The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1.0 Application• • • GARFIELD COUNTY Building & Planning Department 108 81h Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970.945.8212 Facsimile: 970.384.3470 www.garfield-county.com Subdivision Application Form GENERAL INFORMATION (To be completed by the applicant.) Subdivision Name: Plc ari,r): Ptiii c . • Type of Subdivision (check one of the following types): Sketch Plan Preliminary Plan Final Plat ✓ Name of Property Owner {Applicant): � `tE� �j . -, z. eAn Address: 1 tS . toe,„ )7L Rd.4 . 3.3 Telephone: 70 11.7,5..'7feAr ✓ City: K i'riF State: (le Zip Code: eine n FAX: • Name of Owner's Representative, if any (Attorney, Planner. etc): A 'lA • Address: Telephone: • City: State: Zip Code: FAX: • Name of Engineer: Thecyn �i L, er-c S'S • Address: (Nis 11kr-t i ich-e.,14Le Telephone: - Q _ `;544'9 • City: /rx-w wy/.4S y;;,c 3 State: (1() Zip Code: g'1Ce6 r FAX: q76 995'- ) Name of Surveyor: ^ e.v- er-i 61u.1+-Liejij eief) pcLn� > Address: ) $ toei- 3 Co' Zi -Pei Telephone: el -in a5- 3-7// • City: t?) AState: en Zip Code: c 1e x+ FAX: in ➢ Name of Planner. ➢ Address: p i) Telephone: • City: State: Zip Code: FAX: • • GENERAL Location of Property: Section Practical Location / Address INFORMATION continued... ,9 + 3 Township 10 8 Range 93 Lam) of Property: /,,c cS a tici.orri- J7ortd aa.' j '/Qs ep EJ6'50 acres): tr53, 799 ➢ Current Size of Property to ➢ Number of Tracts / Lots Created Property Current Land Use 1. Property's Current 2. Comprehensive Plan Proposed Utility Service: > Proposed Water Source: > Proposed Method of Sewage y Proposed Public Access > Easements: Utility: Ditch: Total Development Area (fill be Subdivided (in within the Proposed Designation: Zone District: ,9 Subdivision: / /Vi ,) 4 Map Designation: ,iii i ` Nt. el ir. A u hind r ,t, } .►r 74 ,34 Disposal: VIA: 0.0L., ki Pow c3 3 ,.. , r � in the appropriate Units / Lots 4 �.• k boxes below): Size (Acres) Parking Provided (1) Residential 146'.7a0/0-66 Single -Family Duplex Multi -Family Mobile Home Total , 1 103, 799 Floor Area (sq. ft.) Size (Acres) Parking Provided (2) Commercial (3) industrial (4) Public / Quasi -Public (5) Open Space / Common Area Total -,r` - A-104 p r Base Fee: Sketch Plan - $325.00; Prelim Plan - $675.00; Final Plat - $200 P Plat Review Fee (see attached fee schedule) paid on 2 • • • I. THE SUBDIVISION PROCESS In order to subdivide land in Garfield County, an Applicant is required to complete the following land use processes in the following order: 1) Sketch Plan Review Process, 2) Preliminary Plan Review Process, and 3) Final Plat Review Process. This section will briefly describe the nature of each process and provide general direction including subdivision regulation citations to a potential applicant requesting subdivision approval in Garfield County. All of the Garfield County Zoning and Subdivision Regulations are located for purchase at the Planning Department and can also be found on the World Wide Web at the following address: http:/fwww.garfield-county.comibuildinq and planningfindex.htm A) The Sketch Plan Review (Section 3:00 of the Subdivision Regulations) 1. Purpose The purpose of the Sketch Plan process is to allow an individual an opportunity to propose a subdivision in a "sketch" format to the Planning Department and the Garfield County Planning Commission in order to obtain a cursory review for compliance with the County's land use review documents, regulations, and policies to identify any issues that would need to be addressed if the proposed subdivision were to be pursued. 2. Applicability Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to complete the Sketch Plan review process as the first step in Garfield County's Subdivision process. More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision (Section 2:20.48) as the division of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels or separate interests, or the use of any parcel of land for condominiums, apartments or other multiple -dwelling units, as further defined by Colorado state law. 3. Application / Submittal Requirements In order to apply for a Sketch Plan Review an Applicant is responsible for reviewing Section 3:00 of the Subdivision Regulations and providing enough information to the Planning Department in the application to conduct a thorough review and provide the resulting comments to the Planning Commission for their review and comments. Specifically, Section 3:30, 3:32, and 3:40 of the Subdivision Regulations contain the specific information required to be submitted to the Planning Department in order to satisfy the application requirements in addition to the information requested on this application form. 4. Process J Public Meeting The Sketch Plan review process is considered a 1 -step process because the application is reviewed only by the Planning Commission at a public meeting. In order to appear before the Planning Commission, an applicant will have submitted all required application submittal requirements mentioned above to the Planning Department Staff. Once submitted, Staff will have 15 working days to review the application to determine if all the required submittal information has been submitted as required. If Staff determines that all the required information has been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed "technically complete." It is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has been • scheduled to be reviewed before the Planning Commission and will request the applicant supply additional copies to provide the Commission for their review. If Staff determines that all the required information has not been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application does not comply with the submittal requirements and therefore has determined the application to be "technically incomplete." The letter will also outline the applications deficiencies so that the applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted. At this point, the applicant has 6 months (180 days) to provide the necessary information to the Planning Department to remedy the application so that it may be deemed technically complete. If the application has not been deemed technically complete within this time, the application will be terminated. Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has been established as to when the Planning Commission will review the application, Staff will conduct a land use review of the application using the County's land use regulatory documents including the Zoning Resolution, Subdivision Regulations, and the Comprehensive Plan of 2000. In addition, Staff will also consider referral comments provided from a variety of state and local agencies who may also review the application. As a result, Staff will write a Memorandum on the proposed subdivision to the Planning Commission containing the results on the land use analysis. This Memorandum will also be furnished in advance to the applicant. At the date and time set for the public meeting before the Planning Commission, Staff will present the findings in the Memorandum and the applicant will be required to present the proposed subdivision and respond to comments and questions provided by the Planning Commission. The comments provided to the Applicant by the Planning Department and the Planning Commission as a result of the Sketch Plan Process will be kept on file in the Planning Department for 1 -year from the meeting date before the Planning Commission. If an Applicant does not submit a Preliminary Plan application to the Planning Department within the 1 -year timeframe, the Sketch Plan file will be closed and the Applicant will need to reapply for a Sketch Plan review prior to a Preliminary Plan review. R1 Preliminary Plan Review (Section 4:00 of the Subdivision Regulations) 1. Purpose The purpose of the Preliminary Plan review process is to conduct a thorough review of the many aspects that are associated with dividing land in Garfield County for the purposes of residential, commercial, and industrial development. This is the most intensive review step where the Building and Planning Staff, the Planning Commission, and the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) will conduct a thorough review of all the issues associated with the proposed subdivision against the County's regulatory requirements. Ultimately, the purpose of this process is to identify all the major issues in the proposed subdivision by using the County's Zoning Resolution, Subdivision Regulations, Comprehensive Plan of 2000, as well as other state and local referral agencies that will provide comments on any issues raised in their review. This is the process that will either approve or deny the application request. 4 • • Applicability Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to complete the Preliminary Plan review process as the second and most intensive step in Garfield County's Subdivision process. More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision as the division of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels or separate interests, or the use of any parcel of land for condominiums, apartments or other multiple -dwelling units, as further defined by Colorado state law. 3. Application / Submittal Requirements In order to apply for a Preliminary Plan Review, an Applicant must have already completed the Sketch Plan review process addressed in Section 3:00 of the Subdivision Regulations. An applicant requesting Preliminary Plan review will be required to submit this application form, all the required submittal information contained in Sections 4:40 to 4:94 of the Subdivision Regulations as well as address all of the applicable Design and Improvement Standards in Section 9:00 of the Subdivision Regulations. In addition to the substantive submittal information related to the proposed subdivision project itself, an applicant is required to complete all the public notice requirements so that legal public hearings can be held before the Planning Commission and the BOCC which is addressed in Sections 4:20 — 4:31 of the Subdivision Regulations. 4. Process f Public Hearings The Preliminary Plan review process is considered a 2 -step process because the application is ultimately reviewed by two County decision -snaking entities during public hearings: the Planning Commission who makes a recommendation to the BOCC. In order to obtain dates for the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the BOCC, an applicant will have submitted all required application submittal requirements mentioned above to the Planning Department Staff, Once submitted, Staff will have 30 working days to review the application to determine if all the required submittal information has been submitted as required. If Staff determines that all the required information has been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed "technically complete." It is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has been scheduled to be reviewed before the Planning Commission / BOCC. Additionally, Staff will provide the applicant with the notice forms to be mailed, published, and posted. If Staff determines that all the required information has not been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application does not comply with the submittal requirements and therefore has determined the application to be "technically incomplete." The letter will also outline the applications deficiencies so that the • applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted. At this point, the applicant has 6 months (180 days) to provide the necessary information to the Planning Department to remedy the application so that it may be deemed technically complete. If the application has not been deemed technically complete within this time, the application will be terminated. Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has been established as to when the Planning Commission / BOCC will review the application, Staff will conduct a land use review of the application using the County's land use regulatory documents including the Zoning Resolution, Subdivision Regulations, and the Comprehensive Plan of 2000. In addition, Staff will also consider referral comments provided from a variety of state and local agencies who may also review the application. As a result, Staff will write a Memorandum on the proposed subdivision to the Planning Commission / BOCC containing the results on the land use analysis. This Memorandum will also be furnished in advance to the applicant prior to the public hearings. As mentioned above, Staff makes a recommendation to the Planning Commission and the BOCC regarding the issues raised in the analysis of the proposed subdivision. The Applicant will first propose the subdivision to the Planning Commission who is responsible for making a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions, or denial to the BOCC. Next, the application will be reviewed by the BOCC during a regular public hearing. The BOCC will consider the recommendations from the Planning Staff and the Planning Commission, the information presented by the applicant, and the public. As a result, the BOCC is the final decision-making entity regarding the proposed subdivision and will either approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application. If the BOCC approves the subdivision application at the public hearing, the approval shall be valid for a period not to exceed one (1) year from the date of Board approval, or conditional approval, unless an extension of not more than one (1) year is granted by the Board prior to the expiration of the period of approval. (See the specific information provided in Section 4:34 of the Subdivision Regulations.) Following the hearing, Staff will provide a resolution signed by the BOCC which memorializes the action taken by the Board with any / all conditions which will be recorded in the Clerk and Recorder's Office. Once an applicant has Preliminary Plan approval, they are required to complete the third and final step in the County's Subdivision Process: Final Plat Review. 0) Final Plat Review (Section 5:00 of the Subdivision Regulations) 1. Purpose The purpose of the Final Plat review process is to provide the applicant with a mechanism to prove to the County that all the conditions of approval required during the Preliminary Plan review process have been met / addressed to the satisfaction of the Planning Staff and the BOCC. This being the case, the chairman of the BOCC will 6 • sign the Final Plat and have it recorded memorializing the subdivision approval granted by the BOCC. This is the last step in the County's subdivision process. 2. Applicability Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to complete the Final Plat review process as the third and last step in Garfield County's Subdivision process. More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision as the division of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels or separate interests, or the use of any parcel of land for condominiums, apartments or other multiple -dwelling units, as further defined by Colorado state law. 3. Application 1 Submittal Requirements In order to apply for a Final Plat review, an Applicant must have already completed the Preliminary Plan review process addressed in Section 4:00 of the Subdivision Regulations. An applicant requesting Final Plat review will be required to submit this application form, all the required submittal information contained in Section 5:00 of the Subdivision Regulations and responses to all the conditions of approval required as part of the Preliminary Plan review process. 4. Process The Final Plat review process is considered a 1 -step process because the application is ultimately reviewed by the Building and Planning Staff and presented to the BOCC for their signature if the application satisfies all the required submittal information to the satisfaction of the Building and Planning Department. If Staff determines that all the required information has been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed "'technically complete." It is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has been scheduled to be presented to the BOCC for signature. (This is not a public hearing or meeting and therefore does not require public notice.) If Staff determines that all the required information has not been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application does not comply with the submittal requirements and therefore has determined the application to be "technically incomplete." The letter will also outline the applications deficiencies so that the applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted. Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has been established as to when the BOCC will review the Final Plat, Staff will review the application / Final Plat in terms of adequacy to determine if all the submittal information satisfies the Final plat requirements as well as the responses to the conditions of approval. During this review, Staff will forward the Final Plat the County Surveyor for review and a signature. In the event there are additional questions or clarification issues to be addressed, the County Surveyor will generally contact the applicant to have the plat adjusted as necessary. Once, Staff has completed the review and all required information has been submitted to the satisfaction of the Planning Department 7 FROM : Mount3 a nCrc,ssEn9 ,Inc FAX H0. :9709455539 Apr. 12 2005 03:42PM P1 and the County Surveyor has signed the Final Plat in Mylar form, it will be scheduled at the next BOCC meeting to be placed on the consent agenda with a request to authorize the Chairman of the BOCC to sign the plat. Once the Final Plat is signed. it is then recorded by the County Clerk in the Clerk and Recorder's Office for a fee of $11 for the first sheet and $10 for each additional shoot thereafter. This fee shall be paid by the applicant. This act of recording the signed Final Plat represents the completion of the Garfield County Subdivision Process. Please refer to the specific language in the Final Plat portion (Section 5:00) of the Subdivision Regulations for specific timelines and additional responsibilities required of the applicant to complete the Final Plat prods. Please Note: This information presented above is to be used as a general guide for an applicant considering a subdivision in Garfield County. It is highly recommended that an applicant either purchase the Garfield County Zoning Resolution and Subdivision Regulations or access them online at: hit ://wvvw. arfield-count .comlhuildln and I nni ilqm In order to ascertain all the necessary requirements for each of the three steps including Sketch Pian Review, Preliminary Plan Review, and Final Plat Review. I have read the statements above and have provided the required attached Information which is correct and accurate to tile st of my knowledge. (Signature of applicant/own: = Date Last Reviser!: 11/21/2002 t[1 3C3Vd t HdO 686175Z.90L6 61:60 Q80c'./ZTI>T0 Preliminary Plan Submittal for: Booms Place Subdivision Garfield County, CO Owner: Ms. Robin J. Fritzlan 1582 County Road 233 Rifle, CO 81650 Phone: 970.625.4616 Date: April 2005 RECrivvP APR 1 GAr.,_ BUIL'LIIN • • • Booms Pace Subdivision 1582 CR, 233 7 Ce, CO 81650 (970)625-4616 April 08, 2005 Mr. Fred Jarman Garfield County Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Preliminary Plan Submittal for Booms Place Subdivision Dear Fred: Attached for your use and review is the Preliminary Plan for the Booms Place Subdivision. The immediate attachment to this letter details the submittal requirements herein. Briefly, the subdivision proposes to divide 63.8 acres into 4 large lots with beautiful views of the Bookcliffs and the Colorado River Basin. There is an existing single family dwelling on one of the lots so only three new residences are proposed. The subdivision Sketch Plan was reviewed by the Planning Commission on August 11, 2004. Thank you for your consideration. It is greatly appreciated. We look forward to working together through the review process. Feel free to call with any questions or comments. Sincerely, Robin Fritzlan Booms Place Property Owner ti • Section 4.0 of the Subdivision Regulations Per the Subdivision Regulations of Garfield County, Colorado the following Submittal Requirements of Section 4:40 through 4:94 have been incorporated, addressed, or attached as follows: 4:40 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 4:41 The Preliminary Plan submittal shall contain an application form, map(s). and required additional and supplemental information. All documentation shalt be of sufficient detail and clarity to answer basic engineering questions and to permit evaluation of the application. Detailed construction. engineering and design plans will be developed at the time of Final Plat submittal. The application form is attached under Tab 1. Additional and supplemental information is attached as described below. 4:42 Unless otherwise specified. maps and plans shall be to scale as follows: Subdivision Lot Area Scale Less than 10,000 sq. 0. 1"=-50' or Less 10.001 sq. ft. - 2 acres 1"-----100' or less 2.01 acres or more I "=200' or less Maps and plans are generally 1"=100' which is a more descriptive scale than the 1"=200". In some certain instance the scale of regional or vicinity maps exceeds the 1 "=200' scale but is adequate for those purposes. In the instance of the Roadway plan and profile the scale is 1 "-20' for the horizontal scale and 1"=10' for the vertical scale. 4:50 PRELIMINARY PLAN MAP The Preliminary Plan map shall show the entire area proposed for subdivision on one (11 sheet• if practical, at a size of 24" x 36". The map shall include the following information: A. Name of the proposed subdivision, which shall be different from that of any subdivision previously recorded in Garfield County. 13. Date of preparation of the map, graphic scale. basis of bearing and symbol designating North. certified by a Colorado registered professional surveyor; C. Boundary lines with bearings and distances, survey ties and legal description attic proposed subdivision; D. Names, addresses and phone numbers of the owner(s). applicant(s), planner(s) and engineer(s) for the proposed subdivision; names and addresses of mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners of record ot'the proposed subdivision. and of the tenants of any structure proposed for conversion; E. Vicinity map from U.S.G.S. quadrangle at a scale of 1"-2000' depicting the location of streets, highways and adjacent utility systems within a minimum one-half(I (2) mile of the proposed subdivision and showing the natural drainage courses for streams flowing through the proposed subdivision with the limits of tributary areas shown where reasonable; Departing property lines, names and addresses of owners of record of all parcels adjoining and within two hundred (200) feet of the proposed subdivision. including those separated by a public right-of-way G. Street. block and lot layout within the proposed subdivision. including the approximate arca of each lot; H. Proposed easements for drainage. irrigation. access and 1. Standard lot setbacks, which may be indicated by map note; .1. Land use breakdown showing: 1. Existing zoning and proposed zoning change. if applicable; 2. Total development area; 3. Total number of lots proposed: 4. Total number ofdwelling units proposed; 5. Total area anon -residential floor space; 6. Total number of individual dwelling units proposed for each structure; 7. Total number of proposed off-street parking spaces: 8. Total gross density proposed, number of dwelling units as a ratio to the total • • • development arca.. K. Existing contours with the following minimum contour intervals: I, Two foot (21 contour interval for subdivision with any lot Tess than two (2) acres in size; 2. Five foot (5) contour interval for subdivisions with all lots being at least two (2) acres in size; (A note shall be included noting the origin and datum of topography). L. Common open space not reserved or dedicated to the public; M. Sites to be preserved or dedicated for public parks, schools and other public buildings. facilities or use: and. or Greenbelt space (2003-18) N. Approximate street grades and road centerline radii of curvature data: and O. Any existing casements. along with the natne(s) and address(es) of the entity having an easement and legal description of those easements. The Preliminary Plan Map has been prepared by Sexton Survey Company and is attached under Tab 2. The required information in Sections 4:50.A through 4:50.0 is included on two 24"x36" plan sheets. However drainage easements are shown on the Drainage Plan under Tab 7 but will be transferred to the Final Plat. 4:60 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The following information shall accompany the Preliminary Plan: A. Proposed terms of reservations or dedication of sites for public and/or common facilities or use. ifan►°; greenbelt (2003-18) No public sites or common facilities are planned. 13, Description of any proposed phasing plan. if arty: The project will consist of one phase so no phasing is described other than this. Evidence that all lots and parcels created will have access to a public right-of-way, as required by Colorado state law; The plan sheets show that all lots have access to County Road 233. D. Total number of proposed off-street parking spaces, excluding those provided for single- family residential use: No separate off-street parking is planned other than that for the single-family residential use. However the lot sizes are large and there will be adequate room for parking on the individual lots. E. Evidence that all areas ofihe proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions. have been identified. and the proposed uses of these areas are compatible with such conditions; A Geotechnical Feasibility Investigation has been prepared by Geotechnical Engineering Group, Inc. addressing these and is attached under Tab 3. F. Radiation evaluation for areas of potential radiation hazard to future land use; The Geotechnical Feasibility Investigation prepared by Geotechnical Engineering Group, Inc. under Tab 3 also addresses radiation levels. G. A title commitment for property to be developed: and Title information is attached under Tab 4. • • If there is a subdivision of a section required. a copy of the final work sheet shall be provided for approval by the County Surveyor. The Preliminary Plan Map has been prepared by Sexton Survey Co. and is attached under Tab 2. 4:70 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: GEOLOGY, SOIL, VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE information on the following characteristics of the area proposed for subdivision shall be shown graphically, and/or by reports. whatever is appropriate, for a complete description of existing conditions. and shall include:: A. Geology - Description and/or illustration by a registered professional engineer licensed by the State of Colorado of bedrock lithology and the stratigraphy of overlaying unconsolidated materials in sufficient detail to indicate any potential development problems resulting from groundwater. subsidence. instability in road excavations and ills. expansive soils. drainage patterns. structural bearing strength. or the like; The Geotechnical Feasibility Investigation prepared by Geotechnical Engineering Group, Inc. under Tab 3 also addresses geology. B. Soils - Map and description of sail types and their boundaries based on the National Cooperative Soil Survey. U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service.. and including a table of interpretations; Applicable sheets of the soil survey for Rifle are attached under Tab 5. C. Vegetation - Map and description of plant associations following practices of the Soil Conservation Service and including a description of adapted materials and the location of major tree masses; and Vegetation is described in various locations: in the soil information of Tab 5, in the letter from the Division of Wildlife of Tab 6, and in the Drainage Plan of Tab 7. Wildlife - Description of w ildlife habitation. including big game ranges based on the mapping practices of the Colorado Division of Wildlife. Description of wildlife is included in the correspondence from the Division of Wildlife with supporting exhibits attached under Tab 6. 4:80 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: DRAINAGE PLAN A drainage plan, at the same scale as the Preliminary Plan and prepared h) an engineer registered in the State of Colorado. shall depict the following information in graphic and!or written form: A. Existing water courses and lakes: B. Limits of tributary areas_ where practical: C. Computations of expected tributary flows: and D. Design of drainage facilities to prevent storm waters in excess of historic run-off from entering, damaging or bcing carried by existing drainage facilities. and to prevent major damage or flooding of residences in a one hundred (100) year storm. showing: 1. Area subject to inundation: and 2. Location and size of proposed culverts. bridges. ditches and channels. Drainage plan and report with supporting data and calculations are attached under Tab 7. 4:90 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: UTILITY PLAN 4:91 A water supply plan, at the same scale as the Preliminary Plan, shall provide the following information in graphic and/or written form: A. In all instances, evidence that a water supply, sufficient in terms of quality. quantity and dependability. shall be available to ensure an adequate supply of water for the proposed subdivision. Such evidence may include. but shall not he limited to: 1. Evidence of ownership or right of acquisition or sue of existing and proposed • water rights: 2. Historic use and estimated yield of claimed water rights; 3. Amenability of existing right to change in use; 4. Evidence that public or private water owners can and will supply water to the proposed subdivision. including the amount of water available for use within the subdivision by such providers, the feasibility of extending service to the area. proof of the legal dependability of the proposed water supply and the representation that all necessary water rights have been obtained or will be obtained or adjudicated. prior to submission of the final plat; and 5. Evidence concerning the potability of the proposed water supply for the subdivision. B. if a central supply and distribution system is to be provided. a general description of the system. as designed by a Colorado registered engineer. In addition: 1. Nature of the legal entity which will own and operate the water system; and 2. Proposed method of financirtg the water system. C. If connection is to be made to an existing water system, a letter from an authorized representative of said system staging that the proposed development will be ser►ed. and evidence from either the Colorado State Engineer's Office or Water Court, Water l)i,.itiiun No. 5. that the existing water system presently possesses an adequate legal water supply to serve the proposed development; D. if individual water systems shall be provided by lot owners, a report indicating the availability of ample potable ground water at reasonable depths throughout the subdivision and the expected quality and long-term yield of such wells, with the written report by a registered professional engineer licensed by the State of Colorado. qualified to perform such work: and E. If applicable. a Plan ofAugnu:ntation and a plan for subdivision water supplies, as required by law, with the supporting engineering work signed by a Colorado registered engineer. shall be submitted by the applicant_ even if the applicant is not the actual supplier of water. The City of Rifle negotiated to provide four water taps to the property as part of the agreement for provided a location for the water tank. Since that time one tap was provided for the existing residence but three additional taps are to be used for each ofthe three additional lots. A copy ofthe agreement. the engineering plans for the construction, letters from an authorized representative, and a Water Plan showing the planned location for the taps is attached under Tab 8. 4:92 A sanitary sewage disposal plan. at the same scale as the Preliminary Plan. shall provide the following information in graphic and/or written form: A. If a public sewage disposal system is proposed evidence that provision has been made for an adequate sewage treatment works for the subdivision and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, evidence that such systems will comply with state and local laws and regulations: 13. If a sewage treatment works is proposed. a general description ofthe collection system and treatment facilities. as designed by a registered professional engineer licensed by the State of Colorado. In addition: I. Copy of a completed, but unapproved, Colorado Department of health Waste Water Treatment Plant Site Location Approval Application; 2. Nature of the legal entity which shall own and operate the sewage treatment works: and 3. Proposed method of financing the sewage treatment works; C. If public or private sewage treatment facilities are to be provided by an existing district or through connection to an existing sewer system. evidence that the treatment facility or system can and will provide adequate sewage treatment for the proposed subdivision. In addition: 1. Letter from an authorized representative of the facility or system staling that the proposed development can and will be served: 2. Nature of the legal entity which will own and operate the sewage treatment works; and 3. Proposed method of financing the sewage treatment works: D. If no central sewage treatment works is proposed and individual sewage disposal systems will be utilized, a description oi'sewage, the disposal means. as well as evidence as the result of soil percolation tests and produce excavations to determine maximum seasonal ground • • • H. water level and depth to bedrock shall be provided. in addition: 1. Indicated by location on the plat; 2. Performed and signed by a registered professional engineer licensed by the State of Colorado; 3. Adequate in number and location to meet requirements of the Garfield County Individual Sewage Disposal Requirements and the Colorado Department of Public I-lealth. Water Quality Control Commission; and If individual sewage disposal systems are to be utilized. a proposed management plan for the operation and maintenance of ort -site systems shall he provided. Individual sewage disposal systems are planned. The existing residence is using an ISDS presently that has performed well since its construction. A percolation test was performed during the geologic investigation and the results are reported by Geotechnical Engineering Group, Inc. under Tab 3. The results were used to generate a Sewer Analysis and Plan attached under Tab 9. 4:93 All utility and road plans shall he marked "Not for Construction". All plans have been marked "Not for Construction". 4:94 Off-site road impacts shall be evaluated for subdivisions through completion of a traffic study identifying the volume of traffic generated from the development. based on Trip Generation Rate calculations utilizing the most current Institute of `traffic Engineers. Trip Generation Manual. to establish an Average Daily Traffic (ADT). The road impact fee shall be established as a result of entering the applicable data identified in the Road Impact Fee calculation Work Sheet located in Appendix A. Filly percent (500/o) of the road impact fees shall be collected at the Final Plat for a subdivision. if the affected County road project is scheduled to start within five years in a Capital Improvements Plan adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. All other road impact fees will be collected at the issuance of a building permit. Any road impact fees collected will he put into a separate interest bearing account in the County Treasurer's office, for each road that impact lees are collected. AH fees collected and interest accrued must be spent on capital improvements to the specific road for which the fees ‘% ere collected within twenty (20) years of the date that the tie is established. All capital expenditures must be consistent with the capital improvements plan used as a basis for establishing the fee. liana twwenty 120) years. the fees collected have not been spent in accordance with the capital improvements plan used to establish the fce, all fees will be returned to the land owner of the property assessed an impact fee. with interest accrued. To the extend the County has expended funds consistent with a capital improvements plan for a particular road and a property owner has not paid a road impact fee as required for a budding permit which establishes additional ADT, the impact fee shall be collect at the time a building permit is issued to recoup the expenditure. Any fees collected after the completion ofan identified orad project. will be credited to the appropriate project and will be used to reimburse the County for the funds advanced to complete the project. The County may use road impact fees for a specific road improvement identified as a critical facility with a high priority for health and safety reasons in a Capital Improvements Plan adopted by the Board ofCounty Commissioners, in advance of the completion of the attire road improvement project. any such use of funds must be consistent with the basis for the impact fee. If, after the use of road impact fees for a critical facility road improvement, the County fails to complete the entire project identified in the capital improvements plan within the twenty (20) year period ofcollection. the proportionate share, with interest, will be returned to the owner of the property subject to the impact fee based on the actual amount of the expenditures made on a particular road system. As a part of the Capital Improvements Plan, the Board may determine that certain portions of the road improvements to a road are critical to complete, before there are any additional traffic generating uses added to the road. If a development is proposed before the County has scheduled to make the necessary improvements identified in the Capital Improvements Plan, the developer niay be allowed to • pay the total cost of the needed improvements prior to the County's schedule. The County will reimburse the portion of the cost that exceeds the amount that would be applicable for road impact fees. plus interest.. by the time that the project had originally been scheduled to be completed. lithe Board of County Commissioners have not established a base road cost per ADT for the area in question. the applicant will not be obligated to provide an analysis of the off-site road impacts. Traffic Study is attached under Tab 10. Section 9.0 of the Subdivision ReEuiations Per the Subdivision Regulations of Garfield County, Colorado the following Design and Improvement Standards of Section 9:10 through 9:81 have been incorporated, addressed, or attached as follows: 9:00 DESIGN AND IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS 9:10 GENERAL, SITE STANDARDS 9:1I In designing and planting individual lots and street layout for a subdivision, the constructed improvements and engineering design shall conform to the provision of this Section 9:00. as well as to other applicable Garfield County land use regulations and standards. 9:12 Land subject to identified natural hazards. such as falling rock. land slides, snow slides. mud flows. radiation, flooding or high water tables, shall not be platted for any use other than open space or an uninhabitable portion of a lot over two (2) acres. unless mitigation is proposed by a Colorado registered professional engineer qualified to do such design. Land subject to flooding. or in a natural drainage channel, shall not be platted for occupancy unless adequate provision has been made to eliminate or control any potential flooding. In rio case shall a project conflict with the standards and requirements established in the Garfield Count} floodplain Regulations. • Refer to the Geotechnical Feasibility Investigation prepared by Geotechnical Engineering Group. Inc. under Tab 3 for natural hazards. 9:13 Development plans shall preserve. to the maximum extent possible. natural features such as unusual rock formations, lakes„ rivers, streams and trees. Where appropriate, the subdivider may be required to dedicate lands to lot owners to preserve these features. In no case shall lots be designed such that a dwelling unit will be located closer than thirty feet (30") to a live stream, lake or pond. regardless of the fact that floodplain regulations may allow dwelling units located closer in some instances. The site has very few live trees. A cluster of a few dead cottonwood trees are adjacent to the abandoned irrigation ditch. No live streams or ponds exist on the site. There are no unusual or interesting rock formations. 9:14 Public access and/or fishing easements to lakes, rivers and streams shall be provided as a part of any development proposal where it is determined to be appropriate by the Board ofCou.nty Commissioners. There are no streams or rivers so this is Not Applicable to this project. 9:15 One (1) dog shall be allowed for each residential unit within a subdivision: and the clog whall be required to be confined within the ow ncrr property boundaries. The requirement shall be included in the protective covenants for the subdivision, with enforcement provisions allow ing for the rento4al ()fa dog from the subdivision as a final remedy in worst cases. (99-096) This is included as a note on the Preliminary Plan and there is a similar request from the Division of Wildlife. This note is intended to be placed on the Final plat instead of in any protective covenants. 9:16 No open hearth. solid -fuel fireplaces arc allowed any within a subdivision. One (1) new solid - fuel hunting stove, as defined by C.R.S. 25-7-401.et.scq.. and the regulations promulgated thereunder. • • • shall be allowed in any dwelling unit. All dwelling units shall be allowed an unrestricted number of natural gas burning stoves and appliances. (99-096) This is included as a note on the Preliminary Plan and is intended to be placed on the Final plat instead of in any protective covenants. 9:17 Each subdivision shall have covenants r.quiring that all exterior lighting shall he directed inward, towards the interior of the subdivision. (99-096) This is intended to be placed on the Final plat instead of in any protective covenants. 9:18 No further subdivision ofa recorded subdivision shall be allowed, except where it is provided for in an approved Preliminary Plan or when the zoning of the property allows for multi -family dwellings as a use by right and the application is fora multi -family chtelling. (99-096: modified 2002-30) A design variance is requested as part of this Preliminary Plan submittal. The large acreage of mild slopes on Lot 4 would be suitable for a future subdivision. The Owner has envisioned that the potential buyer of this lot would have the right to subdivide this lot in the future, most likely after annexed into the City of Rifle, if or when this is possible. In conversations with Rifle annexations and expansion could be a possible scenario and would prefer to limit complications and has endorsed this variance. A letter requesting the variance, as well as a letter from the City of Rifle, is attached under Tab 11. 9:20 LOT AND BLOCK DESIGN 9:21 Lot size, width, depth and shape shall be appropriate for the type of development proposed and shall meet or exceed the minimum lot size ncquiremenis of the Garfield County Zoning Resolution or PUD regulations, where applicable. 9:21.1 Individual lot sizes may be increased by the County above the minimum lot size allowed in the applicable zone district in areas posing a potential health hazard due to soil conditions or geology. 9:21.2 Depth and width of lots shall be adequate to provide for the off-street service and parking facilities required by the type of use and development contemplated. 9:21.3 Corner lots for residential use shall have extra width to permit the required building setback from both roads, as required in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended. 9:22 In no case shall a lot be created with accesses onto a public or private road with less than twenty -live feet (25') of street frontage. 9:22.1 Side lot lines shall be substantially at right angles or radial to road right-of-way lines or centerlines, The large lot design is congruent. See the Preliminary Plan attached under Tab 2. 9:30 STREETS AND ROADWAYS 9:31 Access to all subdivisions shall be from a public street system. The proposed roadway is planned as the improvement of the existing driveway. A plan and profile drawing with the typical cross section is attached under Tab 12. 9.32 Streets and roads shall be designed so that alignments will join in a logical manner. such that adjacent road systems can be combined to form a continuous route from one area to another. 9:32.1 Street shall have the named of existing streets in the same alignment; otherwise there shall be no duplication of street names in the County, 9:32.2 No more than two (2) streets shall intersect at one point, with a minimum of two hundred feet (200') between off -set intersections, unless otherwise approved by the County Road Supervisor. 9:32.3 Streets shall be designed to bear a logical relationship to the topography. A single 5013" road is planned to serve as access from the lots to the county road, see the attached plan and profile under Tab 12. The road is intended to be dedicated to the County, The proposed name is Booms Place. • 9:33 Cul-de-sacs and dead end streets may be designed under the following circumstances: A. Cul-de-sacs may he permitted provided they are not more than six hundred feet (6001 in length and have a turnaround radius of not less than forty-five feet (45') from the center of the cul-de-sac to rad edge and fifty foot (50') right-of-way for residential development and not less than seventy-five foot (75') right-of-way for commercial/industrial development where tractor trailer trucks will enter the property or by providing a T-shaped turnaround with a minimum turning radius of fifty feet (501 for residential development and seventy-five feet (75') for commercial/industrial development where tractor trailer trucks will enter the property. The Board may approve longer cul-de-sacs for topographical reasons and it can be proved that tire protection and emergency egress and access is provided as a part ol'the longer design: and 13, Dead end streets shall be discouraged. except in cases where the dead end is meant to be temporary with the intent to extend or connect the right-of-way in the future. Ifa dead end street is approved. room for ploucd snow storage shall be included by providinga T-shaped turnaround with a minimum turning radius of fifty feet (50') for residential development and seventy-five feet (75') for commercial/industrial development where tractor trailer trucks will enter the property. A dead end street being different from a cul-de-sac in that a dead end street has no permanent turnaround at the end of the street. The road is intended as a dead end street with a length less than the 600' maximum. Due to the remote location and low anticipated traffic volumes, this is expected to serve the project needs adequately. Per the regulations of Section 9:33.B, a "hammer -head" or "T" turnaround is proposed that accommodates the turning radius of emergency apparatus. Rifle Fire Protection District has agreed that this would be acceptable instead of a cul-de-sac with a circular turn -around. The proposed dead end street allows for continuation in the future, see the attached plan and profile under Tab 12. 9:34 All streets are dedicated to the public but all streets will be constructed to standards consistent with these Regulations and repair and maintenance shall be the responsibility of the incorporated Homeowners Association of the subdivision. The road is intended to be dedicated to the County but since the City of Rifle uses the road as access to the tank, it is anticipated that the repair and maintenance will not be an issue. 9:35 Street and roadway design shall be in conformance with the following standards: (chart and notes not shown). The Traffic Analysis under Tab 10 shows that the anticipated ADT fora single lot as 9.57 ADT. The design capacity for the four lots ( 3 proposed, 1 existing) is approximately 40 ADT putting it within the semi -private category ofthe County with the following design parameters: 40' Right-of-way, 8' lane width (implied but not stated as 2 lanes for a total of 16' total lane width), 2' shoulder width. 4' ditch width, 3% gravel lane cross slope. 5% shoulder slope, 50' minimum radii, 10% maximum grade, gravel surface, with an engineered pavement section, and engineered drainage. See the attached cross section, plan and profile under Tab 12 to verify that the roadway design complies with all of these standards except for that of the 40' Right-of-way. Attached under Table 11 is a letter requesting a variance from the 40' width to the proposed 30' width. The access onto the county road is 30' wide and the proposed roadway fits within that right-of-way. 9:37 A variance to the maximum grade of 12% for minor collector and secondary access categories and up to 14% for rural access categories and up to 14% for rural access. semi -primitive and primitive residential. may be approved by the Board of County Commissioners at the time ofthe Preliminary Plan Public Clearing or if the Preliminary Plan has been approved at the time of adoption of these regulations. General consideration shall be given to the interrelationship between the length of grade: its • relation to curves and intersections and the transition between those elements ofa road. At a minimum. in order to approve the requested variance, the following standards shall be met: 1. The applicant shall. by way of graphic illustration on a topographic map. show the difference between a road that would comply with the grade requirements and the proposed road with excessive grade. 2. The excessive grade is necessary to avoid the creation of a cut or the 1111 slope that exceeds twelve(12) feet in height at the top of the cut or the bottom of the hill. 3. That the excessive grade section is the minimum length and the minimum increase in grade necessary to provide access to all lots. 4. The excessive grade has a slope with exposure to maximize solar exposure and minimize snow/ice build up. 5. All excessive grades in excess of 150 feet in length on dead end roads shall have a turnaround approved by the appropriate fire district as to the adequacy of the turnaround to meet fire equipment requirements. 6. If the applicant has not proposed or obtained Board of County Commissioner approval for lire lighting water storage ofadequate capacity at the top of the excessive grade. the proposed excessive grade must permit the transport of such water. If the Board of County Commissioners find that a wild fire hazard is present in the proposed subdivision. the applicant fora variance to the maximum permissible grade must meet the following additional criteria: 1. Excessive grades shall only be approved if. in the judgement of the local fire fighting authority. the wildfire hazard presents a danger due to excessive vegetation, inadequate land widths or inabilit. to transport tater. 2. In areas twhere .+ildfire hazard presents a danger. excessive grades shall only be approved if landscaping requirements consistent with Forest Service recommendations to minimize wildfire hazards are not incorporated into the covenants of the subdivision. 3. A variance to the maximum grade shall only be allowed lithe use of roof shingles and siding of the structure are built out of something other than fire retardant materials and/or sprinklers for internal structural fire protection are not mandated by covenant. No variance is necessary for grade. 9:40 DRAINAGE 9:41 Drainage easements. channels.. culverts and required bridges shall be designed by an engineer registered in the State of Colorado. 9:42 All drainage facilities shall be designed based on a twenty -live (25) year frequency storm. 9:43 Where new developments create run-off in excess of historic site levels. the use of detention ditches and ponds may be required to retain up to a one hundred (100) year storm. 9:44 All culverts shall be designed such that the exposed ends are protected by encasement in concrete or extended a minimum of three feet (3') beyond the driving surface on each side. Culverts, drainage pipes and bridges shall he designed and constructed in accordance with AASIID recommendations for an 11-20 live load. Drainage plan and report with supporting data and calculations are attached under Tab 7. 9:50 WATER SUPPLY 9:51 An adequate potable and irrigation water supply shall be available to all lots within a subdivision. taking into consideration peak demands to service total development population. irrigation uses. and adequate fire protection requirements in accordance with recognized and customary engineering standards. 9:52 Individual wells may be used as the water supply, provided the applicant has submitted the required documentation to the appropriate water court, and the Colorado Division of Water Resources twill approve well drilling permits for all lots within the development, 9:53 Central water systems shall be designed by an engineer qualified to design water systems and be a registered professional engineer licensed by the State of Colorado. Central water and treatment and storage facilities shall be approved by the Colorado Department of I lealth. All limes in a central water system should be looped. with no dead ends included in the system. Where dead ends are proposed for cul-de-sacs, there will either he a fire hydrant or blow -off valve at the end of the line. • 9:54 Water supply stems, on -lot or otherwise located in a floodplain. shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration and avoid impairment during or subsequent to flooding. 9:55 All water mains shall be a minimum diameter of four inches (4"). provided storage facilities adequate for tire protection are available. The City of Rifle negotiated to provide four water taps to the property as part of the agreement for provided a location for the water tank. Since that time one tap was provided for the existing residence but three additional taps are to be used for each of the three additional lots. A copy of the agreement. the engineering plans for the construction of that agreement, letters from an authorized representative, and a Water Plan showing the planned location for the taps is attached under Tab 8. 9:60 SANITARY SEWAGE DISPOSAL 9:61 Disposal by individual sewage disposal systems may be permitted. provided lot sizes are consistent with the Garfield County Zoning Resolution. Individual systems must have representative soil absorption tests performed by a qualified engineer registered to perform such tests in the State of Colorado. 9:62 Central sewage treatment works shall be designed by a registered professional engineer licensed by the State of Colorado. The system shall be designed. in accordance with the standards established by the Colorado Department of health. Site location approval shall be obtained from the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission for systems over two thousand (2,0001 gallons per day. In no event may a system be designed for less capacity than the anticipated maximum daily sewage flow or treatment requirements. Individual sewage disposal systems are planned. The existing residence is using an ISDS presently that has performed well since its construction. A percolation test was performed during the geologic investigation and the results are reported by Geotechnical Engineering Group, Inc. under Tab 3. The results were used to generate a Sewer Analysis and Plan attached under Tab 9. 9:70 FIRE PROTECTION 9:71 Subdivision fire protection plans shall he reviewed by the appropriate tire protection district to ensure that all lots have primary and secondar) access points to escape fire entrapment. 9:72 Where a central water system has lire hydrants, all lire hydrants shall meet the specifications for the appropriate iire protection agency. particularly with regard to thread size on the fire hydrants. 9:73 Where there is no central water system available, a central located tire protection storage tank shall be designed to meet the fire protection needs of the subdivision and be approved by the appropriate lire district. 9:74 Water used for fire protection purposes does not have to be potable water and may be from a source separate from the domestic supply. Rifle Fire protection district has performed a review and provided comments in a correspondence attached under Tab I 3. 9:80 PUBLIC SITES AND OPEN SPACES The owner intends to submit payment in lieu of dedication based on an appraisal to be done at time of Final Plat. Section 3.0 of the Zoning Ordinance Per the Zoning Ordinance of Garfield County, Colorado the following Requirements of Section 3:02 have been incorporated, addressed, or attached as follows: 3.02 A/R/RD — AGRiCULTURAIJRESIDENTIAL/RURAL DENSITY 3.02.01 Uses, by right: Agricultural including farms. garden. greenhouse. nursery. orchard. ranch. small animal farm • for production of poultry, fish. fur -bearing or other small animals and customary accessory uses including buildings for shelter or enclosure of persons, animals or property employed in any of the above uses, retail establishment for sale of goods processed from raw materials produced on the lot: Guiding and outfitting. and park: Single-family dwelling and customary accessory uses. (A. 86-09) Accessory dwelling unit approved as a part of a public hearing or meeting on a subdivision or subdivision exemption or guesthouse special use approved after 7/95 and meeting the standards in Section 5.03.02. 3.02.02 Uses conditional: Aircraft landing strip, church. community buildings, day nursery, and school; group home for the elderly . f A. 97-60) Boarding or rooming houses, studio for conduct of arts and crafts. home occupation. water impoundments. (A. 86-09;87-108) 3.02.03 Uses, suecial: Airport utility. feedlot as principal use of the lot. crematorium, agriculture -related business. resorts, kennel, riding stable, and veterinary clinic. shooting range facility(A_98-108): Two-family dwelling, camper park. ski lift and trails; broadcasting studio, communication facility, corrections facility, storage, storage of heavy equipment, golf course driving range, golf practice range and accessory facilities. commercial recreation facility/park;(A, 97-60: 97-112) ass Transit Facility (added 2002-12) Public gatherings: storage of oil and gas drilling equipment; Site for extraction. processing. storage or material handling of natural resources; utility lines. utility substations: recreational support facilities and guest house. (A. 79-132; 80-64; 80-180; 80-313.81-145; 81-263; 84-78: 86-9; 86-84; 86-106; 87-73: 99-025) Accessory dwelling unit meeting the standards in Section 5.03.02 for any lot not created after a public hearing or meeting after 7/95. Kennel Group Residential Facility for Children & Youth (Add 2004-62) • The proposed use of Single family dwelling is a use by right. • 3.02.04 Minimum Lot Area: I ss o (2) acres: except as otherwise approved in a Cluster Option (2003-17) All proposed lots are greater than two acres. 3.02.05 Maximum Lot Coverage: Fifteen percent (15%). Since the smallest lot is 3.8 acres (more or less), it can be said with a high degree of certainty that the lot coverage would be less than 15%. Fifteen percent of 3.8 acres is approximately 25,000 square feet. 3.02.06 Minimum Setback: (1) Front yard: (a) arterial streets: seventy-five (751 feet from street centerline or fifty (50) feet from front lot line, whichever is greater; (h) local streets: fitly (50) feet from street centerline or twenty- five (25) feet from front lot line. whichever is greater; (2) Rear yard: Twenty-five (25) feet from rear lot line: (3) Side yard: Ten (10) feet from side: lot line. or one-half (1/2) the height of the principal building, whichever is greater. Envelopes have been shown that incorporate the minimum setbacks. 3.02.07 Maximum Height of t3uildiirms: Twenty-five (25) feet. No buildings are proposed that would exceed 25'. 3.02.08 Additional Requirements: All uses shall be subject to the provisions under Section 5 (Supplementary Regulations). Section 5.0 of the Zoning Ordinance • Per the Zoning Ordinance of Garfield County, Colorado the following applicable Requirements of Section 5 have been incorporated, addressed, or attached as follows: 5.01.02 Minimum Off -Street Parking: Parking spaces shall be provided for each use in the following amounts: (I) Residential (except group quarters) - one (I) space per six hundred (600) square feet of floor area or one (1) space per dwelling unit. whichever is greater; each separately rentable room or group of rooms shall be considered a dwelling unit; The large lots will allow adequate room for off-street parking. 5.01.03 Signs: in all residential districts, a sign identifying residential use of a lot may be located on the lot: such signs shall be limited to one (1) per principal use and shall not exceed one (I) square loot in area for each dwelling unit up to a maximum of eight (8) square feet. A sign identifying an accessory commercial use in a residential district shall not exceed twelve (12) square feet in arca. and shall be limited to one (1) sign per accessory use. In any commercial or industrial district, signs identiti ing the use of the premises may be located on the lot. Nothing in this Resolution shall be construed to prevent. Supplementary location of a temporary sign in any district advertising sale or lease of the premises, provided that such sign does not exceed twelve (12) square feet in area. Per the request of the Fire District attached under Tab 13, and this section residential addresses most likely be shown on signs conforming to this regulation. 5.01.04 Frontage: Each lot in separate ownership, unless otherwise provided for under a Planned Unit Development. shall have at least twenty-five (25) lineal feet of irontage on a street right-of-way. either dedicated to the public or to a private association or on a private road and reserved in perpetuity through pri; ate agreement to provide access to the lot. Each building devoted wholly or in part to residential use shall front on a street or road as described above except when two (2) or more such buildings are located on one (1) lot and the required frontage for each building cannot be provided due to the shape of the lot: those buildings lacking street or road frontage shall front on a dedicated driveway casement at least twenty-five (25) feet in width and maintained in an unobstructed condition. • • All lots have at least 25' of frontage. 5.03.035 Riding Stable: (1) All horse riding shall be on the same property; a public right-of-way: other private property he permission: or publicly owned property subject to public land management agency authorization of trail use. if required. (2) No noise. dust. odors or sources of filth shall emanate from the property. (3) Any night lighting shall be hooded and directed inward to the property. (4)An indoor arena shall comply with all county building code requirements. (A. 94-148) The existing riding stable conforms to the above. 5.04 SUPPLEMENTARY LOT AREA REGULATIONS 5.04.01 Lot Slope Determinations: In determining lot slopes for use in establishing minimum lot area requirements and build able area, existing and proposed lots of less than two (2) acres shall be calculated on an individual lot basis. Contour intervals of live (5) feet or less shall be used to make this determination. For lots of two (2) or more acres in size and tracts of land proposed for other methods of development wherein creation of individual lots within said tract is not anticipated. the determination of lot slope shall be made utilizing available topographic snaps, 5.04.02 Development Limitations Based on Lot Slope: (1) Lot Size Less Than 1 Acre: Land with original and undisturbed slope in excess of forty percent (40%) shall not be credited toward lot area in determining whether a lot meets the minimum lot area requirements set forth in the zone district regulations: however, a smaller building envelope may be approved by the Board. as a Special Use permit. after review. (2) Lot Size 1 Acre or Greater: Such lots shall have a minimum building envelope of 1 acre in an area that has less than forty percent (40%) slopes; however. a smaller buildingg, envelope may he approved by the Board after review of the following which shall he submitted by the appl icant: (A) A soil land foundation investigation prepared by a registered. professional engineer. (8) A topographic survey with contour intervals of not more than two (2) feet. (C) A site grading and drainage plan prepared by a register, professional engineer. (D) A detailed plan of retaining walls or cuts, and fills in excess of five (5) feet. • • • (E) A detailed row eeetation plan. All of the above shall show the minimum building envelope size for each lot and shall provide evidence that all structures and facilities can be built within such building envelope arca so as not to disturb any forty percent (40%) slope arca. The following shall he conditions of any approval: (A) Foundations shall be designed by and bear the seal of a registered. professional engineer. (B) All final plans required to be submitted by a professional engineer shall be approved in their final form and shall hear the seal of such registered. professional engineer. (3) For all lots: Driveways. access ways and access easements within the development and on the property of developer shall have a maximum grade of fourteen percent (14°ie), (A. 94-046) All lots have building envelopes of greater than one acre and no slopes greater than 40% exist within. 5,04.03 Lot Area Restrictions Based on Sewage Disposal Method to be Employed: Lot areas and sewage disposal systems do not warrant restrictions, see Tab 9. 5M5 SUPPLEMENTARY SETBACK REGULATIONS Setback regulations are met. 5.11 GEOLOGIC HAZARD AREAS (Added 2002-98) No known geologic hazards warrant restrictions, see Tab 3. The recommend slope setbacks of 100' for greater than 37% slopes have been incorporated into the building envelopes. Comprehensive Plan The large lots fit into the current goals of the Comprehensive Pian. Per the Comprehensive Plan the City of Rifle was involved in the review of the project. Rifle had no immediate comments pertaining to the project but endorsed the request for variance through their correspondence attached under Tab 11. The request for the Variance, allowing for future subdivision of Lot 4. allows for the potential future needs of the City of Rifle. Geoteei»nieai Engineering aii,Group, Inc. Geotechnical Feasibility Investigation Booms Place Subdivision 1582 County Road 233 Rifle, Colorado Prepared For: Ms. Robin Fritzler c/o Ms. Shona Hoffmeister 1101 County Road 227 Rifle, CO 84650 Job No. 1,867 February 14, 2005 Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Testing Consultants (970) 245-4078 • fax (970) 245-7115 • geotechnicalgroup.com 2308 Interstate Avenue, Grand Junction, Colorado 81505 • TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE 1 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS..,..... 1 SITE CONDITIONS .,.,...... 2 EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD 5 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE RECORD REVIEW 6 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 8 LIMITED GAMMA RADIATION SURVEY .., 9 PERCOLATION TESTING 10 LIMITATIONS 11 FIG. 1 -- VICINITY MAP FIG. 2 - SOILS MAP FIG. 3 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY TEST PIT FIG. 4 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY TEST PIT FIG. 5 LEGEND AND NOTES OF EXPLORATORY TEST PIT FIGS. 6 THROUGH 8 - PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS • • SCOPE This report presents the results of a geotechnical feasibility investigation for the proposed Booms Place Subdivision, 1582 County Road 233 in Rifle Colorado. We were requested to investigate several specific topics by the civil engineer. The scope of our field investigation was conducted to include a geologic hazards observation with a limited gamma radiation survey, perform one soil percolation test and give a discussion on the existing gravel roadway, The report includes a site and soils description, geologic hazards review, descriptions of subsoil and groundwater conditions found in one test pit, results of soil percolation testing and a discussion on the existing gravel roadway. This investigation was performed in general conformance with our Proposal No. 04-209 dated November 24, 2004. The report was prepared from data developed during our field exploration, engineering analysis and experience with similar conditions. A brief summary of our conclusions and recommendations follows. Detailed criteria are presented within the report. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1 A site visit was made on January 5, 2005. A gamma radiation survey was conducted at that time. Gamma radiation measurements we made at scattered locations across the subject site ranged from 11 to 17 micro Booms Place Subdivision 1582 County Road 233 GEG Job No 1,B6i • • • Rems per hour. These levels are comparable to our understanding of typical background levels. Additional discussion is included in the text of the report. Soils across the subject site were in the mapped as part of the Potts -- Ildefonso — Vale association geology, characterized by deep relatively well drained, gently sloping to steep soils. Subsurface conditions encountered in the profile test pit located in the vicinity of the proposed percolation field consisted of sandy, silty day to the maximum depths explored of 8.5 feet below ground surface. Percolation rates measured varied from 20 minutes per inch to time intervals which did not measurably percolate. Groundwater was not found the day of observation. Additional discussion is included in the text of the report. The existing gravel roadway consists of less than 1 -inch thickness of base course type aggregate over native soils. If the subgrade becomes wetted we feel that there is insufficient aggregate thickness to support vehicular traffic. It will likely be necessary to add several inches of a road base type aggregate to support light vehicle traffic. We anticipate that construction activities on site during residential construction may result in truck traffic which exceeds the roadway support characteristics. It may be prudent to add road base type aggregate after construction activities are complete. The thickness of aggregate base course will depend on the type of traffic and the subgrade characteristics of the roadway. Additional subsurface investigation and laboratory tests will be necessary to provide aggregate base course thickness recommendations. SITE CONDITIONS The subject site was located in the west central portion of Section 2 and the east central portion of Section 3, Township 6 South, Range 93 West of the 6t1 Principal Meridian, in Garfield County, Colorado. The subject site was roughly rectangular shaped. A vicinity map showing the site location is included as Fig. 1 Booms Place Subdivision 1582 County Road 233 GEG Job No 1.867 • • • The subject site encompassed approximately 64 acres at an average elevation of approximately 5,680 feet (USES, Rifle, Colorado topographic quadrangle dated 1952 revised 1982). The subject site was located in a rural/agricultural area approximately 2.5 miles northeast of Rifle Colorado. We understand that it is proposed to subdivide the subject site into 4 parcels. The subject site was characterized by pasture areas in the south and west portions of the subject site, steeper slopes in the central area aligned north-northwest to south-southeast and an elevated, relatively flat, undeveloped area in the northeast and east portion of the subject site. Pasture grasses, low ground cover and several trees (up to 12 inch diameter) were noted in the south and west portion of the subject site. Sage and other low indigenous ground cover was noted on the steeper slopes and in the northeast and east portion of the subject site, Slopes across the west and south portions of the subject site were generally down toward the southwest south at 2 to 12 percent (untitled, two -foot contour interval, topographic map supplied by Shona Hoffmeister and spot checked in the field with Brunton pocket transit, hand level and hand held rangefinder). A slope near the northwest property corner was down toward the southeast at 10 to 15 percent. The steeper slopes near the central portion of the subject site were down toward the southwest at 11 to 21 degrees. Slopes in the northeast and east portion of the subject site were gently undulating at 1 to 6 percent. Booms Pace Subdivision 1582 County Road 233 GEG Job No 1.867 3 • A gravel roadway entered the subject site near the northwest property corner. We measured a gravel thickness of fess than 1 -inch. This roadway traversed the previously mentioned steeper slopes terminating in the northeast portion of the subject site near a large water storage tank, Several small irrigation ditches were noted in the south and west portion of the subject site. These unlined ditches were 1 to 2 feet wide, 0.5 to 1 feet deep and dry at the time of our visit. A larger ditch was noted near the west and south portion of the subject site. This ditch was approximately 8 to 14 feet wide, 5 to 8 feet deep. A minor amount of water was flowing toward the southeast at the time of our site visit. Topographic maps (USGS, "Rifle", Colorado topographic quadrangle dated 1952 revised 1982 and USGS, "Silt", Colorado topographic quadrangle dated 1962 revised 1987) indicated a drainage, identified as Rifle Creek Canyon Ditch, near the base of the previously identified steeper slopes. We did not note the drainage indicated on the USGS topographic maps near the base of the steeper slopes during our site visit. A gravel pit type excavation was noted near the slope break of the steeper slopes near the east central portion of the subject site. This excavation was 100 to 200 feet in diameter and approximately 14 feet deep_ Clayey to silty gravel sidewalls were noted. Another excavation was located near the toe of the steeper slopes near the southeast portion of the subject site. This excavation was 25 to 45 feet in diameter and 6 to 8 feet deep. We did not find this excavation indicated on the untitled 2 -foot contour interval topographic map. Booms Placa Subdivision 1582 County Road 233 GEG Job No 1.867 • • A single-family residence with outbuildings and a corral were located near the toe of the steeper slopes in the north central portion of the subject site. Undeveloped graze land and agricultural land was north. Undeveloped land was F -.est. Agricultural land was south and west. The vicinity sloped down toward the -,outhwest at 3 to 6 percent (USGS. "Rifle", Colorado topographic quadrangle dated 1952 revised 1982 and USGS, "Silt", Colorado topographic quadrangle -t-ited 1962 revised 1987). Existing Gravel Road At the time of our visit, we measured the existing gravel roadway consists of less than 1 -inch thickness of base course type aggregate over native soils. If the subgrade becomes wetted we feel that there is insufficient aggregate thickness to support vehicular traffic. It will likely be necessary to add several rhes of a road base type aggregate to support light vehicle traffic. We anticipate that construction activities on site during residential construction may result in truck traffic which exceeds the roadway support characteristics. It may be prudent to add road base type aggregate after construction activities are complete. The thickness of aggregate base course will depend on the type of traffic and the subgrade characteristics of the roadway. Additional subsurface investigation and laboratory tests will be necessary to provide aggregate base Booms Place Subdivision 1582 County Road 233 GEG Job No 1 867 • • course thickness recommendations. SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE RECORD REVIEW We reviewed the "Soil Survey of Rifle Area, Colorado (Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties) by J. B. Hartman and D. J. Murray, published by the USDA, Soil Conservation Service in cooperation with the Colorado Agricultural Experimental Station issued May 1985. The subject site was located in an area of the General Soil Map identified as the Potts — Ildefonso — Vale association. This association is characterized by deep, well drained, gently sloping to steep soils on mesas, alluvial fans, terraces and benches. Detailed Soils Maps identified 5 soil types across the subject site, see Fig. 2. The north and east portions of the subject site were identified as Ildefonso stony loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes. This soil type is described as a deep, well drained, hilly to steep soil formed in mixed alluvium derived primarily from basalt. The surface layer is typically 8 inches of brown stony loam over white, very strongly calcareous, very stony loam to a depth of 60 inches. The south central portion of the subject site was identified as Olney loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes. This soil type is described as a deep, well drained, moderately sloping to rolling soil formed in alluvium derived from sandstone and shale. The surface layer is typically 12 inches of grayish brown loam. The subsoil is approximately 21 inches Booms Place Subdivision 1582 County Road 233 GEG Job No 1.867 7 • of grayish brown and light gray sandy, clay loam over light gray, gravelly, sandy, clay loam and very gravelly, sandy loam to a depth of 60 inches. Olney loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes was identified north and west of Olney loam 6 to 12 percent. This soil type is described as a deep, well drained, nearly level soil formed in alluvium derived from sandstone and shale. Typically, the surface layer is about 12 inches of grayish brown loam. The subsoil is approximately 21 inches of grayish brown and light gray sandy, clay loam over light gray, gravelly, sandy, clay loam or very gravelly, sandy loam to a depth of 60 inches. Potts foam was identified north and west of Olney loam 1 to 3 percent and also near the northwest portion of the subject site. This soil type is described as a deep, well drained, moderately sloping soil formed in alluvium derived from sandstone, shale or basalt. The surface layer is typically 4 inches of brown loam and 24 inches of reddish brown clay loam over pinkish white loam to a depth of 60 inches. Halaquepts, nearly level was also identified near the northwest portion of the subject site. This broadly defined unit consists of deep, somewhat poorly drained to poorly drained, nearly level and gently sloping, salt -affected soils formed in alluvium. Although extremely variable, the upper 24 inches generally range from loam to clay. Underlying layers are generally gravelly with stratified sand, gravel and cobbles at a depth of 24 to 40 inches. Booms Place SubdIvIsdon 1582 County Road 233 GEG Job No 1,967 • • • GEOLOGIC HAZARDS We reviewed "Geologic Map of Colorado" dated 1979 by Ogden Tweto, the "Rifle", Colorado topographic quadrangle dated 1952 revised 1982 and "Silt", .olorado topographic quadrangle dated 1962 revised 1987 by the United States Geological Survey and the "Soil Survey of Rifle Area, Colorado (Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties)'. The site geology was mapped as Tertiary Wasatch and Ohio Creek formations and modern Quaternary alluviums. The Tertiary Wasatch and Ohio formations were described as claystone, mudstone, sandstone and conglomerate. We identified sandy clay soils with scattered gravel, cobbles and sandstone pieces. The nearest identified faults were approximately 8 miles north of the subject site. We did identify probable mineral resources (sand and gravel) potential in the area. Further investigation would be necessary to determine the extent and quality of these mineral resources. We also identified relatively steep slopes near the central portion of the subject site, as described in the "SITE CONDITIONS" section of this report. The previously mentioned Soil Survey identified low swell / consolidation potential for the lldefonso and Potts soils and low to moderate swell / consolidation potential for the Olney soils. The Potts soils were identified as having a moderate effect on concrete that comes into contact with soils. Booms Place Sutxlivfaion 1582 County Road 233 GEG Job No 1.867 • • • Based on our findings, we believe it would be prudent to site proposed construction as far as practical away from slopes greater than 37 percent (approximately 20 degrees). We recommend a setback of 100 feet from toe of slopes greater than 37 percent. Further investigation may indicate a lesser set back is warranted. Additionally, it would be prudent to monitor the stability and erosion of the steeper slopes. In our experience, prudent engineering design and proper construction methods can be used to mitigate these concerns. Site-specific recommendations for slope concerns, foundation design and construction should be developed after proposed construction becomes more clear. Limited Gamma Radiation Survey As requested. a Geotechnical Engineering Group (GEG) representative visited the subject site and conducted a gamma radiation survey on January 5, 2005. The survey was completed using a Ludlum Model 19, Micro R Meter. The survey consisted of 15 widely spaced gamma measurements recorded spaced across the subject site. Measurements were made over grid locations based on Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates and acquired with a hand held Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver. Measurements were made with a hand held gamma meter held for several seconds approximately 6 inches above the Hoams Place Subdivision 1582 County Road 233 GEG act No 1 867 • ground surface. Measurements varied from 11 to 17 micro Rems per hour radiation exposure. These measurements are, in aur opinion, consistent with background radiation levels. Our survey did not identify gamma radiation levels that we believe would preclude site from proposed construction. A review of in-house resources and site visit identified no major natural geologic hazards to include: landslides, avalanches, mudflows, debris flows or radioactivity. Steeper, slopes, with near vertical sections, were identified near the north portion of the subject site. PERCOLATION TESTING Percolation testing was performed on January 5, 2005 in percolation holes P-1 through P-3. A profile test pit was observed at test pit TP -1. Locations of test pit TP -1 and P-1 through P-3 are shown on Fig. 3. A graphic log and Legend of the soils found in the exploratory test pit are presented on Figs. 4 and 5. Subsurface conditions consisted of sandy, silty clay to the maximum depth explored of 8.5 feet below ground surface. The sandy clay was dry and brown. Three percolation holes (16 to 21 inches in depth) were excavated at depths of 4 feet (P-1 and P-2) and 4.5 feet (P-3) below existing grade and prewetted between January 4 and 5, 2005. Booms Place Subdivision 1582 County Road 233 GEG Job No 1.867 10 • • • The nearest identified water sources were two small unlined irrigation ditches (dry at the time of our visit). One of the irrigation ditches was approximately 1 foot deep by 2 feet wide and 60 feet south-southeast of the proposed septic area. The other irrigation ditch was approximately 0.5 feet deep by 1 foot wide and 90 feet south-southeast of the proposed septic area. We did not identify other visible water sources near the proposed absorption area. A log and legend of percolation test pit TP -1 is included on Figs. 4 and 5. Results of the percolation testing are included in Figs. 6 through 8. Groundwater was not found in TP -1 the day of testing. We estimate a high seasonal groundwater level of 6 feet below the ground surface. Percolation test results ranged between 20 minutes per inch to time intervals which did not measurably percolate. Based on our observations and tests, we believe the health department may provide a sewage disposal system design for the subject site. LIMITATIONS One test pit was observed at a location as specified by others. We understand the percolation test pit was located in the area proposed for absorption field construction. The test pit is representative of conditions encountered only at Booms Place Subdivision 1582 County Road 233 GEG Job No 1 867 31 • the exact test pit location. Variations in the subsoil conditions not indicated by the test pit are always possible. Subsurface conditions may change if the proposed location of the absorption field is different than anticipated. This is not a sewage disposal system design. Sewage system design and construction in Garfield County is regulated by the Garfield County Building and Sanitation Department. A copy of this report should be provided for Garfield County Building and Sanitation review. We can provide sewage disposal system design services if requested. The scope of work performed is specific to the proposed scope of work and the client identified by this report. Any other use of the data and recommendations (as applicable) provided within this report are not appropriate applications. Reliance by other clients will require project specific review by this firm. Changes in site conditions can occur with time, Changes in standard of practice also occur with time. This report should not be relied upon after a period of three years from the date of this report and is subject to review by this firm in light of new information which may periodically become known. We believe this investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily used by geotechnical engineers practicing in this area at this time. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. If we can be of further service in discussing the contents of this report or the analysis of the influence of the subsurface conditions on the design of the residence. Booms Place Subdlvisfon 1582 County Road 233 GEG Job No 1,867 • • We appreciate the opportunity to provide consultation services, If we can answer any questions regarding this letter or the subject site from a geologic or geotechnical viewpoint, please call, Sincerely,. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. Randall G. Dean Staff Geologist Reviewed by: e;;Get:11.1.Sf,tesli,,* `�a+�►Ns►Rurruuyri • 44- eev Johnstokylk � Norman Senior n g i n ee r ',./'II {r+rt►��t'``, _ qO R EGl 1\ 324 i -e0.. , /Lf` ; °* Reviewed by: John P. Withers, Principal Engineer RGD:NWJ:JPW:cb (2 copies sent) 1 cc: Mountain Cross Engineering Mr. Chris Hale 826 1/2 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Booms Placa Subdivision 1582 County Road 233 GEG Job No 1.857 1:S • Geotechnical Services Booms Place Subdivision 1582 County Road 233 Mesa County, Colorado ,Jab No. 1,867 Vicinity Map Fig. 1 • Note: This figure was prepared based on a site plan provided by Shona Hoffmeister. Potts loam Property Line 3 to 6 percent slopes (typical) Lot Line (typical) Halaquepts nearly level • Ildefonso stony loam 25 to 45 percent slopes Olney loam 1 to 3 percent slopes Olney loam 6 to 12 percent slopes Job No. 1,867 Note: Mapped soil types shown on this figure were summarized from USDA - MRCS document. Soils Map Fig.2 Note: This figure was prepared based on a site plan provided by Shona Hoffmeister.111 Property Line (typical) c� 0 P-2 P-1+ LOT 1 3,674;A&4ES •TP- -3 a LOT 2 3.662,2ACRES LOT 16:31$tACRES Lot Line (typical) LOT 4 45 nal LAcRES Existing Road Legend • Indicates location of exploratory test pit. + Indicates location of percolation test. Job No. 1,867 Location of Exploratory Test Pit Fig. 3 • a) a} 0 10 TP -1 Job No. 1,867 Logs of Exploratory Test Pit Fig. 4 • Legend • • Clay, sandy, silty, dry, brown (CO Notes 1. This pit was excavated and sampled on January 5, 2005. 2. These Togs are subject to the explanations, limitations and conclusions as contained in this report. Job No. 1,867 Legend of Logs of Exploratory Test Pit Fig. 5 III SATURATION AND PREPARATION DATE: January 4, 2005 TIME AT START OF SATURATION: 17:00 Geotechnical 1 iEngia eeriog ii&Grotup, Inc. PERCOLATION TEST DATE: January 5, 2005 WATER IN BORINGS AFTER SATURATION Depth to Water YES X NO PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS HOLE NUMBER 8" Diameter DEPTH (INCHES) TIME AT START OF INTERVAL TIME INTERVAL (MINUTES) DEPTH TO WATER CHANGE IN WATER DEPTH (INCHES) PERCOLATION RATE (MINIINCH) START OF END OF INTERVAL INTERVAL (INCHES) (INCHES) P-1 @ 4' 4" Dia 0 18" 10:36 10 3.75 4.0 0.25 40 18" 10:46 10 4.0 4.25 0.25 40 18" 10:56 10 4.25 4.25 0.0 18" 11:06 10 4.25 4.5 0.25 40 18" 11:16 10 4.5 4.75 0.25 40 18" 11:26 10 4.75 4.75 0.0 03 18" 11:36 10 4.75 5.0 0.25 40 * Note * 00 : indicates did not percolate during this interval. Job No. 1,867 Fig. 6 w Geoteehnical Fagiaeeri®g 1 Group, Ileac. SATURATION AND PREPARATION DATE: January 4, 2005 TIME AT START OF SATURATION: 17:00 PERCOLATION TEST DATE: January 5, 2005 WATER IN BORINGS AFTER SATURATION Depth to Water YES X NO PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS HOLE NUMBER 8" Diameter DEPTH (INCHES) TIME AT START OF INTERVAL TIME INTERVAL (MINUTES) DEPTH TO WATER CHANGE IN WATER DEPTH (INCHES) PERCOLATION RATE (MIN/INCH) START OF END OF INTERVAL INTERVAL (INCHES) (INCHES) P-2 © 4' 4" Dia 21" 10:37 10 4.0 4.5 0.5 20 21" 10:47 10 4.5 4.5 0.0 00 21" 10:57 10 4.5 4.75 0.25 40 21" 11:07 10 4.75 5.0 0.25 40 21" 11:17 10 5.0 5.25 0.25 40 21" 11:27 10 5.25 5.5 0.25 40 21" 11:37 10 5.5 5.75 0.25 40 * Note * co : indicates did not percolate during this interval. L • Job No. 1,867 Fig. 7 Geoteehsleal iiEoglneeriing 1 Group, Inc. SATURATION AND PREPARATION DATE: January 4, 2005 TIME AT START OF SATURATION: 17:00 PERCOLATION TEST DATE: January 5, 2005 WATER IN BORINGS AFTER SATURATION Depth to Water YES X NO PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS HOLE NUMBER 8" Diameter DEPTH (INCHES) TIME AT START OF INTERVAL TIME INTERVAL (MINUTES) DEPTH TO WATER CHANGE IN WATER DEPTH (INCHES) PERCOLATION RATE (MIN/INCH) START OF END OF INTERVAL INTERVAL (INCHES) (INCHES) P-3 @ 4.5' 6" Dia 16" 10:36 10 4.5 4.75 0.25 40 16" 10:46 10 4.75 5.25 0.5 20 16" 10:56 10 5.25 5.75 0.5 20 16" 11:06 10 5.75 6.25 0.5 20 16" 11:16 10 6.25 6.5 0.25 40 16" 11:26 10 6.5 7.0 0.5 20 16" 11:36 10 7.0 7.5 0.5 20 * Note * ce : indicates did not percolate during this interval. • Job No. 1,867 Fig. 8 D IRao eded -70Th-7.571 Va.I NOV 2 0 1991 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, hfakth%. 14th d:ryrd November , W 91 M[,rccrr BOAS PROPERTIES, INC. a c.rpuntioa duly orprliacd mal cahsiwg.'mkr and by virtue o} ihe laws di tie State a Colorado .pmaor,and RONALD D. FRIT2LAN and ROBIN J. FRITZLAN not in tenancy in common but in ,joint tenancy .h, a kpml a iJrMsi M 630 Railroad Avenue Rifle, CO 51650 .,f,he --- •ceaneyd Garfield slate 4 Cuknolo graprr;ry: b^ng 817 ptrt8E GARFIELD NOV 2 0 11991 Maio Doc; e. i WTf 1ESSp'rlI, Thal rhe grannie, for and in consideration of ----Fifteen Thousand and no/100 DOLLARS rhe receipt and suFI cncy of which is Iwrsh!y skaarkdgcd, his grankd.'bargStied. add and cwnt-ye& and by these reseal dui `Tint. bargain. sell. convey, and smarm. snip t4ce gnnecl sl their heirs, summon and assigns [wren, all the real prureny° !ocher with imprwrments, it any. utu ac. tying ant being in the Cwnly ct} Garfield . Swe of Colorado. dincrihcd is 4dhsws' SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND FORMING A PART HEREOF also ►rtwrn try sweet and nu,nb;a as: not assigned TOCETIIElt with an and si pbr rl r hereditan, nt% and appurtennrr drereto belonging. or in anywise apperraiaiag. and the reversion and reversions. minus -ler and renurnkrs, Fenn. bases and pr I i, thereof. pnJ alt the Moak. right. bile. inrnest, Maim and demand whammies of the grantor. citlur w I.rw .r ryuity, Irl, in and in the ohne bargained pi nnises. with rhe heredtra mann and ap orkman:es; TO DAVE AND TYl HOLD rhr uid rammed /Jane Iwcainst oawl bleu...bed with the appuneemers. unou the sr medal their heirs, ti cesuu. aid ae.ign. torero. The gram.. for %hell. uc sueces,. n and :.sign% Juts covenant and apse that it. shalt and will 'W,+18AANT AND 1 i/4tt:4,I 1l DF:i U IJ the PJrm•.balsan,ed premises in tlse.euiet and pcaccdic It.v.cs,nni rd the gratueei•l their heirs. successor and signs., ayarnst all aid .wry pernnn pr persons chiming dee whole at any pan dk%ryt, by. Ihnigh or wider sir pavex IN W11ISI S WIIFit FOF: The parer hsm caused AS sarlpnlae nam/ 4114 hereunto subscribed. by Set A4 67041-1;:' l'lndrm, and os cerpntae scat la be Iscrc441,o affs■est, ansrrsrktrrin Se.snwy. the day and year fust bleat mimeo. Anne• BOAS PROPERTI 5, INC.,. a Coloradorlorat ny 11/41is Virginia rtlt:OF /MN VW Atl.BEM RLE COUNTY } hY n vSAA% lard . r,Y rani r,r Boas,,Pt' p4,FtXe;•..1nc., a Colorado corporation ' 'atyy saarnnri+,u'1►�1fnt1 ••,., �,�`'•.,� 1 x'tr,e.s nor 01,44 sne.rti,c+al II r•e : I 'if m 1.•inefnnsen 'ray and " Thc Ii,repninr rnsanrnrnn v.-ftle.,nk.J J rk#rr ib . .14 .4 November Vin. tarn. R.I' t:II3: •Lu.s+�'tuu.,V75 nrtrricrt.r.",.1 I.t 91 rzeudrni 11411,441 I 4d+i^r`1 na JI. J41a a,.s.r,r. 1e;1 rr' rr.+..r. 1 ate.•J, (11 14`14-- 1.111 !11 Wrr 1,M • • Bog 817 mES47 EXHIBIT "A" A part of the SWI/4Nw1/4, and a part of the NW1/4SW1/4 of Section 2, and a part of the SE1/4NE1/4 of Section 3, Township 6 South, Range 93 West of the 6th P.M., County of Garfield, State of Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the NE corner of the SW1/4NW1/4 of said Section 2; thence South 00°03'25" East along the East line of said SW1/4NW1/4, and along the East line of said NW1/4SW1/4, a distance of 1626.89 feet; thence South 89°50'21" West parallel with the South line of the NWI/4 of said Section 2, a distance of 1319.40 feet to a point on the West line of said NW1/4SW1/4; thence North 00°02'41" West along said West line, a distance of 306.27 feet to the E1/4 corner of said Section 3; thence continuing North 00°02'41" West along the West line of said NW1/4, a distance of 205.12 feet; thence North 89.57'56" West, parallel with the North line of the SE1/4NE1/4 of said Section 3, a distance of 565.80 feet; thence North 00°02'41" West, parallel with the East line of the NE1/4 of said Section 3, a distance of 1085.67 feet; thence North 89.57'56" West, parallel with said North line, a distance of 50.00 feet; thence North 00°02'41" East, parallel with said East line, a distance of 30.00 feet to a point on said North line; thence South 89°57'56" East along said North line of the SE1/4NE1/4, a distance of 615.79 feet to the NE corner of said SE1/4NEI/4; thence North 89°50'48" East along the North line of the SW1/4NW1/4 of said Section 2 a distance of 1319.06 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Recorded'a RecmWow IA. "w"."`"'"."4"11114.1 • ""."1""*"`"01.0 WIIPINIPIN.40;NIMIMMINIM Uarh 3.. ;1,1 • • ..Char04-ar -Leo ,TIIIS DEED, 3% aetitii eeve 111 r,i . day; of 1 . L,.. -F. '. It:. : .1.;_' ' -.;.;' he'7the ieir of. oar Lerd'inis4titiousand nine hundred and si,Ety7seven bet;treen - : ' * GEORGE:: EVERiTT 'itIRGOOS,,i- El latit known as ..:. .,. Everett Turgooser, ' . . of the '• .. ..:.„, . CountY of .„. . .. ..4. ' Stitt& Of Polorao; 'of the gret part, and : • .. ' ' .1:: GENTRY.and ANN,.F.1:GENTRY - - 0 f the .• f County of ' 1110 '.812t tie() and State ot Colorado, of the mond part; _ WiTNESSETIT, That the said part y ' of the first part, for and inconsideration of the sum of ---TENTOLLARS-Aki 'OTHER:CON:YAM) VALUALE:CONSIDERATION----TXUATZ, ' Book 382 Paget 59 REt0i3D S STAMP 2.' • " .1 • V to the said rt y of he first part in hand pnid by the ad.paties of the arrond part, the receipt wheieof is hereby confessed and neknoWledged, ha granted, bargained, sold mid conveyed, and by these Presents do ea grant, bargain, all convey and confirm unto the said part jug of the second part,their heirs and assignforever, all the hillowin• deaeribed lot or parcels of land, situat.g, tying and being in the County of Garfield and - , State of Colorado, to -wit:. , .... .,.Parcel.1....The-Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (NA8W3g)i. .theSouth Half ofthe Southwest Quarter (SkSW1/4) and the Southwest 'Quarter -o the Northwest Quarter (SANW31) of Section Two (2); the t.r.SoUtheastQuarterof the Northeast Quarter (SEA/14E1/4) and the East . _ fraltoofAhe.Southeast Quarter (.EiSE4) of Section Three (3), 1("ownishipSix (6) South, Range Ninety-three (93) West of the Sixth 'Prinbipal Meridian,- containing Two Hundred and -Eighty (280) acres. ,TOethewith allimprovements situate thereon and all ditch and water rights appertaining to or used in connection with the above .deScribed premises. -Save and except Four Tenths (.4) of a cubic foot of water per secOndoftime under Priority 80 adjudicated to the Rifle Creek _Candi) Ditch heretofore conveyed out by decd recorded as Document , 236899. The first patty reserves to Ilimself, 'his heirand .assigns an undivided one-hnlf interest in all oil, gas, and ',OrtineralS in dr upon said land. The above land is subject to 'eaiiitments and rights of way in place and being used or of record tO the daterhereof. • • e1_2The_Soathwest,Quarter-of-tho bortheast euarter'(SW1/4NE',); e:,Soue east Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (SEANE4); the . 'rtheast Quarter :of the Southeast Quarter (N1nSE4), and the West 'fl alf of the Southeast Quarter (WksE4), and Lots Five (5), Six (6). 7'teven (7), Eight (3), Nine (9), Ten (10), Eleven (11), and Twelve '112) 'of Section Thirty (.10) -and the Northwest Quarter of the Owitheast Quarter (NW4NEkr) and Lots Three (3) and Four (4) of Section Thirty-one (31), in Township -Four (4) South of Range Ninety-two (92) West: and the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (SFA5E1/2) of Section Twenty-five (25) in Township Four (4) South of Range Ninety-three (93) West of the Sixth (6th) PrintipaL eentaining-Glx-ltunrareelablrt.e_acmdff.1.5EeMbr=;- four—hundrettrff"15-f aff—acre (6115764).' • • Except mineral reservatirin5 of record and subject to rights of - way in place and being used prior to the date hereof. &IP •-••• • •••••••••••••- • 11 Book 382 Page 592 • TOGET1 1.1It with all arid singutnr the hereditaments and apt>urtennn e„ thereunto belonging, or in ,lay' vh a appertaining, and the reversion end revereiona, remainder and remainders, re11t!1, iaenett and profits thereat'; ,cull iil1 the estntr, right, title, interest, claim •nail demand Itainoever, u1 the stall party ` or the first part either its 1n'V or equity, of, hi and to the above bargained premises, with h-rreclitarrlentx and appurtenances. TO 11 AV1; .\N1) 'I'ti'IOLT) the said prct nasltres -onto 4n lees above harps 'tried and described, with the :rppnrt... J . Centry and Ann -F. Gentry of the seeoi 1 pnrt,thedr heirs nail ensigns forever. the said part jes And the said Ceorge Everett Turgoose, also known as Everett Turcloesc, " roe). part y of the first part, him eel 1 f , his heirs, executors. and administrators; da..es rovenant, grnut, bargain and agree 1ci'anll.wilh the said part jig cif tlic !cents() part, basix; ';:heihn,and nvvigne, That at the tune of the ensealing and delivery of these presents he, is Drell seirerl or the premises above conveyed,n i of gs cl pre, perfect, absolute il defoaliibie:4state'of inheritan i in taw; in fee ,' • simple, and ha good right, full power and lawful sutheri y to pint, bargain, sell and eonviy•the. Fame in Til and form aforesaid, and that the sense are free and Blear from ail former land other 'y 1 grants, bargains, sale, Ileus, taxes, ansesgmentn and incumbrances or whatever kind iar nature !never., i I' �'q"`.i: i iJ+ 4.- i Recorded at._... '.. a ..o'clock. ... M ' .----�-- P-- =#te rn-zior,..,..2 i7 9 t1 he:-Reaorde�r i—. `)5 PCE b • • WARRANTY DEED KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that J. GENTRY of the County tate., L Colorado,_far_the_consideration-of Ten Dollars and 'V Thabre considerations, in hand paid, -hereby- sells and conveys to RIFLE LIVESTOCK, INC., a corporation -duly organized and existing under arfd by virtue of the laws of the State_ of Colorado, the following real property situate in the County of Garfield and -State - of_ Colorado, - to -wit:_ -- PARCEL I: -The NWhSW1/4, S1/2SW1/4 and SWINW1/4 of Section 2; the SEhNE' and the ElISE4 of Sectione3, T. 6 S., R. 93 W. of the 6th P.M., together - with all ditch and water rights appertaining 'to or used in • connection with the above described premises. PARCEL II: The SIINANE1/4, Section 10, T. 6 S., R. 93 W.- of the 6th P.M., tog.ether.with 3/l0ths of a cubic foot of water per second,of time out of and from Priority No. 80 in the decrees of the District Court, connected with the Rifle Creek Canyon Ditch, in Garfield County, Colorado. EXCEPT the following: Beginning at a point on a fence whence the Quarter Corner common'to Sections 9 and 10 bears S.: 55° 35' S0" 183.59 feet;thence N. 86°10'00" E. 99`.64 feet; - _thence_S. 05°10'00"_E. 19.3.46- feet; thence S. 85°50'30"'W. 99.44 feet; thence S. 00°44'24" E. 262,89'feet'to a pointuon•the-Northerly — right-of-way line of a road now existing and in place; thence N. 88°39'19" W. 14.45 feet along the Northerly right-of-way line of said road to a point on said fence; thence N. 00°49'54" W. 455.80 feet along said fence to the, point of beginning. PARCEL III: The NEhNwh of Section 10, T. 6 S., R. 93 W. of the 6th P.M. Together with'all ditch rights and water rights connected with the above land including an undivided interest in and to the Rifle Creek Canyon Ditch No. 5 in Water District No. 39, also 0,8 cubic feet of water per second of time out of Priority No. 80 from Rifle Creek through said ditch, and all of grantor's interest -sir-ana--ter-L b n=Plaste` Vat€r--Ditch--and--water-adjud•ioa-ted thereto and all ditch and.water rights appurtenant to_or used in connection with the aboire_.described_land.— EXCEPT,a parcel of land situated in the NEhNW4 of Sec. 10, T. 6 S., R. 93 W. of ,the 6th P.M. lying_Northerly of -the Northerly right-of-way line of•a county road as constructed and-in'place and Easterly of theEasterly right-of-way line of a county road as constructed and in place, said parcel of land is described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Easterly right-of-way line of said county road whence the 4 corner common to Sections 9 and • 10in said Township and Range bears: S. 40°33'34" W. 2034.96 feet; thence N. 00°38'12" W. 208.71 feet along the Easterly right-of-way line of said County road; thence N. 89°58'32" E. 834.90 feet; thence S. 00°38'12" E. 417.42 feet to a point on the Northerly right-of-way line of said County road; thence' S. 89°58'32" W. .834.90 feet along, the Northerly right-of-way line of said County road; ..thence N.-00°38'.12._208.71_feet_along__the_Easterly right-of-way line of said County road to the Dint of beginning.. - - s � .Together. with .,16/100tha -af a cubic foot. sof water . per second '` time out af` Pri'ority •No=;' • 80 as-ad.judicated: to _ the.,Rifle Creek `Canybn- Ditch-'. 'o: 5; -` together„ with -_a proportiona to right ' through said__ditch •for -the• carriage of..water. - - .1w�C� -EST d LLaL.,tt iot-land---si to t ti_x the- _NEANW of Sec. 10, T. - 5 S., R.' 9,3 .W. ;fai' tWe---6tii:'p.M; a in -Garfield -County,- C:olpraao, , and being more-partieularly described-as`=follows: Beginning -at. _ _ _r . a :point on the • Northerly right-of-way, fence of the -present County -"Road, whence the West'1/2 corner of said Section'10 bears S. 61°12' W. -2769.96 feet; thence _N._..0°-3.9' _.W. 208.71 -feet; thence .N. 89044' E. 208.71 feet--te 'the -Westerly f ric'e►'-_of ari- existing lane; thence S. 0°39' E. along the Westerly fence 'of said lane 208.71 feet to its. intersection with the Northerly fence of said County Road; thence S. 89°44' W.- 208.71 feet along the,Northerly fence of said County Road to the point of beginning, containing 1 acre, more or less. Also, 2/100ths of a cubic foot of water per second of time out of Priority No. 80 as adjudicated to the Rifle Creek Canyon'Ditch No. 5 in Water District No. 39, together with a proportionate right through said ditch for the carriage of the water. PARCEL IV: The SW1/2SE4 and the SE4SW1/2 of Section 3, and the N1/2NW4NE of Section 10, all in T. 6 S., R. 93 W. of the 6t: -P.M.,, together -with=a11-ditch and -water rights belonging to grantor and used min connection with the above3escribed -land-,- including- an -undivided_ _ 5/56 inter&st in and to the Rifle Creek- Canyong Ditch _No._5,.__ in Water District 39 and 1 7/8 cubic feet of water per second of time from Rifle Creek through said ditch out of the priority right. EXCEPT a strip.of land 20 feet wide and 88 rods long, commencing at a stone marked 401 which divides the S1 from the N1 of the NW'NE', Section 10 and running West 20 feet to stone; thence North 88 rods; thence East 20 feet to stone; thence South 88 rods to the place of beginning, all in T. 6 S., R. 93 W. of the 6th P.M. There is excepted from all of the above described property all prior mineral reservations and reservations of rights thereunder which now appear of public record. There is also_ excepted all easements and rights of way which now appear of public record. There is reserved by grantor herein all oil, gas and other minerals not heretofore reserved . . with all its appurtenances, and-warrantthe Effie .66 -the same, - subject to taxes for the year 1974, due and payable in 1975, which -the grantee herein assumes and agrees to pay. Signed and delivered this lath d y of February, 1974. STATE OF COLORADO ° ,;40Y OF p:TaIT �. 1'th ss. GARFIELD J. GENT The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me day of.February, 1974, by J. GENTRY. My commission expires ; C im expires has 1.1974 WITNESS my hand and official seal. Recorded at..._.,C.. t ..o'eI0k Jd JUL 2 1 75 Reception No__.........268559 Recorder. zucf.'1 76 PAGE 497 THIS DEED, Made this 21st day of July , 1975 between RIFLE LIVESTOCK, INC. s corporation duly organized and relating under and by virtue of the Ismael the State of Colorado of the first part, and ROBERT E. PRETTI and DOROTHY G. PRETTI of the County of Garfield and State of Colorado, of the second part: WITNESSETII: That the Bald party of the first part, for and to con- sideration of the sum Ten Dollars and other valuable considerations xxxams, FILING STAMP pr. 22 6(., JUL 21 3975 tet Iatal3EhIUT [IL 4 �. LO It in hand paid by the acid partici of the second part, the receipt whereof Is hereby confessed and ecknowledgrd, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and conflrm unto the 'aid parties of the second part, not in tenancy in common but in joint tenancy, the survivor of than, their assign, and the heirs end assigns of such survivor forever, all the following described lot or parcel of lend, situate, lying and being In the County of Garfield and State of Colorado to wit. The NWI SWC, SI5SW4 and SAHAof Section 2; the SE;NE; and the ELISEh of Section 3, T. 6 S., R. 93 W. of the 6th P.M., together with all ditch and water rights appertaining to or used in connection with the above described premises. TOGETHER with alI and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders. rents, issues and profits thereof; and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and remand whatsoever of the said party of the first part. either In law or equity of, in and to the above bargain premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, unto the said parties of the second part, the survivor of than, their assigns, and the heirs and assigns of such survivor for- ever. And tate said party of the first part, for itself, its successors and assigns, does covenant, grant, bargain and agave to and with the said parties of the second part, the survivor of them, their assigns and the heirs and assigns of such survivor, that at the time of the enaealing and delivery of these presents, it is well seized of the premises above conveyed, as of good, sure, perfect. absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has. good right, full power and lawful authority to grant bargain, sell and couvey the same in manner and form aforesaid, and that the same are Erre and dear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, Lien,, toes, as- seasmenta and enrumbranees of whatever kind or nature soeyer.. and the above bargained premises, In the quiet and peaceable possession of the meld parties of the second part, the survivor of thein, their aaligns and the heirs and asslgna of such survivor, against all and every person or persons lawfully niilming or to claim the whale or any part thereof, the said party ofthe first part shall and will WARRANT Alkl0 YOB INER DEFEND. til, ; •'iT1,�WITi1f• �'S, WHEREOF, The said party of the first part has caused its corporate name to be bereunto sub- ' p ribed +Cyy its •'•, President and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed, attested by its Aii• ix 'ce,a .4 ' S x ct'atary, the day. and year first above written. I_ Se'7 �' /�� f RIFLE LIVESTOCK INC. .2 "STATE OF COLORADO, jus. ..'..3.}a(j. my of_ ... dri,].2lS ._.._... _ 4 The tore ifg instrument was acknowledged before ma thin 21St day of July a,s 75, y■ Robert E. Pretti as President and i; 1 Lt G rC Zr Pretti as Secretary of r e Livestock, Inc. ' b w _ �6 L '� e • My notarial commission. aspires MY COin mea bars 3yroraelon. yw . • f Witness my hand and official aeaL I CIO '" ,. 4e4eaarr tt.alN Nu 9.^9. waakelf r n:3n.—sr.. C..v.r.tr.. le Joist r....t<—a..uera raw..war u... rsr..1 ase.s eu..a ts..+w, 01.1011.4.— t-11 it E Rem -0 ma We ra 2S IVO eirt 544 maC6 TIIIEDrrD, tF.l.th.. 19th W.( October .149. teases. Robert E. Pretti and Dorothy G. Pretti jaw [ •••1 er' Garfield .4 mei* cif Cele,. e. el tie firm pert. eal Horizons Wept. Ltd. a Colorado Limited Parrnarahip .11...ke.1.4kar...e 2090 White Liver Avenue, Rifle, CO 83.650 . rein 0..44 Garfield 61141 Pee I TI: ESSETlr. Tti.. .w./ porde !l i due 11.e p.m 1..r ..d i. r.w...de renew .f a he ... .f Ten Dollars and other good and valuable consideration DOLLAaa. 1. i h....1 pa rtieedt . f.r.e p.m .n h.a p..r by SI. ...d port y of -Liar .....d eeriem e.a.i,q wIsemdi is hare.; r..w rpx.r.i w.d Kt.av L-ia 1, los ve.1.1644. e.i..ard., ..+rt_ .....lel ..f QUIT CLA1lI ED. acrd Yr di.wr ,.r«.t• es mo..e,or. woo. aril owe rel .ad Qt: ITCLAit1 r..1ae M w4 pari y MO* wowed pari„ itaiseife. . ur......e enol ea..er., h..' ea ilrr reit. snit. pate i !Id Owe limo pert M. ve i.. awd to 4i.• Idia.i.e Il.arn W Ino or µ...d .1 eel ...sow. Ird•.i +••d Mines. ib. Ca.wil .l Garfield ..d Mel. C:h.ele.r wet: id1C0R'a #T/•YR 1ia.— rte I5 MO U/Nt Q�f The ENkSWk. StS1114 and SWltNiT}.of Section 2; the SEIATA and the EisSEi of Section 3. T. 6 S.. A. 93 W. of the 6th P.M.,. together with .11 ditch and water right■ appertaining to or used in connection with the above described prtsises e • ewe hereto. a..ireae.ad ..avis TO M A VZ *Jrr. 70 MOLD 166 416 .. 1.,.e her .# h .a ..l ••• a Ser the . p,o. t........wl I he...wa. Wio.fi .4 M Is...g rhe rrv..a ..,p etar:r.e. 0.4 .a 1h. ..t6 r, new. thio, i.s...r.1 ped claim ri.4a.e.rr, r' 1b veil par ii a ad a hr dom. part...4..r r raw re .yw.l. N I V a.ir p.- r ew...weft rad M1eM.d 1•he ..4d parr a %I... m.1 port. it pees eel sew.. M;.+rre- IKri•rTNERS n-nra cor.Th. ..d..rd asrwhe w.4 pan w_ hie /wrote,, art tMier tee/ a sode.wl ■ .dr 1.1 ../ sr+. Toeai.w Lew .-r4.,i ti+Ll �. booed pea Orb.rel r itr M -even. a1 •� Y7 Lt. MEAL! flt� }suis SLAW urLi Ce.+41of GARPIELD STAT[ air rntoa+na, TM 1...wi..t i..1r ra.rM wan .riw.w r obis 1 b dal October w nee. Robert E. Tretti and Dorothy C. Pretti. ry...ri..w.. .spear. Cyt � S' O � !r •J• ip t + �y a er,;t0 ��----- Va SIL Tar 1.1. ee ee • .I. r. •. /L-'3 ii .'Keep.. e.l heed red addb.1...1 .,p T •30' otoot r.fir2• , Pa Tei P14 2es 01 Rer«dwd r � ' . 1 Revenant. N. _ THIS DEED. Made lhob e''�n` day at DecemberA w •-.• �_. brt.,rs HORIZONS WEST. LTD., a Colorado limited partnership, If 80 . 1 1 oft h. Own' of RN r f ie ld and State al C..d. lor., o!the Are pars, and fs TC INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COtIFANy drta aTexas corporation, One Market Plaza, Room 200, San Francisco, California 94105, .isle Olum,af San Francisco and Itat..r GEC 18 IFIn irForn v 1Q a iX'orn a...ndp. oft .rt: WITNESSETH, Tl at the Said part y of the Nat part, roe and In r.rn.idrration of TEN DOLLARS and other good and valuable consideration---- --mama A. the sold pori y of the first part to hand paid by said part y of the .nand part. the receipt whereof to hereby .onfe..ed and acknowledged. hag granted, barg■Lewd. .old and conveyed. .nd b> shear Present • die■ fr1n1. bo,..,n, .ell, "envie and conform, unto the .aid part y of the ..rood pa rt t 5, E.se.4c nd iir�ra fon ever. atl the f.tlowindexrtbed lot a or pains g of land. e.tuate, 1prng and heros in the iCounll or Garfield and St.t. or Colorado, to ern: All of Block A, HORIZONS WEST SUBDIVISION, EXCEPT that portion thereof described in instruments recorded in Book 537 at Page 830, Reception No. 298641 and in Book 559 at Page 298, Reception No. 309070; and All of Blocks B, C, D, and E. all in HORIZONS WEST SUBDIVISION together with the real property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, alae known as street and number vacant land. TOGETHER ..th as and aenguler lh. hered.taments and •ppurtrneners thereto bwlonnng, or In /haywire sipper - [Elmo,. orad the r vera.µ and re..rtioas. cer...,.J., .nd ten ....dere, rents. r .Sart and profet• ther.al, and all the .Hatt. not... 1+40, .Mertes, eleven and drrn.nd . hal....er of the •..d part y of the fret part_ eel her De Is. or equity. .1. in and to the above bargained premises, kith the hexed a.r.rnt. and appue tenoned,.. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the sa.d perm..., .1.0.• b.raa.ned and de.er.brd ante. the apps r teasinres. unto its* sand part y of the .mond part. nrt5//�f�llil gi}�P.t l�. forever And the a,.d party of the first part. for its. err /1 AliNe 4gt�c k drrA admen.rlratore. does covenant, irons, ba'rein. and agree to and wail th. ..id parts, or the...oad part. i ts/ .9F. R LTIftiga, that .i the tome of the eneeahng and dfhvery Others, present a. it is reg seised .1 the prem... .1... eonsryed.. as of gook r u r.. per reel, .btwlule said bdefeasoble eon ate of enherit,r.nr. In law.in fee ..wple,ar.d b. R good right, full parr, and .uth.nty la rant. ba rgnn, tel and r.nrry the erne in manner and born ., aforr,ard, and 1e... the dam. a,e Rey and .I.ar hoe .41 tow mor and other grant.. b.rgain., eaten. kens. t , aaremitdnta and eneumbranees of .h.[r.rr lead .f falw•eawevefr except those matters described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by thi■ references and further provided that party of the first part does not warrant title to the property described on Exhibit A hereto, as4th. Ob.v. bargain.. premi.eal. t Mqu.et lad pear. a bl. poeiw....nof 1 hr .Sed pa.ty *fibs ..reed part, i tilliklEaraFactioa against .11 and ”Try pe rasa 01 pr r.aw. 1400.017 flat. n,m. o r to flails 11.. hole .e any pari ther..f. the tett parr y al the r,,.1 part .hall and watt ■ARRANT AND Mara II DEFEND. IN WITNESS ■'Ht Eor, theaaid port y of Orr fer.t port l• a ber.rnta wet i to bawd -std-rot- ter day .ad yraf Graf slam .,.(t.. oF w C+uatpK,`Fj Om Ise efeng ion...meat was pinorrwterind Ware r tha /.5-'1' 4,,a December 1f i0 .i, Robert E. Pretti and Dorothy 0. Pretti as General Partners* ,dos . witµ,.. y head a....1 .al .eai. STATE elDl.f)RA ;iORIZONS WEST, LTD.. a Colorado Lisetteartn`i r= SSA rJ _B L` Yt,/r"f!!.d-PEAu Robes A. P t , rd! Partner $y2. Ur: SEAL> Dorothy G. PAR;timers' artner wtr..,.r...weapar. // __,. — \r „ , v RY bZ�N 1,0f ORIr WEST, LTD., a Colorado L1 r >t. 14i 1100.1151:41r/ .i [..mss-G•L!� A * d Sm,/µµ. limited partnership. a .ice........, ..., a4.µ.0.,..... c,.+.,. rw+a west -.we. r -a ase _10 : r EXHIBIT A PARCEL As A parcel of land located in the 5W1/4 of the SE1/4, Sec. 3, T. 6 5., R. 93 W. of the 6th P.M., Garfield County, Colorado, being more particularly described as follows' Beginning at the SE Corner of the said SWI/4 of the SE1/4, Section 3/ thence S 89057'53'W. a distance of 60.00 feet/ thence N 00002'07'W a distance of 171,30 feet/ thence along the arc of a curve to the right with a central angle of 42020'05', a radius of 230.00 feet, an arc length of 169.94 feet, and the chord bearing of N 21008'27'E; thence $ 00002'07` E a distance of 329.18 feet to the Point of Beginning. PARCEL Bi A parcel of land located in the WW1/4 of the NE1/4, Section 10, T. 6 S., R. 93 W. of the 6th P.N., Garfield County, Colorado, being more particularly described as follows' Beginning at the NE Corner of said PW1/4 of the NE1/4, Section 3, thence S 00011'47'E, a distance of 1319.41 feet, thence S 89057'53' W a distance of 60.00 feet, thence N 00011'47" W, a distance of 1319.41 feet; thence N 89048'13"E. a distance of 60.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. • rr SU:,,�..n. dr y y�re44 t4 88 N"le?em g4 y • sap EXHIBIT 8 tsex r►ti 168 I. General real property taxes for the year 1980 and subsequent years. 2. Right of way for Rifle Canon Ditch and Raynard Ditch, insofar as the same may affect subject property. 3. Right of way recorded November 28, 1966 in Book 371 at Page 278, Garfield County, Colorado records. 4. Reservation contained in instrument recorded March 9, 1967 in Book 382 at Page 591, Garfield County, Colorado records. 5. Reservation contained in instrument recorded February 13, 1974 in Book 455 at Page 524, Garfield County, Colorado records. 6. Restriction recorded March 5, 1980 in Book 544 at Page 79S, Garfield County, Colorado records. 7. Agreement recorded March 5, 1980 in Book 544 at Page 806. Garfield County, Colorado records, as amended. 8. Deed of Trust recorded March 5, 1980 in Book 544 at Page 812, as amended. Garfield County, Colorado records. 9. Deed of Trust recorded March 5, 1980 in Book 544 at Page 814, as amended. Garfield County, Colorado records. 10. Reservations contained in Patents recorded in Book 12 at Page 544, in Book 56 at Page 551 and in Book 12 at Page 137, Garfield County, Colorado records. 11. Agreement recorded March 5, 1980 in Book 514 at Page 776, Garfield County, Colorado records. 12. Contract recorded March 5, 1980 in Book 514 at Page 790, Garfield County, Colorado records. 13. Raw Water Licence and Lase recorded July 31, 1980 in Book 553 at Page 22, Garfield County. Colorado records. 14. Agreement recorded March 5, 1980 in Book 544 at Page 820, Garfield County. Colorado records. 15. Agreement recorded March 5, 1980 in Book 544 at Page 817, Garfield County, Colorado records. • r.: • teeltedie4 al An fiat llteeritetes Ns. — - - - 9 • 11.11 1880 - -- _ This DEED. NI s44 /.6-f" 1De cember .10 SO ioa.0 HORIZONS WEST, LTD., a Colorado limited partnerehipP 4' the County •1' Garfield •4wi State of Colorado. lar nrot part. wad ERN PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CSt1PANY corporation, '" One Market Plaza, Room 200, San Francisco, California 94105, couitlor San Francisco 1.54 it Ia14 atis_of the oaropfl part rcalizorni. — _- 4',,; ! - wrnInkstrti. mit the ci41 mut y *it 6, rim. part.** ao4 loatoo.o4tooktiolo if ,TEN DOLLARS and Other good and waleabie CondideratiOtv—, -- -- s. kb. fool pool y da 144!,14 Ai per1 I. )6as1 pao414.7 144 pr 1 It * '-' ' 44 the owned part -11w Moil* '•'' , , -, , lwrrhy osaltarse alai arkasaii0414.6011 artaksi.lrareatimar4.1WWWW O-imo.OpOof.00iall 47 ilaioo p4-ormitiffS '-...'e.OT,....„ rant. boreal*. PM oraov;y ami wafts tat. lasts thi base part y at 1 lai *Was/. wail t.144CialitiCar,eg. g W ..r. all the tWirrotair tirorraeord I. . sr parrot • .f lawkial mud., frt.,. 'kiwi briaales E. c....alp se Garfield mow 6, ate of Colorado. to old.. All of Block A, HCiRIZONS NEST SUBDIVISION, EXCEPT that portion thereof described in instruments recorded in Book 537 at n Page 830, Reception No. 298641 and in Book 559 at Page 298, q Reception No. 309070; and All of Blocks 8, C. D, and E. all in HORIZONS WEST SUBDIVISION together with the real property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, . aloe known am strean and nomber vacant land. nx:rnir I .. ri h at! and *Angulo, ti. heredit•ments on1 appurtenance. thereto brelonaprig, or in anyartsr apper, to•nina. and I he re re rm ion and eeeee twang. remainder ara remainder.. rent.. mews and profar tharrot and •U II hs e rtatv. rIghttitle. interest,. Oa". and diroiond whale...re, sr the lewd part y of the firet part. •ither In law mier equity, of. .n and to the eboeir 1011,tr•.111.4 pr0.110-1 S. r.0. 1 I. Ne red Ka riwni , and •ggortenererea TIl HOE 4.D TO 11401.1) the wermt prreniare Ahoy. bargainrd and dieerrtbed wit h the agteurtenareres. unto the said port y of the orrond par._ i teiCaC,dri leFicOm foreiier And IM sera pert y of the first part. for itorfdlqb,,E4cggrIA0 •drninivirltOt., 410,.a. cerement. grant. bargain. and agree to ang snh the said p.rty a 11.4 orvarrod part.it siikraFaC...§§iikRt. that at the urns .4 0.. eneraling and drliorry o f throe tweeente. i t i, well teiserl of the premirree above conveyer', east ave.& more, perfect. stmolots and radrfeaamble rotate gr, Daher -stone., nt law. in fee •imple. and li• s rood 44rot, full pc.... o end awthorrty lar. rTiRt. bar -roma. ore .n.4 osnrop the 11.Pin manner ong farm ma afore.. md, and that 0.. ..nn. •rt free and elms! fro. WI former and other grant.. bargain.. aahre. lama-, Laura $1,144.141,04 M. • a 1, 4 ear wro.b.r•ft-r-2 of shWarar luad of .."..r..” except those matters described in Exhibit 13 attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and further provided that party of the first part does not warrant title , tothe property described on Exhibit A hereto, , --,-,-,---.: ,--- , “;,-,- " ' . ' ' . --,'-',‘,;,,,•-,i7, ,,,,: /. .." ib. 2 h.* '.; II' re-1,14;0avovonisorio fla llio upaioa rood pearraloir powwow hoe alum sail paray -, , .41hw woroaOipall.- :. i1 i t s /1114011141144A aroma* .4 ANA orlon, propior laufalp litaluoing sq Waal= Ow wbolo for sop part F Oboro•-f. thy wad part y with, Groot part &kali awl will WARRANT AND FOIL Vgft DE riff 13- li 1 IN WITNESS WHtli LOY. aloe 144 pull y slip., (Ira part los . loorosautait i t a laaroi P' omooPooralo- . ths dap awl yaw forst sldrov swats. W , A 1 HORIZONS WEST, LTD., a color* 43 a 13y; 014 ,..,3e._ ..lizoi ttp_partries 01 . =Atli i. 0 . IA Rober E. Pretti, _!!!!!! Ny• L---..47 , ... Dorothy G. P tti, Gene al Partner .-. ATATIC OF COLOR* yo. The leer ger low r amoral wow grilmeerwiledered be tare se taro. /w6-7.1'. gqy.r December it80 ,11,7 Robert E. Pretti and Dorothy G. Pretti as General Pertners* M. romm...ktoo•Lo.r.• ' dr/ .2_ — 5 5,1 air% 565 u154 _VI C1151980 A723/-ff- ICAL ERROR IN T LE 8 • T A • ofcliOR22.01M"WEST, LTD., a Colorado limited partnership. „.!• lagassisiderr pbsommillh. ousammied.filMilMeatamt•Illia-.00110/1/Ww—rhte , Wroarai,pri hard orot twat ,210. 7t ZL- ""4"1"1"111"1"1"P""1""""""h• ; AWMPF62”."74WrenV3,117rwr • • rr t74ilIEIT A AL- Iu 585 r:st105 562 Mae, PARCEL At A parcel of land located in the 8111/4 of the REI/4, Sec, 3, T. 6 S., R. 93 W. of the 6th P.M. Garfield County, Colorado, being more particularly described as follows' Beginning at the S1: Corner of the said Sia1/4 of the 581/4, Section 31 thence S 69057'53'1. a distance, of 60.00 feet thence 11 00002'07"W * distance of 174.30- �feek thea ce along the arc of a curve to the right with a central wbgleof. 42°20'05"f,,a radius of 230.00 Leat, art arc length.ot 149.9 feet, ilnd the Chord bearing of M 21008'27"i'} ,/het ;at 0°02*07" E.at df.stanca� of 3x9.18 f41et, to,,•th* PO • Br. Al parcel of land locdted,in the $W1/4' of than NZI./f " 0, T. 5, $. / It; . 93 W. Of .ilii!'; 6th P,M. f Garfield "County, being more particularly deycrlbsd las follows* beginning at the NZ Corner of said 1#w1/4 of the =1/4, Section 11% thence S 00011'47.E, a distance of 1319.41 feet/ thence 5 89057'53' 11 a distance of 60.00 feet; thence N OD011'47' W, a distance of 1319.41 feet/ thence 11 89048'12 E, a distance of 60.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. -w • • ••• *.sea aie.sa‘mabiaeamw, EXHIBIT 8 58.5 PC11.6 8C131 562 fitti68 1. General real property taxes for the year 1980 and subsequent yeare. 2. Right of way for Rifle Canon Ditch and Maynard Ditch, insofar as the same may affect subject property. 3. Right Of way recorded November 28,1945 in 'book 371 at Paga2741, Garfield County, Colorado T.00#181 . - • tion contained in instrument recorded March 5, 1967 at Page 591, Garfield County. Colorado records. 5' 1 itice Contained in instruor ment :1-ecordd rebruary 1I. 1874 in $ "at Page 524, Garfield County. Colorado records. 6. Restriction recorded March 5, 1980 in Book 544 at Page 795,' Garfield County, Colorado records. 7. Agreement recorded March 5, 1980 in Book 544 at Page 806, Garfield County, Colorado records, as amended. 8. Deed of Trust recorded March 1960 in Book 544 at Page 812, as amended, Garfield County, Colorado records. 9. Deed of Trust recorded March 5, 1980 in Book 544 at Page 814, es amended, Garfield County, Colorado records. 10. Reservations contained in Patents recorded in Book 12 at Page 544, in Book 56 at Page 551 and in Book 12 at Page 137, Garfield County, Colorado records. 11. Agreement recorded March 5, 1980 in Book 544 at Page 776, Garfield County, Colorado records. 12. Contract recorded march 5, 1980 in Book 544 at Page 790. Garfield County, Colorado records. 13. Raw water License and Lease recorded July 31, 1980 in Book 553 at Page 22, Garfield County, Colorado records. 14. Agreement recorded March 5, 1980 in Book 544 at Page 820, Garfield County, Colorado records. 15. Agreement recorded Marcia 5,,1980 in Weak 544 at Garfield COunty, Colorado recoide. - • • • smeedo4.$ e•d.( _ _ i[ft 1 5 I 552 iw„,,.. fl. M Oa`� _ ! .1 5M X1107 Taus IlMiD. Nei, IOW !04Ir/ der or Deco *r IISo .brtlea.s SOl1THRRN eACIrxr INDUSTRIAL DEVEI.OPMEWT COMPANY. • mrprrsb.a d lr ae/m*ltd.d ssktl.e reader arab? Omer of tin Iew. attbr Stale 'fiex..al t w feat pert. are I »N x. COCO IRREVOCAnLE TRUST elms* heat Malmo l. ea Republic Mations). Della*, P. Or siox 325961. Dallas, Tapia, I 75265 dthe rel I ..d8ras.i�CdiAei riFdr.s.vr.dp,at': Wrriti.AUT1.That lie sa4port, dthe first Mart, raw ori In sv..riiiertirr.ais6.senior TEN DOLLARS. and. other. good and valuable cDnaideratiOD---- . m the raid w►tr .4 b 4 brae pert. t■ hued i .aid seta y ' • r it ti .o.wmid port the meta* • h.1.br reOtarard aw4 lrb•li+wd'rli'i. her �l.aa.d. llrreir.i. Iola amid Mir ;eyed awl ire them at .a,`.ta M te.rwl• iO4 **ohm ..to tie arid party t . .f h. steed fart its E ferrr.r..0 the itaeata d.serib.d ! r pm•nla d ia.a..kr.... Wei sial Wimp lo Ib. C.eaey er Garfield .d*t.i.dtwlme4s 16 wit ▪ See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this refearonce. and DEC fe 196Q -. e WW1" u See Exhibit b attached hereto and incorporated herein by a this reference, n ti •g a'Z alto i.aes as stroll a.4 wombat vacant 1 and. 7-1 Tepitber with el end etee.irr the bored.saarom fed rppwr4sesese therfluste Wearer. et Is .alrhre .R..' Wolof. tad the 'revise* a.4 reerneena, re masker and remainders. recta.. lomat amid warns tbsre.i:.mi ea OM velem, r..ht. till,. liner.'. rl.im mead demand whatsoever. et the arid party .f the fSrst port. either Is Isle of * fleury d. Ya ■.d t. th. ob., htrfaiaed pressers. writ h the hereditesents amid swarm naneett TO HAVE AND TO NOM the said meow •b her tr.resrned amid dre'ribrd with the .ppwrt..ae.as.. Ewa KessE is 14. G000 r I RREVOCA5L U T. the 4'14 part y .f NU seo.rip.rt. t its 3 i ...'.«m. And tb. .aid p.m et tba Orel part for itself end - teeteeeare mv..a.ta tad aeries ta ad with No mai a ceagods b. ty 8 part y et the west Pert. its A mtins aid asses. the t.en.�rkew •ki..it. .1 tm%.,Med peataabif p..e..ei re of Ire sold Party of Its .creel Part... it it i aid F. puren or perr.wa Weil Mr ristmlai or iodate, tbaf what, or asp part tb.r..4 br, Wallet or end' ibe ..M tartar et Ile Not pv},,y.WAXMAN',AND P'011EVLSDEPT Nrh eXttept subject t0 liens of record. IN n li la'lymoti7Dr. The mid part, el the Hatt pert it aatwd iY—,.-. ,. lobe ir.wslr..bsriad b! ii. ' ,. r' - if c.6 hyoid's. mass areas* t by1 54 7illAhetrrtsrRtir•lafaaiyam fist saw* wines,. A71.� '. .y ' • • 111 :aa W • . ja aig111 SOURoEam PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPIr i "' •x ..•,,; ,i/MIT COMPANY. a Penes coroorat/Os raisers/ a+ 1.7_'L % .te�l.� �r �b rpm t `Nr ML ieuv rGt' ''''''''';;;#1'S rr��A ri Cosset, et sad] redder f SIL The I.r wsirr.laetewte.ar wen aeh.e ti ised Wee* .re Elia 411. as -J"••••1 -,r leo COfWANY. a Texas corporation. bey semmeases empire* w. t rsr. 1119 WITNIBS mer hard 1.4 .flk1. ...L j.v.l. r W. war pg Di .-. iuc C64.1$ 01661.1,4 ri tr�r w:�w+ale L t.�..•.r[ Ra ' .e t�.arr.rami..- lees -atm a •.: 447 of December_ urea i dent. and C .► eietsromemV00 . -te. s Wass Pella 10144 did, *seer** e.uaen 141.0•-cr..�.e.�.a..r.+1171"rr.e4.. mise*....-i......ar..rrwarrts-1111. Li 11 _• e,-•,w�!FiYitic+.i�JivLsc+;'.. +esw.etiw � • • Vann A 'Oa ,5G2 Mei avg 585 ton108 All of 3IOCJI i4 '11ORilO?$,WEST.5U0p11/25 ON, EXCEi that ,portion thereof described IA' in$trU3 fts recorded iri Book 537 at Pace $3D■ Reception -Mo. 291641 and in gook 559 at Page 291, Pe c+pk 4A NO -:-.309076 end 13" • r•r.r... • EXHIBIT 0 ,nr"TlePPIPMMT BO% ,G12 7/078 tir?It 58.5 rfet1O9 PARCEL A; A parcel of land located in the SW1/4 of the SE1/4, Sec. 3, T. 6 S., R. 93 w. of the 6th P.M., Garfield County, - Colorado, being more particularly described as follow Beginning at the SE Corner of the said SW1/4 of the SE1/4, Section 3; thence 5 09057'53"W. a distance of 60.00 feet; thahce N 00002'07sW a distance of 174.30 feet; thence alow,„— the arc of a curve to the right with a central angle of W.057,1 radius of 230.00 feet, an arc length of 169.94 6604411eiringiof-N 21006'27"E; thence , t.ancokV.ip (tat to t3; .!n' of !indlocated An the WO114 of the: 1-4;',.of the 6th P.g.i4ekfieldsttbun Merida, being mo -fe've'r icelarly,lieecribeo as ..,:f—Beginninc at the NE Corner of said 041/4 of the Nr1.441 Section a, thence S 00011.47•E, a distance of 1319.41 ferii thence 5 /3905.7'53 W a distance of 60.00 feet; thence N 00011.'47' W, a distance of 1319.41 feet; thence N 89.0411'13'21 a distance of 60.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. • • • r "wfrrerfr,rm-,,,,,,,Terttrempprmiorrerraertrertyysegover .41131WWWWMP.114TIZIPL.000..1..11...1,Prol. • KENNFmli M. GOOD IfRRVOCAPLF TRUST whose addresa is 410 .17th Street, Suite 1 RR+., Denver, Colorado R0202 City and County of Denver , and State of Colorado , for the consideration ofTEN DOLLAR. and other good and valuable consideration Aollemsr, in hand paid. hereby sell(s) and convey(s) to GOOD/COLORADO , LTD . , a Colorado 1. invited partnership, whose le al rrddrrsi. is 5500 lust Yale Avenue, Suite 3nfl, v . LA Ly .1itIa ._..r Denver, Colorado R0222 Denver . and State of Colorado -' the frllowing real property in the,: County of. Garfield SFE EXI'Ik IT A ATTACHED HERETO ;-.ND INCORPORATED IIRREIN BY Tl -IIS ;'.;_•FERENCE; GA RFIELD JUL 2 3 1982 State Doc. Foo $ also known as wtrr►*t and number vacant !and, M1 with all its appurtenances and warrant(s) the title against an persons claiming underXsax),sna't. it, except subject to those matters set forth on Exhibit: R attached hereto and incorporated herein by /this reference. Signed and delivered441 ( ,H .f -t" -day of fit.-% in the presence or STATE (1P COLORADO, ty and County of Denver ,l9 82 . ,.KE:NNErTFt ; +WflI . IRR 'V"'QC,.I1BIr,E [$EAL] TRUE I3Y.:._..1L,: r � ''".r _ �f ✓ ,.. SEAL) Brownstein, Trustee ,4SEAL] Norman j V A 4 li. r.f PARCEL 9 cont inuc, : PARCEL 10: A tract of land lying in the SEr of Section 36, Township 5 South, Range 93 West of the 6th P.M., and in the SW1 of Section 31, Township 5 South, Range 92 West or the 6th P.M., and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the West quarter corner of Section 31, Township 5 South, Range 92 West of the 5th P.M.; thence N. 89°54'41" E. 620.74 feet; thence S. 4°56'26" W. 1789.93 feet; thence S. 90°00'00" W. 425.06 feet; thence S. 89°30'00" W. 123.00 feet; thence S. 89°20'00" W. 34?.23 feet to a point of the easterly right of way line of Colorado State Highway No. 13; thence N. 0°02'00" E. 1448.10 feet along said right of way line; thence N. R9044'44' E. 422.79 feet to a point on the Wet line of said Section 31; thence N. 0°00'.;5" E. 337.40 feet along said West section line to the point of beginning. thence S. 89°50' W. along said right of way line, 1424.1 feet; thence N. 0°04' W. 185 feet; thence N. 22°30' E. 245 feet; thence N. 14°47' W. 345 feet; thence N. 0°04' W. 949.3 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPT that portion of subject property described in Book 26 at Page 555, as reception No. 14329. PARCEL 11: All of Block A EXCEPT that portion thereof described in instruments recorded in Book 537 at Page 830, Reception No. 298641 and in Book 559 at Page 298, Reception No. 309070. ALL OF BLOCK B, C, D, & E HORIZONS WEST SUBDIVISION a EXHIBIT A- Page 5 •,••• r srr nat:..c.r Reeurdad at 1 . 2O **clock C g JANO 7 1985 Racaption Na, .1.18524G.G i�it! der.. 662 p! 4L ! 80111. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That GOOD/COLORADO, LTD., a Colorado limited partnership, of the City and County of Denver , and State of Colorado, for the consideration of TEN DOLLARS and other good and valuable consideration - - in hand paid, hereby selesand convey/to KENNETH M. GOOD IRREVOCABLE TRUST whose legal address is c/o Norman Brownstein, 410 17th Street, Suite 2222, Denver, Colorado 80202, of the City and County of Denver , and the State of Colorado, the following real property, situate in the County of Garfield and State of Colorado, to wit: See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, with all its appurtenances. also known as street and number Signed and delivered this 3 In the presence of N/A STATE OF COLORADO, County of day of December ,19 84 i GARFIELD JAN 0 7 1985 Stats Doc. Fo oT SEE ATTACHED PAGE FOR SIGNATURES ISEAL] AND N°TARSES [SEAL] ISEAL] The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 39 ,by My commission expires 19 Witness my hand andofficial seal. Seim,rr pix_ No, 991. •AaGAIN AN'OSA t.0 DEED.-494als[.ry P.m—B.Mlltd PS lrhlna C...+a:•u raA.r_. 946441.4.+1.1. .a:/ 4 —I..I 31C104Na • • • SIGNATURE AND NOTARY PAGE TO BARGAIN AND SALE DEED FROM GOOD/COLORADO, LTD. TO KENNETH M. GOOD IRREVOCABLE TRUST STATE OF COLORADO CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER s s 42S GOOD/COLORADO, LTD., a Colorado limited partnership By: THE GOOD PARTNERSHIP, a Colorado limited partnership, a General Partner By: Ke M. M. 4aod, General Partner, by James S. Mandel, his attorney-in- fact By: GOOD/COLORADO INVESTMENT CORP., a Colorado corporation, a General Partner } } ss. } Ay" .#.40,...."•°' -- By: Kenn- h M. Good, President, by James S. Mandel, his attorney-in- fact The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me, the City and County of Denver, State of Colorado, this — day of December, 1984, by James 5. Mandel as attorney-in-fact for Kenneth M. Good, General Partner of THE GOOD PARTNERSHIP, a Colorado limited partnership, a General Partner of GOOD/COLO- RADO, LTD., a Colorado limited partnership, and by James S. Mandel as attorney-in-fact for Kenneth M. Good, President of GOOD/COLORADO INVESTMENT CORP., a Colorado corporation, a Gen- eral Partner of GOOD/COLORADO, LTD., a Colorado limited part- nership. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Cam,n!ssfon Fxvir s April 77, 1564 E Yala aye.. SUN %t7 Drover. Colorado b_ My commission expires: My address is: Z4 Notary • • • SIGNATURE AND NOTARY PAGE TO BARGAIN AND SALE DEED FROM GOOD/COLORADO, LTD. TO KENNETH M. GOOD IRREVOCABLE TRUST STATE OF COLORADO BflI!X S62 ?42S GOOD/COLORADO, LTD., a Colorado limited partnership CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER } } By: THE GOOD PARTNERSHIP, a Colorado limited partnership, a General Partner By: l Ke h M. flood, General Partner, by James S. Mandel, his attorney-in- fact By: GOOD/COLORADO INVESTMENT CORP., a Colorado corporation, a General Partner SS.. By: Kenn - h M. Good, ; President, by James S. Mandel, his attorney-in- fact The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me, i the City and County of Denver, State of Colorado, this day of December, 1984, by James S. Mandel as attorney-in=fact for Kenneth M. Good, General Partner of THE GOOD PARTNERSHIP, a Colorado limited partnership, a General Partner of GOOD/COLO- RADO, LTD., a Colorado limited partnership, and by James S. Mandel as attorney-in-fact for Kenneth M. Good, President of GOOD/COLORADO INVESTMENT CORP., a Colorado corporation, a Gen- eral Partner of GOOD/COLORADO, LTD., a Colorado limited part- nership. WITNESS my hand and official seal. P:ll Commission From April V. 1985 �IXI E. Yale Ave.. SUfld ZA1 Denver. Cotorauu Lely My commission expires: My address is: Notary 'u 1i olo EXHIBIT A PARCEL 1 BR% 6.6.2 i)!GE429 Tract 10 as shown on Plat 1 of the Antlers Orchard Development Company 'as Reception No. 37488 and the 5E 0E1 Section 2, Township 6 South Range 93 West of the 6th P.M., Garfield County, Colorado Excepting therefrom those portions conveyed by documents recorded October 27, 1980 in Book 558 at page 604 as Document No. 308735 and recorded October 20, 1983 in Book 637 at page 551 as Reception No. 346740. TOGETHER WITH all improvements thereon, and together with all water and water rights, ditch and ditch rights, reservoirs and reservoir rights appurtenant to the above-described real property, including, but not limited to, all appurtenant Silt Project water rights appurtenant to the above- described real property, and together with all minerals and mineral rights in, on, and under the above-described real property, easements and rights of Way appurtenant thereto, and other property rights which are situate on, under, or appurtenant to the above-described real property and/or owned or used by party of the first part in connection therewith. PARCEL 2a; A parcel of land situated in the E3SEi of Section 31, Township 5 South, Range 92 West of the Sixth P.M., Garfield County, Colorado, being more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of said Section 31, being 5. 00°19'31" E. 504.00 feet from a stone properly marked for the East Quarter Corner of said Section 31; thence from said point of beginning S. 00°19'31" E. 1257.51 feet along the Easterly line of said Section 31; thence 5. 89°58'33" W. 1234.51 feet to a point 100.00 feet Easterly of the West line of said E}SE1; thence N. 00°00'34" W. 439.92 feet; thence N. 05°39'02" E. 545.47 feet; thence N. 10°49'07" W. 277.88 feet; thence N. 89°53'30" E. along a line parallel to the Northerly line of said ESE* 1225.90 feet to the point Of beginning. Continued . . . • • MK 662 a!t 4 O PARCEL 2b: A parcel of land situated in the Will of Section 31, Township 5 South, Range 92 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado, lying Westerly of a fence line as now constructed and in place, said parcel of land is more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North-South Centerline of said Section 31 being N. 00°18'26" E. 302.03 feet from a stone properly marked for the South Quarter Corner of said Section 31; thence from said point of beginning N. 00°18'26" E. 2334.39 feet to an iron pipe with an aluminum cap properly marked for the center of said Section 31; thence continuing N. 00°18'26" E. 447.19 feet; thence East 341.00 feet to a point Easterly of the Raynard Ditch; thence S. 14°24'32" E. 63.96 feet to a point in said fence; thence along said fence line as now constructed and in place the following six courses: 5. 11°38'24" E. 263.02 feet; thence S. 19°27'50" E. 117.35 feet; thence S. 87°26'58" E. 248.07 feet; thence 5. 18°10'06" E. 12.16 feet; thence S. 84°47'39" E. 82.30 feet; thence 5. 06°17'06" E. 254.50 feet (through an old fenced corral); thence along said fence line the following ten courses: S. 32°56'40" W. 101.64 feet; thence S. 43°12'24" W. 211.24 feet; thence S. 33°39'16" W. 84.47 feet; thence 5. 00°25'03" E. 407.22 feet; thence 5. 07°07'36" E. 329.00 feet; thence S. 20°15'26" W. 290.78 feet; thence S. 05°33'15" W. 468.16 feet; thence S. 82°39'54" W. 64.03 feet; thence 5. 32°39'39" W. 92.74 feet; thence S. 00°16'21" W. 200.17 feet; thence leaving said fence line N. 89°58'57" W. 362.01 feet to the point of beginning. TOGETHER WITH any and all minerals and mineral rights, oil and gas and oil and gas rights, crops, rights of way, easements, improvements, structures, and other property rights appurtenant to the above-described Parcels 2a and 2b and/or owned or used by the party of the first part in connection with the above- described Parcels 2a and 2b, and together with any and all water and water rights, whether adjudicated or not, including, without limitation, subterranean water and water rights, surface water, tributary water, wells, well rights, well permits, storage rights, ditch and ditch rights, reservoir and reservoir rights and water and ditch company stock appurtenant to said Parcels 2a and 2b, including, but not limited to, Raynard Ditch First Enlargement No. 119 in an amount of one-half of that certain one (1) cubic foot of water per second of time, as decreed in Case No. W-2829, Water Division No. 5, State of Colorado, April 26, 1976. PARCEL 3 Township 5 South, Range 92 West of the 6th P.M., Garfield County, Colorado: Section 31: EISWi; Lots 3 and 4 EXCEPT that portion conveyed to Coulter by Deed recorded in Book 273 at page 606. Continued . . EXHIBIT A - Page 2 • • • L1'nx 6G2 ! a431 PARCEL 4 Township 6 South, Range 93 West of the 6th P.M. Garfield County, Colorado: Section 3: A part of Lots 3 and 4 described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Section 3; thence East, along the North line of said Section, 1994 feet; thence 5. 26°45' W. 592.7 feet; thence N. 83"06' W. 120 feet; thence S. 8'49' W. 1186.5 feet to a point on the North right of way line of the County road; thence S. 89°50' W. along said right of way line, 1424.1 feet; thence N. 0°04' W. 185 feet; thence N. 22°30' E. 245 feet; thence N. 14°47' W. 345 feet; thence N. 0004' W. 949.3 feet to the point of'beginning. EXCEPT that portion of subject property described in Book 26 at page 555, as Reception No. 14329. TOGETHER WITH any and all minerals and mineral rights, oil and gas and oil and gas rights, crops, rights of way, easements, improvements, structures, and other property rights appurtenant to the above-described Parcels 3 and 4 and/or owned or used by the party of the first part in connection with the above-described Parcels 3 and 4, and together with any and all water and water rights, whether adjudicated or not, including, without limitation, subterranean water and water rights, surface water, tributary water, wells, well rights, well permits, storage rights, ditch and ditch rights, reservoir and reservoir rights and water and ditch company stack appurtenant to such Parcels 3 and 4, including, but not limited to, all right, interest, and entitlement of party of the first part in and to the Hubbard Ditch, the Wisdom Ditch, and the Raynard Ditch, and the water rights adjudicated thereto, including, without limitation, 1.9 cubic feet per second from Priority No. 7 in said Wisdom Ditch and Priorities Nos. 107 and 119 in said Raynard Ditch, all in Water District No. 39. Party of the first part does not warrant title to the water rights conveyed hereby. PARCEL 5 All that portion of Lot 1, Section 4, Township 6 South, Range 93 West of the 6th P.M., lying Easterly of the main public road as in place and used on April 1, 1912 and Northerly of County Road No. 291. Garfield County, Colorado. TOGETHER WITH any and all minerals and mineral rights, oil and gas and oil and gas rights, crops, rights of way, easements, improvements, structures, and other property rights appurtenant to the above-described Parcel 5 and/or owned or used by the party of the first part in connection with the above-described Parcel 5, and together with any and all water and water rights, whether adjudicated or not, including, without limitation, subterranean water and water rights, surface water, tributary water, wells, well rights, well permits, storage rights, ditch and ditch rights. reservoir and reservoir rights and water and ditch company stock appurtenant to said Parcel 5 and owned andior used by party of the first part In connection therewith, Continued . . EXHIBIT A - Page 3 • 8E11( 662 nr,E432 PARCEL 6 A part of the SWINW1, and a part of the NWISWI of Section 2, and a part of the SEINE} of Section 3, Township 6 South, Range 93 West of the 6th P.M., County of Garfield, State of Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the NE corner of the SW;NW} of said Section 2; thence S. 00003'25" E. along the East line of said SWINWI, and along the East line of said NW#SW}, a distance of 1626.89 feet; thence S. 89°50'21" W. parallel with the South line of the NW} of said Section 2, a distance of 1319.40 feet to a point on the West line of said NW15WI; thence N.00002'41" W. along said West line, a distance of 305.27 feet to the El corner of said Section 3; thence continuing N. 00002'41" W. along the West line of said NWI, a distance of 205.12 feet; thence N. 89°57'56" W., parallel with the North line of the SEINEI of said Section 3, a distance of 565.80 feet; thence N. 00°02'41" W., parallel with the East line of the NEI of said Section 3, a distance of 1085.67 feet; thence N. 89°57'56" W., parallel with said North line, a distance of 50.00 feet; thence N. 00°02'41" E., parallel with said East line, a distance of 30.00 feet to a point on said North line; thence_S. 89°57'56" E., along said North line of the SEINEI, a distance of 615.79 feet to the NE corner of said SEINE}; thence N. 89050'48" E., along the North line of the SWINW1 of said Section 2. a distance of 1319.06 feet to the Point of beginning, being a portion of Horizons West Subdivision PARCEL 7 The Southwest one-quarter of the Northwest one-quarter (SWI/4NW1/4) and the North one-half of the Northwest one- quarter of the Southwest one-quarter (N1/2NW1/4SW1/4) of Section 32, Township 5 South, Range 92 West of the 6th P.M., Garfield County, Colorado, TOGETHER WITH an allotment equal to the number of acre-feet of project irrigation water as granted January 1.5, 1964, through a petition and order issued by the Silt Water Conservancy District, said petition and.order being recorded on March 25, 1964, in Book 356 at pages 586 and 589, Garfield County, Colorado, records, belonging to, used upon or in connection with, any of the lands described as above, as such allotment shall be determined by the Silt WaterConservancy DiistrIct. Party of the first part does not warrant title to the water rigts conveyed nereoy. Continued . . EXHIBIT A - Page 4 PARCEL 8 Roix 66.2 mr€433 A parcel of land lying in.Sections 19, 20, 29, 30, 31 and 32 of Township 5 South, Range 92 West of the 6th Principal Meridian and in Sections 2 and 3 of Township 6 South, Range 93 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado and being more par- ticularly described as follows: TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 93 WEST: Section 1 -- NW1/4SW; Section 2 -- Lot 2, Lot 3, Lot 4, SE4NW4, SW NE4, NE45W4, NW1/4SE1/4; Section 3 -- Lot 1. TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 92 WEST: ..Section 32 -- SW4, S1/4NW4, NW4NW4. Section 31 -- The South two --thirds of the SE4SE4. Section 30 -- ESE', YS�W+ NES. •Section 29 -- W1/4W1/4, NE 4NW 4, N1/4NE1/4. Section 20 -- WASE 4. Together with a parcel of land tying in Section 19 and Section 20, T 5 5, R 92 W being described as follows: Beginning at the Center 4 of said Section 20; thence N 88°47'58" W. 123.45 feet along the north line of the 5W4 of Section 20; thence S 0°28'23" W. 660.73 feet to a point on the southerly right of way line of County Road No. 251; thence along said right of way line the following seventeen courses; along a curve to the left having a central angle of 30°27'52", a radius of 570.00 feet, an arc length of 303.07 feet and of which the - chord bears S 64°28'56" W. 299.5J.)feet; thence S 49°15'00" W. 99.93 feet; thence along a curve to the left having a central angle of 5°21'00" a radius of 3570.00 feet, an arc length of 333.35 feet and of which the chord bears S 46°34'30" W. 333.23 feet; thence 5 43°54'00" W. 149.71 feet; thence along a curve to the right having a central angle of 30°18100" a radius of 970.00 feet an arc length of 512.97 feet and of which the chord bears S 59°03'00" W. 507.01 feet; thence 5 74°12'00" W. 1611.34 feet; thence along a curve to the left having a central angle of 23°46'00" a radius of 200.00 feet; an arc length of 82.96 feet and of which the _chord bears 5 62°19'00" W. 82.37 feet; thence along a curve to the right having a central angle of 14°06'00" a radius of 826.55 feet, an arc length of 203.41 feet and of which the chord bears 5 57°29'00" W. 202.89 feet; thence along a curve to the left having a central angle of 14°24'00", a radius of 675.46 feet, an arc length of 169.76 feet and of which the chord bears S 57°20'00" W. 169.32 feet; thence S 50°08'00" W. 64.72 feet; thence along a curve to the right having a central angle of 48°24'00", a radius of 270.00 feet, an arc length of 228.08 feet and of which the chord bears S 74°20'00" W. 221.36 feet; thence along a curve to the left having a central angle of 8°08'00", a radius of 1356.57 feet, an arc length of 192.57 feet and of which the chord bears N 85°32'00" W. 192.41 feet; thence along a curve to the left having a central angle of 25°21'00" a radius of 170.04 feet, an arc length of 75.23 feet and of which the chord bears S 77°43'30" W. 74.62 feet; thence 5 65°03'00" W. 33.53 feet; Continued . E7CHIBIT A - 'age 5 • PARCEL 8 (Continued) n3 662 mE 434 thence along a curve to the right having a central angle of 42°43'00" a radius of 190.00 feet, an arc length of 141.65• feet and of which the chord bears S 86°24'30" W. 138.40 feet; thence N 72014'00" W. 78.58 feet; thence along a curve to the left having a central'angle of 33041'10", a radius of 100.00' feet, an arc length of 58.79 feet and of which the - chord bears N 89004'35" W. 57.95 feet; thence S 0°05'29" W. 382.56 feet along the west line of the 5E1/45E4 of Section 19 to the Southwest corner of said SESE; thence S 89°33'39" E. 4000.32 feet along the south line of Section 19 and Section 20 to the Southeast corner of the SE4SW4 of Section 20; thence N 0°28'23" E. 2640.88 feet along the east line of the SWC of Section 20 to the point of beginning. EXCEPT that parcel deeded to the Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company in Book 476 at Page 190 of the records of Garfield County, Colorado, being described as follows: Beginning at a point from which the SE corner of Section 30, Township 5 South, Range 92 West of the 6th P. M. bears S 24017'36" E. 1869.09 feet; thence N 62°00'00" W. 129.61 feet; thence N 28°00'00" E. 336.09• feet; thence 5 62000100" E. 129.61 feet; thence S 28°00'00" W. 336.09 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPT, FURTHER, from the foregoing legal description the SW:NW: and the NIINW.SW; of Section 32, Township 5 South, Range 92 West of the 6th P. . ALSO EXCEPTING A triangular tract of land situated Southeasterly of the Cactus Valley Ditch and bounded on the East by the NESE; of Section 2 and on the South by Garfield County Road No. 210, Section 2, Township 6 South, Range 93 West of the' 6th P.M. TOGETHER WITH an allotment equal to the number of acre-feet of project irrigation water as granted January 14, 1964, through a petition and order issued by the Silt Water Conservancy District, said petition and order being recorded on *larch 25, 1964, in Book 356 at Pagea 586 and 589, Garfield County Records, belonging to, used upon or in connec- tion with any of the lands described in Parcel 8, as such allotment shall be determined by the Silt Water Conservancy District. EXHIBIT A - Page 6 • • • EXHIBIT A PARCEL 1 Nu 6 re>A436 Tract 10 as shown on Plat 1 of the Antlers Orchard Development Company `as Reception No. 37488 and the SE#NE1 Section 2, Township 6 South Range 93 West of the 6th P.M., Garfield County, Colorado Excepting therefrom those portions conveyed by documents recorded October 27, 1980 in Book 558 at page 604 as Document No. 308735 and recorded October 20, 1983 in Book 637 at page 551 as Reception No. 346740. TOGETHER WITH all improvements thereon, and together with all water and water rights, ditch and ditch rights, reservoirs and reservoir rights appurtenant to the above-described real property, including; but not limited to, all appurtenant Silt Project water rights appurtenant to the above- described real property, and together with all minerals and mineral rights in, on, and under the above-described real property, easements and rights of way appurtenant thereto, and other property rights which are situate on, under, or appurtenant to the above-described real property and/or owned or used by party of the first part in connection therewith. PARCEL 2a: A parcel of land situated in the E}SE# of Section 31, Township 5 South. Range 92 West of the Sixth P.M.', Garfield County, Colorado, being more fully described as follows. Beginning at a point on the East line of said Section 31. being S. 00°19'31" E. 504.00 feet from a stone properly marked for the East Quarter Corner of said Section 31; thence from said point of beginning S. 00°19''31" E. 1257.51 feet along the Easterly line of said Section 31; thence 5. 89°58'33" W. 1234.51 feet to a point 100.00 feet Easterly of the West line of said E}SE1; • thence N. 00°00'34" W_ 439.92 feet; thence N. 05°39'02". E. 545.47 feet; thence N. 10°49'07" W. 27.7.88 feet; thence N. 89°53'30" E. along a line parallel to the Northerly line of said EISEI 1225.90 feet to the paint of beginning. Continued . . . • eon 60(1X GG2 ncE43S PARCEL 4 Township 6 South, Range 93 West of the 6th P.M. Garfield County, Colorado: Section 3: A part of Lots 3 and 4 described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Section 3; thence East, along the North line of said Section, 1994 feet; thence S. 26°45° W. 592.7 feet; thence N. 83°06' W. 120 feet; thence S. 8°49' W. 1186.5 feet to a point an the North right of way line of the County road; thence S. 89°50' W. along said right of way line, 1424.1 feet; thence N. 0°04' W. 185 feet; thence N. 22°30' E. 245 feet; thence N. 14°47' W. 345 feet; thence N. 0'04' W. 949.3 feet to the point of•beginning. EXCEPT that portion of subject property described in Book 26 at page 555. as Reception No. 14329. TOGETHER WITH any and all minerals and mineral rights, oil and gas and oil and gas rights, crops, rights of way, easements, improvements, structures, and other property rights appurtenant to the above-described Parcels 3 and 4 and/or owned or used by the party of the first part in connection with the above-described Parcels 3 and 4, and together with any and all water and water rights, whether adjudicated or not, including, without limitation, subterranean water and water rights, surface water, tributary water, wells, well rights, well permits, storage rights, ditch and ditch rights, reservoir and reservoir rights and water and ditch company stock appurtenant to such Parcels 3 and 4, including, but not. limited to, all right, interest, and entitlement of party of the first part in and to the Hubbard Ditch, the Wisdom Ditch, and the Raynard Ditch, and the water rights adjudicated thereto, including, without limitation, 1.9 cubic feet per second from Priority No. 7 in said Wisdom Ditch and Priorities Nos. 107 and 119 in said Raynard Ditch, all in Water District No. 39. Party of the first part does not warrant title to the water rights conveyed hereby. 1... - PARCEL 57. All that portion of Lot 1, Section 4, Township 6 South, Range 93 West of the 6th P.M., lying Easterly of the main public road as in place and_ used on April 1, 1912 and Northerly of County Road No. 291. Garfield County, Colorado. TOGETHER WITH any and all minerals and mineral rights, o11 and gas and oil and gas rights, crops, rights of way, easements, improvements, structures, and oshax_.property rights appurtenant to. the above-described Parcel 5 and/or owned or used by the party of the first part in connection with the above-described Parcel 5, and together with any and all water and water rights, whether adjudicated or not, including, Without limitation, subterranean water and water rights, surface water, tributary water, wells, well rights, well permits, storage rights, ditch and ditch rights, reservoir and reservoir rights and water and ditch company stock appurtenant to said Parcel 5 and owned and/or used by party of the first part in connection therewith. Continued . . EXHIBIT A - Page 3 • • • PARCEL 6 tor 662 PaGE439 A part of the SWINWI, and a part of the NWISWI of Section 2, and a part of the SEINE$ of Section 3, Township 6 South, Range 93 West of the 6th P.M., County of Garfield, State of Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: • Beginning at the NE corner of the 'SWINWI of said Section 2; thence S. 00°03'25" E. along the East line of said SWINWI, and along the East line of said NWISWI, a distance of 1626.89 feet; thence S. 89°50'21" W. parallel with the South line of the NWI of said Section 2, a distance of 1319.40 feet to a point on the West line of said NWI5WI; thence N.00°02'41" W. along said West line, a distance of 306.27 feet to the EI corner of said Section 3; thence continuing N. 00°02'41'" W. along the West line of said NWI, a distance of 205.12 feet; thence N. 89°57'56" W., parallel with the North line of the SEINE* of said Section 3, a distance of 565.80 feet: thence N. 00°02'41" W., parallel with the East line of the NEI of said Section 3. a distance of 1085.67 feet; thence N. 89057'56" W., parallel with said North line, a distance of 50.00 feet; thence N. 00'02'41" E., parallel with said East line, a distance of 30.00 feet to a point on said North line; thence S. 89°57'56" E., along said North line of the SEINE*, a distance of 615,79 feet to the NE corner of said SEINE*; thence H. 89°50'48" E., along the North line of the SWINWI of said Section 2, a distance of 1319.06 feet to the Point of beginning, being a portion of Horizons West Subdivision EXHIBIT A — Pn e 4 "4- )?ecordpti all - 3581494?„9 Rvet ption No KNOW AI.I, MEN BY THESE PRESENTS. ThatIc ofthe City ,-i County Denver , and State of Colorado, for the consideration of Five liundrec. lousand Dollars ($500,000.00) di - Dditalit; , in hand paid, hereby sell and convey to AL BLI174 JAW' 0 7 19 RS ecorder 11111104 MFgalita* • BON G1 TO 4 3 KENNETH M. coon IRREVOCABLETRUST whose legal address is 4155 East Jewell. #1510, Deriver, Colorado 80222 state D orthe Ciry and Countynf Denver , and the State of Colorado, $ t he following real property, ',FT ituatn in the County of Garfield and State o CialoradO, to wit: Sie rt./Idled Exhibit A, which is incorporated herein by this reference, ' with all its appurtenances. , also 1; ntown si Feet and number Vacant Land Signed anal cered.avie- 5 1 day of December .1084 In t he oregenee flf s.rxrE ilCM,,ORA DO. fifty and "ton Y Denver 1 KENNETH M. GOOD IRR CABLE [SEAL] TR ST was a,•kplowl,..1„,,..,t "(thy.; Noiman Brownstein, ,hiy Trustee 4 SEA Li December It3 I. Noman Brownstein as '1 nistee of the Konneth m. Good Irrevocable. Trio‘s • . 4,4 • PARCEL 6 box 6e4§: PtC4439 A port of the SW1NW}, and a part of the NW}SW1 of Section 2, and a part of the SEiNEz of Section 3, Township 6 South, Range 93 West of the 6th P.M.. County of Garfield, State of Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: • Beginning at the NE corner of the SW}NW# of said Section 2; thence S. 00°03'25" E. along the East line of said SW}NW1, and along the East line of said NWi;SW#, a distance of 1626.89 feet; thence 5. 891'50'21" W. parallel with the South line of the NW} of said Section 2, a distance of 1319.40 feet to a point on the West line of said NW1SW1; thence N.00°02'41" W. along said West line, f dti.tance of 306.27 feet to the E1 corner of said Section 3; thence continuing N. 00°02'41" W. along the West line of said NWI, a distance of 205.12 fret; thence N. 89°57'55" W., parallel with the North line of the 5E}NE1 of said Section 3, a distance of 565.80 feet; thence N. 00°02'41" W., parallel with the East line of the NEI of said Section 3, a distance of 1085.67 feet; thence N. 89°57'56" W., parallel with said North line, a distance of 50.00 feet; thence N. 00°02'41" E., parallel with said East line, a distance of 30.00 feet to a point on said North line; thence 5. 890S7'56" E., along said North line of the SE1NEi, a distance of 615.79 feet to the NE corner of said SEINE}; thence N. 89050'48" E., along the North line of the SWiNW} of said Section 2, a distance of 1319.06 feet to the Point of beginning, being a portion of Hor'r' zons West Subdivision • A/07 rear ed at Reception Nd I I Jif Reene.kr. SPECIAL VIARRAMI•Y DEED TIM DEED. Made chi, titi dry ,r May 4 88 between AL BLUM GAR ISL 755 ME303 of the JUN 2 1 RAQ Connt) of Arapahoe. Mare of Coloirotl�s. Framt,rl ii. and 5talo Doc,. Eel, BOAS i'KOPEkTIES, INC., a Colorado corporation, $ .•lets.„ legal .w,, r, 15310 Amberly Drive, Suite 300, Tama, Floriea 33647 of the Hillsborough Florida Ni Comely of b' ,rote.41414.4,,tilmx sb: W1TNISSET f. That the granturrod, for and in cvn,idcrarion of the ,u valuable consideration , the reveipi and sufficient y of whit h ia hereby ackno* 'edged. ha a granted, bar garnett. sold and convert/. and by there F+rcsenrl,lo ea grant. bargain. yell. convey and confirm, unto the grantect,)o heirs and assigns firmer, ill lire real properly, together with 'ipro.enments. if any. situate. lying: and being in the County of Garfield , State of Cnkmirdu, described as follows. of TEN DOLLARS and other good and 130& ARS . It Yj See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, DEED IN LIEU — NO DOCUMENTARY FEE REQUIRED also Orman by aures And moldier is vacall t land. Tfx;ET1HER with ill anti ttrlgular the hereditament% and appunsn.lnses'berths belonging, or in anywise appertaining, aril the Ft -merlon and te•rniuns, remainder and rental odcrv, whir. issue, and profit, thereof, and all the caste, ugh!, lisle, interest. cilia' and demand wtsrnoe,er of the gtannals), either 10 law or cyan). or, in and lo the above bargained premises. with the hetrd1iimenn5 and 1)punenane,, Ta) HAVE ANTI TO 110 ID rhe ,aid premise, abode hargemed and described with the :tppurrenances, grain the gruntceisl. heirs and assigns h,rc,rr The grantorl,l, for xi heirs and personal repreerooIives tasucce1Me . ski es oxen inland agree elect he ,hal: and wild WARRANT AND PGREvER DFFEND the ahenrt•lrugarlred grew ret Indic quiet and peacande pu.sestaol of Ile grantcelai. heirs and assigns. agr+nst all and every pawn or persons „dinning Ihr whole nr any pari thereof. by. 110 oigh ra under the glamors I, * IN "WITNESS WHEREOF. rile granturle1 ha a executed Mir decd on the date 17talerrV1 ab *except subject to unpaid taxes and assessments, if any, and to e 4 tint, leasee—aero tenuncien, if any. STATE UE CUI.f]RAIX? City and crwmyaf Denver The foregoing instrument was sick num tedged before me this by AL BLUM. in Isen.cr. inven "City ' and " .:Jan: 19, ISto-d day of May :p, 88 ., o1."- fly ... • p'1 Woks. my harts and nlhc,al scal. uy0017 n0 „spines —��ri•�t'� No, I6. Rrr.. 3-144 S►•I.CI44 10ORRArsTY IlUD Raui.i hAr.a”, ran v. r. A. 121100, - . r 21, a.,., +, r P:4•0 • Tract 10 as shown on Plat 1 of the Antlers Orchard Development Company Is Reception No. 37488 and the SE1NE1 Section 2, Township 6 South'Range 93 West of the 6th P.M., Carfield County, Colorado Excepting therefrom those portions conveyed by documents recorded October 27, 1980 in Book 558 at page 604 as Document No. 308735 and recorded October 20, 1983 in Book 637 at page 551 as Reception No. 346740. TOGETRER WITH all improvements thereon, and together with all water and water rights, ditch and ditch rights, reservoirs and reservoir rights appurtenant to the above-described real property, including; but not limited to, all appurtenant Silt Project water rights appurtenant to the above- described real property, and together with all minerals and mineral right■ in, on, and under the above-described real property, ea+.cments and rights of way appurtenant thereto, and other property rights which are situate on, under, or appurtenant to the above-described real property and/or owned or used by party of the €irat part in connection therewith, PARCEL tat A parcel of land situated in the ESE of Section 31. Township 5 South, Range 92 West of the Sixth P.M., Garfield County. Colorado, being more fully described as follows. Beginning at a point on the East line of said Section 31. being S. D0°19'31° E. 504.00 feet from a stone properly marked for the East Quarter Corner of said Section 31; thence from said point of beginning S. 00°19'31" E. 1257.51 feet along the Easterly line of said Section 31; thence S. 89°58'33" W. 1234.51 feet to a point 100.00 feet Easterly of the West line of said E1SE1; thence N. 00000'34" W. 439.92 feet; thence N. 05°39'02" E. 545.47 feet; thence N. 10°49'07" W. 277.88 feet;. thence N. 89°53'30" E. along a line parallel to the Northerly line of said E3SEi 1225.90 feet to the point of beginning. Continued . • • • $r, -,f 755 mr,t3C5 PARCEL 2b: A parcel of land situated in the WiEf of Section 31, Township 5 South, Range 92 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado, lying Westerly of a fence line as now constructed and in place, said parcel of land is more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point an the North-South Centerline of said Section 31 being N. 00°18'26" E. 302.03 feet from a stone properly marked for the South Quarter Corner of said Section 31; thence from said.point of beginning N. 00°18'26" E. 2334.39 feet to an iron pipe with an aluminum cap properly marked for the center of said Section 31; thence continuing N. 00°18'26" E. 447.19 feet; thence East 341.00 feet to a point Easterly of the Raynard Ditch; thence S. 14°24'32" F. 63.96 feet to a point in said fence; thence along said fence line as now constructed and in place the following six courses: 5. 11038'24" E. 263.02 feet; thence S. 19°27'50" E. 117.35 feet; thence S. 87°26'58" E. 248.07 feet; thence 5. 18°10'06"•E. 12.16 feet; thence S. 84°47'39" E. 82.30 feet; thence S. 06°17'06" E. 254.50 feet (through an old fenced corral]; thence along said fence line the following ten courses: S. 32°56'40" W. 101.64 feet; thence 5. 43°12'24" W. 211.24 feet, thence S. 33°39'16 W. 84.47 feet; thence 5. 00°25'03" E. 407.22 feet; thence 5. 07°07'36" E. 329.00 feet; thence 5. 20°15'26" W. 290.78 feet; thence 5. 05°33'15" W. 468.16 feet; thence S. 82039'54" W. 64.03 feet; thence 5. 32°39'39" W. 92.74 feet; thence 5. 00°16'21" W. 200.17 feet; thence leaving said fence line N. 89058157" W. 362.01 feet to the point of beginning. TOGETHER LITE any and all minerals and mineral rights, oil and gas and oil and gas rights, crops, rights of way, easements, improvements, structures, and other property rights appurtenant to the above-described Parcels 2a and 2b and/or owned or used by the party of the first part in connection with the above- described Parcels 2a and 2b, and together with any and all water and water rights, whether adjudicated or not, including, without limitation, subterranean water and water rights, surface water, tributary water, wells, well rights, well permits, storage rights, ditch and ditch rights, reservoir and reservoir r:.ghts and water and ditch company stock appurtenant to said Parcels 2a and 2b, including, but not limited to, Raynard Ditch First Enlargement No. 119 in an amount of one-half of that certain one (1) cubic foot of water per second of time, as decreed in Case No. W-2829, Water Division No. 5, State of Colorada. April 26, 1976. PARCEL 3 Township 5 South, Range 92 West of the 6th P.M., Garfield County, Colorado: Section 31: E SW}; Lots 3 and 4 EXCEPT that portion conveyed to Coulter by Deed recorded in Book 273 at page 606. Continued . . . E)OCIBIT A - Pare 2 • h'IPK P` 1306 PARCEL 4 Township 6 Snuth1 'Rance 93 West of the 6th P.M., Garfield County, Colorado: Section 3: A part of Lots 3 and 4 described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Section 3; thence East, along the North line of said Section, 1594 feet; thence S. 26°45' W. 592.7 feet; thence N. 83°06' W. 120 feet; thence 5. 8°49' W. 1186.5 feet to a point on the North right of way line of the County road; thence 5. 89050' W. along said right of way line, 1424.1 feet; thence N. 0°04' W. 185 feet; thence N. 22°'30' E. 245 feet; thence N. 14°47' W. 345 feet; thence N. 0'04' W. 949.3 feet to the point of'besqnning. EXCEPT that portion of subject property described in Book 26 at page 555, as Reception No. 14329. TOGETHER WITH any and all minerals and mineral rights, oil and gas, and oil and gas rights, crops, rights of way, easements, improvements, structures, and other property rights appurtenant to the above-described Parcels 3 and 4 and/or owned or used by the party of the first part in connection with the above-described Parcels 3 and 4. and together with any and all water and water rights, whether adjudicated or not, including, without limitation, subterranean water and water rights, surface Water, tributary water, wells, well rights, well permits, storage rights, ditch and ditch rights, reservoir and reservoir rights end nater and ditch company stock appurtenant to such Parcels 3 and 4, including, but not limited to, all right, interest, and entitlement of party of the first part in and to the Hubbard bitch, the Wisdom Ditch, and the Raynard Ditch, and the nater rights adjudicated thereto, including, without limitation, 1,9 cubic feet per second from Priority No. 7 in raid Wisdom Ditch and Priorities Nos. 107 and 119 in said Raynard Ditch, all in Water District No. 39. Party of the first part does not warranr title to the water rights conveyed hereby. PARCEL 5 All that portion of Lot 1, Section 4, Township 6 South, Range 93 West of the 6th P.M., lying Easterly of the main public road as in place and used on April 1, 1912 and Northerly of Cc•unty Road No. 291. Garfield County, Colorado. TOGETHER WITH any and all minerals and mineral rights, oil and gas and oil and gas rights, crops, rights of way, easements, improvements, structures, and other property rights ap,purtenan to the-i,.,,._described Parcel 5 and/or owned or used by the party of the first part .ui connection with the above-described Parcel 5, and together with any and all Water and water rights, whether adjudicated or not, without limitation, subterranean water and water rights, surface t -.-t, tributary water, wells, well rights, well permits, storage rights, ditch ...0 ditch rights, reservoir and reservoir rights and water and ditch company ,stock appurtenant to said Parcel 5 and owned and/or used by party of the fi-st part in co'+•aection therewith. Continued . . EXHIBIT A - Page 3 • • PARCEL 6 Bt'pr 755 PrE3L A part of the SW}NW}, and a part of the NW}SW# of Section 2. and a part of the SEINE} of Section 3, Township 6 South, Range 93 West of the 6th P.M., County of Garfield, State of Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: 8eginnfng at the NE corner of the SW1NW1 of said Section 2; thence S. 00'03125" E. along the East line of said SW}NW1, and along the East line of said NW1SW1, a distance of 1626.69 feet; thence 5. 89°50'21" W. parallel with the South lira of the NW} of said Section 2, a distance of 1319.41 feet to a point on the West line of said NW}SW}; thence N.00°02'41" W. along said West line, a distance of 306.27 feet to the E} corner of said Section 3; thence continuing N. 00°02'41" W. along the West line of said NW}. a dtstanc, of 205.12 feet; thence H. 89°51'56" W., parallel with the Horth line of the SE0E1 of said Section 3. a distance of 565.80 feet; thence N. 00°02'41" W., parallel with the East line of the NE} of said Section 3, a distance of 1085.67 feet; thence N. 89°57'56" W., parallel with said North line, a distance of 50.00 feet; thence N. 00°02'41" E., parallel with said East line, a distance of 30.00 feet to a point on said North line; thence S. 89°57'56" E., along said North line of the SEINE*, a distance of 615.79 feet to the NE corner of said SE.}NE}; thence N. 89°50'48" E., along the North line of the SW1HW1 of said Section 2, a distance of 1319.06 feet to the Point of beginning. being a portion of horizons West Subdivision EYHIBIT A - Page 4 • ADDENDUM 1Q SPECIAL 'I JBBANTY DEED This Deed is an absolute conveyance, Grantor having sold the land to Grantee for a fair and adequate consideration, the entire consideration being the agreement by Kenneth M. Good Irrevocable Trust ("Lender"), to accept a deed in lieu of fore- closing under the loan made by Lender to Grantor which loan is secured by a certain Deed of Trust encumbering the Property (the "Deed of Trust") from Grantor for the benefit of Lender. Grantor hereby declares that the conveyance effected hereby is freely and fairly made, and that there are no agreements with respect to the land, oral or written, other than this Deed and that certain Mutual Releas3 Agreement of even date herewith pursuant to which this Deed is given. 1702k 772 United States In Cooperation with the Department of Colorado Agricultural Agriculture Experiment Station Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey of Rifle Area, Colorado Parts of Garfield and Mesa Counties • En rn I:Pri1 o=production of Engelmann spruce is,`s6il can produce 3,850 cubic feet Every 10 years from a fully stocked, :-of 100 -year-old trees. Steep slopes €arvest, and special care is needed to stein. `black bear, and grouse find habitat on this wand large stones limit community development. Gal design overcomes these limitations. is . soil is in capability subclass Vile, nonirrigated. t2fi—Far low -Rock outcrop association, steep. This 'broadly defined map unit consists of moderately steep to =steep Fariow soils and Rock outcrop on mountainsides. Elevation ranges from 8,000 to 10,500 feet. The Farlow soil formed in residuum from limestone. The average annual precipitation is about 19 inches, the average annual air temperature is about 38 degrees F, and the frost -free period is less than 75 days. The Farlow soil makes up about 65 percent of the association, and Rock outcrop makes up about 25 per- cent. The Farlow soil is deep and well drained. Typically, the surface layer is dark grayish brown channery loam about 10 inches thick. The substratum is light gray and pale brown very channery loam and extremely flaggy loam about 32 inches thick. Weathered limestone is at a depth of 42 inches. Permeability of the Farlow soil is moderate, and availa- ble water capacity is low. Effective rooting depth is about 40 to 60 inches. Surface runoff is rapid, and the erosion hazard is moderate. The Rock outcrop is limestone. Included in mapping are small areas of Dateman soils, generally in depressions. These areas make up 5 to 15 percent of the map unit. This association is used mainly for limited grazing and Wildlife habitat. The native vegetation is mainly needlegrasses, wheat - grasses, and serviceberry. When range condition deteriorates, forbs and shrubs increase. When the range is in poor condition, undesira- ble weeds and annual plants are numerous. Properly managing grazing maintains and improves range condi- tion. Elk, deer, black bear, and grouse find habitat on this soil. Community development and sanitary facilities are lim- ited by slope and depth to rock. Special design is needed to overcome these limitations. This association is in capability subclass Vile, nonirri- gated. 27—Halaquepts, nearly level. This broadly defined 0 unit consists of deep, somewhat poorly drained to poorly drained, nearly level and gently sloping, salt -affected • SOIL SURVEY soils in narrow foothill valleys, on fans, and on low ter- races. Slopes are 0 to 6 percent. These soils formed in alluvium. The soils are extremely variable. The upper 24 inches ranges from loam to clay, and the underlying layers are generally gravelly. The soils are commonly gleyed from the surface down. Stratified sand, gravel, and cobbles are at a depth of 24 to 40 inches. In some areas, gravel and cobbles are at or near the surface. Included with these soils in mapping are small, isolat- ed areas of Arvada, Limon, and Heldt soils that have slopes of 1 to 6 percent. Small areas of severely alkali - affected soils are identified by an alkali spot symbol. These areas make up 10 to 15 percent of the map unit. The water tableis at or near the surface at times, mainly during spring and summer. The level of the water table is strongly influenced by the seasonal water level in nearby streams and rivers and higher Tying irrigation ditches. Water seeps from the ditches into these soils. These soils are subject to rare or occasional flooding. This unit is used mainly for grazing. Some hay is grown in areas drained by ditches. Yields are low because of saline condition. Alkali -tolerant grasses and legumes must be grown for productive hay and pasture. The native vegetation consists of willows, tamarisk, cottonwoods, and alkali- and water -tolerant grasses. Game birds, rabbits, deer, and other wildlife find habi- tat on these soils. Ducks and geese nest in the more swampy areas. Mourning doves nest in the cottonwoods and tamarisk. Rabbits and deer find adequate food and cover on these soils. Where the soil has been drained and is suitable for hay and pasture, planting food plots, trees and shrubs, and nesting cover enhances habitat for upland wildlife. Where the water table is high, open water for waterfowl can be developed by blasting or excavating. Community development is limited by flooding and depth to water table. Onsite investigation is necessary for appropriate design and construction to overcome these limitations. These soils are in capability subclass Vlw, nonirrigat- ed. 28—Heldt clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This deep, well drained, nearly level soil is on alluvial fans and sides of valleys. Elevation ranges from 5,000 to 6,000 feet. This soil formed in fine textured alluvium derived from shale and sandstone. The average annual precipitation is about 14 inches, the average annual air temperature is about 48 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is about 120 days. Typically, the surface layer is grayish brown clay loam about 8 inches thick. The subsoil is light brownish gray clay loam about 13 inches thick. The substratum is light gray clay to a depth of 60 inches. Ited. cent g to 1. 7). soil and it 17 t 43 It 95 oam n or sub - to a s of than cent y is Sur- ril is s in eat- ,ubs ,ira- rerly Re- 'ves s.ent ling. ood iabi- is a clay and age and RIFLE AREA, COLORADO 2: ranges from 5,000 to 6,500 feet. This soil formed in mixed alluvium derived primarily from basalt. This soil has a thin intermittent cap of reddish eolian material. The average annual precipitation is about 14 inches, the average annual air temperature is 46 degrees F, and the verage frost -free period is about 125 days. Typically, the surface layer is brown stony loam about inches thick. The underlying material is white, very trongly calcareous very stony loam to a depth of 60 inches. included with this soil in mapping are small areas of Potts and Ascalon soils on less sloping positions. These areas make up 5 to 15 percent of the map unit. Permeability is moderately rapid, and available water rapacity is low. Effective rooting depth is more than 60 ches. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard moderate. This soil is used mainly for grazing and wildlife habitat. The native vegetation on this soil is mainly pinyon and ah juniper. The understory consists mostly of Indian cegrass, wheatgrass, junegrass, serviceberry, bitter - rush, and big sagebrush. When the understory vegetation deteriorates, grasses most disappear and forbs and shrubs increase. Proper- managing ropermanaging the vegetation maintains wood production nd grazing. Selectively thinning the pinyon and juniper proves understory grazing and provides firewood, sts, and Christmas trees. This soil is suited to production of pinyon and Utah hider. It can produce 9 cords of wood per acre when pes more than 4.5 feet tall reach an average diameter `t one foot) of 5 inches. The low available water capac- affects survival of tree seedlings. Mule deer, chukar, wild turkey, gray squirrel, and cot- ntail rabbit find habitat on this soil. Community development is limited by large stones and eep slopes. Structures to divert runoff are needed for ads. his soil is in capability subclass Vls, nonirrigated. 34-1ldefonso stony loam, 25 to 45 percent slopes.. s deep, well drained, hilly to steep soil is on mesa eaks, sides of valleys, and alluvial fans. A small portion. this unit is on very steep to extremely steep mesa carpments. Elevation ranges from 5,000 to 6,500 feet. is soil formed in mixed alluvium derived primarily from salt. This soil has a thin intermittent cap of reddish flan material. The average annual precipitation is about inches, the average annual air temperature is about degrees F, and the average frost -free period is about 5 days. ypically, the surface layer is brown stony loam about 'inches thick. The underlying material is white, very ngly calcareous very stony loam to a depth of 60 hes. eluded with this soil in mapping are small areas of and Ascalon soils on less steep and depressional positions. These areas make up about 5 to 15 percent o the map unit. Permeability is moderately rapid, and available wate capacity is low. Effective rooting depth is more than 6(. inches. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazarc is severe. lldefonso soil is used mainly for grazing and wildlife habitat. The native vegetation on this soil is mainly pinyon anc Utah juniper. The understory consists of Indian ricegrass wheatgrass, junegrass, serviceberry, bitterbrush, and bic sagebrush. When the understory vegetation deteriorates, grassef almost disappear and forbs and shrubs increase. Proper ly managing the vegetation maintains wood productior and ground cover. The value for grazing is low because of steep slopes and tree cover. Firewood, posts, ane Christmas trees can be harvested on the more gently sloping areas. This soil is suited to production of pinyon and Utal- juniper. It can produce 9 cords of wood per acre wher trees more than 4.5 feet tall reach an average diamete' (at one foot) of 5 inches. The low available water capac• ity affects survival of tree seedlings. Steep slopes anc severe erosion hazard affect harvesting. Mule deer, chukar, wild turkey, gray squirrel, and cot- tontail rabbit find habitat on this soil. Community development is limited by large stones anc steep slopes. Structures to divert runoff are needed for roads. This soil is in capability subclass Vile, nonirrigated. 35---lldefonso-Lazear complex, 6 to 65 percent slopes. Moderately sloping to very steep soils are or hillsides and mesa breaks. Elevation ranges from 5,00C to 6,500 feet. The lldefonso soil formed in very calcare- ous, mixed, stony alluvium derived mainly from basalt, and the Lazear soil formed in shale and sandstone re- siduum. The average annual precipitation is about 14 inches, the average annual air temperature is about 48 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is about 125 days. The lldefonso soil makes up about 50 percent of the unit, the Lazear soil makes up about 30 percent, and soils of minor extent make up 20 percent. The Ildefonso soil is deep and well drained. Typically, the surface layer is brown stony loam about 8 inches thick. The underlying material is white, very strongly cal- careous very stony loam to a depth of 60 inches. Permeability of the lldefonso soil is moderately rapid, and available water capacity is low. Effective rooting depth is more than 60 inches. Surface runoff is me and the erosion hazard is moderate. The Lazear soil is shallow over shale be well drained. Typically, the surface layer is gravelly loam about 4 inches thick. The. k AREA, COLORADO 29 luded with this soil in mapping are small areas of da and Fldefonso soils. The Arvada soils are moder- sloping, and the lldefonso soils are steeper. These s make up 10 to 15 percent of the map unit. ermeability is moderately rapid, and available water pacity is low. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches. tkface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is severe. his soil is used mainly for grazing and wildlife habitat. he native vegetation on this soil is mainly wheat - ss, needleandthread, and sagebrush. When range condition deteriorates, forbs and shrubs ease. When the range is in poor condition, undesira- e weeds and annual plants are numerous. Properly managing grazing maintains and improves range condi- n. Reducing brush improves range, but desirable rubs should not be destroyed. ,Mule deer, cottontail rabbit, chukar, and squirrel find bitat on this soil. Community development is limited by steep slopes. 'immunity sewage facilities will be needed if population 'nsity increases. :This soil is in capability subclass Vile, nonirrigated. '48—Northwater loam, 15 to 65 percent slopes. This ep, well drained, hilly to very steep soil is on moun- nsides. Elevation ranges from 7,600 to 8,400 feet, This rmed in residuum from sedimentary rocks. The e annual precipitation is about 20 inches, the erage air temperature is about 40 degrees F, and the erage frost -free period is less than 75 days. Typically, the upper part of the surface layer is brown am about 10 inches thick. In most places 2 inches of ganic material is on the surface. The lower part of the urface layer is dark grayish brown loam about 15 inches hick. The subsoil is light brown very channery clay loam about 25 inches thick. Fractured sandstone is at a depth ':of 50 inches. Included with this sail in mapping are small areas of Parachute, Rhone, and irigul soils. The Rhone soils are On the north -facing side slopes, and the Parachute and ingui soils are near ridge crests. These areas make up i`e to 15 percent of the map unit. Permeability is moderate, and available water capacity moderate. Effective rooting depth is 40 to 60 inches. ace runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is slight. s soil is used mainly for limited grazing, wildlife t, and recreation. , native vegetation is aspen and an understory of mountain brome, elk sedge, slender wheat- spen peavine, aspen fleabane, snowberry, servi- =and chokecherry. the understory vegetation deteriorates, forbs, and Kentucky bluegrass increase. it is suited to production of quaking aspen. It pee 4,050 cubic feet of wood or 6,800 board ber per acre from a fully stocked, even -aged 80 -year-old trees. At the present there is no commercial harvest of aspen. Steep slopes affect har- vesting, and special attention is needed to reduce soil loss during harvest. Elk, mule deer, coyote, and grouse find habitat on this soil. Use of this soil for community development, for sani- tary facilities, and as a source of construction material is limited by slope and depth to rock. This soil is in capability subclass Vlle, nonirrigated. 49—Olney loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This deep, well draine.d, nearly level soil is on alluvial fans and sides of valleys. Elevation ranges from 5,000 to 6,500 feet. This soil formed in alluvium derived from sandstone and shale. The average annual precipitation is about 14 inches, the average annual air temperature is about 48 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is about 125 days. Typically, the surface layer is grayish brown loam about 12 inches thick, The subsoil is grayish brown and light gray sandy clay loam about 21 inches thick. The substratum is light gray gravelly sandy clay loam or very gravelly sandy loam to a depth of 60 inches. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of Heldt, Potts, and Kim soils that have slopes of 2 to 3 percent. These areas make up 5 to 15 percent of the map unit. Permeability is moderate, and available water capacity is moderate. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is slight. This soil is mainly used for irrigated crops and hay. Alfalfa, small grains, corn for silage, and grass or grass- legume mixtures are grown. Small acreages are in fruits, including apples, peaches, and apricots. This soil is irrigated by furrows and flooding. Sprinklers are also suitable. Drop structures in irrigation ditches help to control water and prevent excessive ditch ero- sion. - The native vegetation on this soil was mainly wheat- grass, needleandthread, and sagebrush. When range condition deteriorates, forbs and shrubs increase. When the range is in poor condition, undesira- ble weeds and annual plants are numerous. Cottontail rabbit, squirrel, pheasant, and some mule deer find habitat on this soil. Community development and recreation are limited by low strength. This soil is in capability subclass Ilte, irrigated. 50—Olney loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes. This deep, well drained, gently sloping soil is on alluvial fans and sides of valleys. Elevation ranges from 5,000 to 6,500 feet. This soil formed in alluvium derived from sandstone and shale. The average annual precipitation is about 14 inches, the average annual air temperature is about 48 30 SOIL SURVEY • .ees F, and- the average frost -free period is about days. Typically, the surface layer is grayish brown loam >T;about 12 inches thick. The subsoil is grayish brown and light gray sandy clay loam about 21 inches thick. The substratum is light gray gravelly sandy clay loam or very gravelly sandy loam to a depth of 60 inches. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of Heldt, Potts, and Kim soils that have slopes of 3 to 6 percent. These areas make up 5 to 15 percent of the map unit. Permeability is moderate, and available water capacity is moderate. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is moderate. This soil is used mainly for irrigated crops and hay. Alfalfa, small grains, corn for silage, and grass or grass - legume mixtures are grown. Small acreages are in fruits, including apples, peaches, and apricots. Isolated areas are used for grazing. This soil is irrigated by furrows and flooding. Sprinklers are also suitable. Drop structures in irrigation ditches help to contra! water and prevent excessive ditch ero- sion. The native vegetation on this soil is mainly wheat - grass, needleandthread, and sagebrush. When range condition deteriorates, forbs and shrubs increase. When the range is in poor condition, undesira- ble weeds and annual plants are numerous. Properly managing grazing maintains and improves range condi- tion. Reducing brush improves deteriorated range. Seed- ing improves range in poor condition. Crested wheat- grass, western wheatgrass, and Russian wildrye are suit- able for seeding. Preparing a seedbed and drilling the seed are good practices. Cottontail rabbit, squirrel, pheasant, and some mule deer find habitat on this soil. Community development and recreation are limited by low strength. This soil is in capability subclasses file, irrigated, and IVe, nonirrigated. 51—Olney loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes. This deep, well drained, moderately sloping to rolling soli is on allu- vial fans and sides of valleys. Elevation ranges from 5,000 to 6,500 feet. This soil formed in alluvium derived from sandstone and shale. The average annual precipita- tion is about 14 inches, the average annual air tempera- ture is about 48 degrees F, and the frost -free period is about 125 days. Typically, the surface layer is grayish brown loam about 12 inches thick. The subsoil is grayish brown and light gray sandy clay loam about 21 inches thick. The substratum is light gray gravelly sandy clay loam and very gravelly sandy loam to a depth of 60 inches. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of Heldt, Potts, and Kim soils that have slopes of 6 to 12 percent. These areas make up 5 to 15 percent of thA map unit. Permeability is moderate, and available water capacity is moderate. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is moderate. This soil is used mainly for irrigated hay, fruits, and grazing. Grass -legume mixtures and apples, peaches, and apricots are grown. This soil is irrigated by furrows and flooding. Sprinklers are also suitable. Drop structures in irrigation ditches help to control water and prevent excessive ditch ero- sion. Keeping a grass or legume cover on this soil at least three-fourths of the time controls erosion. The native vegetation on this soil is mainly wheat - grass, needleandthread, and sagebrush. When range condition deteriorates, forbs and shrubs increase. When the range is in poor condition, undesira- ble weeds and annual plants are numerous. Properly managing grazing maintains and improves range condi- tion. Reducing brush improves the range. Seeding im- proves range in poor condition. Crested wheatgrass, western wheatgrass, and Russian wildrye are suitable for seeding. Preparing a seedbed and drilling the seed are good practices. Cottontail rabbit, squirrel, pheasant, and some mule deer find habitat on this soil. Community developrnent and recreation are limited by steep slopes and low strength. This soil is in capability subclass IVe, irrigated and nonirrigated. 52—Parachute loam, 25 to 65 percent slopes. This moderately deep, well drained, hilly to very steep soil is on north- and east -facing mountainsides. Elevation ranges from 7,500 to 8,700 feet. This soil formed in residuum from sandstone. The average annual precipita- tion is 20 inches, the average annual air temperature is about 40 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is less than 75 days. Typically, the surface layer is grayish brown loam about 5 inches thick. The upper part of the subsoil is very dark grayish brown and brown loam about 13 inches thick, and the lower part is light yellowish brown extremely channery loam about 11 inches thick. Hard, fractured sandstone bedrock is at a depth of 29 inches. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of Rhone and Irigul soils. The Rhone soils are in concave positions. These areas make up 10 to 15 percent of the map unit. lrigul soils are on ridge crests. Permeability is moderate, and available water capacity is low. Effective rooting depth is 20 to 40 inches. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is moderate. This soil is used mainly for wildlife habitat and limited grazing. 32 SOIL SURV 55—Potts loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes, This deep, well drained, moderately sloping soil is on mesas, bench- es, and sides of valleys. Elevation ranges from 5,000 to 7,000 feet. This soil formed in alluvium derived from sandstone, shale, or basalt. The average annual precipi- tation is about 14 inches, the average annual air tem- perature is about 46 degrees F, and the average frost - free period is about 120 days. Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 4 inches thick. The subsoil is reddish brown clay loam about 24 inches thick, The substratum is pinkish white loam to a depth of 60 inches. Included with this sail in mapping are small areas of Olney, Kim, and Ildefunso soils that have slopes of 3 to 6 percent. These areas make up 10 to 15 percent of the map unit. Permeability is moderate, and available water capacity is high. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is moder- ate. This soil is used mainly for irrigated crops and hay and for dryland farming (fig. 10). Alfalfa, small grains, and grass -legume hay are grown. Small areas are used for grazing. These soils are usually irrigated by flooding. Drop structures in irrigation ditches, grassed waterways, and minimum tillage prevent serious erosion. Irrigation water should be carefully managed to avoid piping and erosion. Cover crops or stubble mulching also help to limit ero- sion in dryfarrned areas. The native vegetation on this soil is mainly wheat- grass, needleandthread, and sagebrush. When range condition deteriorates, forbs and shrubs increase. When the range is in poor condition, undesira- ble weeds and annual plants are numerous. Properly managing grazing maintains and improves range condi- tion. Reducing brush improves the range. Seeding im- proves range in poor condition. Crested wheatgrass, western wheatgrass, and Russian wildrye are suitable for seeding. Preparing a seedbed and drilling the seed are good practices. Pheasant, mourning dove, cottontail rabbit, some mule deer, and squirrel find habitat on this soil. Community development and recreation are limited by low strength and the shrink -swell potential. Dwellings and roads can be designed to overcome these limita- tions. Community sewage systems will be needed if the population density increases. This soil is in capability subclasses Ille, irrigated, and IVe, nonirrigated. 56—Potts loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes. This deep, well drained, moderately sloping to rolling soil is on mesas, benches, and sides of valleys. Elevation ranges from 5,000 to 7,000 feet. This soil formed in alluvium derived from sandstone, shale, or basalt. The average annual precipitation is about 14 inches, the average annual air temperature is about 46 degrees F, and 1 average frost -free period is about 120 days. Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about inches thick. The subsoil is reddish brown clay loe' about 24 inches thick. The substratum is pinkish wh loam to a depth of 60 inches. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas Kim, Olney, and Ildefonso soils that have slopes of 6 12 percent. These areas make up 10 to 15 percent the map unit. Permeability is moderate, and available water capac is high. Effective rooting depth is 60 inches or mo Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard severe. This soil is used mainly for grazing, wildlife habitat, a some dryfand farming (fig. 10). Wheat, barley, and oz are grown. Minimum contour tillage and stubble mulching help prevent excessive erosion. The native vegetation on this soil is mainly whe grass, needleandthread, and sagebrush. When range condition deteriorates, forbs and shru increase. When the range is in poor condition, undesi ble weeds and annual plants are numerous. Prope managing grazing improves and maintains range con tion. Reducing brush improves range. Seeding improv range in poor condition. Crested wheatgrass, west€ wheatgrass, and Russian wildrye are suitable for se€ Ing. Preparing a seedbed and drilling the seed are go practices. Community development and recreation are limited low strength, shrink -swell potential, and slope. Dwellir and roads can be designed to overcome these limi tions. Community sewage systems will be needed if 1 population density increases. This soil is in capability subclass 1Ve, irrigated nonirrigated. 57—Potts-Ildefonso complex, 3 to 12 perci slopes. These gently sloping to rolling soils are mesas and sides of valleys. Elevation ranges from 5,C to 6,500 feet. The Potts soil formed in alluvium clerk. from sandstone, shale, or basalt. The Ildefonso formed in very strongly calcareous, basaltic alluvium small amounts of eotian material. The average ann precipitation is about 14 inches, the average annual temperature is about 46 degrees F, and the avers frost -free period is about 120 days. The Potts soil makes up about 60 percent of the n unit, and the Ildefonso soils makes up about 30 perc( The Potts soil is on slightly concave positions, and Ildefonso soil is on the breaks of steeper slopes. The Potts soil is deep and well drained. Typically, surface layer is brown loam about 4 inches thick. subsoil is reddish brown clay foam about 24 inches th The substratum is pinkish white loam that extends t depth of 60 inches. • • • 142 SOIL SU Soil name and map symbol TABLE 14. --PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS --Continued DepthlClay <2mm1 1(ect 1 In 1 17 1 0-21 Cochetopa 121-60 18'0, 19': 1 Cochetopa 1 0-21 :21-60 Jerry : 0-3 : 3-60 1 200. Cryaquolls 1 210: 1 Cushman 1 0-3 3-11 111-32 1 32 : Lazear : 0-4 4-16 1 16 1 22 1 0-3 Bateman . 1 3-22 122-34 1 34 1 23 1 0-12 Detre 112-57 1 57 20-27 1 35-50 1 20-27 35-50 20-25 35-50 16-20 25-35 16-20 15-20 15-20 15-25 10-20 10-20 10-20 20-35 24': 1 Dollard 1 0-5 ! 35-45 1 5-251 35-50 1 25 : --- ; Rock outcrop. 1 ! 1 1 251 0-151 10-23 Etoe 115-241 10-25 124-601 20-25 266: Farlow 0-10! 15-25 10-421 18-27 42 1 --- Rock outcrop. 27' 1 Halaquepts 28, 29, 30, 31---1 0-8 Heldt 1 8-60 32 Holderness Variant 33, 34 Ildefonso 35e: Ildefonsc 1 1 1 1 l Erosion 1 Permeability 1Availabie1 Soil (Salinity= Shrink -swell 1 factors 1Orga 1 water !reaction! 1 potential 1----T----1 mat !cappacityi ( 1 K 1 T 1 In/hr 1 Infin , RA lmmhos/cm1 ; 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 0.6-2.0 :0.16-0.1816.6-7.3 1 <2 :Low --10.241 5 0.06-0.2 10.11-0.1416.6-7,8 1 <2 ,High --10.241 : ; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.6-2.0 10.16-0.1816.6-7.3 : <2 Low 10.241 5 0.06-0.2 10.11-0.1416.6-7.8 I <2 High 10.241 1 1 I 1 0.6-2.0 10.16-0.1816.6-7.3 1 <2 Low 0.281 5 0.06-0.2 10.13-0.1517.4-8.4 1 <2 High 0.321 1 1 1 1 1: i ( 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.6-2.0 10.16-0.2016.6-7.8 <2 Low 0.241 2 0.6-2.0 10.14-0.1817.4-8.4 <2 (Moderate 10.321 0.6-2.0 10.08-0.1217.4-8.4 <2 1Low 10.17 1 1 1 1 0.6-2.0 ;0.08-0.1117.9-9.0 <2 (Low :0.20 1 0.5 0.6-2.0 10.08-0.111 >7.9 <2 :Low 10.20 --- ! --- 1 --- --- 1 1---- 1 1 1 1 1 0.6-2.0 10.11-0.1316.1-7.3 <2 1Low 10.241 3 0.6-2.0 10.08-0.1016.6-7.8 <2 1Low 10.201 0.6-2.0 10.08-0.1016.6-7.3 <2 (Low 1.0.201 --- , -_- 1 __- -__ 1------ ------- -1__--, : 1 1 1 1 0.6-2.0 10.10-0.1416.6-7.8 <2 'Low 10.241 3 0.6-2.0 0.14-0.1616.6-8.4 <2 ;Moderate 10.201 --- _-- --- --- 1 1----1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.06-0.2 0.17-0.19 7.4-9.0 <2 (High 10.371 2 0.06-0.2 0.13-0.18 7.4-9.0 <2 !High 10.431 1 1 1 1 0.6-2.0 10.16-0.1816.1-7.3 0.6-2.0 10.12-0.1416.1-6.5 0.6-2.0 0.05-0.1116.1-7.3 1 1 0.6-2.0 0.12-0.1417.4-7.8 0.6-2.0 0.05-0.07 7.9-8.4 1 1 1 1 1 1 <2 Low 10.201 5 0. <2 Low--- 10.151 <2 :Low !0.151 1 <2 :Low 0.281 3 <2 !Low 0.281 1- ----1 1 1 1 30-45 1 0.06-0.2 10.12-0.1717.4-9.0 <8 ;High---- 0.28 5 35-45 1 0.06-0.2 10.12-0.1717.9-9.0 <8 (High 0.28 1 0-111 30-40 0.2-0.6 10..15-0.19:7.9-8.4 <2 :Moderate 10...24 5 11-301 40-60 0.06-0.2 10.15-0•.1917.9-8.4 <2 :High--- :0.28 30-601 30-40 0.2-0.6 10.15-0.1911.9-8.4 <2 ;High 10.32 : 1 0-8 1 15-25 2.0-6.0 10.08-0..1017.4-8.4 <2 ;Low 0.15 3 8-601 15-25 2.0-6.0 10.06-0.0817.9-8.4 <4 'Low 0.15 1 ! 1 : 1 1 0-8 1 15-25 2.0-6.0 10.08-0.1017.4-8.4 (2 1Low 8-601 15-25 2.0-6.0 10.06-0.0817.9-8.4 <4 1Low See footnote at end of table. 1 1 I RIFLE AREA, COLORADO - 143 • TABLE 14, --PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS --Continued , I I' Sail name and 1DepthlClay <2mm Permeability =Available map symbol 1 water €capacity 1 1 I Erosion I Soil 1Salinityl Shrink -swell 1 factors ;organic reaction; 1 potential 1 I € matter I t 1K II 1 X35*: Lazear 36, 37 Irigul 38": Irigul Starman 39 Jerry 40, 41 Kim 42 Lamphier Norval 45•: Norval. Tridell 46, 47 Nihill 48 Northwater 49, 50, Olney In ,Pct 0-4 15-25 4-16 20-25 16 0-6 15-27 6-17 20-35 17 In/hr L In/in 0.6-2.0 0.6-2.0 0.6-2.0 0.6-2.0 0-6 15-27 1 0.6-2.0 6-17 20-35 1 0.6-2.0 17 1 --- 0-3 15-25 3-13 18-25 13 --- 0-3 I 15-35 3-40 35-45 40-60 20-50 0-60 15-25 10.14-0.16 10.14-0.16 10.09-0.11 10.05-0.07 10.09-0.11 10.05-0.07 EH fmmhos/em T 7.9-9.0 7.9-9.0 6.1-7.8 7.4-8.4 6.1-7.8 7.4-8.4 0.6-2.0 10.09-0.11 7.4-9.0 0.6-2.0 10.09-0.1117.4-9.0 1 10.16-0.18 6.6-7.3 10.13-0.15 6.6-8.4 10.13-0.15 7.9-8.4 1 0.6-2.0 10.15-0.18 7.4-8.4 1 1 i I 10.18-0.2116.1-7.3 € 1 10.14-0.1717.4-8.4 10.12-0.1617.9-9.0 0.6-2.0 10.18-0.2116.6-8.4 0.6-2.0 10.14-0.2117.4-8.4 0.6-2.0 10.08-0.1017.8-8.4 1 1 0.6-2.0 10.18-0.2116.6-8.4 0.6-2.0 10.14-0.2117.4-8.4 0.6-2.0 10.08-0.1017.8-8.4 1 I 0.6-2.0 10.11-0.1317.4-8.4 2.0-6.0 10.06-0.0817.9-8.4 1 10.12-0.1617.4-8,4 10.06-0.0917.9-9.0 1 10.13-0.1816.6-7.8 10.08-0.1016,6-7.8 0.6-2.0 0.06-0.2 0.6-2.0 0-60 20-27 1 0.6-2.0 0-5 30-40 1 0.2-0.6 5-60 35-60 0.06-0.2 0-5 22-32 5-171 28-35 17-601 20-35 0-5 22-32 5-17 28-35 17-60 20-35 0-10 15-27 10-60 15-20 0-11 10-27 11-60 15-27 0-25 20-27 25-50 20-35 50 --- 0-12 18-24 12-33 22-26 33-43 18-22 43-60 16-22 52 1 0-5 15-25 Parachute 1 5-181 15-25 18-291 15-25 1 29 1 --- I 53•: 1 Parachute I 0-5 I 15-25 15-181 15-25 118-291 15-25 1 29 1 --- 1 1 •ee footnote at end of table. 0.6-2.0 2.0-6.0 0.6-2.0 0,6-2.0 1 0.6-2.0 10.15-0.1816.6-8.4 - 0.6-2.0 10.14-0.1617.4-8.4 0.6-2.0 10.10-0.1517.9-8.4 0.6-2.0 10.07-0,1017.9-8.4 1 1 0.6-2.0 10.16-0.1816.6-7.8 0.6-2.0 10.14-0.1616.6-7.8 2.0-6.0 10.03-0.06 6.6-7.8 1 0.6-2.0 10.16-0.18 0.6-2.0 10.14-0.16 2.0-6.0 10.03-0.06 I 6,6-7.8 6.6-7.8 6.6-7.8 1 I I 1 1 <2 Low 10.201 1 <2 ILow 10.201 _- 1----1 1 I <2 ;Low 10.281 1 <2 ;Low 10.201 -- 1 1 Pct 0.5-1 1-3 <2 Low 10.28 1 1-3 <2 Low 10.20 <2 Low 10.24 1 1-2 <2 Low 10.281 --- 1 I----1 I 1 1 1 <2 ;Low 10.321 5 1 3-5 <2 IHigh 10.281 1 <2 ;Moderate 10.201 1 1 1 1 1 <2 ;Low 10.32 5 10.5-1 € 1 1 1 1 <2 €Low --10.28 5 1 2-4 1 1 2-8 IHigh 10.281 5 0.5-1 2-8 IHigh --10.321 1 1 1 <2 'Moderate €0.37€ 5 1-2 <2 IModerate 10.431 <2 ;Moderate 10.24€ 1 1 € <2 ;Moderate 10.37 5 1-2 (2 IModerate 10.43 <2 Moderate 10.24 1 <2 'Low 10.28 3 2-4 <2 ILow 10.201 1 1 I (2 ILow 10.241 2 0-1 <4 ILow- 10.201 1 <2 Low 10.321 5 3-6 <2 Low 10.201 I ' 1 <2 Low 10.321 5 1 1-2 <2 Moderate 10.241 1 <2 ;Low 10.201 1 <2 ILow ;0.101 1 1 1 (2 ILow 10.24€ 2 3-6 <2 ;Low 10.241 <2 €Low 10.101 1 , 1 • 1 1 1 <2 Low 10.241 2 3-6 <2 Low 10.241 <2 Low 10.101 • • 144 Soil name and map symbol 53": Rhone 54, 55, 56 - Potts 57', 58', Potts 59': Ildefonso 60, 61 Rhone 62': Rock outcrop. Torriorthents. 63 Silas 64 Tanna 65". Torrifluv+ents 66': Torriorthents. Camborthids. Rock outcrop. 67": Torriorthents. Rock outcrop. 68, 69, 70 Vale 710: Villa Grove Zoltay 72 Warm TABLE 14. --PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS --Continued r 1 1 1 1 1 1 Erosion ; IDepthlClay <2mmI Permeability 'Available: Soil (Salinity; Shrink -swell 1 factorsOrga i 1 : 1 water ;reaction 1 potential 1 T a} I lcapacity l 1 1 K T �a n ,. Pct , n hr , In/in 1 p mmhas/cm1 ; 1 ; i 1 1 1 3 1 ; 1 (Low 10.241 3 Moderate :0.24; 1 :Low 10.151 1 1 1 i <2 :Low 1 :0.311 5 1 <2 :Moderate :0.431 1 <2 :Low---- 10.551 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 <2 ;Low ;0.371 .5 1 <2 ;Moderate 10.431 1 <2 :Low -10.551 1 ; 1 1 0-8 1 15-25 2.0-6.0 <2 :Low : 10.1.5; 3 10.5-1 8-601 15-25 2.0-6.0 <4 1Low 10.151 1 1 0-8 1 20-27 0.6-2.0 <2 :Low ;0.24: 3 8-281 20-30 0.6-2.0 <2 :Moderate 10.241 28-521 20-30 0.6-2.0 <2 1Low 10.151 52 1 --- ; ------ --- 1 1 1 0-8 1 20-27 0.6-2.0 8-281 20-30 0.6-2.0 28-521 20-30 0.6-2.0 52 1 --- --- 0-4 1 15-25 0.6-2.0 4-281 20-35 0.6-2.0 28-601 15-25 0.6-2.0 0-4 1 15-25 0.6-2.0 4-281 20-35 0.6-2.0 28-601 15-25 0.6-2.0 1 1 I 1 10.19-0.2116.6-7.8 <2 10.15-0.1716.6-7.8 <2 10..06-0.1016.6-7.8 <2 1 10.16-0.1816.6-7.8 10.19-0.21:6.6-8.4 10.16-0.1817.9-9.0 1 1 1 10.16-0.1816.6-7.8 10.19-0.2116.6-8.4 10.16-0.1817.9-9.0 1 ' 4 10.08-0.1017.4-8.4 :0.06-0.0817.9-8.4 I I 10.19-0.2116.6-7.8 10.15-0.1716.6-7.8 10.08-0.1016.6-7.8 1 1 ; 1 1 4 1 4 7 ; 1 1 1 D.1l-(7.1616.6-7.8 1 I i 10.14-0.20;6.6-7.8 :0.12-0.18;7.4-9.0 10.07-0.1217.4-9.0 r. 0-601 15-27 ; 0.6-2.0 0-9 1 27-35 9-241 35-45 24-301 15-30 30 1 --- 0.06-0.2 0.06-0.2 0.06-0.2 1 0-111 20-27 ; 0.6-2.0 111-261 25-35 1 0.6-2.0 126-601 15-30 1 0.6-2.0 ; 1 1 1 1 1 1 0-4 1 15-27 ;. 0.2-0.6 : 4-151 20-35 1 2.0-6.0 115-601 15-25 1 0.2-2.0 4 4 I 1 0-191 20-27 1 0.6-2.0 119-60; 35-95 1 0.06-0.2 1 1 1 1 0-171 10-18 1 2.0-6.0 117-601 10-18 1 2.0-6.0 ; 1 1 Y 6 1 3 1 1 1 <2 Low--- --- - --- 10.241 1 ; <2 :Moderate 10.371 <4 1Moderate10.431 <4 )Moderate 10.241 --- 1---_ 1----f 1 1 1 1 4 1 4 4 1 1 I i I 1 1 1 4 4 3-6` 5 3-5 s 2 20-40.R 1 1 1 ; 1 i 10.19-0.22:6.1-7.8 <2 ;Moderate 10.32; 5 1 2-4 :0.17-0.2216.6-8.4 <2 ;Moderate 10.431 1 10.13-0.2017.4-9.0 <2 :Low 10.431 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 10.16-0.1817.4-8.4 2-8 :Moderate 10.241 5 1 2-4 10.1.0-0.141.7.4-8.4 <8 ;Low 10.201 1 10.14-0:1617.9-8.4 <8 1Moderate10.321 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10.17-0.19:5.6-7.8 <2 :Moderate 10.281 5 ; 2-4 10.13-0.1516.6-7.8 <2 1High 10.241 1 1 1 1 : 1 10.16-0.1816.6-8.4 <2 ;Low 10.201 5 1 3-6 10.15-0.1717.9-8.4 <2 :Low 10.201 1 I I ; 1 1 T I * See description of the map unit for composition and behavior characteristics of the map unit. STATE OF COLORADO Bill Owens, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES • DIVISION OF WILDLIFE AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER • • Bruce McCloskey, Director 6060 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80216 Telephone: (303) 297-1192 March 31,2005 Mountain Cross Engineering, Inc_ Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 826 '/2 Grand Ave, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Attn: Chris Hale Dear Chris, F©r Wildlife - For People I have reviewed the WRIS Maps for the proposal area (Booms Place Subdivision), and I am very knowledgeable of this piece of property. The property does fail within deer and elk ranges, more specifically mule deer winter range. The overall range for elk is not significant involving this property. Mule deer winter range and associated use by deer is usually weather dependent. The area being mapped as winter range is also critical winter range. Meaning this area could be of critical importance to mule deer in one or two winters out of ten. Areas such as this property cannot stand alone as important habitat if the habitat in and around it is being fragmented which is the case in the Rifle area. Therefore 1 would suggest that this subdivision would not be of significant impact if it is subdivided as proposed. In respect to small mammals and birds, any disturbance in the habitat types they are using is important and has an impact, however a proposal such as this one would not have a significant impact on populations of those species. No known populations of threatened or endangered species occupy this property, plant or wildlife. The Division of Wildlife (DOW) would ask that the proponent of this subdivision require kennels for dogs before a certificate of occupancy is issued. The DOW would also request, with the purpose of expunging DOW from liability for game damage on parcels sold (new owners responsible to protect hay and ornamentals)_ Overall this subdivision will not have considerable impacts to wildlife due to location and manner in which it is being sectored out. Respectfully submitted: erry Will District Wiflife Manager Colorado Division of Wildlife 970-984-9292 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Russe George, Executive Dir WILDLIFE COMMISSION, Philip James, Chair • Jeffrey Crawford, Vice -Chair • Brad Phelps, Secretary L .mhcarc Romani Rlar4 . Thiry: Fix idea . Rirk Fncfmrn . r lairs CYhiaar . Peas Ciine.nakar. Kon Trrrac . . . . . . .. . _ . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . ..... .. . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • - - • • • • • • • • - • • ..... . . .. . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . ............. . ............ . .... • • • • • • • • • • - • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .. . . . . . . • • • • — • • • — • • • • • • ..... • • LKG — ---- DitCh/Stn90177 . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . • • - • • • • • • • • • • - • • • ' " – " • • • • • • • • ' ' • • • • • - • • . a • . . : • • • • • • . • * • • • • . . . • . . i,-- --. ............ten Rooms Mace — Road • • • .- • • • • • • • • • • ... .......................(......... . , .. . • - • • • • • • •• • • • • • ••• • • • • • • • • • • . --- Highway/Road SIM Winter Range .. . • • . . • • • NM Town of Rble [ 4 Sections ..... ...... . ... . .. ... • . . • • • • • • • • • • ............::................:.................................. . . . - • "- • - ' • ' ". • • ............... .. . • • • - • • ""• • "• • ....... - • "" • 1000 2000 ...... • .." .....- . . . . . . . . . .. . . • • • ' * ' — • - • . . . . . . . . • . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' • • ' ' • " ' • – ' ' – " • . . . . . ... . . ... . . . . . . . . . . ... .............. . . ... . . ..... . . . . . . .- . . . . ... . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • - • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • . ..... . . ... . ... . . . . . ... . . ... . . . . . .. . . . — " ' ' ' " " ' • ' " ' " – • " • " " ' " ' – ' " ' " " ' " • • " • " ' " ' ' ' • • ' • ' • " ' ' • ' " " ' 41, 8c& I 2000 tram Gwiliiid opiates= Ili, MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING. INC. . . . . • • •.•;.••••••.`.*.•::.:.•.*:.•:.•.•.•. _ ... .. . . . . „ . ... ... . . . . .. , ....... • " * ' • " " " ' • ' ' ' " ' ' ' • " " • ' ' • • • ' • " " ' .. ' ....... ' .......... ........ . ...... . . . . . ............ . ....... . .. • . . . . . . .. . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . ' . ....... . . . . . . . . .. — .... . „ .... , . . . . • • • .. : •• .., . • ' . . . . ... . . . -. • -. ....".'.•.".•.' . ' .. ' .. — ... • – . ....... . ........ – . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... '. . . . . . .. ...–. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ....... . 23 . '--. . .. ' .. ' .............. ..•.'f . .'.".•.•.•.•.'.•.•.•.".'.•,-... : : : : : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . • ' • • . . , . . . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . - . . • ..... . . . . . . . • . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . ' ' • • • ' • . . . . .. . . . . • . . . . . . •••• .... • • • • • • • • • • • • • - - • -•• . . . -. .".•.-.';:.'.'.'.'.'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • ` • • * ' ' • ' - ' ' • – - • - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' – .... • • - . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . ...... • " • " ' " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • .. – - • ... . .. .. .. . . . 21a .• .• .• .• .• .• .• .• .• . . . .. .. .. ,. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . . / .............• . ...a .. ... ... ... ... ... ..• .•. •.. . •• .• • .• • .r • •. - •• .•. .•. .•. .•. .••. •a •.•.•.•.•.•. • .- ... • - • / .s ... ..• ... ... ..ii ..e ..• . ,.• ... .w ..• ..• ... ... .–• ..• ..• ..r ... ..• . ..e ... . • . . . ._.. . ..• .. . .7. . . . ... .. ..• . ..• ..• ..• .,r . • • • . . . . • • ..... • . • • • . r • • . . . . . • . • . . . . . • • • • . . . • • • • • • • . . . . • . • • r • . . • • . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ". . • • • . • • • .. • • • • • • • • • . . . . • t • • ...•.... • • — " • • * • * * • " " • • * — " * — • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • * • • • • • • * • • •• • • . . a . . . • • • r • . . w • • . . . • • • • . . . • • • • . . a • • • . • • e • • • . " " • . . • • • r • . . r ........ . .......... . . . . • . . . . • " * • — * • " • " . " • " — " • • • " . • • • . . • • • • • . • • • • r . . . • • r • . • • • • • ...... • • • .• • • • • . n • . . • • . • • • • • . • . . • . . . . . F... VI...* ....... • • • • . • • • • • . n • • • e . • . . • • • • • • • . • • . • . . • . • r • r r • • • • • . . . • r . . • • • • r . . . . . ... . ...... • a . e . . ;."...•••••••*••• • a • e • • • • • • • . . . . • • • ...... " • ..... . . • • • . . . • _ . . • • • . • " " • * — " " " • . • . • r • . . • • • . . . • . a • • •'•• •*; .*•• •• .....*. * • *. .. . •• ... . .• .••••• • • • . • • " • . . . . • • . . r . • • •• • . . . • • • . . . • • . . . • . • s r • . . . • . . . . • . • s . • . . .... . • • • • • .... • .. • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • A • • • • • • • e • • a • • • •• ........ • • • " • • • • • m • . • • • • • • • • I . • • 4 • • • • M • . • a • • • . . • • • • • r . • . • • • r . • • . . . r • . . . r a • . • • • • . . . . ••••••;•••••• . . • • • • r • m • • • r • . . . . . • . • •• . a• • •. • •• 4 .• . •• . •. . .. • •. • •. a •• • •• r •. . •. . .• • .. • • r • . • . • • • • • . .... . . . 4.. ... . r • . • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • .. • .• • ..• .• . • • ..... .• • . . . • • • a . • • r . . . • • . • • • . • • . • . . • . • r • . • r . • • . • • • . . . . . r . • . .. . 12 r • ..... • r • . • • . . n . . • . • . . . • . . . . . . . • . . . . . • • • . . . . - . . • • e. . • • • • • • • • . • • . • ....v..... iamaig................ . ..... . . . • • • r . . . . • • . • . . • • • . . • • • • • • r • • • • • • . . . • . • • . . . r • • • . • . • • . • • . . . .................. .... ...... . .......... • • • •- • • ... . ..... .......... ...... . ............ ...... .. .........; • • • - • . ..... • • • • • • A . • • • • . • .. . • • • . r • • .. ............. ... ............. . ..... .................... . • ................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • ..... • .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exhibit - Mule Deer Winter Range BOOMS PLACE SUBDIVISION PARTS 0! SECTION 3 MID SECTION 2 TOS. RON, Or 17fE "IN P.M. GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO • 3 233 2 32 210 Booms Place Highway/Rood D Town of Rifle Data SWUM' B. Deft from Garfield Cow* GIS and DOW MSOda: Augur! 2005as • -- Ditch/Stream Road !!Winter Range 1-1 Sections 1000 20ri0 Scale 1 —2000 MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING. NC. T5S T65 43) 221 �4 71 Exhibit - ELir Winter Range DOOMS PLACE SUBDIFL9IOP PARS OP SOON 3 AND SXCTION 2 nw ROW OF TEE WM P.M GAM= COW= COLORADO • Drainage Report and Plan for: Booms Place Subdivision Garfield County, CO Prepared for: Ms. Robin J. Fritzlan 1582 County Road 233 Rifle, CO 81650 Phone: 970.625.4616 Prepared by: March 2005 • MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING, INC. Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 826 102 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ph 970.945.5544k 97©.945.5558 www.mountaencross-0ng. corn MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING. INC. Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 826'V: Grand Avenue, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 P: 970.945.5544 F 970,945.5558 www .mountaincross-cng.cum • • • TABLE OF CONTENTS Drainage Report Page 1-5 Vicinity Map . Figure 1 SCS Soils and Vegetation . Figure 2 Existing Drainage Basins & Concentration Paths Figure 3 Proposed Drainage Basins & Concentration Paths Figure 4 Drainage Plan (24"x36") Figure DRN SCS Curve Numbers . Appendix 1 NCAA Atlas Maps . Appendix 2 Time of Concentration . Appendix 3 Project Flow Calculations Appendix 4 Conveyance Sizing Appendix 5 Detention Calculations Appendix 6 • Drainage Report Booms Place Subdivision March 2005 Purpose and Scope of Report This study evaluates the Booms Place Subdivison project from a storm water management perspective. It supplies data, calculations, and design criteria that will be used to mitigate the site concerning storm runoff. Runoff from snowmelt is typically very Iarge in volume but because it happens over a much longer time period, the peak flows are typically much less than a rainfall event. Therefore storm water is defined in this study to be surface water that is a direct result from a rainfall event. Rainfall events are defined from the probability of the magnitude of an event occurring within a given number of years. Storm water management in this study is concerned with two aspects of runoff: managing the quantity of water to protect public safety and property from damage due to storm water flooding and managing the quality of water to protect downstream ecology from damage due to concentrated pollutants. All flows are listed in units of cubic feet per second (cfs) unless otherwise noted. This study will provide a project overview, a brief description of the methodology, a discussion of the analysis performed, and the results of the analysis. Project Overview The Booms Place Subdivision project is Iocated to the northeast of the City of Rifle, in Garfield County, Colorado. It is located on Graham Mesa, varies in approximate elevation from 5,790 feet to 5,620 feet, is at approximately latitude N 39°33'30", longitude W 107°45'00", and is in Section 2 and Section 3, of Township 6 South, Range 93 West, in the 6th Principal Meridian as shown in the Vicinity Map, Figure I. It is a project involving an area of approximately 63.8 acres. A water storage tank for the City of Rifle occupies the northeast corner of the project, with a drainage and overflow swale contained in an easement to a detention pond in the northeast center of the project. The Rifle Creek Cannon Ditch flows diagonally to the southeast across the project with the abandoned section still bisecting the project. An existing single family residence is located in the northern middle of the project. The proposed project will divided the property into 4 lots. Lots I and 2 will contain approximately 3.9 acres each on the northwest portion of the project. Lot 3 will contain approximately 10.3 acres and the existing residence in the north -center of the project. Lot 4 will contain the balance of the property, approximately 45.7 acres, and the southern and eastern portions of the project. MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING, INC. Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 826'6 Grand Avenue, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 • P: 970.945.5544 F. 970.945.5558 www.mountruncross-eng.cam Drainage Report Booms Place Subdivision March 2005 It is the intent of this study and the attached drainage plan to: 1) Convey safely through the project site the 25 -year storm event. 2) Evaluate potential for damage to the project site by the 100 -year storm event and mitigate the potential damage where practical. 3) Provide detention sufficient enough to release from the site no greater than the calculated existing flows currently being released for the 25 -year and 100 -year storm events. 4) Provide criteria for placing temporary and permanent erosion control measures. Methodology The design of a storm water management plan begins with a calculation of the volume of water that will be produced from a rainfall event. The SCS TR -55 method was used for estimating the amount of runoff that will occur. This method calculates runoff from SCS curve number, basin area, precipitation, and time of concentration. SCS Curve Number A curve number is assigned to a basin that gives a relationship between the amount of precipitation that becomes surface water and the amount of water that is lost to infiltration, evaporation, or transpiration. The SCS curve number is a function of soil type, vegetative-cover/land-use, and antecedent moisture conditions. SCS soils and vegetative-cover/land-use are shown in Figure 2. Because the land -use and the soil types vary through the drainage basin, a composite curve number is assigned based on the weight of the area and its respective curve number. The curve number calculations are attached in Appendix 1. Basin Area Drainage basins have the characteristic that any precipitation falling within that area will drain to the same point of discharge. Basins were delineated from project topographic maps as shown in Figure 3. Precipitation Extreme runoff events from urban areas in western Colorado are caused by cloudburst type storms that are characterized by short periods of high intensity rainfall. The SCS Type II 24-hour distribution reflects this and was used for this study. Estimating rainfall for engineering applications is based on the probability of the magnitude of a storm occurring within a return period. Volume III of the NOAA Atlas 2 maps for Colorado was used for defining design storm rainfall depths for modeled events at SMCGC The following table presents total precipitation depths for the 100, 50, 25, 10, 5, and 2 -year, 24-hour events. The NOAA Atlas Maps are attached in Appendix 2. MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING, INC. Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 826 '6 Grand Avenue, Glenwood Springs. CO 81601 P. 970 945 5544 F. 970.945 5558 worts nlnunlaincross-cng.coin 2 Drainage Report Booms Place Subdivision March 2005 DESIGN STORM DEPTHS RETURN PERIOD (years) RAINFALL DEPTH (inches) 2 1.0 5 1.4 10 1.6 25 2.0 50 2.2 100 2.4 Time of Concentration Manning's kinematic flow equation was used to estimate flow velocity. Length and velocity of flow are used to calculate time. Three flow elements are used: overland -flow, collector -channel flow, and main -channel flow. The parameters needed to determine the flow elements include length, slope, Manning's "n" value, and channel shape. These parameters were determined from topography. The time of concentration calculations are attached in Appendix 3. Analysis The following table summarizes the existing drainage characteristics for the drainage basins delineated: Existing Basin Characteristics Basila Area (ac) CN Tc (min) A 71.66 60 40.9 B 13.71 69 33.8 C , 4.62 69 28.6 The following table summarizes the proposed drainage characteristics for the drainage basins delineated: Proposed Basin Characteristics Basin Area (ac) CN Te (min) A 71.66 60 40.9 B 13.71 70 33.8 C 4.62 69 28.6 The flows for the existing and proposed basins were calculated using the SCS TR -55 method described above. Existing and Proposed drainage basins, along with the concentration paths, are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively. If the flow is increased from existing levels, then detention is planned. The flows are summarized in MOIJNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING. INC. Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 826'h Grand Avenue. Glenwood Springs. CO 8160I P. 970 945 5544 F: 970.945.5558 www.mountaincross-cng.com 3 Drainage Report Booms Place Subdivision March 2005 the following table for the 25 -year and 100 -year storm events. All calculations are attached for review in Appendix 4. Basin Existing Proposed Detention Planned 25 -Yr 100 -Yr 25 -Yr 100 -Yr A 1.32 3.20 1.32 3.20 No B 1.26 2.79 1.51 3.17 Yes C 0.47 1.03 0.47 1.03 No Pipe sizes were calculated using the flows generated from the 25 -year storm events listed above and Manning's equation for open channel flow. The recommended pipe material, minimum pipe size, and minimum slope for each basin are summarized in the following table. Pipe routing is shown on the Drainage Plan, Figure DRN. All calculations are attached for review in Appendix 5. Basin 25 -yr Flow Material Culvert Size 15" Min. Slope 1.0% Passe 10Q -y Yes A 1.32 _ Corrugated B 1.51 Corrugated 15" 1.0% Yes C 0.47 Corrugated 15" 1.0% Yes s r Drainage channels are planned to convey concentrated flows through the project and to withstand the erosive potential of the 25 -yr storm event. The channel shape is a "V" tupe ditch with 1:1 horizontal to vertical side slopes with a depth of 12". The erosive flow velocity for vegetated, earth channels is between 4 and 5 feet per second (fps). The channel slope steeper than 4% creates velocities greater than 5 fps and will be armored with slopes greater than 4%. Riprap is usually the preferred armor due to its natural appearance and availability. Calculations are provided in Appendix 5. Results The drainage design and analysis follows the commonly held practice of detaining storm flows so that the release from proposed does not exceed existing levels. If the impacts to a site are minimal, a minimal increase in flows would be expected. The project has only three new residences planned on large lots, as would be expected, the increase in flows from before and after the project is minimal. The flaws from the site are relatively small. The pipe size could be reduced smaller than the 15" size to safely convey the 25 -year storm but the 15" pipe size was determined to be a practical minimum for maintenance and clean-out purposes. Both the 15" pipe and the 12" V -ditch are adequate to convey the anticipated 100 -year storm. Since it is difficult to anticipate the exact location of residential locations on the large lots with large building envelopes, the analysis assumed a conservative worst case approach MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING, INC. 4 Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 826 `/: Grand Avenue, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 P: 976.945.5544 F. 976,945.5558 www.mountamcross-eng.com Drainage Report Booms Place Subdivision March 2005 and clustered the buildings within Basin B, a smaller basin where the affects of impervious areas would be most realized. Even for this worst case, the detention required is small and best handled on the individual lots instead of in one large pond. There is the chance that the building construction could be spaced out in Basins A and C as well as B. If this is the case the relatively small increase in impervious areas compared to the size of the Basins will render the increase in Flows essentially negligible. Again individual residential detention provides the best alternative, Maintenance would be the responsibility of the homeowner. The drainage basins and concentration paths between the existing and proposed could be severely altered by simply breaching the abandoned ditch that bisects the project. Since the large building envelopes makes the location of the residences difficult to anticipate, individual detention seems to be a simple and easy ;elution. Therefore, individual detention is proposed to be the difference between the xisting and proposed runoff. The target release rate should be 0.02 cfs or 9 gallons per minute for the assumed impervious area of 5000 square feet with detention volume of: [(2.17" — 0.38") 112" per foot] * 5,000 square feet = 746 cubic feet / lot It is generally accepted that the most substantial concentration of pollutants, including erosion, occurs when the frequently occurring storm produces limited runoff. Permanent erosion control measures will be employed using Best Management Practices. Erosion is best controlled at the source by revegetation of disturbed areas. End sections, and riprap aprons are planned on the daylight end of pipes to slow and spread water. Erosion protection is planned for steeper channels to eliminate erosion for the 25 -year storm flows. Temporary erosion control measures are to be employed during construction including the use of silt fencing, hay bale check dams, and the protection of culvert inlets. The drainage plan for the site is attached that shows the project site, the plan for flow routing, the individual detention, and erosion control. There is a certain amount of uncertainty in hydrologic calculations. However, when constructed in accordance with this report and the drainage plan, it is our opinion that the design will safely convey the runoff flows and volume of the 25 -year design storm event for this site. "Thank you for the opportunity to provide this report. Feel free to call if you have any questions, concerns, or comments. Sincerely, Mount in Cross En tneering, Inc. Chris Hale, PE MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING, INC. Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 826 '4 Grand Avenue, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 1': 970.945.5544 F. 970.945.5558 www mountaincross-cng.com 5 • • FIGURES Vicinity Map Figure 1 SCS Soils and Vegetation Figure 2 Existing Drainage Basins & Concentration Paths Figure 3 Proposed Drainage Basins & Concentration Paths Figure 4 Drainage Plan (24"x36") Figure DRN OAK 41, � 1Ft 2000' teal fec DrainP1a, 500-001 FIGURE 1 Vicinity Map Booms Place Subdivision MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING, INC. Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 826 112 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ph 970.945.5544 fx 970.945.5568 www.mountaincro-eng.com '1idle Areas: o s Mixture of Grass, and Brush in Fair Condition Herbaceo 55 55 51 Below Irrigatio Ditch: re, Grasslani , or Range in Fair Con ition SCS "• ils Delinea • it Mes and Hillside V getation: Sageb sh IN/ Grasp Understor Fair Condition awl. Hale Pa% ma. DroinPiro JOS 600-001 FIGURE 2 SCS Soils & Vegetation Booms Place Subdivision 56 MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING, INC. Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 826 1/2 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ph 970.946.6544 Ix 970.946,5558 www.mounIafncross-eng.com w 0 111.1 Drainage Basin Delineations lymaramc Chrfr H0N owu rac OrugsPion FIGURE 3 Existing Drainage Basins & Concentration Paths Booms Place Subdivision MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING, INC. Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 826 112 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ph 970.945.5644 he 970 945 5558 www, mountaincro$s—eng.corn s .praWage Basin Delineations 03/xa/rtis ,00. CSWill HOW MO 'FILE tips -001 FIGURE 4 Proposed Drainage Basins & Concentration Paths Booms Place Subdivision mg. -.r.. _1 'i+DIINTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING, INC Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 826 112 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ph 970.945.5544 tx 970.945.5558 www. mountafncrosa-eng.com • Appendix 1 SCS Curve Numbers • • • • • Map Number Description Hydrologic Group 27 Halaquepts, nearly level B 34 Ildenfonso stony loam, 25% 45% B 49 Olney loam, 1% - 3% B 51 Olney loam, 6% - 12% B 55 Potts loam, 3% - 6% B 56 Potts loam, 6%4 - 12% B • Basin A Improved Existing Curve Number Calculations 3121637.94 = Total Area (sf) 71.66 = Total Area (ac) Gravel Roads (lin.frwidth) 87120 85 67.1 Paved Roads (lin.ft'width) 13200 98 11,7 Houses (number'impervious area) 5000 98 4.4 Landscaping, Good 5000 61 2.8 3.5% 86.1 House Footprint Assumed to be 2500 sq ft./unit Other impervious Assumed to be 2500 sq ft./unit Landscaping Assumed to be 5000 sq ft./unit Basin B Improved Improved Areas 3.5% 86.1 3.0 Sagebrush w/ Grass Understory 58.9% 51 30.0 Herbaceous37.6% 71 26.7 Pasture, grassland, or range 0.0% 69 - 100.0% 59.8 = CN 597195.99 Total Area (sf) 13.71 = Total Area (ac) Gravel Roads (lin.ft'width) 0 85 0.0 Paved Roads (lin.ft'width) 0 98 0.0 Houses (number'impervisus area) 0 98 0.0 Landscaping, Good 0 61 0.0 0.0% 0.0 House Footprint Assumed to be 2500 sq ft./unit Other impervious Assumed to be 2500 sq ft./unit I andscaping Assumed to be 5000 sq ft /unit • Basin C Improved Improved Areas 0.0% 0.0 Sagebrush w! Grass Understory 0.0% 51 Herbaceous 10.0% 71 7.1 Pasture, grassland, or range 90.0% 69 62.10 100.0% 69.2 = CN 201230.69 Total Area (sf) 4.62 = Total Area (ac) Gravel Roads (lin.ft'width) 0 85 0.0 Paved Roads (lin.ft'width) 0 98 0.0 Houses (numberimpervious area) 0 98 0.0 Landscaping, Good 0 61 0.0 0.0% 0.0 House Footprint Assumed to be 2500 sq ft./unit Other impervious Assumed to be 2500 sq ft./unit 1. andscaping Assumed to be 5000 sq ft.lunit improved Areas 0.0% 0.0 Sagebrush w/ Grass Understory 0.0% 51 - Herbaceous 5.0% 71 3.6 Pasture. grassland, or range 95 0% 69 65.55 100.0% 69.1 = CN • • Basin A Improved Proposed Curve Number Calculations 3121637.94 = Total Area (sf) 71.66 = Total Area (ac) Gravel Roads (Iin.ft`width) 116600 85 70.9 Paved Roads (lin.ft"width) 13200 98 9.3 Houses (numberimpervious area) 5000 98 3.5 Landscaping, Good 5000 61 2.2 4.5% 85.8 House Footprint Assumed to be 2500 sq ft./unit Other impervious Assumed to be 2500 sq ft./unit Landscaping Assumed to be 5000 sq ft./unit Basin B improved Improved Areas 4.5% 85.8 3,8 Sagebrush w/ Grass Understory 58.9% 51 30.0 Herbaceous 36.6% 71 26.0 Pasture, grassland, or range 0.0% 69 100.0% 59.9 = CN 597195.99 Total Area (sf) 13.71 = Total Area (ac) Gravel Roads (Iin.ft`width) 17600 85 31.4 Paved Roads (Iin.frwidth) 0 98 0.0 Houses (number'irnpervious area) 15000 98 30.9 Landscaping. Good 15000 61 19.2 8.0% 81.5 House Footprint Assumed to be 2500 sq ft./unit Other impervious Assumed to be 2500 sq ft./unit Landscaping Assumed to be 5000 sq ft./unit Basin C improved Improved Areas 8.0% 81.5 6.5 Sagebrush w/ Grass Understory 0.0% 51 - Herbaceous 9A% 71 6.4 Pasture, grassland. or range 83.0°/0 69 57.27 100.0% 70.2 = CN 201230.69 Total Area (sf) 4.62 = Total Area (ac) Gravel Roads (Iin.ft`width) 0 85 0.0 Paved Roads (lin.frwidth) 0 98 0.0 Houses (numberlmpervious area) 0 98 0.0 Landscaping, Good 0 61 0.0 0.0% 0.0 House Footprint Assumed to be 2500 sq ft./unit Other impervious Assumed to be 2500 sq ft./unit Landscaping Assumed to be 5000 sq ftlunit Improved Areas 0.0% 0.0 - Sagebrush w/ Grass Understory 0.0% 51 - Herbaceous 5.0% 71 3.6 Pasture. grassland. or range 95.0% 69 65.55 100.0% 69.1 = CN • • • Appendix 2 NOAA Atlas Maps • • • COLORADO: NOAA ATLAS 2, Volume III 2 Year, 24 Hour Precipitation BOOMS PLACE SUBDIVISION MgiINTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING, INC. Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 026 112 Grand Avenue Gienwaod Springs, CO 01601 1111 Ir9.94S S4 t. 970.,45 5SS9.,.n.w.mounwdn,ros• Wing.C«.* 0 vf in COLORADO: NOAA ATLAS 2, Volume III 5 Year, 24 Hour Precipitation BOOMS PLACE SUBDIVISION MOUNT/MN CROSS ENGINEERINb, INC. Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 026 V2 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970.945 5544 tx 970 945.5559 www rrtrountaincross-ong corn COLORADO: NOAA ATLAS 2, Volume III 10 Year, 24 Hour Precipitation BOOMS PLACE SUBDIVISION MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING, INC. Civil and EnvIronivental Consulting and Design 826 I!2 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 61601 ph 970 945.7544 f. 970.947.4758 www.moontx nvm.srny cam COLORADO: NCAA ATLAS 2, Volume HI 25 Year, 24 Hour Precipitation BOOMS PLACE SUBDIVISION MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING, INC. Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design $26 lf2 Grande Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ph 170.1.1S.esu f. s:6.7i 5.5556' Ww.mountau.crossenq cam COLORADO: NOAA ATLAS 2, Volume III 50 Year, 24 Hour Precipitation BOOMS PLACE SUBDIVISION MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING, INC. Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 826 112 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CD 87601 ph ITO 416.5644 fz 970.94S 55.5P www.meteLlamcro”-.ny.corn aP se si hl 1.4 COLORADO: NOAA ATLAS 2, Volume III 100 Year, 24 Hour Precipitation BOOMS PLACE SUBDIVISION MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING, INC. Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 826 112 Grand Avenue GEenwood Springs, CO 61601 ph 170.545 5513 rs 570 14 4.5551 ;Awn nwu.. e,....<,.ms sa..11 con, • • • Appendix 3 Time of Concentration • Overland Shallow Channel __ Basin Length Elv Diff Slope Length EIv Diff Slope Length EIv Diff Slope A 300 15.00 0.05 1480 r 115 0.08 1950 5 0.003 B 300 12.00 0.04 725 17 0.02 - C 300 14.00 0.05 425 14 0.03 - • • Basin A • sheet Flow tmp#1.txt uescription Manning's n Flow Length TWO Yr, 4hr Rainfall Land Slope computed Sheet flow time 0.1300 300.0000 ft 1.0000 in 0.0500 ft/ft 0.4349 hrs Shallow concentrated Flow Description L,urface Flow Length watercourse slope velocity computed shallow flow time s h. inel Flow Unpaved 1480.0000 ft 0.0800 ft/ft 4.5635 fps > 0.0901 hrs Description Flow Area wetted Perimeter Flaw Length Channel slope manningg's n Hydraulic radius ................ velocity computed Channel flow time *************************** 4.5000 ft2 69.0000 in 1950.0000 ft 0.0030 ft/ft 0.0200 9.3913 in 3.4560 fps a 0.1567 hrs Total Time of Concentration **************************** Page 1 a 0.6817 hrs Basin B Sheet FlOW Description Manning's n 0.1300 Flow Length 300.0000 ft Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.0000 in Land Slope . 0.0400 ft/ft Computed Sheet flow time > 0.4755 hrs Shallow concentrated Flow Description Surface unpaved Flow Length 725,0000 ft Watercourse Slope ....' 0.0200 ft/ft Velocity 2.2818 fps Computed shallow flow time > 0.0083 hrs *******»******************* Total Time of concentration ...'....... .......... ....> 0.5638 hrs **»^o*^**^*^*********r*»***^ • Basin C • • Sheet Flow tmp#4.txt Description Manning's n 0.1300 Flow Length 300.0000 ft Two Yr, 24 hr Rainfall 1.0000 in Land slope 0.0500 ft/ft Computed Sheet flow time > 0.4349 hrs Shallow Concentrated Flow Description Surface unpaved Flow Length 425.0000 ft watercourse Slope 0.0300 ft/ft. velocity 2.7946 fps Computed shallow flow time ,.> 0.0422 hrs Total Time of Concentration .... > 0.4771 hrs **************************** Page 1 • • • Appendix 4 Project Flow Calculations • • Existing Hydrologic Summary Basin Area Ex CN Tc acres minutes A 71.66 59.8 40.9 B 13.71 69.2 33.8 C 4.62 69.1 28.6 Proposed Hydrologic Summary Basin Area Pr CN Tc acres minutes A 71.66 59.9 40.9 B 13.71 70.2 33.8 C 4.62 69.1 28.6 • • • Existing Proposed 25 -yr Flow Passes Detention Basin 25 -yr Flow 100 -yr Flow 25 -yr Flow 100 -yr Flow Pipe Design 100 -yr Required A 1.32 3.20 1.32 3.20 15" Corr. @ 1% Min Yes No B 1.26 2.79 1.51 3.17 15" Corr. @ 1 % Min Yes Yes C 0.47 1.03 0.47 1.03 15" Corr. @ 1% Min Yes No • • • tmp#5.txt Graphical Peak Discharge Given Input Data: Description Rainfall distribution Frequency Rainfall, P (24 -hours) Drainage area Runoff curve number, CN Time of concentration, Tc Pond and Swamp Areas computed Results: Initial abstraction, Ia Ia/P Unit peak discharge, qu Runoff, Q Pond and swamp adjustment, Fp Peak discharge, qp method Ex Basin A - 25 year Type II 25 years 2.0000 in 0.1120 mi 2 60 0.6817 hrs 0.0000 % of Area 1.3333 in 0.5000 194.2386 csm/in 0.0606 in 1.0000 1.3185 cfs Page 1 • tmp#6.txt Graphical Peak Discharge method Given Input Data: Description Rainfall distribution Frequency Rainfall, P (24 -hours) Drainage area Runoff curve number, CN ......... Time of concentration, Tc ....... Pond and swamp Areas .. Computed Results: Initial abstraction, la ......... Ia/P unit peak discharge, qu Runoff, Q Pond and swamp adjustment, Fp Peak discharge, qp Ex Basin A - 100 year Type II 100 years 2.4000 in 0.1120 mi2 60 0.6817 hrs 0.0000 % of Area 1.3333 in 0.5000 194.2386 csm/in 0.1471 in 1.0000 3.2007 cfs Page 1 • • tmp#8.txt Graphical Peak Discharge method Given Input Data: Description Rainfall distribution Frequency ........... ... ........ Rainfall, P (24 -hours) Drainage area Runoff curve number, CN Time of concentration, Tc Pond and Swamp Areas Computed Results: Initial abstraction, Ia Ia/P ... Unit peak discharge, qu Runoff, Q Pond and swamp adjustment, Fp Peak discharge, qp Ex Basin 8 25 year Type II 25 years 2.0000 in 0.0214 mit 69 0.5633 hrs 0.0000 % of Area 0.8986 in 0.4493 271.8119 csm/in 0.2169 in 1.0000 1.2615 cfs • • • tmp#7.txt Graphical Peak Discharge Given Input Data: Description Rainfall distribution Frequency Rainfall, P (24 -hours) Drainage area Runoff curve number, CN Time of concentration, Tc Pond and Swamp Areas Computed Results: Initial abstraction, Ia Ia/P unit peak discharge, qu Runoff, Q Pond and swamp adjustment, Fp Peak discharge, qp method Ex Basin B - 100 year Type II 100 years 2.4000 in 0.0214 mi2 69 0.5633 hrs 0.0000 % of Area 0.8986 in 0.3744 346.7642 csm/in 0.3761 in 1.0000 2.7909 cfs • • • tmp#9.txt Graphical Peak Discharge method Given Input Data: Description Ex Basin C - 25 year Rainfall distribution Type 11 Frequency 25 years Rainfall, P (24 -hours) 2.0000 in Drainage area 0.0072 mi2 Runoff curve number, CN 69 Time of concentration, Tc 0.4767 hrs Pond and swamp Areas 0.0000 % of area computed Results: Initial abstraction, 1a 0.8986 in ra/P 0.4493 Unit peak discharge, qu 298.3057 csm/in Runoff, Q 0.2169 in Pond and swamp adjustment, Fp 1.0000 Peak discharge, qp 0.4658 cfs Page 1 • • tmp#10.txt Graphical Peak Discharge method Given Input Data: Description Ex Basin C - 100 year Rainfall distribution Type II Frequency ... 100 years Rainfall, P (24 -hours) ... 2.4000 in Drainage area 0.0072 mi2 Runoff curve number, CN 69 Time of concentration, Tc 0.4767 hrs Pond and swamp Areas 0.0000 % of Area computed Results: Initial abstraction, is 0.8986 in Ia/P 0.3744 Unit peak discharge, qu 381.1229 csm/in Runoff, Q 0.3761 in Pond and swamp adjustment, Fp 1.0000 Peak discharge, qp 1.0320 cfs Page 1 • • • tmp#15.txt Graphical Peak Discharge Given Input Data: Description Rainfall distribution Frequency Rainfall, P (24 -hours) Drainage area Runoff curve number, CN Time of concentration, Tc Pond and Swamp Areas computed Results: Initial abstraction, is Ia/P Unit peak discharge, qu Runoff, Q Pond and swamp adjustment, Fp Peak discharge, qp method PR Basin A 25 year Type 11 25 years 2.0000 in 0.1120 mi2 60 0.6817 hrs 0.0000 % of Area 1.3333 in 0.5000 194.2386 csm/in 0.0606 in 1.0000 1.3185 cfs Page 1 • • • tmp#16.txt Graphical Peak Discharge Given Input Data: Description Rainfall distribution Frequency Rainfall, P (24 -hours) Drainage area Runoff curve number, CN Time of concentration, Tc Pond and swamp Areas Computed Results: Initial abstraction, la Ia/P Unit peak discharge, qu Runoff, Q Pond and swamp adjustment, Fp ... Peak discharge, qp method PR Basin A - 100 year Type II 100 years 2.4000 in 0.1120 mit 60 0.6817 hrs 0.0000 % of Area 1.3333 in 0.5000 194.2386 csm/in 0.1471 in 1.0000 3.2007 cfs Page 1 • • • tmp#l4-txt Graphical Peak Discharge method Given Input Data: oescriptimn PR Basin B - 25 year Rainfall distribution Type II Frequency 25 years Rainfall. P (24 -hours) 2'0000 in Drainage area 0.02I4 mi3 Runoff curve number, CN 70 Time of concentration, Tc 0-5633 Mrs Pond and Swamp Areas 0.0000 % of Area computed Results: Initial abstraction, Ia .-...- 0.8571 in Ia/P 0.4286 unit peak discharge, qu 293.5055 csm/in Runoff, Q ............ 0.2406 in Pond and swamp adjustment, Fp 1.0000 Peak discharge, qp 1.5112 cfs Page 1 • • Graphical Peak Given Input Data: Description Rainfall distribution tmp#13.txt Discharge method Frequency .. Rainfall, P (24 -hours) Drainage area Runoff curve number, CN Time of concentration, Tc Pond and Swamp Areas computed Results: Initial abstraction, la Ia/P Unit peak discharge, qu ...... Runoff, Q Pond and swamp adjustment, Fp Peak discharge, qp PR Basin B - 100 year Type 1I 100 years 2.4000 in 0.0214 mi2 70 0.5633 hrs 0.0000 % of Area 0.8571 in 0.3571 362.4795 csm/in 0.4084 in 1.0000 3.1680 cfs Page 1 • • • tmp#12.txt Graphical Peak Discharge method Given Input Data: Description PR Basin c - 25 year Rainfall distribution Type II Frequency .. 25 years Rainfall, P (24 -hours) 2.0000 in Drainage area 0.0072 mit Runoff curve number, CN 69 Time of concentration, Tc 0.4767 hrs Pond and Swamp Areas 0.0000 % of Area Computed Results: Initial abstraction, is 0.8986 in Ia/P 0.4493 unit peak discharge, qu 298.3057 csm/in Runoff, Q 0.2169 in Pond and swamp adjustment, Fp 1.0000 Peak discharge, qp 0.4658 cfs Page 1 • • tmp#11.txt Graphical Peak Discharge method Given Input Data: Description PR Basin C - 100 year Rainfall distribution Type II Frequency 100 years Rainfall, P (24 -hours) 2.4000 in Drainage area 0.0072 mi2 Runoff curve number, CN 69 Time of concentration, Tc 0.4767 hrs Pond and Swamp Areas 0.0000 % of Area Computed Results: Initial abstraction, Ia 0.8986 in gra/P 0.3744 Unit peak discharge, qu 381.1229 csm/in Runoff, Q 0.3761 in Pond and swamp adjustment, Fp 1.0000 Peak discharge, qp 1.0320 cfs • • Appendix 5 Conveyance Sizing 1111 Basin A - 25 -yr Flow Manning Pipe Calculator tmp#17.txt Given Input Data: shape circular solving for Depth of Flow Diameter 15.0000 in Flowrate 1.3200 cfs Slope 0.0100 ft/ft manning's n 0.0200 Computed Results: Depth 5.7774 in Area 1.2272 ft2 Wetted Area 0.4357 ft2 wetted Perimeter 20.0857 in Perimeter 47.1239 in velocity 3.0293 fps Hydraulic Radius 3.1240 in Percent Full 38.5161 % Full flow Flowrate 4.1989 cfs Full flow velocity 3.4215 fps Critical Information Critical depth 5.4455 in Critical slope .... .. ..... . 0.0125 ft/ft Critical velocity 3.2812 fps Critical area 0.4023 ft2 Critical perimeter 19.3997 in 4111 Critical hydraulic radius critical top width 14.4262 in specific energy 2.9861 in 0.6241 ft minimum energy 0.6807 ft Froude number 0.8924 Flow condition subcritical • Page 1 0 Basin B - 25 -yr Flow Manning Pipe Calculator • • tmp#18.txt Given Input Data: Shape Circular Solving for Depth of Flow Diameter ...... 15.0000 in Flowrate 1.5100 cfs Slope 0.0100 ft/ft Manning's n 0.0200 Computed Results: Depth 6.2181 in Area 1.2272 ft2 Wetted Area 0.4807 ft2 wetted Perimeter 20.9855 in Perimeter 47.1239 in velocity 3.1411 fps Hydraulic Radius 3.2986 in Percent Full 41.4541 % Full flow Flowrate 4.1989 cfs Full flow velocity 3.4215 fps Critical Information Critical depth 5.8396 in Critical slope .., . 0.0126 ft/ft Critical velocity 3.4158 fps Critical area 0.4421 ft2 Critical perimeter 20.2135 in Critical hydraulic radius 3.1492 in Critical top width 14.6278 in Specific energy 0.6715 ft Minimum energy 0.7300 ft Froude number 0.8864 Flow condition Subcritical Page 1 illoBasin C - 25 -yr Flow Manning Pipe Calculator tmp#19.txt Given Input Data: Shape Circular solving for .,. Depth of Flow Diameter 15.0000 in Flowrate ........, 0.4700 cfs Slope 0.0100 ft/ft Mannings n 0.0200 Computed Results: Depth 3.3887 in Area 1.2272 ft2 wetted Area 0.2079 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 14.8593 in Perimeter 47.1239 in velocity ... 2.2610 fps Hydraulic Radius 2.0144 in Percent Full 22.5914 % Full flow Flowrate 4.1989 cfs Full flow velocity 3.4215 fps Critical Information Critical depth 3.1998 in Critical slope 0.0126 ft/ft critical velocity 2.4533 fps Critical area 0.1916 ft2 critical perimeter 14.4030 in 1110 critical hydraulic radius 1.9154 in Critical top width 12.2896 in Specific energy 0.3618 ft Minimum energy 0.4000 ft Froude number 0.8939 Flow condition Subcritical • Page 1 4110 100 -yr Max Flow check Manning Pipe Calculator tmp#20.txt Given Input Data: Shape circular solving for depth of Flow Diameter 15.0000 in Flowrate 3.2000 cfs Slope 0.0100 ft/ft Manning's n 0.0200 computed Results: Depth 9.8016 in Area 1.2272 ft2 wetted Area 0.8495 ft2 wetted Perimeter 28.2405 in Perimeter 47.1239 in velocity 3.7668 fps Hydraulic Radius 4.3317 in Percent Full 65.3437 % Full flow Flowrate 4.1989 cfs Full flow velocity 3.4215 fps Critical Information Critical depth 8.6701 in Critical slope 0.0144 ft/ft Critical velocity 4.3509 fps Critical area 0.7355 ft2 Criticalerimeter 25.9021 in 4110 Critical hydraulic radius 4.0888 in Critical top width 15.0000 in Specific energy 1.0336 ft Minimum energy 1.0838 ft Froude number 0.8089 Flow condition subcritical • Page 1 4110 Entered Data: Shape Circular Number of Barrels 1 Solving for Headwater Chart Number 2 Scale Number 3 Chart Description CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CULVERT Scale Decsription PIPE PROJECTING FROM FILL Overtopping Off Flowrate 3.2000 cfs Manning's n 0.0200 Roadway Elevation 3.7500 ft Inlet Elevation 1.0000 ft Outlet Elevation 0.7000 ft Diameter 15.0000 in Length 30.0000 ft Entrance Loss 0.8000 Tailwater 1.0000 ft tmp#21.txt Culvert Calculator • computed Results: Headwater 2.1622 ft Inlet control Slope 0.0100 ft/ft Velocity 3.7689 fps Messages: Inlet head > Outlet head. computing Inlet Control headwater. Solving Inlet Equation 26. Solving Inlet Equation 28. Headwater: 2.1622 ft DIS- HEAD- INLET OUTLET CHARGE WATER CONTROL CONTROL FLOW NORMAL CRITICAL OUTLET TAILWATER Flow ELEV, DEPTH DEPTH TYPE DEPTH DEPTH VEL, DEPTH VEL. DEPTH cfs ft ft ft in in fps ft fps ft 0.20 1.95 0.23 0.95 M1 2.23 8.65 0.19 0.19 0.00 1.00 0.40 1.96 0.33 0.96 M1 3.13 8.65 0.38 0.26 0.00 1.00 0.60 1.96 0.42 0.96 M1 3.83 8.65 0.57 0.32 0.00 1.00 0.80 1.97 0.49 0.97 M1 4.44 8.65 0.76 0.37 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.56 0.99 M1 4.98 8.65 0.95 0.42 0.00 1.00 1.20 2.00 0.62 1.00 M1 5.49 8.65 1.14 0.46 0.00 1.00 1.40 2.02 0.68 1.02 M1 5.96 8.65 1.33 0.50 0.00 1.00 1.60 2.04 0.74 1.04 M1 6.42 8.65 1.52 0.53 0.00 1.00 1.80 2.07 0.79 1.07 M1 6.86 8.65 1.71 0.57 0.00 1.00 2.00 2.09 0.85 1.09 M1 7.29 8.65 1.90 0.61 0.00 1.00 2.20 2.12 0.90 1.12 M1 7.71 8.65 2.09 0.64 0.00 1.00 2.40 2.15 0.95 1.15 M1 8.12 8.65 2.28 0.68 0.00 S 1.00 2.60 2.19 1.01 1.19 M1 8.54 8.65 2.47 0.71 0.00 Page 1 tmp#21.xxt 1.00 2.80 2.23 1.06 1.23 M1 8.95 8.65 2.66 0.75 0.00 1.00 3.00 2.27 1.11 1.27 M1 9.37 8.65 2.85 0.78 0.00 1.00 3.20 2.31 1.16 1.31 M1 9.80 8.65 3.04 0.82 0.00 1.00 3.40 2.36 1.21 1.36 M1 10.23 8.65 3.23 0.85 0.00 1.00 3.60 2.41 1.26 1.41 M1 10.69 8.65 3.42 0.89 0.00 1.00 3.80 2.46 1.32 1.46 M1 11.17 8.65 3.61 0.93 0.00 1.00 4.00 2.52 1.37 1.52 M1 11.69 8.65 3.80 0.97 0.00 1.00 4.20 2.58 1.42 1.58 M2 12.29 8.65 3.99 1.02 0.00 1.00 4.40 2.69 1.69 1.64 NA 15.00 15.00 3.59 1.25 0.00 1.00 4.60 2.72 1.72 1.70 NA 15.00 15.00 3.75 1.25 0.00 1.00 4.80 2.77 1.76 1.77 M2 15.00 15.00 3.91 1.25 0.00 1.00 5.00 2.84 1.78 1.84 M2 15.00 15.00 4.07 1.25 0.00 1.00 5.20 2.91 1.79 1.91 M2 15.00 15.00 4.24 1.25 0.00 1.00 5.40 2.99 1.78 1.99 M2 15.00 15.00 4.40 1.25 0.00 1.00 5.60 2.82 1.82 0.00 NA 15.00 15.00 4.56 1.25 0.00 4111 1.00 1.005.80 2.90 1.90 0.00 NA 15.00 15.00 4.73 1.25 0.00 • 6.00 2.99 1.99 0.00 NA 15.00 15.00 4.89 1.25 0.00 1.00 Page 2 • • tmp#30.txt channel calculator Given Input Data: shape solving for Flowrate Slope Manning's n Height ., Bottom width Left radius Right radius Left slope ... Right slope computed Results: Depth Velocity Full Flowrate Flow area Flow perimeter Hydraulic radius Top width Area Perimeter Percent full Advanced Depth of Flow 1.5100 cfs 0.0200 ft/ft 0.0200 12.0000 in 0.0000 in 0.0000 in 0.0000 in 1.0000 ft/ft (v/H) 1.0000 ft/ft (v/H) critical Information critical depth critical slope Critical velocity critical area ......... .... Critical perimeter critical hydraulic radius critical top width Specific energy Minimum energy Froude number Flow condition 7.5183 in 3.8468 fps 5.2538 cfs 0.3925 ft2 21.2650 in 2.6581 in 15.0366 in 1.0000 ft2 33.9411 in 62.6525 % 8.1185 in 0.0133 ft/ft 3.2990 fps 0.4577 ft2 22.9626 in 2.8703 in 16.2370 in 0.8565 ft 1.0148 ft 1.2117 supercritical Page 1 • • • Appendix 6 Detention Calculations • • • tmp#31.txt Graphical Peak Discharge method Given Input. Data: Description Rainfall distribution ........... Type 11 Frequency 1 year Rainfall, P (24 -hours) 2.4000 in Drainage area 0.0002 mit Runoff curve number, CN 98 Time of concentration, Tc 0.2500 hrs Pond and swamp Areas 0.0000 % of Area Computed Results: Initial abstraction, Ia 0.0408 in Ia/P 0.1000 unit peak discharge, qu 731.3279 csm/in Runoff, Q 2.1714 in Pond and swamp adjustment, Fp 1.0000 Peak discharge, qp 0.3176 cfs Page 1 • • Graphical Peak Given Input Data: Description Rainfall distribution Frequency Rainfall, P (24 -hours) Drainage area ............... Runoff curve number, CN Time of concentration, Tc Pond and swamp Areas ..... computed Results: Initial abstraction, Ia is/P unit peak discharge, qu Runoff, Q Pond and swamp adjustment, Fp ... Peak discharge, qp tmp#32.txt Discharge method Type II 1 year 2.4000 in 0.0002 mit 69 0.2500 hrs 0.0000 % of Area 0.8986 in 0.3744 540.0506 csm/in 0.3761 in 1.0000 0.0406 cfs Page 1 • SCS SPECIAL WARRANTY EASEMENT DEED AND AGREEMENT THIS SPECLAL WARRANTY EASEMENT DEED AND AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into this 1" day of August, 2002 by and between ROBIN J. FRITZLAN, whose address is 1582 County Road 233, Rifle, Colorado 81650 ("Grantor") and the CITY OF RIFLE, a home -rule municipality, whose address is P.O. Box 1908, Rifle, Colorado 81650 (the "City"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City requires a water storage tank to serve the upper pressure zone in the City; and WHEREAS, on January 29, 1999, Fritzlan and the City entered into a Water Storage Tank Option Agreement which was recorded with the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder as Reception No. 540986 (the "Option Agreement") to obtain a utility easement over property owned by Fritzlan as described in the instrument recorded with the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder as Reception No. 429294 in Book 817 at Page 84 (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the City and Fritzlan subsequently extended the option period in the Option Agreement two times on January 19, 2000, recorded with the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder as Reception No. 559384, and January 31, 2002 recorded with the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder as Reception No. 576544 (collectively "Option Extensions"); and WHEREAS, the City exercised its option under the Option Agreement and Option Extensions and the parties desire to fulfill their respective obligations pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Option Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, and for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Grant of Easements On, Over and Across the Property. Grantor, for and in consideration of four (4) City of Rifle water taps discussed in Paragraph 3 below, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm, unto the City, its successors and assigns forever, the easements depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and described as follows: a. Water Tank Easement: a perpetual and exclusive Water Tank Easement, as more particularly described on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, for the installation, operation, maintenance, repair and replacement of a Water Tank and appurtenant facilities and associated utilities. The City shall have the right to fence the Water Tank Easement to prevent third party access to the tank site. Grantor shall have no liability to the City for damage to the Water Tank and appurtenant facilities and associated utilities caused by Grantor's domestic livestock, it being the City's sole [:120021ClientsiRSFLFS.- 21(62)Frazi and Easemc nt. wpcf 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 621794 02127/2003 04:03P B1441 P372 M PLSDORF 1 ..r 11 A GF LAOi n rh PSA roogiri n rniI rr'1 rn. 1 ofd ak-t4 X1903 37 • responsibility to adequately fence its facilities and utilities. If, however, Grantor intends to keep exotic animals, not excluded by a normal livestock fence, it shall be Grantor's responsibility to construct and maintain any additional or extraordinary fence required to adequately protect the City's facilities and utilities. b. Water Tank Access Easement: a perpetual and nonexclusive twenty foot (20') wide Water Tank Access and Utility Easement, as more particularly described on Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, over and across the Property, for the City's access to the City's water facilities located on and through the Property and installation of associated utilities. Grantor reserves unto herself, her successors and assigns, the right of access on or across the Access Easement in common with the City, except Grantor shall not interfere with the City's use or the purpose of the Water Tank Access Easement and no physical structures (not including fences or gates) or equipment shall be built, located, stored or maintained within the Water Tank Access Easement. c. Waterline and Utility+ Easement: a perpetual and nonexclusive twenty foot (20') wide Waterline and Utility Easement, as more particularly described on Exhibit D attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, over and across the Property, for the installation, operation, maintenance, repair and replacement of a waterline and associated utilities, including the right of access thereto. Grantor reserves unto herself, her successors and assigns, the right of access on or across the Waterline and. Utility Easement in common -with the City, except Grantor shall not interfere with the City's use or the purpose of the Waterline and Utility Easement and no physical structures (not including fences or gates) or equipment shall be built, located, stored or maintained within the Waterline and Utility Easement. d. Drainage Easement: a perpetual and nonexclusive Drainage Easement, as more particularly described on Exhibit E attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, over and across the Property, for the operation, maintenance, repair and replacement of water tank, waterline and associated utilities located on and through the Property. Grantor reserves unto herself, her successors and assigns, the right of access on or across the Drainage Easement in common with the City, except Grantor shall not interfere with the City's use or the purpose of the Drainage Easement and no physical structures (not including fences or gates) or equipment shall be built, located, stored or maintained within the Drainage Easement. TOGETHER, with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof; and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of Grantor, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described with the appurtenances, unto the City, its successors and assigns forever. Grantor, for herself, her heirs and personal representatives or successors, do covenant and agree that she shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above -bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the City, its successors and assigns, against all and every person or persons claiming the whole or any part thereof, by, through or under Grantor. r:12OCZClie sIJFLE\R-21(62)Frilzian1Eaumera-wpci. 111111111111111111111111111111(111I1 ll 1111111111II1 521794 02/27/2�i 0403P B1441 P373 M ALSDORF 2 • 3. -Four (4) City of Rifle Water Taps. In consideration for Grantor's conveyance of the above easements, the City hereby grants to Grantor four (4) single-family out -of -City water taps to be used exclusively on the Property, which consists of a sixty (60) acre parcel; provided, however, Grantor, or her successors or assigns, must request and use the four (4) single-family out -of -City water taps within fifteen (15) years from the date of water tap availability, after which date any unclaimed water taps shall expire. Date of availability of water taps shall be determined by recording of a notice by the City, identifying the property and stating that water taps are available as of a specified date and setting forth the date upon which the right to said water taps will expire. The four (4) taps granted herein do not require the payment of the water system improvement fee imposed by Title 10 of the Rifle Municipal Code or any payment of a one-time pressure zone surcharge or special assessment. The cost of connecting any taps to the City water lines shall be borne by Grantor and all construction shall be in compliance with the Rifle Municipal Code and the Public Works Manual. Any water taps claimed by Grantor shall be subject to out -of -city water rates pursuant to the Rifle Municipal Code until the property to which the tap is appurtenant is annexed to the City, after which event Fritzlan will be charged in -City water rates. 4. Improvements to Water Tank Access Easement and Maintenance. The City, in conjunction with the construction of the water tank, shall improve the Water Tank Access Easement, at its sole cost, with grading and a gravel surface and appropriate drainage facilities. The City shall have no obligation for further maintenance of the Water Tank Access Easement, except to repair damage caused by the City and except as determined necessary by the City for the City's uses. Grantor shall have no obligation to maintain the Access Easement, except to repair damage caused by Grantor and except as determined necessary by Grantor for Grantor's uses. The City shall perpetually maintain the drainage structure(s) installed by the City. 5. Revegetation of Construction Areas. After the construction of the water tank, waterline and appurtenant utilities, the City agrees that it shall revegetate all areas disturbed by its construction activities, using native drought -resistant grasses similar to those that are growing on the Property.. Any fences disturbed by City's construction activities shall be replaced in as good or better condition as existed prior to construction. 6. Easements Shall Not Be Relocated. The Easements granted herein and improvements located thereon shall not be relocated, moved or altered without the express written consent of the City. 7. Binding Effect. This Special Warranty Easement Deed and Agreement shall be a covenant running with the Property and the rights and obligations as contained herein shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their successors and assigns. 8. Severability. If any covenant, term, condition or provision contained in this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such covenant, term, condition or provision shall be severed or modified to the extent necessary to make it enforceable, and the resulting Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 9. Recordation. This Special Warranty Easement Deed and Agreement shall be recorded by the City at is expense in the Office of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder. 10. Merger, This Deed and Agreement supercedes and incorporates all terms and 3 f:120021CIhettts4RIFL ail-21(62)FritzlanIFAvInc , wpd III! II II III I III II I I I 111111 !III I !1111 I I III I I III I I I I II II • • provisions of the Option recorded as Reception No. 540986 and Option Extensions recorded as Reception Nos. 559384 and 576544, which Agreements and Options shall have no further effect after recordation of this document. 11. Reversion and Attorney Fees. In the event the City has not commenced construction of the tank within two (2) years of recording of this Deed, the property interests conveyed shall automatically revert to the Grantor, or her successors and assigns. Recording of the Notice of Water Tap Availability shall terminate this reversion right. Should this Agreement become the subject of litigation to resolve a claim of default in performance by either Party, the prevailing party shall be entitled to attorneys fees, expenses and court costs. All rights concerning remedies and/or attorneys fees shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 12, Indemnification. Grantor has no obligation or responsibility to safeguard City's facilities and utilities located on the Easements described herein. The City hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Grantor from any liability, expense, or loss, including reasonable attorneys fees, costs and expenses of litigation, arising out of the City's use and occupancy of the Easements described herein, 13, Subordination. By its signature below, Banker's Trust Company hereby consents to the granting of these Easements and subordinates its lien evidenced by its deed of trust recorded August 2, 1999 in Book 1142 at Page 848 with the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder to the Easements granted herein. WHEREFORE, the parties hereto have executed this SPECIAL WARRANTY EASEMENT DEED AND AGREEMENT on the day and year fust written above. ATTEST: it's City Clerk DEO iSCHE 4lLi`� BANK For . TJUJSTCO !KA PANY, as Trustee By Residential Funding Corp, Attorney InlFact By: CITY OF RIFLE: GRANTOR: Rob -) Fr ami An tban .1 ant Secretary I:42022\Clients1RIFZE\R•202)Fri ztanTaKment..wpd t1,1)ll 4112,121711, !I!II U1I VIII1111111Illylllll 1,110 )1 4 111/ STATE OF COLORADO • COUNTY OF ) ss. as GJ 3 Acknowledged, subscribed, and sworn to before me this Fli2la day of Felon', r y� loo2,,bY LoLm r-4 as Mayor and COQ tic'( Ne./ as City Clerk, City of Rifle, Colorado. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: q-11- STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF Notary Public 7 Acknowledged, subscribed, and sworn to before me this j q A day of r A ,��;; 8 , by Robin J. Fritzlan, Grantor. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: 7 - 7( - c STATE OF California ) ss. COUNTY OF Los Angeles) Acknowledged, subscribed2, and sworn to before me this 17th day of January QQ2, by Anthony J. Golden , as Assistant seore+�l�,nker's Trust Company. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Conunission expires: MICHELLE R. DALE Commission 71358748 Notary Public - California Loa Angeles County My Com, Expires Jun 26, 2006 - ',. I:120021Cliects1RIFLE1R.21(62)FritzlanTasemcot. pd 1612.11,11101121,111110! u uuu loll urns iu irii ui mi *Deutsche Bank Trust Co. FKA Bankers Trust Co. as Trustee by REsidential Funding Corp Attorney In Fact 5 oto Public Ile R. Dale • • a EXHIBIT FRI TZLAN, R.D. & 161,111,1111101121,p1,!le!g1131IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIpIIIFII NOT TO SCALE .VJI' 4/4 5H' 1/4 Ar ., .�. ur SCHMUESER I GORDON k MEYER ENGINEERS 6 SURVEYORS a EXHIBIT WATER TANK EASEMENT 5PctttlCE- .w$??N CREST -«,p DIME 110 w. 8TH, 5uITf 200 P.O. SOX 2155 P.O. SOX 3088 GLENw000 SPF NGS. CO 81 601 ASF EN, G4 81 0.12 CRESTED am -Tr, co 81 224 970.945.100.1 970.925.6727 970-349-5355 FX 970-045-5048 FX: 870.9,25-4157 FX: 070-349.5358 14 July 2002 99055a-86 A parcel of land situated within all that real property recorded at Book 817 Page 846 also being in the SW 114 NW 1/4, Section 2, Township 6 South, Range 93 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the north line of the SW 1I4NW 114 of said Section 2 from which the North 1/16 Corner of said Section 2 bears S89" 34'44"W a distance of 615.71 feet, with all bearings being relative to a bearing of N89a34'44"E between the North 1116 Corner and the NW1/16 Corner of said Section 2; thence N89°34'44"E a distance of 257.43 feet along the north line of said SW 114NW 114; thence S0°00'00"E a distance of 175.07 feet; thence S45°00"00"W a distance of 88.50 feet; thence N50°55'24"W a distance of 251.00 feet; thence NO°00'00"E a distance of 77.53 feet to the point of beginning, containing 1.000 acres, more or loss. tj "�; 4i 47;.f7 O:\1999\99055A-861NEwatertank_doc • 16121,1I11,11,1,121,1110E lJlI mil imuuu nui loom • • EXHIBIT OF 14 July 2002 99055a-86 WATER TANK ACCESS EASEMENT A strip of land situated within a parcel of land recorded at Book 817 Page 846 also being in the SE1/4NE1/4 of Section 3 and the SW 114 NW 114 of Section 2, all in Township 6 South, Range 93 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado being more particularly described as follows: Easement shall be a strip of land twenty feet (20') in width centered upon and extending ten feet (10') from either side of the following described centerline, in such a manner that at all angle points along the centerline and at the point of beginning, the exterior boundary lines of the strip shall be lengthened or shortened as necessary to form a continuous strip exactly twenty feet (20') in width. Beginning at a point on the west boundary of said parcel land from which the Northwest Corner of said parcel bears N00°02'41"W a distance of 10.03 feet and the N1116 Corner of Section 2 and 3 bears N88°50'10"E a distance of 615.71 feet, with all bearings being relative to a bearing of N89°34'44"E between said North 1/16 Corner and the NW 1/16 Corner of said Section 2; thence N89°46'00"E a distance of 327.20 feet along a line ten feet (10') south and parallel with the northerly property line of said parcel; thence 47.24 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 54°07'48" and subtending a chord bearing S63°10'06"E a distance of 45.50 feet; thence S36°06'12"E a distance of 58.35 feet; thence 39.81 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 100.00 feet, a central angle of 22°48'27" and subtending a chord bearing S47°30'26"E a distance of 39.54 feet; thence S58°54'39"E a distance of 229.61 feet; thence 20.52 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 500.00 feet, a central angle of 2°21'05" and subtending a chord bearing S57°44'07"E a distance of 20.52 feet; thence S56°33'34"E a distance of 178.53 feet; thence 33.26 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 100.00 feet, a central angle of 19°03'22" and subtending a chord bearing S66°05'16"E a distance of 33.11 feet; thence S75°36157"E a distance of 45.49 feet; thence 79.75 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 85.00 feet, a central angle of 53°45'31" and subtending a chord bearing S48°44'11 "E a distance of 78.86 feet; thence 521 °51'25"E a distance of 97.68 feet; thence 70.87 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 150.00 feet, a central angle of 27°04'13" and subtending a chord bearing S35°23'32"E a distance of 70.21 feet; thence 548°55'39"E a distance of 231.12 feet; thence 167.92 feet along the are of a curve to the left, having a radius of 300.00 feet, a central angle of 32°04'10" and subtending a chord bearing S64°57'44"E a distance of 165.73 feet; thence S80°59'49"E a distance of 12.72 feet; thence 53.55 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 61°21'49" and subtending a chord bearing 1111 III 1111111 I I II III IIIf, i�llll 11 11 II 1 11 111 .. y -.. . p '+Yyr j%,..4.201 ENGINEERS b SCHMUESER I GORDON MEYER ry 4 EXHiBi7 2 2- t. Amtc:i 457 -Ed CRESTED BUTTE 116 W. 8TH, SUFIC 200 P,0. n0X 2 i 55 P.0, sox 30e8 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 9 t 801 ASPEN. Ca 8 1 6 1 2 CRESTED Runic, co 8 1224 070-945.1004 970.025.6727 970.340.5353 FX: 970-045.5946 FX; 970-025-4157 rR: 970-34S-3359 S50°18'55"E a distance of 51.03 feet; thence S19°38'00"E a distance of 44.93 feet; thence 178.59 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 250.00 feet, a central angle of 40°55'45" and subtending a chord bearing S40°05153'E a distance of 174.81 feet; thence S60° 3'45"E a distance of 90.74 feet; thence 18.52 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 150.00 feet, a central angle of 7°04'22" and subtending a chord bearing S57°01'34"E a distance of 18.50 feet; thence S53°29'23"E a distance of 55.00 feet; thence 121.79 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, a central angle of 139°33'57" and subtending a chord bearing N56°43'38"E a distance of 93.84 feet; thence N13°03'20"W a distance of 117.29 feet; thence 87.79 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 150.00 feet, a central angle of 33°31'57" and subtending a chord bearing NO3°42'38"E a distance of 86.54 feet; thence N20°28'37"E a distance of 45.91 feet; thence 144.50 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 150.00 feet, a central angle of 55°11'39" and subtending a chord bearing N07°07'13"W a distance of 138.98 feet; thence N34°43'02"W a distance of 135.85 feet; thence 59.47 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 1000.00 feet, a central angle of 03°24'27" and subtending a chord bearing N33°00'49"W a distance of 59.46 feet; thence N31°18'35"W a distance of 303.93 feet to a point on the southeast line of tank easement from which the NW 1/16 Corner of said Section 2 bears N65 °05'00"E a distance of 551.27 feet, containing 1.422 acres more or less. • Q: t 199999055A-86WE-rifle-access-eas i. doc L[111).11.11,111.1111 r111111 11111 ilitill I 11111111111 f,; SCHMJESER i GORDON MEYER ENGINEERS !S SURVEYORS • IIII111I1II"11711011311e11411101!1 I )3111111111P13118111t1111_10109 52179402/2 1AI .t 11 13 CC rara ., .. ______• EXHIBIT ij WATER LINE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ".;LW1+n!G1y SPRI?PC.G tl 18 w. 6T1+. SUITE 200 GLENWO D SPRINGS. CO B 1 /501 Q70,64 5-1 004 rx: 970.045.5048 viPEAC P L7. BOM 2I 55 ASPEN. CO B I B 12 470-925.5727 rX: 470•$25.4 157 14 July 2002 99055A-86 CRESTED BUTg P.O. SOX 3088 CRESTED 8L11TE. CO 191224 970.340-5355 rx: g70.349.3358 A strip of land situated within a parcel of land recorded at Book 817 Page 846 also being in the SE 1/4 NE 1/4 of Section 3 and the SW 114 NW 1/4 of Section 2, all in Township 6 South, Range 93 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado being more particularly described as follows: Easement shall be a strip of and twenty feet (20') in width centered upon and extending ten feet (10') from either side of the following described centerline, in such a manner that at all angle points along the centerline and at the point of beginning, the exterior boundary lines of the strip shall be lengthened or shortened as necessary to form a continuous strip exactly twenty feet (20') in width. Beginning at a point an the west boundary of said parcel of land from which the Northwest Corner of said parcel bears N00°02'41 "W a distance of 10.03 feet and the N1/16 Corner of said Section 2 and 3 bears N88°50"10'E a distance of 615.71 feet, with all bearings being relative to a bearing of N89"34'44"E between said N1/16 Corner and the NW 1116 Corner of said Section 2; thence N89°46'00"E a distance of 615.79 feet along a line ten feet (10') south and parallel with the northerly property line of said parcel; thence N89°34'44"E a distance of 615.50 feet along a line ten feet (10°) south and parallel with the northerly property line of said parcel to a point on the westerly boundary of tank site easement and said NW 1116 Corner of said Section 2 bears N88°45'52"E a distance of 703.65 feet containing 0.565 acres more or less. C?: l 1999199O55A-861NE-rrffe-h20-fine-eas 1. d©c 1 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER ENGINEERS & SURVEYOR'S • DRAINAGE EASEMENT 0,..o% 1 19 w 61)-1, 511116 200 CLE14W000 SPAINO5, CO 81801 970-945-1004 FX: 170.945.5948 "-�• �6 STEC 191.71"1—, 0. 802 2155 P.0. 802 3088 ASPEN. c0 81 81 2 CRESTED 4UTTE. CO 81224 970-925.8727 970.349-5355 r2 070-925.4 1'57 r2. 970-349-5358 15 July 2002 99055a-86 Revised 31 July 2002, 16 Sep. 2002 A parcel of land situated within all that real property recorded at Book 817 Page 846 also being in the SW 1 f4 NW 1/4, Section 2, Township 6 South, Range 93 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point from which the NW 1/16 Corner of said Section 2 bears N42°25'38' E a distance of 543.66 feet, with all bearings being relative to a bearing of N89°34'44"E between the North 1/16 Corner and the NW 1116 Corner of said Section 2; thence S74°28'59"E a distance of 15.00 feet; thence S15°31'01"W a distance of 240.38 feet; thence S21 °28'281'W a distance of 107.93 feet; thence S16°54'04"W a distance of 42.89 feet; thence S61 °47`42"W a distance of 102.51 feet; thence S28°32'53"E a distance of 22.92 feet; thence S54"25'29"W a distance of 105.45 feet; thence N35°34'31 "W a distance of 70.00 feet to a ,point from whence the North 1/16 Corner bears N37°17'02"W a distance of 1041.48 feet; thence N54°25'29"E a distance of 74.26 feet; thence S80°46'29"E a distance of 36.60 feet; thence S59°59'13"E a distance of 6.18 feet; thence N61 °47'42"E a distance of 103.77 feet; thence N16°54"04"E a distance of 37.29 feet; thence N21 °28'28"E a distance of 107.74 feet; thence N15°31'01 "E a distance of 239.60 feet; to the point of beginning, containing 0.328 acres, more or less. Q:\1999\99055A-86\NEwatertankDRAINAGE-rev2.doc • 1612111,111,11e1121,112IIIII1j lulu 11111 limo ui nail m gni 111 -Wet l 8 r STA, B9+80 0/S 20.0' L, INSTALL �'�1F1RE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY J».oe t• STA. 89+80. INSTALL (1) 14"s6" TEE W/ C R.B. FOR FIRE HYDRANT I-14" BUTTERFLY VALVE FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY YAPPERS E 7TLl050 STA 93+15, INSTALL (1) 14'x6' TEE W/ C.R.B. FOR FIRE HYDRANT 1-14" BUTTERFLY VALVE FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY N SOPA 57901 PP EXERRETE 1,i89' 7,'56"W Lti 111 • r r...-..z, 0 CT STA. 93+16 O/S 13 0' L. INSTALL (1) FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY " ' Q .550 5640 VERT 10 5613 PROP: SCALE; 1'= 20' ES SURFACE EL AT .CEN TERUNE PROP TOR Or PIPS - +ar 4r nfl4 Ti'S mann CONST 14'.1 I„%• BEND VERT ./ RESTRAINT TOP 1141 ST %ERT P� FpP %31 a1 5681,. 5671: hIJ MATCHLIN1 5680 STA. 93+50 5650 7.4 /sedkaeF arms Apt • 1 aorvirxe ;Remo& arm rem 1 COKST 14'.1114' BEND VERT. ./ RE5TRA9HT tar %i 150 CON5t 14'5' TEL FIRE t1YDRANI 1-11" BUT-1t4ni1 VALVE TCP MAT 77 MR PILO 0 m{ A u1 n O ,y 87.50 00.00 da •SR 59.00 89.50 90.90 0 4 o 90. 91 91 •.5C .3� '42 2 2.2 92.00 92.30 9J.00 9J. 50 SCHMUESER 1 GORDON 1 MEYER e.s:mttMU 4 .uwwlc.nws SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER 18 W. Cm STREET, SUITE 200 0LENW0O0 SRN NOB. COLORADO B 1801 1G1701. 1743-1 004 FAX 1970) 945-5048 ASPEN, COLORADO (0 707 025-8727 CRESTED BUTTE, CO 58701 3417.5355 E•m.! •rgnarrcm. CITY OF RIFLE NORTHEAST WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS LITS eats L 5C 0.1E Si 1,9114 l;J SE FOR COAG PAY 91 PLAN & PROFILE 99053485 RLS 1.. 7/02 C15 A R 9J�YSL}5»( OF • 11,434, -44 A114: +.4 • MATCHLINE MAT /NE STA. 93+50 Ltl 31 co. 31 0. 166 9 464 41 5662 I 5 5553 0 556 53 5655 0 5659 25 556 2 5680 46 V 20 aa, 67- 5A.07 9 5525 52 aw;', 5.86;), m 0 a; 5 S 11 +50 44 7l,46 5596 4r, 31 ,.T11 3 —7:602 00 F4 4 L.4 Ul 131 31 04 31 1*J co143 STA. 99+50 ATCHL1NE TA. 99+50 V iAAA 4 ARasxiee -' Il c 0.:in. u. 'a rw .YLI: 7.,.,.+ .Auto • 49 MATCHLJNE STA. 99+50 w O O peps mo`ga C SUET' Vogt -7K,'_ a —0 jT Al J N 0di; 8z 6,4 bCD uO 3 GN priuCD 11, eta X "ATCHLINE TA. 99+50 I s Btl /* nu " hitt i 47 © '1 / / 1. N aidtR 1. th v+ cn '.4 Cn J qr- 7. N00'0000`E J April 4, 2005 Chris Hale, PE Mountain Cross Engineering, Inc. 826 '/a Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: August 1st, 2002 Agreement between Robin J. Fritzlan and the City of Rifle Dear Chris: As an authorized representative of the City of Rifle water system, the purpose of this correspondence is to inform you that the water system does in fact possess an adequate legal and physical water supply to provide four water taps to Robin J. Fritzlan, per the requirements of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment and the Office of the State Engineer. Providing these taps is based on and subject to the "Special Warranty Easement Deed and Agreement" between Robin J. Fritzlan and the City of Rifle entered into on August 01, 2002. One of these taps is existing and three additional taps are planned. It is my understanding that these taps are to be provided to Robin J. Fritzlan as part of the proposed Booms Place Subdivision. If you have any questions, please give me a call at 625-6223. Sincerely, Bill Sappington, P.E. Public Works Director CITY OF RIFLE 2 0 2 RAILROAD AVENUE • P.O. b o x 1 9 0 8 • RIFLE, CO 8 1 6 5 0 LVW W. R I F L E C O. O F2 i, • Sewer Analysis and Plan for: Booms Place Subdivision Garfield. County, CO Prepared for: 111/ Ms. Robin J. Fritzlan 1582 County Road 233 Rifle, CO 81650 Phone: 970.625.4616 • Prepared by: �_. \;, MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING, INC. Date: November 2004 Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 826 112 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ph 979,945.5541 ix 970.945.5558 www.maunt&incross-ung.com M0UNTAIN CR0SS ENGINEERING, INC Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 826 `>i Grand Avenue, (ilenwood Springs, CO 81601 P: 970.945.5544 F: 970.945.5558 www .mountaincross-eng.cam • • SEWER ANALYSIS Introduction Sewer Analysis Booms Place Subdivision November 2004 The purpose of this report is to evaluate sewage disposal of the proposed Booms Place Subdivision. The Booms Place Subdivision will also be referred to as the Project in this analysis. The sewer analysis will include the following discussions: • An analysis of sewer options • Preliminary calculations of a typical leaching area • Operation and Management Plan Sewer Options There are numerous options for providing sanitary sewer service. Only two were deemed potentially feasible: connection to an existing system and individual sewage disposal systems. the State of Colorado requires connection to a sewer system if located within 400 feet of the property. The nearest sanitary sewer system is located approximately 2,500 feet away, serving the City of Rifle. The distance makes the connection economically infeasible and was quickly eliminated. Garfield County allows individual sewage disposal system (ISDS) provided the lots are larger than 2 acres. The project proposes to divide the existing property into four lots with an existing single family residence contained on one of the four lots. Since the smallest of the four lots is approximately 3.9 acres, ISDS is the proposed method of sewage disposal. Currently, the existing residence uses an ISDS for disposal of sewage and this is the typical method in the surrounding area. The existing residence and the three additional lot owners will be responsible for the design, construction, and maintenance of their own ISDS. Preliminary Design There are practical design constraints when considering the proper construction and operation of an ISDS: percolation rate, flow rate, and location of the system. A preliminary percolation rate was determined from tests performed by Geotechnical Engineering Group, Inc. and the results are reported in the Geotechnical Feasibility Investigation dated February 14, 2005. The average percolation rate was reported as 40 minutes per inch and this rate was used for the preliminary sizing of the ISDS. The flow rate is determined from Garfield County regulations based on the number of bedrooms. The design calculations for sizing of the ISDS leach field are based on an assumed 4 bedrooms and the calculated percolation rate: • REQUIRED ABSORPTION AREA—((483 sq.ft.lbedroom)*(4 bedrooms) — 1,932 sq. ft. The location for a leach field is limited by setback requirements per Garfield County and the State of Colorado. The setback requirements deal primarily with buildings and potential MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING, INC. Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 826'/ Grand Avenue, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 P: 970 945,5544 F: 970945 5558 www ,anounsaincross-eng.com Sewer Analysis Booms Place Subdivision November 2004 contamination from the leach field to either culinary water or surface water. A copy of the Garfield County regulations with these setbacks has been attached for reference. These preliminary calculations have been provided to show that the proposed means of sewage disposal by 1SDS is viable. The actual 1SDS will need to be designed with flow rates and percolation rates applicable to the individual lots. The lot owners will be responsible for the design, construction, and maintenance of their own ISDS. Per Garfield County regulations, a note will be added to the Plat to inform future lot owners. Operation and Management Plan The individual lot owners will need to be responsible for the operation and management of their respective ISDS. They will need to contract with a septic system cleaner to clean the septic tank on a periodic basis. The standards of performance for the septic system cleaner are recommended to be the following, at a minimum: 1. The Systems Cleaner shall be licensed. 2. The Systems Cleaner, when cleaning a septic tank, shall remove the liquid, sludge, and scum, leaving no more than three (3) inches depth of sewage in a septic tank. 3. The Systems Cleaner shall maintain his equipment so as to ensure that no spillage of sewage will occur during transportation, and that its employees are not subject to undue health ka7nrds. 4. The Systems Cleaner shall dispose of the collected sewage only at a designated site recognized by the Board of Health. Thank you for the opportunity to provide you this information. Feel free to call if you have any questions, concerns, or comments. Sincei oun y, ain Cross Enneering, Inc. is Hale, PE MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING, INC. Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 826 ''/ Grand Avenue, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 P. 970.945.5544 F_ 970.945.5558 www.mounuuncross-eng,com Traffic Analysis for: Booms Place Subdivision. Garfield County, CO Prepared for: Ms. Robin J. Fritzlan 1582 County Road 233 Rifle, CO 81650 Phone: 970.625.4616 Prepared by: MOUNTAIN IN +CROSS 1) ENGINEERING, and INC.S Civil and Environmental Consulting ign 826 1/2 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ph 970.945.5544 he 970.945.5558 www.mauntalncross-any cram Date: October 2004 MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING, INC. Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 826'!, Grand Avenue, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 P: 970.945.5544 F: 970.945.5558 www .mountaincross-eng.corn Traffic Analysis Booms Place Subdivision October 2004 111/ TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Introduction The purpose of this report is to evaluate traffic impacts on Garfield County Road 233 (CR 233), associated with the proposed Booms Place Subdivision. Access to the Booms Place Subdivision is via County Road 233. The Booms Place Subdivision will also be referred to as the Project in this analysis. The traffic analysis will include the following discussions: • An analysis of existing traffic • Calculations of traffic to be generated by the Project • Determination of capacity for existing and developed traffic volumes on CR 233 Existing Traffic The existing traffic count data for CR 233 was obtained from Garfield County Road and Bridge department on traffic counts performed in the year 2002. More current counts are unavailable at the time of this analysis. Engineering convention calculates hourly traffic counts based on 16 hour average of the ADT counted by Garfield County Road and Bridge. Traffic was counted approximately one-half mile west from where the project will access CR 233. For these counts the average daily traffic counted in 2002 was 76 vehicles per day (VPD), shown on the attached mapping provided by Garfield County GIS and Road & Bridge. The calculated average vehicles per hour (VPH) are 5. Engineering convention calculates the peak period of traffic on the largest fifteen minute period of traffic, but since the traffic counts provided do not break down the counts per period, a peaking factor of 2.8 has been assumed on the average VPH calculated above. The peak hour traffic was assumed to be in the morning between 7:00 am and 9:00 am. For purposes of this analysis, the design Peak Hour was calculated by taking the maximum average vehicIe hour of 5 VPH and multiplying that by the assumed peaking factor of 2.8 to convert into the Peak Hour of 14 vehicles. The existing traffic is summarized as follows: • 76 ADT for CR 233 on a weekday • 14 VPH for CR 233 on a weekday morning peak hour Generated Traffic The Booms Place Subdivision proposes 4 lots with one single family dwelling unit on each lot. One of the lots will contain the existing single family dwelling unit so the Project will only add three additional single family units. The traffic generated by these three single farnily units was calculated based upon the Trip Generation Manual, Sixth Edition, by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1997 studies of Single Family Detached Housing on a weekday and on. a weekday morning peak hour that are attached: • 3 Single Family Lots * Weekday Average Rate 9.57 = 29 VPD • 3 Single Family Lots * Peak Hour Average Rate 0.75 = 3 VPH MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING, INC. Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 826'1: Grand Avenue, Glenwood Springs, CO 81 101 P: 970:945.5544 F: 970.945.5558 www.mnuntaincross-eng.com Truffle Analysis Booms Place Subdivision October 2004 The anticipated traffic is as follows: • 76 VPD + 29 VPD = 105 ADT for CR 233 on a weekday • 14 VPH + 3 VPH = 17 VPH for CR 233 on a weekday morning peak hour Roadway Capacity and Level of Service The roadway capacity and Ievel of service was determined using the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual for two-lane highways. The method for calculating capacity and level of service includes the following parameters: • width of roadway • effects of narrow lanes • effects of shoulder widths • type of terrain • directional distribution of traffic • roadway grade • roadway curves • roadway intersections • truck, bus, and RV traffic The Level of Service is a quantitative method of expressing a qualitative value of traffic congestion. The Levels of Service are similar in ranking to a school report card, where A is the best with no waiting or congestion, down to an E where there are long waits and lots of congestion. Level of service F is a traffic standstill. The calculations are attached and also show that there are no impacts to the levels of service for CR 233: Level of Service with Existing Traffic: • CR 233: Level of Service A Level of Service with Generated Traffic: • CR 233: Level of Service A The increased traffic projections show no impacts to the Level of Service for CR 233. Since the road immediately adjacent to the project experiences negligible impacts, evaluation of streets exterior to CR 233 is not warranted. Thus it is anticipated that the Project will have negligible impacts from a traffic standpoint according to the above analysis. Roadway Surfacing The existing CR 233 road surface is chip and seal. This surfacing is congruent with the Garfield County road standards based on existing traffic counts performed in the year 2002. With the anticipated increase in traffic, chip and seal is still the warranted surface type. MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING, INC. Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 826'/ Grand Avenue, Glenwood springs, CO 81601 P: 970.9455544 F: 970.945.5558 www rnountaincross-eng. conn Traffic Analysis Booms Place Subdivision October 2004 • The interior road of the Project has an anticipated ADT per the above with four lots of 39 VPD. Based on the roadway standards of Garfield County the appropriate surfacing is gravel. Conclusions Based on the above analysis the following conclusions can be made: • The anticipated increased traffic on CR233 due to the project is 29 VPD The increased traffic has a negligible impact to the existing surrounding roadway system • The surface type on the interior project roads is anticipated to be gravel Thank you for the opportunity to provide this report. Feel free to call if you have any questions, concerns, or comments. Sine rely, o ntain Cross i ngineering, Inc. Chris 1-1ale, PE • • MOUNTAIN CROSS ENGINEERING, INC. Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 826 V Grand Avenue, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 P. 970.945.5544 F 970945.5558 www mountaincross-eng.com • Attachments 1282r 98 I. 87 ;A" 76 BOOMS PLACE SUBDIVISION 296 6 ;1,061.18 119 43 3 392 734 242 991 Rifle 7(1270 1278 y • 1139. 248 re AOT RASED ON DATA GATHERED 8Y GARFELD COUNTY ROAD a ORME C. Ni C0OPptADON MTUH THE DEPT. SEVEN DAY A ElEnnaa. APRL AFC ocro lai. MAPPING BY GARFIELD COUNTY • DEPAMENT CPS TECFNOL0G7 COUNTS COLLECTED 10/22/04 Chris Hale MO FRE traffic 500-001 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS for BOOMS PLACE SUBDIVISION Ms. Robin Fritzlan 140UNT/iIN CROSS ENGINEERING, INC. Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design 826 1!2 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ph 970.945.5544 fx 970.945.6658 www.mountaincrass-eng.com • Single -Family Detached Housing (210) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 348 Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 198 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 9.57 4.31 - 21.85 3.69 Data Plot and Equation T = Average Vehicle Trip Ends 30.000 0 X Actual Data Points 1000 X = Number of Dwelling Units Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.920 Ln(X) + 2.707 2000 Average Rate R2 = 0.96 3000 'Trip Generation, 6th Edition 263 Institute of Transportation Engineers • Single -Family Detached Housing (210) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Number of Studies: 271 Avg. Number of Dwelling Units: 202 Directional Distribution: 25% entering, 75% exiting Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average 'Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.75 .0.33 - 2.27 0.90 Data Plot and Equation T p Average Vehicle Trip Ends 0 X Actual Data Points 1000 X = Number of Dwelling Units Fitted Curve Fitted Curve Equation: T =1:1.700(X) + 9.477 2000 Average Rate a2 =0.t39 3000 Trip Generation, 6th Edition 264 Institute of Transportation Engineers • Highway Capacity Manual 2000 TWO-WAY TWO-LANE HIGHWAY SEGMENT WORKSHEET General Information Analyst C 1p ie., t4 Site information _ __ Highway eg..2 " Agency or Company .• •. •l_ .L— From/To t' + . rm r5 par Dale Performed na Jurisdiction C T]. Analysis Time Period f �, t( 1' Nov Analysis Year t9 U Operational (LOS) 0 Design (vo) Planning (LOS) C Planning (vP) In Data - Shoulder width - -2.- !ft 0 Class 1 highway lass 11 highway Terrain 0 Level Rolling �-- Lane width 12 ft Two-way hourly volume vehffl - Lane R Directional split 10 o/ a c o width ,, mon ',r1' Peak -hour factor. PHF a- Shoulder width . % Trucks and buses, PT 1 % cio .5 % Recreational vehicles, PR 1 Segment length, LI es.mi IDD % No -passing zone % Access points/mi_fmi Average Travel Speed Grade adjustment factor, fa (Exhibit 20-7) 0 .7 - Passenger -car equivalents for trucks. ET (Exhibit 20-9) p Passenger -car equivalents for RVs, ER {Exhibit 20-9) 1 , 1 Heavy factor, -vehicle adjustment fm/ km _ Two-way flow ralevp (pcfh) v, =PHF--v kx vQ' highest di lona! split proportion (prTh) (o Free -Flow Speed from Field Measurement Estimated Free -Flaw Speed ldmeo dssu[P� peed, 5Fm m Base free-flow speed, BFFS 3 milli Observed voluvetlfh Adj. for lane width and shoulder width, ks (Exhibit 20-5)mi/h Free-flow speed, FFS_...milli Adj. for access points. f,� (Exhibit 20-6) .'7 • C mifh _ FFS = Sym + 0.00 . Free-flow speed, FFS O mint FFS=BFFS- IIA -IA Adj. for no -passing zones, fnf, (mifh) (Exhibit 20-11) O. 10,5 Average travel speed, ATS (mi/h) ATS = FFS - 0.00776vp -- Iv "50 Percent l7me-Spent-Followfig Grade adjustment factor, tc (Exhibit 20-8) 0.1} Passenger -car equivalents for trucks, EI (Exhibit 20-10) 11 Passenger -car equivalents for RVs, ER (Exhibit 20-10) 1 , Heavy factor. fHv -vehicle adjustment fir„ - t , P1(ET -1) • Ps(En - 11 - 913/41 Two-way flow rate.[ v (petit) - v - - v p 10 PH` Ip' Irk iF vp * highest directional split proportion? (pcfh) 5 Base percent time -spent -following, BPTSF (°+') BPTSF = 100(1 - e-a'°°aa'°vu) o .6 -qct I Adj. tar directional distribution and no -passing zone, fd,,y (%) (Exhibit 20-12) 31 _ Percent time -spent -fallowing, PTSF (%) PTSF = BPTSF + Limp 31. 8 Levet of Service and Other Performance Measures Level of service, LOS (Exhibit 20-3 for Class 1 or 20-4 for Class II) Volume to capacity rano, vie vfc = 3200 O. OO X Peak 15 -min vehicle -miles at travel, VMTts (veh-mi) '.' T I, = o.25t,(4) a. O 48 II Peak -hour vehicle -miles of travel, VMTNQ (veli -mi) VMT60 = V . Lt 2 3 3.; Peak 15 -min fatal travel time, TT15 (veh-h) Ills = _ vri5 0 • 4 - Notes 1 It vQ ? 3.200 pr1h. terminate analysis ---the LOS is F 2 11 highest directional split v, > 1,700 pcih, terminate analysis --the LOS +s F Chapter 20- Two -Lane Highways • Highway Capacily Manual 2000 TWO-WAY TWO-LANE HIGHWAY SEGMENT WORKSHEET General information Site information Analyst 4444%6 f4 -1,E ---Highway CP_2 3 ? Agency orCompdrly fp litherbel% FroniVto gwiz lS poet Date Performed Li/S [� Jurisdiction ,„r' .._...:10..'► Analysis Time Period -/ f Analysis Year g%+ U Operational (LDS) U Design (vp) l] Planning (LOS) O Planning (vp) fn ut Data Shoulder width ft 0 Class 1 highway "Ftlass 11 highway f Terrain LlLevsl Rolling - Lane width l' ft Two-way hourly volume i whit- Lane la ft UM 0irectionat split t width tbMArran _elk Peak hour factor, PHF �.'Qi Shoulder width fl - % Trucks and buses, PT ) °Je Recreational vehicles, Pa % Segment length, L .6 mi alp 16 % No -passing zone Ja Access points/mi L3 !ml Average Travel Speed Grade adjustrnnenl tactor, 1G (Exhibit 20-7) O. 4 t Passen9er-car equivalents for !rucks, Et (Exhibit 20-9) A.-6 Passenger -car equivalents for RVs, ER_(Exhibit 20-9) 1 , 1 Heavy + factor, iHV r,n, ff ; -vehicle adjustment • �"PttEr-11*pett:a—+} fp C . $`I Two-way flow l rate, vp (pclli)ti yr ' PNF • is - fw C V ` highest directional split proportion2 (pclh) 1. Free -Flow Speed from Field Measurement Estimated Free -Flow S Field measu r m' Base tree -flow speed, BFFS r mi/h Observed volume. V, vehlh Adj. for lane width and shoulder width, fl s (Exhibit 20-5) r". lfl milh Free-flow speed. FFS mi/h Adj. for access points, fA (Exhibit 20-6) Z mi/h v FFS = SFA ” 0.00776(1,—Free-flow speed, FFS 3 0 mi/h FES = BFFS - Its - IA Adii. dor no- ' zones. t� (mi/h) (Exhibit 20-11) - 0 • ! pc Average travel speed, ATS (mitt') ATS = FES - 0.00776vv- f„p_ j Q Percent Time -Spent -Following Grade adjustment factor, f0 (Exhibit 20-8) 0. i Passenger-car equivalents for trucks, ET (Exhibit 20 -ID) 1 , Sil Passenger -car equivalents for RVs, ER (Exhibit 20-10) 1 Heavy -vehicle factor, fhv adjustment f,,,, -1 PT(Ei- t). wit _ 1) j p4 0.D " Two-way Dow rate +rP (pc/h) -- v! = PrtF - - 6C 1 vp • highest direct. split proportionV' (pcfh) ` ^ Base percent time -spent -following, BPTSF (%) BPTSF = 100(1 - e °'D°0e79'a) 0.,6-8,2 Adj. for directional distribution and no -passing zone, fdinp (%) (Exhibit 20-12 1 . Percent time -spent -following, PTSF (%) PTSF = BPTSF + filenp Level of Service and Other Performance Measures 19,0 1 ?z Level of service, LOS (Exhibit 20-3 for Glass 1 or 20-4 for Class 11) .o Volume to capacity ratio, vlc vic = 3100•1.-t:12 Peak 15 -min vehicle -miles of travel, VMT15 (veh-rni) VMMs T,,, aa251.,(4) • a 7 - Peak -hour vehicle -miles of travel„ VMTep (veh-mi) VMTyp = V' 14 Peak 15 -min total travel time, TT15 (veh-h) TT -5 = -ATt • _ -2 0. l a Notes 111 vp > 3,200 pc/h, terminate analysis—the 1.0S is F. 2. If highest directional split vp? 1,100 pc/h, terminate analysis --tile LOS is f. Chapter 20 Two -Lane Highways Booms Plaice Subd viswvn. 1582 CR 233 R ffe, CO 81650 (970)625-4616 April 08, 2005 Mr. Fred Jarman Garfield County Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Request for Variances Dear Fred: The purpose of this correspondence is to a request a variance from the following requirements in the Subdivision Regulations:. Section 9:18 - No further subdivision allowed: A design variance is requested that would allow Lot 4 to be subdivided in the future. The large acreage of mild slopes on Lot 4 would be suitable for a future subdivision. The Owner has envisioned that the potential buyer of this lot would have the right to subdivide this lot in the future. This would most likely happen after annexation into the City of Rifle, if or when this ever occurs. In conversations with the City of Rifle, they would prefer to limit possible complications arising from this requirement and have endorsed this variance. A letter from the City of Rifle, is attached. Section 9:35 — 40' Right of Wiry: The design capacity for the four lots (3 proposed, 1 existing) is approximately 40 ADT putting it within the semi -private category of the County requiring a right-of-way width of 40'. Currently the width onto County Road 233 is 30' and the existing driveway parallels the northern property line. To be consistent with the access, it is proposed that the 30' width is continued out to become the Right -of -Way line. The proposed road construction is planned to simply improve the existing road. The entire road section including ditches can be contained within the 30' proposed right-of- way width making the additional 10' unnecessary Thank you for your consideration. It is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, MATT STURGEON, DIRECTOR ]'ASOH NAESS, PLANNER ERICA MACHADO, GIS COORDINATOR CHARLOTTE SQUIRES, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT KEVIN ROBERTS, BUILDING OFFICIAL • April 5, 2005 Chris Hale, PE Mountain Cross Engineering, Inc. 8261/2 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Booms Place Subdivision Dear Chris: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT KANNINGP R IFLECO.ORQ 970.625.6224 (PHONE) 970.625.6268 (FAX) Per the Garfield County Comprehensive flan, the Booms Place Subdivision is within the sphere of influence of the City of Rifle. The City of Rifle has reviewed the proposed subdivision and has no comments either for or against the concept of the subdivision at this time. The City would like to make the following comments in regards to the development of the subdivision. There are currently four (4) separate water taps present and available for properties within the proposed subdivision. Each of those water taps allows for the development of one residential unit of up to four (4) bedrooms and irrigation of up to 5,000 SF of landscaping associated with that residence. If larger residential units or more landscaping are desired, additional fees would be required by the City of Rifle. The water taps shall not be used to support agricultural activities, including any activities taking place within the arena shown on the submitted "Water Supply Plan". Also, the City of Rifle requests that the easement for the water lines running to the water tank near the Fritrlan's property be shown on the final plat map. It is our understanding that the applicant is planning to request a variance from including the plat note prohibiting further subdivision. If such a plat note would inhibit or complicate future subdivision of the subject property if it was ever found eligible and appropriate for annexation and subdivision within the City of Rifle, the City would be in favor of the variance request. Otherwise, the City would recommend that the plat note text indicate that while further subdivision action within Garfield County may be prohibited, such prohibitions would not apply to the future actions of other municipalities. If you have any questions, please give me a call at 625-6248. Sincerely, City of Rifle Planning and. Development Jason Naess, Planner (970) 625-6248 jnaess(t rifleco.org CITY OF RIFLE 202 RAILROAD AVENUE • P.O. Box 1908 • RIFLE Co 81650 W W W. R I FLE:C0.ORG • • • RIFLE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT October 27, 2004 Robin FritzIan / Shona Hoffineister 1582 County Road 233 Rifle, Colorado 81650 Reference: Booms Place Subdivision Mrs. Fritzlan, The Rifle Fire Protection District has recently reviewed your proposed subdivision on County Road 233 near Rifle. It is the Districts understanding that your proposal is to take one parcel of approximately 63.799 acres and create four parcels, one of approximately 3.874 acres, one of approximately 3.882 acres, one of approximately 10.315 acres, and one of approximately 45.728 acres. The District further understands that the proposed uses of the parcels will be residential. The property is within the boundaries of the Rifle Fire Protection District and fire and emergency medical services are provided to the area by the District. The District approves of the subdivision and would make the following recommendations: 1. Posting of address: addresses are to be posted where the driveway intersects the County Road. If a shared driveway arrangement is used, the address for each home should be posted at the County Road and on the individual residences to clearly identify each address. Letters are to be a minimum of 4 inches in height, Ya inch in width and contrast with background colors. 2. Access roadways: driveways should be constructed to accommodate the weights and turning radius of emergency apparatus in adverse weather conditions. 3. Defensible space: combustible materials should be thinned from around structures so as to provide a defensible space in the event of a wild land fire. 4. Fire Hydrants are along the County Road and the proposal does meet the District's minimum requirements of having an approved water supply within two miles for all proposed lots. Thank you for your cooperation and feel free to contact me if I can be of further assistance. Mike Morgan District Chief Telephone (970) 625-1243 • Fax (970) 625-2963 1850 Railroad Avenue • Rifle, Colorado 81650 PC 8/11/04 -- JR PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COM1WIENTS REOUEST! APPLICANT & OWNER LOCATION: ATER: SEWER: ACCESS: SIZE: EXISTING ZONING: Sketch Plan of Booms Place Subdivision Robin Pritzlan 1582 County Road 233 City of Rifle Water ISDS CR 233 63.799 (4 lots proposed) L I.IESCRIPTION OF11TE PROPOSAL & SITE The Applicant proposes to subdivide 63.799 acres into 4 proposed single family lots (3.874, 3.882, 10.315 and 45,728 acres). The property is located on Graham Mesa less than 2 miles Northeast of the City of Rifle and Interstate 70 on CR 233. The property proposes one (1) main access point onto the property and drains to the southwest with relatively less sloped area to the northeast, northwest and southwest. There is an existing access easeinent for the maintenance of a water tank that is on the northeast of the property and maintained by the City of Rifle. There are a variety of soils ranging in quality of composition, stability, percolation ability upon the moderate to gently sloping topography. 11, REFERRALS Staff referred the application to the following review agencies and departments for general and/or specific cornrmentaty and/or review. The comments received have been generally incorporated into this Memo: 90 3Sdd GHIS 686b5Z90L6 39.00 b00Z/6T/89 • • • a. City of Rifle (no comment) b. Garfield County Road & Bridge Department (Response with no concerns) III. STAFF COMMENTS The following section presents an analysis of the proposed project regarding compliance with provisions in the Subdivision Regulations, Zoning Resolution, and Comprehensive Plan. These comments are intended to provide regulatory direction regarding the development of the property as proposed. The Planning Commission will review the application materials and this memorandum prepared by Staff and will provide comments to the Applicant accordingly. A. Comprehensive Plan The property is located in Study Area 3 and is designated as "Outlying Residential with a 2 acre minimum per dwelling unit" land. The property is located in the sphere of influence of the City of Rifle. The Applicant shall be required to demonstrate that the proposal conforms to and is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. B. Zouintr The property is located in the AIR'RD Agricultural Residential Rural Density zone district which allows the proposed use. The Applicant shall be made aware of the uses contemplated m that zone district as further described in Section 3:07 of the Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended, the Applicant shall consider the following as seen below;. 3.02 A/RIRD AGRICULTURALIRESLOENTL /Rt.+RAL DENSITY 3.02.01 Uses, by right: Agricultural includingfarms, garden, greenhouse, nurse, orchard, ranch, small animal arm for production of poultry, fish, fir-bearingor other small animals and customary accessory uses including buildings for shelter or enclosure of persons, animals or property employed in any of the above uses, retail establishment for sale of goods processed from raw materials produced on the lot; Guiding and outfitting, and park; Single-family dwelling and customary accessory uses. (A. 86-09) Accessory dwelling unit approved as a parr of a public hearing ©r meeting on a subdivision or subdivision exemption or guesthouse special use approved afier 7/95 and meeting the ,standards in Section 5.03.02. 2 f 3rd GHNJ 686ti6Z90L6 T0:00 POK/61/80 • 3.02.02 Uses, conditional: Aircraft landing strip, church, community buildings, day nursery and school; group home for the elderly.(. 97-60) Boarding or rooming houses, studio for conduct of arts and crafts, home occupation, water impoundments. (A. 86-09;87-108) 3.02.03 Uses[ svecial; Airport utility,eedlot as principal use of the lot, crematorium, agriculture -relate business, resorts, kennel, ridding stable, and veterinary clinic, shooting range facility(A.98-108); Two family dwelling camper park ski lift and trails; broadcasting studio, communication facility, corrections facility, storage, storage of heavy equipment, golf course driving range, golf practice range and accessory facilities, commercial recreation facilityfpark;(A. 97-60; 97- 112) Mass Transit Facility (added 2002-12) Public gatherings; storage of oil and gas drilling equipment; Site for extraction, processing, storage or material handling of natural resources; utility lines. utility substations; recreational support facilities and guest house. (A. 79-132; 80-64; 80-180; 80-313, 81-145; 81-263; 84-78; 86-9; 86-84; 86-106; 87-73; 99-025) Accessory dwelling unit meeting the standards in Section 5.03.02 for any lot not created after a public hearing or meeting after 7/95. Kennel • 3.02.04 Minimum Lot Area. Two (2) acres'; except as otherwise approved in a Cluster Option (2003-17) 3.02.05 Maximum Lot Coveraee:: Fifteen percent (15%). 3.02.06 Minimum Setback. (1) Front yard: (a) arterial streets: seventy-five (75) feet from street centerline or fi (50) feet from front lot line, whichever is greater, ) local streets: f�jy (5) feet from street centerline or twenty-five (2 5) feet from front lot rne, whichever is greater; (2) .Rear yard: Twenty five (25) feet from rear lot line;, (3) Side yard: Ten (10) feet from side lot line, or one-half (1/2) the height of the principal building, whichever is greater. 3.02.07 Maximum Height of Buildings• Twenty-five (25) feet. 3.02.08 Additional Requirements: All uses shall be subject to the provisions under Section i (Supplementary Re.gulation.$). Staff Comment: At ppresent, the lots as proposed comply with the minimum Zoning Regulations. c0 39' d 3 GM° 686t298L6 90:00 1700Z/6T/80 • C. Subdivisott The Applicant shall be aware of the requirements outlined in Sections 4:00, 5:00, and 9:00 of the Subdivision Regulations of 1984 regarding subdividing property in Garfield County. Staff has outlined areas of concern for the Applicant to consider during the preliminary plan and final plat portion of subdivision in Garfield County. The Applicant shall consider the following; a. Potable Water Staff Comment: The Applicant proposes that each lot will be served by water taps that have been granted by the City of Rifle.. 4:91 A water supply plan, at the same scale as the Preliminary Plan, shall provide the following information in graphic andlor written form :. In all instances, evidence that a water supply, sufficient in terms of quality, quantity and dependability, shall be available to ensure an adequate supply of water for the proposed subdivision. Such evidence may include, but shall not be limited to: 1. Evidence of ownership or right of acquisition or sue of existing and proposed water rights; 2. Historic use and estimated yield of claimed water rights; 3. Amenability of existing right to change in use; 4. Evidence that public or private water owners can and will supply water to :he proposed subdivision, including the amount of water available for use within the subdivision by such providers, the feasibility of extending service to the area, proof of the legal dependability of the proposed water supply and the representation that all necessary water rights have been obtained or will be obtained or adjudicated, prior to submission of the focal plat; and S. Evidence concerning the potability of the proposed water supply for the subdivision. B. If a central supply and distribution system is to be provided, a general description of the system, as designed by a Colorado registered engineer. In addition: 1. .Nature of the legal entity which will own and operate the water system; and 2. Proposed method offinancing inancing the water system. C. If Connection is to be _made to an existing water system, a letter fr©m an authorized representative of said system staging that the proposed development will be served, and evidence from either the Colorado Stare Engineer's Office or Water Court, Water Division No. 5, that the existing water system presently possesses an i a1 0 68605790L6 10:00 b00Z/61/80 • • adequate legal water supply to serve the proposed development: If individual water systems shall be provided by lot owners, a report indicating the availability of ample potable ground water at reasonable depths throughout the subdivision and the expected quality and long -terra yield of such wells, with the written report by a registered professional engineer licensed by the State of Colorado, qualified to perform such, work; and E. If applicable, a Plan of Augmentation and a plan for subdivision water supplies, as required by law, with the supporting engineering work signed by a Colorado registered engineer, shall be submitted by the applicant, even f the applicant is not the actual supplier of water, In :addition, because the applicant proposes a central water system, the following desigi criteria (Section 9:51) shall be addressed as part of preliminary plan: 9:53 Central water systems shall be designed by an engineer quaked to design water systems and be a registered professional engineer licensed by the State of Colorado. Central water and treatment and storage facilities shall be approved by the Colorado Department of Health. All Mines in a Central water systemshould be looped, with no dead ends included in the system. Where dead ends are proposed for cul-de-sacs, there will either be a fire hydrant or blow -off valve at the end of the line. 9:54 Water supply stems, on -lot or otherwise located in a floodplain, shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration and avoid impairment during or subsequent to flooding. 9:55 All water mains shall be a 'minirnurn diameter offour inches (4'), provided storage facilities adequate for fire protection are available. 9:51 An adequate potable and irrigation water supply shall be available to all lots within a subdivision, taking into consideration peak demands to service total development population, irrigation uses, and adequate fire protection requirements in accordance with recognized and customary engineering standards. b. Waste Disposal Staff Comment: The Applicant proposes individual sewage disposal systems (ISDS) for each lot to serve the wastewater needs of the four (4) lots within the subdivision. 686t' 9OL6 90:00 700Z/6T/80 The Applicant shall be aware of the requirements for the Preliminary pia t Phase of development regarding ISDS in Section 4:92 of the Subdivision Regulations: 4:92 A sanitary sewage disposal plan, at the same scale as the Preliminary Plan, shall provide the following information in graphic and/or written form: D. If no central sewage treatment world is proposed and individual sewage disposal systems will be utilized, a description of sewage, the disposal means, as well as evidence as the result of soil percolation tests and produce .excavations to determine maximum seasonal ground water level and depth to bedrock shall be provided. In addition: 1. Indicated by location on the plat; W Performed and signed by a registered professional engineer licensed by the State of Colorado; 3. Adequate in number and location to meet requirements of the Garfield County Individual Sewage Disposal Requirements and the Colorado Department of Public Health, Water Quality Control Commission; and E. If individual sewage disposal systems are to be'utilized, a proposed. management plan for the operation and maintenance of on-site systems shall be provided. Staff Comn t: Regarding the capacity of ISDS, the Applicant should be aware of potential limitations of ISDS based on the size and type of soils on lots 1 and 2 to minimize ground water contamination. Specifically, the preliminary plan shall address the following sections of the subdivision regulations: 9:61 Disposal by individual sewage disposal systems may be permitted, provided lot sizes are consistent with the Garfield County Zoning Resolution. Individual systems must have representative soil absorption tests performed by a qualified engineer registered to perform such tests in the State of Colorado. 9:62 Central sewage treatment works shall be designed by a- registered professional engineer licensed by the State of Colorado. The system shall be designed, in accordance with the standards established by the Colorado Department of Health. Site location approval shall be obtained from the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission for systems over two thousand (2,000) gallons per day. In no event may a system be designed for less capacity than the anticipated maximum daily sewage flow or treatment requirements. LO AFivd QH J9 685bSZ9EL6 TO:00 1700Z/6i/80 • Le 3Eid Road!Access Staff Comment: The property is accessed by easement from County Road 233 to the northwest of the property. The road within the subdivision shall be constructed to meet county requirements. The Applicant has not indicated if the internal proposed road is to be dedicated to the County road system or kept as a private drive and shall meet all improvement criteria of the Subdivision Regulations of the County. The Applicant shall be aware that Section 9:34 requires that all streets are to be dedicated to the public and cannot be private unless approved as such through a Planned Unit Development. Staff referred the application to the Garfield County Road and Bridge Department which responder) with no concerns at this time d. Fire Protection Staff' Comment: The property is located in the Rifle Fire Protection District. Section. 9:70 of the Subdivision Regulations requires all subdivisions to address the following fire protection provisions as part of the preliminary plan: 9:71 Subdivision fire protection plans shall be reviewed by the appropriate fire protection district to ensure that all lots have primary and secondary access points to escape fire entrapment. 9:72 Where a central water system has fire hydrants, all fire hydrants shall meet the specifications for the appropriate fire protection agency, particularly with regard to thread size on the fire hydrants. 9:73 Where there is no central water system available, a central located fire protection ,storage tank shall be designed to meet the fire protection needs of the subdivision and be approved by the appropriate fire district. 9:74 Water used for fire protection purposes does not have to be potable water and maybe from a source separate from the domestic supply. DrainagerFloociplain Issues 4;80 A drainage plan. at the same scale as the Preliminary Plan and prepared by an engineer registered in the State of Colorado, shall depict the following QHelD 7 6860590L6 90:00 1700Z/61/B0 • • 80 39Vd information in graphic and/or written form: A. Existing water courses and lakes; B. Limits of tributary areas, where practical; C. Computations of expected tributary_ flows; and D. Design of drainage facilities to prevent storm waters in excess of historic run-off` from entering, damaging or being carried by existing drainage facilities, and to prevent major damage or flooding of residences in a one hundred (100) year storm. .showing: I. Area subject to inundation; and 2. Location and size of proposed culverts, bridges, ditches and channels. 9:41 Drainage easements, channels, culverts and required bridges shall be designed by an engineer registered in the State of Colorado. 9:42 All drainage facilities shall be designed based on a twenty-five (25) year frequency storm. 9:43 Where new developments create run-off in excess of hisroric site levels, the use of detention ditches and ponds may be required to retain up ro a one hundred (I00) year storm. 9:44 All culverts shall be designed such that the exposed ends are protected by encasement in concrete or extended a minimum of three fee: (3) beyond the driving surface on each side. Culverts, drainage pipes and bridges shall be designed and constructed in accordance with AASHO recommendations for an H- 20 live load. f, Wildlife / Vegetation Staff Comment: The Applicant will need to address impacts to wildlife as required in Section 4:70(D) which requires the Applicant to provide a "description of wildlife habitation, inching big game ranges based on the mapping practices of the Colorado Division of Wildlife." As required in Section 4:570(C) of the Subdivision regulations, the Applicant shall be required to provide a map and description of plant associations following practices of the Natural Resource Conservation Service and include a description of adapted materials and the location of major tree masses. It shall be noted that auy wetlands, and other significant ant sensitive ecosystems shall also be identified, surveyed and mapped R 686Vr,Z90L6 TO=00 000Z/6t/80 Z6 39kid Further, the Applicant shall provide a weed management and revegetation plan in accordance with the county's weed management requirements. g. Geolo2v !Soils 4:70(A)Description and/or illustration by a registered professional engineer licensed by the State of Colorado of bedrock lithology and the stratigraphy of overlaying unconsolidated materials in sufficient detail to indicate any potential development problems resulting from groundwater, subsidence, instability in road excavations and ills, expansive soils, drainage patterns, structural bearing strength, or the like; Staff Comment: Various issues may present significant problems regarding the use of individual sewage disposal systems 1SDS. h. Assessment 1 Fees Staff Comment: The traffic, impact fees are applied to residential subdivisions that access to a county road. Regarding School Site .Acquisition fees, the property is located in the Garfield RE -2 School District. Normally, a fee .of $200 is collected for each lot created in a residential subdivision; however,. this fee cannot be collected for a commercial subdivision. Staff has determined that if residential units are constructed on any of these lots, this school site acquisition fee would be required at the time of building permit. ft appears the only fees (as they relate to the county) include land use application fees and building permit fees to be paid at the time building permits are obtained for the individual lots as they develop. Impact Fees — Rifle Fire Protection District has cited the development is subject to impact fees adopted by the District for new commercial lots. The Applicant will be required to enter into an agreement with the district for the payment of development impact fees. This payment is due prior to the recording of the final plat. Fees are based upon the impact fees adopted by :the District at the time the agreement is executed. i. Recommended Plat Notes/ Covenants Staff Comment: Please be aware, the county requires the Applicant place the following plat •notes. be included on, the final plat and in protective :covenants: .1. "Colorado is a "Right -to -Farm" State pursuant to C.R.S. 35-3-101, et seq. Landowners, residents and visitors must be prepared to accept the GH i° 9 686V9Z50L6 90:00 000Z16{/80 • • • activities, sights, sounds and smells of Garfield Countys agricultural operations as a normal and necessary aspect of living in a County with a strong rural character and a healthy ranching sector. Alt must be prepared to encounter noises, odor, lights, mud, dust, smoke chemicals, machinery on public roads, livestock on public roads, storage and disposal of manure, and the application by spraying or otherwise of chemical fertilizers, soil amendments, herbicides, and pesticides, any ane or more of which may naturally occur as a part of a legal and non - negligent agricultural operations." 2. "No open hearth solid -fuel fireplaces will be allowed anywhere within the subdivision. One (1) new solid -fuel burning stove as defied by C.R.S. 25- 7-401, et. sew., and the regulations promulgated thereunder, will be allowed in any dwelling unit. All dwelling units will be allowed an unrestricted number of natural gas burning stoves and appliances. " "All owners of land, whether ranch or residence, have obligations under State law and County regulations with regard to the maintenance offences and irrigattcn ditches, controlling weeds, keeping livestock and pets under control, using property in accordance with zoning, and other aspects of using and maintaining property. Residents and landowners are - encouraged to learn about these rights and responsibilities and act as. good neighbors and citizens of the County. ,4 good introductory source for such information is 'A Guide to Rural Living & Small Scale Agriculture" put out by the Colorado State University Ex -tension Office in Garfield County," 4. "All exterior lighting will be the minimum amount necessary and all exterior fighting will be directed inward and downward towards the interior of the subdivision, except that provisions may be made to allow for safety lighting that goes beyond the property boundaries." 5. "One (1) dog will be allowed for each residential unit and the dog shall be required to be confined within the owner's property boundaries. " Note to Applicant: The Sketch Plan comments shall be valid for a period not to exceed one (1) year from the date of the Plug Commission review (valid until 8/11/05). If a Preliminary Plan for the proposed subdivision is not presented to the Garfield County Planning Commission by the date above, the Applicant will have to submit an updated Sketch Plan application to the Planning Department for review and comparison with the original application. 10 60 39tid QH J 686VSzsaL6 TO :a0 VOU/6 i /06 Mail Receipts Proof of Publication C l E F Garfield County Zoning Regulations of 197$, as amended Garfield County Comprehensive Plan of 2000 Application Staff Memorandum Review Memo: Garfield County Road & Bridge Department • Exhibits for Sketch Plan review of the Booms Place Subdivision, Planning and Zoning Commission Public Meeting held on August 11, 2004 VO 3EVd 0H619 686b5Z90L6 i®:00 PO /6t/80 • • From: Wendy Mead Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 8:44 AM To: Jim Hardcastle Cc: Kraig Kuben-y Subject. Booms Place Subdivision Comments Good Morning Jim, Kraig asked me to email his comments about the Booms Place subdivision. Ho said that everything looks good. I1 you have any turther questions, please contact Kraig directly. Have a great day. Wendy 10 3 t/d OHd9 6864gZ90L6 98=00 t'00Z/6T/80 Rpr 25 05 12:26p Shona Hoffineister 04/25/2005 11.28 FAA 5706252120 p.1 iouo1 POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A Amount of Insurance: $135,000.00 Policy No. G32-1260102 Premium $542.00 File No. 0305087 Loan No. 03-2368-064755831-1 Date of Policy. July 2, 2003 at 7:59 AM 1, Name of Insured. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. Its Successors and/or Assigns As Their Interests May Appear The Estate or interest in the land described in this Schedule and which is enc timbered by the insured Mortgage is Fee Simple and is al the date of Policy vested in: Robin J. Fritzlan 3. The Mortgage. herein referred to as the Insured Mortgage, and the assignments thereof, if any, are described as follows: Deed of Trust from Robin J. Fritzlan to the Public Trustee of Garfield Co lnty for the use of Washington Mutual Bank, FA, showing an original amount of $135,000.00, dated June 25, 2003 and recorded July 1, 2003 in Book 1487 at Page 868. The land referred to in this policy is described as set forth in the insured mortgage, is situated in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado, and is identified as follows: See Attached Exhibit "A" Countersigned: yeiS„ Authorized Officer or Agent NL NM 2 PA 20 ALFA Loan Policy(10-17.92) Form 1191-2 Schedule A Apr 25 05 12:26p Shona liof f'me z ster 04/2S12U0b 11:tn FA.L File No. 0305087 EXHIIIT "A" 9706252120 p. 2 A tract of land in the SW 114NW 114 of Section 2, Township 6 South. Range 93 West of the 6th P.M. in Garfield County, Colorado, and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the NW corner of the said SW114NW114 of Section 2. a pipe with a r Aluminum cap properly marked and set for the NW corner, thence North 89`5048' East and along the northerly line of the said SW 114NW 114 of Section 2, a distance of 389.06 feet; thence South 09"52'45" East a distance of 320.34 feet; thence South 76"40'39" West a distance of 411.80 feel; thence North 06'02'13" Vest a distance of 411.72 feet more or less to the POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH a non-exclusive easement for the purposes of ingress and egress. and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the NE corner of the SE114NE1f4 Section 3, Township 6 South, Range' 93 West of the 6th P.M.. a pipe with an aluminum cap, properly marked, thence North 89'57'56` West and along the north line of said SE114NE114 a distance of 615.79 feet to a point on the centerline of County Roz,d No 233; thence South 00'0741 East a distance of 30.00 feet to a point on the soutberty right of way line of said County Road 233; thence South 89"57'56" East and along said southerly right of way line a distance of 50.00 feet, to the NE corner of that parcel of land described in Book 741 at Page 567. Garfield Coun' y Records: thence South 89'57'56" East a distance of 568.94 feet; thence North 06'02'13" West a distance c f 30 17 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Fipr 25 05 12:26p Shona Hof frneister U4/2b/2000 1t:29 FAX SCHEDULE B - PART 1 This Policy does not insure against rose or damage by reason of the rolrowiny: 9706252 1.20 p . :3 u ;r ;s Policy No. G32-1260102 File No. 0305087 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records 2. Easements. or claims of easements. not shown by the public recrards. 3. Discrepancies. conflicts in boundary lines. shortage in area, encroachments. a ncl any facts, wt ich a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose. and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for seances. labor or rnaterial heretofore or hereafter fumished, rrnGx sed by law and not shown by the public records Exceptions Number 1. 2. 3 & 4 are hereby omitted 5. General taxes and assessments for the year 2003, not yet due or payable 6. Any and all water rights. ctairns, or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted are shown by the public record. 7. Right of the proprietcr of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the sal 3e be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted, and a right of way for ditches or canals as constructed iy the auttrority of the United States. as reserved in United Stales Patent recorded April 20. 1892 in Boots 12 at Page 137. a id in patent reccirdeci June 16, 1506 in Book 56 at Page 551. B. Easement and right of way for the Rifle Creek Carron Glitch or Raynard Ditch and any laterals thereto. 9. Right of way for County road No. 233 insofar as it may affect the subject property. 10. Undivided one-half interests in all oil. gas and minerals as reserved by George Everett Turtjoo to in deed recorded March 9, 1957 in Book 382 at Page 591. and any and all interests therein or assignrnent thereof. 11. Reservation of alt oil. gas and mineral rights as reserved by J. Gentry in deed recorded Februi ry 13. 1974 in Book 455 at Page 524. and any and ail intnrnsls therein or assi4nrne_nts thereof. 12. The affect, if arry, of agreement by and between Horizons West Partnership, Kenneth Latham incl Marityn Latham recorded March 3. 19E0 in Book 544 al Page 821) 13. Tears and conditions of Wafer Storage Tank Option Agreement by and between the City of R le, Colorado and Rcnald C. And Robin J. Frrtztan recorded March 1, 1999 in Book 1116 at Page 927. 14. Terms and conditions of Special Warranty Easement Deed and Agreement as more particular y described in instrument recorded February 27, 2003 in Book 1441 at Page 372. NOTE Unless Schedule B Part Il is attached there are not suoordanale matters that affect the title to the estate or interest referred to in Schedule A American Land Title Association Loan Policy Schedule B - Part 1 Form 1006-56 I , rif : Fes;; rare. A4101 2X35 2:14PM P1 BOOMS SUBDIVISION ROW EXHIBIT B PROPERTY DESCH IPTION A PARCEL, OP LAND SITUATED IN THE NEI/4 OF SECTION 3. TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 93 WEST OP THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ©ARFIELD. STATE` OF COLORADO, APING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. DECINNING AT THE NI/16 CORNER or SECTIONS 3 ANO 2:THENCES N119'67. 66"W 566 79 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE N8a'57'56"11' 50.00 FEET. THENCE S00'02.41"E 30,00 FRET: THENCE S89'57'56.'1' 60.00 FE'E'T ffIENCE N00'02.41"W 30.00 Pf,57. TO THE TRUE POINT OF DRCINNING. SAID' PROPERTY CONTAINS 1300 SQUARE FRET AS DESCRIBED 800/15 SUBDIVISION IME SEXTON SURVEY CO 128 WEST 3" STREET RIFLE CO 81650 010-025-3711 970-945- 4700 BY BRIAN A STEJNPINQER P.L..' 3l944 DATE B/29/05 JOB NO 0JZ29 (ftOONCTYRoW.0WG l�