The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication- Permit'! Garfield'County Building & Sanitation Department 108 8th Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003 Job Address Nature of Work Building Permit Qct 1—)- O Q—l 1 Use of . ing ^P 1eia i�� a , a -�� - Owner Q1�U.0 \ �1 Cn i 41 C-_U(l u� u�r Contractor Amount of Permit S 3 t0 `4 , 2 5j Jgioc<: a & M-Q4Z- & 6 i("Wet A1 t Permit No: GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8a Street, Sults 201, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-9452212 / Fax: 970-384-3470 / Inspection Lane: 970-384-5003 lc -13 Parcel/Schedule No: 2:2A 13 2 I o 7. O I 1 AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUC THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMH[TED TO AND REVIEWED BY 781 BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISASOANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WTIH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USI REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 301E201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THA IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE N07 FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATTON, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF ME ABOVE DESCRIBE) STRUCTURE, Till PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THIN COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. 101 ISSUANCE OF A PERM1 BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT 101 BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM T EREAFTE REQUIRING 788E CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEIM CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF IBIS JURISDICTION. TBE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED TBEREAPTE[t DOES NOT CONSHHHDTE AN ACCEPTANCE 0 ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITTES BY GARFIEID COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPON EBILITY FOR THESE ITEM? AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIPICLALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER AND OWNER COMMENTS AR II/TENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND 118 SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Cersem.Om t p l /C . 1 HEREBY ACT/NOV/LEDGE THAT [HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE pIVITLIL)e E V31InG An / /t(7 fo 150$, 6 d-., Job Address: !'i . L-744- 4-C a Lt -41- 611-1611-1ti f. . 04141• .»aMy1 s , Cd 1oIA 1 Lot No I 1 Block No: Subd. / Esemptlau: C EiLi 5 t it -Ar) r-r;•pi4,1 , 2 t C;lutc.4r/ Owner: P IGwtrJS Address Po-Itwy /787 AAA Ae ; . t.o Si & 1, 1%07 0) f z/ -51-1-3 Wk Pb: 3 A 1 -1.868 3 ^, Contractor: !1/ .i ».q 7p, , n,,, Address: .5 Ph: Lie. oqoo gag - 1t, 4 Architect/Engineer: So ti.aJ.+.tE-Mt_ hto.JAd.11 to 1/4c-, Address: 3/ADM, AtAtA4 •j» 64.IOi Ph: Co i of t. -tS Cl Lic. No. 5 Sq. Ft. of Building:3 SZ sf Sq. Ft of Lot: L, �, AcA 4S� Height: .1.40 l No. of Floors: Z 6 Use of Building: p*c, , fi1l', ^'t..- kflagra,wiclatlea 1 Qa 4 7 Describe Work: Aft& /4-o w.£, Co cr'P •• • nit 8 Class of Work: Ire-- New o Alteration o Remove o Addition o Move 9 10 Garage: ❑ Single o.'" Double Carport: o Single o Double ❑ Driveway Permit o On -Site Sew a Disposal Site Plan (Sante) 11 Valuation of Work:: SS 41-5-01 0 e— Adjusted Valuations: 5 1 J j'} - 12TrC.aa F. 4n( G9 yT /-] th0.1 'S-ra.o r sC A Fa( BCtik 5 To �..l 4 IRA . �;t.N..ic. 3770, Z oSi)40 P D aavu 154 P/UJ4M/ Q Ne uJ (h A STE ISSUED THIS AUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION PERIOD 1 HEREBY APPLICATION PROVISIONS COMPLETED GRANTING TO VIO LOCAL OFCO��`' NOTIC ELECTRICAL mown IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION IS NOT COMMENCED WflUIN 180 DAYS, OR, IF OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OK ABANDONED FORA OF 180 DAYS A7 ANY TIME AFTER WORK is COMMENCED. CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS AKNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL ND OF LAWS GOVERNING 1815 TYPE OF WORK Feria BE WITHIN WHITHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE OF A PERMIT DOLS NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY d, OR CANCEL TUE PRO ki ONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR Plan Check Fee- o ta Permit Fee: �S �I, .3�it Total Fee: Dated Permit L4saed: V i "I 7 O )43,73 ] .__L OCC Group: Cont. Type: ,.�+ jy,_ Rte_, Boning: A r ry./ &.. (Z $ / ' 1 Setbacks: r4. r C 0 A • - UCTIO. • R TRE PERFORMANCE ' 0 �V. - / a 11111 — Mann. Home: ]'SDS No. & F�ee•�� )p Z,.,n„ '- - n 4.: T 'APPROVAL/DATE fl en/. err C AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUC THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMH[TED TO AND REVIEWED BY 781 BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISASOANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WTIH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USI REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 301E201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THA IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE N07 FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATTON, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF ME ABOVE DESCRIBE) STRUCTURE, Till PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THIN COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. 101 ISSUANCE OF A PERM1 BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT 101 BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM T EREAFTE REQUIRING 788E CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEIM CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF IBIS JURISDICTION. TBE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED TBEREAPTE[t DOES NOT CONSHHHDTE AN ACCEPTANCE 0 ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITTES BY GARFIEID COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPON EBILITY FOR THESE ITEM? AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIPICLALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER AND OWNER COMMENTS AR II/TENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND 118 SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Cersem.Om t p l /C . 1 HEREBY ACT/NOV/LEDGE THAT [HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE pIVITLIL)e E V31InG An / /t(7 fo 150$, 6 d-., The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I un O • . d and agree to aWde by the above conditions for occupanc �use lanndd the issuance of a ate of • ...� y f. the dwe : under building permit # j f( ( HS Signature BpcontOct2004 Date ' VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicanti 4 y1 AddressLarkspur Drive. Date %- 2) •05 Finished (Livable Area): Main /SI Upper 510 Lower q/ 6 -41 y O -103s Other Subdivision&t Se �irrevt `P6�ase t. Lot/Block (..01- Contractor otContractor 003 Total Square Feet 397 Z v 7 = 7%628 na Valuation Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Crawl Space: Valuation Valuation % 1 0 9(0 9 Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation 211,0 v z 4 ()Pen Valuation 41Pll (�L Total Valuation 12,528 9 IR 4. 5184} SS9Z 3 .q,'194 A . RMr1 RADS rmv CED" Dsn IMEI ( s1 L SAN ;ND+c HER its e* I nu CONS 3RAN7' AILED YOE i BY ,DUNS Err MA lea r Malt (DERV burrs as OR LON DC NEON MEM VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant EPA1.1. Q4 N111 Address 0301 LarKspur Drt'lt Date 0-- 2 3 v C Finished (Livable Area): Main ti Upper 51r� Lower 'q/ 4 1/ l c = ro3 Other Total Square Feet 3 97 Z r Valuation Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Crawl Space: Valuation Valuation Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation Open Valuation Z! (c r 2 4104 (/L Total Valuation A Pte.„ f FCS. 4/43.73 Att Tip Subdivision Cell Se 4ic-4 'pkse 2 Lot/Block Lot /l Contractor 0 u-'r1-tr Anc- 744 5?Q 9IJ 17,9 Z'Ozj , s (045: 3/4),SS2A 7 .‘„5- 1%,62g fiz -7891 41 Ire 12,528 3Z349 11,52.8 5184 s/e`% 5592 5s -2L p ! 994 A . 37Qzo5 ,6 Building Plan g/Zoning Engineered Foundation Pro rty Line Setbacks A Driveway Permit " 30 eam Setbacks m4urveyed Site Plan Flood Plain vi, jkeptic Permit and Setbacks (/ Buil ' g Height ✓G aade/Topography 30% oningfrpa-cl Sign-offAttach Residential Plan Review List ct Fees -/�mimum Alicationuestionnaire pP Q`�}} Subdivision Plat Notes Air /LFire Department Review �Plannin sues (/V 'on Determination/Fees Subdivision Plat Notes r/ Re Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker Attach Conditions ✓ Aplcation Signed lan Reviewer To Sign Application acel/Schedule No. 40# Snowload Letter- Man£ Hms. GENERAL NOTES: RC Approval Grade/Topography 40% GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS for SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS and MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. Adequate and complete information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays because other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been.provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction under the Uniform Building Code". This book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit 1 t t t Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house - rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, an 80 M.P.H. windshear, wind exposure B, windload of 15 pounds per square foot, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing?. Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. NOTE: 1063.1 (7.) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope/ Yes 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easenients and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks4o apply. Yes ,// Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent pfoperties), streams or water courses? Yes 4. 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the prop Yes 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? / Yes ./ 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces andjthe clearances required between wood and earth? Yes 1/ 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces's yid soffits? Yes 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and ydind loads? Yes / 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof constructi'op? Yes ✓ 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof Yes or joists or trusses? 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all coop ns and beams? Yes ✓ 12. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the cave down to existing (u/disturbed) grade contours? Yes 13. Does the plan include any Stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No J1/4),Q1 VW, TR) 3 f 7 14. Does tie plan include a masonry fireplace incbxiing a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Building Code Chapter 37? Yes No ✓ 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Coe? Yes J No 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and v lation for all habitable rooms? Yes No 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes JJ No 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas fiances, boilers and water heaters indicated o plan? Yes No 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants?/ Yes ✓ No 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the architecture committee deny or reject your building plans? Yes ,/ No 21. Will this belie only residential structure on the parcel? Yes ,/ No If no -Explain: 22. Have two (3'complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes 23. Do you understand that the minimum dimensions a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft. long? Yes v .No 4 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other constructioi/code requirements? Yes ✓ No 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zo district? Yes ✓ No 26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes ✓ No 27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the applicaton of these changes? Yes ✓✓ No 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building Pmt? Yes No 29. Are you aware that you mast call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in 384-5003. Yes No 30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a X47.00 re-inpsection fee? Yes ,/ No 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy d occupancy of the building? Yes No 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority be ven for as Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the Urm Building Code? Yes No 5 33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department ft 625-8601. cm& 6a6 6/t.4rt►k4' e 3Tq —5799 Yes �.// No r/dos 41'14 Hf i"13tc..44b Ceruse tity4a+ Cars An€ fit€w!T 34: Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at ti of applicable inspection. Yes ✓ No 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Sch ule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes No 36. Do you know that the local fir district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes No (please check with the building department about this requirement) I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the st of jqy abrility. lit fD Signature of Owner a -C > / >•t z€_ Phone: 94o i-01 - 2 B 10 8 (days); Project Name: C S f- ILeciejtti. Lor O I Project Address: `- 1--01-11-1"L44 4.9-A J a Date (evenings) C-1/1-4148rM frLt1 C- irr Le L 3 Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a Remit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. Bpminreg072004 6 ENVIRONMENTAL DYNAMICS, INC. kept beierie kris callori �. stace mcgee miciiael ryan pk: 505 242 2851 fx 505 242 2852 Andy Schwaller Chief Building Officer Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108th Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Re: Cerise Ranch Lot 11 Dear Andy, My name is Stace McGee and I am the Project Manager for the above referenced project. I recently had a conversation with Gerry Hazelbaker and he requested that I clarify a couple of items concerning this project. The foundation system has been designed with an assumed soils bearing of: 1500 PSF. The floor framing members have been designed with an assumed floor load of: Dead Load: 20PSF Live Load: 40 PSF The foundation system has been designed with an assumed soils bearing of 1500 PSF. The roof framing members have been designed with an assumed roof load of: Dead Load: 15PSF Live Load: 45PSF Please see the notes and general notes on the framing plans. The drawings for this project have been reviewed using the 2003 International Residential Code (IRC) and to the best of our knowledge these plans comply with the IRC. If you have any other questions please do not hesitate to give us a call. Thanks for your time and have a good day. Repetfully, em J. SUacd McGee Grp., se ciAtet4 Lo -r LI C1 BUILDING SECTION @ LIVING ROOM/ENTRY 1/4" = 1'-0" NM • Loaf it IATI BUILDING SECTION @ MASTER SUITE 1/4" = 11-0" 02/18/05 10:23 FAX E.NVIKONMCNTAL DYNAMIC -5, INC. kcnt bcicrle kis callori j. state mcgce michael ryan ph. 905 2+1 2851 cr. 509 242 2852 10001/003 Fax Cover Sheet Date: February 18, 2005 9:30 AM Pages (inc. cover): 3 To: Garfield County Building & Planning Department Attn: Steve Hackett Zoning Compliance Fax: 970-384-3470 Project Name: Cerise Ranch Lot 11 From: J. Stace Mcgee Re: Building Height Complaince Sincerely, J. Stace McGee Environmental Dynamics, Inc. 505.242.2851 Project No: 0434 K(esponsiiife Qesiln of the 5ii,/t £nvironmrnt 02/18/05 10:23 FAX • Im002/003 CEelS?AL4 LOT ti C1 BUILDING SECTION @ LIVING ROOM/ENTRY 1/4" = 11-0. 02/18/05 10:23 FAX IQ003/003 Gratz-tse. RAKGI Lar c Fil BUILDING SECTION @ MASTER SUITE 1/4._11-0. Wintergreen {ort memorandum To: Gerald Hazelbaker - Paradigm Construction From: Tem -Ann Giandomenico (970) 376-2263 CC: File Dote: 01-26-05 Re: Cerise Ranch, Lot #11 DRB Requirements Via: Fed Ex Thank you for your submittal. We have reviewed t sheets, and colors. All have been reviewed and e lot #11 sub proved. Wintergreen Homes, LLC 77 Metcalf Road, Box 1530 Avon. Colorado 81620 970/949-4120 Fax: 970/949-9940 ittal package, drawings, catalog We have enclosed a stamped "reviewed" set for your i es. I will finish reviewing Lot #4 when I return on February 6, 2005. I will tum it around as soon as possible. Thank you for your patience, If further information is required, please do not hesitate to contact Tem -Ann Giandomenico (970) 376- 2263. Paradigm Construction 0824 Pine Crest Lane Snowmass Village CO 81615 (970) 922-9051 Kevin McClure This document may contain PRMI 85 -PD and/or CONFIDENTIAL information intended ONLY for the use of the specific individual or entity named above. It you are not the Intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized dissemination or copying of this document or the Information contained In It b stricty prohibited. If you have received this document in error, please notify the sender at once by telephone and return the original document to the above address via the US Postal Service. Thank you. January 24, 2005 Mr. Andy Schwaller, Chief Building Official Garfield County Building & Planning Dept. 108 8t Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO Re: Cerise Ranch Lot #11 Dear Mr. Schwaller: Please find enclosed a package submitted as application for a building permit for Lot #11 in the Cerise Ranch Subdivision. You will find a completed application and minimum requirements questionnaire; 2 sets of plans with Survey and Soils Report; Design Review Board approval letter and our payment for the Plan Check Fee (Check #1101) . Should there be any questions or if you need further information, please contact me any time. My card in enclosed and my numbers are listed below. Si erald Hazelbaker President PARADIGM CONSTRUCTION CORP. of CO 970-309-2868 (Cell) 970-923-5640 (Home) GAH/nal Enclosures CTLITHOMPSON SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE LOT 11, CERISE RANCH GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Prepared For: PARADIGM CONSTRUCTION P.O. Box 1789 Basalt, CO 81621 Attention: Mr. Gerald Hazelbaker Project No. GS -4347-B 234 Center Drive Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 October 4, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE 1 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 2 SITE EARTHWORK 3 FOUNDATION 4 FLOOR SYSTEM AND SLABS -ON -GRADE 5 BELOW -GRADE CONSTRUCTION 6 SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE 7 SURFACE DRAINAGE 7 LIMITATIONS 8 FIGURE 1 -APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS AND PIT FIGURE 2 - SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS AND PIT FIGURE 3 -EXTERIOR FOUNDATION WALL DRAIN TABLE 1- SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PARADIGM CONSTRUCTION LOT 11, CERISE RANCH CTL 1 T PROJECT NO. GS -4347.B SCOPE, This report presents the results of our soils and foundation investigation for the single-family residence proposed on Lot 11, Cerise Ranch in Garfield County, Colorado. We conducted the investigation to evaluate subsurface conditions at the site and provide foundation recommendations for the proposed construction. Our report was prepared from data developed during our field exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis and our experience with similar conditions. Information from our preliminary geotechnical investigation for the development ( Job No. GS - 2933, report dated January 27, 2000) was used to supplement data obtained for this investigation. This report includes a description of the subsurface conditions found in our exploratory borings and pit, and presents our opinions and recommendations for design criteria for recommended foundations, floor systems, and geotechnical and construction criteria for details influenced by the subsoils. The recommendations contained in this report were developed based on the currently planned construction. If plans will differ significantly from the descriptions contained herein, we should be informed so that we can check that our recommendations and design criteria are appropriate. A summary of our conclusions is presented below. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS ci16/t/1 itt cleKi Pb des 0- 1. Subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory borings consisted of about 12 inches of sandy clay "topsoil" and about 19 to 20 feet of sandy clay underlain by silty gravel, cobbles and boulders to the total explored depth of 23 feet Our exploratory pit penetrated about 1 foot of sandy clay "topsoil" over sandy clay to the total explored depth of 8 feet. Free ground water was measured at depths between 4 and 8 feet in our exploratory borings and pit. 2. We recommend constructing the residence on footing foundations supported by the undisturbed, sandy clay soil. Bottom of footings should be constructed no deeper than elevation 6364 feet. Design and construction criteria for footings are presented in the report 3. We judge potential for differential movement will be low for slabs -on - grade supported by the undisturbed, native soils. Slab -on -grade floors should be no lower than elevation 6364 feet. PARADIGM CONSTRUCTION LOT 11, CERISE RANCH CTL I T PROJECT NO. GS -43474 1 4. Surface drainage should be designed to provide for rapid removal of surface water away from the proposed residence. A foundation drain should be installed around below -grade areas in the building. SITE CONDITIONS Cerise Ranch is a residential development located northeast of the intersection of State Highway 82 and County Road 100 in Garfield County, Colorado. Lot 11 is in the central part of the development and south of Larkspur Road. The building envelope is in the north part of the lot Wetland areas are south of the building envelope. Ground surface in the building envelope slopes gently down to the south at grades visually estimated at less than 10 percent. Vegetation in the building envelope is grass and weeds. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION We understand the proposed residence will be a two-story building with an attached garage. At this writing, the lower level is planned to be constructed below - grade at the uphill side. A slab -on -grade lower level floor is being considered. The garage floor will be a slab -on -grade. Fill will likely be required adjacent to the building to attain frost protection depth. Foundation loads are expected to vary between 1,000 and 3,000 pounds per lineal foot of foundation wall with maximum interior column loads of 30 kips. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions below the building envelope were investigated by drilling two exploratory borings (T1-1-1 and TH-2) and excavating one exploratory pit (TP -1) at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. Exploratory borings were drilled with 4 -inch diameter, solid -stem auger and a track -mounted drill rig. The PARADIGM CONSTRUCTION LOT 11, CERISE RANCH 1 t DRD.IF_CT NO. GS -4347.S 2 exploratory pit was excavated with a mini -excavator provided by the client Drilling operations were directed by our field representative who logged the soils encountered in the borings and obtained samples. Excavation of the exploratory pit was directed by our geotechnical engineer. Samples obtained in the field were returned to our laboratory where typical samples were selected for testing. Graphic logs of the soils encountered in our exploratory borings and pit are shown on Figure 2. Subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory borings consisted of about 12 inches of sandy clay "topsoil" and about 19 to 20 feet of sandy clay underlain by silty gravel, cobbles and boulders to the total explored depth of 23 feet Our exploratory pit penetrated about 1 foot of sandy clay "topsoil" over sandy clay to the total explored depth of 8 feet Results of field penetration resistance tests and observations during drilling and excavation indicated the clay was stiff to very soft and the gravel was dense. The clay soil within about 4 feet of the water table possessed significantly lower shear strength and higher moisture content Free ground water was measured at depths between 4 and 8 feet in our exploratory borings and pit. PVC pipe was installed in the borings to allow future checks of ground water levels. The pit was backfilled immediately after excavation operations were completed. One sample of clay from a depth of 9 feet in TH-1 had an unconfined compressive strength of about 1,400 psf. A sample of the silty sandy clay tested contained 67 percent silt and clay size particles (passing the No. 200 sieve). Results of laboratory testing are summarized on Table I. SITE EARTHWORK We anticipate excavations in the soils at this site can be accomplished using conventional, heavy-duty excavation equipment. Excavation sides will need to be sloped or braced to meet local, state and federal safety regulations. The clay soil PARADIGM CONSTRUCTION LOT 11, CERISE RANCH ..-. nein 'err un RC1L7fl 3 within excavation depths will classify as a Type B soil based on OSHA standards governing excavations. Temporary slopes deeper than 5 feet should be no steeper than 1 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) in Type B soils. Excavations below ground water will require flatter slopes. Contractors should identify the soils encountered in the excavations and refer to OSHA standards to determine appropriate slopes. Free ground water was measured at depths between 4 and 8 feet in our exploratory borings and pit. Ground water levels vary with seasonal conditions and time of year. At this site, ground water generally will be closest to the ground surface during spring and early summer months. We recommend sloping excavation floors to gravity discharges or temporary sumps where water can be removed by pumping. Excavations below elevation 6362 feet will require significant dewatering. Grading plans were not provided to us. Fill will likely be required to raise grades adjacent to the building. Areas which will receive fill should be stripped of vegetation, organic soils and debris. The on-site soils free of organic matter, debris and rocks larger than 6 inches in diameter can be used as fill outside the building footprint Fill should be placed in thin, loose lifts of 8 inches thick or less, moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. Density and moisture content of fill should be checked by a representative of our firm during placement. FOUNDATION We recommend constructing the residence on footing foundations supported by the undisturbed, sandy clay soil. The bottoms of the footings should be constructed no deeper than elevation 6364 feet (see Figure 2). The completed foundation excavation should be inspected by a representative of our firm prior to placing forms to confirm that the exposed subsoils are suitable for support of the PARADIGM CONSTRUCTION LOT 11, CERISE RANCH 4 footings as designed. Recommended design and construction criteria for footings are presented below. 1. The footing foundations should be supported on the undisturbed, sandy clay soil. Soils loosened during the excavation or forming process for the footings should be removed or the soils can be re - compacted prior to placing concrete. 2. Footings should be designed for a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,500 psf. 3. Continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of at least 16 inches. Foundations for isolated columns should have minimum dimensions of 24 inches by 24 inches. Larger sizes may be required, depending upon foundation loads. 4. Grade beams and foundation walls should be well reinforced, top and bottom, to span undisclosed loose or soft soil pockets. We recommend reinforcement sufficient to span an unsupported distance of at least 12 feet Reinforcement should be designed by the structural engineer. 5. The soils under exterior footings should be protected from freezing. We recommend the bottom of footings be constructed at a depth of at least 36 inches below finished grades for frost protection. FLOOR SYSTEM AND SLABS -ON -GRADE The garage floor will be a slab -on -grade. A slab -on -grade floor is being considered for the main level living area. We recommend that slab -on -grade floors be no lower than elevation 6364 feet (see Figure 2).. Based on our laboratory test data and our experience, we judge slab -on -grade construction can be supported by the undisturbed, native soils that are at least 2 feet above the ground water table with low risk of differential movement and associated damage. We recommend the following precautions for slab -on -grade construction at this site. 1. Slabs should be separated from wall footings and column pads with slip joints which allow free vertical movement of the slabs. PARADIGM CONSTRUCTION LOT 11, CERISE RANCH CTL I T PROJECT NO. GS -4.147-13 5 2. Underslab plumbing should be pressure tested for leaks before the slabs are poured. Plumbing and utilities which pass through slabs should be isolated from the slabs with sleeves and provided with flexible couplings to slab -supported appliances. 3. Exterior patio and porch slabs should be isolated from the residence. These slabs should be well -reinforced to function as independent units. 4. Frequent control joints should be provided, in accordance with American Concrete Institute (ACI) recommendations, to reduce problems associated with shrinkage and curling. BELOW -GRADE CONSTRUCTION Foundation walls which extend below -grade should be designed for lateral earth pressures where backfill is not present to about the same extent on both sides of the wall. Many factors affect the values of the design lateral earth pressure. These factors include, but are not limited to, the type, compaction, slope and drainage of the backfill, and the rigidity of the wall against rotation and deflection. For a very rigid wall where negligible or very little deflection will occur, an "at -rest" lateral earth pressure should be used in design. For walls which can deflect or rotate 0.5 to 1 percent of wall height (depending upon the backfill types), lower "active" lateral earth pressures are appropriate. Our experience indicates typical below -grade walls in residences can deflect or rotate slightly under normal design loads, and that this deflection results in satisfactory wall performance. Thus, the earth pressures on the walls will likely be between the "active" and "at -rest" conditions. If the on-site soils are used as backfill, we recommend design of below -grade walls using an equivalent fluid density of at least 50 pcf for this site. This equivalent density does not include allowances for sloping backfill, surcharges or hydrostatic pressures. The recommended equivalent density assumes deflection; some minor cracking of walls may occur. PARADIGM CONSTRUCTION LOT 11, CERISE RANCH t bf[LIPfl NO. GS4147 B 6 Backfill placed adjacent to foundation wall exteriors should be free of organic matter, debris and rocks larger than 4 inches in diameter. Backfill should be moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE Water from rain, snow melt and surface irrigation of lawns and landscaping frequently flows through relatively permeable backfill placed adjacent to a building and collects on the surface of relatively impermeable soils occurring at the bottom of the excavation. This can cause wet or moist conditions in below -grade areas after construction. We recommend installation of an exterior foundation drain around below -ground areas in the residence. The exterior foundation drain should consist of 4 inch diameter, slotted, PVC pipe encased in free draining gravel. The drain should lead to a positive gravity outlet, or to a sump pit where water can be removed by pumping. A typical foundation drain detail is presented on Figure 3. Ventilation is important to maintain acceptable humidity levels in crawl spaces. The mechanical systems designer should consider the humidity and temperature of air, and air flow volumes, during design of crawl space ventilation systems. It may be appropriate to install a ventilation system that is controlled by a humidistat SURFACE DRAINAGE Surface drainage is critical to the performance of building foundations and floor slabs. The mechanical systems designer should consider the humidity and temperature of air, and air flow volumes, during design of crawl space ventilation systems. We recommend the following precautions be observed during construction and maintained at all limes after the residence is completed: PARADIGM CONSTRUCTION LOT 11, CERISE RANCH rn I T PROJECT NO GS -4341a 7 1.. The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the residence should be sloped to drain away from the residence in all directions. We recommend providing a slope of at least 6 inches in the first 5 feet around the residence. 2. Backfill around the exterior of foundation walls should placed be in maximum 8 inch thick loose lifts, moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. 3. The residence should be provided with roof gutters and downspouts. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Splash blocks and downspout extensions should be provided at all discharge points. 4. Landscaping should be carefully designed to minimize irrigation. Plants used near foundation walls should be limited to those with low moisture requirements; irrigated grass should not be located within 5 feet of the foundation. Sprinklers should not discharge within 5 feet of the foundation and should be directed away from the building. Irrigation should be limited to the minimum amount sufficient to maintain vegetation; the application of additional water will increase the likelihood of slab and foundation movements. 5. Impervious plastic membranes should not be used to cover the ground surface immediately surrounding the residence. These membranes tend to trap moisture and prevent normal evaporation from occurring. Geotextile fabrics can be used to control weed growth and allow some evaporation to occur. LIMITATIONS Our exploratory borings and pit were located to obtain a reasonably accurate picture of subsurface conditions. Variations in the subsurface conditions not indicated by our borings and pit will occur. We should observe the completed foundation excavation to confirm subsurface conditions are suitable for support of the footings as designed. Our report was based on conditions disclosed by our exploratory borings and pit, laboratory testing, engineering analysis and our experience. Criteria presented reflect our understanding of the proposed construction. If construction will differ PARADIGM CONSTRUCTION LOT 11, CERISE RANCH CTL I T PROJECT NO. GS -4347-B 8 significantly from the descriptions in the report, we should be informed so that we can check that our recommendations and design criteria are appropriate. This investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by geotechnical engineers currently practicing under similar conditions in the locality of this project. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. If we can be of further service in discussing the contents of this report or in the analysis of the influence of the subsurface conditions on the design of the structure, please call. Very Truly Yours CTL 1 THOMPSON, = Y, RJes D. Kell , '`:'° ,,Im M. .e Pject Engineer`''',.t,,.;.k;ry JDK:cd (5 copies sent) PARADIGM CONSTRUCTION LOT 11, CERISE RANCH 9 SCALE 7'- lar 8 C Paradigm Oone tictlon '.� lout. OM a Farah $ Project No. GS -4347-B Approximate Locations of Expl rat ry B rings and Pit rig. 1 ( r , • NNE 0 • c c 0 0 • W • 6370 6365 6360 6355 6350 clay "topsoil", organic, moist, dark Ity, sondy, scattered sandstone stiff to soft, slightly moist to wet, own. (CL—ML) silty, cobbles, boulders, dense, wet, gray. (GP—GM) ample. The symbol 3/12 indicates blows of a 140 pound hammer 30 inches were required to drive a h 0.D. sampler 12 inches. is fres ground water level measured y — day of drillIng/excavating. 9s free ground water level measured (ember 22, 2004. is practical auger refusal. ary borings were drilled on 6345 er 10, 2004 with 4—Inch diameter, im auger and a track—mounted drill rig. a was installed In borings to allow hacks of ground water level. 'oratory pit, TP -1, was excavated with a 6340 cavator on September 22, 2004. The pit :kfilled Immediately after exploratory on operotlons were completed. s and elevations of exploratory borings roximate. xploratory borings are subject to the tions, limitations and conclusions as id in thls report. Protect No. GS -4347—B Flg. 2 NOTE: ' DRAIN SHOULD BE AT LEAST 2 INCHES BELOW BOTTOM OF FOOTING AT THE HIGHEST POINT AND SLOPE DOWNWARD TO A POSITIVE GRAVITY OUTLET OR TO A SUMP WHERE WATER CAN BE REMOVED BY PUMPING. SLOPE PER OSHA ENCASE PIPE IN WASHED CONCRETE AGGREGATE (ASTM C33, NO. 57 OR NO. 67) EXTEND GRAVE TO AT LEAST 1/2 HEIGHT OF FOOTING. 2 1 a Project N . GS -4347-B SLOPE PER REPORT BELOW GRADE WALL BACKFILL (COMPOSITION PND COMPACTION PER REPORT) ll COVER GRAVEL WITH FILTER FABRIC 2" MINIMUM 8" MINIMUM OR BEYOND 1:1 SLOPE FROM BOTTOM OF FOOTING. (WHICHEVER IS GREATER) 4 -INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE. THE PIPE SHOULD BE PLACED IN A TRENCH WITH A SLOPE RANGE BETWEEN 1/8 INCH AND 1/4 INCH DROP PER FOOT OF DRAIN. PROVIDE PVC SHEETING GLUED TO FOUNDATION WALL TO REDUCE MOISTURE PENETRATION. REINFORCED STEEL PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS CRAWL SPACE 6" BOTTOM OF EXCAVATION PVC DRAIN PIPE / NETWORK IMBEDDED IN WASHED CONCRETE AGGREGATE Exterior Foundati n Wail Drain Fig. 3 PROJECT NO. GS N H J W LU 1— CO LLI 1— } w 0 J Q m g m 5 LL. 0 2 2 0 co SOIL CLASSIFICATION CLAY, SILTY, SANDY (CL -ML) CLAY, SILTY, SANDY (CL -ML) (%) BAMS 00 'ON DNISSVd t -- co SOLUBLE SULFATES (%) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (PSF) 0 3ERG LIMITS PLASTICITY INDEX (96) K wR Q O amat J J N J 0 NATURAL DRY DENSITY (PCF) N O O NATURAL MOISTUR (%) 21.7 1 W Oi I- 2 p W W 0 6 0 f IBORING S1 1- N F 0 cri COa 'Note: Swell due to wetting under an applied load of 1,000 psf. Negative values Indicate consolidation. l I(< • • CTLITHOMPSON INC O P P O■• T C 0 October 13, 2004 Paradigm Construction P.O. Box 1789 Basalt, CO 81621 Attention: Mr. Gerald Hazelbaker Subject: Soils & Foundation Investigation Single -Family Residence Lot 11, Cerise Ranch Garfield County, Colorado Project No. GS -4347-B We reviewed a site plan for Lot 11 Cerise Ranch that was provided to us by Environmental Dynamics via fax on October 11, 2004. Based on ground surface contours shown on the site plan, bottoms of footings and slab -on -grade floors should be constructed no deeper than elevation 6364 feet. The lower level will be constructed with a slab -on -grade floor. A revised exterior foundation wall drain is attached. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project Please call if you have questions. Very Truly Yours CTL I THOMPSON, INO� mes D. K roject Engi JDK:cd (5 copies sent) 234 Center Drivel Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970-945-2809 Fax: 970-945-7411 • • • SLOPE PER OSHA SLOPE PFR RFPnRT BACKFILL (COMPOSMON AND COMPACTION PER NOTE: DRAIN SHOULD BE AT LEAST 2 INCHES BELOW BOTTOM OF FOOTING AT THE HIGHEST POINT AND SLOPE DOWNWARD TO A POSITIVE GRAVITY OUTLET OR TO A SUMP WHERE WATER CAN BE 2-3' REMOVED BY PUMPING. PROVIDE PVC SHEETING GLUED TO FOUNDATION WALL TO REDUCE PREFABRICATED - MOISTURE PENETRATION DRAINAGE COMPOSITE (MIRADRAIN 6000 OR EQUIVALENT) COVER GRAVEL WITH FILTER FABRIC BELOW GRADE WAL1 REINFORCING STEEL PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS PROVIDE POSITIVE SUP JOINT BETWEEN SLAB AND WALL. FLOOR SLAB 8' MINIMUM OR BEYOND 1:1 SLOPE FROM BOTTOM OF FOOTING. (WHICHEVER I5 GREATER) PVC DRAIN NETWORK IMBEDDED IN WASHED CONCRETE AGGREGATE FOOTING OR PAD 4 -INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE. THE PIPE SHOULD BE LAID IN A TRENCH WITH A SLOPE RANGING BETWEEN 1/8 INCH AND 1/4 INCH DROP PER FOOT OF DRAIN. ENCASE PIPE IN WASHED CONCRETE AGGREGATE (ASTM C33, NO. 57 OR NO. 67). EXTEND GRAVEL TO AT LEAST 1/2 HEIGHT OF FOOTING. 6 Project No. GS -4374-B 1 1 Exterior Foundation Wall Drain Rp.3 (Revised) No 1L1�3 Assessor's Parcel Noo 1 -?tel -C -CAl Date 3- (I -n`) BUILDING PERMIT CARD j eta I _. Address MI I! e # LILYv��f7cc Address Phone # ?CR -"srcx Job • - -ss * 1� t_ _ .• Owne Ill AILai '�� M1 Contractorn_CflP" Se Soils Test Footing vr—Z-o:-/•• Foundation Grout Underground Plumbing l, hr. 6itorll/ b -/6-o57)4( Rough Plumbing / 27 -11 -craft - Framing /Z -3c -0 jiff Insulation 1-1/-0 G T71 - Roofing Drywall L-3-04 Gas Piping Other 110 c {pQe r� u �� 44/ / ' "T 10.5 RH LH Zoning INSPECTIONS Weatherproofing Mechanical Electrical Rough (State) ✓ Electrical Final tate) Final heckli m Certificate Occupancy J�� Date (per/ Septic System # Date Final CAttAPQ at.w. e y-ASF3')a 7 c) BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued3j11./...Zoned Area Permit No . (3 AGRE EMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. �, �� Use Zfflfl c • C.l�1 n >! t:�ll [.A�,; Ad o Legal Description (1 C 1� r- - Contracto V1-cre Setbacks ide Side Rear This Card Must 1 qty / 3 ible From The Street Until Final Inspection. TION RECORD Footing 5 2,c Foundation 5-4_ 6 -p if Underground Plumbing(roy , cp,;-;LG-cOlif Insulation /4 -064 - Rough Plumbing ^ ,r. , , - - r' Drywall 9 _3_0(0- Chimney & Vent . Electric Final (by State Ins for&,!4jfrl / Gas Piping L . ,,: '-� i -,-, Final' -/.3-D6, .ks�a7E Electric Rough (By State Inspector)lll Septic Final Framing -je — l�DDA (To include Roof in place ind Windows and Doors installed). Notes: ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phone 384-5003 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. APP0 EDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD IF PLACED OUTSIDE - 1 VER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC