The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication- Permit1 • S Garfield County Building & Sanitation Department 108 8t Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003 NO. q act Job Address n if ((1( k ` L 5 c>7\ Nature of Work Building Permit l (fit 3I1b q m( Q. / c Use of Building f : e.sp,Q cRuad Amount of Permit s I :7 7 Date Clerk c)(13.1,12&\. 4 Permit No: GC"? c L GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8's Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212 / Fax: 970-384-3470 / Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 Parcel/Schedule No:a/8 5o _131%oO3(, U PERMISSI2 Is d1 7+0••- TOR AND/ OOFF CdNTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT ENT SUBMITT , TO AND V WED THE B ILDING DEPARTMENT. .O OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, TILE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 3028101 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIEID COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECr, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Garfom003 " / I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT 1 HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL): - Job Address: OA&7 P7/4ga❑AJ 424 tic CY(�VG�t� S% ss CO U CO 1 Lot No: 1 Lot st (� , Block No: Subd_/ 2 Qfh 1.:..5°"� �J Addres�0 W•i='it% SRvci•s/jg.' dK flly/1I8 Wk Ph: 2 S 13 3 Contractor: Q. tao CO4 a-w4ala+., Address: k •!'kph l3- QMJc- Ac.42 W19 -Oa1a'`t 9Z.7 -9/17 Lic. No. 4 Architect/Engineer: Kixeosao 6ZoSs Address: & ttOM-, Co Ph: .303 -44:L-5138)- Lic. No. 703 (3o 5 Sq. Ft. of Building:3 7 $(0 Sq. Ft. of Lot: $ �„ Height: I No. of Floors: 6 Use of Building:MO/ Ai�//jj 7 Describe Work: / 1J5 L4.) ettr.)S-t &UCZ saki 8 Class of Work: ,a"" New o Alteration ❑ Remove o Addition o Move 9 10 Garage: o Single ,a— Double Carport: o Single ❑ Double .tfr- Drivew y Permit o On -Site Sewage Disposal .e-• Site Plan (Septic) 11 Valuation Work: 3So, �O Adjusted Valuations: $ 241, 48L 12 reAj/e 2tis keige4 f vQ-as7db• /. . NOTICE A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED 15 NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR, IFCONSTRUCTION OR PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORRK IS SUSPENDED OR K 15 COMMEDONED NCED. 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AM) CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. r+/= t - 4_. �r Plan Check Fee: i l,' / ?. . 8 2- Permit Fee: 1, 7 8. 95 - Total Fee: Dated Permit Issued: 2 951 1 77 OC C Group•Tipe: Yf7 '\ . 3- (!(' / - t.1` Zoning: Setbacks: Manu. Home: ISD�JNo. �&Fee: OL�Yt I .LU ' APPR: �� j��s., - ►t �4./IITM/ �,,7"'j�►� i • • r r ‘ a/ aj� P '"4 /DATE A'P' U PERMISSI2 Is d1 7+0••- TOR AND/ OOFF CdNTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT ENT SUBMITT , TO AND V WED THE B ILDING DEPARTMENT. .O OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, TILE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 3028101 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIEID COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECr, DESIGNER, BUILDER, AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Garfom003 " / I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT 1 HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL): - o 1 The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1997 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made; 8. A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupanc , use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit #. ct Signature Bpcont03/2004 /1/47/ Date f VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION ApplicantAter_ CSA- I)' LLL Address C ,26 7 Maroon t r Date 7r01afr`� Finished (Livable Area): Main /SO Upper ?-7/ Lower Other Total Square Feet Valuation Subdivision Far / 1./e i°a6-.4-, Lot/Block Lo -r 3 Contractor Rwa d A t a r"/l0-, 2475 # 67 / 70, 775— Basement: Unfinished /31! * 4 Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Crawl Space: Valuation 572 r / 8 Valuation Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation Open Valuation Total Valuation 53, 75/ 377(0 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS for SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS and MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. Adequate and complete information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays because other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction under the Uniform Building Code". This book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. 1 Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house - rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, an 80 M.P.H. windshear, wind exposure B, windload of 15 pounds per square foot, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. NOTE: 106.3.1 (7.) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes_ 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes X 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the Location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes Y`t'Ls 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes iC 2 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes 4/4 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces's and soffits? Yes ,b 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes �0 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floorjoists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes is 12. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing (undisturbed) grade contours? Yes )X 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes )C No 14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Building Code Chapter 37? Yes No 3 4 ti 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code? Yes si No 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes No 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? YesiejrNo 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes x No 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes No 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will not be accepted without it. we + ?tbw.eaowal ,Aarse<- Yes No 21. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes X No Ifno-Explain: 22. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes 23. Do you understand that the minimum dimensions a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft. long? Yes No 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes No 4 i 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone district? Yes )o No 26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes No 27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes No 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes )C. No 29. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoons. All inspections must be called in by 3:30 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay your inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes No 30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $47.00 re-inpsection fee? Yes 1 No 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes x No 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority be given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the Uniform Building Code? Yes No 33. Are you aware as part of the submittal for a building permit you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit from Garfield County Road & Bridge Department or if applicable the State Highway Department ? If a permit is not necessary, then a letter stating that information is required. You can contact the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601 or refer to the phone book for the State Highway Departments phone number. Yes No 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes k No 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the ParceUSchedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes x No 36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes No (please check with the building department about this requirement) 37. Are you aware, that if you receive your water and/or sewer from an Association, District, or Municipality you will be required to provide the County with a copy of the Tap Permit (or evidence of an exemption) at the time of the building permit application submittal? Yes ) No N/A 38. If you are within five (5) miles of the City of Rifle or the Town of Parachute, have you checked with them concerning water shed protection zone permit requirements for ISDS and other activities? Yes No N/A >c I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. Sign Signfture of Owner 0/ / Date 9?1- 9119 Phone: 3� 45 — Daaj (days); (evenings) I ---c2&- a — -2j 1.At.E 48- oolu Du_uk Spa -1405 /05z Project Name: Project Address: Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a 6 8pr 20 04 01:07p District 1 4 970-945-1318 Garfield County Road and Bridge, District 1 7300 Hwy 82, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970-945-1223 ph. 945-1318 FAX Date: 04-20-04 To: Building & Planning From: Bobby Branham Re: Driveway permit exemption For: Rudd Construction Location: Lot 36 and 38 Four Mile Ranch Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Scope of Work: Obtain building permit Road and Bridge Concerns: This property lies outside the system of maintained county roads, and is therefore exempt from County driveway permit requirements_ Bobby Branham Dist.1 Road and Bridge p.1 Jul -20-04 02:21P • Memorandum To: Garfield County Building Department From: Four Mile Ranch Homeowners Association Date: July 19, 2004 Re: Architectural Review Committee This will certify that the tour Mile Ranch flomeowners Association Architectural Review Comminee has approved the plans for construction by Rudd Construction Fair homes on Lots 36, 37, and 38 in the Four Mile Ranch subdivision. Guy B. Harrell, President Four Milc Ranch 1lomcowners Association P.02 Gtech HEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTEC_HN J._. Fly`n,,irn-R-11v Cio! _ jinn Rn.kl PRELIMINARY SUBSOIL STUDY PROPOSED RESIDENCES LOTS 34 TO 39, 41 AND 42 4 MILE RANCH GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 104 257 APRIL 29, 2004 PREPARED FOR: RUDD CONSTRUCTION ATTN: MARK PRZYBYLSKI 0132 PARK AVENUE BASALT, COLORADO 81621 NT -Li- 303-541-7119 'acl..Springs 719-633 ;6i • un • �ii�horne 970-46 10;-‘5, • TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY - I - PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT - I - SITE CONDITIONS - 2 - SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL - 2 - FIELD EXPLORATION - 2 - SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS - 3 - PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS - 3 - FOUNDATIONS -4- FLOOR SLABS - 4 - UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM - 4 - SITE GRADING - > - SURFACE DRAINAGE - 5 - LIMITATIONS - 5 - FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURES 4 through 7- SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 8 - GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1- SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a preliminary subsoil study for proposed residences to be located on Lots 34 to 39, 41 and 42, Four Mile Ranch. Garfield County. Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Rudd Construction. dated April 2, 2004. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory pits was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for project planning and preliminary design. This report summarizes the data obtained during tliis study and presents our conclusions and recommendations based on the proposed development and subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT A single family residence is proposed on each of the subject lots roughly in the area of the exploratory pits shown on Figure 1. The proposed residences will consist of two story, wood frame structures over a walkout basement level with an attached garage. Basement and garage floors will be slab -on -grade. Cut depths are assumed to range between 4 to 10 feet below the original ground surface. We expect relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. if development plans change significantly from those described, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. lob No 104 257 Gtech 4 SITE C'ONDITIOJNS The subject lots are located in the northern part of the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision near the Maroon Drive cul-de-sac. A water storage tank for the subdivision is located along the uphill side of Lots 35 and 36. The natural topography in the area consists of a broad northerly trending ridge. The ground surface in the building areas is relatively flat and mostly moderately sloping down to the west. Steeper slopes are located west of the building areas of Lots 38, 39, 41 and 42. Vegetation consists of grass and weeds with sage brush. Maroon Formation bedrock is visible on nearby hillsides. SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL Bedrock of the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision. These rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained sandstone and siltstone with some massive beds of gypsum and limestone. There is a possibility that massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie portions of the lots. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas of localized subsidence. Sinkholes were not observed in the immediate area of the subject lots. No evidence of cavities was encountered in the subsurface materials; however, the exploratory pits were relatively shallow, for foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge of the subsurface conditions at the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop. The risk of future ground subsidence on Lot 34 to 39, 41 and 42 throughout the service life of the proposed residences, in our opinion, is low; however, the owner should be made aware of the potential for sinkhole development. If further investigation of possible cavities in the bedrock below the site is desired, we should be contacted. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on April 5, 2004. Eight exploratory pits (one per lot) were excavated at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The pit locations were lased on the proposed house locations JobNo 104257 r-441171enc-h provided to us. The pits were dug with a Case 580 4.a; backhoe. The pits were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical. Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with relativel} undisturbed and disturbed sampling methods. Depths at which the samples were taken are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Pits, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic Togs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Fieure 2. The subsoils were variable and generally consist of about / to 1 foot of topsoil overlying a mixture of clay, sand and rock fragments. Typically, the soils encountered in the upper, eastern part of the site (Pits 5 to 8) were more fine-grained than those in the western lower part of the site (Pits 1 to 4). Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the pits included natural moisture content, density and gradation analyses. Results of swell -consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed samples, presented on Figures 4 through 7, indicate low compressibility under existing moisture conditions and light loading, and generally low expansion/collapse potential after wetting. In general, the samples showed low to moderate compressibility with increased loading after wetting. Results of gradation analyses performed on a bulk sample (minus 6 inch fraction) of the natural coarse granular soils are shown on Figure 8. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table I. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavation and the subsoils were slightly moist to moist. PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS The conclusions and recommendations presented below are based on the proposed development. subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory pits. and our experience in the area. The recommendations are suitable for planning and preliminary Job No. 104 257 LZtech • -4- design. but additional site specific studies should be conducted prior to building construction. For the proposed construction, these studies can probably consist of observing the completed foundation excavation prior to placement of concrete. FOUNDATIONS Bearing conditions will vary depending on the specific lot. Based on the nature of the proposed construction. spread footings bearing on the natural subsoils should be suitable at the building sites. We expect the footings can be sized for an allowable bearing pressure in the range of 1,500 psf to 3,000 psf. Expansive clays encountered in building areas may need to be removed or the footings designed to impose a minimum dead load pressure to limit potential heave. Nested boulders and collapsible soils may need treatment such as enlarging footings or placing compacted fill or concrete backfill. Foundation walls should be designed to span local anomalies and to resist lateral earth loadings when acting as retaining structures. Below grade areas and retaining walls should be protected from wetting and hydrostatic loading by installing an underdrain system. The footings should have a minimum depth of 42 inches for frost protection. FLOOR SLABS Slab -on -grade construction should be feasible for bearing on the natural soils below any topsoil. There could be some post construction slab movement at sites with collapsible matrix or expansive clays, especially if the subgrade is wetted. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. A minimum 4 inch thick laver of free -draining gravel should underlie basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered in the exploratory pits. it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. An underdrain system should be provided to protect lob No 104257 Cc&itech below -grade construction. such as retaining walls, crawlspace and basement areas from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup. The drains should consist of drainpipe surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1 % to a suitable gravity outlet. SITE GRADING The risk of construction -induced slope instability al the lots appear low provided the buildings are located in the area of the exploratory pits as planned and cut and fill depths are limited. Cut depths for the building pads and driveway access should not exceed about 10 feet. Fills should be limited to about 10 feet deep. Structural fills should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density near optimum moisture content. Prior to fill placement, the subgrade should be carefully prepared by removing all vegetation and topsoil. The fill should be benched into the portions of the lots exceeding 20% grade. The on-site soils excluding oversized rock and topsoil should be suitable for use in embankment fills. Permanent unretained cut and fill slopes should be graded at 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter and protected against erosion by revegetation, rock riprap or other means. SURFACE DRAINAGE The grading plan for the lots should consider runoff from uphill slopes throughout the subdivision. Water should not be allowed to pond which could impact slope stability and foundations. To limit infiltration into the bearing soils next to buildings, exterior backfill should he well compacted and have a positive slope away from the building for a distance of 10 feet. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill and landscape irrigation may need to be restricted at some sites. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted according to generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or Job No. 104 257 Gtech • -6- implied. The conclusions am recommendations sub';iitted in this report arc based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits located as shown on Figure 1. the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence. prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. if the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for planning and preliminary design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation, conduct additional evaluations and review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation hearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Trevor L. Knell Reviewed by: Daniel E. Hardin. P. TLK/ksw Job Nu. 104 257 Get -tech .s m APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 60' EXISTING WATER TANK PIT 7 / LOT 35 / 6190/ LOT 36 ) / i / i I 6180 LOT 37 6170.- 7 170/ • • PIT 5 6160'. 7- 6150 6180 - 6170 i / / LOT 34 LOT 33 LOT 32 / LOT 31 / / / • PIT 8 / 6160 2 ■ PIT 6� / ■ PIT 4 I 6140 - LOT 38 6130- 6120 -- 6090- 6080 - 6110-- 6100 - EMERGEN 1106100- / / v / ORIV R PIT 1 PIT 2 • LOT 39 • PIT 3, -- EMERGENCY ACCESS LOT 40 i LOT 41 . 7 i 6150 6140 6130 6120 / 6110 6100 6090 LOT 42 RO PO 111 Oi 00l \LE ROP LOT 43 SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY 104 257 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS Figure 1 km Depth — Feet Depth — Feet 0 5 PIT 1 LOT 42 ELEV.=6132' WC=17.8 DD=111 WC=10.0 DD=94 -200=93 PIT 2 LOT 41 ELEV. =6133' WC=9.8 WC=76 -200=77 PIT 3 LOT 39 ELEV.=6116' WC=17.2 DD=92 WC=7.0 DD=102 200=48 PIT 4 LOT 38 ELEV.=6135' 107 /C✓_ Ar 1 +4=39 -200=29 0 5 _ 10 10 0 5 PIT 5 LOT 37 ELEV.=6156' WC -7.3 DD=95 PIT 6 LOT 36 ELEV.=6166' WC=17.4 DD -103 -200-94 PIT 7 LOT 35 ELEV.=6191' WC=20.6 D0=88 -200=93 PIT 8 LOT 34 ELEV.=6176' WC=15.3 DD=107 0 _- 5 5 10 10 _ Note: Explanation of syrnbols is shown on Figure 3. Depth — Feet d m tL 0 104 257 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Figure 2 LEGEND: rte/ TOPSOIL; sandy silty clay, organic, firm, moist, dark brown. CLAY (CL); slightly sandy to sandy, silty, medium stiff tc stiff, moist, redaish brown. SAND AND CLAY (SC—CL); gravelly, very stiff/medium dense, slightly moist to moist, light brown to reddish brown, calcareous. BASALT GRAVEL AND COBBLES (CL—GC); in a sandy silty clay matrix, less matrix/more rock at Pit 4, very stiff/medium dense, slightly moist to moist, light brown to reddish brown. 2" Diameter hand driven liner sample. Disturbed bulk sample. NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on April 5, 2004 with a Case 580 backhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were obtained by interpolation between contours on the site plan provided. 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) +4 = Percent retained on the No. 4 sieve —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 104 257 HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3 Compression — Expansion % f 1 0 1 2 3 0 b` 1 c 0 m 2 0. E coy 3 4 Moisture Content = 17.8 percent Dry Density = 111 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Pit 1 at 1.5 Feet Expansion upon wetting 0.1 .0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 10.0 percent Dry Density = 94 pcf Sample of: Slightly Sandy Clay From: Pit 1 at 3 Feet Compression upon wetting 0.1 .0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 104 257 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 • 0 1 0 2 Compression Compression 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 Moisture Cc,ntent = 9.8 percent Dry Density = 76 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Pit 2 at 4 Feet Compression upon wetting 0.1 .0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 0.1 0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 104 257 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 5 Moisture Content = 17.2 percent Dry Density = 92 pcf Sample of: Sand and Clay (matrix) From: Pit 3 at 4.5 Feet • • No movement upon wetting 0.1 0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 104 257 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 5 Compression c 0 0. E 0 U 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 3 4 Moisture O stent = 7.3 percent Dry Density = 95 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Pit 5 at 6 Feet Compression upon wetting 0.1 .0 0 APPUED PRESSURE — ksf 100 0.1 1.0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 104 257 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 6 Moisture Content = 17.4 percent Dry Density = 103 pcf Sample of: Slightly Sandy Clay From: Pit 6 at 2.5 Feet °-...........\\0----------------N. No movement upon wetting 0.1 1.0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 104 257 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 6 r t< 0 Compression Compression — Expansion 1 2 0 1 2 0.1 .0 0 APPUED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 20.6 percent Dry Density = 88 pcf Sample of: Slightly Sandy Clay From: Pit 7 at 3 Feet • • N.ID No movement upon wetting Expansion upon wetting 0.1 .0 0 APPUED PRESSURE — ksf 100 0.1 .0 0 APPUED PRESSURE — ksf 100 104 257 HEP WOR TH — PA WLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 7 Moisture Content = 15.3 percent Dry Density = 107 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Pit 8 at 5.5 Feet Expansion upon wetting 0.1 .0 0 APPUED PRESSURE — ksf 100 104 257 HEP WOR TH — PA WLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 7 • ERC N :I A t 24 IR. 7 HR 0 45 IM. 15 IAN lD 20 30 40 so 60 70 so 90 100 .001 HYDROMETER ANALY95 TIE HEADING 60151 19151 4 N91. 1 1114 1200 POO STEW ANALYSIS U.S. STANDARD RI 5 /5o p0 916 /B CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS p 3/6' 3/4" 11/2' Y 5'6" 5" 100 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .150 1.19 2.36 475 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS CLAY TO SRT GRAVEL 39 % LIQUID LIMIT SAND EINE 1 MEDIUM 'COARSE 9.512_5 19.0 37.5 76.2 152 203 127 GRAVEL HIVE 1 COARSE COBBLES SAND 32 % SILT AND CLAY 29 % PLASTICITY INDEX SAMPLE OF: Clayey Sand and Gravel FROM: Pit 4 at 5 to 6 Feet 104 257 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. GRADATION TEST RESULTS 90 so 70 60 6a 40 30 20 10 0 • ERC N PA INS Figure 8 n N 0 O 6 Z .0 0 n U tinZ D J U7 Q W U z G U W U I- W } 0 O 0 Q 5W0 J m Cial a l W = O CL 6 0. L11 2 = SOIL TYPE Sandy clay Slightly sandy clay 7 r = z T i q i' l 7 J ., J of. Slightly sandy clay Sandy clay UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (PSF) ATTERBERG LIMITS LIQUID PLASTIC LIMIT INDEX (%) (%) PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE a 0' 77 D0 7r 29 94 M 0- Z O 0 g u 0 O "N Z o u M GRAVEL (%) o, M NATURAL DRY DENSITY (pcf) _, i 7V O N O v1 L 103 88 O — NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT (%) 0o O O N G r M 20.6 M SAMPLE LOCATION Depth (ft) 3 Vl ri kr, E z ,_ r -1r, .n r m 07/13/04 14:58 FAX 9709274027 RUDD CONSTRUCTION /004 0132 PARK AVENUE • BASALT, COLORADO • 81621 PHONE 970/927-9119 • FAX 970/927-4027 To: Company: Phone No.: Fax No.: en..S1ic-O Co. 6LDG Dep7. From: j4-a-Eee-- DateJTime: -i 113 lc,/ vatSubject .4 - wu.s_,g_ Pages (including this one): dek Le, b- 3 ca Pt-rvPi.- O is 4 Lt771-et_ P -4.S t -f un.w PE.failiwo i� 1-o 4s- "co Cn ti -e. .tc sGcuass3 -WE eta- of -z oD "PLC A )L QuFis-TGUn�S OR - E ,7 nCEVED JUL 1 3 2004 UA l GPiNMN� 07/13/04 14:57 FAI 9709274027 RUDD CONSTRUCTION 1002/004 July 12, 2004 Mark Rudd Rudd Construction 132 ParkAv. Basalt 81621, CO RE: Grading and Drainage Plan review for proposed Residence at Lot 36, Fourmile Ranch Subdivision, Garfield, Colorado SE Job No. 22033.36 Dear Mart: Pursuant to your request, we have reviewed the site plan A-1 by Knudson Gloss Architects and Planners, dated 5-28-04, which delineates the proposed grading and driveway location at the above referenced site. It is our understanding from you that the Garfield County has requested that this submitted plan needs to be checked by and verified by an engineer that it is in compliance with the requirements of the plat. Pursuant to your request this letter presents our findings in regard to proposed grading, drainage and driveway improvements associated with the new residential construction at above referenced Site. Our site specific review of the grading and drainage plan and driveway design are in accordance with general Design and Construction Standards and the general requirements for building permit stated in the Final Plat of Four Mile Ranch Subdivision, sheet 1 of 3. We have reviewed the proposed grading plan, (Site Plan, sheet A-1, by Knudson Gloss Architects and Planners, dated 5-28-04, forwarded to us. This plan includes the proposed site grading, construction improvements and driveway design applicable to the site. Conclusions The grading plan, (Site Plan, sheet A-1, by Knudson Gloss Architects and Planners, dated 5-28-04) is in compliance with the subdivision requirements regarding grading and drainage. Based on our knowledge of the site conditions, review of the development plans and analysis of the pertinent grading and drainage issues associated with the site we believe that the proposed design and site improvements meet the intent of the requirements stated in Final Plat of Four Mile Ranch Subdivision, sheet 1 of 3, prepared by High Country Engineering, Inc. This letter serves as a site specific grading and drainage study for use in approval of the building permit. Our findings are outlined below. Proposed Site Conditions The proposed house will have a walk out lower level, a main level and a garage with a slab on placed fill. The proposed grading and drainage improvements will include up to 5 feet of art and up to 1 foot of fill above exiting grades with grading to allow positive drainage away from the proposed structure in all directions. The plan delineates grading of drainage swales that will direct runoff from impervious and pervious surfaces around the house. The proposed finish floor elevations are adequately set above the natural grade. The parking and driveway surfaces are adequately graded to allow effective runoff to landscaped area features that will provide effective stormwater management. Erosion control features are to be utilized as necessary during construction. 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-0311• Fax (970) 704-0313 SBPRIS ENGINEERING • LLC civil consultants 07/13/04 14:57 FAX 9709274027 RUDD CONSTRUCTION 1 Drainne Plan 1003/004 Mark Rudd SE Job No. 22033.36 July 12, 2004 Page 2 The proposed improvements will include a single family housing structure, driveway, sidewalks and landscape areas. Storm water runoff will sheet flow and will be routed to drainage swales and drainage depressions for infiltration into the ground. Larger volumes of nmoff on the site may flow across the site over native landscaped areas with minimal velocities toward the street. No adverse effects to any adjacent property is anticipated from the post development runoff. The location of the site and absence of adjacent development forgo the need for specific hydrological analysis. Best Management Practices (BMP's) shall incorporated into the grading design along with other active measures to provide erosion and sediment control. The onsite soils have very good infiltration characteristics for the collection and recovery of stormwater. We do not anticipate any significant offsite runoff to flow across the site. The plan is in general compliance with the following drainage recommendations however the final construction plans should further delineate and direct implementation of these recommendations. Exterior foundation backfill should be well compacted and have a positive slope away from the building so that water does not pond within ten feet of the building. The ground surface should be stoped to drain away from the building foundations in all directions. The recommended minimum slope is 12" in the first 10' in unpaved areas and 3" in the fist 10' for paved areas. These drainage recommendations should be maintained around the entire perimeter of the house or be mitigated by installation of additional surface drains. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. We recommend that all roof downspouts and possible yard drains be connected to solid drainage pipe systems and routed to daylight at least ten feet away from the structure. All surface drainage shall be completely separated from anysubsurface and/or foundation drain system. Erasion and Sediment Confrotftecommendations Contractor to utilize "best management practices to control erosion and sedimentation during construction. Polluted runoff to off site areas or water conveyance ditches shall be prevented. The contractor shall maintain sediment and erosion protection throughout the construction operation. Silt fences, hay bales or other Blies shall remain in place until all disturbed areas have been revegetated and stabili7Pit The installation and specifications for BMPs erosion controls shall be in compliance with the CDCfr Erosion Control and Stormwater Quality Guide. 07/13/04 14:58 FAX 9709274027 RUDD CONSTRUCTION W1004/004 Mark Rudd SE Job No. 22033.36 July 12, 2004 Page 3 Storrawater Management Plan Notes All construction project sites disturbing more than one acre of land require a construction Stormwater Discharge Permit from the Colorado department of Public Health & Environment, (CDPHE) Water Quality Control Division (WQCD). Permit No. Cor -03. The permit applicant(s) shall be the owner and/or the owner's representative(s). The application shall be signed by the owner and/or the owner's representative(s). Our grading and drainage review and recommendations are based upon data supplied to us. If proposed development plans are revised from those presented in this report, we should be notified to evaluate the effect it may have in terms of grading and drainage. If you Lave any question or need any additional information, please call. Sincerely, SOPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC Maanaa ettositiat, 36 £O'd • r 4EGarfield County BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT Code Compliance Office stevehacketa,Ea rfield-countv.com July 21, 2004 Rudd Construction Attention Mark P. and Arlen W. and Guy H. Regarding Building Permit application for Lot 37, Four Mile Ranch: This permit cannot be approved for the following reasons. 1. The driveway shown to Lot 37, crossing lot 36, is not a legal access easement. The subdivision plat would have to be amended to create a legal access. Regarding Building Permit application for Lot 36, Four Mile Ranch: This permit cannot be approved for the following reasons. 1. The elevation plan does not show a measurement from midpoint of undisturbed natural grade to the midpoint between the ridge and the eave of the highest roof, which must not exceed 25 feet. Regarding Building Permit application for Pump House. Four Mile Ranch HOA,: This permit cannot be approved for the following reasons. 1. The recorded plat for Four Mile Ranch is noted "all structures prohibited in open space easement". An amended plat would be required to place a structure in the open space easement. 2. No site plan was submitted with this application. Please note, for future application submittals, all of the items specified in the recorded plat and zoning resolution of approval for Four Mile Ranch Subdivision must be included in each application. Site plans showing distances to property lines are required on all applications. Elevations from the midpoint of natural undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of the highest roof, not exceeding 25 feet, must be shown on elevation plans. Thanks Steve Hackett. Note, the most efficient way of communicating with me is by email at the above address. 108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 • Applicant PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST To -MD Date 7 i2-0/ Building neered Foundation Drivewayri/Permit ` ✓eyed Site Plan 7$0r �t ad. Septic Permit and Setbacks Grade/Topography 30% ✓Attach Residential Plan Review List y% inimum Application Questionnaire �/ Subdivision Plat Notes j.4A_ Fire Department Review ✓ Valuation Determination/Fees Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker Attach Conditions -"Application Signed L Plan Reviewer To Sign Application ice//Schedule No. tit A10# Snowload Letter- Manf. Hms. Planning/Zoning Property Line Setbacks 3011 Stream Setbacks Flood Plain Building Height Zoning Sign -off Road Impact Fees HOA/DRC Approval Grade/Topography 40% Planning Issues Subdivision Plat Notes rrGENERAL NOTES: l�N4. /�liy„y3 /Birt ? Aw) ?+ o %-1. Ju1-23-04 08:49A P_02 A , 7 RECEIVEDCSA2 LLC 501 W. 1-41 Service Road JUL 2 3 2404 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73118 GARFIELD GOUNTY BUILDING & PLANNING July 22, 21014 Mr. Steve l lackctt Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 811' Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 816111 Re: Pour Mile Ranch Subdivision Dear Mr. Hackett: This will confirm that Rudd Construction is our designated agent for the permitting and constntction of homes on lots 34, 36, 37, 38 and any subsequent lots to be constructed on by them in the Four Mile Ranch subdivision. Rudd Construction is also the designated agent for the Four Mile Ranch Homeowners Association in the permitting and construction of the irrigation pump enclosure which will lit constructed at the Irrigation easement and appurtenant to the irrigation systrm and owned by the 1 lomeowners Association. If you should have any questions, please contact the undersigned at 713.306-9237. Thank you fot your cooperation. Sincerely, CSA 2 (;up 13. Harrell Attomcy in 1 act Cathi Edinger From: Steve Hackett Sent:• A Thursday, July 22, 2004 3:52 PM To: 'Brandon Watson' Cc: Cathi Edinger Subject: Lot 36 I missed something during the zoning plan review. Cathi caught it for me. We can't release the permit without it. See item 32 and the permit application checklist: "Are you aware that the permit application must be singed by the owner or written authority given for an agent", etc. The parcel number that you gave us belongs to CSA 3 LLC. We need written authority from them for you to be their agent. This will be true, as is the need for all of the other items that we have discussed, on every permit application that we receive. We really do require everything that is listed on the checklist. That will be true on lot 37 as well as the Pump house application. Steve Hackett Code Enforcement Officer, Garfield County stevehackett@garlield-county.com 1 r - Stette Hackett To: Brandon Watson arjleita county Subject: RE: Four Mile Ranch BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT Brandon Thanks, I've approved the permit set for lot 36. Cathi will call you when it's ready to pick up. It's always a little shaky when a new subdivision starts up. We are learning what to look for so that it complies with the Subdivision Conditions of Approval. Thanks for your cooperation. Steve Hackett Code Enforcement Officer, Garfield County stevehackett@gerfleld-county.com -----Original Message ----- From: Brandon Watson [mailto:ruddcon@sopris.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 3:24 PM To: Steve Hackett Subject: Four Mile Ranch Steve we recieved your letter today and have Cul, working on I.ot 37 access easement, and the pump house issues I have sent you the revised grading plan for Lot 36 Please contact us with any further questions or Issues Thank you for your help with these first few Hopefully the rest will go better Brandon Watson Project Manager Rudd Construction 7/22/2004 108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 (970) 945-8212 (970) 285-7972 Fax: (970) 384-3470 • .5 I COUNTY OF GARFIELD - BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at 7-6'7 /Jl4,ec on 4J c Permit No. q2409 I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: (I -e 8* Criss Oftue AJsays iv Be Rimo'.ed a - ed 4 ,rir `��'c�,r'sne 4opieus %dos Sfiete ® li srn» on 6, ►scar ire base Oa,,z 56fee4- Rot ✓4-sG«,4- s,s,. , You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date -ZG--OE Building Inspector Phone (970) 9454212 20 Ab 4 1 No `1 sr‘)C , J. t; ACAssessor's Parcel Noa/ S a73 "rt�a� Date 7-gc'04 � s q�� ! 1 i:� BUILDINGPERMIT CARD T t) 14 �� O C� C Job Address L Owner ' n " L �,, Address50(W.T-44'ri)i ' Phone # >- I a' O ct Contractor Address9 Tb_s i Acle Phone #AaF cAikeik S tbacks: Fro t Rear RH irf w�1: ��. cJ obit:TAC - LH Zoning Oihp INSPECTIONS Soils Test Footing 9-3 c/ Foundation '1 - Z --c`1 Grout Underground Plumbing '1-1 7 Q'7X ' 1FramRough Plumbing Y. - Framing ing .5-/5— o Insulation -1-t2-057 Roofing n Drywall 3 V 30 "a $ / -ry Gas Piping 3 -hi -(9.5-774- 9s-%7¢ -o s-)74- -ori-- Weatherproofing Weatherproofing Mechanical Electrical Rough (State) v Electrical Final State) Final 'Z Checklist Completed9 ✓ Certificate Occupancy # Date Septic System # Date Final Other NOTES (continue on back) r 14 INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS • THIS CARDS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIOyNNSh • BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued? Gflle'Jcith Zoned A rea Permit No... eri. t AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all Jaws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may .`ten be revoked b!, notice from the County Building InspectorI) and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL ANVOID. r Use T. _1 . Po 1" r �l Address 'ption N-.� ', i Owner Setbacks Froot Side ;de Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visit le From The Stree. Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing o -'--5 -C-I q-4" Foundation . Underground Plumb) Tf_/ 7t, :1- Insulation '?_Z-2—cs— Rough Plumbing Z c/_ • Drywall 9- jp„py-,Q ' Chimney & Vent Electric Final (by State Inspector) Gas Piping _ �,L/-CS—/ —- Final 5'_L?—o� /R Septie Final Electric Rough (By State Inspeetor)5 ilCl, Framing 3 r- p,5-59-- (To include Roof in place and Windows and Doors installed). Notes: ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phone 384-5003 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Date? By IF PLACED OUTSIDE - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC e