Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- PermitGarfield County Building, Sanitation, & Planning Department 108 8"' Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003 -033-c-601 NO. CT)3l Job Address ca1G Aonckt& nr• Qct T Nature of Work Building PermitL 9 \J;Q e, Owner cb 1 hQ� r( ContractorLd\ C'rl'l Amount of Permit $ Lf,a 6 , Date Clerk .-rnIxr1IL1.0 L.vUDi 1 Y,tslLILuLING PERMIT APPLICATION GARFIELD COUNTY (GLENWOOD SPRINGS). COLORADO TI EPHONE (970)945-8212 FOB ADDRESS. PERMIT NO INSPECTION LINE (970)384 50( PARCEL/SCHEDULENQ 395-053-01.009 ZlO M6ADO-7-> r11 De 10C-1 e JooLDSPe\\SC's I v. l601 AQIEEMKfl PERMISSION IS HEREBY C ANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER. CONTRACTOR ANDIOR THE AGENT OF TIR CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCIUF DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMFNI. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF ZEUS PERMIT. THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTE GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 3023101 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT Fi COMPLIED WITH IN THE LOCATION, EREl.1 NN, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE F THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUTRLNG CORRECTION OF ERRORS Di SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WH VIOLATION OFTHIS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION THE REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CON RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABILITIES By GARFTEF D COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICALLY WTI -TITHE ARCHITECT, DESIGNER BUILDER AND OWNER_ COMMENTS ARE INTENDED )• OFTBE OWNERS LVITAEST �-�. t•._�v'-'r-r-,�_. �-s ]. ..--.,i Guamoa fa3 THEREBY ACIONdWLEDG4ITLAT I NAVE READ AND UNDI:RSTN•al ACItEFMENT ABOVE. Okl/ly al• AN ACCEPTANCE OF AND EMPLEMENTA ONSERVATIVE AND IN SUP. -t 3551 ai 7/o y LOI NO BLOCK NO. I SUEDES ISIO/N� TION 53/.01 4.t....)Cp \A`q�� 1 1p.{�� 2 Q rT'3 ovrNFa 8E1 1 J y nCPMCa1 ,I�� c�qp •.DDAn" D,g (. OA iL (AWE. m..1 PH -915 .e 9JIS-zl4' ' -'931s -2,40 3 0.f I� cDMrrAcma \A/Vi1STLJ L NS�. ADDAMS 1,1 CASM Dec (Vorie a pa51•-,13I LIC NO 4 Mlw' nceffnC–CY—= 1 4S cc. ✓ a 9 354. NLWOY s6 CabPm� li jnia5(-(6 tz- IIc NO 5 !Q FT OF Mown2384 (ST SQ FT OFLOT O AciE IRQ rz:5 ',di NO OF FLOOD 6 SSE Of SEWING s artcmuIJQ w� r cam. t (-C, �.1 w,.aye...0 7 DfyM=W0.,L NEW St&c.LE- -FAMILYDoSe_Lu rb � dA1TAca-S t cog Q c E- 8 CLASS OP watt °ADOMON cALTFFAWN MEOW D..aaova 9 DAJAOt OSQavz I eealaa rwwar oewaz °DOUBLE 10 u F� oaf( ATE mamas meow. (WPM n , n =ULAN 0DvEv,rry ASP NAi� r:'h%Q `V rL> I �if YALVATICSTa VOALa 3 Z( �'j c , finDva A70I gig 9 5%, ov SPECIAL COKAnDM NOTICE A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTAORI2FD 15 NOT COMMENCED PREEMPT ISO DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK I5 SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 110 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK I5 COMMENCED. HEREBY REBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED THE c HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OMACE A ACE DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE TO VIE.. TE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTTiER STATE OR BE . TING CON51 .U,CETO��N,,,OR THE P �( OF a 'N. (C'3 fI•i""'V &•- C 2dXX/YQ PLAN CHECK FEE: I 1 191,9 PERMIT FES: /833 75 - TOTAL FEE: DATE PERMIT ISSUED - � 42 e 2 . 2- OCC: CROUP: CONST: TYPE: R- 3 c - .. Q SETBACKS. 1 I '9 . ..I cSL ate 2--k-0't . R � - /' s.�-�`�. •te e E 0 /23'7,)3 ISDN NO. WEL � 1 '<( „Q. p ,/A��7 L t// .-� O � 3 -Re .J' 7S'O adding .>� •�s AQIEEMKfl PERMISSION IS HEREBY C ANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER. CONTRACTOR ANDIOR THE AGENT OF TIR CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCIUF DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMFNI. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF ZEUS PERMIT. THE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTE GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 3023101 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT Fi COMPLIED WITH IN THE LOCATION, EREl.1 NN, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE F THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUTRLNG CORRECTION OF ERRORS Di SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WH VIOLATION OFTHIS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION THE REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CON RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABILITIES By GARFTEF D COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICALLY WTI -TITHE ARCHITECT, DESIGNER BUILDER AND OWNER_ COMMENTS ARE INTENDED )• OFTBE OWNERS LVITAEST �-�. t•._�v'-'r-r-,�_. �-s ]. ..--.,i Guamoa fa3 THEREBY ACIONdWLEDG4ITLAT I NAVE READ AND UNDI:RSTN•al ACItEFMENT ABOVE. Okl/ly al• AN ACCEPTANCE OF AND EMPLEMENTA ONSERVATIVE AND IN SUP. -t 3551 ai 7/o y The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1997 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupanry nee and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # 91:33 Bpcont082002 }6 04 y Date VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant 2)707 Subdivision .501,1 Ii yht View j[ Address O 3-10 01 ow W cc clDf, Lot/Block to -t-9 Date qJ- g- Contractor IL'hi51-4i1- a/K4 Finished (Livable Area): Main 708;5 Upper /cue Lower Other Total Square Feet Valuation ?1884 y 429 Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Crawl Space: Valuation Valuation /053 )8 708s y9 Decks/Patios: Covered 1 Valuation 31) , .2`1 Open Valuation 14? (2 Total Valuation It 4co4 5 X52 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS for SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS and MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. Adequate and complete information will prevent delays in the plan review process. Reviewing a plan and the discovery that required information has not been provided by the applicant may result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor may be required to provide this information before the plan review may proceed. This causes delays because other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. If you do not, it may be helpful to obtain a book titled "Dwelling Construction under the Uniform Building Code". This book is available to you through this department at our cost. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. 1 Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house - rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, an 80 M.P.H. windshear, wind exposure B, windload of 15 pounds per square foot, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. NOTE: 106.3.1 (7.) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope, Yes !/ 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbacks,3'o apply. Yes V 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjaceMt properties), streams or water courses? Yes j\) f� 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the proper[/ Yes t/ 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes !l 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces's and soffits? Yes 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof constructign? Yes t/ 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roofjrafters or joists or trusses? Yes 7 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all colun3ns and beams? Yes t/ 12. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing (undisturbed) grade contours? Yes 1/ 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and odel and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase Il EPA certification? Yes ✓ No i --V (1,W > 6030 Tk 3 14. Does the plan include a masonry fire lace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Buildingode Chapter 37? Yes No �V 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code? / Yes Slnc ✓ No 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventllation for all habitable rooms? Yes 1/ No 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify s ety glazing for these areas? Yes No 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated Vie plan? Yes No 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes L No ov PL.110 r 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the architectural cfimmittee deny or reject your building plans? Yes No 21. Will this be Jhe only residential structure on the parcel? Yes 1 No If no -Explain: 22. Have two/2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes L 23. Do you understand that the minimum dimensions a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 20ft.long?/ Yes V No 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction de requirements? Yes r/ No 25. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zof e district? Yes V No 26. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspectionb the Garfield County Building Department? Yes No 27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the applicapion of these changes? Yes j! No 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the 'Permit Fee" as well as any 'Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building pprrrtit? Yes L No 29. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoons. All inspections must be called in by 3:30 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay your inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes 1No 30. Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a,$47.00 re-inpsection fee? Yes i/ No 31. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes v No 32. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority be given for an Agent and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the Uryorm Building Code? Yes No 5 33. Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes No VJAo' 34. Do`you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required alpine of applicable inspection. Yes ✓ No 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a building permit application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes ✓ No 36. Do you know that the local fir district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes No (please check with the building department about this requirement) I her by acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best o . ability. Signature of Owner Phone: S- 3-1 (days); Date Project Name: Ecil \.S QtJ O .L)t- (evenings) Project Address: cpio n�sD�x) LAJ6 C) bit C.C. Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreq 11/2003 10'd Cole Associates, Inc ✓true tura/ Desrgner5 May ! 2, 2004 Garlicd County Bw::firg Department Attn. Andy Schwaller Re, Betts residence nt-9, Sunlight View II 0224 Ncadowood Road Garfield County Dear Andy; During Foundation construction on this project. Paul Whistler' r.nntar ted u5 concerning the vertical bar installation With the use of ' co' io-m" panels, the bars were "5tahed"in place during the wall pow Place r,f being tied to the dowels from the lootniy. We reviewed and approved thr5 procedure with Paul !I we can be of further assistance, please advise hank You, RECEIVED MAY 1 3 2004 UA DFNG PLAN NG :900 Iirghway 65 ' Cedaredge, CO. 814 13 ' (970) 856 G277 016E 9S9 0L6 S3IHdleND• 3HI11S3M Wd 1£:10 b0-£1-AtlW PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Date 3- x -el Applicant►.?'r"') Building / J Engineered Foundation 44 Driveway Permit t/Surveyed Site Plan pa -Septic Permit and Setbacks Grade/Topography 30% G `�Attach Residential Plan Review List Minimum Application Questionnaire ✓Subdivision Plat Notes f.1r4 Fire Department Review < 5006 S. r - Valuation Determination/Fees Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker 7ttach Conditions " Application Signed ✓ Plan Reviewer To Sign Application c — Parcel/Schedule No. Ajr .40# Snowload Letter- Manf. Hms. GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning Property Line Setbacks 30ft Stream Setbacks Flood Plain Building Height Zoning Sign -off Road Impact Fees HOA/DRC Approval Grade/Topography 40% Planning Issues Subdivision Plat Notes GecPtecr, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Hepworth -Pawlak Georechnical, Inc 5020 Counry Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone. 970-945.7988 Fax. 970-945-8454 email hpgeo©hpgeorech corn SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSED BETTS RESIDENCE LOT 9, SUNLIGHT VIEW II 0210 MEADOWOOD ROAD GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 104 116 JANUARY 27, 2004 PREPARED FOR: PAUL R. WHISTLER 71 CASA DEL MONTE COURT GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverrhome 970-468-1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY - 1 - PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION - 1 - SITE CONDITIONS - 2 - FIELD EXPLORATION - 2 - SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS - 2 - FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS - 3 - FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS - 3 - FOUNDATIONS -3- FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS - 4 - FLOOR SLABS -5- UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM - 6 - SURFACE DRAINAGE - 6 - LIMITATIONS - 7 - FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES FIGURE 4 - SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE 1- SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located Lot 9, Sunlight View II, 0210 Meadowood Road, Garfield County, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated January 16, 2004. Hepworth Pawlak Geotechnical Inc., previously performed a preliminary geotechnical study for the Sunlight View Phase 2 subdivision and reported our findings January 31, 2000, Job Number 100 104. A field exploration program consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification, compressibility or swell and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsoil conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will be a two story wood frame structure above a crawlspace with an attached garage. Garage floor will be slab -on -grade. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths between about 3 to 6 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. lob No. 104 116 -2 - If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. SITE CONDITIONS The site was vacant of structures and covered with about 8 inches of snow at the time our field work. Vegetation consists of grass and weeds. The ground surface is relatively flat with a slight slope down to the northeast. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on January 20, 2004. Two exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck -mounted CME -45B drill rig. The borings were logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with linch and 2 inch I.D. spoon samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of Exploratory Borings, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on Figure 2. The subsoils consist of about 1 foot of topsoil and 5 feet of sandy clay overlying clayey sandy gravel with cobbles and small boulders. Drilling in the dense gravel with Job No. 104 116 -3 - auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included natural moisture content, dry density and percent finer than sand size gradation analyses. Results of swell -consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed drive samples, presented on Figure 4, indicate low to moderate compressibility under existing moisture conditions and light loading and a medium to high expansion potential when wetted with swell pressures of 12,000 psf. The laboratory testing is summarized in Table 1. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked 2 days later and the subsoils were slightly moist to moist. FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS The sandy clay subsoils encountered at the site are moderately to highly expansive when wetted. The site is relatively flat and expected cut depths for the proposed crawlspace will likely be founded on the sandy clay soils. We recommend all footing excavations for the residence be extended down below the sandy clay soils to the relatively dense clayey gravel. Design footing grade could be re-established with imported structural fill such as 54 inch road base. The fill should be compacted to 100% standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS FOUNDATIONS Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory borings and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural clayey gravel soils. Job No. 104 116 -4 - The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 36 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies. such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. 5) All existing topsoil and sandy clay soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to relatively dense natural granular soils. The exposed soils in footing area should then be moistened and compacted. If water seepage is encountered, the footing areas should be dewatered before concrete placement. 6) A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe all footing excavations prior to concrete placement to evaluate bearing conditions. FOUNDATION AND RETAINING WALLS Foundation walls and retaining structures which are laterally supported and can be expected to undergo only a slight amount of deflection should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of 55 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site soils. Cantilevered retaining structures which are Job No. 104 116 Gegtech -5 - separate from the residence and can be expected to deflect sufficiently to mobilize the full active earth pressure condition should be designed for a lateral earth pressure computed on the basis of an equivalent fluid unit weight of 45 pcf for backfill consisting of the on-site All foundation and retaining structures should be designed for appropriate hydrostatic and surcharge pressures such as adjacent footings, traffic, construction materials and equipment. The pressures recommended above assume drained conditions behind the walls and a horizontal backfill surface. The buildup of water behind a wall or an upward sloping backfill surface will increase the lateral pressure imposed on a foundation wall or retaining structure. An underdrain could be provided to prevent hydrostatic pressure buildup behind walls. Backfill should be placed in uniform lifts and compacted to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill in pavement and walkway areas should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density. Care should be taken not to overcompact the backfill or use large equipment near the wall, since this could cause excessive lateral pressure on the wall. Some settlement of deep foundation wall backfill should be expected, even if the material is placed correctly, and could result in distress to facilities constructed on the backfill. FLOOR SLABS The natural on-site clay soils, exclusive of topsoil, are expansive if subjected to wetting and are not suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. To mitigate the expansion clay subgrade we reconunend that at least 3 feet of clay be removed from below slab -on -grade areas and be replaced with 3 feet of 34 -inch road base compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce Job No. 104 116 • -6- damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. UNDERDRAIN SYSTEM Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in mountainous areas that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls and deep crawlspace areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. Shallow crawlspaces (less than 3 feet) should not require an underdrain system provided that the exterior backfill is properly placed and sloped to drain as described in the "Surface Drainage" section of this report. If drains are installed, they should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet or sump and pump. Free -draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. SURFACE DRAINAGE The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at Least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in Job No. 104 116 . J ' -7- pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 6 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in paved areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on- site soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at least 5 feet from foundation walls. Consideration should be given to use of xeriscape to reduce the potential for wetting of soils below the building caused by irrigation. LIMITATIONS This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Figure 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified so that re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As Job No. 104 116 -8 - the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Louis E. Eller Reviewed By: Daniel E. Hardin, P. LEE/ksw cc: Cole & Associates - Attn: Harry Cole Job No. 104 116 b 2 BENCH MARK: BASE OF FIRE APPROXIMATE SCALE 1"=30' • n \ r v BORING PROPOSED RESIDENCE BORING 1 • LOT 9 BUILDING SETBACK LINES LOT 8 LOT BOUNDARIES 104 116 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 1 r• 7 d N 0 0 5 10 15 BORING 1 ELEV.= 97.8' 21/12 24/12 WC=11.7 00-118 40/4 BORING 2 ELEV.= 97.9' 19/12 WC=11.1 00-109 -200-88 32/12 40/4 20/2 0 5 10 15 20 20 Note: Explanotion of symbols is shown on Figure 3. Depth — Feet 104 116 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS Figure 2 LEGEND: ® TOPSOIL; sandy silt and clay, organic, firm, moist, dark brown, upper 8 inches frozen. h 21/12 1 NOTES: CLAY (CL); sandy, silty, very stiff, moist, brown. GRAVEL (GC); clayey, sandy, with cobbles and small boulders, medium dense to dense, moist, brown to gray. Basalt rock fragments. Relatively undisturbed drive sample; 2—inch I.D. California liner sample. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch I.D. split spoon sample, ASTM D-1586. Drive sample blow count; indicates that 21 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the California or SPT sampler 12 inches. Practical drilling refusal. 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on January 20, 2004 with a 4—inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Locations of exploratory borings were measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory borings were measured by instrument level and refer to the Bench Mark shown on Figure 1. 4. The exploratory boring locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the borings at the time of drilling or when checked 2 days later. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 104 116 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3 • r Compression — Expansion % Compression — Expansion % 3 2 1 0 1 2 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 Moisture Content = 11.7 percent Dry Density = 118 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From:Boring at 5 Feet Expansion upon wetting 0.1 .0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 0.1 .0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 104 116 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 Moisture Content = 11.1 percent Dry Density = 109 pcf Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Boring 2 at 2 Feet • • • Expansion upon wetting • ---------16 • 0.1 .0 0 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 100 104 116 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 4 .IOD NO 104 116 Z U w E— Z x W H < xm� <<0 F L 0 >- a HEPWORTH-PAW • __ =i 5 Lt R U — 0 Le-, T ct V is v, - C _ o= r } \31] 1101 ON JNISS\'0 LNIJll3.1 OO CO L 0 0 v 0 _ 2 V GR N EL CR.) e i 0 CO OA O i C j 7, r G t 2 l [-- J ^ TT\rII'l l LOC .\ HON Vt N z c N Y , L ) INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB - 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT ��GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued,,,aLt� /o5'.Zoned Area Permit No CCU AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. SPJkarks Front Side Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing 3 -Ly -omit_ Foundation 7"o SCite o%fr Ateny,. 3)Ya Underground Plumbing , .. Insulation 7 /S Rough Plumbing ))6,0 (4 Drywall 7• ti -t) I�NLi Chimney & Vent cf _ j(/Electric Final (by State lnspectorl�j 140v j4. Gas Piping (o,-�_D e Final 9 ; 0`e/8m Electric Rough (By State Inspector) 7 D Septic Final ,dIF Framing 17-4 .. b j, (To include Roof in pl ce add Windows and Doors installed). Notes: ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phone 3845003 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. V E DDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD IF PLA ED OUTSID - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC