The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1.0 Application• • LOY ALE. LEAV ENWORTH SANDER N . KARP JAMES S . NEU KARL J. HANLON MICHAEL J. SAWYER JAMES F. FOSNAUGHT SUSAN W. LAATSCH ANNAS. ITENBERG CASSIA R. FURMAN JENNIFER M . SMITH ROSALIE C. OLSON T. DAMIEN ZUMBRENNEN Mr. Fred Jarman LEAVENWORTH & KARP, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 201 14 rn STR EET, S U IT E 200 P. 0. ORA W ER 2030 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, C OLORADO 81602 Telephone: (970) 945-2261 Facs imile: (970) 945-73 36 kjh @ lklawfirm.co m July 25, 2008 Garfield County Building and Planning I 08 Eighth Street Glenwood Springs, CO 8160 I Re: Glenwood Commercial Center Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: • D E NVER OFFICE :* 70 0 WASHINGTON ST. STE 702 DE NV E R, COLORADO 80203 T e lephon e: (303) 825-399 5 *(Plea se direc t all corresp ondence to our Glenw oo d Sprin gs Office) We represent Glenwood Commercial, LLC, a Colorado Ii ia company (the "Applicant"). In 2005, Glenwood Commercial, LLC submitted a Sketch Plan to the Garfield County Building and Planning Department. The Sketch Plan for a re s f the Glenwood Commercial Center Subdivision, to create the Glenwood Commercial Condominiums, was reviewed in May 2005. This letter accompanies the submission of the Preliminary Plan for resubdivision. While more than a year has elapsed since the Sketch Plan review, no ch anges have been made to the Plan. As such, the Applicant is requesting you accept the Preliminary Plan Application for review. The project consists of four buildings: Buildings I and 2 are l ocated on Lot I , Building 3 is located on Lot 2, and Building 4 is located on Lot 3. Buildings I and 2 will be divided into 20 units each; Building 3 will be divided into 24 units; and Building 4 will b e divided into 28 units. There are also 7 outside equipment units. The total number of commercial condo spaces for the project is 99. The project proposes a total of 180 off-street parking spaces, a s demonstrated on the attached Plat. All lots and parcels created in the Glenwood Commerc ial Condominiums will have easements for access to a public right-of-way. The project has a cu rrent CDOT access permit for ingress and egress, and the required improvements for such access have been completed. Enclosed is a copy of the CDOT Access Permit for the project. All areas of the proposed subdivision presenting hazards or requiring special precautions have been identified. The subject site currently has the four ( 4) buildings proposed either completed • • LEAVENWORTH & KARP, P .C . Page 2 (Buildings 1-3) or under construction (Building 4). As part of the Building Permit submittal, all special conditions were addressed including geotechnical issues. The current application contains the Drainage, Utility and Erosion Control Plans. All improvements required as part of the Building Permit process have been constructed. Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional information. KJH/rco Enclosure(s) cc: Glenwood Commercial, LLC V ery truly yours, LEAVENWORTH & KARP, P.C. 1. Authorization Letter 2. Applic ation 3. State Highway Access Permit -Colorado Department of Transportation 4. Final Drainage Report -JLB Engineering Consultants 5. Preliminary Geotechnical Study -HP Geotech 6. Subsoil Study for Retaining Wall Design -HP Geotech 7. Review of Proposed Retaining Walls -HP Geotech 8. Recommendations for Mechanically Stabilized Earch Retaining Wall Design -HP Geotech 9. Declarations for Glenwood Commercial Center Subdivision 10. Adjoining Property Owner List • • 1:\2 008\C lient s\PrinceC rk \7-G W C0111111-3229\Docu111 c nt s\Submitta l lndex.wpd • GLENWOOD COMMERCIAL, LLC P. 0. Box 700 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Mr. Fred Jarman Garfield County Building and Planning 108 Eighth Street Glenwood Springs , CO 81601 Dear Mr. Jarman: July 22, 2008 Please be advised that we have retained the law firm of Leavenworth & Karp, P.C. in connection with a Preliminary Plan for the resubdivision of the Glenwood Commercial Center Subdivision to create the Glenwood Commercial Condonimiums for the property owned by Glenwood Commercial, LLC at 2550 Highway 82, Glenwood Springs , Colorado. They are authorized to speak on behalf of and process the application for Glenwood Commercial, LLC. WOOD COMMERCIAL, LLC By: (~ David Hicks, Authorization Representative • • • GARFIELD COUNTY Building & Planning Department 108 81h Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs , Colorado 81601 RECEIVED Telephone : 970.945 .8212 Facsim ile : 970.384.3470 JUL 2 5 2008 GARFIELDc BUILDING & p:i~N~~ · www.garfield-county.com SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM Doc.#£ppqzai suso1v1s10N NAME : C7 /ef\c.0ood ComrY1.R(C _r'0-\ CetT-/fr S().bd/u /<6>°rYY'- Type (Choose only one): Sketch Plan ><: Preliminary Plan Final Plat GENERAL IN FOR MATI ON (P lease print legibly) > Mailing Address:2520 5 (..,ro.....J.. S,v.k z.oo > City: & hJ S State: _le> Zip Code : > E-mail address: J~. vl<-s e,;pn'.ou ('Ce ek I~ Telephone: {!ao_) ]'Ll'S-"1.'i'IS- '8 /60 / Cell: ( __ ) ___ _ FAX :(_) __ _ > Name of Owner's Representative. if any, (Attorney, Planner. Consultant , et c): > f< rJ..R.[ T IJA-Alf 0A1 > Mailing Address : 'P; 0. 3n;x 77'0 Telephone : ~) Cfl/5-2 2' / > City: ~ L.JS State : L1.2 Zip Code: 5(/b<2z Cell : ( __ ) ___ _ > E-mail address : kjh 62 Ill Ir. 1...1£i'r-1M . (oy1..., FAX :0UQ_)9~~73J' > Name of Engineer: > Mailing Address : ____________ Telephone : ( __ ) ____ _ > City: State :_ Zip Code : Cell: ( __ ) ___ _ > E-mail address : FAX : ( __ ) ___ _ > Name of Surveyor: J;>-Mailing Address : ____________ Telephone: ( __ ) ____ _ > City: State : _Zip Code : Cell: ( __ ) _____ , > E-mail address : FAX : ( __ ) ___ _ > Name of Planner: > Mailing Address: ____________ Telephone : ( __ ) ____ _ > City : State : _Zip Code : Cell : ( __ ) _____ 1 > E-mail address : FAX: ( __ ) ___ _ L ast Re vised 711 108 • GENERAL INFORMATION continued ... >-Location of Property: Section 22 Township ~3 Range ~ 7 ~ 2 >-Assessor's Parcel Number: 2 -L ~ r;;---6 2 2 -n a_ -_o_J__ s=- >-Practical Location I Address of Property : :2.5 5"0 Id~..: v.. G feti '"'1(")od S p c.•'!:l q_s7 c_ lJ '81 {:fJJ >-Current Size of Property to b:Subdivided (in acres): 4, l7 >-Number of Tracts I Lots Created within the P roposed Subdivision : '()j.1 1,'J~J 1->"'+D (1 CerhdO t4-,..;-.-J.-s 'O L.ofs >-Property Current Land Use Designation: 1. Property's Current Zone District: &n-~~l:l'-~·c.1 ~rev( 2 . Comprehensive Plan Map Designation: ~~<:e~l'""' . ..-l ~ Proposed Utility Service: >-P reposed Water Source: C ; fy ob: GI"'" !&1!2<> J S:-f' n ;,~ S >-(See "Attachment C" to be completed with Pr:limi~j Plan A ~cation) >-Proposed Method of Sewage Disposal : G ~-~l e.h. ~'11-JF)rl $.., r.·l\.a. <; • :S ~c ... Je--/ u I (] >-Proposed Public Access VIA: l+1 7 j(2._ ~ Easements: Utility : Ditch: >-Total Development Area (fill in the appropriate boxes below): (1) Residential Units I Lots Size {Acres) Parking Provided <> 0 s Family / Duplex Multi-Family Mobile Home Ww WU.1 WF Total / % Floor Area {sg. ft.) Size {Acres) Parking Provided (2) commercial <@ 'l2..,GJ20 4 JCj /~O (3) Industrial - (4) Public I Quasi-Public (5) O~en S~ace I Common Area iA>,y<-' ,, K:> <'+ « Total • >-Base Fee : Sket ch P lan -$325 .00 ; Preliminary Plan -$675.00 ; Fi nal Plat -$200 ~ Plat Review Fee (see attached fee schedule) • • • I. THE SUBDIVISION PROCESS In order to subdivide land in Garfield County, an Applicant is required to complete the following land use processes in the following order: 1) Sketch Plan Review Process, 2) Preliminary Plan Review Process , and 3) Final Plat Review Process. This section will briefly describe the nature of each process and provide general direction including subdivision regulation citations to a potential applicant requesting subdivision approval in Garfield County. All of the Garfield County Zoning and Subdivision Regulations are located for purchase at the Planning Department and can also be found on the World Wide Web at the following address: http ://www .garfield-countv.com/building and planning/index .htm A) The Sketch Plan Review (Section 3 :00 of the Subdivision Regulations) 1. Purpose The purpose of the Sketch Plan process is to allow an individual an opportunity to propose a subdivision in a "sketch" format to the Planning Department and the Garfield County Planning Commission in order to obtain a cursory review for compliance with the County's land use review documents, regulations, and policies to identify any issues that would need to be addressed if the proposed subdivision were to be pursued. 2. Applicability Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to complete the Sketch Plan review process as the first step in Garfield County's Subdivision process . More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision (Section 2:20.48) as the division of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels or separate interests, or the use of any parcel of land for condominiums , apartments or other multiple-dwelling units, as further defined by Colorado state law. 3. Application I Submittal Requirements In order to apply for a Sketch Plan Review an Applicant is responsible for reviewing Section 3:00 of the Subdivision Regulations and providing enough information to the Planning Department in the application to conduct a thorough review and provide the resulting comments to the Planning Commission for their review and comments. Specifically, Section 3:30, 3 :32, and 3 :40 of the Subdivision Regulations contain the specific information required to be submitted to the Planning Department in order to satisfy the application requirements in addition to the information requested on this application form. 4. Process I Public Meeting The Sketch Plan review process is considered a 1-step process because the application is reviewed only by the Planning Commission at a public meeting. In order to appear before the Planning Commission, an applicant will have submitted all required application submittal requirements mentioned above to the Planning Department Staff. Once submitted, Staff will have 15 working days to review the application to determine if all the required submittal information has been submitted as required. If Staff determines that all the required information has been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed "technically complete ." 3 • • • It is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has been scheduled to be reviewed before the Planning Commission and will request the applicant supply additional copies to provide the Commission for their review. If Staff determines that all the required information has not been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application does not comply with the submittal requirements and therefore has determined the application to be "technically incomplete." The letter will also outline the applications deficiencies so that the applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted. At this point, the applicant has 6 months (180 days) to provide the necessary information to the Planning Department to remedy the application so that it may be deemed technically complete . If the application has not been deemed technically complete within this time, the application will be terminated. Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has been established as to when the Planning Comm ission will review the application, Staff will conduct a land use review of the application using the County's land use regulatory documents including the Zoning Resolution, Subdivision Regulations, and the Comprehensive Plan of 2000. In addition, Staff will also consider referral comments provided from a variety of state and local agencies who may also review the application . As a result, Staff will write a Memorandum on the proposed subdivision to the Planning Commission containing the results on the land use ana lysis. This Memorandum will also be furnished in advance to the applicant. At the date and time set for the public meet ing before the Planning Commission, Staff will present the findings in the Memorandum and the applicant will be required to present the proposed subdivision and respond to comments and questions provided by the Planning Commission. The comments provided to the Applicant by the Planning Department and the Planning Commission as a result of the Sketch Plan Process will be kept on file in the Planning Department for 1-year from the meeting date before the Planning Commission. If an Applicant does not submit a Preliminary Plan application to the Planning Department within the 1-year timeframe, the Sketch Plan file will be closed and the Applicant will need to reapply for a Sketch Plan review prior to a Preliminary Plan review. B) Preliminary Plan Review (Section 4:00 of the Subdivision Regulations) 1. Purpose The purpose of the Preliminary Plan review process is to conduct a thorough review of the many aspects that are associated with dividing land in Garfield County for the purposes of residential, commercial, and industrial development. This is the most intensive review step where the Building and Planning Staff, the Planning Commission, and the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) will conduct a thorough review of all the issues associated with the proposed subdivision against the County's regulatory requirements . Ultimately, the purpose of this process is to identify all the major issues in the proposed subdivision by using the County's Zoning Resolution, Subdivision Regulations, Comprehensive Plan of 2000 , as well as other state and local referral 4 • • • agencies that will provide comments on any issues raised in their review. This is the process that will either approve or deny the application request. 2. Applicability Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to complete the Preliminary Plan review process as the second and most intensive step in Garfield County 's Subdivision process. More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision as the division of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots , tracts, parcels or separate interests, or the use of any parcel of land for condominiums , apartments or other multiple-dwelling units, as further defined by Colorado state law . 3. Application I Submittal Requirements In order to apply for a Preliminary Plan Review, an Applicant must have already completed the Sketch Plan review process addressed in Section 3 :00 of the Subdivision Regulations. An applicant requesting Preliminary Plan review will be required to submit this application form, all the required submittal info rmation contained in Sections 4:40 to 4 :94 of the Subdivision Regulations as well as address all of the applicable Design and Improvement Standards in Section 9:00 of the Subdivision Regulations . In addition to the substantive submittal information related to the proposed subdivision project itself, an applicant is required to complete all the public notice requirements so that legal public hearings can be held before the Planning Commission and the BOCC which is addressed in Sections 4:20 -4:31 of the Subdivision Regulations . 4. Process I Public Hearings The Preliminary Plan review process is considered a 2-step process because the application is ultimately reviewed by two County decision-making entities during public hearings : the Planning Commission who makes a recommendation to the BOCC. In order to obtain dates for the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the BOCC, an applicant will have submitted all required application submittal requirements mentioned above to the Planning Department Staff. Once submitted , Staff will have 30 working days to review the application to determine if all the required submittal information has been submitted as required. If Staff determines that all the required information has been submitted , a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed "technically complete." It is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has been scheduled to be reviewed before the Planning Commission I BOCC. Additionally , Staff will provide the applicant with the notice forms to be mailed , published, and posted. If Staff determines that all the required inform ation has not been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant ind icat ing the appli cation does not comply with the submittal 5 • • • requirements and therefore has determined the application to be "technically incomplete ." The letter will also outline the app li cations deficiencies so that the applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted. At this point, the applicant has 6 months (180 days) to provide the necessary information to the Planning Department to remedy the application so that it may be deemed technically complete . If the application has not been deemed technically complete within this time, the application will be terminated. Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has been established as to when the Planning Commission I BOCC will review the application, Staff will conduct a land use review of the application using the County's land use regulatory documents including the Zoning Resolution, Subdivision Regulations, and the Comprehensive Plan of 2000. In addition, Staff will also consider referral comments provided from a variety of state and local agencies who may also review the application. As a result, Staff will write a Memorandum on the proposed subdivision to the Planning Commission I BOCC containing the results on the land use analysis. This Memorandum will also be furnished in advance to the applicant prior to the public hearings. As mentioned above, Staff makes a recommendation to the Planning Commission and the BOCC regarding the issues raised in the analysis of the proposed subdivision. The Applicant will first propose the subdivision to the Planning Commission who is responsible for making a recommendation of approval , approval with conditions, or denial to the BOCC. Next, the application will be reviewed by the BOCC during a regular public hearing. The BOCC will consider the recommendations from the Planning Staff and the Planning Commission, the information presented by the applicant , and the public . As a result, the BOCC is the final decision-making entity regarding the proposed subdivision and will either approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application . If the BOCC approves the subdivision application at the public hearing, the approval shall be valid for a period not to exceed one (1) year from the date of Board approval, or conditional approval, unless an extension of not more than one (1) year is granted by the Board prior to the expiration of the period of approval. (See the specific information provided in Section 4:34 of the Subdivision Regulations.) Following the hearing, Staff will provide a resolution signed by the BOCC which memorializes the action taken by the Board with any I all conditions which will be recorded in the Clerk and Recorder's Office . Once an applicant has Preliminary Plan approval, they are required to complete the third and final step in the County's Subdivision Process: Final Plat Review. C) Final Plat Review (Section 5:00 of the Subdiv ision Regulations) 1. Purpose The purpose of the Final Plat review process is to provide the applicant with a mechanism to prove to the County that all the conditions of approval required during the Preliminary Plan review process have been met I addressed to the satisfaction of the Planning Staff and the BOCC . This being the case, the chairman of the BOCC will sign the Final Plat and have it recorded memorializing the subdivision approval granted by the BOCC. This is the last step in the County 's subdivision process. 6 • • • 2. Applicability Any individual proposing a subdivision in Garfield County is required to complete the Final Plat review process as the third and last step in Garfield County's Subdivision process. More specifically, Garfield County defines a subdivision as the division of a lot, tract or parcel of land into two (2) or more lots, tracts, parcels or separate interests, or the use of any parcel of land for condominiums, apartments or other multiple-dwelling units, as further defined by Colorado state law. 3. Application I Submittal Requirements In order to apply for a Final Plat review, an Applicant must have already completed the Preliminary Plan review process addressed in Section 4 :00 of the Subdivision Regulations. An applicant requesting Final Plat review will be required to submit this application form, all the required submittal information contained in Section 5 :00 of the Subdivision Regulations and responses to all the condi t ions of approval required as part of the Preliminary Plan review process. 4. Process The Final Plat review process is considered a 1-step process because the application is ultimately reviewed by the Building and Planning Staff and presented to the BOCC for their signature if the application satisfies all the required submittal information to the satisfaction of the Building and Planning Department. If Staff determines that all the required information has been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application has been deemed "technically complete." It is at this point Staff will also indicate when the application has been scheduled to be presented to the BOCC for signature. (This is not a public hearing or meeting and therefore does not require public notice.) If Staff determines that all the required information has not been submitted, a letter will be sent to the applicant indicating the application does not comply with the submittal requirements and therefore has determined the application to be "technically incomplete." The letter will also outline the app lications deficiencies so that the applicant knows what additional information needs to be submitted. Once the application has been deemed technically complete and a date has been established as to when the BOCC will review the Final Plat, Staff will review the application I Final Plat in terms of adequacy to determine if all the submittal information satisfies the Final plat requirements as well as the responses to the conditions of approval. During this review, Staff will forward the Final Plat the County Surveyor for review and a signature. In the event there are additional questions or clarification issues to be addressed, the County Surveyor will generally contact the applicant to have the plat adjusted as necessary. Once, Staff has completed the review and all required information has been submitted to the satisfaction of the Planning Department and the County Surveyor has signed the Final Plat in Mylar form, it will be scheduled at the next 7 • • • BOCC meeting to be placed on the consen t agenda with a request to authorize the Chairman of the BOCC to sign the plat. Once the Final Plat is signed, it is then recorded by the County Clerk in the Clerk and Recorder's Office for a fee of $11 for the first sheet and $10 for each additional sheet thereafter. This fee shall be paid by the applicant. This act of recording the signed Final Plat represents the completion of the Garfield County Subdivision Process. Please refer to the specific language in the Final Plat portion (Section 5:00) of the Subdivision Regulations for specific timelines and additional respons ibilities required of the applicant to complete the Final Plat process . Please Note: This information presented above is to be used as a general guide for an applicant considering a subdivision in Garfield County. It is highly recommended that an applicant either purchase the Garfield County Zoning Resolution and Subdivision Regulations or access them on-line at: http://www.garfield-county.com/building and planning/index.htm in order to ascertain all the necessary requirements for each of the three steps including Sketch Plan Review, Preliminary Plan Review, and Final Plat Review . I have read the statements above and have provid ed the required attached information which is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge. fsJ;.?~~f,) 61:/"'1 ,,.,eod ~~~c,;../ ~~t~ 7)zo/ofi 8 • GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEE SCHEDULE Garfield County, pursuant to Board of County Commissioners ("Board") Resolution No. 98-09 , has established a fee structure ("Base Fee") for the processing of each type of subdivision and land use applications. The Base Fee is an estimate of the average number of hours of staff time devoted to an application , multiplied by an hourly rate for the personnel involved. The Board recognized that the subdivision and land use application processing time will vary and that an applicant shou ld pay for the total cost of the review which may require additional billing. Hourly rates based on the hourly salary, and fringe benefits costs of th e respective positions combined with an hourly overhead cost for the office will be used to estab li sh the actual cost of County staff time devoted to the review of a particul ar project. .Actual staff time spent w ill be charged against the Base Fee. After the Base Fee ha s been expended, the applicant will be billed based on actual staff hours accrued. Any billing shall be paid in full prior to final consideration of any land use permit, zoning amendment or subdivision plan. If an applicant has previously failed to pay application fees as required, no new or additiona l applications will be accepted for processing until the outstanding fees are paid. • Checks, including the appropriate Base Fee set forth be low, must be submitted with each land use app lication , and made payable to the Garfield County Treasurer. Applications wi ll not be accepted without the required application fee. Base Fees are non-refundable in full , unle ss a written request for withdraw from the applicant is submitted prior the initial review of the application materials. Applications must include an Agreement for Payment Form ("Agreement") set forth below. The Agreement establishes the applicant as being responsible for payment of all costs associated with processing the application. The Agreement must be signed by the party responsible for payment and submitted with the application in order for it to be accepted. The complete fee schedule for subdivision and land use applications is attached . GARFIED COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT BASE FEES e The following Base Fees shall be received by th e County at the time of submittal of any procedural application to which such fees relate. Such Base Fees shall be in addition to and exclusive of any cost for publication or cost of consulting service determined necessary by the Board for the consideration of any application or additional County staff time or expense not covered by the Base Fee , which have not otherwise been paid by the applicant to the County prior to final action upon the application tendered to the County. TYPE OF PROCEDURE Vacating Public Roads & Rights-of-Way Sketch Plan Preliminary Plan Final Plat Amended Plat Exemption from the Definition of Subdivision (SB-35) Land Use Permits (Sp ecial Use /Conditional Use Permits) • Administrative/no public hearing • Board Public Hearing only • Planning Commission and Board review & hearing Zoning Amendments • • Zone District map amendment • Zone District text amendment • • • • Zone District map & text amendment PUD Zone District & Text Amendment PUD Zone District Text Amendment Comprehensive Plan Amendment Board of Adjustment • Variance • Interpretation Administrative Permits • Floodp lain Development • Pipeline Development Planning Staff Hourly Rate • Planning Director • Senior Planner • Planning Technician • Secretary County Surveyor Review Fee (includes review of Amended Plats, Final Plats, Exemption Plats) Mylar Recording Fee Page 2 BASE FEE $400 $325 $675 +application agency review fees and outside consultant review fees, as authorized pursuant to the Regulations , such as the Colorado Geo logic Survey $200 $100 $300 $250 $400 $525 $450 $300 $500 $500 $500 $450 $250 $250 $400 $400 $50.50 $40.50 $33.75 $30 Determined by Surveyor$ $11 -1 st page $ l 0 each additional p age • The following guidelines shall be used for the administration of the fee structure set forth above: 1. All applications shall be submitted with a signed Agreement for Payment form set forth below. 2. County staff shall keep accurate record of actual time required for the processing of each land use application, zoning amendment, or subdivision application. Any additional billing will occur commensurate with the additional costs incurred by the County as a result of having to take more time that that covered by the base fee. 3. Any billings shall be paid prior to final consideration of any land use permit, zoning amendment, or subdivision plan. All additional costs shall be paid to the execution of the written resolution confirming action on the application. 4 . Final Plats, Amended or Corrected Plats , Exemption Plats or Permits will not be recorded or issued until all fees have been paid. 5. In the event that the Board determines that special expertise is needed to assist them in the review of a land use permit, zoning amendment, or subdivision application , such costs will be borne by the applicant and paid prior to the final consideration of the application . All additional costs shall be paid prior to the • execution of the written resolution confirming action on the application . • 6. If an application involves multiple reviews , the Applicant shall be charged the highest Base Fee listed above . 7. Types of "Procedures" not listed in the above chart will be charged at an hourly rate based on the pertinent plann ing staff rate listed above. 8. The Planning Director shall establish appropriate guide l ines for the collection of Additional Billings as required . 9. This fee structure shall be revised annually as part of the County budget hearin g process . Page 3 • • • • '9 COLORADcr""GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SUBMITTAL FORM FOR LAND-USE REVIEWS County ~r c.,'<...J d Date ~/o BJ Project Name _cd=-..........,e'""-'11~i......_.'lc::>_._(!)_..d.....__~=.____,,"""~---"""'"":a....o..--""''~ ... c:..~,{,__ ______ _ APPLICANT (or Applicant's Authorized Representative responsible for pay ing CGS-review fee) Name &-l-<-Vl \.\.2 00 cL ~ iN\.e s:-c...t'c; 1 L I ( - Address 2 £2.0 5 o...__tb 6-n: ......... cl. S '"'-··k LIO Fax No. __________ _ FEE SCHEDULE Reviews for Counties I I I I /4, n, or /4 14 ___ _ Section(s) ___ _ Township ___ _ ' Range ____ _ Small Subdivision(> 3 dwellings and< 100 acres) ......................................... $700 Large Subdivision (.'.".. 100 acres and < 500 acres) ....................................... $1,550 Very Large Subdivision (500 acres or more) ............................................... $2,500 Very small residential subdivisions (1-3 dwellings and < 100 acres) ................... $590 Reviews for Municipalities ................... · ...................... At hourly rate of reviewer Special Reviews ....................................................... At hourly rate of reviewer School Site Reviews ......................................................... $855 CGS LAND USE REVIEWS Geological studies are required by Colorado counties for all subdivisions of unincorpo- rated land into parcels of less than 35 acres, under State statute C.R.S. 30-28-101 et seq. (Senate Bill 35, 1972). Some Colorado municipalities require geological studies for sub- division of incorporate,d land. In addition, local governments are empowered to regu- late development activities in hazardous or mineral-resource areas under C.R.S. 24-65 .1- 101 et seq. (House Bill 1041, 1974) and C.R.S. 34 -1-301 et seq. (House Bill 1529, 1973), respectively. Local-government agencies submit proposed subdivision applications and supporting technical reports to the Colorado Geological Survey " ... for evalua tion of those geologic factors which would have significant impact on the proposed u s e of the land," in accor- dance with State statutes. The CGS reviews the submitted documents and serves as a technical advisor to local-government planning agencies during the p lanning process. Sine~ 1984, the CGS has been required by law to recover the foll d irect cost of perform- ing such reviews. The adequate knowledge of a site's geology is essential for any development project. It is needed at the start of the project in order to plan, design, and construct a safe devel- opment. Proper planning for geological conditions can help developers and future owners/users reduce unnecessary maintenance and/ or repair costs. Colorado Geological Survey 131 3 Sherma n Street. Room 71 5, Denver, CO 80203 Ph : 303-866-261 1, Fax: 303-866-2461 hltp://geosurvey.state.co .us White c opy to CGS Yellow copy to Planning Agency Pink copy to Applicant created 3/16/98 , revised 5125/07 ' ·-···· ' '' H¥••~1 ......... ,,_,,,,,,• ' • '''' .,-.. ---·····--·· ••••••••-·-----· .~ .......... ---~-·-·-••··-·~-· ••••-• ------• ----..-·-•··--··----·-·• 1-•··--··----' • •• _.,,_::;..,_.,_,,,. ... _. ,,...,, .. , ___ .• , ~--·-~,.... •' ----·-----~·-•••'><_,,_. ____ _,,_,. ____ ·~----·- 2 3 4 • 5 6 • e ·e Frequently Asked Questions and Answers Regarding the CGS Land Use Review Process Why am I required to have a CGS review when I already /tired and paid for tm; own consultant? In 1972, Senate Bill 35 was passed stating that any person or entity subdividing a property into parcels of 35 acres or less on unincorporated land must submit geologic or geoteclmical reports to the County as part of the preliminary plat application process. Municipalities or public agencies may request that CGS review a site, although these reviews are not governed by the statute. Why is a CGS review necessary when I already hired my own geo logist? The CGS review is an independent third-party review that is done for the County, similar to the service a building inspector provides for construction review. The purpose of the CGS review is to ensure th at all geologic concerns have been adequa,tely identified and addressed in the geologic reports and that the proposed development is feasible. W1zy does CGS charge for land 11se reviews? Doesn't taxpayer money pay for this service? CGS land use reviews are not subsidized through the general fund, although some other review agencies are supported by taxpayer money. In 1984 the state legislature decided that CGS reviews should be paid for with fees paid by the applicant of the proposed development so that taxpayers are not viewed as subsidizing development. Did the CGS geologist make a field visit to the site? A CGS geologist visits each site being reviewed. If the review is a re-submittal for a site that has been visited previously, a second site visit may not be necessary . If significant changes have occurred since the initial review, the site may be visited again. Why is the CGS review letter so short and simple? What is my fee paying for? The CGS Jetter is a review of the geologic material submitt ed and reflects the level of detail contained in those documents. CGS does not offer designs, but rather ensures that the work that has been done is meaningful and adequate for the site conditions and proposed development. A site review that adequately addresses all the geologic conditions present at the site may be a short confirmation letter. If more work needs to be done or if difficult site conditions are present, the letter n:iay be longer. What ti;pe of information do I need to submit to CGS for a land use review? The more geologic information that is submitted to CGS, the easier it is for CGS to evaluate the property. The required documents may vary based on county requirements and the potential problems that may impact the proposed deve lo pment. A topographic map is essential. Also, information regarding slope, surficial materials, subsurface materials and bedrock, presence of groundwater and depth, and specific geolo gic hazards should be included, where applicable. Grading plans, drainage planq, and geotechnical testing results are also very helpful for the review. The presence of geologic hazards should be evaluated with respect to the development plan. Also, the effect of development on geologic conditions should be discussed. The evaluation should include alternatives such as avoidance and mitigation techniques . 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 The subdivision down the road was approved, why wasn't mine? There could be several reasons: geologic conditions can change over short distances; subdivisions made prior to 1972 were not required to undergo a CGS review and may have not been evaluated for geologic suitability at all; the area down the road may be incorporated as part of a municipality, which exempts it from the CGS review process. Another consideration is that geologic reviews are continually evolving and site conditions that have been judged acceptable in the past may no longer be considered as such, based on the current understanding of the geologic processes and adverse impacts associated with them. Why are CGS reznews required even on lo w-density properties? Senate Bill 35 pertains to subdivisions of less than 35 acres. Geologic hazards can occur ori large-scales or small-scales; relying on low-density subdivision can not mitigate all geologic hazards. For instance, entire hillsides might be prone to rockfall or landslide hazards . Large tracts of land may be subject to groundwater problems. Why can't I just use the soil conservation maps for a geologic report? The USDA soil conserva tion maps are a good start for geologic investigations, but do not contain sufficient detail on the possible geologic problems that may occur at any site. Aren't some of your review comments beyond the scope of geologic hazards 011 my site? Technically other agencies have regulatory au thority regarding issues such as flood plains, groundwater availability and wildfire, but these issues are also important factors in the overall geologic context of the site and may affect geologic hazards on the site . The mention of a condition in the CGS review letter is not intended to influence the statutory authority of any other agency, but rather to ensure that all parties are aware of a potentially problematic geologic condition. For instance, mention of a situation involving a major drainage is a flag that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or the Colorado Water Conservation Board should be reviewing development plans. When I bought this property, no one told me about any geologic hazards on the site; can I go back to the previous owners somehow? CGS can not give legal advice. If the seller was aware of adverse conditions with respect to the proposed use, this should have been disclosed. A legal opinion should be sought. Can 1 get a waiver from having the CGS do a review? The discretion to grant waivers is vested by law with the counties. Once an application for review is submitted to CGS, we are under a statutory responsibility to respond. I am willing to accept tlte risk associated with my property - why is it anyone's business .what I do with my own land? The presumption associated with a subdivision is that portions of the property will be sold to others. This then assigns any risk to future buyers, and the county is required to protect their interests. Sena te Bill 35 addresses a wide variety of land use issues as well as geologic suitability in an attempt to provide information so that the overall appropriateness of the subdivision proposal can be evaluated. • • Prepared for: David Hicks Prince Creek Construction 1317 Grand Avenue, Suite 101 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970.945.4545 Prepared by: James Blankenship, P.E. JLB Engineering Consultants 918 Eldorado Lane Louisville, Colorado 80027 Phone: 303.604.1634 Fax: 303.604.1674 JLB Project Number: FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT Glenwood Commercial Garfield County, Colorado May25, 2004 1098 OF • • • Drainage Report -Glenwood Co~rcial -Phase I May 25, 2004 Page 2 Final Drainage Report Glenwood Commercial Garfield County, Colorado A Parcel in the NE Y4 and SW Y4 of Section 22, Township 6 North, Range 89 West, of the 6th PM, County of Garfield, State of Colorado DRAINAGE REPORT STATEMENT I hereby certify that this report (plan) for the final drainage design of Glenwood Commercial was prepared by me (or under my direct supervision). James Lee Bfil!Bkla§i'J) Colorado Regi stered Professional Engineer No. 30736 • • • COLO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT L/72-o-1Lt-os K:s Permit fee 300.00 Date of transmittal 09/21/2005 Region/Section/Patrol 03/02/12 COOT Permit No . 305203 State Highway No/Mp/Side 082A/002.500/L Local Jurisdiction Glenwood S rin s The Permittee(s); David Hicks Applicant: Ref No. 05-161 2520 South Grand Ave., Ste. 210 Glenwood Springs, CO 8160 I 970-945-4545 David Hicks 2520 South Grand Ave., Ste. 210 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970 -945-4545 is hereby granted permission to have an access to the stale highway at the location noted below. The access shal be constructed, maintained and used in accordance with this permit, Including the State Highway Access Code end any allac:hments, tem1S, conditions and exhibits. Thia permit may be nwduld by the Issuing authority If at any time the permitted accesa and ita use vfolate any parts of thi1 permit. The Issuing authority, the Department and thW duty appointed agents and employffs 1hall be held hannleaa against any action for pef80l18I injury or property damage BUStalned by reason of the exlll'Cile of the il Location: On the north side of SH82, a distance of 2640 feet east from milepost 2, also a distance of 1320 feet west from Roaring Fork Marketplace. Access to Provide Service to: Mixed Use-Sin&Je Family Home, Storage Units, Warebouaiag, General Office Building, Apartments (12 lUllts) Other terms and conditions: • See Attached Pages 2 and 3 and Other Enclosures for Additional Terms and Conditions . MUNICIPALITY OR COUNTY APPROVAL Required only when the appropriate local authority retains issuing authority. By (x) Date Total -72 DHV Upon the signing of this permit the permlttee agrees to the terms end conditions and referenced attachments contained herein. All construction shall be completed in an expeditious and safe manner and shall be finished within 45 days from Initiation. The permitted access shall be completed In accordance with the terms and conditions of the permit prior to being used. The pennlttee shall notify Brian Ktlllan with the Colorado Department of Transportation In Grand Junction at 970·248·7293 at least 48 hours prior to commencing construction within the State Highway right-of-way. The P8f80rt slgnl as the permlttee must be the owner or legal representative of the property seMld by the permitted access and have full authority to accept the pe d its tarms conditions . PenntttM (x) This permit is not valid until signed by a duly authorized representative of the Department. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Reql.hd: 1 .Region 2.Applicant 3 .$11111 Accesa Section Make aiplea •~for: l.oclll Authority In.peeler MTCE Patrol Tra11ic Enijineer Date C>-) --00 end ..., not be ..ct COOT Form 1101 1118 • • • S'rATE HIGHWAY ACCE,PERMIT 305203 Located on State Highway 082A near RP 2.5 Left Issued to David Hicks TERMS AND CONDITIONS e September 21, 2005 1. This permit will replace any and all additional access permits that may be in existence. All other State Highway access to the property shall be removed . 2. Sight distance must be met and maintained accordance with the Access Code (2 CCR 601-1). 3. The Permittee shall design and install a right turn deceleration lane in conformance with section 4 of the State Highway Access Code, 2CCR 601-1. 4. The Permittee shall design and install a right turn -50 foot transition lane, as agreed upon in a June 7, 2005 Pre-design meeting. 5. The access shall be constructed 25-35 feet wide with radii to accommodate the minimum turning radius of the largest vehicle or 50-foot, whichever is greater. The turning radius shall be measured from the white line on the Hwy to the edge of the driveway. This design shall be in conformance with section 4 of the State Highway Access Code, 2CCR 601-1. 6. The access shall be surfaced in accordance with Section 4. 7 of the Access Code immediately upon completion of earthwork construction and prior to use. This access shall be hard surfaced in accordance with Section 4. 7 of the Access Code a minimum distance of 50 feet from the traveled way. Where the hard surface is to abut existing pavement, the existing pavement shall be saw cut and removed a minimum of one foot back from the existing edge for bituminous, or until an acceptable existing cross slope is achieved. Surfacing shall meet the Department's specifications with minimum surfacing to be equal to or greater than existing highway conditions. 7. This permitted access is only for the use and purpose stated in the Application and Permit. This Permit is issued in accordance with the State Highway Access Code (2 CCR 601-1), and is based in part upon the information submitted by the Permittee. Any subsequent relocation, reconstruction, or modifications to the access or changes in the traffic volume or traffic nature using the access shall be requested for by means of a new application. Any changes causing non-compliance with the Access Code may render th is permit void, requiring a new permit. 8. A Notice to Proceed, COOT Form 1265 is required before beginning the construction of the access or any activity within the highway right-of-way . To receive the Notice to Proceeq the applicant shall submit a complete packet to COOT with the following items: (a) A cover letter requesting a Notice to Proceed. (b) Certificate of Insurance Liability as per Section 2.3(11 )(i) of the State Highway Access Code. (c) A certified Traffic Control Plan in accordance with Section 2.4(6) of the Access Code. (d) Ten copies of Construction Plans Stamped (11 "x 17" with a minimum scale of 1" = 50') by a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer in full compliance with the State Highway Access Code. (e) Signed and sealed Notice to Proceed Checklist. (f) Prior to the issuance of any Notice to Proceed, the applicant shall schedule a pre- construction meeting including but not limited to applicant, Engineer of Record, Construction Inspector, construction personnel, permittee (if other than applicant), COOT representative and Traffic Control Supervisor~ (g) A construction schedule will be required at the pre-construction meeting . • • • .~ e STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT 305203 Located on State Highway 082A near RP 2.5 Left Issued to David Hicks TERMS AND CONDITIONS (cont.) September 21, 2005 20. Any damage to present highway facilities including traffic control devices shall be repaired immediately at no cost to the Department and prior to continuing other work. 21 . Any mud or other material tracked or otherwise deposited on the roadway shall be removed daily or as ordered by the Department inspector. If mud is obvious condition during site construction, it is recommended that the contractor build a Stabilized Construction Entrance or Scrubber Pad at the intended construction access to aid in the removal of mud and debris from vehicle tires . The details of the Stabilized Construction Entrance is found in the M & S Standards Plan No. M-208-1 . 22 . A fully executed complete copy of this Permit and Notice to Proceed must be on the job site with the contractor at all times during the construction . Failure to comply with this or any other construction requirement may result in the immediate suspension of work by order of the Department inspector or the issuing authority. 23. All construction and inspection work must be under the direction of a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer. The PE's responsibilities include, but are not limited to: (a) The PE shall evaluate compliance with plans and specifications wi th regard to the roadway improvements within the State right-of-way. The PE shall carefully monitor the contractor's compliance on all aspects of construction , including construction zone traffic control. (b) Engineering Certification: After inspection and before final acceptance, the Engineer shall certify to COOT in writing that all inspections, materials , materials testing, and construction methods conform to the plans, specifications and purpose of design . Upon completion of the work, that responsible Engineer shall subm it an "As Built" plans, showing in detail all approved construction changes, modification. 24 . No work will be allowed at night, Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays without prior authorization from the Department. The Department may also restrict work within the State Highway right-of-way during adverse weather conditions. 25. Areas of roadway and/or right-of-way disturbed during this installation shall be restored to their original conditions to insure proper strength and stability, drainage and erosion control. Restoration shall meet the Department's standard specifications for topsoil , fertilization, mulching, and re-seeding . 26. Upon the completion of the access and prior to any use as allowed by this permit, the applicant shall notify the Access Manager by certified mail with in 10 days to request a final inspection. This request shall include signed and sealed certificat ion .that all materia ls and construction have been completed in accordance with all applicable Department Standards and Specifications; and that the access is constructed in conformance with the State Highway Access Code, 2 CCR 601-1, including this permit. T he engineer of record as indicated on the construction plans, shall be present for this inspection . The access serviced by this permit may not be opened to traffic until written approvalhas been given from the COOT Access Manage~ · Drainage Report -Glenwood Co-rcial -Phase I May 25, 2004 Page 3 • Introduction • • This Drainage Report has been prepared to review and analyze the impact to drainage by the construction of four new two-story office/light industrial buildings, parl<ing lots, and site features on the subject site. The site development will occur in multiple stages with the two southern building comprising phase I. The results of this report and calculations have been integrated into the Drainage and Grading Plan for the new development. The proposed development is located on the north side of Colorado Highway 82, which is also know as Grand Avenue, in Garfield County, Colorado. The site is immediately outside of the City limits of GlenwOod Springs, Colorado. The site is approximately 4.2 acres in size with the lower 1.6 acres comprising the initial phase of development. This Drainage Report and subsequent site design have integrated the concepts of the debris flow analysis prepared by HP Geotech in their report dated April 4, 2002. We have also walked the drainage basins to confirm the limits of the described basins , both on and off the site. Existing Conditions The proposed development is currently a County enclave that consists of two parcels of land, A and 8. The site currently has existing homes, outbuildings and driveways and slopes from the north to the south with highly variable grades ranging from 45% in the upper reaches of the site to less than 2% near the existing buildings. Ground cover generally consists of irrigated grasses, shrubs and trees, pinon and scrub oak. There is an existing shared gravel driveway that accesses Highway 82. This access will be re-aligned with the development to share access with the adjacent mini-storage site. Colorado Highway 82 is a paved five-lane road with roadside ditches, utility infrastructure and culverts at driveway crossings. The utilities are generally located on the site side of the highway pavement. Culverts upstream and downstream of the site are not maintained with some being partially crushed or plugged. Downstream drainage crosses Highway 82 in a culvert that is located less than 1/4 mile northwest of the site and in a culvert approximately 800' east of the property. The old Glenwood Ditch bisects the upper reach of the site and has been vacated. Adjacent properties include the existing mini-storage to the west and existing detached homes and small commercial facilities to the east . Co!orado Highway 82 aligns with the southern boundary and the northern boundary is the steep hillside that is under BLM ownership. Historic Drainage Historically, runoff from the offsite basins was intercepted by the Glenwood Ditch and would overtop at random locations during heavier events. This ditch intercepted runoff from the hillside above and each side of the site without control at property lines, therefore the actual patterns of excess runoff • • • Drainage Report -Gl enwood G=eercial -Phase I May 25, 2004 Page4 are difficult to ascertain. Debris flow has been deposited in the ditch over the years and blocks off segments of the ditch from conveying offsite runoff. Thi s debris flow generally occurs at the defined drainage way. Development to the east has cut off the ditch and routed the hillside runoff to the south through those properties and to Highway 82. Development to the west and north has also cut off the ditch as it approaches the existing Wal Mart site . Runoff exited this site through the mini-storage site and through the exist ing driveway where it combined with other offsite runoff and roadway drainage in the Highway 82 right of way. The discharge of runoff occurred in a random pattern along the property line with the mini-storage where it was conveyed along the toe of slope in a paved driveway to the south . The historic runoff from this site is based on the current condition that includes the existing buildings and driveways. The historic runoff values are: Q1 = I . 14 cfs; Q1s = 4.53 cfs; Q 1 oo = 6 . 16 cfs . Proposed Development The proposed development includes four two-story buildings with walk out basements, driveways and parking areas and landscape areas. The design of the site conforms to the steep topography and addresses the concerns with debris flow and building prot ection. Development of the site will occur in phases with phase I includ ing the first two buildings north of Highway 82 and associated improvements . Access to t he site will be from a shared driveway that replaces the existing driveway to the site and for the adjacent ministorage. Th is access will be perm itted separately by COOT. Generally, each building is made up of several 40' long pods with adjacent pods having a 2 ' step in finish floor elevation. Driveways are located along the side of the buildings to make up for the grade change from the basement to the I st floor or each bui lding. Detention storage is provided on the downhill side of build ings with an outlet in the area of the historic discharge . Runoff is generally conveyed in the middle of the parking lots to provide maximum protection for the buildings from debris flow. Reta ining walls are provided for detention storage where needed and double as runoff overflow control. Drainage basins for detention pond ing purposes extend into the future phases in order to properly size the currently proposed detention ponds for future development. Runoff is released from the detention ponds in a pipe that collects runoff fro m the bottom of the pond. The pipe outlet is provided with a trash rack . Maintenance access to eac h pond is pr ovided from the upper side of the pond. Site Drainage Concepts Site runoff is directed away from and around the proposed building and th rough the site in swales, curb and gutter and over pavement to the detention ponds and site outfall. The site grading for the • • • Drainage Report -Glenwood Co~rcial -Phase I May25, 2004 Page 5 new development will respect the historical grades and the building will be protected against any excess runoff. General minimum slope criteria for improvements is as follows: Asphalt Pavement: Concrete Pavement: Concrete Gutters Grass Swales: 1.5% 1.0% 0.6% 2.0% Runoff values for developed and historical conditions have been calculated for the 2, 25, ·and I 00-year events using the procedures established in the SCS TR-55. Detention pond ing is provided primarily in landscape areas. The detention pond captures runoff up to the I 00-year event and releases it into the historic basin at a maximum of the I 00-year historic runoff rate . According to the soils report, the soils on site are highly reactive to moisture, therefore all detention is proposed on the surface and without drywells . Mitigation measures will be or have been implemented t o protect against any off site mud or debris flows that may enter the site. The first phase of construction is outside of the projected debris flow limits from the hillside. A cut off channel is proposed along the upper side of the site to intercept surface flows and convey them in a channel into the site, where runoff commingles with site generated runoff and is routed through a detention pond west of bu ilding 2 . Site generated runoff is divided into three main developed basins, A, B, and C , one main undeveloped basin, D and two minor developed basins, E and F. Ru noff generally begins as overland flow and soon becomes concentrated runoff in the curb and gutter where it is directed to the detention ponds . Developed runoff for the entire site has been calculated as follows: Q 2 = 2 .79 cfs ; Q2s = 7.54 cfs; Q100 = 9 .34 cfs. T he upper basins are not developed w ith this current plan . The detention ponds are located at the low points of t he site and the parking lots in the tributary basins. The detention pond outlets are through control orifices and int o their historic basins . Overflow is directed into its historic basin as well as debris flow insofar as practical. Future development in the upper basins will require analysis of those basins for conformance with the assumptions in this report and to size other upstream facilities. Impacts on Adjacent Facilities The deve lopment of this site w ill generate additional r unoff to the existing drainage system. This increase runoff is m itigated by the installation of detent ion ponds on site . The discharge is d irected through dispersement basins and into the historic basin. Best Management Practices The des ign of the site utili zes structural Best Manageme nt Practices (BM P's) as related to site runoff. Directly connected impervious areas have been minim ize d and open landscape space maximized . The runoff from the site is directed through the landscape lined detention pond where infiltration of • • • Drainage Report -Glenwood cceiercial -Phase I May25, 2004 Page 6 the first flush of storm runoff and dry weather flow can occur. Non-structural BMP's should include routine cleaning of the site and the detention ponds. Construction Erosion Control Construction erosion contro l should be implemented per the plan prepared for the site. Erosion control measures intend to protect the downstream pro perties and facilities from construction related sediment laden runoff. The erosion control devices shou ld be installed and maintained as required on the plan. The devices should be inspected and repaire d monthly or after a storm event. It is critical for this site to have functioning temporary and permanent erosion control devices due to its proximity to the river. Conclusions • The drainage conditions as presented are based upon the existing site conditions integrated with the proposed development. • Construction of the site should be in accordance with the results of this report and accompanying drainage plan . • Future development in the upper basins of the site will need to be analyzed for conformance to this report. Sizing of facilities to support that development will be necessary at that t ime . Please refer to the attachments for calculations and additional information . ,, :.:·'.'}/\ ·~,.r. r; ,<i. I ,\· ..... Soils Map (Y) N '·\ • ... . ~·. Smith Commercial G lenwood Spring s, Colorado I" 1000' . .. / co ;', '• ·.··;_ ·, ·' ·i i , • j~;: I:·• • J .. ; '', . > •.· ! t'--;. '>' \.0 ' .. : ! . ·-:" > .. I . 1.·._:· -.; .. ,. ' JLB. 2-Yr (in) 5-Yr (in) Smith Commercial Offsite Basins -Historic Garfield County, Colorado Storm Data Rainfall Depth by Rainfall Return Period 10-Yr (in) 25-Yr (in) 50-Yr (in) • 100-Yr (in) 1-Yr (in) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.2 . 0 • 0 Storm Data Source: Rainfall Distribution Type: Dimensionless Unit Hydrograph: 2.2 .0 User-provided custom storm data Type II <standard> 2.6 • 0 ================================================================================== JLB Sub-Area or Reach Identifier SUBAREAS OSl OS2 OS3 REACHES OUTLET Smith Commercial Offsite Basins -Historic Garfield County, Colorado Watershed Peak Table Peak Flow by Rainfall Return Period 2-Yr 25-Yr 100-Yr (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 7.01 27.05 36.34 .00 0.56 0.69 .00 0.87 1. 05 7.01 27.78 37. 73 ================================================================================== JLB ' Sub-Area Drainage TR-55, Version 2001.00.08 Smith Commercial Offsite Basins -Historic Garfield County, Colorado Sub-Area Summary Table Time of Curve Receiving Page 1 Sub-Area 4/15/02 7:44:39 AM • /ftle?h+r;e &~q-4:fk/: 6'~z.5 = /, o '9 cA I At;. 4f o-~ ---. I 1 '-/. 7 c.-~ /~c. e e Ide.ier Area (ac) Concentration Number (hr) Reach De scrip. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OSl OS2 OS3 Total Area: 25.000 .250 .410 25.66 (ac) 0.300 0.16 0.21 85 95 95 Outlet Outlet Outlet Offsite Basin Offsite Basin 2 Offsite Basin 3 ================================================================================== JLB Sub-Area Identifier/ OSl SHEE T SHAL LOW SHAL LOW OS2 Flow Length (ft ) 100 llOO 1000 Smith Commercial Offsite Basins -Historic Garfield County, Colorado Sub-Area Time of Concentration Details Mannings's Slope n (ft/ft ) 0.1800 0.3000 0.6300 0.400 l. 2 1.2 End Area (sq ft) Wetted Perimeter (ft) Velocity (ft/sec) Time of Concentration Travel Time (hr) 0 .243 0.035 0.022 0.300 User-provided 0.16 Time of Concentration 0 .16 OS3 SHEET SHALLOW 100 240 0.2700 1.0000 0.400 l. 2 Time of Concentration 0.206 0.003 0.21 ================================================================================== JLB Smith Commercial Offsite Basins -Historic Garfield County, Colorado Sub-Area Land Use and Curve Number Details TR-55, Version 200 1.0 0 .08 Page 2 4/15/02 7:44:40 AM • e e Su.ea Identifier Land Use Hydrologic Soil Group .rea Area (ac) Curve Number --------------------------------------------------------------------------------OSl Natural desert (pervious areas only) c 25 BS Total Area I Weighted Curve Number 25 85 --== 082 CN directly entered by user -.25 95 Total Area I Weighted Curve Number .25 95 ---== 083 CN directly entered by user -.41 95 Total Area I Weighted Curve Number .41 95 == ================================================================================== TR-55, Version 200 1 .00.08 Page 3 4/15/02 7:44:41 AM • e e JL. 2-Yr (in) 5-Yr (in) Smith Commercial Developed Runoff Garfield County, Colorado Storm Data Rainfall Depth by Rainfall Return Period 10-Yr (in) 25-Yr (in) 50-Yr (in) • 100-Yr (in) 1-Yr (in) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------1.2 . 0 .0 Storm Data Source: Rainfall Distribution Type: Dimen s ionless Unit Hydrograph: 2.2 . 0 User-provided custom storm data Type II <standard> 2.6 . 0 ===================================:============================================== JLB Sub-Area or Reach Identifier Smith Commercial Developed Runoff Garfield County, Colorado Watershed Peak Table Peak Flow by Rainfall Return Period 2-Yr 25-Yr 100-Yr (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------SUBAREAS Basin A 0.60 1.32 1. 61 Basin B 0.64 1. 63 2.04 Basin C 1. 87 3.91 4. 71 Basin D .00 1. 30 1. 74 Basin E .00 .00 .oo Basin F .00 .00 .00 REACHES OUTLET 2.79 7.54 9.34 =====================================================~~=========================== JLB Smith Commercial TR-55, Version 2001.00.08 Page 1 4/15/02 8:07:55 AM • 11-v~~ ov~w~ 4' tz. ~~ = I,~~ d.5 /a<:. cp~(oCI :;:.. °2. , ~2 cJs/1:1c- e e • Sub-Area Identifier Basin A Basin B Basin C Basin D Basin E Basin F Total Area: Developed Runoff Garfield County, Colorado Sub-Area Summary Table Time of Curve Receiving Drainage Area (ac) Concentration Number Reach (hr) .530 0.10 95 Outlet .950 0.26 92 Outlet 1. 510 0.10 96 Outlet 1. 010 0.1 8 85 Outlet .18 0 0 .10 85 Outlet .010 0.10 85 Outlet 4.19 (ac ) • Sub-Area Description ================================================================================== JLB Sub-Ar ea Identi f i e r/ Flow Length (ft ) Smith Commercial Developed Runoff Garfield County, Colorado Sub-Area Time of Concentration Details Mannings's Slo pe n (ft/ft ) End Area (sq ft) Wetted Perimeter (ft) Velocity (ft/sec) Travel Time (hr) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Basin A SHEE T 80 0.0950 0.011 0.015 SHAL LOW 200 0.0640 1. 2 0.011 Time of Concentration 0.10 ======== Basin B SHEET 100 0.1950 0.400 0.235 SHALLOW 130 0.1700 1. 2 0.005 SHALLOW 275 0.0670 1.2 0 .015 Time of Concentration 0.26 ======== Basin C SHEET 100 0.0400 0.011 0.025 SHALLOW 385 0.0520 1.2 0.023 Time of Concentration 0.10 ======== Basin D SHEE T 1 0 0 0.4 6 0 0 0. 400 0 .167 TR-55, Version 2001.00.08 Page 2 4/15/02 8:07:56 AM • e e s.ow 380 0.1630 0 .050 • 0.016 Time of Concentration O.lB Basin E User-provided 0.10 Time of Concentration 0.10 Basin F User-provided 0.10 Time of Concentration 0.10 ================================================================================== JLB Sub-Ar ea Identi fier Smith Commercial Developed Runoff Garfield County, Colorado Sub-Area Land Use and Curve Number Details Land Use Hydrologic Soil Group Sub-Area Area (ac) Curve Number -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Basin A Open space; grass cover > 75% (good) Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways Total Area I Weighted Curve Number Basin B Open space; grass cover < 50% (poor) Open space; grass cover > 75% (good) Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways Total Area I Weighted Curve Number Basin C Open space; grass cover > 75% (good) Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways Total Area I Weighted Curve Number Basin D Natural desert (pervious areas only) Total Area I Weighted Curve Number TR-55, Version .2001.00.08 Page 3 c c c c c c c c .075 74 . 455 98 .53 95 = == .2 86 .12 74 . 63 98 .95 92 = -- .1 74 1. 41 98 1.51 96 ==== == 1. 01 85 1.01 85 4/15/02 8:07:56 AM • e e i Bas. CN di~ectly entered by user -• 85 • Total Area I Weighted Curve Number .18 85 == ="' Basin F CN directly entered by user -.01 85 Total Area I Weighted Curve Number .01 85 ================================================================================== e e TR-55, Version 2001.00.08 Page 4 4/15/02 8:07:58 AM • • • Worksheet 6a: Detention basin storage, peak outflow discharge ( q 0 ) known Project By Date ~J /. ?,__, Su1o; ~mHe.ec//'!L-Jt.8 7/?--~ Location 0 LG/I/ /<..tJOO &t?.et A/e:;S , ~ Checked Date Check one: D Present ~Developed 8/JSIAI A Ql Cl l9 If) D .... 0 c: 0 ~ > Ql iii D . . I . I . I Detention basin storage ·( acre fee t ) 1. Data: Drainage area . . .. . .. ... . .. . Am = ,~()~'j Rainfall distribution type ( I, IA. II , III) = _.;__//_ mi2 I 1st Stage l 2nd l I Stage I 2 . Frequency .................. yr IL--'~:::..c~~~-/_t:J_O__, 3 . Peak inflow I discharge q i ............ ft3/s 1.....:..../,_8_:2..---'~l._b_I__, (from worksheet 4 or Sb) J/ 4 . Peak outflow I 7 tf , i5S I discharge qu .......... ft3/s L. _._5 _ _.... __ __,_ 5 . Compute qo .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .___· _l/_3_,__• _5:3> _ _, q i J/ 2nd stage q includes 1st stage q . 0 0 6 . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .__,-'-~--'1__._l _·_~_-:'7___.I Vr ( Use _2h with figure 6-1) qi I 1t1~1 I 2 ,~ I 7. Runoff, a ................. in L. -~--!.----' ( From worksheet2) 8. Runoff volume ................... ac ft (V r = ~Am 53.33) 9 · e:0 ~.~-~-~-~~~~~: .... ac-ft j ,oz.0 11.02.?>7 I 10. Maximum storage Emax (from plot) q 0 I cf-11 03~~ (2 10-VI -TR -55 , Second Ed., June 1986) D -7 • • • Worksheet 6a: Detention basin storage, peak outflow discharge ( qol known Project By D~/~ 5u1n-1 &,1.1H~l'lt-JLB Locatlon Checked Da4/~z. 6tENWtJOP ~,,.e/,c/4$ c.o Jt.8 Check one: DPresent ~Developed 8ASIAI 8 Q) O'l j9 (/) 0 ... 0 c: 0 ~ > Q) UJ D I . I Detention basin st orage ( acre feet ) 1 . Data: Drainage area . . . . . .. . . . . . . . Am = Rainfall distribution type ( I, IA. II, III) , C/~15 II =---- mi2 I 1st Stage I 2nd I Stage 2. Frequency .................. yr I '2f5" I 100 3. Peak inflow I ;,1;.3 I '2..oc./ I discharge q 1 •••••••••.•• ft3/s ._..:..._ _ __... ___ ____.. (from worksheet 4 or Sb) 4 . dP.eahk outflow f 3/ I /,03 /,40 I 1sc arge qu .......... t s ...... __ __... __ ____._ 5 . Compute ~ .. . .. . .. . .. . . . .. I • b ~ I • i:l/ I q i ).} 2nd stage q includes 1st stage q . 0 0 6 . ~ .............................. l .z35 I ,z.1s-I Vr ( Use ~ with figure 6-1) qi . . I 1, If 3 11. 7:z. I 7. Runoff, Q . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . in '--'--~_,__ __ _, ( From worksheet 2) 8 . Runoff volume ................... ac ft (V r = OAm 53 .33) 10. Maximum storage Em ax (from plot) I , 1111 1-1.3~ I (2 10-Vl-TR -55. Se co nd Ed .. Ju ne 1986) D-7 • • • Worksheet 6a: Detention basin storage, peak outflow discharge ( q0 ) known Project By 5J.'llrH UJ~He-~C/'1L. Location QU:/./MJcJP; ~PH4'S. Co Check one: D Present Ga' Developed Q) Cl .s r.n D ..... 0 c: .Q co > Q) w D Checked Jc..8 Detention basin storage ( acre feet ) Date If /2PdZ Date 4 / 2P!J2_ 1 . Data: Drainage area .............. Am = Rainfall distribution type ( I, IA, II, III) .(!>()~ = __ //_ mi 2 6. ~ .............................. I · 8 1s I ; ~o I I 1st Stage I 2nd I Stage 2 . Frequency .................. yr I z.6 11 rJO 3 . Peak inflow I q I discharge q ............. ft3/s B' I JI, 11 I (from worksheet 4 or Sb) 4 . Peak outflow I I 3 I ,, z.. I discharge qu .......... ft3/s . 'b ~ 'Z- 5 . Compute qo . .. .. .... .. ... .. I t1 't/Z 1 17 ,J./1 I Q1 JJ 2nd stage q includes 1st stage q . 0 0 Vr ( Use ~ with figure 6-1) qi 7. Runoff, ·a .. .. .. .. .... ... .. in 1.-I .:__/-_73~l z_._l_:z..__JI ( From worksheet 2) 8 . Runoff volume ................... ac ft (V r = OAm 53.33) 10. Maximum storage Emax (from plot) (210 -VI -TR -55 . Second Ed .. J une 1986) D-7 e ~ PROJECT: SUBJEC T: • aNJU.TANT5 918 Eldorado Lane Louis\'ille, Cdorado 80027 PROJEC T NO: ,,,,, DATE: ~~ ~If v~ 303.6<>4. I 634 Fax: 303.6<>4.1674 COMMENTS : ~"A ~ n A .! IL. -~'h; "" ,. v, -r t<£1.1 ~./ fl/. ~ = l ~= ~ cl .. ~ -' -~r-' "'\ l~ .. -:::-I} ~ s . t. ~ "' ~ ~ ~~ ff'P T ~ ~ ,, 'Y/f -T "" ~ ~ w • .: ~ , ... Li ,, . ~ ~o ... ' . . --· ~. -""" /I llV ,,{. './., .... .. ~ '->7 1 0 ,, , Her ? .5' ,, -j --·-·-..,/ G-4 ,, . ~ , - a Si: -~~ -~ -~ Q). ~;: ''? ~ ~.N • ro ~ /' iA ti t,Z ~~ ~ ,&" ~ A ~ ., ' , ~ , :;::: /I .e.. " 1A -o~ /(. ·8'< ) .JI! ,A '" -4 ;s ;, 'a. Id 4t.~ I-ff -, ~ ... :a ~ M rt 6·· r!#' I • ' ... ' ~ .. /2 ~ ) .Jt?, ~A 0 L3 --r1J1 (Ji. " ~ ~ ~ J ,_,,,, ~ \J ~/ "/• ,// ::::: ,I 7J q , ·:::,:t , _,,,.~ // v ,, ~ t? -/. q. ' ,. ~lh 'l -- I -~ -•.J ~ .,, ~ ) f A 11 ~ /$, ~ -::. 5~ rs I. ~' "J. ,_ . 'l r, ;..., ·/. ~I tJ './'} -1:. f,( ,, ':J• ~I / lh :; I~. ~· \.. . f , ~ i"' I~ '/ ) t: ~, i1f3 lS"i ,,.~ ~ =-, ~z I~ 'I'/ #') z;;; .~:1 .. ~ 3 ~f VI ,, ~' ~ "' ,. p, 1h ~L _.) ... ,_ ~ L: .-!I .. ........ "'* ,,,_ .. £.,. ~ v> ~ ~I x ' I ~ -- "" \, ~v •i ~.I ,__ 3 ~ z; 'e.&. .I ~J -~ :n .... ,. =-. .... r"!>.,, ~ -~ . .. ,:.ii ·~ C4 ~ /f. 'V H. f/)d --~ --... -~ ·~ '~ .~ )"!:> /.'. ~ IZ ~ --.... /; ~ -... ,_, -· -//. /IJ '1tl .,-!!; ·~ •z c. :::; -r-~ ~--_...., -/ I'. ~-I' I/ Jl'c::::; ~ .A. e;. ~' /"7 "2" ......., ~~ -I I , ,. --, , A :a. tf /C 7t' :s ftf 2. = ~ 7, '3 ~1 ,,., 2 ~ .. : Ill s. q, • SHEET OF • • • catal.TAN15 918 8dorado Lane louisvile, Cdorado 80027 Voice: 303.60i. I 634 Fax: 303.60i.1674 I~ w. 0 J1 tJ c,, ~ v v v O' / ' ) ~o I~ " / v · / • . v :,{.. / / A .J; v ,; / , v ~ ~ , / l.6 / ,; PROJECT: SUBJECT: /1JND ~/Zlrlc.G PROJECT NO: /tJ9 DATE: ///?~It, ~~ ~ ~/) rn !'.&: fl. !:;>) j v-/IJ ) fl, ~ ..'.~~ >-:C J.'-c I>, 1/ , . I/ 0 r---.;;k _, .... /. ~,, .. v I'_) .. ~ ~v I.Al ~' (Y / , Al ,/ ll'A k ~ 'r~ ./ A D" ~ ~ '· .. & ~, ~ ·"' ~ -..... -·. ./, . -,, - I/ "7 /?, v. ~ ':::.) /. •.d. J,; r -, ., ,; , ... / , I ,. ,,, l.1~ _,, ,/, _., -( 41) IT -~~ A 7~~ fj}. ~'ff l'_i; u (~ ~ '2. .. f.1-- . / ... . . SHEET OF Project Deacrlptlon • Wo111she.et Pond A OUtlet Type Circular Orlflet • • Solve For Diameter Input Data Discharge 0.85 cfs Headwater Elevat ,870.20 ft Centroid Elevatlor ,867. 70 ft Tailwater ElevatlO ,867.00 ft DIScharge Coeftlc 0 .62 Results Diameter 4 .5 In Headwater Height Above • 2.50 ft Tallwater Height Above Cc -0.70 ft Flow Area 0 .1 tr Velocity 7 .86 ft/s c :\. .. \drainage\1098smith.fm2 e. Pond A Release Orifice e Worksheet for Circular Orifice Project Engineer: James Blankenship JLB Companies, Inc. FlowMaater 116 .1 [614k] 05124/04 01 :33:48 PM <Cl Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road . Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1668 Page 1 of 1 Projed Deacrlptlon • Worbheet Type Solve For Pond B Outlet Clrcula r Ortflo Diameter • • Input Data Discharge 1 .40 cfs Headwater Elevat ,881.30 ft Centroid Elevatlor ,878.00 ft Tailwater Elevatlo ,877.80 ft Discharge Coetfic 0.62 Results Diameter 5 .3 in Headwater Height Above ' 3 .30 ft Tailwater Height Above Ct -0.20 ft Flow Area 0 .2 ft2 Velocity 9.03 ftls A Pond B Outlet e ~orksheet for Circular Orifice c:\ ... ldrainage\1098smith.fm2 JLB Collll>8nles, Inc. Project Engineer: James Blankenship FlowMaster v6.1 (614k) 05/24/04 01 :34:22 PM IC> Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 1of1 Project Deacrlptlon • Worbheet Type Solve For Pond C Outlel Circular Oriflcl Diameter • • Input Data Discharge 2.22 cfs Headlnter Elevat ,897.50 ft Centroid Elevatlor ,892 .00 ft Tallwater Elevatlo ,891.80 ft Discharge Coetnc 0.62 Results Diameter 5.9 In Headwater Height Above 1 5.50 ft Tallwater Height Above Ct -0 .20 ft Flow Area 0.2 ft2 Velocity 11 .66 ftls c :\. .. ldralnage\1098smlth .fm2 A Pond C Outlet e ~orksheet for Circular Orifice Project Engineer: James Blankenship JLB Companies , Inc. FiowMaster v6 .1 (614k] 05124104 01 :35 :14 PM C Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 USA (203) 755-1666 Page 1of1 ·.-·:" ~c, ·"" -....... "i -. • ~ ..... ' "water table" in the Glo. explain terms such as "rare," "brief," "apparent," and ".ed." > means more than. Abse f an entry indicates that the feature is not a concern] '?t:z;'•-.·. i---Flooding I High water tatffej Bedrock I I Risi< or corrosion lkydro-1 I i i I i I l Potential : , i logic! Frequency i Duration lHonths i Depth : Months : Depth I Hardness I frost !Uncoated :concrete I group : : i i l i I l action I steel I 1 , , ·1 t , I In I ------r------I l I I I I -I I -I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1-----------------i C iNone--------i --- ---I >6.0 i ---: >60 i ---lLow--------IHigh-----ILow. Almy Variant : I : : : I l I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2 * • I I I I I I I t I I • I I I I I I I I I I Ar le-------------: c : None--------: ------l >6. O : ---: 20-40 -: Rippable : Low--------I Moderate I Low. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ansari-----------: D INone--------i ------l >6 .0 l ---i 10-20 !Hard ILow--------lHigh-----lLow. Rock outcrop. 3, 4-------------- Arvada 5, 6--------------Ascalon I I 7*: : Ascalon----------: I I Pena-----------~-: 8*: I I I I Atencio----------: I I Azeltine---------: 9*. Badland I I I I 10 11------------: ' I Begay 1 12*; Bucklon---------- Incha u----------- 13, 14, 15 -------- Chilton 16---------------- Cimarron I I 17----------------: Cochetopa 18*, 19*: : D B B B B B B D c B c c Cochetopa --------: C I . I Jerry------------: C I I I I I I I I I I I I I t I I I I l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I iNone--------: ---i ---l >6.0 l -~-i >6 0 l ---lLow--------IHigh-----lHoderate. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I f I I I I I I I I I f I None--------: ---I ---: >6. 0 l ---l >60 l ---l Ho"derate---l Moderate I Low. I I I I : I !~one--------: I I I I I None--------: I I I I I I I I iNone--------l I I I I lNone--------1 I I I I I I I I I I !None--------: I I I I iNone-------- 1 !None-------- ' I I None-------- ' I !None-------- ' I I I !None -------- ' I I I I I :None--------: I I I I I None--------: >6. 0 >6.0 >6.0 >6 .0 >6.0 >6.0 >6 . 0 >6.0 >6 .0 >6 .0 >6.0 >6. 0 >60 >60 >6 0 >60 >60 10-20 20-40 >60 >60 >60 >60 >60 I I I I I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I lRippable I I lRippable I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I lModerate---lModerate lLow. I I I I I I lModerate---lHigh-----lLow. I I I I I I I I I I I I lLow--------lHigh-----ILow. I I I I I I ILow--------lHigh-----ILow. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'Low--------lHigh-----lLow. I I I I I I I i Hoderate---lHigh-----lLow. I I I I Hoderate---lHigh-----lLow. I I I I Low--------lHoderate lLow. I I I I I ,Moderate---lHigh-----ILow. I I I I I I I I I I I I lHoderate---IHigh-----iLow. I I I I I I I l : I I I I I I IHoderate---lHigh-----lLow. I · I I I I I lHoderate---lHigh-----lLow. : : l See footno te at end of table. ~i m )> :D 9! 8 5 ::IJ )> 0 0 e _.. .j:>. 01 e • • • ..... .,. CD TABLE 15.--SOIL AND WATER FEATURES--Continued l -r---FTooCITng I High water table I Bedrock f I Risk of corrosion Soil name and : Hydro-: I I l I l I l Potential l , map symbol : logic: Frequency : Duration : Months : Depth : Months : Depth : Hardness : frost : Uncoated : Concrete :group : : : : l l l I action I steel I , 1 , , , Ft 1 1 In 1 1 ---: l I I I I I -I I -t I I I I I I I I I I I I l I a 63----------------: B :occasional iBrief-----:Apr-Sepi >6.0 : ---: ------lModerate---lHigh-----iLow. ~ Silas l : l : : l l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 64----------------: C iNone-----------: ---: >6.0 : ---: 20-40 Rippable iLow--------iHigh-----!Low. Tanna : l : : l l l l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I f l I l I · 65*. l : l I J t I l I Torrifluvents l : l I l : 1 l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I J I I I I 66*: : : l : : : : l I Torriorthents. Camborthids. Ro ck outcrop . 67*: Torriorthents. Rock outcrop. 68, 69, 70-------- Vale 71•: Villa Grove------ Zoltay----------- 72---------------- Wann B B c B I I I I I I :None-------- I •I None-------- >6.0 >6.0 None--------l ---: >6.0 I I I I I I I I Occasional !Brief-----iApr-Jull2.0-3.0I I I t I I I I I >60 >60 >60 Apr-Jul >60 : I I !Moderate---!Moderate ILow. 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IModerate---IHigh----•!Low. I I I I I I iModerate---lHigh-----!Low. I I I I I . I !High-------!High-----ILow. I I I I I I I I I 1 • See description of the map unit for composition and behavior characteristics of the map unit. ·!·"". e RIFLE AREA, COLORADO 141 TABLE 14.--PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES Of SOIL S [T.ymbol < means less than; > means more than. Entries under "Erosion factors--T" apply to the entire rofile. Entries under "Organic matter" apply only to the sur face layer. Absence of an entry indicates that data were not available or were not estimated] I I I Soil name and map symbol lDepthlClay <2mml Permeability I I I I l i In Pct In/hr I I ~----------------1 0-8 Almy Variant ' 8-34 34-60 2*: 20 -25 30-35 20-35 ~rle------------0-10 15-25 10-32 10-25 32 Ansar i ----------0-10 18-25 10-18 , 16-20 18 I I Rock outcrop. , l I I I I ~. 4-------------1 0-3 l l\rvada I 3-171 117-601 I I I I 5, 6-------------1 0-5 I ~scalon l 5-301 l30-60l I I I*: l Ascal on ---------1 0-5 I l 5-301 • 130-601 I I I I r ·----------I 0-12 I I 12-60 I I; \tencio---------0-11 11-23 23-28 28-60 lzeltine--------0-18 18-60 ;ad land I I Ill, 11-----------1 0-14 Begay 114-24 124-60, :*: I I I I I I I I ~ucklon---------1 0-5 I 5-151 I I .• P!hau----------1 15 0 -3 I 3-361 la:.:. 36 : ~f:, I ~· ~ I ~'4 , 5-------l 0-13 l 113-601 I I -----------, 0-4 I .• I 4-601 I I I I 15-27 35-45 28-40 10-20 20-30 15-25 10-20 20-30 15-25 15-25 15-25 10-20 20-30 15-25 0-2 10-20 0-2 10-1 8 10-20 10 -15 20 -27 20 -35 15-27 20-35 10-20 10 -1 8 10-25 35 -45 at end of table. 0.6-2.0 0.2-0.6 0.6-2.0 0.6-2.0 0.6-2.0 0.6-2.0 0.6-2.0 0.6-2.0 0.06-0.2 0.06-0.2 0.6-6.0 0.6-2.0 0.6-6.0 0.6-6.0 0.6-2.0 0.6-6 .0 0.6-2.0 0.6-2.0 2.0-6.0 0.6-2.0 2 .0-6.0 6.0-20 2.0-6.0 >6.0 2.0-6.0 2 .0 -6 .0 2.0-6.0 0.06-0.2 0.06-0.2 0 .6 -2 .0 0.6-2.0 0 .6-2 .0 2.0-6.0 0.6 -2.0 0 .06 -0.2 1 , , 1 Erosion I IAvailablel Soil !Salinity! Shrink-swell factors !Organic I water l rea ctio n l I potential , l matter I carci t y I I I K I T ln/i11 l £.!! l mmhos/cm I I Pct I ---I I : I I0.16-0.1917.4-7.8 <2 ILow-----------10 .28 1 5 I0.18-0.2017.4-8 .4 <2 !Moderate------10.321 l0.13-0.1517.9-8.4 <2 ILow-----------10.321 I l l l I I I I 1 I I I I f I l0.07-0.0917.4 -8.4 <2 ILow-----------10.101 2 I0.06-0.0917.9-8.4 <2 ILow-----------10.101 I I I I I 1--------------1----1 I I I I I I I I I lo.10-0.1311.9-8.4 <2 !Low-----------10.151 l0.08-0.1217.9 -8 .4 <2 ILow-----------10.151 I I I I I I I 10.16-0.181 10.01-0.091 10.09-0.11: I I I I >7.9 >8.4 >7. 8 l0.11-0.1616.6-7.8 I0 .13-0.1516.6-7.8 I0.11-0.1517.9 -8 .4 I I I I I I l0.11-0.1616.6-7 .8 l 0. 13-0. 15 I 6. 6-7. 8 l0 .11-0.1517.9-8.4 I I 0.12-0.1517.4-7.9 0.03-0.0817.9-8 .4 I I I I 0.12-0.1417.4-7 .8 0.11-0.1317.4-7 .8 0.07-0.0917.9-8 .4 0.03-0.0517.9-8 .4 I I ,0.08-0.1217.9-8 .4 l0.03-0.0517.4-8 .4 I I I I I I : 0. 12 -0. 14: 6 . 6-8. 4 l0.12-0.1517.4-8 .4 10.08-0.1111.4-8 .4 ' I I I I I0.17-0.20 16.1 -7.3 :0.16-0.1816.1-7.3 I I ' I I I l 0.16-0.181 6 .1-7 .8 : 0 . 11-0 . 15: 6 . 1-7 . 8 ' I I I I I I0.1 2-0.1417 .9-8 .4 :0.01-0.09:1.9-8 .4 ' ' I I I0.1 6-0.1816.6-7.8 :0.14-0 .1 616.6 -7.8 <4 <4 <8 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 2-4 <2 <2 <2 (2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 (2 I I I 1--------------,----1 I I I I I I I I I I ILow-----------l0.321 5 IHigh----------l0.321 IHigh----------l0.321 l I l ILow-----------10.171 5 lModerate------l0.241 ILow-----------l0.241 I I l I I I I I I ILo~-----------10.171 5 IModerate------l0.241 ILow-----------10.241 I I I I ILow-----------10.28 3 ILow-----------10.24 ' I I I I I ILow-----------10.24 IModerate------10.17 lLow-----------10.10 lLow-----------:0.10, I I I I lLow-----------:0.10 lLow-----------l0.10 ' I ' I I I 3 2 ILow-----------10.24 5 lLow-----------10 .32, ILow-----------:0.32 I I I I I IModerate------10.32 IM o derate------:0 .37 l--------------1---- 1 I I I lLow-----------10 .32 3 lLow-----------10.28 I I 1--------------1---- 1 I I I ILow-----------10.28 5 ILow-----------10.15 I 0 I I lLow-----------10.37 5 IHigh----------10.32 I 0 I I I I I I 3-5 2-4 2-4 l0.5-1 ' I 1-3 1-3 1-3 2-4 2-4 : 0. 5-1 I I I I I I 2-5 2-5 I0.5 -2 2-4 144 TABLE 14.--PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS--Continued • Soil name and map symbol 53*: Rhone----------- 54, 55, 56------- Potts 57 *' 58*, 59*: Potts----------- Ildefonso------- 60, 61----------- Rhone 62*: Rock outcrop. Torriorthents. I I iDepth I I I I n 0-8 8-28 28-52 52 0-4 ' I 4-281 28-601 0-4 I I 4-281 28-601 I I 0-8 I I 8-601 I I 0-8 I I 8-281 28-521 52 I I I I I I 63---------------l 0-601 Silas I I I I I I 64---------------1 0-9 I • Tanna I 9-24 I 124-301 I 30 65*. Torrifluvents 66*: Torriorthents. Camborthids. Rock outcrop. 67 *: Torriorthents. I I Rock outcrop. I I I 68, 69, 70-------1 0-111 Vale 111-261 71 *: 126-601 I I Villa Grove-----0 -4 I 4-15 15-60 Zo ltay----------0-19 19-60 ' I 72---------------1 0-171 Wann 117-601 Clay <2min c 20-27 20-30 20-30 15-25 20-35 15-25 15-25 20-35 15-25 15-25 15-25 20-27 20-30 20-30 15-27 27-35 35-45 15-30 20-27 25-35 15-30 15-27 20-35 15-25 20-27 35-45 10-18 10-18 Permeability 0.6-2.0 0.6-2.0 0.6-2.0 0.6-2.0 0.6-2.0 0.6-2.0 0.6-2.0 0.6-2.0 0.6-2.0 2.0-6.0 2.0-6.0 0.6-2.0 0.6-2.0 0.6-2.0 0.6-2.0 0.06-0.2 0.06-0.2 0.06-0.2 0.6-2.0 0.6-2.0 0.6-2.0 0.2-0.6 2.0-6.0 0.2-2.0 0.6-2.0 0.06-0.2 2.0-6.0 2.0-6.0 I I I I Available I Soil !Salinityl Shrink-swell 11 lreactionl I I EE. I I I I I I I0.19-0.2116.6-7.8 I0.15-0.1716.6-7.8 I0.08-0.1016.6-7.8 I I I I I I0.16-0.1816.6-7.8 I0.19-0.2116.6-8.4 10.16-0.1 81 7 .9-9.0 I I I I0.16-0.1 816 .6-7.8 I0.19-0.2116 .6-8.4 :0.16-0.1 817.9-9.0 I I I I I0.08-0.1 01 7.4-8.4 l0.06-0.0817.9-8.4 I I I I I0.19-0.2116.6-7.8 : 0. 15-0. 17: 6. 6-7. 8 l0.08-0.10:6.6-7.8 I I I I I0.14-0.1 616 .6-7.8 I I I I I I I I I0.14-0.2016 .6-7.8 :0.1 2 -0.1 817 .4-9.0 I 0 o 07 -0 • 1 2 I 7 • 4-9 • 0 I 0.19-0.22 6.1-7.8 0.17-0.22 6.6-8.4 0.13-0.20 7.4-9.0 :0.16-0.18 7.4-8.4 :0.10-0.1 4 7.4-8.4 I0.1 4 -0 .1617 .9-8.4 I I I I 10.17-0.1916.6-7.8 10 .13-0 .1 516 .6-7 .8 I I I t :0.16-0.1 816 .6-8 .4 I 0. 15-0. 17: 7. 9-8. 4 I 1 mm OS <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <4 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <4 <4 <2 <2 <2 2-8 <8 <8 <2 (2 <2 <2 I potential ':{ I I I I cm, I I I I r I I I Low-----------I 0 .24 FV 1Moderate------I0.24f . ILow-----------10.151 l--------------1----1 I I I I !Low-----------10.371 5 lModerate------10.431 ILow-----------10.551 I I I I I I Low-----------10.371 5 Moderate------10.431 Low-----------10.551 I I I I Low-----------l0.15' 3 Low-----------10.15 I I Low-----------10.24 3 ,Moderate------10.24 Low-----------10.15 --------·------I ---- !Low-----------0.24 5 I I I IModerate------,0.37 2 JModerate------l0.43 IModerate------l0.24 !--------------:---- ' I I I : I I I I I I Moderate------10.321 5 Moderate------I0.43l Low-----------10.431 I I I I Moderate------10.241 5 Low-----------10.201 ,Moderate------10.321 I I I I I I IModerate------10.281 5 lHigh----------10.241 I I I I I I lLow-----------:0.20: 5 lLow-----------l0.201 I . I I I * See description of the map un it for composition and be havior characteristics of the map unit . • 0.5-1 3-6 -~·1 1 l 3-5 20-40 2 -4 2 -4 2-4 3-6 • L -0) "tj" N >- 0 0 • 0 0 / <{ <I'. 0 z / c 0 -+- 0 E I.- 0 -c _y L 0 5: / > u m _J --, / u "-• "- Q) - • ·.,' ., • file://C:\JLB%20Civil \Work%20lnformation\NOAA \co2y 24.gif 2112 /02 • • • OHECl S/N: 1343001909 HMVersion: 6.33 C:\JLBCIV-l\PROJEC-2\1098-S-l\OFFSITE Data File: C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\-vbh241D.TMP ***************************************** *************************************** * * * * * FLOOD HYDROGRAPH PACKAGE (HEC-1) * * U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS * * MAY 1991 * * HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER * * VERSION 4.0.lE * * 609 SECOND STREET * * * * DAVIS, CALIFORNIA 95616 * * RUN DATE 03/28/2002 TIME 10:15:50 * * (916) 756-1104 * * * * * ***************************************** *************************************** x x xxxxxxx xxxxx x x x x x x xx x x x x x xxxxxxx xxxx x xxxxx x x x x x x x x x x x x x x xxxxxxx xxxxx xxx ........................................... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . Full Microcomputer Implementation by Haestad Methods, Inc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ............................................ ............................................ .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 Brookside Road * Waterbury, Connecticut 06708 * (203) 755-1666 e e ~' ~ \]\ ~\~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~- THIS PROGRAM REPLACES ALL PREVIOUS VERSIONS OF HEC-1 KNOWN AS HECl (JAN 73), HEClGS, HEClDB, AND HEClKW. ~ ~ ~ THE DEFINITIONS OF VARIABLES -RTIMP-AND -RTIOR-HAVE CHANGED FROM THOSE USED WITH THE 1973-STYLE INPUT STRUCTU~ SJ\ ~ THE DEFINITION OF -AMSKK-ON RM-CARD WAS CHANGED WITH REVISIONS DATED 28 SEP 81. THIS rs THE FORTRAN77 VERSION V} ":\. ~ NEW OPTIONS: DAMBREAK OUTFLOW SUBMERGENCE , SINGLE EVENT DAMAGE CALCULATION, DSS:WRITE STAGE FREQUENCY, """ ~ C"", DSS:READ TIME SERIES AT DESIRED CALCULATION INTERVAL LOSS RATE:GREEN AND AMPT INFILTRATION ~\ r~, ~ KINEMATIC WAVE: NEW FINITE DIFFERENCE ALGORITHM ~ Vl ~ • ~ ~ -\ L 0 .. M . ~ ID (") '"".""" ... M IO Q) "' cf • ~ r- (") M 0 ,· Q) .-4 +I I.I') "'"' Ill .... .... 0 0 OE-< H HH • • • • C:\JLBCIV-l\PROJEC-2\1098-S-l\OFFSITE 3 IO 0 0 4 KK BS 5 KM Offsite Basin 6 KO 22 7 BA .0235 8 PB 2.6 9 IN 5 0 10 PI .01 .01 .01 . 02 .02 .08 .19 .25 .25 .25 11 PI .25 .19 .08 . 02 .02 .02 .02 .02 .01 .01 12 PI .01 .01 .01 . 01 13 LS .35 85 0 14 UD 0.6 e 15 KI< B3 16 KM 17 KO 22 18 BA .0032 19 PB 2.6 20 IN 5 0 21 PI .01 .01 .01 .02 .02 .08 .19 .25 .25 .25 22 PI .25 .19 .08 . 02 .02 .02 .02 .02 .01 .01 23 PI .01 .01 .01 .01 24 LS .353 85 0 25 UD 0.6 26 KI< B4 27 KM 28 KO 22 29 BA .0010 30 PB 2.6 31 IN 5 0 32 PI .01 .01 .01 . 02 .02 .OB .19 .25 .25 .25 33 PI .25 .19 .08 . 02 .02 .02 .02 .02 .01 .01 e 34 PI .01 .01 .01 . 01 35 LS .353 85 0 36 UD 0.6 37 KI< B6 3B KM Offsite Basin 39 KO 22 40 BA .0122 41 PB 2.6 42 IN 5 0 43 PI .01 .01 .01 . 02 .02 .08 .19 .25 .25 .25 44 PI .25 .19 .OB . 02 .02 .02 .02 .02 .01 .01 45 PI .01 .01 .01 .01 46 LS .35 B5 0 47 UD 0.6 0 HEC-1 INPUT PAGE 2 LINE ID ....... 1 ....... 2 ....... 3 ....... 4 ....... 5 ....... 6 ....... 7 ....... B ....... 9 ...... 10 OHECl • _9 50 51 52 S/N: 1343001909 ---r--- KO HC 4 zz HMVersion: 6.33 l • 22 Data File: C:\WINDOWS\'l'lifp\~vbh2UD.TMP :Paqe 2 • l - - • • C:\JLBCIV-1\PROJEC-2\1098-S-l\OFFSITE ***************************************** * * * FLOOD HYDROGRAPH PACKAGE (HEC-1) * * MAY 1991 * * VERSION 4. 0. lE * * * * RUN DATE 03/28/2002 TIME 10:15:50 * * * ***************************************** 3 IO IT Offsite OUTPUT CONTROL IPRNT I PLOT QSCAL VARIABLES 0 0 0. HYDROGRAPH TIME DATA NMIN 5 IDATE 1 0 ITIME 0000 NQ 37 ND DATE 1 0 NDTIME 0300 I CENT 0 COMPUTATION INTERVAL TOTAL TIME BASE ENGLISH UNITS PRINT CONTROL PLOT CONTROL HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE MINUTES IN COMPUTATIQN INTERVAL STARTING DATE STARTING TIME NUMBER OF HYDROGRAPH ORDINATES ENDING DATE ENDING TIME CENTURY MARK 0.08 HOURS 3.00 HOURS DRAINAGE AREA PRECIPITATION DEPTH LENGTH, ELEVATION FLOW SQUARE MILES INCHES STORAGE VOLUME SURFACE AREA TEMPERATURE FEET CUBIC FEET PER SECOND ACRE-FEET ACRES DEGREES FAHRENHEIT • *************************************** * * * U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS * * HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER * * 609 SECOND STREET * * DAVIS, CALIFORNIA 95616 * * (916) 756-1104 * * * *************************************** e e *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 4 KK ************** * * BS * * -• (\') ~ ·OI -· if .,:i ; (l ~ g: CJ) -c ~o •r-t ! tQ fd Ill ~ Q) _.., ·r-t ..:I Ol Ii ..... ..... 0 0 c.. T'" t-1 • f,< • p ..... § -.. .. • ·~ • 9 IN 7 BA 8 PB 10 PI 13 LS 14 UD • I PLOT QSCAL IPNCH 0 0. 0 22 1 37 0.083 C:\JLBCIV-l\PROJEC-2\1098-S-l\OFFSITE PLOT CONTROL IOUT ISAVl ISAV2 TIMINT HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE PUNCH COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH SAVE HYDROGRAPH ON THIS UNIT FIRST ORDINATE PUNCHED OR SAVED LAST ORDINATE PUNCHED OR SAVED TIME INTERVAL IN HOURS TIME DATA FOR INPUT TIME SERIES JXMIN 5 TIME INTERVAL IN MINUTES JXDATE 1 0 STARTING DATE JXTIME 0 STARTING TIME SUBBASIN RUNOFF DATA SUBBASIN CHARACTERISTICS TAREA 0.02 SUBBASIN AREA PRECIPITATION DATA STORM INCREMENTAL 0.01 0 .25 0.01 SCS LOSS RATE STRTL CRVNBR RT IMP 2.60 BASIN TOTAL PRECIPITATION PRECIPITATION PATTERN 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.19 0.08 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 INITIAL ABSTRACTION CURVE NUMBER 0.02 O.D2 0.35 85.00 0.00 PERCENT IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.08 0 .02 SCS DIMENSIONLESS UNITGRAPH 1. 13. 2. 0. TLAG 0.60 LAG 3. 11. 1. 0. 5. 8. 1. o. 9. 7. 1. o. *** UNIT HYDROGRAPH 38 END-OF-PERIOD ORDINATES 13. 16. 18. 5. 4. 4. 1. 1. 0. o. 0. 0. 0.19 0 .02 18. 3. 0. 0. 0.25 0 .02 17. 2. 0. 0.25 0 .01 15. 2. 0. 0.25 0.01 • e e *********************************************************************************************************************************** HYDROGRAPH AT STATION B5 *****~***************************************************************************************************************************** * DA MON HRMN ORD RAIN LOSS EXCESS COMP Q * DA MON HRMN ORD RAIN LOSS EXCESS COMP Q er 1 1 00( 0005 0010 0015 0020 1 l 2 3 4 5 . 001 0.01 0 .01 0.01 0.03 ). OCl 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 o. 0( 0.00 o.oo 0.00 0.00 o. 0. o. 0. i * e: * * Page 4 1 1 1 1 1 n39 0140 0145 0150 0155 _o 21 22 23 24 -. 01 0.01 0 .01 0.01 0.01 -.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -. 01 t 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 L . • 16. 15. 13 . 11. e ·e • • • C:\JLBCIV-1\PROJEC-2\1098-S-l\OFFSITE 1 0025 6 0.03 0.03 0.00 0. * 1 0200 25 0.01 0.00 0.01 9. 1 0030 7 0.12 0.12 0.00 0. * 1 0205 26 0.00 0.00 0.00 8. 1 0035 8 0.28 0.27 0.01 0. * 1 0210 27 0.00 0.00 0.00 7. 1 0040 9 0.37 0.26 0.11 0. * 1 0215 28 0 .00 0.00 0.00 6. 1 0045 10 0.37 0.19 0.18 1. * 1 0220 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 5. 1 0050 11 0.37 0.14 0.22 1. * 1 0225 30 0.00 0.00 0.00 4. 1 0055 12 0.37 0.11 0.26 3. * 1 0230 31 0.00 0.00 0.00 4. 1 0100 13 0.28 0.07 0.21 5. * 1 0235 32 0.00 0.00 0.00 3. 1 0105 14 0.12 0.03 0.09 8. * 1 0240 33 0.00 0.00 0.00 3. 1 0110 15 0.03 0.01 0.02 12. *. 1 0245 34 0.00 0.00 0.00 2. 1 0115 16 0.03 0.01 0.02 15. * 1 0250 35 0.00 0.00 0 .00 2. 1 0120 17 0.03 0.01 0.02 17. * 1 0255 36 0.00 0.00 0.00 1. 1 0125 18 0.03 0.01 0.02 18. * 1 0300 37 0.00 0.00 0.00 1. 1 0130 19 0.03 0.01 0.02 18. * e * ******************************************************************************************************************************-***** TOTAL RAINFALL = 2 .60, TOTAL LOSS= 1.34, TOTAL EXCESS = 1. 26 PEAK FLOW TIME MAXIMUM AVERAGE FLOW 6-HR 24-HR 72-HR 3.00-HR (CFS) (HR) (CFS) 18. 1. 50 6. 6. 6. 6. (INCHES) 1.234 1.234 1. 234 1. 234 (AC-FT) 2. 2. 2. 2. CUMULATIVE AREA = 0.02 SQ MI *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***. *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 15 KK 17 KO ************** * * * B3 * * * ************** OUTPUT CONTROL IPRNT I PLOT QSCAL IPNCH IOUT ISAVl ISAV2 TIM INT VARIABLES 0 0 0 . 0 22 1 37 0.083 PRINT CONTROL PLOT CONTROL HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE PUNCH COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH SAVE HYDROGRAPH ON THIS UNIT FIRST ORDINATE PUNCHED OR SAVED LAST ORDINATE PUNCHED OR SAVED TIME INTERVAL IN HOURS e • . 00 •• • 18 BA 19 PB 21 PI 24 LS 25 UD • C:\JLBCIV-l\PROJEC-2\1098-S-l\OFFSITE SUBBASIN CHARACTERISTICS TAREA 0.00 SUBBASIN AREA PRECIPITATION DATA STORM 2.60 BASIN TOTAL PRECIPITATION INCREMENTAL 0.01 0.25 0.01 PRECIPITATION PATTERN 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.19 0.08 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 INITIAL ABSTRACTION CURVE NUMBER 0.02 0.02 SCS LOSS RATE STRTL CRVNBR RTIMP 0.35 85.00 0.00 PERCENT IMPERVIOUS AREA SCS DIMENSIONLESS UNITGRAPH TLAG 0.60 LAG *** 0.08 0.02 UNIT HYDROGRAPH 38 END-OF-PERIOD ORDINATES 0. 0. 1. 1. 2. 2. 2. 2. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 0 . 0. 0. o. o. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. o. 0. 0. 0.19 0.02 2. o. o. o. 0.25 0.02 2. o. 0. 0.25 0.01 2. o. 0. 0.25 0.01 • e *********************************************************************************************************************************** HYDROGRAPH AT STATION B3 *****************************************************************:**************************************************************~ DA MON HRMN ORD RAIN LOSS EXCESS COMP Q * DA MON HRMN ORD RAIN LOSS EXCESS COMP Q * 1 0000 1 0.00 0.00 o,oo 0. * 1 0135 20 0.01 0.00 0.01 2. 1 0005 2 0.01 0.01 0.00 0. * 1 0140 21 0.01 0.00 0.01 2. 1 0010 3 0.01 0.01 0.00 o. * 1 0145 22 0.01 0.00 0.01 2. 1 0015 4 0.01 0.01 0.00 0. * 1 0150 23 0.01 0.00 0.01 2. 1 0020 5 0.03 0.03 0.00 0. * 1 0155 24 0.01 0.00 0.01 1. 1 0025 6 0.03 0.03 0.00 0. * 1 0200 25 0.01 0.00 0.01 1. 1 0030 7 0.12 0.12 0.00 o. * 1 0205 26 0.00 0.00 0.00 1. 1 0035 8 0.28 0.27 0.01 0. * 1 0210 27 0.00 0.00 0.00 1. 1 0040 9 0.37 0.26 0.10 0. * 1 0215 28 0.00 0.00 0.00 1. 1 0045 10 0.37 0.19 0.18 0. * 1 0220 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 1. 1 0050 11 0.37 0.14 0.22 0. * 1 0225 30 0.00 o.oo 0.00 1. 1 0055 12 0.37 0.11 0.25 0. * 1 0230 31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 1 0100 13 0.28 0.07 0.21 1. * 1 0235 32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 1 0105 14 0.12 0.03 0.09 1. * 1 0240 33 0.00 0.00 0.00 o. 1 0110 15 0.03 0.01 0.02 2. * 1 0245 34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 1• .i 01 ; 0125 0130 17 18 19 I , 03 ! 0.03 0.03 ).0) 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 2. 2. * e: * 1 1 )25~ 0300 J6 37 _.oo 0.00 _.oo 0.00 -· 00 : 0.00 • o. *********************************************************************************************************************************** Page 6 e e • TOTAL RAINFALL = PEAK FLOW TIME (CFS) (HR) 2. 1. 50 2 .60, TOTAL LOSS (CFS) (INCHES) (AC-FT) 1. 6-HR 1. 231 0. CUMULATIVE AREA = • C:\JLBCIV-l\PROJEC-2\1098-S-l\OFFSITE 1.34, TOTAL EXCESS = MAXIMUM AVERAGE FLOW 24-HR 72-HR 1. 1. 231 0. 0.00 SQ MI 1. 1. 231 0. 1.26 1. 3.00-HR 1.231 0. • e *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 26 KK 28 KO 31 IN 29 BA 30 PB 32 PI ************** * * B4 * * * * ************** OUTPUT CONTROL IPRNT TIME I PLOT QSCAL IPNCH IOUT ISAVl ISAV2 TI MINT DATA FOR JXMIN JXDATE JXTIME VARIABLES 0 0 o. 0 22 1 37 0.083 INPUT 1 TIME 5 0 0 SUBBASIN RUNOFF DATA SUBBASIN CHARACTERISTICS PRINT CONTROL PLOT CONTROL HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE PUNCH COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH SAVE HYDROGRAPH ON THIS UNIT FIRST ORDINATE PUNCHED OR SAVED LAST ORDINATE PUNCHED OR SAVED TIME INTERVAL IN HOURS SERIES TIME INTERVAL STARTING DATE STARTING TIME IN MINUTES TAREA 0.00 SUBBASIN AREA PRECIPITATION DATA STORM 2.60 BASIN TOTAL PRECIPITATION INCREMENTAL PRECIPITATION PATTERN e v.v ..... v. v• V• Y ... v•r-~:;;21 (){~ 1~:~i o.L I.. _J i _.oat i _. _2 I I 0. -- 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 • v:oi! o.L... i. • 35 LS SCS LOSS RATE STRTL 0.35 INITIAL ABSTRACTION CRVNBR 85 .00 CURVE NUMBER RT IMP 0.00 PERCENT IMPERVIOUS AREA Page 7 e e • • • C:\JLBCIV-l\PROJEC-2\1098-S-l\OFFSITE 36 UD SCS DIMENSIONLESS UNITGRAPH TLAG 0.60 LAG *** UNIT HYDROGRAPH 38 END-OF-PERIOD ORDINATES 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. o. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. o. o. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. ********************************************************************************************************************************~ HYDROGRAPH AT STATION B4 *********************************************************************************************************************************** * DA MON HRMN ORD RAIN LOSS EXCESS COMP Q * DA MON HRMN ORD RAIN LOSS EXCESS COMP Q * 1 0000 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. * 1 0135 20 0.01 0.00 0.01 1. 1 0005 2 0.01 0.01 0.00 0. * 1 0140 21 0.01 0.00 0.01 1. 1 0010 3 0.01 0.01 0.00 0. * 1 0145 22 0.01 0.00 0.01 1. 1 001 5 4 0 .01 0 .01 0 .00 0. * 1 0150 23 0.01 0.00 0.01 1. 1 0020 5 0.03 0.03 0.00 0. * 1 0155 24 0 .01 0 .00 0 .01 0 . 1 0025 6 0.03 0.03 0.00 0. * 1 0200 25 0.01 0.00 0.01 0. 1 0030 7 0.12 0.12 0.00 0. * 1 0205 26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 1 0035 8 0.28 0.27 0.01 0. * 1 0210 27 0.00 0.00 0.00 o. 1 0040 9 0.37 0.26 0.10 o. * 1 0215 28 0.00 0.00 0.00 o. 1 0045 10 0.37 0.19 0.18 o. * 1 0220 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 1 0050 11 0.37 0.14 0.22 0. * 1 0225 30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 1 0055 12 0.37 0.11 0.25 0. * 1 0230 31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 1 0100 13 0.28 0.07 0.21 0. * 1 0235 32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. e 1 0105 14 0.12 0.03 0.09 0. * 1 0240 33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 1 0110 15 0.03 0.01 0.02 0. * 1 0245 34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 1 0115 16 0.03 0.01 0.02 1. * 1 0250 35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 1 0120 17 0.03 0.01 0.02 1. * 1 0255 36 0.00 0.00 0.00 o. 1 0125 18 0.03 0.01 0.02 1. * 1 0300 37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 1 0130 19 0.03 0.01 0.02 1. * * *********************************************************************************************************************************** TOTAL RAINFALL = 2.60, TOTAL LOSS= PEAK FLOW TIME 6-HR (CFS ) (HR) (CFS) 1. 1. 50 I 0. I (INCHES) 1. 231 I (AC-FT) o. 1.34, TOTAL EXCESS = MAXIMUM AVERAGE FLOW 0. 24-HR 72-HR 1. 231 0. 0. 1. 231 0. 1. 26 0. 3.00-HR 1.231 0. . \ ,-----,-·-1 · --,-1 -r ----T ' { \ . I l l • • • *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Page 8 e e • 37 KK 39 KO 42 IN 40 Bil. 41 PB 43 PI 46 LS 47 UD • C:\JLBCIV-l\PROJEC-2\1098-S-l\OFFSITE ************** * * * B6 * * * ************** Offsite Basin OUTPUT CONTROL IPRNT I PLOT QSCAL IP NCH IOUT ISAVl ISAV2 TIM INT VARIABLES 0 0 0. 0 22 1 37 0.083 PRINT CONTROL PLOT CONTROL HYDROGRAPH PLOT SCALE PUNCH COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH SAVE HYDROGRAPH ON THIS UNIT FIRST ORDINATE PUNCHED OR SAVED LAST ORDINATE PUNCHED OR SAVED TIME INTERVAL IN HOURS TIME DATA FOR INPUT TIME SERIES JXMIN 5 TIME INTERVAL IN MINUTES JXDATE 1 0 STARTING DATE JXTIME 0 STARTING TIME SUBBASIN RUNOFF DATA SUBBASIN CHARACTERISTICS TAREA 0.01 SUBBASIN AREA PRECIPITATION DATA STORM 2.60 BASIN TOTAL PRECIPITATION INCREMENTAL 0.01 0.25 0.01 PRECIPITATION PATTERN 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.19 0.08 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 INITIAL ABSTRACTION CURVE NUMBER 0.02 0.02 SCS LOSS RATE STRTL CRVNBR RT IMP 0.35 85.00 0.00 PERCENT IMPERVIOUS AREA SCS DIMENSIONLESS UNITGRAPH TLAG 0.60 LAG *** 0.08 0 .02 UNIT HYDROGRAPH 0. 7. 1. 6 . 3. 4. 5. 3. 38 END-OF-PERIOD ORDINATES 7. 8. 9. 3. 2. 2 . 0.19 0.02 9. 2. 0.25 0.02 9. 1. 0.25 0.01 8. 1. 0.25 0.01 • e e L .. ~ ~ . I (. ·'. .. :: I o :t ,(. I ~~ I o ~ [ ~ i \ J~ \ -~J 1 I ; I I .\ **** ... ****************************************************.******************************.-1!'*****************.*****.**'ll'******* HYDP.OGRAPH AT STATION 86 P4g'e 9 e e • • • C:\JLBCIV-l\PROJEC-2\1098-S-l\OFFSITE *********************************************************************************************************************************** * DA MON HRMN ORD RAIN LOSS EXCESS COMP Q * DA MON HRMN ORD RAIN LOSS EXCESS COMP Q * 1 0000 1 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0. * 1 0135 20 0.01 0.00 0.01 9. 1 000 5 2 0 .0 1 0.01 0.00 0 . * 1 0140 21 0.01 0.00 0.01 8. 1 00 1 0 3 0.01 0.01 0.00 0. * 1 0145 22 0.01 0.00 0.01 8. 1 0015 4 0.01 0.01 0.00 0. * 1 0150 23 0.01 0.00 0.01 7. 1 0020 5 0.03 0.03 0.00 0. * 1 0155 24 0.01 0 .00 0.01 6. 1 0025 6 0.03 0.03 0.00 0. * 1 0200 25 0.01 0.00 0.01 5. 1 0030 7 0.12 0.12 0.00 0. * 1 0205 26 0.00 0.00 0.00 4. 1 0035 8 0.28 0.27 0.01 0. * 1 0210 27 0.00 0.00 0.00 4. 1 0040 9 0.37 0.26 0.11 0 . * 1 0215 28 0.00 0.00 0.00 3. e 1 0045 10 0.37 0.19 0.18 0. * 1 0220 29 0 .00 0.00 0.00 3. 1 0050 11 0.37 0.14 0.22 1. * 1 0225 30 0.00 0.00 0.00 2. 1 0055 12 0.37 0.11 0. 26 1. * 1 0230 31 0.00 0.00 0.00 2. 1 0100 13 0.28 0 .07 0.21 3. * 1 0235 32 0.00 0.00 o.oo 2. 1 0 105 14 0.1 2 0.03 0.09 4. * 1 0240 33 0.00 0.00 0.00 1. 1 OllO 15 0.03 0.01 0.02 6. * 1 0245 34 0.00 0.00 o.oo 1. 1 0115 16 0.03 0.01 0.02 8. * 1 0250 35 0.00 0.00 0.00 1. 1 0120 17 0.03 0 .01 0.02 9. * 1 0255 36 0 .00 0.00 0 .00 1. 1 0125 18 0.03 0.01 0.02 9. * 1 0300 37 0. 00 0.00 0.00 1. 1 0130 19 0 .03 0.0 1 0.02 10 . * * *********************************************************************************************************************************** TOTAL RAINFALL = 2. 60, TOTAL LOSS = 1.34, TOTAL EXCESS = 1. 26 PEAK FLOW TIME MAXIMUM AVERAGE FLOW 6-HR 24-HR 72-HR 3.00-HR (CFS) (HR) (CFS) 10 . 1. 50 3. 3. 3 . 3. e (INCHES ) 1.2 3 4 1. 234 1. 234 1.234 (AC-FT) 1. 1. 1. 1. CUMULATIVE AREA = 0.01 SQ MI *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 48 KK ************** * * * * NodelO * * ************** :JV !\V -. VUJ.~U.1. \,.,VL,.LL,...,,~ .,~,·~--... I . I PLOT QSCAL IPNCH IOUT ISAVl ISAV2 0 o. 0 22 1 37 ~IN~ ITRO PLOT CONTROL • HYDROGRAPH PLOT SC . PUNCH COMPUTED HYDROGRAPH SAVE HYDROGRAPH ON THIS UNIT FIRST ORDINATE PUNCHED OR SAVED LAST ORDINATE PUNCHED OR SAVED Page 10 • e e D • 51 HC TIMINT • C :\JLBCIV-l\PROJEC-2\1098-S-l\OFFSITE 0.083 TIME INTERVAL IN HOURS HYDROGRAPH COMBINATION ICOMP 4 NUMBER OF HYDROGRAPHS TO COMBINE *** • *********************************************************************************************************************************** HYDROGRAPH AT STATION NodelO SUM OF 4 HYDROGRAPHS ********************************************************************************************************************************~ * * . * DA MON HRMN ORD FLOW * DA MON HRMN ORD FLOW * DA MON HRMN ORD FLOW * DA MON HRMN ORD FLOW * * * 1 0000 1 0. * 1 0050 11 2. * 1 0140 21 28. * 1 0230 31 6. 1 0005 2 0. * 1 0055 12 5 . * 1 0145 22 25. * 1 0235 32 5. 1 0010 3 0. * 1 0100 13 9. * 1 0150 23 22. * 1 0240 33 4. 1 0015 4 0. * 1 0105 14 14. * 1 0155 24 18. * 1 0245 34 4. 1 0020 5 0. * 1 0110 15 20 . * 1 0200 25 16. * 1 0250 35 3. 1 0025 6 0. * 1 0115 16 25. * 1 0205 26 14. * 1 0255 36 2 . 1 0030 7 0. * 1 0120 17 29. * 1 0210 27 12. * 1 0300 37 2. 1 0035 8 0 . * 1 0125 18 31. * 1 0215 28 10. * 1 0040 9 0. * 1 0130 19 31. * 1 0220 29 9. * 1 0045 10 1. * 1 0135 20 30. * 1 0225 30 7. * * * * *********************************************************************************************************************************** PEAK FLOW TIME (CFS) 31. (HR} 1. 50 OPERATION HYDROGRAPH AT BS MAXIMUM AVERAGE FLOW 6-HR 24-HR 72-HR 3.00-HR (CFS) 11. 11. 11. 11. (INCHES) 1.233 (AC-FT) 3. CUMULATIVE AREA = STATION 18. PEAK FLOW 1. 50 1.233 1. 233 1.233 3 . 3. 3. 0.04 SQ MI RUNOFF SUMMARY FLOW IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND TIME IN HOURS, AREA IN SQUARE MILES TIME OF AVERAGE FLOW FOR MAXIMUM PERIOD PEAK 6-HOUR 24-HOUR 72-HOUR 6. 6. 6. 0.02 BASIN AREA MAXIMUM STAGE TIME OF MAX STAGE e 1.£.&.L.l.L'~~.L4& .r.io.• \ i.f L ~I L . t I l ··' ( I i ,,O ,\ '~ ' < l ··o.6~1 \ ~ \! . \! \ -· -.:.- • HYDROGRA~H -AT • ) • B4 1. 1.50 o. 0. o. 0.00 HY.OROGRAPH AT Bf> 10. 1.50 3. 3. 3. 0.01 4 COM'SINED AT NOdelO 31. 1.50 11. 11. 11. 0.04 *** NORMAL END OF HEC-1 *** Page 11 ·e e • • • ·-~------·--. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechoical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@bpgeotech.com PRELIMINARY GEOTECBNICAL STUDY PROPOSED OFFICE/WAREHOUSE DEVELOPMENT SMITH PROPERTY, HIGHWAY 82, SOUTH OF GLENWOOD SPRINGS GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORAOO JOB NO. 101175 MARCH 30, 2001 PREPARED FOR: PRINCE CREEK CONSTRUCTION ATIN: DAVID mcKS 1051 COUNTY ROAD 111 CARBONDALE COLORADO 81623 • • •• HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC . March 30, 20CH Prince Creek Construction Attn: David Hicks · 1051 County Road 111 Carbondale Colorado 81623 Job No. 101 175 Subject: Report Transmittal, Preliminary Geot~hnical Study, Proposed Office/Warehouse Development, Smith Property, Highway 82, South of Glenwood Springs, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Hicks: As requested, we have conducted a preliminary geotechnical study for the proposed . development at the subject site. Geologic constraints which will affect the project development include debris flow, rockfall and hydrocompressive soils. Mitigation of these conditions will be needed as part of the site development plans. Subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory pits excavau:xt in the general building areas consist of medium dense, silty clayey sand and gravel with cobbles and boulders. The matrix soils are hydrocompressive. Groundwater was not encountered in the pits and the soils were slightly moist to moist . Development above roughly elevation 5,920 feet does not appear feasible based on the geologic conditions. Spread footings placed on the natural subsoils and designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 1500 psf appear suitable for building support. The foundations should be heavily rei¢'orced and tied together in a box-like fashion to limit the effects of differential settlement if the bearing soils become wetted. The report which follows describes our exploration, summarizes our findings, and presents our recommendations suitable for planning and preliminary design. It is important that we provide consultation during design, and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of the geotechnical recommendations. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us. Sincerely, ORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Rev. by: SLP DAY/djg '------------------ • • TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . 1 SITE CONDffiONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 FIELD EXPLORATION .......................... : . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 FOUNDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 FLOOR SLABS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM .................. -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 SITE GRADING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 5 SURFACE DRAINAGE ............................ · .. ·. . . . . 6 LOOTATIONS .............................................. 6 REFERENCES .................... ; ......................... 7 FIGURE 1 -LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURE 2 -LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURE 3 -LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURE 4-SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS . FIGURE 5 -SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 6 -GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE I-SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS H-P GEOTECH • • • -1 - PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a preliminary geotechnical study for a proposed office/warehouse development to be located on the Smith property, Highway 82, south of Glenwood Springs, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Fig . 1. The study was conducted in accor dance with our proposal for geotechnical engineering services to Prince Creek Construction, dated February 28, 2001 ; A field exploration program consisting of exploratory pits was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for project planning and prelUninary design. A review of the geologic conditions at the site was also done . This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents O\lf conclusion$ and recommendations based on the proposed development and subsurfilce conditio~ encountered . . PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed development will consist of several office/warehouse buildings conceptually located on the site as shown on Fig. 1. We assume the buildings will be two story, wood-frame structures, possibly with partial or full basement levels. Ground floors will probably be slab-on-grade. The development will be serviced with individual septic disposal systems. Once preliminary building and grading have been developed, we sho~d be contacted to review the plans and perform additional analyses as needed . H-P GEOTECH • • • -2 - SITE CONDITIONS The site consists of about 4 acres located adjacent the southern limits of the City of Glenwood Springs to the northeast of Highway 82. The terrain is moderately steep to steep, southwest facing hillside with slope grades ranging from about 25 to 40% in the upper eastern part and 10 to 20 % in the downhill western part. The elevation of the site ranges from about 5880 feet to about 6000 feet. The Glenwood Ditch, which is abandoned, crosses the north~t part of the property (see Fig . 1). The site is occupied by several existing structures including a residence and a mobile home as shown on Fig. 1. Portions of the site have undergone some previous grading consisting apparent of shallow cuts and fills. Vegetation consists of grass, weeds, brush and some trees. GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS The Glenwood Springs Metropolitan Area regional geologic hazard study indicates the site is exposed to debris flow, rockfall and hydrocompressive soil hazards (Lincoln-Devore, 1978). The Lincoln-Devore report found the debris flow, rockfall and liydrocompressive soil hazards risk to be severe. Regional mapping of the Glenwood Springs area by Kirkham and others (1995) indicates the surficial soil deposits are colluvium and younger debris flow deposits . The geologic conditions at the site should be considered in the project planning. We believe the debris flow and rockfall hazard risks in the upper, steeper part of the site are severe and will probably preclude development in that area. Development should be feasible in the less steep terrain provided the potential geologic hazards are · mitigated as needed . Mitigation of the debris flow and rockfall hazards may consist of berms or deflection structures. Recommendations to limit the hydrocompressive soil risk are provided in the "Preliminary Design Recommendation" section. When preliminary building plans have been developed, we should conduct geologic assessments to develop recommendations for mitigation of the debris flow and H-P GEOTECH • • • - 3 - rockfall hazards. We expect that the geologic constraints and mitigation will probably make development above roughly elevation 5,920 ·feet at the site infeasible. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on March 7, 2001. Seven exploratory pits were excavated at the locations shown on Fig. 1 to evaluate the general subsurface conditions. The pits were dug with a rubber-tired backhoe. The pits were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc . Samples of the subsoils were taken with relatively undisturbed and disturbed · sampling methods. Depths at which the samples were taken are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Pits, Fig. 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing . SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Fig. 2. The subsoils consist of about 1h to 1 1h feet of man-placed fill or 1h foot of organic topsoil overlying medium dense, silty clayey sand and gravel containing cobbles and small boulders extending to the pit depths of 6 V2 to 8 feet. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the pits included natural moisture-content and den8ity, gradation analyses and Atterberg limits. Results of swell- consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed drive samples, presented on Fig . 4 and 5, indicate low compressibility under natural moisture conditions and light loading with a low collapse potential when wetted under a constant light load. The samples showed moderate compressibility when loaded after wetting. Results of gradation analyses perfonned on disturbed bulk samples (minus 5 inch fraction) of the natural granular soils are shown on Fig. 6 . The laboratory testirig is summarized in Table I . H-P GEOTECH • • • - 4 - No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavation and the subsoils were slightly moist to moist. PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS The conclusions and recommendations presented below are based on the proposed development, subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory pits, and our experience in the area. The recommendations are suitable for planning and preliminary design but site specific studies should be conducted for the individual buildings. FOUNDATIONS Based on the nature of the proposed construction, lightly loaded spread footings bearing on the natural subsoils should be suitable for building support. The foundations should be heavily reinforced and constructed in a box-like configuration to limit the effects of differential settlement if the bearmg soils become wetted. Potential sources of wetting include surface water ponding, excessive irrigation and utility line leaks. Precautions should be taken to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. We expect the footings can be sized for an allowable bearing pressure on the order of 1500 psf. Existing fill, debris and topsoil encountered in building areas should be removed to expose the natural soils. Nested boulders and loose matrix soils may need treatment such as enlarging footings or placing compacted fill or concrete backfill. Foundation walls should be designed to span local anomalies and to resist lateral earth loadings when acting as retaining structures. Below grade areas and retaining walls should be protected from wetting and hydrostatic loading by use of an underdrain system . The footings should have a minimum depth of 36 inches for frost protection. FLOOR SLABS Slab-on-grade construction should be feasible for bearing on the natural soils or compacted structural fill. There could be some post construction slab movement if the H-P GEOTECH • • • - 5 - subgrade becomes wetted. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. A minimum 4 inch thick layer of free-draining gravel should underlie basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water \\'.as not encountered in the exploratory pits, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. An underdrain system should be provided to protect below-grade construction, such as retaining walls and basement areas from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup. The drains should consist of drainpipe surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1 % to a suitable gravity outlet. An impervious membrane such as 30 mil PVC should be placed below the drain gravel in a trough shape and attach~ to the foundation wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. SITE GRADING The risk of construction-induced slope instability at the site should be low (roughly below elevation 5,920 feet) provided the buildings are located in the less steep, lower part and cut and fill depths are limited . Cut depths for the building pads and driveway access should not exceed about 10 feet. Fills should be limited to about 10 feet deep and should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density near optimum moisture content. Prior to fill placement, the subgrade should be carefidly prepared by removing all vegetation, topsoil and existing fill and debris. The fill should be benched into the portions of the hillside exceeding 20% grade. The on- site soils excluding oversized rock and topsoil should be suitable for use in embankment fills . H-P GEOTECH • • • - 6 - Permanent unretained cut and fill slopes should be graded at 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter and protected against erosion by revegetation, ·rock riprap or other means. Oversized rock from embankment fi ll construction will tend to collect on the outer face. A protection fence should be provided downslope of the embankment toe to prevent rockfall into developed property and on Highway 82. This office should review site grading plans for the project prior to construction. SURFACE DRAINAGE The grading plan for the subdivision should consider runoff from steep uphill slopes through the project and at individual sites. Water should not be allowed to pond which could impact slope stability and foundations. To limit infiltration into the bearing soils next to buildings, exterior backfill should be well compacted and have a positive slope away from the building for a distance of at least 10 feet. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill and landscape irrigation should be restricted. The existing Glenwood Ditch is partly filled with debris from recent flows. The ditch should be cleaned out to provide interim debris flow protection until the site is developed. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted according to generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from available geologic reports, the exploratory pits located as showri on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed . If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described .in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made . H-P GEOTECH • • •• -7- This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for planning and prelimil!lary design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves. we should provide continued consultation. conduct additional evaluations and review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative . of the geotec_hnical engineer . Respectfully submitted • . David A. Young P . Reviewed by: ~-:f ,;°~ Steven L. Pawlak P. E. DAY/djg REFERENCES Lincoln-DeVore. 1978. Geologic Hazards of the Glenwood Springs Metropolitan Area, Garfield County, Colorado. Colorado Geological Survey Open File Report 7S-10. Kirkham, R.M. and Others, 1995 . Geologic Map of the Glenwood Springs Ql,ladrangle, Garfield County, Colorado. Colorado Geological Survey Open Fiile Map 95-3 . H-P GEOTECH • • • 5910 \. 5920 '\. ........ ' ' '\. 5900 \ \ \ \ PIT 7 \ \ \ 5890 \ \ \ \I \ \ \ \ • \. ......_ PIT 5880 EXISTING TRAILER HOME ' \ '\. \ \ I \ I \ I APPROXIMATE SCALE 1 w ·=-80. \ \ z \ \ ' \ \ '\. ' ' '\ ' '\. \. '\. '\. ' '\. ' \ '\. ' '\ '\. '\. '\. '\ '\ ' '\ " Q.( \ ' :e,, ' ' ·~()_ ' ' -o,... ' ' . 'V ' '\ \ 5880 .0 ' ' <-~ \ ~ \ 5920 5890 \ \ " I 101 175 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS CONCEPTUAL BUILDING LOCATIONS (TYPICAL) Fig. 1 • 0 J.) Q) Q) rx. .i:: 5 J.) g. 0 10 • 0 .&-I Q) Q) rx. ..c: 5 .iJ p. Q) Cl 10 • 101 175 PIT 1 ELEV.::::5883 I WC=7.4 DD=95 -200=60 I +4=60 -200=19 PIT 5 ELEV.=5909' PIT 2 ELEV.=5881' WC=8 .3 DD=l04 -200=35 LL=22 PI=l WC=l2.3 DD=l06 PIT 6 ELEV.=5893' --I I I -.J PIT 3 ELEV.=5902' --I -.J PIT 7 ELEV.=5907' -- I I +4=76 I -200=11 -.J PIT 4 ELEV.::::5885' WC=l0.9 DD=103 -200=52 LL=23 PI=4 WC=l2.0 DD=103 .Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Fig. 3 . HEPWQRTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS '----------------------- 0 .iJ Q) Q) 1%. 5 ..c: J.) ~ 0 10 0 J.) Q) Q) "" s ..s:: J.) p. Q) 0 10 Fig.2 • • • LEGEND: FILL; manplaced, silty sand and gravel to sandy clayey silt, moist, dark brown, some trash/debris . TOPSOIL; organic sandy clayey silt, moist, dark brown. SAND AND GRAVEL (SM-GM); with cobbles and small boulders, medium dense, slightly moist to moist, red-brown, r ocks are'primarily angular sandstone. 2• Diameter hand driven liner sample . Disturbed bulk sample. NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on March 7, 2001 with a backhoe. 2. 3 • 4. 5. 6. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features oh the site plan provided. Elevations of the exploratory pits were obtained by interpolation between contours on the site plan provided. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used . The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between mat erial types and transitions may be gradual. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) +4 = Percent retained on No. 4 sieve -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve LL = Liquid Limit ( % ) PI = Plasticity Index { % ) 101 175 HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig. 3 Mo isture Content = 7.4 percent Dry Density = 95 pcf • Sa mple of: Sandy Clayey Silt Matrix From : Pit 1 at 2.5 Feet 0 Compression II upon 1 l!l. wetting ~ 2 ~ c \~ 0 0 m CD 3 ..... a. E 0 (.) - 4 • 5 6 7 8 9 10 0.1 1.0 10 100 • APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf 101 175 HEPW~TH-PAWLAK SWELL CO NSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 4 GEOTE HNICAL, INC. • Moisture Content = 12.3 percent Dry Density = 106 pcf Sample of: SUty Clayey . Sand Matrix From: Pit 2 at 7 Feet 0 r--. I'-r-. t--.. ~'""" 1"'--r-. ~ 1 ~ ~ '"No movement c ~ upon 0 -.; wetting m 2 G L. \ ~ E 0 0 3 ~ > 4 0.1 1.0 10 100 • APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf Moisture Content = 12.0 percent Dry Density = 103 pct -Sample of: Very Sondy Clayey St1t Matrix From:Pit 4 at 4 Feet 0 I I ~~ - 1 10 -' ~ r--.. Compression ~ ,....!-. i-."upon c wetting 0 2 : I\ G ... ~ E 3 0 \ 0 4 ' \ I~ 5 I • 1.0 10 100 0.1 .' APPLIED PRESSURE -ksf HEPW©RTH-P AWLAK SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 5 101 175 GEOTECHNICAL. INC. I HlDRtlilETER NIAL lSIS I SIE'IE ANAL '\'SIS I lllE AEADINCS U.S. STAHDARI> SERIES I a.EAR SQ.I.ARE CP£HNOS Z4 HR. 7 HR 1 1/'X' 'S" 5"1" ft' ~ 1111. 15 .... lllollN. 111111. 4 1111. I Wl pm 1100 ~ fJIJ '" f8 14 3/r 3/4" 0 100 • 10 llO . 20 eo 0 (!) w z JO 70 z ~ ·~ u; ~ VI w 40 ICI < a::: ~ 0.. I-~~ I- z 50 50 z w w u () a::: l50 40 a::: w w 0.. 0.. 70 JO -llO 2D 90 10 100 0 .IXl1 JlQ2 .oas .!IOI .Diii M7 .1174 .150 .3ClD .IOD 1.11 2.31 4.75 8.512..5 111.0 :n.s 78.2 152 2113 12.7 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MIWMETERS a.AY TO Sl..T I ~ !COARSE I lii&fltU COARSE I COIB£S AHE I IEllllW FH: GRAVEL 60 % SAND 21 " SILT AND CLAY 19 % LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % SAMPLE OF: Silty Clayey Sandy Gravel with FROM: Pit 1 at 6 thru 8.5 Feet Cobbles • I HlllROM£1ER MM.TSS I ~ MAL'YSS I 1IE READelGS U.S. STAN>NID SEJIES I aIM SQUARE CPEHIHOS 24 HR. 7 HR 11/r :r' S"~ rt' 45 1111. 15 -. --1--. 4 ... 1-. f2a:J flllO f8J f3D fll Ill f4 3/r 3/4" 0 100 10 . 90 211 811 0 (!) w 311 ~ z z ~ u; (/) w 40 ISO < a::: 0.. I-I- z 50 50 z w ~ w (.) 0 a::: 61 40 a::: w w 0. 0.. 70 30 ~ Ill 20 IO 10 1DD D .DO! .oo:z .DCl5 .cot .019 .lIS1 .074-.1SI .300 Siii 1.111 2.31 4.75 L512.5 11.0 "ST..5 75.2 1S2 203 1Z7 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS a.A Y 1l> SILT I :wm troARSE I Z?W'L CXWISE I CXllBLES f1IE I loEllM F1NE GRAVEL 76 % SAND 13 " SILT AND CLAY 11 % UQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX " • SAMPLE OF: Silty Clayey Sandy Grovel with FROM: Pit 7 at 4 thru 6 Feet .. ·-. ----·-· Cobbles 101 175 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GRADATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 6 GEOTECHNICAL, INC. • • • HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE I JOB N0 .101 175 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RES UL TS SAMPLE LOCATION NAT\IRAL NATURAL ORADATION PERCENT ATTERBERO LIMITS UNCONFINED Pit DEPTH MOISTURE DRY GRAVEL SAND PASSINO LIQUID PLASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOIL OR 11••11 CONTENT DENSITY (%} (%} NO. 200 LIMIT INDEX STRENGTH BEDROCK TYPE l'lbl lpcf) SIEVE ('Mol ('Mol IPSFI -·---- 1 2% 7.4 95 60 Sandy Clayey Silt Matrix 6-8% 60 21 19 Silty Clayey Sandy Gravel with Cobbles e 2 5 8.3 104 35 22 1 Silty Clayey Sand Matrix 7 12.3 106 Silty Clayey Sand Matrix 4 2 10.9 103 52 23 4 Very Sandy Silt & Clay Matrix 4 12.0 103 Very Sandy Clayey Silt Matrix 7 4-6 76 13 11 Silty Clayey Sandy Gravel With Cobbles e ' ' • • • HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL SUBSOIL STUDY Hepwor -wlak Geotechnical, lnc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 email: hpgeo@hpgeotech.com FOR RETAINING WALL DESIGN PROPOSED IDGHW AY 82 DECELERATION LANE GLENWOOD COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT SOUTH OF GLENWOOD SPRINGS GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB N0.105 217 MAY 11,2006 PREPARED FOR: PRINCE CREEK CONSTRUCTION ATTN: DAVID IDCKS 2520 SOUTH GRAND A VENUE, SUITE 210 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 Parker 303-84 1-711 9 • C olorado Springs 71 9-63 3-556 2 • Si lverthorne 9 70-46 8 -1 989 • • • TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY ............................................................................ - 1 - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ..................................................................................... - 1 - SITE CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................... - 2 - FIELD EXPLORATION ................................................................................................. -2- SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ...................................................................................... -2- ENGINEERING ANALYSIS ......................................................................................... - 3 - DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................. - 3 - LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................... - 4 - FIGURE 1 -LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 -LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 -LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4 -GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1-SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS • • • PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed retaining wall to be constructed as part of the Highway 82 deceleration (and turn) lane into the Glenwood Commercial Center, south of Glenwood Springs , Garfield County, Colorado . The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the retaining wall design. The study was conducted in accordance with our proposal for geotechnical engineering services to Prince Creek Construction dated October 24, 2005 . We previously conducted a preliminary geotechnical study for the proposed commercial development, submitting our findings in a report dated March 30 , 2001, Job No. 101 175 . A field exploration program consisting of expl oratory borings was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory t o determine their classification and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for the wall design. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The wall will be located along the uphill, north ern side of Highway 82 and retain a cut slope needed for construction of the highway deceleration lane westbound turning lane. The wall will be about 400 feet long, extending from Highway Sta. 5 + 30 to Sta. 9+ 23, and be from about 5 to 12 feet high. The wall will be constructed of Stone Strong Blocks. The 24 SF blocks previously used at the project are 3 feet tall , 3 12 feet wide and 8 feet long modular concrete units that weigh about 5800 pounds each. The existing water and sewer lines in the driveway above the wall are t o be relocated further north outside of the retaining wall construction limits. A 15 inch di ameter corrugated metal pipe (CMP) culvert is planned below the wall at about Sta. 4+00 . Job No. 105 217 • • • -2- If the proposed construction changes significantly from that described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. SITE CONDITIONS The proposed retaining site is an existing cut at the base of generally moderately sloping terrain . The cut is steep and ranges up to about 12 to 14 feet high. We observe no signs of seepage or instability from the cut face and no free water was encolintered in the borings drilled above the cut. There is a driveway with a shallow fill embankment above the proposed retaining wall. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on November 16, 2005. Two exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck-mounted CME-45B drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with 1% inch and 2 inch I.D . spoon samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. Tbis test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils . Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsoils, below about Yi to 2Yi feet of base course and sandy clayey silt fill , consisted of medium dense, silty to occasionally very silty sand and gravel with cobbles and small boulders that extended to the drilled depths of 24Yi and 26 feet. Drilling in the course Job No . 105 217 • • • - 3 - granular soils with auger equipment was occasionally difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content and dry density, and gradation analyses. Results of gradation analyses performed on small diameter drive samples (minus 1 Y2 inch fraction) of the mainly sandy soils are shown on Figure 4. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table 1. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling and the subsoils were moist in the fill becoming slightly moist with depth. ENGINEERING ANALYSIS It should be feasible to construct the retaining wall with the Stone Strong Blocks. The lower wall sections should act as gravity retaining structures. Mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) should be provided behind the taller sections of the wall for stability. The earth reinforcement should consist of geo-grid placed between each course of the block and extended the specified distance behind the block. An underdrain should be provided behind the MSE backfill to prevent build-up of hydro-static pressure. Due the variability of the on-site soils, an imported aggregate base course or similar material should be used as the MSE backfill. For our analysis, we assumed the foundation and retained soils have an angle of internal friction of 30 degrees, no cohesion and a unit weight of 120 pcf. We also assumed the MSE backfill material will have a minimum angle of internal friction of 34 degrees , no cohesion and a unit weight of 130 pcf. Due to the slope up to the driveway above the wall face , surcharge from a 2 horizontal to 1 vertical slope and 100 psfunifonn load were also assumed. The design is based on the 24 SF blocks, that are 3 feet tall , will be used for the wall construction. The blocks have a natural constructed batter of about 1 horizontal to 11 vertical . DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS The mechani _cally stabilized earth (MSE) w~l should be constructed with geo-grid placed on each block level (3 foot intervals) and extended behind the blocks a distance equal to Job No. 105 217 • • • -4- at least 0.8 the wall height. The geo-grid should extend a uniform distance behind the wall based on the total wall height at that location. The geo-grid should consist of Tensar UX 1500 or equivalent with the long axis of the grid placed perpendicular to the wall face. The MSE backfill should consist of aggregate base course meeting Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Class 5 or 6 specifications, or CDOT Class 1 structure backfill specifications. The MSE backfill should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum modified Proctor density (ASTM D-1557) at a moisture content within about 2% of optimum . Twelve inches of aggregate base course compacted to at least 95% modified Proctor density should be placed as a leveling course below the blocks. At the base of the wall, the blocks should bear at l east 12 inches below the ground surface at the face. For wall areas 8 feet or less in height, no geo-grid reinforcement is needed. An underdrain should be provided behind the wall face and at the base of the MSE backfill. The drain should consist of 4 inch diameter perforated PVC pipe surrounded above the invert level with free-draining granular material at least 1 foot thick that extends up the entire height of one wall face on geogrid reinforcement. The drain pipe should slope at a minimum 1 % grade to a suitable gravity outlet. Free-draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. Filter fabric such as Mirafi 140N or equivalent should separate the drain gravel from the on-site soils. The void space in the blocks should be backfilled with free draining gravel. A drainage mat covered with filter fabric can be used against the uphill cut face instead of the drain gravel. A swale should be provided above the top of the block wall and the driveway should have an uphill cross slope to divert surface water. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Figure 1, the design guidelines by Tensar, Inc . and Stone Strong Systems, Job No. 105 217 • • • - 5 - and our experience with similar wall systems . If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We should observe the subgrade preparation for the wall and the underdrain construction, and observe placement and test compaction of the MSE backfill material on a regular basis to evaluate compliance with our recommendations . Respectfully Submitted, Reviewed by: Steven L. Pawlak, P.E. DAY/ksw cc: JLB Engineering Consultants -Attn: Jim Blankenship Job No. 105 2 17 - APPROX!MA TE SCALE : 1" = 60 ' I I I I \ \ ' ' ' .... !-..... / 2552 HIGHWAY 82 ' i PROPOSED ; RETAINING WALL / I I -.. __ 'o, / i ! l I i ~.__ ____ _._i l,_,.,_t..f.Ll.. __ _...1.1... __ ..:,_,....;_..i....-..i.,r----.--i;~/-/1------------------------"T---------' 105 217 LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 1 ·-1 I • 0 5 10 li) al LL r. "5. al 15 0 20 25 30 105 217 BORll\JG 1 ELEV.= 98.3' 24/12 11/12 WC=3 .3 +4=19 -200=47 11/12 WC=3.5 00=113 15/12 BO RING 2 ELEV.= 106 .9' 5/6,20/6 WC=13.6 00=116 -200=79 40/12 45/12 WC=4 .3 00=128 45/12 +4=19 -200=51 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3 . LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS 0 5 10 a> al LL ..c Ci. 15 Q) 0 20 25 30 Figure 2 • LEGEND: BASE COURSE ; tor roadway surface, about 8 to 12 inches thick . FILL ; manplaced sandy clayey silt, stiff, moist, red-brown. SAND (Slvl); silt to very silty , gravelly, scattered cobbles , medium dense, sl ightly moist, red-brown . Rocks are primarily subangula r. SAND AND GRAVEL (SM-GM); with cobbles and small bou lders, silty , medium dense , slight ly moist, red -brown. Rocks are primarily subangular . 24/12 T NOTES: Relatively und isturbed drive sample; 2-inch l.D . California line r sample . Drive sample; standard penetrat ion test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch 1.0 . split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586 . Drive sample blow count ; indicates that 24 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches . Practical drilling refusal. Where shown above bottom of Jog, indicates that multiple attempts were made to advance the boring. 1 . Exploratory borings were drilled on November 16, 2005 with 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided . 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were determined by instrument level and refer to the Bench Mark shown on Figure 1 . Boring logs are drawn to depth . 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual . · 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling . Fluctuation in water level may occur with time . 7. LaboratOry Testing Results: WC= Water Content ('1<'.) DD = Dry Density (pcf) 0 +4 = Percent retained on the No . 4 sieve -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 105 217 ~ HEPWOR'Tl+PAWl..AK GEOTECHNICAL LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3 • s1::vr: ANA LYSIS TIME READINGS U.S STANDARD S::RIES CLEAR SQUARE OP::l\IJ NGS ~s't11\I . 1~tMIN 60MINJ9MI N .4 MIN. 1 MIN . #20(1 #100 #50 #30 #16 #8 #4 3/8" 3/4' 1 1/2'" 3•· 5'6 ' 8 ' 0 0 0 0 2 w z 3 0 ~ w 4 er 0 1-z 5 w 0 0 er 60 w Q_ 70 BO 90 100 f f f ' 10f• 90 Bu CJ 70 ~ Cf) Cf) 6D 'cf 1- S(J z w u <C er w fl._ 30 20 1 0 .001 .Oil'.? .005 .009 .019 .03:' .07-4 .150 .300 .600 1.18 2 .35 4.7.5 9.5 12.5 , 9.0 3 7.5 75 .I 152 203 0 w z ~ w 0: I-z w 0 a: w CL 121 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS CU.\'TOSILi GRAVEL 19 % LIQUID LIMIT D I /D FINE SAMPLE OF: Very Silty Sand with Gravel HYDROMETER ANALYSIS TIME READINGS SAN D GRAVEL GOBEL.ES COARSf MEDIUM FINE COA RSo SAND 34 % SILT Al\ID CLAY 4 7 % PLASTICITY INDEX % FROlv1: Boring 1 at 5 Feet SIEVE ANALYSIS U.S. STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 24 R. 7HR 45 MIN . 15 MIN. 60M IN19MIN .4 MIN . 1 MIN. #200 #100 #50 0 #30 #16 #8 #4 3/8' 3/4" 1 1/2" 3' 5'6' B' 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 BO 90 100 .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .150 .300 .600 1.18 2 .36 4.75 9.S,2 _519.0 37.5 76.2 12~52 203 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS CLAY TO SILT S.<\ND GRAVEL C089L£S FINE MEDIUM COARS~ FINE COARSE GRAVEL 19 % SAND 30 % SILT AND CLAY 51 % LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % SAMPLE OF: Very Silty Sand with Gravel FROM: Boring 2 at 20 Feet 90 BO CJ 70 z (/) Cf) 60 ~ 1-z 50 w u 40 f5 fl._ 30 20 10 0 105 217 ~ GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure He wo rth -Powlok Geo t ec hnicol 4 • • • HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE 1 Job No . 105 217 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SAMPLE LOCATION NATURAL NATURAL GRADATION PERCENT ATIERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED MOISTURE DRY GRAVEL SAND PASSING LIQUID PLASTIC COMPRESSIVE SOJL OR BORING DEPTH CONTENT DEN SITT NO . 200 LIMIT INDEX STRENGTH BEDROCK TYPE (%) (%) SIEVE (ft) (%) Coen ('Yo) C'Yo) (PSF) 1 5 3.3 19 34 47 Very silly sand with gravel 10 3.5 113 Silty sand with grnvel 2 2'/z 13.6 116 79 Sandy clayey silt (fill) • 10 4.3 128 Silty sand and gravel -- 20 7.0 19 30 51 ·Very silty sand with gravel • • • HEPWORnf ·PAWL.AK GEOTECHNICAL April 6, 2005 Prince Creek Construction Attn: Fred CamerQti 2520 South Grand Avenue, Suite 210 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Hepworth·Pawlalc Oeocechnka}, inc- 50ZO C'..oun.ty Road 154 Glenwood Sprines, C-Olor~•:> 81501 Phone: 970.945·7988 Fax: 970.945-8454 email: hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Joh No. 105 217 Subject: Review of Proposed Retaining Wall Designs, Glenwood Commons- Phase I, Highway 82, South of Glenwood Springs, Garfield CoWlty, Coiorado Dear Fred: A5 requested, we have reviewed the designs for the proposed site retaining wall ju the areas of Buildings 1 and 2 currently under construction at the subject site. The review was performed as part of our professional. services agreement with Prince Creek Construction dated March 2, 2005. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotcchnical previously conducted a prellininary subsoil study at the site and presented our findings in a report dated March 30, 2001, Job No. 101 175. Proposed Site Walls: The site retaining walls are planned along the east and wesl sides of the property near Buildings 1 and 2. The walls on the east side will retain cut and be from about 3 to 14 feet high. There is an existing residence above the proposed wall at about 5 feet from the property line adjacent the deepest cut area. Kurtz and Associates has designed a cast-in-place concrete wall system for this area The walls along the west side will primarily retain fill and be from about 3 to 16 feet high. Some of these walls will retain run-off detention ponds (Ponds B and C) adjacent the west side of Buildings 1 and 2. It is desired to use "Stone Strong" block gravity retaining wall system, where feasibie . The system consists of prccast concrete open cell blocks and are proposed to be placed on a concrete footing and backfilled with crushed rock. The technical information on the modular block wall system was provided by Terry Kirk. Conclusions and Recommendations: It should be feasible to use the Stone Strong block retaining wall system for portions of the walls at the site. The primary exception is the tall wall section below the existing residence where there is a dsk of wall movement and ground settlement that could cause distress to the building. The cast-in-place concrete wall proposed by Kurtz and Associates appears suitable for the tall wall sectiotJ below the residence to help limit the potential for wall movement. An underdrain should be provided behind the walls to prevent build-up of hydrostatic prcsslll"e. The ba~kfill of the ca,<it-in_.place concrete below an effective 1 : l slope beyond the residence foundation should be a structural material, such as CDOT Class 5 or 6 aggregate base course, compa"''ted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density (SPD) at a moisture content within about 2% of optimum. We estimate this to be about the lower 1/3 of the Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719.-633-5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989 HJ3.l038 d-H 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs , co 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-9"5-845 .. hpq.,@hpgeotech.com Report of Masonry Grout Testing •·-••••••·••U•••••U•••••••·••••••••·••·•••••·••··-•••·•·••••-··--••••••••••••••••.-·-·•••••••• .... ,.,, .. ,,,,,_..,,, ..... ,..,, ... ,.,, .. ,,,,,,,,,,u _,.,, ............... --•··-·••••oo•••· .. -u o•••'""''''''"'n"o•o•••H ••'"''"'''"''"''u ooo ••-··•·••·-• Prince Cn!!ek . Construction David Hicks 2S20 South Grand Avenue, Ste. 210 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Job No : 105 217 Date: 4-7-05 Sheet 1of1 Project: Glenwood Commercial Project, Hwy 82, South Glenwood Springs, Colorado Placement Location : Unit 1, Front W•ll, 1st Lift Type & Size of Specimens: Cast In block cells and a 3u diameter core cut Supplier : Casey Concrete Mix Design No: -Time Batched: Ticket No: Truek No: Field Testing lnfonnation: Time Sampled : 1 :30pm Slump: -in. Watsr Added: - Air Temperature: -0 Sample Tempera ture : -0 c ornpress1ve s tren~ t hT esting Age Days 7 28 28 i Date Tested 4·14 S-6 5-6 . Maximum Load{lbs) 14,487 14,238 25,213 Length {in) 6.0 6.0 6.0 Diameter (in) 3.00 3.00 3.00 Area (inl) 7.07 7.07 7.07 UDRatio 2.0 2.0 2.0 l..ID Correction 1.0 1.0 1.0 Compressive Strength 2050 2010"* 3670 (psi) Specified Strength: 2000 psi @ 28 Days Progress Report: Grout was cast into block by contractor and picked up by HP Geotech 4-11-05. ** Core had a .defect along the side. Cop ies: · Kurtz & Assoeiates ~ Brian Kurtz Casey Concrete -Shawn Vondette Field Technician H'.)31038 d -H Michael Evans Reviewed By • HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL 5020 County Road 1S.. Glenwood Springs, CO 8160 1 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax:97o.H&8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST DATA Prince Creek Construction David Hicks · 2520 South Grand Avenue, Ste. 210 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Job No. 105 217 Date Cast 3-2-05 Sheet 1of1 Project Glenwood Commons Project, Hwy 82, South Glenwood Springs, Colorado Placement Location: Walls, Eastern End of Building Supplier: . Casey Concrete Time Batched: 9:58 10:20 10:34 Cubic Yds: 1 O at 30 of 60 Truck No: 17 Ticket No : 125242 Mix Design: 3500 psi Method of Placement: pump Time Sampled : · AirTemp: · Concrete Temp : Water Added: 10:40 51° 69" 5 gallons Time Arrived : Time Placed : Slump: Air Content: Wet. Unit Wt: Sample Point 5%in. 5.4% 137.0 Pcf truck discharge Recommencteg §)pecifications Slump: · 4 in. Air Content: 4-6 o/o ,.,._.,,.,_;_--.,,,,,,_,....,..,.,,...,,..,~.--...,._ .... ..,._,. .. _, ______ , ___ ,..,._,.,,NH_~H.J;.H,,_,•~-,.------"-- Time Cylinders Cast 10:55 Initial Cure : 24 hrs onsite Field Storage: i n sul box under blanket Date Stripped : 3-3~5 Cyl Temp@ Pick Up: n Min/Max: 61°/82° Compressive Strength 1 Compressive Age Days I Date Load Diameter Area Strength . Remarki lbs. in. in:l psi 7 3-9 43,200 4.02 12.69 3400 l 1 ) 7 3-9 42,800 4.02 12.69 3370 I 28 i 3.30 I 60,600 4.03 12.76 4750 1 28 . 3-30 I 60,800 4.02 12.69 4790 I f Specified Strength: 3500 psi@ 28 days Progress Report: Contractor and supplier were notified of test results. Copies: Kurtz & Associ~ -Bri an Kurtz Casey Concrete ;_Shawn Vondette c l/t:>0 'd Julia Rebel Fiel d Techn ici an H:l 31039 d -H Michael· Evans Reviewed By £17:11 900c -60 -A ~W • 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970.945·7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotach.com REPORT OF CONCRETE TEST DAT A ,., ..... ,,. .... ,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,.,.,.,,, .. ,,,,.,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,, .. ,,.,,,,,,,,,u.1.0.0.•.u.o.o •• o••···•·•••••••••••·-·•••••••••••·•••••••••••••••••••••••··••·.-ooo u oooo un•H••••••••,..•u••u .. o•·-.•·••••••••••.a•••·•··•-·••••••••••• .... ,,,,,.,.,,. ... ,,, Prince Creek ·construction David Hicks · Job No. 105 217 Date Gast 3-14-05 2520 SoUth Qrand Avenue, Ste. 210 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 . Sheet: 1 of 1 Project: Glenwood Commercial Project, Hwy 82, South Glenwood Springs, Colorado Placement Location: Walls, West End Building #2 Supplier: Casey Concrete 21 Time Batched: 1 :28 Cubic Yds : 4 at 11 of 44 Truck No: Time Arrived: 2:00 Ticket No: '125444 Time Placed: 2:10 Mix Design: Method of Placement: pump Sample Point: truck discharge , ____ ..__.. .. .,,,, ..... ..,._ __ ·---------.---.... -.. ,,,_;,~-----~- Time Sampled : Air Temp :·· 2:20 Slump: 4 in. 37° Air Content: 6.0 % Concrete Temp: 67° Wat Unit Wt 135.0 Pcf Water Added :· 1 O gallons added by pump operator Time Cylinders Cast 2:30 Initial Cure : · 24 hrs onsite Date Stripped : 3~15..05 I Age Day• I Date 3 I 3-17 i 7 I 3~21 28 I '~11 28 I 4-11 i I Field Storage: lnsul box Cyl Temp @ Pick Up: 44" Compressive strength Load Diamete r Area lbs. in. in 2 26,400 4.02 12.69 38,200 4.02 12.69 54,400 4.02 12.69 58,4'00 4.02 12.69 Specified Strength: 3000 psi @ 28 days Specifications Slump: 4 in. Air Content: 5~8 % Min/Max : 44°170° Compressive Strength Remarks psi 2080 3010 4290 i I 4440 I i -----~_.,,_,, _____ _..,.._,,,_ . ..__,,_...,._N_W, __ l f -•'"-''•'"''"•-~•'IMl -W""-""'•#,....HJ< Progress Report: Contractor and supplier were notifaed of test results . ........................... :•'"''''•: .,,.,,,, ........... , ........................................................................................................................................................................................... . Copies: Kurtz & A.sociatea -Brian Kurtz Casey Concrete -·Shawn Vondette Shane Ehlers Field Technician HJ31038 d-H Mich~el Evans Reviewed By £v:11 900c-60-A~w • ~ ·Gia ,~ HEPWORTH· PAWLAK GEOTEC:HNICAL 50ZO County Road 154 Glenwc:iod Springs. CO 81~1 Phona: 970-845-7988 Fu:970-945-8454 h pqeollhpqeotech&S!I!) Report of Masonry Mortar Testing ••-····• .. ••••••····•-•••••••••••••••••••••••H••••••••••,.•••·•·••·-··•······•••H••••••,...••-•n•••"'''''•u ooM o•o.&•Mo""'',..•·--•••••••.-.. -·ot•••"''''''O•••nu•u •o•••••-·•-•••••••••··-•"'''''.,''''''''''''''•" .. •••-•••••"''"''" .. ""''''''' Prince Creek .Constr:uction David Hicks Job No : 105 217 Date: 4-11-05 2520 South Gr.and Av•nue, Ste. 210 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Sheet: 1of1 Project Glenwood Commercial Project, Hwy 82 , So uth Glenwood Springs, Colorado Placement Location: Front W1ll 1 Unit 1, South End, 11th Course Type & Size of Specimens : 2 x 2 cubes Supplier: Permanent Bldrs Mix Design No : job mixed T ime Batched: not observed Type : N Field Testing lftormation : Time Sampleq: 3:15 Air Temperature : 63° Sample Temperature: 61° Compres8lve Strem Ith Testing Age Days 7 28 28 Date Tested 4-18 5~9 S-.9 Maximum Load "{lbs) 9496 12,973 12,915 Length (in) 2.0 2.0 2.0 Width (in) 2.0 2.0 2.0 Area (h') 4.0 4.0 4.0 Compressive Strength 2374 3240 3230 I (psi) Specffled Strength: 1800 psi @ 28 Days Progress Report · Sampled from tub on scaffolding • ............................. ................................................................ ,. ... , ... , ......................................................................................................... , ................... , ...... ,.,, ..................... . Copies: Kurtz & Associ.ates -Brian Kurt;i: Ca.ey Concrete -Shawn Vonclette Field Technician Reviewed By L---------··--··-······-·· •••·4 ·•·-- H:J31038 d-H £v :ll 900c -50-AtfW • • • cVl0"d HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNJCAL May 24, 2005 Prince Creek Construction Attn: Fred Cameron 2520 Sc:iuth Grand Avenue, Suite 210 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 J-lcp W\)r!..]! ... Pawla~ C tc1.~1.~\:h i 1 ~ .. ;;\. 1!u .. :. 5('~ ~1 Cu uu t r R,,,,,1 L;~ (;!L'ltW tli..~d Spr i1lg~. (: .. }l~)l'~~dc .. '• i ~:.~J Pl1 0m:: ll/C'··Y4 5-7;;1'1l JC ,,,, <)7:'-'>~'1-M '5 1i 1·1 n :1il: h pi.:c1 l:i'1•hpgL:1 11n·i·1 .• :1 1::: Job No. 105 217 Subjt:ct: Com1mmts Regarding Retaining Wall Construction. Northeast P{lrtion of Glenwood Commons -Phase I , Highway 82, South of Glenwood Springs, Garfield County, CoJorado Dear Fred: As requested, we arc providing comments rega rding construction of the cast-in-place concrete retaining wall co be located in the northeast portion of the subject site .. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotcchnical previously prov ided recommendations for wall :designs at t11c sjle submitting our findings in a report da ted April 6, 2005 under the above job numher . The retaining wall wHI he located below the residence adjacent the northeast property line. The wall will be cast in-place concrete construction as previously recommended to limit the potential for sl<)pe movement anc.l distress to the residence. Of concern is che pot~~tial for slope instability below the residence during construction of the wall. It is desir~d 1.0 u..(te drain gravel as the lower portion of the wall backfill to expedite the backfill placement and minimize vibration during the backfill operations . · The wall should be excavated, constructed and backfilled in at least two section,':> below the residence to limit the risk of slope instability . There is astep in wall footing elevation below about the middle of the residen ce that can serve as the divide point for the :;taged construction. The wall backfill can consist of drain gravel to within about 3 feet of the ground surface provided the backfill is pla<.:t!<l in relatively thin lifts and compacted with several passes of a vibratory compactor. The upper 3 feet (or more) of the backfill can consist or the on-site soils compacted as previously recomroen<led. The drain gravel should be separated from the on-s ite soils by filter fabric to prevent wasl .li.rig nf fines from the soil into the drain gravel The rct.<dning wall sections below the residence should be constrncted and bar:kfi.lled in a timely rnanner to reduce the time the exc;ivat ion cut slope is exposed. Surfact: water shoulcl :n ot be allowed co discharge onto and erode the exposed cut gJope. The cut slope should be observed for signs of instability on a r egular basis . If signs of inst;hility are ohs ervc<l, we should be contacted to observe the conditions and provide P[trk cr j;}j.,S 41-7ll9 t Colorado Springs 719J633 J5562 • Silverthorn e 970.-46 iJ-1989 H'.)31038 d-H £v:tt 900c-60-A ~w • • • cvs0·d Prince Creek Construction May 24 , 2005 Page 2 rcoommr.·mdations for remooial repair. Other re commendations provide in our previous report rh ar. are applicable should aL~o be observed If you have any questions or neetl further assist ance , please calJ our offo.:e _ Sincereiy, HEPWORTH~ PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL , INC_ David A .. Young, P.E. Rev. by : ·DEH DAY/djb cc: Kurtz and Associates -Attn: Brian Kur tz ...---------···-··--- Job No . 105 217 HJ31 038 d-H vv:ii 900c-60-A~w 6020 County Rold 1S4 Gl•nwood Springs, co 81601 Phone: 870-Ml-79aa · Fu: 870..9'5 84H hpgeaehpgeotech.oom REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Prince Creek Construction Job No.: 105 217 D1vfd Hicks 2520 South Gnand Avenue, Ste. 210 Glenwood Sprtrigs, CO 81601 Date: S-3-05 Sheet 1of1 Project: Gh~~wood Commercial Project, Hwy 82, South Glenwood Springs, Colorado Weather Conditions and Temperature: partly cloudy, SO's 0 Contractor's Activities: Major Equipment: H P Geotech'~ Site Activities: Site visit to collect a Hmple of proposed onslte backfill material for laboratory telting ; the 1'9sults •re attached. · Verbal Communication With: Copies: Kurtz & Anoclates -Brian Kurtz Tim Barrett Michael ".Evans Fleld Technician Reviewed By cV60'd HJ3103D d-H vv:11 900c-60-AtJW • • • Particle Size Distribution Report _,; i: -~ .!! ~ ·:' 0 .. a a Q .. ~ .~ o.: .~ ~ s ~ ~ i! '" "' ;;: ~ ~ ; .. ;;; ~ ,. ·X ; ,;.;1;1:: · .. :,,:=.:i.:' .• ·.• •. . ,=1' 1 ; !'.;j i.' ;, ! 1l i ~ ' ;:1 ·:; j i 1 I . ' . : ·~~· i_iL ;;j • : . . 90 ------~---:~·~-~:-•·~, ·---.. rn-• ! ;;; ~ l i ~: ~f ;~f:T~~~--- • •.. . . ., ' ;; ; . ifiii ';;. :ii!l!i i :-.. ~-1L ___ ;1-LD:nllk , !i.;r i ·1 i ... il'11i ii 1 ' : ·, . i . •, . : : I i '; ; I ;·1': I :; ·1' : ! : :I i id I : 100 ; I .. : '. i : ,i l : : t ·;-1-· ---;--- 1' I ' I I l ! : ~ : ~ : ~ ... ;..~~-..!..-· ---.. ···--- : ~ : . . ':,;: ,· 'l·!i;' -~:! ·i '. :.1.1,1~·:'1:. l, er 1 • ! · : · ; ~. : ! :: · ; : : :: • ! f:rr.r'.._il ; J [ \ ~1 1 1:: 1 w eo ---· ··-----------1.--~-· · ·----··~-.•. .,-,_, 1 j N · · r· r·-,~--+ -·-·-'--'--·-• : , ' ; :. • I I ' : :: I ; 1: I I 1 · · . . ! : ~! I : : I I I I ;-:-. -: ' I ~ :·.!! :: :: I • '1; ': : : 1!:'1: :: ~I : :Jii:1i: i I • ;!'.j ! : ; ~ 50 _ _.__: ___ · _· ___ · __ i _~_ l. :· : :.; . : i_j j_~_i_ ___ J .. ,..,i:l_,_i+!-ri._ii --;-l -:-~i 1'-!,_.-...,:i...,..l ..... i:1-!'c-i:-;-! -'~! :.:~:: 1 L.i··.:.·'·: . .L._; ...... : m · '· ·i'': i · i: ;: · i'iij i 1!1 . ; :1: ii :1 I:! ·11.:j1 i ~ . . ··,..;: :. ;: , ,.· ;:.:: i : itn!~;'1·~·4:· i: I .. ;:·ii i i!·i:· UJ 40 ,---: ' ' -i---' -· .,.'.--. -,:·~i-f--;:-t-:-1-·· . '.I l~-:~.:--,--:1 "' 1' 1' ---,:!,:'.:,: .. ··.:-i. ·.:--.,: -1.,-1· c.. : : : : I . ;: ' ,. '. ! !. ' ! :1 ' ' ' ! : I ' ! j': ' ' I •. ' !· . . ·1·1 ' •' I I "I . I. 1 · ' 'I' • 11' 1.: ! . ! I • • 1 • 1' 1 •' • l I J ,. 1 • • 11 · J • r I · 30 .,: 11' : ' i ! ~J.-~ ll ·,:; j : :: : ::11. : ! I II! II :I '1 I :, I : I : I ; !: :, ;,. ! ! ; ! : l _j____ ! '1 1,· II : :,· ,i :~: :,. ~ ,i.i : ;' l,t. :.: 1·:.1 1 ii I tt-H:!. l ', ;,' !,ii I I ii ;.· ': i, :.j iii: : ! : I -i l ; ! i ! i l ; 1· I I .. ' 'H' .. I ' 'i ·t • ' •• ' '' J ' ·11 .' 20 .. _ • .:...~ -· ·--~----·----·+-' ' ' .. ' . ··-· ! l : :.::. ' i: i' :: : 1!1: ! , : i ' !:11 ·1· i, I·' : 11,1· ! I -·n 1 .. : .. , .... I :·----- .; : : :;:::;! :: :: :; ; 1::::1:::' : 11:,, ·:!I[' [1:::,!:. i;i :: : : 11 10 ···-i--~--11\ :-t1~1 : l:--n:i: i : :n ·: ---r~--1·'~1::1: i 1 1 1 :·,-: 1 · i i' 1 1 • ::· 1 : 1 1 11 -m-;-;~Til ··--·:---- : •i :: I j • : 1::1 ! I .;: : ·1 : I 1 : : : 1: I I Ii :!;: i : 0 : ~ ;: ~ ! ~ ; : ; ; ! ! ! ' 1: ! 1 : j 1 ;i '. : I : l ' ' I I i : : i ! 500 100 1 0 .01 0.00 1 GRAIN SIZE -mm 1-......... %~C~O~S_B_L_ES~--~··~~~%~G~R~A~V~E~L~~-+-~~--~%~S=AN:::.:.:D:__ ___ --+-----'%:.:....=S~IL~T~~·_._~~%~C~l~A~Y~ 0 ; . 25 32 43 SIEVE l PERCENT SPEC .. SIZE FINE~ PERCENT 3 in. iQO I 1.S i n. 92. .75 in . .. 85 .375 in . 7S #4 l 7 5 #8 I 70 #16 66 #30 I 62 #50 S i · #100 5 1 #200 4 3 I I I l I I I I ! • (no spi:cilicati on pmvi d!!d) PASS? (X .. NO) : Soll Qescription Silty, cl ayey und with gravel Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318} PL::; 2 1 ll= 26 Pl= 5 Classjfic:ation uses= sc-sM AASHTO= A-4(0) Da5= 19 .0 030== Cu;; Coefficients 0 60 = 0-449 015= Cc::: Date Tested: 5-5-05 Tested By: AB .BB Remarklil See fi gu re la for maximum dry dens ity and o;;fom1m moisture . F .M .=2 .64 Sample No.: ! 14 -5 Source of Sample: On -Site Date Sampled: 5-3-05 Etev.roepth: Location: Wal! Baek.till Checked a ;,_!'viDE Title: Lab Mana11;er j Hepworth-Pawlak 1 Geotechnical, Inc. ~----·----~~·-·- Client: Prince Creek Consn·uction Project: Glenwood Commercial Center Proj ect. Highwa:-' s::~ G l<!1rn·o.;1d 1 Springs, Colorado I Project No: 105 2 17 Figure H'.)3103~ d-H 11 !I ll • • • COMPACTION TEST REPORT 123.0 : . i . ... . ........ ~ .. ~ --·-··· .. ·-.-~·---······'··----+-~--.,..--+--t-'--~-;.-.... i-1--""---'--_.:......~.....j --..-... _.-,--_-,--J ~-~-~~-=~~~-~-.--. : .. --#~·--~.: "" ----'---1,-;----r ~I--.:---:---'.'----' ·-~~~~_-_..... . --· -'. ....... -. •• : ••..... ..i ...... _:_,._~~---·~·-···; --L.-1--~i\~ ~· -..,.-;l-t----;---~-t---------i-··~·--.. -·-- 120.5 '. ' • '; : . : ; ',:: :!.:\\ i __ J__~--~ __ :,: ___ 1 _:_t ___ ,:.· __ ·•-"""' ·--·-·-··· ~---:-----···--. -'-+-+--~~-·-. ~ ••' -·-~ .... :. __ . \ \ i i ' ; I . _ _..:._ c._c ___ --' _) i...... : I i ! i I I : -1 --L ---:-;---1------~---,-·- i ' i -;-·-; \I ' , I i i I .-~-.·-·· ... -...... T-·r-··;~-.~--\ r \ I L I I i'--i-! -t---,-,~.-·:·--i- ---. -. , .• ~ ..... ___ ,.. ·i I\ l \ ! f ·:---t·-'1-.----,----;--,+--;---...,:·--r--T- 11a.01----.:.........;---;-._-+--i-:1,___---.---+---'----;---i-+-'--H-.;..-..;.--;--+--+--+--+-.,......;.........:.1 --+~~~;------i g_ ---;--·; ______ , d i , i I ! i \ I \ I ! ! i i : · ! : ~ ___ J~-+~--i___J_~---·-+---i ···-----L-)-L ] JK-f ! I !-~T~----:~1~-: ·-~ ·· ·:-->-:·--!·-.. · 1···1 --t--·i--1-~'. --'(~\---...l\--l__,_-:--~r ·+-~----.. -1-.: -i·-:- c --· . j _: _J _ L ..l-_J,... __ ! -__ I I I ·-r-1! --·1·--.-.,...1 -t--.,.-..,-!. ··--.-----1· i - ' Cl I • !' I I : : I I i ' I\ ' I 115 5 ! ' : , , ! : ' I : ! ! j -1 -L I i _i i H -'·-1--U---T---'----+--+-, ......;!----;..:-r-~·.i.-·-'-----1 ~,,..-. _l__j _j__, ! i 1 i I l ~ i i I I j_J_[ ~ ' : ; ' ' ' I I J. r 1· I i'·· I !, . 1· I 1.· j ' : ; : I ' ' I -~·--·~·-~<····--1---l-·-·-· --i----· +· --t---t+---+-'i-+---i--~-t---+ I, --+,.-,-·· .. _J,,---+---"-·-,:-- J l : . ; 1 ! ! ! ; f 113.0 ' > I • ; ' ···+-··!··-·+~·+-··---+'··: .. ··j ····j-r-..,...l--+:--;l-.;----i--+--t---\-r\--r!-1---.----J:---f-+-c-·-!-1-T--i ·-- --1---j--.'..-·i --' -] ' I ·4· ;~I ! I ·~-\ ' I I : I; : . '.''••'-1··· : I : : I ! l ! I I i : I ' .. --~--j--'.---1----+--:-; ....... !._ ; ····-+-·-· I 1 , ·->·--~ ZAV for __ : _ _j __ : __ J_ ___ ~_L_I___! i ' I , \ I i l ! ! i Sp.G. = 11 o.s : : : · r : : ! 1 ! I I I , IT : 1 • : 2 ·67 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Water conte nt, % Test specificatio n : Classification Nat. .1 %> %~ Elev( Depth uses AASHTO Moist. Sp.G. LL Pl 3/4 In. No.2 r r. SC -SM A-4(0) . TEST RE.SUL TS Maximum dry dens ity "" 121.9 pcf Optimum moisture ~ 9.8 % ProjectNo. 105 2 17 Cli ent; Prince Creek Construction Project: · Glenw ood CommCi·ci al Center· Proj ect , Highw ay 82 , Glenwood Sptings, 1 C olorado Date: 5-03 -05 ! • Location: WtJ li Bu ck fill COMPA CTION TES T REPORT L Hepworth-Paw .lak Geotechnical, Inc. 26 5 IS .O MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Silty, clayey sand with srav~I Remarks: s~ figure I for gr:id ai ion . S:i1T1ple 114-5 Figure H::l 310~ d-H 4J -- c:i · d lt:1101 ....-..t-IP ~tecri HEPWORTH ·PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone:97D-845-7988 Fax:970..e45-8454 hpgeo@hDaeotech.com Report of Masonry Grout Testing Prince Creek ·Construction David Hicks Job No: 105 217 Date: 6-15-05 2520 South Grand Avenue, Ste. 210 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Sheet: 1of1 Project Glenwood Commercial Project1 Hwy 821 South Glenwood Springs1 Colorado Placement Location: Unit 21 Bond Beam Type & Size of Specimens : Cast in block cells and a 3" diameter core cut Supplier: Casey Concrete Mix Design No: -Time Batched : Ticket No: Truck No: Field Testing Information: Time Sampled: Slump: -in. Water Added : - Air Temperatt.ire : --0 Sample Temperat ure: -0 c ompress1ve Str; th T ti eng es ng Age Days I 7 28 28 Date. Tested 6-22 7·13 7-13 Maximum Load {lbs) I 22,720 28,962 31,637 Length (in) 6.00 6.00 6.00 Diameter (in) 2.98 2.98 2.98 Area {in") 6.97 8.97 6.97 UD Ratio 2.01 2.01 2.01 UD Correction i 1.0 1.0 1.0 Compressive Strength 3260 4150 4640 (psi) Specified Strength: 2000 psi @ 28 Days Progress Report: Grout was cast into block by contractor and picked up by HP Geotech S.22-0S . ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... , .. Copies: Kurtz & Associates -Brian Kurtz Casey Concrete ~Shawn Vondette cl/cl 'd Field Technician H:>31039 d-H Micha~I Evans Revie~By s v:11 900c-60-AtlW i • • S~Vi~0 "d ~ HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL July I. 2005 Prince Creek Construction Attn: Fred Cameron 2520 South Grund Avenue, Suite 210 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 ~~e~~v'::11'.h -hwh1k G:'-~r~.('h'""":. h:L. )•)~.v ( ..c 1u111.y Roa<l 1 J4 C fen wood Springs, Colnrnd(' f; J e,[> l Phone; 970-94~-79HH Fnx ; 97'1 -9~5-8454 ("J\<\il; hpgco~l hp~e<it.f"dHom Job No. I 05 217 Su~jcct: Recommendations for Mechanically Stabilized Earth Retaining Wall Design, Glenwood Commons -Phase I. Highway 82, South of Glenwood Springs, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Fred: As requested, we are providing recommendations for mechanically stabilized eart.h (MSE) wall design at the subject site. Hepworth-Pawlak Gcotechnical previously provided general recommendations for retaining walls at the site, including the feasibility ofMSE \Vd!ls, submitting our findings in a report dated April 6, 2005, Job No t 05 217 . Stone Strong walls were originally planned for the retaining wall and detention pond areas on the west sides of Buildings l and 2. Due to the wall heights of up to about 14 feet, mechanically stabilized earth is needed to !lupport the Stone Strong walls. It is desired to use the on-site soils as the MSE backfill. Attached as Figures 1 and la are the laboratc)ry test results of standard Proctor, gradation analyses (minus 3 inch fract1011), and Atlt!tberg limits perfimned on a sample of the on-site soils. The soils are a silly clayey sand with gravel mixture. Based on the laboratory test results and our experience, we estimate an angle of internal friction of about 28 degrees, no cohesion, and moist in-place unit weight of about 125 pcfforthese soils. The MSE walls should be constructed with geo-grid placed on each block Level (3 foot intervals) and extend behind the blocks a distance equal to at least the wall height. The geo-grid should consist of Tensar UX 1500 or equivalent with the long axis of the grid placed perpendicular to the wall face. The on-site predominantly granular soils, excluding plus 3 inch size rocks, can be placed as the MSE backfill and should be compacted to nt least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density (SPD) at a moisture content.within about 2% of optimum. At curves in the walls where the geo -grid overlaps, 3 inches of soil should separate the overlapping geo~grid. Six inches of aggregate base course compacted to at least 95% SPD should be placed as a leveling course beiow the Stone Strong block. An underdrain should be provided behind the MSE walls to prevent build-up of hy<lro·static pressure. Parker 303·841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633~5562 • Silverthorne 970-468-1989 HJ31038 d-H 6£:11 900c-60-A~W • • • S0/£0'd Princc ·Creek Construction July 1 ~·2005 Page 2 The re~ommendations submitted in this letter are based on the laboratory test rcsul.ts, the design guidelines by Tensar, Inc. and Stone Strong Systems, and our experience with similar wall systems. We should observe the wall construction and test ba.ckfill compaction on a regular basis to evaluate compliance with our reconunendatkms. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH-PAWLAK OEOTECHNJCAL, INC. David A. Young, P.E . Rev. by: SLP DAY/ksw attachments Figure 1 -Particle Size Distribut ion Report Figure la -Compaction Test Report Job No . Hl:'5 217 HJ31038 d-H 0v:n 900c-60-AtlW • • • Particle Size Distribution Report % COBBLES 0.0 . .. SIEVE PERCENT S!Ze; FINER .1 in . 100 .0 i .5 in . 'l?.O .75 in. ~~ :5. (I .375 in. 7 1\.0 f/4 7:\1) #8 i'O .O #16 66.0 #30 6 2 .0 f/50 Yi .t) i/11)0 5 i .o /1200 4 .1.D spi;.c.· PERCENT • (no sp~cilic~ti~11 provided) PASS? (X-"NO) Sample No.: i I .-1.5 Source of Sample: Location: WJll l:l<1ddill On -Site %SANO •/.SILT 32.0 Soil Description Silty, clayey s and with gravel 43 ~0 Atterbem Limits (ASTM D 4318) Pl= 21 LL= 26 Pt::: 5 Classific1Jion USCS= SC-SM AASHTO= A·4(0) Das"' 19 .0 030= Cu= Date Tested: Coefficients D50= 0.449 D15= Cc= 5-5-05 Tested By: AB .BB Remark$ %CLAY Se e figure 1 a for maximum dry density and optimum mois ture. f.M.=2.64 Date Sampled: 5-:~-05 ElevJDepth : , .. J~hecke,~ ~x; __ )'ff=?J~~· .~ .. ...;.:_..:.==. =--~ .... :-::-... ,-,, •. ~.= .. -=--=---,=tt===..:T~-i~t!.~~=:-~L~a~b~M~.~a.:i~a::;g~cr~====-===-~--.,,, .. ===-~=,·=·-=· -=-·~·-=e··o..:.·-::::· ==::::-:=--;! Hepworth-Pawlak ~~~=t: Pr~~:~~~~,\~~;::~~it:~~cntcr Projecl . .11;g1may s2. Glenwood i . · • Springs, Colorado L ~e.o_te_c_h_. n_!~~I, Inc. Pro·ec1 .~.~ l os211 i Figu!!__ __ ,) ______ j H:l31038 d-H • • • S0"d ltllOl COMPACTION TEST REPORT 123.0 , i I . '1"'""'···-·-----'-··-.... ; I i · -.. r-r--·,-·-:-· -- , [ . ----· 120.s1----,-.~_,,~--1--~~-1+~~+--'--\---'---'+-1----+-.....;...--,-+---:--+---~~t----~-~---i ! --··-----,-·-· -r · i . ! '"i""'-·~-1---T--';--'--'-"' ! . --, ___ __!_ ___ , __ ! ~ ! "i -... J ___ .:.... __ _ •• ., .......... ,_ •• _••I• i : . ' . 118.0 "ti 0.. I ·····-·--··---···--·------.... ~ .... ~ . ---i ! -----'---:--.. ~---_]. .. ~ ..... :. -t---r--·-: ---,--1--i : I I 115 .51----.,...:_~--4"':..-~~..:....~-4-~-.;__~-+-44~~__.;__.:.,._.,.~+--..;.-_.;...--'-~~,--+----+-~--1 .. :·· •··-~···-·-_______ ,: ........ 1··. .... ! ....... : .•• _, . ...... :--t-! -.. ---:--. ! ; ' : : --------:---! . 110.5 0 5 10 15 Water content, % Test specific:;:tior:: AS'fM D 698 -00a Method C Standard Elev/ Depth Classification uses AASHTO SC-SM A-4(0) Nat. Moist. ··-··i -4-~-'-+-· ~-· .. . I I ' --··-··+-··-+--1--~---···· ... .!. ... t_.~ ... -1_._ ' , I ! . . . . i .. ·-····--· -··· : ... ··---:--! ---~-~-----· . i : I l -·-····-···· i l I i : : .. ···----·-·-· -1--~~-;---·i -. -·. ' I I 20 25 30 %> Sp.G. LL Pl 3/4 in. ··--· --·~· ···--··---- 26 5 15.0 ZAV for Sp .G.-= 2.67 %< No.200 4:~ TEST RESULTS MATERIAL .DESCRIPTION Maximum dry r:!(·nsity = 12 J _l) pcf Optimum moi:>lllrC ::..: 9.8 % I .. J [P·~oje~t·N~. -~;7~-~t-""7 "'' -''-'-' "'"·==---.:.:--:::::--=-=c=-,=ie=n=t=:=p=,.i==~=c·e"" .. ··"'c""~:~""~""';-=c=.o=n=s=rr=u=ct'°'i~"':'"" .. =-""""='-=-=-======;}-R-e_m_a_r_k_s_: ----'------------j Project: Cilcnwoo<l C:ommcrt:iul Cen\cr Project, lfi~hwny 82, Glenwood Spring~, Sec figure 1 for g.:a .. fation. I Colorado Date: 5-03-05 Sample I 14-5 1• Location: Wall ll:i ck.fill I COMPACTION TEST REPORT I LHepwo~-~-PawlC!:~-~-~~~~_chnical, Inc. Figure I n S0/S0"d HJ31039 d-H • • FAX TRANSMITTAL FORM ~"··----.. ------- ---········--···"' ____________ _ -----····--- FROM: ~_y_Y'_J-+-. -~ Number of Pages: b (lnr;:Judlng this page) MESSAGE: 0 tU : r ·~ f Q / r fpr The original of this transmittal will be sent by: Ordinary Mail 'i:ll . Fax Only~ HEPWORTH • PAWLAK ~ECIECHNICAL, INC . 5!::20 County Road 154 Glenwood Spring::. Coiorado Cli S01 Phone: B70-9ol'l5-798B r:a>:: S70-Sl43-8454 e-mCJll : hµgo'o@hpgeotcoh.com PROJECT NO.: _jQ;5 217 __ Overnight "n Other '7il The informatiot. c:::>ntained in this fa:::simile message is confidential a:-id intended for the sole u:;c; of the individual r.a~ed above. If yo:.J are not the intended rscipien~ received t'iis communication m a::-or, or i1 problems occ:.J~ wlth transmission, please notify us at 970-945-7988. • Sent By:----· S0/rn"d HJ3.1038 d-H t • • • • DECLARATION FOR GLENWOOD COMMERCIAL CENTER SUBDIVISION THIS DECLARATION is made this day of , 2007 , by Glenwood Commercial , LLC , a Colorado Limited Liability Company , and Declarant hereby submits the Project, as hereinafter defined, to the pro visions of this Declaration and does hereby publish and declare that the following terms , covenants , conditions , easements , restrictions , uses , limitations, and obligations shall be deemed to run wi th the lands hereinafter described , together with all improvements , appurtenances and facilitie s thereto and thereof, and shall be a burden and a benefit to Declarant, its successors and assign s, and any persons acquiring or owning an interest in the real property and improvements hereinafter described, their grantees , mortgagees , successors, heirs, executors , administrators , devisees or assigns . I. DEFINITIONS. 1.1 Association. "Association" means the Glenwood Commercial Center Unit Owners Association, a Colorado unincorporated no n profit association, whose members shall be the Owners of Units of Glenwood Commercial Center Subdivision, their successors and assigns . 1.2 Building. "Building" or "Buildings" means one or more of the four building improvements situated on the Real Property and containing the Units , as shown and described on the P lat and on the Map and any supplements thereto which may be filed in the Garfield County records. 1.3 Common Elements. "Common Elem ents" means and includes that part of the Real Property described in Exhibit A, comprising Lot 1, Lot 2 and Lot 3 as described on the Plat, together with all appurtenances thereto and together with all improvements thereon, except the portions thereof which constitute the Units , and sh all include an y part of the Buildings or any facilities or fixtures which may be within a Unit which are or may be necessary or convenient to the support, existence , use, occupancy, operation, m aintenance, repair, or safety of the Buildings or any part thereof or any other Unit therein. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing , the following shall constitute the Common Elements appurtenant to the Real Property : (a) the real property; (b) all foundations, columns, girders , beams and supports of the Buildings ; ( c) all exterior walls of the Buildings , the main or bearing walls within the Buildings , the main or bearing subflooring and the roof of the Buildings; ( d) all entrances , exits , exterior storage spaces , stairs, stairways , landings and fire escapes not within any Unit; ( e) all utility , service and maintenance areas , spaces, fixtures , apparatus, install ations and facilities for purpos e s of power, light, gas, telephone, television , hot water, cold water, heatin g, refrigeration , incineration, trash mashing , or similar utilities , including furnaces , tanks, pumps , motors , fans , compressors , vents , Rev . 08/14/07 • • • ducts, flues, wires, pipes , conduits and other similar fixtures , apparatus , installations and facilities currently existing or installed in the future , provided they do not exist solely to serve a Unit in which they may be located; and (f) all open space , landscaped areas , walkways , parking areas and driveways , including drainage facilitie s and the monument sign. The Common Elements are owned by the Association for the benefit of the Owners and consist of General Common Elements and Limited Common Elements . 1.4 Declarant. "Declarant" means Glen wo od Commercial , LLC. 1.5 General Common Elements. "General Common Elements " means all Common Elements except Limited Common Elements , a s hereinafter defined , including, without limitation, those Common Elements depicted as "GCE " on the Plat or Maps. 1.6 Guest. "Guest" means any invitee of any Owner and any person or entity who has acquired any title or interest, less than fee simple , in a Unit by, through or under an Owner , including tenants or invitees of any such person or entity. 1. 7 Limited Common Elements. "Limited Common Elements" means any portion of the Common Elements designated herein for exclusive use by the Owner(s) of one or more , but less than all of the Units. Limited Common Elements include those designated "L.C.E." and referring to a specific numbered and lettered Uni t on the Map , or referring to all Units in a Building, as the case may be. Unless otherwise h erein provided, the definition of "Limited Common Elements" shall correspond to that set forth in§ 38-33.3-202 , C.R.S. 1.8 Map. "Map " or "Maps" mean th e Maps for Glenwood Commercial Center Subdivision describing the Units as built, filed and to be filed in accordance with the provisions of Article XI hereof in the records in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado. 1.9 Mortgagee. "Mortgagee " means any person or entity who is a mortgagee under a recorded mortgage or a beneficiary under a recorded deed of trust or the holder of a similar recorded security instrument encumbering a Unit. "First Mortgage " means the first and most senior of all recorded mortgages, deeds of trust and similar instruments encumbering a Unit, and "First Mortgagee" means the Mortgagee under such mortgage, deed of trust or other instrument. 1.10 Owner. "Owner" means the person or persons or entity or entities, including Declarant, who own fee simple title to a Unit. The term Owner shall not include the owner or owners of any lesser estate or interest. 1.11 Plat. "Plat" means the Final Plat fo r Glenwood Commercial Center Subdivision and comprised of Lot 1, Lot 2 and Lot 3, as shown and described thereon and as said Lots are re- subdivided into Units. Such Units located on sai d Lot 1 appear as-built on Map filed as 2 Rev . 08 /14/07 • • • Reception No. of the records of Garfiel d County, Colorado, and the remainder of which Units, located on Lot 2 and Lot 3 , are to be c onstructed and filed on other and additional Maps in accordance with the provisions of Article XI hereof. 1.12 Project "Project" means the Real Property and the Buildings and other improvements now or hereafter located on the Real Property, together with all appurtenances thereto, which Project shall be known and desc ri bed generally as "Glenwood Commercial Center." 1.13 Real Property . "Real Property" m eans the real property situate in the City of Glenwood Springs, County of Garfield , State of Colorado , described in Exhibit A attached hereto, together with all appurtenances thereto. 1.14 Unit. "Unit" means an air space defined as cons1stmg of enclosed rooms occupying part of each of the Buildings. Each Uni t is shown on the Map and is identified on each with a number and letter in combination. The boundaries of each Unit are shown on the Plat and as -built on the Map by lines along the w alls, floors and ceilings which , together with Plat Notes appearing on the Plat, mark the perim eter boundaries of the Unit. The exact boundaries of a Unit are the interior surfaces of such walls , floors and ceilings which mark the perimeter boundaries and, where found along such w alls , floors and ceilings , the interior surfaces of windows and doors in their closed position, and the Unit includes both the portions of the Building so described and the air space so encompassed. The Units, both those existing on Lot 1 and those to be added upon filing of additional Maps in accordance with Article XI hereof, are those enumerated and described on the Plat and in Section 2.2 below. Any Common Elements , as herein defined, which may be within a Unit shall not be part of the Unit or owned by the Owner of the Unit. II. DECLARATION AND EFFECT THEREOF. 2 .1 Declaration. Declarant, for itself, its successors and assigns , as Owner of the Project, hereby declares that the Project shall at all times be owned, held, used and occupied subject to the provisions of this Declaration and any amendments thereto . 2.2 Division into Units . The Project is to be divided into ninety-two (92) Units , those Units located on Lot 1, being currently in existence , and those on Lot 2 and Lot 3 to be added to the Project under the provisions of Article XI bel ow, each consisting of a separate fee simple estate together with appurtenant rights in the Common Elements , and more particularly described as the following Units: 3 Re v. 08 /14/07 • • • LOT 1 LOTl L OT2 LOT3 Unit 1-A Unit 2-A U nit 3-A Unit 4-A Unit 1-B Unit 2-B Unit 3-B Unit 4-B Unit 1-C Unit 2-C Unit 3-C Unit 4-C Unit 1-D Unit 2-D Unit 3-D Unit 4-D Unit 1-E Unit 2-E U nit 3-E Unit 4-E Unit 1-F Unit 2-F U nit 3-F U nit 4-F Unit 1-G Unit 2-G Unit 3-G Unit 4-G Unit 1-H Unit 2-H Unit 3-H Unit 4-H Unit 1-I Unit 2-I Unit 3-I Unit 4-I Unit 1-J Unit 2-J Unit 3-J Unit 4-J Unit 1-K Unit 2-K U nit 3-K Unit 4-K Unit 1-L Unit 2-L U nit 3-L Unit 4-L Unit 1-M Unit 2-M U nit 3-M Unit 4-M Unit 1-N Unit 2 -N Unit 3-N Unit 4-N Unit 1-0 Unit 2-0 Unit 3 -0 Unit 4-0 Unit 1-P Unit 2-P U nit 3-P Unit 4-P Unit 1-Q Unit 2-Q Unit 3 -Q Unit 4-Q Unit 1-R Unit 2-R U nit 3-R U nit 4-R Unit 1-S Unit 2-S U nit 3-S Unit 4-S Unit 1-T Unit 2-T Unit 3 -T Unit 4-T Unit 3-U Unit 4-U U nit 3 -V Unit 4-V Unit 2-W U nit 4-W Unit 2-X Unit 4-X Unit 4-Y Unit 4-Z Unit 4-AA Unit 4-AB 2.3 Association OwnershiQ of Common E lements. The Common Elements shall be owned by the Association, subject to the benefici al use thereof by the Owners and the other rights herein expressed . Until such time as the Ass ociation comes into existence upon the first conveyance of a Unit by Declarant as hereafter provided , Declarant shall retain complete authority over and control of the Project, and any functions and duties enjoined upon the Association herein shall be performed and fulfilled by the Declarant. 2.4 Descri12tion of a Unit. Any instrument affecting a U nit shall le gall y describe it by reference to the identifying Unit number and letter shown on the Map for such Unit. This identifying number for a Unit in the Project is the n umber and letter on a Map identifying the Unit. A legal description of a Unit in the Building and on the Lot shall be in the following form: 4 Rev . 0 8/14/07 • • • Unit ---- Glenwood Commercial Center Subdi v ision in accordance with and subject to the Declaration recorded , 2007, in Book __ at Page __ as Reception No . ; Plat filed as Reception No. ____ _ and Map filed , 2007, as Reception No. ____ _ all of the records in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado. and any conveyance or other instrument affecting title to a Unit or any part thereof shall be deemed to include and describe the entire Unit, including the appurtenant rights , easements , obligations , limitations, encumbrances, covenants, conditions and restrictions benefiting or burdening the Unit under the terms of this Declarati on. Any reference to Glenwood Commercial C enter in any description shall mean the Glenwood Commercial Center Subdivision acco rding to the Plat and the Map and this Declaration, as these three (3) documents are filed and recorded in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado , and as the same may be amended . 2 .5 Duration of Ownership. The ownership of the Project created under this Declaration shall continue until this Declaration is terminated or revoked as hereinafter provided. 2 .6 Inseparability . Subject to the other applicable provisions hereof, the interests of an Owner in a Unit and the appurtenant rights, inter e sts and burdens connected therewith which constitute a Unit shall be inseparable for the period of ownership hereinabov e described, and any transfer, conveyance , encumbrance or lease thereof shall be so restricted . 2. 7 Partition of Common Elements Not P ermitted. The Common Elements shall be owned by the Association and there shall be no j udicial or other partition of the rights and interests of an Owner in the Common Elements , or any part thereof, nor shall any Owner bring any action seeking partition thereof. 2 .8 Ad Valorem Taxation. All taxes, a sse ssments and other charges of the State of Colorado or of any of its political subdivisions or of any special improvement district or of any other taxing or assessing authority shall be assessed ag ainst and collected on each Unit separatel y and not on the Buildings then currently constructed or the Project as a whole and each Unit shall be carried on the tax records as a separate and disti n ct parcel. For the purpose of valuation for assessment, the valuation of the Common Elements, b oth General and Limited, shall be included in the assessment of the Units and the Declarant shall deliver to the County Assessor of Garfi e ld County, Colorado, a written notice and copy of this Declaration as required by the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act at§ 38-33.3-105, C.R .S., setting forth descriptions of the Units , and shall furnish all necessary information with re spect to such apportionment of valuation of 5 Rev. 08 /14/07 • • • Common Elements for assessment. The lien for taxes assessed to any Unit shall be confined to that Unit. No forfeiture or sale of any Unit fo r delinquent tax es , assessments or other governmental charges shall divest or in any way affect the title to any other Unit. 2.9 Mechanic 's Lien. No labor perfo rmed or materials furnished for use in connection with any Unit with the consent or at the request of the Owner of such Unit or his agent, contractor or subcontractor shall create any ri ght to file a statement of mechanic 's li e n against the Unit of any other Owner not expressly consenting to or requesting the same or against any interest in the Common Elements. Each Owner shall indemnify and hold harmless each of the other Owners from and against liability or los s arising from the claim of any lien against the Unit, or any part thereof, of such other Owner for labor performed or materials furnished for use in connection with the first owner's Unit. At the written request of any Owner the Association shall enforce such indemnity by collecting from the Owner of the Unit on which the labor was performed and/or for which the materials were furni shed the amount necessary to discharge any such lien, including all costs incidental thereto , incl uding attorney 's fees. If not promptly paid, the Association may collect the same in the manner provided herein for collection of assessments for the purpose of discharging the lien. III. VARIO US RIGHTS AND EASEMENTS . 3 .1 Owner's Rights in General Common Elements . Subject to the provisions of this Declaration, each Owner and each Owner's Guests shall have a nonexclusive right to use and enjoy for the intended purpose the General Common E lements, provided there is no hindrance or encroachment upon the lawful rights of use and enj oyment of other Owners and their Guests as described in this Declaration and the Rules and Regulations of the Association. 3.2 Owner's Rights in Limited Common Elements . Subject to the provisions of this Declaration, each Owner and Owner's Guests shall have the right to use and enjoy the Limited Common Elements, the interests and rights in which are appurtenant to the Unit owned by such Owner. 3.3 Owner 's Rights in Unit. Subject t o the provisions of this Declaration, each Owner shall have full and complete dominion and o wnership of the Unit which is owned by such Owner and each Owner and each Owner's Guests shall have the exclusive right to use and enjoy the same. Subject to the provisions of this Declaration, each Owner shall have the right to paint, repaint, tile, carpet, paper and otherwise refinish and decorate the interior surfaces of the walls , ceilings, floors , windows and doors which are within the boundaries of his Unit. 3.4 Owner's Easements for Access, Support and Utilities. Each Owner shall have a 6 Rev . 08/14/07 • • nonexclusive easement in common with all the other Owners for access to and from the Unit of such Owner and public roads and streets, including, without limitation, over open space, landscaped areas, walks, parking areas, driveways and any other exterior access and/or other easements consistent with the express purpose of su ch easements which are part of the Project; each Owner shall have a non-exclusive easement in and over Common Elements, including Common Elements within the Unit of another Owner, for horizontal and lateral support of his Unit and for utility service provided to that Unit, including water, sewer, gas, electricity, telephone and television service. 3.5 Easements for Encroachments. If an y part of the Common Elements encroaches or shall hereafter encroach upon a Unit, an eas ement for such encroachment and for the maintenance of the same shall exist. If any part of any Unit encroaches or shall hereafter encroach upon the Common Elements, or upon an other Unit, the Owner of that Unit shall have an easement for such encroachment and for the maintenance of the same. Such encroachments shall not be considered to be encumbrances either on the Common Elements or on a Unit. Encroachments referred to herein include, but are not limited to, encroachments caused by error in the original construction of the Building, by error in the Map, by settling or shifting of the Building, or by changes in position caused by repair or reconstruction of the Project or any part thereof. 3.6 Easements in Unit for Installation, Repair, Maintenance and Emergencies . Some of the Common Elements are or may be located within a Unit or may be conveniently accessible only through a Unit. The Association shall have an easement for access to each Unit and to all Common Elements from time to time during such reasonable hours as may be necessary for the future installation, maintenance, repair or replacement of any of the Common Elements located therein or accessible therefrom or for making emergency repairs therein necessary to prevent damage to the Common Elements or to any Unit or to perform any other duties or functions which it is obligated or permitted to perform under this Declaration. Any entry into a Unit shall be made with as little inconvenience as practicable to the Owner and any damage in the Unit entered shall be repaired by and at the expense of the Association. 3 .7 Ease.ments Deemed Appurtenant. The easements and rights herein created for an Owner shall be appurtenant to the Unit of that Owner and all conveyances of and other instruments affecting title to a Unit shall be deemed t o grant and reserve the easements and rights as are provided for herein, even though no specific reference to such easements appears in any such conveyance or other instrument. 3.8 Right to Combine Units. Subject to the following provisions, an Owner shall have the right to combine a Unit with one or more a djoining Units only after obtaining written approval from the Manager of the Association. A combination of Units shall become effective only when the Owner of the Units which 7 Rev . 08 /14/07 • • are to be combined executes and records in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado, a written statement describing the Unit to be combined and declaring that the same are combined. Such combination shall not affect the designation nor prevent separate ownership of the Units in the future, nor shall such combining of Units affect the status thereof for property tax assessment purposes. Upon the combination of Units , the resulting interest in Limited Common Elements of the combined Units shall be the total of the separate interests prior to combination. In the event of such combination, any part of the Building within the new perimeter boundaries of the combined Units shall cease to be Common Elements if such part of the Building would not have constituted Common Elements had the combined Units been originally designated on the Map as a single Unit. An Owner shall have the right, if such Owner owns two adjacent Units, to create a doorway between the Units in any common wall. 3.9 Partition of Units Prohibited/Unit Boundary Adjustments . No Owner shall partition or subdivide any Unit so as to convey to a prospective owner any interest in less than an entire Unit. The foregoing notwithstanding , the boundaries of any Units may be altered and adjusted by the Owners thereof provided the followin g conditions are complied with: i) ii) iii) iv) The Unit boundary adjustment is approved by the Manager of the Association . The Unit boundary adjustment will not result m the creation of an additional Unit in the Building. Any Unit boundary adjustment shall be accomplished in strict accordance with the land use regulations of the City of Glenwood Springs, Colorado. The Owner(s) of the Units whose boundaries are to be adjusted shall bear all expense in connection with the accomplishment of the Unit boundary adjustment, including without limitation, expense of amending the Map if necessary . Provided further, that an Owner of a Unit consisting of two or more Units combined pursuant to Article 3 .8 may partition and re -subdivide such Unit into Units conforming to the dimensions of the Units as originally described in th e respective Maps. IV. THE ASSOCIATION. 4 .1 General Purposes and Powers. The Association is hereby formed to be and constitute the Association to which reference is made in this Declaration, to perform functions and hold and manage property as provided in this Declaration and to further the interests of Owners of Units in the Project. It shall have all power s necessary or desirable to effectuate these 8 Rev . 08 /14/07 • • • purposes. 4.2 Membership. Each Owner, by virtue of being an Owner and for so long as he is an Owner, shall be a Member of the Association . Membership in the Association shall be appurtenant to the fee simple title to each Unit and t itle to and ownership of the Membership for the Unit shall automatically pass with fee simple title to the Unit. Each Owner of a Unit shall automatically be entitled to the benefits and subject to the burdens relating to the Membership for his Unit. If fee simple title to a Unit is held by more than one person or entity, the membership appurtenant to that Unit shall be shared by all such persons or entities in the same proportionate interest and by the same type of ownership as fee simple title to the Unit is held. Memberships in the Association shall be limited to Owners of Units in the Project. 4.3 Member Action. Unless otherwise herein provided, the Association shall make all decisions, take all actions, exercise all powers and fulfill all obligations required of it hereunder by Member Action, which shall consist of the affirmative vote of the Owners of a majority of the Units appearing in person or by proxy at any meeting called in accordance herewith, or, without a meeting, by the written approval of any particular action by the Owners of not less than a majority of the Units, provided that the Owners of all of the Units are provided an opportunity to approve or disapprove any such action in writing. Any reference herein to any exercise of authority by or fulfillment of any obligations enjoined upon the Association, unless otherwise provided herein, shall be undertaken by Member Action, whether or not specifically expressed in any particular provision hereof. 4.4 Voting of Owners. The Owner of each Unit shall have one vote. Voting by proxy shall be permitted. In the event of multiple Owners of the same Unit, the multiple Owners shall share the vote assigned to the Unit so owned in the same proportionate interest as fee simple title to the Unit is held. The right to vote may not be severed or separated from any Unit, and any sale, transfer or conveyance of any Unit to a new Owner or Owners shall operate to transfer the appurtenant voting rights without the requirement of any express reference thereto. 4.5 Manager. The Association, by Member Action, from time to time and for a term to be specified in such action, shall appoint a Manager or Managers to perform the various functions and exercise the various powers herein delegated to or imposed upon the Manager. The Manager or Managers shall be Owners, and shall be reasonably compensated by the Association for his or their services and reimbursed for expenses incurred in performance of delegated duties. 4.6 Meetings/Notices. Each Owner shall be entitled to notice of any meeting at which such Owner has the right to Vote. At least one meeting shall be held during each fiscal year of the Association in accordance with Section 6.2 below and the date, time and location within the Project of such meeting shall be determined by the Manager and notice given to the Members as hereinafter provided. Other meetings may be called by request therefor being made to the 9 Rev. 08/14/07 • • • Manager, in writing, by the Owners of not less than twenty-five (25) Units. Such written request shall specify the purpose for the requested meeting and notice shall be given by the Manager to the Members as provided herein. Notices of meetin gs shall be in writing and shall state the date, time and place of the meeting and shall indicate each matter to be voted on at the meeting which is known to the Association at the time notice of the meeting is given. Such notices shall be given not less than ten (10) nor more than fifty ( 50) days before the date for the meeting. Any notice shall be deemed given and any budget or other information or material shall be deemed furnished or delivered to a party at the time a copy thereof is deposited in the mail , postage or charges prepaid, addressed to the party, or, in any ev ent, when such party actually receives such notice, information or material. Any notice, information or material shall be deemed properly addressed to an Owner if it is addressed to the name and address shown on the most recent written notice of name and address , if any, furnished to the Association by such Owner or, if a name and address is not so furnished , if it is addre ssed "To The Owner" at the address of the Unit of such Owner. 4. 7 Record Date. The Manager of the Association shall have the power to fix in advance a date as a record date for the purpose of determining Owners entitled to notice of or to vote at any meeting or to be furnished with any budget or other information or material, or in order to make a determination of Owners for any purpose. The Owners existing on any such record date shall be deemed the Owners for such no t ice , vote , meeting, furnishing of information or material or other purpose and for any supplementary notice, or information or material with respect to the same matter and for any adjournment o f the same meeting. A record date shall not be more than fifty (50) days prior to the date on which the particular action requiring determination of Owners is proposed or expected to be taken or to occur. If no record date is established for a meeting, the date on which notice of such meeting is first given to any Owner shall be deemed the record date for the meeting. 4.8 Quorums. The presence of Owners who hold a majority of the total voting rights of the Association, in person or by proxy, at a meeting to consider a matter shall constitute a quorum for consideration of that matter. v. RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION 5.1 Association as Attorney-In-Fact fo r Owners . The Association is hereby irrevocably appointed attorney-in-fact for the Owners of all Units and each of them to manage, control and deal with the interest of such Owner so as to permit the Association to fulfill all of its duties and obligations hereunder and to exercise all of its rights hereunder; to deal with the Project upon its destruction or obsolescence as hereinafter provided and to deal with and handle insurance and insurance proceeds and condemnation and condemnation awards as hereinafter provided. The acceptance by any person or entity of any interest in any Unit shall constitute an appointment of the Association as attorney -in -fact as herein provided . 10 Rev. 08/14/07 • 5.2 Common Elements Maintenance. Th e Association shall be obligated to and shall provide for the care , operation, managem ent, maintenance , improvem ent , repair and repl acement of the Common Elements and for utility service to the Common Elements and to Units. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing , said obli gations shall include keeping the Common Elements in good , clean, attractive and sanitary co ndition , order and repair ; removing snow and any other materials from the Common Elements to permit access to and throughout the Project and to the Units , keeping the Project safe , attracti ve and desirable , including, if necessary , the removal of such snow and other materials from the Project itself if the snow storage facilities are not adequate to the purpose; making necessary or des irable alterations, additions , betterments or improvements to or on the Common Elements; and paying utility charges, except separately metered utilities and trash collection services which shall be paid by the Owner or user of the Unit served thereby. No prior approval of Owners shall be required for such work but prior approval of the Association , acting through its Manage r , shall be required for all such work. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each Owner shall be obligated to and shall pro vide for th e care , operation, management , maintenance , improv ement, repair and replacement of the Limited Common Elements, the use of and rights in whi ch are appurtenant to the Unit(s) of that Owner(s). • 5.3 Other Association Functions . The A ss ociation may undertake or contract for any • lawful activity, function or service for the benefit, or to furth er the interests of all, some or any Owners of Units on a self-supporting , regular assessment, or supplementary assessment basis. 5.4 Labor an d Services . The Association may obtain and pay for the services of any person or entity to manage its affairs , or any part thereof, to the extent it deems ad visable , as well as the services of such other personnel as the As sociation shall determine to be necessary or desirable for the proper operation of the Project, whether such personnel are furnished or employed directly by the Association or by any pers on or entity with whom or which it contracts. The Association may obtain and pay for legal and accounting services necessary or desirable in connection with the operation of the Project or the enforcement of this Declaration. 5 .5 Real and Personal Property of Ass oci ation . The Association may acquire and hold tangible and intangible personal property and m ay dispose of the same by sale or otherwise. The Association may lease or acquire and hold title to real property , in addition to holding title to the Common Elements , for the performance of Association purposes and functions ; provided, that such decision shall be made by the Association by Member Action . Subject to the rules and regulations of the Association, each Owner and each Owner 's Guests may use such Association property. Upon termination of ownership of the Proj ect and dissolution of the Association the beneficial interest in any such property shall be d ee med to be owned by the then Owners of Units, on a ratable basis according to the Schedule of Assessments set forth on Exhibit B hereto . 11 Rev. 08/14/07 • • • / 5.6 Construction on Association Property. The Association may construct new improvements or additions to real property owned by the Association or demolish improvements thereon, provided that in the case of any improvements, addition or demolition (other than maintenance or repairs to same), such activity shall be undertaken by the Association only by Member Action. 5. 7 Association Right to Utilize, Lease or License General Common Elements. The Association shall have the right to utilize portions of the General Common Elements for the furtherance of its duties, obligations, rights or privileges. Such utilization may include, but is not limited to, the construction of improvements on the General Common Elements for recreational facilities . Any such improvements shall be undertaken by the Association in accordance with the provisions of Article 5.6 above. The Association shall have the right to make such use of General Common Elements as may be necessary or appropriate for it to perform the duties and functions which it is obligated or permitted to perform under this Declaration. The Association, through its Manager, shall have the right to license or lease to, or permit the use of the General Common Elements or any Unit owned by the Asso ciation, by fewer than all of the Owners or by non-owners and with any charge by the Association which it deems desirable; provided , however, no such lease shall be for a term of longer duration than three (3) years. Any charge by the Association for a license or lease shall be appl ied to reduce amounts to be raised by regular assessments . 5.8 Association Right to Borrow Money. The Association shall have the right to borrow funds to pay for any expenditures or outlay required to fulfill its duties, obligations, rights or privileges given to it by this Declaration; provided, however, that in the event the loan proceeds exceed an amount equal to twenty-five percent (25%) of the Association's approved annual budget, the Manager shall call a meeting to discuss the same and give thirty (30) days notice thereof to all Members and the Association and shall obtain the approval of a majority of the votes present or represented at such meeting before making and transacting any such borrowing. Following such approval, the Association may levy a regular or supplementary assessment under the provisions of Article VI for the purpose of the payment of any funds so borrowed and may pledge as collateral for any such loans the assessment so levied together with any of the Association's real or personal property, including the Common Elements. 5.9 Rules and Regulations. The Association may make and enforce reasonable and uniformly applied rules and regulations (the "Rules and Regulations") governing the use of Units and of Common Elements. Such Rules and Regulations may, without limitation, regulate use of Common Elements to assure equitable use and enjoyment by all persons entitled thereto and require that draperies, shades or other window coverings shall present a uniform and attractive appearance from the exterior of the Buildings. Any such rules and regulations made by the Association may be amended from time to time by Member Action. The Association shall furnish each Owner with a written copy of each and every Rule or 12 Rev. 08/14/07 • • • Regulation adopted pursuant to this Article 5.9; however, failure to furnish said copy shall not be deemed to invalidate said Rules or Regulations to any extent. The Association shall have the right to enforce any of the Rules and Regulations of the Association or the obligations of any Owner under this Declaration by suspending the right of such Owner to vote at meetings of the Association ; provided that such voting suspension may not be imposed for a period longer than thirty (30) days per violation. No penalty may be imposed under this paragraph until the Owner accused of any such violation has first been notified in writing of the violation and afforded the right to have a hearing before the Members of the Association at a meeting specially called for such purpose, or has , in writing, waived such right. Each such Owner shall have the right to be heard in person, by submission of a written statement, or through a spokesman, at any such hearing. The Association may also take judicial action against any Owner to enforce compliance with such rules, regulations or other obligations or to obtain injunctive relief and damages for noncompliance, all to the extent permitted by law. 5.10 Implied Rights. The Association shall have and may exercise any right or privilege given to it expressly by this Declaration, or reasonably to be implied from the provisions of this Declaration, or given or implied by law, or which may be necessary or desirable to fulfill its duties, obligations, rights or privileges . VI. ASSESSMENTS. 6.1 Assessments. Each Owner shall be obligated, and shall pay to the Association amounts as hereinafter provided, which amounts are herein called Assessments. Assessments shall include Regular and Supplementary Assessments . Subject to the provisions hereof, the Association, by Member Action , shall have the power and authority to determine all matters in connection with Assessments, including, without limitation, power and authority to determine where , when and how Assessments should be paid to the Association, and each Owner shall comply wi th all such determinations. 6.2 Determination of Budgets and Assessments. The fiscal year of the Association shall be determined by Member Action of the Association at its first meeting. Within thirty (30) days prior to the commencement of each fiscal year of the Association, the Members by Member Action shall determine the total amount to be raised by Regular Assessments during such fiscal year. The amount to be raised by Regular Assessments for any fiscal year shall be that amount necessary to cover the costs and expenses of fulfilling the functions and obligations of the Association in that fiscal year plus the amount necessary for the capital reserve fund for contingencies, exterior maintenance, construction or reconstruction , repair or replacement of the Project or components thereof, including without limitation, structural and roof repairs and replacement and repair of mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems ("Capital Reserve 13 Rev. 08/J 4/07 ..... , • • • Fund"), plus an amount sufficient to provide a reasonable carryover reserve for the next fiscal year and such determined amount shall constitute the annual budget. The amount to be raised by Regular Assessments shall include amounts necessary to cover obligations made in connection with, or contemplated under, any previously approved annual budget. The total amount required to be raised by Regular Assessments for any fiscal period less than a full fiscal year shall be the total amount or annual budget required to be raised for the fiscal year determined as above multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days in the fiscal period and the denominator of which is the number of days in that fiscal year. To determine the total amount required to be raised by Regular Assessments, the Manager shall prepare or cause to be prepared and the Members approve a budget for the fiscal year showing, in reasonable detail, the estimated costs and expenses which will be payable in that fiscal year, the amount necessary for the capital reserve and maintenance fund, if any , and for a reasonable carry-over reserve . The Members shall subtract from such estimated costs and expenses an amount equal to the anticipated surplus (exclusive of any reserve funds) attributable to Regular Assessments collected but not disbursed in the fiscal year immediately preceding the fiscal year for which such estimate has been prepared. The Manager shall furnish a copy of the proposed budget to each Owner. If the Members fail to determine or cause to be determined the total amount to be raised by Regular Assessments in any fiscal year, and/or fail to notify the Owners of the amount of such Regular Assessments for any fiscal year, then any funds held by or on behalf of the Association, including capital reserve and maintenance funds, may be used for the operation of the Project. Except as emergencies may require, the Association shall make no commitment or expenditures in excess of the funds reasonably expected to be available to the Association. In addition to Regular Assessments, the Members may levy Supplementary Assessments, payable over such period as the Members may determine: (a) for the purpose of defraying, in whole or in part, to the extent the amounts in the capital reserve fund are insufficient therefor, the cost of any construction or reconstruction, repair or replacement of the Project or any part thereof; (b) for the purpose of defraying any other expense incurred or to be incurred as provided in this Declaration; or ( c) to cover the deficiency in the event that, for whatever reason, the amount received by the Association from Reg ular Assessments is less than the amount determined and assessed by the Association. 6.3 Allocation of Assessments. All Assessments, whether a Regular or Supplemental Assessment, will be allocated among the OwnerDs of Units according to the fractional proportions set forth on Exhibit "B" annexed hereto and incorporated herein (the "Schedule of Assessments"). 6.4 Time for Payments. Unless otherwise established by Member Action, the amount 14 Rev. 08/14/07 . I • • • of any Assessment or other amount payable with re spect to any Owner or Unit shall become due and payable uniformly as specified by the Manager o f the Association and, in any event, thirty (30) days after any notice of the amount due as to such Assessment or other amount shall have been given by the Manager to such Owner, and any such amount shall bear interest from the date due and payable until paid at the rate of eighteen percent (18.0%) per annum. 6.5 Lien for Assessments and Other Amounts . The Association shall have a lien against each Unit to secure payment of any Assessment or other amount due and owing to the Association with respect to the Owner of that Unit or with respect to such Owner's Guests or Unit, plus interest from the date due and payable, p lus all costs and expenses of collecting the unpaid amount, including reasonable attorney 's fee s. The lien may be foreclosed in the manner for foreclosures of mortgages in the State of Colorad o . If any Owner is deemed to be in default hereunder and fails to cure such default within thirty (30) days, the Association shall give written notification of such default to any First Mortgagee of the Unit owned by such Owner whose name and address is expressly provided in the recorded mortgage , deed of trust or other lien. The lien for Assessments shall have priority over all other liens and encumbrances on or against a Unit, except for the lien for general ad valorem tax es. 6.6 Estoppel Certificate. Upon the payment of a reasonable fee as the same shall be established from time to time by Member Action and upon written request of any Owner or any person with any right, title or interest in a Unit or inte nding to acquire any right, title or interest in a Unit, the Association shall furnish a written statement setting forth the amount of Assessments or charges , if any, due or accrued an d then unpaid with respect to the Unit, the Owner, and such Owner's Guests and the amount of the Assessments for the current fiscal period of the Association payable with respect to the Uni t, which statement shall , with respect to the party to whom it is issued, be conclusive against the A ssociation that no greater or other amounts were then due or accrued and unpaid. 6. 7 Liability of Owners, Purchasers an d Encumbrances. The amount of any Assessment charge owing to the Association by an y Owner under this Declaration shall be a personal obligation to the Association of such Owner and such Owner's heirs , personal representatives , successors and assigns. A party acquiring fee simple title to a Unit shall be jointly and severally liable with the former Owner fo r all amounts which had accrued and which were payable at the time of the acquisition of fee simple title to the Unit by such party, without prejudice to such party's right to recover any of said amounts paid from the former Owner. Each such amount, together with interest thereon, may be recovered by suit for a money judgment by the Association without foreclosing or waiving any li en securing the same. VII. USE AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS 7.1 Unit Restrictions. Each of the Units id entified and depicted on the Plat and Maps, 15 Rev . 08/14/07 • l l 1 • • • and the rights and interests therein which are appurtenant thereto , shall be used for commercial purposes only and the use of such Units shall be limited and restricted to the uses allowed under the , whether such aforesaid commercial uses are allowed as Uses by Right, Special Uses or Conditional Uses, but expressly excluding any type of residential use allowed under the cited provision of the ____________ _ 7.2 Common Elements Restrictions. No Owner and no Owner 's Guest shall obstruct, damage or commit waste to any of the Common Elements. No Owner and no Owner's Guest shall change, alter or repair, or store anything in or on, any of the Common Elements without the prior written consent of the Association. 7.3 No Imperiling of Insurance. No Owner and no Owner's Guests shall , without the prior written consent of the Association, do anything or cause anything to be kept in or on the Project which might result in an increase in the prem iums for insurance obtained for the Project or which might cause cancellation of such insurance . 7.4 No Violation of Law. No Owner and no Owner 's Guests shall do anything or keep anything in or on the Project which would b e in violation of any statute, rule, ordinance, regulation, permit or other validly imposed requirement of any governmental body . 7.5 No Noxious, Offensive, Hazardous or Annoying Activities. No noxious or offensive activity shall be carried on upon any part of the Project, nor shall anything be done or placed on or in any part of the Project which is or may become a nuisance or cause embarrassment, disturbance or annoyance to others. No activity shall be conducted, and no improvements shall be made or constructed, on an y part of the Project which are or might be unsafe or hazardous to any person or property. N o sound shall be emitted on any part of the Project which is unreasonably loud or annoying to others . No odor shall be emitted on any part of the Project which is noxious or offensive to others . No light shall be emitted from any part of the Project which is unreasonably bright or causes unreasonable glare. 7 .6 No Unsightliness. No unsightliness shall be permitted on or in any part of the Project. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, nothing shall be kept or stored on or in any of the Common Elements, nothing shall be hung or placed upon any of the Common Elements, and nothing shall be placed on or in windows or doors of Units which would or might create an unsightly appearance. 7.7 Restriction on Signs. No signs or advertising devices of any nature shall be erected or maintained on any part of the Project without the prior written consent of the Manager. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Owners of the Units may install , affix or apply a sign upon Unit entry doors for purposes of identifying the occupant and business located and conducted within a Unit. Further, a monument sign structure constituting a General Common Element shall be constructed by the Declarant and maintained by the Association on the Real 16 Rev . 08 /14/07 -l ' • • • Property identifying the project and the individual businesses and offices located in the respective Units. Nothing herein contained shall pro hibit or restrict in any way the Declarant's right to construct other such promotional signs or other sales aids on or about any portion of the Project which it shall deem reasonably necessary in connection with its sale or leasing of the Units. All signs referred to above and permitted to be installed and maintained on the Property shall be m strict compliance with the 7 .8 Antennas. No radio, television or other type of antenna shall, without the written consent of the Manager, be installed or maintained on the roof or exterior of the Buildings. 7 .9 Maintenance of Unit. Each Unit an d the Limited Common Elements , the rights and interests in which are appurtenant thereto , an d all improvements , fixtures , furniture and equipment therein shall be kept and maintained by the Owner thereof in a safe condition and in good repair. No structural alterations within any Unit or such Limited Common Elements shall be made and no electrical , plumbing or similar work within any Unit or such Limited Common Elements shall be done without the prior written consent of the Manager. 7.10 No Violation of Rules. No Owner or Owner 's Guests shall violate the Rules and Regulations adopted from time to time by the Ass ociation whether relating to the use of Units , the use of Common Elements , or otherwise , and violations of the Rules and Regulations by any Owner 's Guests shall be treated as a violation by such Owner and shall be enforceable in accordance with Article 5.9 hereof. 7 .11 Owner Caused Damages. If, due to the act or neglect of an Owner or such Owner's Guests, loss or damage shall be caused t o any person or property , including the Buildings, the Common Elements, or any Unit, su ch Owner shall be liable and responsible for the same, except to the extent that such damage or lo ss is covered by insurance obtained by the Association, and the insurer has waived its rights of subrogation against such Owner. The amount of such loss or damage may be collected by the Association from such Owner, and such amount shall be enforceable as an Assessment and li en therefor in accordance with Article VI hereof. 7.12 Animals . No animals of any kind whatsoever shall be permitted, kept or maintained on a temporary or permanent basis on an y part of the Buildings or the Project, except not more than two (2) dogs per Unit and only upon the condition that any such dog shall be kept at all times either within such Unit or be walked upon a leash and shall not , in the sole discretion of the Manager, unduly be a nuisance to other Owne rs or their Guests . 7 .13 Recreational and Other Vehicle Related Restrictions on All Units . No Owner nor OwnerDs Guests shall park or store at any location or area on the Project constituting a Common Element, any recreational vehicle , including but not limited to, motor homes , snowmobiles , all- 17 Rev . 08 /14/07 -I • • • terrain vehicles , boats of any type, nor any inoperable or unlicensed v ehicle of any kind . Further, no such Owner or OwnerDs Guests shall perform or permit to be performed any service, maintenance or repair work on any motor vehicle at any location or area on the Project, exterior to the Unit of such Owner. Further, no Owner no r Owner's Gue st shall use or occupy at an y time a greater number of GCE-Parking spaces than such Owner's Unit or Units bears in proportion to the total number of Units existing at such time to the total number of GCE Parkin g spaces available at such time. 7-14 Trash Disposal Facilities. The Trash Disposal Facilities shown on the Plat as GCEs are available for use by all Unit Owners and their tenants , but only for disposal of not more than two (2) thirty (30) gallon trash bags per Unit per week and any such use shall not include disposal of tires , appliances , batteries, paint or hazardous materials of any nature, nor for disposal of anything unacceptable for unrestricted di sposal at the landfill owned by the City of Glenwood Springs, Colorado. VIII. INSURANCE 8.1 Insurance, Requirements Generally . The Association shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect at all times certain casualty, liability and other insurance as hereinafter provided. All such insurance shall be obtained from responsible companies duly authorized to do insurance business in the State of Co lorado. All such insurance shall name as insureds the Association, the Declarant, the Members and Managers of the Association, the Association's employees and agents and the Unit Owners, in their capacity as Owners. All such insurance shall protect each of the insureds as if each were separately insured under separate policies. To the extent possible such casualty insurance shall : (a) provide for a waiver of subrogation by the insurer as to claims against Declarant, the Association, its Members, Managers, employees , and agents and against each Owner and each Owner's employees and Guests; (b) provide that the insurance cannot be cancelled, invalidated or suspended on account of the conduct of the Association , its Members, Managers, employees and agents of any Owner or such Owner's emp loyees or Guests; ( c) provide that any "no other insurance" clause in the insurance policy shall exclude any policies of insurance maintained by any Owner or Mortgagee and that the insurance policy shall not be brought into contributi on with insurance maintained by any Owner or Mortgagee ; ( d) contain a standard mortgage clause endorsement in favor of the Mortgagee of any Unit or part of the Project except a Mortgagee of a Unit or part of the Project who is covered by other and separate insurance; ( e) provide that the policy of insurance shall not be terminated , cancelled or substantially modified without at least ten (10) days ' prior written notice to the Association and to each Owner and to each Mortgagee covered by any standard mortgage clause endorsement; (f) be in the form of a single policy co v ering all of the improvements in the entire Project; and (g) provide that the insurer shall not hav e the option to restore the Buildings, or an y of them, if ownership of the Project is to be terminated in accordance with the terms of this Declaration or if the Buildings , or any of them, are to be sold in accordance with the destruction, 18 Re v. 08 /14/07 -1 I I • • • condemnation and obsolescence provisions of this Declaration. To the extent possible , public liability and property damage insurance shall provide for coverage of any cross liability claims of Owners against the Association or other Owners an d of the Association against Owners without right of subrogation. Any insurance policy may contain such deductible provisions as the Association deems consistent with good business practice. The Association shall obtain an independent appraisal of the Project every three years ; provided, however , that said appraisal may be p erformed by an appraiser employed by an msurance company. Certificates of insurance coverage or copies of insurance policies shall be issued to each Owner and each Mortgagee who makes written requ es t to the Association for an y such certificate or copy of an insurance policy . The cost and expense of all insurance obtained by the Association, except insurance covering additions , alterations or improvements made to a Unit by an Owner or other insurance obtained at the request of and specifically benefiting any particular Owner, shall be an expense of the Association, for which the Associat ion shall levy and collect an Assessment in accordance with the provisions of Article VI. 8.2 Casualty Insurance. The Association shall obtain and maintain casualty insurance covering the Project and each Unit covering loss or damage by fire and such other hazards as are covered under standard extended coverage polici es, with vandalism and malicious mischief endorsements, and , if available and if deemed appropriate by the Association , war risk , for the full insurable replacement cost of the Project, including each Unit. At the option of the Association, such insurance may also cover additions, alterations or improvements to a Unit made by an Owner if the Owner reimburses th e Association for any additional premiums attributable to such coverage. The Association shall not be obligated to apply any insurance proceeds to restore a Unit to a condition better than the conditions existing prior to the making of additions, alterations or improvements by an Own er in the absence of insurance covering such additions, alterations or improvements as aforesaid . 8.3 Public Liability and Property Dama ge Insurance . The Association shall obtain and maintain comprehensive public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury and property damage liability of the Association, its Members , Manager , emplo yees and agents and of each Owner and each Owner 's emplo ye es and Guests , and the Declarant arising in connection with ownership , operation, maintenance, o ccupancy or use of the Project, of any Unit in the Project or the Common Elements, with limits of not less that $1 ,000 ,000.00 for each occurrence involving bodily injury liability and/or pro perty damage liability. 8.4 Worker's Compensation and Emplo yer 's Liability Insurance . The Association shall obtain and maintain worker's compensation and employer's liability insurance as may be 19 Rev . 08/14 /07 • 1 • l • • • necessary to comply with applicable laws . 8.5 Insurance by Owners. Except to the extent coverage therefor may be obtained by the Association and be satisfactory to an Owner, eac h Owner shall be responsible for obtaining insurance he deems desirable , including, without limitation, casualty insurance covering fixtures , tenant finish, furnishings and personal property bel onging to that Owner and insurance covering personal liability of that Owner and that Owner 's employees and Guests. Any insurance policy obtained by an Owner shall be such that it will not diminish or adversely affect or invalidate any insurance or insurance recovery under policies carried by the Association and shall, to the extent possible, contain a waiver of the right of subrogati on by the insurer as to any claim against the Association, its Members , Manager, agents and employees and against other Owners and their employees and Guests and the Declarant. A copy of any insurance policy obtained by an Owner shall be furnished to the Association. 8.6 Receipt and Application of Insuranc e Proceeds. Except as some particular person has legal right to receive insurance proceeds directl y, all insurance proceeds and recoveries shall be paid to and received by the Association. All ins urance proceeds or recoveries received by the Association shall be applied by the Association: fir st, as expressly provided elsewhere in this Declaration; second, to the Owner's or persons wh om the Association may determine are legally or equitably entitled thereto; and third, the balance, if any, to Owners of Units ratably , in accordance with the Schedule of Assessments set forth in Exhibit B hereto. 8. 7 Other Insurance by Association. The Association shall have the power or authority to obtain and maintain other and additi onal insurance co verage , including casualty insurance covering personal property of the Asso ci ation, fidelity bonds or insurance co vering employees and agents of the Association and in surance indemnifying Members , Manager , employees and agents of the Association and the Decl arant. 8.8 Owner-Increased Premiums. In the ev ent that , as a consequence of the hazardous use of any Unit, or of any Owner-installed impro ve ments to any Unit, the premiums of any policy of insurance purchased by the Association are increased, or a special policy is required , the cost of such increase or special policy shall be p ay able by the Owner of such Unit. IX. DESTRUCTION, CONDEMNATION, OBSOLESCENCE, AND RESTORATION OR SALE OF THE BUILDINGS. 9 .1 Certain Definitions . The following terms shall have the following definitions : (a) Substantial and Partial Destruction. "Substantial Destruction" shall exist whenever , as a result of any damage or destruction to the Project, including the Buildings and Common Elements , the excess of Estimated Costs of Restoration (as hereinafter defined) over 20 Rev . 08 /14/07 ' . ' • • • Available Funds (as hereinafter defined) is fifty perce nt (50%) or more of the estimated Restored Value (as hereinafter defined) of the Project, incl u ding the Buildings and Common El ements . "Partial Destruction" shall mean any other damage of the Project, including the Buildings or Common Elements or any part thereof. (b) Substantial and Partial Condemnati on. "Substantial Condemnation" shall ex ist whenever a complete taking of a Building or a part thereof has occurred under eminent domain or by grant or conveyance in lieu of condemnation has occurred, and the excess of the Estimated Costs of Restoration over Available Funds is fift y percent (50%) or more of the estimated Restored Value of the Building. "Partial Condemnation" shall mean any other such taking by eminent domain or grant or conveyance in lieu of em inent domain. ( c) Substantial and Partial Obsolescence. "Substantial Obsolescence" shall ex ist whenever the Owners of more than fifty percent (50 %) of the total number of Units in the Project determine by vote that Substantial Obsolescence exists or whenever the Project, including the Buildings and Common Elements or any part thereo f, has reached such a state of obsolescence or disrepair that the excess of Estimated Costs or Restoration over Available Funds is fift y percent (50%) or more of the estimated Restored Value o f the Project, including the Buildings and Common Elements . "Partial Obsolescence" shall m ean any state of obsolescence or disrepair which does not constitute Substantial Obsolescence . ( d) Restoration. "Restoration ," in the c as e of any damage or de struction , shall mean restoration of the Project, including the Buildings and Common Elements , to a condition the same or substantially the same as the condition in which it existed prior to the damage or destruction; in the case of condemnation shall me an Restoration of the remaining portion of the Project, including the Buildings and Common El ements to an attractive , sound and desirable condition; and , in the case of obsolescence , shall me an restoration of the Project, including the Buildings and Common Elements to an attractive , sound and desirable condition. ( e) Restored Value. "Restored Value " shall mean the value of the Project, including the Buildings after Restoration , as estimated by the A ssociation by Member Action. (f) Estimated Costs of Restoration. "E stimated Costs of Restoration " shall mean the estimated costs of Restoration , as determined by the Association by Member Action. (g) Available Funds. "Available Funds" shall mean any proceeds of insurance or condemnation awards or payments in lieu of condemnation attributable to the Project, including the Buildings and Common Elements , plus a percentage of any uncommitted income or funds of the Association, including funds from the capital re se rve fund and the carry-over reserve fund of the Project, including the Buildings and Common Elements. Available Funds sha ll not include that portion of insurance proceeds legally required to be paid to any party other than the Association, including a Mortgagee , or that portion of an y condemnation award or payment in 21 Rev. 08 /14/07 ' ' • • • lieu of condemnation payable to the Owner of a Unit for the condemnation or taking of that Owner's Unit. 9.2 Determination by the Members. Upon the occurrence of any damage or destruction to the Project, including the Buildings or any part thereof, or upon a complete or partial taking of the Project, including the Buildings under eminent domain or by grant or conveyance in lieu of condemnation, the Members, by Member Action, shall make a determination as to whether the excess of Estimated Costs of Restoration over Available Funds is fifty percent (50%) or more of the estimated Restored Value of the Buildings and Common Elements. In addition, the Members shall, from time to time, review the condition of the Project, including the Buildings and Common Elements, to determine whether Substantial Obsolescence exists. 9.3 Restoration of the Buildings. Restoration of the Project, including the Buildings and Common Elements, shall be undertaken by the Association without a vote of Owners in the event of Partial Destruction, Partial Condemnation or Partial Obsolescence but shall be undertaken in the event of Substantial Destruction, Substantial Condemnation or Substantial Obsolescence only with the affirmative vote and consent of the Owners of more than fifty percent (50%) of the total number of Units in the Buildings and the consent of the First Mortgagees who hold security interests in those Units . In the event the insurance proceeds actually received exceed the cost of Restoration when such Restoration is undertaken pursuant to this Article IX, the excess shall be paid and distributed to all of the Owners of Units in the Buildings, ratably, based upon fractional proportions set forth in the Schedule of Assessments set forth on Exhibit B hereto. 9.4 Sale of the Buildings. The Project, including the Buildings and Common Elements, shall be sold in the event of Substantial Destruction, Substantial Condemnation or Substantial Obsolescence, unless consent to Restoration has been obtained in accordance with Section 9.3 above. In the event of such sale, ownership of the Project, including the Buildings and Common Elements, under this Declaration shall terminate and the proceeds of sale and any insurance proceeds, condemnation awards or payment in lieu of condemnation shall be distributed by the Association to the Owners of Units in the Buildings, ratably, based upon fractional proportions set forth in the Schedule of Assessments set forth on Exhibit B hereto. Payments to be made to Owners hereunder shall be made jointly to Mortgagees as to Units which are mortgaged at the time of such payment. 9.5 Authority of Association to Restore or Sell. The Association, as attorney-in-fact for each Owner, shall have full power and authority to restore or to sell the Project, including the Buildings and Common Elements and each Unit in the Project, whenever Restoration or sale , as the case may be, is undertaken as hereinabove provided. Such authority shall include the right and power to enter into any contracts, deeds or other instruments which may be necessary or appropriate for Restoration or sale, as the case may be . 22 Rev. 08/14/07 • • • 9.6 Payment of Proceeds. All insurance proceeds or proceeds of sale shall be paid to the Association as trustee for all of the Owners an d all Mortgagees , as the interest of such Owners and such Mortgagees may appear, subject to the obligation of the Association to restore the Project, including the Buildings and Common Ele ments , as provided herein. 9. 7 Supplementary Assessments for Re storation. Whenever Restoration is to be undertaken , the Association may levy and collect Supplementary Assessments from each Owner of a Unit in the Buildings to cover the costs and expenses of Restoration to the extent not covered by Available Funds. Such Supplementary Assessments shall be apportioned to the Owner of each Unit, ratably, based on the Schedule of Assessments set forth on Exhibit B hereto. Such Supplementary Assessment shall be payable over such period as the Association may determine, and shall be secured by a lien on the Unit of each such Owner as in the case of Regular Assessments . Notwithstanding any other provisions in this Declaration to the contrary , in the case of Substantial Destruction, Substantial Condemnation or Substantial Obsolescence , any such Supplementary Assessment shall not be a personal obligation of any such Owner who did not consent to Restoration, but, if not paid, may be recovered only by foreclosure of the lien against the Unit of such Owner. 9 .8 Receipt and Application of Condemnation Funds. All compensation, damages or other proceeds constituting awards for a complete taking of the Project, including the Buildings or a taking of part of the Project, including the Buildings under eminent domain or by grant or conveyance in lieu of condemnation, shall be payable to the Association. The amount thereof allocable to compensation for the taking of or injury to a particular Unit or to improvements of an Owner therein shall be apportioned to the Owner o f that Unit. The balance of the award shall be applied to costs and expenses of Restoration, if undertaken, and, to the extent not so applied, shall be allocated as follows: first, any portion of th e award allocable to the taking of or injury to Common Elements shall be apportioned among all Owners of Units in the Buildings, on a ratable basis according to the Schedule of Assessments set forth on Exhibit B hereto; second , the amounts allocable to severance damages with re spect to condemnation of a portion of the Buildings shall be apportioned among Owners with Units in the Building which was not taken or condemned, on a ratable basis according to the Schedule of Assessments set forth on Exhibit B hereto; and third, the amounts allocated to consequential damages or for other purposes shall be apportioned as the Association determines to be equ itable under the circumstances. 9 .9 Reorganization in the Event of a Condemnation. In the event all of a Unit is taken in condemnation, that Unit shall cease to be part of the Project, the Owner thereof shall cease to be a Member of the Association, and any interest in Common Elements appurtenant to that Unit shall automatically become vested in the Association for the benefit of the remaining Units in the Buildings on a ratable basis. Any provision of this Article IX notwithstanding , the provisions of § 38-33.3-107, C.R.S ., shall control with regard to any taking under the power of eminent domain . 23 Rev . 08/14/07 o( I I • • • 9 .10 Voting. Except as is provided in this Article IX, the votes of all Owners of all Units in all of the Buildings shall be considered one hundred percent for such voting purposes. x. COMMONLY OWNED UNITS 10.1 Commonly Owned Units. Any Unit owned by the Association shall be deemed a "Commonly Owned Unit." A Commonly Owned Unit may be a Unit acquired by the Association by foreclosure of liens, purchase or otherwise. Notwithstanding the fact that any Unit may constitute a Commonly Owned Unit, the Unit shall not be deemed part of the Common Elements. 10.2 Votes and Assessments for Commonly Owned Units. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Declaration to the contrary , for so long as any Unit is a Commonly Owned Unit, there shall be no regular membership in the Association for that Unit; no vote assigned to that Unit; and no Assessment levied or paid with respect to that Unit. If any Unit is a Commonly Owned Unit upon termination of ownership of the Project, including the Buildings and Common Elements, the beneficial interest in such Unit shall be deemed owned in common by the then Owners of all other Units, on a ratable basis. 10 .3 Sale or Lease of Commonly Owned Units. The Association may sell any Commonly Owned Units for their fair market value and shall have the right to lease or permit the use of any Commonly Owned Unit in the same manner as provided in Article 5. 7 with respect to Common Elements. XI. RESERVATION OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS BY DECLARANT 11.1 Additional Units, Lot 2 and Lot 3 . The Declarant hereby reserves the right to construct additional Units on Lots 2 and 3 of Glenwood Commercial Center Subdivision. The number of Units to be constructed on Lot 2 shall not exceed twenty-four (24) and the number of Units to be constructed on Lot 3 shall not exceed twenty-eight (28). All of said Units to be constructed on Lot 2 shall be completed not later than January 1, 2009, and all of said Units to be constructed on Lot 3 shall be completed not later than January 1, 2010. Upon completion of construction of said additional Units on both Lot 2 and Lot 3 of this Subdivision , an appropriate Map disclosing all of the requirements of the land use regulations of the City of Glenwood Springs, Colorado, shall be submitted by the Declarant to the City for its approval and shall be duly filed for record with the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder. At the time of filing of such approved Maps for said additional Units, the Units shall come into existence as such and be subject for all purposes to the provisions of this Declaration. In this connection, the schedule 24 Rev. 08 /14/07 • • • annexed hereto as Exhibit B -Schedule of Assessments, shall be appropriately amended by the Declarant as the owner of all such additional Units. Such amendment to this Declaration shall also include a Statement of Dedication and Ownership dedicating all common elements to the Glenwood Commercial Center Unit Owners Association, as the case may be. 11.2 Addition of Contiguous Property by Declarant. The Declarant further reserves the right to add to the Project any real property contiguous to the Project as it presently exists by appropriate amendment by Declarant of this Declaration and the Plat and Maps to include such real property in all respects and by appropriate dedication of utilities and drainage easements to the City of Glenwood Springs, Colorado, and by dedication of all Common Elements to the Glenwood Commercial Center Unit Owners Association. XII. MISCELLANEOUS 12.1 Duration of Declaration. Each provision contained in this Declaration which is subject to the laws or rules sometimes r eferred to as the rule against perpetuities or the rule prohibiting unreasonable restraints on alienation shall continue and remain in full force and effect for a period of twenty-one (21) years following the death of the last to die of David Hicks or Connie Hicks, or until this Declaration is terminated as hereinafter provided, whichever first occurs . All other provisions contained in this Declaration shall continue and remain in full force and effect until ownership of the Project and this Declaration is terminated or revoked as hereinafter provided. 12.2 Amendment and Termination. Any provision contained in this Declaration may be amended, or additional provisions may be added to this Declaration, or this Declaration and ownership of the Project may be terminated or revoked, by the recording of a written instrument or instruments specifying the amendment or addition or the fact of termination and revocation, executed by more than fifty percent (50%) of the Owners of all of the Units. No such amendment to this Declaration shall have the effect of prohibiting the use of any Unit for a purpose which is valid under the provisions of Section 7 .1 hereof at the time of such amendment. 12.3 Effect of Provisions of Declaration. Each provision of this Declaration, and any agreement, promise, covenant and undertaking to comply with each provision of this Declaration, and any necessary exception or reservation or grant of title, estate, right or interest to effectuate any provision of this Declaration: (a) shall be deemed incorporated in each contract of sale, deed or other instrument by which any right , title or interest in the Project, including the Buildings and the Common Elements or in any Unit, is sold, granted, devised or conveyed, whether or not set forth or referred to in such contract of sale, deed or other instrument; (b) shall, by virtue of acceptance of any right, title or interest in the Project, including the Buildings and the Common Elements or in any Unit by an Owner, be deemed accepted, ratified, adopted and declared as a personal covenant of such Owner, and, as a personal covenant, shall be binding on 25 Rev. 08 /14/07 .. . . • • • such Owner and such Owner's heirs, personal representative, successors and assigns and, as a personal covenant of an Owner, shall be deemed a personal cov enant to, with and for the benefit of the Association but not to, with or for the benefit of any other Owner; ( c) shall be deemed a real covenant by Declarant, for itself, its successors and assigns , and also an equitable servitude, running, in each case, as a burden with and upon the title to the Project, including the Buildings and the Common Elements and each Unit, and as a real covenant and also as an equitable servitude shall be deemed a covenant and servitude for the benefit of the Project, including the Buildings and the Common Elements and each U nit; and ( d) shall be deemed a covenant, obligation and restriction secured by a lien in favor of the Association, burdening and encumbering the title to the Project, including the Buildings and the Common Elements and each Unit, in favor of the Association. 12.4 Enforcement and Remedies. In addi t ion to any other remedies herein provided, each provision of this Declaration with respect to an Owner or the Unit of an Owner shall be enforceable by the Association or by any individual Owner by a proceeding for a prohibitive or mandatory injunction or by a suit or action to recover damages or both. If any court proceedings are instituted in connection with the rights of enforcement and remedies provided in this Declaration, the prevailing party shall be entitled t o recover from the losing party its costs and expenses in connection therewith, including reasonab le attorney's fees . 12 .5 Protection of Encumbrancer. Except as otherwise provided in Article VI hereof, no violation or breach of, or failure to comply with, any provision of this Declaration and no action to enforce any such provision shall affect, de feat, render invalid or impair the lien of any First Mortgage or Deed of Trust on any U nit taken in good faith and for value and perfected by recording in the Office of the County Clerk and Rec order of Garfield County, Colorado , prior to the time of recording in said office of an instrument describing the Unit and listing the name or names of the Owner or Owners of fee simple title to the Unit and giving notice of such violation , breach or failure to comply; nor shall such violat ion, breach, failure to comply or action to enforce affect, defeat, render invalid or impair the ti t le or interest of the holder of any such First Mortgage or Deed of Trust or the title or interest acquired by any purchaser upon foreclosure of any such First Mortgage or Deed of Trust or by deed in lieu of foreclosure , except as provided in said Article VI hereof. Any such purchaser on foreclosure or by deed in lieu of foreclosure shall, however, take subject to this Declaration. 12.6 Limited Liability. Neither Declarant, the Association, the Members and Manager of the Association, nor any agent or employee of any of the same, shall be liable to any party for any action or for any failure to act with respect to any matter if the action taken or failure to act was in good faith and without malice. 12 .7 Successors and Assigns . This Declaration shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the Association, the Declarant and each Owner and the heirs , personal representatives, successors and assigns of each . 26 Rev . 08 /14/07 . • "-" r • • • 12.8 Severability. Invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Declaration in whole or in part shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provisions or any valid and enforceable part of a provision of this Declaration. 12 .9 Captions. The captions and headings in this instrument are for convenience only and shall not be considered in construing any provisions of this Declaration. 12.10 No Waiver. Failure to enforce any provisions of this Declaration shall not operate as a waiver of any such provision or of any other provision of this Declaration. 12.11 Further Assurances. The Association and each Owner hereby agree to do such further acts and execute and deliver such further instruments as may reasonably be required to effectuate the intent of this Declaration. 12.12 Word Usage. The use of the masculine gen der herein shall be deemed to include the feminine and neuter genders and the use of the singular shall be deemed to include the plural, whenever the context so requires . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarant has executed this Declaration the day and year first above written. STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) GLENWOOD COMMERCIAL, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company David Hicks, Manager DECLARANT The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this __ day of ______ , 2007, by David Hicks as Manager of Glenwood Commercial, LLC, the Declarant. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires -------- 27 Rev . 08 /14/07 • Notary Public • • 28 Rev . 08 /14/07 • • GLENWOOD COMMERCIAL LLC ADJOINING PROPERTY LIST Margarito and Maria Eugenia Chaven 2566 Highway 82 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 218522300037 David J. Hughes Trust 2191 I Road Grand Junction, CO 81505 218522300036 Don L. and Christine G. Lynch 26241 S . Lakemont Drive Sun Lakes, AZ 85248-7156 218522300027 John E. Colby 2552 Highway 82 Glenwood Springs , CO 81601-4301 218522300028 Nancy R. Byers 352 Beaver Dam Circle Vail, CO 81657 218522300026 Roaring Fork Market Place LLLP 1245 Mountain View Aspen, CO 81611 218522206013 Donald Craig Byers Trust 352A Beaver Dam Circle Vail, CO 81657-5001 218522206018 Bureau of Land Management 50629 H ighway 6 & 24 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 218522100965 1:\2008 \Client s\PrinceCrk\7-GWCornm-3229\Public Notice\Adjoin in g Prope1ty Owner List.wpd Adjoining 2185-214 ® ~ Ii "' !"> ! ~ ('\'.) -~ co "" Cl) "' I I .., ('\'.) fl ('\'.) ~ (() !"> ii 11 , g ® "" . ~ ~ ® :--i "' ~ C) I "' I rTl ~ l\:i z "' "1 -~ ~ a:i 0 0-iO ri lo Rl l\:i (f) :;,; l\:i \J "'! l\:i ::<] ~ z GJ (f) ® @ " Id "s • 0 29TH GLEN PLACE SUBDIVISION Adjoining 218!i-211 SUBDIVISION ® @ .l--.l~l ®