The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1.0 ApplicationGarfield County Regional Airport 0375 County Road 352 Building 2060 Rifle, CO 81650 Mr. Fred Jannan Director, Building and Planning Garfield County 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 July 1, 2010 REF : PUD AMENDMENT, GARFIE LD COUNTY AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX PUD. Dear Fred : As the Managing Partner for Airport Land Partners Limited (ALP) I am writing to authorize the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado to process an amendment to the above referenced PUD . Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter. Very truly yours, AIRPORT LAND PARTNERS LIMITED ~~ Robert A. Howard Managing Partner cc Brian Condie, Garfield County Regional Airport Molly Orkild-Larson, Garfield County Planning Eric Rasmussen, Development Economics , October 15, 2010 Mr. Fred Jarman Director, Building and Planning Garfie ld County 108 8th Street, Suite 40 l Glenwood Springs, CO 8160 1 REF: PUD AMENDMENT, GARFIELD COUNTY AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX PUD . Dear Mr. Jarman: As the authorized agent for Airport Land Partners (ALP) in the matter of the above referenced PUD rezoning, I am writing to request that Eric Rasmussen be recognized to make the Applicant's presentation to the Garfield County Planning Commission at the meeting scheduled December 8, 2010. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, GARFIELD COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT Brian Condie C.M. Airport Director cc Robert A. Howard, ALP Molly Orkild-Larson, Garfield County Planning Eric Rasmussen, Development Economics 0375 County Road 352, Building 2060 I Rifle, Colorado 81650 Ip (970) 625-1091 If (970) 625-8501 RifleAirport@gmail.com I www.RequestRifle .com Your 24/7 Colorado Rockies Airport MEMORANDUM To: Through: cc: Molly Orkild-Larson Brian Condie Robert H. Howard Eric Rasmussen October 10, 2010 From: Date: Subject: Staff Comments Regarding PDAA 6349 Garfield County Planning Staff has reviewed and commented on the Application For Text Plan Amendment: Garfield County Airport Industrial Park Complex dated June 4 , 2010. This memo provides a series ofresponses by Applicant's consultant (Applicant's Response) to the Staff Comments. The Applicant's Response to the Staff Recommendation is summarized as follows: Applicant requests the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval for the proposed PUD amendments to the Board of County Commissioners for the Garfield County Airport Industrial Complex without the following conditions: 1. Extraction shall not be allowed in the following zone districts: Residential/Single Family (R/SF, Residential/Urban (R/UD), and Mobile Home Park (MHP). 2. Solar Power Generating Systems shall not be allowed in the following zone districts: Residential/Single Family (R/SF, Residential/Urban (R/UD), Mobile Home Park (MHP). 3. Storage Areas and Facilities shall not allowed in the following zone districts : Residential/Single Family (R/SF, Residenti a l/Urban (R/UD), and Mobile Home Park (MHP). DISCUSSION BY APPLICANT Solar Power Generating System Staff Response: The Garfield County Comprehensive Plan of 2000 encourages homeowners to implement solar design in their homes but is silent about the support of larger commercial solar power generating systems. In addition , the ULUR does not allow this land use within residential districts. Therefore, Staff recommends that commercial solar power generating systems not be allowed within any residential zone district (R/SF , R/UD and MHP) of the PUD. The ULUR does allow solar power generating systems within rural, commercial, industrial , and resource lands (subareas: gentle and plateau) districts by Major Impact Review and therefore Staff would support this use within all other districts specified in this application. Applicant Response : ALP reiterates its belief that the inclusion of Solar Power Generating Facilities within residential zones districts (R/SF, R/UD, MHP) of the PUD through a text amendment is appropriate and necessary for the following reasons : - 1 - • The premise of PUD zoning is "to permit and encourage greater flexibility and innovation so that the development is compatible with the site's physical and environmental characteristics." • The proposed text amendment incorporates the ability to provide electrical generating capacity supporting residential uses • The incorporation of solar power generating facilities within residential has been shown to be compatible with surrounding or adjacent residential uses; • The amendment to the existing zone district permitted uses to incorporate solar power generating facilities allows for accommodation of future technological improvements in solar generating facilities; • The requirement of the applicant to make application for a Major Impact Review for approval of applications within the residential zone districts provides an appropriate level of discretion in the review and approval of specific implementations of solar generating power facilities . Extraction Staff Response : The ULUR defines Extraction as : Industrial Use or Activity. Uses engaged in processing, manufacturing of materials from either extracted or raw materials or from previously prepared materials resulting in a new product designed for wholesale or retail sale . 1. Extraction: to draw out or forth ; hence to derive as if by drawing", removal of physical matter in a solid o r liquid state form its naturally occurring location; the initial step in utilization of a natural resource; examples include shale and coal mines , gravel pits, timber cutting; Extraction of soil materials would fall within this definition due to the movement of soil material that is needed for building the airport runway. This type of extraction would also be required to be reviewed through the Major Impact Review. Under the ULUR, extraction is not allowed in residential or commercial zone districts. For this reason and since the movement of earth can be managed through other County permits Staff recommends that no extraction be allowed within any residential districts of the PUD more specifically districts Residential/Single Family (R/SF), Residential/Urban (R/UD), and Mobile Home Park (MHP). Staff also recommends not allowing extraction in the Public Administration/Facilities (PA/F) zone district since this district contains building and any earth movement can be accomplished through a grading permit However, with the close proximity of several of the of the commercial zone districts to the GCRA it makes sense for extraction to be allowed in the PUD commercial districts including Commercial/Airport Services (C/AS), Commercial/Convenience Retail (C/CR), and Commercial/Office Research (C /OR). Under the URLA, extraction within the rural, industrial, and resource lands (all subareas) are reviewed through the Maj or Impact Review process. For this reason , Staff supports extraction in the other remaining PUD - 2 - districts indicated such as Industrial/General Service (I/GS), Recreational/Camper Park (R/CP), and Agricultural/Industrial/Open Space (A/I/OS). Applicant Response: Restricting Extraction from Residential zone distric ts (R/SF , R/(JD, :MJIP ) is not consistent with the purpose of a Planned Unit Development and would impose practical limitations upon the implementation of development within the PUD . Inconsistent with the purpose ofa PUD The premise of PUD zoning is "to permit and encourage greater flexibility and innovation so that the development is compatible w ith the site 's physical and environmental characteristics ." The flexibility require d to maintain the "site 's physical and environmental characteristics" is not and should not be limited to commercial and industrial zone districts . The ability to extract soil fo r transport in and out of residential zone districts when they are described as separate property boundaries and ownership is an important tool in preserving the environmental characteristics of future land use implementation. Imposition of Practical Limitations Applicant asserts that the original requirement to amend the PUD through a text amendment was to provide for instances where soils are required to be transported across parcel boundaries . This is often the case where soil extraction on a given parcel necessary to construct improvements would cause environmental degradation . Parcels within the PUD may be sold or exchanged b etween different ownership entities . In this circumstance , the developers(s) will likely ne ed the ability to transport soil within the logical development (e.g. PUD) but across property boundaries . The purpose of this proposed text amendment is to provide for flexibility by future developers within the PUD to engage in cooperative grading projects . Furthermore, the requirement for a Major Impact Review provides an appropriate level of discretion for the review and approval of specific implementations of extr action activities within residential zone districts .. Storage Areas and Facilities Staff Response: Storage Areas and Facilies can be further defined as follows : Industrial Use or Activities, Uses engaged in processing , manufacturing or materials from either extracted or raw materials or from previously prepared materials resulting in a new product designed for wholesale or retail sale. Storage : act of storing or state of being stored, specifically, the sale keeping of goods in a warehouse or other depository, examples include products and open storage of mineral storage piles of grave, ore and shale ; Under the ULUR, this use is allowed as a use by rig ht in the commercial and industrial zone districts and reviewed through the Limited Impact Review process in the rural and - 3 - resource lands (subareas: plateau and gentle) districts. Also, the ULUR does not allow this proposed land use within any residential district. Staff supports the Storage and Facilities land use in all zone districts specified through this application with the exception of residential districts (RJSF , RllJD, and MHO) since this land use is not compatible with a residential use . Ap plica nt Response: The intent of including Storage Areas and Facilities in zone districts within the PUD is to support temporary implementation of storage for the oil and gas industry. Restricting Extraction from Residential zone districts (RJSF, RJUD, MHP) is not consistent with the purpose of a Planned Unit Development any potential impacts can be identified and mitigated within the Limited Impact Review process. Temporary Use The proposed inclusion of Storage Areas and Facilities within residential land use districts will be limited to a period not less than three years and not more than five years from the date of approval. Applicant is willing to limit the implementation of adjacent residential uses during the period of the use of Storage Areas and Facilities within a given area. Inconsistent with the purpose of a PUD The premise of PUD zoning is "to permit and encourage greater flexibility and innovation so that the development is compatible with the site's physical and environmental characteristics." The flexibility required to maintain the "site's physical and environmental characteristics" is not and should not be limited to commercial and industrial zone districts . The ability to extract soil for transport in and out of residential zone districts when they are described as separate property boundaries and ownership is an important tool ill preserving the environmental characteristics of future land use implementation. Limited Impact Review The use of the Limited Impact Review of applications for specific Storage Areas and Facilities will provide Garfield County with an appropriate level of discretion in the · review and approval of specific implementations of solar generating power facilities. - 4 - ;:;-p COMM/CONVEN IENCE7AI CICRI 0 £ ~ ~ I MOB ILE HOMF. PARK IM HP; 9 ,; ~ ... AG/INDU S/OPB\I SP, (ANOS! MOBILE HOME PARK (MHPi MOBILE HOME PARK (MHPi P. U. D. Plan: Garfield County Airport Industrial Park Complex 0 250 500 1 OC-0 1.500 2.0 00 2.500 3 000 Feel AG/l NDUSIOPEN SPACE (A/VOS) PUBLIC AOMIN/FACl~ES (PNF) COMMICC»4YmtENCE RETA IL (ci<JU ·. ·. PUBUC AOMtN/FACIUTIES (PA/F) AG/INDUSJOPEN SPACE WllOSi L e gend D Airporr Boumlr1ry A irport lndisln<-l l Pari City of Rifle Xc el Lines Xc el Struc ru rP:'i Xc el S11bs tatin11s RESlO!NTIAL/SINGLE FAMILY (RISF) - RESIDENTIAUURBAN (RJUO) - MOBILE HOME PARK (MHP) COMM/AIRPORT SVC (CJAS) COMM/CONVENIEN CE RETAIL (CJCR) INDUSTRIAUGENERAL '!NC (VGS) - COMMfOFFICE RESEARCH (CJOR) REOCAMPER PARK (R/CP) AG/INDUS/OPEN SPACE (A/VOS) PUBLIC ADMlN/FACIUTI ES (PA/F) A-PD ~-:::..,., A-S NoriAnne11.atloo Airport Expansion Parcel Garfield County) 12 . H Ae. 1Ul ~JJ-=jl" I --rn •< I /·:----=~--------.l:l"'•-l."> -.-t--+1-{ .,;=~ · .-··~--·---,__ I l I I FPA RIFLE A/RP ARK OVERVIEW Draft Master Plan with Zoning Designation and Conceptua l Lots [] A-LI -Airport light Industrial -202.25 Acres r-] L __ _ [l [] ---i ~ l"J A-CO -Airport Commercial -93.20 Acres A-ID -Ai1port In dusrrial -56.25 Acres MU -Airport Multi Use (Existing Rifle Zo11i11g) -45.55 Acres A-PD -Public/Institu tional -46.00 Acres A-S -Airport Suppo rt District -159.11 Acres OS -Open Space -54.55 Acres Potential Open Space -53.13 Acres FPA -Future Plann ing Area -244.26 Acres (\. I '• 1:,1~1- "" Ll••l••><•n•°' '"'"'"' .................... ,, .. , ........ " .. ._ ......... . ~ --~ e e ... -m cD :c >< w .sa1qqei e !I Exhibit 1-'l Mabtl:'r Plan e I ~.s~V 11 I ,-6 . .ffA;---i ~ I ::;\;K~r~tiliJ! \ I A-LI Airport Light Industrial 239SO Acres .. ~~~ I f~ A-CO Airport Commercial 85.06 Acres J A-ID Airport Industrial 59.33 Acres _ J ID Industrial (Existing Zoning) 41 .46 Acres A-PD Publidlnstitutional 61 .93 Acres A-S Airport Support District 155.30 Acres OS Open Space 88 .02 Acres •pas Potential Open Space Transition Zone 43 .92 Acres •Acreage is Jnclud~ in A-ll ~ H -\l.U~i I l 't•h1 N G ~LI I' .... ~ ................... . 1:, •:,~· :,~'e",.., • :~: •,;;,;.• :.~: -·· . ---·---·-----·-------- ~ O:ne: 80~ 16W l2JllfUW)'2007 WHEREA.5, Robert Chancellor and Rifle Land Associates Ltd. have made appiic:ation to the Board of County Commissioners of Ga'.fle!d Covnty, Colorado, for a Pl anned Unit Development amendmenl to the Zoning Resolution of Garfield County, Colorado, said proposed P lanned Unii Development being lmown as T!ie Garfield County Airport Industrial Park Comp.lex all as more particular ly described in said application; and WHEREAS, said application was referred to the Planning Commission of Garfield County'· Colorado, as provided in Section 8 . OZ! of saici Zoning Hesolution and further that sai d Planning Commission has certified i:o the Board of County Commissioner,:; of Carfle:d Courrty;-eoforr:th,,-tts--re~ettdation-that-the--s-ald-applkatfon-*-·-------------------- approved subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the Board cf County Commiss ioners of Garfield Count~·, Colorado, has duly and r egularly held a public hearing on said application in conformity with the !llWS of the State of Coloi-ado and the provis!or: o_f said Zoning Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commis sione r!> of Garfield County, Colorado, Is now fully <fdvised in the premises in regard to se.id application, and finds that such Planned Unit Development amendm<int is In conformity with the Gene.rat P lan for Garfield County and the Zoning ·Resolution of Garfield County, Colorado. NOW , Tl-lEREFORE, BE Ii RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO , that the application for a Pi<J nccl Llnlt Developr:v> •1 amenclment to the Zoning Resolution of Garfield County, Colorado, for The Garfield .County Airport Industrial Park Complax, be and the ~ame is hereby ;;;pproved, !:mt ~XP,.~$s:y s;ubject tv .ompli<:ince? '.Vl th and ful~illme.n • of the f:illmv•ng eond\t~Q 1s, to w it: • d av icas to be included in the d esign of the storm d r ai nage s y$tem if the Board of County Gommissioners finds that i ncreased run -off fre>m the pr~ject poses a pollution hazard. (2) That the Plan provide that the omm<:I" lal convenience to re shown in the Pla11ned Unit Development be included in the phased development when the need for said convenience store is demonstrated to the Board of County Commissioners .of Cerfield Co unty , Colorado. (3} That the Plan provida that the fire prolection ;systam be designed to p r ovi de a minimum o f sixty (60) pounds per square Inch static line pressure and five hundred (500) gallons per minute volume of flow to all lots as subdivided on the project. and that no development of the subjecl property under said plan or Imple- mentation of said plan shall be done until all of the .foregoing conditions have been complie d with lo !ht: satisfaction of the Board c.f Cour.iy Commissioners of' Garfield Coun ty, Colorado. And that upon such compliance, the Zone District Map of Garfield County be accordingly amended to r e flect this amendment. ATTEST: • .. ,, -· • To carry out the purposes and provisions of the Garfield County Zone Resolution, Garfield County, Colorado, the Garfield County Airport Industria l Park Complex Planned Unit Development Zoning District is furt her divided into the following Zone District classifications: RiSF R/UD q ~ MHP C/AS C/CR I/GS Residential/Single Family District Residential/Urban Derisity District Mobile Home Park District Commercial/Airport Service District Commercial/Convenience Retail District Industrial/General Service District c.JOR R/CP All/OS Recreational/Camper Park District Agricultural/Industrial/Open Space The boundaries of each Zone District shall be located as shown on the various final plat s as may be filed from ti me to time and shall 'be governed in conformity with the hereinafter described regulations. I. Residential/Single Fa ily District, R/Sf A. Uses b,y Right: Single family dwelling and customary accessory uses including buildings for shelter or enclo- sure of small animals or property accessories to the use of the lot for single family resi- dential purposes including but not restricted to fences, hedges, gardens, walls and similar landscape features, vehicle parking and pri- vate swimming pool for use by single family residence and guests, park and green belt. B. Conditional Uses: Community Facilities, consisting of church, place of worship, community building, day nursery, day school. C. Special Uses: None. D. Minimum Lot Area: 16.000 square feet at a density not to exceed 2 units per acre, based on gross area within each filing or final plat. E. Maximum Lot Coverage: 30 percent .. • • F. Minimum Setback: Front yard: 30 feet . • -~ Side yard: 20 feet -k \\'(\G\v)--.rr Rear yard; Main structure: 25 feet Accessory building: 10 feet G. Maximum Building Height: 25 feet H. Off-Street Parking: Four (4) off-street parking spaces on the same lot per dwelling unit or one (1) space per 600 square feet of residential floor area. which- ever is greater. Parking may be.covered or uncovered. II. Residential/Urban Density District, R/UD A. Uses by Right: Single family, two-family, multiple-family ·-----------&dwe-l+i-ngs,-vn<i·-ttu-s~~~lllff-v-· ------------------ accessory uses incl~ding buildings for shelter or enclosure of small animals, property acces- sories to the use of the building sites for residential purposes, fences, hedges, gardens. walls and similar landscape features, vehicle parking, private swimming pool, park and green belts. B. Conditional Uses: Com merc ial facilities consisting of membership club facilities for clubs consisting of an association of persons for some common pur- pose. but not including such groups organized to render a service carried on as a business.· Community Facilities. consisting of church. place of worship, community building, day nursery, day school. C. Special Uses: D. Bulk residential development, consisting of an area planned as a unit to provide variation in building placement which may vary from the requirements herein stated for Use by Right, r.li n imum Lot Area: Building with 4 or fewer dwelling units: Building with more than 4 dwelling units: 7.500 sq.ft. 1a.ooo sq.ft. E. Maximum Lot Coverage: 10% of the remaining open area may be devoted to landscaped areas. F. Minimum Setback: Front yard: Tangent streets, cul-de-sacs Side yard: Rear yard: 2 30 feet 25 feet 10 feet 20 feet \ I • • G. Maximum Building Height: 35 feet H. Off-Street Parking: Building with 4 or fewer dwelling units shall have not less than two (2) spaces per dwelling unit. Building with more than 4 dwe l l ing units shall have not less than 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit. III. Mobile Ho•e Park District. MHP A. Uses by Right: Single ~ajily mobile home units or modular home units utilized for residential occupancy and customary accessory uses, park, open space, common laundry or other utility fac i - lities provided for the use and benefit of the residents and guests. B. Conditional Uses: Camper vehicles. c. Special Uses. None. D. Minimum Lot Area : 6,000 sq.ft. at a density not to exceed 5.0 urtits per acre based on gross area within each filing or fin a l plat. E. F. G. . H. Maximum Lot Coverage: Minimum Setback: Front yard: 15 feet Side yard: 5 feet Rear yard: 10 feet Trailer or Building Height : Off-Street per unit • Parking: Two (2) 35 pe r cent 16 feet parking s paces . IV. Commercial/Airport Service District, C/AS A. Uses by Right: Airport Hotel, motel, lodging facilities with assoc- iated businesses and i~cidential use s~ all conducted within the principal build i ng as required to serve the principal faci li ty, including, but not limited to, restau r ant, coffee shop, cocktail lounge , car ren t al. indoor amusement business, gift shop . Airport terminal operation facilitie s, Parking lots, Flight school, Aircraft service business, Aircraft repair and sales, Other air transportation oriented commercial businesses, including professional of f ices, car rental and servicing. B. Conditional Uses: None. C. Special Uses: None. 3 • • D. Minimum Lot Area: 25.000 sq.ft. E. Maximum Lot Coverage: More than one structure or building may be placed on any one lot pro- vided not more than 90 percent of the lot area is covered. F. Minimum Setback: Front lot: 20 feet or limits of power lines Side lot: 10 feet Rear lot: 15 feet or edge of power lines. G. Maximum Building Height: 45 feet H. Off-Street Parking: Motels, hotels, lodges, 1 space per each guest room. plus 1.0 space per each 300 sq.ft. of business and office space. Aircraft oriented commercial business, 1 space per each 3 employees. Other offices and businesses. 1 space per each 300 sq .ft. of floor area. V. Co .. ercial/Convenience Reta11 District, C/CR A. Uses by Right : tonvenience services and retail businesses which generally provide for the needs of those working or residing within the local area, including, but not limited to, conven- ience grocery store. service station, drug store, beverage outlets~ liquor outlets, laundromat, and other similar retail outlets and personal services. B. Conditional Uses: None c. Special Uses: None D. Minimum Lot Area: 7,500 sq.ft. E. Maximum Lot Coverage: 90 percentt More than one structure or building may be placed on one lot providing the total number of square feet of building area does not exceed the lot coverage for the filfng on the final plat of the District. F. Minimum Setback: Front lot: Side lot: Rear lot: 50 feet None 10 feet G. Maximum Building Height: 25 feet H. Off-Street Parking: One (1) space per each 300 feet of bu1lding area. unless otherwise justified. 4 ) ) • • VI. Industrial/General Service District. I/GS A. Uses by Right: B. c. D. E. Offices for conducting business including commercial, professional. m~nufacturing; research and light manufacturing; wholesale business, sales and/or warehousing; warehous- ing; storage; general contracting fac i lities including offices. shops; and yards; any commodity manufactured and/or fabrica t ed. Conditional Uses: Plant for fabrication of goods from process~d n~tura) resources. Special Uses: Plant for proc~ssing natural resources and/or agricultural materia l s. Minimum Lot Area: Maximum Lot Coverage: 20.000 sq.ft. 90 percent F. Mi11lmu111 Setback. 6. Front lot: 20 feet or edge of utility easements whicheve r is gr eater. Side lot: None. . . Rear lot: 10 feet or edge of utility easement, whicheve r is greater. Maximum Building Height: None . H. Off-Street Parking: One (1) space pe r every 3 employees. VII. co .. ercial/Office Research District. C/OR A. Uses by Right: Offices for conducting of business, i ncluding offices for the professions, real estate, government, corporations, financial i nstitu- tions, administrative offices, execu t ive offices or other businesses wh i ch . do not involve personal non-professional services or retail sales of personal goods . B. Conditional Uses: None c. Special Uses: None D. E. Minimum lot Area: Maximum Lot Coverage: F. Minimum Setback: Front lot: Side lot: Rear lot: 50 feet 5 feet 10 feet G. Maximum Building Height: None 5 7.500 sq.ft. 90 pe r cent ) • • H. Off-Street Parking: One (1) space per each 300 feet of office area or one (1) space for every 3 employees. VIII. Recreational/Camper Park District, R/CP A. · Uses by Right: Recreational vehicle parking, camper vehicles or trailers, or tent camping, horse stables, tack storage, target ranges, hunting lodges, and accomodations for visitors. B. Conditional Uses: Rodeo grounds and stock facilit1es. C. Special Uses: None. IX. Agricultural/Industrtal/Open Space District, A/I/OS A. Uses by Right: Agricultural including fa~m. garden, gre~tm-ouse, nursery, 01cha1d, ranch, kennel, guiding and outfitting, riding stable, park~ green belt, veterinary clinic, and cµstomary accessory uses including buildings for shelter ~,,_:! ,.....--f{! / an,d enclosure of p~rsons, animals, and/or _/,)) 1 tJ f ~,, property employed rn any of the above uses. Vf '( ~.,.-..---.,.,.,_ .... "'··-f.:,?f!__:~ ,,.,,-. .. _ ·. 1;,__....,.·."..,F ...... -.. ~ Conditional Uses: Mobile home as accessory /'/ use to ranch or far~ operation~ Y 8. c. Special Uses: None. 6 • STATE OF COLORADO . County ot Garfield Ai a ....... r~.9.~J...S.~ ............ ,. ........ -.. -.......... meefuig o! the Board oi Cou."lty C~mtni~oners for Garfield County, Color?.do, held at the Court Hou•• in Glenwood Sprir.;s on .•.•.•••..• MondaY., ....... : .............. --··-········-·······-· the .....•.•. 2n.d. ................ ;day of }1~ .. :i;:;gh ............................ -... -A. ·D. 19 ..... ?.J .... , there were p:eBOnt : · . .. -.f..l?.J!.gfi.,,iJ.., ..... C.s.t'.i.l?.~.1 .... Tgll'J?.Ql:.9.'.hY., Comzrissioner Chairman ..... 1.';.l-1.9..~~ .... '.'..\l;i...m.'.'.,_.:..Qi;:;i,_g,':;;)).g.'\I.§.~.: ......... , Comm;,,ioner ::::8£th~~i.=~~:=~gj;:iM}:;:i;E;:;,::~J..~:;:::~::::: : =:t:~ney . .... ,£.;h.§.*Y1. .... .J., .... JS9.:?..§.1 ..... ~.J?..\!.t.Y. ............ -, Clerk of the Board when the following proceedings, among othe..• were ~d ond done, to·wit: I r.SSv)...i'.. ;· .-:-. ;, J. g ::; G RESOLUTION CONCERNED WITH THE APPROVAL OF A ZONE DISTRICT Ai.~NDMENT TO THE GARFIELD COUNTY ZONING RESOLUTION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOP- l·IBNT PLAN OF GARFIELD COUN'.l'Y AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL PARK REQUESTED BY RIFLE LAND.ASSOCIATES , LTD . WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by this Board on December · 29., 1980 ; and WHEREAS, based on the evid·ence , testimony, · exhibits , study of the General Pla n for the unincorporated.area of the county, comments of the Garfield County Planning Department, com.~ents of public officials and agencies , and comments from all interested parties , this Board finds as follows: · 1 . That pro.per publication and publ~ c notice was provided as required by law for the hearing before the Board; 2 . That .the hearing before the Boa:rq was extensive and complete , that all pertinent fac;ts ~ matters and issues were sub- mitted and that all interested· parties were heard at that· hearing; 3. That the Garfield County Planning Commission has recom- mended to this Board that the requested rez oning be granted ; 4. That the proposed zoning is in compliance with the recom- mendations set forth in the General Plan for the unincorporated area of the County if certain conditions more fully set forth herein are imposed upon the proposed Planned Unit Development; 5. That the proposed land use will be compatible with existing and permitted land uses resulting from the natural and planned expansion of the City of Rifle if certain conditions more fully set forth herein are Luposed upon t.~e proposed Planned Unit Development; 6 . That changing conditions and a.q error in the adoption of the present zone district map . clearly require amendment to the Zoning Resolution; 7. That, other than in' the foregoing part1culars, the requested zone change amendment and plan approval are in general conformity with the General Plan for G.arfield County, Colorado, a.Tld meet all requirements of the Zoning Resolution of .Garfield County , and further that the requested Planned Unit Development is suitable and appropriate for the subject property considering the location, condition and circumstances of said property, and -1- {2.e~ fs? /I ~ ~ { R/1~ '1i ~up that the proposed amendment implements the purposes and meets the standards and requirements of the Planned· Unit Development provisions of the Garfield County zoning Reso_lution. NOW , THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado; Section 1 . That the petition of this Board of County Commissioners and.Rifle Land Associates, Ltd. for ·a zone change from Agricultural/Industrial Zone District and Agricultural/ Residential/Rural Density Zone District to ~lanned Unit Development Zone District for the following described unincorporated area of Garfield County be approved, subject however, to the conditions contained here~n: All of Lots 2, 3, and 4 of Section 18, Township 6 South, Range 92 West of the ·Sixth Principal Meridian. The South One-half {S~), the South One-half of the Northeast One-quarter (S~NE~) , the Southeast One- quarter of the Northwest One-quarter (SE~NW~), and Lot 2 of Section 13; the North.One-half of the Southeast One-quarter ·(N~SE\), and the Southeast One-quarter of the Southeast One-quarter .(SEl>;;-SE!i;), of Section 14; the Northeast One-quarter of the southeast One·-quarter (NE~SE~) of $ection 23i the East One-half (BJ,) of Section 25; and all of Section 24, all within Township 6 South (T6S) , Range ·93 West (R93W) of the Sixth Principal Meridian, exceptins those portions of the-described tracts ·contained within the right-of-way of Interstate Highway 70. Section 2. Prior to approval of any final plat of the Planned Unit Development, or any part thereof, the applicant shall establish evidence of ownership and availability OL sufficient water rights to provide to the planned unit development an adequate supply of potable water to serve· the rieeds of the entire proposed development for domestic and other uses contemplated under the · plan.'1ed unit development plan, provided, ·how..lver, that the applicant may submit and the county may approve, all other requirements being satisfied ,-th~ final plat of the col11ffiercial-industrial portion of the planned unit development upon a showing .of an. adequate water supply for only that porti9n. o:( the planned unit development . Section. 3. The design of the sewerag~ system for the planned unit development shall include provisions for pretreatment of indus- trial waste. Section-4 . _The· proposed locations of future school sites shall be recognized as general in nature and-subject to modifica- tion upon agreement between the developer and the School District. Section 5 . Engineering standards to be used in the construc- tion of all public improvements under the planned unit development plan shall be consistent with those standards used by the City of Rifle when such standards are at least as restrictive as those presently in force under the regulations of Garfield County, Colorado . Section 6 . That the Vlar:ned onit Oe,1e..,o ncmt shal:. consist · o f nine (91 Zone D.:Ls ricts , the boundaries of which shall be the same designated in the final plats of the Garfield County Airport Industrial Park, a Planned.Unit Development, and which districts shall be designated as follows: R/SF R/UD MHP C/AS Residential/Singl~-Family District Residential/Urban Density pistrict Mobile Home Park District Commercial/Airport Service District -2- C/CR !/GS C/OR R/CP A/I/OS ·.e Commercial/Convenienc e Retail District I:ndustrial/GE:neral S.:;rvice District Com.'llercial/Office Re s earch District Recreational/Camper Park District Agricultural/Industri al/Open Space Section 7. That the uses permit ted within said dis- trict, together with the regulations affecting the usage of the lands contained therein, shall be a s follows: I. Residential/Single family Qistri c t, R/Sf A. Us.es by Ri~!_: Single family dwelling and customary accessory uses including building s for shelter or enclo- sure of small animals or property accessories to the use of the lot for single family resi- dential purposes includi ng but not restricted to fences, hedges, gardens, walli and simila r landscape features, vehi c le parking and pri~ vate swimming pool for use by single family residence a~d guests, pa rk and green belt . . s. Conditional Uses:· Community .Facilities, co nsisting of church, place of worship, commu ni ty. build~ng, day nursery, day school. C. Spectal Uses:· None. D. Minimu~ Lot Area: 16,000 square feet at a · density not tc exceed 2 units per acre, based on gross area ~ithin each filing or flrial plat. · · F. Maximum Lot Coverage: 30 percent r -3- e . F. Minimum Setbac k : Fr ont yard: 30 feet Side yard: 20 feet .. Rear yard.: Main structure: 25 feet Accessory building: 10 feet G. · Maximum Building Height: 25 feet . - H. Off-Street Parking: Four (4) off-street parking spaces on the same lot per dwelling unit or one (1) space per 600 square feet of resjd~ntial floor-area, which- ever is greater •. Parking may be covered or · uncovered. II. Residential/Urban Density District, R/UD --···---·-·· .A. .Uses by Righ.t: Single family, two-fam i ly, multiple-family dwellings, and cluster· housing and cust'omary accessory uses including buildings for shelter or enclosure of small animals, property acce~ sories to the use of the tuilding sites for - resident i al purposes, fences, hedges, garden ·s. walls and similar landscape features, vehicle parking, privd.te ·swimmi .ng pool, park an~ green belts. B. Conditionc1 Uses: Comm~rci.!1-1 .facilities consisting cif me.mbership club facili~ies fQr club~ consisting of an _ association of -pe rsons f'O -,. some common pur- pose, but not including such groups . organized to render a s.ervice carrfed· on as a bus i ness. Com.munity Facilities, consisting of church, place of worship, community b~ilding, day nursery , day school. C. Special Uses: o. Bulk res i de~tial development, consisting .of an area pJdn~ed-as a unit to provide var-iation in building placement which may vary. from the requirements herein stated for Use by Ri ght. Minimum Lot Area: Bui f(Ffng wi th 4 or- fewer dwelling units : Building with more · th~n 4 dwelling units: 7,500 sq.ft, 18,000 sq.ft. E. Maximum Lot Covera~: 10% of the remaining ·open area .may be devoted to landscaped areas:. F. Minimum Setb~£~: Front yard: Tangent streets, cul-de-sacs· Sid e y~r d: Rear yard: -· --....... --·-···-· -4- 30 feet 25 feet . " .J: --.A. J.V I ~C\. 20 feet G. 35 feet H. Off-St r'E_e_ ~~r.:l.i.!Ul: Building ~ith 4 or fewer dwelling units shall have not less than t~o (2) spaces per dwelling . unit. Building with .more than 4 dwelling units shall have not less than 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit. 6 III. Mobile Home Park District. MHP A. Uses ~l~: Single famiry mobile home unils or modular . home · units utilized for r esidential occupa~cy and customary accesso r y uses, park~ op~n space, common laundry or other utility faci- lities provided ·for the use and benefit of th~ residents and .guests. · B. t:onditio.nal Uses: Campe r vehicles. C. Special Uses: None •. D. Minimum Let Area: 6,000 sq.ft. at· a density not to ex~eed s:o units per acre based on gross· area within each fi 1 ing or final plat ~ E. Maximum Lot Cover~~: 35 percent ·F. Minimum Setback: G. Front yard: Side yard: Rear" yard: ·1s·feet - s feet 1~ feet Trailer ~rJ!!:0J.ging Height: 16 feet H. Off-Street Park i!1Jj_: Two ( i) parking spaces per un 1 t. IV. Commercial/Airport Se.rvice Distri"ct; C/AS A. useu~~!.= Airport operated by a government~] body, Hotel, motel, lodgtffg tacilitles with assot- iated businesses and inc i denttil ·uses~ all conducted within the principal building ·as required t6 serve the pr i ncipal facility, including. but not limited to, restaurant~. coffee shop, cocktail lounge. car rental; indoor amusement busines s , gift shop. Airport terminal operation facilities, Parking lots. ' Flight school, Aircraft service business. Aircraft repair and sale s , Other air transportatio"·oriented commercial b~sinesses. including professional offices, car rental and servicing . B. Conditio!:!_~~: None. C. Soecial Uses: None. ------ -5- .a ... .... O. ·Minimum lot Are!: 25,000 sq.t~. E. Maxi~!!!ll Lot Covera9_~: More than one struc~ure or building may be placed on any one lot pro- vided· not more than 90 percent of the lot ~rea is cove.red. F. Minim~ __ Setback: Front lot: 20 feet or limits of power lines Side lot: 10 feet '' Rear lot: 15 feet or edge of power lines. G. Maximum Building Height: 45 feet H. Off-Street Parkino: Motels, hotels, lodges, 1 space per each guest room, plus ·1~0 space per each 300 sq .ft. ·of business and office space. Aircra~t or i e~tei commercial business, 1 space pe.r each 3 employees. Other offices and businesses,. 1 space per each 300 sq.ft. of floor area. V. Com~erciaJ/Coovenience Retail District, C/CR A. Convenience se~vices and retail businesses which gener~lly provide ·for the needs cf those. working or residing within the local area. including, but not limited to, conven~ fence grocery store ,. service station.,. drug store, beverage outlets, liquor outlets, laundro~at, and other similar .retail riutlets and personal . services. B. Conditional ·uses: None C. Special Uses: ·None D. Minimum Lot .Area: 7,500 sq.ft. E. Maximum Lot Cov~r!s~: 90 percent: More than one structure or building may be placed on one lot providtng the total n~mber of square feet of buildin":J area does not exceed ·the lot cov;erage for the. fn ing on the final . plat of the . District . . Fron.t lot: Sid~ lot: Rear lot: 50 feet None 10 feet G. Maximum Buil~~~g_Hei!t!!~: . 25 feet H. Off~St~eet Pa~~i!g: One (1) space per ~ath 300 feet ~f building area, ~nless otherwise justified. -6- .e · VI. Industrial/General Service Di~trict, I/6~ A. Uses by Right: Offices for cond ucting business including comnercia1, professional, ~anufacturing; research and ligbt manufacturing; wholesale business, sales and/or warehousing; warehous- ing; storage; ge neral contracting facilities including offices, \hops, and yards; any commodity manufactured and/or fabricated. B. Conditional Uses: Plant for fabrication of goods f~om processed natural resources. c, IBCial Use~: Pl ant for processing natural · resources and/or agricultural materials. o. Mini~um Lot A~ea: 20,000 .. sq.ft. E. Maximum Lot co·verage:. 90· percent F. Minimum Setback: Front lot: 20 feet or edge of utility easements whichever i ·s greater. Side Jot: ~one. · ~ear lot: 10 feet or edge of utility easement, whi~hever is greater. 6.. Maximum Building Height: None. H. Qff-Street Pa!:_~it\g: One .(lj space per every . 3 Mlp l oyee s. VII. Commercial/Office Research District, C/OR A. Uses bi._ f!.i.9..!!!: Offices for conducting of business, including offi~es for the professions,.~eal estat~. government, corporations, financial institu- tions, administrative offices; executive offices or other businesses which do not involve personal no .n-professional services or retail sales of personal goods. B. · Condit:!_on~LQ~: None C. ·~cial_~~es: None o. E. Minimu!_!! Lot_A~: Maximum Lot Cover a ~: F. Minimum Setback: Front lot: Side lot: Rear lvt: 50 feet 5 .feet io feet 7,500 sq.ft. 90 perc.ent •.· •• H. ~treet Park!~g: One (1) space per each 300 feet of office area or one (l)'space for every 3 employees.· VIII. Recreational/Camper Park District? R/CP A. Uses by Right: Recreat~onal vehicle par~ing, tamper vehi~les or tratl~rs, or tent ~amping, hors~ stable~,· tack storage, target ranges, hunting lodges; and ·~ccomodations for visitors. B. Conditional Uses: Rodeo grounds and stock facilities. C. Special Uses: None. IX. Agricu1turalll_nc!ustrial/Open Spac.e District', A/I/OS A. u·ses by Right: Agricultural including farm .,· garden, greenhouse, nursery, ·orchard, ranch, tenne1, guiding and outfitting, riding stable, p·ark, green ·oeH, 'veterinary clinic, and custo-mar:y accessory uses in .eluding ·buildings for shelter and enclosure of persons, animals, and/or property em~loyed in any of . the above uses. S. Conditional Uses: Mobile home as accessory use to rdiiCiliJrfarm operation. C. Special Uses; None. ATTEST: STATE QF COLORADO Co1ll1IY o! Garfield BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GARFIELD COUNTY', COLO~O l, ------··--·.:.__ ____ ,.. __ , ~:...:.~) =...~ ... ..,: -.-v;~ ~ii: oi ti~ Board oi Couacy Commissioners In and !ot the County and State afoie.aid do Ji.,.by c..-uly ~! tne annexed .anti fcreqoir.9 Order is truly copied from the Recon!S of the Pr~ or tho Board o! County Commissiocon for s:tld C..field County, now .Jn my o.U-u:e. IN WITNESS WHE.'U:OF, l ha~ hereunto set. my band ind •fflxed the S<.11 of :said County, at Glenwood Spdnqs. th!s, ___ ,dayof--···--·----•A.l>.19--- County C\crk and ex-<>!fu:fo Clerk or the Beard of Count)' Co~n=. ._,. GARFIELD COUNTY COMME RC IAL/ COVEN IENC E RETAIL 5 ae . ~ = .. ~::~~~--::: ... - ~~::::: ..... i.-<l•lll .... I• ..!-;t.':..,_,_ ··~~;;:::, "°""''••<-rcl•ll •1._1 t..o•I•• ·~··-1 u--r~• , .............. . .... .-.-.... ... "', ..... ~1 ,,.,.,,s...1 .... 1 .. k_, ... 1 .... 1 ... fN.t l _., =.::1al~1 •l ·-· ~:·•"-"·-'- 1S!cl :: ····· ;;:;a ~ J.sw1 . . ~ .. ..... , ...... ..... ......... ~ .. ':! AIRPORT :§l:;:-2 '-'"' ... .. ... l<ftl• .l!!.!.uL~ ~ ~t •:: ... -i.-.tf(- ••Al<-OWI ,..,1.r ... 11,-.... 1 ..... -h-•111"""'•'''"'' ..,_ ...... -"''--"-+-'"'---c.JL-11-"!!Lll---=--"--l-2!..---·· t.-.1•··ll•··---'-'' r .. "'''""' ,.,._. ...ll'----' INDUSTRIAL PARK . COMPLEX P.U.D. PLAN I ! Submitt ed by J ames M. Bow ers & Assoc. -Pla n n.ers for Rl FLE LAND AS SOCIATES, LTD . IITilIIl = JUNE , 1985 R EV I SED lllE IU1lDlllL r.111vlMTIMill/IN.l fN\1 1.1' l\D 11 Ll \btEP.to1111. (Cl'lf'llfl-:1'4LiC.0rrtl11 1111ClltctAI\.. C.C..Utt N.ftlfF !Cl ituvoAOI ?" • ·-·-·.:..\ /~SD~/C3 -~~jt>."~;::-·_.: ., ... -~'.J~'.L:}!>·,//·~~-·/~:<~lt? .<?. d trJh~u tl:e f<•Jlowm911rt)C,•i!J1119~. wmon9u1hen w~•c llild .:md tJ'.>o A, lo~~ Hl'.SOLU'J':CON CONCl':HNim \H'J'H . :1'1,l~ ~P~r<OVJ\T.. 01? '/\ PnELIM~~N/\HY P!.i\. !'OH Ml\MM Clo::r~J( lNIJUS'l'IU:AL f'AW< SUBDIVISION. J.ar)d /,ssociates, Ltd. has filed ap['.lli- of County Commissjoners of_.S;c ·leld County, '-"'"' I <' f»··e•fn-trm )' .· " r , . t he herein the unincorporated ar.ea of Garfield County; and ', --------------------~·.,wrrllffihrt-m.s, a public hee.ri.ng was held by the Gar.field Cc'.!nty l'lanni.ng Con1111ission on t:he 26th day of: May, 1901; and Wl!Efll'I\~;, based on the cvJrlenc<:, testimony, exhibits, stndy of the Co111prehens.ive Pl<1n fo r· the i.:1d.!1co1:poi:at"?d area of the County, the recor11mendation of the Gar.f:.ield County Plann.i.n<J Connu.i ss.i.on, th e co1nrnents of the Garf.ielu County Planning Departm•?nt, c:onunent:s of publ.ic ciffi.cials and agencies , and commc:mts frn111 all int:ei:ested parUes, this Doarcl finds as follows: 1. '!'hat pr:oper posi:Jng, publi.cati.on and :_.)ulJU.c notice was pr,~vided as 1:equ.i.cec1 b y law for the hearin<J before the Planning Commlssion. 2 . 'l'hcot Lhe l•ear.i ng be fore the Planni.nq Commission was extensive and complE.:te, that all pert.i.nent . facts, matters and issues W<!ni submitted and that all intere sted parti.es .·1ere hea1:d crt t:hat hez.n·in9. 3. 'l'hat the p<oposed subd ivision of land .is in com- pliance wi.th t!1e reco1umendat.ions set for.th in the Comprehensive Plan for the u11.inc orpoi-c1t ed a1:ea of the County. 4 . '!'hat all <lat<•, sur.-ve ys, analyse s , studies, plans, nncl de signs as ar.e regtli.r-orl b y l:he State of Colort1do a·nd Gai:-field County have he en s1.1b111i.U:ed, i·evie1-1ed, and found to meet all sound planni.ng and e1HJinee1:-.ing .-equiremenl:s of lhe Garfield County Subdivision Regt1lati.ons, provided that certain c:ond.i. tions an~ compU ed w j th. s_ '!'hat the pl."oposcd s11bdi.vis i on of land co nforms to t he Garf.ield County Zonin9 Resol.ut.ions, provided that cer.tain conditi.ons are cou:plied wi.th. 6. 'l'h11t for. the above-stated and ot:hei: reasons, the proposed subdiv ision is in the bast i.nterest of the health , safety, morals , conven i ence, order., prosperity and weleare of tho citiz ens cf Garfie l d County, provided thnt certain conditions are complied Hi th. NOi-i, 1'11lmP.FORf::. DF. I'l' HESOLVr::n that thr-> recoi:d and x·econml<~ndation of the Gn1:field Cou1\ty Planning Coinm.i.ssio~ !;-c ::,:;~~:-..•·..,,1:t : ..... .4 •·i•al· f·l.,:a f . 1•l.,i1 ·I l:~ •; r(:..;: _(, j . ~ t:: \ · i';,;.cl, S 1.1bd1v 1.:.~it.J.\ I:or. the fo l io\.J .in<; descr i bed unincor- porated arei\ of Garf i.~ld Cou11t.v bc~ appcove•d: -4-- .. :, ·~ i,' : t"'·' . ;:.;~~·:r: ·::~.:~·; . "·~ .: ..• : ·:--···· : ·:\~'.:i~ . . :~ / -........ ;· . . . .. :: . .,. ~: ·);_~:_ i · • -•• ":;.,.·.~.-f-.·• ... •. ·. -·, • . ... ~:· .' .. ·;~·;_, _. --..... ·' n Tr.act of Land situated in the South one-~a1i (S~) of Section ll, the Southeast 6ne-guarter (SE~) of section l~. nnd th~ North one-quarter (N~;) of S"t:iction 24 of 'l'm111shit> 6 South ('1'6$1, fl1111qe 93 \~est IR93W) of the Sixth Principal Mer.idian {6th l'.M .); a11cl Lot 4 of"Section l.!I, T. 6 S., R. 92 w. of the 6th P.H., all in Garfield County, Color.ado. ur; l'I' l:'Ull'l'lll::n nesoi..vt:o th<it the foH0~1in9 conditions shall be plnced upon this approval: 1. There will be a single lot within the Subdivision desi9nated as a sit~ for a firestation. Title to the lot shall l>e conveyc<l to the responsible f:ire protection district withi.n ·ninety (90) ~ays of Final Plat approv<il; · 2. l\ll fire hydrants 1lesc1:ibcd on the Pinal Pl.at shall be located .in conformity with the directions of the responsible fire protection district: 3. Evidence that the natural drainage patterns within the Subdi.vi.si.on .ltave been maintained; 4. Evidence that ther.c is an ndequate le al 1·!ater sanitary and fire protec- tion purposes: 5 . 'l'he completion of: any_ necessary street realignments and lot size changes, as contt·olled by a lettci: dated llpril. 17, 1981, from Hobert E. Chancellor "to nay Baldwin; 6 . 1\ building height limitation consistent with the use of adjoinin<J land for air.port purposes shall. be placed upon the property at the time of. Pinal Pl.at approval; 7 . 1'he applicant shall demonstrate adequate acco:!ss to the Subdivision . at the time of Final Plat appr_oval, either by improvements to the County road between the pi:esent Inter- state 70 inter.cl··rn9e at Rifle or by establishment of an Inter.state 70 intct·change at Marn111 Creek; 8. The applicant sh.all <lemons tr.ate the availeibil.ity of water service <ind sanitation service to the Subdivision at the time of. l·'inal !'lat approval, either l.Jy inclusion in the Rifle Village South Metropolitan District or, if inclusion ~\ such district may not be arranged on a practical basis, as determined by the Board, by estabU.shment of a water and/or sanitation district to serve the Subdivision; and 9. Execution of a recordable contract between the developer and the Garfield County Airport Authority to insure an adequate water supply fol:" the air.port facilities. ATTEST : llOl\RO Ot> COUN'l"i COMMISSIONERS GArtFll~LO COUN'l'Y, COLOll/\DO ~ .. ··-. 1.·; \. ~--l · ~(! ( ' ~ ~l v ~ /1,., . "<• ·Oe·[;ut~$fr'e~~-PV-2i;e,a~l~<1rd c1;~·i,:,;~: ' ··-·---s=::;.,.._-:-:--._ Upon mocl111l duly!_Jli(Jc .JnJ uicondtd d•c for'"~i:nj RoohJlion wH 0101,1"'1 l>)' the fo11.:>winq vole: -~ ...... Lai; .q c .. V.e.la sq.ue:z. .......... _ .. : ...•............................ -................ Ay• ·~. :::::~:~;:~~~:::~~::1~\.~~:''.~;-~;~ki~~;~~:~::~::::~::=:::::=:::::::::=:::::::~~: Commi1doncr1 STATE OF COl .Ol<nlJO Cou111)' oC G.uflitM t. ••••••··•·••·•··•·•·•····•·•• .. ·•· ···•·••···•··•·•·••·-....... _ ... , C°.lL ;;;~• ::::.:1: • .1;;.! .... .;;;i.;; ... ::~;. .,; ,;,._. ;,,~.,,~ u; .._:.,.._,.,.,. ._:...,1utniii;;t\11;f• h1 an~ for \he: Co\l nly #nJ SI.ate _,f.Jrc~IJ do hc:r..:Uy ccnity th.n t'1r illh1twcd and lort."ct)in~ Order is t1uly corlcd h.:»111 the Rti:ocds of 1hc Ptoccetli11tJS of lhc IJO,)h l of County ~inmiukincn ror SOiid C.l<field C..:imuy. l~W i11 •II)' allic~. IN WlTttf-:SS WllEIU·:OF. I h:111a hLorc:uuto set my h:\nd Olllld oiiffiwM thCl> sc.\1 or s.lhl Cou111y 0 a1 Clr'nw?Od Srrinqi, thl• ...•......•.. ····· d•y of ........... ········-····· ··········-~~::.,~~I ~l:;~··;::~·-.•·ortkl<> C1<1l of 1hr """''" nl Coun1 y c .. ..,.,,1,,1,,.,..,. ~-·:i · ' .... . , '· ·.···: .. · .. .... ··.;/n :~: . :?7:~~: f'¥~~ ·;:_.: ··,. ... ·.-;.:.-- :-:: ;; . r • STATE OF COLORADO . . ) R~ et IC'. ~0 'cl ck f\ .:~ M · JUL 17 1985 ~ ss. R~~n Ne. 3633SB MILDRED ALSDORF, RECORD: County of Garfield GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO At a regular meeting of the Board of County commissioners for Garfield County, Colorado, held at the Commissioners' Meeting Room at the Garfield County Courthouse in Glenwood ·springs on the l5th day of July A.D. 19a5__, there were present: Robert Richardson , Commissioner Chairman I.a rry Schmueser , Cornmi ss ione r ~~~~~~~~~~F~l-a~v-e~n~.I~C~e~r~ise Commissioner absent Don Deford , County Attorney Mildred Alsdorf Clerk of the Board ~~~~~~~~~~~Ro~g~e"r_..,!.~u~dw~iw·g.__r Administrative Assistant absent when the following proceedings, among others were had and done, to-wit: RESOLUTION NO. 85-103 A RESOLUTION CONCERNED WITH THE APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONE DISTRICT -~XT, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF THE GARE'!ELD COUNTY AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL PARK AND CERTAI~J;TIO~F .APPROVAL CONTAINED IN RESOLUTION NO. 81-56 REQUESTED BY RIFLE LANll'-ASS!JC!1(TE!'S-;""LTri.'"·~·~-·------·- ~~""·'"-~~ .. ...:...:-... _ ... ) • ..,.... ...... _ ... ,t;.~ ..... ""'...........-·-······ ~..,.....,, _ _..,,_,J:.,;;;c,....._~ ... 1~~1,•;«.~ ...... J~~'~"J~ll'l'~•.<•'/l'""'"""'.\f'!.,.-"l""'"'l!¥:~..,.,.:ll ~·-~·.• ... <:1".U'h.J~/l#"(~,!.t~_l ....... 'f""-¢ WHEREAS, Rifle Land Associates, Ltd. has filed an application with the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County for the modification of the Garfield County Airport Industrial Park Planned Unit Development Zone District Text Approval of its plan for the parcel of land and certain conditions of approval contained in Resolution No. 81-56; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by this Board .on June 24, 1985; and WHEREAS, based on the evidence, testimony, exhibits, study of the General Plan for the unincorporated area of the County, comments of the Garfield County Planning Department, comments of public officials and agencies, and comments from all interested parties, this Board finds as follows: 1. That proper publication and public notice was provided as required by law for the hearing before the Board; 2. That the hearing before the Board was extensive and complete, that all pertinent facts, matters ~nd issues were submitted and that all interested parties were heard at that hearing; 3. That the Garfield County ~lan~JE9__£~~~sion has recommended to this Board that the requested rezoning be granted; 4. That the proposed recommendations set unincorporated area more fully set forth Unit Development; zoning is in compliance with the forth in the Comprehensive Plan for the of the County, provided certain conditions herein are imposed upon the proposed Planned 5. That the P.U.D. modification is consistent with the efficient developmenr-"ana~'"preser\T"ation of the entire P.U.D., does not affect, in a substantially adverse manner, either the enjoyment of the land abutting upon or across a street from the P.U.D., or the public interest, and is not granted solely to confer a special benefit upon any person; . ' BOOK f3~ PAGE:J~~ 6. That the requested Planned Unit Development Modification is in gene~al compliance with a l l requirement~ of the applicabl~ Garfield County Zoning Resolu~ion and, further, that the requested Planned Unit Development Modification is suitable and appropriate for .. the ;sub.:;j ,e .ct ,, .;proper:ty, , given the location, condition and circumstances of the property, and it is generally compatible with existing land uses in the surrounding nearby area; 7. That for the above stated and other reasons, the requested Planned Unit Development Plan is in the best interest of the morals~ order, health, safety, convenience and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners · of Garfield county, that the application for the modification of the Garfield County Airport Industrial Park Planned Unit Development zone district text and plan and certain conditions of approval contained in Resolution No. 81-56 for the following described property in the unincorporated area of Garfield County be approved as follow: 1. That the following sections of Resolution No. 81-56 be modified to read as follows: Section 2. Prior to approval of any final plat of the Planned Unit Development, or any part thereof, the applicant shall establish evidence of ownership and availability of sufficient water rights · to provide :1 J:,o the planned unit developm~nt _ an aaequate supply of potable water to serve the needs of the entire · proposed development for .dom s contemp];ated under the planned unit development plan, provided, however, that · the applicant may submit and the County may approve, all other requirements being satisfied, the final plat of the -... cornrnerci'!!_-indust.ri!:_~ ... ~___...EQ.tlion, -· -including · the agr icuJ:_Eura!7 I J icu5,£r :1;a ,l'i:PJ?.£R -~i;:,!:;.._.\':!ort,,i on, of the planned unit ----aeveIOpment upon a showing of an adequate water supply for only that portion of the planned unit development. Section 3. The design of the sewage system for the Planned Unit Development ;shall c:y1ude provisions for the pretreatment of industrial waste. Further, that individual sewage disposal systems may be utilized prior to the development of the sewage system, provided the_Ls.o S¥S.t~rnl.9 meet all requirements of the Garfield county Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended and the appropriate Garfield County Environmental Health Regula t ions. . .... ~, Further, that at such time that the central sewer system is .:.Z-S,'i7"':··1 \, ' available to any lot having a n I.S.D. system, the I.S .D. system ._/ ,,..:J j ~-~/ ....... · w ~-~.:J: -~~---_r..:~_?::_:_~ .. -~~~-5_~.E._~on made to the central sewer system.) ////~,,,--;/ Section 6. That the Planned Unit Development shall cons i st of nine (9) zone Districts, the boundaries of which shall be the (Y' same designated in the final plats of the Garfield County Airport /,·'-Q.. 1 .. , {) 'l" Industrial Park, a Planned Unit · Development, but in a manner ff{!' generally depicted On the development elan Submit e Wl lS /(Ji'\,_/ ~l_u_t_io~_, and which di.str1icts ·shall be _d_e _s _1-=g_n_a_t_e_d __ a_s-:f:o=l=l=o=w=s=::=:::..--_JL-" // IX. Agricultural/Industrial/Open Space District, A/I/OS A. uses by Right: -"// Agricultural, including farm, garden, greenhouse, nursery, / orchard, ranch, kennel, guiding and outfitting, r iding / stable, pa<k, g<eenbelt, vete<ina<y clinic,· and customa<y ~~' ~ a ccessory uses including buildings for shelter and enclosure ~;o~:rs~~!~,"-\~±n:n~~-J~~!:r~;e~~i!~~~~v~~ea __ ~~~!~ /7 f'. ___ ::2::_'-"'/ ):.,~·,0/~f':~~.1.,;7 ··the ·--greenho·u'Se~------------(/··I/ . -, [1·" c),,,~ '1 7/, -10 ) ~ : v ,' II '1 ,C~".,1 ' i 0,y,,,,;e, f Orf"c-' '~"· ;p r -fc, /:{; '(' s cfcG c "141 .IL r A -1rvUiti/:,,;."_.,A,.t;,,c,1.t>j q .,Jo r r"l-t'~d--f""L. P•';.;t"-''=/l"J .rl.t'r...fi )», 2. ) .. ··i/)i,.,,.e_ BOOK 672 P!GE346 . };);-:,,. Conditional uses ·: '\ ;-B. Mobile home as an accessory use to ranch or farm operation. ) __ ..... c. Special uses:· None That the planned unit development plan map for the Garfield county Airport Industrial Park Planned Un i t Development is attached hereto as Exhibit "A", incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein. 3. That the legal descript.ion of the property which encompasses the ?arfield County Airport Industrial Park Planned Unit Development _,.. /(· )_,,,,./ is as follows: ~ ,./' (} [/"O ......,, / All of Lots 2, 3 and 4 of Section 18, Township 6 South, J!.e_i:t..9~-~ , ,./0 / I ~he Sixth Principal Meridian./"-'""Tfie·---sout:lf"""'(5ne-half (S ,.t / t:J l/2l, the solith -one-::n-ar·r ··--·r:ffe··--N"'O'r·Ene~st one-quarter cs 1/2, NE ,'!/~,,. _j 1 1/4), the Southeast One-quarter' of t;he Northwest One-quarter (SE /"';f )/. ' 1/4 NW 1/4), and Lot 2 of Section (!1"}) the North One-half of the ' <; Southeast One-quarter (N 1/2 SE ' 1/4), and the Southeast \ (\ One-quarteh-E\f the Southeast One-quarter (SE 1/4 SE 1/4), of ) .___,. Section <-.::!V · the Northeast One-quar~. of the Southeast One-quarter (NE _...!L4 SE. 1/4) of Section 23.· the East One-half (E 1/2) of Section~ and all of Section , all within Township 6 South {T6S), Range~ West (R93W) "'f the Sixth Principal j Meridian, ~,p,ting '-t.11bse portions of the described tracts contained within the right-of-way of Interstate Hiqhwa~ .. 1.Q. _7 Dated this 15th day of ~J_u~ly.__~~~' A.D.l~ ATTEST: GARFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS CfuOftheBoard ~ ~{}j,, GA~~ cfMiriili1 Upon motion duly made and seconded the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the following vote: ~~~~~R~o~b~er~t.._.R~j~c~haa~rd~s~o~n.__~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-Aye ~~~~~L~a~r~ry"-'S~c~h~m~u~e~se~r.__~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-Aye ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_._E~l~av~e*n.....,.I~C~e~r~1~s~e~a~hs~e~nut~~~~-~ STATE OF COLORADO County of Garfield I, , County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County and State aforesaid do hereby certify that the annexed and foregoing Order is truly copied from the Records of the Proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners for said Garfield County, now in my office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal A.O. of said County, at Glenwood Springs, this day of 19 County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners. GARFIELD COUNTY --- COMMERCIAL/ COVENIENCE RETAIL ~rffi-::::::: ..... 10 a..1,i ... ,1 .. uu,..1 .. ...!~:·:.._, ... k Dlllufl.,,l••l<l•I '7.':::!:!/alilh l..Wurl•llli-•ul :~;-.!~: ~-~~ .... ,, ~ ll_, .. ,,,._, ll...:•tl<l11t•H ,,.,.,.r .. ..iu ••• ... "''"""''' J_,.,,,,.,.1,.,nr,... h'-'"•J-l•r t.•H•ll" "' ~":=~~'·'!'-••\ ''"·~,:;:.or1c-.. ~1 .... h ••uu1l ..... 11C-or 5 ac . , ..... ~ -:-::"!'· "";~~::· D ......... ····· ~ llol4..i ....... ~ ~~ " " " " " .. .. " • ••• 1-................ ..... :=t· ::::~::-"' .... 1,11 ...ili!..cl ~1!u:.!.L " ... 1~~ " AIRPORT c-1 .... Dn•l•r ~ " "' .. " , ••• ·~-••<!• •• 51 ~••• ,_ .. , "-~••"'11 ,., •• ~ ........ 111-•••••• , ..... ,,.. -"''--"'---+-""'---2L-Jl---""---+--"''----'"--H-!:!...- '" l·11•' 10)1 JU ~ ........ u ........... c,.. ..... , f ~r Al ""'''""''"''"" -"'-'-----l-----'11-'"--1------11 ,. INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH PARK COMPLEX P.U .D. PLAN Submitted by Jame:s M. Bowers & Assoc, -Plann.ers for RIFLE LANO A SSOCIATES, LTD. llilIID -- JUNE, 19 8 5 REVISED nu 111t11TIA\JllWiL£ Fl•lllLY RUIDElfTIM.fUlllllAH Dfll!>ITY CllltfW!Ullffll.ElllllllllillL (otV\Enc1.t.LICoKVEUIUtCCRUAIL Ca~1nc1M./OfF1c1Ruu11c11 Co.-v:tRCIAL/A1 .-rantStnYICI!. ., 1' .~, I j . (I/ f ___ ,,.,. .9 STATE OF COLORADO ) )SS county of Garfield ) At a regular commissioners for Garfield Meetin9 Room, Garfield meeting of the Boa.rd of county County , Colorado, held in the commissioners county Courthouse, in Glenwood Springs of SepteIDber A.D. 1 9~, there were on Mondav , the 15th present: _.,L=a~r~ry.._.S~c~h~m~ue;s~e~r ..... ~ ......................... ~~----~' Commissioner Chairman _...R~o~b~er~t"-"R~i~c~ha=r~d~s~o~n ......................... ~ .......... ~~-' Commissione r _.F~l~a~ve~n,_,,J~-~Ce~r~i~s~e.._ ......................... ~~--~~• Commissioner Don DeFord , County Attorney -"M~i~ld-r~e;d..=.A~l-sd_o_r_f~----~--~~------~-, Clerk of the Board __,,Cb~-~u~ck,.._,D~e~s~c~he~n~e~s.__ .............................. ~~--~-' County Administrator when the following proceedings, among others were had a na done , to-wit: RESOLUTION NO. 86-:!2I.,_ ~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~-~""""~~~~~~~~~~~~~-'--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A RESOLUTION CONCERNED WITH THE APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE ZONE DISTRICT TEXT OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL PARR P .U.D. CONTAINED IN RESOLUTION NO, 85-103 1 REQUESTED BY RIFLE LAND ASSOCIATES , LTD. AND COGENERATION AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. WHEREAS, Rifle Land Associates, Ltd., and Cogeneration Technology a nd Developmen t Company have filed an application with the Board of count¥ Commissioners of Garfield county £,or the mod1fication of the Garfiel Co unty Airport In dustrial Park Planned Unit Developmen Zone District Text Ap proval of its plan for the pa~0el of lane centained ln Resolutio No . 8 5-1 0 3; ana WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by this Board on September a, l986; and WHEREAS, based on the evidence, testimony, exhibits , study of th~ General Plan for the unincorporated area of the county , comments of th~ Garfield county Planning Department, com..~ents of public officials and agencies, and comments from all interested parties , this Board finds as follows: 1 . That proper publication and public notice was provided as required by law for the hearing before the Board; 2. That the hearing before the Board was extensive and complete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that all interested parties were heard at that hearing; 3, That the Garfield County Planning commission has recommended to this Board that the requested rezoni nq be granted; 4. That the proposed zoning is in compliance with the recommendations set forth in the comprehensive Plan for the unincorporated are a of the county; S. That the P.U.D. modification i s consistent with the efficient development and preservation of the entire P.U.D., does not affect, in a substantially adverse manner, either the enjoyment of the land abutting upon or across a street from the P.U.D., or the public interest, and is not granted solely to confer a special benefit upon any person; • 6. That the requested Planned Unit Development Modification is in 9ene·ral compliance with all requirements of the applicable, Garfield county Zoning Resolu~ion and, further, that the requested Planned Unit Development Modification is suitable and appropriate for .. the :sullj,ect,,;ptopei:;ty, · .. ·given the location, condition and circumstances of the property, and it is generally compatible with existing land uses in the surrounding nearby area~ 7, That for the above stated and other reasons, the requested Planned Unit Development Plan is i n the best interest of the morals-, order, health, ,.safety, convenience and welfare .oi; the citizens of Garfield county. NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners· of Garfield County , that the application for the modification of the Garfield county Airport Industrial Park Planned Unit Development zone district text and plan and certai~ conditions 9f approval contained in Resolution No, 81 -56 for the following described property in the unincorporated area of Garfield County he approved as follow: L '!'hat the following sections of Resolution No . ~ be modified to read as follows: Section 2. Prior to approval of any final plat of the Planned Unit Development, or any part thereof, the applicant shall establish evidence of ownership and availability of sufficient water rights· to provide:1 to the planned unit developmEj!.nt _ an adequate supply of potable water to serve the needs o·f the el'itire· proposed development for ,_domestic and other uses contempl.:ated ~ under the planned unit development plan, provided, however, that· the applicant may submit and the County may approve, all other requirements being satisfied , the final plat of the ___.- commercial -industrial portion, · · -including the ~ ag ric ultural/inc3ust rial ;i'opeo ·space poi:tion , of the planned unit development upon a showing of an adequate water supply for only that portion of the planned unit development. Section 3. The design of the sewage' system for the Planned unit Development shall include provisions for the pretreatment of industrial waste. Further that individrral sewage disposal s y stems ma y be utilize d prior to the development of the sewage sy~tem, provid ~d the I .S .D systems meet all requirements of the Garfield County Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended and the · 1 ~ A J appropriate Garfield County Environmental Health Regulations , ~ Further, that at such time that the central sewer system is available to any lot having an I.S.D. system, the I.S.D. system will be removed and connection made to the central sewer system. Section 6. That the Planned Unit Development shall consist of nine (9) zone Districts , the boundaries of ~hich shall be the same designated in the final plats of the.Garfield County Airport n 1 . j Industrial Park , a Planned Unit-Development , but in a manne.r _ ~ enerally depicted on the eeveiopment plan s ubmittea with this r esolution, and which ·i$tricts shall be designated as follows: IX . Agricultural/Industria~/Open Space District, A/I/OS A. Uses by Right: Agricultural, including farm, garden, greenhouse, nursery, orchard, ranch, kennel , guiding and outfitting, riding stable, park, greenbelt, veterinary clinic, and customary accessory uses including buildings for shelter and enclosure of persons, animals, and/or property employed in any of the above uses, inc u ing fac1 it1es us ed to provi de he at fof 1 n I the g reenfl o use use . ~ \ .• • • B. conditional uses: Mobile home as an accessory use to ranch or farm operation. c. Special uses:· None 2. That the planned unit development plan map for the Garfield county Airport Industrial Park Planned Unit Development is attached hereto as Exhibit "A", incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein. 3. That the legal description of the property which encompasses the Garfield County Airport Industrial Park Planned Unit Development is as follows: All of Lots 2, 3 and 4 of Section 18, Township 6 South, Range 92 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian. The South One-half (S 1/2) , the South One-half the Northeast One-quarter (S 1/2, NE 1/4) , the southeast One-quarter of the Northwest One-quarter (SE 1/4 NW 1/4), and Lot 2 of Section 13; the North One-half of the Southeast One-quarter (N 1/2 SE 1/4), and the southeast One-quarter of the Southeast One-quarter (SE 1/4 SE 1/4), of Section 14; the Northeast One-quarter of the Southeast One-quarter (NE 1/4 SE 1/4) of Section 23; the East One-half (E ~-----l~,~1 2~~on 25; and all of Sectio1l-2.4.,_al.L..liit.hi~P-6-~~-'-------~----~ South (T6S), Range 93 West (R93W) of the Sixth Principal Meridian, excepting those portions of the described tracts contained within the right-of-way of Interstate Highway 70. Dated this 15th day of _J_u_l~y ____ , A.D.lill_ • • ATTEST: GARFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF COMr~ISSIONERS GARF~~ • Upon motion duly made and seconded the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the following vote: ____ Rwo~b~e~r~t_R~1uc~b~a~rd~s~o~n.__ _________________ .Aye ---~'~·a~r~r~y_S~c~h~m~n~e~se~r.__ __________________ .Aye ______________ -.JF~J~a~v~e~n~.11--~Ce~r~!ue~e'-.B.ah~s~e~n~t~-----.!~ STATE OF COLORADO County of Garfield r, , County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County and State aforesaid do hereby certify that the annexed and foregoing Order is truly copied from the Re.cords of the Proceedings of the Board of county Commissioners for said Garfield County, now in my office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal A.O. of said County, at Glenwood Springs, this day of -~~-- 19 __ county Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners • • • • STATE OF COLORADO. ) )ss County of Garfield ) At a r egular meeting of the Board of Cou nty Com missioners for Garfield County, Colorado, held in the Commissioners' Meeting Room, Garfield County Courthouse, in Glenwood Springs on Tuesday, the 4th day of September, 2001 there were present : J""'o=hn""'-'M~aru"-=·n,.__ ________________ , Commissioner Chairman L=any=J...=M=c=C=o,,_w'""n"'-----------------'' Commissioner ...:..W.:....:al=t=-S=t=o'-'-w"'-'e"------------------' Commissioner =D'-"o=n'-=D"'"e=fi=o""'rd=-------------------' County Attorney ~Mi=.l=d"""'re'-"do..;Al~sd=o=rf=---------------• Clerk of the Board =Ed=w~a~rd::....;::Gr,,,_· e=e=n,__ _______________ , County Manager wl1e11 the foUowing-pmeeedings,-amoog-et-her-s-w.ere-had-ami-dooe,t.o..,,_wi ..... ·---------_.:..._' __ _ RESOLUTIONNO. 2001-65 A RESOLUTION CONCER._"NED WITH THE APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE RIFLE AIRPORT INDUSTR1AL PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) PLAN AND ZOl\1E DISTRICT TEXT. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, and the Airport Land Pa1tners, Ltd. made application for the approval of a amendment to the Garfield County Aitpmt Industrial Park Planned Unit Developmen Pla n ancl zqne district te ; and WHEREAS, Garfield County Planning Commission held a public meeting on Wednesday the l lh of July, 2001 upon the question of whether the above described PUD Plan and zone district text amendments should be granted or denied, at which meet ing the public and interested persons were given the opportunity to express their opinions concerning the approval of said PUD Plan and zone district text amendments; and WHEREAS, the Board held a public hearing on Monday, the 20th day of August, 2001 upon the question of whether the above described PUD Plan and zone district text amendments shou ld be granted or denied, at which hearing the public and interes ted persons were given the opportunity to express their opinions regarding the approval of said PUD Plan and zone district text amendment ; and -lllllll lilll llllll Ill llllll llllll llllll Ill lllll llll llll 587826 09/05/2001 03 :53P 81283 P722 M ALSDORF 2 of 6 R 0.00 D 0 .00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO WHEREAS , the Board on the basis of substantial competent evidence produced at the aforementioned bearing, has made the following detennination of fact as listed below. 1. That proper publication and public notice was provided as required by law for the hearing before the Board of County Commissioners . 2 . That the hearing before the Board of County Commissioners was extensive and complete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that all interested parties were heard at that hearing . 3 . That the application is in .compliance with the Garfield County Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended . 4 . For the above stated and other reasons , the proposed use , upon compliance with all conditions of approval, will be in the best interest of the health, safety, morals , convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County . and ; WHEREAS the Board has made the following determination of findings as listed below . I . I he GarTie1~g Cmmuissiou teviewed the Application and recommended approval of the Application under certain conditions on July 11, 2001 . 2. The Board of County Commissioners established a date for public hearing on the Application for the PUD, which commenced on August 20, 2001 . · 3 . Pursuant to evidence produced at the public hearing on this Application, the Board finds : a. The property owners adjacent to the property that is the subject of this Application received notification of the date, time, and location of the above- referenced public hearing by certified mail, sent at ]east fifteen (I 5) days prior to the commencement of the hearing . b. Notification of the public hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation at least thirty (30) days prior to the commencement of the hearing . c. The substance of the mailed and published notification substantially informed interested parties of the subject matter and the location of the requested modification to the existing zoning . · d. The Board of County Commissioners bas jurisdiction to conduct the public hearing on the Application and render a decision thereon. e. The requested PUD Plan and zone district text amendments do not affect in a substantially adverse manner either the enjoyment of fa.nd abutting upon or 2 ) e · I llllll llfll 111111 111111111111111111111111111111111 1111 587826 09/05/2001 03:53P 81283 P723 M ALSDORF 3 of 6 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO across a street from the PUD, or t he public in t erest, and is not granted solely to confer a special benefit upon any person . 4 . The hearing before the Board of County Commissioners w as extensive and complete; all pertinent fact s, matters, and issues were submitted ; and all interested parties were heard at the hearing. 5 . All uses by right , conditional uses, minimum lot areas, minimum lot coverage, minimum set-backs, maximum height of buildings, and all other use and occupancy restrictions applicable to this PUD zone district text amendment are hereby approved by the Board of County Commissioners as set forth in the zone text attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A and the PUD Plan amendment attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, that the Garfield County Airport 'Industrial Park PUD Plan is hereby approved. Dated this 4th day of September, A.D. 2001 Clerk of the Board vote : 3 GARFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMJSSIONERS, · GARFIELD COUNTY , CO LORADO on was adopted by the ollowing ) e ' ' 1· IHlll llill llllll Ill llllll llllll llllll Ill lllll llll llll 587826 09/05/2001 03:53P 81283 P724 M ALSDORF 4 of 6 .R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss County of Garfield ) I, County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the :Soard of County Commissioners in and for the County and Stale aforesaid do hereby certify that the annexed and foregoing Resolution is truly copied from the Records of the Proceeding of the Board of County Commissioners for said Garfield County, now in my office . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County, at Glenwood Springs, this __ day of , A .D . 2001 County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners 4 ) e 1 ·111111 lllll llllll Ill llllll llllll llllll Ill llllf 1111 1111 587826 09/05/2001 03:53P 81283 P725 M ALSDORF 5 of 6 R 0.00 D 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO Exhibit A Public Administration/Facilities CPA!F) Zone District Pefmitted Uses : Public Administration fac ilities/buildings, Road & Bridge Administration, Operations and Storage facilitie s, Corrections facilities, Community corrections facilities , Publicly Owned Communicati ons facilities, Public Utilities , Singl e Family and Multi-family housing for persons employed in any of the pr evious uses by right . Supplemental Standards: Any outside storage of vehicles or materials sourth of the Public Service Company easement will be allowed as a use by right. Any outside storage of vehicle~ or materials north of the Public Service easement shall be subject to the screening requirements of the City of Rifle . Privately run Comnmnity €011 ections-facili-~~altr.1:-------------------- 1. Implement one of the following three (3) alternatives: a. A County sheriff's presence within the facility ; or b. A Sheriff Substation located on the Property; or c. The County or the operator of the facility will reimburse the City annually in advance, for the annual gross pay associated with the lowest paid police officer on the City of Rifle Police forc e . 2 . Public or private transportation shall be provided for all work-release inmates . Objectionable Uses : Any use not listed as a permitted use . Minimum Lot Area: 20,000 sq . ft . Maximum Lot Coverage: More than one building may be put on a Jo t, provided not more than 90 percent of the lot is covered . Minimum Setback: Front yard: Side yard : Rear yard : Other: Off-street parking: 20 feet 10 feet 15 feet boundary of any utili t y easement for buildings Per Chapter 7: Off Street Parking Regulation, City of Rifle Municipal Code. iiiiu.. --II!::·' -··-,..o =g --_, ~a:g -c ->--<DI-=Nz: iiiiiii Ii: g -(.) =::Jc -Nd -.... w !!!!!in .... -Lt.. =o..a:: iiiiii&U~ -·· =(')IS) -&& !!!! ... cs;; -Q -IS)C -N !!!!! ...... ti) -IDCS> -cg . -'-51 --en m-& O!: -cow =N --~ 'O !!!!!Ill) -ID!O ................... -... -_. .. ~·--"--- ···•···•· G@---->----1m-----· l. P. U. D. Plan: Garfield County Airport Industrial Park Complex ·.:· .. ·.·,--;·,:·.: Gatti~ld County Re glo,,•J Airport ........... ::::::.: ·::: I ' ! I ·I --"'• !rdu.ttll -Bo!md1iy Im COMWCO!l\IE!!IENCE li£TAJI. --Akpl)r1~1'Y ~ COMWl~Rlf.LSYC ·---·-lftiilyl>w ~ COUr.llOFFICE 1<£i£0;<al c.f 0 ~ IIlllll!ilJ ~llO~FW< Mt\f j ~ -~ICADl.l!IV\'hQU'll$ P!6</f 11 1.1m!!!5iiii!l.ll~iiiil'!!~!!!!!!!v!!iiiiiiimiiiiiiiiiiiiii•.lllG~~!!!!!!"'";'...i ~ ~~'C.<!!r'°..l!r.w< ~/cf' f;.dloquoltO.?.;milas S RESlllEllTIM.'SiliGOEF-Y ~/Sf ~---------------------------------------------~ \u$1J. /Ur~aJJ. tuwJ.i \x~t e--/~~ C6Wl'tll / A\ffD (f. t>l-t Arlt. /os Aj ri /t wt. / o ~ , LW\l~t;.IA0) i../£PS \n.~f'YW Ge\'\ ~r P ---.,-----~ ,..,.-----------------------------------·----·---------·--------- ~!.~ ' ~ • ", 1'1;1 . l ~ ~":l'!D ' t • :k:___ _, " ~ -~ fl support retail, office, entertamment, accommodations, food and other service busines'>es catering to the busmess and residential demand I I • Airport lndustnal (A-1) comprises almost 9 percent of the potenttal bu1ldmg area w1thm the Mas-January 10, 2008 Matt Sturgeon Planning Director City ofl'.ifle This Planned Unit Development submittal is a cu lminati on of years of analysis, preparation and coopera- tion with the City of Rifle and Garfield Count y. The existing zoning for the property dates from a 19 82 County approved PUD undertaken by our predecessors, who donated approximatel y 200 acres for t he development of the Garfield County Regional Airport, and were instrumental in getting the State of Colo- rado to build the Mamm Creek I-70 Interchange to support both t he Airport and 1982 PUD development. Airport Land Pa rtners has continued that spirit of cooperation, donating land to the County for mu nicip al fac ilities as well as an interagency fire station, which resulted in the construction of a sewer interceptor and one million gallon water storage tank on our property in 2000. A su bsequent agreement to convey '1d- ditional land to fac ili tate expansion of the airport resulted in reconstruction of Airport Road through our property. And most recently, Colorado Mountain College opened a new 34,000 square foot state of the art building on land donated by Airport Land Partners. The PUD described herein was developed consistent with the Master Plan for Rifle Airport Planning Area approved by the City of Rifle in March 2007. The goals and objectives of the Rifle Airpark PUD conform with the approved Master Plan and seek to: Develop a comprehensive, consistent and high quality land use plan and development standards guiding future construction of the PUD in order to accomplish the economic development goab of the City of Rifle and western Garfield County. Organize the development and operation of sustainable businesses for the benefit of land owners, husiness owners and the community. Establish a model process to ensure high quality development that protects and enhances both the natural environment and the built environment. OVERV IEW O F PLAN ll>e Rifle Airpark PUD introduces four land uses guided by a t ightly controlled set of development stan- dards th.<! will offer a platform for economic development that could support over 6 million square feet of commercial. industrial and airport related building. The long-term commitment by property owners to a master planned business community will be accomplished through a Property Owners Association to maintain the development, building construction and maintenance of the business community. The highlights of the Rifle Airpark master land use plan are: A mix of industrial. commercial, airport re lated and governmental land uses that are cons istent with the forecast market demand of the regional economy, and the land base itself. Developable land will be offered in four proposed new land use districts and one existing Rifle :i.one district: Airport Light Industrial (A-LI) comprises almost 36 percent of the potential building area and sup- ports assembly, warehousing, distribution, and wholesale and retail sales bu sinesses. Airport Commercial (A-C), making up approximately 13 percent of potential building area, will ter Plan and w ill support rnanufacturing, service and repair, storage and distribution businesses. I I • Airport Support (A-S) businesses provide direct logistical, aircraft service and distribution services \ I including those requiring dose proximity and access to the Garfield County Regional Airport, and J I will comprise approximately 23 percent of the potential building area within the Master Plan Area. I • Open Space (O/S) comprises 20 percent of the land area contained within the PUD area: over 13 I I percent falling within contiguous and large parcels that will be managed by a Property Owners Association; 6.5 percent occurring in large parcels of land privately owned and protected from j development by way of restrictive land covenants; and the balance of open space occurring in on-i ! parcel landscape buffers a long front set-backs, side set-b acks and in parking cells. The development standards controlling the "look and feel" of Rifle Airpark will include restrictions and guidelines that extend the ex isting development requirements of the City of Rifle enforced through City staff revi ew and Design G uidelin es established and administere d by the Rifle Airpark POA. Examples of regulations specific to the Rifle Airpark PUD are: Restrictions on outdoor storage that req uire appropriate screening through fencing or barrier walls; Road standards that refine right-of-ways stanrurds and restrict parking from roadways; Pedestrian oriented pathways linki ng businesses with open space areas to afford an amenity to workers in their off work time; Floor-area and coverage ratios as well as height limitations that promote architecture and building construction techniques supportive of new businesses; Parking and loading standards offering more flexibility to large warehouse and industrial users. IMPACT OF RIFLE PLANNED lJNIT DEVELOPMENT The Rifle Airpark PUD will facilitate significant economic growth to Rifle and surrounding wes tern Gar- field County. The PUD will provide the land base for b11siness development over an extended t im e frame. Up to 20 years of growth will be accommodated yielding the following projected benefits: Employment and business space employing upwards of 6,600 persons by the year 2022. Labor income generation of $322 million by the year 2022 Accumulated tax and fee revenues of more than $46 million to the City of Rifle by the year 2022. In submitting this app li cation for PUD approval for Rifle Airpark, I want to assure the City of Ri fl e that Airport Land Partners and its associates will pursue development of Rifle Airpark at the highest level of quality. Further, we will diligently support the overall goals of the community to provide productive and sustainable employment that will foster Rifle's developm ent as an economic centerpiece within the We st- ern Slope region of Colorado. Respectfully submitted, Airport Land Partners Limited ~~~-/I / ,, .· ··r' u ---· ---,a;_,,., .,.· Robert A. Howard Managing Partner _) ----------------~~ ~ _ _/ . _INTR~oucn~:-J L__ ~J V 1s10N, SWONs & O BJECTI VES F tH U RE LAND U sE & S UBAREAS 5 U ST A l l"AB L E (TROWTl-f. PATTER NS A D I V ERSE ECO N OM IC B AS E A H l &l-f.L y L IV EA BLE C OMMU N ITY IN FLu rn c1 N & EXTERNAL F ORCES Slllvl MARY APPENDIX LAND Us1: MAP T A BLE O F C ONTEN TS 1.6 B IOC:OR RI D O R AN D TH E ENER G Y I NNC1VATION C ENTE R A conceptual plan was developed for the West Rifie Gateway which envisioned the gateway becom- ing an alternative energy hub. The plan included specific land uses which would help bridge Rifie's current oil and gas boom into a bio-mass and dis- tributed ener~1 y center. The Biocorridor follows State Highway 6 as it leaves Downtown Rifle and extends to the West Rifie Interchange . The Energy Innovation Center concept pkm was developed for the eastern portion of the Biocorridor. The Energy In novation Center houses an alternative fuels research facility and exposition center. Fi gure 11: D o wntown Master Plan 1.7 !DO WN TOW N MA STER P LAN During the preparotion of the Comprehensive Plan, an advisory team of key downtown stakeholders created a Downtown Plan to help the City emerge as a regional economic center. The Plan focused on increasing the strength and density of downtown without detracting from the historic c ore. Where possible the information has been incorporated into the Rifie Comprehensive Plan . Refer to the D·Jwnrown iv\·Jster Plan for more detail. The Comprehensive Plan incorporated the Downtown Master Plan in the Subarea Section [See the Dowmcw more detail.) ~ previouJ lliew L rir ,, _1 section in hapter 3 for IH I l~-~o;:~~l I P 1 ....... j .·t ·. \J_.1 ~t~·-t~1. ... __ -I l ., .. ,,.ll ! 11 ~ c::> torward page up page down view LB R IM R OCK AT R IFLE M ASTER P LAN Rim Rock a1 Rifle Master Plan is a p lan for 350 acres in Northwest Rifle. The Rim Rock at Rifle Master Pl a n has been a ijopted by the City of Rifle. Any devel- opment must follow that plan or a new master plan must be develope d and adopted by Rifle. The master plan anticipates a v ariety of ho using type s throughout the project that will reach a variety o f price points in the local housing market . The plan e includes a mix of residential and commercial units connected by roads, trails, bikeways and paths . Dedication of a school site is desired at a yet to b e determined location in the northern portion of th e project. 1 . 9 RIFLE AI RPARK MA STE R l'LAN The Rifle Airpark Master Plan includes c1pproximatel y 500 acres surrounding the Rifle-Garfield County Airport. It includes a modern industrial park con- cept wit h the intent of providing land for economic development and job creation. The area is high- lighted with a "Special Area Plan" designation o n A the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The Rifle W Airpark Master Plan has been adopted by the City of Rifle . Any development must follow that plan or a new master plan must be developed and adopted by Rifle. [See Rifle A irpark Master Plan .) 1.10 EA ST GATEW A Y SUBARE A P LAN Rifle's east "gateway" gives vi si tors their first impres- sion of the City and the Downtown. The East Gate- Rifle Comprehensive Plan ~ Expiration : June 2010 \::::.J -Exhibit 1-2 Vi1:il\itlj Milp Garfield County Fair Grounds High Scho ol Rifle Cre e k Museum Co lorado Mountain Co llege Water Treatment Facility Sanitary Waste Plant City Of Ri tfle Industrial Park Fire Statio n Garfie ld County Regional Airport "'--------.......... _____ RlflE GAP REHRVOll •: 6 A ~mm Pea\ fa. 1i ' WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FORHl WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST ~ llO ftTll The proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Rifl e Airpark is located in unincorporated Garfield County adja- cent to the City of Rifle. The PUD area comprises a signifi- cant portion of the 732-acre Rifle Airport Planning Area (RAPA). Thre e parcels within the RAPA were the subject of prior annexations and are zoned either industrial or publ ic. The PUD area is accessible to 1-70 via two interchanges --the main Rifle interchange (Exit 87) and Mamm Creek A interchange (Exit 89). Airport Road links the PUD area withW' Exit 87 , paralleling 1-70 to the south through a commercial and industrial area that is within the City of Rifle. Exit 89 serves the eastern side of Rifle Airpark via Mamm Creek Road to Airport Road. Currently there is no development on Mamm C reek Road and li mited development on Airport Road east of the entry road to the Garfie ld Regiona l Airport. The Garfield Regional Airport is t he center of aviation activ- ity within we stern Garfield County offering fully automated weather information, 24-hour service, a 7,000' by 100' runway with !LS and GPS approaches . The airport provid es pilots with two FBOs, car and limousine rental services al o ng with airplane hanger space and a paint shop . e •1:= Eng inu ri'lg Repol1 ·Rifle Ar Park MasW Pla!llPUO -SE P1oject No. 25221 Nov ember 14, 2007 Table 3·1, Rifle 's Water Usage Criteria Development Type Density Consumptiv e Criteria Demand Commercia l Bulldlna• Per acre 500 aod Professlonal Build inas Per acre 500 nnd Industrial Annltcatlon Per acre 600 nnd The estimated water demand projection s, based on the se criteria, are summari zed in the following Table 3-2 . Table 3-2, Water Usage -City Criteria Land Use Category Area Demand Adjusted Peak Daily size Rate Peaking Consumptive Factor Use IAcresl load/acre\ laalonsl Airoort Liaht Industri al 239.50 600 2.50 359 250 Ai roort Industr ial 56.26 600 2.00 67 512 City Industrial 44.53 600 2.00 53 436 Airoort Commerc ial 85.06 500 3.00 127 590 Alroort Public/ Institutional 61.93 500 3.00 92 895 Airoort Support 156.49 500 2.50 195613 I TOTAL DEMAND 896 296 The water use cri teria se t in the City of Rifle 's Public Works Manual does not elaborate on demand ca lculahon or process water needs, production facility needs, and facility user needs. nor does the manu al establish a spe cific peaking fac tor for proper infrastructure sizing of different types of indu strial and commercial developments planned for this project. We proposed average adjustment factors to reflect the anticipate d uses for this development. Additi ona ll y, we approached an alternative evaluation method for determining water demands in order to provide a comparison base in our calculations, and to help us arrive at a satisfactory conclusion that will adhere to the project land use applications . This alternative approach is called "Water Usage Averaging" and is exp lained in the following paragraphs . 2. WATER USAGE AVERAGING CRITERIA (WUA)-This alternative approach, as explained above , is an empirical method and is based on past projections and statistical demand s for sim il ar uses that provide flow projections (Appendix-A). The consumptive demands in this criteria vaiy with the types of land uses . The following Table 3-3 itlustrates the water demands based on WUA criteria . SOPRIS ENG I NEERING • UC (970)704·031 \ Fn :(970)704·0313 civi l consulta nts 502 Main Slf11! Suite A3 Carbonda11 Colo1ado 8 1623 Engineering Report· Rifle Ai' Park Mastu PlarvPUO ·SE Project No. 26227 November 14, 2007 Table 3-3, Water Demand -WUA Criteria Land Use Category Area Average-Day Correction Peak Da ily si ze Demandl•I Factorlbl Consumptive Use I Acres\ '""d/acre\ (aallons' Alrnort Linh! Industrial 239.50 1 380 1.00 330 510 Airoort Industrial 56 .26 1 380 1.30"' 100 930 Citv Industrial 44.53 1 380 1.30\D ) 79 887 Alroort Comme rcial 85.06 1 380 1.00 117 383 Public/ Institutional 61 .93 1 380 1.00 85 463 Airnort Suooort 156.49 1 380 1.00 Table foot Notes (a) See appendix A I TOTAL DEMAND 215956 930 129 (b) The: ra tio uf lhc Ci ty'~ wale r ~ugc ctitcrm O\'tr Wc stc:m Uni te d Stute Rc:siclcntm l wu tc r usogc, 600 + 460 = 1.30 From our evaluation of the site conditions and verification of the ex.is ting utilities , we have concluded that th e average daily consumptive demand for this development will be closer to the WUA criteria quantities . Therefore, we are recommending the estimated 930, 129 gallons pe r day water usage be selected in the master planning pro cess for this development . 3. CONCLUSIONS-The total water demand is the daily consumptive use plus the fire flow requirements . We are recommending adequate fire suppres sion supply of at least 960,000 gallons . This flow rate plus the consumptive demand will establish a storage capacity of approximately 2.0 milli on gallons of availabl e water supp ly or a storage tank that can deliver the required vo lum es. The fire flow storage demand may be reduced to less than one million gallons if the buildings proposed for this development are equip ped w ith fire sprink ler systems . The property will require a main water sup pl y loop line capable of delivering the required fire flows at adequate pressures fo r fire sup pression and domestic consumptive uses. From a fire protection standpoint, there will be fire hydrants along the roads and the internal traffic circulation streets to provide th e necessary fire flows for th.is development. Utility Sketch Plans accompanying this report show the proposed water sys tem delivery lines . It is our understanding that th e project will be developed in several phases and, therefore ; the utility infrastructure will only be constructe d as required. This phasing is in order to provide pub li c uti lity services to developing segments with the caveat that certain compone nt s of the infrastructure will be installed beyond the phase boundaries to ensure inter·phase transitio ns between successive development stages . SOPRIS ENGIN EERING • llC civil consultants 502 Mein Str1 1l Su lh A3 Cerbond1l1 Color1 do 81623 (9 7 0)704 ·0311 Fu :(970)704·0313 e e I Engineering Report. Ri!le Ai' Pivk Mastr:r PlanlfUD • SE Project No. 26227 NOVembef 14~20071 IV. Wastewater Collection Wastewater flows from this project will be collected from the various areas throughout the development and conveyed by a 12" gravity flow sewer line to an existing 12" sanitary sewer interceptor north of the existing Airport Drive corridor. This line co1U1ec ts to the existing 18" diameter South Rifle Interceptor, as shown in the Wastewater Masterplan prepared by Schmueser Gomdon Meyer (SGM) Consulting Firm and dated January 2006 . The Utility Sketch Plans illustrate the wastewater collection and conveyance system for this development. Wastewater flows for a gravity sanitary sewer system are provided in Table 3-4 below. Was tewater nows we re based on the City of Rifle's Public Works Manual, Section 110.2, and the flow data Table! 10-1, and include peaking fac tors Table 34, Wastewater Flows Land Use Category Source Area Average Peaking Design Designation Size Daily Flow Factor Flow (80% of usage Rate (acre) cfs/acre) lcfsl Airport Liciht Industrial Mixed Industry 239.50 0 .0018 2.00 0 .86 Air port Industrial Mixed Industry 56.26 0 .0022 2 .25 0.28 Cttv Ind ustrial Mixed Industry 44.53 0 .0022 2.00 0.20 Airoort Commercial Mixed Commer 85.06 0.0018 2.25 0.34 Public/Institutional School 61 .93 0 .0018 2.00 0.22 Airoort Suooort Mixed Commer 156.49 0.0018 2.25 0 .63 I TOTAL FLOW 2.53 Pea.king factors will be used in the design and sizing of the gravity sanitary sewers . It is recommended that the collection system Oow at 80% full in order to maintain the expected performance of the system. This flow rate will ensure uninterrupted gravity flows by al1owing room for air movement inside the pipe. The peak system design calculations for total wastewater flows from this site are projected to be 2.53 cubic feet per second (cfs). It must be remembered that the actual average daily flows will be lesser than the peak flows . The project wastewater flow projections are for mixed us e developments within commercial industrial, public, and institutional facilities . These numerical universal values are used for infrastructure planning purposes ; and tlte actual development demands may deviate from these general projections . SOPRIS ENGINEERING• UC clvil consu l tants S02 M•l n Slr .. t Sul!• A3 C11bcindal1 Ccilor1dci 81623 (970)704·0311 Fax :(970)704 -0313 I Eniiintet~Report ·Rifle A~ P11rk Master-Pl8NFUD ·~SE Prli)ectNo.2622i November 14, 2007 I V. Stormwater Management A. S_ite Descriotion The existing site and most of the surrounding lands have remained rural, and include three types of road networks as listed below : • Paved roads Unpaved roads Undeve lop ed roads TI1e road networks within the first lop two categories are maintained by Garfield Connty . The City of Rifle does not have a stonnwater collection and conveyance system in this area. Surface runoff patterns consist of overland flows on sparse ly grown, natural vegetative gronnd cover established on varying slop es. Overland flows are primarily intercepted by natural ground depressions and drainage swa les . The existing drainage collection system consists of a series of dry ditches and swales that convey storm waters to Dry Creek within tl1e westerly portions of the proposed development area. Drainage from a very small easterly portion of the land is naturally conveyed to Mamm Creek, which is located further east and outside of the study area. During our meeting with the City Planning and Pub li c Works Departments, staff appreciably expressed tl1eir concerns for protection and preservation of these natural water courses . Staff recommendations were in support of proper design considerations, and included protection of these environmentally sensitive corridors from drainage outfalls and discharges into streams. B. Existing Conditions The Rifle Airpark land is situated between Dty Creek and Marnm Creek, which perform as the major drainage ways in south Rifle, south of the Interstate Highway 70 Corridor. Naturally occurring soil erosions, caused by lack of dense vegetative ground covers, trigger sediment transport into these major drainage ways. Very little to no stabilizatio n work and effort is made to alleviate or reduce the sediment deposits in these major drainage ways. The site within our study area generates runoff as sheet flows across the land, which is then collected by tl1e existing natural swales and ground depressions . While a portion of the flow is dispersed through the gronnd by natural percolations, the remaining runoff is generally conveyed through an overland flow to tl1e northwest portions of the property . C. Proposed Sto rm water Management Plan Our proposed drainage mitigation system plan will consist of adequate overlot grading, open and closed collection systems, and cascaded detention/pretreatment and temperature stabilization ponds capable of handling initial to moderate frequency storms. Additionally, flood proofing guidelines will be provided to protect the habitat area from major storm events . The initial drainage studies were based on the proposed impermeable surfaces provided in the master plan prepared for this development. The collection system layout indicates major collection components of the system. Flow calculations were computed for 25·year storm events using the Soil Conservation Service TR-55 method for each delineated sub- SDPRIS ENGINEERING • llC civll consultants 502 M1ln St111t Su lh A3 Cubcindal• Colondci 8 1623 (970)704·03 1 1 Fu :f970)704·0313 .. e e i •• . . FutureJ • Commen:ial!Aitport • !e,fu~;! /~eleral Service • Gl'rfii&icJ Couniy Hegionel A1!'pcr( Future Industrial o General Service \ 23A< . J __ \ : P. u. D. Plan : Garfield County Airport Industrial Park Complex Legend c:J Airport Boundary c:::J Airport lndislTial Park [_~_; CityofRif/e c 25050U i,UW i,500 2,000 2,bUU ::s,u':'eet Xcel Lines Xcel Structures Xcel Substations . · . E:'.':E AG/OPEN SPACE z. - . ·. ~ COMM!CONVENIEN~ D ~1NousrR1Js vc !'.£-=JI COMM/OFFICE RESEARCH D MOBILE HOME PARK ~ PUBUCADMINIFACIUTIES D REC/CAMPER PARK D RESIDENTIAUSINGLE FAMILY 1 11 le l 11 I! tf CJ)/' ...... ~f , I G . ,.,{'> )' .. l I I I/ ~\ \ D. Plan: !Id County Airport ·trial Park Coma/ex • • ~ •• ~ • ~ .. 4 • Jl I ··-~~ Legend P. U. D. Plan: Land U City of Rifle 1-~-...;:~j AG/OPEN SPACE --··-lndusrial Park Boundary Airport Boundary ··················-·····•··-·Ciiii·-··4---·~·· •···•···•· ¢' P. U. D. Plan: Garlield County Airport Industrial Park Complex 0 .. ·, ~ : Gra fi •l d C cJ1;1oty fl itQ'!O /l f./ A.l rR or t . . . . : :: : . ·.-:: ·:· ..... .... ••• 1 ..... '.coo 2,()00 t Nt<:/t *ju•ls 0.2$ mllff .., .· -__ ...... -·-·~·.&.-_ ....... -..... .--·-··-·--............. ---- f>)A-r ~I~ G/M l (CYS o '.'\ plu., \rw+- ,, ~~ t>J._dd ~ ~~+. P. u. D. Plan: Land U•• IL.~[~ Clly of Rift< [ ~ • .ej Aa/OPEll SPACE -•-M• lloduolttl Poll< Boulldll'f m COMWCOllVENIENCE A!TAJL -Allpo~ -'Y r:rr.r:n ··-tMity LIM ~ COMMllllOU$TRW. ave t.000 FHt ~ COMllJOl'!'lCf tl!S!AltCH llIIlllilll MOetlE !IOME PAAIC ~ PUBUC.t.OlllNIFN:IUTI!S ~ llf~UPE!l,Alll< ~ ll!!Slll!llTIAIJSIHGLI '"-"IL Y -----------------------· ·-·· ---------·--------··· ----------,~.-·-----;,, ;;:t·-.. -·----·-~ !Pa U. !Da Plan: Garfiel d County Airpr;rl Industrial Park Complex 1,000 500 ,.....7i1'§$i# : :. . :, ; ~ .. : · ..... . ;• ~: ". ' r t !;. -. ftl O·fCIJ ~ G·.~.HH·~: Re!t~l(;..tJ.('J.~ I fi-"li'U!'l I r / f / ·--, !-'!·;-;· /-- / \. \' .. ~/ ' ;---· -· ,( ·~ I Legend P. U. D. Plun : L and Use .,~··""; -~ ~#! : . • City oi Rm o -7 ~ AG/OPEN SPACE ~ ......... . -.. -.. m · ln du srial Pork Boundory t1fr'1.'lfj;;J COMM /CONVENIENCE R ETAIL ---A irport Boundary ,.. ____ "ii f = Road & BriC ge Sh~P '--~-... .,. .. v-->l-·--...•-Util ity Lin e Mt-8 COMM/INDUSTRI AL SV C fF'jJ~l CCMMIOFFIC E RESEARCH l!llllillill MOBILE HOME PARK 1,000 2,000 .3,WU ,!Feet ----;:> ~ RECiCAMPER PARK 4* 1 in(:JJ equars 0.25 milss ITililJ RESIDENTIAL/SINGLE F AM ILY .!' / ;' I / ..// r . -, , t i 1 -.1 l .... .., ' •. OBSTRUCTION DATA SHEET ODS 6741 GARFIELD COUNTY AIRPORT RIFLE, COLORADO DIGITIZED FROM OC'6741 SURVEYED JONE 1991 2ND EDITION PREPARED AND DISTRIB UTED BY THE NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE U.S . DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE FOR THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ATTENTION See SPECIAL NOTICES in "Dates of Latest Editions, Airport Obstruction Charts -Obstruction Data Sheets," for possible corrections. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Apministration (NOAA) publications are available through NOAA Distribution Branch (N/CG33), National Ocean Service, Riverdale, MD 20737. Telephone: 301-436-6990 .. .. , .. OBSTRUCTION DATA SHEET The Obstruction Data Sheet (ODS) provides digital obstruction and runway data for use in aircraft arrival and departure planning. This information has been obtained using field survey and photogrammetric methods by the Photogram- metry Branch of the National Ocean Service in accordance with Federal Aviation Regulations Part 77 (FAR-77), 11 Qbjects Affecting Navigable Airspace 11 and FAA Nr. 405, "Specifications -Airport Obstruction Chart and Related Products.11 The ODS is a derivative of the Airport·Obstruction Chart (OC). The source OC is indicated on the ODS cover. All objects, both obstructing and nonobstruct- ing, that carry an elevation on the OC are listed in the ODS. The ODS (and OC) depict a representation of objects that existed at the time of the QC field survey. ODS information is arranged as follows: 1. Objects located in FAR-77 approach (including supplemental approaches if present) or primary areas are listed with the associated runway {reference runway). ror example, all objects in the Runway 9R · approach or primary ar~ listed with Runway 9R. Distances to these objects are compute<;( from both the physical end .and th res ho 1 d of Runway 9R. Objects in the Runway 27l approach or primary are listed with Runway 27l. (Obj~cts in the common 9R/27L primary area are · 1 i sted with both runw~ys. ) · 2. All objects not included in 11 1" above are listed with the Airport Reference Point (ARP). 3. Runway configuration and runway lengths, widths, and elevations are presented on the ODS last page. The FAR-77 imaginary approach surfaces for which the obstruction surveys were performed are coded in the ODS as follows (see footnote 2 on page 3): A(V) ..••. Utility runway -visual approach only A(NP) •••• Utility runway -nonprecision instrument approach B(V) ••••• Nonutility rynway -visual approach only C •...•.•. Nonutility runway -nonprecision instrument approach with visibility minimums greater than 3/4 mile D •.•••••. Nonutility runway -nonprecision instrument approach with visibility minimums as low as 3/4 mile PIR •••••. Precision instrument runway SUPLC ••• Supplemental C underlying a B(V) FAR-77 imaginary surface dimensions are defined on page 2 of this report. Primary surface width is determined .by the widest approach at the two approach/primary interfaces for that runway. 1 2 0 0 .. L 0 0 0 .. A ~ 0 0 '! .. DIM A a 0 E -HORIZONTAL SURFACE.._ 150 FEET ABOVE ESTABLISHED AIRPORT ELEVATION . 20'1 CONICAL SURFACE ITEM ISVAI. RUNWAY A WIOTH OF PRlllARY SURFACE AND APPROACH SURFACE WIDTH AT 250 500 500 500 INNER ENO RADIUS OF HORIZONTAL SURFACE 5 000 5 000 5000 IODOO D 1,000 10000 VISUAL HOH-PRfCISION APPROACH INSTRUM NT APPROACH A APPROACH SURFACE WIDTH AT ENO 1,250 1,500 2.000 APPROACH SURFACE LENGTH S,000 5,000 5,000 APPROACll SLOPE 20• I 20•1 ZO•I A· UTILITY RUNWAYS 8· RUNWAYS LARGER THAN UTILITY C· VISIBILITY lllNINUNS GREATER THAN 3/4 MILE D· VISIBILITY MINIMUMS AS LOW AS 314 lllLE a 3,500 4,000 10,000 10,000 34of 34•1 PRECISION INSTRUMENT RUNWAY 1,000 10 000 PRECISION 1NSTRUllENT APPROACH 16000 • a PRECISION INSTRUlllENT APPROACH SLOPE IS 50•1 FOR INNER 10,000 FEET AHO 40•1 FOR AN ADDITIONAL 40,000 FEET PRECISION INSTRUllENT APPROACtl Yl$UU OR NON PRECISION APPROACH .!.A 1 ISOMETRIC VIEW OF SECTION A-A FAR-77 CIVIL AIRPORT IMAGINARY SURFACES ISLOPE-El ANNOTATION OF ODS DATA FORMAT . oc xxxx AIRPORT ELEVATION XXXX x1 x2 xxxx;xxxx 3 xxxxxx.xxx 4 xxxxxxx.xxx 4 xxxxxxx 5 xxxx;xxxx 6 xxxxxx.xxx 7 xxxxxxx.xxx 7 OBJECT xxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx ---ci+ I ----- f t LAT LONG A8 ELEV 9 AGLlO HAR 11 HAT 11 HAA 11 DEND 12 DTHR 12 DCLN 12 PNTR 13 xxxxxx.xxx xxxxxxx.xxx xx xxxx xxxx xxx xxx xxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxxx.xxx xxxxxxx.xxx xx xxxx xxxx xxx xxx xxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx f_ Afi-1)' APPfiO 'ACH SUf1FAC£ ******************** I I HAR HAT I I RUNWAY PK~ END DISP7!HRESHOlO i" IV I I HM J' AIRPORT '\°' \ I I \ . ...... . (NOT 10 SCALE) I DENO---------Elevations and distances are in feet I DTHR I ·~ e e w 4 EXPLANATION Of ·FOOTNOTES 1 Data block identifier. If a runway number is entered (reference runway), this data block will contain data pertinent to the reference runway and to objects in the FAR-77 approach and primary area of the reference runway. If ARP is entered, this data block will contain the ARP position and data relative to all objects not in an FAR-77 approach or primary area. 2 For the reference runway, the lowest FAR-77 approach surface for which an · obstruction survey was performed. (More than one surface may be surveyed.) 3 Reference runway approach physical end elevation/touchdown zone elevation 4 Latitude and longitude of reference runway approach physical end 5 Reference runway geodetic azimuth reckoned clockwise from south 6 Reference runway displaced threshold elevation/touchdown zone elevation 7· Latitude and longitude of reference runway displaced threshold 8 Accuracy Code: Horizontal 1 = 20 2 = 40 Vertical A= 2 B = 5 c = 20 9 Mean Sea Level (MSL) elevation at top of object . This value includes 15 feet added to noninterstate roads, 17 feet added .to interstate roads, and 23 feet added to railroad tracks. IO Height above ground level (AGL). AGLs are provided only for those objects appearing on the OC that are equal to, or greater than, 200 feet AGL. AGL accuracy is ±10 fe et. 11 HAA -Height above airport HAR -Height above reference runway approach physical end HAT -Height above reference runway touchdown zone elevation 12 DENO -Distance along reference runway centerline from point perpendicular to object to reference runway approach physical end DTHR -Distance along reference runway centerline from point perpendicular to object to reference runway threshold DCLN -Distance left (L) or right (R) of reference runway centerline as observed facing forward in a landing aircraft. A negative value for DENO or DTHR indicates object is i n primary area on roll-out side of zero distance point. 13 PNTR -Penetration of indicated FAR-77 approach or primary surface {see footnote 2). r. .. OC6741 AIRPORT ELEVATION 5544 8 SUPLC 5457/5494 393136.521N 1074419.360W 2725022 OBJECT LAT LONG A ELEV AGL HAR HAT HAA DEND DTHR DCLN PNTR WINDSOCK 393130.62 1074250.47 lA 5568 111 74 24 -6987 250R 24 GROUND 393131.49 1074259.21 lA .5539 82 45 -5 -6298 196R 2 BUSH 393135.52 1074300.23 lA 5544 87 50 0 -6198 207L 9 . . GROUND 393132.00 1074313.54 lA 5524 67 30 -20 -5174 201R 2 WINDSOCK 393133.78 1074355.51 lA 5499 42 5 -45 -1881 184R 19 BUSH 393137.31 1074356.98 lA 5482 25 -12 -62 -1747 167L -GROUND 393134.03 1074401.61 lA 5475 18 --19 -69 -1402 183R OL ON LOCALIZER 393136.82 1074427.16 lA 5458 1 -36 -86 612 OR -11 ON ON DME ANTENNA 393134.22 1074427.43 lA 5457 0 -37 -87 620 264R .. -12 26 SUPLC 5544/5544 393133.085N 1074250.165W 0925119 OBJECT LAT LONG A ELEV AGL HAR HAT HAA DEND DTHR DCLN PNTR GROUND 393134.03 1074401.61 lA 5475 -69 -69 '-69 -:5596 183L 1 BUSH 393137.31 1074356.98 lA 5482 -62 -62 -62 -5250 · 167R 4 WINDSOCK 393133.78 1074355.51 lA 5499 -45 -45 -45 -5117 184L 19 GROUND 393132.00 1074313.54 lA 5524 -20 -20 -20 -1824 201L 2 BUSH 393135.52 1074300.23 lA 5544 0 0 0 -800 207R 9 GROUND 393131.49 1074259.21 lA 5539 -5 -5 -5 -700 196L 2 WINDSOCK 393130.62 1074250.47 lA 5568 24 24 24 -11 250L 24-GROUND 393132.BB 1074245.07 lA 5548 4 4 4 400 lL -2 POLE 393137.65 1074212.44 lA 5600 56 56 56 2930 609R -24 TREE 393134;62 1074209.27 lA 5593 49 49 49 3193 315R -39 FENCE POST 393125~93 1074206.62 lA 5608 64 64 64 34:44 553L -31 FENCE POST 393121.12 1074140.61 2C 5653 109 109 109 5505 937L -47 Page 5 OC6741 AIRPORT ELEVATION 5544 ARP 393134.805N 1074334.762W OBJECT LAT LONG A ELEV AGL HAA MAG BEARING DISTANCE ' LIGHTED WINDSOCK 393128.15 1074334.74 lA 5522 -22 167 35 674 ROD ON AIRPORT BEACON 393121.93 1074335.93 lA 5548 4 171 44 1306 OL ON NDB TOWER 393139.77 1074253.47 lA 5586 42 68 53 3274 TRANSMISSION TOWER 393100.35 1074405.15 lB 5758 214 202 2 4222 TREE 393051.42 1074320.07 lB 5730 186 153 0 4538 POLE 393127.57 1074233.87 lA 5576 32 86 25 4828 e TRANSMISSION TOWER 393121. 06 1074441.87 lB .. 5554 10 242 53 5439 TREE 393055.25 1074423.41 lB 5930 386 211 19 5527 TREE 393049.90 1074241.78 lB 5715 171 125 17 6155 TREE 393026.88 1074318.26 2C 6073 529 157 2 6994 GROUND 393053.97 1074213.85 lB 5730 186 110 47 7568 TRANSMISSION TOWER 393047.34 1074451. 31 2C 6251 707 219 2 7685 OL ON POLE 393048.65 1074453.26 2C 6230 686 220· 30 7724 TREE 393050.63 1074503.69 2C 6173 629 225 2 8279 TREE 393009.79 1074348.71 2C 5912 368 174 57 8671 TRANSMISSION TOWER 393043.98 1074504.37 2C 6310 76f~ 221 30 8704 TREE 393046.16 1074203.12 2C 5918 374 112 7 8707 TREE 393243.28 1074456.74 2C 5648 104 304 53 9448 TREE 393009.64 1074432.36 2C 5908 364 195 21 9728 TREE 393050.06 1074525.55 2C 6177 633 230 10 9792 TRANSMISSION TOWER 393039.99 1074519.74 2C 6318 774 223 44 9922 POLE 393018.18 1074507.75 2C 6275 731 210 56 10641 TRANSMISSION TOWER 393112.51 1074120.17 lB 5781 237 89 46 10786 e TRANSMISSION TOWER 393036.10 1074534 .. 85 2C 6329 785 225 27 11129 Page 6 -~ N I EL .5457 E Cl.I =-==:::::::::::::::7'~0~00~X~~7O~O~P~A~VE~O==A~A~P:<$$(1~9~9~1~}:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::==~,.::s ARPT ELEV. 5544 FT. GARFIELD COUNTY AIRPORT RIFLE, COLORADO (NOT TO SCALE} TOUCHDOWN ZONE RUNWAY ELEVATION 8 5494 26 5544 FAR Part 77 Imaginary Surfaces Once the runway classification and type of approach are determined, the dimensions of the imaginary surfaces can be identified. The various imaginary surfaces are defined below and shown in Figures 2-2 and 3-5. Primary Surface -A primary surface is longitudinally centered on a runway. When the runway has a specially prepared hard surface, the primary surface extends 200 feet beyond each end of the runway. When the runway has no specially prepared hard surface, or planned hard surface, the primary surface ends at the runway end. The width of the primary surface ranges from 250 feet for utility runways with visual approaches to 1000 feet for precision instrument runways. The width of the primary surface will be the width prescribed for the most precise existing or planned approach for either end of that runway. The elevation of any point on the primary surface is the same as the elevation of the nearest point on the runway centerline. The primary surface should be free of any object or activity that does not have to be located there. Runway light fixtures are an example of objects that have to be located in the primary surface. Primary surfaces are normally completely within the boundaries of an airport and therefore under the direct control of the airport owner. Being under the direct control of he airport owner, these surfaces are usually not specifically listed in hazard zoning regulations. Approach Surface -Approach surfaces are longitudinally centered on a runway centerline and extend outward and upward from either end of the primary surface. An approach surface is applied to each runway end based upon the most precise type of existing or planned approach for that runway end. The inner edge of the approach surface is the same width as the primary surface and expands uniformly to widths ranging from 1,250 feet to 16,000 feet depending on the runway classification and type of approach. Each approach surface extends for a horizontal distance varying from 5,000 feet to 50,000 feet with approach slopes ranging from 20: 1 (20 feet horizontally for each 1 foot vertically) to 50:1, also depending on the runway classification and type of approach. Transitional Surface -Transitional surfaces extend ou~ard .and upward ~t? slope of7:1 from the edges of the primary surface and approach surfaces to the horizontal surface. For a precision approach surface that projects through and beyond the limits of the conical surface, a transitional surface also extends 5000 feet horizontally from the edges of those portions of the approach surface. Horizontal Surface -The horizontal surface is a horizontal plane 150 feet above the established airport elewtion that extends from the transitional surface to the conical surface. The perimeter is constructed by swinging arcs from the center of each end of the primary surface of each runway and then connecting the arcs with tangent lines. The radius of each arc is 5,000 feet for utility or visual runways and 10,000 feet for all others. The radii of the arcs at each runway end are the same and are determined by the higher value for either end of the runway. Conical Surface -The conical surface extends outward arrl upward from the periphery of the horizontal surface at a slope of 20: 1 for a horizontal distance of 4000 feet. 36 Figure 3-5: Imaginary surfaces Plan View Conical Surface Horizontal Sutface Primary Surface Profile View Primary Surface ground level ........ ~---~ 150' Above RW Figure 3-6: Imaginary Surface Technical Matrix 37 fl'" Graphical Depiction Horizontal Surface Approach Surface Conical Surface \ Transi t/ional Surface Primary Surface CEE 4674 -Airport Planning and Design - ~--':--:_:_~ ,...~ -· ., . \-' : -:.... 9 of 28 e e ~ ---. ./:;;;/ti ~-1-. ' ~ . _,,,,,.,. . FAR Part 77 Imaginary Surfaces -·~-~-~ '\ - • Primary== aligned (longitudinally) with each r unway and extends 200 ft. from each runway end • Approach == longitudinally centered with the runway and extends beyond the primary surface • Horizontal== horizontal plane 150 ft. above tl1e established airport elevation. Constructed by swinging arcs around the end of the primary surface • Conical== 20: 1 slope surface extending beyond the horizontal surface • Transitional== constructed to join approach and horizontal or approach and transitional surfaces C E E 467 4 -Airport Planning and Design 8 of 2 8 e e e 32 Ai rp ort s an d the Newes t Generation of Gene ral Aviat ion Ai rcraft RPZ M inimum Facllltles B-1 (1 M ile) RPZ 250' x 1,000' x 450' Runway 3,200' x 60' 250' x 1,000' x 450' All Small A ircraft RPZ B-11 (1 M ila) RPZ 250' x 1,000' x 450' Runway 3,360' x 7S 250' x 1,000' x 450' Cffi E -:-:?~Z=·'~!: ~~~ ~ ~=:J OFA --OFA --Of'A --OFA --OFA RPZ 1,000' x 1,700' x 1,510' M inmum Facilities w ith Improved Approach B-1 (3/4 M lle) Runway 3,200' x 60' A ll Small Aircraft w ith Improved Approach B-11 (3/4 Mile) Runway 3,360' x 7 5' All Small A ircraft with Precision Approach B-11 (112 M ile) Runway 4,200' x 100' --OF> --OFt. --or• --OfA --OfA ---__ .....,,.. ------------__ .....,.. --- --OFA --°"' --OFA --°"' --OFA ---... ---Runway Safety Area --""' Runway Object Free Ania --on Runway Object Free Zone --RU.CR Runway Safety Area/Runway Object Free Zone Source: FAA Ad visory Circu lar 150/5300-13, Airport Design. Figure 5-1. Minimum facility requirements for new generation GA aircraft. RPZ 1,000' x 1,700' x 1,510' 32 Airp ort s an d t he New est Ge ne rat ion of Gen er al Av iation Air cr aft RPZ Minimum Facllltlas B-1 (1 Mile) RPZ 250' x 1,000' x 450' Runway 3,200' x 60' 250' x 1,000' x 450' All Small A ircraft RPZ B-11 (1 Mile) RPZ 250' x 1,000' x450' Runway 3,360' x7S 250' x 1,000' x450' Cffii,:: !~;=e-~~·" -ii~~ °""' --oFo\ -----o•• --OF• RPZ 1,000' x 1,700' x 1 ,510' M inmum Facilities w ith lmpruved Approadi B-1 (314 Mlle) Runway 3 ,200' x 60' All Small Aircraft with Improved Approach B-11 (3/4 Mile) Runway 3,360' x 75' All Small A ircraft with Precision Approach B-11 (112 Mile) Runway 4 ,200' x 100' --oFo\ -----or• -----OF• --OFA -----OFA --0FA --OFA ---... ---Runway Safety Area --"'" Runway Object Free Area --on Runway Object Free Zone --........, Runway Safety Area/Runway Object Free Zone Source : FAA Advisory Ci rcu lar 150/5300-13 , Airport De sign . Figure 5-1. Minimum facility requirements for new generation GA aircraft. RPZ 1,000' x 1,700' x 1 ,510' -------+--..:- '\ ... .i~1 / Jfl-@!l !-),,.'."~~/ II :)! .... (; I ; I @I .233 @J .,,,.---: "' :'f ~I ~(~ ,. / ' ,;; ·--""'---___)__ . / ~ .. , ----:; I / ~-~-.. /~I ·. , I ~ ., I ·~ , I Garfield County Regional Airport Approach Surfaces, Rifle, Colorado 1m~F:~.nly iJ~. .. ~r Legend ~ 1, ; r ! ... ·· C=3 Airport Boundary r~-.~J City or Town T·: ,~, ~ ,~ .\§J ~t ' ,•• -1 ~ J If·---l -~··(f~·::i:~ -- -@l ' / / @] / .......... ·;" ·::' ··~ ........................ . , , RPZ =Runway Protection Zone NOTE: tn the event that any ptoperty East of the section line bet'Neen Township 6 !!Outh and Range 91 West and Township 6 South and Range 92 West is annexed by the City of Rifle &fldlor becomes subject to the City's subdivision authOfity. the city and county agree to amend this map aceordiniiy ----•- Gorffo/d Counry Rtglon•I Airpon Saurco; 1. Garfield Counfl' R<tgion .. Airport Oll-Airpol1 Llllld Us. PLan. Isbill A.soc:i Ai"pon Conaul .,1•. EngJ.vwood. CO. (M:.y 111119). ...... ._ ..... ·-