HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- Permito.
Garfield County
Building & Sanitation Department
108 8th Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601
Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003
Coit �2�nneL
Job Address`ci \_ca r pl lV V-�1' . \
Nature of Work Building Permit cR I9 ! ' ` — CQ — (ThQ4
NO. ci 1
Use of Building
Owner
-en`,-he)
Contractor
uonor
Amount of Permit $ CFa
J
1 ?
Permit No:
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
108 8" Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Phone: 970-945-8212 / Fax: 970-384-3470 / Inspection I1ne: 970-384-5003
Parcel/Schedule No: di {3Q-10ab04
AGREEMENT
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUC
THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USI
REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 7028201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES TBA -
1 THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBE)
STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE R SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID.
THE ISSUANCE OF A PERM- BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM TRERF °FTE!
REQUIRING 1ffi CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR PROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION REIN.
CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION.
THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE 0
ANY RF.SPONSIBILITES OR r UAB TF[ BY GARFEW COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCI'S. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEM
AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER COMMENTS AR
INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. y
it
66�%'�
//p
11E.REBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL): VS
Job Address: W1 I
45 Ldita pile Ibrw9 , Cax106nOL A , CO S'1U a 3
1 Lot No: Block No: Sabel. / EEempdcc:
i.0 4 Ci nsfl, C hen P1ws
1
2Orly:.
aiso1,to5ter, tu;511.1.
Address
Q.0. Ybo,c iWi, Pu..,..64.+
Ph:
LA-tnly63SsaA
Wk Ph:
Wltl3i i 5i`la3
3
Contractor:
0ViniVe iRwddra
Address:
VD pyx\Iin,e4 a -Ls
Ph:
ilib 1b3 -tag
Lic. No.
131ii- e•O3
4
Architect/Engineer:
tnd,,arn,v...ko-i kyr irri.vs bw.
Address:
2iO42.A1ted- ia,Alz1 i,m` Z
Pb:
LSes1:34.3-wes1
Lic. No.
5
Sq. FL of Building:
a°100 sc,4.
Sq. Ft. of Lot:
3.4&Ys s
Height:
Tilt'
No, of Floors:
IS 1 billle4d-
6
Use of Building: ,, (� - �y,.� -. - Q - _
etc l oizx a AA. Cimtal iNl Cil). , +r `f a
C��Ai��('���/�
�
7
rat.4,.
Describe Work: L V U
kiOtQ h0TYLF. COfS C��
✓1 V
8
Class of Work: s1r New ❑ Alteration ❑ Remove
a Addition 0 Move
9
10
Garage: a Single tel &0,. coy
❑ Double �''u�c
Carport: o Single
o Double
Tr‘
"K Dri eway rmit o On-Sitel 1 Site Plan Sewage ISisposa
(Septic)
11
Values of ork: $
o, bob
Adjusted Valuatlons: $
258/ 263
12
NoT : rg 01,w (6- 5iu kitt. ,p •
6-15.1 C,
A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL
ISSUED BY THE STATE
ZT
THIS FRA BECOMP.S
AUTHORIZED IS NOT
CONSTRUCTION OR
PERIOD OF 180 DAYS
I HEREBY CERTIFY
APPLICATION AND
PROVISIONS OF LAWS
COMPLETED WITHIN
GRANTING OFA PERMIT
TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL
LOCAL LAW REGULATING
OFCONSTR �N.
f.. /RI
PERMITE15 REQUIRED AND
OF COLORADO.
NULL AND VOID 1F WORK OR CONSTRUCTION
COMMENCED WT'HIN 180 DAYS, OR, IF
WORK I5 SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED
AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK I5 COMMENCED.
THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED
ND
KNOW TOE SAME TO BE TRUE ACORRECT.
GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL
WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR
DOES NOT PRFSUi1l TO GIVE AUTHORITY
THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER
CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE
D LI
MUST BE
FOR A
THIS
ALL
BE
NOT. THE
STATE OR
I jobs
i
Plan Check Fee:
/ 22.4 70
Permit Fee:
/ (D1li /5-
Total Fee: Dated Permit Issued:
3 /o m
magic
oCCGO Const. Type:
�.,�.,
Zoning:
Setbacks:
Manu. Home: ISDS No. & Fee:
I, ,
t..��_�
/ ER / DA
/
34 - _ r.#7. // ...2(ff.'
' DE /DATE - :Af1R0'' e , • H/
AGREEMENT
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUC
THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USI
REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 7028201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES TBA -
1 THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBE)
STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE R SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID.
THE ISSUANCE OF A PERM- BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM TRERF °FTE!
REQUIRING 1ffi CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR PROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION REIN.
CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION.
THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE 0
ANY RF.SPONSIBILITES OR r UAB TF[ BY GARFEW COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCI'S. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEM
AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER COMMENTS AR
INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. y
it
66�%'�
//p
11E.REBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL): VS
J
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection:
1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector;
2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily
visible from access road;
3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows
installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all
necessary plumbing;
4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold
running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door,
5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or
decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements;
6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building;
7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until
all the required items are completed and a final inspection made;
8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway
installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State
Agencies where applicable.
'A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE
ABOV} ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
(C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE
CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING
PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupan, use and the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # 't 4 0?� .
c4A- Zlkc 111»s
Signature Date
BpcontOct2004
Applicant
Address
VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION
Finished (Livable Area):
Main 25
Upper 323-
Lower
2fLower
Other
Subdivision Q ,g phase)
Lot/Block tut- if
Contractor
()W Y1ev
Total Square Feet po x 7cf 48 2/4 '7Z
Valuation
Basement:
Unfinished
Conversion of Unfinished to Finished
Plan Check Fee for Conversion
Valuation
Garage:
Crawl Space:
Valuation
Valuation
Decks/Patios:
Covered
Valuation
Open
Valuation
g9ax /A
2575 y
q9 $ rz`i _
/4,/44
23, /75-
Z 3S2
Total Valuation 251 Z(e3
•
�.
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
Applicant O
Building
/Engineered Foundation
141 Driveway Permit
-Stied Site Plan T11.1 Cog A E
114- Septic Permit and Setbacks
✓ Grade/Topography 30%
-Attach Residential Plan Review List
`Minimum Application Questionnaire
Subdivision Plat Notes
get Tire Department Review
✓Valuation Determination/Fees
Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker
[� 4. Attach Conditions
✓Application Signed
Plan Reviewer To Sign Application
jatel-lSchedule No.
40# Snowload Letter- Mani Hms.
GENERAL NOTES:
Date
3 —
Pla g/Zoning
Property Line Setb
30ft Stream Se acks
Flood
Buildin
Zo
lain
eight
Sign -off
d Impact Fees
OA/DRC Approval
Grade/Topography 40%
Planning Issues
Subdivision Plat Notes
Wintergreen 7� C
{�orn
uP\
memorandum
To: Gerald Hazelbaker - Paradigm Construction
From: Terri -Ann Giandomenico (970) 376-2263
CC: File
Date: 02-08-05
Re: Cerise Ranch, Lot #04
DRB Requirements
Via: Fed Ex
Wintergreen Homes, LLC
77 Metcalf Road, Box 1530
Avon, Colorado 81620
970/949-4120
Fax: 970/949-9940
Thank you for your submittal. We have reviewed the lot #04 submittal package, drawings, catalog
sheets, and colors. All have been reviewed and approved.
We have enclosed two stamped "reviewed" sets for your files.
If further information is required, please do not hesitate to contact Terri -Ann Giandomenico (970) 376-
2263.
Paradigm Sonstruction
0824 Pine Crest Lane
Snowmass Village CO 81615
(970) 922-9051
Kevin McClure
This document may contain PRIVILEGED and/or CONFIDENTIAL information intended ONLY for the use of the specific
individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized
dissemination or copying of this document or the information contained in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this document in error, please notify the sender at once by telephone and return the original document to the above
address via the US Postal Service Thank you.
J
GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING
970-945-8212
MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
for
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION
including
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADDITIONS
ALTERATIONS
and
MOVED BUILDINGS
In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the
issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. Adequate and complete
information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that
required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit
issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contactor may be required to
provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays because other plans
that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after
it has been provided to the Building Department.
Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your
project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be
helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction under the Uniform Building Code".
This book is available to you through this department at our cost Also, please consider using
a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for
construction of your project.
To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building,
plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to
and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the
completed checklist at time of application for a permit
1
J
•
Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and
drawn to scale.
Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with
decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line.
A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar,
anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house -
rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material.
A window schedule. A door schedule.
A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square
foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, an 80 M.P.H. windshear, wind exposure B, windload of 15 pounds
per square foot, and a 36 inch frost depth.
All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or
your plans will be returned.
All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC.
1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and
distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a
licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing?
Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. NOTE: 106.3.1
(7.) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a
property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision
final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and
professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope
of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building
envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the
envelop
Yes
2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and
utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution
if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special
setbacks apply.
Yes
3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage
Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and
adjacent perties), streams or water courses?
Yes
2
4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing
the property?
Yes
5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all
reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered
design? ✓
Yes
6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl
spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth?
Yes
7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist
spaces's and soffits'?
Yes
8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a
minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor
loads and wind loads?
Yes
9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof
construction?
Yes d
10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling
joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses?
Yes ✓
11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection
of all columns✓ and beams?
Yes
12. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point
of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the cave down to
existing (undisturbed) grade contours?
Yes
13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including
make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification?
Yes No 1'hhlsl --Vet
3
14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to
comply with the Uniform Buildipg Code Chapter 37?
Yes No
15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows
from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform
Building Code? tn.duW ccA Istocvi
Yes No
mantSi.dnitios
16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural
light and ration for all habitable rooms?
Yes �/ No
17. Do the plans indicate the Location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors,
glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as
a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures
and specify safety glazing for these areas?
Yes ✓ No
18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters
indicated o the plan?
Yes No
19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption
process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or
covenants?,
Yes ✓ No
20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility
to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to
submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from
the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the
architectur committee deny or reject your building plans?
Yes No
21. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel?
Yes ,/ No If no -Explain:
22. Have tw) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application?
Yes .7
23. Do you understand that the minimum dimensions a home can be on a lot is 20fi.wide and
20ft.1ong?/J
Yes No
4
•
24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other
constructio} code requirements?
Yes ✓ No
25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your
properties 7e district?
Yes No
26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final
inspection ,y the Garfield County Building Department?
Yes J No
27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to
the applica+on of these changes?
Yes J No
28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you
at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as
well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your
building p t?
Yes ✓ No
29. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before
the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections
will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be
called in to 384-5003.
Yes J No
30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will
result in a $47.00 re-inpsection feel
Yes ./ No
31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform
Building Code including approval on a final inspection arior to receiving a Certificate of
Occupancy d occupancy of the building?
Yes No
32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written
authority be given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply
with the U orm Building Code?
Yes No
33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to
show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road
& Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge
Department t 625-8601.
G4414 oobbL 6001 -sure
Yes No �( ( ,
34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician cat eicQ.
and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are
performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be itrun 1"'
required at tiny of applicable inspection. t O1/4 4149Yes ✓ No ,piamp.
35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in
the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal
of a building p t application? Your attention in this is appreciated.
Yes ✓ No
36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of
fire safety issues? Yes �/ No (please check with the
building department about this requirement)
I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the
'/ ��99,,
best of my ability.
4#C. 12)10o-14.- t t1,,a1 IFAS
Signature of Owner Date
Phone: lr1b a�6DRltal'Djdays): 6110%3-at?D9 (evenings)
Project Name: (boditA s_ e€Lnt LA- 4 Cat £tsnzk
Project Address: We-la*r tqt»' l�rialR . �.ewbmrvi e i CO Sella 2,3
Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this
information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process.
Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a
permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review
the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application
may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not
reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first
position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction.
Bpminreg072004
ENVIRONMENTAL
DYNAMICS. INC.
kept beiere
kris callori
j. stace mcgee
michaeI ryan
ph: 505.242 2851
tx: 505.242 2852
Andy Schwaller
Chief Building Officer
Garfield County
Building & Planning Department
108'h Street, Suite 201
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Re: Cerise Ranch Lot 4
Dear Andy,
My name is Stace McGee and I am the Project Manager for the above referenced
project.
The foundation system has been designed with an assumed soils bearing of:
1500 PSF.
The floor framing members have been designed with an assumed floor load of:
Dead Load: 20PSF
Live Load: 40 PSF
The foundation system has been designed with an assumed soils bearing of 1500
PSF. The roof framing members have been designed with an assumed roof load of:
Dead Load: 15PSF
Live Load: 45PSF
Please see the notes and general notes on the framing plans.
The drawings for this project have been reviewed using the 2003 International
Residential Code (IRC) and to the best of our knowledge these plans comply with
the IRC with the following exception.
"R 3.7 minimum at garage and house walls at slab on grade"
If you have any other questions please do not hesitate to give us a call.
Thanks for your time and have a good day.
lull Illu�ulu u1u111ulvlul11u�11 ,
11.11: �. 111.uu1.1uMNIIWI Elo.
"COI unuuunnuumu Iuu•nnnlnn n
EXISTING GRADE
IATI BUILDING SECTION - GARAGE/LOFT
1/4" = 1'-0"
uJ
x
EXISTING GRADE
ICTI BUILDING SECTION - TYPICAL
1 1/4' = V-0•
c ranch -lot 4
Choice
Conditions
Data
Attributes
Actual
Critical
Status
Ratio
Values
Adiustments
Loads
HEADER FOR GABLE HIP
gable hip header B3
Date: 2/17/05
BeamChek 2.2
(3) 2x 12 DF North #2
BASE Fb = 825 ADJ Fb = 949
'91 NDS
Min Bearing Area
R1= 4.8 in2 R2= 2.1 in2 DL Defl 0.05 in
Beam Span
Beam Wtperft
Beam Weight
Max Moment
TL Max Defl
LL Max Defl
11.5 ft Reaction 1 2974 # Reaction 1 LL
12.3 # Reaction 2 1282 # Reaction 2 LL
141 # Maximum V 2974 #
6238'# Max V (Reduced) 2597 #
L 1240 TL Actual Defl L ! 734
L 1480 LL Actual Defl L 1 >1000
2143 #
899 #
Section (in3) Shear (in2) TL Defl (in)
LL Defl
94.92
78.90
OK
83%
50.63
35.65
OK
70%
0.19
0.57
OK
33%
0.13
0.29
OK
47%
Fb (psi)
Fv (psi)
E (psi x mil)
Fel (psi)
Base Values
Base Adjusted 949
B25
95
109
1.6
1.6
625
625
CF Size Factor
Cd Duration
Cr Repetitive
Ch Shear Stress
Cm Wet Use
1.000
1.15 1.15
BeamChek has automatically added the beam self -weight into the calculations.
Uniform TL: 120 = A
Uniform LL:
90
Point LL Point TL Distance Par Unif LL Par Unif TL
Start End
1500
Pt loads:
R1 = 2974
B = 2059
H
2.5
203
H = 270
Uniform Load A
U
R2 = 1282
SPAN = 11.5 FT
Uniform and partial uniform loads are lbs per lineal ft.
0
2.5
J
c ranch -lot 4
Choice
Conditions
Data
Attributes
Actual
Critical
Status
Ratio
Values
Adjustments
Loads
Beam for large dormer ridge
gable ridge
Date: 2/17105
BeamChek 2.2
(3) 1-314x 16 1.9E TJM Microllam® LVL
BASE Fb = 2600 ADJ Fb = 2875
Min Bearing Area R1= 5.3 in2 R2= 5.4 in' DL Defl 0.11 in
Beam Span
Beam Wt per ft
Beam Weight
Max Moment
TL Max Defl
LL Max Defl
17.0 ft
21.58 #
367 #
27405'#
L / 240
L/480
Reaction 1
Reaction 2
Maximum V
Max V (Reduced)
TL Actual Defl
LL Actual Defl
4009 # Reaction 1 LL
4038 # Reaction 2 LL
4038 #
3769 #
L/485
L / 663
2882 #
2903 #
Section (in3) Shear (in') TL Dell (in)
LL Defl
224.00
114.37
OK
51%
84.00
17.25
OK
21%
0.42
0.85
OK
49%
0.31
0.43
OK
72%
Fb (psi)
Fv (psi)
E (psi x mil)
Fcl (psi)
Base Values 2600
Base Adjusted 2875
285
328
1.9
1.9
750
750
CF Size Factor
Cd Duration
Cr Repetitive
Ch Shear Stress
Cm Wet Use
0.962
1.15 1.15
BeamChek has automatically added the beam self -weight into the calculations.
Uniform TL: 120 = A
Uniform LL:
90
Point LL Point TL Distance Par Unif LL Par Unif TL
Start End
3850
Pt loads:
R1 = 4009
B = 5100
H
8.5
45
45
H = 60
I=60
Uniform Load A
B
R2 = 4038
SPAN = 17 FT
Uniform and partial uniform loads are lbs per lineal ft.
0
4.0
12.0 17.0
February 22, 2005
Mr. Andy Schwaller, Chief Building Official
Garfield County Building & Planning Dept.
108 8i° Street, Suite 201
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: Cerise Ranch Lot #4
Dear Mr. Schwaller,
Please find enclosed a package submitted as application for a building permit for Lot #4 in the
Cerise Ranch Subdivision. You will find a completed application and minimum requirements
questionnaire; 2 sets of plans with Survey and Soils Report; Design Review Board approval letter
and our payment for the Plan Check Fee (check #3174).
Should there be any questions or if you need further information, please contact me any time at
the number listed below.
Sincerely,
213014,
Kristen Boothe
(970) 963-0808
Enclosures
CTLITHOMPSON
INCOR P O E• TED
SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE
LOT 4, CERISE RANCH
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Prepared For:
PARADIGM CONSTRUCTION
P.O. Box 1789
Basalt, CO 81621
Attention: Mr. Gerald Hazelbaker
Project No. GS -4347-A
October 4, 2004
234 Center Drive I Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Telephone: 970-945-2809 Fax: 970-945-7411
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SCOPE 1
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1
SITE CONDITIONS 2
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 2
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 2
SITE EARTHWORK - 3
FOUNDATION 4
FLOOR SYSTEM AND SLABS -ON -GRADE 5
BELOW -GRADE CONSTRUCTION 6
SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE 7
SURFACE DRAINAGE 7
LIMITATIONS 8
FIGURE 1 -APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS AND PIT
FIGURE 2 - SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS AND PIT
FIGURE 3 -EXTERIOR FOUNDATION WALL DRAIN
TABLE I - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
PARADIGM CONSTRUCTOR
LOT 4, CERISE RANCH
CTL 1 T PROJECT NO. GS.4347,A
SCOPE
This report presents the results of our soils and foundation investigation for
the single-family residence proposed on Lot 4, Cerise Ranch in Garfield County,
Colorado. We conducted the investigation to evaluate subsurface conditions at the
site and provide foundation recommendations for the proposed construction. Our
report was prepared from data developed during our field exploration, laboratory
testing, engineering analysis and our experience with similar conditions. Information
from our preliminary geotechnical investigation for the development ( Job No. GS -
2933, report dated January 2T, 2000) was used to supplement data obtained for this
investigation. This report includes a description of the subsurface conditions found
in our exploratory borings and pit, and presents our opinions and recommendations
for design criteria for recommended foundations, floor systems, and geotechnical and
construction criteria for details Influenced by the subsoils. The recommendations
contained in this report were developed based on the currently planned construction.
If plans will differ significantly from the descriptions contained herein, we should be
informed so that we can check that our recommendations and design criteria are
appropriate. A summary of our conclusions is presented below.
SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
1. Subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory borings
consisted of about 12 inches of sandy clay "topsoil" and about 13 feet
of sandy clay underlain by silty gravel, cobbles and boulders to the
total explored depth of 16 feet. Our exploratory pit penetrated about 1
foot of sandy clay "topsoil" over sandy clay to the total explored depth
of 5 feet. Free ground water was measured at depths between 2 and 4
feet in our exploratory borings and pit.
2. We recommend constructing the residence on footing foundations
supported by the undisturbed, sandy clay soil. Bottom of footings
should be constructed no deeper than elevation 6352 feet. Design and
construction criteria for footings are presented in the report
3. We judge potential for differential movement will be low for slabs -on -
grade supported by the undisturbed, native soils. Slab -on -grade floors
should be no lower than elevation 6352 feet.
PARADIGM CONSTRUCTION
LOT 4, CERISE RANCH
CTL 1 T PROJECT NO. GSd34T,A
1
4. Surface drainage should be designed to provide for rapid removal of
surface water away from the proposed residence. A foundation drain
should be installed around below -grade areas in the building.
SITE CONDITIONS
Cerise Ranch is a residential development located northeast of the intersection
of State Highway 82 and County Road 100 in Garfield County, Colorado. Lot 4 Is in
the west part of the development and south of Larkspur Road. The building envelope
is in the north part of the lot. Wetland areas are south of the building envelope.
Ground surface in the building envelope slopes gently down to the south at grades
visually estimated at less than 5 percent. Vegetation in the building envelope is grass
and weeds.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
We understand the proposed residence will be a one or two-story building with
an attached garage. At this writing, a crawl space is planned below the main level
floor. A slab -on -grade main level floor is being considered. The garage floor Is
planned as a slab -on -grade. Alt will likely be required adjacent to the building to
attain frost protection depth. Foundation Toads are expected to vary between 1,000
and 3,000 pounds per lineal foot of foundation wall with maximum interior column
loads of 30 kips.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Subsurface conditions below the building envelope were investigated by
drilling two exploratory borings (TH-1 and TH 2) and excavating one exploratory pit
(TP -1) at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. Exploratory borings were
drilled with 4 -Inch diameter, solid -stem auger and a track -mounted drill rig. The
PARADIGM CONSTRUCTION
LOT 4, CERISE RANCH
CTL ( T PROJECT NO. GSd347-A
2
exploratory pit was excavated with a mini -excavator provided by the client Drilling
operations were directed by our field representative who logged the soils
encountered in the borings and obtained samples. Excavation of the exploratory pit
was directed by our geotechnical engineer. Samples obtained in the field were
returned to our laboratory where typical samples were selected for testing. Graphic
logs of the soils encountered In our exploratory borings and pit are shown on Figure
2.
Subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory borings consisted of
about 12 Inches of sandy clay "topsoil" and about 13 feet of sandy clay underlain by
silty gravel, cobbles and boulders to the total explored depth of 16 feet. Our
exploratory pit penetrated about 1 foot of sandy clay "topsoil" over sandy clay to the
total explored depth of 5 feet Results of field penetration resistance tests and
observations during drilling and excavation Indicated the clay was stiff to very soft
and the gravel was dense. The clay soil within about 2 feet of the water table
possessed significantly lower shear strength and higher moisture content. Free
ground water was measured at depths between 2 and 4 feet in our exploratory
borings and pit. PVC pipe was Installed in the borings to allow future checks of
ground water levels. The pit was backfilled Immediately after excavation operations
were completed.
One sample of clay from a depth of 4 feet in TH-1 had an unconfined
compressive strength of about 800 psf. A sample of the silty gravel tested contained
12 percent silt and clay size particles (passing the No. 200 sieve). Results of
laboratory testing are summarized on Table 1.
SITE EARTHWORK
We anticipate excavations in the soils at this site can be accomplished using
conventional, heavy-duty excavation equipment Excavation sides will need to be
sloped or braced to meet local, state and federal safety regulations. The clay soil
PARADIGM CONSTRUCTION
LOT 4, CERISE RANCH
CTL T PROJECT NO. GS -430a
3
within excavation depths will classify as a Type B soil based on OSHA standards
governing excavations. Temporary slopes deeper than 5 feet should be no steeper
than 1 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) in Type B soils. Excavations below ground water
will require flatter slopes. Contractors should identify the soils encountered in the
excavations and refer to OSHA standards to determine appropriate slopes.
Free ground water was measured at depths between 2 and 4 feet in our
exploratory borings and pit. Ground water levels vary with seasonal conditions and
time of year. At this site, ground water generally will be closest to the ground surface
during spring and early summer months. We recommend sloping excavation floors to
gravity discharges or temporary sumps where water can be removed by pumping.
Excavations below elevation 6350 feet will require significant dewatering.
Grading plans were not provided to us. Fill will likely be required to raise
grades adjacent to the building. Areas which will receive fill should be stripped of
vegetation, organic soils and debris. The on-site soils free of organic matter, debris
and rocks larger than 6 inches In diameter can be used as fill outside the building
footprint. Fill should be placed In thin, loose lifts of 8 inches thick or less, moisture
conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at
least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. Density and
moisture content of fill should be checked by a representative of our firm during
placement
FOUNDATION
We recommend constructing the residence on footing foundations supported
by the undisturbed, sandy clay soil. The bottoms of the footings should be
constructed no deeper than elevation 6352 feet (see Figure 2). The completed
foundation excavation should be inspected by a representative of our flrm prior to
placing forms to confirm that the exposed subsoils are suitable for support of the
PARADIGM CONSTRUCTION
LOT4 CERISE RANCH
C7 . T PROJECT 140. GS -047.A
4
footings as designed. Recommended design and construction criteria for footings are
presented below.
1. The footing foundations should be supported on the undisturbed,
sandy clay soil. Solis loosened during the excavation or forming
process for the footings should be removed or the soils can be re -
compacted prior to placing concrete.
2. Footings should be designed for a maximum allowable soil bearing
pressure of 1,500 psf.
3. Continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of at least 16
inches. Foundations for isolated columns should have minimum
dimensions of 24 inches by 24 inches. Larger sizes may be required,
depending upon foundation Toads.
4. Grade beams and foundation walls should be well reinforced, top and
bottom, to span undisclosed loose or soft soil pockets. We
recommend reinforcement sufficient to span an unsupported distance
of at least 12 feet. Reinforcement should be designed by the structural
engineer.
5. The soils under exterior footings should be protected from freezing. We
recommend the bottom of footings be constructed at a depth of at least
36 inches below finished grades for frost protection.
FLOOR SYSTEM ANI) SLABS -ON -GRADE
The garage floor will be a slab -on -grade. A slab -on -grade floor Is being
considered for the main level living area. We recommend that slab -on -grade floors be
no lower than elevation 6352 feet (see Figure 2). . Based on our laboratory test data
and our experience, we judge slab -on -grade construction can be supported by the
undisturbed, native soils that are at least 2 feet above the ground water table with low
risk of differential movement and associated damage.
We recommend the following precautions for slab -on -grade construction at
this site.
1. Slabs should be separated from wall footings and column pads with
slip joints which allow free vertical movement of the slabs.
PARADIGM CONSTRUCTION
LOT 4 CERISE RANCH
CTL T PROJECT NO. GS -4347-A
5
2. Underslab plumbing should be pressure tested for leaks before the
slabs are poured. Plumbing and utilities which pass through slabs
should be isolated from the slabs with sleeves and provided with
flexible couplings to slab -supported appliances.
3. Exterior patio and porch slabs should be isolated from the residence.
These slabs should be well -reinforced to function as independent units.
4. Frequent control joints should be provided, in accordance with
American Concrete Institute (ACI) recommendations, to reduce
problems associated with shrinkage and curling.
BELOW -GRADE CONSTRUCTION
Foundation walls which extend below -grade should be designed for lateral
earth pressures where backfill is not present to about the same extent on both sides
of the wall. Many factors affect the values of the design lateral earth pressure. These
factors include, but are not limited to, the type, compaction, slope and drainage of the
backfill, and the rigidity of the wall against rotation and deflection. For a very rigid
wall where negligible or very little deflection will occur, an "at -rest" lateral earth
pressure should be used In design. For walls which can deflect or rotate 0.5 to 1
percent of wall height (depending upon the backfill types), lower "active" lateral earth
pressures are appropriate. Our experience Indicates typical below -grade walls in
residences can deflect or rotate slightly under normal design loads, and that this
deflection results in satisfactory wall performance. Thus, the earth pressures on the
walls will likely be between the "active° and "at -rest° conditions.
If the on-site soils are used as backfill, we recommend design of below -grade
walls using an equivalent fluld density of at least 50 pcf for this site. This equivalent
density does not include allowances for sloping backfill, surcharges or hydrostatic
pressures. The recommended equivalent density assumes deflection; some minor
cracking of walls may occur.
PARADIGM CONSTRUCTION
LOT 4, CERISE RANCH
CTL 1 T PROJECT NO. 63-4.147,4
6
Backfill placed adjacent to foundation wall exteriors should be free of organic
matter, debris and rocks larger than 4 inches in diameter. Backfill should be moisture
conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at
least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM ID 698) maximum dry density.
SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE
Water from rain, snow melt and surface irrigation of lawns and landscaping
frequently flows through relatively permeable backfill placed adjacent to a building
and collects on the surface of relatively impermeable soils occurring at the bottom of
the excavation. This can cause wet or moist conditions in below -grade areas after
construction. We recommend Installation of an exterior foundation drain around
below -ground areas in the residence. The exterior foundation drain should consist of
4 inch diameter, slotted, PVC pipe encased In free draining gravel. The drain should
lead to a positive gravity outlet, or to a sump pit where water can be removed by
pumping. Atypical foundation drain detail is presented on Figure 3.
Ventilation Is Important to maintain acceptable humidity levels in crawl spaces.
The mechanical systems designer should consider the humidity and temperature of
air, and air flow volumes, during design of crawl space ventilation systems. It may be
appropriate to install a ventilation system that is controlled by a humidistat.
SURFACE DRAINAGE
Surface drainage is critical to the performance of building foundations and
floor slabs. The mechanical systems designer should consider the humidity and
temperature of air, and air flow volumes, during design of crawl space ventilation
systems. We recommend the following precautions be observed during construction
and maintained at all times after the residence Is completed:
PARADIGM CONSTRUCTION
LOT 4, CERISE RANCH
CTL I 7 PROJECT NO. GS -4847,A
7
1. The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the residence should
be sloped to drain away from the residence in all directions. We
recommend providing a slope of at least 6 inches in the first 5 feet
around the residence.
2. Backfill around the exterior of foundation walls should placed be in
maximum 8 inch thick loose lifts, moisture conditioned to within 2
percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95
percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density.
3. The residence should be provided with roof gutters and downspouts.
Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits
of all backfill. Splash blocks and downspout extensions should be
provided at all discharge points.
4. Landscaping should be carefully designed to minimize irrigation.
Plants used near foundation walls should be limited to those with low
moisture requirements; irrigated grass should not be located within 5
feet of the foundation. Sprinklers should not discharge within 5 feet of
the foundation and should be directed away from the building.
Irrigation should be limited to the minimum amount sufficient to
maintain vegetation; the application of additional water will Increase
the likelihood of slab and foundation movements.
5. Impervious plastic membranes should not be used to cover the ground
surface immediately surrounding the residence. These membranes
tend to trap moisture and prevent normal evaporation from occurring.
Geotextile fabrics can be used to control weed growth and allow some
evaporation to occur.
LIMITATIONS
Our exploratory borings and pit were located to obtain a reasonably accurate
picture of subsurface conditions. Variations in the subsurface conditions not
indicated by our borings and pit will occur. We should observe the completed
foundation excavation to confirm subsurface conditions are suitable for support of
the footings as designed.
Our report was based on conditions disclosed by our exploratory borings and
pit, laboratory testing, engineering analysis and our experience. Criteria presented
reflect our understanding of the proposed construction. If construction will differ
PARADIGM CONSTRUCTION
LOT 4, CERISE RANCH
CTL IT PROJECT NO. GS -4347•A
8
significantly from the descriptions in the report, we should be informed so that we
can check that our recommendations and design criteria are appropriate.
This investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care
and skill ordinarily exercised by geotechnical engineers currently practicing under
similar conditions in the locality of thls project No other warranty, express or
implied, is made. If we can be of further service in discussing the contents of this
report or in the analysis of the influence of the subsurface conditions on the design of
the structure, please call.
Very Truly Yours
CTL fTHOMPSO
11
mes D. Ke4• gg
'oject Engineer
Reviewed rh
John Mecklin
Branch Ma • a
(5 copies sent)
PAR4DION CONSTRUCTION
LOT 4, CERISE RANCH
CLL 1 T PROJECT NO. GS -4347,A
9
Lae 4, Osibe Ranch
Project No. GS -4.347-A
Approximate
Locations of
Exploratory
Borings and Pit Fig. 1
— 6355
0
c
c
0
4-
0
0
W
MIN
NEN
MIR
r•
6350
6345
6340
6335
— 6330
5-4347–A
TH-1
EL=6352:5_
TH-2
EL=6354-
TP-1
EC=6355
Deepest Recommended
Footing and Floor Slob 6345;
Elevation (EL=6352)
6355
6350
SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPL
TP -1 '.
EL=6355
v
/1
a
•
6355 —
6350
Recommended
and Floor Slab 6345
(EL=6352)
6340
6335
MOM
MIM
MEW
OEM
MEI
MIN
•
5
0
rt
LEGEND:
® Sandy clay "topsoil". organic. very moist,
dark brown.
v
�1•
6330 —
NOTES:
Clay, sandy, medium stiff to very soft,
very moist to wet, brown. (CL)
Gravel, silty, cobbles, boulders, dense, wet,
brown, gray. (GP—GM)
Drive sample. The symbol 3/12 Indicates
that 3 blows of a 140 pound hammer
falling 30 inches were required to drive a
2.5 Inch 0.D. sampler 12 inches.
Indicates fres ground water level measured
on the day of drilling/excavating.
Indicates free ground water Ievei measured
on September 22. 2004.
Indicates practical auger refusal.
1. Exploratory borings were drilled on
September 10. 2004 with 4—inch diameter,
solid—stem auger and a track—mounted drill ti
PVC pipe was Installed In borings to allow
future checks of ground water level.
2. The exploratory pit, TP -1, was excavated with
mini—excavator on September 22. 2004. The
was backfilled immediately after exploratory
excavation operations were completed.
3. Locations and elevations of exploratory boring:
are approximate.
4. These exploratory borings aro subject to the
explanations, Iimitafions and conclusions as
contained in thls report.
.OGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS AND PIT
NOTE:
DRAIN SHOULD BE AT LEAST 2 INCHES
BELOW BOTTOM OF FOOTING AT THE
HIGHEST POINT AND SLOPE DOWNWARD
TO A POSITIVE GRAVITY OUTLET OR TO
A SUMP WHERE WATER CAN BE REMOVED
BY PUMPING.
SLOPE
PER
OSHA
SLOPE
PER REPORT
PROVIDE PVC SHEETING GLUED
TO FOUNDATION WALL TO REDUCE
MOISTURE PENETRATION.
REINFORCED STEEL
PER STRUCTURAL
DRAWINGS
ENCASE PIPE IN WASHED
CONCRETE AGGREGATE (ASTM
C33. NO. 57 OR NO. 67)
EXTEND GRAVE TO AT LEAST
1/2 HEIGHT OF FOOTING.
No. GS -4347-A
CRAWL SPACE
MINIMUM
8" MINIMUM
OR BEYOND
SLOPE FROM
OF FOOTING.
(WHICHEVER
1:1
BOTTOM
IS GREATER)
4 -INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED
DRAIN PIPE. THE PIPE SHOULD
BE PLACED IN A TRENCH WITH A
SLOPE RANGE BETWEEN 1/8 INCH
AND 1/4 INCH DROP PER FOOT
OF DRAIN.
BOTTOM OF EXCAVATION
PVC DRAIN PIPE
NETWORK IMBEDDED
IN WASHED CONCRETE
AGGREGATE
Exterior
F undation
Wall Drain
Ftp. 3
PROJECT NO. GS
• r
W
J
m
•
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
SOIL CLASSIFICATION
CLAY, SANDY (CL)
GRAVEL, SILTY (GM) 1
PASSING
NO. 200
SIEVE
(%)
N
SOLUBLE
SULFATES
(%)
UNCONFINED
COMPRESSIVE
STRENGTH
(PSF)
ATTERBERG LIMITS
PLASTICITY
INDEX
0
o 'c:
J
J
y
NATURAL
DRY
DENSITY
(PCF)
N
CO
NATURAL
MOISTUR
(%)
I.-
a
N
ao
o
r
X
d W
III
e
0
if
o
CO
±
'-
±
1—
'Note: Swell due to wetting under an applied load of 1,000 psf. Negative values Indicate consolidation.
H
z
W • W
1
wW
0
z
z
0
�
m Z
•0
O I W
it
O �.
• u
a
0
O
O.
U
H
0>
O.
N
O le
cu,
07
5 ene
0
ti
a�
c
O
T i
0a
N
co
N
.c
co
0
1
z
2Wo
~ U
W 1•
0 `o
ZZms (NI
O T
O 3 N
-� c in
mc)
U
0
0
J
W o
. c
CL T
a W �• glea
O co
co
Z
a o
O
0ao
U
•
Job located a
Job located
O
z
E
d
a
0
z
E
a
d
a 'o
d 0
c
COSS CO
O
`1 V
M L
• 8
O
« U
N O)
N E
« o
•a —
_ «
to d
y .1.0
•
c �^
l6 w
w tic.c {d
d 0
E
—
a
j
--s
`-d
shd,
:r
kz ra-
1
cz
li h
c
t
'r
%I
0)
0
0.
a
N
E
c
O
0
co
u0
0 ca
m
a° 0
m
d
L o
0
Y o
0
d
O
C N
a
Ij.
have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003.
When correction(s
Building Inspector
Phone (970) 945-8212
J •
•
No CH
Assessor's Parcel No
� BUILDING PE 1 CCAdvID
Job Address ra [-ty-I lel'_
L' 1 �+A
Owner SSt % • • _ / Atdia .dl e - Address
Contractor CLOW- Address
Seib cks: Front ear
Soils Test'
Footing 3 !G-ogT71if—
Foundation 3 ";-7-CS-77--
Grout
i l-05-%2Grout
Underground Plumbing
Rough Plumbing 42 -7 -7 -U$ -
Framing 0-7 --e."3-
Insulation 7 -( —eg J79—
Roofing �}
Drywall 7-Z$ -0y7-F¢_
Gas Piping G✓L1-on*
e?) -ft -
(307
)1 anck
Phone #—ItO?SCSLXS
Phone ei1CPRIga3
RH LH Zoning
NSPECTIONS
Weatherproofing
Mechanical
Electrical Rough (State)
Electrical Final tate)
Final hecklic�gp�ted?
Certificate Occupancy # / �j
Date lo- 3"0s
Septic System #
Date
Final
Other
NOTES
(continue on back)
l
INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS
THIS'CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB
• 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS
BUILDING PERMIT
GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Date IssueiL. k4.6.S.Zoned Area Permit No CIL' ;"-a's
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all
laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed
structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations
are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above
described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building
Inspector nd IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID.
aib
rirged,
Adtestor Legal DecriptionnOtlr o�
Contractor® tfers—
h4
Owoe
Setbacks From Side Side Rear
This Card Most Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection.
INSPECTION RECORD
Footing S , c ,
Foundation - '-2/_cf
7,
Underground Plumbing
Insulation L
7_/ 3-o5q
Rough Plumbing /0-7.7 _off
Drywall '1- 28.0r7�t4—
Chimney & Vent (c -1 Z
Electric Final (by State Inspecto�) toK
Gas Piping 6-z7_01j4-
Final /0-13_0 -
Electric Rough (By State Inspector»; -
Septic Final
Framing (0-27-x574/ '.!.
(To include Roof in place sod Window
and Doors installed).
Notes:
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING -
WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
Phone 3845003
THIS PERMIT 1S NOT TRANSFERABLE
109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado.
APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARE)
Datey�(a/I'F PLEAEDC OUTSIDEt3 W '-I CLEAR PLASTIC