HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 Staff Report BOCC 6.4.01ST - ?ct^^'d,!.-w
%.r4D n .o,.'d.9 *
BEQUEI:
APPLICANT:
PLAITINER:
LOCATION
SITE DATA:
W.B:
SEWER:
ACCESS: Direct access to County Road 237
EXISTING/ADJACENT ZONING: A/R/RD
I. RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
According to the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan of 2000, this site lies in the "Outlyiqg
Residential" area which has a suggested maximum density of 1 unit per 2 acres
.r &.. 1,r,,.r,-.. I . ir.. ,r i : ,,'-,:iqn-.{.*
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL ;
Site Description and Development Proposal: The western half of the property is
irrigated pastureland while the eastern half is comprised of native vegetation
including pinyon, juniper, sage, and grasses. The proposal is to divide the
approximately 43 acre hact of land into 3 lots. l,ot A would comprise the remainder
parcel with about 38 acres. Lots B and C would be about 2 tD 2 Yz acres in size. ThG
proposed building sites are situated on relatively flat slopes. An existing gravel
driveway from CR 237 would serve all#-lots. Several irrigation pipeline
easements and an irrigation pond easement are located on the subject parcel. The
east lateral of the Farmer's Irrigation Ditch bisects Lot A and provides Silt Project
water for the property. An existing house occupies Lot B. Existing barns and
Ylrt-1c T-F"t n"t7
a-4qSF , Vto.rr&-' a", LOt C.
II.
A.
Page I of8
PROJECT INFORMA
Carq
+'1^&
Silg Colorado,
tract of land
25, Township
6ft P.M.
2000 County R@d237,north of
and south of Harvey Gap. A
in a portion of Section
5 South, Range 92 West of the
43 +l- Acres
Shared Well
ISDS
ohn Taufer and Associates
outbuildings occupy Lot A. The well and well easement occupy that part of Lot B
which is south of the driveway.
Applicabilitv: Section 8:10 allows the Board of County Commissioners the
discretionary power to exempt a division of land from the definition of subdivision
and, thereby, from the procedure in Sections 3:00, 4:00 and 5:00, provided the Board
determines that such exemption will not impair or defeat the stated purpose of the
Subdivision Regulations nor be detrimental to the general public welfare.
III. REFERRALS
The was referred following review agencies for comments
L-!frt..-&\.{.,(lrL
See letter, pagelg:fl Has no objections.A.
Notes that due to the distance from the stations there will be some delay in rcsponse
times.
B. Garfield Countv Road and Bridee Department Kraig Kuberry commented via telephone
on5122/01. There is a need to cut the vegetation back for approximately 200' along the
County Road. The applicant represented that all access will occur from the existing
driveway, thus no driveway permit is necessary.
C. Garfield County Engineer: To date, no comment has been reqeiyed.
D. Garfield Countv Public Health Nurse: See referral sheet, pag?l-. Notes that the
property lies within a specific area of concern with regard to nitrate levels. Thus, the
water will need to be checked for bacteria on an annual basis and periodic chemical
analysis should be conducted as well. Questions whether 8 g.p.m. is sufficient to
meet the demands of three homes with-lisited irrieation.
E. Town of Silt: See referral sheet, pug, A . No Jomment.ET
MAJgR ISSUES AND CONCERNS
Subdivision Regulations. Section 8.52 of the Garfield County Subdivision
Regulations states that "No more than a total offour (4) lots, parcels, interests or
dwelling units will be createdfrom any parcel, as that parcel was described in the
records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder's ffice on Jarutary I , I97 3, and
is not a part of a recorded subdivision; however, ony parcel to be divided by
exemption that is split by a public right-of-way (State or Federal highway, County
road or railroad) or naturalfeoture, preventing joint use of the proposed tracts, and
the division occurs along the public right-of-way or natural feoture, such parcels
thereby created may, in the discretion of the Board, not be considered to have been
created by exemption with regard to the four (4) lot, parcel, interest or dwelling unit
limitation otherwise applicable; For the purposes of definition, all tracts of land
thirty-five (35) acres or greater in size, created afier January l, 1973, will count as
parcels of land created by exemption since January l, 1973."
B
IV
A.
Page 2 of 8
B. Comprehensive Plan: The proposal does not appear to be inconsistent with the comp
plan.
C. Zonins.Rezulations: It should be noted that if the reouest is aooroved- the existinsffit B while all the other existine itructurei'will o6cupv Lot Al
As a result, thebarns and outbuildings will no longEr be conveyed with thle house.
The applicant has provided proof of ownership in the form of a recorded deed (book
638, page 998). The parent parcel was about 79 acres in size from which two parcels
now exist the 38 ac. subject parcel anda4l acre parcel which has been further split
via subdivision into five Antlers Orchard Development (AOD) lots, as reflected on
the officially recorded AOD plat #1. Based on the information provided, the
property appears to qualifu for the three (3) lots requested. If the request is
approved, no more exemption lots would be permitted under Garfield County
regulations.
D. Legal and Physical Access: Section 8:52 C states:
All lots created will have legal access to a public righrof-way and any necessary
access easements have been obtained, or are in the process of being obtained;
The proposed access is via an aristng gravel driveway from CR 237,for which a 30:
wide access easement is proposed. The Road and Bridge Department has noted a
need to cut the vegetation back for approximately 200' along the County Road in
order to increase sight distance. The applicant represented to the Road and Bridge
Dept. that all access will occur from the existing driveway, thus no driveway permit
is necessary. However, the application contains a copy of a road sharing agreeme,nt
which discusses maintenance responsibilities for the driveway, which does not
reference Lot C. As drawn on the plat, the access easement from Lot C is not
continuous (it stops at the well head, falling short of the existing driveway). Staff
understands thatlnt C will access directly from CR237 (confirmed by John Taufer
in telephone conversation 5123/01). As a result, the applicant must obtain adriveway
permitpriorto final approval of the exemption.
E. Water: Section 8:52 D of the Subdivision Regulations states the following:
The Board shall not grant an exemption unless the division proposedfor exemption
has satisfied the following criteria: Proyision has been made for an adequate source
of water in terms of both the legal and physical quality, quantity and dependability,
and a suitable type of sewage disposal to serve each proposed lot;
The application cuttainsa copy of well prmin#232603 (which replaces #200052).
This permit allows for domestic usie within three single farnily dwellings, the
L+A
{
Page 3 of8
^l,UJ^lilP
-t\.-z- "*"1t#+,t^j ?u,^^45 l.J
, Wft"dd?ov'" Vt,
iAirh +'Y-*d +L'a
Ttr**,*:n
watering of poultry, domestic animals, and livestock on a farm or ranch and the
irrigation of not more than one acre of home lawn and gardens. The legal water
rights appear adequate. The well will be shared by the 3 lots and access easements
for the potable water distribution system are indicated on the plat. The application
contains a copy of a well sharing agreement (which is in need of slight revisions to
reflect the new well permit).
The application contains the results of a four hour pump test conducted by J & M &Pump Company. The well was drilled at a depth of 210'. The water level was at a
depth of 42' while the drawdown was 160'. The well had a sustained yield
gallons per minute and recovered 50o/o within 45 minutes.!
The application also contains an analytical report from Grand Junction Laboratories
and comment on the report from Resource Engineering. The sodium, chloride, and.
dissolved solids all exceed the State's recommended limits for drinking water.
Resource Engineering notes that the water can be treated with standard household
package water treatment systems. The water bacteriology report states that no
coliform was detected;
Saffbelieves the physical water supply to be adequate for the proposed use as long
as the water is teated and the Public HealthNurse's recommendations are followed,
and included as a plat note and in the well sharing agreement: The water shall be
checked for bacteria on an annual basis. Periodic chemical analysis shall also be
conducted.
The application states that irrigation water will be supplied from SiltProject sharw
ovrrned individually by the owners of Lots Ae B, and C. The l-aFrenz' presently have
water rights for 95 acre feet which is delivered to the property via the east lateral of
the Farmer's Irrigation ditch. 40 acre feet shall inigate the 4l acre remainder lot
(which actually exists as 5 AOD lots). Lot A shall receive 45 acre feet while Lots B
and C shall receive 5 acre feet each.
Sewer: Individual Sewage Disposal Systems (ISDS) currently serve the existing
house. The same is proposed for the new lots.
Soils: Four predominant soil typs occupy the subject property: Cushman-Lazear
stony loams,15-650/o slopes (#21), Kim loam, 6-12% slopes (#41), Olney loam, 6-
12% slopes (#51), and Torriorthents-Rock outcrop, steep (#67). The application
states that all proposed development is located outside the areas of the Cushman
lazear stony loams and Torriorthents Rock outcrop. However, the plat does not
identiff any "no build" zones, or buildrng envelopes.
The Kim and Olney loams are deep and well drained The Kim loam is a moderately
5
F
T"ffi #
G.
5
Page 4 of 8
C$
. ploping to rolling soil on alluvial fans and benches. It is used mainly for crops, hay,
^ nffindpasture. Permeability is moderate, and available water capacity is high. Surface
runoff is slow, while erosion hazard is moderate. Building site development has
moderate consffaints due to slope and low stength. The Kim loam presents moderate
constraints for septic tank absorption fields due to slope and slow percolation rates.
The Olney Loam is a moderately sloping to rolling soil found on alluvial fans and
sides of valleys. Permeability, available water capacity, and erosion hazard are all
moderate. The surface runoffis medium. Community development is limited by
steep slopes and low strength.,.il -'i i;-,,;.-,'-^.,-,---ffiqy' ;e"J- L €'r'a-€,/r,.^.r .
Drainage: The applidation does not address drainage issues. The existing buildings
do not appear to lie within any major drainages. Any new buildings should avoid
areas of nattual drainage. Natural drainages should be preserved to the rnaximum
extent possible.
,(
L.a{4f-lL-r
1
p^y
,0,Y*
*'AP 4te,iif)d +-s
.-\j
H.
L Fire Protection: The application lies within the Burning Mountain Fire District
(BMFPD). BMFPD has not stated any objections to the proposal. The BMFPD does
note that due to the distance from the stations there will be some delay in response
times. Staffsuggests the plat contain the following note:
"Lot purchasers should be aware that due to the distance from stations, there will be
some delay in emergency response times."
Mineral Rights: The application does not discuss ownership of the mineral rights.
Since potential for mineral exploration may exist a disclosure to all potential lot
omers must be included in the covenants, plat notes, and at the time of closing.
Utilities and Easements: All easements, existing and proposed must be shown on the
plat.
School Impact Fees: Prior to the approval of the final plat, the applicant will be
required to pay the applicable school site acquisition fee, as adopted by the County,
for each newly created lot (approximately $400.00, subject to change).
That proper posting and public notice was provided as required for the meeting
before the Board of County Commissioners.
That the meeting before the Board of County Commissioners was extensive and
complete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submified and that all
interested parties were heard at that meeting.
J
K.
L.
v.STAFF RECOMMENDED FINDINGS
1
2
Page 5 of8
That for the above stated and other reasons, the proposed exemption has been
determined to be in the best interest of the health, efety, morals, convenience, order,
prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County.
4. That the application has met the requirements of the Garfield County Subdivision
Resolution of 1984 a.a. Section 8:00, Exemption.
VI. RECOMMENDATION:,1,b:,/l\
Staffrecommends APPROVAL of this application with the following conditions:
That all representations of the applicant either within the application or stated at the meeting
before the Board of County Commissioners, shall be considered conditions of approval;
A Final Exemption Plat shall be submitted, indicating the legal description of the property,
dimension, and area of the proposed lots, 25 ft. wide access to a public right-of-way, and
any proposed easements for setbacks, drainage, irrigation, access or utilities;
That the applicant shall have 120 days (until 10/4/01) to present a plat to the Commissioners
for signature from the date of conditional approval of the exemption,
That the applicant shall submit the applicable School Site Acquisition Fees for the creation
of the exemption parcels prior to approval of the exemption plat;
That the 1978 Garf,reld County ZonrngResolution and the Colorado Department of Health
standards shall be complied with.
That the applicant submit a copy of an approved driveway permit for Lot C prior to
finalization of the exemption plat, That the recommendations made by the Road and Bridge
Department shall be followed.
'reErtati
exemption plat
The access roadway to the parcels shall be maintained adequately to accommodate the
weights and turning radius' of emergency apparatus to permit access during adverse weather
conditions. A legal road sharing agreement, which discusses all costs associated with the
maintenance of the road, who will be responsible for paying these costs, and how
assessments will be made for these costs, shall be filed with the exemption plat.
8.That domestic water shall be treated with standard household package water treatment
systems in order to meet the State's recommended limits for drinking water; That the Public
Health Nurse's recommendations shall be followed and incorporated into the well sharing
agreement.
vl,
J
{
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
A
o
*ft
,P 6of
er
h
9
arleqr'^te te eupply water b tlrc rrmubetdproposerd"'ots ba ed on arrassrtrrlptiud.trfi6TdS3"'''
tqan 1 q Fenple p6rdwelhng"rrrriq-using*l00.,geUons "poc-da+6*--_-
The plat shall identify building envelopes which exclude areas occupied by Cushman Lazear
stony loams and Torriorthents Rock outcrop.
A disclosure to all potential lot owners regarding the potential for mineral exploration and
recovery must be included in the covenants, plat notes, and at the time of closing.
11. That the following plat notes shall appear on the Final Exemption Plat:
"Domestic water shall be treated with standard household package water treatment systems
in order to meet the State's recommended limits for drinking water. The water shall be
checked for bacteria on an annual basis. Periodic chemical analysis shall also be
conducted."
"Lot purchasers should be aware that due to the distance from stations, there will be some
delay in emergency response times."
"One (1) dog will be allowed for each residential unit and the dog shall be required to be
confined within the owners property boundaries."
"No open hearth solid-fuel fireplaces will be allowed anywhere within an exemption. One
(l) new solid-fuel burning stove as defied by C.R.S. 25-7-401, et. sew, and the regulations
promulgated thereunder, will be allowed in any dwelling unit. All dwelling units will be
allowed an unrestricted number of natural gas burning stoves and appliances".
"All exterior lighting will be the minimum amount necessary and all exterior lighting will
be directed inward, towards the interior of the subdivision, except that provisions may be
made to allow for safety lighting that goes beyond the property boundaries".
"No further divisions by exemption from the rules of Subdivision will be allowed."
"Any new buildings shall avoid areas of natural drainage. Natural drainages shall be
preserved to the maximum extent possible."
10
Page 7 of 8
operations."
"A11 owners of land, whether ranch or residence, have obligations under State law and
County regulations with regard to the maintenance of fences and irrigation ditghes,
controllin{weeds, keeping livestock and pets under control, using properry in accordanc6
with zonin-g, and other itpdtt ofusing andmaintaining property. (eisiaints'and landowners
are encourlsed to leam about these rifuts and responsi6ititibs aird act as sood neishbors and
citizens of the County. A good introiluctory souice for such informatio-n is "A Guide to
Rural Living & Small Scale-Agriculture" pul out by the Colorado State University Extension
Office in Girfield County." e
Page 8 of 8
I .l
,o
GARFIELD COUNTY
Building & Planning DePartment
Review Agency Form
Date Sent: April 18,2001
Comments Due: May 18,2001
Name of
Sent to
Garflreld County requests your comment in review of this project. Please noti$ Kit Lyon
in the event you aIe unable to respond by Wednesday, May 18r 2001. This form may be
used for your response, or you may attach your own additional sheets as necessary.
Wriuen comments may be mailed or faxed to:
Garfield County Building & Planning
Staffcontact: Kit Lyon
109 8u'Street, Suite 301
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Fax:970-384-3470 # Z.'J
Phone: 970-945-8212 /;i ftL
General comments
a)
,: tl{l.rnw*-i
:/l.t{
CortUatx)
z./4
:{it4.{da/dt'i-
This review agency recommends (
The following conditions of or are the reasons for denial:
Li
Name of review agency
By:Date
o",,.?,n,nn
General comments...v ol -
o
B,itfiffiFl;?"?:HJ,,*,,, RECETED P,AY t 7 2oot
Review Agency Form
n.#n rt"cl
Date Sent: April 18,2001
Comments Due: May 18, 2001
Name of application:LaFrert.z
Sent to
Garfield County requests your comment in review of this project. Please notiff Kit Lyon
in the event you are unable to respond by Wednesday, M4y 18, 2001. This form may be
used for your response, or you may attach your own additional sheets as necessary.
Written comments may be mailed or faxed to:
Garfield County Building & Planning
Staffcontact: Kit Lyon
109 8th Street, Suite 301
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Fax: 970-384-3470
Phone: 970-945-8212
This review agency recommends (circle one):Denial
The following are suggested conditions of approval, or are the reasons for denial:
Name
By
Rcvised
Burning Mountains
Fire Protection District
Box 2
Silt, Co 8L652
Board
Barbara Kemp'Suriderland, President
Robert Throrver, Yice President
BritC MclitU Director
Michael Watts, I)irector Don Z.ordel-Chief
Stu Cerise-Assist. ChicfRobcrt Sup&en. Director
May 9, 2001
Subject: LaFrenz Exemption
TO WHOM it MAY CONCERN
This is to inform you that the Burning Mountains Fire Protection District has no objections to the
exemption as it is. We do Provide fire protection to this property and can see no problems at this
time. It should be noted that due to the distance from the stations there will be some delay in
response times.
You
Donald L.
Burning
il
o
GARFIELD COUNTY
Building & Planning Department
Review Agency Form
RECEIVEDMAY 172001
Date Sent: 04ll8l0l
Comments Due: 05/18/01
Name of application: LaFrenz Exemption
Sent to: Town of Silt
Garfield County requests your comment in review of this project. Please notiff Kit Lyon
in the event you are unable to respond by 05/18/01. This form may be used for your
response, or you may attach your own additional sheets as necessary. Written comments
may be mailed, e-mailed, or faxed to:
Garfield Cotrnty Building & Planning
StaffContact: Kit Lyon
109 8n'Street, Suite 301
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Fa:r: 970-384-5004
Phcne: 97A-945-8212
E-mail : " garcopln@rof.net
General comments: The Town of Silt is in receipt of the LaFrenz Exemption referral
form. This application was reviewed at the May l. 2001. reeular Plannine Commission
meetins. Thank you for referring this to the Town of Silt for review.
However. this application causes the Town of Silt no particular concerns. and therefore.
we have no comment.
Sincerelv
Janet G. Steinbach
Town Planner
Bv Fa:r: Mav 16.2001
Bv Mail: Mav 16.2001
t>
JOHN L. TAUFEF| & ASSOCIATEST lNC.
Lendscape AFchiEeccune / Land Planning
RECEIVEDAPR12200l
April 10,2001
Kit Lyons, Senior Planner
Garfield County Building & Planning Department
t 09 8th Street
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Re: Supplementary Information -LaFrenz Subdivision Exemption, Silt, Colorado
Dear Kit,
Please find attached the following documentation that you requested in order to bring the
LaF r enz Subdivi sion Exemption application into compliance :
l. Chain of Title
a. Deed from Brooks to Salvucci ( Reception # 249190) dated February
1971, conveying 79 acres to Salvucci
b. Deed from Salvucci to LaFrenz ( Reception # 500662) dated November
1996, conveying 79 acres to LaFrenz
2. Ownership Deed
a.Copy of Exhibit A attachment to the Warranty Deed
3. Well Permit
a. Copy of Amended Well Permit #232603, which replaces Well Permit
# 200052. This amended permit is specific to the exemption parcel.
The other information that you requested is in the process of being completed. The
additional potable water test results will be available next week from the lab in Grand
Junction. I will provide you with a copy when available.
The other piece of information that you requested that we provide proof of a legal supply
of water for the five (5) existing AOD lots. In speaking with Dwight Whitehead,
Division 5 Engineer, he stated that since the Antler Orchard Subdivision was platted prior
to June 1,1972 that he would issue permits for the existing AOD lots.
9O9 Colonado Avenue o Box 2271 . Glenrazood Spnings,CO 81802
(97o) e,45.-1337 . FAX (97o) 94=-7914 /3
I mentioned to you that we are in the process of preparing an amended plat to adjust
existing lot boundaries for the five existing AOD lots that the LaFrenz family owns. The
state could issue the permits immediately but in order to avoid having to re-issue the
permits based on new legal descriptions for the AOD lots, it was suggested by the state
that we apply for the permits once the amended plat is approved.
We look forward to presenting this application to the Board of County Commissioners in
the very near future.
If you have questions, or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact
my offrce. It has been a pleasure working with you on this land use application.
Sincerely,
u
John L. Taufer, Owners Representative
Attachments
2 /Y
\ ir*)_x/--;&
IilIIIrIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
FIES dUHCE
ENGINEEFIING INC
RECETvEIApiTz 32001
Mr. John Taufer
John L. Taufer & Associates
PO Box 2271
Glenwood Springs CO 81602
April 19, 2001
RE: LaFrenz Well Water Quality
Dear John:
The water quality test results from Grand Junction Labs is attached. Please note that
sodium, chloride and dissolved solids all exceed the State's recommended limits for
drinking water. The water can be treated with standard household package water
treatment systems.
lf you have any questions, please call me
Sincerely,
RESOURCE ENGINEERING, INC.
I S. Bussone, P.E.
Water Resources Engineer
PSB/mmm
858- 1 .O I water qual test.Bsg.wpd
Attachment
Consulting Engineens and HydnologisEs ls
9O9 Colonado Avenue f Glenwood Spnings, CO A160l a (970)945-6777 f Fax (970)945-1137
JOHN C. KEPHABT & co.
8flAl-lO JtJt'lIIION LABORAIORIIS
433 ,{orrH Ayfr.uE a P}.oil: ltarol ?a2-ar,ar o Flr: 1r'lol 2tL3''a29t o Gaa].o Jut{c?lor' cor'onaoc attot
-
- ANALYTICAL BEPORT -
Rccivcd Imn:Resource Engineering, Paul Bussone
9O9 Colorado Ave.
Blenrood Springs' trB 81601
1970lS45-6777, FAX -1 137
b2b4
Curtoocr No.tiborrbt,' No. SrorPlc
-
4/5/Qt 4/ te/ol
water
Liinits for Drinkingt
{or ReferentreLab number
Saropl e ID
/soaium (Na)
Calciurn(Ca)
Magnesi r-rrn ( I'19 )
Fotassium (H)
-Chloride(trI )
SuIfate (SO4)
Phernol . Al k'al i ni tY (CaCOS)
Total Al !';aI initY (CaCOS)
Dissolved Solids
Hardness (CatrO3)
pH
ConductivitYG25 deg' C
b264
LaFrenze *858-t.O
369
2t
I
I
352
Lb7
o
211
131{]
56
B. OO
196()
m9/l
ng/l
mg/l
ng/l
nq/l
mg./ I
mg/ I
nq/ L
rng/l
mg/1
umhos/cm
2(r mgll
no official
723 nqll
no official
25O mgll
250 mgll
no of{icial
no official
SOCI mg/I
?0t) mg./I
6-5 to €l.5
no official
Iiroit
limit
limtt
limit
limit
NOTES: Fsr drinlring end household useo sodiurnrt trhloride and Dissolved
solids are higher than reconrrnended. Especial l y those restricting
dietary Sodiurn may be concerned; for each Iiter o{ watert 369 milligFams
ofsodiurnareconsumed.BacteriaEhouldalwaysbeconfirmedabsent
be{ore drinking'
Lab Dir'.: Brian S. Batter
I c
GFiii i-t )i -l
SLU-U t R UlV 5 t LL : Cil 1-945-5bb5 UeC 1',2 9.',l
:'Jn): H.5"llfiHa?{s]ffi-qre;llqrrffi#8ffi E so u Rc L -
.2I?46 NO.UU5 P.U1
APPROVED WELL LOCATIoN
GARFIELD COUNTY
SW 1t4 NE 114 Sec'tion 25
TownshiP 5 S Range 92 W Silrth P'M'
glsrANgE@
1550 Ft. from North Section Line
2450 Ft. from East Sec{ion Llne
u:tM CooRDINATES
Northing:
(36) 68+ss81
APPLICANT
THOMAS & CECILIA IAFRENZ
2OOO COUNTY ROAD 237
stLT, CO 81652'
(e70) 876-1e2e Easting:
WELL PERMIT NUMBER 23290s ' '-
DIV.5 WD39 DES. BAS]N MD
ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT
1)
2l
3)
CoNDITIONS OF APPROVAI'
Thls welr shall be u'ed ln euch a way ar to cause no materier inJury to exrsung water nghE. The issuence of thh pemit
doeenotaB6uretheapplicantthetnolniurywilloccultoanothe]vastedwatelrlghtorplecludesnotherownerofavested
water right from seeklng rellef ln a cMl court action' a ^^a ,A.
Tho constructlon of thls well ehall be in compliance with the water well conetruction Rules 2 ccR 402'2, unless approval
of a variance has been g;1el ;rho statoBoald ol Examlnere of waler Well construcuon and Pump lnstallalion
Contractoc in accoldance with Rule 18'
Approved pursuant to cRs 37-g2402(3XbXrxA) ae the onry wefl on a tract or rsnd or 43.23 acres descdbed as that porron
of the sw 1/4, NE 1/4, Sec. 25. Twp. 5 South, nng. gz wes' eth P.M., Garlield coun$' more particularly descilbed on the
attached exhibit A-
4) Approved for an amendment of legal descrlption and change in uso of an exlsting well conetructed under pemit no'
2ooo52(canceled).Thelssuanceofthlspemltherebycancglspermitno.200052.
5) The uee of ground water from thls we[ is llmited to flre protection, ordlnary houeehold pu]po86s inside not more than
three (g) slngle family dwellingB. the watedng oi poury domeedc animals and livestock on a farm or rench and the
lrrigation of not more fhan one (1) acre of home getdens and lawne'
6) The maxlmum pumping raii of thls wellehallnot exceed 15 GPM'
ll The return flow from th6 use of this welt must be through an lndlvldual waete wattr disposal syEtem of the
non-evaporauve we where the water ls leturned to the sams stream EyEtem in whlch the well is located'
g) This wellshall be located not more ttran 200 feet flom the locstion epecified on this permit' -
N.TE: parcet tdsntification Number (P,N);23.2127.251-OO-001 * *-- a1/
NoTE: AsseseorTaxSchedutsNumber: zoo$oz(totaling76.10acres) A tsfr /fiaa /
R09APRO9
7r1APPROVEDIDMWA.
State Englnecr (7