Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- Permit.Garfield County Building & Sanitation Department 108 t' Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003 NO. A3'\ Job Address / g 5 ill aCtddCJ W ©Cct PCt GELDS Nature of Work Buifdin2 Permit �39� ®��3 ' 09- (0 I Use of Building�l� ((�%l�l rS� 5 u 0 S a' Owner J. l D ?-€. MOO 4- r) CI Contractor Amount of Permit $ r' 14, (77-r— Date TA L 70 Clerk t D— c.R7 —dc—{ Permit No: GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8i° Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212/ Fax: 970-384-3470 / Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 fR 1 1 ParceUSchedule No: J(f-633-C/VrI Job Address: o l83 /'ii - ) oo j?.�� Block No: Sypd. / j%(,y1,(,t 1 p ri„Goe, d . _ 1 Lot No: Exemption• L kr- V IQ.t J L 2 Oxygen 416314;ayf Nr46.14t k.141ut Address at590-2 el )Sul- Ph: t;J )3 76 791 Wk Ph: X,9 -k' 6 of °�`ctor: t �aunnctl--, Address: U co_ Inn.) Ph: Sc2n Q Lic. No. 4 jijSS.LQ1.1 Alt/et/En /et/En ineer: t5ca12iUnn Address: Ge,Id3-4.c�804 ! DA(45 t3'15-incl Lic. No. 537 5 Sq. Ft. of Building: y 3 ` 3 b Sq. Ft. of Lot: s (0604 thee Height: . Y.; / No. Floors: 6 Use of Building: n - ` l 61 n .1 ?(rYYti L ladt._ at.0 . �9itai PE,,f Z -It- eA0Ao4 7 Describe Work: 00 Q S.hr U Class of Work: New o Alteration o Remove ❑ Addition o Move 8 9 10 Garage: o Single Ii Double Carport: ❑ Single ❑ Double ❑ Driveway Permit o On -Site Sewage Disposal et' Site Plan FAQ. ip 4- (Septic) 11 Valuation of Work: $ Adjusted Vel ions: $ Q� • 12 Special Conditions: ,�Mr� ti 'wisp/ r- '1-/r-05" .R' 3z7 /6S �.9(. nx-'t 1 o Oe /VtwVa.ivar a /II, A SEPARATE ISSUED THIS AUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION PERIOD 1 HEREBY APPLICATION PROVISIONS COMPLETED GRANTING TO LOCA OF NOTICE ELECTRICAL PERMIT I5 REQUIRED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID 1F WORK OR IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO VIO TE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY 1 W RECUL TI. CONSTRUCTION OR THE RUCTIO / AND MUST BE CONSTRUCTION OR,IF FOR A COMMENCED. EXAMINED THIS CORRECT. ALL WILL BE OR NOT. THE GIVE AUTHORITY OTHER STATE OR PERFORMANCE 0 071 Plan Check Fee- 99 g/ ' Q 'T Permit Fee: 2270.53" 3-i-34-15. ,3y75. Taal Fee: Dated Permit Issued: ��,� 1111,���ss,,,, Q 2 y4/ .41/ J / 237 J3 d 1 10 OCC Group: E. r1 1, J J t..j'�( Const. Type: /j Q / IL AI Zoning: I\ l\ Setbacks: t A I t Jed Manu. Home: �i- n 37; /3 ISDS No. & Fee: hi: I E *t� 7:2�. ` 4�3 G. B 1 x i G. DEPT. APP'IVA /DATE APPROVAL/DATE 1' AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS ekAND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE Q'1. INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. loiD 1 ,t3jc 1A. y�rfom 003 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL) . A "514 W The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1997 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7' Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMSHAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. • • I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancyausse and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # 1 . aaall adieed--) .-.E0 • - o Signature Date Bpcont03/2004 VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION b\Ars ApplicantpSubdivision croltacior Val -3 t Address II�l.,5�0 Lot/Block /1 Date `I oct Contractor Russ (( i&a.ww r, u Finished (Livable Area): Main / 8O Upper 1100 Lower Other Total Square Feet 35a,0 y 69 Valuation Basement: Unfinished $'S7 t` 4 1 Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Valuation 6c9) k i$ Crawl Space: Valuation 30II Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation Open Valuation «16 Total Valuation z 411 35, / 37 qoo Coo$ 103 1(01 4440 SQ - TR 's %-415 VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant ,AL t S Subdivision crevatogr.-w1 AddressLot/Block // Date `I (�31oc/ Contractor k se (( 4uwd itvacifit Finished (Livable Area): Main / a0, Upper /10(0 Lower Other Total Square Feet 350co V / Valuation Basement: Unfinished $ 57 f Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Valuation &9D !g Crawl Space: Valuation 3b Y9 Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation Open Valuation 9C6 50/ \I Total Valuation 1L 85 4343 x �9 3°1, 047 24/,914) 35,137 /4440o I4,400 r o s,70 (eta) 3 GD4g 103 1101 327 /4 $ pcR.sAt 1 3S24.66 37%4/ V 21. 7‘1, PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant (411,07 7 1400M Date /143-04 Building Planning/Zoning /Engineered Foundation Property Line Setbacks Alf 4 Driveway Permit AI,430ft Stream Setbacks �nu veyed Site Plan All, Flood Plain /%/,dSeptic Permit and Setbacks .X.ilding Height - rade/Topography 30% ✓Zoning Sign -off ttach Residential Plan Review List t..,4 ad Impact Fees Min/HO Minimum Application Questionnaire lA/DRC Approval ✓S/ubdivision Plat Notes L•••Grade/Topography 40% NriFire Department Review /I.AABlanning Issues i/ Valuation Determination/Fees ubdivision Plat Notes ✓Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker . Z Attach Conditions ,/A<p lication Signed ✓ P1an Reviewer To Sign Application �(,j. Water and Sewer �/ParceVSchedule No. 4011 Snowload Letter- Mani'. Hins. GENERAL NOTES: L GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS for SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS and MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. Adequate and complete information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays because other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction under the Uniform Building Code". This book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house - rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, an 80 M.P.H. windshear, wind exposure B, windload of 15 pounds per square foot, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. NOTE: 106.3.1 (7.) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do�apply. Yes f� 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent roperties), streams or water courses? Yes_ 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes 2 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design?/ Yes f/ 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and tlye clearances required between wood and earth? Yes I/ 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces's anji soffits? Yes �/ 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wir loads? Yes ll// 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction Yes 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rakers or joists or trusses? Yes 1 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all coluand beams? Yes 1/ 12. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing (ur sturbed) grade contours? Yes 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and mo el and Colorado ase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes !� No ( tI 1-Lue motel 14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Building ode Chapter 37? Yes No 3 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Coe? Yes No 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ver lation for all habitable rooms? Yes j/ No 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes saNo 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on a plan? Yes No 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes No 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will not be accepted without it. Yes V No 21. Will this bf the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes ►/ No If no -Explain: 22. Have two (2.) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes (/ 23. Do you unde stand that the minimum dimensions a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft. long? Yes No 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other constructs code requirements? Yes !� No 4 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zo'}o district? Yes V No 26. Does the pl accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection tyy the Garfield County Building Department? Yes 1/ No 27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the applic ion of these changes? Yes No 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your buildin/ermit? Yes fit// No 29. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoons. All inspections must be called in by 3:30 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections ill delay your inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes No 30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $47.00 re-inpsection fee? Yes �/ No 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy occupancy of the building? Yes f No 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority be en for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the Un' orm Building Code? Yes 1 No 33. Are you aware as part of the submittal for a building permit you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit from Garfield County Road & Bridge Department or if applicable the State Highway Department ? If a permit is not necessary, then a letter stating that information is required. You can contact the Garfield County Road & Bridge 5 Department at 625-8601 or refer to the phone book for the State Highway Departments phone nuttyber. Yes !/ No 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required atti}pe of applicable inspection. Yes ✓ No 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building ppm p'application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes (/ No 36. Do you know that the local fire dis ict may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes No (please check with the building department about this requirement) 37. Are you aware, that if you receive your water and/or sewer from an Association, District, or Municipality you will be required to provide the County with a copy of the Tap Permit (or evidence of7 exemption) at the time of the building permit application submittal? Yes ( No N/A 38. If you are within five (5) miles of the City of Rifle or the Town of Parachute, have you checked with them concerning water shed protection zonppermit requirements for ISDS and other activities? Yes No !/ N/A I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my a ty. Signature of Owner Phone: 3/Cf - cot( Project Name: Project Address: (days); Date %-(T/ / cJfiCp (evenings) O -j I I CSI Lm,JA.�1\- ‘Law jf 010 %Ukakoui (I -p & 400 Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a 6 Gtech Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs. Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com PRELIMINARY GEOTECILNICAL STUDY SUNLIGHT VIEW PHASE II, 4 -MILE ROAD GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 100 104 JANUARY 31, 2000 PREPARED FOR: BILL ZILM 0090 SUNLIGHT DRIVE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. January 31, 2000 Bill Zilm 0090 Sunlight Drive Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Job No. 100 104 Subject: Report Transmittal, Preliminary Geotechnical Study, Sunlight View Phase II, 4 -Mile Road, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Zilm: As requested, we have conducted a preliminary geotechnical study for design of foundations at the subject site. Subsurface conditions encountered in the pits excavated throughout the proposed development, below about '/ to 1 foot of topsoil, consist of very stiff sandy clay overlying relatively dense gravel, cobbles and boulders in a sandy clay matrix. Groundwater was not encountered in the pits at the time of excavation. Development of the property should be feasible based on geotechnical considerations. Buildings can be founded on spread footings placed on the natural subsoils and designed for an allowable bearing pressure in the range of 1,500 psf to 3,000 psf for the clay soils and 3,000 to 4,000 for the gravel, cobble and boulder soils. The upper expansive clay soils should be removed or the footings designed for minimum dead load pressure. The report which follows describes our exploration, summarizes our findings, and presents our recommendations. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Trevor L. Knell Rev. by: SLP TLKIksm TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY 1 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 1 SITE CONDITIONS 1 SITE GEOLOGY 2 FIELD EXPLORATION 2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 2 FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS 3 PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 3 FOUNDATIONS 4 FLOOR SLAB 4 BELOW GRADE CONSTRUCTION 4 ROADWAY GRADING 5 SURFACE DRAINAGE 5 RADIATION POTENTIAL 5 LIMITATIONS 5 FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURES 3 AND 4 - SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE I - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS H -P GEOTECH PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a preliminary geotechnical study for the proposed Sunlight View Phase II development, 4 -Mile Road, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Fig. 1. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the subsurface conditions and develop recommendations for foundation and grading designs. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for professional engineering services to Bill Zilm, dated January 5, 2000. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory pits was conducted to obtain information on subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsoil conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Development plans for the property consist of 30 single family residential lots having a size in the range of about 1/3 to 1 acre. A roadway system will provide access to the lots. The development plan is shown on Fig. 1. SITE CONDITIONS The site consists of fallow alfalfa pasture located on the east side of 4 -Mile Road and situated in the valley bottom. The existing Sunlight View subdivision borders the north side of the property. The topography is gently sloping down to the north with approximately 75 feet elevation difference across the property. Outcrops of Maroon sandstone are visible high on the steep hills and valley side to the east, beyond the H -P GEOTECH -9 - boundaries of the property. The she was covered with about 1 foot of snow during our field work . SITE GEOLOGY The development is located on alluvial deposits overlying the Maroon Formation. The near surface alluvial deposits consist of mostly fine grained soils and have been deposited under the influence of water. The deeper alluvium encountered at depths between 31/2 to greater than 8 feet at the pits consists of boulder Iaiden deposits that apparently extend to considerable depth below the property. Bedrock outcrops exist to the east high on the ridge, but these are well beyond the boundaries of the subject property. There are no indications of rockfall impact to the property. The potential geologic hazards are minor and can be mitigated with appropriate design and construction typical of the area. Methods for mitigating potentially expansive clays are described below in "Foundations" and `Floor Slab" sections. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on January 7, 2000. Five exploratory pits were excavated at the location shown on Fig. 1 to evaluate subsurface conditions. The pits were dug with a rubber -tired backhoe. The pits were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with relatively undisturbed and disturbed sampling methods. Depths at which the samples were taken are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Pits, Fig. 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface profiles encountered at the site are shown on Fig. 2. Below about ' to 1 foot of organic topsoil, the subsoils consist of very stiff to H -P GEOTECH hard, slightly sandy to sandy clay overlying relatively dense gravel, cobbles and boulders in a sandy clay matrix. Pit 1 did not encounter the gravel, cobble and boulder soils to the explored depth of 8 feet. The upper clays were blocky and medium plastic which can possess an expansion potential when wetted. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained during the field exploration included natural moisture content and density, percent finer than the No. 200 sieve and Atterberg limits. Swell -consolidation testing was performed on relatively undisturbed liner samples of the clay subsoils. The swell -consolidation test results, presented on Figs. 3 and 4, indicate low compressibility under relatively light surcharge loading. The two samples from depth 2 and 3 feet showed a low to moderate expansion potential when wetted under a constant light surcharge. The two samples from depth 41/2 and 7' feet showed low to moderate compressibility when loaded after wetting. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table I. No free water was encountered in the pits at time of excavation. The subsoils were slightly moist to moist with depth. FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS The clay soils encountered to a depth of about 4 feet at the site generally possess low to moderate expansion potential when wetted. The deeper soils appear to be compressible under loading and when wetted. Foundations that transition shallow to deeper clay soils and the underlying gravel, cobble and boulder soils could have differential settlement/heave potential. The expansion potential at shallower footing grades can be mitigated by load concentration and subexcavation of the expansive soils. Surface runoff, landscape irrigation, and utility leakage are possible sources of water which could cause wetting. PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS Development of the property should be feasible based on geotechnical considerations. The following recommendations are made for planning and preliminary design of the building and site grading. H -P GEOTECH I.: -4- FOUNDATIONS Spread footings placed on the natural soils below the topsoil should be suitable for support of typical light residential building loads designed for an allowable bearing pressure in the range of 1,500 psf to 3,000 psf. The expansion potential of the upper clay soils can probably be mitigated by engineered foundations designed for the site specific conditions and subexcavation of the expansive clay soils. Footings placed on the clayey gravel, cobble and boulder soils can be designed for an allowable bearing pressure in the range of 3,000 psf to 4,000 psf. Footings placed on the expansive clay soils should also be designed for minimum dead load pressure expected to be in the range of 800 psf to 1,000 psf. Evaluation of the bearing conditions should be made for the individual buildings when their location, grading and loadings have been determined. FLOOR SLAB The upper clay soils posses an expansion potential and slab heave could occur if the subgrade soils were to become wet. Removal of the expansive clays should reduce the potential for slab heave if the subsoils were to become wet. Separating the slab from the bearing walls and columns is usually adequate to allow for slight movement and limit potential distress. Backfill placed beneath slabs should consist of properly placed and compacted non -expansive granular soil. BELOW GRADE CONSTRUCTION Basement level construction should not encounter shallow groundwater but seasonal perched water could occur from spring runoff and local irrigation. Subsurface drainage is recommended to protect below grade construction. Typically, this consists of foundation drains and underslab free draining gravel connected to a gravity outlet or sump. Deeper foundations were the gravel, cobble and boulder soils are encountered may be difficult to excavate due to the presence of large boulders. H -P GEOTECH -5 - ROADWAY GRADING We assume grading for the roadway development will be relatively minor. Existing topsoil, vegetation and debris should be removed from any cut and embankment fill areas. In fill areas the exposed surface should be moistened to optimum and compacted to at least 95% of standard Proctor density. Structural fill should then be placed and compacted to the project specifications and elevations. Embankment fill should be compacted to at least 95 % of standard Proctor density near optimum moisture content. The on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil, debris and oversized rock should be suitable for use as structural fill. Positive drainage away from the road surface and subgrade should be provided. A Hveem stabilometer 'R' value of 10 can be assumed for pavement subgrade consisting of the on-site clay soils. SURFACE DRAINAGE Positive surface drainage should be provided around the buildings and throughout the site to prevent ponding adjacent to structures and roadways. The soils are susceptible to erosion, particularly after the vegetation is stripped. RADIATION POTENTIAL The project site is not in a geologic setting that would indicate high concentrations of radioactive minerals in the near surface soils. We expect the radiation level to be similar to the natural surrounding area of the project. There is a potential that radon gas could be present in the area. If is difficult to detect radon gas in open areas before buildings are constructed. Testing for radon gas levels could be done when the residences and other occupied structures have been completed. New buildings are often designed with provisions for ventilation of lower enclosed areas should post construction testing show unacceptable radon gas concentrations. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no H -P GEOTECH -6 - warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear to be different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so reevaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications of the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL INC. Trevor L. Knell Reviewed by: Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. TLK/ksm cc: Schmueser Gordon Meyer - Attn: Debbie Duley John Taufer H -P GEOTECH 10 0 APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 200' EXISTING SUNLIGHT VIEW SUBDIVISION 6310 PIT 1 � ..- PIT PIT 2 I 6310 ■ L_ JN 6320 PROPOSED SUNLIGHT VIEW PHASE II 6360 6370 100 104 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig. 1 4 r 0 0 5 PIT 1 PIT 2 PIT 3 PIT 4 PIT 5 • ELEV. = 6320' ELEV. = 6328' ELEV. = 6350' ELEV. = 6368' ELEV. = 6345' WC=12.4 DD=111 -200=91 11=40 PI=24 WC=17.7 DD=99 WC=14.4 DD=110 WC=7.5 DD=107 -200=45 LL=22 P1=7 WC=13.6 0D=110 -200=93 LL=38 PI=23 WC =13.3 DD=109 -200=93 LL=43 P1=28 WC=11.5 00=104 0 WC=11.7 00=94 -200=88 11=36 P1=16 5 10 10 LEGEND: NOTES: TOPSOIL; slightly sandy silty clay, organic, slightly moist to moist, medium stiff, brown, blocky. Depth — Feet CLAY (CL); silty, slightly sandy to sandy, medium stiff to hard. slightly moist to moist with depth, reddish brown, slightly porous and calcareous, medium plasticity. GRAVEL, COBBLES AND BOULDERS (GC); sandy cloy matrix, dense, slightly moist to moist, brown and reddish brown, basalt rock. Diameter hand driven liner sample. Disturbed bulk sample. 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on January 7, 2000 with a CASE 480 D backhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of the exploratory pits were obtained by interpolation between contours on the site plan Provided. Logs of exploratory Pits are drawn to depth. 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve LL = Liquid Limit ( % ) PI = Plasticity Index ( % ) 100 104 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig. 2 0 1 0 O y 2 d a E v 3 4 Compression — Expansion Moisture Content = 17.7 percent Dry Density = 99 pcf Sample of: Slightly Sandy Clay From Pit 1 at 7 1/2 Feet Compression upon wetting 0.1 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 1 0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 14.4 percent Dry Density = 110 pcf Sample of: Sandy Cloy From: Pit 2 at 2 Feet Expansion upon wetting 0.1 1 0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 100 104 HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 3 4 in 1 Compression 7e 0 1 2 3 01 1 0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 11.5 percent Dry Density = 104 pcf Sample of: Slightly Sandy Clay From: Pit '4 at 3 Feet Expansion upon wetting 0.1 1 0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 100 104 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 4 Moisture Content = 15.5 percent Dry Density = 104 pcf Sample of: Slightly Sandy Clay From: Pit 3 at 4 1/2 Feet • V No movement pon wetting , 01 1 0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 11.5 percent Dry Density = 104 pcf Sample of: Slightly Sandy Clay From: Pit '4 at 3 Feet Expansion upon wetting 0.1 1 0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 100 104 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 4 d 0 O 0 O z HEPWORTH-PAW SUMMARY a r O z U O y O 1 Slightly Sandy Clay II Slightly Sandy Clay @W U c c roCn Very Clayey Sand II Slightly Sandy Clay Slightly Sandy Clay Slightly Sandy Clay Slightly Sandy Clay 11 Sandy Clay II UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTI4 IPSFI ATTERBERG LIMITS 0 x 51 = d N L I N M N CO N CO 0 "N a € = 40 N 00 el 0) d CD 0) PERCENT PASSING NO. 2OO SIEVE O) to d M a) 0) 0) I 88 r 0 a 0 c a 0 0 a _ w u1 W _ 0 L 0 NATURAL DAY DENSITY IPc11 O a OLL N O OLL 104 h 104 m NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT 1%1 d 17.7 d toN CD ID C') in N SAMPLE LOCATION o - N N N 5 I N d ‘- C•) 0) 0 0 m r N C') V CO COUNTY OF GARFIELD - BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at 0/t3 /headogo (.Mood i2 Permit No. 931/ I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: j�' y02 Id' 54 64)WL�7 .'_"lK kf 30 C7y-icc e 6o re_ N0 ? Oi.1. 0It c 1a t3 &es c3 s aje 4' Xenia k4 -,_ tabs /Io /zu . Ajo-f- Co p /t is SepfeS 47) sA0g41 FivcAece You are are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s)/have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date "/-/ 3 -0-s— Building Inspector Phone (970) 945-8212 No 9311 Job Ad ss Owner Contractor ) Setbacks: Front Assessor's Parcel Nc9 )75 &25 -aZ-t/) Date /O t7- O1 T BUI `IDM CING PERMIT AR C( 3 5;01 / /J U e id Com` Addres "f. Address l I'1 LQ^ 1 ear ��_C RH ISPECTIONS Soils T€st Footing X2-2-0crp� Foundation ! 2--/ 7 b 41124 - Grout Underground Plumbing J "- -�' Rough Plu Ybing Framing-l5 �� InsulationZO , Roofing Drywall Gas Piping 9 2-rS('s LH •hone #7(c)-T9I Phone alq-aXcl(C) Zoning Weatherproofing Mechanical Electrical Rough (State) 1.0" - Electrical Electrical Final ( tate) ✓ Final 17w hecklist Completed ✓ Certificate Occupancy # Date Septic System # Date Final Other efrcioc ��OTES f (continue on back) rs POs ED Ong T HE r BUILDING PERMIT GARFI��ELD COUNTY, COLORAD(O'� Date Issued�.q f 1[[.'oned Area Permit No Ca‘k AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspect. and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. Use //�� Address or Legal Description V' Owner Ralik Setbacks Front Side Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing 12- 2 -ocf Foundation I 2 rfroefilt Underground Plumbing 3 2Ss v' -e/ie- Insulation 705-r Rough Plumbing 22) .05.11__Drywall j_ 1.6 /FEW— Chimney & Vent . a w t-�� r_ Gas Piping Q23.0c Final ern --o _ Septic Final Framing q-y-0577,ENotes: (To include Roof in place and Windows and Doors installed). - — ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phone 3845003 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. APPROVED Date IF PLACED OUTSIDE CO WITH CLEAR PLASTIC