Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 ApplicationBEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO PETITION FOR EXEMPTION Pursuant to C.R.S. (1973) Section 30 -28 -101(10)(a) -(d) as amended, and the Subdivision Regulations of Garfield County, Colorado, adopted September 1, 1972 and amended April 14, 1975, Sections 1.02.17(d) and 3.02.01, the undersigned Colorado Mountain Junior College District respectfully petitions the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, to exempt by resolution a parcel of ground approxi- mately five acres, more or less, more fully hereinafter described, from the definitions of "subdivision" and "subdivision land" as the terms are used and defined in C.R.S. (1973) Section 30 -28 -101(a) -(d) and the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations, for the reasons stated below: To enable the College to sell to a private developer land to build student apartments in accordance with the College's Planned Unit Development zoning plan as approved by the County Commissioners September 22, 1975. )4‘Sub 'tted at Glenwood Springs, Colorado, this 7 day of /V ! `/ / 1920 cp/e, idt— ottel.i/ Petitioner 6/4e .bAr7. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Colorado Mountain Junior College District, David Watts and James Watts, have made application to the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, for a Planned Unit Development amendment to the Zoning Resolution of Garfield County, Colorado, said proposed Planned Unit Development being known as Colorado Mountain College Planned Unit Development all as more particularly described in said application; and WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Planning Commission of Garfield County, Colorado, for its approval, disapproval, or recommendation all as provided in Section 8.04 of said Zoning Resolution; and WHEREAS, said application has been submitted to the Planning Department of Garfield County for thorough and complete review thereof resulting in recommendations from said department which recommendation has been presented to said PlanninpCommission and Board of County Commissioners and now comprises a portion of the record of the proceedings in respect to such applications; and WHEREAS, the said Planning Commission has certified to the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado its recommendation that the said application be approved; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado has duly and regularly held a public hearing on said application in conformity with the laws of the State of Colorado and the provisions of said Zoning Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado is now fully advised in the premises in regard to said application, and finds that such planned unit development amendment is in conformity with the general plan for Garfield County and the Zoning Resolution of Garfield County, Colorado • • NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO, that the application for Planned Unit Development amendment to the Zoning Resolution of Garfield County, Colorado, for the Colorado Mountain College Planned Unit Development, be and the same hereby is adopted, and that the zone district maps comprising a part of the Zoning Plan and Zoning Resolution of Garfield County, Colorado be accordingly amended to reflect this amendment. ATTEST: Ierk and Reorder cofnmissioner 2 Commissioner • • COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE MEMORANDUM TO: Robert Witowski, County Planner FROM: Donald S. Hix, Colorado Mountain College SUBJECT: Subdivision Exemption - S.B. 35 Exemption DATE: Fuary 9, 1976 ( On September 22, 1975 Colorado Mountain College was granted a Planned Unit Development designation for the West Campus property. All the property included in the PUD is solely owned or in the process of ownership by the Colorado Mountain Junior College District with the exception of a five (5) acre tract owned by David and James Watts who purchased the property, built and operate a student apartment complex. As stated in the PUD, one of the principal uses of the property would be for the construction of student apartments --the apartments to be built by a private developer if at all possible. In order to do this the College must be granted permission by the Garfield County Commis- sioners to sell another five (5) acre tract of land. The development schedule, as presented in our PUD proposal, calls for the construction of an additional 60 units to house 120 students during the 1975/76 academic year. Because of a constant demand for more student housing we want to enlarge this first phase to accommodate 200 students to be constructed during the 1976/77 academic year. Our present plans call for ten 8 -unit buildings. Each unit would have two 2 -bedroom apartments and six 1 -bedroom apartments housing 20 students in each building. The location for the new apartments is in accordance with the master plan. The apartments will be approximately two hundred feet east- southeast of the present Pinon Alps. Access to the new apartments will be a continuation of the road from the Pinon Alps to the northwest corner of the new site. Adequate parking space is provided in the proposed plans. Our parking schedule, as approved in the PUD, calls for 75 parking spaces for the second apartment site. We are proposing parking for approximately 130 cars for this projection which exceeds our demand factor of one car for every two students. Again referring to the information in the PUD, the water supply and sewage disposal should not be a concern. The College will supply water to the apartment complex and allow the apartment sewage system to hook into the College's sanitation system on a fee -use basis. The present • • Robert Witowski Page 2 February 9, 1975 capacity of both the College's water and sanitation systems are more than adequate to handle the additional requirements that the new apartment complex will create. Drainage should not be a problem for this development. The gentle slope of the ground on which the development is located will make any runoff flow primarily to the southwest into a natural drainage draw, running in a southerly direction into open fields. The West Campus is served by the Carbondale Fire Department. However, due to the distance from Carbondale to the campus, the College admin- istration is constantly concerned about adequate fire protection. The College has its own small fire truck to help alleviate some danger. For this new development fire hydrants will be installed near the buildings for fire protection, individual fire extinguishers and smoke detectors will be located in each apartment, and fire drills will be conducted periodically throughout the year. In summary, the College is following the schedules that are part of our approved PUD. I request you keep me advised as to the correct procedures to follow so we can be exempted from S.B. 35 and Garfield County's subdivision regulations. I will be available to come over to your office any time to keep the ball rolling on this matter. DSH:sr 1 • fel EXHIBIT A attached to and forming a part of LEASE AND OPTION between Bruce Dixson as Lessor and Colorado Mountain Junior College District as Lessee, dated January I, 1972. Part of Lots 6 and 7 of Section 4, part of Lot 11 of Section 5, all of Lot 8 and part of Lots 3 and 4 of Section 8 and all of Lots 4, 5, 6 and 7 of Section 9, all in Township 7 South, Range 88 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado, lying Southeasterly of a county road as constructed and in place, described as follows; Beginning at the Southwest corner of Lot 3 of said Section .8, being the same as the Southeast corner of Lot 4 of said Section 8, whence the Northeast corner of said Section 8 bears N. 52°35'14" E. 1572.97 feet; thence S. 88°43'38" W. 426.39 feet along the Southerly line of said Lot 4 to a point on the Westerly line of . said road; thence N. 03°12'18" E. 242.69 feet along the Westerly line of said road; thence N. 14°58'08" E. 144.01 feet along the Westerly line of said road; thence N. 32°07'00" E. 1473.78 feet along the Westerly line of said road; thence N. 43°58'38" E. 132.65 feet along the Westerly line of said road; thence, N. 64°10'20" E. 392.30 feet along the Northwesterly line of said road; thence N. 72°07'36" E. 885.11 feet along the Northwesterly line of said road; thence N. 61°58'39" E. 214.19 feet along the Northwesterly line of said road; thence N. 57°45'47" E. 271.83 'feet along the Northwesterly line of said road; thence N. 61°35'17" E. 658.56 feet along the Northwesterly line of said road; thence N. 72°45'00" E. 112.70 feet along the Northwesterly line of said road to a point on the Easterly line of Lot 6 of said Section 4; thence S. 00°09'39" W. 1787.80 feet along the Easterly lines of Lots 6 and 7 of said Section 4 to the Northeast corner of Lot 5 of said Section 9, being the same as the Northwest corner of Lot 4 of said Section 9; thence N. 89°41'57" E. 1366.29 feet along the Northerly line of said Lot 4 to the Northeast corner of said Lot 4; thence S. 00°38'41" W. 2198.27 feet along the Easterly lines of Lots 4 and 7 of said Section 9 to the Southeast corner of said Lot 7; thence S. 88°42'41" W. 361.02 feet along the Southerly lineof said Lot 7; thence North 317.99 feet along the Southerly line of said Lot 7; thence S. 69°57' W. 988.46 feet along the Southerly line of said Lot 7; thence Sr 88°42'41" W. 1601.16 feet along the Southerly lines of Lots 7 and 6 of said Section 9 to the Southwest corner of said Lot 6, being the same as the Southeast corner of Lot 8 of said Section 8; thence S. 88°46'10". W. 1245.83 feet along the Southerly line of said Lot 8 to the South- west corner of said Lot 8; thence N. 00°05'49" W. 1319.90 feet along the Westerly line of said Lot 8 to the Northwest corner of said Lot 8, being the same as the Southwest corner of Lot 3 of said Section 8, the point of beginning. EXCEPT a strip of land sixty (60) feet in width which is the County road as now situate and in place and which extends along the entire Northwesterly portion thereof in said Lots 3 and 4, Section 8, Lot 11, Section 5 and Lots 6 and 7, Section 4. ALSO EXCEPT an undivided one-half interest in and to all oil, gas and other mineral rights lying in, upon or under the land above described, together with the right to prospect for and remove the same upon .payment of all surface damages, said reservation being for the life of G. B. Gaumer, otherwise known as Gladwyn B. Gaumer, as appears in warranty deed recorded as Document No. 220654 in Book 347 at Page. 457. • ALSO EXCEPT the following described parcels of land heretofore conveyed to the Colorado Mountain Junior College District, as follows: Tract or parcel of land, containing 58.475 acres, more or less, in Lot 5 and Lot 6 of Section 9 and in Lot 6 and in Lot 7 of Section 4, T. 7 S., R. 88 W. of the 6th P.M., in Garfield County, Colorado, said tract or parcel being more particularly described as follows: ••Beginning at a point which point is the SW corner of Section 4, T. 7 S., R. 88 W., 6th P.M., from which point the NW corner of Section 9 bears S. 89°42' W. a distance of 180.8 feet; thence N. 89°42' E. along the South line of Section 4 a distance of 683.1 feet; thence N. 0°25'30" W., a distance of 1,444.7 feet to the Northwesterly line of the County road; thence N. 61°35'30" E. along the Northwesterly line of the County road, a distance of 658.6 feet; thence N. 72°45' E. along the Northwesterly line of the County road, a distance of 112.7 feet to the East line of Lot 6 of Section 4; thence S. 0°13'30" E. along the East line of Lot 6 and Lot 7 of Section 4, a distance of 1,787.8 feet to the South line of .Section 4; thence S. 0°07'30" E. along the East line of Lot 5 and Lot 6 of Section 9, a distance of 1,044.4 feet; thence S. 89°42' W., a distance of 1,374.6 feet; thence N. 0°20' E., a distance of 1,044.5 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, except the strip of land 60 feetin width, which is the County road and now situated and in place and which extends along the Northerly portion of the above described parcel;'and Tract or parcel of land, containing 19.525 acres, more or less, in Lot 6 and in Lot 7 of Section 4, T. 7 S., R. 88 W., of the 6th P.M., in Garfield County, Colorado, said tract or parcel being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point which point is the SW corner of Section 4, T. 7 S., R. 88 W., 6th P.M., from which point the NW corner of Section 9 bears S. 89°42' W., a distance of 180.8 feet; thence N. 0°20' E., along the West line of Section 4, a distance of 1123.0 feet to the Northwesterly line of the County road; thence N. 72°07'30" E. along the Northwesterly line of the County road, a distance of 259.5 feet; thence North 61058'.30", E. along the Northwesterly line of the County road, a distance of 214.2 feet; thence N. 57°46' E. along the Northwesterly line of the County road, a distance of 271.8 feet; thence S. 0°25'30" E., a distance of 1,444.7 feet to the South line of Section 4; thence S. 89°42' W. along the South line of Section 4, a distance of 683.1 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. 1 • P. U. D. APPLICATION COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE SPRING VALLEY The following narrative and supporting documents are in accordance with the Planned Unit Development Amendment to the Garfield County Zoning Resolution dated November 11, 1974. The proposed P. U. D. is in conformity with the County's general plan. Ownership - All the property included in the proposed P. U. D. is solely owned or in the process of ownership by the Colorado Mountain Junior College District with the exception of a five (5) acre tract owned by David and James Watts who purchased the property, built and operate a student apartment complex. The Watts Brothers have given the College written consent for this P. U. D. application. Plan - The planning concepts supporting the request are for the purpose of allowing the College to develop in accordance with our Master Plan which was completed September, 1972 by a firm called "Inter Plan" and recent revisions to this plan by the architectural firm of Caudill Associates. There are 622 acres to be included in the proposed P. U. D. The principal use, for this property is to support a two year community college. The buildings now on the property and those to be built would be: class- rooms, laboratories, teaching and administrative offices; student recreation, social and housing; learning center and ancillary buildings for college maintenance. Dwelling Units - The term dwelling units in this application is intended to mean student apartments. The college has previously sold five (5) acres to a private commercial developer who built and rents apartments to our students. It is the intention of the college to continue this practice. The present apartment complex called the Pinon Alps is composed of two apartment buildings and a supporting recreation center, It has forty- four (44) one bedroom units and twenty-nine (29) two bedroom apartments with a total student capacity of one hundred ninety-six (196) students. Our planning projects a need for apartments to house an additional one hundred -twenty (120) students for the 1975-76 academic year, another one hundred -twenty (120) students by 1980-81, and an additional one hundred -forty-seven (147) for our maximum capacity during the year 2000. This will give us student housing for 583 students and will require construction of 193 new apartment units. Our student housing is pro- jected on housing one-third of our full time students on campus, Common Open Space - The twenty-five per cent minimum will be greatly exceeded. Acres Proposed Uses - Educational Facilities 80 13 Student Apartments 20 03 Common Open Space 522 84 622 100 Internal Circulation Systems - See Map # Three School Sites - This is not applicable to our request. Commercial -Industrial Uses - Not applicable with the exception of student apartments owned and managed by private enterprise. Utilities - The present utilities are now in existence and in use: Water - four wells, with a combined capacity of 940 gpm exist of which two are being used to serve our present operation. A 600,000 gallon storage tank, booster pumps, chlorination equip- ment as well as a 25,000 gallon back-up storage tank. Sewer - The system is comprised of 8" trunk mains falling into two sewage lagoons. The primary lagoon has aeration equipment -2- • • for use when future, increased loads require. Presently only one lagoon is in use with evaporative disposing of all waters. Gas - Supplied by Rocky Mountain Gas Company through high pressure mains. Electricity - Supplied by Holy Cross R. E.A. 480/217V-3 phase service. Telephone - Mountain Bell Other Restrictions - Architectual Review Committee The purpose of the committee is to ensure that future buildings con- structed in the P. U. D. conform to the objectives set forth in the college is Master Plan. The Committee will be composed of college staff members and repre- sentatives of the college architectual firm. The Committee will require approval for: a. Schematic plans b. Preliminary design plans c. Final design plans The Committee will be concerned with the following considerations in any building projects: a. Location and site exposure b. Setting on property c. Parking d. Exterior lighting e. Underground utilities f. Animal restrictions (no pets) g. Encourage the use of solar energy h. Acoustical treatment i. Exterior finish j. Fire alarm system The college has final authority for approving all plans and specifications for any building. -3- • • PARKING The College presently has parking spaces for approximately 350 automobiles. Our master plan projects a need for around 900 parking spaces to accommodate the needs of the school which include parking around the student apartments. The following schedule is from the original master plan, modified to be more realistic to known student enrollment projections: 1. Spaces required for 1975-76 Group Number Demand Factor Total Students 685 .5 342 Faculty/Staff 65 1.0 65 Visitors 10 1.0 10 417 2. Spaces required for 1980-81 Students 841 .5 420 Faculty/Staff 92 1. 0 92 Visitors 10 1.0 10 522 3. Spaces required for maximum size Students 1,450 . 5 725 Faculty/Staff 134 1.0 134 Visitors 10 1.0 10 869 The present parking requirements are satisfied as follows: Lot #1 Lot #2 Lot #3 Lot #4 Lot #5 80 spaces 50 35 60 50 275 Apartment site #1 - Pinon Alps 75 Total available -3a- 350 Master plan projections: Lot #1 80 Lot #2 80 Lot #3 80 Lot #4 100 Lot #5 105 Lot #6 60 Lot #7 75 Lot #8 20 600 Apartment site #1 - Pinon Alps 75 #2 75 #3 75 #4 75 300 Total parking for proposed P. U. D. 900 Note: Parking space is calculated at 9 x 18 feet -3b- • Regional Location Map - See Map # One Site Map - See Map #Two Site Topographic Map - See Map # Two . Legal Description - See Attachment It One Written Statement - Objectives: Through a voluntary decision to comply with County Zoning Ordinances Colorado Mountain College is applying for a Planned Unit Development to permit the orderly development of the West Campus. -4- * • DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE --COLLEGE FACILITIES Existing Structures: Academic Buildings 48,479 sq. ft. Dormitory Building 18, 672 Student Center 4,080 Animal Health Tech. Building 960 Natural Resources Building 2, 400 Total Existing 74,591 sq. ft. Phase I, 1975-1976: Existing Space Learning Center Building Photo Studio Addition College Center Building Total Phase I Phase II, 1980-1981: Existing Plus Phase I General Academic Building Less Dormitory Building Total Phase II 74,591 12,500 2,400 6,270 95,761 31,160 <18,672> 95,761 sq. ft. 108,249 sq. ft. Maximum Phase, 2000-2001: Existing Plus Phase I and II 108, 249 General Academic Building 82, 460 Total 190,709 Replace Academic Building -48, 479 New Academic Building Total Maximum Phase -5- 142,230 75,430 217,660 • • DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE --APARTMENTS Existing Units Students Pinon Alps 73 196 Phase I, 1975-1976 60 120 Phase 2, 1980-1981 60 120 Maximum Phase, 2000-2001 73 147 Totals 266 583 -6- • • SPECIAL COVENANTS - CONDITIONS The information presented on page three of this application is intended to satisfy the requirement for this section. The purpose of the architectual review committee is to ensure that future buildings constructed in the P. U. D. are in agreement with the objectives of the College. The architectural review committee will be concerned with building setbacks, height limits, access requirements, and grade or slope restrictions for future construction within the P. U. D. -7- • • OWNERS The following is a list of owners of adjoining property: Direction from P. U. D. North South East West Name Address Foster Petroleum P. O. Box 729 Bartlesville, Okla. 74003 James & Daniel Quigley Rt. 1, Spring Valley Glenwood Spgs. , Colo. 81601 Bureau Land Management 113 - 9th Glenwood Spgs. , Colo. 81601 Bruce Dixon 2035 Overlook Drive Grand Junction, Colo. 81501 John G. Powers P. O. Box 557 Aspen, Colo. 81611 James & Raymond Nieslanik 7203 County Road 115 Glenwood Spgs. , Colo. 81601 Charles J. Becker 0447 - 233 Road Rifle, Colo. 81650 George H. Dapples 2143 Santa Fe Santa Fe, New Mexico Sunlight Partnership 2736 Marilyn Road c/o H. O. Tucker Colo. Spgs. , Colo. 80909 -8- • • LICENSED ENGINEER Water - Sewage - Storm Drainage - Potential National Hazards The following opinion is taken from the report of Jerry Brown, Community Planner and Jerome F. Gamba, P. E. , Eldorado Engineering dated June, 1971 for the Spring Valley Landowners. "In order that a realistic appraisal can be made of existing for use in development other than college growth, it was necessary to estimate the probably future water and sewer requirements of the college. Estimates of these requirements were computed and are illustrated in Table "A" (water and Table "B" (sewer). The population projections used in these tables are from the Interplan report. " Water The production capacity of the existing wells is conservatively estimated to be 430,000 gallons per day. The present storage, which is low pressure, is 25,000 gallons and the booster pump capacity to raise this storage to normal service pressure is 300 gallons per minute. Comparing the above with figures from Table "A", the following may be concluded: a) The water well production would be adequate to supply in excess of 300,000 gallons/day to domestic use other than the college in the year 2000. b) Construction of high-pressure storage and/or increase in booster pump capacity will be needed in the very near future to supply college domestic needs. c) Fire storage for the college is presently inadequate. Lack of high- pressure fire storage in the event of a simultaneous fire and power outage could prove disastrous. A pumper truck pulling water from the existing storage (if full) would be effective for less than one hour. -9- • • The report further recommended the construction of a 500,000 gallon storage tank and additional booster pumps to provide for better fire protection and institutional growth at the college. This recommendation has been accomplished. Sewage The existing sewage treatment plant has a capacity (under present Health Department standards) to serve college needs up through the loading projected for the year 1990. In addition to this, the lagoons are designed to be expanded to double the present capacity at.a minimal cost. Therefore, it would appear that sufficient capacity exists in the college sewage treatment system to serve outside development. The following statement is taken from the Interplan report. "Adequate natural slope exists in the proximity of the projected buildings to suggest that storm run-off be handled by a system of open swales which can be developed along with the building clusters. " It is the opinion of the college staff that potential natural hazards in the P. U. D. such as avalanche areas, landslide areas, flood plain areas, and unstable soils are not a concern or has evidence of any of these natural hazards ever occurred in the past. -10- Date P.E. (a) Water Max. Student=1.0 Inst. Faculty and Demand Staff=.2 (b) G.P.M. M.I.D. P.E. (c) TABLE "A" Demand G.P.D. Iiigh Pressure Storage Reg. G.P.D. (gallons) P.E. (est.) (d) Fire Storage (e) Total Required Storage to Nearest 5000 Gallons (f) Present 1975 1980 1990_ 2000 312 700 860 1,175 1,480 624 1,260 1,420 1,450 1,480 2.00 1.80 1.65 1.35 1.00 18,000 (actual) 52,500 64,500 88,125 111,000 58 75 75 75 75 6,480 19,200 22,400 23,000 23,600 135,000 240,000 240,000 375,000 375,000 • 155,000 365,000 380,000 580,000 610,000 • (a) P.E.=Population Equivalent. (b) Calculated from Interplan report. (c) Assumed from national averages, probably inflated for present, but should not be reduced in• examining future needs. (d) For equalizing storage, high pressure storage rec*uirements in gallons=maximum instantaneous demand for 20 minutes - yield of well for 20 minutes. (e) Fire storage=(fire duration hours) (required flow --Table "A-1"). (f) Total water storage=equalizing storage + fire storage + emergency storage (g). (g) Emergency storage=one day is demand. TABLE "A-1" Required Fire P. E. Flow (G.P.M.) Duration (Hours) • 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 750 _ 3 1,000 4 1,250 .5 1,500 - -6 TABLE "B" SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT CAPACITY Estimated G.P.D. Date P. E #B.O.D. B.O.D./P.E. Hydraulic Estimated G.P.D./P.E. Present 1975 1980 1990 2000 312 700 860 1,175 1,480 53 .17 15,600 50 119 .17 49,000 70 172 .20 60,200 70 235 .20 82,200 70 296 .20 103,500 70 GARFIELD COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 8.1601 14 BLAKE AVENUE • ,June 13, 1974 Dr. Elbie Gann Colorado Mountain College Glenwood Springs, CO ,!Dear Dr. Gann, 1 `!I1. (iii I • ) ,/ 1 .1 r PHONE 945.7255 • ti t •,• �/ Enclosed you will find the chemical and radiological ;test results of your water supply. These samples were taken ,in March of this year and processed for us by the Colorado State Health Department Laboratory. We are pleased to point out that these results show your ,drinking water to be excellent in all listed categories and places yours among the best in the nation. As for the bacteriological quality of your water, this office will continue to sample random points in the system monthly and inform you of any possible problems. It should be noted that. as long as your operator•main- tains a constant trace residual of chlorine at the ends of ithe distribution system you will seldom have an "unsafe" sam- !ple result. Therefore, may we suggest that your operator make use of ;the enclosed. information book and record sheet_s to show that residuals are being properly maintained. ff•we can be of any possible assistance to you, your staff, pr citiens, please feel free to' contact us at this office or myself at home. Edward L. Feld !Deputy 'Sincerely, Lamont L. Kinkade, R.P.S. Director tv: r,ri ir1 e ipality: Colorado Mtn. College Where Collected: Cafeteria Date and Time Sc -:pled: 3-13-7h 5:45 :e of Supply '(If well give depth): Collected by: "L. Kinkade eamicni. ni:%Ll':la wr h'Alrn COLORADO DEP» ,LENT OF HEALTH Date Ar.z1:7.cd: 3-15-74 • • Chemist: Maximum allowable j As found Pecor.�-cnd .imii i"- nu - ' 266 m_1.1 y y� --biditv - 5 units 0.28 Total hardness Calcium (Ca) (as CaCO3) t - 226. 17-.=12 lor (Cobalt Scale) 15 units - 0 Magnesium (Mg) - 125 mg/1 - re/- mrd' -eshold Odor Number • 3 - Phenolphthalein Alkalinity - senic (As) 0.05 mg/1. . 0.01 mg/1 recommended , 0 mg/1 Total Alkalinity - 278 r,. -:r. ;imium ' 0.01 mg/1 0 mg/1 Total Solids 500 mQ/1 316r..c7- _SCd) +6 romium (Cr ) 0.05 mg/10 - mg/1 Specific Conductance - - 514 ^icro-.h uoride (F) 2.4 mg/1 0.3 mg/1 Sodium (Na) - 11 r"/- nd (Fb) 0.05 mg/1 Q - mg/1 Methylene Blue Active Surfactants - 0 '"f= Ienium (Se _ .0.01 mg/1 t m./1 Copper (Cu) 1.0 mg/1 0.03 rz/: rium (Ba) 1.0 mg/1 - mg/1 -nide (CN) 0.2 mg/1 0.01 mg/1 recommended _ m,/1 Zinc (Zn) 5.0 mg/1 0.24 r -:i Silica (Si) 24 Iron (Fe) 0.3 mg/1 0.05 r=%: (Mn).05 Manganese (M ) mg/1 ,0 rw!' Molybdenum (Mo)0 Chloride (C1) 250 mg/1 11 r.t "oss Alpha Activity uuc/1 .uuc/1 1FB ITS Nitrate (NO3) 45 mg/1 5.5 rrt '-oss Beta Activity :odium 226 - uuc/1 _ Sulphate (S0,) 250 mn/1 117 *•:'1 _.. — -- — Phosphate (PO4) - - - 0.2 Ammonia (N1f) - - 0 r7, . Boron (BZ - 10.01 - 1 _ COLORADO DEPARTMciT OF HEALTH 4210 EAST 11TH AVENUE • DENVER, COLORADO 80220 • PHONE 388-6111 Edward G. Dreyfus,•M.D., M.P.H.;Executive Director 1/4 January 16, 1975 Mr. Evan Lucas, Architect Chief, Design and Engineering Division ROFEC Department of Health, Education and Welfare 11037 Federal Building 1961 Stout Street Denver, Colorado ' 80202. Dear Sir: This concerns the construction of a learning center at the Colorado Mountain College, Glenwood Springs, Colorado. The College waste- water treatment facilities are adequately sized to treat the addi- tional waste fromthe learning center andwe envision no water. • quality problems as a result of this project. Very truly yours, FOR DIRECTOR, WATER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION Gregory T.IM i s1Sach, P.E. District. Engineer 6 :ef cc: Mr. Lamont Kinkade, Sanitarian Garfield County 2014 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, Colorado .81601, District Engineer 4210 East 11th Avenue Deriver, Colorado 80220 PUBLIC SEWERAGE FACILITIES 01/PELT I ON SHEET CVUnty„ irrit! Iriltr ,River Bas! o o ,// o Recnlving Stream Classification] n aucl%orq . SUBJECT CONDITIONS REMARKS A. COLLECTION SYSTEM SeparateVCombined No. of Taps Tributary Pop. equivalent served? ..� r Domestic Industrial Total' c100 Trunk Sewers Adequate (Size -f---- Flush Tanks with water connection? System flushed periodically? 1 f"S No. of storm sewer outlets to streamI B. LIFT STATIONS J' Number of Lift Stations 11/0. �� Adequate pumps - Capacity? — Meet Design Criteria. for Safety?. Meet Design Criteria for Reliability? C. TREATMENT Deslgn Capacity • Average Influent *601 000 mgd Maximum Influent mgd Treatment Capacity Adequate? V CS Degree of Treatment Time Prl__ Sect. -Tort C12 residual Treat}ient Pr c lss1Used: (list) rd 1' r riR v a r., Sludge Digestion an drying facilities meet criteria? A70 nC Specify other sludge disposal Known X -connections with drinking water? D. COMPLIANCE Date of last sampling " Mo Yr Percent BOD reduction BOD of effluent •a•r'Je' Does degree of treatment meet legal stds. (sec. with disinfection)? g Does discharge cause stream classification violation? Abatement date set by \IPC Comm Mo Yr RECOMMENDATIONS FOR OPERATIONAL OR PLANT IMPROVEMENTS 5J 41;41(.1 c. '•0 r i No. OF CERTIFIED OPERATORS A B C • No Ccrti f icatc_L • .- ei , Manager.W., 1/ r a m 8f, L✓ i P, k% Person Interviewed LS7!r yr.r ;Wing ing Address V/ r m C:i n w`^a 5, r, r J S (Zip) P. H. Engineer_ 7 1% On�✓1 (✓C�`' Date 5//7-3 wP-16(Rev,7-72-25) • • EASEMENTS Access and egress to the P. U. D. is by county road 114, leading from Colorado Highway 82. County road 114 runs adjacent to and through the proposed P. U. D. The College has granted the Watts Brothers an easement for a road to service the student apartments they own and operate. The College in the near future will construct a road and grant an easement for its use to John Powers. The road will begin from county road 114, approximately 3,000 feet in an easterly direction to the east boundary of the P. U. D. to that which adjoins property owned by John Powers. This proposed road will be built to county road specifications and in the future will be deeded to the county, when acceptable by the county. -11- • • NATURAL ENVIRONMENT By far the greatest asset Colorado Mountain College has, other than the philosophy on which the school is based, is its magnificent natural setting. This prime resource should be respected and enhanced to become a theme to guide campus development. It is not anticipated that development in Spring Valley will be extensive to the degree as to change the "natural" character of the valley. The college will set an example and play a leading role in showing respect for, and sensitive development within this environment. The college will influence other development in the valley to do likewise. It is recommended that the physical facilities of the campus be concen- trated in isolated clusters to lessen the impact on the natural environment and its wildlife. The majority of the campus property is planned to be utilized with only limited development required. This seems appropriate considering the resulting lower development and maintenance costs as well as the in- cremental development anticipated. The natural landscape should be allowed to "flow" between the clusters of development to retain the overall character of the land, and provide for movement of wildlife through the area. Road alignments, paths, parking areas and recreation fields should be laid out to be in sympathy with the general topography. Extensive earth moving should be avoided. Automobile storage should be concentrated in parking lots and screened with trees to lessen their impact. Natural features, such as craters, overlooks, and meadows abound and should be respected and utilized. Development in the conservation areas -12- • • is seen to be limited to a trail system to provide access for nature study and recreational purposes. These conservation areas can serve to eliminate the definition of property boundary lines and retain the integral valley identity as deve- lopment takes place. -13- • . LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS The legal descriptions are referenced to various parcels of land and are found in Attachment # One . Parcels one through eight are owned outright by the college district, parcels nine and twelve are being purchased through lease purchase agreements. Parcel number thirteen is the Watts Brothers property. -14- • TO: Colorado Mountain Junior College District FROM: David Watts and James Watts SUBJECT: P. U. D. Consent We, David and James Watts, hereby consent for a Planned Unit Development (P. U. D.) zoning for Colorado Mountain Junior College District. rte(, David Watts /.) �y Date mes Watts Date • 1 January 31, 1975 Mr. Don Hix Colorado Mountain College Box 1367 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 DON - Enclosed is a brief outline of items you should con- sider in preparing your application and protective covenants for PUD designation of the West Campus. You should coordinate preparation of the material with the college attorney and Larry Schmueser. We sincerely hope our outline is of help. If you need further assistance be sure to contact us. Sincerely, CAUDILL ASSOCIATES . ARCHITECTS A.I.A. Don Ball DB/nk r- AI in!LL ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS A.I.A. • P. O. BOX FF, ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 • PHONE 303-925-3383 .,.....,....r.Mw�.w+►..+..«rq,�+�,r'^r,7+'f�7-. ,,x �rmn F. *.r,-. �,csslA�^AZ atwinn,OrIt Alrltrtr +1nIrriMR1P37PATIVinriP$t: ms.s. i'A- "fit w�..••.. _.. __ _...._..�. •Al ,vienA, 1_31.41kuto is saga _� ,ea.r. �., tr�,xntwrE ,: arvts:.—, , ;, ww a+iii/NOr Mr. Don Hix • January 31, 1975 Page 2 1/ Review Committee . (has final authority to approve or disapprove) Schematic Design . Site Plan, Basic Building Shapes, Over-all Dimensions, General Concepts. Preliminary Design . Floor Plans, Elevations, Outline Specification, Final Site Plan. Final Review . Complete finished drawings and Specification and samples of products used and color selections. 2/ Environmental Considerations . 1. Figure total CMC property and designate the required portion as permanent open space and high density on Housing site only. 2. Ask P&Z to allow a higher than normal density if solar energy is utilized for housing development. 3/ County Commissioners reserve the right to waive or modify applicable subdivision and zoning restrictions as stated in PUD Amendment. The college may be justified in submitting whatever restrictions they consider reasonable and best for the area instead of adhering strictly to zoning restrictions. 4/ Architectural Considerations . 1/ Concept: disturb the least amount of terrain & trees possible. A/ Cluster parking in natural clearings. B/ (same for buildings) 2/ Control of exterior lighting and landscaping, pedestrian pathways, etc. 3/ Acoustical Considerations: -Floor System -Wall System 4/ Durability Factor -Exterior Materials -Enterior Materials CAUOILL ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS A.I.A. • P. 0. BOX FF, ASPEN, COLORADO 81811 • PHONE 303-825-3383 Mr. Don Hix January 31, 1975 Page 3 5/ Enough electrical outlets for reading lights. 6/ View considerations from every unit. 7/ Design for utilization of passive solar energy (south exposure, block to the north)'. 8/ Performance Spec. on applicances. 9/ Reasonable number of washers and dryers in each building. 10/ Screen trash from view. 11/ Minimum size units (measure center of walls) Studio apt. w/ kitchenette 400 s.f. 1 - Bdr. apt. 600 s.f. 2 - Bdr. apt. 750 s.f. 12/ Maximum Height 28 ft. (Measured from grade outside building) 13/ Setbacks From street or road 150 ft. Min. between buildings 75 ft. Side setback 30 ft. 14/ Graphics - signs 15/ Maximum graded slope 3.11 16/ Parking Stall 9 x 18 17/ Sidewalks - main 5'-0" 18/ Insulation min. @ Roof 6" min. @ Wall 31/2" 19/ Min. size hot water heater Studio 30 Gal. 1 - Bdr.-50 Gal. 2 - Bdr.-60 Gal. 20/ Physical Provisions for mail distribution. 21/ Kitchen and Dining Facilities if dorm concept is utilized. 22/ Minimum Bathroom Facilities. 23/ Storage space. 24/ Building and site maintenance. 25/ All construction must meet Uniform Building Code Requirements. CAUDILL ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS A.I.A. • P. O. BOX FF, ASPEN, COLORADO 81811 • PHONE 303-925-3383 A tract or parcel of land in Lot 5, Lot 6 of Section 9 and in Lot 6 and in Lot 7 of Section 4, Tp. 7 S., R. 88 W., of the 6th p.m., in Garfield County, Colorado, said _tact -or parcel being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point which point is the SW corner of Section 4, Tp. 7 S., R. 88 W., 6th P.N., from which point the NW corner of Section 9 bears S. 89°42' W., a distance of 180.8 feet; thence N. 89°42' E., along the South line of Sec. 4, a distance of 683.1 feet; thence N. 0°25'30" W., a distance of 1,444.7 feet, to the northwesterly line of the county roae thence N. 61°35'30" E., along the northwesterly line of the county road, a distance of 658.6 ft thence N. 72°45'E., along the northwesterly line of the county road, a distance of 112.7 feet, to the east line of Lot 6 of Section 4; thence S. 0°13'30" E., along the east line of Lot 6 and Lot 7 of Sec. 4, a distance of' 1,787.8 feet to the south line of Section 4; thence S. 0°07'30" E., along the east line of Lot 5 and Lot 6 of Section 9, a distance of 1,044.4 feet; thence S. 89°42' W., a distance of 1,374.6 feet; thence N. 0°20' E., a distance of 1,044.5 feet, more or less, to the point of beg}nning. ?;.R.=L ::0. ) Beginning at a point, which point is the SW corner of Section 4, Tp. 7 S., R. 88 W., 6th P.`:., from which point the NW corner of Section 9 bears S. 89°42' W., a distance of 180.8 feet; thence N. 0°20' E., along the west line of Section 4, a distance of 1123.0 feet, to the n.ort..::ester1y line of the county road; thence N. 72°07'30" E., along the northwesterly line of the county road, a distance of 259.5 ft thence N. 61°58'30" E., along the northwesterly line of the county road,a distance of 214.2 ft. thence N. 57°46' E., along the northwesterly line of the county road, a distance of 271.8 feet, thence S. 0°25'30" E., a distance of 1,444.7 pet, to the south line of Section 4, the. -ace S. 69°42' W., along the south line oiJr4;o a distance of 683.1 feet, more or less to the point of bezinning. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ( t 1 1i i c c c c c P.\R:. L -o. 3 A triC-I—or parcel of land in Lot 6 and in Lot 7 of Section 4, Tp. 7 S., R. 88 W., 6th P.M., in Garfield County, Colorado, said tract or parcel being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the West line of Section 4, Tp. 7 S., R. 88 W., 6th P.M., from which point the :E corner of Section 8, Tp. 7 S., R. 88 W., 6th P.M., bears S. 9°28' W., a distance of 1,139.4 feet; thence N. 0°20' E., along the West line of Section 4, a distance of 1,442.7 feet to the North line of Lot 6 of Section 4; thence S. 89°55'30" E. along the North line of Lot 6 of Section 4 a distance of 1,341.5 feet to the East line of Lot 6 of Section 4; - thence S. 0°13'30" E. along the East line of Lot 6 and Lot 7 of Section 4, a distance of 768.8 feet to the ;;orths-csterly line of the County road; thence S. 72°45' W. along the Northwesterly line of the County road; a distance of 112.7 feet; thence S. 61°35'30" W. along the Northwesterly line of the County road a distance of 658.6 ft. thence S. 57°46' W. along the Northwesterly line of the County road a distance of 271.8 ft., thence S. 61°58'30" W. along the Northwesterly line of the County road, a distance of 214.2 feet; thence S. 72°07'30" W., along the Northwesterly line of the County road, a distance of 259.5 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. PLtC' L 7o. . 4 Beginning at a point on the east line of Section 5, Tp. 7 S., R. 88 W., 6th P.M., from sjhich point the NE corner of Section 8, Tp. 7 S., R. 88 W., 6th P.M., bears S. 9°28' W., a distance of 1,139.4 feet; thence S. 72°07'30" W., along the northwesterly line of the County road, a distance of 195.8 feet; thence N. 0°12' W., a distance of 4,187'.5 feet, to the north line of Section 5; thence N. 0°12' W., into Sec. 32, T. 6 S., R. 83 W., 6th P.M., a distance of 823.5. feet; thence S. S9°57' E., a distance of 201.0 feet, to the east line of Sec. 32; thence S. 89°57' E., a distance of 177.4 feet, to the east line of Lot 18, Sec. 33, Tp. 6 S., R. 88 W., 6th P.M., ' thence S. 0°07'30" E., along the east line of Lots 18 and 19 of Sec. 33, a distance of 823.5 feet, to the South line of Section 33; thence N. 89°57' W., along the. South line of Sec. 33, a distance of 177.4 feet to the corner co;. -Ion to Sec. 32 and Sec. 33, Tp. 6 S., R. 88 W., 6th P.M., and Sec. 4 and Sec. 5, T. 7 S., R. 88 W., 6th P.M., t:o ce S. 0°12' E., along the east line of Sec. 5, a distance of 2,684.6 feet, to the East 1/4 corner -of Sec. 5; thence S. 0°20' W., along the east line of Sec. 5, a distance of 1,442.7 feet; more or less, to the point of bci;inning. e 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 PARCEL No. 5 A tract or parcel of .land in Lot 1 and in the SINE! of Section 4, Tp. 7 S., R. 88 W., of the 60 P."., in Garfield county, Colorado, said tract or parcel being more particularly e'cscr_:cdas ollows: Beginning at a point in Lot 1 of Section 4, Tp. 7 S., R. 88 W., :: 6th P.M., from 'iich.point the ;:E: corner of Section 4 bears N. 33°20' 30" E., a distance of 995.7 feet; thence S. 0°30'30" E., a distance of 514.4 feet, to the North line of the S:NE1 of Sec. 4; thence S. 0°30'30" E., a distance of 1,3'46.1 feet to the South line of the SNE of Sec. 4; thence N. 89'55'30" W., along the South line of the S-.NE1 of Section 4 a distance of 2,128.3 feet to the West line of the S'NE4- of Section 4; thence N. 0°30'30" W., along the test line of the SNE- of Section 4, a distance of 1,344.4 feet to the North line of the S:NE1 of Section 4; thence S. 89°58' E., along the North line of the S-1NE1 of Section 4, a distance of 1,343.3 feet to the West line of Lot 1 of Section 4; thence N. 0°35' W., along the West line of Lot 1 of Section 4, a distance of 514.4 feet; thence S. 89°58' E., a distance of 785.7 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. PA:CEL No. 6 A tract or parcel of land in the NE:SW1 and in the \;; SE- of Section 4, Tp. 7 S., R. 88 W., of the 6th P.M., in Garfield County, Colorado, said tract or parcel being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the north line of the SE4 of Section 4, Tp. 7 S., R. 88 W., 6th P.M., from which point the SE corner of Section 4 bears S. 30'52'30" E., a distance of 2,933.8 feet; thence S. 00°30'30" E., a distance of 1,264.9 feet to the South line of the NW-SEk of Sec. L thence S. 89°49' W., along the south line of the NWISE1 of Section 4, a distance of 1,214.1 feet to the Lest line of the NW:SE: of Section 4; thence S. 89°49' W., along the south line of the NE1SW1 of Section 4, a distance of 1,360.0 feet to the west line of the NESW'y of Section 4; thence N. 0°13'30" W., along the west line of the NE-SW1 of Section 4 a distance of 1,276.6 feet to the north line of the NEIISW1 of Section 4; thence S. 89°55'30" E., along the north line of the NE1SW1 of Section 4 a distance of 1,353. feet to the East line of the NEuSW of Section 4; - thence S. 85°55'30" E., along the north line of the ML SEk of Section 4 a distance of 1,214.: feet, more or less to the point of beginning. PAR I, :7o. 7 Lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 11 of Section 4, Tp. 7 S., R. 88 W., of the 6th P.M. 2 ROEL ."o. 6 The T SW1 and SE:S'a of Section 34, Tp. 6 S., R. 88 W., of the 6th P.M. • LEGAL DESCRIPTION A parcel of lard situated in the NE 1/4 S7i1 1/4 and the NW 1/4 SE 1/4, Section 4, Township 7 South, Range 39 West, 6th P.M., County of Garfield, State of Colorado, and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Section 4; thence N 72° 21'48" W 4226.11 feet to the southwest corner of the NE 1/4 SW 1/4 of said Section 4; thence easterly along the South line of said NE 1/4 SW 1/4 912.85 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing easterly and along the South line of the NE 1/4 SW 1/4 and the South line of the NW 1/4 SE 1/4 of said Section 4 a distance of 560.00 feet; thence northerly along a line parallel to the West line of said NW 1/4 SE 1/4 a distance of 400.00 feet; thence westerly along a line parallel to the South line of said NW 1/4 SE 1/4.and along a line parallel to the South line of said NE 1/4 SW 1/4 a distance of 560.00 feet; thence southerly along a line parallel to the East line of said NE 1/4 SW 1/4 a distance of 400.00 feet to the point of beginning, containing 224,000 square feet or 5.14 acres, more or less.. 1 • LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel 12 - Lot 12, in Section 4, Township 7 South, Range 88 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado.