Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10 BOCC Staff Report 08.02.2014Board of County Commissioners — Public Hearing Exhibits Ski Sunlight, Inc. Limited Impact Review — Substantial Amendment September 2, 2014 (File LPAA-7912) L L C/ (? v� Exhibit Letter (Numerical) Exhibit Description 1 Public Hearing Notice Information 2 Proof of Publication 3 Receipts from Mailing Notice 4 Photo evidence of Public Notice Posting 5 Garfield County Land Use and Development Code, as amended 6 Garfield County Comprehensive Plan of 2030 7 Application 8 Staff Report 9 Staff Presentation 10 Referral Comments from Mountain Cross Engineering (dated August 7, 2014) 11 Referral Comments from Garfield County Road and Bridge (dated August 6, 2014) 12 Letter from Bill White owner unit A-9 in Brattelberg Condos (dated July 31, 2014) 13 Land Use Change Permit for Ski Sunlight (application LIPA-7060 14 Resolution 2012-41, Limited Impact Review for a Ski Sunlight, Inc. Communication Tower 15 Staff Report for Ski Sunlight, Inc. Communication Tower (application LIPA-7060) 16 NEPA Compliance Checklist, Issued July 22, 2014 17 Referral Comments from Ron Biggers of the Glenwood Springs and Rural Fire Protection District (dated August 18, 2014) 18 Referral Comments from Steve Anthony of Garfield County Vegetation Management (dated August 15, 2014) o� 1 / ( V l ('. �' /='I i (C- ,,,��LIr•'1 /- '�- n.'`� C �S /!:'-‘ c(,, R`c i:./• c BOCC 8/2/2014 File No. LPAA-7912 DP PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS REQUEST Amendment to a Land Use Change Permit condition of approval - Limited Impact Review for a Telecommunication Facility (monopole). APPLICANT — PROPERTY OWNER Ski Sunlight, Inc. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL # 2395-333-00-051 PROPERTY SIZE A 12' X12' pad site on an overall tract of approximately 183.17 acres. LOCATION The property is located approximately 12.5 miles south of the City of Glenwood Springs, in Section 33, T7S, R89W. ACCESS The facility is accessed by County Road 117 ("Four Mile Road"). EXISTING ZONING The property is zoned Commercial Limited I. GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant is requesting an amendment to a condition of approval for previously approved Limited Impact Review Land Use Change Permit. The original Land Use Change Permit was approved on May 7, 2012 and memorialized under Resolution 2012-41 (Exhibit 14). The Applicant is requesting to amend one of the Conditions of Approval, specifically Condition number 5. In accordance with Section 4-106(A)(4), "Any requested change of a specific condition(s) as identified in a resolution adopted by the BOCC shall be considered a Substantial Modification." As a result, this request has been processed as a Substantial Modification and has required a new application for a Land Use Change Permit. The review and subsequent decision, however, only affect the proposed change to the Land Use Change Permit and if denied, the original approval will still stand. When the 60' monopole was approved, it was approved temporarily for two years with the understanding that the Applicant was looking for a permanent site. The Applicant would now like to make the current site and equipment permanent, stating that "this location offers the best cellular reception not only at the resort and condominiums but also for the skiers on the mountain." As a result, the Applicant is requesting to eliminate 1 Condition 5 of Resolution 2012-41, which states "The Applicant shall be approved for two years from the date of this approval by the BOCC. The Applicant may request additional time from the BOCC in a public meeting so long as the Applicant can demonstrate that it is making good faith effort to obtain a permanent location." The Applicant is not proposing to make any changes to the site as it exists today and as indicated that only one change has occurred in the past two years. This change was the removal of a full size satellite dish that was replaced by a small dish located on the pole. The communication facility is located within the Sunlight Ski area parking lot. Vicinity Map 2 Location Map 3 View of 12' X 12' Pad Area View of 60' Monopole 4 II. LOCATION - SITE DESCRIPTION The site is currently constructed as approved and no additional changes are proposed. The monopole is located within the parking area for Sunlight Ski area but is not disruptive to traffic flow or parking. While the facility is easily located within the parking area, the facility blends with the topography of the area and is not easy to see from County Road 117. The property is zone Commercial Limited while surrounding zoning is Rural and public lands. III. PUBLIC COMMENTS AND REFFERAL AGENCY COMMENTS Public Notice was provided for the Board's public hearing in accordance with the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code as amended. One letter of support was received from Bill White of the Brattelberg Condos (Exhibit 12). Comments from referral agencies and County Departments are summarized below and attached as Exhibits. 1. Garfield County Consulting Engineer, Chris Hale, Mountain Cross Engineering: (See Exhibits 10) • Mr. Hale indicated that he has no comments on the proposed change. 2. Garfield County Road and Bridge Department: (See Exhibit 11) • Mr. Prehm indicated that he has no objection to the proposed change. 3. Garfield County Emergency Management • Mr. Bornholdt indicated that he has no comments on the proposed change. 4. Glenwood Springs and Rural Fire Protection District (See Exhibit 17) • Applicant shall provide Fire District with MSDS sheets on al hazardous materials and quantities that will be contained on site. These sheets shall also be present on site. • Doors to the building or equipment cabinet as well as fencing shall be signed with hazardous materials identification signs as specified in NFPA 704 and Section 2703.5 of the 2009 IFC. • The building and all surrounding areas shall comply with chapter 27, Hazerdous Materials — General Provision and Chapters 28-44 of the 2009 edition of the IFC. All buildings and facilities shall comply with the 2009 IBC. • Current facilities are not signed. 5. Garfield County Vegetation Management • Mr. Anthony indicated that he has no comments on the proposed change. 6. Other agencies that did not submit comments include: (a) the US Forest Service. 5 IV. STAFF COMMENTS AND ANALYSIS In accordance with the Land Use and Development Code, the proposal is required to meet all of the standards as identified in Article 7, Divisions 1, 2, and 3, including Section 7-1102 Telecommunication Facilities. The Application materials were limited to those items necessary to review the proposed change. 7-101 — 103: Zone District Regulations, Comprehensive Plan & Compatibility The proposed use demonstrates general conformance with applicable Zone District provisions contained in the Land Use and Development Code and in particular Article III standards for the Rural zone district. The Comprehensive Plan 2030 designates the site as RH (Residential High Density) and as an Unincorporated Community. Excerpts from the Land Use Description Section Chapter 2 and Section 8, Natural Resources and Section 9, Mineral Extraction are provided below. Chapter 2 — Future Land Use Residential High (RH) Criteria for determining RH density within the allowed range will be specifically determined by the Planning Commission and will be based on "degree of public benefit", considering factors such as: amount of affordable housing including a mix of housing types, amount of parks/trails/ open space, energy conservation, fiscal impacts on the County, preservation of views, providing for schools and other public needs, etc. Unincorporated Community Self-contained subdivisions that contain town and neighborhood centers primarily to serve their own populations. Their infrastructure and certain governmental functions are provided by one or more special districts. Section 4 — Economics, Employment and Tourism Vision The County has encouraged economic opportunity and diversity to develop in strategic locations by designating a variety of areas as employment and commerce centers. Designated areas have encouraged business clusters to develop and incubators, entrepreneurial and existing business have expanded into these areas. The county has played a key role in providing traditional and communications infrastructure to specific commerce centers. 6 The location and design of the proposed facility is in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan Vision. The Application has also provided information indicating the character of the area and adjacent land uses. The request demonstrates general compatibility with adjoining uses that are primarily tourism based. 7-104 & 105: Source of Water & Waste Water Systems The Communication Tower is an unmanned facility. 7-106: Public Utilities No public utilities are required for operation of the facility. 7-107: Access & Roadways The Communication Tower was previously permitted. As part of this review process, the Staff Report indicated that "access is appropriate and well established". No modification to access is proposed as a part of this Land Use Change Permit amendment. 7-108: Natural Hazards The Communication Tower was previously permitted. As part of this review process, the Staff Report indicated that "no geophysical hazards are identified for the site including slopes and flood plains". 7-109: Fire Protection The Application was referred to the Glenwood and Rural Fire Protection District with no comment received. As the tower is within the Ski Sunlight parking area and adjacent to other established developments, fire protection is expected to be readily available. The Applicant will need to conform to all IFC and IBC requirements as outlined in the letter from the Glenwood and Rural Fire Protection District (exhibit 17). 7-201: Agricultural Lands With no new disturbed areas and fencing for the tower pad area, no impact on agricultural land is anticipated. The site is located within the parking area for Ski Sunlight. 7-202: Wildlife Habitat Areas The Communication Tower was previously permitted. As part of this review process, the Staff Report indicated that no impact to wildlife is expected. 7 7-203: Protection of Water Bodies The Communication Tower was previously permitted. As part of this review process, the Staff Report indicated that no impact to water bodies is expected. 7-204: Drainage and Erosion (Stormwater) The Communication Tower was previously permitted. As part of this review process, the Staff Report indicated that drainage on the site is adequate and that no erosion issues are anticipated. Following a site visit of the facility as it exists today, no erosion issues were identified. No change to the grading or drainage is proposed as a result of this change. 7-205 Environmental Quality The Communication Tower was previously permitted. As part of this review process, the Staff Report indicated that no adverse impacts to environmental quality is expected. 7-206: Wildfire Hazards The Application was referred to the Glenwood and Rural Fire Protection District with no comment received. As the tower is within the Ski Sunlight parking area and adjacent to other established developments, fire protection is expected to be readily available. In addition, this tower could provide vital communications in the event of a wildfire. 7-207 Natural and Geologic Hazards See Section 7-108, above. 7-208: Reclamation The proposed change would make the facility permanent and, as no changes to the facility are proposed, would not cause any new disturbance. 7-301 & 302: Compatible Design, Parking, and Loading The Communication Tower is located within the parking area for Ski Sunlight. Parking requirements for the facility are limited to occasional repairs and maintenance. In addition, the Applicant has represented that the facility does not reduce the amount of parking available for Ski Sunlight. Staff has visited the site and found that the tower blends well with the surrounding topography. 8 7-303: Landscaping The Communication Tower was previously permitted. As part of this review process, the Staff Report indicated that the Applicant was to "install chain-link fencing that can be screened with either dark green fabric (or similar color) or typical slat -systems to aid in the screening of the base mechanical area". Upon visiting the site and as can be seen in the photos in this report, this screening is in place as proposed. 7-304: Lighting The Communication Tower was previously permitted. As part of this review process, the Staff Report indicated that lighting of the tower is not required by the FAA. Any other lighting shall be limited to down directed, shielded and internally oriented fixtures in accordance with the County's lighting standards. 7-305 Snow Storage Adequate snow storage is available within the Ski Sunlight parking area where this facility is located. 7-306 Trails Trails standards are generally not applicable based on the limited footprint and nature of this proposal. 7-1102 Telecommunication Facilities The Applicant represents that the facility will comply with all the Telecommunication Facility Standards contained in Section 7-1102. The following summary addresses the applicable provisions. Many of these requirements were addressed at the time of original submittal and are not applicable to the proposed amendment. A. New Towers and Facilities The Tower and associated Facilities are currently existing and were previously reviewed and permitted. B. Structural and Engineering Standards The Tower and associated Facilities are currently existing and were previously reviewed and permitted. C. Public Utility Structures The Tower and associated Facilities are currently existing and were previously reviewed and permitted. 9 D. Design, Materials and Color The Tower and associated Facilities are currently existing and were previously reviewed and permitted. E. Lighting and Signage The Tower and associated Facilities are currently existing and were previously reviewed and permitted. F. Non -Interference The tower was originally permitted as a temporary facility (up to 24 months) with the FCC. The Applicant has provided demonstration that the facility has been permitted as a permanent facility with the FCC and obtained all necessary NEPA approvals. G. Federal Aviation Agency Form The Tower and associated Facilities are currently existing and were previously reviewed and permitted. Staff understands the facility is in compliance with all FAA requirements. H. Telecommunications Act The Tower and associated Facilities are currently existing and were previously reviewed and permitted. Staff understands the facility is in compliance with all FAA requirements. V. SUPPLEMENTAL AND ADDITIONAL STAFF ANALYSIS The Applicant submitted the completed FCC / NEPA Checklist on July 22, 2014. Staff understands this NEPA approval permits the facility as a permanent site. VI. SUGGESTED FINDINGS 1. That proper public notice was provided as required for the hearing before the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The hearing before the Board of County Commissioners was extensive and complete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that all interested parties were heard at that meeting. 3. That for the above stated and other reasons the proposed Amendment to the 10 Land Use Change Permit for the Ski Sunlight, Inc Communication Facility is in the best interest of the health, safety, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County. 4. That with the adoption of conditions, the application is in general conformance with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, as amended. 5. That with the adoption of the Conditions of Approval the application has adequately met the requirements of the Garfield County Land Use and Development Code, as amended. VII. RECOMMENDATION The following recommended conditions of approval are provided for the Board of County Commissioners consideration. Prior to Issuance of the Land Use Change Permit 1. The applicant shall provide Glenwood Springs and Rural Fire Protection District with MSDS sheets on all the hazardous materials and quantities that will be contained on the site and in the building. These sheets shall also be appropriately located on the cabinets and outside the fence of the site and in compliance with applicable codes. The doors to the building or equipment cabinet shall be signed in a viable location with hazardous materials identification signs as specified in NFPA 704 and Section 2703.5 in the 2009 edition of the International Fire Code (IFC). The building and area surrounding it shall comply with all the sections that apply in Chapter 27, Hazardous Materials -General Provisions and Chapters 28- 44, 2009 edition of the IFC. These improvements shall be reviewed and installation confirmed by the Glenwood Springs and Rural Fire Protection District prior to issuance of the Land Use Change Permit. Other Conditions 2. That all representations made by the Applicant in the application shall be conditions of approval, unless specifically altered by the Board of County Commissioners. 3. That, with exception to the elimination of condition number 5 as identified in Resolution 2012-41, all other conditions from Resolution 2012-41 shall remain in effect including that the facility shall operate in accordance with all state, federal and local regulations, the tower shall be a painted / powder coated a darker non - reflective color that blends with the surrounding area, the mechanical pad shall be fenced that incorporates screening, and the facility shall be signed appropriately for all hazardous materials or applicable dangers. 4. Through the elimination of condition number 5 in Resolution 2012-41, the Land 11 Use Change Permit for the Telecommunication Facility shall not be limited to two years. 12 1 EXHIBIT Garfield County PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE INFORMATION Please check the appropriate boxes below based upon the notice that was conducted for your public hearing. In addition, please initial on the blank line next to the statements if they accurately reflect the described action. ❑✓ My application required written/mailed notice to adjacent property owners and mineral owners. Mailed notice was completed on the 23 day of July , 2014. All owners of record within a 200 foot radius of the subject parcel were identified as shown in the Clerk and Recorder's office at least 15 calendar days prior to sending notice. All owners of mineral interest in the subject property were identified through records in the Clerk and Recorder or Assessor, or through other means [list] ■ Please attach proof of certified, return receipt requested mailed notice. 13 My application required Published notice. Notice was published on the 30 day of July ■ Please attach proof of publication in the Rifle Citizen Telegram. 0 My application required Posting of Notice. Notice was posted on the 24 day of JuIY , 2014. , 2014. Notice was posted so that at least one sign faced each adjacent road right of way generally used by the public. I testify that the above information is true and accurate. Name: Lowell Nelon Signature: Date: July 23, 2014 Ad Name: 10396493D Customer: GSPI House- no employment Your account number is: 1009112 PROOF OF PUBLICATION THE RIFLE CITIZEN TELE6Mtil STATE OF COLORADO, COUNTY OF GARFIELD I, Michael Bennett, do solemnly swear that 1 am Publisher of The Rhe Citizen Telegram, that the same weekly newspaper printed, in whole or in part and published in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Garfield for a period of more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement; that said newspaper has been admitted to the United States mails as a periodical under the provisions of the Act of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof, and that said newspaper is a weekly newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado. That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said weekly newspaper for the period of 1 consecutive insertions; and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 7/31/2014 and that the last publication of said notice was dated 7/31/2014 the issue of said newspaper. In witness whereof. I have here unto set my hand this 07/29/2014. _ Michael Bennett, Publisher Publisher Subscribed and sworn to before me, a notary public in and for the County of Garfield, State of Colorado this 07/29/2014. My Commission Expires 1110112015 rl amela chultz, Notarj-Public My Commission expires: November 1, 2015 TAKE NOTICE that Ski Sunlight Inc . has applied to the Board of Co of Colorado. to request approval for a Land Use Change Peron Amen Garfield. State of Colorado: to -wit Lceal Dcscnato0; A tract of land located in Section 33. Township 7 South, Range 89 West of the 6th Principle Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 33, monumented by a 3' aluminum cap stamped SGM C -K533, LS 15710, from whence the Northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter (3E1/4) of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 33, monumented by a 3" aluminum cap stamped SGM C•N51/56,15 15710 bears N 03'37'52" E with all other bearings contained herein being relative thereto; thence 5 73'21'12" W 958.29 feet to the Point Of Beginning; thence N 44.4722" W 10.00 feet; thence el 45'12'38" E 20 00 feet; thence 5 44.4772" F 21) t=1 fast;, Monro t 45'12'38' W 20.00 feet; N 44'47'22" W 10.00 feet to the Point Of Beginning, containing 400 square feet more or less. Together with an access easement, said easement being ten (10) feet wide, five (5) feet on each side of the following described centerline: Beginning at the Point of Beginning of the above described tract; thence proceeding along said centerline S 45'12'38" W 52.18 feet more or less to northerly right line of way of County Road 117A and easement end line, containing 521 square feet more or less. The sidelines of said strip are lengthened or shortened to intersect the above described tract and the northerly right of way line of County Road 117A. Also together with a utility easement, said easement being ten (10) feel wide. five (5) feet on each side of the following described centerline; Commencing at the Point of Beginning of the above described trap; (hence proceeding along the southerly line of said tract 5 44'47'22" E 10.00 feet; N 45'12'38" E 10.00 feet to the Point of Beginning of said utility easement; thence S 44'47'22" E 45.00 feet to the easement end line, containing 450 square feet, more or less. The sidelines of said strip are lengthened or shortened to intersect the above described tract. Modification In any way of the foregoing property description terminates all liability of the surveyor who prepared that desuiptlon. Practical Dcscnolag. 10901 County Road 117. Approxrntately 12 5 mks south alb: Cin of Glenwood Springs within Section 33. Range 89 West of the 6. P51. The propene is also known by Assessor's Parcel No. 2395.333-00- 051 Project Drscnotro0. This is a Limited Impact Revra. Land Use Change Permit Amendment to modify Condition 5 of the original Resolution 2012-41 for a ti0-foot tall monopole communication tower Condition 5 is concerned with a limitation for the tower on die site not to exceed 2 years. The Applicant is .. ishing to make the tower permanent in its current configuration and location. The o.erall properly is approximately 183 17 acres The Ptopeny is toned Commercial Limited All persons affected by the proposed plan are invited to appear and state their views, protest 00 suppon. 1f you can not appear personally at such hcanng. then you are urged to state your 5 tests by letter. as the Board of County Commissioners will give consideration to the comments of surrounding property owners. and others affected. in deciding whether to grant or deny the request The application may be re.iewcd at the office of the Planning Department located at 108 8th Street, Suite 401, Garfield Counh Plata Bwldmg. Glenwood Springs. Colorado between the hours of % 30 a. m and 5.00 p.m.. Monday through Friday A public hearing on the application has been scheduled for Tuesday. September 2, 2014 at 1:00 P.M. in the County Commissioners Meeting Room. Garfield County Administration Building. 108 8th Street. Glenwood Spnngs. Colorado. Planning Department Garfield County (INFEET) CINCH =3GUSFEE. GRAPHIC SCALE 15 8 0 15 ',4,101,1,3 Burro d, SecOn 33 7706'07 SagBMW 35%ludtes Seo Press* Stee030 GOIAe5 Co:^ty. Coaaae. ter 1 eaa ,ardoditrit dei=ced as Nt47es :'4:753.3''12 .o�. nr0 at ee Notes! caner at em 3w.^wut 03.rr !SY!!•4i d SeeAsn 33 frovs* (00 try a T ae,mn.'n 1.* hanged SCU '. %33 1515• 10 hero Oems me Nonne=mre• 0r IN? So.000u 0!anu tSE!vl 0! to Ncr".no I dumr (SW1:41 d S'caor 31 npuaneme0 cy a 3' avmnunn cap Mane* 5GM C4.5158 LS 15'10 teen N 00'3752" Ens' al Sea turas mnantel Iwai) eery daaw Ism= tear 73'21'17W35325 led1)e Pont 018csrm-g.n-e03ce N44'4'22' VI 1C 00Vet scarceN 45"238- E2000 act mete $44'4•'22- E 3400 est rasa 545+235'W20,0'set N 44.4727 L.4 10 ec !Setrode Pct 0(Bepmip. =marl 4)1 1a3r0 'est stere a Intl TOyetel 44th an me= see cower( ue.9:en'le; feet eon :51 NH 4e, eaoJ, mut=es !cloaca=aglow when -4 010 010113 a eve P000 5 wow Beg a! oro ow asst.. rer. roue :.40019 along 554 3 050 5110 S 45' 121 W S218 Set mem a we 1000091 9631031 a way a Canty now 1170 Aro eel Ment ane ale. cancan° 521 para baa masa lea ins Edw.al sad /no eng8*onn.1 50010110301)0,,.:t•tri atoms Jeea400 sada'Jtn. -u11'wrr ,qO of say Insd Canty Rase 1174 4 w age.='001 a 3Atr ea0enen; Led eaurwn mop te' '1;'e.0 woe 1st 31411 T30.0ode Y 0.Iacerrs 3.5000.:00. ;a osnnong =the Pons 01 Bumpy, dm acu.detertat Tact thence 0300.5007 am; rui10300109004 tad soli 544'1773'E 1000 be: N 45"2 3e' E 1;.00 tests aro Pciv ue Buns,' d sae i%ry s01e•ne^t thence 5 44.4722 eae E 4500 Nat K sV emarend re COMar,1g45050031*Ie9t'ere_r 3xThe scetnesdladrte erabn¢•wensla 0orta5r, rased 8,. =tow =sand cad Ltafac ar 0307WYaOe kraus=0OPMY'*amts.ts'r"IWM a1 !scaly a ore unseal *000335.50101 010RLten Published in the (.19,01) Telegram July 31.2014 ,L,pr,kSki50ra. Receipt of Payment sq-in-,p, C� Swift Communications 9112 'I House- no employ Credit Card ))945-8515 Type M Grand Ave Num ********************* Auth 02385P Expir &&/fm iwood Springs )2 Country Code US 4 Paytype CC 4 Rate Code VPI Issues 1 Class 0990 -1 Sunlight Ski Resort, CO 172.00 Rep 8PI75 0.00 Ad # 10396493 172.00 Paytype Credit Card 0.00 Balance 0 Receipt No 2:44 PM • •r-, -. #` Ad shown is not actual print size 0 Words Ad Size 2 cols x 10.75 inches 112 House- no employ )45-8515 irand Ave ✓ood Springs Original Receipt of Payment Swift Communications Credit Card Type M Num ********************* Auth 02385P Expir &&/fm Country Code US Paytype CC Issues 1 Rate Code VPI Class 0990 Sunlight Ski Resort, CO 172.00 Rep 8PI75 0.00 Ad # 10396493 172.00 Paytype Credit Card 0.00 Balance 0 Receipt No Date 2:44 PM Ad shown is not actual print size 0 Words Ad Size 2 cols x 10.75 inches Customer Copy Date 0002 1873 2321 O .11 rR EU r -q 0 N 0 CERTIFIED MAIL,. RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only;. No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.coms GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81601. Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) rn rn v m cO rq Total Postage & Fees S $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 GARY J. GROSSMAN 11101 COUNTY ROAD 117 #4F, FOUR MILE ROAD GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 r7 0 4 11 L'` Postmark Here A 07/23/2014 or Instructions CEPostal beMAILTM RECEIr provided) CERTIFIED No Insurance Coverage Mail Only; at (Domestic M For delivery information visit our websfte y CO 80504 L�1.. I11... � Postage Certified Fee rU Receipt Fee O Return aired) C2(Endorsement Req Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Reeturefl) O & Fees r- Total Postage rR N O N Sr JEFF OLSON ; 9039 DRAKE WAY c FREDRICK, CO PS Form 3800, August 2006 stmark o eVere "} �ZYJCE 0112312wA rR ru rU m r- 1:3 0 O 0 rR ru a 0 N CERTIFIED:MAIL,. (DomOst(c Mall Only; No insui For delivery information visit our t Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 N ru m N ca ru O O See Reverse torinstruc viceT,� T U.S. postal $eMp1�TM RECE�F a Provided) CERTIFIED . CE ail Onlybaits at�No insurance Coverage (Domestic M visit our For delivery lnformstlon vitttOMO IN `.46943 4 4. postage Certified Fee ReturnReceipt ecetFe (Endorsicem ettpee alefstemRq�rd ) ti( CU rR r 011 Total postage & Fees E. LORENTSON FAMILY TRUST e"f LEONARD -6*-6 P• O. BOX 93246903-0932 or KOKOMO IN ciiy, rR m ru 111 N 00 Se— T- BRETTLEBERG CONDOMINIUMS ASSN 0 11101 COUNTY ROAD 117 c GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601-9534 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instruction U.S. Postal Service.,, CERTIFIED MAILTf,, RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.come KOKOMO IN 46903 (EPostage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee ndorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent o 0 Street, AprNo• LEONARD E. LORENTSON FAMILY TRUST or PO Box No. P. O• BOX 932 City Sfafe,.29P+4 KOKOMO, IN 46903-0932 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal ServiceTM CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.com.K Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To Street, Apt or PO Box City, State, $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $ $6.49 `/l Postmft� Here IA; 07/23/2014 RICHARD C. & SHIRLEY E. BARBEL 4675 WATERFORD CT NE ST PETERSBURG, FL 33703-4948 PS Form 3800, August 2006 0 co 0 0 A See Reverse for Instructions $0.00 co co tr ui cJ C`- D D ra u1 D rR D N t.n IS" Er- Er rIr u'I ra 0 CI D rR D r -a D 0001 7856 CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery intormatibn visit our websito at www.4sps.come BENNETT CO 80102 7014 0510 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees nt To $ 30 9 / Oigl1-- C 3.30 32.70 $0.00 36.49 Cheryl M. Nathum Street, PO Box N< 8201 S. Santa Fe #121 or citystare,z, Littleton, CO XI 2 Fc;/,9-U §ittZ1 07/23ye014 PS Form 3800, August 2006 iN m See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal Servicer.,, CERTIFIED MAILTr., RECEIPT (Domestic Mali Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.coms Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To $ 30.49 33.30 32.70 30.00 30.49 Carol A. Henson Srreet,Apt.No.: 7059 S. Windermere or PO Box No. City, State, ZIP+ Littleton, COCi -W.2 l ( 07/7.312014 PS Form 3800, August 2006 Jr 7 / O See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal Servicer.,, CERTIFIED MAILTr., RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.coml.; DENVER CO 80206 E Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To Seth O. Stevens Street f or POB 1369 Columbine St. city,St Denver, CO 80206 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions r:13 m m r=0 r-9 rtJ D O D O —0 rR nJ a D 1 m Cr co J m co m ti m 1-1 t` - c0 D O ..n rU ra D rs- CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) For deliveryinformation visit our website at www.usps.como C0VINA CA 91724-1123 7014 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ 30.49 $3,30 32.70 30.00 CM G 36.49 07/23/2014 ostmarkr-- Here ti w Sent To Gerald A. Darien 3`rreetA, 20065 Stephanie Drive or P0& City, Stat Covina, CA 947 24 0 zann Anr, r t 9000 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal Services,, ' CERTIFIED MAILT..r RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.com. VERO BEACH FL 32963-x$71 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees 30.49 $3.30 E4 $6.49 11 wPbStmadc O Here ' ,/ate 078x014 Sent To --Street AF Mary M. Graham or PO Bo. 300 Harbour Drive # 101D c;ry,srar< Vero Beach, FL.32963-2890 PS Form 3800, August 2006 Seo Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal Service,. CERTIFIED MAILTf., RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our webslte at www.usps.come 6AV AM818bt304=1869 Postage Certified Foe Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postaee & Fees .1i JERRY HOLT, MIKE & ADELE SISTEK, HERBERT L & ARLENE F CREED 30553 ZION RD SALISBURY. MD 41804-1869 36.49 1 "-Postmark'. � � W Here 43/2014 yy ®0154 m r -i IT' IT rU r -R D D D D ru O Q' D P- tr m ru m rR rL D D D D a tU r -R D i` - D U) P- IT' IT' Ir' ..n ru D D O D ru D 0� D D v - r - TM CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For drrIlverytn,formation visit our webslte at www.usps.comv Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $ $6.49 0154 ti Postmat ,7 Herik, O \�F\v ,yv Qom, 07/23/2014 Sent To MARY M. & CHRISTOPHER L. LEHRMAN Street, 1503 CRAWFORD WAY or POE Ctty,St, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal ServiceTr., CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery intormation visit our website at v ,vvi.tisps.coms • p ,. �pRADESRRIHOS CO 80.922 41.; Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To Street, Apt. No.; No. $0.00 0154, 11) Posture Here 8666 07/23/2014 RONALD & CECILIA METCALF 7013 ALLENS PARK DRIVE or PO Box Ciry,State, ZIP+4 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 8092 PS Form 3800, August 2006 0 rt See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal Services:, CERTIFIED MAIL., RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our webslte at www.usps.comv E 641'4 I08,Dsoaps CO 81601 Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $ $6.49 0 Pos rk tr�+a r1 Herat' n rj *47 c4. 07/23/2014 sent% THOMAS L & SUSAN 0 ADGATE street, dpt' 2070 COUNTY ROAD 109 or POBox t CO, State, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions m ru m iU D D .11 ls- 0- ru rR CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) 'For delivery Information vlait;our websfte at www.usps.com,.; COLORADO SPRINGS CO 80922 Er- a— _a Ir_D nJ r -q D I= D rU c0 D 0 D O D m r -R Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees ,bL0 0002 Sent To s $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 0154 G �► N Postmstk Hero- �� 07/23/2014 r L RONALD & CECILIA METCALF street,,tpt.t 7013 ALLENS PARK DRIVE or PO Box A City, State COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80922 D P- PS Form 3800, August 2006 Sen Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal Service T. CERTIFIED MAILTr, RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For dell,o:- i }'ormati; r, visit our website at www.usps.com: •fi Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ Ser FREDERICK BURCH WEISS & stn ALTA FOCHT WEISS ort 85 SANDYHOOK RD aty OCEAN PINES, MD 21811 PS m A 11 r� Pps�h a 7 r) . 07/23/2014 ee Reverse for Instruction U.S. Postal Service,,, CERTIFIED MAIL, RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.com; , Postage Codified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Foe (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees A 70560 $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $ $6.49 ,01;4 c t Po�Tirr arkk Dere c., /2014 0 Sent ToGARY A & LAURA POE sires 1615 COTTONWOOD DR or P[ City, NEW IBERIA, LA 70560 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instruction D-' m Ir ..D m fti r --R D D D r-1 D r -R D r- D-' m 0001 7856 D a D r -R D . . ' TMA CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our webalte at www.usps.come SAN1 IEGO 1p1044 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To Mary E. Janke Revocable Trust StreetAj 3571 Wrightman Street or PO Bc crry,stai San Diego, CA 92104-3116 07/± 014 PS Form 3800. August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal Servicer,,, CERTIFIED MAILT,,, RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.come 6RM11 JUNCTION; CO 81506 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent o Street, Apt. N or PO BoxNc 935 Lakeside Court QV, State, ZI Grand Junction, CO 81506-2815 $ $0.49 11 dtC \`r`t If Here 47 / 07/23/2014 Edward M. Gardner PS Form 3800, August 2006 ru D D-. _D m ra D See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal Servicer,,, CERTIFIED MAILT,,, RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.come IDA CO 81201 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $ $6.49 Sent 7, s4reer,Apaly Rodney Patch or PO BoxNc 7498 Highway 50 City, State, ZI Salida, CO 81201 Postmaarrk�` HerpV 07/23/2014 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions m ft rL 0- ,.n m N rl D D D 7014 0510 D iu 0- r- ,-a 'r- D D D D rq u1 D r--1 0 ru r - CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.come COLORAIDO SPRINGS CO 80911 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent 7 Robert W. Long 3`ireef or PO 7130 Trails End Court city Colorado Springs, CO 80911-2842 $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $6A9 015 Postmark, -IV Vere`1 07/23/2014 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for instructions U.S. Postal Servicerr:, CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.coms, FORT COLLINS CO 80521 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 Postmal1 \V I' I Siete nr � 07/23/2014 Leonis J. User Street, Apt or Posox t 1204 Ponderosa Drive City Siete,. Fort Collins, CO 80521-4907 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal ServiceT,., CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) m 05363 iS/" -� -gid Ln f` - r -9 D D D Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) D D r -i D Total Postage & Fees C, \. 44� `N rO11 Po3rtmark r Here / i --,-,\01p j -Ft O 07/23/2014 Sent To Susan M. Little Street'Apl., PO Box 1959 or PO Box A City State,; Wilmington UT; 05363-1959 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for lnstructions $3.30 $0.49 ' $2.70 7014 0510 0001 78.56 CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIRT (Domestic -Mall Only; No Insurance Coverabf; Provk(ed) ; -For delivery Information visit our webalte,at ti viw.yeps corns Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $ $6.49 Sent To Veronica Lopez trectApt.74i 320 Blue Skies Drive or PO Box No City, State, Sparks, NV 89436 0154 :sem Postmark - Here 07/23/414 ;v. PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal ServiceTM CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mali Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.com;; c lDWt.E Cil $ib? -E Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To Stanley Shane Weaver m m t:71 D D Se $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 Postmark 07/23 414 = U.S. Postal Service,., CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our webalte at www.usps.coma 0031328, Postage Certified Fee $ $0.49 0154 $3.30 Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) lra Postmark '' Here r,; ,:l.1" ; v, $0.00 Total Postage & Fees rR D N Si or Fred Simpson PO Box 1102 Mancos, CO 81328 PS Form 3800, August 2006 2014 See Reverse for Instructions 7856 9464 r -i D D 0 D rR IU1 l 0 r9 0 N CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.coma 00°304C B Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $0.00 $6.49 11 tp�a„ l q ���ili p0 Here r. roti e 07/2372014 r1 11) Cr ..D N rR 0 0 0 D rR to 0 r -R 0 N Sent To Street, Apt. No.; Robert Colbert orPOBoxNo. 2643 Sherwood Cr. City, stare, ziP+1 Boulder, CO 80304 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal ServiceTM CERTIFIED MAILTr:, RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.coma i1A TEt a NC: Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 0.y j Itosimark T\ Here /,�� d0/ 07/23/2014 Sent To Street, Apt Edward Dalrymple or PO sox 4431 Derby Shire Lane City, State, Mathew, NC 28105 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal Servicer.., CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mali Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.coma WILTLN a4CT '6897 C A L Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 i ; Jnr Ostmark Here 07/23/2014 n r -- Sent Sent T Bailey D. Sterrett III Street or PO 67 Canterbury Lane c`s" Wilton, CT 06897 7014 0510 CERTIFIED CERTIFIED MAILTr,, RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) For deity sl,f);t9tr) term .vjeit our website at www.usps.coma 1 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To Street, Apt. A or PO Box Nr Theresa & Pick & Linda A. Zancanella Ciry,State, z PO Box 1908 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Tom & Lenora F., William & Pugh, Mary PS Form 38 r -i m 0 .11 Ln N r9 D D D u7 D r -R D N 7856 9266 U.S. Postal ServiceTr., CERTIFIED MAIL,. RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.com;. REOLANDS CA 92374 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To s $3.30 . Pos Bert Bacca 07/t rr,Apt. N oPO r POBox 619 Daisy Court o Ciry,State,zt Redlands, CA 92374-4102 PS Form 3800, August 2006 ri e See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal ServiceTr:, CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.corm, LEANDER TX 78641 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee D (Endorsement Required) O Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) r -R Total Postage & Fees vi D r-9 D N $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 Sent T Gary Kent Aenchbacher 3`Treet• or PO 1606 Mason Creek Blvd Cary, s Leander, TX 78641 Postmark rn Here 07/23/2014 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions N —o 0 D- ru 0820 0001 0— I=1 N • CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; Nolnsurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.come BIRMINGHAM AL 35242 Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $6A9 D-' IL Er .n u1 r- r-� D D D D ra D a D N 7856 9327 rR D D D Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) ent To Js n► m Postmark Here '0 07/23/2014 SUNLIGHT INN & REALTY LLC 71ireet, 3755 CORPORATE WOODS DRIVE or PO City Stt BIRMINGHAM, AL 35242 PS Form 3800• August 2006 ruswi ervIceTM See Reverse for Instructions CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.com:.; FORT COLLINS.CO $0521.' Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $6A9 015,4 11/4 ostmark Here vs,10740'GZ 0� 7/ 14 0� Sent To Stanley User Street, Apt. 1204 Ponderosa Drive or PO Box City, State, Fort Collins, CO 80521-4907 i1coI1I1wiTTnT i 801. • U.S. Postal ServiceTM CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.coma SUGAR LAND TX 77479 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) 7014 0510 Total Postage & Fees Sent o $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 ostmark,4 Here ;roti 07/23/2014 '3 0// Martha J. Berckles St Poo 6519 Parkriver Crossing City, Stab Sugar Land, TX 77479-5922 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions r0 D-' rU m r- 1=0 1-1 RJ D D D 0 ra RJ r -R D r•- -a -n ru m N r� r-� PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instruction. CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.com,a G4"Et*JOOD SPRINGS CO 81602 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $ $6.49 015403 si; Pole( 07/23144 Sent Tr WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST Street . P. 0. BOX 948 city,s' GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 U.S. Postal ServiceTr,, CERTIFIED MAIL., RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.com GLEi OD SPRINGS CO 81601 Postage Certified Fee ru D Retum Receipt Fee D (Endorsement Required) D D rR ru rR D N Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postene a Feec nt To 11. ��oStmark Here 5t $6.49 MICHAEL P SHEA & LAURA J FETKO Street, Apt. or PO Box 612 HIGHLANDS DRIVE City, State,: GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 fotn. 07/23/2014 iti _n RI m r- rq rU O 0 0 0 rR RJ r1 0 , N Lf) ru 1640 0002 1873 ru Nr -i 0 CERTIFIED MAIL. RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) For -delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.coms DENVER CO 80228 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sento JOHN E. & JUDITH E. BRADY 12298 W. MISSISSIPPI AVE Ciry,State, ZIP+4 LAKEWOOD, CO 80228-3639 $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 Post* f 566. r 07/23/2014 Street, Apt. No.; or PO Box No. PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instruction. U.S. Postal Service,. CERTIFIED MAIL?, RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.coms. GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81602 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees PS Form 3800, August 2006l See Reverse tor Instructions, v.J. t-ustaservicer., CERTIFIED MAILrr,, RECEIPT rr1 (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) ..n For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.com;; ..0 tti4GNOLIA TX 77355 Sent To Street, Apt. or PO Box! City, State, . $0.49 $3.30 $22.70 $0.00 $6.49 0154 sod sn Postmark* HevJ )1'1.it_ „ 07/23/Z04 o i RUSH LLC & GOLDEN STREAM INVESTMENTS LLC P. 0. BOX 518 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 PS Form 3800, August 2008 See Reverse tor Instructions U.S. Postal Service,., CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information vialt our website at www.usps.com;, i1ESQUITE TX 75185 Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee 0 (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) ru cp Total Postage & Fees 0 IT - 0 0 N $3.79 P Here mt�� • 071h/2014 Sent To MICHAEL W & LEE ANN BOWER 'st'r'eei,A KATHLEEN A & BRADLEY R BAILEY orPOB°; 20115 SAPPHIRE CIR Ciy Stair MAGNOLIA, TX 77355 PS Form 3800, August 2006 r m N 0154 1-4 Postage Certified Fee ru D Return Receipt Fee 0 (Endorsement Required) D 0 Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) See Reverse for Instructions RJ r-4 0 r- Total Postage & Fees S—ego $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 tmark Here T�S'bpt08 O 07/23/2014 WHITE PROPERTY CO #2 LTD Street, d; or PO& P. 0. BOX 850172 City,Stai MESQUITE, TX 75185-0172 r O) PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions rr ru t.rl 11J m N c0 r1 ru D D D O _n rq t, • 'TM,. .. . CERTIFIED MA!LTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; NolnsuranCrr:Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at wivw.usps.come GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81601 Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 LSent To ru QStreet, Apt. N or PO Box. N fU ru rq D N D 1-0 fu City, State. 1 O BRETTLEBERG CONDOMINIUMS ASSN 11101 COUNTY ROAD 117 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601-9534 U.S. Postal Service,. CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.come GLENWOOD SPRINGS: CO 81601 oaGorcR for Instructions Postage Certified Fee Ret Fee (Endorsement Reqm Receiui ed) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees / 07/?�/201��' DEEDDA MCLEAN 11101 COUNTY ROAD 117 A-3 i GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 PS Form 3800, August. 2006 U.S. Postal Service>,, CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.come DRS GROVE IL 60515 13.E See Reverse for Instructions Postage Certified Fee ReFee (Endorsement R Reqceiuired) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) c tmatk ere rr m Total Postage & Fees Sent To "shear' Apr. T or PO Box Nr City State, -2 07/Z3)18014 JOANNE SMALL 3964 DOUGLAS RD DOWNERS GROVE, IL 60515 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for instructions ru ✓ q ru m N cO rq ru D D D 7012 1640 m ru ru m N tO r1 fU D D D D rq fU rq D m rU m N r▪ i ru D D D D r-3 fU rq D N • CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Informs Ion visit our website at www.usps.come RIFLE CO 81650 Postage Certified F Return Receipt F (Endorsement Requl Restricted Delivery F (Endorsement Requir= $ Soa x$0,49 : Total Postage & Fees vt• $0.00 0154 11 Postmark Here 6B r n (ti:49 07/23/2014 Sent To StreetApti DAVID R & ELIZABETH L MCKENZIE or PO Box 1402 WEST 2ND STREET crty, scare, RIFLE, CO 81650 U.S. Postal Service, CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mali Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.come GLENWOOD SPRIHGS:-00 81601. Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 £S 0, Postatatk, BRETTLEBERG CONDOMINIUMS ASSN osrPosoz 11101 COUNTY ROAD 117 City, State, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601-9534 PS Form 3800. August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal Service,. CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.come CARBONDALE CO 81623 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 07/23. og 0 Sent To Street, Apt. t FINCA ORO BLANCO, LLC or POBox IV 14913 HWY 82 #297 City, State,2 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse tor Instructions $0.00 r1 D N r4 rR .I ru 7012 1640 0002 1873 1640 0002 1873 ru ra D CERTIFIED MAIL. RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.comb Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent Tc Michele A. Sterrett or PPoO, 2902 MorninI? Creek Road or City St Chula Vista, CA 91914 $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 QS Oke 07/23/2014 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal ServiceTM CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visitour website at www.usps.come Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 0154 1 mark Here /23/201/'/ RVI nt To street, Apt. WHITE PROPERTY CO NO2 or PO Box P. 0. BOX 850172 Clty,state, MESQUITE, TX 75185-0172 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal ServiceTM CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall. Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.coma Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To 0154 11 Postmark Hero 7/23/2014 ROHS FAMILY TRUST DATED 3-20-2008 treot,Apt i WEST 352 NORTH 5240 or POBox A City, State,: NORTH LAKE DRIVE czoniiiOCONONMOWOC, WI 53066 mitemaimmishim ra D u1 o-- -11 to N rR O D D r -R u"1 D r1 D N 0 r -R iT _0 u1 c0 N 0510 0001 CERTIFIED MAIL; RECEIPT (Domestic Mali Only; No'Insurance Coverage Provided) ra D 0— LI) c0 — cO N r1 D D D D rl ul D rR D c` - For delivery information visit our webslte:at www.usps.coma ARATJA'CO 80004 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To Ralland S. Stevens $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 Street, 5841 Quail Street city, stat. Arvada, CO 80004 1 am' Postmark T Here 07/23/2014 PS Form 3800. August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal ServiceTM CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.coma GRAND gt.140ut C .91F1::„ i Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To Arline M. Stewart Street, or POE 708 25 %2 Road ctdYSt. Grand Junction, CO 81505-9506 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal Service.r.r CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.com5 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 Charles Simpson PO Box 3053 Gallup, NM 87301 co `\ C1 07/23ti72014 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions _n D^ m m N co nJ O II O 7012 1640 Ir ru m N rR ru O O 0 ..0 r—1 ru r -R 0 N CERTIFIEDMAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic. Mall Only, No lnsuranco Coverage Provided);: For delivery information visit our website at www:usps.come •` : t'rti" CO 81623 Postage Codified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To Nile Gerbaz Street, Apt orPOBox PO Box 1325 city, state, Carbondale, CO 81623 11 i. r -- Ro tmark (Here 07M/2014 ` 0 IPS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal ServiceTM CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.come Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees m ti Sent To BARBARA J & JAMES A PEZOLDT Street Apt. No 4738 VISTA VIEW LANE or PO Box No. City, State, Z1F COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 809154040 0154 J CO Postmerk� s H e, :b n x �rJ 7 / 07/23/2014 `a� Sent To Raymond Lynn Cerise o;Poso 19445 750th Ave City, stat Grand Meadows, MN 55936 H Form 3800, August 2006 See, Reverse forinstructtons U.S. Postal ServiceTM CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mali Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www usps.com6 COLORADO SPRItN$S CO 80915 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees 11 Pos UL 2 3 2Q.) c., '07723/2014 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions ru ul m m N r▪ R R1 O O O IJ r- R ru rR N 0- u1 m 0002 1873 r- 1 ru ra 0 N IT) ru m N 113 r -q ru O 0 D u 9 3 CERTIFIED MAIL. RECEIPT (Domestic Mali Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at.www.usps.coms NEW CASTLE CO 81647 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent o Street, Apt. l Martha Long or POBox t' 8193 County Road 312 city state" New Castle, CO 81647 11 ii Co Here � 0'714 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for lnstruction. U.S. Postal ServiceTM CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.come CARBOtlDALE 00.81623 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sen Stacey Pach o P 831 Latigo Street City Carbondale, CO 81623-1569 $ 50.49 83.30 82.70 50.00 36.49 rk O 1• 67 866 �: 07/23Y2014 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.come WOOD SPRINGS CO 81601 Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent T Edward L Grange Ireei, or PO, 1301 Bennett Ave city s Glenwood Springs, CO 81601-3913 PS Form 3800, August 2006 Y r. 44 P. 07/23/2014 s O n On m D- N m 0002 1873 0 r�R ru D N m m N IJ rR ru Retum Receipt Fee OO (Endorsement Required) CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.come 61011100D SPRINGS :CO 81601., Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 0154 1 -v 07/2014 o' Sent To JIGMEISTER TRUST street, Apt 11101 COUNTY ROAD 117 #5-C or PO Box City, State, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at wwtv;usps,coms GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81602 Postage Certified Fee Restricted Delivery Fee D (Endorsement Required) fU r -R N w ru Total Postage & Fees Sent r MICHAEL S DUNN orrf P. 0. BOX 804 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 PS Form 3800, August 2006 m N rR D C] O r 4 e Postmark i ' Here /2014 \ O 0 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal Services, CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.com-. L OOp..SPRINGS CO, 81602 Postage ru D N Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST Sheet, orPOI P.O. BOX 948 city.s. GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 See Reverse for Instructions 1 0 07/23 A`+14 wrk o 1 PS Form 3800, August 2006 u -I m N m m r -R rU D D D D rl ru rR D P- ru ru r1 D N CERTIFIED MAILTr.i RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.com G a FL 32097 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 1L. 0 1▪ . f Postmark II—. Here gni O ▪ 4 07/2x2014 Sent To MITZVAH PROPERTIES gtreet, Apt. or POBoxN 86149 MEADOWFIELD BLUFFS RD City, State,2 YULEE, FL 32097 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See' Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal Service., CERTIFIED MAIL,. RECEIPT (Domestic Mali Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.com.a 14U1O;IN4903 Postage $ Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To LEONARD E. LORENTSON FAMILY TRUST Sireei,Apt"Ni P. 0. BOX 932 orPC) BoxNo KOKOMO, IN 46903-0932 City, Slate, ZI r --7 $0.49 � `, >6 $3.301 7f $2.70 \,, , $0.00 $ $6.49 11c 0, Postma 0-1 *Awe/ .`r 07/23/2014 D m m 113 rR ru D D co 0 r -R ill rR D PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for instructions CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.coms COLORADO SPRINGS CO 80922 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Foe (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ $0.49 83.30 $2.70 $0.00 $ $6.49 y 07 01 Sent 7 RONALD & CECILIA METCALF or Po 7013 ALLENS PARK DRIVE City, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80922 4 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions See Reverse for Instructions 0001 2699 7181 O 11J D Ir D 0 N •, - fl . - -r "TM CERTIFIED MAIL,,, RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) For de;3 try, !Pforn ation visit our website at www.usps.comL. . ial Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To Street, A or PO Br City, Sta stmark $ $0.00 $6.49 07123I2� ROBERT R. & WENDI D 30800 WEST 95th STREET DE SOTO, KS 66018 PS Form 3800, August 2006 _0 D- u-. ,13 nJ D D D nJ D tr IJ 0 N 0 -n 0 0- -0 ru r-� D D D 7009 0820 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal Service,. CERTIFIED MAIL., RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For &livery information visit our website at www.usps.com:, i.f.. .11 ai n e Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $ $6.49 E 0154 -- yC (Ppstmark, Herb'. I!- vJ )1 07&372014 nt Christopher S & Michelle A. Kane Sbeef, Apt. P or PO BoxNc 605 Manor Drive City, State, ZI Salisbury, MD 21804 PS Form 3800. August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal Service,. CERTIFIED MAIL, RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For deli'ror; Cdr.,Ma,!• •4website at www.usps.com,, Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ 54 r!Uc. 4 cs,PosimArk' a Here \ 0. OE. 07/23/2014 �Ja! Sent To BARBARA J & JAMES A PEZOLDT or PO Box street,Apt.hNc 4738 VISTA VIEW LANE crry,State, z COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80915-1040 PS Form 3800. August 2006 See'Reversefor instructions N r -i Er - N nJ ru D Ir D D rR N 0- 0� -a ru r-9 D IL D O N -D m rR N 0 nJ ra D D D D ru D Ir 0 D • CERTIFIED MAILrr,, RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.com;.; Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent o icU Postmark `j4 Here $6.49 07/23/2014 ALSTATT LIVING TRUST orPO6 889 W. 102"" PLACE city,sra DENVER, CO 80260 PS Form 3800. August 2006 See Reverse tor Instructions U.S. Postal Service,, CERTIFIED MAIL,., RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.com;, GLENWOIOII SPRINGS CO 81601 ft_ Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $0.49 $3.30 $2.70hoz atior 0154 t1 Postmark 07/21 rl ti Sent To SUNLIGHT MEADOW CABIN LLC or rPO bio 151 LAIRD LANE city,? GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 P r1 006 ,,ee Rever uc i.n U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL,,.; RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.com;; GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81601 1) Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To sir"esf Apt No or PO Box No. City, Slate, ZIF $ $0,49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 0154 w. sL,. 07/23/2014 42o- ' KOCHER, KLAUS H. & LEVIN 275 VISTA DRIVE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 PS Form 3800, August 2006 m -0 m P- rri rn P- 11:1 ,1J ES/ Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) -1:1 Total Postage & Fees r-4 U.S. Postal Service,. CERTIFIED MAIL. RECEIPT (DoMestIc Mall OnlYfrAkilmiurance Coverime Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.coMs RLISSIAVILLE IN 46979 Postage Codified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 Y-tr Posttnguk Here- 4,J 07/23/2014 Sent NATHAN & JULIE EPP -grit AR MILL ROAD • U.S. Postal Service,. CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website attIASU(jrgii Til 77 www.usps.coine Postage Certified Fee ru r -N -1 Sent To SUNLIGHT MOUNTAIN PROPERTIES, LLC ............... 631 2ND AVENUE SOUTH SITE SUITE 300 NASHVILLE, TN 37210 004: /_• \ i -"-.; ,:, c7.-__, \ ..▪ .. to Posit/Ark 1 t- 0 Hefe:' I 8) ...-1 / ▪ - -.. 07/2P2014 PS Form 3800, August 2006 N 43 -0 m m N c0 r-1 r1.1 rR ru r-9 IN- ............... See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal ServjceTM CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance CoVerage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.come RIFLE CO 81650 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees ent To DAVID RYAN MCKENZIE I; or PO I 1402 WEST 2ND STREET City, SI RIFLE, CO 81650 PS Form 3800, August 2006 01 11 st fle‘- ,...) HA. ft' Pernarlc 07/2322614 ......... See Reverse for instructions ru ir IT' ,ru ci ru 43 0 0 -n -n -0 r11 M r- . 43 1-1 11.1 00 0 0 -u rI r1 r- .11 r .n _o a- -n ru 0 0 1= 111 c0 0 0 1r 0 CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.coml. KOKOMO IN 46903 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 USE ,,... 4 ..es:. ,./.. _ c \ , ,0,,,, a potni,-...'-,,, \,... sHere `10 , 422 $0.00 $6.49 07/23/2014 Sent To LEONARD E. LORENTSON FAMILY TRUST -treet, A, orP08( P. 0. BOX 932 city, Stai KOKOMO, IN 46903-0932 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instruction U.S. Postal Servicem CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.come FORT WORTH TX 76108 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 r Postdirls Here9.1 sr() 15 $6.49 07/23/2014 0 0. Sent - DEAN & VIRGINIA ARNOVE -grit) or P 209 PAINT PONY TRAIL NORTH -66;• FORT WORTH, TX 76108 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse tor Instructions U.S. Postal Service,. CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.comD CARBONDALE CO wp Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To Street, r or P013 City. Sts PS For NORTH THOMPSON — FOUR MILE MINERAL & LAND CORPORATION 1872 PRINCE CREEK ROAD CARBONDALE, CO 81623 • • - • IceTM ruCERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT ru _ (Domestic Mall Only, No, Insurance Cove age Provided) frN1 For delivery Information visit our website at www.uaps,come GLENNOOD SPRINGS CO 81601 m N m r-3 ru D D D D -0 r9 ru 1-9D N r3 m N m 0002 1873 D -0 rR rU r1 D N 43 N m m N ru D D Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees LcPostmark r- Here • 07721/2014 Sent To SKI SUNLIGHT, INC or POE 1901 COUNTY ROAD 117 city, st, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601-4541 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions CERTIFIED MAILTM RELtiP 1 (Domestic Mall Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our webslte at www.uaps.com®. GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81601 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $ $6.49 ,01, Poetinad Here • 07/23/2014 " CRAIG BURGER Street, 4231 FANNING PLACE City, State GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 PS Form 3800. August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal Servicer, CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided). For delivery Information visit our webslte at www.uaps,come LEANT° FL 34461 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent BERRY & MYRNA BOULERICE S or PC lree 7480 S. HOBBS POINT city: LECANTO, FL 34461 PS Form 3800, August 2006 Postinkrk 1 .6: Hate - a. Q 1. \. oy . 07/23/2014 See Reverse for Instructions 0, 0 m m N co r1 ru D D 7012 1640 CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our webslte at www.usps.coms BROOKLYN NY 11235 yam. Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $3.30 $0.00 4154 rs Po1Y�. N st ) a He Oa 3-11-2 07/23/2014 D N m m N 43 r•R ru D D 1-9 i ti ra 0 r- 1-9 r -R N m m N cO rl 7012 1640 0002 Sent To Street, ApRtvo.; JOEL QUINTALINO or PO Box No. 140 MACKENZIE STREET City, state,ziP+ BROOKLYN, NY 11235 PS Form 3800. August 2006 Se, Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal Servicer.., CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.coma GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81601 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sen sire HUGH P. & CHRISTINE S. REILLY or 10256 COUNTY ROAD 117 cIry. GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 $0.49, MUM 0154 ce; ostmalk . Here $6.49 07/23/2014 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse forInstructioi U.S. Postal ServiceTM CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.come RIFLE CO 81650. Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Feo (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To Street, Af or PO 8o; City, State $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 FREDERICK 0154 "i Postma) o � t Here C� 07/23%2014''15`)') -- WILLIAM HIORT, JR & BARBARA J HIORT P. O. BOX 164 RIFLE, CO 81650 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions fs- • ED MAILtM .RECEI hr grity;110,lnsurance Cover Provided) , m GLENWOOII SPRINGS CO 81601 r - c0 Postage ra Certified Fee fU Retum Receipt Fee CO (Endorsement Required) O O O r-1 ru a 0 O 0-' .-0 0- 0- -D ru r -R O O 7009 0820 sr • �- COE J. ELIASSEN O1 11101 COUNTY ROAD 117 C2 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601-9534 Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent o $ 80.49 83.30 82.70 80.00 86.49 w OJ Postmark Here 07/23/2014 JAMES K DOWLING or PO Box 11101 COUNTY ROAD 117 #B7 clry,state• GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601-9534 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal Service T,, CERTIFIED MAIL,.., RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.comc 1131 ER CO 80226 ,.t 0 ru ru ru r1 0 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees 80.49 83.30 82.70 80.00 $ 86.49 0154 Postmark Here 07/23/2014 o ROBERT GARCIA Si. 427 S ESTES ST ;. LAKEWOOD, CO 80226 PS Form 3800. August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal Service,. CERTIFIED MAIL, RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.com4 GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81601 k':, Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ 80.49 83.30 82.70 80.00 86.49 01.E Postmark 7m+ r, \ Here nF 07/23/2014 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse tor Instructions _o N m m N r1 11J O O O S -n r-1 CERTIFIED MAIL. RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.come BERLIN MD 21211 Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Foe (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees 0 sir or, Cit. PS 0154 11,0VCK p /4.`• Postmark r 1 " • Here JUL 23204 14 86.49 FREDERICK BURCH WEISS & ALTA FOCHT WEISS 85 SANDYHOOK RD OCEAN PINES, MD 21811 nstruction U.S. Postal Servicetr,, CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.com0 MONUMENT CO 80132 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) $ 80.49 83.30 82.70 80.00 Total Postage & Fees $ 86.49 Laurie A. Coryell 4385 Red Forest Road Monument, CO 80132-8287 07Y0614 PS Form 3800. August 2006 See Reverse tor Instructions U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.com;7, KIHEI HI 96753 Postage $ Certified Fee Retum Receipt Foo (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees ru ▪ JAMES E. GARLOW & 1-1 �t BRENDA NELSON-GARLOW r- or 'ci 14 KUAPAPA PLACE KIHEI, HI 96753 Wit_ IfT lT? tt !!9 m Q" Ln N r -R D D D D rR rR D N ru fr u1 N r -R D O D D r -R Lr) D r -R D N CERTIFIED MAIL., RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Infprmatlon visit our webske at www;gspa.cgme FL0`(IIS KNo0 fti 014'd Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ $0.49 , $3.30 : $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 07/23/2014 �0 tit Sent To Street, Apt. No.; or PO Box No. 4005 Kendall Ct. City,State,ZIPi Floyds Knobs, IN 47119-9337 Rita A. Banet PS Form 3800. August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal Service=,, CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.come Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent Tc Thomas A. Zancanella Street PO Box 1908 or PO! city,st Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 07/23/2014 PS Form 3800. August 2006 U.S. Postal Service= CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) to m ru 0- �.n 0510 0001 D m See Reverse for Instructions For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.coms, 't' • rt' r CO 81623 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $ $6.49 0154 114, tr Postmark ,t Here (t7 07/23/2014 Emma G. Taucher Street, Apt. A or PO Box N, 1200 Village Road City,,State, Z Carbondale, CO 81623-1564 0 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions fu m N 1-9 D D D D Jn r1 ru rR D N ru .n ru m N co rl D D D D ..a n-1 143 D m Ir u1 m N r-9 D r -R u1 r9 D • • u • CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our webalte at www.usps.cnntd MIRAMAR BEACH FL 32550 Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 ROBERT EARL WARD & SHIRLEY TILLMAN WARD 392 SHORE DRIVE S MIRAMAR BEACH, FL 32550 0154 1i. Postmark Here 9,23/2014 rse or Instructions CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our webalte at www.uaps.come COLORADO SPRIN•!GS CO 80906 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 31. r - N 9 0 rk O $6.49 07/23/2014 Albert Cerise Fancily Company Sire 3565 Hickory Hill orf Colorado Springs, CO 80906 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions U.S. Postal Service=., CERTIFIED MAIL=., RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) a:rr0ty For delivery intormt t -T .dr1t our ,,Jebsite at www.usps.com; 0 Postage $ Certified Foe Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees LJ S .3 1 r.1 , $ iyo 54 11 �c rte. Pork tioG fl ire /O� \ 4;: ;O 0 07/23/2014 qr 0 n Sent To Srreet,Apt. N Roaring Fork LLC or PO BoxNc 321 Moross Street City, State, Z, Groose Point Farms, MI 48236 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions See Reverse for Instruction rU m c0 rU D D D c0 ru r-9 ='• ru m r - c13 1-1 (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.comg BERLIN ND 2184 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To FREDERICK B WEISS & osrfrepoe4g ALTA F WEISS city, stat 85 SANDYHOOK RD OCEAN PINES, MD 21811 0154 11 Postmark Here. 07/23/2014 U.S. Postal ServiceTM. CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.conu GLEI4400,1)- SPRINGS *CB 8/60, Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees sem MICHAEL SHEA str" 612 HIGHLANDS DRIVE or PC City, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 MEM $0.00 $6.49 ,. • 0154 11 Postmark Hero 07/23/2014 U.S. Postal ServjceTM CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.comt NEWPORT BEACH 0;92660 See Reverse for Instructions postage IU Certified Fee C3 Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee D (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees ru r-4 r- Sent To GLORIA FREDERICK 101 LINDA ISLE or PO Box -- NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 2 5 Postmark 3 Hero $6.49 Anar:2014 PS Form 3800, August 2006 See Reverse for Instructions Cr ru m r- 1-3 ru cJ D 1=1 (=i -n r--4 nJ D m 17.3 rn Er N D D rl r-9 D N ru ru 1640 0002 1873 rU rR N •• TM CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our webslte at www.usps.com4. WINTER PARKFL 32789 Postage Certified Fee Retum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Requi Restricted DeIiveiye , (Endorsement Requ(red) Total Postage & Fees Sent To • JOHN G & GEORGIA A LANGDON $ $0.49 0154 $3.30. 11 KirleVA-P-1 or PO Box 942 POINCIANA LANE Postmark Here 07/23/2014 CilY State' WINTER PARK, FL 32789-1016 PS Form 3800, August 2006 Pots . • U.S. Postal ServiceTM CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.come SILT‘C8_81F2 11 C Postage Certified Fee- Retum Receipt F (Endorsement Requked Restricted Delivery Fe's (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees 0154 11 Postmark Here 07/23/2014 Sent To Larry E. & Lester A. Spaulding Utreet, A or PO Bc 531 Circle # 260 eifxsta Silt, CO 81652-9545 PS Form 3800, August 2006 U.S. Postal Service,. See Reverse for Instructions CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery information visit our website at www.usps.com5 TOCCOA 'GA 30577 Postage Certified Fee 0154 11 Postmark Retum Receipt Fee Hero (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees 7/23/2014 Son' — EMILY ELIZABETH SKELTON Sin or I 177 ADDINGTON DRIVE 06 TOCCOA, FL 30577 PS Form 3800, August 2006 DENVER CO 80214 Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 0154 Postmark O He)e 4 07/2° /P014 Sent To treat Apt. No.; or PO Box No. GEORGE DALRYMPLE 2225 AMMONS STREET Ciry,State, ZIP+. LAKEWOOD, CO 80214 PS Form 3800, August 2006 1 See Reverse for Instructions 1873 2352 nJ Return Receipt Fee O (Endorsement Required) U.S. Postal Service,. CERTIFIED MAILTM RECEIPT (Domestic Mall Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) For delivery Information visit our website at www.usps.comv GLENWOOD sPRINGs co 81601 Postage Certified Fee O 7012 1640 Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To Street, Apt. or PO Box 1 $ $0.49 $3.30 $2.70 $0.00 $6.49 0154 \,. mark t(i;re L-..3 07/2R.2014 s JAMES H. GRIFFIN 701 GRAND AVENUE, APT 301 City, State,GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 Ski Sunlight Inc. Notice Posting 7/24/14 e NOTICE TAKE NOTICE That _Skt_Se2Let._ T L h. applied to rho V 1:310o, of o�' Ct ? , Ceseemf Garfield. County V pursuant to LCI Leal '., wsa/ _I.�iI� D MMf r GIC to allow !ftJ A,.In e ,w,, ge.sohocen ZOjL.-J� I tiecap.?L1 rr Q.caislal+xwrz on this property. A public I eve•Aq on this apphudon will bo ?veld In the{pp,./__af,--C"-ar Ct y..y.l.hiALiµ-e—i t t.•K .__13QQ�� Glenwood Sprint .. Colorado ICC/2 1 Bate Nolko Was Posted, By. For additional information, contact the at(210)i ri,�?!_Eor . 108 8th St. Surto 1/210( drilonwood Springs. CO 9101 MOUNTAIN CROSS August 7, 2014 Mr. David Pesnichak Garfield County Planning 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ENGINEERING, INC. Civil and Environmental Consulting and Design EXHIBIT lL) RE: Review of Ski Sunlight, Inc. Communication Tower Amendment: LI AA -7912 Dear David: This office has performed a review of the documents provided for the Limited Impact Amendment application of the Communication Tower for Ski Sunlight, Inc. The submittal was found to be thorough and well organized. The review generated no comments. Feel free to call if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, Mount 'n Cross Engjneing is Hale, PE 826 1/2 Grand Avenue, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 P: 970.945.5544 F: 970.945.5558 www.mountaincross-eng.com David Pesnichak From: Michael Prehm Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 2:34 PM To: David Pesnichak Subject: Ski Sunlight Inc. -Communication Tower Amendment Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged David, Garfield County Road & Bridge has no concerns with this Communication Tower Amendment. Any questions please contact me. Mike Prehm Garfield County Road & Bridge Foreman/Glenwood District (970) 945-1223 Office (970) 945-1318 Fax.P (970) 618-7109 Cell 1 EXHIBIT WHITE PROPERTIES, INC. July 31, 2014 _ iCountyt.tJ:i.iiiiiSSiGncrS Garfield County Plaza Building Suite 100 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601-3355 Re: Public Hearing Tuesday, September 2, 2014 at 1:00 PM Dear Sirs: C F V' AUG 0 : 2014 GARFtELD UUUN C" )MMUNITY DFVEI.OPMEti` Please accept this letter as our vote in favor of the request by Ski Sunlight, Inc. to extend the communication tower limit from two years to a permanent structure in its current configuration and location. As owner of Unit A-9 of the Brettelberg Condominiums, this service would definitely be of benefit to us. Sincerely, Bill White, Owner Brettelberg Condo, Unit A-9 11101 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 621 South Bryant I3cltline • P.O. Box 850172 • \Ie.squitc. "Icxas —51.19 • 1912) 288-131.1 • Rt t9-21 288--1313 ■III !!!r rrisiZ`ittiNItl ii'1I'111! F ,TVt,11.'L Firlhlli L'} 11 II I Receptions: 848909 05005/20'•1 03 13 25 PM Jean f11b.:r rco 1 of 3 Pec `e.e $0 00 Onc FPO 0 00 GHRF1F;G C01.1Y CC LAND USE CHANGE PERMIT for EXHIBIT A Parcel of Land Owned by Ski Sunlight, Inc. located Approximately 10 miles southeast of the City of Glenwood Springs on County Road 117 (Four Mile Road) in Section 33, Township 7 South, Range 89 West of the 6th P.M. and Legally Described in Exhibit "A"attached hereto. Assessor's Parcel No. 2395-333-00-051 In accordance with and pursuant to provisions of the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended, and Resolution No. 2012-41 of the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, State of Colorado, the following activity is hereby authorized by Land Use Change Permit: Communication Facility consisting of one 60 -foot tall monopole within a 12' by 12' footprint, the facility is to be operated by Ski Sunlight, Inc. (LIPA —7060) This Land Use Change Permit is issued subject to the conditions contained in Resolution No. 2012-41 and set forth in Exhibit "B", consistent with the representations made in LIPA-7060 and shall be valid only during compliance with such conditions and other applicable provisions of the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended, Building Code, and other regulations of the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado. ATTEST: LD COUNTY BOARD OF OUNT1( COMMISSIONERS, ARFILD COUNTY, COLORADO 5 e-wc, 077 a- rk of the Board 1111 !rd1'lTiti'tIl'itN4CYr,thitN1,11A1.',TiA 10',011 111 Receptions:: 848909 Mi06o2014 03 13 2 PM Jean Fltertcc 2 of 3 Rec. Fee $0 00 Doc Fee 0 00 00RFIELD COUNTY CO Exhibit A (Legal Description) A tract of land located in Section 33 Township 7 South Range 89 West of the 51r Principle Meridian. Garfield County, Co.oradc. berg more particularly described as follows Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Southwest Quarter (SW1r4) of Section 33 monumented by a 3' aluminum cap stamped SGM C•Y. S33. LS 15710, from whence the Northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter (SE114) of the Northwest Quartos (SW1;4) of Sec bon 33. nonumented by a 3' aluminum cap stamped SGM C-NSIIS6 LS 15710 bears N 03'37'57' E with all other bearings contained herein being telative thereto, thence S 7321'12' W 958 29 feet to the Point Of Beginning thence N 44'47'22" W 10 00 feet, thence N 45°12 38" E 2000 feel thence S 44°47'27' E 20.00 feet. thence S 45'1738- W 20 00 feel N 44'47'27 W 10 00 feet to the Point Of Beginning. conta.ning 430 square feet more or less, Together with an access easement. said easement being ten (10) feet wide. five (5) feet on each side of the following described centerline Beginning at the Point of Beginning of the above described tact. thence proceeding a'ong said centerline S 45'1738' W 52 15 feet more or ess to northerly right line of way of County Road 117A and easement end fine. containing 521 square feet more or less The sidelines of said strip aro lengthened or shortened to intersect the above described tract and the northerly right of way tine of County Road 117A 4:so together with a utility easement, said easement being ten (10) feet wide, five (5) feet on each side of the fol owing described centerline. Commenting at the Point of Beginning of the above desaibed tract; thence proceeding along the southerly line of said tract S 44'4727' E 10.00 feet. N 45'12'38' E 10.00 feet to the Point of Beginning of sad utility easement: thence S 44'47'27' E 45 00 feet to the easement end ine containing 450 square feet, more or less. The sidelines of said strip are Lengthened or shortened to intersect the above described tract Vlodificabon in any way of the foregoing aooert) descnptan terminates all liability of the surveyor who prepared that des notion ■III Will;tl1'M71,l5111,14U 1-iilNklif li>fi'rriN%'.3111, ,11111 Reception#: 848909 05/06/2014 03 13 25 Ph Jean Alberico 3 of 3 Rec Fee $0 00 Doc Fee.0 00 GARFIEID COUNTY CO Exhibit B 1. That all representations made by the Applicant in the application, and at the public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners, shall be conditions of approval, unless specifically altered by the Board of County Commissioners; 2. The operation of this facility and any future amendments shall be done in accordance with all applicable Federal, State and Local regulations governing the operation of this type of facility including but not limited to the FAA and FCC. 3. The Applicant shall submit final engineering plans for the tower to the Garfield County Building and Planning Department prior to initiating construction. Construction and installation of the fence and communication cabinet shall be properly permitted with the Garfield County Building Department and meet all zoning and related requirements. 4. Prior to issuance of the Land Use Change Permit, the Applicant shall provide Staff with additional documentation or written confirmation from their telecommunications engineer that no further FCC notification is required. 5. The Applicant shall be approved for two years from the date of this approval by the BOCC. The Applicant may request additional time from the BOCC in a public meeting so long as the Applicant can demonstrate that it is making a good faith effort to obtain a permanent location. 6. The Applicant shall paint / powder coat the monopole a darker non -reflective color to better blend in with the surrounding area. 7. The Applicant shall install a screening -system incorporated within the chain-link fencing such as either dark green fabric (or other similar color) or typical slat -systems to aid in the screening of the base of the monopole and mechanical cabinet. 8. The Applicant shall install proper signage for any hazardous materials on the mechanical cabinet or fencing as applicable pursuant to the International Fire Code. �IIIPII11IY131li,I�lrR1 4�K1w1�11��'I C�+�I�IN��L 11111 Reception#: 819604 06/06/2012 10:21:00 AM Jean Albertoo 1 of 6 Rio Fee:SO.00 Doo Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss County of Garfield ) EXHIBIT 1 iv At a regular meeting of the Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County, Colorado, held in the Commissioners' Meeting Room, Garfield County Administration Building in Glenwood Springs on Monday, the 7th day of May A.D. 2012, there were present: John Martin Mike Samson Tom Jankovsky (Recused for this matter) Andrew Gorgey Carey Gagnon Jean Alberico , Commissioner Chairman , Commissioner , Commissioner County Attorney, Acting -County Manager , Assistant County Attorney , Clerk of the Board when the following proceedings, among others were had and done, to -wit: RESOLUTION NO. a0iQ- y A RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL FOR A LAND USE CHANGE PERMIT FOR A COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY (60 -FOOT TALL MONOPOLE) ON A 183.17 PROPERTY OWNED BY SKI SUNLIGHT, INC. LOCATED IN THE MAIN PARKING LOT AT THE SKI SUNLIGHT RESORT IN SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., GARFIELD COUNTY PARCEL NO# 2395-333-00-051 Recitals A. The Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, (Board) received a request for a Land Use Change Permit to allow for a Communications Facility (consisting of a 60 -foot tall monopole) as further described in the Site Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A. B. The Communications Facility is located within a 183.17 -acre parcel of land owned by Ski Sunlight, Inc. The ownership of this property is described in a Deed of Trust found in Book 629, Page 842 having a Reception Number of 343470 in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder. C. The subject property is located within unincorporated Garfield County in the Commercial Limited zone district, approximately 10 miles southeast of the City of Glenwood Springs on County Road 117 (Four Mile Road). D. A Communications Facility may be permitted in the Commercial Limited zone district 1 ■III I �I'S�l�tll',tillilINC avithlia'hieIiiGChi Cil4t 111411 N Receptlonfi: 819604 06/06/2012 10:21:00 AM Jean Alberloo 2 of 6 Reo Fee:$0.00 Doo Fee:0.08 GARFIELD COUNTY CO with Limited Impact Review. C. The Board is authorized to approve, deny or approve with conditions a Limited Impact Review application resulting in the issuance of a Land Use Change Permit pursuant to the Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended. F. The Board of County Commissioners opened a public hearing on the 7th day of May, 2012 for consideration of whether the requested Land Use Change Permit should be granted or denied, during which hearing the public and interested persons were given the opportunity to express their opinions regarding the request. H. The Board of County Commissioners closed the public hearing on the 7th day of May, 2012 to make a final decision. I. The Board on the basis of substantial competent evidence produced at the aforementioned hearing, has made the following detenninations of fact: 1. That proper public notice was provided as required for the hearing before the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The hearing before the Board of County Commissioners was extensive and complete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that all interested parties were heard at that meeting. 3. That for the above stated and other reasons the proposed Land Use Change Permit for a Communications Facility consisting of the construction of a 60 -foot tall monopole having a 12' x 12' foot print located in the main parking lot at Ski Sunlight Resort on an 183.17 -area parcel in the Commercial Limited zone district is in the best interest of the health, safety, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County. 4. That, with the adoption of conditions, the application is in general conformance with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, as amended. 5. That, with the adoption of conditions, the application has adequately met the requirements of the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended. RESOLUTION NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, that: A. The forgoing Recitals are incorporated by this reference as part of the resolution. 2 1111 iiiIINCIOtriletltitk Ili 11111 Reception# : 819604 06/05/2012 10:21:00 RM Jean Rlberlco 3 of 6 Reo Fee10.00 Doe Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO B. The Land Use Change Permit for a Communications Facility related to construction of a 60 - foot tall monopole with a 12' x 12' foot print located in the main parking lot at Ski Sunlight Resort is hereby approved subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1. That all representations made by the Applicant in the application, and at the public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners, shall be conditions of approval, unless specifically altered by the Board of County Commissioners; 2. The operation of this facility and any future amendments shall be done in accordance with all applicable Federal, State and Local regulations governing the operation of this type of facility including but not limited to the FAA and FCC. 3. The Applicant shall submit final engineering plans for the tower to the Garfield County Building and Planning Department prior to initiating construction. Construction and installation of the fence and communication cabinet shall be properly permitted with the Garfield County Building Department and meet all zoning and related requirements. 4. Prior to issuance of the Land Use Change Permit, the Applicant shall provide Staff with additional documentation or written confirmation from their telecommunications engineer that no further FCC notification is required. 5. The Applicant shall be approved for two years from the date of this approval by the BOCC. The Applicant may request additional time from the BOCC in a public meeting so long as the Applicant can demonstrate that it is making a good faith effort to obtain a permanent location. 6. The Applicant shall paint / powder coat the monopole a darker non -reflective color to better blend in with the surrounding area. 7. The Applicant shall install a screening -system incorporated within the chain-link fencing such as either dark green fabric (or other similar color) or typical slat -systems to aid in the screening of the base of the monopole and mechanical cabinet. 8. The Applicant shall install proper signage for any hazardous materials on the mechanical cabinet or fencing as applicable pursuant to the International Fire Code. IA- , r Dated this -I" day of , A.D. 20 1 2- 3 A I'IEST: 1111 EA 11 III Receptlon#: 819604 06/05/2012 10:21:00 ao F$00OooFe:00GAFIELD COUNTY CO GARFIELD COMMISS UNT UNTY BOARD OF NE' ., DO GARFIELD Jerk of the Board Chairm Upon motion duly made and seconded the fo following vote: COMMISSIONER CHAIR JOHN F. MARTIN COMMISSIONER MIKE SAMSON COMMISSIONER TOM JANKOVSKY tion was adopt by the , Aye , Aye , Recused 4 mIII6nI'aEwm.III+ut iriKrvi work int Recept Ion# : 819804 08f0 5 of55Reo Fee?5000 Jean COUNTY CO Exhibits for Public Hearing: 05/07/12 Board of County Commissioners Exhibit A Proof of Publication & Posting B Proof of Mailing C Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended D Garfield County Comprehensive Plan of 2030 E Land Use Change Permit Application F Staff Memorandum G Letter from the GWS Fire Department dated 3/20/12 H Referral Form from the Garfield County Sheriff dated 3/9/12 I Letter from Bill White dated 2/27/12 J Letter from the USFS dated 3/22/12 K Letter from Christina Lorentson Sawyer dated 3/26/12 L Light Site Schematics M Email from Lowell Nelson to Garfield County Staff dated 4/23/12 N Applicant's photo representation of tower location Board of County Commissioners May 7, 2012 LIPA-7060/FJ PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS TYPE OF REVIEW Limited Impact Review — Land Use Change Permit for a Communication Facility APPLICANT (OWNER) Ski Sunlight, Inc. OPERATOR Commnet of Nevada, LLC (Commnet) LOCATION Sunlight Mountain Resort is located Approximately 10 miles southeast of the City of Glenwood Springs on County Road 117 (Four Mile Road) LEGAL DESCRIPTION The site is located in Section 33, T7S, R89W PROJECT SITE The facility has a 12' x 12' footprint ZONING Commercial Limited (CL) I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL Ski Sunlight, Inc., owner of Sunlight Mountain Resort, is requesting approval from the Board of County Commissioners to install a temporary 60 -foot tall monopole telecommunications facility on the edge of one of the existing parking lots about 230 feet northwest of the Ski Sunlight Lodge building. The facility would be owned and operated by Commnet of Nevada, LLC (Commnet). The facility has a 12' x 12' footprint that would house the mechanical cabinet, the monople base and would be enclosed with a 6 -foot chain Zink fence. As this is a monopole design, there are no guy wires required and the facility is self supported. The purpose of the facility is to provide cellular coverage to the resort base area including the Ski Sunlight Lodge, the Brettelberg Condominiums and the Sunlight Mountain Inn which does not have service to date. Due to the temporary nature of the facility as a "Lite -Site" ("Quick Deploy Cell Site"), this site is intended to be a temporary site to determine feasibility and that a permanent site would be sought in the near future. II. SITE DESCRIPTION AND ADJACENT USES III. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The site is a flat 12' x 12' portion of the existing upper gravel parking lot at Ski Sunlight which is located in the Commercial Limited Zone District. Adjacent uses to the south include the Ski Sunlight Lodge and ski area and the Brettelberg Condominiums. The uses to the north include the lower parking lot and the Sunlight Mountain Inn is located approximately 780 feet to the northwest of the site. Considering the entire parcel more broadly, the zoning to the north and south Is Public Lands (US Forest Service) and Rural to the east and west as can be seen in the map to the left. (The Ski Sunlight parcel is in red.) A. Article XVI of the Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended (ULUR) defines a Communications Facility as a non -Inhabitable structure supporting antennas and microwave dishes that sends and/or receives radio frequency signals, Including television and date Impulses through space by means of electromagnetic waves. Communication facilities include structures or towers, and accessory building. Individual/personal direct - to -home satellite services are not Included in the definition of Communication Facility. B. The Land Use Tables contained in Section 3-501 of the ULUR, designates Communication Facilities within the CL Zone District as requiring a Limited Impact Review. Section 4-502 sets forth the submittal requirements including suitability and impacts analyses. Section 7- 823 of the ULUR sets forth Additional Standards Applicable to Communication Facilities. IV. STAFF ANALYSIS A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Staff finds the proposed Communications Facility is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan 2030. Ski Sunlight Is designated as an Unincorporated Community and as such, cellular coverage for the inhabitants and visitors of that community is considered a critical infrastructure component and facilitates its growth and development as well as provides a critical Zink to first responders. B. PUBLIC AND REFERRAL COMMENTS Referral packets were sent to the following agencies with comments and responses summarized below and Included as exhibits. 2 1) Glenwood Springs Fire Protection District: Need to provide the MSDS sheets for any hazardous chemicals, doors and fences shall be signed regarding hazardous materials present, and the area appropriately signed if hazardous chemicals are present. 2) United States Forest Service: Does not object to a 1 -year feasibility test location. Could a shorter tower (around 20 -feet) be considered; could other locations be considered; could the tower be treated or powder coated with a non -reflective color; and could the tower be made to look more like a tree. 3) Garfield County Sheriff: No Comments 4) Bill White: In favor of facility and owns a unit at the Brettelberg Condominiums. 5) Christina Sawyer: In favor of facility and owns a unit at the Brettelberg Condominiums. C. SITE SUITABILITY ANALYSIS The Application meets the ULUR requirements and addresses key issues for the site as follows: (1) access is appropriate and well established; (2) there is no water demand associated with the use; (3) no geophysical hazards are identified for the site including slopes and flood plains; (4) no additional significant impacts on natural habitat will occur; and (5) no additional impacts on cultural resources are anticipated. D. IMPACT ANALYSIS Staff conducted a review of the project against Section 4-502(D) and determined that because the proposed 12' x 12' site is to be located on -surface / at grade in an existing parking lot, many of the standards in the Impact Analysis were found to be 'not applicable' to an already disturbed site. Similar to the Site Suitability Analysis, it was determined the proposed project would have no affect on site features, soil characteristics, geology / natural hazards, existing water supply, environmental attributes, wildlife, traffic, nuisance, nor required a reclamation plan. The Applicant did provide an address list of real property adjacent to the subject property, and the mailing address for each of the property owners. E. COMMUNICATION STANDARDS SECTION 7-823 1) Shared Facility: The Applicant has represented that consideration of future co -location on the subject tower would be considered so long as the antennae did not exceed the technical engineering specifications for what the monopole could safely handle. 2) New Towers / Facilities: The Applicant has examined other existing locations that already have communications facilities such as Sunlight Peak and Compass Mountain. For technical reasons elaborated by the Applicant in their letter dated February 3, 2012, those sites cannot provide the coverage without conflicted with other signals and will not have the desired effect of getting service to the base of the resort. 3 3) Structural & Engineering Standards: The Applicant will be submitting site specific engineering to the County Building and Planning Department that takes into account the elevation and weather related issues. 4) Interference: The Applicant shall comply with all FCC requirements and provisions to ensure no interference. 5) Health Standards: All health standards as required by the FCC shall be met. 6) Public Utility Structures: The Tower does not include any public utility elements. 7) Design / Materials / Color: The Applicant has agreed to paint the monopole a darker non -reflective color to better blend in with the surrounding area. 8) Landscaping & Screening: The Applicant has agreed to install chain-link fencing that can be screened with either dark green fabric (or other similar color) or typical slat -systems to ald in the screening of the base mechanical cabinet. 9) Lighting & Signage: Lighting of the tower is not required by the FAA. Contact information signage is proposed and appropriate. 10) Freestanding Transmission Tower / Telecommunications Equipment: The Applicant represents that It will meet all zoning requirements. All building and/or state electrical permits shall be required as applicable. 11) Modification / Demolition: Any future modifications to the facility shall be in accordance with the County regulations. 12) Maintenance: The Applicant has represented that maintenance will occur and all FAA and FCC regulations will be complied with. 13) Review: This standard requires there be a two year review by the Director of the Building and Planning Department. In this case, as the facility is proposed as a temporary facility, Staff suggests that the Applicant be approved for two years from the date of approval by the BOCC. The Applicant may request additional time from the BOCC In a public meeting so long as the Applicant is making a good faith effort to obtain a permanent location. 14) Abandonment: Compliance with ULUR abandonment provisions is required, 15) FAA Compliance: The Applicant has provided excellent documentation from the FAA which is a Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation which states the structure does not exceed obstruction standards and would not be a hazard to air 4 navigation...based an this review, marking and lighting are not necessary for aviation safety. V. SUGGESTED FINDINGS The following findings support action by the Board of County Commissioners to approve the Land Use Change Permit request for a Limited Impact Review for Ski Sunlight, Inc. 1. That proper public notice was provided as required for the hearing before the Board of County Commissioners, 2. That the hearing before the Board of County Commissioners was extensive and complete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted or could be submitted and that all interested parties were heard at that meeting. 3. That for the above stated and other reasons, the Land Use Change Permit for a Communication Facility is in the best interest of the health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County if recommended conditions of approval are required. 4. That the application can be in conformance with the applicable Sections of the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended, if recommended conditions of approval are required. VI. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL In support of a motion to approve the Land Use Change Permit request for a Communications Facility for Ski Sunlight, Inc, the following recommended conditions of approval are provided for the Board of County Commissioner's consideration. 1. That all representations made by the Applicant in the application, and at the public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners, shall be conditions of approval, unless specifically altered by the Board of County Commissioners; 2. The operation of this facility and any future amendments shall be done in accordance with all applicable Federal, State and Local regulations governing the operation of this type of facility including but not limited to the FAA and FCC. 3, The Applicant shall submit final engineering plans for the tower to the Garfield County Building and Planning Department prior to initiating construction. Construction and installation of the fence and communication cabinet shall be properly permitted with the Garfield County Building Department and meet all zoning and related requirements. 5 4. Prior to issuance of the Land Use Change Permit, the Applicant shall provide Staff with additional documentation or written confirmation from their telecommunications engineer that no further FCC notification is required. 5. The Applicant shall be approved for two years from the date of this approval by the BOCC. The Applicant may request additional time from the BOCC in a public meeting so long as the Applicant can demonstrate that It is making a good faith effort to obtain a permanent location. The Applicant shall paint / powder coat the monopole a darker non -reflective color to better blend in with the surrounding area, 7. The Applicant shall install a screening -system incorporated within the chain-link fencing such as either dark green fabric (or other similar color) or typical slat -systems to aid In the screening of the base of the monopole and mechanical cabinet. 8. The Applicant shall Install proper signage for any hazardous materials on the mechanical cabinet or fencing as applicable pursuant to the International Fire Code, 6 dePAR'tt° March 20, 2012 To: Fred Jarman, Garfield county Planning Department From: Ron Biggers, Deputy Fire Marshal, Glenwood Springs Fire Department Re: Limited impact review, file number LIPA 11-11-7060, project name Sunlight Mountain Resort Communication Facility, applicant Sunlight Mountain Resort, contact person Lowell Nelson, location 10901 CR 117, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Comments: The applicant shall provide Glenwood Springs Fire Department with MSDS sheets an all the hazardous materials and quantities that will be contained on the site and in the building. These sheets shall also be present in the building on the site. The doors to the building shall be signed in a viable location with hazardous identification signs as specified in NFPA 704 and Section 2703.5 in the 2009 edition of the international Fire Code (IFC). If the building will be enclosed by fencing this type of signage shall also be affixed to It in a visible location. The building and area surrounding it shall comply with all the sections that apply in Chapter 27, Hazardous Materials -General Provisions and Chapters 28-44, 2009 edition of the IFC. For Building Code compliance the applicant shall also reference all the Chapters and Sections of them In the International Building Code (IBC), 2009 edition that apply to the building and the hazards housed In it. 101 WEST 8TH STREET GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 970-384-6480 FAX 970-945-8506 REFERRAL RRAL FORM Garfield County Building and Planning Department 108 8°i Street, Suite 401, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970} 945-8212/Fax: (970} 384-3470 Sent: 03/05/2 kelurn Requested: EXHIBIT File NunlberlName(s) I Project Name(s) 1 Trpe of Aulication(s) LIPA 1 1-I 1-7060 Sunlight Mountain Resort- Communication Facilit Limited Impact Review Staff Planner: Fred Jarman, Email: fredjarman@garfield-county.com Phone: 970-945-1377 ext. 1580 Applicant: Sunlight Mountain Resort Phone: 970-945-7491 Contact Person: Lowell Nelson Phone: 303-660-2729 Location: 10901 County Road 1 f 7 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Summary of Request: Communication Facility IIOA The Garfield County Planning Department has received a land use request as referenced above. Your comments are an important part of the evaluation process. In order to review all appropriate agency comments and incor'por'ate thein into the Staff Report, we request your response by dasr AND date: Mondavi 03/19/2012 GARFIELD COUNTY Office or Division OTHER Ntrmlxr or [Mail Road & Bridge(DisIrict?) Engineering (company?) Attorney IIOA Housing- Geneva Powell Planning Commission Sherifrs Dept.- Jim Sears Zliag r ployd, )r Ojow6-, s' Board of County Commissioners Vegetation Manascr}%? Oil and Gas - Kirby Wynn 1I Pub is Environmental Health - Jim Rada COLORADO STATE LOCAtJFED GOVT ENTITIES Water Runtime / Starr' Eneineer Tmj,fl - f1WSi11msali/)rHrnuwH'dalckk' Geological Surrey (Fee) Count}^ - Fag lelh Icsall�ioBI ncofpitkin Department ofTrnnsportation Llureauofland Management Water Conservancy Board (Name) US Pores! Service Mined Land Reclamation Board IJ.S. Army Carps of Engureers Health Department CDPHE cratcrfair? Forest Service Wildlife Division GWS OR GJ Office DISTRIC"I'S/SER V IC ES — a - I1SWry - Public Service 1 ioiy Cross Eleetaic - - AT&T Schoo11)istrict- RE -I, RIi-2, 16 Fire District - GtiVS 'iII/RiI1efGV/Cdnie 1 Soil Conservation District (name) iVater/Sanitatson District (nanrc) RFTA WHITE' PROPERTIES, INC. February 27, 2012 County Commissioners Garfield County Plaza Building Suite 100 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601-3355 Re: Public Hearing Monday, April 2, 2012 at 1:15 PM Dear Sirs: EXHIBIT 9s Please accept this fetter as our vote in favor of the request by Ski Sunlight, Inc. for a Limited impact Review Permit for a Communications Facility in the upper parking lot at the base of Skl Sunlight. As owner of Unit A-9 of the Brettelberg Condominiums, this service would definitely be of benefit to us. Sincerely, Bill White, Owner Brettelberg Condo, Unit A-9 11101 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 621 5utejli tieyan/I1elslinc ■ N.O. Box 850172 ■ Alcsquite, Texts 75149 ■ (972) 288.4344 ■ I;ex (972) 288.4313 USDA United States frid Department of Agriculture Forest Service White River National Forest Supervisor's 0 900 Grand Ave Glenwood Spg (970)945.2521 FAX (970)945-3266 EXHIBIT File Code: 2380/2300 Date: March 22, 2012 Garfield County Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Dear Garfield County Commissioners and County Planning Department, We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the proposal for a cell phone facility to be located at the base of Ski Sunlight, We support Sunlight's desire to expand their visitor services to include the availability of cell phone coverage. We share with Sunlight the desire to make the visitor's experiences to the ski area and the surrounding national forest land as positive as possible. Through direct communications with Sunlight staff, we understand that the proposal before the planning department is to allow a one year test to see it is physically and financially feasible to provide cell coverage at Sunlight. We understand from your scoping letter and staff conversations that the current proposal includes the temporary location of a cell tower which is a 60 foot tall monopole with a 12' by 12' foot print to be located on the north side of the upper parking area and this test location was selected primarily due to the location of power and phone lines immediately adjacent to this site. While we have concerns with how this structure will affect the visual appearance of the valley and ski area, we do not have a strong objection to erecting this tower for a one year feasibility test. If the first year of testing is successful and a decision is made to move forward with developing a more permanent facility, we feel there are likely better options than the tower and location described in the proposal to lessen impacts on the scenery in the valley. Reasonable efforts should be made to limit the visibility of structures such as cell phone towers by locating them to blend with surroundings and to be minimally noticeable. Cell towers can be located and designed to blend and harmonize with the setting and minimizing visibility in a variety of ways. The proposed temporary cell tower will be very visible to everyone visiting the ski area and from the Four Mile Road. We have the following comments and recommendations that we ask you consider in you deliberations for the test and especially regarding any long term approvals for cell phone conununication facilities for Ski Sunlight: • Technology is available which would allow a shorter and less conspicuous tower of 20 feet or Tess to be located on top of the existing restaurant building. The bulk and structure of the building and surrounding trees would minimize any visual impact due to the addition of a small tower. Please consider this option. Caring for the Land and Serving People PIfrN M ReGyU d Paper • There are many other locations in the general vicinity which would likely provide good coverage, be Tess noticeable and minimize the visibility of the proposed cell tower. We recommend looking at other locations which would better blend into a backdrop of taller trees, geologic features, etc. • Choosing a color of the cell lower is another important consideration for minimizing the visibility of the tower. A darker color which is consistent with adjacent colors will reduce how easily the cell tower is seen. There are options available to reduce future maintenance costs. Cell towers with exteriors made of galvanized metal or other reflective surfaces can be treated or powder coated with a dark non -reflective color that blends with the surrounding area. For the surface, use of either double dipped zinc coated darkened galvanized or powder coating will reduce the visibility of the tower and eliminate painting maintenance on the ea tower surface. • Cell towers that look like trees exist in many locations in communities, along travel corridors and in the areas around highly developed recreation sites. I have enclosed photos showing what one of the "stealth tree" cell towers looks like installed at a ski resort. Please consider this option lithe size or location cannot be changed to otherwise minimize the visual impact. Maintaining the scenic values of the Resort, Forest and other wild land areas around the county is a mutual goal we all share. It is one of the main reasons people come here to work, play and live. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this proposal. Please contact Donna Graham at (970) 945-3263 if you have further questions. Six erely, ure 1�►IILLIAMS visor cc: Rich Doak, Donna L Graham, Tom Hays Sprint F Nextel Site Naraae: Keystone Repeater - Santiago Existing view to the North e Propose Sprint it Nextel Monopine Proposed Sprint ! Nextel Wood Pole with Panel Antennas ZuifMMa Consultants Inc. /This photo sinaarrrfion Is for iifarsinilive rain uses (ndv) Sprint /I4EXTEL Sprint/NEXTEL COMMNLINVCA1IONS 3/26/12 Dear Sir/Ma'am, Lorentson Mfg. Co., Inc. Designers & Builders ''Plastic Molds Tools & Dies Custom Molding 1 am writing on behalf of the Leonard E Lorentson family in regards to your Tetter of 2/22/12 regarding the construction ofa monopole communication facility in the upper parking lot at the base of Ski Sunlight. I, and my family, have been homeowners at the Breltelbitig for 30+ years; and majority stock -holders of Ski Sunlight for 15+ years. We spend a significant amount of dine at Sunlight. We are most definitely endorsing the construction of this monopole communication facility. To be able to have 24/7 cell phone service on the mountain would be fabulous!!! We are in favor of this! ill If you would like to discuss further, I can be reached e 765-452-4425, or email cr tinasawyer@lorenison.coin. Thank you & sincerely, ' (. 7L DY1 PP' Clu•istina Lorentson Sawyer QS 9000 & ISO 9002 Registered Company 1111 Rank Parkway • P.O. Box 932 • Kokomo, IN 46901 • Phone (765) 452-4425 • Fox (765) 452-7940 • lorentsonmrg@icpicst,nel EXHIBIT PIM Wit.. %mlllr 1r.i M r l� ■ \! QUICK DEPLOY CELL SITES The patented Lite -Site (US patent # 7,098,864) is a self contained wireless cell site. It is a modular system consisting of a base frame, fence, pole and antenna mounts.. The Lite -Site minimizes both visual impact and cost of a site. The Lite -Site uses a small diameter monopole to attach low wind area antennas which creates a site that has minimal visual impact and also minimal wind area. The small wind area creates loading on the pole which requires much less of a base foundation system. The Lite -Site base frame is similar to a non- penetrating roof mounted sled. The Lite -Site base frame is placed atop crushed gravel or similarly prepared area and filled with ballast. Ballast can be concrete block, ballast blocks, gabions or the base frame can be used as a form and poared concrete added for a permanent site. The base frame has built in adapters for a fence and access gate to be attached directly to the base. The base also has attachment points for the pole, electronic cabinets and grounding system. Lite -Site base frame, Tapered Steel Monopole and Lite -Site Fencing delivered to site location. A few hours later, the site is ready for electronics installation, 55' tall fiberglass monopole With (6) 5' panel antennas on 4' separation arms Northeast Pennsylvavia sr Poured concrete base frame Las Vegas area 30' tali steel pipe monopole With (3) close contact pipe mount On top of parking garage Southern California 30' painted pipe monopole With antenna shroud and microwave Wooden fenced compound area Denver area 70' (3) piece pipe monopole With (3) close contact antennas On parking arca above river Chicago area Temporary site with concrete Block ballast locally supplied San Francisco area Delivery to the site of Lite -Site base frame, monopole, antenna mounts, fencing and ballast blocks. Lite -Site base frame is assembled on a level compacted gravel Mase. Base plate assembly is installed in the base frame and ballast and fencing begins being installed. The monopole is normally assernbled in the horizontal position (in the rain) with antennas and coax cables installed before erection. The monopole can be raised by crane or lifting device. Ballast and fencing is completed and electronics begins to be installed. Fred Jarman From: Lowell Nelson [LoweflNelson1 awcc.com] Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 1:28 PM To: Fred Jarman Subject; RE: Picture Good afternoon Fred: See answers in RED Lowell Nelson Real Estate Specialist AWCC/Commnet Wireless 1562 N. Park Street Castle Rock, CO 80109 From: Fred Jarman [mallto:fjarmanCc garfield-countv.com) Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 1:11 PM To: Lowell Nelson Subject: RE: Picture Hi Lowell: Just a few questions as I write the Staff Report: EXHIBIT 1) How long do you intend for this monopole to be there? Our intention is to make this location (Sunlight Ski Resort) a permanent site, 2) Does it come "pre-engineered" to meet this elevation / Colorado concerns? We will provide site specific engineering documents before submitting for the building permit that will take into effect the elevation and Colorado weather. 3) Would you consider other "tenant's to co -locate on the same monopole? Yes — as long as the future antennas do not exceed what the tower will handle. 4) Would you be willing to paint this monopole to a non -reflective darker green color to blend in a bit? Yes 5) Would you be willing to install a green fabric or slats in the chain link fencing to screen" the cabinet? Yes 6) When do you intend to install? Upon final determination of exactly what equipment (panel antennas and microwave/satellite dishes) is determined. At that time, we will submit for building permit. 7) Are you going to pursue a permanent location later / in the same spot? We will work with the Garfield Planning Department, Sunlight Ski Resort and the National Forest Service on a permanent location. Of course, the final location has to meet our coverage objectives. Thanks, Fred From: Lowell Nelson [malito:LowellNelson@awcc.corni Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 9:35 AM To: Fred Jarman Subject: RE: Picture Good morning Fred: We will be installing a "Lite Site" at Sunlight — please see attached description/photos. Please understand that the photos are generic and will be changed to meet your county requirements. Thanks osa„ 1 3 bun 4e uoi eoo ap 10 paso * ©.ld s;auwwo - Im5,38 .1.1.4 :Huns 1e uo!leoalx715 IIa pasodoJ,d 5 auwi.ua , COMMNET WIRELESS, LLC EXHIBIT 1 NEPA COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST PROPOSED 60 -FT MONOPOLE COMMUNICATIONS TOWER SITE NAME: SUNLIGHT MOUNTAIN 10901 COUNTY ROAD 117 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO (GARFIELD COUNTY) LATITUDE: N 390 23' 59.57" ± LONGITUDE: W 107° 20' 14.78" t DATE INSPECTED: MAY 14, 2014 DATE NEPA ISSUED: JULY 22, 2014 COMPLETED BY: George T. Swearingen, III Of 'TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS Project Site Specific NEPA Compliance Checklist Commnet Wireless, LLC Sunlight Mountain July 22, 2014 iii Lel �'Itl TOWER ENGINEERINRING PROFESSIONALS Ms. Alexis Leidigh Commnet Wireless, LLC 1001 Technology Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 Re: NEPA Checklist Commnet Wireless, LLC Sunlight Mountain 10901 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 (Garfield County) Dear Ms. Leidigh: Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (TEP) completed a FCC Compliance NEPA Checklist (NEPA) for the proposed 60 -ft AGL Monopole Communications Tower (65 -ft with appurtenances) for the site designated as Sunlight Mountain, and is pleased to submit the findings to Commnet Wireless, LLC. The proposed site is located on a parcel of real estate in Garfield County, CO. The parent property and the adjoining properties were primarily occupied by undeveloped forested and recreational land uses at the time of the site inspection. The NEPA Checklist research conducted by TEP indicates that the site is not: located in an officially designated wilderness area; located in an officially designated wildlife preserve; located in a floodplain; located in a residential zoned area and required to be equipped with high intensity white lights; and will not: affect threatened or endangered species or their designated critical habitats; affect districts, sites, buildings, structures or objects listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places; affect Indian religious sites; or involve significant changes to surface features. TEP, with the assistance of PaleoWest Archaeology conducted the Section 106 of the NHPA portion of the NEPA checklist. and the Native American consultation. TEP filed the proposed Sunlight Mountain site with the FCC Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) on 4130/14 and was assigned TCNS Identification Number 110419. TEP has received correspondence from. or referred to the FCC, all of the applicable tribes with known ancestral and/or aboriginal rights to Garfield County, CO as per FCC TCNS. The results of the NEPA Checklist conducted by TEP conclude that no further investigation (i.e. NEPA Environmental Assessment) is warranted or recommended for the Sunlight Mountain site. This NEPA Checklist is limited to the location of the proposed 60 -ft AGL monopole communications tower (65 -ft with appurtenances) and associated 10-fi x l0 -ft tower compound lease area and approximately 37 -ft long utility route as depicted on the "A-2 Project Site Plan," dated 11/1/11, which was provided to Commnet Wireless by TEP. Any future or additional access and/or utility easements not depicted on the aforementioned site sketch were not assessed as part of this NEPA Checklist and are not warranted with this document. Sincer9Jy 7 Tower Engineering Prog essionals, Inc. George T. Swearingen, III Environmental Manager 3703 Junction Boulevard, Raleigh, NC 27603-5263 0) 919.661.6351 F) 919.661.6350 gsIvearinien4 teggroup.net 1 FCC NEPA COMPLIANCE AUDIT CHECKLIST j1 ill' COMMNET WIRELESS, LLC SUNLIGHT MOUNTAIN SITE ",\1 PROPOSED 60-FT MONOPOLE TOWER 10901 COUNTY ROAD 117 N, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 ►�� T ° w R GARFIELD COUNTY VIIENGINEERING PRD FESSI O NALS 1. Ls the proposed facility located in an officially designated wilderness area? 2. Is the proposed facility located in an officially designated wildlife preserve? 3. Will the proposed facility likely adversely affect threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitats; or likely jeopardize the continued existence of any proposed endangered or threatened species; or likely result in the destruction or adverse modification of proposed critical habitats (as determined by the Endangered Species Act or 1973)? 4. Will the proposed facility affect districts, sites, buildings, structures or objects significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture, that are listed (or eligible for listing) in the National Register of Historic Places? 5. Will the proposed facility affect Indian religious sites? 6. Is the proposed facility located in a floodplain? 7. Will construction of the proposed facility involve significant change in surface features (e.g., wetland fill, deforestation or water diversion)? 8. Is the proposed facility located in a residential neighborhood and is required to be equipped with high intensity white lights (as defined by local zoning law)? No No No No No No If any of the above questions result in an answer of "yes", then construction may not start on any of these sites prior to receipt of a finding of no significant impact by FCC. RF Exposure Screening Under NEPA 9A. Will the proposed NON -ROOFTOP facility equal or exceed total power (of all channels) of 2000 watts ERP (3280 Watts EIRP) and have antennas located less than 10 meters above ground level? 9B. Will the proposed ROOFTOP facility equal or exceed total power (of all channels) of 2000 watts. ERP (3280 Watts EIRP)? NIA IF "yes" is the answer to either of the two RF exposure questions, an evaluation must he performed to determine if Commnet Wireless exceeds the FCC's exposure limits. TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS, INC. Print Name: George T. Swearingen, III Date: July 22, 2014 Signature: The following provides additional information concerning each item on the checklist. Designated Wilderness Areas - Based on a review of the National Wilderness Institute Map of Wilderness Areas, Wild & Scenic Rivers, National Natural Landmarks and UN Biosphere Reserves, dated 1995, and the Wildemess.net - U.S. National Wilderness Preservation System Map, the proposed tower site is not located within an officially designated wilderness area. 2. Designated Wildlife Preserves - Based on a review of the US Fish and Wildlife Service: National Wildlife Refuge System Map, dated September 30, 2004, the proposed tower site is not located within an officially designated wildlife preserve. 3A. Listed Threatened or Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitats - Based on a review of the listed threatened and endangered species within Garfield County, Colorado, as obtained from the USFWS - Official Species List, Consultation Tracking Number: 06E24100 -2014 -SLI -0134, dated 5/27/14, correspondence with the USFWS -Colorado Ecological Services Field Office, and an on-site investigation, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed collocation will have "no effect" on federally listed threatened or endangered species or their designated critical habitats. According to the USFWS Critical Habitat Mapper, there are no critical habitats depicted in the vicinity of the proposed tower. The on-site investigation conducted by TEP personnel on 4/1/14 concluded that the proposed collocation will not affect suitable/preferred habitat for any federally listed threatened and endangered species within Garfield County, CO. Additionally, the USFWS response dated 6/27/14 stated "you have made a no effect' determination for other species potentially impacted by the project, therefore, consultation is not required or those species." Therefore, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed facility will have "no effect" on federally listed threatened or endangered species or their critical habitats. 3B. Proposed Threatened or Endangered Species or Proposed Critical Habitats - Based on a review of the listed threatened and endangered species within Garfield. County, Colorado, as obtained from the USFWS - Official Species List, Consultation Tracking Number: 06E241.00 -2014 -SLI -0134, dated 5/27/14, the North American wolverine and the yellow -billed cuckoo are the only proposed species that could be affected by the proposed facility. During the on-site investigation on 5/14/13, no indications of preferred or suitable habitat or species occurrences were observed in the vicinity of the project area. Additionally, the USFWS response dated 6/27/14 stated that "the Service concurs with your not likely to jeopardize' determinations for the proposed North American wolverine (Gulo gulp Iuscu.$) and the proposed yellow - billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus).- Therefore, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed collocation will not likely jeopardize the continued existence of any proposed threatened or endangered species or their proposed critical habitats. 4. Historical Places - Based on the results of our coordination with History Colorado - Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (CO-SHPO), the proposed tower will have "no effect" on properties listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places within the FCC designated 0.5 -mile radius area of potential effect (APE). TEP also provided written correspondence to the Garfield County Community Development Department, Glenwood Springs Historic Preservation Commission (CLG), and the Frontier Historical Museum & Historical Society on 6/3/13. No responses have been received to date. 5. Indian Religious Sites - Based upon a review of available information obtained from, the Bureau of Indian Affairs -Indian Reservations in the Continental United States, dated 5/96, and the responses to the FCC - Tower Construction Notification ID #110419, filed 4/30/14, no known Indian religious sites will be affected by the proposed tower site. 6. Floodplains — Based on a review of the floodplain map of the area, FIRM Index No. 0802051NDOA, dated 8/2/2006 of Garfield County, CO, the proposed communications tower site is located on an unprinted panel designated as being located within Zone D, areas of undetermined, but possible, flood hazards. According to the USGS 7.5 -Minute Cattle Creek, CO topographic quadrangle, the proposed tower site is located approximately 330 -ft south and 90 -ft up -gradient of the nearest mapped surface water feature (Fourmile Creek). Therefore, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed facility is not located within a 100 -yr floodplain. 7. Surface Features — Bused on our on-site investigation and a review of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory map of the area and the USGS 7.5 -minute Cattle Creek, CO topographic quadrangle, the proposed tower is not anticipated to result in a significant change or modification to surface features such as fill in jurisdictional wetlands, deforestation, or water diversion. 8. Zoning/High Intensity White Lights — The proposed tower will be 60 -ft AGL (65 -ft with appurtenances) and the use of high intensity white lights should not be necessary. According to FAA Aeronautical Study No. (ASN) 2011-ANM-2940-OE, the proposed tower has been determined to be of no hazard to air navigation and marking & lighting are not necessary for aviation safety. Therefore, the proposed tower is anticipated to be an unlit structure. 9A. Radio Frequency Emissions — Based on the specified elevation of the proposed antennas (>10 meters) and because the site will be located within a restricted area, no further study concerning radio frequency emissions is required. ►r� r�r \1 `" TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS ATTACHMENT 1 OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED WILDERNESS AREAS U.S. National Wilderness Preservation System Map Map Legend Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Bureau of Land Management r IOr l- wilderress Fish Fs Wildlife Service Wilderness Fish & Wildlife Service riCll•Wilderress Forest Service Wilderness Forest Service 1(011 -Wilderness II National Park Service Wilderness I1at-onal Park Service r1011•'.Vilderness H Ma;or Roads E Fern; Routes (AKi it lei vq, %N,EE ENGINEEFlINO PRRFESSIONAL5 ATTACHMENT 2 OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED WILDLIFE PRESERVES 0.vn 1.OFRCF. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service — National Wildlife Refuges in Colorado Map http://www.fws.gpry/mountain-prairie/refuges/co/ Browns Park NationalWildlife Refuge aMI Grand Ju,i cdon Arapaho Notional I Wildlife Refuge Pon Collins . Rocky Flats National wldlif* Rdfuge Propoeed) Boulder ■ Monte Vista National Wildlife Refuge Two Ponds National Wild{$, Reiuga Rocky INeuntaln Arsenal ' National WIldlife•Rokage Alemoaa National Wildlife Rofuge Of Styli% •Croloreo Springs PurNo iY Walantr.ro yPROr' r© ER GINEERiNG ESSIONALS ATTACHMENT 3 LISTED/PROPOSED THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Ecological Services 445 West Gunnison Ave, Suite 240 Grand Junction, Colorado 81501-57l 1 IN REPLY REFER TO ES/CO: FCC TAILS 06E24100-2014-1-0147 June 27, 2014 Ryan Malek Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. 5545 West 56 Avenue — Unit E Arvada, Colorado 80002 Dear Mr. Malek, The US Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed your June 4, 2014, letter regarding installation of a communication tower. The tower is proposed to be installed in a gravel parking lot at Sunlight Ski Resort south of Glenwood Springs in T7S, RS9W, NE1/4, SW 114 s.33, Garfield County, Colorado. The tower is proposed to be 60 feet tall, will not have guy wires, and will not have lights. The Service concurs with your "not likely to jeopardize" determinations for the proposed North American wolverine (Gulo Gulo luscus) and the proposed yellow -billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus). You have made a "no effect" determination for other species potentially impacted by the project, therefore, consultation is not required for those species. Due to the height of the tower, lack of guy wires, and lack of lights we agree that impacts to migratory birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act should be minimized. Additionally, due to lack of large stature trees in the area we agree that nesting or roosting is unlikely and no direct impact to bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) or golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act will occur. If the Service can be of further assistance, please contact Terry Ireland at the letterhead address or (970) 628-7188. Sincerely. TIrcland: FCCComrnTowerSunlightSkiRcscnCL.d0cx:062714:KM r Tohnna Roy Acting Western Colorado Supervisor COMMUNICATIONS TOWER SITE EVALUATION FORM 1. Location (Provide maps if possible): 10901 County Road 117, Glenwood Springs, CO, 81601 State: CO County: Garfield Latitude/Longitude/GPS Grid: N 390 23' 59.57" W 107° 20' 14.78" City and Highway Direction (2 miles W on Hwy 20, etc.): From Grand Junction, CO: Take I-70 E for approximately 77.6 -miles, take exit 114 toward W Glenwood, at the traffic circle take the second exit onto Midland Ave and continue onto Midland Ave for approximately 5 -miles before taking slight right onto 4 Mile Road/County Road 117 and continue for ap rroximatel 9.3 -miles until reaching the Sunlight Mountain Resort and the site. The proposed 60 -ft AGL monopole communications tower will be located at 10901 County Road 117, along the northeastern portion of a gravel _parking lot associated with the Sunli • ht Mountain Ski Resort south-southwest of the Cit of Glenwood S .rin s in southeastern Garfield County, Colorado The proposed tower site is located within the is located within the NE1/4-SW1/4 of Sec. 33, T7S, R89W., Sixth Colorado P.M. 2. Elevation above mean sea level: 8,127 -ft AMSL 3. Will the equipment be co -located on an existing FCC licensed tower or other existing structure (building, water tank, etc)? YIN NO If yes, type of structure: 4. If yes, will the compound be expanded: N/A If yes, will the tower be extended: N/A 5. If No, provide proposed specifications for the new tower: Height: 60 -ft AGL Construction Type (lattice, monopole, etc.): Monopole Guyed -Wire? NO No. Bands: NIA Total No. Wires:N/A Lightning (Security and Aviation): Tower anticipated to be unlit 6. Area of tower footprint in acres or square feet: The proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound lease area will occupy 100-ft2 (0.002 -acres). 7. Length and width of access road in feet: Access to the site is provided by an existing gravel drive. The proposed utility route will be approximately 5 -ft wide x 37 -ft long 8. General description of terrain (mountains, rolling hills, flat, flat to undulating, etc.). Photographs of the site and surrounding area are beneficial: Mountainous, along northern side of Sunlight Ski Mtn and primarily sloping to the northeast. 9. Meteorological conditions (incidence of fog, low ceilings, rain, etc.): May 14, 2014, Sunny, —34 degrees Fahrenheit. Soil Type(s): According to the report provided to TEP by Environmental Data Resources, the soil within the Iro.osed action area consists of Cocheto+a cla loam. A t .ical profile of Chocheto'a cla loam conisists of cla loam cla ston cla and stontsandy clay and occurs on mountain slopes, hills, and valley sides, Chochetopa soils are well drained and formed from in colluvium and alluvium derived mainly from basalt and rhyolitic tuff. 10. Habitat types and land use on and adjacent to the site: Habitat Type: Acreage: Percentage of Total: Commercial/Recreational —110 -acres 60% Undeveloped Forested —73 -acres 40°io Adjacent land use: Undeveloped forested associated with the White River National Forest 11 Dominant vegetative species in each habitat type: Proposed action area was primarily occupied by a gravel parking lot associated with the Sunlight Mountain Resort and an existing temporary tower. 12. Average diameter breast height of dominant tree species in forested areas: Tree species: NIA 13. Will construction at this site cause fragmentation of a larger block of habitat into two or more smaller blocks? YIN NO If yes, describe: 14. Is evidence of bird roosts or rookeries present? YIN NO If yes, describe: None in immediate vicinity of proposed action area. 15. Distance to nearest wetland area (forested swamp, marsh, riparian, marine, etc.), and coastline, if applicable: According to the USFWS NWI Map, a freshwater emergent wetland is located approximately 1.75 -miles west of the proposed action area. 16. Distance to nearest telecommunications tower: According to the FCC Antenna Structure Registration search, the nearest tower is located -2.12-miles northwest of the proposed action area. 17. Potential for co -location of antennas on existing towers or other structures: Unknown anticipated that collocation would not provide suitable RF coverage to desired area. 18. Have measures been incorporated for minimizing impacts to migratory birds? Y1N YES If yes, describe: Tower is less than 100 -ft AGI_., does not involve the use of guyed wires., and is anticipated to be an unlit structure. 19. Ras an evaluation been made to determine if the proposed facility may affect listed or proposed endangered or threatened species or their habitats as required by FCC regulations at 47 CFR 1.1347(a)(3)? YIN YES If yes, present findings: It is the opinion of TEP that the proposed action will have no effect on the listed threatened and endangered species within Garfield County. CO. United States Department of the interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Western Colorado Ecological Services Field Office 764 HORIZON DRIVE, BUILDING B GRAND IUNCTION, CO 81506 PHONE: (970)243-2778 FAX: (970)245-6933 URL: www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/estCoIoradol; www. fws.gov/platteriver/ Consultation Tracking Number: 06E24100 -2014 -SLI -0134 Project Name: Sunglight Mnt Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location, and/or may be affected by your proposed project. May 27, 2014 To Whom It May Concern: The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements ofthe U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the EGOS-1PaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list, The purpose ofthe Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or designated critical habitat. A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological. evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12. If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: http://vvww.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF Please be aware that bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.G. 668 et seq.), and projects affecting these species may require development of an eagle conservation plan (http://www.fws.gov/windenergy/eagle guidance.html). Additionally, wind energy projects should follow the wind energy guidelines(http://www.fws.gov/windenergyf) for minimizing impacts to migratory birds and bats. Guidance for minimizing impacts to migratory birds for projects including communications towers (e.g., cellular, digital television, radio, and emergency broadcast) can be found at: http://www.fws.gov/m igratorybi rds/C urrentB irdI ssues/Hazards/towers/towers.htm ; http://www.towerkill.com; and http://www.fws.gov/m igratorybirds/CurrentB ird I ssues/Hazards/towers/comtow.htm 1. We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Tracking Number in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office. Attachment 2 United States Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Project name: Sungl ight Mnt Official Species List Provided by: Western Colorado Ecological Services Field Office 764 HORIZON DRIVE, BUILDING B GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 (970) 243-2778 http://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairietesICoIorado/ http://www.fws.goviplatteriver/ Consultation Tracking Number: 06E24100 -2014 -SLI -0134 Project Type: Communications Tower Project Description: The proposed 60 -ft monopole will be located at 10903 County Road 117 within a portion of a gravel parking lot associated with Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort in Garfield County, Colorado. The total action area is anticipated to occupy —0.022 -acres total. http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 05/27/2014 12:13 PM 1 United States Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Project name: Sunglight Mnt Project Location Map: Project Coordinates: MULTIPOLYGON (((-1073373679 39.3998021, -107.3374194 39.3998461, -107.3374462 39.3998233, -107.3375127 39.3998705, -107.3374565 39.3999204, - 107.3373834 39.399867, -107.3374033 39.3998546, -107.3373439 39.3998086, -1073373679 39.3998021))) Project Counties: Garfield, CO http:I/ecos.fws.gov/ipac, 05/27/2014 12:13 PM 2 United States Department of interior Fish and Wildlife Service Project name: Sunglight Mnt Endangered Species Act Species List There are a total of 11 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on your species list. Species an this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. Critical habitats listed on the Has Critical Habitat lines may or may not lie within your project area. See the Critical habitats within your project area section further below for critical habitat that lies within your project. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. Bonytail chub (Gila elegans) Population: Entire Listing Status: Endangered Has Critical Habitat: Final designated Canada Lynx (Lynx canadensis) Population: (Contiguous U.S. DPS) Listing Status: Threatened Has Critical Habitat: Final designated, Proposed Colorado pikeminnow (Ptvchacheilus luaus) Population: except Salt and Verde R. drainages, AZ Listing Status: Endangered Has Critical Habitat: Final designated Greater sage -grouse (Cenlrocercus urophasianus) Population: entire Listing Status: Candidate Greenback Cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki stamias) Population: Entire Listing Status: Threatened Humpback chub (Gila cypha) Population: Entire http:/lecos.fws.gov/ipac, 05/27/2014 12:13 PM 3 United States Department of interior Fish and Wildlife Service Project name: Sunglight Mnt Listing Status: Endangered Has Critical Habitat: Final designated Mexican Spotted owl (Strix occidentalis lucida) Population: Entire Listing Status: Threatened Has Critical Habitat: Final designated North American wolverine (Culp gulo luscus) Listing Status: Proposed Threatened Razorback sucker (Xvrauchen texanus) Population: Entire Listing Status: Endangered Has Critical Habitat: Final designated Ute ladies" -tresses (Spiranthes diluvialir) Listing Status: Threatened Yellow -Billed Cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus) Population: Western U.S. DPS Listing Status: Proposed Threatened http:Jlecos.fws.gov/ipac, 0512712014 12:13 PM 4 United States Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Project name: Sunglight Mnt Critical habitats that lie within your project area There are no critical habitats within your project area. http:f/ecos.fws.govlipac, 0512712014 12:13 PM 5 AV int ►ll T D W E R iik,N111e- EN4INEERIN6 PROFESSIONALS June 4, 2014 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Western Colorado Ecological Services Field Office 445 West Gunnison Avenue, Suite 240 Grand Junction, CO 81501-5711 Attn: Ms. Patty Gelatt Re: Categorical Exclusion for the construction of a proposed 60 -ft monopole communications tower, Garfield County, CO Conunnet Wireless, LLC Site: Sunlight Mountain Dear Ms. Gelatt, Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. has been contracted by Comment Wireless, LLC to provide environmental services for the aforementioned proposed telecommunications facility. TEP personnel's investigation of the site has determined that the site will have no effect on federally listed and proposed threatened and endangered species and their listed/proposed critical habitats. Concurrence from the Service for "no effect" determinations is not required under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act; however, we are submitting the following information for your review and comments regarding impacts to protected species for the purpose of completing an FCC NEPA Environmental Compliance Checklist for the following telecommunications tower. The intent of the checklist is to establish the basis for a Categorical Exclusion for the proposed tower. Although candidate species are not offered the same protection under the Endangered Species Act as listed threatened or endangered species, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service recommends that impacts to proposed and candidate species be addressed within the consultations. The USFWS Official Species list has indicated the potential presence of two (2) proposed threatened species (North American wolverine & yellow -billed cuckoo) and one (1) candidate species (greater sage -grouse). Correspondence was also sent to Colorado Parks & Wildlife and the White River National Forest. The characteristics of the site and the vicinity are described as follows:. Sunlight Mountain Site Location and Specifics: The proposed 60 -ft AGL monopole communications tower will be located at 10901 County Road 117, along the northeastern portion of a gravel parking lot associated with the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort, south-southwest of the City of Glenwood Springs in southeastern Garfield County, Colorado The proposed tower site is located within the is located within the NE1/4-SW1/4 of Sec. 33, T7S, R89W, Sixth Colorado P.M., and on an approximately 183 -acre parcel identified as Parcel # 239533300051 by the Garfield County Tax Assessor's Office. The site elevation is approximately 8,127 -ft AMSL. Access to the proposed site will be provided by an existing gravel drive which spans southeast from a portion of County Road 117 for approximately 0.24 -miles until reaching the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound lease area. The proposed utility route will span northwest from an existing wooden utility pole for approximately 37 -ft before reaching the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound area. The proposed tower compound lease area will occupy 100-ft2 (-0.002-acres) and the proposed utility easements are 5545 W. 56 Avenue — Unit E, Arvada, CO 80002 O) 303.566-9914 F) 919.566.9916 rmalek@tepgroup.net TOWER ENC NEERIN3 PROFESSIONALS anticipated to occupy approximately 740 -ft' (-0.02-acres) and are herein referred to as the proposed action area. The proposed tower is anticipated to be an unlit structure. At the time of inspection on May t4, 2014, the area in the vicinity of the proposed action area was primarily occupied by an existing 10 -ft x 10 -ft "lite site" monopole tower facility located within a portion of a gravel parking lot associated with the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort, within the exterior boundaries of the White River National Forest. The existing "lite site" monopole tower facility was previously utilized as a temporary facility and is now intended to become a permanent facility, thereby triggering NEPA. The surrounding undeveloped forested areas within the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort and White River National Forest consisted of Douglas -fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), blue spruce (Picea pungens), aspen (Populus tremuloides), and ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa). The site inspection consisted of a pedestrian inspection of the proposed action area and vicinity for indications of preferred habitat and occurrences of listed species, as described by USFWS profiles. According to the USGS 7.5 -Minute Cattle Creek, CO topographic quadrangle, a portion of an intermittent stream identified as Fourmile Creek is located approximately 400 -ft northeast of the proposed action area. The approximate coordinates of the tower location are as follows: Latitude: 390 23' 59.57" (NAD 83) Longitude: 107° 20' 14.78" (NAD 83) Action Area Description and Effects: The proposed action area is anticipated to include the 37 -ft long utility route and the proposed 10 -ft x 10_ ft tower compound lease area. According to the report provided to TEP by Environmental Data Resources, the soil within the proposed action area consists of Cochetopa clay loam. A typical profile of Chochetopa clay loam conisists of clay loam, clay, stony clay, and stony sandy clay and occurs on mountain slopes, hills, and valley sides. Chochetopa soils are well drained and formed from in colluvium and alluvium derived mainly from basalt and rhyolitic tuff. Review of the USFWS — Official Species List for the project (Consultation Tracking # 06E24000 -2014 - SLI -0134) indicated the possible presence of three (3) listed threatened or endangered terrestrial species: Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis), Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidentalis lucida), and the Ute ladies' - tresses (Spiranthes diluvialis), two (2) proposed threatened species: North American wolverine (Gulp gulo luscus) and yellow -billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus), and one (1) candidate species: greater sage -grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). The site inspection performed on May 14, 2014 consisted of a pedestrian inspection of the proposed action area and immediate vicinity for indications of the presence of federally listed species and/or their critical habitats and preferred/suitable habitat, as described by the USFWS, Colorado Parks & Wildlife, NatureServe Explorer, and Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS), when available. Additionally, due to the nature of the project, the proposed action is not anticipated to have the potential to affect any of the listed aquatic species in Garfield County, CO (bonytail chub, Colorado pikeminnow, greenback cutthroat trout, humpback chub, and the razorback sucker). Further, according to the USFWS Critical Habitat Portal, the proposed action area is not located on, or in the vicinity of a designated critical habitat. 5545 W. 56 Avenue — Unit E, Arvada, CO 80002 0) 303.566-9914 F) 919.566.9916 rmatek@tepgroup.net ►r R TOWER 1 ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS Canada Lynx: The Canada lynx is listed as a threatened species in Garfield County. According to the USFWS Species Profile, the habitat of the Canada lynx is within moist, cool, boreal spruce -fir forests that provide one or more of the beneficial habitat elements for the lynx including snowshoe hares for prey, abundant, large, woody debris piles that are used as dens, and winter snow conditions that are generally deep and fluffy for extended periods of time. Disturbances that create early successional stages within forest stands such as fire, insect infestations, and timber harvest, create forage and cover for snowshoe hares which are the main diet of the Canada lynx. Individual lynx maintain large home ranges generally between 12 to 83 square miles. The size of lynx home ranges varies depending on abundance of prey, the animal's gender and age, season. and the density of lynx populations. According to the Colorado Parks & Wildlife 'White River National Forest Lynx Locations Map' there are no known lynx locations within the vicinity of the proposed action area or the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort. Although the lynx make long distance exploratory movements outside their home ranges, the proximity to existing human disturbances associated with the existing tower, the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort, and County Road 117 present conditions that make it unlikely for the consistent use and habitation of the area by the Canada lynx. Additionally, the proposed action area is relatively small and utilizes and existing access drive and gravel parking lot. Therefore, due to the lack of suitable/preferred habitat, existing human disturbances, and the minimal scale of the proposed action area, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed action will have no effect on the Canada lynx. Mexican Spotted Owl: The Mexican spotted owl is listed as a threatened species in Garfield County. According to the USFWS Species Profile, the species resides in old-growth or mature forests that possess complex structural components as well as canyons with riparian or conifer communities and mixed conifer, Madrean pine -oak, Arizona cypress, encinal oak woodlands, and associated riparian forests. Actions that open up or remove mature or old-growth forests (logging, wildfire, road or site construction that results in fragmentation of the forest) are detrimental to the local owl population. Human activity in or near nesting, roosting, or foraging sites may result in abandonment of an area, and indirectly may affect habitat parameters from trampling, vegetation removal, or increased fire risk. Therefore, due to the proximity to existing human disturbances in the vicinity of the proposed action area (the existing tower, the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort, and County Road 117), the minimal amount of disturbance associated with the proposed action, and the lack of riparian or old-growth forested areas that could be potentially impacted by construction, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed action will have no effect on the Mexican spotted owl. Ute ladies' -tresses: The Ute ladies' -tresses is listed as a threatened species in Garfield County. According to the USFWS species profile, the species typically blooms from late July through August and is endemic to moist soils near wetland meadows, springs, lakes, floodplains, and perennial streams where it colonizes early successional point bars or sandy edges. The proposed action area is not located on, or in the vicinity of moist soils associated with wetland meadows, springs, lakes or perennial streams. According to the USFWS Rangewide Status Review of Ute ladies' -tresses, there are no known distributions of the species located within Garfield County, CO. Therefore, due to the absence of preferredlsuitable habitat within the proposed action area, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed action will have no effect on the Ute ladies' -tresses. North American wolverine: The North American wolverine is a proposed threatened species in Garfield County. According to the USFWS species profile webpage, the North American wolverine inhabits habitats with near arctic conditions that maintain deep snow into spring and cool temperatures throughout 5545 W. 56 Avenue — Unit E, Arvada, CO 80002 O) 303.566-9914 F) 919.566.9916 rmalek@tepgroup.net TOWER ENGINEERING r PROFESSIONALS summer. According to the Western Regional Climate Center website Glennwood Springs, CO receives approximately 60.2 -inches of snow annually and the annual average annual max temperature is 62.9°F. According to the U.S. Forest Service species information, the wolverine prefers mature forests dominated by Subalpine Fir and Douglas Fir, which are found in elevations of approximately 8,800 -ft or higher. Additionally, the North American wolverine prefers large isolated tracks of wilderness that support diverse prey. Although the elevation of the proposed action area is below the species' preferred habitat, the wolverine could potentially use the area to forage or travel between more preferred habitats; however, the proximity to existing human disturbances associated with the existing tower, the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort, and County Road 117 present conditions that make it unlikely for the consistent use and habitation of the area by the wolverine. Additionally, the proposed action area is relatively small and utilizes and existing access drive and gravel parking lot. Therefore, due to the lack of suitable/preferred habitat, existing human disturbances, and the minimal scale of the proposed action area, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed action will not likely jeopardize the continued eadstence of the North American wolverine. Yellow -Billed Cuckoo: The yellow billed cuckoo is a proposed threatened species in Garfield County. According to the USFWS, the species breeds in dense willow and cottonwood stands in river floodplains and utilizes a cottonwood overstory for foraging. The greatest reported threat to the species is loss of large, woody riparian habitat. The proposed action is not anticipated to involve the loss or degradation of large, woody riparian habitat and will not impact dense willow or cottonwood stands near floodplains. Therefore, based on the absence of preferred/suitable habitat, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed action will will not likely jeopardize the continued existence of on the yellow billed cuckoo. Greater sage -grouse: The greater sage -grouse is as a candidate species in Garfield County. According to the species information provided by the USFWS and the Colorado Parks & Wildlife, sage -grouse inhabits large tracts of sagebrush. The largest populations of the species found in Colorado are located in Jackson, Moffat, Rio Blanco, and Routt Counties. The area in the vicinity of the action area primarily consisted of a gravel parking lot with no significant continuous tracts of sagebrush. Although the proposed tower could introduce potential raptor vantage points to the area, the lack of quality habitat, the presence of existing potential raptor vantage points (existing tower, power poles, ski lifts, and other structures associated with the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort) and existing human disturbances present conditions that make it unlikely for the consistent use and habitation of the area near the proposed action area. Further, according to the Colorado Parks & Wildlife `Greater Sage -grouse Priority Map', linkages, preliminary priority habitat areas, and preliminary general habitat areas for the greater sage -grouse are identified as being limited to the northwestern portion of Garfield County. Therefore, due to the absence of preferred/suitable habitat and the extent of existing human disturbances, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed action will have no effect on the greater sage -grouse. Minimizing Impacts to Migratory Birds protected under the MBTA: The following siting and construction details were implemented in an attempt to comply with the recommendations of the Memorandum of Understanding, directed by the President of the U.S. under the Executive Order 13186, for minimizing impacts to migratory birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the USFWS Interim Guidelines for Recommendations on Communications Tower Siting, Construction, Operation, and Decommissioning. Due to the distance from existing FCC licensed communications towers, collocation is not anticipated to be a feasible option to provide suitable RF coverage to the desired area. The proposed tower is less than 100 -ft AGL, does not require the use of guy 5545 W. 56 Avenue — Unit. E, Arvada, CO 80002 0) 303.566-9914 F) 919.566.9916 rmalek@tepgroup.net T O W E R ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS wires for support, and is anticipated to be an unlit structure, minimizing impacts to night -migrating birds. Further due to the lack of available information to suggest so, the proposed telecommunications tower does not appear to be located within a major diurnal migratory bird movement route or stopover site or raptor/waterbird concentrated area. Additionally, with regards to the Bald Eagle & Golden Eagle Protection Act, no active or abandoned nests were observed in the vicinity of the proposed action area at the time of inspection and there did not appear to be any large suitable nesting trees in the immediate vicinity that would be removed or adversely modified by the proposed action. Therefore, no direct impacts to Bald/Golden Eagles, nests, or eggs are anticipated as part of the proposed action. We have enclosed a portion of the pertinent USGS Cattle Creek, CO 7.5 -Minute topographic quadrangle, site plans, and site photographs. We request your concurrence and any comments regarding our determination that the proposed action will have no effect on the Canada lynx, Mexican spotted owl, and Ute ladies' -tresses and will not likely jeopardize the continued existence of the North American wolverine or yellow -billed cuckoo. While, concurrence from the Service for "no effect" determinations is not required under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act we are submitting the following information for your review and comments regarding impacts to protected species for the purpose of completing an FCC NEPA Environmental Compliance Checklist for the aforementioned telecommunications tower. Please provide any comments within 30 days of receipt of this letter. If there are any questions or if further information is needed for the processing of this request please don't hesitate to call. Thank you for your cooperation and your assistance. Sincerely, otn_ I 4, Td r Enginef ng Professionals, Inc. Rya A. Malek Environmental Scientist 5545 W. 56 Avenue — Unit E, Arvada, CO 80002 0) 303.566-9914 F) 919.566.9916 rmalek tepgroup.net ail ►\',t E 1/4 EiJL41NI"ERING E PRQFES5PDNA T ❑4'I.J;a June 4, 2014 Colorado Parks & Wildlife 0088 Wildlife Way Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Request for comments regarding the construction of a proposed 60 -ft Monopole Communications Tower, Garfield County, CO Commnet Wireless, LLC Site: Sunlight Mountain To Whom It May Concern, Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. has been contracted by Mercury Towers to provide environmental services for the aforementioned proposed telecommunications facility. We are submitting the following information for your review and comments regarding impacts to protected species for the purpose of completing an FCC NEPA Environmental Compliance Checklist for the following telecommunications tower and to comply with state wildlife laws and regulations. The intent of the checklist is to establish the basis for a Categorical Exclusion of the construction of the proposed telecommunications tower. The characteristics of the site and the vicinity are described as follows: Sunlight Mountain Site Location and Specifics: The proposed 60 -ft AGL monopole communications tower will be located at 10901 County Road 117, along the northeastern portion of a gravel parking lot associated with the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort, south-southwest of the City of Glenwood Springs in southeastern Garfield County, Colorado The proposed tower site is located within the is located within the NEI/LI-SWIM of Sec. 33, T7S, R89W, Sixth Colorado P.M., and on an approximately 183 -acre parcel identified as Parcel # 239533300051 by the Garfield County Tax Assessor's Office. The site elevation is approximately 8,127 -ft AMSL. Access to the proposed site will be provided by an existing gravel drive which spans southeast from a portion of County Road 1 17 for approximately 0.24 - miles until reaching the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound lease area. The proposed utility route will span northwest from an existing wooden utility pole for approximately 37 -ft before reaching the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound area. The proposed tower compound lease area will occupy 100-ft2 (-0.002-acres) and the proposed utility easements are anticipated to occupy approximately 740-ft2 (-0.02-acres) and are herein referred to as the proposed action area. The proposed tower is anticipated to be an unlit structure. At the time of inspection on May 14, 2014, the area in the vicinity of the proposed action area was primarily occupied by an existing 10 -ft x 10 -ft "lite site" monopole tower facility located within a portion of a gravel parking lot associated with the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort, within the exterior boundaries of the White River National Forest. The existing "lite site" monopole tower facility was previously utilized as a temporary facility and is now intended to become a permanent facility, thereby triggering NEPA. The surrounding undeveloped forested areas within the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort and White River National Forest consisted of Douglas -fir 5545 W. 56th Ave, Unit E, Arvada, CO 80002 O) 303-566-9914 F) 919-661-6350 rmalek@tepgroup.net t TOWERkV kV ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS (Pseudotsuga menziesii), blue spruce (Picea pungens), aspen (Populus tremuloides), and ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa). The site inspection consisted of a pedestrian inspection of the proposed action area and vicinity for indications of preferred habitat and occurrences of listed species, as described by USFWS profiles. According to the USGS 7.5 -Minute Cattle Creek, CO topographic quadrangle, a portion of an intermittent stream identified as Fourmile Creek is located approximately 400 -ft northeast of the proposed action area. The approximate coordinates of the tower location are as follows: Latitude: 39° 23' 59.57" (NAD 83) Longitude: 107° 20' 14.78" (NAD 83) Action Area Description and Effects: The proposed action area is anticipated to include the 37 -ft long utility route and the proposed 10 - ft x 10 -ft tower compound lease area. According to the report provided to TEP by Environmental Data Resources, the soil within the proposed action area consists of Cochetopa clay loam. A typical profile of Chochetopa clay loam conisists of clay loam, clay, stony clay, and stony sandy clay and occurs on mountain slopes, hills, and valley sides. Chochetopa soils are welt drained and formed from in colluvium and alluvium derived mainly from basalt and rhyolitic tuff. Review of the USFWS — Official Species List for the project (Consultation Tracking # 06E24000 -2014 -SLI -0134) indicated the possible presence of three (3) listed threatened or endangered terrestrial species: Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis), Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidentalis lucida), and the Ute ladies' -tresses (Spiranthes diluvialis), two (2) proposed threatened species: North American wolverine (Guba gulp luscus) and yellow -billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus), and one (1) candidate species: greater sage -grouse (Cenrrocercus urophasianus). The site inspection performed on May 14, 2014 consisted of a pedestrian inspection of the proposed action area and immediate vicinity for indications of the presence of federally listed species and/or their critical habitats and preferred/suitable habitat, as described by the USFWS, Colorado Parks & Wildlife, NatureServe Explorer, and Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS), when available. Additionally, due to the nature of the project, the proposed action is not anticipated to have the potential to affect any of the listed aquatic species in Garfield County, CO (bonytail chub, Colorado pikeminnow, greenback cutthroat trout, humpback chub, and the razorback sucker). Further, according to the USFWS Critical Habitat Portal, the proposed action area is not located on, or in the vicinity of a designated critical habitat. Canada Lynx: The Canada lynx is listed as a threatened species in Garfield County. According to the USFWS Species Profile, the habitat of the Canada lynx is within moist, cool, boreal spruce -fir forests that provide one or more of the beneficial habitat elements for the lynx including snowshoe hares for prey, abundant, large, woody debris piles that are used as dens, and winter snow conditions that are generally deep and fluffy for extended periods of time. Disturbances that create early successional stages within forest stands such as fire, insect infestations, and timber harvest, create forage and cover for snowshoe hares which are the main diet of the Canada 5545 W. 56th Ave, Unit E, Arvada, CO 80002 0) 303-566-9914 F) 919-661-6350 rmalek@tepgroup.net awl r1 LNI 441 TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS lynx. Individual lynx maintain large home ranges generally between 12 to 83 square miles. The size of lynx home ranges varies depending on abundance of prey, the animal's gender and age, season, and the density of lynx populations. According to the Colorado Parks & Wildlife `White River National Forest Lynx Locations Map' there are no known lynx locations within the vicinity of the proposed action area or the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort. Although the lynx make long distance exploratory movements outside their home ranges, the proximity to existing human disturbances associated with the existing tower, the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort, and County Road 117 present conditions that make it unlikely for the consistent use and habitation of the area by the Canada lynx. Additionally, the proposed action area is relatively small and utilizes and existing access drive and gravel parking lot. Therefore, due to the lack of suitable/preferred habitat, existing human disturbances, and the minimal scale of the proposed action area, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed action will have no effect on the Canada lynx. Mexican Spotted Owl: The Mexican spotted owl is listed as a threatened species in Garfield County. According to the USFWS Species Profile, the species resides in old-growth or mature forests that possess complex structural components as well as canyons with riparian or conifer communities and mixed conifer, Madrean pine-oak, Arizona cypress, encinal oak woodlands, and associated riparian forests. Actions that open up or remove mature or old-growth forests (logging, wildfire, road or site construction that results in fragmentation of the forest) are detrimental to the local owl population. Human activity in or near nesting, roosting, or foraging sites may result in abandonment of an area, and indirectly may affect habitat parameters from trampling, vegetation removal. or increased fire risk. Therefore, due to the proximity to existing human disturbances in the vicinity of the proposed action area (the existing tower, the. Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort, and County Road 117), the minimal amount of disturbance associated with the proposed action, and the lack of riparian or old-growth forested areas that could be potentially impacted by construction, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed action will have no effect on the Mexican spotted owl. Ute ladies' -tresses: The Ute ladies' -tresses is listed as a threatened species in Garfield County. According to the USFWS species profile, the species typically blooms from late July through August and is endemic to moist soils near wetland meadows, springs, lakes, floodplains, and perennial streams where it colonizes early successional point bars or sandy edges. The proposed action area is not located on, or in the vicinity of moist soils associated with wetland meadows, springs, lakes or perennial streams. According to the USFWS Rangewide Status Review of Ute ladies' -tresses, there are no known distributions of the species located within Garfield County, CO. Therefore, due to the absence of preferred/suitable habitat within the proposed action area, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed action will have no effect on the Ute ladies' -tresses. North American wolverine: The North American wolverine is a proposed threatened species in Garfield County. According to the USFWS species profile webpage, the North American wolverine inhabits habitats with near arctic conditions that maintain deep snow into spring and cool temperatures throughout summer. According to the Western Regional Climate Center website Glennwood Springs, CO receives approximately 60.2 -inches of snow annually and the annual average annual max temperature is 62.9°F. According to the U.S. Forest Service species information, the wolverine prefers mature forests dominated by Subalpine Fir and Douglas Fir, which are found in elevations of approximately 8,800 -ft or higher. Additionally. the North 5545 W. 566 Ave, Unit E, Arvada, CO 80002 0) 303-566-9914 F) 919-661-6350 rmalek@tepgroup.net w\� 444*14TOWER ENDINEERIN6 PROFESSIONALS American wolverine prefers large isolated tracks of wilderness that support diverse prey. Although the elevation of the proposed action area is below the species' preferred habitat, the wolverine could potentially use the area to forage or travel between more preferred habitats; however, the proximity to existing human disturbances associated with the existing tower, the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort, and County Road 117 present conditions that make it unlikely for the consistent use and habitation of the area by the wolverine. Additionally, the proposed action area is relatively small and utilizes and existing access drive and gravel parking lot. Therefore, due to the lack of suitable/preferred habitat, existing human disturbances, and the minimal scale of the proposed action area, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed action will not likely jeopardize the continued existence of the North American wolverine. Yellow-Billed Cuckoo: The yellow billed cuckoo is a proposed threatened species in Garfield County. According to the USFWS, the species breeds in dense willow and cottonwood stands in river floodplains and utilizes a cottonwood overstory for foraging. The greatest reported threat to the species is loss of large, woody riparian habitat. The proposed action is not anticipated to involve the loss or degradation of large, woody riparian habitat and will not impact dense willow or cottonwood stands near floodplains. Therefore, based on the absence of preferred/suitable habitat, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed action will will not likely jeopardize the continued existence of on the yellow billed cuckoo. Greater sage -grouse: The greater sage -grouse is as a candidate species in Garfield County. According to the species information provided by the USFWS and the Colorado Parks & Wildlife, sage -grouse inhabits large tracts of sagebrush. The largest populations of the species found in Colorado are located in Jackson, Moffat, Rio Blanco, and Routt Counties. The area in the vicinity of the action area primarily consisted of a gravel parking lot with no significant continuous tracts of sagebrush. Although the proposed tower could introduce potential raptor vantage points to the area, the lack of quality habitat, the presence of existing potential raptor vantage points (existing tower, power poles, ski lifts, and other structures associated with the Sunlight. Mountain Ski Resort) and existing human disturbances present conditions that make it unlikely for the consistent use and habitation of the area near the proposed action area. Further, according to the Colorado Parks & Wildlife `Greater Sage -grouse Priority Map', linkages, preliminary priority habitat areas, and preliminary general habitat areas for the greater sage - grouse are identified as being limited to the northwestern portion of Garfield County. Therefore, due to the absence of preferred/suitable habitat and the extent of existing human disturbances, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed action will have no effect on the greater sage -grouse. Minimizing Impacts to Migratory Birds protected under the MBTA: The following siting and construction details were implemented in an attempt to comply with the recommendations of the Memorandum of Understanding, directed by the President of the U.S. under the Executive Order 13186, for minimizing impacts to migratory birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the USFWS Interim Guidelines for Recommendations on Communications Tower Siting, Construction, Operation, and Decommissioning. Due to the distance from existing FCC licensed communications towers, collocation is not anticipated to be a feasible option to provide suitable RF coverage to the desired area. The proposed tower is less than 100 -ft AGL, does not require the use of guy wires for support, and is anticipated to be an unlit structure, minimizing impacts to night -migrating birds. Further due to the lack of available 5545 W. 56th Ave, Unit E, Arvada, CO 80002 O) 303-566-9914 F) 919-661-6350 rmalek @ tepgroup. net +tr TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS information to suggest so, the proposed telecommunications tower does not appear to be located within a major diurnal migratory bird movement route or stopover site or raptor/waterbird concentrated area. Additionally, with regards to the Bald Eagle & Golden Eagle Protection Act, no active or abandoned nests were observed in the vicinity of the proposed action area at the time of inspection and there did not appear to be any large suitable nesting trees in the immediate vicinity that would be removed or adversely modified by the proposed action. Therefore, no direct impacts to Bald/Golden Eagles, nests, or eggs are anticipated as part of the proposed action. We have enclosed a portion of the pertinent USGS Cattle Creek, CO 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle, site plans, and site photographs. We request any comments you may have regarding the proposed action's potential affect on federal and state protected species for the purpose of completing a FCC NEPA compliance checklist for the proposed tower. PIease provide any comments within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Correspondence has also been sent to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and White River National Forest. If there are any questions or if further information is needed for the processing of this request please don't hesitate to call. Thank you for your cooperation and your assistance. Sincerel , wer Engineering Professionals, Inc. Ryan A. Malek Environmental Scientist 5545 W. 56th Ave, Unit E, Arvada, CO 80002 0) 303-566-9914 F) 919-661-6350 rmalek@tepgroup.net i1 I;I ►`r rie i\1"444,-"r.. NTOWER GINEERING \PFESSIONALS June 4, 2014 White River National Forest 120 Midland Ave - Suite 140 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Attn: Mr. Scott Fitzwilliams - Forest Supervisor Re: Opportunity for comment regarding construction of a proposed 60 -ft monopole communications tower 10901 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs, CO (Garfield County) Commnet Wireless Site: Sunlight Mountain Dear Mr. Fitzwilliams, Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. has been contracted by Commnet Wireless to provide environmental services for the aforementioned proposed telecommunications facility. We are submitting the following information for your review and any comments for the purpose of completing an FCC NEPA Environmental Compliance Checklist for the following telecommunications tower. The intent of the checklist is to establish the basis for a Categorical Exclusion of the construction of the proposed telecommunications tower. We are providing your department with the opportunity to comment on the project, particularly with regards to protected wildlife. The proposed action area is located on private land within the exterior boundaries of the White River National Forest, therefore we would like to extend the invitation to comment to your department. We have also provided correspondence to the USFWS and Colorado Parks & Wildlife. The characteristics of the site and the vicinity are described as follows: Sunlight Mountain Site Location and Speciifics: The proposed 60 -ft AGL monopole communications tower will be located at 10901 County Road 117, along the northeastern portion of a gravel parking lot associated with the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort, south-southwest of the City of Glenwood Springs in southeastern Garfield County, Colorado The proposed tower site is located within the is located within the NEI /4 -SW 114 of Sec. 33, T7S, R89W, Sixth Colorado P.M., and on an approximately 183 -acre parcel identified as Parcel # 239533300051 by the Garfield County Tax Assessor's Office. The site elevation is approximately 8,127 -ft AMSL. Access to the proposed site will be provided by an existing gravel drive which spans southeast from a portion of County Road 117 for approximately 0.24- miles until reaching the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound lease area. The proposed utility route will span northwest from an existing wooden utility pole for approximately 37 -ft before reaching the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound area. The proposed tower compound lease. area will occupy 1.00-ft2 (-0.002-acres) and the proposed utility easements are anticipated to occupy approximately 740 -ft'` (-0.02-acres) and are herein referred to as the proposed action area. The proposed tower is anticipated to be an unlit structure. 5545 W. 56th Ave. Unit E, Arvada, CO 80002 fl) 303.566.9914 F) 303.566.9916 rmalek@tepgroup.net 41 AV AV its Nk; 'TOWER il ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS At the time of inspection on May 14, 2014, the area in the vicinity of the proposed action area was primarily occupied by an existing 10 -ft x 10 -ft "lite site" monopole tower facility located within a portion of a gravel parking lot associated with the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort, within the exterior boundaries of the White River National Forest. The existing "lite site" monopole tower facility was previously utilized as a temporary facility and is now intended to become a permanent facility, thereby triggering NEPA. The surrounding undeveloped forested areas within the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort and White River National Forest consisted of Douglas -fir (Pseudorsuga menziesii), blue spruce (Picea pungens), aspen (Populus tremuloides), and ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa). The site inspection consisted of a pedestrian inspection of the proposed action area and vicinity for indications of preferred habitat and occurrences of listed species, as described by USFWS profiles. According to the USGS 7.5 -Minute Cattle Creek, CO topographic quadrangle, a portion of an intermittent stream identified as Fourmile Creek is located approximately 400 -ft northeast of the proposed action area. The approximate coordinates of the tower location are as follows: Latitude: 390 23' 59.57" (NAD 83) Longitude: 107° 20' 14.78" (NAD 83) Action Area Description and Effects: The proposed action area is anticipated to include the 37 -ft long utility route and the proposed 10 - ft x 10 -ft tower compound lease area. According to the report provided to TEP by Environmental Data Resources, the soil within the proposed action area consists of Cochetopa clay loam. A typical profile of Chochetopa clay loam conisists of clay loam, clay, stony clay, and stony sandy clay and occurs on mountain slopes, hills, and valley sides. Chochetopa soils are well drained and formed from in colluvium and alluvium derived mainly from basalt and rhyolitic tuff. Review of the USFWS — Official Species List for the project (Consultation Tracking # 06E24000 -2014 -SLI -0134) indicated the possible presence of three (3) listed threatened or endangered terrestrial species: Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis), Mexican spotted owl (Strix occidentalis lucida), and the Ute ladies' -tresses (Spiranthes diluvialis), two (2) proposed threatened species: North American wolverine (Gulo gulo luscus) and yellow -billed cuckoo (Cocc yzus americanus), and one (1) candidate species: greater sage -grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). The site inspection performed on May 14, 2014 consisted of a pedestrian inspection of the proposed action area and immediate vicinity for indications of the presence of federally listed species and/or their critical habitats and preferred/suitable habitat, as described by the USFWS, Colorado Parks & Wildlife, NatureServe Explorer, and Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS), when available. Additionally, due to the nature of the project, the proposed action is not anticipated to have the potential to affect any of the listed aquatic species in Garfield County, CO (bonytail chub, Colorado pikeminnow, greenback cutthroat trout, humpback chub, and the razorback sucker). Further, according to the USFWS Critical Habitat Portal, the proposed action area is not located on, or in the vicinity of a designated critical habitat. 5545 W. 56th Ave. Unit E, Arvada, CO 80002 0) 303.566.9914 F) 303.566.9916 rmalek@tepgroup.net 0 T ❑ E € R €NiiIN€F�YINC3 PROFESSIONALS Canada Lynx: The Canada lynx is listed as a threatened species in Garfield County. According to the USFWS Species Profile, the habitat of the Canada lynx is within moist, cool, boreal spruce -fir forests that provide one or more of the beneficial habitat elements for the lynx including snowshoe hares for prey, abundant, large, woody debris piles that are used as dens, and winter snow conditions that are generally deep and fluffy for extended periods of time. Disturbances that create early successional stages within forest stands such as fire, insect infestations, and timber harvest, create forage and cover for snowshoe hares which are the main diet of the Canada lynx. Individual lynx maintain large home ranges generally between 12 to 83 square miles. The size of lynx home ranges varies depending on abundance of prey, the animal's gender and age, season, and the density of lynx populations. According to the Colorado Parks & Wildlife `White River National Forest. Lynx Locations Map' there are no known lynx locations within the vicinity of the proposed action area or the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort. Although the lynx make long distance exploratory movements outside their home ranges, the proximity to existing human disturbances associated with the existing tower, the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort, and. County Road 117 present conditions that make it unlikely for the consistent use and habitation of the area by the Canada lynx. Additionally, the proposed action area is relatively small and utilizes and existing access drive and gravel parking lot. Therefore, due to the lack of suitable/preferred habitat, existing human disturbances, and the minimal scale of the proposed action area, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed action will have no effect on the Canada lynx. Mexican Spotted Owl: The Mexican spotted owl is listed as a threatened species in Garfield County. According to the USFWS Species Profile, the species resides in old-growth or mature forests that possess complex structural components as well as canyons with riparian or conifer communities and mixed conifer, Madrean pine -oak, Arizona cypress, encinal oak woodlands, and associated riparian forests. Actions that open up or remove mature or old-growth forests (logging, wildfire, road or site construction that results in fragmentation of the forest) are detrimental to the local owl population. Human activity in or near nesting, roosting, or foraging sites may result in abandonment of an area, and indirectly may affect habitat parameters from trampling, vegetation removal, or increased fire risk. Therefore, due to the proximity to existing human disturbances in the vicinity of the proposed action area (the existing tower, the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort, and County Road 117), the minimal amount of disturbance associated with the proposed action, and the lack of riparian or old-growth forested areas that could be potentially impacted by construction, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed action will have no effect on the Mexican spotted owl. Ute ladies' -tresses: The Ute ladies' -tresses is listed as a threatened species in Garfield County. According to the USFWS species profile, the species typically blooms from late July through August and is endemic to moist soils near wetland meadows, springs, lakes, floodplains, and perennial streams where it colonizes early successional point bars or sandy edges. The proposed action area is not located on, or in the vicinity of moist soils associated with wetland meadows, springs, lakes or perennial streams. According to the USFWS Rangewide Status Review of Ute ladies' -tresses, there are no known distributions of the species located within Garfield County, CO. Therefore, due to the absence of preferred/suitable habitat within the proposed action area, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed action will have no effect on the Ute ladies' -tresses. 5545 W. 56`x' Ave. Unit E, Arvada, CO 80002 0) 303.566.9914 F) 303.566.9916 rmalek@tepgroup.net �\I TOWER \\\_\ ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS North American wolverine: The North American wolverine is a proposed threatened species in Garfield County. According to the USFWS species profile webpage, the North American wolverine inhabits habitats with near arctic conditions that maintain deep snow into spring and cool temperatures throughout summer. According to the Western Regional Climate Center website Glennwood Springs, CO receives approximately 60.2 -inches of snow annually and the annual average annual max temperature is 62.9°F. According to the U.S. Forest Service species information, the wolverine prefers mature forests dominated by Subalpine Fir and Douglas Fir, which are found in elevations of approximately 8,800 -ft or higher. Additionally, the North American wolverine prefers large isolated tracks of wilderness that support diverse prey. Although the elevation of the proposed action area is below the species' preferred habitat, the wolverine could potentially use the area to forage or travel between more preferred habitats; however, the proximity to existing human disturbances associated with the existing tower, the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort, and County Road 117 present conditions that make it unlikely for the consistent use and habitation of the area by the wolverine. Additionally, the proposed action area is relatively small and utilizes and existing access drive and gravel parking lot. Therefore, due to the lack of suitable/preferred habitat, existing human disturbances, and the minimal scale of the proposed action area, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed action will not likely jeopardize the continued existence of the North American wolverine. Yellow -Billed Cuckoo: The yellow billed cuckoo is a proposed threatened species in Garfield County. According to the USFWS, the species breeds in dense willow and cottonwood stands in river floodplains and utilizes a cottonwood overstory for foraging. The greatest reported threat to the species is loss of large, woody riparian habitat. The proposed action is not anticipated to involve the loss or degradation of large, woody riparian habitat and will not impact dense willow or cottonwood stands near floodplains. Therefore, based on the absence of preferredfsuitable habitat, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed action will will not likely jeopardize the continued existence of on the yellow billed cuckoo. Greater sage -grouse: The greater sage -grouse is as a candidate species in Garfield County. According to the species information provided by the USFWS and the Colorado Parks & Wildlife, sage -grouse inhabits large tracts of sagebrush. The largest populations of the species found in Colorado are located in Jackson, Moffat, Rio Blanco, and Routt Counties. The area in the vicinity of the action area primarily consisted of a gravel parking lot with no significant continuous tracts of sagebrush. Although the proposed tower could introduce potential raptor vantage points to the area, the lack of quality habitat, the presence of existing potential raptor vantage points (existing tower, power poles, ski lifts, and other structures associated with the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort) and existing human disturbances present conditions that make it unlikely for the consistent use and habitation of the area near the proposed action area. Further, according to the Colorado Parks & Wi[dlife `Greater Sage -grouse Priority Map', linkages, preliminary priority habitat areas, and preliminary general habitat areas for the greater sage - grouse are identified as being limited to the northwestern portion of Garfield County. Therefore, due to the absence of preferred/suitable habitat and the extent of existing human disturbances, it is the opinion of TEP that the proposed action will have no effect on the greater sage -grouse. Minimizing Impacts to Migratory Birds protected under the MBTA: 5545 W. 56th Ave. Unit E, Arvada, CO 80002 0) 303.566.9914 F) 303.566.9916 rmalek@tepgroup.net TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS The following siting and construction details were implemented in an attempt to comply with the recommendations of the Memorandum of Understanding, directed by the President of the U.S. under the Executive Order 13186, for minimizing impacts to migratory birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the USFWS Interim Guidelines for Recommendations on Communications Tower Siting, Construction, Operation, and Decommissioning. Due to the distance from existing FCC licensed communications towers, collocation is not anticipated to be a feasible option to provide suitable RF coverage to the desired area. The proposed tower is less than 100 -ft AGL, does not require the use of guy wires for support, and is anticipated to be an unlit structure, minimizing impacts to night -migrating birds. Further due to the lack of available information to suggest so, the proposed telecommunications tower does not appear to be located within a major diurnal migratory bird movement route or stopover site or raptor/waterbird concentrated area. Additionally, with regards to the Baid Eagle & Golden Eagle Protection Act, no active or abandoned nests were observed in the vicinity of the proposed action area at the time of inspection and there did not appear to be any large suitable nesting trees in the immediate vicinity that would be removed or adversely modified by the proposed action. Therefore, no direct impacts to Bald/Golden Eagles, nests, or eggs are anticipated as part of the proposed action. We have enclosed a portion of the pertinent USGS Cattle Creek, CO 7.5 -Minute topographic quadrangle, site plans, and site photographs. We request any comments you may have regarding the proposed project. Please provide any comments within 30 days of receipt of this letter. If there are any questions or if further information is needed for the processing of this request please don't hesitate to call. Thank you for your cooperation and your assistance. Sincerely, o'. /146,E, To er Engine ring Professionals, Inc. Ryan Malek Environmental Scientist 5545 W. 56`h Ave. Unit E, Arvada, CO 80002 0) 303.566.9914 F) 303.566.9916 rmalek@tepgroup.net A aaCi iwi N, TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS ATTACHMENT 4 SECTION 106 - SHPO HISTORYai Ryan A. 1.9,1iLk Power Engineering Professionals, Inc. 5545 West 56thAve., unit E Arvada, CO 80002 RE: Placement ofa cellular antenna equipment faculty at: Dear Mr. Malek: Conunnet Wireless, Sunlight Mountain 10901 County Road 1 l 7 Glenwood Springs vicinity, Garfield County Thank you for your recent correspondence concerning the installation ofa cellular facility at the above address (a project having Federal Communication Commission involvement). Our office has reviewed the submitted materials. There are no cultural resources in the Area of Potential Effect (APE). X_ No historic or archaeological resources will be afTected by this project. No historic properties will be affected by this project. However, there is a possibility that historic and/or prehistoric subsurface resources are located in the APE. If artifacts are discovered during the course &construction, please scop work immediately and contact aur office for further guidance. The proposed project will have no adveiseeffect on cultural resources within the APE. The proposed project will result in an adverse effect. Please refer to [he attached letter for more details. II 1HI IUL C �IYYI t11Yti'tilltan. Illt'il.t �4'l't 11e•r I+� L0111;4(1 1u,a'lllt ',vr', Irlaiii i cr_ al (1011 8(I(, 17 11 \\re hulk Irtrwwrr•r.l In 11Lrwoi11 f"dward C. Nichols f State llistoric Prescry inion Officer and President, C'ulwrradu 11islurical Soe OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ANI) 1115 l'ORIC PRI?SERVA 11ON 30343GG-3392 * Fax 303-866-2711 * l: -mail. uulrpru-slaie.cu.us • lnlerncl: www.hisurrycolorndo.ora History Colorado. 1200 Broadway, Denver, CO 80203 HisloryColorado.org krz lNa CND I N W E Fi rROFE9510Np1S June 3, 2014 Mr. Joe Saidibar History Colorado Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation 1200 Broadway Denver, CO 80203 Re: FCC 620 Submittal Packet Commnet Wireless, LLC Site: Sunlight Mountain Proposed 60 -ft AGL Monopole Communications Tower 10901 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (Garfield County) Dear Mr. Saidibar, Attached herein is the FCC 620 Submittal Packet for the proposed Commnet Wireless, LLC site identified as Sunlight Mountain. TEP is sending the Colorado SHPO the attached information in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 106 Review of the National Historic Preservation Act for the proposed FCC registered facility. Commnet Wireless proposes the construction of a 60 -ft AGL monopole communications tower (65 -ft overall with appurtenances) to be located at 10901 County Road 117, along the northeastern portion of a gravel parking lot associated with the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort, south-southwest of the City of Glenwood Springs in southeastern Garfield County, Colorado. TEP contracted PaleoWest Archaeology, a cultural resources consulting firm, to conduct a Class III Cultural Resource Survey and literature review for the proposed direct and visual effects APEs. PaleoWest requested a file search of the Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation's (OAHP's) COMPASS database of cultural resources and OHAP performed the file search on May 28, 2014 within the direct effects APE and the 1/2 -mile visual effects APE. Five (5) previously conducted Class III cultural resource inventories were identified within the visual effects APE; however no previously recorded historic properties were identified within the direct effects or visual effects APE. Further, PaleoWest evaluated the proposed project area on May 20, 2014 and determined that all of the proposed project elements would be within areas of the property which have been significantly disturbed by grading and construction of the existing parking lot and exceeds the proposed project -related construction depth by at least two feet. Therefore, it is the opinion of PaleoWest that the proposed project site has no potential to contain historic properties and no archaeological investigation of the location is necessary. PaleoWest recommends a finding of no effect on Historic Properties. TEP agrees with this determination and requests concurrence from the CO SHPO. Tower Engineering Professionals. Inc. (303) 566-9914 Fax (303)566-9916 Al iv etigv r C3 W E R E"NGiNFERINO PRC FF._531EltArt.LS TEP initiated consultation with applicable Native American tribes that have expressed a geographic interest in the project area via the FCC's Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS# 110419) on April 30, 2014. TEP has submitted the requested information to the Native American tribes which have expressed a potential interest in pre -construction review for the project. TEP also provided correspondence to the Garfield County Community Development Planning Department, City of Glenwood Springs Historic Preservation Commission (CLG), and the Frontier Historical Museum & Historical Society. The attached FCC 620 submittal packet includes the FCC TCNS tribe list and copies of the letters sent to the interested tribes and gov't / historic preservation entities. Please provide correspondence to the address listed below. Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. Attn: Ryan Malek 5545 W. 56t1' Avenue — Unit E Arvada, CO 80002 Sincerely, Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc.. Ryan A. Malek Environmental Project Manager Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. (303) 566-9914 Fax (303)566-9916 18) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 0018456921 19) Name: PaleoWest for TEP (information filed by TEP) FCC Form 620 Notification Date: File' Number: FCC Wireless Telecommunications Bureau New Tower ("NT") Submission Packet General Information Approved by OMB 3060 - 1039 See instructions for public burden estimates 1) (Select only one) ( NE ) NE -- New UA - Update of Application WD - Withdrawal of Application 2) If this application is for an Update or Withdrawal, enter the file number of the pending application currently an file. File Number: 3) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 0007116403 Applicant Information 4) Name: TEP for Commnet Wireless, LLC Contact Name 5) First Name: Alexis 6) MI: 7) Last Name: Leidigh 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Senior Regulatory Specialist 10) P.O. Box: !0 d 11) Street Address: 1001 Techno ogy Drive - 2nd Floor 12) City: Little Rock 13) State: AR 14) Zip Code: 72223 15) Telephone Number: (501)448-1545 16) Fax Number: (501)448-1151 17) E-mail Address: aleidigh@atni.com Consultant Information Principal Investigator 20) First Name: Rebecca 21)Ml: 22) Last Name: Schwendler 23) Suffix: 24) Titte: Principal Investigator 1 25) P.O. Box: And 26) Street Address: 2460 W. 26th Avenue Suite 15C 27) City: Denver 28) State: CO 29) Zip Code: 80211 30) Telephone Number: (970)409-9893 31) Fax Number: 32) E-mail Address: rschwendler@paleowest.com lof16 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Professional Qualification 33) Does the Principal Investigator satisfy the Secretary of the Interiors Professional Qualification Standards? ( X ) Yes ( ) No 34) Areas of Professional Qualification: (X ) Archaeologist (X ) Architectural Historian ( ) Historian ( ) Architect ( ) Other (Specify) Additional Staff 35) Are there other staff involved who meet the Professional Qualification Standards of the Secretary of the Interior? ( )Yes (X )No If YES." complete the following: 36) First Name: 37) MI: 38) Last Name: 39) Suffix: 40) Title: 41) Areas of Professional Qualification: ( ) Archaeologist ( ) Architectural Historian ( ) Historian ( ) Architect ( ) Other (Specify) 2 c7f 16 FCC Form 6120 May 2014 Tower Construction Notification System 1) TCNS Notification Number: 110419 Site Information Site Information 2) Positive Train Control Filing Subject to Expedited Treatment tinder Program Comment: ( ) Yes ( X ) No 3) Site Name: Sunlight Mountain 4) Site Address: 10901 County Road 117 5) Detailed Description of Project: 6) CRY Glenwood Springs 7) State: CO 8) Zip Code: 81601 9) County/Borough/Parish: GARFIELD 10) Nearest Crossroads: CR 117 /Sun King Drive 11) NMI 83 Latitude (DD-MM-SS.S): 39-23-59.6 ( X )Nor ( j S 12) NAD 83 Longitude (DD-MM-SS.S): 107-20-14.8 ( }Ear( X ) W Tower Information 13) Tower height above ground level (include top -mounted attachments such as lightning rods): 19.8 ) Feet ( X) Meters 14) Tower Type (Select One): ( ) Guyed lattice tower ( ) Self-supporting lattice ( X ) Monopole ( ) Other (Describe): Project Status 15) Current Project Status (Select One): ( X ) Construction has not yet commenced ( ) Construction has commenced. but is not completed ( ) Construction has been completed Construction completed on: Construction commenced on: Construction commenced on: 3 of 16 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Determination of Effect 14) Direct Effects (Select One): ( X ) No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects (APE) ( ) No Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on Historic. Properties in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on one or more Historic Properties in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): ( X ) No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects (APE) ( ) No Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on ane or more Historic Properties in APE 4 of 16 C C 1-orm 620 May 2014 Triba I/N HO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APES for direct and visual effects? 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 110419 (X ) Yes ( ) No Number of Tribes/NHOs: 9 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of TribeslNHOs: 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe&NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Apache Tribe of Oklahoma Contact Name 5) First Name: Yolanda 6) MI: 7) Last Name: Reyna 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Tribal Administrator Dates & Reponse 10) Date Contacted 05(08/2014 (X ) No Reply { { { ) Replied/No Interest ) Replied/Have Interest ) Replied/Other 11) Date Replied Tribe/NI-10 Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Cheyenne -Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma Contact Name 5) First Name: Andrew 9) Title: THPO Dates & Res onse 6) Mf: 7) Last Name: Willey 8) Suffix: 10) Date Contacted 05/08/2014 ( ?C ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 11) Date Replied Soft. FC'C Form 620 May 2014 TribalIN HO Involvement ) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NhQs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual effects? 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 110419 Number of Tribes/NHOs: 9 ( X ) Yes ( ) No 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of TribesINHCs: 0 TribeINHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) TribeINHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Crow Tribe Contact Name 5) First Name: Emerson 9) Title: THPO Da#es R. Response 6) MI: 7) Last Name: Bu11 Chief 8) Suffix: 10) Date Contacted 051013!2014 ( x, ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 11) Date Repiied TribeINHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NH° Name: Jicarilla Apache Nation Contact Name 5) First Name: Joanna 9) Title: THPO Technician 6) MI: 7) Last Name: Dykehouse Il.fact fL Raannncv 8) Suffix: 10) Date Contacted 05(0812014 (x ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 11) Date Replied 6 of 16 FCC Form 620 May 20 14 Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual effects? 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 110419 Number of Tribes/NHOs: 9 (x ) Yes ( ) No 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: 0 TribeINHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) TribefNHO FRN: 4) Tnbe/NHO Name: Northern Arapaho Contact Name 5) First Name: Corine 9) Title: THPO Dates & Response 6) Mt: 7) Last Name: Headley 8) Suffix: 10) Date Contacted 05/08/20 14 (x ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 11) Date Replied Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Trtbe/NH0 Name: Northern Cheyenne Tribe Contact Name 5) First Name: Conrad 6) Ml: 7) Last Name: Fisher 8) Suffix: 9) Title: THPO Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ( Jf� ) No Reply 0510812014 ) Replied/No Interest ) Replied/Have Interest ) RepfiedfOther 11) Date Replied 7of16 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Tribal/NI-10 Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APES for direct and visual effects? ( X )Yes ( ) No 2a) TdbesINHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 110419 2b) TribesINHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of TribeslNHOs: 9 Number of Tribes/NHOs: 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) TribefNHO FRN: 4) TribelNHO Name: Southern Ute Tribe Contact Name 5) First Name: Alden 6) MI: 7) Last Name: Naranjo 8) Suffix: 9) Title: NAGPRA Coordinator Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ( X ) No Reply ( { ( 05!0812014 ) Replied/No Interest ) Replied/Have Interest ) Replied/Other 1' 1) Date Replied Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NH° Name: Ute Indian Tribe Contact Name 5) First Name: Betsy 9) Title: Cultural Rights & Protection Director 6) Ml: L 7) Last Name: Chapoose 8) Suffix: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted 05F08l2014 { X ) No Reply { ) Replied/No interest { ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 11) Date Replied t3 of 16 FCC Form 620 May 2014 TribalIN HO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual effects? 2a) TribesfNHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 110419 Number of TribesfNHOs: 9 (X )Yes( )No 2b) Tribes1NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of TribesJNHOs: 0 TribeINHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) TribefNHO FRN: 4) Tribe/MHO Name: Ute Mountain Ute Tribe Contact Name 5) First Name: Terry 9) Title: NAGPRA Coordinator Bates R R.S.,,..n 6) MI: 7) Last Name: Knight 8) Suffix: 10) Date Contacted 05f08l2074 (X ) No Reply ( ( ) Replied/No Interest ) RepliedfHave interest ) Replied/Other 11) Date Replied 9 of 16 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Other Tribes/NHOs Contacted Tribe(NHO information 1) FCC Registration Number (FRN); 2) Name. Contact Name 3) First Name: 4) MI: 5) Last Name: 6) Suffix: 7) Title: Contact Information 8) P.O. Box: And / 9) Street Address: i 10) City: 11) State: 12) Zip Code: 13) Telephone Number: 14) Fax Number: 15) E-mail Address: 16) Preferred means of communication: ( ) E-mail ( ) Letter ( ) Both Dates & Response 17) Date Contacted ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 18) Date Replied lOof 16 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Properties Identified Historic Properties 1) Have any historic properties been identified within the APEs for direct and visual effect? 2) Has the identification process located archaeological materials that would be directly affected, or sites that are of cultural or religious significance to TribesfNHOs? 3) Are there more than 1G historic properties within the APEs for direct and visual effect? If "Yes', you are required to attach a Cultural Resources Report in lieu of adding the Historic Property below. Historic Property 4) Property Name:. 5) SHPO Site Number: Pro.e Address 6) Street Address: 7) City: 10) County/Borough/Parish: Maxus & Eligibility ( )Yes (X )Na )Yes (X ) No ) Yes ( X ) No 8) State: 9) Zip Code: 11) Is this property listed on the National Register? Source: 12) Is this property eligible for listing on the National Register? Source: 13) Is this property a National Historic Landmark? )Yes ( )No ) Yes ( ) No ) Yes ( ) No 14) Direct Effects (Select One): ( ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): ( ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 11 of 16 ICC Form 620 Ms4 2014 Local Government Involvement Local Government Agency 1) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 2) Name: Garfield County Community Development Contact Name 3) First Name: To Whom 4) MI: 5) Last Name: It May Concern 6) Suffix: 7) Title: Contact Information 8) P.O. Box:jOr 9) Street Address: 108 8th Street Suite 401 to) City: Glenwood Springs 11) state: CO 12) Zip Cade: 81601 13) Telephone Number: (970)945-8212 14) Fax Number: 15) E-mail Address: none@nonelisted.com 16) Preferred means of communication: ( ) E-mail ( X ) Letter ( ) Both Dates & Response 17) Date Contacted 06(03/2014 ( X } No Repky { ) Replied/No Interest { ( ) Replied/Have Interest ) Replied/Other 18) Date Replied Additional Information 19) Information on local government's role or interest (optional): 12 or 16 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Contact Information 9} P.O. Box: /Ord I0) Street Address: 101 8th Street 11) City: Glenwood Springs 12) State: CO 13) Zip Code: 81601 14) Telephone Number: (970)384-6428 15) Fax Number: 16) E -marl Address: none@nonelisted.com 17) Preferred means of communication: ( ) E-mail ( X ) Letter ( ) Both Other Consulting Parties Other Consulting Parties Contacted 1) Has any other agency been contacted and invited to become a consulting party? (X ) Yes ( ) No Consulting Party 2) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 3) Name: Glenwood Springs Historic Preservation Commission (CLG) Contact Name 4) First Name: Gretchen 5) MI: 6) Last Name: Ricehill 7) Suffix: 8) Title:: Dates & Response 18) Date Contacted 06(0312014 ( X ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 19) Date Replied Additional Information 20) Information on other consulting parties' role or interest (optional): 13 o1` IF FCC Farm 620 May 20 14 Other Consulting Parties Other Consulting Parties Contacted 1) Has any other agency been contacted and invited to become a consulting party? (X ) Yes ( ) No Consulting Party 2) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 3) Name: Frontier Historical Museum and Historical Society Contact Name 4) First Name: To Whom 5) MI: 6) Last Name: It May Concern 7) Suffix: 8) Title: Contact Information 9) P.O. Box:/Ord 10) Street Address: 1001 Colorado Avenue 11) City: Glenwood Springs 12) State: CO 13) Zip Code: 81601 14) Telephone Number: (970)945-4448 15) Fax Number: 16) E-mail Address: history@rof.net 17) Preferred means of communication: ( ) E-mail ( X ) Letter ( ) Both pates & Response 18) Date Contacted 06/03/2014 ( X ) No Reply ( ) RepiiedfNo Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 19) Date Replied Additional Information 20) Information on other consulting parties' role or interest (optional): 14 01'16 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Designation of SHPOITHPO 1) Designate the Lead. State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) or Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO) based on the location of the tower. SHPOITHPO Name: History Colorado 2) You may also designate up to three additional SF1POs/THPOs if the APEs include multiple states. If the APEs include other countries. enter the name of the National Historic Preservation Agency and any state and provincial Historic Preservation Agency. SHPO/THPO Name: SHPO1THPO Name: SHPOITHPO Name: Certification I certify that all representations on this FCC Form 620 Submission Packet and the accompanying attachments are true, correct. and complete, Party Authorized to Sign First Name: Signature: MI: Last Name: Date: Suffix: FAILURE TO SIGN THIS APPLICATION MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE APPLICATION AND FORFEITURE OF ANY FEES PAID. WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS MADE ON THIS FORM OR ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND/OR IMPRISONMENT (U.S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001) AND/OR REVOCATION OF ANY STATION LICENSE OR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 312(a)(1)), AND/OR FORFEITURE (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 503). 15 of 16 FCC Form 620 May 2014 NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Attachments Attachment 1, Resumes/Vitae See attached resumes of Ms. Rebecca Schwendler (Archeologist & Architectural Historian) of PaleoWest - Secretary of Interior Qualified personnel who completed the Cultural Resource Report for the proposed facility. Attachment 2. Additional Site Information The project, in addition to the proposed 60 -ft monopole communications tower (65 -ft overall with appurtenances) and associated l0 -ft x l0 -ft tower compound lease area, will include an —5 -ft wide x —37 -ft long utility route. The property in the vicinity of the proposed tower compound lease area and utility route was primarily occupied by an existing temporary 10 -ft x 10 -ft "lite site" monopole tower facility within a portion of a gravel parking lot associated with the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort. Attachment 3. Tribal and NHO Involvement All applicable federally recognized tribes that have expressed an interest in commenting on sites within Garfield County, CO have been contacted and provided an opportunity to comment on the proposed action via FCC - TCNS #110419 filed by TEP on 4/30/14. Letter packets including review fees and other requested information/documents have been sent to the applicable tribes which expressed such consultation requirements. See attached copies of letters sent to the tribes that expressed interest in reviewing the site. Attachment 4. a. A notification of the proposed project, including a letter packet with pertinent attachments was mailed to the Garfield County Community Development — Planning Department 6/3/14. No response has been received to date. See attached copy of letter. b. N/A Attachment 5. TEP published a legal public notice in the Glenwood Springs Post Independent that will run on 6/6/14 inviting comments on the proposed tower's impact to Historic Properties by 7/6/2014. No comments have been received to date. See attached copy of the public notice ad proof (affidavit not received yet). Attachment 6. TEP mailed and emailed a letter packet with pertinent attachments to the City of Glenwood Springs Historic Preservation Commission (CLO) and the Frontier Historical Museum & Historical Society on 6/3/14. No responses have been received to date. See attached copies of the letters. Attachment 7. a. The geographic area, scale and nature of the undertaking and subsequent effects of the proposed project were analyzed to determine the APE for direct effects. The determined APE for direct effects of the proposed project is the I0 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound lease area, w -5 -ft wide x -.37 -ft long utility route. b. The geographic area, scale and nature of the undertaking and subsequent effects of the proposed project were analyzed to determine the APE for direct effects. Further, required background research and suggested standards by the FCC Nationwide Programmatic Agreement were reviewed to determine the APE for visual effects for the proposed project. The APE for visual effects is determined to be a 0.5 -mile radius from the proposed 60 -ft AGL monopole tower (65 -ft overall with appurtenances) centerline. The determined APE for visual effects is currently primarily occupied by commercial and recreational land uses associated with the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort and undeveloped forested land uses associated with White River National Forest. Attachment 8. Historic Properties Identified in the APE for Visual Effects a. No historic properties were identified within the °/z -mile APE using the COMPASS database of cultural resources from the Colorado Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation on May 28, 2014. b. No properties were identified by comment in the determined APE for visual effects. c. N/A Attachment 9. Historic Properties Identified in the APE for Direct Effects a. No Historic Properties were identified in the direct effects APE during the file search using DHAP COMPASS or during archeological evaluation of the site performed by PaleoWest on May 20, 2014. b. No properties were identified in the APE for direct effects. c. On May 20, 2014, Dr. Rebecca Schwendler of PaleoWest evaluated the proposed project area and determined that all of the proposed project elements would be within areas of the property which have been significantly disturbed by grading and construction of the existing parking lot and exceeds the proposed project -related construction depth by at least two feet. Therefore, it is the opinion of PaleoWest that the proposed project site has no potential to contain historic properties and no archaeological investigation of the location is necessary. Attachment 10. Effects on Identified Properties a. No Effect — no Historic Properties identified in the APE. h. N/A d. No alternative sites being considered were made apparent to TEP. Attachment 11. Photographs a. See attached photograph pages and Cultural Resource Report, completed by PaleoWest. b. N/A c. N/A d. See attached aerial photograph and USES 7.5 -Minute Cattle Creek, CO Topographic Quadrangle (part of Cultural Resource Report). Attachment 12. Maps a. See attached. PALED W arc.haESToolagy May 30, 2014 Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. 5545 W. 56th Avenue - Unit E Arvada, CO 80002 RE: Review of Previous Disturbance and Potential for Historic Properties at the Proposed Sunlight Mountain Cell Tower Site, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Malek: On May 20, 2014, PaleoWest Archaeology (PaleoWest) reviewed the location of the proposed Sunlight Mountain cell tower site at 10901 County Road 117 in Glenwood Springs, CO 8160I for Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. in order to assess the level of prior disturbance at the property and to determine if the location has the potential to contain historic properties (cultural resources that are listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places ,[National Register]) that could potentially be impacted by the proposed undertaking. The project area is located within the NW % of the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 33, in Township 7S, Range 89W of the 6th Principal Meridian, in Garfield County (Figures 1 and 2). The proposed undertaking would be the construction, by Cormmnet Wireless, of a 60 -foot (18.3- m) tall monopole communications tower within a 10 x 10 -foot (3 x 3-m) fenced equipment area and an underground utility route estimated to be about 5 feet (I.5 m) wide that runs approximately 37 feet (I 1.3 m) southeast from the equipment area to an existing power pole (Figure 3). Together the proposed activities mentioned above would encompass less than 0.01 acres. Currently the proposed project area is the gravel parking lot of the Sunlight Mountain Resort, which already contains a temporary Commnet communications tower. Temporary towers are exempt from National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) review for up to 24 months (FCC 2004). The proposed permanent tower would replace the temporary tower, however, triggering NHPA review. 1 0 feet 2.000 p�lsl� WEST 0 meters 500 urchaeolaoy im 1:24,000 USGS 7.5' Quadrangle: • Direct APE Cattle Creek, CO (1987) 6th PM, T7S, R89W, Section 33 G Visual APE UTM NAD 83 Zone 13 For Official Use Only Disckesire W 5ile Locations is Prohibided {38 CFR Y9B.SBI. Figure 1. Location of the proposed project area, with APEs for di r ;ct and visual effects. 2 a! 1r 14A IA11=ili 1J4p), 1-.iwJ, L U 3, CL kappliirj 11d. _j4 ;1, 1.:1,1 3r, o`,vl- - qvo, , t i 1.111) 61t III,W? irri11 iffy 0 feet 2,000 f ALEO WAST aim 500 rchaeolnc�y m 1:24,000 USGS 7.5' Quadrangle:MI Direct APE Cattle Creek, CO (1987) 6th PM, T7S, R89W, Section 33 G Visual APE UTM NAD 83 Zone 13 For Official Use Only. Oiacloeure of Site 6oceliwla a i rol b ed (3e CFR 298 189. Figure 2. Aerial map of the project area, with APE for direct and visual effects. 3 Oel, W 2 - 331 2 ',IP' _833 ti i eeg 114 11 1 1-3 Ili 14 ,0 �S fi il lElihignilliihdligilli Y r _...+...«..xedeet x C_ ieb .M1 14litit E PaleoWest requested a file search of the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation's (OAHP's) COMPASS database of cultural resources to determine if any historic properties have been recorded previously within the area of potential effects (APE) for direct effects or the 1/2- mile radius APE for visual effects. In addition, at the request of the Northern Arapaho tribe, which is on the Federal Communication Commission's Tower Construction Notification System list for this area, PaleoWest requested a file search for a 1-mile radius of the project area/APE for direct effects. A brief culture history and ethnographic summary, as well as results of the expanded file search, are provided in Appendix A to this letter report. OA1-IP performed the file search on May 28, 2014, revealing that five Class III cultural resource inventories have been conducted previously within the APE for visual effects. Those were two block inventories for six tracts at Ski Sunlight and the Cactus Valley Unit Well No. 2, two linear inventories for the Ski Sunlight natural gas pipeline and U.S. West Communications Glenwood Springs Exchange Segments 2 and 3, and one combination block and linear inventory for the proposed Four Mile Road parking lot expansion and Sunlight Ski Area Babbish Gulch snowmaking pond and access. No historic properties have been recorded previously within the APEs for direct and visual effects. Within a 1-mile radius of the project area, only one cultural resource site—a historic coal mine— has been recorded previously. It is located between 1/2 and 1 mile from the proposed project area. No prehistoric resources of any kind have been recorded previously within 1 mile of the proposed project site. Dr. Rebecca Schwendler of PaleoWest evaluated the proposed project area on May 20, 2014 to assess previous disturbances there. As seen in Figures 4-9, she observed that all of the proposed project elements would be placed in locations that have already been significantly disturbed by grading and construction of the existing parking lot. 5 Figure 4. Overview of proposed project location with existing temporary tower, looking east. 6 Figure 5. Proposed tower equipment area with existing temporary tower, looking north. Figure 6. Proposed tower equipment area with existing temporary tower, looking east. 7 Figure 7. Proposed tower equipment area with existing temporary tower, looking east. Figure 8. Proposed tower equipment area with existing temporary tower, looking west. 8 Figure 9. Proposed utility route area under existing overhead utility line, looking east. The locations of all of the proposed project elements have been disturbed by previous grading and construction of the parking lot, so that the depth of previous disturbance exceeds the proposed project -related construction depth by at least two feet. Therefore, the proposed project site has no potential to contain historic properties. As such, it is PaleoWest's professional opinion that no archaeological investigation of the location is necessary and the project, as proposed, will have no effect on historic properties. Please call me at 970-409-9893 or email me at rschwendler cr paleowest.corn if you have any questions. Sincerely, Rebecca H. Schwendler, Ph.D., RPA Principal Investigator/Project Manager 9 PALE° WEST archaeology REBECCA H. SCHWENDLER, Ph.D., RPA Principal Investigator / Project Manager 2460 W. 26th Avenue, Suite 15-C, Denver, Colorado 80211 970-409-9893 phone, 303-477-1278 fax rschwendler@paleowest.com Education Ph.D. (with distinction), Anthropology, University of New Mexico M.A., Anthropology, University of New Mexico B.A. (magna cum laude), Sociocultural Anthropology, Tufts University Areas of Expertise Dr. Schwendler has over 20 years' experience conducting diverse academic and compliance projects across the U.S. and in Europe, and over three years' experience in cultural resource preservation advocacy. Her professional responsibilities have included all aspects of research design, inventory, testing, data recovery, monitoring, eligibility recommendations, effects determinations, and public education. Through her varied work with universities, federal and state agencies, tribes, and private developers, she is skilled at completing compliance projects efficiently while contributing to the field of archaeology. From her tenure in preservation advocacy, she has firsthand experience reviewing NEPA documents, and conducting consulting party meetings and crafting programmatic agreements under Section 106 of the NHPA. Her research interests include hunter -gatherer colonization and mobility, hunting technologies, trade and exchange, personal ornamentation, and social competition. She has authored many articles and reports and presented numerous professional papers about the archaeology of Colorado, New Mexico, Wyoming, and Georgia, as well as hunter -gatherers of Western Europe. Dr. Schwendler meets the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Archeology and Architectural History. Rebecca H. Schwendler, Ph.D., RPA— Page 2 Selected Professional Employment and Positions 2012—present Principal Investigator/Project Manager, PaleoWest Archaeology, Denver, Colorado 2011, 2001 Field and Laboratory Research Assistant, Hohle Fels and Gei3enklasterle Projects, Swabian Alb, Germany (summer field sessions) 2008-2012 Public Lands Advocate, National Trust for Historic Preservation, Denver, Colorado 2006-2008 Senior Project Manager, SWCA Environmental Consultants, Denver, Colorado and Albuquerque, New Mexico 2004-2005 Crew Member for various firms in Maine and New Hampshire, including Independent Archaeological Consulting, TRC, and Monadnock Archaeological Consulting 2001-2005 Archaeology GIS Technician and Subcontracting Archaeologist, BLM Rio Puerco Field Office (through the Office of Contract Archaeology, Albuquerque, New Mexico) 1997-2000 Field Supervisor and Laboratory Research Assistant, El Miran Prehistoric Project, Cantabria, Spain (summer field sessions) 1996 Volunteer Teaching Assistant, Waugh Folsom Site, northwestern Oklahoma, with the University of Kansas and University of Oklahoma (summer field season) 1993-1995 Crew Chief, Archaeologist, and Laboratory Assistant, Garrow and Associates, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia 1992 Archaeologist, Kissonerga-Mosphilia Project, Cyprus Selected Research 2012 Diversity in Social Organization across Magdalenian Western Europe ca. 17-12,000 BP. Quaternary International 272-273:333-353. 2008 Hokona: A Pueblo III—IV Settlement on NM 53 Near El Morro (Cibola County, New Mexico). NMDOT Technical Series Report No. 2007-2. SWCA, Albuquerque, 2005 Magdalenian Perforated Disks in Geographic and Social Contexts. Bulletin de la Societe Prehistorique Frangaise 39:73-84. Professional Affiliations and Committees Colorado Council of Professional Archaeologists New Mexico Archaeological Council Register of Professional Archaeologists Society for American Archaeology (Member of Programs Committee 2012; Chair, Student Paper Award Committee 2008-2011) City of Lafayette, Colorado Historic Preservation Board (Chair 2011—present) PALE° WEST TOTL Surveys, Inc. PO BOX 5146 Buena Vista, CO 81211 PHONE & FAX: 719-395-6630 October 26, 2011 2C Letter Mr. Andrew Dreisziger Commnet Wireless L.L.C. 1562 Park Street, Suite E Castle Rock, CO 80109 RE: Ski Sunlight Inc., Commnet Wireless. Located in Garlfield County, Colorado. Date of Survey: October 24, 2011. Dear Mr. Dreisziger: Below you will find the coordinates for the proposed antenna site near Sunlight Mountain. The position and elevation were determined using GPS observations based on NGS OPUS SOLUTION REPORT. GEOGRAHIC COORDINATES for proposed Antenna fi Latitude: 39°23'59.57" N 7` Longitude: 107°20'14.78" W Elevation of Ground: 8127' Statement I state that the latitude of 39°23'59.57" N and the longitude of 107°'24'14.78" W are accurate to within 20+ feet horizontally, and that the site elevation of 8127 feet is accurate to within +5 foot vertically. The horizontal datum (coordinates) are in terms of the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83) and are expressed as degrees, minutes and seconds, to the nearest hundredth of a second. The vertical datum (elevation) are in terms of the North American Vertical Datutn of 1988 (NAVD) and are expressed to the nearest foot. Kevin M. Burdges PLS 34985 Date: For and on behalf of TOTL Surveys, Inc. o 34985 - • o '•/O �c t5—i / lho 1 1 C s s L r' z 11 all t� 8 z1&) " 15'4 40;4it 1 t K gU R2 g a 1 1 Commnet Wireless 4,00 whit. R d 4W 190 JLML 610136350 Ffia 67/3933/80 Far 37113&5911 N@DESIGN GN ::.. _ MN1 ,Rat aw uaalla arae r.�y�,.r Y I° 1 SUBMITTALS I a.7e 1 acxcsrrlw Is+ a yat�ai 10 5 vee NAM SLINLEGIN MOUNTAIN RESORT COLORADO malar RAW LAND BUILD M1 ❑thii 4. f� �$Q'Q9} i 1 rY I 1 ll 111 ail 11 G ! : 1� Kill, 111 I 0 i3• sig ,gAiiiii I Al� SII I I E — ^ 4 „4 ea sia z#riG�F�s4 1 a a i R PIO ebIF ENii Ptt e 2 011 11 11 I MI ti ;1 al 4 g O 1 EE k4 0 R C dik El k El SI 1111111111141.1gil11 __ SA ;SSA k77kngo M 411)11111 WDili a 1IiI tai ax a S E NAlB SUNLIGHT MOUNTAIN RESORT COLORADO g a, 1 ,„ N ti z e ii� -Si_ .. EE k4 0 R C dik El k El SI 1111111111141.1gil11 __ SA ;SSA k77kngo Ewan Malek From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Dear Sir or Madam: towernotifyinfo@fee.gov Friday, May 09, 2014 1:01 AM Ryan Malek Jonathan.Jonas@fcc.gov; diane.dupertL fcc.gov NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWER CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email ID #3723602 Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). The purpose of this electronic mail message is to inform you that the following authorized persons were sent the information you provided through TONS, which relates to your proposed antenna structure. The information was forwarded by the FCC to authorized TCNS users by electronic mail and/or regular mail (letter). Persons who have received the information that you provided include leaders or their designees of federally -recognized American Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages (collectively "Tribes"), Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs), and State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPOs). For your convenience in identifying the referenced Tribes and in making further contacts, the City and State of the Seat of Government for each Tribe and NHO, as well as the designated contact person, is included in the listing below. We note that Tribes may have Section 106 cultural interests in ancestral homelands or other locations that are far removed from their current Seat of Government. Pursuant to the Commission's rules as set forth in the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal Communications Commission (NPA), all Tribes and NHOs listed below must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to respond to this notification, consistent with the procedures set forth below, unless the proposed construction falls within an exclusion designated by the Tribe or NHO. (NPA, Section IV.F.4). The information you provided was forwarded to the following Tribes and NHOs who have set their geographic preferences on TCNS. If the information you provided relates to a proposed antenna structure in the State of Alaska, the following list also includes Tribes located in the State of Alaska that have not specified their geographic preferences. For these Tribes and NHOs, if the Tribe or NHO does not respond within a reasonable time, you should make a reasonable effort at follow-up contact, unless the Tribe or NHO has agreed to different procedures (NPA, Section IV.F.5). In the event such a Tribe or NHO does not respond to a follow-up inquiry, or if a substantive or procedural disagreement arises between you and a Tribe or NHO, you must seek guidance from the Commission (NPA, Section IV.G). These procedures are further set forth in the FCC's Declaratory Ruling released on October 6, 2005 (FCC 05-176). 1. THPO Technician Joanna Dykehouse - Jicarilla Apache Nation - Dulce, NM - regular mail 2. NAGPRA Coordinator Alden Naranjo - Southern Ute Tribe - Ignacio, CO - electronic mail and regular mail Details: Under the following 6 conditions, the Southern Ute Indian Tribe does not need to review the proposed tower (PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FORM 629 IS MANDATORY IF THE PROPOSED TOWER NEEDS TO BE REVIEWED. IF YOU DO NOT SEND US THE FORM 620 FOR TOWERS THAT NEED TOBE REVIEWED, PLEASE CONSIDER THE MATTER TO BE AN OPEN MATTER, AND DO NOT PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION. WE WILL NOT MAKE ANY DETERMINATIONS UNTIL WE ARE ABLE TO REVIEW THE FORM 620): 1 The Southern Ute Indian Tribe does NOT need to review proposed extensions to increase the height of already existing towers The Southern Ute Indian Tribe does NOT need to review proposed collocations on already existing towers. The Southern Ute Indian Tribe does NOT need to review proposed structures that are to beplaced on rooftops. The Southern Ute Indian Tribe does NOT need to review proposed structures that are within a city's limits, if the proposed structure is to be located on a disturbed road that has already been gravelled. The Southern Ute Indian Tribe does NOT need to review proposed structures that are to be placed on pastures that have already been plowed or cultivated. The Southern Ute Indian Tribe does NOT need to review proposed structures that are merely extensions inheight of an already existing structure. For all other proposed areas, the Southern Ute Indian Tribe DOES NEED a copy of the Form 620. Please send the Form 620 via regular mail and be sure to INCLUDE THE FAX # of the company in order to receive a reply: Alden Naranjo, NAGPRA Coodinator, P.O. Box 737, Mail Stop #73, Ignacio, Colorado 81137 If the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Southern Ute Indian Tribe within 30 days AFTER YOU HAVE SENT THE FORM 620 to the Tribe (including color photographs and resumes), then the Southern Ute Indian Tribe has no interest in participating in pre - construction review for the site. 3. NAGPRA Coordinator Terry Knight - Ute Mountain Ute Tribe - Towaoc, CO - electronic mail and regular mail Details: If the Applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe of Towaoc, Colorado within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe has no interest in participating in pre -construction review for the proposed site. The Applicant/tower builder, however, must notify the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and applicable law. 4. THPO Andrew Willey - Cheyenne -Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma - Concho, OK - electronic mail and regular mail 5. Tribal Administrator Yolanda Reyna - Apache Tribe of Oklahoma - Anadarko, OK - electronic mail and regular mail Details: The Apache Tribe of Oklahoma has no interest in participating in pre -construction review for this site. The Applicant, however, must notify the Apache Tribe of Oklahoma in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction. 2 6. THPO Emerson Bull Chief - Crow Tribe - Crow Agency, MT - electronic mail and regular mail Details: The Crow Tribe handles TCNS matters through our Tribal Nation's website. Please consult crowthpo.org for further information. Sincerely, Emerson Bull Chief, THPO Emerson.Bullchief@crow-nsn.gov 7. THPO Corine Headley - Northern Arapaho - St. Stephens, WY - electronic mail and regular mail Details: The Northern Arapaho Tribe requests no emalls of reports and requests but a hard copy or a CD with the following: PLEASE SEND AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OR SITE INVENTORY/MAP FOR THE AREA WITHIN 1 MILE OF THE APE FOR 'PRECONSTRUCTION AND COLLOCATION PROJECTS. The request gives the tribe an opportunity to comment on past projects that are now proposed as collocation projects. The Northern Arapaho Tribe requests a legal description of the proposed site (township, range, section and topo map name). The Northern Arapaho Tribe requests a chronology if sites are within the 1 mile radius of the APE. The Northern Arapaho Tribe requests information of Native American tribes identified having traditional use within the 1 mile radius of the APE. Ethnographic reports for the Arapaho are requested. The Northern Arapaho tribe may request a site visit for areas of significance to the tribe's history. There is a consultation fee of $400 for review of the tower reports. Please make the $466 checkpayable to 'The Northern Arapaho Tribe.' Write the words 'Northern Arapaho THPO' in the memo line on the check. Mail the check to: 'The Northern Arapaho Tribe, THPO' at P.O. Box 67, St. Stephens, WY 82524. ATTN: Corinne Headley. Once the fee is received the project will be reviewed. 8. Cultural Rights & Protection Director Betsy L Chapoose - Ute Indian Tribe - Ft. Duchesne, UT - electronic mail and regular mail 9. THPO Conrad Fisher - Northern Cheyenne Tribe - Lame Deer, MT - electronic mail and regular mail If the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Northern Cheyenne Tribe within 36 days after notification through TCNS, the Northern Cheyenne Tribe has no interest in participating in pre -construction review for the proposed site. The Applicant/tower builder, however, must immediately notify the Northern Cheyenne Tribe in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and applicable law. The information you provided was also forwarded to the additional Tribes and NHOs listed below. These Tribes and NHOs have NOT set their geographic preferences on TCNS, and therefore they are currently receiving tower notifications for the entire United States. For these 3 Tribes and NHOs, you are required to use reasonable and good faith efforts to determine if the Tribe or NHO may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties that may be affected by its proposed undertaking. Such efforts may include, but are not limited to, seeking information from the relevant SHPO or THPO, Indian Tribes, state agencies, the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs, or, where applicable, any federal agency with land holdings within the state (NPA, Section IV.B). If after such reasonable and good faith efforts, you determine that a Tribe or NHO may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties in the area and the Tribe or NHO does not respond to TCNS notification within a reasonable time, you should make a reasonable effort to follow up, and must seek guidance from the Commission in the event of continued non -response or in the event of a procedural or substantive disagreement. If you determine that the Tribe or NHO is unlikely to attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties within the area, you do not need to take further action unless the Tribe or NHO indicates an interest in the proposed construction or other evidence of potential interest comes to your attention. None The information you provided was also forwarded to the following SHPOs in the State in which you propose to construct and neighboring States. The information was provided to these SHPOs as a courtesy for their information and planning. You need make no effort at this time to follow up with any SHPO that does not respond to this notification. Prior to construction, you must provide the SHPO of the State in which you propose to construct (or the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, if the project will be located on certain Tribal lands), with a Submission Packet pursuant to Section VILA of the NPA. 10. Deputy SHPO Carol Griffith - Arizona State Parks - Phoenix, AZ - electronic mail 11. Deputy SHPO William Collins - Arizona State Parks - Phoenix, AZ - electronic mail 12. SHPO Edward C Nichols - History Colorado - Denver, CO - regular mail 13. SHPO Bob L Blackburn - Oklahoma Historical Society - Oklahoma City, OK - regular mail If you are proposing to construct a facility in the State of Alaska, you should contact Commission staff for guidance regarding your obligations in the event that Tribes do not respond to this notification within a reasonable time. Please be advised that the FCC cannot guarantee that the contact(s) listed above opened and reviewed an electronic or regular mail notification. The following information relating to the proposed tower was forwarded to the person(s) listed above: Notification Received: 04/30/2014 Notification ID: 110419 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: TEP for Commnet Wireless, LLC Consultant Name: Ryan A Malek Street Address: 5545 W. 56th Avenue Unit E City: Arvada 4 State: COLORADO Zip Code: 80002 Phone: 303-566-9914 Email: rmalek@tepgroup.net Structure Type: MTOWER - Monopole Latitude: 39 deg 23 min 59.6 sec N Longitude: 107 deg 20 min 14.8 sec W Location Description: 10901 County Road 117 City: Glenwood Springs State: COLORADO County: GARFIELD Detailed Description of Project (Optional): Ground. Elevation: 2477.1 meters Support Structure: 18.3 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 19.8 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 2496.9 meters above mean sea level If you have any questions or comments regarding this notice, please contact the FCC using the electronic mail form located on the FCC's website at: http://wireless.fcc.gov/outreachlnotification/contact-fcc.html. You may also call the FCC Support Center at (877) 480-3201 (TTY 717-338-2824). Hours are from 8 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday (except Federal holidays). To provide quality service and ensure security, all telephone calls are recorded. Thank you, Federal Communications Commission 5 Ft `�7NIN TOWER EERNFESSIONALS June 3, 2014 Southern Ute Tribe P.O. Box 737, Mail Stop #73 116 Capote Drive Ignacio, Colorado 81137 Attention: Mr. Alden Naranjo — NAGPRA Coordinator Subject: Proposed 60 -ft Monopole Communications Tower Commnet Wireless, LLC Site: Sunlight Mountain TCNS# 110419, filed 4/30/14 10901 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (Garfield County) Dear Mr. Naranjo: Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. has been contracted by Commnet Wireless, LLC to complete a NEPA Checklist (FCC Compliance Audit) for the aforementioned proposed 60 -ft AGL monopole communications tower (65 -ft overall with appurtenances) to be located at 10901 County Road 117, along the northeastern portion of a gravel parking lot associated with the Sunlight Mountain Resort, south-southwest of the City of Glenwood Springs in southeastern Garfield County, Colorado. The proposed tower site is located within the NE 114 -SW 114 of Sec. 33, T7S, R89W, Sixth Colorado P.M., and on an approximately 183 -acre parcel identified as Parcel # 239533300051 by the Garfield County Tax Assessor's Office. The site elevation is approximately 8,127 -ft AMSL. Access to the proposed site will be provided by an existing gravel drive which spans southeast from a portion of County Road 117 approximately 0.24 -miles until reaching the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound lease area. The proposed utility route will span northwest from an existing wooden utility pole for approximately 37 - ft before reaching the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound area. The proposed tower compound lease area is currently occupied by an existing temporary "Iite site" monopole facility within a portion of a gravel parking lot associated with the Sunlight Mountain. Ski Resort and is located within the exterior boundaries of the White River National Forest. The direct effects APE has been determined to be the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound lease area and the approximately 39 -ft long utility route. The visual effects APE has been determined to be a 1/2 -mile radius from the proposed tower's centerline. The proposed tower is anticipated to be an unlit structure. The approximate coordinates of the tower location are as follows: Latitude: 39° 23' 59.57" (NAD 83) Longitude: 107° 20' 14.78" (NAD 83) TEP contracted PaleoWest Archaeology., a cultural resources consulting firm, to conduct a Class III Cultural Resource Survey and literature review for the proposed direct and visual effects APEs. PaleoWest requested a file search of the Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation's (OAHP's) COMPASS database of cultural resources and OHAP performed the file search on May 28, 2014 within the direct effects APE and the 1/2 -mile 5545 W. 566" Ave. Unit E, Arvada, CO 80002 0) 303-566-9914 F) 303-566-9916 rmalek@tepgroup.net 41 A\� AU TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS visual effects APE. Five (5) previously conducted Class Ill cultural resource inventories were identified within the visual effects APE; however no previously recorded historic properties were identified within the direct effects or 1/2 -mile visual effects APE. Additionally, one (1) cultural resource site was identified as being located within 1 -mile of the project area: Sunlight Coal Mine (5GF.1600); however, no previously recorded prehistoric resources were identified within 1 -mile of the proposed project site. Further, PaleoWest evaluated the proposed project area on May 20, 2014 and determined that all of the proposed project elements would be within areas of the property which have been significantly disturbed by grading and construction of the existing parking lot and exceeds the proposed project -related construction depth by at least two feet. Therefore, it is the opinion of PaleoWest that the proposed project site has no potential to contain historic properties and no archaeological investigation of the location is necessary. PaleoWest recommends a finding of no effect on Historic Properties and TEP agrees with this determination. Therefore, it is the position of TEP that the proposed tower site does not appear to pose a threat to affect Native American sites of religious or cultural significance. A copy of the FCC Form 620 containing the Cultural Resource Survey, pertinent USGS topographic map, site photographs, and site plans has been included for your review. Pursuant to your standing request via TCNS, if TEP does not receive a response from the Southern Ute Tribe within 30 days of the date of this letter, we will assume that your office has no interest in participating in pre -construction review for this site. If there are any questions, or if any additional information is needed, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation. Sincerely„ v4— Ryan A. Malek Environmental Scientist 5545 W. 56th Ave. Unit E, Arvada, CO 80002 0) 303-566-9914 F) 303-566-9916 rmalek@tepgroup.net 7�, TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESBIONALB June 3, 2014 Cheyenne — Arapaho Tribes Tribal Historic Preservation. Office Attention: Mr. Andrew Willey Subject: Proposed 60 -ft Monopole Communications Tower Commnet Wireless, LLC Site: Sunlight Mountain TCNS# 110419, filed 4/30/14 10901 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (Garfield County) Dear Mr. Willey: Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. has been contracted by Commnet Wireless, LLC to complete a NEPA Checklist (FCC Compliance Audit) for the aforementioned proposed 60 -ft AGL monopole communications tower (65 -ft overall with appurtenances) to be located at 10901 County Road 117, along the northeastern portion of a gravel parking lot associated with the Sunlight Mountain Resort, south-southwest of the City of Glenwood Springs in southeastern Garfield County, Colorado. The proposed tower site is located within the NE1/4-SW1/4 of Sec. 33, T7S, R89W, Sixth Colorado P.M., and on an approximately 183 -acre parcel identified as Parcel # 239533300051 by the Garfield County Tax Assessor's Office. The site elevation is approximately 8,127 -ft AMSL. Access to the proposed site will be provided by an existing gravel drive which spans southeast from a portion of County Road 117 approximately 0.24 -miles until reaching the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound lease area. The proposed utility route will span northwest from an existing wooden utility pole for approximately 37 - ft before reaching the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound area. The proposed tower compound lease area is currently occupied by an existing temporary "lite site" monopole facility within a portion of a gravel parking lot associated with the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort and is located within the exterior boundaries of the White River National Forest. The direct effects APE has been determined to be the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound lease area and the approximately 39 -ft long utility route. The visual effects APE has been determined to be a 1 -mile radius from the proposed tower's centerline. The proposed tower is anticipated to be an unlit structure. The approximate coordinates of the tower location are as follows: Latitude: 390 23' 59.57" (NAD 83) Longitude: 107° 20' 14.78" (NAD 83) TEP contracted PaleoWest Archaeology., a cultural resources consulting firm, to conduct a Class 111 Cultural Resource Survey and literature review for the proposed direct and visual effects APEs. PaleoWest requested a file search of the Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation's (OAHP's) COMPASS database of cultural resources and OHAP performed the file search on May 28, 2014 within the direct effects APE and the 1/2 -mile visual effects APE. Five (5) previously conducted Class III cultural resource inventories were identified within the visual effects APE; however no previously recorded historic properties were identified within the direct 5545 W. 56th Ave. Unit E, Arvada, CO 80002 0) 303-566-9914 F) 303-566-9916 rmalek@tepgroup.net TOWER ENI3INEERIN 3 PROFESSIONALS effects or''/ -mile visual effects APE. Additionally, one (1) cultural resource site was identified as being located within 1 -mile of the project area: Sunlight Coal Mine (5GF.1600); however, no previously recorded prehistoric resources were identified within 1 -mile of the proposed project site. Further, PaleoWest evaluated the proposed project area on May 20, 2014 and determined that all of the proposed project elements would be within areas of the property which have been significantly disturbed by grading and construction of the existing parking lot and exceeds the proposed project -related construction depth by at least two feet. Therefore, it is the opinion of PaleoWest that the proposed project site has no potential to contain historic properties and no archaeological investigation of the location is necessary. PaleoWest recommends a finding of no effect on Historic Properties and TEP agrees with this determination. Therefore, it is the position of TEP that the proposed tower site does not appear to pose a threat to affect Native American sites of religious or cultural significance. However; we are requesting a letter from the Cheyenne - Arapaho Tribes to confirm our findings. A copy of the Cultural Resource Report, pertinent USGS topographic map, site photographs, and site plans have been included for your review. If there are any questions, or if any additional information is needed, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation. Sincerely, gt 4 Ryan A. Malek Environmental Scientist 5545 W. 56th Ave. Unit E, Arvada, CO 80002 0) 303-566-9914 F) 303-566-9916 rmalek@teuroup.net Ryan Malek From; Crow THPO [noreplygjotform.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 9:58 AM To: Ryan Malek Subject: Crow THPO Form Auto Responder Question Answer Submission ID: 267620303410723996 Date: 06/03/2014 09:50 Real Name (F M L): Ryan Adam Malek Requesting Organization: Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. Email: rmalek@tepgroup.net Address l : 5545 W. 56th Avenue Address2: Unit E City: Arvada State: CO Zip: 80002 Office Phone #: 303 566-9914 Mobile Phone #: 919 332-1917 Fax #: 303 566-9916 Project Name: Sunlight Mountain TCNS #: 110419 Government Agency Involved: FCC Describe the project: Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. has been contracted by Commnet Wireless, LLC to complete a NEPA Checklist (FCC Compliance Audit) for the aforementioned proposed 60 -ft AGL monopole communications tower (65 -ft overall with appurtenances) to be located at 10901 County Road 117, along the northeastern portion of a gravel parking lot associated with the Sunlight Mountain Resort, south-southwest of the City of Glenwood Springs in southeastern Garfield County, Colorado. The proposed tower site is located within the NE114-SW 114 of Sec, 33, T7S, R89W, Sixth Colorado P.M., and on an approximately 1 83 -acre parcel identified as Parcel # 239533300051 by the Garfield County Tax Assessor's Office. The site elevation is approximately 8,127 -ft AMSL. Access to the proposed site will be provided by an existing gravel drive which spans southeast from a portion of County Road 117 approximately 0.24 -miles until reaching the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound lease area. The proposed utility route will span northwest from an existing wooden utility pole for approximately 37 - ft before reaching the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound area. The proposed tower compound lease area is currently occupied by an existing temporary "lite site" monopole facility within a portion of a gravel parking lot associated with the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort and is located within the exterior boundaries of the White River National Forest. The direct effects APE has been determined to be the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound lease area and the approximately 39 -ft long utility route. The visual effects APE has been determined to be a 1/2 -mile radius from the proposed tower's centerline. The proposed tower is anticipated to be an unlit structure. The approximate coordinates of the tower location are as follows: Latitude: 390 23' 59,57" (NAD 83) Longitude: 107° 20' 14.78" (NAD 83) 1 TEP contracted PaleoWest Archaeology., a cultural resources consulting firm, to conduct a Class III Cultural Resource Survey and literature review for the proposed direct and visual effects APES. PaleoWest requested a file search of the Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation's (DAHP's) COMPASS database of cultural resources and DHAP performed the file search on May 28, 2014 within the direct effects APE and the 1/2 -mile visual effects APE. Five (5) previously conducted Class III cultural resource inventories were identified within the visual effects APE; however no previously recorded historic properties were identified within the direct effects or' V2 -mile visual effects APE. Additionally, one (1) cultural resource site was identified as being Iocated within 1 -mile of the project area: Sunlight Coal Mine (5GF.1600); however, no previously recorded prehistoric resources were identified within 1 -mile of the proposed project site. Further, PaleoWest evaluated the proposed project area on May 20, 2014 and determined that all of the proposed project elements would be within areas of the property which have been significantly disturbed by grading and construction of the existing parking lot and exceeds the proposed project -related construction depth by at least two feet. Therefore, it is the opinion of PaleoWest that the proposed project site has no potential to contain historic properties and no archaeological investigation of the location is necessary. PaleoWest recommends a finding of no effect on Historic Properties and TEP agrees with this determination. Describe any previous disturbance: The entire site has been previously disturbed for the construction (mechanical grading and graveling) of a gravel parking lot for the ski resort. See attached photos and cultural resources report. Land Ownership: Private File 1 to Upload letter packet TCNS# 110419.pdf File2 to Upload File3 to Upload jitsik toki 441p).1000:::. W E R ENC3INEERING PROFE55IONAL6 June 3, 2014 Northern Arapaho Tribe Tribal Historic Preservation Office P.O. Box 67 St. Stephens, WY 82524 Attention: Ms. Corinne Headley — TUFO Subject: Proposed 60 -ft Monopole Communications Tower Commnet Wireless, LLC Site: Sunlight Mountain TCNS# 110419, filed 4/30/14 10901 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (Garfield County) Dear Ms. Headley: Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. has been contracted by Commnet Wireless, LLC to complete a NEPA Checklist (FCC Compliance Audit) for the aforementioned proposed 60 -ft AGL monopole communications tower (65 -ft overall with appurtenances) to be located at 10901 County Road 117, along the northeastern portion of a gravel parking lot associated with the Sunlight Mountain Resort, south-southwest of the City of Glenwood Springs in southeastern Garfield County, Colorado. The proposed tower site is located within the NE 114 -SW 114 of Sec. 33, T7S, R89W, Sixth Colorado P.M., and on an approximately 183 -acre parcel identified as Parcel # 239533300051 by the Garfield County Tax Assessor's Office. The site elevation is approximately 8,127 -ft AMSL. Access to the proposed site will be provided by an existing gravel drive which spans southeast from a portion of County Road 117 approximately 0.24 -miles until reaching the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound lease area. The proposed utility route will span northwest from an existing wooden utility pole for approximately 37 - ft before reaching the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound area. The proposed tower compound lease area is currently occupied by an existing temporary "lite site" monopole facility within a portion of a gravel parking lot associated with the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort and is located within the exterior boundaries of the White River National Forest. The direct effects APE has been determined to be the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound lease area and the approximately 39 -ft long utility route. The visual effects APE has been determined to be a 1 -mile radius from the proposed tower's centerline. The proposed tower is anticipated to be an unlit structure. The approximate coordinates of the tower location are as follows: Latitude: 39° 23' 59.57" (NAD 83) Longitude: 107° 20' 14.78" (NAD 83) TEP contracted PaleoWest Archaeology., a cultural resources consulting firm, to conduct a Class III Cultural Resource Survey and literature review for the proposed direct and visual effects APEs. PaleoWest requested a file search of the Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation's (OAHP's) COMPASS database of cultural resources and OI-iAP performed the file search on May 28, 2014 within the direct effects APE and the' -mile 5545 W. 56111 Ave., Arvada, CO 80002 0) 303-566-9914 F) 303-566-99 i 6 rmalek@tepgroup.net 1 yr 41 TOWER \\\\�_ ENGINEERFNC PROFE9590NALS visual effects APE. Five (5) previously conducted Class III cultural resource inventories were identified within the visual effects APE; however no previously recorded historic properties were identified within the direct effects or 1 -mile visual effects APE. Additionally, one (1) cultural resource site was identified as being located within 1 -mile of the project area: Sunlight Coal Mine (5GF.I600); however, no previously recorded prehistoric resources were identified within 1 -mile of the proposed project site. Further, PaleoWest evaluated the proposed project area on May 20, 2014 and determined that all of the proposed project elements would be within areas of the property which have been significantly disturbed by grading and construction of the existing parking lot and exceeds the proposed project -related construction depth by at least two feet. Therefore, it is the opinion of PaleoWest that the proposed project site has no potential to contain historic properties and no archaeological investigation of the location is necessary. PaleoWest recommends a finding of no effect on Historic Properties and TEP agrees with this determination. Therefore, it is the position of TEP that the proposed tower site does not appear to pose a threat to affect Native American sites of religious or cultural significance. However; we are requesting a letter from the Northern Arapaho Tribe to confirm our findings. A copy of the Cultural Resource Report, Ethnographic Report, Chronology, pertinent USGS topographic map, site photographs, and site plans have been included for your review. If there are any questions, or if any additional information is needed, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation. Sincerely, IAA- 4 - Ryan A. Malek Environmental Scientist 5545 W. 56th Ave., Arvada, CO 80002 O) 303-566-9914 F) 303-566-9916 rmalek@tepgroup.net 1�1 TOWERE R ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS June 3, 2014 Garfield County Community Development Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Subject: Proposed 60 -ft Monopole Communications Tower Commnet Wireless, LLC Site: Sunlight Mountain 10901 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (Garfield County) To Whom 1t May Concern: Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc.. has been contracted by Commnet Wireless, LLC to complete a NEPA Checklist (FCC Compliance Audit) for the aforementioned proposed 60 -ft AGL monopole communications tower (65 -ft overall with appurtenances) to be located at 10901 County Road 117, along the northeastern portion of a gravel parking lot associated with the Sunlight Mountain Resort, south-southwest of the City of Glenwood Springs in southeastern Garfield County, Colorado. The proposed tower site is located within the 144E1/4-SW1/4 of Sec. 33, T7S, R89W, Sixth Colorado P.M., and on an approximately 183 -acre parcel identified as Parcel # 239533300051 by the Garfield County Tax Assessor's Office. The site elevation is approximately 8,127 -ft AMSL. Access to the proposed site will be provided by an existing gravel drive which spans southeast from a portion of County Road 1 17 approximately 0.24 -miles until reaching the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound lease area. The proposed utility route will span northwest from an existing wooden utility pole for approximately 37 -ft before reaching the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound area. The proposed tower compound lease area is currently occupied by an existing temporary "Lite site" monopole facility within a portion of a gravel parking lot associated with the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort and is located within the exterior boundaries of the White River National Forest. The direct effects APE has been determined to be the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound lease area and the approximately 39 -ft long utility route. The visual effects APE has been determined to be a'' Ji -mile radius from the proposed tower's centerline. The proposed tower is anticipated to be an unlit structure. The approximate coordinates of the tower location are as follows: Latitude: 39° 23' 59.57" (NAD 83) Longitude: 107° 20' 14.78" (NAD 83) TEP contracted PaleoWest Archaeology., a cultural resources consulting firm, to conduct a Class III Cultural Resource Survey and literature review for the proposed direct and visual effects APEs. PaleoWest requested a file search of the Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation's (OAHP's) COMPASS database of cultural resources and DHAP performed the file search on May 28, 2014 within the direct effects APE and the 1 -mile visual effects APE. Five (5) previously conducted Class 1II cultural resource inventories were identified within the visual effects APE; however no previously recorded historic properties were identified within the direct effects or'/ -mile visual effects APE. Additionally, one (1) cultural resource site was identified as being located 5545 W. 56`h Ave. Unit E, Arvada, CO 80002 0) 303-566-9914 F) 303-566-9916 rma1ek@tepgroup.net til a1� TOWER011 oka ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS within 1-mile of the project area: Sunlight Coal Mine (5GF.1600); however, no previously recorded prehistoric resources were identified within 1-mile of the proposed project site. Further, PaleoWest evaluated the proposed project area on May 20, 2014 and determined that all of the proposed project elements would be within areas of the property which have been significantly disturbed by grading and construction of the existing parking lot and exceeds the proposed project-related construction depth by at least two feet. Therefore, it is the opinion of PaleoWest that the proposed project site has no potential to contain historic properties and no archaeological investigation of the location is necessary. PaieoWest recommends a finding of no effect on Historic Properties and TEP agrees with this determination. Therefore, in the opinion of PaleoWest and TEP, the proposed tower will have no effect on Historic Properties listed on, or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. We are required by the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement (NPA) to provide notification of the planned undertaking to local governments and potential consulting parties who have land use jurisdiction and historic preservation interest over the project area. We would appreciate any comments that you may have on the proposed activity regarding the possible impacts that the proposed facility may have on Historic Properties listed on or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Please make any comments within thirty days of the receipt of this documentation. A portion of the 7.5-minute Cattle Creek, CO topographic map that depicts the proposed tower location and 0.5- mile APE, Cultural Resource Survey Report, site plans, and site photographs have been included for your review. If there are any questions, or if any additional information is needed, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation. Sincerely, Ryan A. Malek Environmental Scientist 5545 W. 56th Ave. Unit E, Arvada, CO 80002 0) 303-566-9914 F) 303-566-9916 rmaiek@tepgroup.net. <i AO ivex /11eila "I.V P. \\ TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESBIEINALE June 3, 2014 City of Glenwood Springs Historic Preservation Commission 101 8th Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Attn: Ms. Gretchen Ricehill - Planner Subject: Proposed 60 -ft Monopole Communications. Tower Commnet Wireless, LLC Site: Sunlight Mountain 10901 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (Garfield County) Dear Ms. Ricehill: Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. has been contracted by Commnet Wireless, LLC to complete a NEPA Checklist (FCC Compliance Audit) for the aforementioned proposed 60 -ft AGL monopole communications tower (65 -ft overall with appurtenances) to be located at 10901 County Road 117, along the northeastern portion of a gravel parking lot associated with the Sunlight Mountain Resort, south-southwest of the City of Glenwood Springs in southeastern Garfield County, Colorado. The proposed tower site is located within the NE1/4-SW 1/4 of Sec. 33, T7S, R89W, Sixth Colorado P.M., and on an approximately 183 -acre parcel identified as Parcel # 239533300051 by the Garfield County Tax Assessor's Office. The site elevation is approximately 8,127 -ft AMS L. Access to the proposed site will be provided by an existing gravel drive which spans southeast from a portion of County Road 1 17 approximately 0.24 -miles until reaching the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound lease area. The proposed utility route will span northwest from an existing wooden utility pole for approximately 37 -ft before reaching the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound area. The proposed tower compound lease area is currently occupied by an existing temporary "lite site" monopole facility within a portion of a gravel parking lot associated with the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort and is located within the exterior boundaries of the White River National Forest. The direct effects APE has been determined to be the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound lease area and the approximately 39 -ft long utility route. The visual effects APE has been determined to be a '/a -mile radius from the proposed tower's centerline. The proposed tower is anticipated to be an unlit structure. The approxirnate coordinates of the tower location are as follows: Latitude: 390 23' 59.57" (NAD 83) Longitude: 107° 20' 14.78" (NAD 83) TEP contracted PaleoWest Archaeology., a cultural resources consulting firm, to conduct a Class III Cultural Resource Survey and literature review for the proposed direct and visual effects APEs. PaleoWest requested a file search of the Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation's (OAHP's) COMPASS database of cultural resources and OHAP performed the file search on May 28, 2014 within the direct effects APE and the 1/2 -mile visual effects APE. Five (5) previously conducted Class III cultural resource inventories were identified within 5545 W. 56''' Ave. Unit E, Arvada, CO 80002 0) 303-566-9914 F) 303-566-9916 analek@tepgroup.net tt k�S a S TOWER ENGINEERING 'V PROFESSIONALS the visual effects APE; however no previously recorded historic properties were identified within the direct effects or '/x-mile visual effects APE. Additionally, one (1) cultural resource site was identified as being located within 1-mile of the project area: Sunlight Coal Mine (5GF.1600); however, no previously recorded prehistoric resources were identified within 1-mile of the proposed project site. Further, PaleoWest evaluated the proposed project area on May 20, 2014 and determined that all of the proposed project elements would be within areas of the property which have been significantly disturbed by grading and construction of the existing parking lot and exceeds the proposed project-related construction depth by at least two feet. Therefore, it is the opinion of PaleoWest that the proposed project site has no potential to contain historic properties and no archaeological investigation of the location is necessary. PaleoWest recommends a finding of no effect on Historic Properties and TEP agrees with this determination. Therefore, in the opinion of PaleoWest and TEP, the proposed tower will have no effect on Historic Properties listed on, or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. We are required by the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement (NPA) to provide notification of the planned undertaking to local governments and potential consulting parties who have land use jurisdiction and historic preservation interest over the project area. We would appreciate any comments that you may have on the proposed activity regarding the possible impacts that the proposed facility may have on Historic Properties listed on or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Please make any comments within thirty days of the receipt of this documentation. A portion of the 7.5 -minute Cattle Creek, CO topographic map that depicts the proposed tower location and 0.5 - mile APE, Cultural Resource Survey Report, site plans, and site photographs have been included for your review. If there are any questions, or if any additional information is needed, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation. Sincerely, Ryan A. Malek Environmental Scientist 5545 W. 56`'' Ave. Unit E, Arvada, CO 80002 0) 303-566-9914 F) 303-566-9916 rmalek@tepgroup.net !E� kv �, ❑ ikro E R ENDlrVEERintS PRO FE551 O NAL June 3, 2014 The Frontier Historical Museum Frontier Historical Society 1001 Colorado Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Subject: Proposed 60 -ft Monopole Communications Tower Commnet Wireless, LLC Site: Sunlight Mountain 10901 County Road 117 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (Garfield County) To Whom. It. May Concern: Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. has been contracted by Commnet Wireless, LLC to complete a NEPA Checklist (FCC Compliance Audit) for the aforementioned proposed 60 -ft AGL monopole communications tower (65 -ft overall with appurtenances) to be located at 10901 County Road 1 17, along the northeastern portion of a gravel parking lot associated with the Sunlight Mountain Resort, south-southwest of the City of Glenwood Springs in southeastern Garfield County, Colorado. The proposed tower site is located within the NE1/4-SW1/4 of Sec. 33, T7S, R89W, Sixth Colorado P.M., and on an approximately 183 -acre parcel identified as Parcel # 239533300051 by the Garfield County Tax Assessor's Office. The site elevation is approximately 8,127 -ft AMSL. Access to the proposed site will be provided by an existing gravel drive which spans southeast from a portion of County Road 117 approximately 0.24 -miles until reaching the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound lease area. The proposed utility route will span northwest from an existing wooden utility pole for approximately 37 -ft before reaching the proposed 10 -ft x 10 -ft tower compound area. The proposed tower compound lease area is currently occupied by an existing temporary "lite site" monopole facility within a portion of a gravel parking lot associated with the Sunlight Mountain Ski Resort and is located within the exterior boundaries of the White River National Forest. The direct effects APE has been determined to be the proposed I0 --ft x 10 -ft tower compound lease area and the approximately 39 -ft long utility route. The visual effects APE has been determined to be a'/3 -mile radius from the proposed tower's centerline. The proposed tower is anticipated to be an unlit structure. The approximate coordinates of the tower location are as follows: Latitude: 39° 23' 59.57" (NAD 83) Longitude: 107° 20' 14.78" (NAD 83) TEP contracted PaleoWest Archaeology., a cultural resources consulting firm, to conduct a Class 111 Cultural Resource Survey and literature review for the proposed direct and visual effects APEs. PaleoWest requested a file search of the Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation's (OAHP's) COMPASS database of cultural resources and OHAP performed the file search on May 28, 2014 within the direct effects APE and the 1/2 -mile visual effects APE. Five (5) previously conducted Class I1I cultural resource inventories were identified within the visual effects APE; however no previously recorded historic properties were identified within the direct effects or l/ -mile visual effects APE. Additionally, one (1) cultural resource site was identified as being located 5545 W. 56th Ave. Unit E, Arvada, CO 80002 0) 303-566-9914 F) 303-566-9916 rmalek @ tepgroup. nel y4 TOWERkV ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS within 1 -mile of the project area: Sunlight Coal Mine (5GF.1600); however, no previously recorded prehistoric resources were identified within 1 -mile of the proposed project site. Further, PaleoWest evaluated the proposed project area on May 20, 2014 and determined that all of the proposed project elements would be within areas of the property which have been significantly disturbed by grading and construction of the existing parking lot and exceeds the proposed project -related construction depth by at least two feet. Therefore, it is the opinion of PaleoWest that the proposed project site has no potential to contain historic properties and no archaeological investigation of the location is necessary. PaleoWest recommends a finding of no effect on Historic Properties and TEP agrees with this determination. Therefore, in the opinion of PaleoWest and TEP, the proposed tower will have no effect on Historic Properties listed on, or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. We are required by the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement (NPA) to provide notification of the planned undertaking to local governments and potential consulting parties who have land use jurisdiction and historic preservation interest over the project area. We would appreciate any comments that you may have on the proposed activity regarding the possible impacts that the proposed facility may have on Historic Properties listed on or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Please make any comments within thirty days of the receipt of this documentation. A portion of the 7.5 -minute Cattle Creek, CO topographic map that depicts the proposed tower location and 0.5 - mile APE, Cultural Resource Survey Report, site plans, and site photographs have been included for your review. If there are any questions, or if any additional information is needed, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation. Sincerely, A[IL Ryan A. Malek Environmental Scientist 5545 W. 56th Ave. Unit E, Arvada, CO 80002 0) 303-566-9914 F) 303-566-9916 rmalek@tepgroup.net Ad Name: 10249158A Customer: T.E.P. Group Your account number is: 5596152 PROOF OF PUBLICATION GLENWOOD SPRINGS POST INDEPENDENT STATE OF COLORADO } SS. COUNTY OF GARFIELD } I, Michael Bennett, do solemnly swear that I am Publisher of the Glenwood Springs Post Independent, That the same Daily newspaper printed, in whole or in part and published in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado, and has a general circulation therein; that said newspaper has been published continuously and uninterruptedly in said County of Garfield for a period of more than fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the first publication of the annexed legal notice or advertisement and that said newspaper has published the requested legal notice and advertisement as requested. The Glenwood Springs Post Independent is an accepted legal advertising medium, only for jurisdictions operating under Colorado's Home Rule provision. That the annexed legal notice or advertisement was published in the regular and entire issue of every number of said daily newspaper for the period of 1 consecutive insertions: and that the first publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 616/2014 and that the last publication of said notice was in the issue of said newspaper dated 6/6/2014. In witness whereof has here unto set my hand this 06/06/2014. Michael Bennett, Publisher Subscribed and swam to before me, a notary public in and for the County of Garfield, State of Colorado this 0610612014. c21141-1- Jib -444-1-t Pamela J, Schultz, Notary Public My Commission expires: November 1, 2015 PUBLIC NOTICE Public Notice: Comment 'Wireless proposes the Construction of a 60-f1 AGL Monopole Communica- tions Tower (65-1t overall with appurlenances), to be located at 10901 County Road 117, south- southwest ol the City at Glenwood Springs, Cole- redo olo-redo (Garfield County Parcel6 239533300051) at latitude:14 39° 23" 59.57" (NAD 63). longitude: W 107° 20' 14.76' (NAD 83). Please submit any written comments by July 6, 2014 regarding the potential effects that the proposed lower may have on Historic Properties that are fisted or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Plac- es to: Tower Engineering Professionals, tnc.(Atttn:Geor a Swearingen) 326 Tryon Road, Raleigh, 76 NC 208 Telephone:: (919) 661-6351 Fax: ig Published in the Glenwood Springs Post [lent June 6, 2014.00249158) Gouge earth feel 100 500 3V AV �rA .90 TWCRENGINERING PROFESSIONALS ATTACHMENT 5 SECTION 106 - INDIAN RELIGIOUS SITES FCC Federal )Communications - Commission Tower Construction Notification FCC > WTB > Tower Construction Notification Logged In: (Log Out) Section 106 Tower Construction Notification New Notification Notifications Home FCC Site Map Your Notification has been successfully submitted to the FCC. The date for this Notification is 04/30/2014, Your Notification ID number is 110419. Please make a note of this Notification ID — print out this page for your records. A confirmation of this submitted notification will also be emailed to the email address specified in your notification. This system is intended to facilitate consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act by providing early notification of proposed construction to Tribes and State Historic Preservation officers. This system is not to be used in place of Section 106 consultation, and use of this notification system in itself does not satisfy parties' obligations with respect to historic preservation review under the Commission's rules. Please note: the submission of this notification is NOT to be considered a submission for Antenna Structure Registration. Tower Structures that require antenna structure registration based on FCC Rules 47 C.F.R. Part 17 must complete FCC Form 854 after FAA clearance is obtained. ASR Help ASR License Glossary - FAQ - Online Help - Documentation - Technical Support ASR Online TOWAIR- CORES/ASR Registration - ASR Online Filing - Application Search - Systems Registration Search About ASR Privacy Statement - About ASR - ASR Home Federal Communications Commission 44512th Street SW Washington, DC 20554 More FCC Contact Information... Phone: 1-877-480-3201 TTY: 1-717-338-2824 Fax 1-866-41:8-0232 Submit Help Request - Web Policies & Privacy Statement - Required Browser Pluq-ins - Customer Service Standards - Freedom of Information Act Ryan Malek From: towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 2:20 PM To: Ryan Malek Subject: Proposed Tower Structure Info - Email ID #3718932 Dear Ryan A Malek, Thank you for submitting a notification regarding your proposed construction via the Tower Construction Notification System. Note that the system has assigned a unique Notification ID number for this proposed construction. You will need to reference this Notification ID number when you update your project's Status with us. Below are the details you provided for the construction you have proposed: Notification Received: 04/30/2614 Notification ID: 110419 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: TEP for Commnet Wireless, LLC Consultant Name: Ryan A Malek Street Address: 5545 W. 56th Avenue Unit E City: Arvada State: COLORADO Zip Code: 80002 Phone: 303-566-9914 Email: rmalekRtepgroup.net Structure Type: MTOWER - Monopole Latitude: 39 deg 23 min 59.6 sec N Longitude: 107 deg 20 min 14.8 sec W Location Description: 10901 County Road 117 City: Glenwood Springs State: COLORADO County: GARFIELD Detailed Description of Project (Optional): Ground Elevation: 2477.1 meters Support Structure: 18.3 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 19.8 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 2496.9 meters above mean sea Level 1 Ryan Malek From: towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 1:01 AM To: Ryan Malek Cc: Jonathan.Jonas@fcc.gov; diane.dupert@fcc.gov Subject: NOTICE OF ORGANIZATIONS) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWER CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email ID #3723602 Dear Sir or Madam: Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). The purpose of this electronic mail message is to inform you that the following authorized persons were sent the information you provided through TCNS, which relates to your proposed antenna structure. The information was forwarded by the FCC to authorized TCNS users by electronic mail and/or regular mail (letter). Persons who have received the information that you provided include leaders or their designees of federally -recognized American Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages (collectively "Tribes"), Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs), and State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPOs). For your convenience in identifying the referenced Tribes and in making further contacts, the City and State of the Seat of Government for each Tribe and NHO, as well as the designated contact person, is included in the listing below. We note that Tribes may have Section 106 cultural interests in ancestral homelands or other locations that are far removed from their current Seat of Government. Pursuant to the Commission's rules as set forth in the Nationwide 'Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal Communications Commission (NPA), all Tribes and NHOs listed below must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to respond to this notification, consistent with the procedures set forth below, unless the proposed construction falls within an exclusion designated by the Tribe or NHO. (NPA, Section IV.F.4). The information you provided was forwarded to the following Tribes and NHOs who have set their geographic preferences on TCNS. If the information you provided relates to a proposed antenna structure in the State of Alaska, the following list also includes Tribes located in the State of Alaska that have not specified their geographic preferences. For these Tribes and NHOs, if the Tribe or NHO does not respond within a reasonable time, you should make a reasonable effort at follow-up contact, unless the Tribe or NHO has agreed to different procedures (NPA, Section IV.F.S). In the event such a Tribe or NHO does not respond to a follow-up inquiry, or if a substantive or procedural disagreement arises between you and a Tribe or NHO, you must seek guidance from the Commission (NPA, Section IV.G). These procedures are further set forth in the FCC's Declaratory Ruling released on October 6, 2005 (FCC 05-176). 1. THPO Technician Joanna Dykehouse - Jicarilla Apache Nation - Dulce, NM - regular mail 2. NAGPRA Coordinator Alden Naranjo - Southern Ute Tribe - Ignacio, CO - electronic mail and regular mail Details: Under the following 6 conditions, the Southern Ute Indian Tribe does not need to review the proposed tower (PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FORM 620 IS MANDATORY IF THE PROPOSED TOWER NEEDS TO BE REVIEWED. IF YOU DO NOT SEND US THE FORM 620 FOR TOWERS THAT NEED TOBE REVIEWED, PLEASE CONSIDER THE MATTER TO BE AN OPEN MATTER, AND DO NOT PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION. WE WILL NOT MAKE ANY DETERMINATIONS UNTIL WE ARE ABLE TO REVIEW THE FORM 620): 1 The Southern Ute Indian Tribe does NOT need to review proposed extensions to increase the height of already existing towers. The Southern Ute Indian Tribe does NOT need to review proposed collocations on already existing towers. The Southern Ute Indian Tribe does NOT need to review proposed structures that are to beplaced on rooftops. The Southern Ute Indian Tribe does NOT need to review proposed structures that are within a city's limits, if the proposed structure is to be located on a disturbed road that has already been gravelled. The Southern Ute Indian Tribe does NOT need to review proposed structures that are to be placed on pastures that have already been plowed or cultivated. The Southern Ute Indian Tribe does NOT need to review proposed structures that are merely extensions inheight of an already existing structure. For all other proposed areas, the Southern Ute Indian Tribe DOES NEED a copy of the Form 620. Please send the Form 620 via regular mail and be sure to INCLUDE THE FAX # of the company in order to receive a reply: Alden Naranjo, NAGPRA Coodinator, P.O. Box 737, Mail Stop #73, Ignacio, Colorado 81137 If the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Southern Ute Indian Tribe within 30 days AFTER YOU HAVE SENT THE FORM 620 to the Tribe (including color photographs and resumes), then the Southern Ute Indian Tribe has no interest in participating in pre - construction review for the site. 3. NAGPRA Coordinator Terry Knight - Ute Mountain Ute Tribe - Towaoc, CO - electronic mail and regular mail Details: If the Applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe of Towaoc, Colorado within 30 days after notification through TONS, the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe has no interest in participating in pre -construction review for the proposed site. The Applicant/tower builder, however, must notify the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and applicable law. 4. THPO Andrew Willey - Cheyenne -Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma - Concho, OK - electronic mail and regular mail 5. Tribal Administrator Yolanda Reyna - Apache Tribe of Oklahoma - Anadarko, OK - electronic mail and regular mail Details: The Apache Tribe of Oklahoma has no interest in participating in pre -construction review for this site. The Applicant, however, must notify the Apache Tribe of Oklahoma in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction. 2 6. THPO Emerson Bull Chief - Crow Tribe - Crow Agency, MT - electronic mail and regular mail Details: The Crow Tribe handles TCNS matters through our Tribal Nation's website. Please consult crowthpo.org for further information. Sincerely, Emerson Bull Chief, THPO Emerson.Bullchief@crow-nsn.gov 7. THPO Corine Headley - Northern Arapaho - St. Stephens, WY - electronic mail and regular mail Details: The Northern Arapaho Tribe requests no emails of reports and requests but a hard copy or a CD with the following: PLEASE SEND AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OR SITE INVENTORY/MAP FOR THE AREA WITHIN 1 MILE OF THE APE FOR PRECONSTRUCTION AND COLLOCATION PROJECTS. The request gives the tribe an opportunity to comment on past projects that are now proposed as collocation projects. The Northern Arapaho Tribe requests a legal description of the proposed site (township, range, section and topo map name). The Northern Arapaho Tribe requests a chronology if sites are within the 1 mile radius of the APE. The Northern Arapaho Tribe requests information of Native American tribes identified having traditional use within the 1 mile radius of the APE. Ethnographic reports for the Arapaho are requested. The Northern Arapaho tribe may request a site visit for areas of significance to the tribe's history. There is a consultation fee of $400 for review of the tower reports. Please make the $400 checkpayable to 'The Northern Arapaho Tribe.' Write the words `Northern Arapaho THPO' in the memo line on the check. Mail the check to: 'The Northern Arapaho Tribe, THPO' at P.O. Box 67, St. Stephens, WY 82524. ATTN: Corinne Headley. Once the fee is received the project will be reviewed. 8. Cultural Rights & Protection Director Betsy L Chapoose - Ute Indian Tribe - Ft. Duchesne, UT - electronic mail and regular mail 9. THPO Conrad Fisher - Northern Cheyenne Tribe - Lame Deer, MT - electronic mail and regular mail If the applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Northern Cheyenne Tribe within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Northern Cheyenne Tribe has no interest in participating in pre -construction review for the .proposed site. The Applicant/tower builder, however, must immediately notify the Northern Cheyenne Tribe in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction, consistent with Section IX of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement and applicable law. The information you provided was also forwarded to the additional Tribes and NHOs listed below. These Tribes and NHOs have NOT set their geographic preferences on TONS, and therefore they are currently receiving tower notifications for the entire United States. For these 3 Tribes and NHOs, you are required to use reasonable and good faith efforts to determine if the Tribe or NHO may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties that may be affected by its proposed undertaking. Such efforts may include, but are not limited to, seeking information from the relevant SHPO or THPO, Indian Tribes, state agencies, the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs, or, where applicable, any federal agency with land holdings within the state (NPA, Section IV.B). If after such reasonable and good faith efforts, you determine that a Tribe or NHO may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties in the area and the Tribe or NHO does not respond to TCNS notification within a reasonable time, you should make a reasonable effort to follow up, and must seek guidance from the Commission in the event of continued non -response or in the event of a procedural or substantive disagreement. If you determine that the Tribe or NHO is unlikely to attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties within the area, you do not need to take further action unless the Tribe or NHO indicates an interest in the proposed construction or other evidence of potential interest comes to your attention. None The information you provided was also forwarded to the following SHPOs in the State in which you propose to construct and neighboring States. The information was provided to these SHPOs as a courtesy for their information and planning. You need make no effort at this time to follow up with any SHPO that does not respond to this notification. Prior to construction, you must provide the SHPO of the State in which you propose to construct (or the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, if the project will be located on certain Tribal lands), with a Submission Packet pursuant to Section VILA of the NPA. 1.0. Deputy SHPO Carol Griffith - Arizona State Parks - Phoenix, AZ - electronic mail 11. Deputy SHPO William Collins - Arizona State Parks - Phoenix, AZ - electronic mail 12. SHPO Edward C Nichols - History Colorado - Denver, CO - regular mail 13. SHPO Bob L Blackburn - Oklahoma Historical Society Oklahoma City, OK - regular mail If you are proposing to construct a facility in the State of Alaska, you should contact Commission staff for guidance regarding your obligations in the event that Tribes do not respond to this notification within a reasonable time. Please be advised that the FCC cannot guarantee that the contact(s) listed above opened and reviewed an electronic or regular mail notification. The following information relating to the proposed tower was forwarded to the person(s) listed above: Notification Received: 04/30/2014 Notification ID: 110419 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: TEP for Commnet Wireless, LLC Consultant Name: Ryan A Malek Street Address: 5545 W. 56th Avenue Unit E City: Arvada 4 State: COLORADO Zip Code: 80002 Phone: 303-566-9914 Email: rmalek@tepgroup.net Structure Type: MTOWER - Monopole Latitude: 39 deg 23 min 59.6 sec N Longitude: 107 deg 20 min 14.8 sec W Location Description: 10901 County Road 117 City: Glenwood Springs State: COLORADO County: GARFIELD Detailed Description of Project (Optional): Ground Elevation: 2477.1 meters Support Structure: 18.3 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 19.8 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 2496.9 meters above mean sea level If you have any questions or comments regarding this notice, please contact the FCC using the electronic mail form located on the FCC's website at: http://wireless.fcc.gov/outreach/notification/cantact-fcc.html. You may also call the FCC Support Center at (877) 480-3201 (TTY 717-338-2824). Hours are from 8 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday (except Federal holidays). To provide quality service and ensure security, all telephone calls are recorded. Thank you, Federal Communications Commission 5 Ryan Malek From: towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 7:08 AM To: Ryan Malek Cc; Diane.Dupert@fcc.gov; Jonathan.Jonas@fcc.gov Subject: Proposed Construction of Communications Facilities Notification of Final Contacts - Ernail ID #14109 TEP for Commnet Wireless, LLC Ryan A Malek 5545 W. 56th Avenue Unit E Arvada, CO 80002 Dear Applicant: This letter addresses the proposed communications facilities listed below that you have referred to the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) for purposes of contacting federally recognized Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages (collectively Indian Tribes), and Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs), as specified by Section IV.G of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement (NPA). Consistent with the procedures outlined in the Commission's recent Declaratory Ruling (1), we have contacted the Indian Tribes or NHOs identified in the attached Table for the projects listed in the attached Table. You referred these projects to us between 06/12/2014 and 06/19/2014. Our contact with these Tribal Nations or NHOs was sent on 06/19/2014. Thus, as described in the Declaratory Ruling (2), if you or Commission staff do not receive a statement of interest regarding a particular project from any Tribe or NHO within 20 calendar days of 96/19/2014, your obligations under Section IV of the NPA with respect to these Tribal Nations or NHOs are complete(3). If aTribal Nation or NHO responds that it is interested in participating within the 20 calendar day period, the Applicant must involve it in the review as set forth in the NPA, and may not begin construction until the process set forth in the NPA is completed. You are reminded that Section IX of the NPA imposes independent obligations on an Applicant when a previously unidentified site that may be a historic property, including an archeological property, is discovered during construction or after the completion of review(4). In such instances, the Applicant must cease construction and promptly notify, among others, any potentially affected Tribal Nation or NHO. A Tribal Nation's or NHO's failure to express interest in participating in pre -construction review of an undertaking does not necessarily mean it is not interested in archeological properties or human remains that may inadvertently be discovered during construction. Hence, an Applicant is still required to notify any potentially affected Tribal Nation or NHO of any such finds pursuant to Section IX or other applicable law. Sincerely, Dan Abeyta Assistant Chief Spectrum and Competition Policy Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 1) See Clarification of Procedures for Participation of Federally Recognized Indian Tribes and Native Hawaiian Organizations Under the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement, Declaratory Ruling, FCC 05-176 (released October 6, 2005) (Declaratory Ruling). 2) Id S 8-10. 3) We note that, under the Declaratory Ruling, an expression of interest by an Indian Tribe or NNO addressed solely to the Commission staff during the 20 -day period is sufficient even if it does not contact the Applicant. 4) Id at 5 11. LIST OF PROPOSED COMMUNICATIONS TOWERS TCNS# 110419 Referred Date: 06/17/2014 Location: 10901 County Road 117, Glenwood Springs, CO Detailed Description of Project: Tribe Name: Ute Indian Tribe LEGEND: * - Notification numbers are assigned by the Commission staff for sites where initial contact was not made through TCNS. 2 Ryan Malek From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: towemotifyinfo@fcc.gov Thursday, July 10, 2014 7:08 AM Ryan Malek Diane.Dupert@fcc.gov; Jonathan.Jonas@fcc.gov Proposed Construction ofCommunications Facilities Notification of Final Contacts - Email ID #14200 TEP for Commnet Wireless, LLC Ryan A Malek 5545 W. 56th Avenue Unit E Arvada, CO 80002 Dear Applicant: This letter addresses the proposed communications facilities listed below that you have referred to the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) for purposes of contacting federally recognized Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages (collectively Indian Tribes), and Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs), as specified by Section IV.G of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement (NPA). Consistent with the procedures outlined in the Commission's recent Declaratory Ruling (1), we have contacted the Indian Tribes or NHOs identified in the attached Table for the projects listed in the attached Table. You referred these projects to us between 07/03/2014 and 07/10/2014. Our contact with these Tribal Nations or NHOs was sent on 07/10/2014. Thus, as described in the Declaratory Ruling (2), if you or Commission staff do not receive a statement of interest regarding a particular project from any Tribe or NHO within 20 calendar days of 07/10/2014, your obligations under Section IV of the NPA with respect to these Tribal Nations or NHOs are complete(3). If aTribal Nation or NHO responds that it is interested in participating within the 20 calendar day period, the Applicant must involve it in the review as set forth in the NPA, and may not begin construction until the process set forth in the NPA is completed. You are reminded that Section IX of the NPA imposes independent obligationsonan Applicant when a previously unidentified site that may be a historic property, including an archeological property, is discovered during construction or after the completion of review(4). In such instances, the Applicant must cease construction and promptly notify, among others, any potentially affected Tribal Nation or NHO. A Tribal Nation's or NHO's failure to express interest in participating in pre -construction review of an undertaking does not necessarily mean it is not interested in archeological properties or human remains that may inadvertently be discovered during construction. Hence, an Applicant is still required to notify any potentially affected Tribal Nation or NHO of any such finds pursuant to Section IX or other applicable law. Sincerely, Dan Abeyta Assistant Chief Spectrum and Competition Policy Division Wireless Telecommunications Bureau 1) See Clarification of Procedures for Participation of Federally Recognized Indian Tribes and Native Hawaiian Organizations Under the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement, Declaratory Ruling, FCC 05-176 (released October 6, 2005) (Declaratory Ruling). 1 2) Id 5 8-10. 3) We note that, under the Declaratory Ruling, an expression of interest by an Indian Tribe or NHO addressed solely to the Commission staff during the 20 -day period is sufficient even if it does not contact the Applicant. 4) Id at S 11. LIST OF PROPOSED COMMUNICATIONS TOWERS TCNS# 108798 Referred Date: 07/08/2014 Location: US Highway 14A, Cody, WY Detailed Description of Project: Tribe Name: Cheyenne -Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma TCNS# 110419 Referred Date: 07/08/2014 Location: 10901 County Road 117, Glenwood Springs, CO Detailed Description of Project: Tribe Name: Cheyenne -Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma TCNS# 105831 Referred Date: 07/08/2014 Location: Idaho Hill Road, Marion, MT Detailed Description of Project: Tribe Name: Cheyenne -Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma TCNS# 109320 Referred Date: 07/08/2014 Location: Montana Highway 278, Wisdom, MT Detailed Description of Project: Tribe Name: Cheyenne -Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma LEGEND: * - Notification numbers are assigned by the Commission staff for sites where initial contact was not made through TCNS. Ryan Malek From: towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 8:26 AM To: Ryan Malek Cc: tcns.fccarchive@fcc.gov; fcc.gov; dykehousej@gma l.eom Subject: Reply to Proposed Tower Structure (Notification ID: 110419) - Email ID #3764305 Dear Ryan A Malek, Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). The purpose of this email is to inform you that an authorized user of the TCNS has replied to a proposed tower construction notification that you had submitted through the TCNS. The following message has been sent to you from THPO Technician Joanna Dykehouse of the Jicarilla Apache Nation in reference to Notification ID #110419: We have no interest in this site. However, if the Applicant discovers archaeological remains or resources during construction, the Applicant should immediately stop construction and notify the appropriate Federal Agency and the Tribe. For your convenience, the information you submitted for this notification is detailed below. Notification Received: 04/30/2014 Notification ID: 110419 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: TEP for Commnet Wireless, LLC Consultant Name: Ryan A Malek Street Address: 5545 W. 56th Avenue Unit E City: Arvada State: COLORADO Zip Code: 80002 Phone: 303-566-9914 Email: rmalek(teperoup.net Structure Type: MTOWER - Monopole Latitude: 39 deg 23 min 59.6 sec N Longitude: 107 deg 20 min 14.8 sec W Location Description: 10901 County Road 117 City: Glenwood Springs State: COLORADO County: GARFIELD Detailed Description of Project: Ground Elevation: 2477.1 meters Support Structure: 18.3 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 19.8 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 2496.9 meters above mean sea level Ryan Malek From: towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 3:14 PM To: Ryan Malek Cc: tcnsiccarchive@fcc.gov; awilley@c-a-tribes.org Subject: Reply to Proposed Tower Structure (Notification ID: 110419) - Email ID #3832543 Dear Ryan A Malek, Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). The purpose of this email is to inform you that an authorized user of the TCNS has replied to a proposed tower construction notification that you had submitted through the TCNS. The following message has been sent to you from TWO Andrew Willey of the Cheyenne -Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma in reference to Notification ID #110419: At this time it is determined to be No Effect; however, if at any time during the project implementation inadvertent discoveries are made that reflect evidence of human remains, ceremonial or cultural objects, historical sites such as stone rings, burial mounds, village or battlefield artifacts, please discontinue work and notify the THPO Office immediately. If needed, we will contact the Tribes NAGPRA representatives. For your convenience, the information you submitted for this notification is detailed below. Notification Received: 04/30/2014 Notification ID: 110419 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: TEP for Commnet Wireless, LLC Consultant Name: Ryan A Malek Street Address: 5545 W. 56th Avenue Unit E City: Arvada State: COLORADO Zip Code: 80002 Phone: 303-566-9914 Email: rmaleOtepgroup.net Structure Type: MTOWER - Monopole Latitude: 39 deg 23 min 59.6 sec N Longitude: 107 deg 20 min 14.8 sec W Location Description: 10901 County Road 117 City: Glenwood Springs State: COLORADO County: GARFIELD Detailed Description of Project: Ground Elevation: 2477.1 meters Support Structure: 18.3 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 19.8 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL:. 2496.9 meters above mean sea level OROW TRIBE EXEOUT'IME BRRIAION `YGJ Bacheeitche Avenue P.O. Box 159 Crow Agency (BaaxuwUaaShe), Montana 59022 Phone: (406) 636-3709 June 5, 2014 Ryan Adam Malek Tower Engineering Professionals, Inc. 5545 W. 56"' Avenue, Unit E Arvada, CO 80002 Project: Sunlight Mountain/ TCNS #110419 Darrin Old Goyote CHAIRMAN Dana Wilson VICE-CHA1RMAN Alvin Not Afraid Jr. SECRETARY Shawn Back Bone VICE -SECRETARY To Ryan: The Crow Tribal Preservation Office (CTHPO) found the Site Sunlight Mountain/ TCNS #110419 to be of No Interest. We have determine that the site will not affect or impact Historic/Cultural Properties due to the location of the proposed project. This project does not required any monitors from our office. If any Historic/Cultural properties are found during ground disturbance please call our office immediately. If you have any concerns, comments, or questions please let us know at email: Ererson.BullChief@crow nsn.gov, Jartles.DayChild(ucrow-nsn.gov; Work # is (406) 638-4238/3969, Cell # (406) 208-6670 or (406) 679-3710. Sincerely, Emerson Bull Chief Crow Tribal Historic Preservation Officer PO Box 159 Crow Agency, MT 59022 The Great Apsaalooke Nation: "Teepee Capital of the World" Crow Tribal Historic Preservation Office P.0.1 o. 159 1 Crow Agcnci Monition 590221 P. -40(036.423K j witi%.ernwthpo.ore Hoinon'einino' Northern Arapaho Tribe TRIBAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE P.O.8ax 67 - SL Stephens, Wyoming 82534 - PH: 307.656+,1628 Date: Environmental Company: Contact: Email Address Address: Telephone: July 6, 2014 Tower Engineering Professionals Ryan A. Malek, Environmental Scientist rmalek@tepgroup.net 5545 w. S6"' Ave. Arvada, Colorado 80002 303-566-9914 Fax: 303-566-9916 TCNS #: 110419 Site Name: Sunlight Mountain Company Name: Comment Wireless, LLC New Construction: 60 ft. monopole on a 10X10 ft. lease area and a 39 ft. long utility route. Collocation; Building Type for Collocation: Tower Height: Overall Height:60 ft. Appurtenances/Panels/ Dish #: Location: T7S , R89W, Section 33 Address: 10901 County Road 117, Glenwood Springs, Garfield County, Colorado The Northern Arapaho THPO has reviewed your Consultation Request under the National Environmental Protection Act and National Historic Preservation Act, Section 106 process regarding the proposed project and offers the following response: NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN THE DIRECT APE- The file search and pedestrian survey for direct effects on the APE yielded no historic findings. The area where the APE is located is noted to be developed and associated with the Sunlight Mountain Resort. NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES WITHIN A Yi MILE OF THE APE FOR VISUAL EFFECTS - There are no properties of religious and cultural significance to the Northern Arapaho that are within the area of potential effect. Should human remains or traditional cultural properties Le found during construction, contact our office and send a report Thank you for consulting with the Northern Arapaho Tribe and providing the cultural resource inventory report. Sincerely, eptbusa ditestailely Tribal Historic Preservation Officer northernarapahothpo@gmail.com la sofolaSott4 Si. itillitagairk too i ** a rr P +�i � � � ,edb 3 t,Ssl�'MR 4110* ea'� *►1w XML+' ipviik_ipso wF * �k y� r1u : t int + �yrl,,[is .• �,'� -0 Iborrierew,pugo.—e-foraeo a4a 4� 4w *rJ ! filf,f IF tiositAr itrt'` stiosti�nin 10111111111021100011111.1011K. i.;r,� �w#N4. q 0 ,�„1* vie . '� '*� ialilis �G+'r*i a► a *40.4►'! ■ + i ■■ = �* *{air +►iRl�► ia, }��'�* �� �Y��* ie ■ A ■� r nab *1i1►�y 1 r�i +s SIF :: i41 ,M■!a ws e` s gh �i� ♦ [ M wiralos *� 1 4461-4,11.1, i► ,111 iat tel*f r■ �� w t ■ ,rap 1.1110111011,11V 101004,4066hir4400141410 ilMsr11- .44talia1i ■eVit a • r �` ilismossitax rita i r■ompl tier. . ia`'`a1.■a.•1 is s i�■■e j *. vag 1 ■ "=OaMidA�t■MiaP.�iill /�� wr oil# �!"► �,rFL.i�sal.■ ■s�i.l� j�q7■■■��� + #�� ' loot dallv ial ■l �r ::x:2:1■■■■i�IIII ,�., -•11. �4��Ir�i�l �/ IF ID 76.1.11.11111 ■1 IIt'!"4iii4Iii!ULiiIifiEIll!!iiiiIF' �. ■:■■■■�!s■ .ate ' Arr � � A °+ plaisiodtv mm National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Resources for Tribes Museums Agencies Public Press Indian Reservations in the Continental United States MAP INDEX Full Size Map (PDF) 0 No Data 1. ABSENTEE SHAWNEE' 2. ACOMA 3. AGUA CALIENTE 4. ALABAMA-COUSHATTA 5. ALABAMA-QUASSARTE CREEKS• 6. ALLEGANY 7. APACHE 8. BAD RIVER 9. BARONA RANCH 10. BATTLE MOUNTAIN 11. BAY MILLS 12. BENTON PAIUTE 13. BERRY CREEK 14. BIG BEND 15. BIG CYPRESS 16. BIG LAGOON 17. BIG PINE 18. BIG VALLEY 102. HUALAPAI 103. INAJA 104. IOWA • 105. ISABELLA 106. ISLETA 107. JACKSON 108, JEMEZ 109. JICARILLA 110. KAIBAB 111. KALISPEL 112. KAW 113. KIALEGEE CREEK • 114. KICKAPOO • 115, KIOWA • 116. KLAMATH * 117. KOOTENAI 118, L'ANSE 119. LAC COURTS OREILLES 120. LAC DU FLAMBEAU 204, RED CLIFF 205. RED LAKE 206. RENO -SPARKS 207. RINCON 208. ROARING CREEK 209. ROCKY BOYS 210. ROSEBUD 211. ROUND VALLEY 212. RUMSEY 213. SAC AND FOX# 214. SALT RIVER 215. SANDIA 216. SANDY LAKE 217. SANTA ANA 218. SANTA CLARA 219. SANTA DOMINGO 220, SANTA ROSA 221. SANTA ROSA (NORTH) 222. SANTA YNEZ Home Frequently Asked Questions Law and Regulations Online Databases Grants Training Notices Documents and Publications Review Committee Special Topics Contact National NAGPRA 19. BISHOP 20.BLACKFEET 21. BRIDGEPORT 22. BRIGHTON 23. BURNS PAIUTE COLONY 24. CABEZON 25. CA'DDO • 26. CAHUILLA 27. CAMPQ 28. CAMP VERDE 29. CANONCITO 30. CAPITAN GRANDE 31. CARSON 32. CATAWBA 33. CATTARAUGUS 34. CAYUGA • 35. CEDARVILLE 36. CHEHALIS 37. CHEMEHUEVI 38. CHEROKEE •# 39. CHEYENNE-ARAPAHOE' 40. CHEYENNE RIVER 41. CHICKASAW • 42. CHITIMACHA 43. CHOCTAW ' # 44. CITIZEN BAND OF POTAWATOMI • 45. COCHITI 46. COEUR D"ALENE 47. COLD SPRINGS 121. LAC VIEUX DESERT 122. LAGUNA 123. LAS VEGAS 124. LAYTONVILLE 125. LA JOLLA 126. LA POSTA 127. LIKELY 128. LONE PINE 129. LOOKOUT 130. LOS COYOTES 131. LOVELOCK COLONY 132. LOWER BRULE 133. LOWER ELWAH 134. LOWER SIOUX 135. LUMMI 136, MAKAH 137. MANCHESTER 138. MANZANITA 139. MARICOPA 140. MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT 141. MATTAPONI + 142, MENOMINEE 143. MESCALERO 144. MIAMI • 145. MICCOSUKEE 146. MIDDLETOWN 147, MILLE LACS 148. MISSION 149. MOAPA 223. SANTA YSABEL 224. SANTEE 225. SAN CARLOS 226. SAN FELIPE 227. SAN ILDEFONSO 228. SAN JUAN 229. SAN MAN UAL 230. SAN PASQUAL 231. SAN XAVIER 232. SAUK SUTATTLE 233. SEMINOLE • 234. SENECA-CAYUGA • 235. SEQUAN 236. SHAGTICOKE + 237. SHAKOPEE 238. SHEEP RANCH 239. SHERWOOD VALLEY 240. SHINGLE SPRING 241. SHINNECOCK + 242. SHOALWATER 243. SHOSHONE 244. SILETZ 245. SISSETON 246. SKOKOMISH 247. SKULL VALLEY 248. SOBQBA 249. SOUTHERN UTE 250. SPOKANE 251. SQUAXON ISLAND 252. ST. CROIX 48. COLORADO RIVER 49. COLVILLE 50. COMANCHE • 51. COOS, LOWER UMPQUA & SIUSLAW 52. COQUILLE • 53. CORTINA 54. COUSHATTA 55. COW CREEK 56. CREEK • 57. CROW 58. CROW CREEK 59. CUYAPAIPE 60. DEER CREEK 61. DELAWARE • 62. DEVILS LAKE 63. DRESSLERVILLE COLONY 64. DRY CREEK 65. DUCKWATER 66. DUCK VALLEY 67. EASTERN SHAWNEE • 68. EAST COCOPAH 69. ELY COLONY 70. ENTERPRISE 71. FALLON 72. FLANDREAU INDIAN SCHOOL 73. FLATHEAD 74. FOND DU LAC 75. FORT APACHE 150. MODOC 151. MOLE LAKE 152. MONTGOMERY CREEK 153. MORONGO 154. MUCKLESHOOT 155. NAMBE 156. NARRAGANSETT 157. NAVAJO 158. NETT LAKE 159. NEZ PERCE 160. NIPMOC- HASSANAM ISCO + 161. NISQUALLY 162. NOOKSACK 163. NORTHERN CHEYENNE 164. NORTHWESTERN SHOSHONE 165. OIL SPRINGS 166. OMAHA 167. ONEIDA # 168. ONONDAGA 169. ONTONAGON 170. OSAGE 171. OTOE-MISSOURI • 172. OTTAWA' 173. OUT 174. OZETTE 175. PAIUTE 176. PALA 177. PAMUNKEY + 178. PASCUA YAQUI 253. ST. REGIS 254. STANDING ROCK 255. STEWARTS POINT 256. STOCKBRIDGE MUNSEE 257. SUMMIT LAKE 258. SUSANVILLE 259. SWINOMISH 260. TAOS 261. TE-MOAK 262. TESUQUE 263. TEXAS KICKAPOO 264. TOHONO OODHAM 265. TONAWANDA 266. TONIKAWA • 267. TORRES MARTINEZ 268. TOULUMNE 269. TRINDAD 270. TULALIP 271. TULE RIVER 272. TUNICA-BILOXI 273. TURTLE 274. TUSCARORA 275. TWENTYNINE PALMS 276. UMATILLA 277. UNITAH AND OURAY 278. UNITED KEETOOWAH BAND OF CHEROKEE• 279. UPPER SIOUX 280. UPPER SKAGIT 281. UTE MOUNTAIN 76. FORT BELKNAP 77. FORT BERTHOLD 78. FORT BIDWELL 79. FORT HALL 80. FORT INDEPENDENCE 81. FORT MCDERMITT 82. FORT MCDOWELL 83. FORT MOHAVE 84. FORT PECK 85. FORT YUMA 86. FT. SILL APACHE' 87. GILABEND 88. G1LA RIVER 89. GOSHUTE 90. GRANDE RONDE 91. GRAND PORTAGE 92. GRAND TRAVERSE 93. GREATER LEECH LAKE 94. GRINDSTONE 95. HANNAHVILLE 96. HAVASUPAI 97. HOH 98. HOLLYWOOD 99. HOOPA VALLEY 100. HOPI 101. HOULTON MALISEETS 179. PASSAMAQUODDY 180. PAUCATAUK PEQUOT + 181. PAUGUSETT + 182. PAWNEE' 183. PECHANGA 184. PENOBSCOT 185. PEORIA' 186. PICURIS 187. PINE RIDGE 188. POARCH CREEK 189. POJOAQUE 190. PONCA • 191. POOSEPATUCK 1'- 1 92 . 192. PORT GAMBLE 193. PORT MADISON 194. POTAWATOMI # 195. PRAIRIE ISLE 196. PUERTOCITO 197. PUYALLUP 198. PYRAMID LAKE 199. QUAPAW ' 200. QUILLAYUTE 201. QUINAULT 202. RAMAH 203. RAMONA 282. VERMILION LAKE 283. VIEJAS 284. WALKER RIVER 285. WARM SPRINGS 286. WASHOE 287. WEST COCOPAH 288. WHITE EARTH 289. WICHITA' 290. WIND RIVER 291. WINNEBAGO # 292. WINNEMUCCA 293. WOODFORD INDIAN COMMUNITY 294. WYANDOTTE • 295. XL RANCH 296. YAKAMA 297. YANKTON 298. YAVAPAI 299. YERINGTON 300. YOMBA 301. YSLETA DEL SUR 302. YUROK 303. ZIA 304. ZUNI 14istory & Culture NPS,gav FOIA 1 Privacy PMM Disclaimer 1 USA.gov TOWERkaa �� ENGINEERING PRCFESSIONALS ATTACHMENT 6 FLOODPLAIN M A P KEY TO MAP 500 -Year Hood Boundary 100 -Year Flood Boundary Q Yi a 0 N Zone Designations w 0 N 100 -Year Flood Boundary 500•Year Flood Boundary sr Flood Elevation Linc m rh Elevation In Fear* n co co LU X Elevation Reference Mark Zone 1) Bourtda; • • 4. »ial Cieotietit Vertical Datum of 1929 tx 7. EXPLANATION OF ZONE DESIGNATIONS EXPLANATION YJ z 0 hl 9-0 • a a S rN f Z-1 4. 9 D G r ... -C yff''=n a w Tv i-,T,Yo ` V C nc o a ca om n© ,3o vcri 0.0 6d ? E uC 2��� .,.f� G G ae n .� N 7 :3 7 E a- ‹..c: -.0S.,2 s t4 G -am! c - ea -0 ^s '''"';''''-9-..2 0 Cr c r 4 a U � Z 3 �°` r i- " .C.n. v « c+ ai A .S C1 C :C A J *s 4--. Oma- '-., anti r a a 4. u Q'- a O7 pto�d -U �C b O d co]0os,p on j...-S.,a O : G C p O • v -0F. , y do .. U ?,, a up2 ,. 4- VI r — A.A < v •. �..4. r C to reas of minim P m 0 X ? c0i m r Q a d ffJ 7 iii �rE 423 TOWER ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS ATTACHMENT 7 SURFACE FEATURES S (WETLANDS, DEFORESTATION, WATER DIVERSION) 2 (0 0 N RJ 2 Freshwater Emergent Freshwater Forested/Shrub Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Estuanne and Marine a 0 0.5 Mr 2000 Ft Map provided by MyTopo.com Y��00 D spR, 0EP'AI % August 18, 2014 To: Dave Pesnichak, Planner Garfield County From: Ron Biggers Deputy Fire Marshal, Glenwood Spring Fire Department EXHIBIT Re; File LAPP -7912, Project Ski Sunlight Inc.- Communication Tower Amendment Applicant Ski Sunlight Inc., contact person, Lowell Nelson, location 10901 CR 117, Section 33, range 89 west of the 6th PM. Comments The applicant shall provide Glenwood Springs Fire Department with MSDS sheets on all the hazardous materials and quantities that will be contained on the site and in the building. These sheets shall also be present in the building on the site. The doors to the building or equipment cabinet shall be signed in a viable location with hazardous materials identification signs as specified in NFPA 704 and Section 2703.5 in the 2009 edition of the International Fire Code (IFC). If the building/equipment cabinets will be enclosed by fencing it to shall have the correct hazardous materials signage affixed to it in visible locations. The building and area surrounding it shall comply with all the sections that apply in Chapter 27, Hazardous Materials -General Provisions and Chapters 28-44, 2009 edition of the IFC. For Building Code compliance the applicant shall also reference all the Chapters and Sections of them in the International Building Code (IBC), 2009 edition that apply to the building and the hazards housed in it. FYI: The fencing and cabinets housing the present temporary cell tower site at Sunlight Resort are not labeled with hazardous material signage. See attached photos. The most common hazardous materials on these sites are usually the electrical power and back-up batteries. 101 WEST 8TH STREET GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 970-384-6480 FAX 970-945-8506 August 15, 2014 Garfield County David Pesnichak Garfield County Community Development Department RE: Sunlight Comm Tower LPAA 7912 Dear David, I have no comments on this one. Sincerely, Steve Anthony Garfield County Vegetation Manager Vegetation Management 0375 County Road 352, Bldg 2060 Rifle, CO 81650 Phone: 970-945-1377 x 4305 Fax: 970.6255939 David Pesnichak From: Kirschvink, James A -FS <jkirschvink@fs.fed.us> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 10:59 AM To: David Pesnichak Subject: Ski Sunlight Tower proposal LPAA 7912 Hi David: This is in regards to the tower proposal in the Ski Sunlight parking lot: EXHIBIT The LUSFS has no issues with this, other than we recommend using a non -reflective color for the tower that blends into the environment. An acid -etched finish, such as those that many ski lift towers use would be adequate and low maintenance. Also, there may be requirements with the FAA regarding new tower construction to ensure that the uses on the tower don't interfere with aircraft navigation. Although unlikely, this may be a requirement. 1 recommend you contact the FAA and perhaps the FCC to ensure that their protocols are met. Due to the large distance between the site on Sunlight Peak and your parking lot, it may not be a requirement, but I'm not sure. I would also consider the possibility of future uses with this tower that may be unforeseen at this time. Feel free to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jim Kirschvink USDA Jim Kirschvink Realty Specialist Forest Service :Aspen-Sopris Ranger District p: 970-963-2266 x3118 f: 470-063-1012 ikirschvink(j:•fs.fed.us 620 Main Street Carbondale. CO 81623 www. fs.fed.us Caring for the land and serving people This electronic message contains information generated by the USDA solely for the intended recipients. Any unauthorized interception of this message or the use or disclosure of the information it contains may violate the law and subject the violator to civil or criminal penalties. If you believe you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete the email immediately. 1