HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.0 BOCC Staff Report 10.04.2004REQUEST
BOCC 10/04/04
FJ
PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS
Correct a Scrivener's Error & Amend the text
of the Blue Creek Ranch Planned Unit
Development (PUD)
APPLICANT Blue Creek Land Holdings, LLC
REPRESENTATIVE(S) Balcomb & Green, PC, Lawrence R. Green
LOCATION 3220 County Road 100 (Catherine Store Rd)
ZONING PUD
I. BACKGROUND
The Board of County Commissioners approved the Blue Creek Ranch PUD and Preliminary Plan on
August 5th, 2002 which is memorialized in Resolution 2002-82 (the Resolution). The Board
subsequently approved the Final Plat on February 18t, 2003. The Board approved the PUD as a site
specific development plan which was proposed and intended to include a total of 48 single-family
residential lots. Lot 1 was designed to include the existing original ranch house as well as an existing
accessory dwelling unit (ADU). Due to a scrivener's error, the Resolution refers to 49 residential lots
rather than 48 residential lots as well as neglected to specifically include a reference to the ADU on lot
1 which was contemplated throughout the review process as an existing unit which would continue to
exist as a lawful use on Lot 1.
Additionally, confusion has recently arisen regarding the intent of the term "barn" which was approved
as a use -by -right in the private common open space district within the PUD. The Applicant intended
the barn to mean "storage barn" for the benefit of individual lot owners in the PUD where owners in
the subdivision would be able to store personal belongings in the barns as a private amenity provided
by the Homeowners Association (HOA). Because this specific intent was never discussed during the
review process, Staff maintained a more agricultural understanding of the term "barn." As a result of
that understanding, building permits had been submitted by the Applicant for one of the proposed
barns which, by design, resembled a traditional "barn" design on the exterior while the interior was
designed as "storage" units which was contrary to Staff's understanding.
II. REQUEST
The Applicant requests the Board approve a request to amend Resolution 2002-82 to 1) correct a
scrivener's error effectively changing 49 residential lots to 48 residential lots while including the
existence of the ADU on Lot 1 and 2) to clarify the definition and intent of "barn" as it is contemplated
as a use -by -right in the private common open space zone district within the PUD.
1
• •
III. STAFF COMMENTS
Section 4.12.03 of the Garfield County Zoning Resolution identifies the criteria the Board of County
Commissioners shall use to determine if a modification to a PUD is warranted (pursuant to CRS 24-67-
106(3)(a — c)). Specifically, it states, all those provisions of the Plan authorized to be enforced by the
County may be modified, removed or released by the County, subject to the following (these criteria are
listed below in bold italics).
(1) No modification, removal or release of the provisions of the Plan by the County shall
affect the rights of the residents, occupants and owners of the PUD to maintain and enforce
those provisions at law or in equity; and
(2) No substantial modifications, removal or release of the provisions of the Plan by the
County shall be permitted except upon a finding by the County, following a public hearing
called and held in accordance with the provisions of Section 24-67-104. C.R.S., that the
modification, removal or release is consistent with the efficient development and preservation
of the entire PUD [and the modification] does not affect in a substantially adverse manner
either the enjoyment of land abutting upon or across a street from the PUD, or the public
interest, and is not granted solely to confer a special benefit upon any person.
(3) If time-share or fractional ownership units or other similar interest in property are
proposed after PUD zoning is granted by the Board of County Commissioners, an application
for such designation shall contain unanimous approval of all owners of real property within
the PUD.
Staff Response
Staff finds the request to correct the scrivener's error is warranted simply on the basis that it was an
oversight in preparing the Resolution. Clearly, the number of single-family lots proposed, discussed, and
approved was 48 rather than 49 and the ADU on Lot 1 was also contemplated throughout the approval
process and inadvertently left out of the Resolution.
The clarification of the term "barn" to mean "storage barn" to contain storage units for the specific
benefit of lot owners within the subdivision is consistent with the primary residential nature of the
development as well as the general intent of the PUD as a shared amenity. Staff agrees that cluster
design incorporated into Blue Creek Ranch contemplates smaller lots while preserving larger tracts of
open space. A separate storage barn for the benefit of the lot owners affords additional storage space
without compromising the intent of the small lot concept. The PUD does not include any time-share or
fractional ownership units. Staff finds the proposal is consistent with the efficient development and
preservation of the entire PUD [and the modification] does not affect in a substantially adverse manner
either the enjoyment of land abutting upon or across a street from the PUD, or the public interest, and is
not granted solely to confer a special benefit upon any person.
2
• •
IV. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION & SUGGESTED FINDINGS TO
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
On September 8, 2004, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended the Board of County
Commissioners approve the request to 1) correct a scrivener's error to Resolution 2002-82 and 2) amend
the text of the Blue Creek Ranch PUD to clarify the intent of "barn" in the private open space to mean
"storage barn" finding that:
1. That the meeting before the Board of County Commissioners was extensive and complete,
that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that all interested parties were
heard;
2. The PUD text is consistent with the efficient development and preservation of the entire PUD
[and the modification] affects in a substantially adverse manner either the enjoyment of land
abutting upon or across a street from the PUD, or the public interest, and is not granted solely
to confer a special benefit upon any person;
3. That the proposed PUD Amendment has been determined to be in the best interest of the
health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield
County; and
4. That the application has met the requirements of the Garfield County Zoning Resolution of
1978, as amended.
3
•
Garfield County
October 4, 2004
Lawrence R. Green
Balcomb & Green, P.C.
P. O. Drawer 790
818 Colorado Avenue
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602
BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE: Text Amendment to the Blue Creek Ranch Planned Unit Development
Dear Larry,
As you are aware, on Monday, October 4th, 2004, the Board of County Commissioners (the Board)
approved the request to amend Resolution 2002-82 to 1) correct a scrivener's error effectively
changing 49 residential lots to 48 residential lots while including a specific reference the existence of
the Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) on Lot 1 and 2) to amend the text of the PUD to clarify the
intent of the term "barn" to mean a "storage barn" which is to be used as a shared amenity as a use -
by -right in the private common open space zone district within the PUD for the benefit of lot owners
in the PUD and is owned and managed by the Homeowners Association. In addition, the Board also
agreed that a total of four (4) such storage barns are contemplated in the private common open space
within Blue Creek Ranch PUD.
This office will draft a new resolution that reflects these changes described above which will be
presented to the Board on a consent agenda for signature in the next few weeks. Please do not
hesitate to contact this office should you have any questions regarding this matter.
Very truly yours,
Fred Jarman, AICP, Senior Planner
970.945.8212
108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
(970) 945-8212 (970) 285-7972 Fax: (970) 384-3470