Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication-PermitI Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office:970·945-8212 Fax: 970·384-3470 Inspection Line: 970·384-5003 Building Permit No. Parcel No: Locality: 2395-013-27-314 _____ -~~~nbridge PUD Ph2, flg1!2&3, Lot 31~-------·· __ o"5.8S Job Address: ..-&Fox Run GWS ----~--------~----------~----~---~~-----~----------------~ Use of Building: ----··· s/f on fo~ndation w/-eev fJBiie & attached garage'---- Owner: ____ ........::LB Rose Ranch LLC Contractor: Hansen Construction Fees: Plan Check: $ JD'{_t~ Septic: ----·--------~ Bldg Permit: _$_fge:5. ~? RFTA: 750.00 Total Fees: $ .;LS3']. S 3 Clerk: -12--~~-Date: -~ ou~~~~ GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8"' Street, Suite401, Glenwood Springs, Co 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212/ Fax: 970-384-3470 I Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 www. o·arficld~countv .com 2 g"f(,ol 3 4 5 6 7 8 Use of Building: 9 Describe Worlc I 0 Class of Work: o Alteration o Addition II SepticN. o ISDS o Detached 12 Ov,rners valuation of Work: $ NOTICE Authority, This application for a Building Penn it must be signed by the Owner of the property, described above, or an authorized agent If the signat11re below is not that of the Owner, a separate letter of authority, signed by the Owner, must be provided with this Application. Legal Access. A Building Pcm1it cannot be issued without proof of legal and adequate access to the prope11y for purposes of inspections by the Building Department. Other Permits. Multiple sepamtc permits may be required: (I) State Electrical Permit, (2) County ISDS Permit, (3) another pennit required for usc on the property identified above, e.g. State or County Highway/ Road Access or a State Wastewater Discharge Pem1it. Void Permit. A Building Permit becomes nul! and void if the work authorized is not commenced within ISO days of the date of issumlce and if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days after commencement CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I have read this Application and that the infonnation contained above is true and correct I nndcrsta11d that the Building Department accepts the Application, along with the plans and specifications and other data submitted by me or on my behalf (submittals), based upon my certification as to accuracy. Assuming completeness of the submittals and approval of this Application, a Building Penn it will be issued granting permission to me, as Owner, to construct the strncttlrc(s) and facilities detailed on the submittals reviewed by the Building Department. ln consideration of the issuance of the Building Penn it, I agree that I and my agents will comply with provisions of any federal. state or local law regulating the work and the Garfield County Building Code, JSDS regulatioHS and applicable land use regulations (County Regulation(s)). I acknowledge that the Buildi11g Pennit may be suspended or revoked, upon notice from the County, if the location, constmction or use of the stmcture(s) and facility(ies), described above, ll!'e not in compliance with County Regu!ation(s) or any other applicable Jaw. J hereby grant pemlission to the Building Department to enter the property, described above, to inspe<:t the work. I further acknowledge that the issuance of the Building Permit docs not prevent the Building Official from: (I) requiring the correction of e1rors in the submittals, if any, discovered after issuance; or (2) stopping construction or use of the structnrc(s) or facility(ies) if such is in violation of County Regulation(s) or any other applicable Jaw. Review of this Application, including submittals, and inspections of the work by the Building Department do not constinnc an Acceptance of responsibility or liability by the County of errors, omissions or discrepancies. As the Owner, I acknowledge that responsibility for compliance with federal, stnte and local Jaws and County Regulations rest with me and my authorized agents, including without limitation my architect designer, engineer and! or buiJdo;r. J HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE NOTICE & CERTIFICATION ABOVE· 2=£s ~~ 7{27br& .. OWNERS SIGNATURE ::....:=:::r DATE J STAFF USE ONLY Special Conditions: Permit Fee: Adjusted Valuation: .ir Plan Che"k Fee: 115/::/~t..i!f "'a<f,r:S Manu home Fee: Mise Fees:· . .fl-F1'IfJ ., 7 )() dJ !.:?&J>.3S ISDS Fee: Total Fees: Fees Paid: Balance Due: ~ & Issue Date: ISDS No & Issued Date: rf j,s :Y>.s ~ 7/~.1<{ /IJ.ff,.:O,q 1toga..7{'f/J.f/'~ Setbacks: BLDG DEPT: ~~vir; \l \. ~~ OCC Group: ;:f'fL (__ Const Type: Zoninpl..d) PLNGDEPT: db\ u.L-- APIJlW'\i>I.L DATE v The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: 1) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to all!BC and IRC requirements including guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. 1 understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit. VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Address Date .:;;L:;:B;;;R:'-:o::'se:::..:;Ra;o:no::c:o;h;c-_-~--'----,-Subdivision Ironbric!ge f>M D -ph "'d-- 0585 Fox Run Ct. Lot/Block 314 -':47./1"-;40,:/2'-"o~08'P"="'-------~ Contractor -:'H-3-a"'"n-se_n __________ _ Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Basement: Unfinished Square Feet Valuation Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Total Valuation Garage: Valuation Crawl Space Valuation Decks/ Patios Valuation Covered Open Type of Construction: Occnpancy: Valuation Total Valuation 660 sf 778 sf sf sf X $74.68 1438 sf sf X $41.00 sf X $33.68 474 sf X $18.00 sf X $9.00 32 sf X $24.66 Commercial sf X $12.00 sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X 107,389.84 0.00 8,532.00 0.00 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a pIan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a· construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. I. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure( s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: 106.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes )( 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a buildii1g permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbac~~.do apply. Y es,__,l,_'-'--- 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the T.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes ,K I 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? 2 5. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Depa~tment stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Departi11fjll at 625-8601. Yes _ _,A~--- 6. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforci\g)teel in accordance with the IRC or per stamped engineered design? Yes_---cfcA:--- 7. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces a1~he clearances required between wood and eaJth? Yes_-fA-->.---- 8. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces and soffits? Yes}( I 9. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes X I 0. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof constrtVIon? Yes _ _f,._p... ___ _ II. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, !~</-rafters or joists or trusses? Yes_~X-0c----- 12. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all coJtiiJlns and beams? y es,_.,/,.,x'-"'------ 13. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a :y:oof? (Building height measurement usually not to exceed 25 feet) Yes, __ _l:,.__f-"-__ _ 14. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including 3 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No __ ,)L~~~--~ Does the plan include a masofuy fireplace mcludmg a fireplace sectionmdiCatmg design to comply with the IRC? Y Yes No __ ~~---------- Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the IRC? Yes J No _______ _ Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and\/ntilation for all habitable rooms? Yes 1~ No ___________ __ Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specif safety glazing for these areas? Yes No ____________ __ Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicate'\~ the plan? Yes ~ No ____________ _ Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or ~>:ants? Yes ~ No ____________ _ Do you understand that if you belong to a Homeowners Association (HOA), it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? The building permit application will be accepted without it, but you run the risk of the HOA bringing action to enforce the covenants, which can result in revocation of pennit issued. Additionally, your Plan Review fee is not refundable if the plans have been reviewed by the Building Department prior to any action by the HOA that requires either revocation or substantial modification of the plans. Yes X: No ________ _ ( Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes )( No lfno-Explain: __________ _ Have t~ (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes,-t/L'-'----- 4 24. Do you understand that the minimum dimension a home can be on a lot is 20ft. wide and 20ft. long? Yes 'j-No ____ _ 25. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes 'f No _____ _ 26. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone district? Yes fQ No ______ _ 27. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to constmct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes } No ____ _ 28. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the ap~cation of these changes? Yes p. No ____ _ 29. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your buildin~;Permit? Yes ,l'-No _____ _ 30. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made from 7:30a.m. to 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes 'f-No _____ _ 31. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a 50.00 re-inspection fee? Yes No _____ _ 32. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IRC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupay of the building? Yes f"-c No. _____ _ 5 33. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the JRC? Yes )C No ____________ _ 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at \~lf of applicable inspection. Yes -f'--No ______________ _ 35. Are you aware, that on the front ofthe Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this penn it on prior to submittal of a buildi~ermit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes -A-No. _______ _ 36. Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes No (please check with the building department about this requirement) 37. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? \{ Yes --f-A-"-- 38. Are you aware that if you will be connecting to a public water and/or sewer system, that the tap fees have to be paid and the connections inspected by the service provider prior to the issuan~of a Certificate of Occupancy? Yes 1\ -,f--\,--- 1 hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the -.E~ r n-. p/cn/c• Phone: 32;4-::c)CflD (days); (evenings) ·ProjectName: LDT 31lf liC"fbd&Li£.) Ph~ ProjectAddress: D6<6o fO}[ ~UD {2J. GLD"B Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this 6 information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. !fit is determined by the Building Official that additional infonnation is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. Bpminreq November2006 7 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant Building ~ngineered Foundation 1.../J)riveway Permit £;c"'-t- J,urveyed Site Plan \../"'Septic Permit and Setbacks 1 d . c~ __l_LCfrade/Topography 30% ~ch Residential Plan Review List __t.LMirumum Application Questionnaire __iLSubdivision Plat Notes o/ire Department Review ~ aluation Determination/Fees ~ed Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker ~Attach Conditions ~pplication Signed ~an Reviewer To Sign Application _0arcei/Schedule No. ~ 40# Snowload Letter-Manf. Hms. ~Soils Report GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning ~roperty Line Setbacks ~30ft Stream Setbacks V Flood Plain V'ii'uilding Height ~ning Sign-off ~oad Impact Fees ~HOA/DRC Approval l../(}rade/Topography 40% ~anning Issues ..l.L:_Subdivision Plat Notes Assessor's Parcel No.;!. 3 '15' • 0 1'3-J. 7-·3;y Date Cf f;z..t f 0 ~ I BUILDING PERMIT C D Job Address 0 5 fs -:::r ~ c:J-. « Jf 3 (<.{ ' fU.f} Ph. <S. s· .G8/Cc."t>/ Owner[/& ~ R.~ cf_£.C · Address J(l"f)~t<.cHi-.5fR~ne #:::-;;:----Contractor~~-. Address<ffO~ ~GS p;~ne ,;3_2'1-399o Setbacks: Front Rear RH LH Zoning ____ _ S/ (--(/'lA. ~ IJ.) (edt·~ INSPECTIONS Soils Test~ Weatherproofing ?-;z.-c:;S ~P--: Footing ~ ~ Mechanical 9' -/7 -o 2>'. ?c:<./ Foundation~~ Electrical Rough (State) . ' Grout Electrical Final· (State) 9'-3 --:-C/ • Underground Plumbing 5·/¥· o&-~ f ~.:30"'~Final 9':-/Z-.::?o/Che. cklisr C?rt!P11eted? •z{t::« Rough Plumbing '7-ih/-orc~ -?»'2-Certificate Occupancy# LO! b1 _ . Framing ?-;;u~~ Date I 5SLlED L·t.-/•0'} Insulation z--;z.:r~~ Septic System #-'-B-+-f'-"n ________ _ Roofing 'l-/7---v>S f:??u, Date __________ _ Drywall 7-;t 9-0 8 "Jt?P fina1---------.------GasPiping.Z~/CJ-c78~ Other~_~ L) NOTES ...__ '(-,.I (~ ~J v~--1 ?-/?~o~ A~"~<kn' (continue on back) COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at osP>5' ~ & (/ Permit No. /(} fl'l7 ?7-f~.) /?" I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: ~Call for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date ? , ?--9'-df? 20 ry---;;;;;;;::;,..-- Building Inspector ~ Phone (970) 945-8212 COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at 05''$.5-u; ~(J;I. Permit No. ----'-/-"Cl'-'f?':::_9-<-L_Z _____________ _ I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: )::(Call for Re-lnsoection v ~ $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection v ' You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date 7-/( -og' 20;-----.::::::::::;:;;::::::_ Building Inspector ~~ Phone (970) 945-8212 COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at 6Cgo' ~ b ~ Permit No. /0'69 7 /dJf.?ly' I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: ~Call for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date 7-lo-o/5 20 ____ _ Building Inspector ~~~ Phone (970) 945-8212 ~~ IL IN PE I ?;~ GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued .. i./~!.l!?...~ ..... Zoned Area ................•.............. Permit No .... /P...?..~1. ....... . AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. ~"'"' lhf'lrl'/1 l"f u,~-~~~~~~~~~~ IJ Address or LegalDescription.__.rJ""-=5=Z-"'S____._IQ-=--<6_,/I'""'(J-"-V.-CfJ"'-"'-U=£-'-!fi__,Uw""""'"-"5=-'---------- 0wner Lf3/?DOC (<amh LL( Contractor fJCJVJS.tn Setbacks Front Side Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing Driveway Insulation (To include place and Windows and Doors installed). ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING- . WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE For Inspections CaU 384-5003 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, Colorado APPROVED Do NoT DEsTRoY THis cARD Lot Date~p.t:~~~x~!!!!l ~~~TH CLEAR PLASTIC \~ June9, 2008 lronbridge Golf Club & Sporting Community 410 Ironbridge Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 8160 I ATTN: Mike Woelke RE: Post Tensioned Slab-on-Grade Certification 0585 Fox Run Court Lot 314 Ironbridge Community Garfield County, Colorado Dear; Mike 1205 S. PlATTE RlVER DRIVE, Sum; 200 DENVER, CoLORADO 80223 OFFIC£ (303) 715·9885 F.x (303) 715-9890 As of June 5, 2008 all required construction observations for the Post Tensioned Slab-on-Grade Foundation System at the subject site have been completed by this office. From our observations, we have concluded that this foundation has been constructed in accordance with the approved construction documents and guidelines set forth by the Post Tensioning Institute. All required observations and their subsequent letters by this office for the Post Tensioned Slab-on-Grade Foundation System which includes the Trench Beam and Steel Observation including Ufer Rod, Tendon Placement (pre-pour) Observation, and Tendon Stressing Observation have been approved by this office. We also note that the required insulation has been installed per our structural details and the International Residential Code, 2003 Edition. No further observations are required. Please call if you have any questions . . MSI':jm" file I --~ . lfFmm.MANN · iiENGINEJERING §JERVICJES, LlLC June 9, 2008 !ron bridge Golf Club & Sporting Community 4 l 0 !ron bridge Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 8!60 I Attn: Mike Woelke RE: Tendon Stressing Observation 0585 Fox Run Court Lot314 Iroubridge Subdivision Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mike: 1205 S. PLAm Riv£R DRIV:E, Surrn 200 DENVER, CoLORADO 80223 C>FACE(303)715-9885 FAX (303) 715-9890 Per your request, we visited the subject site on June 5, 2008 to observe the tendon stressing operations for post- tensioned slab-on-grade design. The stressing of the tendons were conducted within acceptable tolerances and appeared to be in general conformance with the construction. At this time, tendon tails may be cut off and the anchor cavities grouted with a high strength, non-shrink grout. This concludes the construction of the post-tensioned foundation system. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Fuhrmann Engineering Services, LLC MatthewS. Peterson, P.E., PT! #1919 MSP:jma attachments file May23, 2008 Ironbridge Golf Club & Sporting Community 410 !ron bridge Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 8160 l Attn: Mike Woelkc RE: Tendon Placement (pre-pour) Inspection 0585 Fox Run Court Lot314 Ironbridge Subdivision Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mike: Per your request, we visited the subject site on May 21, 2008 to observe the tendon placement and interior trench beams of the post-tensioned slab-on-grade. The dimensions, geometry, and required options have not been verified at this time. The contractor assumes responsibility for the accuracy of all building dimensions, locations on lot, foundation elevations, and the slab step layout The installation of the tendons and interior stiffened beams appeared to be in general conformance with the construction plans. We observed the top of grade appeared to be at the correct elevation to maintain the slab thickness per plan. It is the responsibility of the contractor to verifY slab thickness and tendon layout remain as observed during concrete placement. No other items were observed at this time. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Fuhrmann Engineering Services, LLC MatthewS. Peterson, P.E., PT! #1919 MSP:jma attachments file May 23,2008 Iron bridge Golf Club & Sporting Community 410 Ironbridge Drive Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Attn: Mike Woelke RE: Trench Beam and Steel Observation including Ufer Rod 0585 Fox Run Court · Lot 314 Ironbridge Subdivision Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mike: Per your request, we visited the subject site on May 21, 2008 to observe the construction of the trench beams of the post-tensioned slab-on-grade. The dimensions, geometry, and required options have not been verified at this time. The contractor assumes responsibility for the accuracy of all building dimensions, locations on lot, foundation elevations, and the slab step layout The trench beam depth, width, and required steel placement appeared to be in general conformance with approved construction documents. Also, we observed the required l-inch polystyrene foam (extruded) insulation was placed in the trenches at the exterior of the building footprint per plan and is temporarily to the trench waiL We also observed that an Ufer rod was placed at the time of the wall steel installation. No other items were observed at this time. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Fuhrmann Engineering Services, LLC MatthewS. Peterson, P.E., PTI #19!9 MSP:jma Attachments file Cit9'1btech Hcpwon;hrPawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 Cottn(y Road I 54 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 8!001 cPholleo·970-94 jc 79811--1 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Faxo 970·945·8454 email: bpgr:o@h.pgeocech.com ~~o.wlaJL C44"5-/9~ PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL STUDY PROPOSED AFORDABLE HOUSING IRONBRIDGE DEVELOPMENT 410 IRONBRIDGE DRIVE GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 105 ll5-5 PREPARED FOR: L.B. ROSE RANCH, LLC ATTN: DAVID JOSEPH 410 IRONBRIDGE DRIVE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ............................................................................ -l - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ..................................................................................... -l - SITE CONDITIONS ........................................................................................ , .............. -2- FIELD EXPLORATION ................................................................................................. -2- SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ...................................................................................... -3 - ENGINEERING ANALYSIS ......................................................................................... -4- PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................... -5- FOUNDATIONS ......................................................................................................... -5- FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS ............................................................ -6- FLOOR SLABS .......................................................................................................... -8 - UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM .......................................................................................... -8 - SITE GRADING ......................................................................................................... -9 - SURFACE DRAINAGE ............................................................................................. -9- LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................. -10- FIGURE I-LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURES 2 AND 3-LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 4-LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURES 5 AND 6-SWELL~CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1-SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS ... .;.<-... PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a preliminary geotectmical study for the proposed affordable housing area located at the lronbridge Development, 410 Ironbridge Drive, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure I. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations tor the foundation and grading designs and to evaluate the potential for future ground subsidence. The study was conducted in general accordance with our agreement for professional engineering services to L.B. Rose Ranch, LLC dated March 14,2005. We previously conducted geotec!mical studies for planning and preliminary design of the Rose Ranch Development (now known as Ironbridge), reports dated October 29, 1997 and September !0, 1998, Job No. !97 327. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions including the depth to and quality of the underlying formation rock. Samples ofthe subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to detennine their classification and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation and for the general grading. This report swnmarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed development plan was preliminary at the time of our study and will generally consis~le fami!y lots located roughly as shown on Figure I. We assume the buildings will generally be I and 2 story structures possibly above a basement level. Ground floors could be slab-on-grade or structural above crawlspace. We assume foundation loadings will be relatively light and carried mainly by continuous walls. The ~-;-:-;:;:·---·------· Job No. 105 115-5 -2- access road will loop through the building area and probably be retained on the uphill side near the entrance area )when building loadings, location and grading plans have been developed for design, we could be contacted to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. SITE CONDITIONS The affordable housing site is located immediately northeast of the existing parking lot for the pro shop and sales buildings and the driving range as shown on Figure l. The site was vacant and covered with sparse grass and weeds. There could be some disturbance from the prior ranching facilities. Two old ranch outbuildings are located just southeast of the project site. The ground surface slope is somewhat irregular but typically gentle down to the northeast with about 20 feet of elevation difference across the project site. The existing Robertson Ditch follows the nottheast side of the project site. The entire project site is covered with debris fan deposits. Bedrock of the _!3agle Valley Evaporite outcrops to the west of County Road I 09 adjacent the cart path and the steep valley side. FrELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted between March 16 and 29, 2005. Five exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure l to evaluate the subsurface conditions. TI1e borings were advanced with 6 and 8 inch diameter ODEX casing Utrough the soils and into the formation rock then continuously cored with HX size barrel powered by truck-mounted CME-55 and CME-75 drill rigs. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geoteclmical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with 1% inch and 2 inch LD. spoon samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. TI1is test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency ofthe subsoils and hardness of the bedrock. Depths at Job No. 105115-5 .. -3- wltich the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figures 2 and 3. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encomttered at the site are shown on Figures 2 and 3. TI1e subsoils, below a thin topsoil or fill layer, typically cottsist of roughly stratified, soft to stiff, silt and sand debris fan deposits overlying river gravel alluvium at depths of20 to 42 feet. Occasional silty sand and gravel layers were encountered in the debris fan deposits. Siltstone, claystone and gypsum bedrock oflhe Eagle Valley Evaporite formation was encountered below the gravel alluvium at depths of 53 to 82 feetPo~sible in-filled cavity material was encountered in the upper lO to 33 feet of the formation rock at Borings 2, 3 and 4. The overlying alluvium and debris fan deposits at these borings are deeper than found at Borings 1 and 5 and may have subsided as a result of the cavity fonnation and filling. The fonnation materials extended to the drilled depths of87 to 115 feet. The bedrock quality was erratic but typically poor to fair and included considerable gypsum and weathered zones. No significant voids or cavities were encountered in Borings 1 and 5 where the bedrock surface was encountered at depths of 53 to 57 feet. Borings 2, 3 and 4 are located in the central part of the project area that could coincide with an old subsidence area, see Figure I. Laboratory testing performed on san1ples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content and density, and finer than the No. 200 sieve (silt and clay size) gradation analyses. Results of a swell-consolidation test perfonned on samples of the silt soils, presented on Figures 5 and 6, indicate relatively low compressibility under light loading and high compressibility when loaded after wetting. The samples showed a low to moderate collapse potential (settlement under constant load) when wetted. The upper predominantly fine-grained soils are debris fan deposits and typical! y show low to moderate hydrocompression potetltiaL The laboratory test results are summarized in Table L -=-Jo-:b-N-o-. -:c10:-c5-:l-l5c:-_s---------· -4- Free water was not encountered in the upper debris fan deposits and the soils were typically slightly moist to moist Groundwater was encountered itl the underlying river gravel alluvium between depths of about 53 to 68 feet at the time of drilling. The water levels are approximate and the stabilized depths are probably somewhat shallower. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS The subsurface conditions encountered in the proposed development area are variable in depth, possibly due to old subsidence in the central part. The soils encountered in the borings to depths of20 to 42 feet consist of debris fan deposits that tend to collapse (settle under constant load) when wetted. The amount of collapse will depend on the t ' depth of the compressible soils and the wetted depth below the foundation. 'he soft condition of some of the soils could tend to increase the settlement potenti ~pread footings and heavily reinforcing foundation walls placed on about 3 to 5 feet of compacted structural fill should be used to reduce the effects of any differential settlement from the collapsible so~ heavily reinforced mat foundation designed for differential settlements could also be used to reduce the settlement risk. I{ lit 1-t ~ Si u-11:. \~cOte-"fo'lei-"'T.t>.IA.l..-: }"Eagle Valley Evaporite that underlies the project area is known to be associated with ~inkholes and localized ground subsidence in the Roaring Fork River valley A sinkhole was identified during our previous study for the subdivision development located in the 16th Fairway just to the southeast of Phase 2{b sinkhole appeared in early January, 2005 within the parking lot located more than 100 feet to the southwest of the housing project site and a small sinkhole appeared in early May, 2005 on the westem edge of the driving rang~oth of these nearby siul<holes have been repaired by compaction grouting and there has been no indication of recurring subsidence. Surface indications of ground subsidence are not apparent in the housing project sit but in-filled cavities that could indicate a risk of future ground subsidence were encountered in Borings 2, 3 and 4 drilled for the current project In our opinton, the risk of future ground subsidence below the proJect area of Borings I and 5, where no voids were indicated, is low and similar to other areas of the Roaring Fork River valley that overlie the Eagle Valley Evapmite where there have not been indications of ground subsidence. The tisk of future ground Job No. 105 115-5 -5 - subsidence in the central par1 of the project area of Borings 2, 3 and 4 could be greater since there appears to have been ground subsidence and loosening of the overlying soils by possible caving into old voids in the bedrock. Recommendations for preliminary design of the proposed housing project are presented below. The recommendations are only con>idered applicable to development outside of the possible old subsidence area Additional subsurface exploration should be performed to better identifY the apparent subsidence area and possible methods of remediation if needed. The additional borings won conceu rate on evaluating the depths and cor1dition oftl1e debris fan deposits and gravel alluvium. When preliminary building plans have been developed, we shonld review the information for compltance wrlh oar reoommendatrons. PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, the residences can be founded with spread footings bearing on compacted structural fill with some risk of settlement potential and bnilding distress. Precautions should be taken to prevent post-construction wetting of the bearing soils as described below in "Underdrain System", "Site Grading" atld Surface Drainage". A mat foundation may be desired to limit potential distTess, especially in the possible subsidence area, and will be considered as part of the additional subsurface exploration and analysis. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing fOtmdation system. l) Footings placed on at least 3 feel of compacted silty sand and sandy silt soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 1,200 psf_ Based on experience, we expect initial settlement of footings desigt1ed and constructed as discussed in this section will be less than l inch. Additional lob No. !05 115-5 -6- differential settlements of about I to 2 inches could occur if the underlying debris fan soils are wetted. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of20 inches for contirlUous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) The foundation should be constructed with continuous walls rather than with isolated footings as much as practicaL The foundation walls should be heavily reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 14 feet Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of tbis repmt. 5) The topsoil, existing fill and debris fan soils should be removed to a depth of at least 3 feet below design bearing leveL The exposed soils in footing area should then be moistened and compacted. The on-site soils should be replaced compacted in thin lifts to at least 98% of the standard Proctor density within 2 percentage points of optimum moisture content. 6) A representative of the geoteclmical engineer should evaluate the compaction of the fill materials and observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement for bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral eartlt pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 55 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which arc separate from the buildings and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed lob No. 105 115-5 j -7- on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for backfill consisting of tl1e on-site soils. All foundation and retaining structures should be designed [or appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls an a horizontal backfill surface The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surfacee•ill increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An nderdrain should be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. f>:o <.:-· t Lo-"--"'-'""----- Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the walL Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. TI1e lateral resistance of foundation or retaining wall footings will be a combination of the sliding resistance ofthe footing on the foundation materials and passive earth pressure against the side of the fooling. Resistance to sliding at the bottoms of the footings can be calculated based on a coefficient of friction of0.35. Passive pressure of compacted backfill against the sides of the footings can be calculated using an equivalent fluid unit weight of 300 pcf. The coefficient of friction and passive pressure values recommended above assume ultimate soil strength. Suitable factors of safety sl10uld be included in the design to limit the strain which will occur at the ultimate strength, pat1icular!y in the case of passive resistance. Fill placed against the sides of the footings to resist lateral loads should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Job No. 105 115-5 -8- FLOOR SLABS TI1e natural soils encountered below the topsoil and existing fill soils are suitable to support lightly loaded slab-on-grade construction. The debris fan soils are typically compressible when wetted and there could be some potential for slab settlement. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, nonstmctural floor slabs should be s;:_Earated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to recjyce dmpage dye to slyinkage cracking The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use A minimum 4 inch layer of free-draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with at least 50% retained on the No.4 sieve and less thoo2% passing the No. 200 sieve. An impervious liner should underlie the drain rock to prevent wetting on the bearing soils as described below in "Underdrain System". All fill materials placed for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95% of maximum standard Proctor density within 2 percentage points of optimum moisture content. Required fill can consist of the fine-grained debris fan soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was generally encountered below probable excavation depth, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below-grade construction, such as retaining walls and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. An underdrain should not be provided around crawlspace and slabs constructed near to above the adjacent ground smface. Job No. I 05 It 5-5 •'-I~<-I ~ bd~ btt-~-1- -9- The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of !he wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least I foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum I% to a suitable gravity outlet or sump and pump. Free- draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of2 inches. TI1e drain gravel backfill should be at least I'/, feet deep. An impervious membrane, such as a 30 mil PVC liner, should be placed beneath the drain gravel in a trough shape and attached to the foundation wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. SITE GRADING Grading for the project facilities is expected to be relatively minor with cut and fill depth" up to about 8 feet. Structural embankriJ.ent fills should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density within 2 percentage points of optimum moisture content. The fill material can consist of the on-site soils excluding vegetation, topsoil and rock larger than about 6 inches. Prior to fill placement, the subgrade should be carefully prepared by removing all vegetation and topsoil and compacting to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at near optimum moisture content The fill should be 5'1 benched into slopes that excee{20% grad~ Permanent uuretained cut and fill slopes should be graded at 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter and protected against erosion by revegetation or other means. SURFACE DRAINAGE Precautions should be taken to prevent wetting of the bearing soils such as proper backfill construction, positive backfill slopes, restricting landscape irrigation and use of roof gutters. The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after houses have been completed: I) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. ~:-:-:-:-::-c:-:-c:--------------·----·---------;-::;,-· Job No. 105115-5 ~tech -10- 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. TI1e slope should be at least 6 inches in the first 5 feet in unpaved areas and at least 3 inches in the first I 0 feet in paved areas. Drain gravel and granular backfill of basement walls should be capped with at least 2 feet of the on- 5) site fine-grained soils to reduce surface water infiltration. Roof gutters should be provided with downspouts that discharge into a l storm drain pipe. __J. Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation, such as sod, arrd sprinkler heads should be located at least 5 feet from foundation walls. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty eitber express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in tl:tis report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Figure I, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include detennining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future .. lfthe client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditio11S may not become evident until excavation is performed. If condi lions encountered during constmction appear different from those described in this repo11, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. ------------Job No. 105 115-5 ~tech -I I - This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill on a regular basis by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Reviewed by: SLP/ksw cc: High Country Engineering-Attn: Scott Gregory -----·---------· Job No. 105 115-5 APPROXIMATE SCALE: r = too• I' ' !" \ LEGEND: \ • BORING FOR CURRENT STUDY \ 0 BORING FOR JOB NO. 105 115-3 \ { ) DEPTH TO GRAVEL ALLUVIUM [ ] DEPTH TO FORMA liON ROCK \I\ I\ I I I I'V ». fA'./A./0 105 115-5 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 1 0 10 20 30 ..., " .. .... 40 .c -a. .. 0 50 I 60 I I I ~ 110 I E._ 120 105 115-5 BORING 1 EI£V.=5960' 11/12 ~6.1 D0-=101 13/12 ~9.7 00=97 -200=78 7/12 10/0 Cored from 6/ to ar lJ REC>=51 RQO=JO Bottom of Hole ot 8/ BORING 2 EI£V.=5971' Bedrock transnion at 62. Cored from 88• to 115' ss· to 1os' REC>=B RQI)=O Poulble lnfflled Cavity to 105' tos' to 115' REC=33 ROO=J Bottom ot Hole at 115" BORING 3 EI£V.=5978' 11/12 32/12 18/12 18/12 WC=1.8 -200=53 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Bedrock transition ot 68' Cor6d from 7ff to 94' -:-l]Wat« a:t 68' Possible lnfilled 7f!l to 94' Co.tty to 78' REC>=93 R00=82 Bottom of Hole 94' 110 120 ..., ., ., .... I .t:. ..., g. 0 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 4. HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 2 0 10 20 ~ .. ~ 30 ..c -a. " 0 40 50 60 100 110 105 115-5 BORING 4 ElEV.=5962' 14/12 5/12 Vf0-6.5 00=84 J/12 VJC;:11.7 00=87 -200=78 3/12 B&drock transition ot 63' S?T sample at 76•. 20/60 Cored from 90' to 98' 1J 90' to 96' Posslb. le lntnled Calo'lty to REC=43 90' · RQ0=4- Bottom of Hole ot gg• BORING 5 ELEV.=5971' Cored from 53' to 1 os• s:s· to 70' REC=51 RQ0=5 70' to 95' REC=51 R00=5 95' to 105' REC=20 ROO=O Bottom of Hole ot 105' Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 4. HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GE01ECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS 0 10 20 ~ .. ~ 30 .<:: -a. " a 40 50 60 100 110 Figure 3 LEGEND: All; silty sand and grovel with cobbles, loose. moist. brown to dark brown and block. TOPSOIL; organic sandy silt, root zone. SILT (ML); slightly sandy to sandy, scattered gravel, soft to stiff, ,slightly moist, light brown, slightly calcareous. SAND AND SILT (SM-ML); stratified, scattered gravel to gravelly, loose to medium dense, slightly moist, mixed brown. GRAVEL. COBBLES AND BOULDERS (GM-GP); sandy, slightly silty. dense. slightly moist, brown, rounded rock. EAGLE VALLEY EVAPORITE; mainly siltstone, claystone and gypsum, some sandstone, dry to wet, mixed white and gray. Poor rock quality/possible voids at Borings 2, .3 and 4. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2-inch 1.0. California liner sample. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 .3/8 inch J.D. split spoon sample, ASTM 0-1586. 11 ;12 Drive sample blow count; indicates that 11 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. IJ NOTES: Portion of boring drilled with continuous HX core. REC = Average % Recovery, ROO = Rock Quality Designation, % for entire depth cored. Otherwise noted at boring breaks. Depth at which free water wos encountered in the boring following drilling. 1. Exploratory borings were drilled between March 16 and 29, 2005 and advanced with 6 and 8-inch diameter OOEX casing through the overburden soils then to the final boring depth with continous HX core steel. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were obtained by interpolation between contours shown on the site plan ' provided. J4. The eKplorotory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. I 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. Water level readings shown on the logs were mode at the time and under the conditions indicated. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. f 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) I DO = Dry Density ( pcf ) -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve I I, 105 11.5-5 LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 4 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL. INC. -~------~--------~----~-------------------------L------~ Moisture Content = 6.1 percent Dry Density = 101 pcf Sample of; Sandy Silt From: Boring 1 at 5 Feet 0 Compression ~ -upon 1 wetting 2 !\ 3 \ 4 5 \ 6 ~ I c 0 \ I 1Ji 7 I UJ .. \ ... a. E 0 8 (.) I \ 9 ' \ 10 I. 11 ' I 12 1\ \ f 13 I 14 0.1 1.0 10 100 I' APPUED PRESSURE -ksf 1'105 115-5 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK SWElL-CONSOUDA TION TEST RESULTS GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Figure 5 Moisture Content = 6.5 percent Dry Density = 84 pcf Sample of: Sandy Silt From: Boring 4 crt 9 Feet 0 Compression upon 1 -~----wetting . v 2 3 \ ~ \ c 0 -;; " 4 ., \ .... Q. E 0 u 5 \ 6 f\ 7 \ 8 '! ' ' I ' I 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPUED PRESSURE -ksf • ! 105 115-5 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK SWELL-CONSOUDA110N TEST RESULTS GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Figure 6 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 Job No.105115-5 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS ( . SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL NATURAL GRADATION PERCENT ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED BORING MOISTURE DRY GRAVEL SAND PASSING LIQUID PLASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOIL OR NO. DEPTH CONTENT DENSITY N0.200 LIMIT INDEX STRENGTH BEDROCK TYPE (%) (%) SIEVE (fl) (%) _(p<ill_ (%) (%) lPSFl 1 5 6.1 101 Sandy silt 10 9.7 97 78 Sandy silt 3 18 1.8 53 Very sandy silt with gravel 4 9 6.5 84 Sandy silt 14 11.7 87 78 Sandy silt I IRONBRIDGE CLUB §] l<l [j] [jjJ ® ® o- LEGEND TRANSFORMER . ELEC1RIC PEDESTAL TELEPHONE PEDESTAL CABlE PEDESTAL STORM MANHOlE SEWER MANHOLE SEWER ClEANOUT & SEWER SERVICE MARKER C( FIRE HYDRANT Ow-WA 1ffi SERVICE 0Mkr G GAS MARKER 0Mkr £ ELECTRIC MARKER PLOT PLAN LOT 314, BLOCK 1 ----.,.,.-,::,.,- N40"5 '32·w so.oo· \J;45'46'51·w _15.1.2'_ FOX RUN !if2:!L_ ElEVATION PER GRADING PLAN M:Z_ DESIGN ELEVATION uo --UNDER DRAIN @ UNDER DRAIN CLEANOUT C/0 COMMENTS: -- / LOT 315 l.HOUSE MODEL 123 DRAWN FROM SLAB INTERFACE & FIRST FLOOR PLANS DATED 8/24/07 2.GRADING DESIGN BASED ON JRE GRADING PLAN DATED 03/05/08 SCALE: 1·=20' ~:MAINTAIN POSillVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM ALL SlRUCTURES. JOB NUMBER: 71006 00 SUBDIVISION: IRONBRIDGE Et\LJ)_ -PHASE 2 FiliNG 1 LOT: 314 BLOCK:-'--- ADDRESS: 585 f.DJ; E!.llii COllEr CITY /COUNTY: /GARFIEI D MINIMUM SETBACKS: FRONT: 10' REAR:2lL_ SIDE: s:..._ r CORNER: N/A FINISHED GRADE: 5964 z BUILDING/BUILDING ___ TYPE oF HousE: 'epir::isil1 h.Asi'L~== NOTE:: 1. BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS SHOVtfl ON THIS PLOT PLAN ARE CONCEP'WAL FOR '!HE SOLE PURPOSE OF OBTAIN1NG A BUILDING PERMIT. REFER TO APPRO\f:D ARCHITE.ClURAL PLANS FOR Cc;t.!STRUC110N Of' BUilDING IMPOOVEMENTS. 2.. lHE DRAINAGE PATTERNS SHOWN ON iHIS PLOT PLAN ARE CONCEPTUAL, MODIFICA110N MAY 6E REQUIRED BY EXlSTING CONO!llONS TO PROVIDE POSillVE DRAINAGE Of lHE FINISHED Silt: DRAWN BY: REV: REV: _____ ~----------REV: DATE: 03/06/QB DATE: DATE: ___ _ DATE: ~ JR lENGKNJElEllUNG A Subsiclia!Y o!Westrian 6020 Qoolwoo:l fl>1a BM!·~ co aom :D3-740-9393•Fax: 3J3-i'2!-00ri:l•wmi'; ~ Parcel Detail Page 1 of3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information A_s_sessor/Treasurer Property SeaTch I Assessor Subset Que1:x I Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search Basic Building Chara.;;teristics I Tax Information i'.i!.m:~JJ.2elail I YalJ.le D.et.ail Sale.s Deti!il I Res.LclentialLCommercia.Umpro:veinenilletail Land Detail I Photographs I TaxArea II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I I o9o II R043400 II 239501327314 II 67.224 I Owner Name and Mailing Address ILB ROSE RANCH LLC II II007 WESTBANK ROAD !GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 II Legal Description ISECT,TWN,RNG:l-7-89 SUB:IRONBRIDGE I JPUD, PHASE II, FILING I, 2 & 3 I ILOT:314 PRE:R041510 BK:l596 PG:871 I jBK:l565 PG:600 BK:l560 PG:438 I IBK:l560 PG:431 BK:l057 PG:0745 I IBK:l028 PG:768 BK:l028 PG:597 I IBK:I006 PG:743 BK:l822 PG:287 I IRECPT:702424 BK:l822 PG:283 I IRECPT:702422 BK:l822 PG:250 I IRECPT:702421 BK:l782 PG:269 I IRECPT:694479 BK:l782 PG:264 I IRECPT:694478 BK:l747 PG:l I IRECPT:686745 BK:l218 PG:738 I IRECPT:572583 BK:l218 PG:715 I IRECPT:572582 BK:l217 PG:266 I IRECPT:572131 BK:l206 PG:852 I http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp ?Parce!Number=23 9501327314 12112/2007 Parcel Detail JRECPT:569200 BK:1206 PG:780 I JRECPT:569199 BK:1206 PG:768 I JRECPT:569197 BK:1206 PG:734 I JRECPT:569195 BK:1206 PG:662 I jRECPT:569194 BK:1206 PG:637 II JRECPT:569192 BK:1206 PG:629 I JRECPT:569191 BK:1206 PG:574 I JRECPT:569190 BK:1063 PG:0578 I JBK:1063 PG:0571 I Location I Physical Address: 11585 FOX RUN CT GLENWOOD SPRINGSJ I Subdivision: I IRONBRIDGE PUD, PHASE II, FILING 1, 2& I Land Acres: I 0 I Land Sg Ft: 115,602 I I Section II Township II Range I 1 II 7 II 89 I Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Assessed Value I I Land: II 71,56oJI I Im~rovements: II Oil I Total: II 71,56011 l li========S==al=e D=a=te=i: I I Sale Price: I Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 0 Buildings: Number of Commllnd 0 Buildings: No Building Records Found Tax Information 20,7501 0 20,7501 http://www. garcoact. com/ assessor/parcel.asp ?Parce!N umber=23 9 50 13 2 7314 Page 2 of3 12/12/2007 Parcel Detail Tax Year II Transaction Type II Amonnt I 2006 II Tax Payment: Second Half II ($43.36)1 2006 II Tax Payment: First Half II ($43.36)1 2006 II Tax Amount II $86.721 IopofPi!ge Assessor Database search Options I Treasurer Database Search Options l:;lerk_Q.:_E,~ce.Ql:9et_Pata12ft_s~Mar_clL0Ptions Garfield County Home Pa__ge Page 3 of3 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright© 2005 -2006 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Go_od]'urll§ __ S_oitwJlLe. http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce1Number=23 9501327314 12/12/2007