The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication- Permit. Garfield County 'Building & Sanitation Department 108 8`" Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003 NO. ci a Job Address (ri / Old rn/ LII' 24) 04 623 Nature of Work Building Permit 039 / 53 - -� Use of Building cliC ��( i 1� D Qr Cow L!ec t Owner Contractor 5L .(_ �1dr5— Amount S Amount of Permit $ / 70 & J Permit No: GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8'h Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212 / Fax: 970-384-3470 / inspection Line: 970-384-5003 qUI Parcel/Schedule No: c23 95 - 153—/).-00 3-, AGREEMENT PERMISSION 15 HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY CARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 3028201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIA BLITZES BY CARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Garfom.003 ' (_]r,/��1 Mit"' HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE�]THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL): _ _� .CT, Y ' �J it "' 3I /' / ' I��'�I-rl�tl(1u i�GC I,.C"1 a/net/act IW /qt., Rn 7 Job Address: ooj( bfdCO Met d)o .d )ctr Sh C.S fl6o/ 1 Lot No: # Block No: Subd. / Exemption: , , 7i -+ aett .} vu), 4Pkrt-Se_ j o, m��t� c,S wi De/0.-v 2 Owner: ke-to kew L COhvLsOki_ Address cxl/D 01;3 oil ICK/t4�0Gtusn) Ph: ?tic.- epic- '3S1ca Wk Ph: 3 Contractor: 5 LT Ato c_< , Address: oo/o ot.d ffinziatitbc.to Ph:(( / 1 r l 11 Lic. NQf besi / . cn 4 Architect/Engineer: VvhA-sSetz b low-trI Address:SSC MAi+ti C. GazSD b06, co . ei4e5 Ph: 19)61 963 - 9643 Lic. No. 26377 5 Sq. Ft. ofBuilding:UV1y 61404192 310004-c• Sxxrt Sq. Ft. of Lot: _/-- Q, 1L/ Height: c,v-fAtL1-0L1 ire', No. of Floors: 2- 6 Use of Building: t Lc e6 v`teLAAA pA,C,.—yry cSY�R _ Q / (1 1 CtTT.0 -la T 7 Describe Work: U 111 2 "SLataii 5 t=. N.-DTie-1,z_Tocr,�)51W,ci1.47'-ell Wctoo.SlDeex-, 8 Class of Work: V New o Alteration o Remove ❑ Addition o Move 9 10 Garage: o Single we Double Carport: o Single o Double Afi/ Driveway Permit Cyt 1 On -Site Sewage Disposal o Site Plan (Septic) 11 Valuation of Work:4 c Li to,��/J Adjusted Valuations: $ �3 s 12 _ Special Conditions: frsi66`-717 L'k ad -e "-owl o�r+Atere /Q(Jg -Tt »»AFT` I , 1umee-a' ,?yecf��t R,vaeve4v�. Car 44of 4 J� o•.� //'Tt C - 1JCrlDr'_ AlfsV /Ice' NOTICE NOTICE VV 17PIan A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED I5 NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR, IF CONSTRUCTION WORKANYAFTER OR15 ABANDONEDFORA PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK 1S COMMENCED. PERIOD OF 180 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. Check Fee: )/ 270.10 Permit Fee: MOD. Ma)- / Total Fee: Dated Permit Issued: 10+4 2970.z 5-f- �� — JR'S 3.J OCC Group: 3 , 1 (� Const. Type: / ') . / �[ /v Zoning: Setbacks: p� Irl �,..aa ISDS No. & Fee: �i ems_ il A__ In , �t sla. B DG APPROVAL . ,JP /ms' E AGREEMENT PERMISSION 15 HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY CARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 3028201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIA BLITZES BY CARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Garfom.003 ' (_]r,/��1 Mit"' HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE�]THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL): _ _� .CT, Y ' �J it "' 3I /' / ' I��'�I-rl�tl(1u i�GC I,.C"1 a/net/act IW /qt., Rn 7 The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non- absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1997 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOTOCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISE UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit# in -79 Signature " Date BpcontO82002 Applicant VALUATIONIFEE DETERMINATION Address ao l 1, Date it- n -C4 Finished (Livable Area): Main I55bt Upper /5(o Lower Other Subdivision d f Lot/Block 42 Contractor .SLS Total Square Feet 3) 0 Valuation Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Crawl Space: Valuation )i 6_, I Decks/Patios: �t f Covered Valuation liG - 110 Open Valuation 574, v. %0 id /3(a2 Valuation Total Valuation 2Li3,sz3 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS for SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS and MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. Adequate and complete information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays because other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction under the Uniform Building Code". This book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. 1 A Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house - rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, an 80 M.P.H. windshear, wind exposure B, windload of 15 pounds per square foot, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC. I . Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. NOTE: 106.3.1 (7.) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope Yes 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special setbacks do)pply. Yes i/ 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent pr perties), streams or water courses? Yes \J 7 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property Yes / 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes ,/ 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and 9 e clearances required between wood and earth? Yes I/ 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces's and soffits? Yes t/ 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafter"; joists or trusses? Yes 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns�ard beams? Yes ✓ 12. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing (undi bed) grade contours? Yes 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and mo c and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes ,/ No 3 14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Building ode Chapter 37? Yes No 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code?? Yes ✓ No 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and vent' tion for all habitable rooms? Yes No 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes 1/- No 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on plan? Yes thNo 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? / Yes c/ No 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the architectural cprimittee deny or reject your building plans? Yes No 21. Will this be thh my residential structure on the parcel? Yes ✓ No If no -Explain: 22. Have two (2omplete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes 23. Do you understand that the minimum dimensions a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft.long? Yes ✓ No 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction co requirements? Yes No 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone di ct? Yes No 26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by arfield County Building Department? Yes No 27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application -of these changes? Yes '/ No 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building pe Yes / No 29. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoons. All inspections must be called in by 3:30 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay your inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003/ Yes No 30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $4 re-inpsection fee? Yes No 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and upancy of the building? Yes r No 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority be given fo Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the Unifo uilding Code? Yes No 33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 5-8601. Yes No 34. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of livable inspection. Yes No 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building p it application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes No 36. Do you know that the local fire djstfict may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes t No (please check with the building department about this requirement) I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. Signature of Own Date Phone: Co D (days); 9 t-6---) l/ 07 (evenings) Project Name: t'up IN\ uetuv Project Address: 0011. QC -n \1,t.{'cti-4Th (',-, CO c) C.? . S ( too Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreq 11/2003 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant Date Building ✓>ingineered Foundation �riveway Permit ''�`/Surveyed Site Plan JC(cWSeptic Permit and Setbacks —Cirade/Topography 30% attach Residential Plan Review List ----Minimum Application Questionnaire subdivision Plat Notes lu`i• Fire Department Review I/Valuation Determination/Fees `� Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker 6.-Th<ttach Conditions "-----Application Signed [/Plan Reviewer To Sign Application Parcel/Schedule No. 40# Snowload Letter- Manf. Hms. GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning Property Line Setbacks 30ft Stream Setbacks Flood Plain Building Height Zoning Sign -off Road Impact Fees HOA/DRC Approval Grade/Topography 40% Planning Issues Subdivision Plat Notes VAR -23-2004 16:42 DELANEY & DELHt-EY 970 945 2303 ARCHI'T'ECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE OAK MEADOWS RANCH • P.O. Box 2115 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 March 23, 2004 Stephen Johnson/Joy Benedict P.O. Box 3173 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 RE: Lot 2, 0011 Old Midland Drive, Oak Meadows Ranch Dear Stephen Johnson es Joy Benedict: P.02 Telephcme: (970) 945.7148 Facsimile: (970) 945-2303 The Architectural Control Committee has approved your plans and exterior color choices. The siding materials are hardiplank and the roofing shingles are 30 -year architectural shingles as per your samples. Body Color - Hardiplank - Warm Cedar Trim Color - Woodland Accent Color - Copper Mountain Roof Color - Brownwood Soffit Color - Woodland Thank you for submitting your color choices and drainage plan in a timely manner. RD/ tla Yours truly, ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE By: ��C,5 Ralph Delaney TOTAL P.02 • UarllelU I.UUllly_ ..per _ l�_ - 20 / Thrpasa Baker �4 ce,2 t9 From: Bobby Branham Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 1:13 PM To: "Tereasa Baker 1(tbaker@garfield-county.com1)"@mail.sopris.net Subject: Bennedict Exemption Itn trying another way to e-mail to you. Let me know if this works ok or if you still want it as an attachment. Bobby Garfield County Road and Bridge, District 1 7300 Hwy 82, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970-945-1223 ph. 945-1318 FAX Date: 03-26-04 To: Building & Planning From: Bobby Branham Re: Driveway permit exemption For: Steve Johnson and Joy Benedict Ph. 945-7407 Fx. 963-0879 Location: 0011 Old Midland Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Scope of Work: Obtain building permit Road and Bridge Concerns: This property lies outside the system of maintained county roads, and is therefore exempt from County driveway permit requirements. Bobby Branham Dist.1 Road and Bridge 3/26/2004 1° 0 r o'o EI 99I to I 0 N O -O -v L O-O-bZ f ,ao 3 3 fl LL LL 8-9-4Z LL LL J 5-9- L L 0 9 I 1 t ;I COUNTY OF GARFIELD - BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 � `, Job located at CX/' O(7✓ e/CM-rD �"• Permit No. ge ! 2— I I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: •'t ye You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date tic — Z —( 20 Building Inspector -7(42-e../... Phone (970) 945-8212 Z 128-946 auogd s O S C 7 = m a o3s 3 0 0 3.s m g o 5 a 3 a 3 m m v a. 0 A a 0 n O o' g o3 3 c St crm a 3 a Ts 0 co a Q a 0 a s)uonaaJJoa uaq have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. 0 0 • 3 0 Ip cp N m s �a o C 1/44 7 C N S a �0 0 m a f .N 0 O c -In. 0Fe, 0 03 N O. 7 ^' CD N 0 ay C0 0 a J 0 CO r N A w 0 co 0 e0 0 •A' 0 N Q. (1) W 0 0 O 0 a 0 v co 3 Z O 3011ON NO1103118OO ;e Pomo! Sof COUNTY OF GARFIELD - BUILDING DEPARTMENT 0 0 O co C N C Pi Q au N mD - o Am11 P 4.-B0 CO - D 0 C C v_ N a Z Z 9 Q0 -I -Rd CO is 0 )i.:1 111 3 0 m d O. 0 z —I Wo CAC-,\ BU LDING PERMIT Assessor's Parcel No X395- j 7 - I.; -at Date 4 - (03 04 Address, c Address RH NSPECTIONS Set s: Front �%cn Soils Test I� Footing S-- - -/ l�U Foundation S-/0- P7v\ Grout Underground Plumbing Rough Plumbing 7 -LS 'Gy Framing Y --;y C'< Insulation /0 w -O /OMA - Roofing Drywall /0-/3 -041 Gas Piping t-?it)`C/ EXTERIOR Address No. Drainage Decks -support & clearance to good Decks -stairs & rails tick Exterior locks Flashing around doors & windows Insect screens INTERIOR GARAGE Fire wall separation Service doors -13/4" mm. GpD f2Qmm I w/auto closer-13/4"s+inr_ S ' ,parmmation of chimn tsm NOTES Phone #(___g_5(gj Phone # LH Zoning Weatherproofing Mechanical Electrical Rough (State) ti" -o( CrW Electrical Final State) /2-/6 -DV GaJ Finalbl - Checklist Completed9 Certificate Occupancy # Date Septic System # rI Date Final Other FINAL CHECKLIST (continue on back) STAIRWAYS / Headroom (6'6'-) ✓ // Railing & guardraiS ✓/ Width Rise & run MECHANICAL ROOM Boder Hot water F A. ges/oil Floor dram Clearance Air con. system wn Hot water heater 'v 1 Combustion air Gas prying. valves LPG Dram FIREPLACE/STOVE Clearance to combustibles "tqi Mech. equip 16" above floor No opening into sleeping area BASEMENT -CRAWL AREA Access Insulation Headroom/Stairs Ventilation Combustion air Hearth (12" or 20" on sides) Glass doors Certified by REMARKS V KITCHEN Clearance above gull Exhaust fan .Y Broiler exhaust (1 hr chase) BEDROOMS Egress Smoke detector BATHROOMS Exhaust tan Shatterproof glass OTHER INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS • • THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued . . .Zoned Area Permit No 907 AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector nd IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. P _ 1 S Use Address or Legal Descriptio Ow Setbacks Front Coatracto r Side Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing 5—tf-(fit/ Foundation 6-- 10 - 0 4 Underground Plumbing Insulation /0 - 6-o f ,Y►1, Rough Plumbing y_ ZK-c..(� Drywall /0-13 q) �qp Chimney & Vent 4_10_0r- Electric Final (by State Inspector) illbitii ,11 Gas Piping y_ z' -�, Final , -(t vS" 1 Electric Rough (By State Inspector y T`/ • t Septic Final /OA_ Framing c`-2-j-C»YTj¢— ! / P (To include Roof in place and Windows and Doors installed). Notes: ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phone 384-5003 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. APP OVEGDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Date i• By IF PLACED OUTSIDE CO WITH CLEAR PLASTIC CTL I THOMPSON SOILS AND FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION LOT 2, FILING NO. 4, PHASE 1 OAK MEADOWS SUBDIVISION GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Prepared For: SLJ BUILDERS P.O. Box 1237 Glenwood Springs, Co 81602 Attention: Mr. Steve Johnson Job No. GS -4118 January 8, 2004 234 Center Drive 1 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970-945-2809 Fax: 970-945-7411 TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE 1 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1 SITE CONDITIONS 2 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 SITE EARTHWORK 4 FOUNDATION 5 FLOOR SYSTEMS AND SLABS -ON -GRADE 6 BELOW -GRADE CONSTRUCTION 8 SURFACE DRAINAGE 9 LIMITATIONS 10 FIGURE 1 - APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 - SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURES 3 AND 4 - SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 5 - EXTERIOR FOUNDATION WALL DRAIN TABLE I - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SLJ BUILDERS LOT 2, FILING NO. 4, PHASE 1 OAK MEADOWS SUBDIVISION CTUT JOB NO. GS -4118 r SCOPE This report presents the results of our soils and foundation investigation for the single-family residence proposed on Lot 2, Filing No. 4, Phase I at Oak Meadows Subdivision in Garfield County, Colorado. We conducted the investigation to evaluate subsurface conditions at the site and provide foundation recommendations for the planned construction. Our report was prepared from data developed during our field exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis and our experience with similar conditions. This report includes a description of the subsurface conditions found in our exploratory borings, and presents our opinions and recommendations for design criteria for recommended foundation and floor systems, and geotechnical and construction criteria for details influenced by the subsoils. The recommendations contained in this report were developed based on the currently planned construction. If plans will differ significantly from the descriptions contained herein, we should be informed so that we can check that our recommendations and design criteria are appropriate. A summary of our conclusions is presented below. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1. Subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory borings consisted of a 1 to 3 feet thick surficial layer of organic sandy clay "topsoil" above sandy clays with scattered gravels, cobbles and boulders. In our TH-1, the clays were underlain by clayey gravels with cobbles and sandy to gravelly clay lenses. In our TH-2, a layer of the gravels was in the clays from 8 to 22 feet deep. Maximum explored depth was 24 feet below the existing ground surface. No free ground water was found in our exploratory borings the day drilling. 2. We recommend constructing the residence on footing foundations with a minimum dead load supported by the undisturbed, native clay soils. Design and construction criteria for footings are presented in the report. SLJ BUILDERS LOT 2. FILING NO. 4. PHASE 1 OAK MEADOWS SUBDIVISION CTUT JOB NO. GS -4118 1 3. We judge garage slabs -on -grade can be supported by the native clay soils at this site with low potential for differential heave and related damage, provided a high degree of care is taken to prevent wetting of the subsoils below the building. Additional discussion is in the report. 4. Surface drainage should be designed to provide for rapid removal of surface water away from the proposed residence. A foundation drain should be constructed around the exterior foundation wall of the residence. SITE CONDITIONS River Oak Subdivision is located approximately 3/4 of a mile southwest of the intersection of Four Mile Road (County Road 126) and Dry Park Road (County Road 125) in Garfield County, Colorado. Lot 2, Filing No. 4 is located in the north part of the development, west of Old Midland (see Figure 1). Ground surfaces on the property generally slope gently down to the east. Dense oak brush is in the central part of the lot. Approximately 6 to 8 inches of snow covered the site the day of drilling. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION We understand the proposed single-family residence will be a one and two- story, wood -frame building with an attached garage. The main level floor will be structurally supported with a crawl space below. The garage floor will be a slab -on - grade. Foundation loads are expected to vary between 1,000 and 3,000 pounds per lineal foot of foundation wall with maximum interior column loads of 30 kips. We anticipate maximum foundation excavation depths on the order of 3 to 5 feet deep. Site grading fill will likely be placed outside the building footprint to adjust final grades for drainage. If construction will differ significantly from the descriptions SLJ BUILDERS LOT 2, FILING NO. 4, PHASE 1 OAK MEADOWS SUBONISION CTLIT JOB 140. GS -4118 2 above, we should be informed so that we can adjust our recommendations and design criteria, if necessary. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions at the site were investigated by drilling three exploratory borings (TH-1 through TH-3) at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. Drilling operations were directed by our engineering geologist who logged the soils encountered in the borings and obtained samples. Samples obtained in the field were returned to our laboratory where field classifications were checked and typical samples selected for testing. Graphic logs of the soils encountered in our exploratory borings are shown on Figure 2. Subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory borings consisted of a 1 to 3 feet thick surficial layer of organic sandy clay "topsoil" above sandy clays with scattered gravels, cobbles and boulders. In our TH-1, the clays were underlain by clayey gravels with cobbles and sandy to gravelly clay lenses. In ourTH-2, a layer of the gravels was in the clays from 8 to 22 feet deep. Maximum explored depth was 24 feet below the existing ground surface. No free ground water was found in our exploratory borings the day drilling. Results of field penetration resistance tests and observations during drilling indicated the clays were stiff and the gravels were dense to very dense. Borings were backfilled immediately after drilling operations were completed. One sample of the clays and one sample of clayey sand were selected for one- dimensional, swell -consolidation testing. The clay sample exhibited 2.9 percent swell and the clayey sand sample 0.1 percent swell when wetted under an applied pressure of 1,000 psf. Swell -consolidation test results are shown on Figures 3 and 4 and laboratory test results are summarized on Table I. We judge the clays to have a low to moderate expansion potential, clayey sands to posses a low expansion to SLJ BUILDERS LOT 2, FILING NO. 4, PHASE 1 OAK MEADOWS SUBDIVISION CTUT JOB NO. GS -4118 3 low consolidation potential and the clayey gravels with sandy to gravelly clay lenses to be slightly compressible. SITE EARTHWORK Fill will likely be placed outside the building footprint to adjust grades for drainage. Areas which will receive fill should be stripped of vegetation, organic soils and debris. The on-site soils free of organic matter, debris and rocks larger than 6 inches in diameter can be used as fill. Fill should be placed in thin, loose lifts of 10 inches thick or less, moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. Structural fill may be placed below floor slabs. Structural fill should be compacted to at least 98 percent of ASTM D 698. Moisture content and density of fill should be checked by a representative of our firm during placement. We anticipate excavations for the foundation and utilities can be accomplished using conventional, heavy-duty excavation equipment. Excavation sides will need to be sloped or braced to meet local, state and federal safety regulations. We believe the native clay and gravel soils will classify as Type B and Type C soils, respectively, based on OSHA standards governing excavations. Temporary excavated slopes deeper than 5 feet should be no steeper than 1 to 1 (horizontal to vertical) in Type B soils and 1.5 to 1 in Type C soils. Contractors should identify the soils encountered in the excavations and referto OSHA standards to determine appropriate slopes. Free ground water was not encountered in our exploratory borings during drilling operations. We do not anticipate excavations for the planned foundation or utilities will penetrate ground water, however, excavations should be sloped to a gravity discharge or to a temporary sump where water can be removed by pumping. SLJ BUILDERS LOT 2, FILING NO. 4. PHASE 1 OAK MEADOWS SUBDIVISION CTUT JOB NO. GS -0118 4 The ground surrounding the excavations should be sloped to direct runoff away from the excavation. FOUNDATION Our exploratory borings indicate native clays are the predominant soil present at anticipated building foundation depth (3 to 5 feet). The underlying gravel soils could be encountered in some parts of the excavation. The foundation system should be designed to concentrate the weight of the building to resist potential uplift from the expansive clay soils. We recommend constructing the residence on footing foundations with a minimum dead load. The completed foundation excavation should be inspected by a representative of our firm prior to placing forms to confirm that the exposed soils are as anticipated and suitable for support of the footings as designed. Recommended design and construction criteria for footings are presented below. 1. Footings supported by the native clay soils should be designed for a maximum soil bearing pressure of 3,000 psf and a minimum deadload of 750 psf or as high as practical. Soils loosened during the forming process for the footings should be removed or re -compacted prior to placing concrete. 2. If use of interrupted footings is necessary to maintain dead loads, a 4 - inch void should be constructed below grade beams, between footing pads, to allow for expansion of the subgrade soils and concentrate the weight of the residence on the footing pads. 3. Continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of at least 14 inches. Foundations for isolated columns should have minimum dimensions of 18 inches by 18 inches. Larger sizes may be required, depending upon foundation loads. 4. Grade beams and foundation walls should be well reinforced, top and bottom, to span undisclosed loose or soft soil pockets. We recommend reinforcement sufficient to span an unsupported distance SLJ BUILDERS LOT 2, FILING NO. 4. PHASE 1 OAK MEADOWS SUBDIVISION CTLJT JOB NO. GS -4118 5 of at least 12 feet. Reinforcement should be designed by the structural engineer considering the effects of lateral loads on wall performance. 5. The soils under exterior footings should be protected from freezing. We recommend the bottom of footings be constructed at least 36 inches below finished exterior grades for frost protection. The Garfield County building department should be consulted to verify the required depth 6. The completed foundation excavation should be inspected by a representative of our firm, prior to placing concrete forms, to confirm that subsoils are suitable for support of designed footings. FLOOR SYSTEMS AND SLABS -ON -GRADE The garage floor is planned as a slab -on -grade. The native clays at this site possess a low to moderate expansion potential. The expansive clay is stable at the existing moisture content, but upon wetting will heave lightly loaded slabs. Some increase in moisture must be assumed because of the impact of residential construction and associated landscaping. Based on our laboratory test data and our experience, we judge slab -on -grade construction can be supported by the undisturbed, clay soils with low potential risk of differential heave and associated damage, provided a high degree of care is taken to prevent wetting of the subsoils below the building. The movement potential could be reduced by sub -excavation of at least 1 foot of the soils below the garage floor slabs and replace with moisture treated, densely compacted structural fill. Placement of structural fill is discussed under SITE EARTHWORK. We were told floors in living areas will be structurally supported. Structural floors are a positive method to mitigate movement. The structural floor is supported by the foundation system and an excellent choice from a geotechnical standpoint. SLJ BUILDERS LOT 2. FILING NO. 4, PHASE 1 OAK MEADOWS SUBDIVISION CTLJT JOB 140. GS -411S 6 We recommend the following precautions for slab -on -grade construction at this site. These precautions will not prevent movement from occurring, they tend to reduce damage if slab movement occurs. 1. Slabs should be supported directly on the native clay soils or an at least 1 foot thick mat of moisture treated, densely compacted structural fill. Provision of a gravel or sand layer below slabs is not recommended because it increases the risk of a single source of water wetting the entire area supporting the slabs. 2. Floor slabs should be separated from exterior walls and interior bearing members with slip joints which allow free vertical movement of the slabs. 3. Use of slab bearing partitions should be minimized. Where such partitions are used, a float allowing at least 2 inches of free vertical slab movement should be used. Doorways and stairways should also be designed to allow vertical movement of slabs 4. Underslab plumbing should be eliminated where feasible. Where such plumbing is unavoidable, it should be pressure tested for leaks before the slab is constructed. Plumbing and utilities which pass through slabs should be isolated from the slabs with sleeves and provided with flexible couplings to slab supported appliances. 5. Heating and air conditioning systems supported on slabs should be provided with flexible connections capable of at least 2 inches of vertical movement so that slab movement is not transmitted to the duct work. 6. Exterior patio and porch slabs should be isolated from the buildings. These slabs should be well -reinforced to function as independent units. 7. Frequent control joints should be provided to reduce problems associated with shrinkage and curling. Our experience indicates panels which are approximately square generally perform better than rectangular areas. We advocate use of an additional joint about 3 feet away from and parallel to foundation walls. SLJ BUILDERS LOT 2, FILING NO. 4, PHASE 1 OAK MEADOWS SUBDIVISION CTLIT JOB NO. GS -4118 7 BELOW -GRADE CONSTRUCTION Foundation walls which extend below -grade should be designed for lateral earth pressures where backfill is not present to about the same extent on both sides of the wall. Many factors affect the values of the design lateral earth pressure. These factors include, but are not limited to, the type, compaction, slope and drainage of the backfill, and the rigidity of the wall against rotation and deflection. For a very rigid wall where negligible or very little deflection will occur, an "at -rest" lateral earth pressure should be used in design. For walls which can deflect or rotate 0.5 to 1 percent of wall height (depending upon the backfill types), lower "active" lateral earth pressures are appropriate. Our experience indicates typical below -grade walls in residences can deflect or rotate slightly under normal design loads, and that this deflection results in satisfactory wall performance. Thus, the earth pressures on the walls will likely be between the "active" and "at -rest" conditions. If the on-site soils are used as backfill, we recommend design of below -grade walls using an equivalent fluid density of at least 50 pcf for this site. This equivalent density does not include allowances for sloping backfill, surcharges or hydrostatic pressures. The recommended equivalent density assumes deflection; some minor cracking of walls may occur. If very little wall deflection is desired, a higher equivalent fluid density may be appropriate for design. Our recent experience indicates most basement and below -grade walls designed with 45 pcf to 55 pcf equivalent fluid density have performed satisfactorily. Backfill placed adjacent to foundation wall exteriors should be free of organic matter, debris and rocks larger than 4 inches in diameter. Backfill should be moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. SLJ BUILDERS LOT 2, FILING NO. 4, PHASE 1 OAK MEADOWS SUBDIVISION CTL7T JOB NO. GS -4118 8 Water from rain, snow melt and surface irrigation of lawns and landscaping frequently flows through relatively permeable backfill placed adjacent to a residence and collects on the surface of relatively impermeable soils occurring at the bottom of the excavation. This can cause wet or moist conditions in crawl space areas after construction. To reduce the likelihood water pressure will develop outside foundation walls and reduce risk of accumulation of water in the crawl space, we recommend provision of a foundation drain. The drain should consist of a 4 -inch diameter, open joint or slotted pipe encased in free draining gravel. The drain should lead to a positive gravity outfall, or to a sump pit where water can be removed by pumping. A typical foundation drain detail is presented on Figure 5. In addition, adequate crawl space ventilation should be provided. SURFACE DRAINAGE Surface drainage is critical to the performance of foundations, floor slabs and concrete flatwork. We recommend the following precautions be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence is completed: 1. The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the residence should be sloped to drain away from the residence in all directions. We recommend providing a slope of at least 12 inches in the first 10 feet around the residence. In no case should the slope be less than 6 inches in the first 5 feet. 2. Backfill around the exterior of foundation walls should be placed in maximum 10 inch thick loose lifts, moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. 3. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Splash blocks and downspout extensions should be provided at all discharge points. We specifically recommend against burying downspout discharge pipes because it increases the potential for subsurface wetting near the foundation. SLJ BUILDERS LOT 2, FILING NO. 4, PHASE 1 OAK MEADOWS SUBDIVISION CTUT JOB NO. GS -4118 9 4. Landscaping should be carefully designed to minimize irrigation. Plants used near foundation walls should be limited to those with low moisture requirements; irrigated grass should not be located within 5 feet of the foundation. Sprinklers should not discharge within 5 feet of the foundation and should be directed away from the building. Irrigation should be limited to the minimum amount sufficient to maintain vegetation; the application of additional water will increase the likelihood of slab and foundation movements. 5. Impervious plastic membranes should not be used to cover the ground surface immediately surrounding the residence. These membranes tend to trap moisture and prevent normal evaporation from occurring. Geotextile fabrics can be used to.control weed growth and allow some evaporation to occur. LIMITATIONS Our exploratory borings were located to obtain a reasonably accurate picture of subsurface conditions. Variations in the subsurface conditions not indicated by our borings will occur. We should observe the completed foundation excavation to confirm the native clay soils are exposed and suitable for support of the footings as designed. Our report was based on conditions disclosed by our exploratory borings, laboratory testing, engineering analysis and our experience. Criteria presented reflect our understanding of the proposed construction. If construction will differ significantly from the descriptions in the report we should be informed so that we can check that our recommendations and design criteria are appropriate. This investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by engineering geologists and geotechnical engineers currently practicing under similar conditions in the locality of this project. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. If we can be of further service in SLJ BUILDERS LOT 2, FILING NO. 4, PHASE 1 OAK MEADOWS SUBDIVISION CTLJT JOB NO. GS -4118 10 discussing the contents of this report or in the analysis of the influence of the subsoil conditions on the design of the structure, please call. CTLITHOMPSON, INC. 10193 - Wilson L. "Liv" Bow Engineering Geolog Review John Bra LB: M: (5 coWes sent SLJ BUILDERS LOT 2, FILING NO. 4, PHASE 1 OAK MEADOWS SUBDIVISION CTLIT JOB NO. GS -4118 11 SCALE: 1'= sa H-2 i MVO acid — ----7 el C3c1°- TH-3 / I �� , //// / / %,/ Old Midland SW Builders Luta FIM. Mae Oak Meadow Subdivision Job No. GS -4118 • TH-1 / / Planned Building Footprint Approximat Locations of Exploratory Borings Fig. 1 91.1.4—SO 'oN 9of SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Depth Bek 1IIIII1111|11111111111111111111 0 G 0 0i » 7 .'' ''''' ' N. N. N. N. . 64iV»]\\.\�� ƒCR 0 � 0 - G �N.�NN.N�\��, �.......\. .\ u.\.s'.�.� G 0 Cs1 11/43 CO int 01 o 1111111111111111111111111111111 is•A o 5 _ 3 • S o §ka, o f°-0 a§k ;") 030 Sck 5;a t7a.L • } } 00.ril 2 •3• rs 33E� 2{ E§3 3 —3 . 3. f ] }! «ƒ) • s x COMPRESSION % EXPANSION EXPANSION UNDER CONSTANT PRESSURE DUE TO WETTING 0.1 Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL) 10 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF 10 100 NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 100 PCF From TH-1 AT 4 FEET NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 13.1 % JOB NO. GS -4044 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. 3 COMPRESSION % EXPANSION 7 6 5 4 3 2 0 2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 01 EXPANSION UNDER CONSTANT PRESSURE DUE TO WETTING Sample of SAND, CLAYEY (SC) 10 10 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF From TH-3 AT 9 FEET JOB NO. GS -4044 100 NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 101 PCF NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 6.6 % Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. 4 SLOPE PER OSHA SLOPE PER REPORT BACKFILL (COMPOSRION AND COMPACTION PER REPORT) PROVIDE PVC SHEETING GLUED TO FOUNDATION WALL TO REDUCE MOISTURE PENETRATION COVER GRAVEL WITH FILTER FABRIC ENCASE PIPE IN WASHED CONCRETE AGGREGATE (ASTM C33, NO. 57 OR NO. 67). EXTEND GRAVEL TO AT LEAST 1/2 HEIGHT OF FOOTING. ................ .............. NOTE: DRAIN SHOULD BE AT LEAST 2 INCHES BELOW BOTTOM OF FOOTING AT THE HIGHEST POINT AND SLOPE DOWNWARD TO A POSITIVE GRAVITY OUTLET OR TO A SUMP WHERE WATER CAN BE REMOVED BY PUMPING. STRUCTURALLY SUPPORTEDJr FLOOR SYSTEM ` = = N -.-----FOOTING OR PAD CRAWL SPACE REINFORCING STEEL PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. Job No. GS -4118 2" MINIMUM f 8" MINIMUM OR BEYOND 1:1 SLOPE FROM BOTTOM OF FOOTING. (WHICHEVER IS GREATER) 4 -INCH DIAMETER PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE. THE PIPE SHOULD BE LAID IN A TRENCH WITH A SLOPE RANGE BETWEEN 1/8 INCH AND 1/4 INCH DROP PER FOOT OF DRAIN. BOTTOM OF EXCAVATION Exterior Foundati n Wall Drain Flg. 5 JOB NO. GS -4118 N J > NW N W H cc W 0 J Q CO ce H 0 CO LL 0 Yr 2 2 SOIL CLASSIFICATION CLAY, SANDY (CL) (CLAY, SANDY (CL) [CLAY, SANDY (CL) J 0 O Z Q co 0 U SAND, CLAYEY (SC) 'PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE (%) N Cop A SOLUBLE SULFATES (%) - UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (PS9 3ERG LIMITS PLASTICITY INDEX (%) W Xy Q GIij FH 3. OC O J J J 3 ? N lV O NATURAL DRY DENSITY (PCF) 100 o 100 1 en O NATURAL MOISTURE (%) r A G 0 t b 7 b b = a W w 0 e en a e as C7 Z 0 m ' F ' F N 1- TH-3l (7 1- a ca a 'Note: Swell due to wetting under an applied load of 1,000 psf. Negative values indicate consolidation.