HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- Permit4.
Garfield County
Building & Sanitation Department
108 8th Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003
NO. cis -33
Job Address 0388 4d rb 7 / ,(, V Js
Nature of Work Building Permit i %rnjoran C .
r Iir'I :Mr
,,at _i
Use of Building
Owners
Contractor
t. gala
Amount of Permit $ 411)t_90) ,
t qc s.$)—
Date
Clerk
31310`ailAkizAk,‘LQA SetiA.4 FAA/LAI,
Permit No:
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
108 8^ Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: 970-945-8212 / Fax: 970-384-3470 Inspection Line: 970-384-5003
R�33
Parcel/Schedule No: /2/S 5 374/600q
AGREEMENT
PERMISSION 15 HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT
THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE
REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 3028.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT
IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED
STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID.
THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER
REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEIN
CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION.
THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF
ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIEID COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS
AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OVWER. COMMENTS ARE
INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST.
irfora.008
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT 1 HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL):
1 V"J
Job Address•
0383 RtibcceA C,"Cct otZNwOcD Viem-6 Cc 8 160
/
1 Lot No: qBlock No: Subd. / EYemption:
'TOUR MILL RA -1G1-1
2
Owner:
'h' WTD So j -4
Address 8 1 1 PALM EQ 11 VE
frtyv 6-1,0s44000 90:',,i,ra
Ph:
970,309 0,/a
Wk Ph:
970 118 r3S
3
Contractor:
/t -s A&oJk-.
Address:
Ph:
Lic.
4
Arehitect/Engineer:
PARR`' (OLE
Address:
Ph:y70 sy 60277Lic.
No.
5
Sq. Ft. of Building:
3o00
Sq. Ft. f LI: _ / `Seight:
%� /3 ,45�
•�/1 i
IY i%
^�
No. of Floors:
/ 1- CAA •ria,S MLN sLI dt
6
Use of Building:
U.(A L✓!
7
Describe Work: ti
(On) frT luC; jpi OF tie vJ R£ gii3EAClimadets
-
8
Class of Work: SCC New ❑ Alteration o Remove
❑ Addition N Move
9
10
Garage: o Single
gc Double
Carport: o Single
o Double
❑ Driveway Permit,❑ On -Site Sewage Disposal K Site Plan
4 (Septic) m1,4
��j,�% jt �v"
11
Valuation of Work: $01501 000.00
,#`� y'�/��Ij�
L 'g
,,��//
A'r> 1 •�?! $�'l f• �,
���lll�j "�/ J
12
4$patt l CondltWes:
--yjJI�
To
` ,/ ittia (D
3- 31.O(o -t-
in V 24044.2-
- �d� p ( l(ia.1r)
NOTICE
A 4PARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE
ISSUED BY THE STATE OFCOLORADO.
THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION
AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR, IF
CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A
PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED.
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS
APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL
PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE
COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE
GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY
TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR
LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE
OF es NSTRUC ON.
0 'Cr. J 9.4 7OS
Plan Check Fee:
i's5 Z In .31)
Permit Fee:
2.25 -10o9.71 -
T I Fee: Dated Permit Issued:
/
1 o4.i 41744
OC Group: Const. Type:
—�1�
R5
Zoning:
Setbacks:
Manu. Home: ISDS No. &l Fee:w'a
Teirnefea
,kiri 7 0.OS 4121 cif 041-C6�"`&
LDGD P •G. DEPT.
' APPRO . 'ATE A'PROVAL/DATE
AGREEMENT
PERMISSION 15 HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT
THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE
REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 3028.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT
IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED
STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID.
THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER
REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEIN
CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION.
THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF
ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIEID COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS
AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OVWER. COMMENTS ARE
INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST.
irfora.008
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT 1 HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL):
1 V"J
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection:
1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector;
2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily
visible from access road;,,,
3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows
installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all
necessary plumbing;
4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water,
non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door;
5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or
decks over 30" high constructed to all 1997 UBC requirements;
6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building;
7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until
all the required items are completed and a final inspection made;
8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway
installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, where applicable.
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE
ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
(C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE
CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING
PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
1 understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy,Ase and the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # !`S3 �.
AatAkrP 722 05 -
Signature Date
Bpcont03/2004
k
VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION
Applicant s Subdivision T kt e..4C J/!7I le Ka,,,
Address Yit3 rrthiFF auk ack Lot/Block 9
Date o. / a me Contractor F n z -rt
Finished (Livable Area):
Main ? j' &S„
Upper
Lower
Other
Total Square Feet st(4 v 7)
Valuation
Basement:
Unfinished zSbe. 411
Conversion of Unfinished to Finished
Plan Check Fee for Conversion
Valuation
Garage:
Crawl Space:
Valuation (73 110 4 lg
Valuation
Decks/Patios:
Covered
Valuation
Open
Valuation
Z15,6Zep 4e
HS 34,
7o,) •c 24 4 $9(i
7�jYiL Jsog
Total Valuation
342044 d3
P
VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION
Applicant iQ /LA Subdivision /tll f&Ar pV7],ie yfcc 4
Address ' Q Fr Once Lot/Block 7
Date Co a Contractor
Finished (Livable Area):
Main z •
P
Upper
Lower
Other
Zig y 74S = 2r5m574242.
Total Square Feet , d '..)
Valuation
Basement:
Unfinished a SS 4' )) 11S 3:.‘
Conversion of Unfinished to Finished
Plan Check Fee for Conversion
Valuation
Garage:
Crawl Space:
Valuation 73 d;io 4 ip =
Valuation
Decks/Patios:
Covered
Valuation
Open
Valuation
i`frG S8
2o� 24) 4894
Total Valuation
VS 02,
1
'BC. f i?»
4o x•57
4 J'
Aiktritookair
431, 052
4%
gspg
i' fill 74)
Sip-) Friz
4Weil O
. 31aIhb
l
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
970-945-8212
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
For
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION
Including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
And
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the
issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan
and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in
the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or
contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other
plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed
after it has been provided to the Building Department.
Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your
project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider
using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for
construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the
plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design ProfessionaL
To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building,
plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to
and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the
completed checklist at time of application for a permit.
Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and
1
drawn to scale.
Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with
decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line
and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof,
including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation,
sheeting, house -rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered
foundations may be required.
A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be
designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind
speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth.
All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your
plans will be returned.
All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC.
1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and
distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a
licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing?
Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE
Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft.
of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision
final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and
professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope
of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope
as it is sho on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope.
Yes rY
2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and
utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if
the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special
setbacks do Iy.
Yes /I
3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I. S.D. S. (Individual Sewage
Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and
adjacent properties), streams or water courses?
Yes_
2
4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing
the property?
Yes
5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all
reinforcing l in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design?
Yes
6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl
spaces anthe clearances required between wood and earth?
Yes
Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist
spaces and soffits?
Yes ✓
8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a
minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor
loads and wind loads?
Yes
Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof
construct"?
Yes ✓
10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling
joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses?
Yes
11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of
all columns and beams?
Yes ✓
12. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point
of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to
existing (undisturbed) grade contours?
Yes
13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including
make and model d Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification?
Yes ni it- No
3
14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to
comply with th IRC?
Yes 4 No
15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows
from sleeping ro and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC?
Yes r No
16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural
light and ventila ''°n for all habitable rooms?
Yes V No
17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors,
glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a
walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and
specify safetyg for these areas?
Yes No
18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters
indicated on the plan?
Yes No
19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption
process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or
covenants?
Yes Z No
20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to
obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to
submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will not
be accepted wi t it.
Yes No
21. Will this be to4nly residential structure on the parcel?
Yes No If no -Explain:
22. Have two yrnplete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application?
Yes t
23. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft.
long?
Yes No
4
l
•
24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other
construction a requirements?
Yes No
25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your
properties zone ct?
Yes No
26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final
inspection by the eld County Building Department?
Yes No
27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to
the application o ese changes?
Yes No
28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at
the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well
as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building
permit?
Yes No
29. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before
the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections
will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to
be called in 384-5003.
Yes_ No
30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will
result in a $47. e -inspection fee?
Yes C No
31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC
including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and
occupancy of ding?
Yes No
32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority
being given for ap-Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the
IRC?
Yes No
5
33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to
show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road
& Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge
Department at g25-8601.
Yes /1 / fJ No
34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician
and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are
performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required
at time of appli a inspection.
Yes i / No
35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the
Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a
building permit ap tion? Your attention in this is appreciated.
Yes No
36. Do you know that the local fire strict may require you to submit plans for their review of
fire safety issues? Yes No (please check with the building
department about this requirement)
I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the
best o(my ability.
ignature of Owner
<42 770
Dat
Phone: 97O - 2O -U7/ Z (days); 47 70 - 3C.)6 O Z i Z. (evenings)
Project Name: b. -ALS ,Qt-fi QE,,i C, f
Project Address: 3 el r L, A6 1 4 l Vii & �',6 l , (0 k>/Lc
Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this
information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays
in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If
it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the
application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may
be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed
until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for
review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction.
BpminregOct2004
6
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
Applicant B s Date 6, 2 3• O5 -
Building
✓ Engineered Foundation
/14. Driveway Permit
Surveyed Site Plan 3. E. e{a,)s,l
j/4 Septic Permit and Setbacks
-.Grade/Topography 30%
✓Attach Residential Plan Review List
L.
Minimum Application Questionnaire
_ubdivision Plat Notes
Al/Fire Department Review
Valuation Determination/Fees
wed Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker
Attach Conditions
lication Signed
--iPllaan Reviewer To Sign Application
✓Parcel/Schedule No.
40# Snowload Letter- Marti Hms.
Plagning/Zoning
a//Prroperty Line Setbacks
&30ft Stream Setbacks
AT 4. Flood Plain
uildin Height
ing Sign -off
Road Impact Fees
�HOA/DRC Approval
`'-/ Grade/Topography 40%
//-- di Issues
Subdivision Plat Notes
Aar 11 05 03:21p
fax transmittal
Dale. March 11.2005 Time: 2:14 PM
To: David Bowers Fax, 970 945-9619
Company: Phone: 970 928-2135
Project Name: Lot 9 Four Mile Ranch
Regarding. Preliminary/Final DRC Approval
Number of Pages: 3
Project Job k.
Comments:
PBA Letter, 04140 Lot 9 L3, 3/11/05
..enclosed.
p.1
palominobartharchitcu, PC'
David,
As discussed, approval for Preliminary and Final Design Review approval enclosed for
your files.
Best Regards,
Jack Palomino
pl.nr•nl r.
-- - nyHarrl 39S7=14R2-Fax -
Jeff Vogel 303 892-4984 Fax
Michelle Hagemann 970 963-2298 Fax
Mogli Fairbanks 970 947-9335 Fax
Enclosure:
815 bit avenue glenwooe springs colorxlo 81601
p 970 945 6655 r 970 945 6585
ww, plum; nobaih mm
9
Mar 11 05 03:21p
1 --
Please note that Guy Harrell will review the expense of relocating the existing Qwest
telephone pedestal for easier driveway access for Lot 8. We agree that access to Lot 8 is not
your responsibility, although construction sequencing may be easier if relocation of that
utility is accomplished prior to completion of your final driveway paving and landscaping.
If you have any questions or comments regarding these approvals, I can be reached at
970 945-6655. Thanks again for your participation.
Sincerely,
Jack Palomino AIA, Principal
Palomino Barth Architects P.C.
On behalf of the Four Mile Ranch Design Review Committee
JP/jp
04-140 Lot 9 L3
cc: DRC Members
p.3
815 Blake atenue glen wood spnngs. colorndo 81601
2 p 970 995 665 (9709456685 www palommohunn.com
DRAINAGE STUDY
Lot 9: 4 -Mile Ranch
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO
PROJECT NO. Bowers
Prepared by:
BOUNDARIES
UNLIMITED INC.
Consulting & CIvII Engineers
923 COOPER AVENUE, STE. 102
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81 601
TELE: 970.945.5252 / FAX: 970.384.2
Deric J. Walter, P.E.
Project Engineer
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
INTRODUCTION 1
HYDROLOGY 1
DRAINAGE PLAN 1
SUMMARY 1
FIGURES: 1) Vicinity Map (8'/2' x 11")
2) SCS Soils Map (8'/2' x 11")
3) Drainage Plan (11"x17")
4) Misc. Notes and Details (11"x17")
APPENDIX: Calculations
INTRODUCTION
The proposed residential development of the Lot 9: 4 -Mile Ranch property is located off
Red Cliff Circle in the 4 -Mile Ranch Subdivision, Garfield County, Colorado. The 2.45
acre property is presently vacant. The proposed development will consist of a single-
family residential structure, an access drive, landscaping and undisturbed grasses. See
the enclosed Vicinity Map for site location.
HYDROLOGY
The hydrologic methods for this study are outlined in the United State Department of
Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) publication
"Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds TR -55" and the computer program AutoCAD
Hydrology SCS TR -55 Tabular Method. The property is located well above the Roaring
Fork River and 4 -Mile Creek floodplains. Site soils consist of Type B soils with a historic
vegetative cover of pasture grasses in fair condition. No major offsite basins affect the
property. See the enclosed NRCS Soils Map for hydrologic determinations.
DRAINAGE PLAN
The stormwater runoff from the lot will be, in general, unconcentrated sheet flow and
shallow channel flow. The existing general flow patterns will be maintained with runoff
tending to the northwest. Due to the rural nature of the subdivision and regionalized
detention in the lower valley, no individual detention should be necessary to offset the
impacts of development for this lot. An 8" deep diversion ditch or berm, with 2:1 side
slopes, should be construction parallel to the boundary between Lots 8 & 9 to ensure
that runoff is diverted away and around from all downhill building sites. Erosion logs or
certified weed free hay bales should be placed in the flowline every 100 LF and
maintained until the site is fully revegetated. Swales should also be constructed on the
uphill side of the residence to ensure that offsite runoff is diverted away from and
around the proposed structure.
Page 1
Figures
Page 2
Boundaries Unlimited, Inc.
923 Cooper Avenue, Ste. 102
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
tele- 970 945 5252 fax- 970 384 2833
SCALE: 1"=2000
DATE: 3/12/05
FILE: GR -01
SHEET. 1
David Bowers
Garfield County, Colorado
Lot 9: 4 -Mile Ranch
Vicinity Map
,� .
t'�''__ �r
_ t_
�
I
.)
!
e (
7
,
\
•
d'F
2
.%
I'
ti.�
w
\
..._..,
iii
SITE
f7s;
I i
1 ' .
At;ti
1 ��
'
.2',
_
.
'x
C.
v'
i
.I.,
.,
do.,,.
Boundaries Unlimited, Inc.
923 Cooper Avenue, Ste. 102
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
tele- 970 945 5252 fax- 970 384 2833
SCALE: 1"=2000
DATE: 3/12/05
FILE: GR -01
SHEET. 1
David Bowers
Garfield County, Colorado
Lot 9: 4 -Mile Ranch
Vicinity Map
19
f
:
1
\
J
//
SI
;5
•\
j
5
\
I j
j
:rrrti.-
7I/(
a
I
`
'r0\
— K/%
t
z
<
R
9 t
l
13
>.
i—
\\/
33
�
34
2
����/
ror.„
LU4IT or s01L so"ver
(6-12% slopes,
SOIL TYPE
Soil Type B)
6: Ascalon Fine Sand Loam
deep, well drained, mod. permeability:
-
Boundaries Unlimited, Inc.
SCALE: 1"=2000
DATE: 3/12/05
FILE: GR-01
SHEET: 2
David Bowers
Garfield County, Colorado
Lot 9: 4-Mile Ranch
NCRS Soils Map
923 Cooper Avenue, Ste. 102
Glenwood Springs, C081601
tele: 970.945.5252 fax: 970.384.2833
w D -n D 0 0 N 0
c f O z T m¢ o
v K Z OM il r Z
moD-1mm
O A D O C
O�z{oCz�
m * r C
±00>21
mA A
N 0ce�r ro
i
m ri z0 vim
r mo ons
r m
O\ mrozvn
I 1 m0o0zz
ru Li AcnZm›in
•{OI in in cA
O' A c 20 c C
O A O
f� „mCy0
CO,OA n'
A
�X/
ZOo
r mC m A rn
/A y
z)r Gm j0
m{rAr� rn
mm�2
zr
_ir m O m 0
ti › N N N A
O_
zz InODN
m
(nor z>G7
c 0 In =
O_C,)-1 CO
tins Ort:m A
fD FupZ D m
rsFrg9ct .
ehlr
Garfield County, Colorado
Lot 9:4 -Mlle Ranch
Grading and Drainage Plan w/ Erosion Control
David Bowers
819 Palmer Avenue
Glenwood Springs. CO
928-9558
Consulting & C,44 En®"..n
ui Cooper Gwnue.su 10
Glenwood Sohn 008160
161e 970 945.5252 fax 9703842133
Z
O
-i
0
0
t!1
m
m
> 0
z
�O
z
D>
—r
—r
zoo
4z
.._
z
2
m
O
cn D i
—0 EnY
7
Z Z 0 S0
r Oma\\�
A
z FPri
Z
n
n
D
D
0
O
O
0 0
0
N
z
0
N m D mo n N N Z A 0 N 5
firm m0>0CnDmla
r m O m Z A m Z n m O O n
mrpmA m
4CmZ Z AADInnAZ
oZMM
TI -c PDO m'N Cn!F
O m m A O m m m r
m A �r cy Dn
coN
a WC > p no
u1 > s
0 m o o N
F p N N N
O
n O A A
O Z M
0 0 ODm
s 2A➢
as aCO
se
Z
s
T
>m Noon-Ssm A Z-4VKD
AO :::::
0n<maON Or In 0m2Dnm
N a 4 Nfr2pr ND a D'ID0.
o
y m �__ ZD >MO
ZKZAON
ZmD�DmAAYTO~�.A� . Dm mNm FIAnmCSy� �m r_z 0CDF�OOmmmmm0DD=1 z 02mjN II
m>!OZZarX0ZK :D Oa ZC
Cm0°m
o 2 min IA
0mOOm� ZZz:QOQ to .ozal $' mmz'^MO'jzCoo� ODa tiaDNC�ONAAoO-+ mr O_O `3 op�A D�DOO KZ
Inay OM
KnZmO Fap_OcO~ralSm C_mti� ONSOCOKAZKDD fZmmMW 22 N SAODnat �� Ilii:_
O 2 m p rr�5 O A O N 1 o ti n p N D A D O a t ?I O a O r>- n Z O N p p 0
Z N m m ti A 2 A O m D5 -_-,97,M Inn = m m oo r 2 y > A A O> Z O n
A>Fm>m °-nm>mm V. NQz ODa OC DNn�llm n A�Iaj m n�nCO
PvoODmm Cm22Fm0 oNZ .r;IK/I moLAO m=o�m��mKmy> slDjl aZ1zn
Inti-ZNn NaOr mC ;41,c
N'I .11 y rm yaym mot- Immmy <D< rO m.TOIi rw mapnp
Omnc
r'amN SAO-0�0 OFDAO C0�fn0 o 0�0>< m��mO Mc
KD °lemon
N
_mono °Naze° >mFI' xS oinz2 iK/I�OpZpm m vO:mn. zn nzm i
c `` N
COZT re
mDOAO L)�mOOm .I^�A 0S000P 2Oa0mn� DmmZ T; ZZ A(Ci�
Daazn Dr�D� m A�m� �0� 0 r�zNNos D �rCCmoony, >nmzAc an ~r Oz ZO oFzm
D n O m z o n o 0 N m O m O F m N. m m: a o m< D O m O Z=
Mr" _ Z Iyr m m
>mZ In Amcmmgy OOZa rymti�r <A UIn D-IM� 2 Ky90LZl n2 DaOA
I^o runt CX Z0 aN92 >>0710AKD rn ~OLmmmm D o".Zm1 ,mAo OT CD<on
p m n D Z C m x m; p D o r 9 D N >a .1J rnn m K 2- D 0 o Z 2°; M ti m N N Z m
0>Z0Z 2 9mmFNm AOnm TO -•TOO yDN�9Zy . ton -Oz zD
n+TiyDz Nr Nsr- rn
O
0n�2 a3ool'Im ay ODN -1
mn-^ti >m2C0Z ONm n~m�a OmNm patiN <0 Ar`1mn y2 Om >
A m zz< N 2 42 n r n o 9 le n fn y G Dp y N r A m n
D w m 2 Z a ynm Z m z a m D? D $ m N O a O- O- " N- Z m O K O
N>000 OTZDIn IDK iO2Ym D yl+lm
DmAx ZO r gran 0 A T O 00 Z O D z
CD > a m O Z Z 0
ryD`D 0 A m
N 000 at,, Z O
Om A n
m
0:x0 FZ�OrMZ!O CM
00 0Ap Ammpyy1 mmZN Ir Z rN ;ir;;;;14
ntn
DrMMN yFDA7�
Wm np mVI>A�nx apZr DNpN S> Zr
co >cmt
r m 0 r� O D m on p y n O Z* m C Z ti r i Z N N r O r InOOA Nxfnn 0> W92;37.2-2
09�a °a�CC nAO1�x
r~I a 2> AOrm
Z
oz n D Z O m D Z Z Z> O r C p Z m Z p y N n n y cc y
00-,2 ;AN �S> 22
mm Or (>' XrIADmo mmx
�AN!n Nma DC Wid ley CaDmo 9yln~`Z
za n z � n D cy n z Nmr
0��0 2`9:0~0
-Mm O�
on NNyO VIIAAm NInL O'� A2 VOZyC�O
ynAA 1/IarN. yA Z Amm-.x;pA °250 2m. O N 2mtiinS�KD
ZZr'ID 5>oro O� rD K m�mN S�rnni 000 mZ k� ONmrO�x
"Mnma2 2
n-
on
0 <y tit n ms -30 n-. A N TA20. Z
m 2 0 C y A D L O m D m Z D m m C O D C O 0 9 ^� O p m m y pZ n £
>0
rmrlm> ii;
11/02 ?? jD Voy�yOO9xD jm2S n dm ZD mKm2l>/1 m l/I ZC
,,Or A AA mDKrymD OZCC �N mD Nn mn �D0�2>CA
rA-rl0 c of 4-o1r>ysi mm�o X' �a., az
o » Ago<�Z Dzo
VIN. oomOappOKN P1 o�s rinmao�; D+oi0C�Z ZrZC-0mDr.lZO D�'2ZDCmO
ZS OGmtiZ11120 ZZO .Z TDAONKDIn> K °D A41 00NOOyr5.2nm rn T:::: m OmZrzA 2 AO rr'y yDr.AOrm0D000 Ain mc
Ar y.Zol ZN �yT OSmC NmTm � £ (19, f�19C oZ .y�aln
2 F2. IA An A� 0s m 2 Z_a O>0
Tzm n0-oo/lo s yy yA Vill
mlmilDsoo C00+mjIZ/10 nD Dmim=aT9JDV'x
yP0 MOWyAN.imc o .ZIC pmz Jo ys2nSFm 00DOlmnnlna0G�ZKy`50-r
1NDnlm/I?OAFD:<O 9mym-oAZOnmZnCOON OmZDZmxAin
o m-
�l;nACAADtD'IN22ozo
D mm>yz00o InD mm CS zoDtixocZpvZma N~Oym 0 r NT D C i' 0 NOmZ D NAA D p0OSZ rZO Oin, non or' p D no ym;D,
O NaiN y KO Z Z !nm
no ~ > < 2 O Z .9 Z N 0 O Z O
x A 0 0
•
fl
-1
Z
Garfield County. Colorado
Lot 9: 4 -Mile Ranch
Misc. Notes and Details
David Bowers
619 Palmer Avenue
Glenwood Springs, CO
928-9558
rarses
•nlimited Inc
conwin[ S Oxl 5.perm
923 0xper GA,V. 51e 10
Glenwood epn p CO 5150
leis 9909.55252 far 9703992
DES DJw
NO
DATE
REVISION
DR OM
CN. PAH
DATE. a/12/05
BY
Appendix
Drainage Study Calculations
Input into AutoCAD Hydrology TR -55 Tabular Method
Project: Lot 9:4 -Mile Ranch
Project No: Bowers
By: DJW
Date: March 12, 2005
Area:
Basin: 22124 sf.± (Topographed area)
Precipitation, 24 hr:
25 -yr: 2.0"
100 -yr: 2.4"
Time of Concentration, Tc
Existing: Sheet= 170'@ 7%, Shallow= N/A Tc= 0.23 hr
Developed: Sheet= 90'@ 8%, Shallow= 150'@ 3% Tc= 0.20 hr
Soil Type:
Basi n=Type B: 6: Ascalon Fine Sand Loam (6-12% slopes, deep, well drained, mod. Perm.: Soil Type B)
Curve Number, CN
Existing=69 Pasture, fair condition
Developed=79 33% Imperv. (98)
67! Revegetated landscaping/grasses (69)
Existing Runoff, QH
Lot 4: QH,A25= 0.08 cfs
Developed Runoff, Chi
Lot 4: QE,A 25= 0.30 cfs
QH,A1oo= 0.23 cfs
QE,A 100= 0.45 cfs
Due to the rural nature of the property, no detention is proposed, but an 8" deep diversion ditch or 12"
high berm with 2:1 side slopes should be constructed parallel to the property line of Lots 8&9 to
maintain runoff away from and around downstream building envelopes.
Ex-Q25.txt
Bowers Property
Lot 9: 4 -Mile Ranch
Existing Conditions
25 -yr Runoff
3/12/05
TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method
Input Summary
Description
Existing Conditions: 25 -yr Runoff
Rainfall Distribution Type II
Ia/P Interpolation On
Total Area 22142.00 ft2
Peak Time 12.20 hrs
Peak Flow 0.08 cfs
Given Input Data:
Subarea
Description
Area CN Tc Tt Rainfall
(ft2) (hrs) (hrs) (in)
Topographed Area 22142 69 0.23 0.00 2.00
Support Data:
Subarea Name: Topographed Area, Row: 1
Sheet Flow
Description
Manning's n 0.15
Flow Length 170.00 ft
Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.40 in
Land slope 0.07 ft/ft
Computed sheet flow time > 0.23 hrs
***************************
Total Time of Concentration > 0.23 hrs
Page 1
EX-Q100.tXt
Bowers Property
Lot 9: 4 -Mile Ranch
Existing Conditions
100 -yr Runoff
3/12/05
TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method
Input Summary
Description
Existing Conditions: 100 -yr Runoff
Rainfall Distribution Type II
Ia/P Interpolation On
Total Area 22142.00 ft2
Peak Time 12.20 hrs
Peak Flow 0.17 cfs
Given input Data:
Subarea
Description
Area CN TC Tt Rainfall
(ft2) (hrs) (hrs) (in)
Topographed Area 22142 69 0.23 0.00 2.40
support Data:
Subarea Name: Topographed Area, Row: 1
Sheet Flow
Description
Manning's n 0.15
Flow Length 170.00 ft
Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.40 in
Land Slope 0.07 ft/ft
Computed Sheet flow time > 0.23 hrs
ac*arnfrxatae4*ant*e
Total Time of Concentration > 0.23 hrs
eeafr*eer eaapex***********
Page 1
PR-Q25.txt
Bowers Property
Lot 9: 4 -Mile Ranch
Proposed Conditions
25 -yr Runoff
3/12/05
TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method
Input Summary
Description
Proposed Conditions: 25 -yr Runoff
Rainfall Distribution Type II
Ia/P Interpolation On
Total Area
22142.00 ft2
Peak Time 12.20 hrs
Peak Flow 0.30 cfs
Given Input Data:
Subarea Area
Description (ft2)
CN TC
(hrs)
Tt Rainfall
(hrs) (in)
Topographed Area 22142 79 0.20
Support Data:
Subarea Name: Topographed Area, Row: 1
Sheet Flow
Description
Manning's n
Flow Length
Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall
Land Slope
Computed sheet flow time
0.00 2.00
0.24
90.00 ft
1.40 in
0.08 ft/ft
> 0.19 hrs
Shallow Concentrated Flow
Description
Surface
Flow Length
watercourse slope
Velocity
Computed Shallow flow time
Unpaved
150.00 ft
0.03 ft/ft
2.79 fps
> 0.01 hrs
Total Time of Concentration > 0.20 hrs
* *****************
Page 1
PR-Q100.txt
Bowers Property
Lot 9: 4 -Mile Ranch
Proposed Conditions
100 -yr Runoff
3/12/05
TR -55 Tabular Hydrograph Method
Input Summary
Description
Proposed Conditions: 100 -yr Runoff
Rainfall Distribution Type II
Ia/P Interpolation On
Total Area 22142.00 ft2
Peak Time 12.20 hrs
Peak Flow 0.45 cfs
Given Input Data:
Subarea
Description
Area CN
(ft2)
Tc Tt Rainfall
(hrs) (hrs) (in)
Topographed Area 22142 79
Support Data:
Subarea Name: Topographed Area, Row: 1
Sheet Flow
0.20
0.00 2.40
Description
Manning's n 0.24
Flow Length 90.00 ft
Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.40 in
Land slope 0.08 ft/ft
Computed sheet flow time > 0.19 hrs
Shallow Concentrated Flow
Description
surface
Flow Length
Watercourse slope
Velocity
Computed Shallow flow time
Unpaved
150.00 ft
0.03 ft/ft
2.79 fps
> 0.01 hrs
aacaarar---rar*ceecr*ccr
Total Time of Concentration > 0.20 hrs
*a*strra*eeaerc*aa=ec*ecaxo-ae
Page 1
Bowers Property
Lot 9: 4 -Mile Ranch
channel Flow
100 -yr Runoff
3/12/05
Channel.txt
Channel Calculator
Given Input Data:
Shape Trapezoidal
Solving for Depth of Flow
Flowrate 0.45 cfs
Slope 0.03 ft/ft
Manning's n 0.04
Height 8.00 in
Bottom width 0.00 in
Left slope 0.50 ft/ft (V/H)
Right slope 0.50 ft/ft (V/H)
Computed Results:
Depth 4.17 in
velocity 1.86 fps
Full Flowrate 2.55 cfs
Flow area 0.24 ft2
Flow perimeter 18.66 in
Hydraulic radius 1.87 in
Top width 16.69 in
Area 0.89 ft2
Perimeter 35.78 in
Percent full 52.16 %
Critical Information
Critical depth 3.79 in
Critical slope 0.05 ft/ft
critical velocity 2.25 fps
Critical area 0.20 ft2
Critical perimeter 16.95 in
Critical hydraulic radius 1.70 in
Critical top width 15.16 in
Specific energy 0.40 ft
Minimum energy 0.47 ft
Froude number 0.79
Flow condition Subcritical
Page 1
tech
HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL
Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical Inc
5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Spnngs, Colorado 81601
Phone 970-945-7988
Fax 970-945-8454
email hpgeo®hpgeomch.com
SUBSOIL STUDY ,
FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN
PROPOSED RESIDENCE
LOT 9, FOUR MILE RANCH
RED CLIFF CIRCLE
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
JOB NO. 104 814
NOVEMBER 30, 2004
PREPARED FOR:
DAVID BOWERS
1043 WEST 3RD STREET
RIFLE, COLORADO 81650
Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
SITE CONDITIONS
SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL
FIELD EXPLORATION
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS - 4 -
FOUNDATIONS -4-
FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS - 5 FLOOR SLABS -7-
UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM - 7 -
SURFACE DRAINAGE - 8 -
LIMITATIONS
FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES
FIGURES 4 and 5 - SWELL-CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
TABLE 1- SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY
This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located
on Lot 9, Four Mile Ranch, Red Cliff Circle, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site
is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the
foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for
geotechnical engineering services to David Bowers dated November 1, 2004.
A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain
information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the
field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification,
compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field
exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for
foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation.
This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions,
design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the
proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
The proposed residence will be a single story structure over a walkout basement level.
The attached garage and basement floors are proposed to be slab -on -grade. Grading for
the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 3 to 8 feet.
We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of
construction.
If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described
above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report.
Job No 104 814
- 9 -
SITE CONDITIONS
The site is located in previously irrigated pasture that was vacant at the time of our field
exploration. The ground surface is relatively flat with a gentle to moderate slope down to
the west. There is about 2 to 4 feet of elevation difference across the building envelope.
Vegetation consists of grass and weeds.
SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL
Bedrock of the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the Four Mile Ranch
subdivision. These rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained
sandstone/siltstone and limestone with some massive beds of gypsum. There is a
possibility that massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite
underlie portions of the lot. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause
sinkholes to develop and can produce areas of localized subsidence.
Sinkholes were not observed on the subject lot or in the immediate area of the subject lot.
No evidence of cavities was encountered in the subsurface materials; however, the
exploratory borings were relatively shallow, for foundation design only. Based on our
present knowledge of the subsurface conditions at the site, it cannot be said for certain
that sinkholes will not develop. The risk of future ground subsidence on Lot 9 throughout
the service life of the proposed residence, in our opinion, is low; however, the owner
should be made aware of the potential for sinkhole development. If further investigation
of possible cavities in the bedrock below the site is desired, we should be contacted.
FIELD EXPLORATION
The field exploration for the project was conducted on November 9, 2004. Two
exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the
subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight
Job No. 104 814
-3 -
augers powered by a truck -mounted CME -45B drill rig. The borings were logged by a
representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc.
Samples of the subsoils were taken with a 2 inch 1.D. spoon sampler. The sampler was
driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30
inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method
D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or
consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration
resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples
were retumed to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2.
The subsoils consist of about 1/2 to 1 foot of topsoil overlying very stiff to hard, sandy
silty clay to depths of 51/2 to 6 feet where relatively dense, basalt gravel, cobbles and
boulders in a silty sand matrix was encountered. Drilling in the dense coarse granular
soils with auger equipment was difficult due to the rock size and hardness and drilling
refusal was encountered in the deposit.
Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural
moisture content, density and finer than sand size gradation analyses. Results of swell -
consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed drive samples of the clay and
silty sand matrix soils, presented on Figures 4 and 5, indicate low compressibility under
existing moisture conditions and light loading. The clay samples showed a low to
moderately high expansion potential when wetted under a constant light surcharge with
swelling pressures of about 4,500 psf and 8, 000 psf. The sample of the silty sand matrix
from the coarse granular soils showed a minor collapse potential (settlement under
constant load) when wetted and moderate compressibility upon increased loading after
wetting. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table 1.
Job No. 104 814
-4 -
No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling and the subsoils were
slightly moist to moist.
FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS
The subsoils encountered beneath the topsoil consist of about 41/2 to 51/2 feet of very stiff
to hard clay that possess an expansion potential that could lift the building floor and
foundation if wetted. Surface runoff, landscape irrigation and utility line leakage are
possible sources of water which could cause wetting. The underlying coarse granular
soils are relatively dense and have a low settlement potential. Subexcavation of the
expansive clay and bearing on the underlying granular soils or replacement with
compacted structural fill should be used to mitigate potential movement and building
distress to the residence.
DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
FOUNDATIONS
Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the
nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread
footings bearing on the natural granular soils beneath the clays or on compacted structural
fill.
The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread
footing foundation system.
1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soils or structural fill
should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. Based
on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed
as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less.
2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous
walls and 2 feet for isolated pads.
Job No 104514
-5-
3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided
with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection.
Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is
typically used in this area.
4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span
local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10
feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be
designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation
and Retaining Walls" section of this report.
5) The topsoil, clays and any loose or disturbed soils should be removed and
the footing bearing level extended down to the relatively dense natural
granular soils. Voids created by the removal of large rocks should be
backfilled with compacted sand and gravel or with concrete. As an
alternative, design bearing levels can be re-established with compacted
structural fill. The fill should be a granular material, such as road base,
compacted to at least 100% of standard Proctor density at a moisture
content near optimum. The fill should extend laterally beyond the edges
of the footings a distance at least equal to the depth of fill below the
footings.
6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing
excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions.
FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS
Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be
expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral
earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf
for backfill consisting of the on-site granular soils. Cantilevered retaining structures
which are separate from the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to
mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth
pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 40 pcf for
Job No 104814
-6 -
backfill consisting of the on-site granular soils. Backfill should not contain vegetation,
topsoil, clay soils or oversized rock.
All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and
surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and
equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the
walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward
sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or
retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure
buildup behind walls.
Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum
standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and
walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor
density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment
near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some
settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is
placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill.
The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the
sliding resistance of the footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure
against the side of the footing. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be
calculated based on a coefficient of friction of 0.45. Passive pressure of compacted
backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit
weight of 350 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended
above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the
design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case
of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral Toads
should be a granular material compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor
density at a moisture content near optimum.
Job No 104814
-7 -
FLOOR SLABS
The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil and clays, are suitable to support lightly
loaded slab -on -grade construction. The clays are expansive and should be removed from
beneath the building area. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor
slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which
allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce
damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab
reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended
slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath
basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch
aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No.
200 sieve.
All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of
maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can
consist of the on-site granular soils or suitable imported granular soils devoid of
vegetation, topsoil, clays and oversized rock.
UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM
Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our
experience in the area and where clay soils are present that local perched groundwater can
develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during
spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction,
such as retaining walls and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic
pressure buildup by an underdrain system.
The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill
surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should
be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish
Job No 104814
-8 -
grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular
material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200
sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The
drain gravel backfill should be at least 11/2 feet deep.
SURFACE DRAINAGE
The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and
maintained at all times after the residence has been completed:
1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be
avoided during construction.
2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and
compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in
pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard
Proctor density in landscape areas.
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be
sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We
recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved
areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas.
Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on-
site finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all
backfill.
5) Irrigation sprinkler heads and landscaping which requires regular heavy
irrigation, such as sod, should be located at least 5 feet from foundation
walls.
LIMITATIONS
This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical
engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either
Job No. 104 814
-9 -
express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are
based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations
indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area.
Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or
other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is
concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be
consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface
conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface
conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions
encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we
should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We
are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the
project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during
construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to
verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design
changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations
presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation
bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical
engineer.
Respectfully Submitted,
HEPWORTH - PAWLA EO
Jordy Z. Adamson, Jr., P.E.
Reviewed by: D
L
Steven L. Pawlak, P.E.
JZA/djb
Job No 104814
NOT TO SCALE
LOT 11
LOT 10
LOT 9
rBUILDING ENVELOPE
•
BORING 2
BORING 1
•
RED CLIFF CIRCLE
/
LOT 8
104 814
HEPWORTH—PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
Figure 1
Depth — Feet
0
5
10
BORING 1 BORING 2
25/12
10/4,10/0
WC -10.1
D0.107
22/12
29/12
•C-5.1
00.111
-200-40
40/12
O.
'1 5
D0-
0los
60/12
0
5
10
15 15
Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3.
Depth — Feet
104 814
HEPWORTH—PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
Figure 2
Compression — Expansion %
Compression %
3
2
1
0
1
2
3
4
0.1
Moisture Content = 10.1 percent
Dry Density = 107 pcf
Sample of:Sandy Silty Clay
From:Boring 1 of 5 Feet
Expansion
upon
wetting
0
1
2
3
4
.0 0
APPUED PRESSURE — ksf
100
Moisture Content = 5.1 percent
Dry Density = 111 pcf
Sample of:Silty Sand Matrix
From: Boring 1 at 10 Feet
Compression
upon
wetting
0.1
1.0 0
APPUED PRESSURE — ksf
100
104 814
HEPWORTH—PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
Figure 4
Compression — Expansion R
N O
Moisture Content = 9.5 percent
Dry Density = 105 pcf
Sample of: Sandy SHty Clay
From: Boring 2 at 4 Feet
D
Expansion
upon
wetting
0.1 .0 0 100
APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf
104 814
HEPWORTH—PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
Figure 5
Job No. 104 814
HEPWORTH
SOIL OR
BEDROCK TYPE
Sandy silty clay
Silty sand matrix
Sandy silty clay
UNCONFINED
COMPRESSIVE
STRENGTH
(PSF)
ATTERBERG LIMITS 1
PLASTIC
INDEX
(%)
LIQUID
LIMIT
(%)
PERCENT -
PASSING
NO. 200
SIEVE
40 I
GRADATION _ 1
0
GRAVEL
(%)
NATURAL
DRY
DENSITY
(P=0
h
O
-
—
—.
-
un
0
.�
NATURAL
MOISTURE
CONTENT
l%)
O
V;
on
1 SAMPLE LOCATION 1
DEPTH
(R)
Br
O
NI -
O
2
O
m
N
COUNTY OF GARFIELD - BUILDING DEPARTMENT
CORRECTION NOTICE
108 8th St., Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Phone (970) 945-8212
Job located at 0 3s? AelGce (VA-
Permit No. 931.3 3
I have this day inspected this structure and these
v1 premises and found the followin4 corrections needed:
/toxo(.
Q rteh, LTA 4n
3)ieAsearg, C
�4,„,aptere,
You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected
before covering.
When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003.
Date 6 th /06 20
Building Inspector .zj" :—
Phone (970) 945-8212
No 9 i-� 53
Assessor's Parcel Noc 195. -0271l -1(o-4009'
/� �pate(..C1-Q1- G�
UILDING PERMIT C : D CC ��`,,--JJ 9
Job A ess 75c- . P B.. ��J `-i attic.
r D
Owner C PY5 B G .I AddressS JR L tua.. 4 g -kilic Phone '--5521-1
E R - .«c -F
Contractor Address f Phone ` —a S
Setb ks: F ��• n Rearr, RH LH ..--7
Y 630
5/ �' ' /• INSPECTIONS
Zoning
Weatherproofing
ooting -Z8-0S /Olt- Mechanical
Foundation fS 1$-Ds741-11-13-u57jFt/Q -Z7-c57g Electrical Rough (State)
Grout Electrical Final (State) /
Underground Plumbing I1-3- 1i -712-Final 6-3-06. mp /Checklis Qted?
Rough Plumbing - Certificate Occupancy #
Framing 3-4YSt;! Date -a7-O6
Insulation 3-)7-c67*- Septic System # tiV
Roofing
Drywall S -ca3-064?�t
Gas Piping �2-z8'-o(,�Ti3� Other
NOTES
Date
Final
4C)Oa/��cz
?SuCT3,31-4 9.0,1$100 continue on back)
3/31f tic
BUILDING PERMIT
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Date Issue • • ..l. .Zoned Area Permit No. ..t'wr3.r?
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all
laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed
structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations
are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above
described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building
Inspector an, IMME I;ATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID.
Use
Address or Legal Description
OwnerreStAstSanSta
as V
Setbacks Front
Side
Side
Rear
This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection.
INSPECTION RECORD
Footing ?_25- o S ,vim 1 Driveway
Nil]
Foundation ,_ r-iR7cP ttt►t:Pr,/ Sq-jtot-v
, ,
Underground Plumbing /( -3-o »') ,
Insulation 5-/ ?air .
Rough PlumbingL.. Z'- 7--
Drywall i
Chimney & Vent
r .. , ,. •, r•,6I
Gas Piping A=4.5( -0(a
Final (2-2.3-oG2z1/
Electric Rough (By state i,r,„
Septic Final
Framing 3 -I ii -0 0-15-
(To include Roof in place and Windows
and Doors installed).
Notes: , .r,
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING -
WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
Fur Inspections Call 384-5003 P 1b i dais,
APPROVEDDO NO DES I RIP,
riaanAi L<nu Intl ,e..
,olho-aciu