Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- Permitf •• Job Address Garfield County Building, Sanitation, & Planning Department 108 8"' Street, Suite #201 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Office- 945-8212 Inspection Line- 384-5003 NO. $9 CDS (DSsi C Q :ac Nature of Work Building Permit Use of Building 5/ P j 1 t TQ CnO-to s&k322,4e_j Owner Contractor Amount of Permit $ T- l \ . 9.-D) Date 1 11 , - D� Ie' (St( weasti ,T T 1 _ a 0,).'i - Clerk V • Permit No: GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 B° Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Phone: 970-945-8212 / Fax: 970-384-3470 I Inspection Line: 970-384-5003 YAlDS Parcel/Schedule No: ea/77 :90/ 0) 0 AGREEMENT PERMISSION 1S HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR ANDIOR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN 11X 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS UN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIEm COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. / � CaHom.003 I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL): Job Address:'1 oM /�� /C n'S ^ o /2 ] IA_ 67b5-0 ( ONo: 1 Lot No: Block Subd. /Exemption: 2 Owner: IMO �A,P��(6C'Du�6a�C�aG, /Jajs o%i(� 13�54c-E,a ' .z, Ph: i 963- 3�y WI�PZS ,yCa. (tom 3 Contrac[g�� ^ 1k/ . / Oe NS f N Address: Ph:^e Li _ 7 rt� `� Lic. No. 4 Architecr� eb e : ��,�,�y 0ARDN�E,2 Address: Ph:y �1�-oc0�� Lic. No. 5 Sq. Ft. of Buildings n S3 Sq. F !ot 1 jl,�/21 Height: /6, No. of Floors: 6 Use of Building: n� JZSL / .�,yiZI���8 7 e-ia,L.A.r C` �a�aktto'.•all Describe Work: pith, Class of Work: New o Alteration o Remove ❑ Addition o Move 9 10 Garage: o Single o Double Carport: o Single o Double S Driveway Permit ,jjr Q ❑ On -Site Sewage Disposal Site Plan Q (Septic) 11 `a,�� Valuation of Work: $`S "': `� Adjusted Valuations:�7 a14 . 017 12 SpedalConditions::lml,y Rgmrat I: 4,� -01.4iO 4+ firs 'f7,F,C . 7 A SEPARATE ISSUED THIS AUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION PERIOD I HEREBY APPLICATION PROVISIONS COMPLETED GRANTING TO VIOLA]'E LOCAL OF CONST ' ; NOTICE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR, IF OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE WITHIN WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE OFX`PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY R CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LA REGU AT STRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE,- UCTIO'. t 1,0'-3 Plan Check Fee: 95i1 $ v Permit Fee: 419. 35 Total Fee: Dated Permit Issued: 239 i.93 OCC Group: Const. Type: g i 1 T N x_ _^� Zoning: y7( fl9j ` / 1 n P {/ v t� �„ � is ,so Set-bacJFs: nv A003-27 Manu. Home: ISOsNo. &Fee:co >*, ��r4-�v�, ,,�,��v�x r" ��2 /1 i `i V r.••••'/AvAirar I 'e : LOGS+', .'" PLNG. I,,,QPT� ��y/.�� APPRI . _ / DATE AP 4I te' f AGREEMENT PERMISSION 1S HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR ANDIOR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN 11X 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPILED WITH IN THE LCOATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION, AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS UN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FROM PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABLITIES BY GARFIEm COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPENCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICIALLY WITH THE ARTICTECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. / � CaHom.003 I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE (INITIAL): 1 The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non- absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1997 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOTOCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISE UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy_ ssee and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit# c{ �Z _ w`! ( ' , I Signature s Date BpcontO82002 • VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Ce( anp-o"i Subdivision Address Lot/Block Date )'Q _ (o • 03 Contractor Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other f� ^ Const. Total Square Feet 2 t77Z v c? RN 3 q S Valuation Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Crawl Space: Valuation Valuation S.0C Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation Open Valuation Total Valuation /4 24) a 18 25 Co 32. 413-i y 5 2i)t) 175- Z241 r Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house - rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, an 80 M.P.H. windshear, wind exposure B, windload of 15 pounds per square foot, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each comer of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. NOTE: 106.3.1 (7.) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the final plat with the proposed structure located within the envelope Yes 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the property you are applying for a building permit on is located on a corner lot. Special setbac do apply. Yes 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjace ,t .roperties), streams or water courses? Yes l� 2 L 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes 5. Do the pldhs include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces a u1 the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces's(and soffits? Yes 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads an¢l wind loads? Yes 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof cons n? Yes 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists ri • f rafters or joists or trusses? Yes Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes 12. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existinki('ii disturbed) grade contours? Yes 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado,Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes , No 3 1 14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Bui11ipg Code Chapter 37? Yes No 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code? Yes No 16. Does the pn include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes %i,C/I No 17. Do the pl is indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify saf ty glazing for these areas? Yes UtiJ No 18. Is the 1ion of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated o, the plan? Yes / No 19. Do you tinklerstand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are .wilding plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenant 9 Yes No 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the architectural committee deny or reject your building plans? Yes No 21. Yes No If no-Explain:24L . Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? 22. Have two (2) omplete sets of construction drawings been sub e. with Ih ph tion? Yes 23. Do you nderstand that the minimum dimensions a home can be on a lot is 20ft.wide and 2011. lo Yes No 4 r 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other constructio code requirements? Yes /1,C/1) No 25. Do your Iflans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your properties zone d'strict? Yes No 26. Does the pian accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspect' Pnb� the Garfield County Building Department? Yes t.tiGai No 27. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the applie tion f these changes? Yes No 28. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building�� Yes vldy No 29. Are yo r1 aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoons. All inspections must be called in by 3:30 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay your inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes t4"" No 30. Are you are that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a 5447.0% re-inpsection fee? Yes Gll/U/ No 31. Are you Wware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupanc and cupancy of the building? Yes No 32. Are yoaware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority be given for an Agent . d that the party responsible for the project must comply with the UI/}f rm Building C� +,; Yes /,l� No 5 r 33. Are you aware that prior to submittal issuance of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road �&Brridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridg�art �/�'`// ent at 625-8601. Yes No 34. Do you uhderstand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required . "me of applicable inspection. Yes No 35. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the ParceUSchedul- Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of a buildi : n ermi I application? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes i; No I hereby a owledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best o -ability. g 11 o3 Signatur;r'(c):2-S- Ownrj Date Phone: (S2 2 S - ISO 7 (days); j, et 3 - A2- (evenings)/n/_ Project Name: CSD,12d, J 20 434,-Q- C�bt c gr ei-Lkyh) Project Address: C.0 • kat , 3 Za Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreq 04/2003 6 • PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST %� Applicant \ 0 j3 Date /o4 -o3 Building -/Engineered Foundation ✓Driveway Permit 6d7 ?r to r _Surveyed Site Plan ./Septic Permit and Setbacks uG44.24I,Q �Grade/Topography 30% ✓ttach Residential Plan Review List ..-Minimum Application Questionnaire �ClT� Subdivision Plat Notes f.1 a'{ Fire Department Review V,al uation Determination/Fees Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker Attach Conditions Application Signed Plan Reviewer To Sign Applicata ParceUSche. e No. 40# Snowload Letter- Mani Hms. GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning Property Line Setbacks 30ft Stream Setbacks Flood Plain Building Height Zoning Sign -off Road Impact Fees HOA/DRC Approval Grade/Topography 40% Planning Issues Subdivision Plat Notes Thoo,24:11 so? OK 28/12/2003 B2:29 19706258247 a7/29A2ee3 22:86 6258627 Roan WC WI %E Garfield County ladovaIVI DaprlrS P.O. MM Mme, co awe gar 4/ PAGE 02 r•• PAGE e1 Invoke hole. Dale W*ID00 Imolai Number M RW Ta Han Cabin 1415 Airport Road Eflle , CO SU Driveway Peale Nailer OS MM per » +f int Weeny Itself Fee: MAO Tall Dao: 'Than Yowl !75.00 08/12/2003 02:29 19706258247 PAGE 05 97/29NrPi 277 ne 6256627 READ NC MIME 6) Ind'wet It became escasnry a ran re tidal ray teem, ds peps a.ia.r fide d1h. ems dull be wady bated Wort Sc fine i as to mesa my ALdkim of foe rariry Sees .d 811 pots Md we. noel shell M used eve n the Maki Road U 'visa d St Band d Cn•ay Cee n semen. 7) TS deme MSS dal beatSM ahaay(s)ab tppelewaee at Ottri amy rem Mae maiaia eft lama &C aey Camidirwa /1 &o.ein.s sad wpadk.tba atdbt/ lana tit arty on.tl rads aider S jtri.inla di bead «Caney Csosi.isos of Garth. Cm., Cant std as /psciGesfisae se forth on et. semb.d Sesf end M erpaad b.sis et eembtesa beast kiaLCISSAMIL 1. lib k terMai beat Stain •d/• 2. 2V wide arena stem be It deep by 4" Web stapbdt or eseosa hsa a.aetry real hen proptny k na.kea. 3. VMS, Mega le beta Gnats est/ le More/ et ON ohm 4. Wert sae SAM YMSS s wap.ale ler ma bens 6. b rpadee oftieserp we M slaked npea saa defies end mat be approved by.up,anSMe elle*/ • trite. H efp in fide eppikeioa eon upon taidg sdaisda.ed pninim.o anti the drw•ety area (a) da ted bels as ypiker sipieles wba k rad. adattads w ample the festpebt/ presaea. ad 0adl000 and sires a maw at e) b mat w* ti. stoat.-1'Ma eptoinceete pin maid tad epprwed yYtfaaldCasa CaaW/isre. ore.. �ipO �L�Gt,JaI & /#/ a g(6s o tens amber %f0 62 5- 1./5.02 Paste goad Mall. Mem to Si pseetia, gsa6.t ee w r- Ml.a ttiyeltle0 Mena Pa Bowe of Comby Caaoisiasn' of Orden Coma. Colmar w d:ep,r.assln of SAS cam; PAM ad pri/ps SASS 88/12/2003 02:29 19786258247 67/2g17003 .17.33 , 675e6,0 PA 04 Rost ChD 8R7Da PAGE Eo Agnilimatim s- AM1v.wey app.ehs.adatsed SIP be met WOOD alt mosey toad rtoawof way hews tat pneeere dp MS tM pgay IS des is dwipss ted vmd for me best moot S Sage bear the midway me/ Ss* 'Wm). 2. As may latentedoet • driveway diel b. .Ia. d for a sulfites annul Iron ds. id.as 4aa b mum the acral and eat msveaeea of eat. lis ta wisest lad lot nen) sedate atssa Set a mlelesm letascdot ehtenau of f0 Sr be prowld ted far ten! oeasoscid .atmos s aalte.a of 100 fat bt pwided ) ]. AN eases a0 ab dad be ss Wed sad sena ed the wattle s ootwal wag s `wi Ota all b. a* to dole visite iris demurs in loss demi* Wee the sexy sed i soda es mean ratty ted *halt i befei0 with suety raid taf & 4. The Meese dao no k p rudad b awl w rota a dishy eseral ebbs Aad et taswbla an or aledib was my pads' alt oesay rad dybof..ws I Oanaeay. m acre eke sat sppaah dal le ahead suit pawl or papa" abs borer of sable gra the ea headed (100) fiat Addl eoal asesoa at sits IS peals haat a &Thou ia sone ern hetttdrad 100) St shall he petaad ally ale Sow* afoetal aeaaiaae meed aunty. 6. All drivaawys Nd le so lowed that St die peeita 4sar s datray.W ray all use steoa-h yon WOOS' papas. 7. N/ ..maenad driveway Sal law • Inds Vela lata thirty (10) d.a nMaM w real ages la the owe ries oU s anyway sa¢ sat Moused by our site* rims. ?1e Snead drin.ey gal have a lea `ale Out nosy (20) Aar msa.nd at nfle sola to the atearlas of 0e *shitty, nape ma Maasssd bt psteiaible mei 1 The axle ass appose bthe raid soy kaarid* iota ribs cartisctor die away wad adofryaegis braes ninny (00) bow ad they (d) Ms Me SP sat to b Oma day (60) den A4ateeat will be weft acrid)$ to tat typo of oaf& to bs sod sod ass.bek1 conahoa 9 The amolasion of peke; a ..,.leg, ones a the ass, tad rtadeorwey is sets* prohiial Cossrdal aablbksna fur awamt asses abaahS pewit adds" perky bailees. 10. The pile of nee ad eat SU suw Sward ad wary bora tbe it trace at the wee no u oke w eld smile. laps and ilr a as. awl b dm ea alt iSuWs tea la so ease S thea twteay (20) Se ties IS pereesees doss Ars ands eet mmeanmef b sol was Nes telt para (10%). 11 All skiwnym a 'potashes dull be se e.asnlbd tut Ory atoll oat start iota the Wigs swan d So SIM ants not The Apple's Wl be rewind is worlds at Ma vin spa &a c 111www at S oo ad WKS* *ill hawse a rgtsl pat alt Sims Swap qts. IUfaaed of Caws Consist or Sr tsprteeaterl., prig se iaessdeioq esti Sprott the tYauser sad npw of 40 10101.10 e.aetaa. NNr Ms malt del S aide a alMb► d shat We 'rim sag alta vs M Was does A web swab w Mass ante wa sad shat. 0(a) was saws sppMarea flat poise rile bila at. Sirs bol', 0tsalas, a SS ,09/12/2003 02:29 197%258247 07/29v7ee3. 22:89. 6258627 spot AND a?t DOE Gan eld County AI'YFs1(s f Dm.. ar Persil it rdk..h, DS: menu Pre Nauedrtil Pate: Bary Coignes teweiris Daleladlp Cs* •astNoseber: 121 h.*.ew: Set Goyim Obis 3 Sit araair Aye PAGE 03 PAGE 822 r _ • ybdair ref _ ispe Sissy(N AM.efny re -ser *S 01126. t . property Seasbr.paPoaeiteleki tesistap.,ey. /pokers lin boureitts da the m.wisedoe.d epp.eel ofar Meed of Conn Cessiaaes• sketcher the proposed WYllmler Aeewiap all the nsawy a soul Son Stell! inlet I. Flea se of is attar eaa. 2. ate tae sat Also oriel s peps* Yee. 3. Noe* of *webs mead ♦ Iyidtb derma i leeaean r am* of amen 5. Die*n.e.*OM dt egyafledSsastiotifalp. 6. Bae ted asp da noes driveways 1f sot len Pse eAe08oR 7. Saha Jar blsetp)sdo eoreaoatie.,ro.saab- I. Ns Was 1 apse as say reed, try dense a sed te county tort al e speed a addieiioa apes b. larpessrledor Mpert laOle deer dseapis a 1) The ewers npeeae a pubs s ion sad alloys etas 11e *henry ep,roai (e) is b be resets.'' hr IS fee t base ids papas of sem* as on ip.,atr ad acs fors puree. of Meat Wiese or seweie8 nhtefos as the usd no s efw ay. 2) The apples eel fur+lek ed Met ad Welt Outs AM wale end Mr la eaa 4 osawaoe wilt be oaanstian d die di s.$s). All week dam k. sosplyd wtla *My (30) days oldie pens Sae. S) 11* type d eoaawuo. *al be et SL d sdia.,pard by the Saud of Canty Cweaieieeas a their sepaeaaelet ad d eoyesiek seed Sal be d mSM6awp balky W %k at is ilipma Ind wpm* olds load dCaay COSOM/e sr Ibw nortmlelin 4) Ts wan* retie 12wye d dna the indnien alb Plage *nit API .S .i al sad the sees of County flat awe ad tisk dab appeal stub eel espbyse sees he held Seeks Maes ap anion let snout Jetty or Fops, due essairsi by ay ten of a rites of the Perot S) Ts Appli a it as rapealdlky tor tie taro a eiaaas draw, lea Of der wpbs e., peva of 2118rag ypsri(en asti *4spe dda68eisreay(s)t•theamenofasCAMaCWaaagl o8rrakeer DEC -11-2003 14 53 H—P GEOTECH • • rettecn HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL December 11, 2003 Harry Colborn c/o Harry's Heavy Haulers, Inc. 1605 Airport Road R:fkc, Colorado 81650 H. WL l'awlak Ccy,_6r..c:t, Inc 5020 Loun„y Road 151 Glcuwo,d 4pi,cgn C,.l, -.'c.6!h:1! Tonic 970-945-79P.A Flcx. 970,945.841 cmnil Irpgeo42.111pgrcnr ch caw 81(05- Job 9(0S Job No. 103 252 Subject: Observation of Excavation and Compaction Testing, Proposed Residence, Lots 74 and 75, Willows Subdivision, County Road 320, East of Rifle Village South, Garfield County, Colorado u t h 1 1 2003 Dear Mr. Colborn: PAH lAkiN CON;i1Rl1C1ION, 11VL` As requested, a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the building area subgrade at the subject site on December 4, 2003 to evaluate the soils exposed for suitability of structural fill placement. Compaction testing was performed between December 4 and 9, 2003. Our observations, recommendations and test results arc presented in this report. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated May 29, 2003, Job No. 103 252. The proposed residence will a single story wood frame structure with an attached garage. Ground floor will be slab -on -grade. The footing elevation will be raised above existing grade with approximately 2 feet with compacted imported gravel. At the time of our initial visit to the site, the building area had been prepared by loosening the upper 1 foot of soil. The loosened soils were left in place to protect the subgrade from freciing. We understand that the loosened soils were removed and the exposed subgrade compacted prior to placement of structural fill. The subgrade soils below the loosened material consisted of sandy silty clay. Results of swell - consolidation testing performed on samples of the subgrade taken from the site, shown on Figures 1 and 2, indicate tow compressibility under existing low moisture conditions and Tight loading and a low collapse potential (settlement under a constant load) when wetted. The samples showed moderate to high compressibility with increased loading atter wetting. No free water was encountered and the subgrade soils were slightly moist to moist. We were informed at rhe site that 3 -inch road Kase would he used for Parker 303.841.7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 • Silverrhorne 970-466.1989 DEC -11-2003 14:53 Harry Colborn December 11, 2003 Page 2 GEOTECH P.©3, 15 str crura! fill below the footings and slabs -on -grade, and that fill placement would begin later that day. A sample of the structural fill (3 -inch road base) was obtained from a stockpile at the site and returned to our laboratory for testing. The test results ate shown on Figures 3 and 4. 2g11r't7;�ai;'�,' e (. i 1 2003 Multiple site visits were made between December 4 and 9. 2003 to observe structural ()Alt JAIN fill placement below footing and Flab -on -grade areas and perform nuclear gauge „UIVSI II' HMI. \L moisture/density testing. Density test results are presented in the attached daily "Earthwork Observation and Testing Reports". Maximum standard Proctor density and optimum moisture values were not available during in the initial phase of the fill placement and testing. Values of 140 pcf and 6% were assumed fun the maximum standard Proctor density and optimum moisture content during the first twu days of testing. It was recommended by our office to compact the structural fill to at least 98% of the maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Fill was being placed in 1 foot lifts and compacted with a vibratory, smooth -drum roller. In general, the compaction effort appeared adequate and below optimum moisture conditions were measured. It was recommended in the field to scarify, moisten and recompact areas which did not meet the recommended project specifications. The earthwork observations and test results are attached. The suhgrade conditions exposed in the building footprint are generally consistent with those previously encountered on the site and suitable for placement of stnictural fill. Structural fill consisting of the stockpiled 3 -inch road base compacted to at least 98% percent of the maximum standard Proctor density appears adequate for placement below footings and slabs -on -grade. Based on our observations and compaction test results, the structural fill placed for building support appears suitable for spread footings designed for 1,500 psf as recommended in our previous subsoil study. The exposed subgrade should be protected from freezing, and fill or concrete should not be placed on frozen ground. Other recommendations presented in our previous report which are applicable should also be observed. The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the suhgrade soils exposed within the building footprtnt, the previous limited subsurface exploration at the site and compaction test results. Variations in the subsurface conditions below the structural fill could increase the risk of inundation movement. If any variations are encountered m the subgrade conditions or design changes made, we lou #103 252 H\'�GSGtec+ , DEC -11-2003 14:53 P GEDTECH Harry Colborn December 11, 2003 Page 3 should be contacted to review the recommendations contained in this letter. If there are any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. :9nrire. Trevor L. Knell Reviewed by: Daniel E. Hardin, P. TLK/ksw attachment Figures 1 and 2 - Swell -Consolidation Test Results Figure 3 - Particle Size Distribution Report Figure 4 - Compaction Test Report Earthwork Observation and Testing Reports cc: Partain Construction Inc. - Attn: Dave Partain P.04,15 uEC 1 1 2003 I'r{N Wild coNSIIiUCrNON, l\L rob #103 252 H� DEC, -11-2003 • 4 GEOTECH P.O5/15 DEC 1 1 2003 l',', H I AIN (ION,1N�: Moisture Content = 7.6 percent Dry Density = 99 pcf -200 = 83 percent Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay From- Subgrade of Northeast Corner of Building Footprint 0 5 J- Compression % J 0 N A W N 4 i Compression upon wetting 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE - ksf 103 252 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 1 DEC 1 1 2003 l',', H I AIN (ION,1N�: DFC-.11 Zoo: 14: 5-4 GEOTFCH P. 0.6. 15 DEG 1 1 2003 I AIN cow; H; HUN, ii..„, Moisture Content = 7.8 percent Dry Density = 93 pcf —200 = 82 porcent Sample of: Sandy Silty Clay From: Subgrode at Center of Building Footp(nt 0 1 L' Compression upon wetting 3 1 N' r 4 u 0) m a. 0. 5 E U 6 7 7 T- 8 9 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 103 252 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK 1 GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Figure 2 DEG 1 1 2003 I AIN cow; H; HUN, ii..„, DEC --.11.-220.0^114:54 SGEOTECH P. 07, 15 T YV�/• t Glenwood - .7 Colorado 61601 Phone 970-945-7986 5Sp945un 7966 ray 9111-94-,-6454 HEPWORTH-PAWL AK GEOTECHNICAL nppeocwhpaeclech cam Earthwork Observation and Testing Report Client. Harry Colborn Atin clo Harry's Heavy Haulers 1605 Airport Road Rifle, Colorado 81650 Job No.. 103 252 Date 12-4-03 Page 1 Of 2 Protect. Proposed Residence, Lots 74 and 75, Willows Subdivision, County Road 320, East of Rifle ViItage South, Garfield County, Colorado Weather. Sunny Earthwork Contractor. Harry's Heavy Haulers Major Equipment Loader, dozer, vibratory smooth drum roller Temperature Range Contractor's Construction Activities : Contractor has placed and compacted 1' of under footing/stab fill consisting of 3" aggregate base course. H -P Geotech's Material Placement and Compaction Observations: Contractor's work procedure. Observed: Not Observed X Area & Time(s) of observation. Moisture conditioning method. Compaction equipment used. 2 visits Vibratory smooth -drum roller Maximum observed lift thickness. Minimum number of passes observed Maximum observed size of rock placed. Were procedures and materials observed andlor tests performed in conformance with project requirements? Yes. X No Unknown. Describe. assumed specifications Person(s) informed. Harry Colborn Nonconformance corrected' Material(s) and location(s) sampled. Additional Information. We performed density tests and test results indicated that satisfactory compaction had been achieved. THIS REPORT PR SENTC OPINIONS ASA RESULT OF OUR ObStRVATIONSOF FII I R ACFMFNT WE IIAVC RELIED ON THE CONTRACTOR 1U WN I (NUC A','I'LYING Int MECUMMt NUE a THE NI/CI r AR OENSUM,=TER Mf1HUO O TCS INC WAS USED IN SUDSTANTIAL ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM 02922 ANTI Ulu+T See Page 2 for additional density test results. DEC 1 1 2003 Aii I NI IV CUtd51!(UCTIUN, INC Phil Orgill Field Observer Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. Reviewed By DEC -11-200; 1454 GEOTECH u GeStech HEPWORTH - PAWiAK GEOTECHNICAL P.08,15 0020 Courtly rivad 154 Gicnw000 Springs Coloraoo 81650 Phone 971'-9i5.7988 Fax 910-945-b454 IlpSe741)11p'o4'^ked Lqn' Earthwork Observation and Testing Report Client: Harry Colborn clo Harry's Heavy Haulers Project Job No. 103 252 Report No Date 12.4.03 Page 2 Of 2 Proposed Residence, Lots 74 and 75, Willows Subdivision, County Road 320, East of Rifle Village South, Garfield County, Colorado Nuclear Gaurte Moisture/Density Test Results Test No Location Under fooling/slab fill Depth or Elev Field Dry Density PCF Reid Moisture Content Percent Comp Min Com Regp' Proctor Lab No 1 30' northeast of southwest building cornerfooting 1' below grade 138.2 4.5 99 98 2 10' southwest of northeast building corner 18" below Footing grade 139.7 4.6 4.7 100 L_- 99 98 98 �f 3 Southeast building corner 1' below footing grade 136.9 11 Proctor Sample References: Lab No. Method assumed I Description Max Dry Opt Dens Moist 3" aggregate base course ! 140.0 6.0 IHE NUCI.:AP CENSONr TLG M'_THO0 Or TESTING WAS USED IN 911e5TAN I IAL ACC:riDANCE W ITI I ASTM D2922 AND 03317 GO. Dave Partain .1'15 DEC i 1 2003 t'Ati1AIN UUNSIHIICTION, INC Phil Orgill Field Observer Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. _ Reviewed By DEC-11-.�22.01J: 1I;55 GEOTECH HEPWORTM-PAW! AK GEOTECHNICAL P.09. 15 Waco ..uunry ?cosy Cienv+ooc Springs Color9dc E 1E01 Phone 97D-945-7988 Fax 97D-945-8450 npgcoCalnppeoiach con, Earthwork Observation and Testing Report ChenL Harry Colborn Attn. c/o Harry's Heavy Haulers 1605 Airport Road Rifle, Colorado 81650 Project. Job No.: 103 252 Date: 12-5-03 Page 1 Of 2 Proposed Residence, Lots 74 and 75, Willows Subdivision, County Road 320, East of Rifle Village South, Garfield County, Colorado Weather Cloudy Temperature Range. 300 - 400 Earthwork Contractor: Harry's Heavy Haulers Major Equipment. Loader, dozer, vibratory smooth drum roller Contractor's Construction Activities : Contractor has placed and compacted the structural fill up to design footing grade. H -P Geotech's Material Placement and Compaction Observations: Contractor's work procedure' Observed: x Not Observed: Area & Time(s) of observation. 2 p.m. visits oisture conddion,ng method: None available, none added Maximum observed lift thickness. 1' Compaction equipment used: Vibratory smooth -drum roller Minimum number of passes observed: Maximum observed size of rock placed 3" Were procedures and materials observed and/or tests performed in conformance with project requirements? Yes: No: X Unknown: Describe. See Below Person(s) informed: Dave Partain with PCI Construction Nonconformance corrected' Material(s) and location(s) sampled: Additional Information- The moisture content of the fill appears to be below optimum. Some areas did not meet assumed project specifications. The contractor intends to scarify, moisten and recompact footing grade on 1216103. We will return toperform retests. T45 PEPORf °HE SFN'S JPRJIDNS .ASA RESULT CR Mid 09SFRVATIONSOF FILL PLACEMeNT, WE HAVr RCLRD CN 1 HE CONTRACTOR TO CUR IHVCC APPLYING THE RECOMMENDED THE NJCLAR OCApOMS' EN ME: HOD Or Tts NNE. WA5 VSED IN SUBSTANTIALACCORUANCC WITH ASTM 0311! AND 03'+1) See Page 2 for additional density test results. IJEC 1 1 2003 i AR]AIly Phil Orgill _Daniel E. Hardin, P:E. CONSTRUCTION, INC Field Observer Reviewed By DEC -11-2003 14:55 P GEOTECH P.10/15 IP GlenwooT Jar r595, Colorado 81650 1Gtech 5020 Gounty RoDC 154 Pion 570-945.7988 Fax 970.045-4454 HEPWORTH . PAWLAK GEOTCCHNIC AL tin rt, elect, rnm Earthwork Observation and Testing Report Client. Harry Colborn Job No 103 252 Date 12-5-03 Cro Harry's Heavy Haulers Report No. Page 2 Of 2 Project Proposed Residence, Lots 74 and 75, Willows Subdivision, County Road 320, East of Rifle Village South, Garfield County, Colorado _ Nuclear Gauge Moisture/Density Test Results Test No Location under footing/slab fill Depth or Elev Field Dry Density PCF Field Moisture Content "!o Percent Comp, Min Com RegP Proctor Lab No 1 Northeast building corner f5 adE 141 8 4.5 100 98 2 Southeast building corner grade 136.6 4.6 98 98 2A Retest of test #2 gratde 142.0 4.2 100 98 3 45' west of southeast building corner footing grade 136.1 4.7 97 98 4 Southwest building corner f'ratde 141.3 4.7 100 98 f s Northwest building corner fgrade 137.8 3.9 98 98 6 North bedroom wing, 20' south of north end footing grade 137.9 4.2 99 98 Proctor Sam • Ie References: Lab No. Method Description Max Dry Dens Opt Moist _ assumed _____ 3" aggregate base course j 6.D .140.0 i THE VLCLEAF DEN90m3 7 z A NEThOD Or TESTING WAS USED m SIIB5 I AN] ins ACCORDANCE WITIl ASTM 02922 AND J30:7 CC: Dave Partain `I-1;v,a_.:IVIE ' Phil Orgill Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. DEC 1 1 2003 Field Observer Reviewed By t'Ali IAIN CONSTRUCTION, iNt'_ DEC -11-2003 14 S. GEOTECH f P.11 1_ Particle Size Distribution Report 103 QC rU 70 - LC LU EC L Li- ~ 50 Z w (J Li 40 I m -- -- o -L— — - i', 0 1 ' I I I I i I 1'1'1 I I 1 1' 500 IOU 10 5: COBBLES 4/. GRAVEL GRAN SIZE mm SAND 1 0,1 Cl:1UOOI 0 CRS I FINE CRS 29 30 I 6 % FINES MEDIUM FINE 1 SILT CLAY 14 12 SIEVE PERCENT SPEC' I PASS? SIZE 1 FINER PERCENT Ik=N0) 3 in. 100 1S,n 92 75 in 71 1751:1 52 i;4 4i �8 fi 416 72 +:30 25 7150 17 4100 i2 4200 '10 Soil Description 3•' aggregate bas: cowl se Aherbere Limits (ASTM D 43181 PL= -- LL= -- P1= .. Classification USCS= GP -CM AASHT0= Coefficients D85= 29.2 D50= 13.2 D50= d o5 D30= 0942 D75= 02N 010= 0.0067 Cd: 130 39 Cc.= 0 69 Date Tested: 12-04-0i Tested By: 3G Remarks Sce figrne 4 for ion wimum dry k-nsny nnrl nl,nmunl mol\tme .-Ided) Sample No.: 630-3 Source of Sample: import nom Unncd Rt, R111L. Cutin, cis• Date Sampled: i 2-04-03 Location. Hurry Colborn RcsItl nce EIOV ;Depth. Checked By ,MDF, Title: Lab Manage Cr—Client. Harry Col&omHepvorth-PavlaPrjeG[: Leis 748,-n Wllnwi ]u6Ctvlslon lmnl(v nua.'320(J FiII:I V rllage Soull;, G,rfi_ld Cuddy, Colo:ad' re®technics! Inc. Project No: 103 252 Figure 1 EC 1 1 Z003 DEC -11-2003 14:5E 136 134 132 130 128 126 2 Test specification: H -P GEOTECH COMPACTION TEST REPORT P.19 15 4 6 t3 Water content, % ASTM D 698-91 Procedure C Standard 3 ZAV for Sp G = 270 Elevl Depth Classification USCS AASHTO Nat. Moist. Sp.G. LL GP -GM A -1-a PI 314 in are No.200 - I 29.0 90 TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Maximum dry density = 134 6 pcf Optimum moisture = 8 7 io Y' aggregote hose course, United Pi . Rifle. Colorado Project No. 103 252 Client: Hairy Colburn Project: 1.o:; 74&75. Willows Subdivision, County Road 320, East of Rifle Village South, Garfield County, Colorado Date: 12-04.03 Location: Harry Colborn Residence 1 Remarks: See figure 1 rot gradation. Sample 0630-_ COMPACTION TEST REPORT Hepworth-Pawlak Geot-chnical, Inc. , Figure 4 ITT J Imo— F L —;-- — I i 1 I. I I 1 — �4 -40 - t I j 1 i t , -trill • -' . TION I ; t I i I I I I 1- I -- H = 1 �� 1 i 4 6 t3 Water content, % ASTM D 698-91 Procedure C Standard 3 ZAV for Sp G = 270 Elevl Depth Classification USCS AASHTO Nat. Moist. Sp.G. LL GP -GM A -1-a PI 314 in are No.200 - I 29.0 90 TEST RESULTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION Maximum dry density = 134 6 pcf Optimum moisture = 8 7 io Y' aggregote hose course, United Pi . Rifle. Colorado Project No. 103 252 Client: Hairy Colburn Project: 1.o:; 74&75. Willows Subdivision, County Road 320, East of Rifle Village South, Garfield County, Colorado Date: 12-04.03 Location: Harry Colborn Residence 1 Remarks: See figure 1 rot gradation. Sample 0630-_ COMPACTION TEST REPORT Hepworth-Pawlak Geot-chnical, Inc. , Figure 4 • DEC -11-2003 14:56 r , , GEOTECH P.114 1` GeateCh HEPWORTH PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs. CO 81601 Phone. 970-945-7988 Fax: 970.945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeoteeh.com REPORT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES Harry Colborn clo Harry's Heavy Haulers 1605 Airport Road Rifle, Colorado 81650 Job No.: 103 252 Date: 12-8-03 Sheet. 1 of 1 Project Proposed Residence, Lots 74 and 75, Willow Subdivision, County Road 320, East of Rifle Village South, Garfield County, Colorado Weather Conditions and Temperature: Light Snow, 30° H -P Geolech's Site Activities. As requested by Dave Partain with PCI Construction, we visited the site this afternoon to perform density testing. The contractor was not on-site. No tests were performed on this date. Copies Dave Partain Phil Orgill Field Engineer DEC 1 1 2003 If;nlr.id I;UNS113UC1tON, INC Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. Reviewed By • DEC -11-2007 14:55 GEOTECH f-, . - 1 r.• frr r GeateChe GlenwocO Springs, do 81601 Phone. 97C -945-798B Fax 979-945-8454 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL hpgeo@hpgCOIecnsom Earthwork Obs rvation and Testing Report Client: Harry Colborn Job No.: 103 252 Date: 12-9-03 Attn clo Harry's Heavy Haulers Page 1 Of 2 1605 Airport Road Rifle, Colorado 81650 Project: Proposed Residence, Lots 74 and 75, Willows Subdivision, County Road 320, East of Rifle Village South, Garfield County, Colorado Weather: Cloudy Temperature Range. Mid 30' Earthwork Contractor: Harry's Heavy Haulers Major Equipment Loader, dozer, vibratory smooth drum roller Contractor's Construction Activities : Contractor has scarified, moistened and recompacted footing grade. H -P Geotech's Material Placement and Compaction Observations: Contractor's work procedure: Observed: Not Observed: X Area & Time(s) of observation: Moisture conditioning method: Maximum observed lift thickness - Compaction equipment used: Vibratory smooth -drum roller Minimum number of passes observed. Maximum observed size of rock placed: 3" Were procedures and materials observed and/or tests performed in conformance with project requirements? Yes. No: X Unknown: Describe: Person(s) Informed: Dave Partain with PCI Construction Nonconformance corrected: Material(s) and location(s) sampled: Additional Information. All tests performed met assumed project specifications. Footing grade will be blanketed prior to placing concrete. THIS REPORT PRESENTS OPINIONS AS A RESULT OF OUR OBSERVATIONSOF FILL PLACEMENT, W E HAVE RELIED ON THE CDNTRAC fOR TO CONTINUE APPLYING THE RECOMMENDED THE NUCLEAR OENSCMF ER METHOD OF TESTING WAS USED IN SUBSTANTLAL ACCORDANCE YrITn ASTM 02E22 AND D3017 See Page 2 for additional density test results DEC 1 1 2003 iTJil" hl Phil Orgill Daniel E. Hardin, P.E. i;'.Ii`aclPLUG EMAIL Field Observer Reviewed By DEC -11-2003 lar% GEOTECH P.aS 15 r - - H PGlanweod Sprngs, Coloraao 81650 GeateCh 5020 County Road 154 Pnone. 970-945 7899 Fax' 970-945.4454 HEPWORIH- PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL hpaeo@hpgeoIgcJ% Earthwork Observation and Testing Report Client: Harry Colborn Job No. 103 252 Date. 12-9-03 cio Harry's Heavy Haulers Report No. Page. 2 Of 2 Protect Proposed Residence, Lots 74 and 75, 'Willows Subdivision, County Road 320, East of Rifle Village South, Garfield County, Colorado Nuclear Gauge Moisture/Density Test Results I est No. Location Under footingisiab fill Depth or Elev. Field Dry Density PCF Field Moisture Content % Percent Comp. Min. Com Regp' Proctor Lab No. 3A Retest of test #3 12-5-03 footing grade 140.8 6.3 100+ 98 630-3 'I 5A Retest of test #5 12-5-03 footing grade 141.7 6.7 100+ 98 630-3 II 6A Retest of test #6 12-5-03 footing grade 142.2 7.0 100. 98 II 630-3 1 10' southwest of northeast building corner Footing grade 140.2 6.5 100+ 98 630-3 11 Proctor Sample References: Lab No. i Method [ Description Max Dry Dens f Opt Moist 630-3 ASTM D698 -91C 3" aggregate base course 134.6 6.7 t 1 THE NUCLEAR DENSOMf 1 Fd METHOD OF TESTING WAS USED IN SUBSTANTIAL. ACCORDANCE Wan ASTM 02922 AND 0]D- / cc Dave Partain b DEC 1 1 2003 I-r.HIN.W PhD Orgill Daniel E. Hardin. P.E- ;u1SIl;UCI1UN, ItuC Field Observer Reviewed By TnraL P, 1c. Sir COUNTY OF GARFIELD - BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 201 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at /Q 302-62 Permit No. 8j As --- 6 1 have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date (02 a V 20 Building Inspector Phone (970) 945-8212 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT 109 8th Street Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone (303) 945-8212 INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT PROPERTY Owner's Nam4 0%$61 LegalSystem Location j 0 Legal Description of Assessor's Parcel No. SYSTEM DESIGN Plesent Address Permit N° 3 8 8 9 Assessor's Parcel No. This does not constitute a building or use permit. 330 g 19/ 7"7 -,(D/ -00 - Cep 9' Septic Tank Capacity (gallon) Percolation Rate (minutes/inch) Number of Bedrooms (or other) Required Absorption Area - See Attached Special Setback Requirements - Date Inspector FINAL SYSTEM INSPECTION AND APPROVAL (as installed) Call for Inspection (24 hours notice) Before Covering Installation r` Other System Installer Septic Tank Capacity astatto 171-07 r 46L Septic Tank Manufacturer or Trade Name Septic Tank Access within 8" of surface Absorption Area Absorption Area Type andlor Manufacturer or Trade Name Adequate compliance with County and State regulations/requirements Other 1,1, �n1 ,��l� T �I Date Inspector M'r'4/On1 LS Fzc H4A [ ri) Z AA %f1Ov/ RETAIN WITH RECEIPT RECORDS AT CONSTRUCTION SITE L / •CONDITIONS: 1. All installation must comply with all requirements of the Colorado State Board of Health Individual Sewage Disposal Systems Chapter 25, Article 10 C.R.S. 1973, Revised 1984. 2. This permit is valid only for connection to structures which have Tully complied with County zoning and building requirements. Con- nection to or use with any dwelling or structures not approved by the Building and Zoning office shall automatically be a violation or a requirement of the permit and cause for both legal action and revocation of the permit. 3. Any person who constructs,alters, or installs an individual sewage disposal system in a manner which involves a knowing and material variation from the terms or specifications contained in the application of permit commits a Class I, Petty Offense ($500.00 fine —6 months in jail or both). White - APPLICANT Yellow - DEPARTMENT No. %9(C) Job A dr • s Owne Contracto Assessor's Parcel No a1 - c1 BUILDING PER .I CARD b Addres f•-� �� at ') Phone � � 5 >' Addressc2IQ 519 ,kt�� . Phone # /p�% x7_96 Zoning (0(K --O 13 Date la - I Q -C)3 Setks1:,� Fle Fr n a RH � w SPECTIONS Foos Test Footing ,42 -(2.3a _ Foundation Grout Underground Plumbi Rough Plumbin Framing 'S- -• Insulation 5-2- g Z Roofing Drywall c -1-[) Gas Piping 11-9-7-0 NOTES LH Weatherproofing Mechanical '` Electrical Rough (State).!'4�/ Elect ' al Fin (State) 1-2./-0 C,40 Final D Checklist Completed? fr.-- Certificate �Certificate Occupancy # Date Septic System # Date TT Final %-'i1 o4 r.� 2E4%4c Ludgne ok -- 4/1 Other (continue on back) ' INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date IssuedI 4b ..Zoned Area Permit No. . nw? IIIIII AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIAT LY BECOME NULL AND V l ID. Use �Ad resc, r Incl D c' p o __ ,�/� Imo, Ownell.ZS �' w • L • e " ,f e►' Setbacks FSont Side Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing , -.2-03 1757737 Foundation /2-/(0-03JO C_ Underground Plumbing 3-) 2-0 arA Insulation 5'4. _ 0 1141111 Rough Plumbing _ MM. Drywall b_ _ ''J Chimney & Vent j - 61�ci-4 oh,. rr . ,, ,:an. , Gas Piping lagrfl, Final -/0-D ei Electric Rough (By State Inspector) ` - „fid Septic Final 7./127 Framing5 2J -D is (To include Roof inlace and Windows and Doors installed). Notes: / ' ' #gff ! r r , I7 8 /0 C 7( ! ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT 1S NOT TRANSFERABLE 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Date 1 By (((((( IF PLACED OUTSIDE - C 1 VER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC