85 to 95 days.
This unit is about 55 percent Morval loam and 30
percent Tridell moderately stony loam. The Morval soil
is in slightly concave areas, and the Tridell soil is in
convex areas.
Included in this unit are small areas of Showalter
very stony loam and small areas of Rock outcrop.
Included areas make up about 15 percent of the total
acreage.
The Morval soil is deep and well drained. It formed in
alluvium derived dominantly from basalt. Slope is 12 to
40 percent. Typically, the surface layer is brown loam
about 7 inches thick. The upper 12 inches of the subsoil
is clay loam. The lower 4 inches is loam. The
substratum to a depth of 60 inches is loam. The soil is
noncalcareous to a depth of 19 inches.
Permeability is moderate in the Morval soil. Available
water capacity also is moderate. The effective rooting
depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the
hazard of water erosion is moderate.
The Tridell soil is deep and somewhat excessively
drained. It formed in alluvium and colluvium derived
dominantly from basalt. Slope is 12 to 50 percent.
Typically, the upper part of the surface layer is grayish
brown stony sandy loam about 2 inches thick. The
lower part is very cobbly fine sandy loam about 7
inches thick. The upper 5 inches of the substratum is
very cobbly fine sandy loam. The next 11 inches is
cobbly sandy loam. Below this is 12 inches of very
stony fine sandy loam. The lower part of the substratum
to a depth of 60 inches is very stony loamy sand.
Permeability is moderately rapid in the Tridell soil.
Available water capacity is low. The effective rooting
depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is rapid, and the
hazard of water erosion is high.
This unit is used as rangeland or for firewood
production.
The potential plant community on the Morval soil is
mainly needleandthread, western wheatgrass,
muttongrass, prairie junegrass, and big sagebrush. The
average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about
1,500 pounds per acre.
The potential plant community on the Tridell soil is
Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado 65
Grasses and legumes grow well if adequate fertilizer is
used. Limiting tillage for seedbed preparation and
controlling weeds help to control runoff and erosion. If
properly managed. the unit can produce 3 tons of
irrigated grass hay or 60 bushels of barley per acre
annually.
The potential plant community on the Showalter soil
is mainly bluebunch wheatgrass, western wheatgrass,
prairie junegrass, Indian ricegrass, true
mountainmahogany, antelope bitterbrush, Saskatoon
serviceberry, and big sagebrush. The average annual
production of air-dry vegetation is about 900 pounds per
acre.
The potential plant community on the Morval soil is
mainly needleandthread, western wheatgrass,
muttongrass, prairie junegrass, and big sagebrush. The
average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about
1,500 pounds per acre.
The main limitation for range seeding or mechanical
treatment is the surface stoniness in areas of the
Showalter soil. Range seeding generally is restricted to
broadcasting because of this limitation.
This unit is poorly suited to homesite development.
The main limitations are the shrink -swell potential and
the stones throughout the profile.
This map unit is in capability subclass Vle, irrigated
and nonirrigated. The Showalter soil is in the Loamy
Slopes range site, and the Morval soil is in the Deep
Loam range site.
95—Showalter-Morval complex, 15 to 25 percent
slopes. This map unit is on alluvial fans, high terraces,
and valley sides (fig. 7). Elevation is 7,000 to 8,500
feet. The average annual precipitation is 14 to 16
inches, the average annual air temperature is 42 to 44
degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 80 to 90
days.
This unit is about 45 percent Showalter very stony
loam and 35 percent Morval loam. The Showalter soil is
in convex areas, and the Morval soil is in the more
concave areas.
Included in this unit are small areas of soils that are
similar to the Morval soil but have 30 to 50 percent
cobbles in the substratum. Included areas make up
about 20 percent of the total acreage.
The Showalter soil is deep and well drained. It
°. formed in alluvium derived dominantly from basalt.
``About 10 to 15 percent of the surface is covered with
stones, 5 percent with cobbles, and 5 percent with
gravel. Typically, the surface layer is brown very stony
loam about 8 inches thick. The upper 3 inches of the
subsoil is very cobbly clay loam. The lower 28 inches is
very cobbly clay. The substratum to a depth of 60
Inches or more is very cobbly clay loam.
Permeability is slow in the Showalter soil. Available
water capacity is moderate. The effective rooting depth
is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard
of water erosion is moderate.
The Morval soil is deep and well drained. It formed in
alluvium derived dominantly from basalt. Typically, the
surface layer is brown loam about 7 inches thick. The
upper 12 inches of the subsoil is clay loam. The lower 4
inches is loam. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches
is loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 19
inches and calcareous below that depth.
Permeability is moderate in the Morval soil. Available
water capacity also is moderate. The effective rooting
depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the
hazard of water erosion is slight.
This unit is used as rangeland or hayland or for
homesite development.
The potential plant community on the Showalter soil
is mainly bluebunch wheatgrass, western wheatgrass,
prairie junegrass, Indian ricegrass, true
mountainmahogany, antelope bitterbrush, Saskatoon
serviceberry, and big sagebrush. The average annual
production of air-dry vegetation is about 900 pounds per
acre.
The potential plant community on the Morval soil is
mainly needleandthread, western wheatgrass,
muttongrass, prairie junegrass, and big sagebrush. The
average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about
1,500 pounds per acre.
The main limitation for range seeding or mechanical
treatment is the surface stoniness in areas of the
Showalter soil. Suitable management practices include
proper range use, deferred grazing, and rotation
grazing. Aerial spraying is suitable for brush
management.
If this unit is used for hay and pasture, the main
limitations are the surface stoniness, the slope, and the
slow permeability in the Showalter soil. Grasses and
legumes grow well if adequate fertilizer is used.
This unit is very poorly suited to homesite
development. The main limitations are the slope, the
shrink -swell potential, and the stones throughout the
profile.
This map unit is in capability subclass Vle,
nonirrigated. The Showalter soil is in the Loamy Slopes
range site, and the Morval soil is in the Deep Loam
range site.
96—Southace cobbly sandy loam, 1 to 6 percent
slopes. This deep, well drained soil is on upland
terraces, mountainsides, and alluvial fans. It formed in
alluvium derived dominantly from redbed sandstone and
shale intermixed with gypsiferous material. Elevation is
6,000 to 7.000 feet. The average annual precipitation is
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
72 Soil Survey
The Rock outcrop consists mainly of barren
sandstone. shale, and basalt.
This unit is used as wildlife habitat. The native
vegetation is grasses. forbs, pinyon. and Utah juniper.
This unit is poorly suited to homesite development.
The main limitations are the slope, the depth to
bedrock, and large stones.
This map unit is in capability class VIII. No range site
is assigned.
106—Tridell-Brownsto stony sandy loams, 12 to 50
percent slopes, extremely stony. This map unit is on
terraces and mountainsides. Elevation is 6,400 to 7,700
feet. The average annual precipitation is 12 to 14
inches, the average annual air temperature is 42 to 44
degrees F. and the average frost -free period is 85 to
105 days.
This unit is about 45 percent Tridell soil and 35
percent Brownsto soil. About 5 to 10 percent of the
surface is covered with stones.
Included in this unit are small areas of ForeIle and
Evanston soils in the less sloping cleared areas. Also
included are small areas of basalt Rock outcrop and
soils that are similar to the Tridell soil but have less
gravel and fewer stones. Included areas make up about
20 percent of the total acreage.
The Tridell soil is deep and somewhat excessively
drained. It formed in alluvium and colluvium derived
dominantly from sandstone and basalt. Typically, the
upper part of the surface layer is grayish brown stony
sandy loam about 2 inches thick. The lower part is
grayish brown very cobbly fine sandy loam about 7
inches thick. The upper 5 inches of the substratum is
very cobbly fine sandy loam. The next part is cobbly
sandy loam about 11 inches thick. Below this is 12
inches of very stony fine sandy loam. The lower part of
the substratum to a depth of 60 inches is very stony
loamy sand. Hard basalt is commonly below a depth of
about 60 inches. The soil is calcareous throughout. A
thin layer of partially decomposed needles, twigs, and
leaves is on the surface in many places.
Permeability is moderately rapid in the Tridell soil.
Available water capacity is low. The effective rooting
depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is rapid, and the
hazard of water erosion is moderate.
The Brownsto soil is deep and well drained. It formed
in alluvium derived dominantly from coarse textured,
calcareous sandstone and basalt. Typically, the upper
part of the surface layer is light brownish gray stony
sandy loam about 4 inches thick. The lower part is light
brownish gray stony sandy loam about 7 inches thick.
The upper 19 inches of the substratum is very gravelly
sandy loam. The next 12 inches is very gravelly loamy
sand. The lower part to a depth of 60 inches is gravelly
sandy loam. A thin layer of partially decomposed
needles, twigs. and leaves is on the surface in many
places.
Permeability is moderate in the Brownsto soil.
Available water capacity is low. The effective rooting
depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is rapid, and the
hazard of water erosion is moderate.
This unit is used mainly for livestock grazing or
wildlife habitat. It also is used for limited homesite
development. for Christmas trees, or as a source of
firewood and posts.
The potential plant community on the Tridell soil is
mainly pinyon pine and Utah juniper with an underston,
of bluebunch wheatgrass, Indian ricegrass, Wyoming
big sagebrush, and muttongrass. Other plants that
characterize this site are bottlebrush squirreltail,
antelope bitterbrush, and true mountainmahogany. The
average annual production of air-dry vegetation is abou
300 pounds per acre.
The potential plant community on the Brownsto soil
mainly Wyoming big sagebrush, needleandthread,
Indian ricegrass, western wheatgrass. and scattered
pinyon pine and Utah juniper. Other plants that
characterize this site are bottlebrush squirreltail,
antelope bitterbrush. and true mountainmahogany. The
average annual production of native understory
vegetation is about 600 pounds per acre.
If the range condition deteriorates, Wyoming big
sagebrush, cheatgrass, and annual weeds increase in
abundance. Mechanical treatment is not practical
because of the very stony surface and the slope.
Suitable management practices include proper grazing
use and a planned grazing system. The slope limits
access by livestock. The limited accessibility results in
overgrazing of the less sloping areas. Selective thinninc
of the pinyon and juniper stands improves the quality o
the understory for grazing and provides firewood, posts
and Christmas trees.
The Tridell soil is suited to limited production of
pinyon pine and Utah juniper. The average annual
production is 5 cords per acre. The average stocking
rate is 150 trees per acre. To ensure sustained yields
and continued use, the kind of wood production should
be considered before the stands are thinned or cleared
Special care is needed to minimize erosion when the
stands are thinned or cleared. Thinning the stands
generally promotes the growth of understory grasses
and young trees.
Only the less sloping areas of this unit are suited to
homesite development. The main limitations are the
slope and the stoniness. Erosion is a hazard in the
steeper areas. Only the part of the site that is used for
construction should be disturbed. Topsoil can be
stockpiled and used to reclaim areas disturbed during
Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado 73
construction. The gravel and cobbles in disturbed areas
should be removed if the site is landscaped, particularly
in areas used for lawns. Areas adjacent to hillsides are
occasionally affected by runoff, which may be
accompanied by the movement of rock debris.
Population growth has resulted in increased
construction of homes in areas of this unit.
This map unit is in capability subclass Vile,
nonirrigated. The Tridell soil is in the Pinyon -Juniper
woodland site, and the Brownsto soil is in the Stony
Foothills range site.
107—Uracca, moist-Mergel complex, 1 to 6 percent
slopes, extremely stony. This map unit is on alluvial
fans, benches, and valley side slopes. Elevation is
6,800 to 8,400 feet. The average annual precipitation is
16 to 19 inches, the average annual air temperature is
40 to 43 degrees F. and the average frost -free period is
75 to 95 days.
This unit is about 50 percent Uracca soil and 40
percent Mergel soil.
Included in this unit are small areas of soils that are
similar to the Uracca and Mergel soils but have a
thicker surface layer and a lower content of coarse
fragments. Included areas make up about 10 percent of
the total acreage.
The Uracca soil is deep and well drained. It formed in
alluvium derived dominantly from mixed igneous and
metamorphic material. About 3 to 15 percent of the
surface is covered with boulders, stones. cobbles, and
gravel. Typically, the surface layer is brown cobbly
sandy loam about 3 inches thick. The upper 5 inches of
the subsoil is cobbly sandy loam. The lower 7 inches is
very cobbly sandy clay loam. The substratum to a depth
of 60 inches or more is extremely cobbly loamy sand.
The content of coarse fragments ranges from 35 to 85
percent, by volume, in a major part of the surface layer
and subsoil.
Permeability is moderately rapid in the Uracca soil.
Available water capacity is low. The effective rooting
depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is stow, and the
hazard of water erosion is slight.
The Mergel soil is deep and well drained. It formed in
glacial outwash. About 3 to 30 percent of the surface is
covered with boulders, stones, cobbles, and gravel.
Typically, the surface layer is grayish brown cobbly
loam about 8 inches thick. The upper 12 inches of the
substratum is very cobbly sandy loam. The lower part to
a depth of 60 inches is extremely stony sandy loam.
The content of coarse fragments ranges from 35 to 80
percent, by volume.
Permeability is moderate in the Mergel soil. Available
water capacity is low. The effective rooting depth is 60
inches or more. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of water
erosion is slight.
This unit is used mainly for irrigated hay and pasture.
It also is used for homesite development or rock
quarrying.
If this unit is used for hay and pasture, the main
limitation is the low available water capacity. Frequent
irrigation is needed. Applications of nitrogen and
phosphorus fertilizer improve the growth of forage
plants. Proper stocking rates, pasture rotation, and
restricted grazing during wet periods help to keep the
pasture in good condition and protect the soil from
erosion. Irrigation water can be applied by corrugation,
sprinkler, and flooding methods. Pipe, ditch lining, or
drop structures in irrigation ditches facilitate irrigation
and reduce the hazard of ditch erosion. If properly
managed, the unit can produce 4 tons of irrigated grass
hay per acre annually.
If this unit is used for homesite development, the
main limitations are the large stones and boulders on
and below the surface. Population growth has resulted
in increased construction of homes in areas of this unit.
Preserving the existing plant cover during construction
helps to control erosion. The gravel and cobbles in
disturbed areas should be removed if the site is
landscaped, particularly in areas used for lawns. The
effluent from septic tank absorption fields can surface in
downslope areas and thus create a health hazard. If the
density of housing is moderate or high, community
sewage systems are needed to prevent the
contamination of water supplies resulting from seepage
from onsite sewage disposal systems. Areas adjacent to
hillsides are occasionally affected by runoff, which may
be accompanied by the movement of rock debris.
This map unit is in capability subclass Vis, irrigated
and nonirrigated. It is in the Stony Loam range site.
108—Uracca, moist-Mergel complex, 6 to 12
percent slopes, extremely stony. This map unit is on
alluvial fans and valley side slopes. Elevation is 6,800
to 8,400 feet. The average annual precipitation is 16 to
19 inches, the average annual air temperature is 40 to
43 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 75 to
95 days.
This unit is about 50 percent Uracca soil and 40
percent Mergel soil.
Included in this unit are small areas of soils that are
similar to the Uracca and Mergel soils but have a
thicker surface layer and a lower content of coarse
fragments. Included areas make up about 10 percent of
the total acreage.
The Uracca soil is deep and well drained. It formed in
alluvium derived dominantly from mixed igneous and
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
194
Soil Survey
TABLE 10. --BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT --Continued
1
Soil name and I Shallow I Dwellings
map symbol I excavations I without
I basements
I I
Dwellings I Small I Local roads
with I commercial I and streets
basements I buildings I
Lawns and
landscaping
' 39
Empedrado
• * 35
Empedrado
111
36
Empedrado
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
37
Etoe
38
Evanston
39, 40, 41
Evanston
42*
Fluvaquents
43*:
Forelle
Brownsto
44*:
Forelle
Brownsto
45
Forsey
46, 47
Forsey
48
Fughes
49
Goslin
50
Goslin
Slight
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Slight
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
cutbanks cave,
wetness.
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
cutbanks cave.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
cutbanks cave,
slope.
Moderate:
large stones.
Severe:
slope.
Moderate:
too clayey.
Slight
Severe:
slope.
See footnote at end of table.
Slight
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Slight
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
flooding,
wetness.
Moderate:
slope.
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Moderate:
large stones.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
shrink -swell.
Slight
Severe:
slope.
I I
Slight 'Moderate: (Moderate:
I slope. I frost action.
I I
Moderate: ISevere: IModerate:
slope. I slope. I slope,
I I frost action.
I I
Severe: ISevere: ISevere:
slope. I slope. I slope.
I I
Severe: (Severe: !Severe:
slope. I slope. I slope.
I I
Slight (Slight ISlight
I I
I I
Severe: 'Severe: (Severe:
slope. I slope. I slope.
I I
Severe: 'Severe: (Severe:
flooding, 1 flooding, I wetness,
wetness. I wetness. 1 flood:ng,
frost action.
I I
1 I
Moderate: ISevere: IModerate:
slope. I slope. I slope.
I I
(
Moderate: !Severe: !Moderate:
slope. I slope. I slope.
I I
1 I
I I
I I
Severe: ;Severe: 'Severe:
slope. I slope. 1 slope.
I I
Severe: (Severe: ISevere:
slope. I slope. I slope.
I I
1 I
Moderate: !Moderate: 'Moderate:
large stones. I slope, I frost action,
I large stones. I large stones.
I I
Severe: (Severe: ISevere:
slope. I slope. 1 slope.
I I
I
Severe: (Severe: 'Severe:
shrink -swell. 1 shrink -swell. I shrink -swell,
I I low strength.
1 I
Slight (Moderate: 'Slight
I slope.
I I
Severe: 'Severe: (Severe:
slope. I slope. I slope.
I I
Moderate:
large stones.
Moderate:
large stones,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Slight.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
wetness.
Moderate:
large stones,
slope.
Moderate:
small stones,
droughty,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
large stones,
slope.
Moderate:
large stones.
Slight.
Severe:
slope.
196
TABLE 10. --BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT --Continued
Soil SurveJ
1
Soil name and
map symbol
Shallow I
excavations I
Dwellings
without
basements
Dwellings
with
basements
Small
commercial
buildings
I Local roads
I and streets
Lawns ani
landscape
69
Kilgore
70
Kobar
71
Kobar
72
Kobar
73
Kobar
74
Leavittville
75
Millerlake
76, 77
Mine
78
Miracle
79
Moen
80
Moen
81
Moen
82, 83
Monad
84
Morval
85, 86
Morval
87*:
Morval
Severe:
cutbanks cave,
wetness.
Moderate:
too clayey.
Moderate:
too clayey,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Moderate:
too clayey,
slope.
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock.
Severe:
depth to rock.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Slight
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
See footnote at end of table.
Severe:
flooding,
wetness.
Severe:
shrink -swell.
Severe:
shrink -swell.
Severe:
shrink -swell,
slope.
Severe:
shrink -swell.
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Moderate:
shrink -swell,
depth to rock.
Moderate:
shrink -swell,
slope,
depth to rock.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Moderate:
shrink -swell.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
flooding,
wetness.
Severe:
shrink -swell.
Severe:
shrink -swell.
Severe:
slope,
shrink -swell.
Severe:
'shrink -swell.
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock.
Severe:
depth to rock.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Moderate:
shrink -swell.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
flooding,
wetness.
Severe:
shrink -swell.
Severe:
shrink -swell,
slope.
Severe:
shrink -swell,
slope.
Severe:
shrink -swell,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Moderate:
shrink -swell,
depth to rock.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Moderate:
shrink -swell.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
!Severe:
I flooding.
'Severe:
I shrink -swell,
I low strength.
'Severe:
I shrink -swell,
I low strength.
'Severe:
1 shrink -swell,
I low strength,
I slope.
(Severe:
I shrink -swell,
I low strength.
(Moderate:
I slope.
(Severe:
I slope.
'Severe:
I slope.
'Severe:
I slope.
(Moderate:
I depth to rock,
I low strength.
(Moderate:
I depth to rock,
I low strength,
I slope.
'Severe:
I slope.
(Severe:
I slope.
(Moderate:
I low strength,
I frost action.
(Severe:
I slope.
!Severe:
I slope.
Moderate:
wetness,
flooding.
Slight.
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Moderate:
slope.
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Moderate:
small stone
thin layer.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Moderate:
small stone'
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Slight.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado
TABLE 10. --BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT --Continued
197
Soil name and
map symbol
I Shallow
I excavations
Dwellings
without
basements
Dwellings
with
basements
Small
commercial
buildings
Local roads
and streets
I Lawns and
I landscaping
87*:
Tridell
88*:
Moyerson
Rock outcrop.
89
Mussel
90
Mussel
91
Mussel
92
Redrob
93
Rogert
94*:
Showalter
Morval
95*:
Showalter
Morval
96
Southace
97
Southace
98, 99
Southace
Severe:
cutbanks cave,
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
cutbanks cave.
Severe:
cutbanks cave.
Severe:
cutbanks cave,
slope.
Severe:
cutbanks cave,
wetness.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Moderate:
too clayey,
large stones,
slope.
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Moderate:
large stones.
Moderate:
large stones,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
See footnote at end of table.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
shrink -swell,
slope.
Slight
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
flooding.
Severe:
slope,
depth to rock.
Moderate:
shrink -swell,
slope,
large stones.
Moderate:
shrink -swell,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Moderate:
large stones.
Moderate:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope,
shrink -swell.
Slight
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
flooding,
wetness.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Moderate:
slope,
large stones.
Moderate:
slope,
shrink -swell.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Moderate:
large stones.
Moderate:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
shrink -swell,
slope.
Slight
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
flooding.
Severe:
slope,
depth to rock.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Moderate:
large stones.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe: ISevere:
slope. I slope.
Severe: ISevere:
low strength, I slope,
slope, I thin layer.
shrink -swell. I
Moderate: 1Slight.
frost action. I
Moderate: IModerate:
slope, I slope.
frost action. I
Severe: !Severe:
slope. I slope.
Moderate: !Moderate:
wetness, I wetness.
flooding.
Severe: ISevere:
depth to rock,! small stones,
slope. I slope.
Moderate: ISevere:
slope, I large stones.
frost action, I
shrink -swell. I
1Moderate:
I slope.
Moderate:
low strength,
slope,
frost action.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Moderate:
large stones.
Moderate:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope.
1Severe:
I large stones,
I slope.
'Severe:
I slope.
'Severe:
1 droughty.
ISevere:
I droughty.
1Severe:
I droughty,
I slope.
198
TABLE 10. --BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT --Continued
Soil Surve1
y
Soil name and Shallow
map symbol excavations
Dwellings
without
basements
Dwellings
with
basements
Small
commercial
buildings
Local roads
and streets
1
Lawns an,
landscaping
100*:
Starley
Starman
101*:
Tanna
Pinelli
102*:
Tanna
Pinelli
103*:
Tanna
Pinelli
Severe:
depth to rock.
Severe:
depth to rock.
Moderate:
depth to rock,
too clayey.
Moderate:
too clayey.
Moderate:
depth to rock,
too clayey,
slope.
Moderate:
too clayey,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
104*:
Torriorthents----(Severe:
I depth to rock,
I slope.
Camborthids
Rock outcrop.
Variable
105*:
Torriorthents----1Severe:
I depth to rock,
I slope.
Rock outcrop.
106*:
Tridell
Severe:
cutbanks cave,
slope.
See footnote at end of table.
Severe:
depth to rock.
Severe:
depth to rock.
Severe:
shrink -swell.
Moderate:
shrink -swell.
Severe:
shrink -swell.
Moderate:
shrink -swell,
slope.
Severe:
shrink -swell,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope,
depth to rock.
Variable
Severe:
slope,
depth to rock.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock.
Severe:
depth to rock.
Severe:
shrink -swell.
Moderate:
shrink -swell.
Severe:
shrink -swell.
Moderate:
slope,
shrink -swell.
Severe:
slope,
shrink -swell.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Variable
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope,
depth to rock.
Severe:
slope,
depth to rock.
Severe:
shrink -swell.
Moderate:
shrink -swell.
Severe:
shrink -swell,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
shrink -swell,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope,
depth to rock.
Variable
Severe:
slope,
depth to rock.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock.
Severe:
depth to rock.
Severe:
shrink -swell,
low strength.
Moderate:
shrink -swell,
low strength.
Severe:
shrink -swell,
low strength.
Moderate:
shrink -swell,
low strength,
slope.
Severe:
shrink -swell,
low strength,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Variable
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
small Ston
depth to Stoll,
Severe:
small stop
depth to r
Moderate:
depth to rt.
Slight.
Moderate:
slope,
depth to
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope,
depth to
Variable.
Severe:
slope,
depth to rock.
1
f
1
1
1
1
rock.
1
1
Severe:
slope.
1
1
1
1
Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado i
TABLE 10. --BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT --Continued
Soil name and
map symbol
Shallow
excavations
Dwellings
without
basements
Dwellings
with
basements
Small
commercial
buildings I
1
1 Local roads
1 and streets
I Lawns and
1 landscaping
106*:
Brownsto
107*:
Uracca
Mergel
108*:
Uracca
Mergel
109*, 110*:
Uracca
Mergel
111
Vandamore
112
Woodhall
113
Woosley
119
Yamo
115
Yamo
116
Yamo
117*:
Yeljack
Severe:
cutbanks cave,
slope.
Severe:
cutbanks cave,
large stones.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
cutbanks cave,
large stones.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
cutbanks cave,
large stones,
slope.
Severe:
large stones,
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock,
large stones,
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
cutbanks cave.
Severe:
cutbanks cave.
Severe:
cutbanks cave,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
See footnote at end of table.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope.
Slight
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Slight
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope.
Slight
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope.
Slight
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
low strength,
slope.
Severe:
large stones,
slope.
Severe:
large stones,
droughty.
Moderate:
large stones,
droughty.
Severe:
large stones,
droughty.
Moderate:
large stones,
droughty,
slope.
Severe:
large stones,
droughty,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope.
Slight.
Moderate:
slope.
!Severe:
I slope.
1Severe:
I slope.
204
Soil name and
map symbol
Soil Surveil
TABLE 11. --SANITARY FACILITIES --Continued
1 1
Septic tank 1 Sewage lagoon I Trench Area 1 Daily cover
absorption 1 areas I sanitary 1 sanitary 1 for landfill
fields 1 1 landfill I landfill 1
29*, 30*:
Rock outcrop.
31
Dotsero
32
Dotsero
33*:
Earsman
Rock outcrop.
34
Empedrado
3k 35
Empedrado
36
Empedrado
37
Etoe
38
Evanston
39, 40, 41
Evanston
42*
Fluvaquents
43*:
Forelle
Brownsto
44*:
Forelle
Brownsto
Severe:
slope.
Slight
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Slight
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Moderate:
percs slowly.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
flooding,
wetness,
poor filter.
Moderate:
percs slowly,
slope.
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
See footnote at end of table.
Severe:
seepage,
slope.
Severe:
seepage.
Severe:
seepage,
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
seepage.
Severe:
seepage,
slope.
Severe:
seepage,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Moderate:
seepage,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
seepage,
flooding.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
seepage,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
seepage,
slope.
Severe:
seepage,
slope.
Severe:
seepage.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
seepage.
Severe:
seepage,
slope.
Severe:
seepage.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
seepage.
Severe: Severe:
seepage. seepage.
Severe: Severe:
seepage, seepage,
slope. slope.
Severe: Severe:
slope, slope.
large stones.
Slight Slight
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
flooding,
seepage,
wetness.
Moderate:
slope.
Moderate:
slope,
too sandy.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
flooding,
seepage,
wetness.
Moderate:
slope.
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Poor:
slope.
Fair:
small stones
Poor:
area reclaim,
small stones,
slope.
Fair:
small stones.
Fair:
small stones,
slope.
Poor:
slope.
Poor:
large stones,
slope.
Good.
Poor:
slope.
Poor:
seepage,
too sandy,
small stones.
Fair:
slope.
Poor:
small stones.
Poor:
slope.
Poor:
small stones,
slope.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado 207
TABLE 11. --SANITARY FACILITIES --Continued
Soil name and
map symbol
I Septic tank
I absorption
fields
Sewage lagoon
areas
Trench
sanitary
landfill
Area
sanitary
landfill
Daily cover
for landfill
80
Moen
81
Moen
82, 83
Monad
89
Morval
)k"85, 86
Morval
87*:
Morval
Tridell
88*:
Moyerson
Rock outcrop.
89
Mussel
90
Mussel
91
Mussel
92
Redrob
93
Rogert
94*:
Showalter
Severe:
depth to rock.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
percs slowly,
slope.
Moderate:
percs slowly.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
poor filter,
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Moderate:
percs slowly.
Moderate:
percs slowly,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
wetness,
poor filter.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
percs slowly.
See footnote at end of table.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
seepage,
slope.
Moderate:
seepage,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
seepage,
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Moderate:
seepage,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
seepage,
flooding,
wetness.
Severe:
seepage,
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
depth to rock.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Moderate:
too clayey.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Slight
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
seepage,
wetness,
too sandy.
Severe:
depth to rock,
seepage,
slope.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
depth to rock.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
seepage,
slope.
Slight
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Slight
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
seepage,
wetness.
Severe:
depth to rock,
seepage,
slope.
Moderate:
slope.
Poor:
area reclaim.
Poor:
area reclaim,
slope.
Poor:
slope.
Fair:
too clayey,
small stones.
Poor:
slope.
Poor:
slope.
Poor:
slope.
Poor:
area reclaim,
hard to pack,
slope.
Good.
Fair:
slope.
Poor:
slope.
Poor:
seepage,
too sandy,
small stones.
Poor:
depth to rock,
seepage,
small stones.
Poor:
small stones.
208
TABLE 11. --SANITARY FACILITIES --Continued
Soil Sul
Soil name and
map symbol
Septic tank
absorption
fields
Sewage lagoon
areas
Trench
sanitary
landfill
Area
sanitary
landfill
1
1 Daily cover
1 for landfill
1
94*:
Morval
95*:
Showalter
Morval
96
Southace
97
Southace
98, 99
Southace
100*:
Starley
Starman
101*:
Tanna
Pinelli
102*:
Tanna
Pinelli
103*:
Tanna
Moderate:
percs slowly,
slope.
Severe:
percs slowly,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Moderate:
large stones.
Moderate:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock.
Severe:
depth to rock.
Severe:
depth to rock,
percs slowly.
Severe:
percs slowly.
Severe:
depth to rock,
percs slowly.
Severe:
percs slowly.
Severe:
depth to rock,
percs slowly,
slope.
See footnote at end of table.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
seepage,
large stones.
Severe:
seepage,
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
seepage,
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock.
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Moderate:
slope,
too clayey.
Severe:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
depth to rock.
Severe:
depth to rock.
Severe:
depth to rock.
Slight
Severe:
depth to rock.
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Slight
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock.
Severe:
depth to rock.
Slight
Slight
Moderate:
slope.
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Fair:
too clayey,
small stones,
slope.
Poor:
small stones,
slope
Poor:
slope.
Poor:
small stones.
Poor:
small stones.
Poor:
small stones,
slope.
Poor:
depth to rock,
small stones.
Poor:
depth to rock.
Poor:
depth to rock.
Good.
Poor:
depth to rock.
Fair:
slope.
Poor:
depth to rock,
slope.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado
TABLE 11. --SANITARY FACILITIES --Continued
Soil name and
map symbol
Septic tank
absorption
fields
Sewage lagoon
areas
Trench
sanitary
landfill
Area
sanitary
landfill
1
1 Daily cover
1 for landfill
103*:
Pinelli
104*:
Torriorthents
Camborthids
Rock outcrop.
105*:
Torriorthents
Rock outcrop.
' 106*:
Tridell
1
Brownsto
1
107*:
II Uracca
1
1
Mergel
108*:
Uracca
Mergel
109*, 110*:
Uracca
IMergel
1
Severe:
percs slowly,
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Variable
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
poor filter,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
poor filter,
large stones.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
poor filter,
large stones.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
poor filter,
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope,
large stones.
See footnote at end of table.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Variable
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
seepage,
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
seepage,
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
seepage,
large stones.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
seepage,
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
seepage,
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Variable
Severe:
depth to rock,
slope.
Severe:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
seepage,
large stones.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
seepage,
large stones.
Severe:
large stones.
Severe:
seepage,
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope,
large stones.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Variable
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Severe:
seepage.
Slight
Severe:
seepage.
Moderate:
slope.
Severe:
seepage,
slope.
Severe:
slope.
Poor:
slope.
Poor:
depth to rock,
small stones,
slope.
Variable.
Poor:
depth to rock,
small stones,
slope.
Poor:
slope.
Poor:
small stones,
slope.
Poor:
seepage,
large stones.
Poor:
large stones.
Poor:
seepage,
large stones.
Poor:
large stones.
Poor:
seepage,
large stones,
slope.
Poor:
large stones,
slope.
209
'O
v
G
N
0
O
w
a
F
1-4
c,r
O
z
0
N
1
10
1-1
256
c
0
vl
N
0
4
4
0
U
4.1
0
x
N
a
High water table
01
0
.O
O
0
Concrete
0) 4
0)
0 v
0 i1
U
c
ro
•.i 1 0
N
J.1 O
0 0
0) 4
4) W U
o m
a
3 Cr, 3 3
O "a 0 0
1 I I
v 1 1 1
1 4 I
04
4.4 1 1 I
N .c .0
•0 to 0) 0
X i s
A
0)
Moderate.
3
0
W a
3 3
ao
Moderate.
Moderate
1
Soil Survey
1
Moderate.
3
a
0 E 0 .°a ao
1 1 1 1
1 i 1 1 1 a)
1
1 I y 1
1 I 1 1 1 ro I
1 I I 1 1
.0 .0 •c •c 1 4
0,totorn L v c
rn v
X X X X z i S x
I I I I I I I
I I 1 I 1 1 I 1
1
0) a)1 vI
0) 0) v N v v
L L L L JJ JJ L 1.) y)
04 ro RI
4 '0 m n1
4 4 'IN 4 1%4 44
N
3 3 1CD 11
CO U a) 0) N 4
W v v
..00 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 3 0 '0 3 3
E z X z z z 0 a0 0 z ao a0
0)
m
4
v
0
0
E
1
1
b v U
,r1
0 4-4 1 b b 4 0 '0
Z N .0
I O O 0
Q. G 00 0 1D o o V• Q• O 0 0 0 0 0
I 10 10 1 1 1D 1D N 0 O N O
0) H A A O A n O 0 A A A � 0 m I
v' N N .4 An O ^
U
N U
0) O N
+) 1 L]
c 0 1
o,r4c
E h
'0
c
x
I I
Duration Months 1 Depth
L
c
v
4
ro
0.
0.
1-7
0) '
i)
0
c
4
ro
a
0 I 0
a
' o 0
0
L 1 O O O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 Q' 0 0
)i1 I O 10 tD 10l0 l0
A A A LD l0 l0 l0 LD 1D 40 10
Very brief
U
c
0)
0
a
v
w
Occasional
a) v
o 0
z z
a) v a)
O 0 c
O O O
z z z
v 0) v
0 c c
O O O
z z z
v v v
C c c
o 0 0
z z z
0)
c
0
z
a
0 E
N
01 U o0 W W U U W W al 0) 01
14 c 0
mio
a z z
co U in U
.11
r
CsJ
Leavittville
Millerlake
O -0
m c m ro
0 - O
0 £ N
r m
••o
m
Rock outcrop.
rn
.0
0
4
0)
4.1
1.
a)
0+
Inco
Cr,
1
1
1
b
1
0
1
1
Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado
1
1
1
1
1
1
H
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
of corrosion
Concrete
3 33 3 3 3 3 3
a 0 0 .40 0 0 0 0 0
Moderate.
3 3 3 3
0 a 0 o
a
30 0
3
a
I I
I I
I I
1 I
1 I
.0 .0
x x
i I I 1 1
1 I 1 I I 1
1 I 1 1 1 I
I I 1 1 I 1
I I I I I I
0' 0' of 0' 0' rn
._4 •'1 .-1 •.i •'1 -.1
x x x x x x
1 I 1
1 I 1
1 I I
1 1 I
11 I
o, of rn
..-1 --4 ._4 •.1
x x x
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
L
ro
4
0
0
z
3
0
a
.)
L
ro
4
3
al
O 0 0 O
a z a a
3 3 O
a a a
3
0
a
3 -
a
0
b b w b -o
MI ro 0 ro ro
x x 1n x x
I 71 0 O
4 4
1 ro ro ro
x x x
0 0 0
O 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 N N V' O ('l l0 V• 0 0 0 O cr.
V' d•
l0 1.0 I I I I 1 I I 1
N I A A O lD O A c ‘.11l � c A A A A O O O
N N N N
High water table
Kind (Months
O
O
O
z
0 O O O O O
l0 In In 0 to
A A A A A A
O 0
A A
O 0 O O O O 0 O
1p ,0 lD 10 l0 l0 t0 l0
A A A A A A A A
0
O
.N
a1
ro
4
7
U
G
7
a
4
I U a
0 •.1 7
4 0 0
-O O 4
c 0
0 0
z z
CA 07
c c 0) 0 0 c
O O 0 0 0 0
z z z z z z
c c c c
O O O O
z z z
c 0 c 0
O O O O
z z z z
❑ ❑ ❑ 0) ❑ O ❑ LO 0] 0 07 (0 0 U
m
rn
Starman
m
O
-1
L
a)
a)
L
4
0
i# 41
4
c 0
O H
.-1
Camborthids
Rock outcrop.
Rock outcrop.
.-1
ro
.�
0 4
O itH
r-1
Brownsto
' mi N
0, - 4c 40
44 1:3N
a) 0 0 0
Z .�-1 > .N-1 3 - 3
.-1 r1 .-1
U
4-1
0 `-1 >4
257
See footnote at end of table.
APPENDIX C
WILDLIFE MITIGATION PLAN
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2- 8-02;12:22PM;Robert M. Noone. P.0 ;9709455570 # 7/ 7
WILDLIFE MITIGATION PLAN
The property has been identified by the Colorado Division of Wildlife as possessing these
wildlife characteristics: Black Bear Overall Range, Elk Winter Range, Elk Severe Winter Range, Elk
Overall Range, Mule Deer Winter Range, Mule Deer Overall Range, Mule Deer Summer Range,
Bald Eagle Winter Range within one mile, Elk Production Range within one mile, Mule Deer
Migration Patterns within one mile, Mule Deer Winter Concentration Area within one mile, Mule
Deer Severe Winter Range within one mile, Native Fish - Mottled Sculpin within one mile, and
Raptors - Red Tail Hawk within one mile.
In order to mitigate any adverse impacts on wildlife, development on the Clark Subdivision
shall comply with the following wildlife mitigation standards:
A. One dog shall be allowed per each residential unit and the dog shall be confined
within the owner's property boundaries.
B. Owner shall maintain existing native, non-agricultural, vegetation outside of the
building envelope.
C. All horse/livestock feed shall be enclosed or fenced with a minimum 8 foot high
wildlife proof fence.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
APPENDIX D
DRAINAGE STUDY CALCULATIONS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ti
/ /
/ /
�.' /
/
i
T
i
NE S€cbon 13 Eouno
C911n(y, Surveyors ALC/%
/
/
/ /
// ! ;%.
/
i
LOT t
891;862 sq.ft.
20.47 acres -±1'
•
0
L.1-1
E a
0;
zu
Ws
zo
� o
Zi
W W
au
E;
vo
3'
0".
tfrN„
N
f1 0
N.Y.3HAiprr-13Found
Brass Cap- "�•
PARK DIIFCH
/1
co
r
z
DRAINAGE BASINS
FEBRUARY 12, 2002
N
I I
LJ
LJ
N
›-
CD
S
T
T)11
0
O
N
o 6
Ind 10.t5::77,(0l, t -I 0) 11D\'V\ntl\1U
Hti `)
sub-a-pre100.txt
TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method
Input Summary
Description
Subbasin A, Pre -develop
Rainfall Distribution Type II
Ia/P Interpolation On
Total Area 13.9989 ac
Peak Time 12.2000 hrs
Peak Flow 9.0703 cfs
Given Input Data:
Subarea D/S Subareas
Description
Area
(ac)
CN
Tc Tt Rainfall
(hrs) (hrs) (in)
A
Support Data:
Subarea Name: A, Row: 1
Sheet Flow
13.9989
72 0.2172 0.0000 2.6000
Description
Manning's n 0.4000
Flow Length 42.0817 ft
Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.2000 in
Land Slope 0.1182 ft/ft
Computed Sheet flow time > 0.1437 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.2000 hrs in row <1>.
Shallow Concentrated Flow
Description
Surface Unpaved
Flow Length 193.4568 ft
Watercourse Slope 0.1109 ft/ft
Velocity 5.3731 fps
Computed Shallow flow time > 0.0100 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.2000 hrs in row <1>.
Channel Flow
Description
Flow Area 1.9500 ft2
Wetted Perimeter 8.0594 ft
Flow Length 1089.2449 ft
Channel Slope 0.0957 ft/ft
Manning's n 0.0375
Hydraulic radius 0.2420 ft
Velocity 4.7599 fps
Computed Channel flow time > 0.0636 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.2000 hrs in row <1>.
Page 1
***************************
Total Time of Concentration
> 0.2172 hrs
****************************
sub-a-pre100.txt
Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator
Description
Area (ac) Curve Number
Soiil06 Juniper 9.2390 75
Soi195 Sage 4.7599 67
Total Area > 13.9989 72 < Weighted CN
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.2000 hrs in row <1>.
Page 2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
sub-a-postl00.txt
TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method
Input Summary
Description
Subbasin A, Post -develop
Rainfall Distribution Type II
Ia/P Interpolation On
Total Area 13.9989 ac
Peak Time 12.2000 hrs
Peak Flow 9.0513 cfs
Given Input Data:
Subarea D/S Subareas
Description
Area
(ac)
CN
Tc Tt Rainfall
(hrs) (hrs) (in)
A 13.9989 72 0.2172 0.0000 2.6000
Support Data:
Subarea Name: A, Row: 1
Sheet Flow
Description
Manning's n 0.4000
Flow Length 42.0817 ft
Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.2000 in
Land Slope 0.1182 ft/ft
Computed Sheet flow time > 0.1437 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.2000 hrs in row <1>.
Shallow Concentrated Flow
Description
Surface Unpaved
Flow Length 193.4568 ft
Watercourse Slope 0.1109 ft/ft
Velocity 5.3731 fps
Computed Shallow flow time > 0.0100 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.2000 hrs in row <1>.
Channel Flow
Description
Flow Area 1.9500 ft2
Wetted Perimeter 8.0594 ft
Flow Length 1089.2449 ft
Channel Slope 0.0957 ft/ft
Manning's n 0.0375
Hydraulic radius 0.2420 ft
Velocity 4.7599 fps
Computed Channel flow time > 0.0636 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.2000 hrs in row <1>.
Page 1
***************************
Total Time of Concentration
****************************
sub-a-post100.txt
Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator
Description
Soill06 Juniper
Soi195 Sage
Lot2 Res
Lot2 Lawn
Total Area
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.2000 hrs in row <1>.
Area (ac) Curve Number
9.1020
4.7099
0.0500
0.1370
> 13.9989
> 0.2172 hrs
75
67
98
61
72 < Weighted CN
Page 2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
sub-b-pre100.txt
TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method
Input Summary
Description
Subbasin B, Pre -develop 100
Rainfall Distribution Type II
Ia/P Interpolation On
Total Area 9.7089 ac
Peak Time 12.4000 hrs
Peak Flow 4.8676 cfs
Given Input Data:
Subarea D/S Subareas
Description
Area
(ac)
CN
Tc Tt Rainfall
(hrs) (hrs) (in)
B
Support Data:
Subarea Name: B, Row: 1
Sheet Flow
9.7089 73 0.4036 0.0000 2.6000
Description
Manning's n 0.4000
Flow Length 76.5000 ft
Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.2000 in
Land Slope 0.0562 ft/ft
Computed Sheet flow time > 0.3120 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.4000 hrs in row <1>.
Shallow Concentrated Flow
Description
Surface Unpaved
Flow Length 345.0732 ft
Watercourse Slope 0.1109 ft/ft
Velocity 5.3731 fps
Computed Shallow flow time > 0.0178 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.4000 hrs in row <1>.
Channel Flow
Description
Flow Area 1.2480 ft2
Wetted Perimeter 6.4475 ft
Flow Length 1089.2449 ft
Channel Slope 0.0957 ft/ft
Manning's n 0.0375
Hydraulic radius 0.1936 ft
Velocity 4.1020 fps
Computed Channel flow time > 0.0738 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.4000 hrs in row <1>.
Page 1
sub-b-pre100.txt
***************************
Total Time of Concentration > 0.4036 hrs
****************************
Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator
Description
Area (ac) Curve Number
Soi1106-85 Juniper 7.0430 75
Soi195 Sage 2.4289 67
Lotl Res 0.0870 98
Lotl Drive 0.1500 85
Total Area > 9.7089 73 < Weighted CN
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.4000 hrs in row <1>.
Page 2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
sub-b-postl00.txt
TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method
Input Summary
Description
Subbasin B, Post -develop 100
Rainfall Distribution Type II
Ia/P Interpolation On
Total Area 9.7089 ac
Peak Time 12.4000 hrs
Peak Flow 4.8376 cfs
Given Input Data:
Subarea D/S Subareas
Description
Area
(ac)
CN
Tc Tt Rainfall
(hrs) (hrs) (in)
B
Support Data:
Subarea Name: B, Row: 1
Sheet Flow
9.7089 73 0.4036 0.0000 2.6000
Description
Manning's n 0.4000
Flow Length 76.5000 ft
Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.2000 in
Land Slope 0.0562 ft/ft
Computed Sheet flow time > 0.3120 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.4000 hrs in row <1>.
Shallow Concentrated Flow
Description
Surface Unpaved
Flow Length 345.0732 ft
Watercourse Slope 0.11.09 ft/ft
Velocity 5.3731 fps
Computed Shallow flow time > 0.0178 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.4000 hrs in row <1>.
Channel Flow
Description
Flow Area 1.2480 ft2
Wetted Perimeter 6.4475 ft
Flow Length 1089.2449 ft
Channel Slope 0.0957 ft/ft
Manning's n 0.0375
Hydraulic radius 0.1936 ft
Velocity 4.1020 fps
Computed Channel flow time > 0.0738 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.4000 hrs in row <1>.
Page 1
sub-b-post100.txt
***************************
Total Time of Concentration > 0.4036 hrs
****************************
Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator
Description
Area (ac) Curve Number
Soi1106-85 Juniper 6.8560 75
Soi195 Sage 2.4289 67
Lotl Res 0.0870 98
Lotl Drive 0.1500 85
Lot4 Res 0.0500 98
Lot4 Lawn 0.1370 61
Total Area > 9.7089 73 < Weighted CN
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.4000 hrs in row <1>.
Page 2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
sub-c-pre100.txt
TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method
Input Summary
Description
Subbasin C, Pre -develop 100
Rainfall Distribution Type II
Ia/P Interpolation On
Total Area 16.7610 ac
Peak Time 12.6000 hrs
Peak Flow 6.6084 cfs
Given Input Data:
Subarea D/S Subareas
Description
Area
(ac)
CN
Tc Tt Rainfall
(hrs) (hrs) (in)
C
Support Data:
Subarea Name: C, Row: 1
Sheet Flow
16.7610
73 0.5503 0.0000 2.6000
Description
Manning's n 0.4000
Flow Length 139.6583 ft
Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.2000 in
Land Slope 0.0605 ft/ft
Computed Sheet flow time > 0.4904 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.5000 hrs in row <1>.
Info: Time of Travel rounded to 0.1000 hrs in row <1>.
Shallow Concentrated Flow
Description
Surface Unpaved
Flow Length 436.1997 ft
Watercourse Slope 0.1330 ft/ft
Velocity 5.8841 fps
Computed Shallow flow time > 0.0206 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.5000 hrs in row <1>.
Info: Time of Travel rounded to 0.1000 hrs in row <1>.
Channel Flow
Description
Flow Area 1.0080 ft2
Wetted Perimeter 5.4475 ft
Flow Length 1089.2449 ft
Channel Slope 0.0778 ft/ft
Manning's n 0.0175
Hydraulic radius 0.1850 ft
Velocity 7.6909 fps
Computed Channel flow time > 0.0393 hrs
Page 1
sub-c-pre100.txt
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.5000 hrs in row <1>.
Info: Time of Travel rounded to 0.1000 hrs in row <1>.
***************************
Total Time of Concentration > 0.5503 hrs
****************************
Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator
Description
Area (ac) Curve Number
Soill06-85 Sage 8.2370 75
Soi195 Sage 2.1000 73
Lott Drive 0.1430 85
Soi1106-85 Ag 6.2810 69
Total Area > 16.7610 73 < Weighted CN
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.5000 hrs in row <1>.
Info: Time of Travel rounded to 0.1000 hrs in row <1>.
Page 2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
sub-c-postl00.txt
TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method
Input Summary
Description
Subbasin C, Pre -develop 100
Rainfall Distribution Type II
Ia/P Interpolation On
Total Area 16.7610 ac
Peak Time 12.6000 hrs
Peak Flow 6.6985 cfs
Given Input Data:
Subarea D/S Subareas Area
Description (ac)
CN
Tc Tt Rainfall
(hrs) (hrs) (in)
C 16.7610 73 0.5503 0.0000 2.6000
Support Data:
Subarea Name: C, Row: 1
Sheet Flow
Description
Manning's n 0.4000
Flow Length 139.6583 ft
Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.2000 in
Land Slope 0.0605 ft/ft
Computed Sheet flow time > 0.4904 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.5000 hrs in row <1>.
Info: Time of Travel rounded to 0.1000 hrs in row <1>.
Shallow Concentrated Flow
Description
Surface Unpaved
Flow Length 436.1997 ft
Watercourse Slope 0.1330 ft/ft
Velocity 5.8841 fps
Computed Shallow flow time > 0.0206 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.5000 hrs in row <1>.
Info: Time of Travel rounded to 0.1000 hrs in row <1>.
Channel Flow
Description
Flow Area 1.0080 ft2
Wetted Perimeter 5.4475 ft
Flow Length 1089.2449 ft
Channel Slope 0.0778 ft/ft
Manning's n 0.0175
Hydraulic radius 0.1850 ft
Velocity 7.6909 fps
Computed Channel flow tjT.=, > 0.0393 hrs
Page 1
sub-c-postl00.txt
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.5000 hrs in row <1>.
Info: Time of Travel rounded to 0.1000 hrs in row <1>.
***************************
Total Time of Concentration > 0.5503 hrs
****************************
Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator
Description
Area (ac) Curve Number
Soil106-85 Sage 7.8300 75
Lot4 drive 0.2200 85
Lot4 res 0.0500 98
Lot 4 Lawn 0.1370 61
Soi195 Jun 1.9900 73
Lot2 drive 0.1100 89
Lotl Drive 0.1430 85
Soi1106-85 Ag 6.2810 69
Total Area > 16.7610 73 < Weighted CN
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.5000 hrs in row <1>.
Info: Time of Travel rounded to 0.1000 hrs in row <1>.
Page 2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
sub-d-pre100.txt
TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method
Input Summary
Description
Subbasin D, Pre -develop 100
Rainfall Distribution Type II
Ia/P Interpolation On
Total Area 8.4708 ac
Peak Time 12.7000 hrs
Peak Flow 3.0247 cfs
Given Input Data:
Subarea D/S Subareas
Description
Area
(ac)
CN
Tc Tt Rainfall
(hrs) (hrs) (in)
D
Support Data:
Subarea Name: D, Row: 1
Sheet Flow
8.4708 73 0.6927 0.0000 2.6000
Description
Manning's n 0.4000
Flow Length 153.3897 ft
Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.2000 in
Land Slope 0.0395 ft/ft
Computed Sheet flow time > 0.6268 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.7500 hrs in row <1>.
Shallow Concentrated Flow
Description
Surface Unpaved
Flow Length 279.8859 ft
Watercourse Slope 0.1330 ft/ft
Velocity 5.8841 fps
Computed Shallow flow time > 0.0132 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.7500 hrs in row <1>.
Channel Flow
Description
Flow Area 0.5625 ft2
Wetted Perimeter 4.5297 ft
Flow Length 498.2545 ft
Channel Slope 0.0923 ft/ft
Manning's n 0.0175
Hydraulic radius 0.1242 ft
Velocity 6.4212 fps
Computed Channel flow time > 0.0216 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.7500 hrs in row <1>.
Page 1
sub-d-pre100.txt
Channel Flow
Description
Flow Area 0.7200 ft2
Wetted Perimeter 2.7889 ft
Flow Length 590.3748 ft
Channel Slope 0.0441 ft/ft
Manning's n 0.0240
Hydraulic radius 0.2582 ft
Velocity 5.2718 fps
Computed Channel flow time > 0.0311 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.7500 hrs in row <1>.
***************************
Total Time of Concentration > 0.6927 hrs
****************************
Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator
Description
Area (ac) Curve Number
Soill06-85 Juniper 6.3530 75
Soiil06-85 Ag 2.1178 69
Total Area > 8.4708 73 < Weighted CN
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.7500 hrs in row <1>.
Page 2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
sub-d-post100.txt
TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method
Input Summary
Description
Subbasin D, Post -develop 100
Rainfall Distribution Type II
Ia/P Interpolation On
Total Area 8.4708 ac
Peak Time 12.7000 hrs
Peak Flow 3.0981 cfs
Given Input Data:
Subarea D/S Subareas
Description
Area
(ac)
CN
Tc Tt Rainfall
(hrs) (hrs) (in)
D
Support Data:
Subarea Name: D, Row: 1
Sheet Flow
8.4708 74 0.6927 0.0000 2.6000
Description
Manning's n 0.4000
Flow Length 153.3897 ft
Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.2000 in
Land Slope 0.0395 ft/ft
Computed Sheet flow time > 0.6268 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.7500 hrs in row <1>.
Shallow Concentrated Flow
Description
Surface Unpaved
Flow Length 279.8859 ft
Watercourse Slope 0.1330 ft/ft
Velocity 5.8841 fps
Computed Shallow flow time > 0.0132 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.7500 hrs in row <1>.
Channel Flow
Description
Flow Area 0.5625 ft2
Wetted Perimeter 4.5297 ft
Flow Length 498.2545 ft
Channel Slope 0.0923 ft/ft
Manning's n 0.0175
Hydraulic radius 0.1242 ft
Velocity 6.4212 fps
Computed Channel flow time > 0.0216 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.7500 hrs in row <1>.
Page 1
sub-d-postl00.txt
Channel Flow
Description
Flow Area
Wetted Perimeter
Flow Length
Channel Slope
Manning's n
Hydraulic radius
Velocity
Computed Channel flow time
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration
***************************
0.7200 ft2
2.7889 ft
590.3748 ft
0.0441 ft/ft
0.0240
0.2582 ft
5.2718 fps
> 0.0311 hrs
rounded to 0.7500 hrs in row <1>.
Total Time of Concentration > 0.6927 hrs
****************************
Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator
Description
Soill06-85
Drives
Lot3 Res
Lot3 Lawn
Soii106-85
Lot3 Res
Lot3 Lawn
Total Area
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration
Area (ac)
Juniper 5.8660
0.3000
0.0500
0.1370
Ag 1.9308
0.0500
0.1370
> 8.4708
Curve Number
75
85
98
61
69
98
61
74 < Weighted CN
rounded to 0.7500 hrs in row <1>.
Page 2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
sub-e-pre100.txt
TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method
Input Summary
Description
Subbasin E, Pre -develop 100
Rainfall Distribution
Ia/P Interpolation
Total Area
Peak Time
Peak Flow
Given Input Data:
Type II
On
3.3370 ac
12.3000 hrs
2.9611 cfs
Subarea D/S Subareas
Description
Area
(ac)
CN
Tc
(hrs)
Tt Rainfall
(hrs) (in)
E 3.3370
Support Data:
Subarea Name: E, Row: 1
Sheet Flow
79 0.2916
0.0000 2.6000
Description
Manning's n 0.4000
Flow Length 96.7695 ft
Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.2000 in
Land Slope 0.1510 ft/ft
Computed Sheet flow time > 0.2536 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.3000 hrs in row <1>.
Shallow Concentrated Flow
Description
Surface
Flow Length
Watercourse Slope
Velocity
Computed Shallow
Messages:
Info:
Time
Channel Flow
flow time
of Concentration
Unpaved
212.2368 ft
0.1316 ft/ft
5.8531 fps
> 0.0101 hrs
rounded
Description
Flow Area
Wetted Perimeter
Flow Length
Channel Slope
Manning's n
Hydraulic radius
Velocity
Computed Channel flow time
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration
to 0.3000 hrs in row <1>.
0.7200 ft2
2.7889 ft
484.8873 ft
0.0197 ft/ft
0.0175
0.2582 ft
4.8322 fps
> 0.0279 hrs
rounded to 0.3000 hrs in row <1>.
Page 1
sub-e-pre100.txt
***************************
Total Time of Concentration > 0.2916 hrs
****************************
Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator
Description
Area (ac) Curve Number
Soi195 Ag 3.3000 79
Lotl drive 0.0370 89
Total Area > 3.3370 79 < Weighted CN
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.3000 hrs in row <1>.
Page 2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
sub-e-post100.txt
TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method
Input Summary
Description
Subbasin E, Post -develop 100
Rainfall Distribution
Ia/P Interpolation
Total Area
Peak Time
Peak Flow
Given Input Data:
Type II
On
3.3370 ac
12.3000 hrs
2.9771 cfs
Subarea D/S Subareas Area
Description (ac)
CN
Tc
(hrs)
Tt Rainfall
(hrs) (in)
E 3.3370
Support Data:
Subarea Name: E, Row: 1
Sheet Flow
79 0.2916
0.0000 2.6000
Description
Manning's n 0.4000
Flow Length 96.7695 ft
Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.2000 in
Land Slope 0.1510 ft/ft
Computed Sheet flow time > 0.2536 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded
Shallow Concentrated Flow
Description
Surface
Flow Length
Watercourse Slope
Velocity
Computed Shallow flow time > 0.0101 hrs
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.3000 hrs in row <1>.
to 0.3000 hrs in row <1>.
Unpaved
212.2368 ft
0.1316 ft/ft
5.8531 fps
Channel Flow
Description
Flow Area
Wetted Perimeter
Flow Length
Channel Slope
Manning's n
Hydraulic radius
Velocity
Computed Channel flow time
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration
0.7200 ft2
2.7889 ft
484.8873 ft
0.0197 ft/ft
0.0175
0.2582 ft
4.8322 fps
> 0.0279 hrs
rounded to 0.3000 hrs in row <1>.
Page 1
sub-e-post100.txt
Total Time of Concentration > 0.2916 hrs
****************************
Composite Runoff Curve Number Calculator
Description
Area (ac) Curve Number
Soi195 Ag 3.1130 79
Lotl drive 0.0370 89
Lot2 Res 0.0500 98
Lot2 Lawn 0.1370 74
Total Area > 3.3370 79 < Weighted CN
Messages:
Info: Time of Concentration rounded to 0.3000 hrs in row <1>.
Page 2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
APPENDIX E
WATER SUPPLY PLAN
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION No. 5
CourtAddress: I09 8th Street
Glenwood Springs, CO 8I60I
CONCERNING THE APPLICATION FOR WATER RIGHTS OF:
John and Susanne Clark, in Garfield County
Court Use Only o
Attorney for Applicant:
Robert M. Noone, #I2452
Gregory J. Hall, #273I7
ROBERT M. NOONE, P.C.
Attorneys at Law
I00I Grand Avenue, Suite 207
P.O. Drawer 39
Glenwood Springs, CO 8I602
Phone: (970) 945-4500
Fax: (970) 945-5570
E-mail: rmn@noonelaw.com
Case No.: 00 CW 292
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULING OF THE REFEREE,
JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF THE WATER COURT
This claim has come before the Water Referee on the Application for Underground Water
Rights and for Approval of Plan for Augmentation of John and Susanne Clark.
The Water Judge referred the Application to the undersigned as Water Referee for Water
Division No. 5, State of Colorado, in accordance with Article 92 of Chapter 37, Colorado Revised
Statutes 1973, known as the Water Rights Determination and Administration Act of 1969.
The undersigned Referee has made such investigations as are necessary to determine whether
or not the statements in the Application are true, has become fully advised with respect to the subject
matter of the Application and its attachments, and has consulted with the Division Engineer for
Water Division No. 5. The Referee hereby makes the following determination and ruling as the
Referee in this matter.
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Applicants filed their Application on December 28, 2000.
2• The statements in the Application are true.
3. The Application was properly published in the resume for Water Division No. 5 as required
by law, and the Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this proceeding and over all
persons or water rights affected thereby, whether they have appeared or not. See C.R.S. §37-
92-302.
4. None of the water rights or sources thereof involved in this Application are located within
a designated ground water basin.
5. No statements of opposition to the Application were filed and the time for filing such
statements has expired.
CLAIM FOR UNDERGROUND WATER RIGHTS
Name of Structures for which Conditional Groundwater Rights are Claimed: The Clark
Lot 2 Well, the Clark Lot 3 Well, and the Clark Lot 4 Well
A. Clark Lot 2 Well
(1)
Source: Ground water tributary to Cattle Creek, tributary to the Roaring Fork
River.
(2) Location: The proposed location for the Clark Lot 2 Well is NW 1/4 NE 1/4,
Section 13, Township 7 South, Range 88 West, 6th P.M. at a point 620' from
the North line and 1,380' from the East line of said Section 13.
(3) Date of Appropriation: October 4, 2000
(4) How appropriation was initiated: Location of well in the field and
formulation of intent to appropriate water for beneficial use.
Water Court, Division 5
Case No. 00CW292
Applicants: John and Susanne Clark
Ruling of the Referee and Judgment and Decree
Page 2 of 12
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
(5)
Amount: 0.033 cfs (15 gpm), conditional (1.0 AF/yr)
(6) Proposed Uses: Domestic (including fire protection), irrigation and stock
water.
(7) Description of Irrigated Acreage: Up to 2,500 square feet of lawn and
gardens.
(8) Description of Non -Irrigation Purposes: Domestic uses (including fire
protection) for up to one main residence and one accessory dwelling unit, and
stock watering for up to six head of livestock.
(9)
Name and Address of Owner of Land on which point of diversion and use are
located: Applicants.
B. Clark Lot 3 Well
(1)
Source: Ground water tributary to Cattle Creek, tributary to the Roaring Fork
River.
(2) Location: The proposed location for the Clark Lot 3 Well is NW 1/4 NE
1/4, Section 13, Township 7 South, Range 88 West, 6th P.M. at a point 1,315'
from the North line and 1,650' from the East line of said Section 13.
(3) Date of Appropriation: October 4, 2000
(4) How appropriation was initiated: Location of well in the field and
formulation of intent to appropriate water for beneficial use.
(5) Amount: 0.033 cfs (15 gpm), conditional (1.0 AF/yr)
(6) Proposed Uses: Domestic (including fire protection), irrigation and stock
water.
(7) Description of Irrigated Acreage: Up to 2,500 square feet of lawn and
gardens.
Water Court, Division 5
Case No. 00CW292
Applicants: John and Susanne Clark
Ruling of the Referee and Judgment and Decree
Page 3 of 12
(8) Description of Non -Irrigation Purposes: Domestic uses (including fire
protection) for up to one main residence and one accessory dwelling unit, and
stock watering for up to six head of livestock.
(9) Name and Address of Owner of Land on which .oint of diversion and use are
Iocated: Applicants.
C. Clark Lot 4 Well
(1) Source: Ground water tributary to Cattle Creek, tributary to the Roaring Fork
River.
(2) Location: The proposed location for the Clark Lot 4 Well is NW 1/4 NE 1/4,
Section 13, Township 7 South, Range 88 West, 6th RM. at a point 1,150'
from the North line and 2,300' from the East line of said Section 13.
(3) Date of Appropriation: October 4, 2000
(4) How appropriation was initiated: Location of wells in the field and
formulation of intent to appropriate water for beneficial use.
(5) Amount: 0.033 cfs (15 gpm), conditional (1.0 AF/yr)
(6) Proposed Uses: Domestic(including fire protection), irrigation and stock
water.
(7)
Description of Irrigated Acreage: Up to 2,500 square feet of lawn and
gardens.
(8) Description of Non -Irrigation Purposes: Domestic uses (including fire
protection) for up to one main residence and one accessory dwelling unit, and
stock watering for up to six head of livestock.
Name and Address of Owner of Land on which .oint of diversion and use are
located: Applicants.
(9)
Water Court, Division 5
Case No. 00CW292
Applicants: John and Susanne Clark
Ruling of the Referee and Judgment and Decree
Page 4 of 12
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
STATEMENT OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION
John and Susanne Clark are the owners of a 52 -acre parcel located at 3523 County Road 103
in Garfield County. The property is located in Section 13, Township 7 South, Range 88 West, 6th
P.M. in Water Division 5, District 38. The property is proposed for subdivision into four residential
lots, each lot requiring water for one main residence, one accessory dwelling unit, up to 2,500 square
feet of lawn and garden irrigation and watering of up to six head of livestock.
There is one existing single family home on the property that is served by the Sherwood Well
No. 1 (Permit No. 20095), which well was decreed for 0.11 cfs (50 pm) in Case No. W 679. The
land is also served by the Needham Ditch in which the Applicants own 88 shares and which has been
used historically to irrigate about 12.6 acres on the 52 acres.
There is also a decreed augmentation plan, approved in 81 CW292 for 0.5 AF, which covers
specific domestic, irrigation and livestock uses by the existing Sherwood Well No. 1. The 0.5 AF
of water rights used for the augmentation of the Sherwood Well No. 1, is adjudicated augmentation
water decreed in 79CW97 which is perpetually leased from the Carbondale Land Development
Corporation (CLDC), owner of 5 shares of the Park Ditch and Reservoir Company.
Lots 2, 3 and 4 of the Clark Subdivision will have individual wells and will be covered by
the augmentation plan described below. The three wells will result in total annual diversions of
1.044 AF. The yearly water requirements, monthly diversions, and consumptive uses are shown on
the table attached as Exhibit A.
The proposed augmentation plan in the Clark case provides for replacement of depletions
associated with the three wells. The total annual diversions are approximately 1.044 AF (.348 AF
per well).
The depletions will accrue to Cattle Creek on a delayed impact basis. The wells will be
completed in a sandstone formation at depths in excess of 200 feet and at distances between 2,500
feet to 3,000 feet from the creek. As such the wells are designated as category E wells as defined
in Basalt Water Conservancy District Case No. 87CW155. The monthly delayed depletion factors
for category E wells are as shown on the table attached as Exhibit B. The monthly delayed depletions
expressed in acre feet (AF) using the factors are as follows:
MONTH
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
DEPLETIONS
0.075
0.076
0.076
0.076
0.076
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.075
0.074
0.075
Water Court, Division 5
Case No. 00CW292
Applicants: John and Susanne Clark
Ruling of the Referee and Judgment and Decree
Page 5 of 12
For augmentation of depletions associated with the decreed uses of the Clark Lot 2 Well, the
Clark Lot 3 Well, and the Clark Lot 4 Well, Applicants intend to rely upon two sources: (1)Water
Service Contract No. 376, dated December 4, 2000 with the Basalt Water Conservancy District
(BWCD) for the non -irrigation season, and (2) a Water Lease and Agreement with Carbondale Land
Development Company (CLDC) pursuant to an option dated December 21, 2000 for Park Ditch
water for the irrigation season.
The proposed water rights plan for augmentation will, when implemented, provide a legal
water supply for the claimed uses and fully augment the depletions associated with the uses for the
Clark Lot 2 Well, Clark Lot 3 Well, and Clark Lot 4 Well. Each lot will have two single family
homes (main residence and an accessory dwelling unit), up to 2,500 square feet of lawn and garden
irrigation, and up to six horses.
The Applicants' BWCD Contract for 0.10 AF for the non -irrigation season and the CLDC
Contract for 0.60 AF' for the irrigation season are sufficient to allow uninterrupted diversions and
prevent injury to other vested and decreed conditional water rights under this plan for au
The BWCD Contract water will augment the potential Cameo call in April while the CLDC Contract
water will augment the Cattle Creek irrigation season call.
A. Basalt Water Conservancy District Augmentation Rights:
(1) Information from the previous decree for Green Mountain Reservoir:
a. Source: Blue River, tributary of Colorado River
b. Legal Description: Located approximately 16 miles Southeast of the
Town of Kremmling in Summit County, Colorado, and more
particularly in all or parts of Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 24 of
Township 2 South, Range 80 West, and in Sections 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
28, 29, and 34, Township 2 South, Range 79 West of the 6th P.M.
c. Adjudication Date: October 12, 1955
d. Appropriation Date: August 1, 1935
e. Case No.: 2782, 5016, and 5017
This CLDC contract for 0.60 AF augmentation water is in addition to the 0.5 AF of CLDC water
currently augmenting the Sherwood Well No. 1.
Water Court, Division 5
Case No. 00CW292
Applicants: John and Susanne Clark
Ruling of the Referee and Judgment and Decree
Page 6 of 12
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
f. Court: United States District Court, District of Colorado
g•
Decreed Amount: 154,645 AF
h. Decreed Uses: In accordance with paragraph 5(a), (b), and (c) of the
section entitled "Manner of Operation of Project Facilities and
Auxiliary Facilities" in Senate Document 80.
(2) Information from the previous decree for Ruedi Reservoir:
a. Source: Frying Pan, tributary of Colorado River
b. Legal Description: An on -channel reservoir located in Sections 7, 8,
9, 11, and 14 through 18, Township 8 South, Range 84 West of the
6th P.M. The reservoir is located in portions of Eagle and Pitkin
Counties.
c. Adjudication Date: June 20, 1958
d. Appropriation Date: July 29, 1957
e. Case No.: C.A. 4613
f. Court: Garfield County District Court
g. Decreed Amount: 102,369 acre-feet (Originally decreed for 140,697.3
AF; reduced to 102, 369 AF in Case No. W-789-76).
h. Decreed Uses: Generation of electric energy, domestic, municipal,
industrial, irrigation and stock watering.
i. By decree of the Water Court in Case No. 81CW34, Ruedi Reservoir
was decreed a refill right in the amount of 101,280 AF, conditional.
In Water Court Case No. 95CW95, 44,509 AF was made absolute.
B. Carbondale Land Development Company Augmentation Rights:
The Applicants shall obtain a perpetual lease for 0.6 AF of historic consumptive use decreed
in Case No. 79CW097, Water Division 5. The 0.6 AF of adjudicated consumptive use is derived
from water rights decreed to Park Ditch and Reservoir Company.
Water Court, Division 5
Case No. 00CW292
Applicants: John and Susanne Clark
Ruling of the Referee and Judgment and Decree
Page 7 of 12
(1) Infoiniation from previous decrees for Park Ditch and Reservoir Company
rights:
a. The Park Ditch and Reservoir Company diverts water directly from
Cattle Creek, tributary to the Roaring Fork, tributary to the Colorado
River, under the following priorities:
Ditch
Decreed
Amount (cfs)
PARK DITCH WATER RIGHTS
Priority No.
Decreed Adjudication Appropriation C.A.
Location: Date Date
§7, T7S,
R87W
Park Ditch 9.0 221A NW/SW/SE 06/26/1913 09/12/1904
1627
Park Ditch 4.1 232 NW/SW/SE 06/09/1916 07/01/1912
1821
Park Ditch
1.8 221A NW/SW/SE 06/26/1913 09/12/1904
1627
Park Ditch 2.0 232 NW/SW/SE 09/05/1918 07/01/1912
1973
Landis Canal 130.0 718 NW/SW/SE 06/20/1958 07/29/1957
(alternate pt. 4613
of Park Ditch
see 80CW113)
1
b. Direct flow diversions under the Park Ditch and Reservoir Company
priorities described above are supplemented by releases from
Consolidated Reservoir. This reservoir operates under the following
decreed priorities:
Structure
Decreed
Amount
Priority No.
Decreed
Location
§19,T6S,
R87W
Adjudication
Date
Appropriation
Date
C.A.
Consolidated
Reservoir
Consolidated
Reservoir
Consolidated
Reservoir
595.0 AF
285.6 AF
401.0 AF
8B
678
754
NE/NE
NE/NE
NE/NE
02/15/1921
06/20/1958
11/05/1971
09/08/1898
09/01/1948
09/01/1948
2144
4613
5884
Water Court, Division 5
Case No. 00CW292
Applicants: John and Susanne Clark
Ruling of the Referee and Judgment and Decree
Page 8 of 12
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
(2) Decreed Uses: Water storage, irrigation, domestic.
II. RULING OF THE REFEREE
The foregoing Findings of Fact are fully incorporated herein.
1. Timely and adequate notice of the Application was properly given as required by law, and
the Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this proceeding and over all persons and
water rights affected thereby, whether they have appeared or not. See C.R.S. §37-92-302.
2. The Application is complete, covering all applicable matters required pursuant to the Water
Rights Determination and Administration Act of 1969, C.R.S. §§ 37-92-302-602 and the
Applicants have fulfilled all legal requirements for issuance of the requested decree for water
rights and plan for augmentation, including the requirements of C.R.S. §§ 37-92-103(9), 37-
92-302(1) and (2), and 37-92-305(8).
3. The Applicants have established that water can and will be diverted under the subject
conditional water rights and will be beneficially used, and that this water supply project can
and will be completed with diligence and within a reasonable time.
4. The water rights described and decreed herein will not result in any injury to the owner of
or persons entitled to use water under a vested water right or a decreed conditional water
right, if operated in accordance with this Judgment and Decree.
5. The Court has given due consideration to the Report of the Division Engineer/Summary of
Consultation filed herein.
6. The Referee hereby grants:
A. The application for groundwater rights described herein.
B. The plan for augmentation described herein.
7. Well permits issued pursuant to C.R.S. § 37-90-137(2) and this plan for augmentation must
be obtained prior to the construction and/or operation of the subject wells pursuant to this
plan.
8. The Applicants shall install measuring devices, provide accounting, and supply calculations
regarding the timing of depletions as required by the Division Engineer for the operation of
this plan. The Applicants shall designate a representative responsible for filing an annual
report with the Division Engineer by November 15th of each year summarizing diversions
and replacements made under this plan.
Water Court, Division 5
Case No. 00CW292
Applicants: John and Susanne Clark
Ruling of the Referee and Judgment and Decree
Page 9 of 12
9. Prior to the augmentation plan decreed herein being effective and prior to the issuance of any
well permits, the Applicants shall provide to the Division 5 Engineer copies of approved
contracts between the Applicants and the Basalt Water Conservancy District and the
Carbondale Land Development Company for an adequate amount of replacement water to
replace out -of -priority depletions.
10. The Applicants shall establish a homeowners association which shall be responsible for
ensuring that the terms and conditions of this decree are met.
11. In consideration of the specific findings and conclusions made herein, and in conformance
with C.R.S. § 37-92-304(6) (1990), as amended, the plan for augmentation decreed herein
shall be subject to reconsideration by the Water Judge on the question of injury to the vested
water rights of others for a period of five (5) years following the build out of 662/3% of the
proposed development, or the issuance of certificates of occupancy for two of the three main
residences included in the proposed development. If no petition for reconsideration is filed
within said five years, retention of jurisdiction for this purpose shall automatically expire.
Any party who desires the Court to reconsider the question of injury must file a verified
petition with the Court, setting forth the facts that cause such injury and explaining the
claimed injury. The party filing the petition shall have the burden of proof to establish the
facts and the injury alleged in the petition.
12. In conformance with C.R.S. §37-92-305(8), the State Engineer shall curtail all out -of -priority
diversions, the depletions from which are not so replaced as to prevent injury to vested water
rights.
13. Should the Applicants desire to maintain the conditional water rights awarded herein, an
Application for Finding of Reasonable Diligence shall be filed in the month and year set
forth below, unless a determination has been made prior to that date that such conditional
rights have been made absolute by reason of the completion of the appropriation or
otherwise.
14. Pursuant to Rule 9 of the Uniform Local Rules for All State Water Court Divisions, upon the
sale or other transfer of the conditional rights decreed herein, the transferee shall file with
the Division 5 Water Court a notice of transfer which shall state:
A. The title and case number of this Case No. 00CW234;
B. The description of the conditional water right transferred;
C. The name of the transferor;
Water Court, Division 5
Case No. 00CW292
Applicants: John and Susanne Clark
Ruling of the Referee and Judgment and Decree
Page 10 of 12
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
D. The name and mailing address of the transferee; and
E. A copy of the recorded deed.
15. The owner of the conditional water right shall also notify the Clerk of the Division 5 Water
Court of any change in mailing address. The Clerk shall place any notice of transfer or
change of address in the case file of this Case No. 00CW292 and in the case file (if any) in
which the Court first made a finding of reasonable diligence.
16. It is accordingly ordered that this Findings of Fact and Ruling of Referee, Judgment and
Decree shall be filed with the Water Clerk and shall become effective upon such filing,
subject to judicial review pursuant to C.R.S. § 37-92-304, as amended.
17. It is further ordered that a copy of the Findings of Fact and Ruling of Referee, Judgment and
Decree shall be filed with the State Engineer and the Division Engineer for Water Division
No. 5.
Done at the City of Glenwood Springs, Colorado, this 7,tit, day of
2001.
Copy of the foregoing mailed to all
Counsel of record -'iii
Referee, --Div. Engineer—and
State ineerDate 12 - 10- (-)1
Woo Q
Water Court, Division 5
Case No. 00CW292
Applicants: John and Susanne Clark
Ruling of the Referee and Judgment and Decree
Page 11 of 12
BY THE RE1±REE:
on. 1 aniel Petre, ater Referee
Water Court for Water Division No. 5
State of Colorado
III..TUDGMENT ANI DECREE
No Protest was filed in this matter. The foregoing findings of Fact and Ruling of the Referee
is confirmed and approved, and is made the Judgment and Decree of this Court; subject, however,
to reconsideration on the issue of injury to vested water rights for a period of five (5) ()years following
the issuance of certificates of occupancy for two of the three main residences included in the
proposed development, which the Court finds reasonable given the adequacy of the augmentation
plan decreed by the Court herein.
The month and year for filing an Application for Finding of Reasonable Diligence shall be
-2 Done at the City of Glenwood Springs, Colorado, this r
2001! day of r
Copy of the foregolnled to all
Counsel of record- Water
Refenee,---Div. En1ee, --and
State EnC4neer=Date
awa ait h
Noone
Water Court, Division 5
Case No. 00CW292
Applicants: John and Susanne Clark
Ruling of the Referee and Judgment and Decree
Page 12 of 12
BY THE COURT:
Thomas W. Ossola, Water Ju
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
EXHIBIT A
0
ON 0 o4
U
E
O • F
E
O
3333-a�����33
= w W W U U U U U U g m
rr_o_srnonTr rr
M C' V r1 r1 N—
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0(6=6,00000000
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 N N N 0 0 00
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
000000000000
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
000000000000
OM 0000000000
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
000000000000
0
0
0
O
0
0
O
0
0
CLARK SUBDIVISION
NOVEMBER 27, 2000
CO
N-.
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)*
Domestic Commercial Lawn Crop
In -House Or Other Irrigation Irrigation Livestock TOTAL
I-- a\ r r V o 0 co N— 7 r
o00o0--00000
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7
Q
—
W
M
0
����������,p
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o
0 0 0 O O O O O 6 0 0 0
r
0
O
0
E
O O O O O O O O O O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
000000000000
0
0
0
0
m
0 0 0 m \O -7 N 0 N on 0 0
Water User:
IAnalysis Data:
District Area:
ISource Series:
)emand:
co O 0 0 N l r C' 0 0 0
000000000000
0000600066d0
0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
oo0000000000
r-0rcrarrrNTr- r
soso'0so0so.0so.0 soso'o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O O 6 0 0 0 0 0
TOTALS
0.784
*(fit (171 Mint incl,„low corn ”
2
T0
T T
3= CJ E
iGC2.4.-,<cn0Z:-)
o
N
O
0
N
0
O
o -
0 CUU
c�72,
• ca
• U
cc:
c o
E
V�
3
0 >
.^ U 1.,-4
OA 0
ti
b
U
SD ^C C1.
3 ,
C4 CDU ❑
MI
O GQ `n
ct •
= a)
U
5 • "
cd �.
U g
„03 E
o
,9
to a)
c;1 cn
o
o
•cZ:
L
U U �
-713
U
N
•
CA a 3
0
•
C
0
LLCA.) .r
G, +• �
MONTH
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
TOTAL
BASALT WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT
AUGMENTATION PLAN - CASE NO. 87CW155
MONTHLY DEPLETION AND DELAYED RETURN FLOW FACTORS
0.058
0.057
0.057
0.057
0.057
0.062
0.108
0.134
0.132
0.108
0.100
0.070
1.000
B
0.089
0.086
0.082
0.080
0.077
0.076
0.076
0.080
0.085
0.089
0.09.0
0.090
1.000
WELL GROUP
C
0.072
0.063
0.059
0.057
0.056
0.061
0.085
,0.112
0.123
0.116
0.106
0.090
1.000
0.087
0.08.8...
0.085
0.084
0.083
0.082
0.081
0.080.
0.081
0.081
0.083
0.085
1.000
1111.1111
0.082
0.03
0.083
0.084
0.084
0.084
Q.4,
0.084
0.083
0.083
0.083
0.083
1.000
0.086
0.082
0.079
0.077
0.075
0.07,4
Q\Q•4
0.082
0.090
0.09.4
0.094
0.091
1.000
IKE
0.068
0.068
0.068
0.068
' 0.068
0.072
Q.Qa
0.109
0.116
0.106
0.092 I
0.076
.1.000..
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
BASALT WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT
WATER ALLOTMENT CONTRACT NO. 376
Pursuant to C.R.S. 1973, 37-45-131
John and Susanne Clark (hereinafter "Applicant") has applied to the Basalt Water
Conservancy District (hereinafter the "District"), a political subdivision of the State of Colorado,
organized pursuant to and existing by virtue of Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, 37-45-101, et §&a.,
for an allotment Contract for beneficial use of water rights owned, leased, or hereafter acquired by
the District. By execution of this Contract, Applicant agrees to the following terms and conditions
and those certain terms and conditions set forth in the attached Order, which is fully incorporated
as a part of this Contract:
1. QUANTITY: In consideration of the covenants and conditions herein contained,
Applicant shall be entitled to receive and apply to beneficial use 0.033 cubic feet of water per second
from the District's direct flow rights and 0.1 acre feet per year of storage or other augmentation water
owned or controlled by the District. Applicant shall restrict actual diversions and use under this
Contract to these amounts.
2. SOURCE OF ALLOTTED WA 1"ER: Water rights allotted pursuant to this Contract
shall be from the District's water rights decreed to the Basalt Conduit, Landis Canal, Stockman's
Ditch Extension, Troy and Edith Ditch, Robinson Ditch, or other decrees or water rights hereafter
acquired by the District, including the District's contractual right to receive storage water from Ruedi
Reservoir and Green Mountain Reservoir. The District shall have the right to designate the water
right or Decree of the District from which the Applicant's allotted rights shall be obtained. The
Applicant's use of any of the District's water rights shall be subject to any and all terms and
conditions imposed by the Water Court on the use of the District's said rights. Exchange or
augmentation releases made from the District's storage rights in Ruedi or Green Mountain Reservoirs
or other works and facilities available to the District shall be delivered to the Applicant at the outlet
works of said storage facility and release of water at such outlet works shall constitute full
performance of the District's delivery obligation. Delivery of water from the District's storage rights
in Ruedi or Green Mountain Reservoir shall be subject to the District's lease contract with the United
States Bureau of Reclamation and any rules and regulations promulgated pursuant thereto. Releases
from other facilities available to the District shall be subject to the contracts, laws, rules, and
regulations governing releases therefrom. Furthermore, the District hereby expressly reserves the
right to store water and to make exchange releases from structures that may be built or controlled
by the District in the future, so long as the water service to the Applicant pursuant to this agreement
is not impaired by said action.
3. PURPOSE AND LOCATION OF USE: Applicant will use the water rights allotted
pursuant to this Contract for beneficial purposes by diversion at Applicant's point of diversion under
the District's direct flow water rights and/or by use of augmentation or exchange water owned or
controlled by the District. Applicant will use the water allotted by the District within or through
facilities or upon lands owned, operated, or served by Applicant, which lands are described as 52
8.'.�.p Jnel3Lthc OWCDICI+.k,llm Con4st
1
acres located in Section 13, Township 7 South, Range 88 West, 6th P.M.; provided that the location
and purpose of Applicant's use of said water shall be legally recognized
cable governmental authority having jurisdiction over theproperty and permitted by the appli-
cable
Applicant's contemplated
usage for the water allotted hereunder is for the following use or uses:
X Domestic/Municipal Industrial Commercial Agricultural
Other
It is acknowledged that the subject Contract is for water service to lands located in Area B
of the District, and that such lands may not be susceptible to service.solely by the District's water
rights allotted hereunder, or the District's said water rights may not satisfy Applicant's needs and
purposes. To the extent that service cannot be achieved by use of the District's allotted water rights,
or in the event said service is inadequate, Applicant may utilize such other water rights, by way of
supplementing the District's water rights, or otherwise, as is necessary to assure water service
sufficiently reliable for Applicant's intended purpose or purposes.
All lands, facilities and areas served by water rights allotted hereunder shall be situated
within the boundaries of the District.
Any quantity of the Applicant's allocation not delivered to or used by Applicant by the end
of each water year, shall revert to the water supplies of the District. Such reversion shall not entitle
Applicant to any refund of payment made for such water.
Water service provided by the District shall be limited to the amount of water available in
priority at the original point of diversion of the District's applicable water right and neither the
District, nor those entitled to utilize the District's decrees, may call on any greater amount at new or
alternate points of diversion. The District shall request the Colorado State Engineer to estimate any
conveyance losses between the original point and any alternate point and such estimate shall be
deducted from this amount in each case. The District, or anyone using the District's decrees, may
call on any additional sources of supply that may be available at an alternate point of diversion, but
not at the original point of diversion, only as against water rights which are junior to the date of
application for the alternate point of diversion.
Within two years of the date of this Contract, Applicant shall institute legal proceedings for
the approval of an augmentation plan and/or any change to an alternate point of diversion of the
District's water rights to allow the Applicant to utilize the water allotted hereunder, and the Applicant
shall give the District written notice of such proceedings. The District shall have the right to approve
the Applicant's application for change of water right, and/or augmentation plan or other water supply
plan involving the District's rights. and the Applicant shall provide the District copies of such
application and of all pleadings and other papers filed with the Water Court in the adjudication
thereof.
The District reserves the exclusive right to review and approve any conditions which may
be attached to judicial approval of Applicant's use of the District's water rights allotted hereunder.
.�.Jac�LS�AAc SWCDACIukl*ij tCo.-act 176
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Applicant agrees to defray any out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the District in connection with
the allotment of water rights hereunder, including, but not limited to, reimbursement of legal and
engineering costs incurred in connection with any water rights adjudication necessary to allow
Applicant's use of such allotted water rights. Applicant shall be solely responsible for providing the
structures, works and facilities, if any, necessary to utilize the District's water rights allotted
hereunder for Applicant's beneficial use.
4. PAYMENT: Applicant shall pay annually for the water service described herein at
a price to be fixed annually by the Board of Directors of the District for such service. Payment of
the annual fee shall be made, in full, within fifteen (15) days after the date of a notice from the
District that the payment is due. Said notice will advise the Applicant, among other things, of the
water delivery year to which the payment shall apply and the price which is applicable to that year.
If a payment is not made by the due date, a late fee of $50 (or such other amount as the Board may
set from time to time) will be assessed and final written notice of the delinquent account and late fee
assessment will be sent by the District to the Applicant at Applicant's address set forth below. If
payment is not made within thirty (30) days after said final written notice, the District may, at its
option, elect to terminate all of the Applicant's right, title, or interest under this Contract, in which
event the water right allotted hereunder may be transferred, leased or otherwise disposed of by the
District at the discretion of its Board of Directors.
In the event water deliveries hereunder are made by or pursuant to agreement with some
other person, corporation, quasi -municipal entity, or governmental entity, and in the event the
Applicant fails to make payments as required hereunder, the District may, at its sole option and
request, authorize said person or entity to curtail the Applicant's water service pursuant to this
Contract, and in such event neither the District nor such persons or entity shall be liable for such
curtailment.
5. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS: The Applicant agrees that so long as this Contract
is valid and in force, Applicant will budget and appropriate from such sources of revenues as may
be legally available to the Applicant the funds necessary to make the annual payments in advance
of water delivery pursuant to this Contract. The Applicant will hold harmless the District and any
person or entity involved in the delivery of water pursuant to this Contract, for discontinuance in
service due to the failure of Applicant to maintain the payments herein required on a current basis.
6. BENEFIT OF CONTRACT: The water right allotted hereunder shall be beneficially
used for the purposes and in the manner specified herein and this Contract is for the exclusive benefit
of the Applicant and shall not inure to the benefit of any successor, assign, or lessee of said
Applicant without the prior written approval of the Board of Directors of the District.
Upon the sale of the real property to which this Contract pertains, Applicant has a duty to
make the buyer aware of this Contract and the need to assign the Contract to the buyer. However,
prior written approval of the Board of Directors of the District is required before the assignment is
effective. Payment of an assignment fee in an amount determined by the Board shall be required as
a prerequisite to approval of the assignment.
C. .p.ennt lAec B\vCD\cL0Alloi conua.J 376
3
In the event the water right allotted hereunder is to be used for the benefit of land which is
now or will hereafter be subdivided or otherwise held or owned in separate ownership interest, the
Applicant may assign the Applicant's rights hereunder only to a homeowners association, water
district, water and sanitation district or other special district properly organized and existing under
and by virtue of the laws of the State of Colorado and then only if such association or special district
establishes to the satisfaction of the Basalt Water Conservancy District that it has the ability and
authority to assure its performance of the Applicant's obligations under this Contract. In no event
shall the owner of a portion, but less than all, of the Applicant's property to be served under this
Contract have any rights hereunder, except as such rights may exist through a homeowners
association or special district as above provided.
Any assignment of the Applicant's rights under this Contract shall be subject to and must
comply with such requirements as the District has adopted or may hereafter adopt regarding
assignment of Contract rights and the assumption of Contract obligations by assignees
successors, provided that such requirements shall uniformly apply to all allottees receiving District
service. The restrictions on assignment as herein contained shall not preclude the District from
holding the Applicant, or any successor to the Applicant, responsible for the performance of all or
any part of the Applicant's covenants and agreements herein contained.
7. OTHER RULES: Applicant's rights under this Contract shall be subject to the Water
Service Plan as adopted by the District and amended from time to time; provided that such Water
Service Plan shall apply uniformly throughout the District among water users receiving the same
service from the District. Applicant shall also be bound by all applicable law, including, for
example, the provisions ofthe Water Conservancy Act ofthe State of Colorado, the Rules and Regu-
lations of the Board of Directors of the District, the plumbing advisory, water conservation, and
staged curtailment regulations, if any, applicable within the County in which the water allotted
hereunder is to be used, together with all amendments of and supplements to any of the foregoing.
8. CURTAILMENT OF USE: The water service provided hereunder is expressly
subject to the provisions of that certain Stipulation in Case No. 81 CW253 on file in the District
Court in Water Division 5 of the State of Colorado, which Stipulation provides, in part, for the
possible curtailment of out -of -house municipal and domestic water demands upon the occurrence
of certain events and upon the District giving notice of such curtailment, all as more fully set forth
in said Stipulation.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
9. OPERATION AND MAIN I ENANCE AGREE
plicant shall enter int
an "Operation and Maintenance Agreement" with the District if and when pthe Board of Directors
finds and determines that such an agreement is required by reason of additional or special services
requested by the Applicant and provided by the District or by reason of the delivery or use of water
by the Applicant for more than one of the classes of service which are defined in the Rules and
Regulations of the Board of Directors of said District. Said agreement may contain, but not be
limited to, provision for water delivery at times or by means not provided within the terms of
standard allotment contracts ofthe District and additional annual monetary consideration for exten-
C OWCD1CIark\Albi Contra, 176
1
1
1
1
1
sion of District services and for additional administration, operation and maintenance costs, or for
other costs to the District which may arise through services made available to the Applicant.
10. CHANGE OF USE: The District reserves the exclusive right to review and approve
or disapprove any proposed change in use of the water right allotted hereunder. Any use other than
that set forth herein or any lease or sale of the water or water rights allotted hereunder without the
prior written approval of the District shall be deemed to be a material breach of this Contract.
11. PRIOR RESOLUTION: The water service provided hereunder is expressly subject
to that certain Resolution passed by the Board of Directors of the District on September 25, 1979,
and all amendments thereto, as the same exists upon the date of this application and allotment
Contract.
12. NO FEE TITLE: It is understood and agreed that nothing herein shall give the
Applicant any equitable or legal fee title interest or ownership in or to any of the water or water
rights of the District, but that Applicant is entitled to the right to use the water right allotted
hereunder, subject to the limitations, obligations and conditions of this Contract.
13. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT. Applicant
shall comply with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and consult with the Army Corps of
Engineers to complete any Section 404 compliance that may be required as a result of the
construction of any facilities necessary to use contract water.
14. CONSERVATION PRACTICES: Applicant shall implement and use commonly
accepted conservation practices with respect to the water and water rights allotted hereunder and
shall be bound by any conservation plan hereafter adopted by the District, as the same may be
amended from time to time.
15. WELL PERMIT: If Applicant intends to divert through a well, then Applicant must
provide to District a copy of Applicant's valid well permit before the District is obligated to deliver
any water hereunder, and it is the Applicant's continuous duty to maintain a valid well permit.
Applicant shall also comply with all restrictions and limitations set forth in the well permit obtained
from the Colorado Division of Water Resources. Applicant must comply with the well -spacing
requirements set forth in C.R.S. §37-90-137, as amended, if applicable. Compliance with said
statutory well -spacing criteria shall be an express condition of the extension of service hereunder,
and the District shall in no way be liable for an Applicant's failure to comply.
16. MEASURING DEVICE OR ME I'ER: Applicant agrees to provide, at its own
expense, a totalizing flow meter with remote readout to continuously and accurately measure at all
times all water diverted pursuant to the terms of Applicant's water right and the terms of this
Contract. Applicant agrees to provide accurate readings from such device or meter to District upon
District's request. Applicant acknowledges that failure to comply with this paragraph could result
in legal action to terminate Applicant's diversion of water by the State of Colorado Division of Water
Resources. By signing this Contract, Applicant hereby specifically allows District, through its
cm.r.dams\Abe BWCD,C!,rk,.1,1 cant,,.. nc
authorized agent, to enter upon Applicant's property during ordinary business hours for the
of determining Applicant's actual use of water. purposes
17. CONTRACT 1"LRMINATION:
A. Termination by District:
1. The District may terminate this Contract for any violation or breach
of the terms of this Contract by Applicant.
2. The District may terminate this Contract if, in its discretion, any
judicial or administrative proceedings initiated by Applicant threaten the District's
authority to contract for delivery or use of the District's water rights, or threaten the
District's permits, water rights, or other interests of the District.
B. Termination by AnAlicant:
1. Applicant may terminate this Contract in its entirety for any reason
by notifying the District in writing of the termination on or before April 1.
Notice by said date will prevent the Applicant's liability for the next annual
contract charge.
18. RECORDING OF MEMORANDUM: In lieu of recording this Water Allotment
Contract, a Memorandum of Water Allotment Contract will be recorded with the Garfield County
Clerk and Recorder's Office. The costs of recording the Memorandum shall be paid by Applicant.
Applicant's Address:
John and Susanne Clark
3523 County Road 103
Carbondale, CO 81623
STATE OF- COLORADO )
) ss.
C,vli.rlacluUbc BIVCDICI.1rk\Allu1 ConVacl J96
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
COUNTY 0
Subscribed and sworn to before me this r9qthday of 71/1(J ) (r)
John and Susanne Clark.
I,S\Ah MVCDClark,Ila Cannata ]76
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:ut-yt.th,
7
Notary Public
,JC0
, 2000, by
APPENDIX F
GEOLOGIC EVALUATION AND
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL
INVESTIGATION
1
1
111
11
GEOLOGIC EVALUATION AND
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
PROPOSED CLARK SUBDIVISION
MISSOURI HEIGHTS
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Prepared For:
JOHN AND SUSANNE CLARK
c/o Robert M. Noone, Attorney at Law
1001 Grand Avenue
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Attention: Mr. Robert M. Noone
Job No. GS -3548
January 21, 2002
CTL/THOMPSON, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
234 CENTER DRIVE ■ GLENWOOD SPRINGS. COLORADO 81601 ■ (970) 945-2809
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ivJ]
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SCOPE 1
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 2
SITE DESCRIPTION 2
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 3
GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS 3
Geologic Hazards and Development Considerations 4
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 5
Clays 6
Gravels 6
SITE DEVELOPMENT 6
Overlot Grading and Access Drive Construction 7
Utility Construction 8
PRELIMINARY BUILDING CONSIDERATIONS 8
Preliminary Foundation Considerations 8
Interior Floors and Exterior Slabs -On -Grade 9
Below Grade Walls and Basement Construction 9
INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS (ISDS) FEASIBILITY 10
SURFACE DRAINAGE 10
LIMITATIONS 11
FIGURE 1 - VICINITY
FIGURE 2 - GEOLOGIC MAP
FIGURE 3 - APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
FIGURE 4 - SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
FIGURES 5 AND 6 - SWELL/CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
FIGURE 7 - BENCHED FILL DETAIL
TABLE I - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
JOHN AND SUSANNE CLARK
CLARK SUBDIVISION
MISSOURI HEIGHTS
CTL/T GS -3548
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SCOPE
This report presents the results of our Geologic Evaluation and Preliminary
Geotechnical Investigation for the Proposed Clark Subdivision in the Missouri
Heights area of Garfield County, Colorado. The site is planned for a single family
residential development. Our geologic evaluation was performed to identify geologic
conditions at the site and judge their possible influence on the planned development
and discuss preliminary mitigation concepts. Our geotechnical investigation
involved performing subsurface exploration and engineering analysis to provide an
overview of geotechnical considerations to assist in planning the development of the
subdivision and developing preliminary foundation recommendations. After building
footprints are finalized and building plans are known, additional design level
geotechnical studies will be needed to develop design level recommendations and
construction criteria for individual buildings. This report identifies issues believed
to be common throughout the site and to most of the Tots and provides preliminary
geologic and geotechnical discussion and recommendations regarding mitigation
of geologic hazards, overlot grading, infrastructure installation, building site
excavations and fills, foundation construction, lateral earth pressures and floor
slabs. Our report includes a description of the subsoil conditions found in our
exploratory borings and a discussion of site development as influenced by
geotechnical considerations. This investigation was performed in accordance with
our Proposal GS -01-242, dated November 26, 2001.
This report is based on a review of published geologic maps and literature,
an evaluation of aerial photographs, site observations, conditions disclosed by our
exploratory drilling, results of laboratory tests, engineering analysis of field and
laboratory data and our experience. The criteria presented in this report are intended
for planning purposes only and not for design of specific structures. A summary of
our conclusions is presented below.
JOHN AND SUSANNE CLARK
CLARK SUBDIVISION
MISSOURI HEIGHTS
CTUT GS -3548
1
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
1. We did not observe any geologic conditions or geologic hazards that
would preclude development of this site for the intended single family
residential use. The subsoil conditions are generally favorable for the
proposed residential development.
2. Our exploratory borings penetrated a nil to 2 feet thick layer of
organic, silty clay "topsoil". In our TH-1 and TH-2 the organic clays
were above stiff to very stiff, silty to sandy clays above dense to very
dense, silty to sandy gravels with cobbles and boulders and clayey
sand lenses. Our TH-3 penetrated organic clays above silty to sandy
gravels underlain by hard to very hard, sandstone bedrock. No free
ground water was encountered in our exploratory borings during our
field investigation.
3. In general, we judge the natural clays to vary from slightly to
moderately expansive. We judge the natural gravels and sands to
possess a low consolidation potential.
4. We anticipate spread footings placed on native soils will be the
recommended foundation type. To mitigate the chance of differential
foundation movement a minimum dead load or placement of a mat of
structural fill below footings may be recommended where moderately
expansive clays are found at footing elevations.
5. Preliminary data indicates concrete slabs -on -grade floors placed on
the gravels, sands or clay possessing a low expansion potential will
perform satisfactorily. Where moderately expansive clays occur at
floor subgrade elevations placement of a mat of structural fill below
slabs -on -grade or structural floors may be recommended.
6. Control of surface drainage is important to the performance of
foundations, interior and exterior slabs -on -grade and roadways and
access drives. Surface drainage should be designed to provide rapid
removal of surface runoff away from buildings and off of roads. Water
should not be allowed to pond adjacent to buildings. roadways or
access drives.
SITE DESCRIPTION
The proposed Clark Subdivision is an approximately 52.25 acre parcel in the
Missouri Heights area of Garfield County, Colorado. The property is located
JOHN AND SUSANNE CLARK
CLARK SUBDIVISION
MISSOURI HEIGHTS
CTLJT GS -3548
2
approximately 5 miles north of Catherine's Store. County Road 103 is along the
south and east property boundary. An existing ranch house with associated out
buildings is at the northwest part of the property. The site can be visualized as gently
rolling topography with several low ridges trending down to the southwest and west.
Steep slopes rise above the site to the north and drop abruptly along the west and
south part of the site. Vegetation consists of pinion and juniper forestation with
open meadows with irrigated pasture grasses and weeds. Several shallow irrigation
ditches approximately 2 feet wide and 1 to 2 feet deep trend along the low ridges and
across the irrigated pasture (meadow) areas. At the time of our field investigation
approximately 0.5 to 1 foot of snow covered much of the site. The snow cover was
discontinuous in the building envelopes and on south facing slopes where much of
the ground surface was exposed.
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
We understand the parcel is to be developed for single family residential
usage. Plans are to develop four Tots. Lot 1 will be the existing ranch house. Lots
2, 3 and 4 will be developed for single family residential use. Access drives will be
constructed from County Road 103 or existing drives to each building envelope.
We understand one single-family residence will be constructed on each of the
Tots. One or two-story, wood frame buildings with attached garages are anticipated_
We understand that basements may be considered. Percolation fields will be
constructed adjacent to the residences. Sewer service will be individual sewage
disposal systems (ISDS). Water service will be provided by wells drilled on the Tots.
GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS
We investigated geologic conditions by reviewing published literature, aerial
photographs and regional geologic mapping, performing a geologic and geologic
hazard reconnaissance of'the site and drilling three (3) exploratory borings.
JOHN AND SUSANNE CLARK
CLARK SUBDIVISION
MISSOURI HEIGHTS
CTLT GS -2,548
3
1J
This site, as well as all of the Missouri Heights area is located in the
Carbondale Collapse feature. The Carbondale Collapse feature is the result of
dissolution and removal of soluble minerals in the underlying Eagle Valley Evaporite
Formation of Pennsylvanian age. Overlying bedrock and surface materials have
down faulted into the void space created by dissolution and removal of the Eagle
Valley Evaporite resulting in fractured and rubblized bedrock and the undulating
surface topography present at this site. The Carbondale Collapse feature is
considered active in a geologic time frame. Maximum theoretical ground subsidence
associated with the Carbondale Collapse feature is on the order of 1 foot per 1,000
years. In the context of time frames relative to standard engineering practice (100
years) we consider the Carbondale Collapse feature to be comparatively stable.
Bedrock at this site consists of Quaternary to Tertiary aged basalt (map unit
QTb) and the Cretaceous aged Dakota Sandstone. Overlying the bedrock are
undifferentiated Quaternary aged eolian (wind blown) deposits, sheetwash and
colluvium (map unit Qu) and undifferentiated alluvium and colluvium (map unit Qac).
In general, surficial deposits in the open meadows appear to be predominately eolian
and sheetwash consisting of silty to sandy clays (loess) and clayey sands. In
forested areas the surficial deposits are predominately colluvium consisting of
basaltic gravels, cobbles and boulders with lesser amounts of the eolian and
sheetwash sands and days. A topographic bench along the south part of the site
is a man disturbed area (map unit DA) where an irrigation ditch has been excavated.
In addition, small amounts of fill are along irrigation ditches across the site.
Identified geologic units are shown on the Geologic Map, Figure 2.
Geologic Hazards and Development Considerations
We did not observe any geologic conditions or geologic hazards that would
prevent development of the site as planned. Geologic conditions exist that should
be considered during planning.
JOHN AND SUSANNE CLARK
CLARK SUBDIVISION
MISSOURI HEIGHTS
CTLT GS -3548
4
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Ground waterwas not encountered in our exploratory borings during our field
investigation. We believe that the development of a temporary ground water
condition associated with flood irrigation at the site and on adjacent property should
be anticipated.
We observed no evidence of recent or active slope failure at this site. Slopes
along the west and south parts of the site are steep and should be considered
potentially unstable. In our opinion, excavation into slopes steeper than 30 percent
should be addressed by a geotechnical engineer on an individual basis.
We performed a preliminary radiation survey at the subject site. Our survey
involved observing radiation readings at random areas free of snow cover across the
proposed building envelopes. Measurements were taken with a Lundlum
Instruments, Model 19 Micro -R -Meter. We observed radiation readings that averaged
13 to 17 micro Roentgens per hour. In our opinion, these readings are consistent
with normal background radiation in the area.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Subsurface conditions were investigated by drilling three (3) exploratory
borings at the approximate locations shown on Figure 3. Our borings were drilled
using a truck mounted drill rig and 4 -inch diameter, continuous flight auger.
Subsurface exploration operations were directed by our field representative who
logged the soils and obtained samples for laboratory testing. Graphic logs of the
soils found in our borings and results of field penetration resistance tests are
presented on Figure 4. Penetration resistance tests were performed in borings by
driving a modified California sampler or standard barrel sampler with a 140 pound
weight falling 30 inches. Local experience indicates penetration resistance tests
using a California sampler are similar to the results of a standard penetration test.
The modified California sampler results in a 2 -inch diameter by 4 inch long sample
suitable for many laboratory tests. Samples obtained from our borings were
JOHN AND SUSANNE CLARK
CLARK SUBDIVISION
MISSOURI HEIGHTS
CTUIT GS -3548
5
returned to our laboratory where they were visually classified and typical samples
selected for testing. Laboratory test results are presented on Figures 5 and 6 and
summarized on Table 1.
Our exploratory borings penetrated a nil to 2 feet thick layer of organic, silty
clay "topsoil". In our TH-1 and TH-2 the organic clays were above stiff to very stiff,
silty to sandy clays above dense to very dense, silty to sandy gravels with cobbles
and boulders and clayey sand lenses. Our TH-3 penetrated organic clays above silty
to sandy gravels underlain by hard to very hard, sandstone bedrock. No free ground
water was encountered in our exploratory borings during our field investigation.
Clays
Up to 24 feet thick layers of silty to sandy clays were found. The soils are the
result of a combination of eolian and sheetwash material. Clay samples subjected
to one dimensional swell/consolidation testing to judge volume change potential
exhibited a slight to a moderate expansive potential.
Gravels
The gravels were below the clays or topsoil at depths of 2 to 9 feet in our
exploratory borings. The gravels were predominantly silty to sandy with cobbles, -
boulders and clayey sand lenses. The gravels were dense to very dense and slightly
moist to moist. The gravels and clayey sand lenses are slightly compressible at
foundation Toads typical of single-family residential construction.
SITE DEVELOPMENT
The following sections present recommendations and discusses overiot
grading, access drive construction and utility installation.
JOHN AND SUSANNE CLARK
CLARK SUBDIVISION
MISSOURI HEIGHTS
CTL/T G5.3548
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Overlot Grading and Access Drive Construction
Grading plans were not prepared at this writing. Where earthwork is required
to level the ground surface it appears maximum cuts and fills will generally be on the
order of 10 feet or Tess. We believe excavations can be accomplished with large
earthmoving equipment such as D-8 dozers with ripper teeth and trackhoes.
Irrigation ditches are along and/or through the building envelopes at this site.
The existing ditches will need to be abandoned from below building footprints to
prevent wetting soils below the house foundations and floor slabs. We recommend
lining ditches that will be near new buildings.
Subgrade for interior access drives will be native clays and gravels. The clays
will provide comparatively poor subgrade support characteristics. The gravels will
provide good to excellent subgrade support for roads.
Areas to receive fill must be properly prepared. The area below the new fill
should be stripped to the natural soils free of existing fill, organics, debris or other
deleterious materials. The exposed soils should be prepared for fill placement by
scarifying the upper 6 inches, moisture treating and compacting. The resulting
surface should be proof rolled with a heavy (18 kip/axle) pneumatic tire vehicle such
as a loaded tandem. Soft areas should be reworked or otherwise stabilized prior to -
placing fill.
The on-site soils free of organics or rock larger than 6 inches in diameter or
other deleterious materials can be used as fill. Fill for overlot grading or access
drive construction should be placed in maximum 8 inch thick, loose lifts, moisture
conditioned to between 2 percent below to 2 percent above optimum moisture
content and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698)
maximum dry density. Fill placed on steeper cross slopes should be placed on flat
benches. The benches should be 8 to 12 feet wide to allow for heavy compaction
JOHN AND SUSANNE CLARK
CLARK SUBDIVISION
MISSOURI HEIGHTS
CTIJT GS -3548
equipment. Maximum bench height should be equal to or Tess than bench width (see
Figure 7). Placement and compaction of fill should be observed and tested during
construction.
Utility Construction
Utility trenches should be sloped or shored to meet local, State and Federal
safety regulations. Based on our subsurface exploration, we believe the clays are
Type B and the gravels are Type C based on OSHA standards. OSHA recommends
temporary construction slopes no steeper than 1 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) for Type
B and 1.5 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) for Type C soils above the water table.
Excavation slopes specified by OSHA are dependent upon types of soils and
groundwater conditions encountered. Seepage and groundwater conditions in
excavations will down grade the OSHA soil type. Excavation slopes recommended
above will slough to near 4 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter below the water
table. Contractors should identify the soils encountered in excavations and refer to
OSHA standards to determine appropriate slopes. Excavations deeper than 20 feet
need to be designed by a professional engineer.
PRELIMINARY BUILDING CONSIDERATIONS
Preliminary Foundation Considerations
Near surface soils are generally silty to sandy clays or silty to sandy gravels
with cobbles and boulders and clayey sand lenses. The clays were judged to vary
from slightly to moderately expansive. The gravels and sands are judged to be
slightly compressible when the moisture content increases and light to moderate
foundation Toads are applied. We anticipate spread footings can be placed directly
on the native soils where gravels, sands or clays possessing a low expansion
potential are exposed at footing elevations. Where moderately expansive clays
occur at footing elevations we will likely recommend to mitigate the chance of
JOHN AND SUSANNE CLARK
CLARK SUBDIVISION
MISSOURI HEIGHTS
CTUT GS -3548
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
differential foundation movement. Mitigation procedures would most likely be either
a) designing footings with a minimum dead Toad or b) placement of a 3 to 4 feet thick
mat of structural fill built with the native soils below footings. Design level soils and
foundation investigations are recommended on a lot by lot basis to determine the
appropriate foundation type for individual buildings and to develop design level
criteria.
Interior Floors and Exterior Slabs -On -Grade
We anticipate excavations at Lots 2 and 4 will expose silty to sandy clays and
at Lot 3 silty to sandy gravels at slab -on -grade subgrade elevations. If a basement
is constructed on Lot 2 the silty to sandy gravels may be exposed at slab -on -grade
subgrade elevations. Slab -on -grade floors placed on native gravels, sand or clays
possessing a low expansion potential should provide good performance if subsoils
do not get wetted. Where slabs will be supported by moderately expansive clays it
may be recommended to remove the upper 1 to 2 feet of soil from below slabs and
replace it with structural fill or build a structural floor with a crawl space below.
Structural fill below floor slabs can be with the native on site clays.
A gravel layer should not be placed below slabs -on -grade where the subgrade
consists of clays. A gravel layer below floor slabs increases the possibility of a
single water source wetting the entire area below slabs. To reduce the adverse -
effects of differential slab movement, floor slabs should be separated from all
bearing walls and columns with expansion joints. Control joints should be used in
floor slabs to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking.
Below Grade Walls and Basement Construction
Foundation walls will be subjected to lateral earth pressures. Foundation
walls at the back of some buildings may act a retaining walls. These walls are
restrained and cannot move, therefore, they should be designed for the "at rest"
JOHN AND SUSANNE CLARK
CLARK SUBDIVISION
MISSOURI HEIGHTS
CTLJT GS -3548
9
lateral earth pressure. We believe an equivalent fluid density in the range of 50 to
60 pcf will be recommended to design for the "at rest" case when backfilled will be
the native clays. The equivalent fluid density will be in the range of 45 to 55 pcf for
the "at rest" case where gravel soils are the backfill. We recommend backfill behind
the walls be compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698)
maximum dry density. Preliminary lateral earth pressure values do not include
allowances for sloping backfill, hydrostatic pressure or surcharge loads.
Water from surface run-off (precipitation, snow melt, irrigation) frequently
flows through backfill placed adjacent to foundation walls and collects on the
surface of the comparatively impermeable soils occurring at the bottom of
foundation excavations. This can cause damp or wet conditions in basement and
crawl space areas of buildings. To reduce the accumulation ofwaterwe recommend
that a foundation drain be placed adjacent to foundation wails. The foundation drain
should lead to a positive gravity outfall. In addition, adequate crawl space ventilation
should be provided.
INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS (ISDS) FEASIBILITY
Due to winter conditions percolation testing could not be performed. We
reviewed the USDA Soil Conservation Service (SCS) data which estimates the soils
at the site percolate at rates varying from 30 to 100 minutes per inch. We believe that -
Individual Sewage Disposal Systems (ISDS) will be appropriate at this site, however,
percolation rates outside the range of 5 to 60 minutes per inch will require special
"engineered" systems. We recommend performing percolation testing when actual
percolation field locations and elevations are known.
SURFACE DRAINAGE
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Surface drainage will need to control and channelize surface water down,
around and away from buildings and off of road surfaces. Existing irrigation ditches
JOHN AND SUSANNE CLARK
CLARK SUBDIVISION
MISSOURI HEIGHTS
CTLJT GS -3548
10
1
1
will need to be obliterated, rerouted and/or lined to prevent directing water towards
buildings and wetting soils below foundations and floor slabs.
The performance of foundations and concrete flatwork is influenced by
moisture conditions in the subsoils. Wetting of foundation soils can be reduced by
grading the ground surface to cause rapid run-off of water away from the buildings.
Wetting or drying of the open foundation excavations should be avoided. The
ground surface surrounding the buildings should be sloped to drain away from the
buildings in all directions. We recommend a slope of at least 12 inches in the first
10 feet. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all
backfill. We recommend against burying discharge lines since they increase the
likelihood of wetting soils near the foundation.
LIMITATIONS
The criteria in this report is preliminary and not for construction of buildings.
The criteria is intended for use in developing preliminary designs and construction
of access drives and installation of utilities. Design level criteria can only be
developed and published after review of grading and building plans for individual
lots. Individual site specific investigations will be needed. Our exploratory borings
were spaced to obtain a reasonably accurate picture of the subsurface. Variations
in these subsurface conditions not shown by our exploratory borings will occur.
Our report was based on conditions disclosed by our exploratory borings,
results of laboratory testing, engineering analysis and our experience. Criteria
presented reflects anticipated construction as we understand it.
This investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of
care and skill ordinarily exercised by engineering geologists and geotechnical
engineers currently practicing under similar conditions in the locality of this project.
JOHN AND SUSANNE CLARK
CLARK SUBDIVISION
MISSOURI HEIGHTS
CTLJT GS -3548
11
No other warranty, express or implied, is made. If we can I/
of further service or if
you have questions regarding this report, please call.
CTL/THOMPSON, INC.
Wilson L. "Liv" Bowden, C.P; �. ;
Engineering G, oiogist �- (^�
Reviewed by.
O , q,1
Johrv' :i� in �:R '� • `„ ;
Bram •'�Mana ro: O =
� bis �j �' a
•
•
L-. ,�
OA -
•. \A9.
Aly
(5 copies sent)el
JOHN AND SUSANNE CLARK
CLARK SUBDIVISION
MISSOURI HEIGHTS
CTL/T GS -3548
12.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
fJob No. GS -3548
erodLa mom 1 1-11'1.1I UZUW WddtlowCC f mmducnons (www t0QO-Cpm)
VICINITY MAP
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
'1
0
-1
Q"
®0
C c
0-
0
pe5D /Col�ei 04
0
C
0
0
Q
O O C 0 0
O c0 3 0 c CL -r 4
m • a 0 -
O m (D C*3 • a
--om 3a co
W 0 -4- c c
0 3 0 Cr
a_ a)
-.I 3 d . 1, tD a
t --e, a
(A tp a) 0 Ca
lD C 3 -- 0
O �. -.-C
Co a p <. n
? m C
_3 1
O 0 a 3 1.
a� ca
0
,00Z=.1. :e1QoS
MN = NMI N MN = N NM = I NM = N E M IMINI IIIIE N NM
Mil
NEIMO Ell 1111 1 MN-- N NE NM i -- NM I
11111
21,g2—S0 •oN qor
r
O
U)
O
11
)dOIVo1dX3
O
70
O
U)
Depth In Feet
cN
01
w
O
01
01
O
N
0 oo
o \ 0
N \_
N N
N
01
0
01
0
N
N
0
0i
O
01
O
� W N
mmuo a3Xaox 6000X030am y0a— ro5. -a. 5-
3'
• Qo a - o -
a 0• X 0.13 N 0 D a O
j 0
ra 0 0 t0 0 - • 0 _. 0
�_o uo-'' o -cc �3x�o-
Fo-3 0 3 ?x Di.a- am 3 3 3.
• `� a o co n. c 3. 0
O 12 3 �. �-QI 0 C .4.
• d4
• 4 0 12 0 aO
3Q 13 aa C- oG° a,oa
a m -o 0 1 0 ,, �.
0co
a.
° � o ao =c , . o m
CaQ 0- m -, (a a 7 II 0`;a
mac003,o�
0 Cr 0 o o 'D c0 3 0
u 0 � 0 0 , - 0
1 0
a 0 0 Cr 0 ° m c 3
O 3 3 a o 10 0
306000 0m®
u
Sr)
Z
0
-1•
rtrii
3$ j UI 4tdea
55 u
F a 0ryoa
n 3 3- <
0 �'
uo
u to m * o
u
c o V� 3
m
w Oma
w
-4. 3 •c�7
c .n o 0 0
o 0 a u
ti
o c j
0 aao
a ° o
3 0 3 v
c o -1A
(0 n Ci
a =0
3-E
j
0 (0
3
0o0
(Q o
o0w1:? ON 300
o
3 3 0 < .> 0 a0
n
0 0
0
Nry o-0
u i'
5' •
3-121 �.
O�
. 3 -13 a
0- c
o n. 3
aso
< 0
<03
0 0\_
N -�. N
in o
>>a
a-`°
lock) a
0 -a
0
-a-
0
0 0
0rr. cj" • u
m
` n
m 0 �
�-4.
0
0
o'tea L. 0
7
s o 3�
0 u
0. 0
s
O 0
• o
0 �
Off+
'4 -slow `ploy tier 04
a
-4'
- «
0
0
9-
0
ut
0
0
0
13
u
0
a
3-
0
0
3
a
0
9 -
Cr
0
3
COMPRESSION % EXPANSION
a
-4
5
-s
-7
a
EXPANSION UNDER- CONSTANT
PRESSURE DUE TO WETTING
o.1 1.0 10
APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF
Semple of CLAY, SANDY (CL) NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT=
From TI -I-1 AT 4 FEET NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 10.6 %
loo
103 PCF
JCB NO. GS -3548
Swell Consolidation
Test Results
FIG. 5
COMPRESSION % EXPANSION
3
2
0
2
-3
-4
5
-b
-7
-8
7
EXPANS ON UNDER CONSTANT
PRESSURE DTJETGWETTING
0.1
1.0
10
APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF
Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL) NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT=
From TH-2 AT 9 FEET
JOB NO. GS -3548
100
114 PCF
NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 19.5
Swell Consolidation
Test Results
FIG. 6
NI
COMPACTED FILL
5
2 �- o
5' MAXIMUM
1
3
1
MAXIMUM
SLOPE
NATURAL
GROUND
SURFACE
10' MINIMUM
NOTES: 1.) NATURAL SLOPES OF 20% OR STEEPER ARE TO
BE BENCHED PRIOR TO FILL PLACEMENT.
2.) SLOPE BENCHES TO OUTSLOPE AT 2i PERCENT.
Benched
Fill
Detail
Fig. 7
JOB NO. GS -3548
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
m
o►
a
Swell due to wetting at an applied load of 1,000 psf.
Q
Z
1
•
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Ir
SOIL CLASSIFICATION
Clay, sandy ICLI
'Sand, clayey (SC1
Clay, sandy (CLQ
'Clay, sandy ICL1
[Clay, sandy (CU
CD
zw
o
W o
a Q
M
ti
SOLUBLE
SULFATES
(%)
UNCONFINED
COMPRESSIVE
STRENGTH
(PSF)
3ERG LIMITS
PLASTICITY
INDEX
(%)
e
N
I 21
W
Q
0
5 2
J J
1n
M
J
0
j - 1,i
0
O
NATURAL
DRY
DENSITY
(PCF)
103
../'
r
Of
co
NATURAL
MOISTURE
(%)
10.6
O
t •
O
01
c-
N
'
CV
Cr)
N
e-
_
,
4. lw
w LL..
o .--
-
;I:
N
T
a
r
N
BORING
TH-1
7
N
N
M
m
o►
a
Swell due to wetting at an applied load of 1,000 psf.
Q
Z
1
•
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
APPENDIX G
INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE GUIDE
1
� OPERATION and MAINTENANCE GUIDE
1
' PREPARED BY:
Gamba & Associates, Inc.
1
1 INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
The following tips and suggestions are intended to increase the useful life of your engineered
sewage disposal system and to prevent disposal system failure due to neglect and abuse.
MINIMIZE THE LIQUIDS
1 Wastewater that enters the system can be minimized by practicing water conservation practices
within your home. The less wastewater you produce, the less wastewater there will be to treat
and dispose.
1 1. Repair leaky fixtures. Check the toilet by dropping food coloring dye in the tank
and see if it shows up in the bowl prior to flushing.
1 2. Wash clothes only when you have a full load.
3. Take short showers instead of baths. Don't turn on the shower all the way and
turn it off while lathering.
4. Install and use water saving fixtures and devices in your bathrooms, laundry
1 rooms and kitchens.
5. Do not let the water run while washing, shaving, brushing teeth, rinsing
1 vegetables, dishes, etc. Use a stoppered basin where possible.
6. Provide adequate drainage around the engineered system area to divert surface
runoff from higher ground during storms or winter snowmelt.
1 MINIMIZE THE SOLIDS
Septic systems are "anaerobic" treatment systems. Digestion of solid materials is very slow and
1 requires air or "aerobic" conditions to "disappear". The less material you put into the system,
the less often it will require pumping. A good rule to follow is:
I
"Don't use your septic system for anything that can be disposed of in some other
way"
CLARK SUBDIVISION
February 18, 2002
Avoid using a garbage disposal. Throw out scraps and other garbage with the
trash.
2. Collect grease in a container rather than pouring it down the sink.
3. Minimize the disposal of paper products into the system. Non -degradable items
such as disposable diapers, sanitary napkins, tissues, cigarette butts and paper
towels are especially harmful to the system.
4. Only three things should go into the septic tank:
Human Wastes;
Toilet Paper; and
Water.
5. Ordinary household chemicals (bleaches, detergents & soaps) will not hurt the
bacteria in your system when not used in excessive amounts.
6. DO NOT DISPOSE OILS, PAINTS, THINNERS OR OTHER TOXIC LIQUIDS
INTO YOUR SYSTEM.
SEPTIC TANK ADDITIVES
Advertised chemical additives, bacteria, enzymes, etc. do not help solids breakdown in the
septic tank and should not be used to reduce the need for pumping the septic tank.
REGULAR INSPECTIONS
Septic Tank:
To inspect the septic tank, remove the manhole cover at the inlet end of the tank. Use a
shovel to push the scum layer away from the side of the tank and estimate it's thickness.
If the scum layer is 12" thick or more, arrange to have the septic tank pumped
immediately. Replace the cover and wash off the shovel and your hands.
For an average 3 or 4 bedroom residence, the pumping interval for the septic tank is
usually between 2 and 4 years. Annual inspection of the septic tank should become part
of your overall home maintenance routine.
Dosing Tank or Pump Station:
To inspect the dosing tank, follow the same instructions for the septic tank. However,
there should not be a scum layer or sediments inside the tank. Check to see if the water
level markings are consistent on the side of the tank. Variability indicates that the siphon
or effluent pump is not operating properly. If the water level is near the top of the
G:\98749-01\PRELIMINARY PLAN.doc 4
CLARK SUBDIVISION
February 18, 2002
markings, wait for the siphon or pump to operate and watch for problems. The siphon
has an overflow pipe in which the effluent will flow out of the tank by gravity. Should this
be occurring, have the tank pumped and check the siphon openings to see if they are
plugged.
Filter Mound or Trench:
Check the observation tubes regularly. Standing water near the same elevation as the
natural soil surface (or higher) may be an indication of trouble.
Look for seepage or excessive wetness near the base of the filter mound or trench area.
SUMMARY
A general inspection of the septic tank, dosing tank (or pump station), filter mound or trench
area should be made each year. These inspections are best made during the wet season of the
year. If these items are not routinely inspected, solids can carry over into the disposal areas
from the septic tank and clog the system resulting in system failure and health hazard risk. In
areas with potentially high ground water, the septic tank should be pumped during low water
months such as September, October, and November. Pumping during high water months may
cause the septic tank to float out of the ground
G:\98749-01\PRELIMINARY PLAN.doc
5
APPENDIX H
MINERAL RIGHTS OWNERS
Mineral Rights Owners
The property is encumbered by a perpetual non -participating royalty of 1/32 of all oil, gas and
other minerals which is or may be in, upon or that may be produced from the above described
property. This reservation is contained in Warranty Deed dated February 15, 1966 and recorded
in Book 375, Page 50. This royalty is in the name of:
Charles P. Renftle and lma Renftle
Address Unknown
APPENDIX 1
VEGETATION MAP
1 MI M N I MS E 11.111 N I= 11111 1 M I
Jadwnr-uolcud
SCALE: 1" = 200'
addalg gsnlga6es
m
c
UJ
z
0
f I
1
H3110 )121Vd
6970
ee Ann
Eustis and
eskso
6y4
a
by3'
@30
M, -D; and
Sai ipels
x
CLARK SUBDIVISION
VEGETATION MAP
SHEET: 1 OF 1
DATE: FEBRUARY 20, 2002
PROJECT: 98749-01
DRAWING: prsIIM-PUN-MAP020502.dw8
DIRECTORY G:\98749.01\
DRAWN BY: BK
CHKD BY:
NIB
GAMBA
ASIOCIATII
John and Susanne Clark
3523 County Rd. 103
Carbondale, CO 81623
GAMBA & ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS
970/945-2550 WWW,GAMBAENGINEERING.COM
113 NINTH ST., ITE, 114 P.O. 10% 14/1 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 111808
6900
SHEET NO.
1
O O O O um O O O O O O O O O O O O O O