The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About5.0 Resolution 86-103STATE OF COLORADO )ss County of Garfield ) Recorded at 1: 5 6 no'cclocic�l___—M SEP 15 1986 Reception No 3''14454 MILDRED ALSDORF, RECORDER GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO BOOK 695 pAGE D)7 At a regular meeting of the Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County, Colorado, held at the Commissioners' Meeting Room, Garfield County Courthouse in Glenwood Springs on Monday , the 15th day of September A.D. 1986 , there were present: when Larry Schmueser Robert Richardson Flaven J. Cerise Don DeFord Mildred Alsdorf Chuck Deschenes the following proceedings, , Commissioner Chairman , Commissioner , Commissioner , County Attorney , Clerk of the Board , County Administrator among others were had and done, to -wit: RESOLUTION NO. 86-103 A RESOLUTION CONCERNING APPROVAL OF A P.U.D. PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE DISTRICT TEXT AMENDMENT OF THE LAZIER -SILLS PARTNERSHIP, CANYON CREEK ESTATES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. WHEREAS, the Lazier -Sills Partnership, a Colorado General Partnership, submitted to the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, an application to amend the P.U.D. Plan and Zone District Text of Canyon Creek Estates Planned Unit Development as originally approve by Resolution No. 81-136 and amended by Resolution No. 83-46. WHEREAS, reviewed and District text the Planning and Zoning Commission of Garfield County recommended approval of the P.U.D. Plan Amendment and' Zone amendment at a meeting on June 11, 1986; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by this Board on June 30, 1986; and WHEREAS, based on the evidence, testimony, exhibits, study of the Comprehensive Plan for the unincorporated area of the County, comments of the Garfield County Planning Department, comments of public officials and agencies, and comments from all interested parties, this board finds as follows: 1. That the hearing before the Board of County Commissioners was extensive and complete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted, and that all interested parties were heard at the hearing; 2. That the Amended P.U.D. Plan and Zone District text amendments are consistent with the efficient development and preservation of the entire P.U.D., does not affect, in a substantially adverse manner, either the enjoyment of the land abutting upon or across a street from the P.U.D., or the public interest, and is not granted solely to confer a special benefit upon any person; 3. That the proposed zoning is in general compliance with the recommendations set forth in the Comprehensive Plan for the unincorporated area of the County, provided certain conditions are met in any subsequent land use permit applications; 4. The the requested Amended Planned Unit Development Plan and Zone District text amendments are in general compliance with all requirements of the applicable Garfield County Zoning Resolution and, further, that the requested Planned Unit Development Modification is suitable and appropriate for the subject property given the location, condition and circumstances of the property, and it is generally compatible with existing land uses in the surrounding nearby area; BOOK 695 PAGE 105 5. That for the above -stated and other reasons, the proposed Planned Unit Development Zone District text amendments arein the best interest of the health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF GARFIELD COUNTY THAT: 1. The P.U.D. Plan Amendment depicted on that certain map attached as Exhibit "A", is hereby approved. Further development of Canyon Creek Estates P.U.D. shall be as set forth on this amended plan. 2. That the Zone District Text for the Canyon Creek Estates P.U.D. as depicted on the Amended P.U.D. Plan shall be as set forth on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Dated this 15th day of ATTEST ,r t.,JJ / ��'--�- Cl rk of the Board September , A.D. 1986. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO By: Chairman Upon motion duly made and seconded the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the following vote: Larry Schmueser Robert Richardson Flaven J. Cerise Aye Aye Aye STATE OF COLORADO ) County of Garfield ) I� , County Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County and State aforesaid do hereby certify that the annexed and foregoing Resolution is truly copied from the Records of the Proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners for said Garfield County, now in my office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County, at Glenwood Springs, this day of , A.D. 19 EXHIBIT "B" BOOK 695 N 103 CANYON CREEK ESTATES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONE DISTRICT TEXT AMENDMENT AMENDMENT TO CANYON CREEK P.U.D. ZONE DISTRICT REGULATIONS APPROVED BY GARFIELD COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 83-46, RECORDED MARCH 8, 1983, AS RECEPTION NO. 338978 IN BOOK 621 AT PAGE 510. A. SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE DISTRICT 1. Uses by Right: Single-family and customary accessory uses. Home occupation and crafts. 2. Minimum Lot Area: 0.25 acres. 3. Minimum Building Setback: a. Front yard: 25 feet from front lot lines. b. Rear yard: 10 feet from rear lot line. c. Side yard: 7.5 feet from side lot line. 4. Maximum Height of Buildings: 30 feet. 5. Maximum Lot Coverage: 40 percent. B. COMMON OPEN SPACE 1. Uses by Right: Passive and active recreation, recreational facilities, community facilities, water storage facilities, sanitation facilities, stables and paddocks. 2. Minimum Building Setbacks: a. Front yard: 50 feet from street centerline. b. Rear yard: 50 feet from residential buildings. c. Side yard: 10 feet from side and rear lot lines. 3. Maximum Height of Buildings: 25 feet. 4. Maximum Lot Coverage: 15 percent. -1- SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATIONS 1. Parking Requirements: a. Residential: Two spaces per unit. b. Common Open Space: Community facilities shall be centrally located and designed for pedestrian access. For community facilities located, or to be located, within deeded common open space, parking facilities will accommodate a minimum of 20 percent of the projected users of these facilities. BOOK 695 PAGEI.1.0 2. Home Occupation Standards: a. No home occupation shall be permitted that: (1) Changes the outside appearance of the dwelling or is visible from the street; (2) Creates a hazard to person or property, results in alc ctr tcrrl intorior.oncr, or - becomes a nuisance; (3) Results in the outside storage or display of anything. b. The following are prohibited as home occupations: (1) Dancing studios; (2) Repair shops; (3) Restaurants; (4) Stables or kennels; (5) Automobile repair or paint shops. D. DEFINITIONS 1. Active Recreation: Recreational activities undertaken on land improved with recreational or community facilities. 2. Building Height: Measured vertically from the average natural finished grade line immediately adjoining the foundation to the average roof height. 3. Community Facilities: Public restrooms and meeting facilities designed alone or in conjunction with recreational facilities. -2- BOOK 695 PAGEI.! 1 4. Lot Coverage: The portion of a lot or tract which is covered or occupied by buildings, structures, parking and drives. 5. Minimum Setback: The minimum dimension of a required yard. 6. Minimum Lot Area: The total land area within the boun- daries of a lot. 7. Passive Recreation: Recreational activities on land in its natural state, without landscaping or any improvement. 8. Recreational Facilities: Improvements such as pools, tennis courts, playgrounds, picnic tables, softball fields, volleyball courts, and horseshoe pits designed to provide for active recreation. 9. Sanitation Facilities: Wastewater treatment plants, lift stations, collection lines, trunk lines, power line, and all other appurtenances thereto. 10. Water Storage Facilities: Treated water storage faci- lities and all lines, pumps, and all other appurtenan- ces thereto. -3-