HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 Staff Report BOCC 4.2.84REQUES!:
gEuEn:
LOCATION:
SITE DATA:
EATEB:
SEWEB:
ACCESS:
EXISTING ZONING
ADJACENT ZONING
Bocc 4/2/84
PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS
S.B. 35 Exemption
a.
Paul and Virginia Lappala
A parcel located in the NW 1/4,Section 27, T7S, R88W, morepractically described as a parcellocated l/4 mile northeast of theinLersection of State Highways g2
and 133.
To split a 31.02 acre parcel intotwo parcels of approximately 17acres and 14 acres.
Individual wells
Individual sewage disposal
Off of County Rd. 107
A/R/ao
A/R/ao
I. DESCRIPTION OF T HE PROPOSAL
site Description: The terrain is fairry hirryr with primariryp-Inon ana-lfinlFai r"g"ti;i;".
B. Pro ect Descri tion: T his parcel was originally a part of alarger pa rcel of .022 acres. In May, 1975 10.058 acres lvas
A
split off by exempt ion.In 1978, the remain ing parcel was splitinto four par cels of 5.16, 15, I4.5 and I 3.98 acres each byResolut i on #78-19. Then in L979, Resolut ion #78-19 was amendedto creat e three parcels of 5.26 10.84 and 32.64 acres b v
,
,Resolution #79 -129. In that reso lution there is a langu agestating that the 32.64 acre parcel may be split in the f utur einto two tracts of not 1ess than 10 acres each. Then in 1 980,the previously mentioned 10.84 acre parcel was ad justed to createan 11.3 acre parcel in Resol ution #80-I39. As a result of anerror by the attorne y presenting the a pplication, the remainin g30+ acres was subjec L to language in t he Resolution of Approva 1prohibiting any furt her splits b y exemption. Resolution #90-lg7amended Resoluti on #80-139, to c orrect the previously menLionederror and allows the 30+ acre pa rcel to be split into tlro par cel sas allowed in pre vious resolutio ns. This application is b e ingmade to clarify and finalize theresolutions.
/-
splits allowed by previou s
a
III.MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCERNS
A. It is proposed thateasement. This easementplat and included in thebeing crossed.
III.FINDINGS
1. That the meeting beforeextensive and complete, tha
r^rere submitted and that all
meet ing;
the two parcels will have a common accessshould be IegaIIy described on an exemptionappropriate lega1 description of the fot
B. If one well is used to provide watereasements should be Iegally described anexemption plat.
to both lotsr tnointenanced graphically shown on the
the Board of County Commissioners wast all pertinent facts, matters and issuesinterested parties were heard at that
2. That the application forsubdivision gualifies under
#80-65;
exemption from the definition ofcriteria established in Resolution
for the
a water
an
the
IV.
3. ThaL the lots created
zone distr ict;meet the lot size requirements of the arlflrznp
4- That for the above stated and other reasons, the proposedexemption from the definition of subdivision is in thL best interestof the healthT safety, morals, convenience, orderr prosperity andwelfare of the citizens of Garfield County
RECOMMENDATION
APPROVAL, with the following condiLions:
atTh
1.
2.
3.
A
B
c
an exemption plat be drawn that:Has 1egal descriptions of both lots created;Has a 1ega1Iy described perpetual access easementappropriate lot;
!?s perpetuar maintenance and access easement forIine and the well.
That $200.00 be paid ro theimpact prior to the signing
Department of Development for schoolof the exemption plat.
That all conditions of approvalapproval.are met wiLhin 120 days of
5-