The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication- Permit• • Garfield County `Building & Sanitation Department 108 8, Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003 NO. 9 ,'aa Job Address O: ' \ I V `arinOr1 r, G Nature of Work Cil Buildd inz Permit c�i a�� %3 - l L - c VP07-7 & �] Use of Building Q, 7 CL14 /00.22. (/rajeS) (ede JOwner fg� Contractor (7Lgan & Amount of Permit $ Date Clerk Permit No: GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8" Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212 / Fax: 970-384-3470 / Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 Parcel/Schedule No: ales- a-13-162-o3g AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 3028201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY ANI) THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCEES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Garton.003 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT 1 HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL): Job Address: �n TBD nag/ ag7 /J/GII rponrlin _ ✓ 1 Lot No: Block No: 38 -1-3//2-- Subd / Exemplpn: G�- ita,0c 37'1-Oo' 2 Owner: Rudd Construction, Inc. Address 132 Park Ave Basalt, CO 81621 Ph: 970-927-9119 Wk Ph: n/a 3 Contractor: Rudd Construction, Inc. Address: 132 Park Ave Basalt, CO 81621 Ph: 970-927-9119 Lic. No. n/a 4 Architect/Engineer: Pl.,1 irk,.ao )?ffiVIVTI4 Address: g! S4stAJe-Cau.a5 eo. Ph: 4q5-GG55 Lic. No. 203;s3 5 Sq. Ft. of Building: 3 2 5 Sq. Ft. of Lor C a� Height: No. of Floors:3 6 Use of Building: residential 7 Describe Work: construction of spec house 8 Class of Work: me New new construction ❑ Addition o Alteration o Remove o Move 9 10 Garage: ❑ Single 07 Double Carport: o Single none o Double ❑ Driveway Permit ❑ On -Site Sewage Disposal n / a (Septic) o Site Plan 11 Valuation of Work: $ �5OI coo12 Adjusted Valuations: S In 5 .2-77 , 7 Special Conditions• '{�/ / _ 7:3/4 st7 #41 �y _ ��te NOTICE A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN I80 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK 1S SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING TMS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULAT• s TRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. 'tri / .:' r ,` ri Plan Check Fee: rr��,, / 9s8 . `' �] D Permit Fee: /4737 3?- Total Fee: ;j�jj Z+ S4 33 loop: Dated Permit Issued: OCC K o Ca .t.T pe: , 0 ' r't. ` 3 (Jt ..{�- 7l Zoning: Setbacks: Manu. Home: ISIS No. & Fee: A rR / r DE BLD 'E' . PG. APPROVAL ' ATE rAr'.:1� AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 3028201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY ANI) THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCEES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Garton.003 1 HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT 1 HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL): • The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non- absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1997 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOTOCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISE UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy br - dwelling under building permit# Riia 5-3-01 Signatdre Date BpcontO82002 VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Pow Address Date 2 S0/ Finished (Livable Area): Main 7 95 Upper /096 Lower Other Total Square Feet ) (a 93 Valuation Basement: )/ /, Unfinished 9(p a 4 Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Crawl Space: Valuation 460 Valuation Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation (el Open Valuation 4 )0 Total Valuation Subdivision Lot/Block Contractor )340, �I7 844o Applicant PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Pu Di) Date 5-)4 -0 Building v Engineered Foundation ,t9„Q Driveway Permit ,_/Surveyed Site Plan AZQ_ Septic Permit and Setbacks --rade/Topography 30% -Attach Residential Plan Review List Minimum Application Questionnaire -- Subdivision Plat Notes te/(4, Fire Department Review ✓4aluation Determination/Fees K/ed Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker .-Attach Conditions / AApplication Signed _ ...,Kan Reviewer To Sign Application Parcel/Schedule No. S/tJ RkPsn i 40# Snowload Letter- Manf. Hms. GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning Property Line Setbacks 30ft Stream Setbacks Flood Plain Building Height Zoning Sign -off Road Impact Fees HOA/DRC Approval Grade/Topography 40% Planning Issues Subdivision Plat Notes palumln3barairIrchirecis plannitiN itericfs_ •nre Mkan maul. Ms • • 2410 t/1" Mfr'MLH ROOF HFJ6HT ABOVE EASING GRADE COPYBIOHT PA11A@IO BARTH PC EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Ph M04-102 dans by 101.4 darted by BNB d¢ Rwe 4410/04 — remarks N14S Penni 5-15iU4AdkSumNI I 4 -MILE RESIDENCE WT 3114 -MILE RANCH GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO palomhlobarthmcm cuts PC pl„ •w polars rebut. con GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 4 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS for SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS and MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. Adequate and complete information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays because other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction under the Uniform Building Code". This book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. • Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house -rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, an 80 M.P.H. windshear, wind exposure B, windload of 15 pounds per square foot, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. NOTE: 106.3.1 (7.) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope. Yes__ L/__ 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes___ v V __ 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes___ --- Nl✓J- 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes ✓ 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes__ L/ 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces's and soffits? Yes 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes--- - 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connectiop of all columns and beams? Yes 12. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing (undisturbed) grade contours? • • • ' Yes 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes__[. N 14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Building Code Chapter 37? Yes_ No_ZC---_____ 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code? Yes___X ____ No 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? No 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? YesNo 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes____ X No 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes - No__—___—___—_ 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the architectural committee deny or reject your building plans?/ Yes_____ X ___ No 21. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes\G ___ No If no -Explain: 22. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes 23. Do you understand that the minimum dimensions a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft. long? Yes_ __ No - 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes -----1--- No____—__ - 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone district? Yes --- --- No — --- 26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes__—_____ No 27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes No 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes- x --- No— ___ —__- 29. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoons. All inspections must be called in by 3:30 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay your inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes No 30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not ' accessible will result in a $47.00 re-inpsection fee? Yes No 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes___ No 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority be given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the Uniform Building Code? Yes)G No 33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes No_____ 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes No 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes------- — --- No I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to t ' e bes of my ability. Signature of Owner Q Phone: QC� % ' 6 c� ✓ / (days); 3-1 (7;3121 (evenings) Project _ rn`�� Name:__ __-- Date Project Address: Oa�� A) fL Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreq 04/2003 Apr 20 04 01:07p District 1 • 970-945-1318 p•1 Garfield County Road and Bridge, District 1 7300 Hwy 82, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970-945-1223 ph. 945-1318 FAX Date: 04-20-04 To: Building & Planning From: Bobby Branham Re: Driveway permit exemption For: Rudd Construction Location: Lot 36 and 38 Four Mile Ranch Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Scope of Work: Obtain building permit Road and Bridge Concerns: This property lies outside the system of maintained county roads, and is therefore exempt from County driveway permit requirements. Bobby Branham Dist.1 Road and Bridge Ge Ptech HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL i-lepv—Tris-rdu;nl. PRELIMINARY SUBSOIL STUDY PROPOSED RESIDENCES LOTS 34 TO 39, 41 AND 42 4 MILE RANCH GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 104 257 APRIL 29, 2004 PREPARED FOR: RUDD CONSTRUCTION ATTN: MARK PR7YBYLSKI 0132 PARK AVENUE BASALT, COLORADO 81621 Parker 303.841.7119 • Colorado Springs 719.633-3562 • S;lverthorne °70-468-I 9H) TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY - 1 - PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT - 1 - SITE CONDITIONS - 2 - SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL - 2 - FIELD EXPLORATION - 2 - SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS - 3 - PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS - 3 - FOUNDATIONS -4- FLOOR SLABS -4- UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM - 4 - SITE GRADING - 5 - SURFACE DRAINAGE - 5 - LIMITATIONS - 5 - FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURES 4 through 7- SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 8 - GRADATION TEST RESULTS TABLE I- SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS • PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a preliminary subsoil study for proposed residences to be located on Lots 34 to 39, 41 and 42. Four Mile Ranch, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to Rudd Construction. dated April 2, 2004. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory pits was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for project planning and preliminary design. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions and recommendations based on the proposed development and subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT A single family residence is proposed on each of the subject lots roughly in the area of the exploratory pits shown on Figure 1. The proposed residences will consist of two story, wood frame structures over a walkout basement level with an attached garage. Basement and garage floors will be slab -on -grade. Cut depths are assumed to range between 4 to 10 feet below the original ground surface. We expect relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. if development plans change significantly from those described, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. lobNo 104 257 Gettech -2 - SITE CONDITIONS The subject lots are located in the northern part of the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision near the Maroon Drive cul-de-sac. A water storage tank for the subdivision is located along the uphill side of Lots 35 and 36. The natural topography in the area consists of a broad northerly trending ridge. The ground surface in the building areas is relatively flat and mostly moderately sloping down to the west. Sleeper slopes are located west of the building areas of Lots 38, 39, 41 and 42. Vegetation consists of grass and weeds with sage brush. Maroon Formation bedrock is visible on nearby hillsides. SUBSIDENCE POTENTIAL Bedrock of the Pennsylvanian age Eagle Valley Evaporite underlies the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision. These rocks are a sequence of gypsiferous shale, fine-grained sandstone and siltstone with some massive beds of gypsum and limestone. There is a possibility that massive gypsum deposits associated with the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlie portions of the lots. Dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes to develop and can produce areas of localized subsidence. Sinkholes were not observed in the immediate area of the subject lots. No evidence of cavities was encountered in the subsurface materials; however, the exploratory pits were relatively shallow, for foundation design only. Based on our present knowledge of the subsurface conditions at the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop. The risk of future ground subsidence on Lot 34 to 39, 41 and 42 throughout the service life of the proposed residences, in our opinion. is low; however, the owner should be made aware of the potential for sinkhole development. if further investigation of possible cavities in the bedrock below the site is desired. we should be contacted. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on April 5, 2004. Eight exploratory pits (one per lot) were excavated at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The pit locations were based on the proposed house locations Job No. 104 257 Gegtech provided to us. The pits were dug with a Case 580 4x4 backhoe. The pits were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical. Inc. Samples of' the subsoils were taken with relatively undisturbed and disturbed sampling methods. Depths at which the samples were taken are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Pits, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsoils were variable and generally consist of about % to 1 foot of topsoil overlying a mixture of clay, sand and rock fragments. Typically, the soils encountered in the upper, eastern part of the site (Pits 5 to 8) were more fine-grained than those in the western lower part of the site (Pits 1 to 4). Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the pits included natural moisture content, density and gradation analyses. Results of swell -consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed samples, presented on Figures 4 through 7, indicate low compressibility under existing moisture conditions and light loading, and generally low expansion/collapse potential after wetting. In general, the samples showed low to moderate compressibility with increased loading after wetting. Results of gradation analyses performed on a bulk sample (minus 6 inch fraction) of the natural coarse granular soils are shown on Figure 8. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table 1. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavation and the subsoils were slightly moist to moist. PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS The conclusions and recommendations presented below are based on the proposed development, subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory pits, and our experience in the area. The recommendations are .suitable for planning and preliminary Job No. 104 257 Gtech -4 - design. but additional she specific studies should be conducted prior to building construction. For the proposed construction. these studies can probably consist of observing the completed foundation excavation prior to placement of concrete. FOUNDATIONS Bearing conditions will vary depending on the specific lot. Based on the nature of the proposed construction, spread footings bearing on the natural subsoils should be suitable at the building sites. We expect the footings can be sized for an allowable bearing pressure in the range of 1,500 psf to 3,000 psf Expansive clays encountered in building areas may need to be removed or the footings designed to impose a minimum dead load pressure to limit potential heave. Nested boulders and collapsible soils may need treatment such as enlarging footings or placing compacted fill or concrete backfill. Foundation walls should be designed to span local anomalies and to resist lateral earth loadings when acting as retaining structures. Below grade areas and retaining walls should be protected from wetting and hydrostatic loading by installing an underdrain system. The footings should have a minimum depth of 42 inches for frost protection. FLOOR SLABS Slab -on -grade construction should be feasible for bearing on the natural soils below any topsoil. There could be some post construction slab movement at sites with collapsible matrix or expansive clays, especially if the subgrade is wetted. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. A minimum 4 inch thick layer of free -draining gravel should underlie basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered in the exploratory pits. it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. An underdrain system should be provided to protect Job No 104257 Gtech -5- below—grade construction. such as retaining walls. crawlspace and basement areas from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup. The drains should consist of drainpipe surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. SITE GRADING The risk of construction -induced slope instability at the lots appear low provided the buildings are located in the area of the exploratory pits as planned and cut and fill depths are limited. Cut depths for the building pads and driveway access should not exceed about 10 feet. Fills should be limited to about 10 feet deep. Structural fills should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density near optimum moisture content. Prior to fill placement, the subgrade should be carefully prepared by removing all vegetation and topsoil. The fill should be benched into the portions of the lots exceeding 20% grade. The on-site soils excluding oversized rock and topsoil should be suitable for use in embankment fills. Permanent unretained cut and fill slopes should be graded at 2 horizontal to 1 vertical or flatter and protected against erosion by revegetation, rock riprap or other means. SURFACE DRAINAGE The grading plan for the Tots should consider runoff from uphill slopes throughout the subdivision. Water should not be allowed to pond which could impact slope stability and foundations. To limit infiltration into the bearing soils next to buildings, exterior backfill should be well compacted and have a positive slope away from the building for a distance of 10 feet. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill and landscape irrigation may need to be restricted at some sites. LIM ITATIONS This study has been conducted according to generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or Job No. 104 257 Gtech -6 - implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits located as shown on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified al the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. if conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for planning and preliminary design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations b) others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation, conduct additional evaluations and review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Or Q. Trevor L. Knell Reviewed by: Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. TLK/ksw 'C3 24443 $ s y(3o/a1/1 CAt ONAL E1' tor -"Mmontn. lob No. 104 257 �Ptech APPROXIMATE SCALE 1" = 60' EXISTING WATER TANK / PIT 7 / LOT 35 / 6190/ LOT 36 / / i 1 1 6180 i LOT 37 7 / 6170 l �■ PIT 6 7 • PIT 5 i 6160/ -' // i 6150 ■ PIT 4 I 6140 _ LOT 38 _, --- � 1 6130 6120' 6090 - 6080 1 i LOT 34 i • PIT 8 6180 - - LOT 33 i /LOT 32 6170 LOT 31 6160 6150 6140 6130 PIT 2 ■ LOT 39 • PIT 3, 6110 6100 EMERGENCY ACCESS LOT 40 7 LOT 41 R1 6120 6110 6100 / 6090 LOT 43 ROPppl 0 `4 P X1\1 SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY 104 257 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS Figure 1 Depth — Feet Depth — Feet 0 5 PIT 1 LOT 42 ELEV.=6132' WC=17.8 DD -111 WC=10.0 OD=94 -200=93 PIT 2 LOT 41 ELEV.=6133' WC=9.8 WC=76 -200=77 PIT 3 LOT 39 ELEV.=6116' WC=17.2 DD=92 WC= 7.0 DD=102 200-48 PIT 4 LOT 38 ELEV.=6135' +4=39 _ -200=29 0 5 — _ 10 10 0 5 PIT 5 LOT 37 ELEV.=6156' WC -7.3 OD=95 PIT 6 LOT 36 ELE V.= 61661 WC -17.4 DD=103 -200=94 PIT 7 LOT 35 ELEV.=6191' WC=20.6 DD=88 -200=93 PIT 8 LOT 34 ELEV.= 6176' WC=15.3 0D=107 0 5 _ _ 10 10 Note: Explanation of symbols is shown on Figure 3. Depth — Feet Depth — Feet 104 257 HEP WORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Figure 2 4 LEGEND: TOPSOIL; sandy silty clay, organic, firm, moist, dark brown. CLAY (CL); slightly sandy to sandy, silty, medium stiff to stiff, moist, reddish brown. SAND AND CLAY (SC—CL); gravelly, very stiff/medium dense, slightly moist to moist, light brown to reddish brown, calcareous. BASALT GRAVEL AND COBBLES (CL—GC); in a sandy silty clay matrix, less matrix/more rock at Pit 4, very stiff/medium dense, slightly moist to moist, light brown to reddish brown. 2" Diameter hand driven liner sample. Disturbed bulk sample. NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on April 5, 2004 with a Case 580 backhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were obtained by interpolation between contours on the site plan provided. 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) +4 = Percent retained on the No. 4 sieve —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 104 257 HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3 Compression — Expansion Z 1 0 1 2 3 Compression % 4. (,1 N) — O Moisture Content = 17.8 percent Dry Density = 111 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Pit 1 at 1.5 Feet Expansion upon wetting 0.1 .0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 10.0 percent Dry Density = 94 pcf Sample of: Slightly Sandy Clay From: Pit 1 at 3 Feet Compression upon wetting 0.1 .0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 00 104 257 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 • 0 1 r 2 Compression c 0 m d 0. E 0 U 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 Moisture Content = 9.8 percent Dry Density = 76 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Pit 2 at 4 Feet 0.1 Compression upon wetting .0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 0.1 0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 104 257 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 5 Moisture Content = 17.2 percent Dry Density = 92 pcf Sample of: Sand and Clay (matrix) From: Pit 3 at 4.5 Feet • • No movement upon wetting 0.1 0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 104 257 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 5 Compression Compression 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 Moisture Content = 7.3 percent Dry Density = 95 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Pit 5 at 6 Feet Compression upon wetting 0.1 .0 0 APPUED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 17.4 percent Dry Density = 103 pcf Sample of: Slightly Sandy Clay From: Pit 6 at 2.5 Feet No movement upon wetting 0.1 .0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 104 257 HEP WORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 6 • t 0 Compression Compression — Expansion % 1 2 0 1 2 0.1 .0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 15.3 percent Dry Density = 107 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Pit 8 at 5.5 Feet Expansion upon wetting 0.1 .0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 104 257 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 7 Moisture Content = 20.6 percent Dry Density = 88 pcf Sample of: Slightly Sandy Clay From: Pit 7 at 3 Feet • • • No movement upon wetting 0.1 .0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 Moisture Content = 15.3 percent Dry Density = 107 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Pit 8 at 5.5 Feet Expansion upon wetting 0.1 .0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 104 257 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 7 ' RCEN RETA 1 24 M. 7 HR o 45 MN 15 W. 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 6U 90 100 .001 HYDRQCTER ANALYSIS TIME READINGS 66168. I949N. 4 W 1 NEL /200 n00 U.S. STANDARD SERIES /50 ►3D no /6 STEW AMALISS 1 CLEAR SQUARE ORCnNGS /1 3/6' 3/4' 1 1/2' 3' 5'6' C 100 r .005 .019 .037 .074 .150 .300 .600 1.16 2.36 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS CLAY TO 9LT GRAVEL 39 % LIQUID LIMIT SAND 4.75 ENE 1 MEDIUM (COARSE SAND 32 % 9.5125 19.0 37.5 GR KL nNE S COARSE 76.2 152 203 127 SEs SILT AND CLAY 29 % PLASTICITY INDEX SAMPLE OF: Clayey Sand and Gravel FROM: Pit 4 at 5 to 6 Feet 104 257 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. GRADATION TEST RESULTS so so 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 ' ERC NT PA INe Figure 8 • Job No. 104 257 U Z J 0 Z 2 U w >- 0 O w 0 0 gw0 J m .92 o_ u = O 0 a CL E L1.1 2 (f) l!) N Lu ce F— LU W • w a Sandy clay Slightly sandy clay a :. �,. ,-- 6 V] - - R F.. G up v , G - v. >. p >, c - L./ I I , = — v >. J70 :>. � — ,.i . c..,_ = F U Slightly sandy clay HI V ¢ > - DL — ✓= U >. - 7 V) UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (PSF) ATTERBERG LIMITS__ LIQUID PLASTIC LIMIT INDEX (%) (%) PERCENT - PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE M .1 77 f 48 29 94 --- M GRADATION GRAVEL SAND (%) (To) 39 94 92 102 a j 1 88 - pp 10.0 1 9.8 1 N O 17.4 1 20.6 f'1 SAMPLE LOCATION Pit Depth No. (ft) — -1 - N Cr Vr 19 01c '. N c'1 t (--1 M 11 4 vi .0 r on i Model GD36NTR ._........... ..,,,... Iiesk , ., -_ . ,.:. One fireplace over 40.000 different looks. Just the right amount of heats and luxury! Pure. Simple.Tasteful. Whether you're looking to heat a small or large room the GD36NTR is the answer With BTU input ranging from 17,500 to as much as 27,000 this great looking fireplace is the way to go. Builders and homeowners alike love this full sized, highly efficient fireplace. www hreplacedesignsludio.com Product Specifications G1770NT BGD48N BGD4ON GD95N BGD42N-D BGD38NT GD36NTR GD34NT GD33NR Fuel Natural Gas P"opzt Natural Gas Propane Natural Gas Propane Natural Gas Propane Natural Gas Propane Natural Gas Propane Natural Gas Propane Natural Gas Propane Natural Gas Propane BTU Input 35,000 7]nnn Maximum Heating Efficiency BTU Output AFUE Steady State 28.350 7 400 36.000 23.500 36.000 23.500 30,000 20.400 30.000 20.400 45,000 36,900 40,000 33.200 72% 72% 81% 8095 62% 65% 62% 65% 68% 68% 82% 673% 83% 28,500 19,500 64% 68.5% 24,000 16,000 61 5% 67% 26,000 16,750 26,000 17,200 26,000 22.400 26.000 22,800 24,500 19,500 24,500 19,500 22.000 22.000 57% 644% 58% 66.2% 73% 86% 74% 88% 17,000 63% 17,500 63% 81 3% 813% 77.2% 79A% Years of research. design and testing have enhanced optimum performance allowing Napoleon products to achieve some of the highest heater rating efficiencies on the market. Our products continuously surpass industry standards not only in appearance but in efficiency and performance. Installation Versatility • No need for costly foundation or brick work • Ground level and above installations • Zero Clearance to combustibles • Suitable for mobile home installations • In Canada. approved for R2000 advanced housing • Basement installations, even below grade using a Periscope • Also approved with Simpson Dura-Vent direct vent pipe • Approved for bedroom. bathroom & bedsitung room installations Heating Flexibility I rnaintains adjacent • •e. -rt en an'' Qfltt ( " F;ffered_achoiceof distributing a.po X s3 on; at the heat generated frorn ro ., fireplace either to other rooms, adding to your overall home comfort ...''t BwAyxR you yant"tor extract maximum heat an optional Cci attn btowerofers increased heating efficiency. pra F , t A thermal- sensor switch automat tally turns blower on when fireplace heating efficiency is secondary to a ar'nbiance of a fireI_< dispersed outdoors z • iideaj for entertaining.' apd-a;vanablekspeed control is designed to be e•bottortt ofthe unit or on a wall. -- • NAPOLEON • •NAPOLEON• QUALITY FIREPLACES Product Specifications GD7ONT BGD48N BGD40 '-✓•*mated Y v Y Y Y Wall Irrnace r*d rY _ N N' r -Yfkr. k :':—. sits .'ertr't, nr h^9r'•mIA, Y y Y Hinged door assembly Y N Y Y N Y ti N N Venting Top 45' 45' 45° 45° Top Rear/Top Top Rear PHAZER® logs „07 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Ceramicglass 5 5 - - 5 S S Tempered Gass - 5 5 - . 5 5 - - - Door Size H4W On inches) 23 x 31 5/8 26 12x44 182 End 19 3/8 x 17 1/8 22 I/4 x 39 1/2 22 x 38 5/8 23 x 31 5/8 19 3/8 x 31 5/8 16 x 30 5/8 16 x 30 5/8 Face 19 3/8 x 31 5/8 ICC% safety shut off 5 5 5 5 S 5 5 5 5 Zero clearance 5 S 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 No hearth extension required 5 S S 5 5 5 5 5 S Sealed comtusuon chamber S 5 5 5 5 5 S 5 5 Presiders Lmrted Lifetime Warranty 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 S 5 GD4SN BGD42N-D BGD38NT GD36NTR GD34NT GD33NR N Y Y Y STANDARD .$ OPTIONAL -0 YES Y NO N N/A - Tested as a heater and/or wall furnace Tested to 721.86, Z21 88 and CSA 2 32. CSA 233 in Canada and United States. CSA 2 33 and ANSI 721.88 or CSA 2 22-M and ANSI 721.50 forVented Gas Fireplaces Accessories GD7ONT BGD48N BGD4ON GD4SN BGD42N-D BGD38NT GD36NTR GD34NT GD33NR Decorative brick panels Old town red brick panels Metal brick panels Herringbone MIRRO-FLAMETM porcelain reflective panels - Polished brass tnm 0 Antique brass trim - Brushed stainless steel tnm 0 Polished brass 3D trim 0 Antique brass 3D tnm Brushed stainless steel 3D trm 0 Polahed brass rectangular door trim Bay window kit - Bay front kit with screen O Arched door facia Webbed arch door facia kit Polished brass louvres 0 24 karat gold plate: louvres 0 Brushed stainless steel louvres 0 Black louvres 0 Antique brass louvres - Ornamental face plates 0 Ornamental insets• O Andirons 0 Decorative dDor kits - Cast Iron st,rrouncs• • • 0 Hot air d str button kit 0 Hand-held on/or remote con-rcl wish digital readout 0 Hand-held on/off thermostatic remote control 0 Hanc- eld modulating thermostatic remote (contras dame anc 'blower') 0 Wall thermostat 0 Heat circulating blower 0 Pre -Wired wad s=rtc- S Attached gas Sex tonne^or • GD70, BG012 and BGCae a.aaabe in Hentaze onb 5 S 5 O O O O O O O O O O - - - 0 - O - S 0 0 0 0 O O - 0 0 0 0 0 O - 0 - 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O - - 0 - - O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 . O - - - 0 0 0 0 - 0 - - O 0 0 0 0 O - 0 - - O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - - O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O - - 0 O 0 0 - 0 O" O' O 0 0 0 0 O' O' O O••• 0 0 0 0 - O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O C O 0 0 0 0 0 - - O 0 0 0 0 ., 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 - - 3 - - - •• AfeBbea arched cm, • • • BGC4CN iSee cru —oriel only •Su,taoie for tz `ism o BGDa2N-D BGD38NT 5'li 3' ELECTRICAL INLET LEFT SIDE ° GAS2P 27 INLET r/f 11'-4 ez 41 '6 36' A A n r 7'— 1' 35 7; ELECTRICAL INLET LEFT SIDE 5112'— ELECTRICAL li— GAS INLET 1E' ELECTRICAL INLET LEFT SIDE 37 MN a'DL GAS r DI INLET B'ii —R 37!' f T 2II! ELECTRICAL INLET LEFT SIDE 7'13"—I 34'1 334. MN 31" 29'13" ELECTRICAL INLET LEFT SIDE 17 CUM GAS INLET 11 n 2 rE[IN.1 Line dimensions are to be used as a guide only. Please consult your installation manual for updated and precise measurements before proceeding to install or frame your Napoleon Fireplace Unit. Installation Manuals can be requested from your dealer or found on the Napoleon Website: www.napoleonfireplaces.com Venting Flexibility Top Vent' GGiuN i GD34NT BGD38NT Aamyrymraly Engraved Tamnaba, Ka Flexion Nummum Vent For Easy Instaleeon Zero Clearance To Combustible Framing Heated Air Room Radiant Hee High Heat Ceramic w Ten Bred Glass Gnang Embers Cool Room Ai Rear Vent - GD33NR Vest Up To 40FT Vertically Or 20F7 Honzonnuly Through The Wal Flue Gas Outlet Carorrsepn Sir Inlet Errant Heal Eitwxp System Sailed COmdamn Clamber Lever Burner Opn ni Nr Grcdenng ridable Speed Fan Healed Roam Au Radant Heat High Heal Ceramic Glass Preuwn Pon Pan stun Heal Exchange System fFite aGGas Outlet ConduWn Nr Inter Sealed Combuaem Clamber Opltrml An Ortolan, Variable .Shad Fan Cool Roam Air Rear/Top Vent - GD36N TR Heated Acorn M Raaenr Hear Phezere Logs Hgh Heat Catena. Glass P Po Pa Cod Room All 45° - BGD48N BGD42N-D GD45N BGD4ON' 'tut&oarthema tee mann fordadh: TOP VENT HTZMIBI and vearnn j.7 nnrnanan e Gas Outlet ilu --' RComdrsnde Au Inlet Enfant Heat Exchange System J Flue Gas Outlet Conlvsnon An inlet Sealed Combustion Chamber Opl'gal Air Circulating variable .Sued Fan Aero nmmlrarly Engineered Termination MA Flexible Aluminum Vent For Easy Insmallairm Zero Clearance To Combustibles Framing and Faorrg Materels Vent Up To 40FT Unwell/ Using A Comennnl 45 Angle Take 011 or 20E- HannonWlyT rougn Tha ME Flue Gas Outlet Heated Room Pr Rodent Heat HighHeal Comm or Tempered Glass Radrani Hear Cow Room Ai ombusiion Au Inlet Efficient Heat Exchange System Seated Combustion Clamber Gua Lwel Burner Opnanai for Circmaling Venable Speed Fan Rrepla;e Inserts Outdoor _nog 011 Stoves Car.. Iron Gas Stoves High Efficiency Gas Stoves Vent 'ren =replaces E ear c Fireplaces Not' al' -rent -^paces A✓COCbur'ng Stoves Consult your owners manual for complete installahon rnslnlebons and proper clearances to ambusnble rnalenals Cheek all I0W and national burging codes and gas regulations All spectcallons are subject to change without poor notice ere r0 on-going product improvements Naooleon•Is a regrslered Trademark of Wall Steel Ltd Paint U S 5 307 8'1 75054 -Lan 2 073 411 2 082 915.745 0 Wdl Steel Ltd / � g NAPOLEON OUALITY FIREPLACES UFETIME WARRANT Wolf Steel Ltd. 24 Napoleon Road Bame.ON Ca ada L4M 4Y6 Wolf Steel Ltee-Logistlque Climbed 7200 Route Transcanadlenne Montreal. PO Canada HOT 1A3 Wolf Seel USA Inc. Crittenden, Kentucky USA 41030 FBepiace ,1 Designstudlo .cornjp Phone 705-721-1212 • Fay 705-722-6031 vrww napoleontlreplaces.com • www Ilreplacedesignstudlo com ask®napoleon on. ca SBA c=anp , Authorized Dealer 310G 4 COUNTRY pithorti AND 7-10,0E 3 SV cie4f ' O :cog5g0 4(W CiWts. CO 03647 P'rn,ed rn Canaca 10 2003 July 12, 2004 Mark Rudd' Rudd Construction 132 Park Av. Basalt 81621, CO RE: Grading and Drainage Plan review for proposed Residence at Lot 36, Fourmile Ranch Subdivision, Garfield, Colorado SE Job No. 22033.36 Dear Mark: Pursuant to your request, we have reviewed the site plan A-1 by Knudson Gloss Architects and Planners, dated 5-28-04, which delineates the proposed grading and driveway location at the above referenced site. It is our understanding from you that the Garfield County has requested that this submitted plan needs to be checked by and verified by an engineer that it is in compliance with the requirements of the plat. Pursuant to your request this letter presents our findings in regard to proposed grading, drainage and driveway improvements associated with the new residential construction at above referenced Site. Our site specific review of the grading and drainage plan and driveway design are in accordance with general Design and Construction Standards and the general requirements for building permit stated in the Final Plat of Four Mile Ranch Subdivision, sheet 1 of 3. We have reviewed the proposed grading plan, (Site Plan, sheet A-1, by Knudson Gloss Architects and Planners, dated 5-28-04, forwarded to us. This plan includes the proposed site grading, construction improvements and driveway design applicable to the site. Conclusions The grading plan, (Site Plan, sheet A-1, by Knudson Gloss Architects and Planners, dated 5-28-04) is in compliance with the subdivision requirements regarding grading and drainage. Based on our knowledge of the site conditions, review of the development plans and analysis of the pertinent grading and drainage issues associated with the site we believe that the proposed design and site improvements meet the intent of the requirements stated in Final Plat of Four Mile Ranch Subdivision, sheet 1 of 3, prepared by High Country Engineering, Inc. This letter serves as a site specific grading and drainage study for use in approval of the building permit. Our findings are outlined below. Proposed Site Conditions The proposed house will have a walk out lower level, a main level and a garage with a slab on placed fill. The proposed grading and drainage improvements will include up to 5 feet of cut and up to 1 foot of fill above exiting grades with grading to allow positive drainage away from the proposed structure in all directions. The plan delineates grading of drainage swales that will direct runoff from impervious and pervious surfaces around the house. The proposed finish floor elevations are adequately set above the natural grade. The parking and driveway surfaces are adequately graded to allow effective runoff to landscaped area features that will provide effective stormwater management. Erosion control features are to be utilized as necessary during construction. 502 Main Street • Suite A3 • Carbondale, CO 81623 • (970) 704-03110 Fax (970) 704-0313 SOPRIS ENGINEERING LLC civil consultants Mark Rudd SE Job No. 22033.36 July 12, 2004 Page 2 Drainage Plan The proposed improvements will include a single family housing structure, driveway, sidewalks and landscape areas. Storm water runoff will sheet flow and will be routed to drainage swales and drainage depressions for infiltration into the ground. Larger volumes of runoff on the site may flow across the site over native landscaped areas with minimal velocities toward the street. No adverse effects to any adjacent property is anticipated from the post development runoff. The location of the site and absence of adjacent development forgo the need for specific hydrological analysis. Best Management Practices (BMP's) shall incorporated into the grading design along with other active measures to provide erosion and sediment control. The onsite soils have very good infiltration characteristics for the collection and recovery of stormwater. We do not anticipate any significant offsite runoff to flow across the site. The plan is in general compliance with the following drainage recommendations however the final construction plans should further delineate and direct implementation of these recommendations. Exterior foundation backfill should be well compacted and have a positive slope away from the building so that water does not pond within ten feet of the building. The ground surface should be sloped to drain away from the building foundations in all directions. The recommended minimum slope is 12" in the first 10' in unpaved areas and 3" in the fist 10' for paved areas. These drainage recommendations should be maintained around the entire perimeter of the house or be mitigated by installation of additional surface drains. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. We recommend that all roof downspouts and possible yard drains be connected to solid drainage pipe systems and routed to daylight at least ten feet away from the structure. All surface drainage shall be completely separated from any subsurface and/or foundation drain system. Erosion and Sediment Control Recommendations Contractor to utilize "best management practices to control erosion and sedimentation during construction. Polluted runoff to off site areas or water conveyance ditches shall be prevented. The contractor shall maintain sediment and erosion protection throughout the construction operation. Silt fences, hay bales or other BMPs shall remain in place until all disturbed areas have been revegetated and stabilized. The installation and specifications for BMPs erosion controls shall be in compliance with the CDOT Erosion Control and Stormwater Quality Guide. • • • Stormwater Management Plan Notes Mark Rudd SE Job No. 22033.36 July 12, 2004 Page 3 All construction project sites disturbing more than one acre of land require a construction Stormwater Discharge Permit from the Colorado department of Public Health & Environment, (CDPHE) Water Quality Control Division (WQCD). Permit No. Cor -03. The permit applicant(s) shall be the owner and/or the owner's representative(s). The application shall be signed by the owner and/or the owner's representative(s). Our grading and drainage review and recommendations are based upon data supplied to us. If proposed development plans are revised from those presented in this report, we should be notified to evaluate the effect it may have in terms of grading and drainage. If you have any question or need any additional information, please call. Sincerely, SOPRIS ENGINEERING, LLC May 26 04 05:01p PalominaBarth I (TINED fax tra»s a , MAY 2 6 2084 BUILDING & PLANNING Date: May 26.2004_ Time: 5:04 PM To Steve Hackett Architects 9709456685 Company: Garfield County Building Dept. Fax: 970 384-3470 Phone: 970 945-8212 Project Name: 4 -Mile Ranch Lot 38 Project lob a: 04-102 Regarding: Building Height Number of Pages: 2 p.1 palommobartharcllitects PC Comments: PBA Drawing, Partial Sht. 43], Exterior Elevations, 5/26/04 Revised Bldg. Height, ..enclosed for your review. Steve, As requested by Mark Przybylski of Rudd Construction we have revised our elevation of this building so that the maximum height to the mid -point of the roof shall not exceed 25'. Please call me if you have any questions. Best Regards, Jack Palomino cc: Mark Przybylski 927-4027 Fax Enclosure: 815 blakc oveum g@nwcod spnopa. calo,ada 81601 p9709456655 (970 945 6683 wwwpalammbanh com Mats 26 04 05:02p PalominoBarth Architects 9709456685 p.2 OSOUTH ELEVATION • 1/4 = 10' L r t 11 M,a GOM%ao: 14 559TFFM2 EL"CIAIMENT ry 5wijrAortRERY RECAMPCOA'Ig5 3 fro- PMEMS1095 To rKs OF FRAHMG Lo5E55 Wino OMERNSC • E%FA'OR MOS 701E=W• 16' OC mLE55 Rorer 01110(/46 REFER TO !TRIGT/4Y CRn111 5 S on5ROR IT•L9 TO Be 1i4 • •6" OC W435 CROM C5 .:091.3. Aa APT CRM1 .1.95T9 A`O RAFTCE9 p T. C00eRlMTE y'BT PL/({PO.T ATM PUMEI90 FmTRE EATON • oLO KL Pl1ABI6 TRA95 MARY!• A9 POS`OLE. tootOMATE 141E CA•MET Af Re 9 NO vEMT CR PUM916 5:AO[5 ARE TO OE Lapreo n PARTY raLLS O RR fl .EYED PL)CI 6 STACKS ARM TO SE GGT OCR IMLL T -L! RF}OI Tn* Cram_ YKE 79E -MEOW OF GRA 'C.NSY DEPICT'1 f O JE% LCA J E 0 'O M RESPONSIBLE SIBLE of TME og FORK n CCFTRAom 5 EMI -W1/1•3 34 proces es OO TECmI AND _FCO r cToN. NE processes HALL C YCTGW.TME MLMVTI Mon teO CILTFo GG 91101 M fie ORwalp5 9 OR TKA15 OF Roof -CI SEE PI}X 1 OWEST ELEVATION • 1/4-T 1-0' T 2T 5fE tack • &ARAbM 5EE PL.N T CONC. .EE P -IM 0 34 A3.1 04tl]NI No ci/L2 l Job Adp ess Owns t Contracto e ern Seibbks: Front �or-) u.n-1. bo -4-t_., Soils Test Footing ic-7 Foundation v-(C-Li/Q- Grout Underground Plumbing -41-D t, Rough Plu bing t /C' 7 Framing -'3 �riP Insulation 67-50 -Cie/EV/- Roofing .,1 Drywall /0 -5 --sneak Gas Piping i- BUILDI G PER el) hecd4-e.t g1 els c ssesAso1 lss Parcel No r'l kS-/27.T-!4 O 3P e Date / 61 /d38 1 Address Address 1 4fut� ar pHA LH IN ELTIONS EXTERIOR Address No t/ Drainage r/ Decks -support & clearance to wood Decks -stairs & rails Exterior locks t--- Flashing around doors 8 windyws Insect screens ✓ INTERIOR GARAGE Fire wall separation 1 Service doors -13/4" min Door (20 min.) w/auto closer -1W' min r/ Mech. equip. 18" above floor No opening into sleeping area —� BASEMENT -CRAWL AREA Access ✓ Insulation Headroom/Stairs Ventilation NOTES Phone #9,3.7-9 t 19 Phone # Zoning Weatherproofing Mechanical //-%/-0c7g7Q— Electrical Rough (State) Electrical Final (Ste) Final i Z Z hecklist Completed? Certificate Occupancy # Date Septic System # Date Final L.. Other FINAL CHECKLIST MECHANICAL ROOM Boller ✓ Hot water F A gadoil Floor dram Clearance Air con. system Hot water heater Combustion air al Gas piping. valves 1/ LPG Drain (continue on back) STAIRWAYS Headroom (8'8") Railing & guardrails Width Rise & run KITCHEN clearance above grill ✓ Exhaust fan Broiler exhaust (1 hr. chase) BEDROOMS Egress FIREPLACE/STOVE Smoke detector Clearance to combustibles _— BATHROOMS Termination of chimney '.' Exhaust fan Combustion air ..i Shatterproof glass Hearth (12" or 20" on sides) 1 Z-‘ t OTHER Glass doors Certified by- /4-011-4144-v—.2 REMARKS BUILDING PERMIT • GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued i.J Zoned Area Permit No 91aa, AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the jtpplicanthereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, Iocation;nstructibfn and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the abn's t said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector,pnd IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. teta Use eine AddjA An res Legal D c ' do Owner f� i 11 Contractor Setbacks Front Side Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Unti' Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing (il - 7- et Foundation - I C -t:L(r" U i l' P11 " ' 1 ' L - -CL( Insulation -Z Y -c, A/ Rough Plumbing fil / .. Y Drywall 0 `tf 4' , Chimney & Vent " -y -cc/ Electric Final (by State Inspector) UM Gas Piping r7 /t _ c., / Final 2. - ZZ , I Electric Rough (By State Iospectorft7 r•44 Septic Final Framing 9_ ; -c _i (To include Roof in place (n' indows and Doors installed). Notes: ALL LIST£"•'" • ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED WHETI; `INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phone 384-5003 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwoot; Springs, Colorado. APP • VEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Date b By IF PI.ArFI) OITTQTfF .. r'fl 7 slirmi ri C AA nT ' "'Tar