Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application-Permit
Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Stree~ Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office:970·945-8212 Fax: 970·384-3470 Inspection Line: 971).384-5003 Building Permit No. I og? f' ----~----------------------- Parcel No: 2395-134-06-032 Locality: Aspen Glen flg7, Lot H32 Job Address: 0016 Spring Loop, Carbondale Use of Building: s/f dwelling on crawl space w/patios & attached garage ------------~----~----L---------~~------- Owner: Blacklion Associates LTD Contractor: Burkholder Construction Fees: Plan Check: $ 1,705.18 Septic: Bldg Permit: $ 2,623.35 Other Fees: Total Fees: $ 4,328.53 I Clerk: c.~ Date: }lj_dJ.-da ~ ;,l~ I GARFIELD COUNTY BillLDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8th Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, Co 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212 I Fax: 970-384-3470 I Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 www.garfield-county.com Authority. Thls application for a Building Pennit must be signed by the Owner of the property, described above, or an authorized agent. If the signature below is not that of the Owner, a separate letter of authority, signed by the Owner, must be provided with this Application. Legal Access. A Building Permit cannot be issued without proof of legal and adequate access to the property for purposes of inspections by the Building Department. Other Permits. Multiple separate permits may be required; (l) State Electrical Permit, (2) County ISDS Permit, (3) another pennit required for use on the property identified above, e.g. State or County Highway/ Road Access or a State Wastewater Discharge Permit. Void Permit. A Building Permit becomes null and void if the work authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance and if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days after commencement. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I have read this Application and that the information contained above is true and correct. I understand that the BuHding Department accepts the Application, along with the plans and specifications and other data submitted by me or on my behalf (submittals), based upon my certification as to accuracy. Assuming completeness of the submittals and approval of thls Application, a Building Permit will be issued granting permission to me, as Owner, to construct the structure(s) and facilities detailed on the submittals reviewed by the Building Department. In consideration of the issuance of the Building Permit, 1 agree that I and my agents wiJJ comply with provisions of any federal, state or local law regulating the work and the Garfield County Building Code, ISDS regulations and applicable land use regulations (CoUnty Regulation(s)). I acknowledge that the Building Permit may be suspended or revoked, upon notice from the County, if the location, construction or use of the structure(s) and facility(ies), described above, are not in compliance witl1 County Regulation(s) or any other applicable law. I hereby grant permission to the Building Department to enter the property, described above, to inspect the work. I further acknowledge that the issuance of the Building Pennit does not prevent the Building Official from: (1) requiring the correction of errors in the submittals, if any, discovered after issuance; or (2) stopping construction or use of the structure(s) or facillty(ies) if such is in violation of County Regulation(s) or any · law. Review of this Application, and inspections of the work by the Building Department do not constitute an acceptance of responsibility or liability by the County of errors, omissions or discrepancies. As the · for compliance with federal, state and local Jaws and County Regulations rest with me and my authorized agents, including without limitation my I HEREBY UNDERSTAND THE NOTICE & CERTIFICATION ABOVE: STAFF USE ONLY Special Conditions: ' Adjusted Valuation: Plan Check Fee: \~ Permit Fee: ) Manu home Fee: Mise Fees: 31o Cj \;?, 1J-)'loS' J.t, :)_ ~ ~ tf ct ISDS Fee: To~~~6' S~ Fees Paid: Balance Due: BP No & Issue Date: ISDS No & Issued Date: C/ \iD\·~ Q-bJb t{'f f o<z')?: /3/ J.9'jo'8 t-'J/ (i Setbacks: OCCGroup: ConstType: I Zoning: ·::r:e c BLDG DEPT: PLNGDEPT: ~n -~-\%"-0~ .U \&._ 1-\ r -o<Y AP 1 DATE APPR •l'Ul DATE The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: 1) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to all me and IRC requirements including guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit. ~~ o·-S-~os ~A~TU~RE~~~~~----~~~--------~D~A-TE~--------------- Bapplicationctecember2007 VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Address Date -=S;:an~d~p:;.tip:!:er;.-::---------Subdivision Aspen Glen -fi ( i "'!J '7 -'00-",0l,6:,.:S"-"p::Cri:;,n,._g.:::L::.:oo::.tp:_ _______ Lot!Block .!Hc:;.·=.:32::,_,....,------,.-,-------,-- -=3"-'/1,_,8,_,/2::;:0'-"0"-8 ----------Contractor Burkholder Construction Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Basement: Unfinished Square Feet Valuation Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Total Valuation Garage: Valuation Crawl Space Valuation Decks/ Patios Valuation Covered Open Type of Construction: Occupancy: Valuation Total Valuation 2660 sf 1082 sf 840 sf sf X $74.68 4582 sf sf X $41.00 sf X $33.68 1142 sf X $18.00 1820 sf X $9.00 342,183.76 0.00 20,556.00 16,380.00 355 sf X $24.00 !!: 8 5 .;l o. 277 sf X $12.00 c 3 3 ;)'-{ . Commercial sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X -11,844.00 0.00 390,963.76 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. TWO (2) SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS & TWO (2) SITE PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTEDFOR ALL APPLICATIONS. Please review this document to determine if you have enough informatio:n to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of yo:nr project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. · To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. I Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure( s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes >( ' 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do apply. . A Y es __ :;t!"-'--- 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties1 streams or water courses? Yes _ _.~""'--- 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes b4 2 5. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your right to use a private easement/right of way; A County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept. of Highway Permit, including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any combination. You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. See phone book for other agencies Yes t>< 6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes 's>< 7. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes b< No ___ _ 8. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Y es_-1/><""";;.----No ____ _ 9. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes ~ 10. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes f>< 11. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes . t>( 12. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes 'l;:x, 13. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes K. 14. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes ~ No · 3 15. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IRC? Yes _____ No. _ _.,f><t"--=---- 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes \::::< 17. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes K, 18. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes (>.( No _____ _ 19. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes ~ z 20. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes (>( 21. Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will be accepted without it, but you run the risk of the HOA bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in revocation of permit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either revocation or substantial modification of the plans. Yes W 22. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes f>< No Ifno-Explain: _____ _ 23. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes ~ 24. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? Yes e!,k 4 25. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes tk:; 26. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone district? Yes C< 27. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes k 28. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes t).-"' ·- 29. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes I>< 30. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30a.m. to 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes ~ No _____ _ 31. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.00 re-inspection fee? Yes K. 32. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes ~ 33. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the IRC? Yes ~ 5 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes V 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes 1><, 36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes ~ (please check with the building department about this requirement) 37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes~ 38. Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the tap fees have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy? Yes ~ Ihereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. ~~Q -. Date Phone: C{10C4L-\2) 101-1L! (days); ~::=::. _____ '--' ______ (evenings) Project Address:___,()()\~...._6......__~---"-==--"-'-='--l-CCP-·------f'-'-~--'--"'--'---'=---=~::::.....:.--~/-SD~ 6 Notes: If any required information is missing delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. BpmimeqDec2007 7 . GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING REQUIREMENTS Codes: 2003 IRC, IBC, IFGC, IMC, IPC, Setbacks: Check subdivisions and zone district for setback requirements. Snowload (measured at the roof): 40PSF up to 7000ft. elevation. 50PSF 7001 to 8000ft. 7 5PSF 8001 to 9000ft. lOOP SF 9001 to 1 OOOOft. Seismic design category: B Weathering probability for concrete: Severe Termite infestation probability: None to slight Wind speed: 90mph Decay probability: None to slight Wind Exposure: B or C (see section R301.2.1.4) Frost Depth: 36in. to 8000ft. elevation. 42in. 8001 and above. Winter Design Temperature: Minus 2 to 7000ft.; minus 16 over 7000ft. elevation. Air Freezing Index: 2500deg F-days to 7000ft.; over 7000ft. to be determined by Building Official. Ice shield under-layment required. Mean Annual temp.: Variable Insulation: Maximum glazing U factor: 0.50 Minimum R-Values: • Ceilings/roofs R values are: R-30 stick built structures. R-38 log construction and steel rafter construction. • Wails R values are R-19 wood frame; R -19 cavity R-3 sheathing steel studs. • Floors R-values are R-19. • Basement wall R-values are R-10 beiow grade, R -19 above grade. • Slab perimeter R-value and depth is R- 10/36in. • Crawl space wall R-values are R-10 below grade and R-19 above grade If floors over crawl spaces are not insulated, the crawl space walls must be insulated. Basement wall must be insulated to frost depth. Common walls garage to house must have R-19 insulation. Common ceiling/floor garage to house must have R-19. Take precautions to protect plumbing in these areas. PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Building J.gineered Foundation L\.L V Driveway Permit t fA-~rk vsurveyed Site Plan ~Septic Permit and Setbacks ' ~ ---..l....L'Gradeffopography 30% ~ach Residential Plan Review List ~Minimum Application Questionnaire ~ubdivision Plat Notes 4:--Fire Department Review 4aluation Determination/Fees _J_Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker *Attach Conditions --vLApplication Signed 0~ ~Plan Reviewer To Sign Application Date __ 3_,_-_,_\ -"]:;~-_o,O,_y-"--~ Planning/Zoning ~operty Line Setbacks ~30ft Stream Setbacks ~6dPlain __ Building Height \.-/Zoning Sign-off ~d Impact Fees ~HOA/DRC Approval ~adeffopography 40% V Planning Issues Usubdivision Plat Notes --\,L_Parcel/Schedule No, y~ flW o~ ~ 40# Snow load Letter-Manf. Hms, ____J Soils Report GENERAL NOTES: Assessor's Parcel No.b13'1 5-I 3 <f~ola-Q3;lo.. · Date 3 I c?t-8/ cf I I ...,0 BUILDING PERMIT CARD ~ o/ ~ ~ o<.' C '~ Co 'lib).. -:r 'I f/~3d... ~ •• ~ . r.~~~~~ ~ Owner~~~~~~~~1!1~~~<:4.4~~~~· --rr-~ ·Address ~SM.. tfzy; RJ.~''"1'hone # 9 ,il2=3"1 l:./ 12 .. /A A .. O()' {'_ 1L ~ CJ._A-~-tr&-f/4J.( /.l 0 Contractor ~ ~~ Address ,;lo::S";;t<c _. ~ ~ Phone #...., 4<r -'7°'f 'f -r I> &.c:>(. Setbacks: Front Rear RH LH Zoning ____ _ S(P 6)\.~~uJ/f~ q-INSPECTIONS . Soils Test ~ ~ Weatherproofing-r--:::---;::;-n--:-;;;--:;,-;-;---- Footing ~-;;zo-os~ f#e~ Mechanical · t/-3 -~fJ &2//GII<j(/v. Foundation '£·27-af5'2??/~ Electrical Rough (State) p-z/l'-0 .3' Grout . . . Electrical Final (State) 7-Z-6'7 Underground Plumbing ¢2 -. /7~$ ~ Final 7-/&:!1' /Checkh.~C9Ql=leted? 7'&r!?:. ~ Rough Plumbing __ /t?-Z.'%?~&,3 f;:;::g.; Certificate Occupancy# -::-!si>::::!Z.X.l.~-~--3.-t:.-=--- Framing 1!_-c:>~ -<-?Y ~U-Date ~~~U-ii_7.0'l Insulation J.i'"' d-Ofltt'.S: Septic System #_~IV'--1/~-------- Roofing · Date ------------ ilf'Drywall ~~/f-Is--c~ fj Final __________ _ ;~~):7;/!c;~M NOTES Othe<,x,4••''""''7 ~w (continue on back) I 24 HOURS NOTiCE REQli!RED fOH iNSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date lssued.3./~-~ .. Zoned Area ............................... Permit No .... /.O.. .. t.?.& .. . AGREEMENT In consideration of the issUan(:e of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. use ;jF c/w(Urit£1 mn aaur 11zace cu,t;xliffls rof/acMct qwzqc;e Addcoss or Leg• I Description {)()[(, ::'feme t&Ofo (ag b.pnr/a IC =~(f.[)!./J.oJ tl3,1!9rrb/f( Ub -'&»tractor flurrl1~1Clfi [IS!J1~f· Setback<; Front Side Sjde Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing Driveway Foundation -'.i Underground Plumbing ~~ · Insulation Rough Plumbing Drywall,;; .. ;.:, <'-,·:~:-' ~~--' .. · ., ... ~. ·. ~::--. . ,. ..... _ ... ·.1'.-:.-· .:·.(. . ;;.· .. - Chimney & Vent Electric. Filla'! (by State ~c' ~ 7/z-M Gas Piping Final~ 7-l(fd} .,:-.- EDedric R~H.Jgh {By Sa::m lnspector) Septic Final Framing Notes: (To include Roof in place aud Windows and Doors installed). ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING- WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For inspections Caii384-500J 108 8111 Street Glenwood Spl"ings, Colorado APPROVED DO NOT DESTROY nus CARD o;7hst11)<;< syT\a~wlcml R.,C£ "c~LACED ouTSIDE':' JovF.R WITH CLEAR PLASTIC COUNTY OF GARFIELD m BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone(970)945-8212 Job located at &">0/6 .st?(;Af'G-<:. oo-P Permit No. /0 8 72{ I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: &ot/i:c77V~?: sa£vf? o u GAS L//1/~s ~~,£/fli;-h&t:fiAciC$ ~ 5~L ALL "7'2:>/C.~/ 77;/LS,S r2d/<S~ 0 Call for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date • ·-b 20 0 T Building Inspector __:.,~~~~L-.~~~~:::..t-~~~=-~ Phone (970) 945-821 COUNTY OF GARFIEL::> -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at 00/6 ..5/ft!l;f/G L«C!~ Permit No. /(78 73 I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: /tr{( D Call for Re-lnspection D $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date /t/-Z-o 20 CJ.Jr Buildinglnspector C/~,4 ~ Phone (970) 945-8212 / COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at o<::? /0 ~/!!'(;?. Lczo r"'" Permit No. /CJ 8 7:?? ' I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: Akrco 2&Ac/NG-/ ~ 77( ¢>s ,e:s < !V/ZtC-!? //l('£s73rr?A/& CA«L-K 'o;< NAJ11-ArA51?tt £ 15/'f oiZt(L /479w {"o/I/77Jl/d;e /3t?:.tu<.MIG . ~sV:S . 70 ;:::bC//V£24770/{). :£2;e. !::?Ul. ?'Tl(Ae 77!i/~/1TR:; AY PKY;e:g_ CC)GCA/f: V/£.-S ~or Re-lnspection D $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date ·-;:?' Building Inspector -~'?""'~~:::_:::::___t.,a~~~2":~== Phone (970) 945-8212 Nov. 3. 2008 2:48PM 3 November 2008 Gameld CoW!ty Building Dept. . . ' Attn: Andy Schwaller/Jim 'Wilson ' ' I ' . Re: Aspen Glen; I·132 · Burkholder Construction Andy and Jim, No. 37~ P. .' It has been brought to our attention that Todd Burkholder has cbo~en !o use a 'timberstrand' product for stud~· in the balloon framed wall . .' Re indicaleif&to me that there m~y be a conc~rn ·over the Weight or' these versus standard 2 x f.ranlihS-Ilrial. Based on my con:versatio~ with Mr. Burkh~lder, til$ 'timber$trand' material being used i• the saine size as a standard 2 x 6. · · · . it has been our practice that thi~ substitute is a viahle~tive for stapdarii 2 x framing: Jn ~ality, we have framed entire houses with this system, which is also a ~green' system. Therefore, this is an acceptable alternative for framing and has been engineered accordingly. . · If any further information is requested, f~el free to contact me. Brad Jordan, AlA Principal Architect 410 20th Street. Suite 204 • P. 0. Box 1031 • Cl!enw<lod Spring;, C!.!!mado 81602 • Ph<.me: 970-947 -IIB7 • Fax: 970-947-'o425 · . DAVID E THOMAS RICHARD J. CINCLAIF~, JR. RUDot .. F" W. 8EUTIENMULLEI'I ROBERT C. BURRELL, JR OF COUNSEL: THOMAS C. SELF THOMAS, CINCLAIR & BEUTTENMULLER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS & COUNSELORS 5335 SPRING VALLEY DALLAS, TEXAS 75254 March 19, 2008 HAND DELIVERY Garfield County Building and Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 8160 I Re: Blacklion Associates, Ltd. Gentlemen: TELEPHONE: (972) 991-21 2 I TELECOPIER: (972) 99 I ·3220 www..tcb!awfirm .com This law firm has been sole legal counsel to Blacklion Associates, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership, since its formation in 1995. The general partner of Blacklion Associates, Ltd., is a limited liability company called Blacklion Management, LLC, and Timothy J. Dorsey (Tim Dorsey) is the only manager of Blacklion Management, LLC. As sole manager, Mr. Dorsey has complete and total legal authority and power to deal with all of the assets owned by Blacklion Associates, Ltd., including the lots that Blacklion owns in Carbondale, Garfield County, Colorado. Mr. Dorsey and Blacklion Associates, Ltd., have designated Todd Burkholder and Burkholder Construction as authorized agents to pull a building permit for Parcel No. 239513406032 (Lot H-32, Aspen Glen Filing #7), in Garfield County, Colorado (the "Lot"). Blacklion Associates, Ltd., will build a home on such Lot with Mr. Burkholder in a new venture and therefore authorize him to pull this building permit and to deal with Garfield County Building and Planning Department in all respects for the planned construction on this Lot. Please advise if you need anything further. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, THOMAS, CINCLAIR & BEUTTENMULLER, A ProfessiA-o,J.S' SANDPIPER ENTERPRISES LLC OPERATING AGREEMENT TIDS OPERATING AGREEMENT has been adopted as of the 1st day of December, 2007, by BLACKLION ASSOCIATES, LTD., a Texas limited partnership ("Blacklion"), and by MEADOWLARK ENTERPRISES LLC, a Colorado limited liability company ("Meadowlark"), being all of the initial members of SANDPIPER ENTERPRISES LLC, a Colorado limited liability company ("Company" or the "Company") for the governance of the affairs of the Company: ARTICLE I OFFICES AND BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Section I. The registered office shall be located in the City of Carbondale, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. Section 2. The Company may also have offices at such other places, either within or without the State of Colorado, as a majority of the managers may from time to time determine or as the business of the Company may require. Section 3. The business of the Company shall be to construct, own and operate a single-family residence on Lot H-32, in the Aspen Glen Subdivision, Carbondale, Garfield County, Colorado, and such other lawful purposes as shall be Approved by the Members. ARTICLE II RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF MEMBERS Section I. All ownership rights in and to the Company shall be vested in its members, and each member shall hold a Percentage Interest (herein so called) in the Company. Section 2. The initial members of the Company are as set forth below. The initial members have contributed or shall contribute the amounts of cash set forth below to the capital of the Company as their respective initial contributions to the capital of the Company, which have been or shall be credited to their respective capital accounts, as follows: Blacklion $300,000.00 in Property Meadowlark None For its initial capital contribution, Blacklion shall contribute to the Company, free and clear of all liens, Lot H-32, Aspen Glen Filing No. 7, according to the plat thereof recorded 9/23/1999, as Reception No. 552596, along with the associated golf club membership (the "Property"). All SPE002\0A OPERATING AGREEMENT SANDPIPER PAGE I Cathi Edinger From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: debbie burkholder [debbie_burkholderhomes@hughes.net] Thursday, March 20, 2008 11:08 PM Cathi Edinger todd_burkholderhomes@hughes.net Building permit H 32 Aspen Glen Attachments: Garfield Letter New Page 1.pdf Thursday, March 20, 2008 Re: Aspen Glen sub division Lot H-32 Building Permit Attention: C. Edinger Page 1 of 1 Attached is a letter from Blacklion's attorney, Mr. Rudy Beuttenrnuller. This letter should enable Burkholder Construction to pull the permit in question for lot H-32 in the Aspen Glen sub-division in Garfield Coun1y. This is the same letter format, from the same attorney, that Blacklion used two years ago for Burkholder Construction (aka Blue Heron), to pull a permit and build in Aspen Glen on Lot H5. We are the same p!lfltlers but on this lot, our enti1y is Sandpiper instead of Blue Heron, and we remain Burkholder Construction as the General Contractor. Please contact the attorney, Mr. Beuttenrnuller if you need additional information as he is the sole liaison for Mr. Dorsey aka Blacklion. Sincerely Todd Burkholder 3/24/2008 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL SUBSOIL STUDY l·lt:pw;:-~nh·h<\\'lnk G~otc·chnknl, Inc. SOlO County R,~;:ld 154 Glenwood Springs, Coh;mvJo 81601 Phon~~: 970,9-'+.5-?9fk1 fr1x: 9"70·945--8454 t.•,mnil: hpgeo@hpg:cotech.c-om FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED DARSEY RESIDENCE LOT H-32, THE HOMESTEAD AT ASPEN GLEN SPRING LOOP GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 108 027 A JANUARY 31, 2008 PREPARED FOR: JORDAN ARCHITECTURE ATTN: BRADJORDAN P.O. BOX 131 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 P I ·JrY' 8"1 -119 c··· 1 1· s · · ~~-, ,.,., "'"7 ---~-·h ·'7" uq 19°'' ·ar<.er .. L)~ ·t ... ~t --· 0 .... o onKO '-.pnngs (. '/,..I).)),..)JO~ * :,!.vert orrtt: \1 \.,•uiOcr· .. o:1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ........................................................................ -1 - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ................................................................................. -1- SITE CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... -2- SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL ..................................................................................... -2 - FIELD EXPLORATION ............................................................................................ -2- SUB SURF ACE CONDITIONS ............................................................. , .................... -3 - DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................. -3- FOUNDATIONS .................................................................................................... -3 - FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS ......................................................... -4- FLOOR SLABS ...................................................................................................... -5 - UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM ...................................................................................... -6- SURFACE DRAINAGE ......................................................................................... -6- LIMITATIONS .......................................................................................................... -7 - REFERENCES ........................................................................................................... -8 - FIGURE I -LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2-LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3-LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4-GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1-SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This repo1t presents the results of a subsoil study for the proposed Darsey residence to be located on Lot H-32, The Homestead at Aspen Glen, Spring Loop, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure I. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechoical engineering services to Jordan Architecture dated January 28, 2008. Chen-Northern, Inc. previously conducted a preliminary geotechoical engineering study for development of Aspen Glen and geotechoical engineering study for preliminary plat design (Chen-Northern, 1991 and 1993). Afield exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures tor the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechoical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOS.ED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will be a two story wood frame structure over a partial basement level and crawlspace. The attached garage and basement floors will be slab-on-grade. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 3 to I 0 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical ofthe proposed type of construction. lfbuilding .loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. Job No. J 08 027 A -2~ SITE CONDITIONS The site was vacant and covered with about I foot of snow at the time of our field exploration. There could be some minor fill on the lot from overlot grading as part of the subdivision development. There is a marshy area to the east and north of the lot. The gronnd surface is relatively flat with about 2 feet of elevation difference across the building area. Vegetation consists of grass and weeds. SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL Bedrock of the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the Aspen Glen development. These rocks are a sequence ofgypsiferous shale, fine-grained sandstone/siltstone and limestone with some massive beds of gypsum. There is a possibility that massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie portions ofthe lot. Dissolution ofthe gypsum under certain. conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas oflocalized subsidence. During previous studies in the. area by Chen-N01thern (1991 and 1993), several broad subsidence areas and smaller size sinkholes were mapped scattered throughout the Aspen Glen development. These sinkholes were primarily located on the east side of the Roaring Fork River and appear similar to others associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite in areas of the Roaring Fork River valley. Sinkholes were not observed in the innnediate area of the subject lot. No evidence of cavities was encountered in the subsurface materials; however, the exploratory borings were relatively shallow, for foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge of the subsurface conditions at the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop. The risk of future ground subsidence on Lot H-32 throughout the service life of the proposed residence, in our opinion, is low; however, the owner should be made aware of the potential for sinkhole development. If :further investigation of possible cavities in the bedrock below the site is desired, we should be contacted. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on Jan\lary 28, 2008. Two exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the Job No. 108 027 A -3- subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck-mounted CME-45B drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with a 1% inch I.D. spoon sampler. The sampler was qriven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsoils consist of about 'h foot of topsoil overlying relatively dense, slightly silty to silty sandy gravel with cobbles and boulders to the drilled depths of5 to 11 feet. Drilling in the dense granular soils with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content and gradation analyses. Results of a gradation analyses performed on a small diameter drive sample (minus I 'h inch fraction) of the coarse granular subsoils are shown on Figure 4. The laboratory testing is summarized on Table 1. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked 3 days later and the subsoils were slightly moist to moist. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature ofthe proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural gravel subsoils. Job No. 1 08 027 A -4- The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread tooting foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural gravel subsoils soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of3,000 ps£ Based on experience, we expect settlement offootings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about I inch or Jess. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their liearing elevation tor frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous fuundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least I 0 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 5) The topsoil and any loose or disturlied soils should lie removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the natural gravel soils. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are separate from the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral eatth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 40 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. Backfill should not contain vegetation, topsoil or oversized rock. Job No. !08 027 A ~tech -5- All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will iocrease the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or . retaining structure. An underdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behiod walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, sioce this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backflll. The lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination ofthe sliding resistance ofthe footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the footing. Resistance to slidiog at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of0.45. Passive pressure of compacted. backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent t1uid unit weight of350 pcf The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values reco:nunended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety should be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, particularly in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be compacted to at least 95% ofthe maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. FLOOR SLABS The natural soils, exclusive of topsoil, can be used to support lightly loaded slab-on-grade construction. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all beariog walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spaciog and slab Job No. I 08 027 A ~tech -6- reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist ofthe on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls, crawlspace and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic presswe buildup by an underdrain system_ The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passingthe No. 200 sieve, less than 50% ·passing the No.4 sieve and have a maximum size of2 inches. The drain gravel b(lckfill should be at least 1 Yz feet deep. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be .observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: I) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. Job No. I 08 027 A -7- 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free-draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on- site finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our fmdings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identifi.ed at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurfuce conditions may not become evident until excavation is perfonned. If conditions encountered during construction appear different fi·om those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not respons.ible fur technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to Job No. !08 027A ~tech -8- verifY that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Jordy Z. Adamson, Jr., P.E. Reviewed by: Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. JZNvad REFERENCES Chen-Northern, Inc., 1991, Preliminmy Geotechnical Engineering Study, Proposed Aspen Glen Development, Gaifzeld County, Colorado, prepared for Aspen Glen Company, dated December 20, 1991, Job No. 4112 92. Chen-Northern, Inc., 1993, Geotechnical Engineering Studyfor Preliminmy Plat Design, Aspen Glen Development, Gmjield County, Colorado, prepared for Aspen Glen Company, dated May 28, 1993, Job No. 4 112 92. Job No. 108 027 A ~tech \ \ \ 997 ' '\ 998 999 1000 \ ) I / " / \ ) / I '\ ~,:---------~--..... 1001 ) \ / -----. '\ / / _..-__.---.:WOO---' I / / .J-001--. "'\ " I 1// '\ '\ 1 11 l I'\ \ \ I I 1 I \ ", I \ \ .-1 BO~NG 1 \ -- I \ '--1()(}1 e I \ -+' I \ >---F--I '-, ------' \] I I / / , ___ ....... ___ ....... I '\ / / ' ' 1 / / / I \ I "' -, PROPOSED - RESIDENCE --1000 I / / / I LOT H-31 I 1000 ,-------.J/ LOTH-32 -J 1\ ------...._ -- SPRING LOOP / / -' /-....._ I f I l --1000 -j I I I 1000 LOT H-33 APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 30' 108 027A ~tech He worth-Pawlok Geotechnical LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 1 1000 995 1i) "' LL ' c: 0 J &l 990 985 108D27A BORING 1 ELEV. = 1 000.0' 35/6, 15/1 we= o.9 -200 = 12 BORING2 ELEV.= 999.0' 43/6 48/6,50/5 ]we= 1.6 +4=48 -200 = 14 50/5 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. ~ LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS HEPWORTH·F'AWL.AK GEOTECHNICAL 1000 995 1i) "' u.. ' c: 0 ] 990 w 985 Figure 2 LEGEND: TOPSOIL; sandy silty clay, organics; roots, firm, moist, brown, frozen. GRAVEL (GM); slightly silty to silty, sandy, with cobbles and boulders, dense, slightly moist, reddish brown, calcareous. 39/12 T NOTES: Drive sample; standard penetration test (SP1), 1.3/8 inch J.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 39 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the SPT sampler 12 inches. Depth at which boring caved when measured on January 31, 2008. Practical drilling refusal. 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on January 28, 2008 with 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by taping from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours on the site plan provided and checked by instrument level. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked 3 days later. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) +4 = Percent retained on the No. 4 sieve -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 108 027A ~tech HEPWORTH•PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3 8 z ~ w "' 1-z w u "' w a. I HYDROMETER ANALYSIS I SIEVE ANALYSIS I .I. HR TlME READINGS I 24 HR. 7 0 45 MIN. 15 MJN. 60MIN19MJN.4 M!N. 1 M!N. #200 U.S. STANDARD SERIES I #100 #50 #30 #16 #8 #4 CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS I 3/8" 3/4" 11/2" 3" 5"6" a· 100 10 90 20 80 30 70 40 60 50 50 60 40 70 30 80 20 90 10 0 100 .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .150 .300 .600 iJ8 2.36 4.75 9.5 19.0 37.5 12.5 76.2 152 203 127 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILUMETERS Ci.AYTO SiLT FJNE MEDIUM . COARSE FINE COA COBatES GRAVEL 48 % SAND 38 % SILTANDCLAY 14 % LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % SAMPLE OF: Silty Sandy Gravel FROM: Boring 2 at 5 and 10 Feet Combined (!) z iii U) < a. 1-z w u "' w a. 108 027A ~ HEPWORTH·PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 Job No. 108 027A SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL NATURAL GRADATION PERCENT ATIERBERG UMITS UNCONFINED MOISTURE DRY GRAVEL SAND PASSING UQUID PLASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOIL OR BORING DEPTH CONTENT DENSITY NO. 200 UMIT INDEX STRENGTH BEDROCK TYPE (%) (%) SIEVE (ft) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (PSF) 1 2 0.9 12 Silty Sandy Gravel 2 5 and 10 1.6 48 38 14 Silty Sandy Gravel combined Parcel Detail Page 1 of3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information ,A.ssessor/Treasur~r Prop~Search I Assessorllubset Query I As.sessor Sales search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search BaskJ3uildingJ;::haracteristics I J ax Infowation Parcel Detail I Value~Detail I sales Detail I Residentiai/Gonunerci&ILIUProvement Detail Land Detail I Photographs I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II 2007 Mill Levy I I 082 II R005466 II 239513406032 II 64.976 I Owner Name and Mailing Address IBLACKLION ASSOCIATES, LTD 15335 SPRING VALLEY ROAD !DALLAS, TX 75254 Assessor's Parcel Description (Not to be used as a legal description) !sECT,TWN,RNG:13-7-89 SUB:ASPEN GLEN !FLG #7 LOT:H32 PRE:R1 00091 BK: 1700 !PG:572 RECPT:676959 BK:1700 PG:571 !RECPT:676958 BK:0921 PG:0661 IBK:0921 PG:0661 BK:0918 PG:0408 !BK:0911 PG:0791 BK:0908 PG:0449 IBK:0908 PG:0447 BK:0908 PG:0445 jBK:0908 PG:0443 BK:0908 PG:0441 [BK:0908 PG:0439 BK:0894 PG:0995 [BK:0894 PG:0702 Location Physical Address: I!GLENWOOD SPRINGS Subdivision: I!ASPEN GLEN FLG #7 II II http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=239513406032 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3/5/2008 Parcel Detail Page 2 of3 I Land Acres: 110.506 I I Land Sq Ft: llo I Section II Township II Range I I 13 II 7 II 89 I 2007 Property Tax Valuation Information II II Actual Value II Assessed Value I I Land: II 127,74011 37,0401 I Im~rovements: II oil 0 I Total: II 127,74011 37,0401 Sale Date: 116/23/2005 Sale Price: 111,004;500 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 Buildings: Number of Commllnd 0 · Buildings: No Building Records Found Tax Information I Tax Year II Transaction Type II Amount I 2007 II Tax Amount II $2,406.721 2006 Tax Payment: Whole II ($2,438.88)/ 2006 Tax Amount II $2,438.881 2005 Tax Payment: Whole II ($2,449.58)1 2005 Tax Amount II $2,449.581 2004 Tax Payment: Whole II ($2, 7 46.44 )I I 2004 II Tax Amount II $2,746.441 I 2003 Tax Payment: Whole II ($2,221.44 )I I 2003 Interest Payment ($88.86)1 I 2003 Interest Charge $88.861 I 2003 Tax Amount $2,221.441 I 2002 II Tax Payment: Whole ($2,823.60)1 I 2002 II Tax Amount I $2,823.601 " http:/ /www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=239513406032 3/5/2008 Parcel Detail I 2001 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($2,712.76)1 I 2001 II Tax Amount II $2,712.761 I 2000 II Interest Payment II ($38.34)1 I 2000 Interest Charge II $38.341 I 2000 Tax Payment: Whole II ($3,834.48)1 I 2000 Tax Amount II $3,834.481 I 1999 Tax Payment: Whole II ($185.20)1 I 1999 Tax Amount II $185.201 Top ofPag~ Assessor Database Se.arch Options I Treasurer Database Search Qption~ Cl~rk &_Record~ Database Searcll_Qptions Garfield County Home Page Page 3 of3 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 -2008 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. http:/ /www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce1Number=239513406032 3/5/2008