Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- Permita f 0957 lob Address GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING, SANITATION, and PLANNING DEPARTMENT 109 8th, Stmt, Suite 303 j�al!Ln -C_ i Glenwood Springs, rl^' No. 8722 Nature of Work Building Permit Use of Building 'b/A Q Owner cc Ce 1-4.0€ 7�� Contraetor 1)O a€_}--Uetrf t Cx4©C3 Amount of Permits CIS.. 1.6 Date — L Clerk GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION GARFIELD COUNTY (GLENWOOD SPRINGS), COLORADO TELEPHQNE: (9704945-9212 G ^�-� os/ 5/Qc% pj�4'�ePE "I' Na O !O(ra PARCEL/SCHEDULENO. 239509100130 INSPECTION LINE: P70284-5003 10B ADDRESS: leAw nc�(,I Jpt 1v�95L f(+Ci 1 LOTNOParcel 1 BLOL7CN0. Faranhyll Ranch SUBDWISION/E,( MMPIION 15b1DISrplartit 2 DwNimScott & Debbie Fifer mnalas 0351 Van Dorn Road P"945-8405 'Pt945-6777 3 ComEACIOI Cross Creek Centrsctoro,_Inc. .�Dlma GlemYULni Spy, CO 81601 Box 1145 Gypsum, CO 8163 524-041C 877.6411 4 µAker Cole Aco... Box 2224 Vail, CO 81658 "°926-3240 "°"3'-201696 5 Redwi11e/Reiziait a0. FT. OFEL9DMo 4200 + - Tiv4n7 7tt 17th St. DellveL, ee 80202 IG PT. OPLOT 35 Dcras 573-9010 wain 13673 NO°MOORE 3+Ber: 6 mRDe.uDm+D �t . I_ Residential ��.�a "(IA��L 7 °�`"°" Construct new residential /home 8 C.MI0!WORL xCMBW OADDrt10N °ALTERATION DYOW °REMOVE 9 W.AD< mean cDOW ! WP <T. D 0 B MOOSUP 1- 10 00{N(VAY9l6( v0ON Int SEWAGE DISPOSAL (IeTDC) ITIS PIAN N/A waiting on letter- WDA,fOH G.W®L, p $331,199 ADMRD YALEATWN.I $ 338�9c ,Ot •'..AtamennSpoinalisit / SysrS w RCQwp.LQ— SLJcr Wt 31..t 4440 #, & 7a JprJP IDID MOT it NA CV nv f eetek NOTICE A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMR 1S REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY DIE STATE OF caORAZ» PIAN CHECK FEE: /5/5, /v PERMIT FEE: 2332. /5' THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED Wn1IN 150 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK 15 SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOA A PERIOD OF 1S0 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTEAWORK IS COMMENCED. TOTAL FEE: MI B DATE PERT ISSUED: 389 5 o5 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BR TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING110S TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED LIEREDI OR NOT. nis NOT PRESUME TO �OR VIOLATE OORCANCFLTHE PG OF A ROVISIONS OCC: MOUE CONST: TYPE: P "^ �� `1 ti _ iii AUTHORITY TO OF ANY OTHER STATE LOCAL LAW RIGUTATINO CONSTRUCTION OR 171E PERFORMANCE OF CONSTR O., ---,.-I - I 9 a3 TONING: SETBACKS: 11141010 ..�-ij .AVO ,., . NOTE: 345C) yND.� P!!8: J Build'.. ... pWDYw9No .. , c • ...,177• X11, 50 , D K-✓le�0 `((JJsySr.MA AGREEMENT PERMISSION 5 Y GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR 771E AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THC STRUCTURE DETAILED ON P 5 me SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY 771E BUIDINGDEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF IAIS PERMIT, TEE SIGNER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WTI71 ALL BUILDING CODES AND IAN) USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.23.201 CRS AS AMENDED. 771E SIGNER FUSTIER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FIJI COMPLIED WITH 114 THE LOCATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, 171E PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FR THE COUNTY MW THAT 111214*140 THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. TIE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PIANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND O11IEK DATA SHAM. NOT PREVENT 111E BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING. CORREC JON OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BURRING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN VIOLATION OF THIS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OK REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. 771E REVIEW OF IHR SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED niEREAFTEK DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF i RRSPONSIDIITIE9 OR UABI.TnIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS. OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR TIMER ITEMS AND IMELEMENTAT DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICALLY WI1ITHE ARCIIIIEcr. DESIGNER BUILDER AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO E CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPI OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. G.d * 3 IPAEBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT MANE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE. ITNLTIM. The following items are required by Garfield County fora final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1997 UBC requirements; 6. Outside gradingtdone to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupanc�yy, use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # '61 aa, . iasee, Signature Bpcont082002 Date • VALUATION/FEE DETERMINATION Applicant riF$u( Subdivision fgranLitlI KarLie, AddressLot/Block Pei r� e 1 3- Date .711111 Contractor Crct s Cit C Finished (Livable Area): Main 1903 Upper I O) 3 Lower IS 32. Other Total Square Feet Valuation 44g x 6q - 3 cie 9/a Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Vaination Garage: Crawl Space: Valuation 4 28 ti 1$ Valuation Decks/Patios: Covered bit Valuation 252 Open 950 w 24 Valuation 34D r /2. Total Valuation 33A,41 Building Permit Fee 23.S 2 Jr Plan Review Fee TS /S. 9Q Total BP & PR 3 M 05" TZ- , SP-trL SD. Oce 3$9 S. 05 !p 704 /0 Sop 4ogo 0 Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists. wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house - rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, an 80 M.P.H. windshear, wind exposure B, windload of 15 pounds per square foot, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be retumed. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties ith slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. Yes 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility ease nts? Yes ✓✓ 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent pro ies), streams or water courses? Yes 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the proper, Yes 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes Nr/4 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces's and s {fiats? Yes 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and woads? Yes 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? 7 Yes ✓ 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes ✓ 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns ltd beams? Yes 12. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing (uncjisturbed) grade contours? Yes �►// 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No f,/ 14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Buildinp,�ode Chapter 37? Yes No 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code�Z Yes �/ No 3 1 16. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and venljilation for all habitable rooms? Yes ►/ No 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify s ety glazing for these areas? Yes No 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated onsite plan? Yes r/ No 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes V No 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the architectural c ittee deny or reject your building plans? Yes l No 21. Will this bethe dilly residential structure on the parcel? Yes �/ No If no -Explain: 22. Have two (2)�e6mplete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes 23. Do you underhand that the minimum size a home can be on a lot is a 20ft. x 20ft.? Yes l/ No 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction p6de requirements? Yes ✓ No 25. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspectionhe Garfield County Building Department? Yes t/ No 1 26. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the applicatio of these changes? Yes No 27. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building p t? Yes V No 28. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoons. All inspections must be called in by 3:30 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspectionswil) delay your inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes Y No 29. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy at}d'occupancy of the building? Yes 1/ No 30. Are you aware that the person signing the Permit Application, whether the "Owner", "Agent of the Owner", "General Contractor", "Contractor" or otherwise, is the party responsible for the project co ng with the Uniform Building Code? Yes ✓ No 31. Are you aware that prior to issuance of a building permit you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. / Yes Y No 32. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time pplicable inspection. Yes V No 7 33. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to issuance of a building pe i Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes No I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. 4 -4 -os Si ature Date Phone: qv. 624- 04io (days); 170 • 4%7 -ti sl / fcert Project Name: El ee.t R asI 0eski(_i✓ Project Address: Pira GEL ( ` ��/�/J 1-4- Y LL RA- sJc 14 Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreq 08/2002 Applicant 'lf-g..2 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Building Engineered Foundation t1.4 Driveway Permit ✓Slarve Site Plan -eteptic Permit and Setbacks Grade/Topography 30% -�Attach Residential Plan Review List `inimum Application Questionnaire Subdivision Plat Notes /Fire Department Review /Valuation Determination/F ✓Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker Attach Conditions a/pplication Signed nan Reviewer To Sign Application l/Parcel/Schedule No. ki 440# Snowload Letter- Mani Hms. GENERAL NOTES: Date -2 -0 Planning/Zo ' ng Property ine Setbacks 30ft Str am Setbacks Flood ' lain Buil •g Height Zo . g Sign -off R • ad Impact Fees OA/DRC Approval Grade/Topography 40% Planning Issues Subdivision Plat Notes 2-03-203 5:3G-'14 FROM a GLststeCh December 6, 2001 Scott Fifer c/o Resource Engineering 909 Colorado Avenue Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Hepworth•Paivlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road l54 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7911.9 Fay: 970.945-8454 hpgeo@hpguolech.rmn Job No. 101 777 Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Test, Proposed Residence. Parcel 1, Faranhyll Ranch. Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Fifer: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study and percolation test for foundation and septic disposal designs at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services to you dated November 16, 2001. The project sire is shown on Figs. 1 and 2. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented M this report. Evaluation of potential geologic hazard impacts on the site are beyond the scope of this study. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be one to two story wood frame above a walkout basement with an attached garage and located on the site as shown on Fig. 2. Ground floors are proposed to be slab -on -grade. Cut depths are expected to range between about 4 to 8 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of construction. The septic disposal system is proposed to be located downhill and northeast of the•residence. If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate tbe recommendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: Parcel 1 is located on an east facing hillside near the 4 mile meek valley bottom and consists of approximately 36 acres The ground surface in the building area is moderately sloping down to the east with about 5 feet of elevation difference across the proposed building. The building area is vegetated with a dense stand of scrub oak and brush. An existing irrigation ditch is located south of the building site and was flowing at the time of our field exploration. Scattered basalt cobbles and boulders are exposed on the ground surface and approximately 3 inches of snow covered the ground. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by excavating two exploratory pits in the building area and one profile pit in the septic disposal area at the approximate locations shown on Fig 2. The logs of tbe pits are presented on Fig. 3. The subsoils encountered, below about one foot of topsoil, consist of about 2 feet of sandy clay overlying clayey gravel with cobbles and boulders. Practical digging refusal with a backhoe was encountered in the pits between 4.5 and 5.5 feet depth. Results of swell -consolidation testing performed on a relatively undisturbed sample of the upper clay, presented on Fig. 4, indicate low compressibility P. 1 :.'-o'<-:o? S. 3771N FROM P. 2 Scon. Fifer December 6, 2001 Page 2 under existing trioistute conditions and Tight loading and a low expansion potential when wetted. Results of a gradation analysis performed on a sample of clayey gravel r,minus 5 inch fraction) obtained from the site are presented on Fig. 5. No free water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and rhe soils were slightly moist to moist. Foundation Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural clayey gravel soil designed for en allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 psi for support of the proposed residence. The upper clay soils rend to expand after wetting and should be removed to expose the underlining gravelly soils. The expansion potential of the clay material of the slave! soils should be evaluated at the time the building excavation is completed. Foot.ngs should be a minimum width of 16 inchec for continuous wails and 2 feet foi columns. Loose and disturbed soils encountered at the foundation bearing k'iel within the excavation should he renewed and the footing hearing level extended down to thz undisturbed natural gravelly soils. Exterior footings sttoutd be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assutniug an unsupported length of at leasr 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should he designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight Of at least 50 pct for the on-site gravelly soils (excluding oversized rock) as backfill. Floor Slabs: The natural on -she soils, exclusive of topsoil, can be used to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. The upper clays are expansive when wetted and should be removed below the basement floor. To reduce the effects of some differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing wails and columns with expansion joints which allcv; unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use A minimum 4 inch layer of tree -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50;9 passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. Ail fill materials for support of floor stabs should be compacted to at least 95 % of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist- of' the on-site gravelly soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. Underdraie System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in mountainous areas that local perched groundwater can develop during tunes of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground dunes spring runoff can create a perched condition. We reconrn:end below -grade H -P CEO I F.1-1 2-03-203 S• =,s- i FROM P.3 Scott Fifer December 6, 2001 Page 3 construction. such as retaining walls, crawlspace and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below Lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 11/2 feet deep. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should he observed during construction and maintained at all tunes after the residence has been completed: 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. Drying could increase the expansion potential of the clay soils. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on-site. finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in rhe first I0 fret in pavement and walkway areas. A swale will be needed uphill to direct surface runoff around the residence . 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at least 5 feet from the building Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted on November 28, 2001 to evaluate the feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. One profile pit and three percolation holes were dug at the location:: shown on Fig. 1. The test holes (nominal 12 inch diameter by 12 inch deep) were hand dug at the bottom of shallow backhoe pits and were snaked with water one day prior to testing. The soils exposed in the percolation boles are similar to those exposed in the Profile Pit shown on Fig 3 and consist of sandy clay overlying clayey gravel with cobbles and boulders. Practical digging refusal in the boulders was encountered at 5.5 feet. The percolation test results are presented in Table 11. Rased on the subsurface conditions encountered and the percolation test results, an engineered septic disposal system may be requites]. We recommend the system be oversized due to the clay soils. Deepening the system H -P GEOT EC is 2-33-203 5.38PH FRGH P 4 Scott Fifer December 6, 2001 Page 4 into the gravelly soils may result in an acceptable percolation rate. Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may net become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verity that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. / Louis E. Eller Reviewed by: Steven L Pawtak, P. LEE/djg attachments H -P GEu-IEc' 2-03-203 5:39PM FROM P WU U? CCt Di coz UW • 2-03-203 S:40P1 FROM P 6 APPROXIMATE SCALE 1' a 100' PIT 1 PROPOSED RESIDENCE PIT 2 PROFILE P17 P1^ P2 Q_ P 3 EXISTING IRRIOATON DITCH FARANHYLL RANCH PARCEL 1 BUILDING ENVELOPE 101 777 I HEPWORTH-PAWLAK LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS GEOTECHNICAL. INC. AND PERCOLATION TEST MOLES 1 Fig. 2 2-03-203 5.40PM FROM F 7 11 5 0 0 — 0 —.5 10 LEGEND: N ISI 1 NOTES: PIT 1 PIT 2 00-106 -200.85 sod- ,•411 4.4-60 J -200-26 TI wa31 PI -15 ] -AC •02.2 11/0-107 TOPSOIL: sandy silty day, organic, loose, moist, brown. CLAY (CL): sandy. stiff to very stiff, moist, brown. PROFILE PIT 0 5 • • 10--, GRAVEL (GO); clayey, sandy, with basalt cobbles and boulders, medium dense to dense, moist, brown, subangular and subrounded rock. 2" Diameter hand driven liner sample_ Disturbed bulk sample. Practical digging refusal In boulders with Cat 4200 backhoe. Depth — Feet 1. Exploratory pits were excavated on November 27, 2001 with a backhoe. 2. Locutions of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features on the site pion provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were not measured and loge of exploratory pits are drown to depth. 4. The exploratory pit locutions should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit Togs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the pits of the time of excavating. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( X ) -200 w Percent passing No. 200 sieve DO - Dry Density ( pcf ) LI. = Liquid Limit ( ) +4 = Percent retained on No. 4 sieve PI - Plasticity Index ( X ) 101 777 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOOS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig. 3 4 2--03-203 5 : 41 Pt 1 FPOIA P. 8 Compression — Expanslon % N a 0 a N Moisture Content = 12.2 percent Dry Density = 107 pct Sample of: Sandy Clay From: Pit 2 at 2.5 Feet a , Expansion upon stetting i I _ 1 0,1 1.0 0 100 APPLIED PRESSURE — kat 101 777 HEPWORTH—PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL. INC. SWELL CONSOLIDATION 'FEST RESULTS Fig. 4 2-03-203 5-41P1 FROM R NTR A! i eroroyelei 04u4.1121 Th' 11161:403s P. 9 u2. 3100A 411eS 0 42,! NIL 710 1.11. 15 S. wK 114111 4 la 1 Mit 00 poo 6 10 20 w 40 GO 44 70 60 b 1W --r ICC ALCMS azn !WPIC 00D0673 3/r 3/C 11K Y sr e' too -- —S• isms • w wr VINO disse sliNisww w ems suss ss•Si — ED .r. !MI MI SP IS Wwm sa um s - WWI OM OMEN, =MI 03=x' :S ,O SPOONS = S SOS sews ..1:.. r OS rSEE7r—E S �= �=re= = MOS _ ==110 ==.0..o=0— w..�S=ws�ir X00= ==' SU ---w —.. w SOS 5—Su_— ISS• Ss SS SS dpiesS OS POSES ===== PrSww— ENVIES. w—_ --ww— Z•••••SINOI• SOUSE SPO ElISE w��w--- FENNO SONO = =OSP SSW SSP -- = .001 .002 A04 .001 .00 .037 .074 .130 MS so =a 1.�. w C —= a .300 .100 1,11 131 4.75 nits 11.0 37.5 74.2 , ;at 201 DIAMETER CF PARTICLES IN MILUMETERS aur 10 sr GRAVEL 60 z LIQUID LIMIT 31 % SAND 15 % SAMPLE OF: Clayey Gravel with Sand and Cobbles 101 777 SILT AND CLAY 25 % PLASTICITY INDEX 15 % FROM: Pit 2 at 3 Ihru 5 Feet 10 50 fi 60 10 40 30 20 10 0 HEPWORTH-13AWLP.K GEOTECHNICAL, INC. GRADATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 5 2-03-203 5 : 42P1•1 ma 0 SUMMARY P. ,e ! ! | 9 m sandy clay Ji co c - /) ]7 ||r_ | t1 . §! t. §'-- S. ,- - ]§� G. W• I :,I■ up ° 25 , .4- § |!, e !to - 0 f|it. !) ) | § ■I! �a — 3 f m 2-03-203 5,43711 FROM HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE II PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS c 1I JOB NO. 101 777 HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL (MIN) WATER DE,Til AT START OF INTERVAL (INCHES) WATER DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL (INCHES) DROP IN AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE tMIN.3NCN1 WA fER LEVEL (INCHES( P-1 27 20 8: 7°/. '/. 80 71/4 7% Y. 7'h 7 5 7 6'% 6% 6'% % 61 6% V. P-2 25 20 8 71 'a 80 7'/. 7 7 6'h :4 6% 61/4 'h 61. 6 1/4 6 51/4 %: P•3 28 20 71/4 7 80 7 6'4 '/. 6% 6% '/. 6y 6'i 1/4 6'/. 6 '; 6 5','. V. Nota. Percolation test holes were hand dug in the bottom of backhoe pits and soaked on November 27, 2001. Percolation tests were conducted on November 28, 2001. The average percolation rates were based on the last three readings ct each test. The test holes were protected from freezing overnight with insulation. From Bolt Browrlee To Andy Schwaller Date 10/62003 Time 106 46 PM Page 1 of 2 toss Cie! IIntsacfta; 111 PO Box 1145 500 Red Table Drive Suite 2 B Gypcum, CO 81637 FACSIMILE COVER PAGE To: Andy Schwaller From: Bob Brownlee Fax #: 970-384-3470 Fax #: 970-524-1021 Company: Garfield County Building Tel #: 970-524-0410 Subject. Sent: 10/8/2003 at 1:06:42 PM Pages: 2 (including cover) MESSAGE: Dear Andy, This report was prepared by the Structural Engineer for the Fifer Residence, Building Permit # 8722, located at Parcel 1, Faranhyll Ranch, 0251 Black Diamond Mine Road. I have scheduled the framing, rough plumbing, chimney and ventilation and gas piping inspection for Thursday 10/9 and thought that you may want this for your records. Sincerely, Cross Creek Contractors, Inc. Bob Brownlee, President GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING & SANITATIONDEPARTMENT 108 8TH STREET #201 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 WinFax PRO Cover Page RECENE'L From: Boa Brownlee To- Andy Schwaller • Redwine-Reman Inc • - Structural Engineers JOBSITE OBSERVATION Date 10/82003 Time 1 06-46 PM Page 2 of 2 Project: Client: Report #: Temperature Fifer Residence Kirk Aker 2 60, sunny Project #: 02073 Page 1 Date: 10/06/03 Time: 11:30 am PRESENT AT SITE: Bob Brownlee Cross Creek Construction Leslie Reed Redwine Engineers WORK IN PROGRESS: Framing work is nearly complete. The roofs, walls and floors have been sheathed. Drywall has not been placed, so that we were able to observe the structural framing. Contractors were working on exterior stone and stucco finishes. The decking has not been placed on the exterior decks. Shear wall WI -F9 at grids E & 2 on S2.11 is not complete. OBSERVATIONS: We observed the Fifer Residence on October 06, 2003 for substantial conformance to our structural drawings. This was our third and final framing walk-through, and we understand that the framing inspection will be performed later this week by the county. We noticed the following items not in compliance with our drawings 1. The deck east of the morning room has been extended to gridline 1 between grids E and F. A 6x10 beam spans between grid E and the built-up column to carry 2x12 joists at 16" o.c. We understand that the owner instructed the contractor to perform this change without architectural or structural approval. We have checked the structural capacity of the as -built deck, and have found the addition to be adequate. 2. The deck north ofthe morning room has been extended to the garage wall at grid 2.5. We have checked the capacity of the 2x1 2 joists and 6x18 beam, and have found the members to be adequate. The 2x12 joists meet the code minimum requirements for deflection. However, we typically design for lower deflection limits. If the owner would like a stiffer deck, the 2x12 joists may be doubled up at this location. Written by: Copies to: Leslie Reed Bob Brownlee- Cross Creek Construction 524-1021 Kirk Aker — Aker Cole Architects 926-3206 700 17'" Street, Suite 1900 Denver, CO 80202 (303)575-9510 phone (303)575-9515 fax 0150 East Beaver Creek Blvd , A204 Avon Colorado 81620, P 0 Box 6009 (970)748-0711 phone (970)748-0722 fax COUNTY OF GARFIELD - BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECT TICE 108 8th St., Glenwood Sprlpgs, Colorado one (970) 9454212 Job located at Oa- 5- actel O(JVTh eJ VA4 4 C• Permit No. S'71-1.- . I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: i -.D -7o uik- 17 10 -6, -)ti/ ig(2A,ThiJkl 470 ?e -c-. d),„2,04-45hd211.,“96i a_ "31f4 -s-1 0 ((-(3-03 ,e You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date t15_D3 n 20, Building Inspector Phone (970) 945-8212 No 7S-130, 117;5/ 6144 Dm aro n ml,Z-CAsseS/e ssor o 2 r G PERMIT CARD Job Addr- s Owner Contracto Set cks: ILC s Parcel lS` L-_______ Date SCI- ( 3 Addres- dress ea SRH LH SPECTIONS Foos Test Footing Foundationly lo -7-0,1011 Grout Underground Plumbing 7-7--v3 Rough Plumbing /0-4-03 Framing 10- &- 03 Insulation 10-�?-(� �QY►— Roofing Drywall 11- -- i, Gas Piping es---e- one/3 / — hone ACS "S #3=." Zoning WeatherproofingkatL� 6-2,106-02 Mechanical /O-9-63,vZ �/,t,ey°L ttka Electrical Rough (State) w7� Electrics Fin I (State) z-24-- G Ge.) Fina checklist Completed? Certificate Occupancy # Date Septic System # — Date L-)0LA-ACt Final 2.- 27 -CA Other 4' NOTES G"' �! EICTURIOR Address No Drainage Decks -support 8 clearance f0 wood / Decks -stairs & rails Y/ Exterior locks Raking around deists & windows Insect screens INTERIOR GARAGE Fire wall separation Service doors -13/4" min Door (20 min.) wlauto closer -13/4" min Mech. equip. 18" above floor No opening mto sleeping area BASEMENT -CRAWL AREA (continue on back) FINAL CHECKLIST MECH ICA ROOM STAIRWAYS Boller Headroom (81") ✓ Hot water Railing 8 guardrails • FA gasloil Width Rise 8 run ✓ Floor drain Cle arance KITCHEN Air con. system Clearance above grill / Hot water heater .mow`/��/siy Exhaust tan Ir Combustion air ✓ / Broiler exhaust (1 hr. chase) ✓ Gas piping. valves O/ BEDROOMS / LPG Drain Egress _/ FIREPLACE/STOVE Smoke detector '�j ✓ bee Clearance W combustibles / Termination of chimney a.0Combustion air BATHROOMS Exhaust fan •r Shatterproof glass Hearth (12" or 20" on sides)vapo OTHER Glass doors 1 Access Certified by - Insulation Headroom/Stairs ✓i Ventilation REMARKS 5aPTi t POO 2 3003 • INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT G RFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issuedwr .t .Q.3...Zoned Area Permit No..S AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building inspe o, IM .DIATE Y BECOME NULL AND VOI P. • Use dile at 0.t _ Addre:, a1D_ �� _.. 1rAr► , Setbacks Front Side Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing _ L: -0 i r 0 - 3 O . E:� Foundation 6-5_0 4 . . 5a -o5 , // •„/ Underground Plumbing - 3A: Insulation L0-aa_b3 • Rough Plumbing ✓ _ . -a . i Drywall - s 1 Chimney & Vent g_ -D7 fa Electric Final (by State Ins - or)l ,jr� tfi_ Gas Piping 0 � _p 3 d Final 3-/..0 nillaMIIM Electric Rough (By State Inspector)',, rift 0 Septic Final; ,2 „p , Akt,trim. Framing/0- S-034)4nr - ` lee, (To include Roof in place 80 Windo s and Doors installed). 0 more- Notes: i o - ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phone 3845003 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado.. APP ' s VEDDO NOT DESTR ' THIS CARD Date A'ro h 1 i I ' LACED OUTSIDE • • R WITH CLEAR PLASTIC