Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.01 Supplemental App InfoEXHIBIT A 1. All representations of the applicant within the application shall be considered conditions of approval unless otherwise modified by the Director Determination. 2. Prior to issuance of the Final Plat for TCI Lane Ranch PUD the Applicant shall provide a copy of the conditional FIRM and floodway map revision approved through FEMA. 3. No alterations of the floodplain may be made other than the specific improvements noted in the application and shown on drawings by James Brzostowicz, P.E., as labeled "General Layout Pedestrian Bridge" and "Floodplain Site Plan Lots" Sheets 1 and 2 attached hereto as Exhibit B. 4. All new construction or substantial improvements shall be designed (or modified) and adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement of the structure resulting from hydrodynamic and hydrostatic loads, including the effects of buoyancy. 5. All new construction or substantial improvements shall be constructed with materials resistant to flood damage. 6. All new construction or substantial improvements shall be constructed by methods and practices that minimize flood damage. 7. All new construction or substantial improvements shall be constructed with electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities that are designed and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. 8. All new and replacement water supply systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system. 9. New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system and discharge from the systems into flood waters. 10. On-site waste disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to them or contamination from them during flooding. 11. No disturbance of a regulated wetland shall be allowed. ABUT #1 1 SPAN 1 SPAN 2 I 76'-10" 115'-0" CLEAR WIDTH E� 193-5" /F BUT B/F ABUT CORROSION PROTECTION N/A N/A CAMBER 9 ! NONE 76' �(, "SPAN #7 I 115'-0" SPAN #2 85 PSF VEHICLE LOAD 10 K 10 K 1 35 PSF 35 PSF 1" EJ I I I RUB RAILS N/A N/A I 4 PIER #21 /r '-TCI LANE 8' WIDE ASPHALT PATH Y 0 \ � w _ BRIDGE DESIGN INFORMATION SPAN 1 SPAN 2 OVERALL LENGTH 76'-10" 115'-0" CLEAR WIDTH CORROSION PROTECTION N/A N/A CAMBER NONE ! NONE LIVE LOAD 1 85 PSE 85 PSF VEHICLE LOAD 10 K 10 K WIND LOAD 35 PSF 35 PSF SEISMIC ZONE I I I RUB RAILS N/A N/A TOE PLATE STEEL STEEL RAIL HEIGHT 4'-6" 4'-6" DECKING ( TIMBER TIMBER TRUSS ttPE H - TYPE I H - TYPE STEP 2'-6" MAX 2'-6" MAX BREAKAWAY DEVICE NO I NO CLOSURE PLATE REQUIRED I REQUIRED _ SKEW F 90 1 C 6320 - 6310 ------------ 6300 6290 Print Date: File Name: TCI LANE GENERAL NOTES: A. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTON, 2005 EDITION, AND PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS; THE LATEST M&S STANDARDS; COUNTY OF GARRELD STANDARDS; AND THE PROJECT CONTRACT BID DOCUMENTS. B. STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING ASTM SPECIFICATIONS: COLD FORMED WELDED SQUARE AND RECTANGULAR HOLLOW STRUCTURAL SECTIONS: ASTM A847 PLATES AND OTHER STRUCTURAL STEEL SHAPES: ASTM A588 ANCHOR BOLTS: ASTM A307 Horiz. Scale: Vert. Scale: As Noted] , Unit Information Unit Leader Initials] --------------------------- LOW CHORD AT THIS END = 6302.9 MIN Sheet Revisions Date: i Comments Init. - B/F ABUT 115'-0" SPAN f PIER $2 ELEV 6309.00 —p MAX s * 100 -YR ELEV 6301.83 el� ------------------- BRIDGE PROFILE - H -TRUSS 10 5 0 10 ORIGINAL SCALE: 1" = 10' Fails wd A6mcabs, Inc mer �w�m.. rr ueoey m,.m� ganuarrs As Constructed No Revisions: Revised: — Void: BRIDGE SECTION - H -TRUSS 2 1 0 2 ORIGINAL SCALE: Mi" = Y-0" \w BRIO GRANDE TRAIL i� 6320 i i 6310 LOW CHORD AT THIS v/ END = 6308.52 MIN /� i -------- 6300 * 100 -YR ELEV BASED ON: FLOOD LIMITS, EXHIBIT SHEET 1, JOB Na E-5875, MAY 21st 2008 (FROM DREXEL & BARRELL & CO. 1-11-10) 6290 TCI Lane Ranch Pedestrian Bridge Project No./Code GENERAL LAYOUT PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE STE M535-004 Designer: Structure) _ J 16663 Detailec iNumbers Sheet Subset: BX I Subset Sheets: Sheet Number — I OESGNE0 BY: I MAA 1 NOTE: 1, ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON NAVA 88 DATUM, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. LEGEND 2. CONVERSION: ELEV 100.0 (NAVA 1929)=104.51 (NAND 1988) PRov UNc 3. FLOODPLAIN LIMITS PLOTTED FOR FEMA FIS uswwr MAPPING, NOT BY ELEVATION. oRA�nNG sa c; # OENa1Es INTERpOLa1E➢ Ci055 YCTaNSEcnCN o..___. _ 9O' # 4. ELEVATIONS NOTED ARE REGULATORY FLOODPLAIN MODEL. NORIZ NTAL 1-60' VERPCAL; NONE FLOODPLA N FFMA es moss swnax Lo.__._._....._..........---- CE ... MwIMIIM M1OOR EtEvanoN - — SITE PLAN (INCWOING BAS£AFlft) FlS cRo55 SECTON IOCaT N ........® ® ® LOTS PROJECT NO E-5875 DRAWING NO Yi c = ._ �ON AREA- BE 41 /- - 0.,§7 ACR �. :49 ACRES y, 24T 28 ACRES - 5185.1 SF \ -LOT : 32 u i I __ ii // • , /_ 1 -'\ 0.19 ACRES I SOT: 52 JE �a . MIN FEE- 5 _ 4 A R -" BE 42 e a _ 5200.8 SF > \ \ °� 1 ..600] - LOT 51 \_ MIN FSE- 042 CR MIN 6298,0 - / -- :MIN FFE 35919 SF6a0z. LOT 50 E 5297.0 LOT 49 036 ACRES 1'. 62970 MIN FFE / - I LOT 48 0.35 ACRES 1 _ - 6289 99 / BE 44 I LOT . 47 -p:35 ACRES',' I MIN FFE 41280 SF - LOT 46 0.35 ACRES .. 629602 MIN FEE= 1 0.34 ACRES I _.6 1 MIN FEE=61 - - ~ _ 629111 L TbT : 45 MIN FFE 1 .6294.63 629531 0.31 ACRES - ; �i MIN FEE- MIN1, - f - _ - -._-zt.:4,_ ..MIN FEE. ., __ L 6293 �9_ I 6294.01 .0 1� MEX GLS Y I LOT E"39 026 kCRES R T :;37 10'23 FCRES' LOT : 35 i 022 ACRE OT m : 34 >.e >4 sse 030 1 _ - 1 1 _ ' 1 LOT 33 0.42 ACRES �_% 1' 11 c _` `s 6 1 0 3131 ACRES" _ ._ _ 1. T 1.07-30 1 1 ? i I �1-. LOT: 29 \ 0.207 ACRE& BE 41 /- - 0.,§7 ACR �. :49 ACRES y, 24T 28 ACRES - 5185.1 SF \ -LOT : 32 u i I __ ii // • , /_ 1 -'\ 0.19 ACRES I SOT: 52 JE �a . MIN FEE- 5 _ 4 A R -" BE 42 e a _ 5200.8 SF > \ \ °� 1 ..600] - LOT 51 \_ MIN FSE- 042 CR MIN 6298,0 - / -- :MIN FFE 35919 SF6a0z. LOT 50 E 5297.0 LOT 49 036 ACRES 1'. 62970 MIN FFE / - I LOT 48 0.35 ACRES 1 _ - 6289 99 / BE 44 I LOT . 47 -p:35 ACRES',' I MIN FFE 41280 SF - LOT 46 0.35 ACRES .. 629602 MIN FEE= 1 0.34 ACRES I _.6 1 MIN FEE=61 - - ~ _ 629111 L TbT : 45 MIN FFE 1 .6294.63 629531 0.31 ACRES - ; �i MIN FEE- MIN1, - f - _ - -._-zt.:4,_ ..MIN FEE. ., __ L 6293 �9_ I 6294.01 z�-• PPCPEQT"t1NE =� _ - sa��LOF ' S7❑ 47 ACRES 048 ACRES L{/', e 629642 as>'- MIN FFE % ze MIN IEEE ; / 0 A \ i.- � .•' 471L- ' 6 207 58 MIN FFE 44\1 GKf X96-42 6_ trP iJ \ MIN FFr- _n ti 1 6 2 6193 BWNdF1'(7AJ L -_ 5 •i \. � %�1; _ S-., c ' 6196 / � I E r-8 x`29 b MX60 le e MIN IT _ \ MI 62'-gCRQE S 97 9 / LOT 62 T Z, , = MIN FFE - 0 "-- y ' _ 6299 D f PREPARED 87: XN DREXEL, BARBELL & CO Hn 11 •SuvryOn �3rIH 6II1�[ 6O(aD6M. CbtDMCO 6061 1 DESIGNED BY. I MAA 1 HORIZON -I, 1"=60' rORi L NONE FLOODPLAIN SITE PLAN LOTS .0 z�-• PPCPEQT"t1NE =� _ - sa��LOF ' S7❑ 47 ACRES 048 ACRES L{/', e 629642 as>'- MIN FFE % ze MIN IEEE ; / 0 A \ i.- � .•' 471L- ' 6 207 58 MIN FFE 44\1 GKf X96-42 6_ trP iJ \ MIN FFr- _n ti 1 6 2 6193 BWNdF1'(7AJ L -_ 5 •i \. � %�1; _ S-., c ' 6196 / � I E r-8 x`29 b MX60 le e MIN IT _ \ MI 62'-gCRQE S 97 9 / LOT 62 T Z, , = MIN FFE - 0 "-- y ' _ 6299 D f PREPARED 87: XN DREXEL, BARBELL & CO Hn 11 •SuvryOn �3rIH 6II1�[ 6O(aD6M. CbtDMCO 6061 1 DESIGNED BY. I MAA 1 HORIZON -I, 1"=60' rORi L NONE FLOODPLAIN SITE PLAN LOTS ESOURCE ■■■■■ E N G I N E E R I N G I N C Kathy Eastley March 19, 2010 Garfield County Building and Planning Dept 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 RE: Reid Trust Exemption Review Dear Kathy: At the request of Garfield County, Resource Engineering, Inc. (RESOURCE) reviewed the submittal by the Reid Trust for a Major Exemption to create a total of 4 lots for a 40 acre parcel located on Graham Mesa near Rifle, Colorado. The submittal is dated May 14, 2009, but includes items dated in February 2010. Based on the April 8, 2009 Pre - Application Conference Summary, the applicable technical requirements include water, ISDS, Access and Roads, and hazards as indicated in Section 5-406(c), (d), (e) and (f) with reference to corresponding standards in Article 7 of the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution ULUR. Review comments for the applicable standards and presented below. SECTION 7-104 WATER The proposed Parcels 1, 2 and 3 will be served by an existing well (Permit No. 282586). A proposed well sharing agreement was included. Well Permit No. 282586 is an exempt 35+ acre permit that allows for 3 residential units and irrigation of up to one acre. There is no documentation of adequate water quantity and quality as required by the ULUR in Sections 7-104 B.2.a. and d. There is no proposed legal or physical water supply for Parcel 4. However, Proposed Plat Note I indicates that Parcel 4 cannot be sold or built on until it is merged with the adjacent parcel. The Rifle Fire Protection District (RFPD) indicates that adequacy of fire protection is dependent on the location of future structures. A Plat Note must be added that indicates construction on Parcel 3 and Parcel 4 is subject to review by the RFPD and additional fire protection measures may be required. Alternatively, a building envelope that allows for adequate fire protection according to RFPD standards could be developed. SECTION 7-160 ISDS The ULUR requires evidence that ISDS systems are feasible for the proposed project including soil suitability, slopes, surface hydrology, and water table depth. Parcels 1 and 2 have existing dwelling units and ISDS systems. The ISDS permit and system design for the adjacent parcel was included in the submittal. Based on this information, RESOURCE can infer that a standard (or engineered if necessary) ISDS could be located on Parcel 3. Consulting Engineers and Hydrologists 909 Colorado Avenue 0 Glenwood Springs, CO 81 601 0 [9701945-6777 ■ Fax [970)945-1137 Kathy Eastley Page 2 SECTION 7-108 ACCESS March 19, 2010 Each of the proposed parcels would have access from County Road 233. The existing driveway to Parcel 4 should have an easement across Parcel 1. One driveway permit was included in the submittal. Evidence of Compliance with GARCO Road and Bridge Standards must be submitted for all parcels. SECTION 7-210 HAZARDS The submittal does not contain any information regarding compliance with Section 7- 210. Please call if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, RESOURCE NGINEERING, INC. r) Michael J. rio , E. Water R sources Engineer MJE/mmm 885-69.0 1::!:RES0UHL:l= ..... E N G I I N C ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Connecting our region "th transit and trails March 18, 2010 Jon Fredericks Land West 345 Colorado Ave. Unit 106 Carbondale, Co 81623 Re: TCI Lane Ranch, LLC's Request for Support for Floodplain Development Application Dear Jon; As requested, I have signed the Floodplain Development Application that TCI Lane Ranch, LLC has requested of RFTA in connection with TCI Lane's request for a Floodplain Development Permit from Garfield County. I have done so because in April 2008 my Board of Directors provided conceptual support for your development as presented at that time and because I understand that Garfield County requires RFTA's signature as a real property owner whose property may be utilized or accessed in some way by your development in order to process your application. Providing this signature, however, should in no way be construed as final Board approval to provide trail access or other use of RFTA land. Such decisions can only be made by the RFTA Board. Moreover, RFTA is not agreeing to pay for or be responsible in any way for providing any additional information to Garfield County in support of your application. I have also signed the Statement of Authority as you requested. Again, however, please note that only the RFTA Board of Directors has the authority to convey, encumber or otherwise affect title to real property and it has not yet done so in this instance. Please copy me on all correspondence between TCI Lane and Garfield County regarding the bridge that will connect the Rio Grande Trail to the TCI Lane development. Thank you for indulging my deference to RFTA's attorney request that I clarify these points. I hope that these signed documents assist you in your application process and if I can be of further assistance please let me know. Sine rely, Mike Hermes STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY Pursuant to C.R.S. X38-30-172, then undersigned executes � �p� this � Sta�t^ement of Authority on behalf of QUanInq I(QYl(<�� 1Q11 iib ay-I� a SCS Tran<(bMA-TonAfA'�ky,(' (corporation, Olimited Iliability compYhy, gene al partnership, registered limited liability partnership, registered limited liability limited partnership, limited partnership association, government agency, trust or other), an entity other than an individual, capable of holding title to real property (the "Entity"), and states as follows: The name of the Entity and is formed under the laws The for 0 is {V [ Kwong O (Ii IOOC (n 471 t�jU� C) -t �Lr of('hiDr��100� PSO the Entity is 00 l51 SPYJ((1 , r4y- U The name and/or position of the person authorized to execute instruments conveying, encumbering, or otherwise affeptinpg title to real property, onL behalf of the Entity is {�'� � (�I\011�7L Atm-0CeAw n k Fa 1-1 h A k 0-"44 w 1 � A4- aPfr©� D[ -qhe V . F. i ���0A' O(e rs crts The limit tions upon the authority of the person named above or holding the position described above to bind the Entity are as follows: KInK-)P, (if no limitations, insert "None") Other matters concerning the manner in which the Entity deals with any interest in real property are: (if no other matter, leave this section blank) 10 EXECUTED this t l day of � 2010. Signature: r Name(typed or printed: j�faqeA 4(� mC= y,, Title (if any) : �'c" �aG,,�� STATE OF �'� � ) )SS. COUNTY OF j_ ` (A ) Th/e(�f_oregoing instrument was acknow edged before me this I lJ day of t',(`�'(\ , 20L by M.'( Nea �,_Q nS , on behalf of a 3+ws Witn m hand and official seal. \tn$igU,,,, � M. KIN �o, 30`1711 � y_� ii*}y,GOYircitis $ expires; �., TAR r'�� 1 ary Public) :%ALI Exgvss THIS QUITCLAIM DEED made this 15" day of November 2001, between the ROARING FORK RAILROAD HOLDING AUTHORITY, a governmental entity formed pursuant to title 29, article 1, part 2, Colorado Revise Statutes, and article XIV, section 10 of the Colorado Constitution (hereinafter the "Grantor"), and the ROARING FORK TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, arural transportation authority formed pursuant to title 43, article 4, part 6, Colorado Revise Statutes, as amended and article XIV, section 18 of the Colorado Constitution (hereinafter the "Grantee"); WITNESSETH: That the Grantor, for and in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has remised, released, sold, assigned, conveyed and QUIT CLAIMED, and bythese presents does remise, release, sell, convey and QUIT CLAIM unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns, forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the Grantor has in and to the real property, situate, lying and being in the COUNTY OF GARFIELD and State of Colorado, described on Exhibit A and Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Property"), together with all improvements located on and fixtures attached to the Property, if any. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same, together with all and singular appurtenances and privileges thereunto belonging or in anywise thereunto appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest and claim whatsoever, of the Grantor, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this deed on the date set forth above. ROARING FORK RAILROAD HOLDING AUTHORITY By: �f /Lst 4c.. �.�i Dorothea Farris, Chair STATE OF COLORADO ) )as. COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) Acknowledged, subscribed and sworn to before me this 15" day of November 2001, by ',.�tYbra•,Farris. i' 1fJJWI1 ?£SSmy hand and official seal. My Commission ex 'res, v .a Notary bli C�✓ the former Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company, more particularly described as.follows: Parcel 1 A strip of land 100 feet in width, lying 50 feet on each side of the center line of the westerly wye track of said Aspen .Branch, extending southerly from the intersection of said center line with a line parallel with and distant 65 feet southerly, measured at right angles, from the center line of the main track of said Company to a line drawn South 66015' West from the southwesterly corner of out -lot 40 1h the Town of Glenwood Springs, said 100 feet wide strip of land being a portion of the land described in the following deeds: (1) Deed dated December 1, 1893, from John L. Noonan to The Denver and Rio Grande Railroad Company, recorded September 1, 1894, in Book 35, page 269, records of the County of Garfield. (2) Deed dated December 29, 1971, from the State Department of Highways, State of Colorado, to The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company, recorded February 9, 1972, being a portion of land described therein as Parcel No. 41 and Parcel No. 42, Rev. 3, recorded in Book 427, page 117; Parcel No. 43 Rev. recorded in Book 427, page 118, and Parcel No. 58, recorded in Book 111111111111 HIM 111111111111111111111111111111111 II11 Pag. L eL 10 59"24 12/19/2001 03452P 91313 P652 M ALSDORF 3 of 19 R 95.0e D 0.00 ORRr1ELD COUNTY CO in Back 29, page 597, records of the County of Garfield Parcel 2 All of the land described in deed dated July 7, 1887, from Elisha B. Cravens to The Denver and Rio Grande Railroad Company, recorded August 26, 1892, in Book 25, page 384, records of the County of Garfield. (1) Excepting therefrom a portion of the land described in deed dated March 18, 1971, from The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company to the United Lumber and Mercantile Company described therein as follows: "A tract or parcel of land containing 0.515 acres, more or less, in Lots 2 and 3 of Section 9, Township 6 South, Range 89 West, 6th Principal Meridian, being a part of the station grounds of the Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad within the City of Glenwood Springs, Garfield County, Colorado, and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point in the southerly property line of the Railroad Company from whence the street corner monument located at the intersection of 8th Street and Pitkin Avenue bears South 420 28' 40" East 517.02 feet; thence South 58' 37' West along said southerly property 11111111 III 111111111111111111111111111111111 Ifill fill IN 694024 12/1®/2001 03952P ®1313 M3 A 4 sLSOW of 19 R is." 0 0.00 1ELD CoWrY CO Paga 2 of 10 property line a distance of 25.48 feet to a point that is 50 feet southeasterly at right angles from the centerline of Railroad Company's track ICC No. 102; thence along the arc of a curve to the left of radius 520.92 feet, parallel to and 50 feet at right angles from said track a distance of 258.5 feet, more or less, to the intersection of said curve with the northerly right of way line of Railroad Company's original Main Track (the chord of this arc bears approximately North 10 59' West a distance of 256 feet, more or less); thence easterly along said northerly right of way line and along the arc of a curve to the left of radius 408.37 feet a distance of 256 feet, more or less, to the intersection of said curve and right of way line with the southerly property line of the Railroad Company (the chord of this arc bears approximately South 65° 03' East a distance of 252 feet, more or less); thence South 59° 03' 35' West along said Southerly property line a distance of 40.47 feet to the point of beginning." (2) Also excepting therefrom all of the land described in deed dated July 15, 1967, from The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company to the United Lumber and Mercantile Company described therein as follows: 11111111181 HIM 11111111111111 INS 111111111111 IN P.S. 3 of 10 594024 12/10/2001 02150 01212 F094 M AL4DORF 5 o/ 10 R 05.00 D 0.00 OWIELD COWTY CO on the North by Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 of said Block 41, which alley was duly vacated by ordinance No. 2, Series 1967, a certified copy of which ordinance is recorded in Book 383 at Page 128, Document No. 237478, of the records in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado. Also, that certain tract or parcel of land situated in Lot 3 of Section 9, Township 6 South, Range 89 West of the 6th P.M., in the City of Glenwood Springs and described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest Corner of Lot A, in Block 41, in the City of Glenwood Springs, as the point of beginning; thence S. 4133' W. 444.87 feet; thence S. 53`42' W. 94.23 feet; thence S. 5537' W. 74.75'; thence 20.603 feet along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 17.58 feet (the chord of said arc bears S. 89'11'33' W. 19.446 feet); thence N. 57014'W. 5.83 feet; thence N. 46031' E. 630.19 feet to the West Line of said Block 41; thence S. 1'32' W. 5.61 feet along the West Line of said Block 41 to the point of beginning." (3) Also excepting therefrom a portion of the land described in deed dated December 19, 1991, from The Denver and Rio Grande 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 I 1 504024 12/10/2N1 03!5V ®1313 PM h ALSDW 0 of 10 R WOO D 0.00 SWI€ M COUNTY CO tag. 4 of 30 more or less, in Section 9, Township 6 south, Range 89 West, of the Sixth Principal Meridian, said tract or parcel being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point from which the N4 corner of Section 9, T6S, R89W, bears N. 00007' E., a distance of 2818.7 feet; 1. Thence S_ 67048' W. a distance of 58.0 feet to a point on the west line of Lot 3, Section 9; 2. Thence S. 12015' W. along the easterly border line of a release of land dated September 8, 1894, recorded in Book No. 35, Page 137 of the Garfield County Recorder's Office, a distance of 103.71 feet to the northerly line of Seventh Street extended; 3. Thence N. 58'38' E. along the northerly line of Seventh Street extended, a distance of 49.02 feet; 4. Thence N. 20025'30" E. a distance of 58.5 feet; 5. Thence along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 423.5 feet, a distance of 44.9 feet (the chord of this arc bears N. 17023'30" E. a distance of 44.9 feet), more or less, to the point of beginning." I Will 1111111111111111111111111WIN 11111111 IN IN 004024 12/10/2001 811/2r 01313 rasa M RLSDORF 7 Of 10 R 50.00 D 0.00 OWIMA COUNTY CO Pages S of 30 Jeffery and Chester S. Morey, Trustees, recorded September 23, 1896, in Book 20, page 487, records of the County of Garfield. Parcel 4 All of the land described in deed dated September 10, 1887, from John L. Noonan to The Denver and Rio Grande Railroad Company, recorded November 18, 1887, in Book 14, page 265, records of the County of Garfield. Excepting therefrom a portion of the land described in deed dated December 19, 1991, from The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company to the Holt Family Funeral Home as described in item 3 of the above described Parcel 2. Also excepting all of the land described in Release of Lands dated February 8, 1894, by the United States Trust Company of New York, as Trustees, recorded March 3, 1894, in Book 35, page 137, records of Garfield County_ Parcel 5 All of the land described in deeds to The Denver and Rio Grande Railroad Company recorded in the records of the County of Garfield, as follows: 1111111111111111111111 ! III l 111111111111111 IN 1111 831 81513 MY M ® of is R .as O 8.00 QWZELB COI"TY CO Yoga 6 at 10 Hiram P. Bennett 2-21-16du 19 4a Lewis Bailor 6-16-1888 3 313 Joseph S. Reef, et al 5-3-1889 3 375 Thomas Flannery 2-21-1888 3 288 Howard B. Westover 2-21-1888 19 35 Collins D. Fuller 2-21-1888 19 34 Myrtle E. Hardwick 2-21-1888 3 287 Hyrcanus Staton 2-21-1888 19 33 John Gregory 2-21-1888 19 36 Andrew Thorson 2-21-1888 1 325 Delancy C. Ring 2-21-1888 19 37 Stephen Peebles 2-21-1888 19 42 Luther K. Crane 2-21-1888 19 43 Louis Lang 2-21-1888 3 292 Fred Childs 7-7-1887 3 208 William Wells 2-21-1888 3 291 Thomas Turpin 2-21-1888 19 41 Phillip E. Weaver 2-21-1888 19 40 Phillip E. Weaver 9-14-1891 26 339 Crystal River Land and Improvement Company 4-4-1898 44 273 Isaac Vosseller 3-21-1898 43 195 Ludocia Moore 4-11-1895 35 403 John F. Turner 2-21-1888 17 89 James W. Campbell 6-16-1888 19 153 Milton D. Campbell 2-21-1888 17 88 James W. Zimmerman 2-21-1886 14 308 Alexander Paterson 2-21-1888 3 290 John Cummings 2-21-1888 19 39 Joseph Bogue 2-21-1888 19 38 Parcel 6 All those certain strips of land, 200 feet in width, lying 100 feet on each side of the original surveyed center line of said Aspen Branch, acquired by Act of Congress dated March 3, 1875, within the following described subdivisions: SWk, of Nwh, Est of SWh, SEh Section 22; NE'¢ of NEh Section 27; Lot Nos. 9, 17, 18 and 26 Section 35; Lot No. 2 Section 36, 111111111111111111111111111 IIIII 111111111111111 IIII IIII Page 7 of 10 004024 12/10/5001 63i6V 01313 F600 N ALSDONF 0 of 10 R 05.00 D 8.00 GOWIlLD COUNTY CO - Lot No. 1 of Section 29; Lot No. 5 and SQL of Section 28; Lot No_ 2 of Section 33, Township 7 South, Range 88 West; Sh Section 31 (excepting the westerly 446 feet), NWh of SWh and SEh of Section 32 (original survey); NW11 of SWh of Section 33 (original survey), Township 7 South, Range 87 West, and NEh of NWh of Section 4 (original survey), Township 8 South, Range 87 West, Sixth Principal Meridian. Parcel 7 A strip of land, 100 feet wide, lying 50 feet each side of the center line of the track of the Aspen Branch of the former Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of said center line of Aspen Branch with the North line of Lot No. 16 of Section 34, Township 7 South, Range 88 West, Sixth Principal Meridian; thence southeasterly, along said center line, to the west line of land described in said deed from Ludocia Moore, recorded April 11, 1895, in Book 35, Page 403, Deed Records of said County. EXCEPTING from the above described parcels of land all of the land described in deeds from The Denver and Rio Grande Western 11111111111111 HIM 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 I 504824 12/10/2001 03i5V 51713 x696 R ALSOOV 10 of 10 R 25.00 0 0.00 GMFXKLD COUNTY CO Page 8 of Lo Grantee ware noox rauc Colorado Dept. of Highways 4-6-1970 409 13 Colorado Dept. of Highways 1-14-1969 399 6 Colorado Meadows, Inc. 10-14-1975 479 666 Town of Carbondale 8-22-1995 950 861 American Tree and Cement, Inc. 6-30-1995 945 464 American Tree & Cement, Inc. 10-22-1996 997 904 C -Dale, LLC 10-22-1996 997 929 ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM a portion of the land described in deed from Philip E. Weaver to The Denver and Rio Grande Railroad Company, recorded February 21, 1888, in Deed Book 19, Page 40, and recorded September 14, 1891, in Deed Book 26, Page 339, records of the County of Garfield, described as follows: A tract of land being a portion of that land described in deeds from The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company to Southern Pacific Transportation Company recorded December 29, 1993 in Book 888, Page 38, and recorded December 29, 1993, in Book 888, Page 30, both Records of said County, situated in Lots 5 and 12 of Section 34, Township 7 South, Range 88 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Town of Carbondale, Garfield County, Colorado, and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Southwesterly right-of-way line of said Southern Pacific Transportation Company right-of-way, also being a point on the Westerly right-of-way line of Sixth Street extended Northerly in said Town of Carbondale, whence the street centerline monument located at the intersection of Eighth Street II'III "III t'II'I VIII fl�" III'I I'I�'tl III I�IIII ('I f"I - P.S. 9 of 10 614024 12n9/2W1 03s62P 61713 POGO N ALSDMP 11 of 1G N 66.00 D 0.00 DAVI6LD COUNTY CO N 62010'51' W 154.86 feet along said Southwesterly right-of-way line of said railroad; thence N 27°49'09" E 25.00 feet to a point on a .line which lies 25.00 feet Southwesterly of and parallel to the centerline of the Main Track of said Southern Pacific Transportation Company; thence S 62010'51" E along said parallel line for a distance of 617.96 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way line of said Sixth Street extended Northerly; thence S 00025'00" E 123.99 feet along said westerly right-of-way line extended Northerly, to the point of beginning, containing 35,686 square feet, more or less- 1111111111111111 ess_ 11 III ill HIM 11111 NO ill I1111111111111111111111111 JI 024 12/19/2991 93152P 01313 P991 M ALsDW 12 of 19 R 90.09 0 @.M =WIELD COUWry CO Fn. 10 of 10 [see attached 6 -page legal description] Im Garfield, State of Colorado, being a portion of the Aspen Branch of the former Denver and Rib Grande Western Railroad Company, more particularly described as follows: Par^_,cam-- A strip of land 100 feet in width, lying 50 feet on each side of the center line of the westerly wye track of said Aspen Branch, extending southerly from the intersection of said center line with a line parallel with and distant 65 feet southerly, measured at right angles, from the center line of the main track of said ,,,,any to a line drawn South 66015' West .from the southwesterly corner of out -lot 40 in the Town of Glenwood .Springs, said 100 feet wide strip of land being a portion of the land described in the following deeds: (1) Deed dated December 1, 1893, from Sohn L. Noonan to The Denver and Rio Grande Railroad Company, recorded September 1, 1894, in Book 35, page 269, records of the County of Garfield. (2) Deed dated December 29, 1971, from the State Department ,.of Highways, State of Colorado, to The Denver and Rio Grande W -' Western Railroad Company, recorded February 9, 1972, being a Mr portion oflanddescribed therein as Parcel No. 41 and Parcel No. EM 42, Rev. 3, recorded in Book 427, page 117; Parcel No. 43 Rev. , .,recorded in Book 427, page 118, and Parcel No_ 58, recorded in Book 111111111111111111111 HIM 111111111111111111111111111 111 4ag. t of 0/2001 M52P 11313 PM M ALSOORF 00.00 O 0.00 OMFIELO COUNTY CO in Book 29, page 597, records of the County of Garfield. Parcel 2 All of the land described in deed dated July 7, 1887, from Elisha B. Cravens to The Denver and Rio Grande Railroad Company, recorded August 26, 1892, in Book 25, page 384, records of the County of Garfield. (1) Excepting therefrom a portion of the land described in deed dated March 18, 1971, from The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company to the United Lumber and Mercantile Company described therein as follows: "A tract or parcel of land. containing 0.515 acres, more or less, in Lots 2 and 3 of Section 9, Township 6 South, Range 89 West, 6th Principal Meridian, being a part of the station grounds of .the Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad within the. City of Glenwood Springs, Garfield County, Colorado, and more particularly described as follows_ Beginning at a point in the southerly property line of the Railroad Company from whence the street corner monument located at the intersection of 8th Street and Pitkin Avenue bears South 42° 28' 40" East 517.02 feet; thence South 58' 37' West along said southerly property Pnge 2 of 6 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IN SOM4 12/10/2001 0395V 01313 FW M RLsaW 15 of 15 R 98'" D 0.00 OW11ILD COIMTY co property line a distance of 25.48 feet to a point that is 50 feet southeasterly at right angles from the centerline of Railroad Company's track ICC No. 102; thence along the arc of a curve to the left of radius 520.92 feet, parallel to and 50 feet at right angles from said track a distance of 258.5 feet, more or less, to the intersection of said curve with the northerly right of way line of Railroad Company's original Main Track (the chord of this arc bears approximately North 1' 59' West a distance of 256 feet, more or less); thence easterly along said northerly right of way line and along the arc of a curve to the left of radius 408.37 feet a distance of 256 feet, more or less, to the intersection of said curve and right of way line with the southerly property line of the Railroad Company (the chord of this arc bears approximately South 65' 03' East a distance of 252 feet, more or less); thence South 59' 03' 35" West along said Southerly property line a distance of 40.47 feet to the point of beginning." (2) Also excepting therefrom all of the land described in deed dated July 15, 1967, from The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company to the United Lumber and Mercantile Company described therein as follows: o 111111111111111111III1111111111111111111111111111111111 Paga 3 f b 5*4024 12/19/2881 83192! 01313 PM M ALsMF la of Sa R 95,eO D 8.08 OWSELD COWTT CO on the North by Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 of said Block 41, which alley was duly vacated by Ordinance No. 2, Series .1967, a certified copy of which Ordinance is recorded in Book 383 at Page 128, Document No. 237478, of the records in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado. Also, that certain tract or parcel of land situated in Lot 3 of Section 9, Township 6 South, Range 89 West of the 6th P.M_, in the City of Glenwood Springs and described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest Corner of Lot A, in Block 41, in the City of Glenwood Springs, as the point of beginning; thence S. 41033' W. 444.87 feet; thence S. 53042' W. 94.23 feet; thence S. 55'37' W. 74.75'; thence 20.603 feet along the arc of a curve to the right having a radius of 17.58 feet (the chord of said arc bears S. 89011'33" W. 19.446 feet); thence N. 57°14'W. 5.83 feet; thence N. 46031' E. 630.19 feet to the west Line of said Block 41; thence S. 1032' W. 5.61 feet along the West Line of said Block 41 to the point of beginning." (3) Also excepting therefrom a portion of the land described in deed dated December 19, 1991, from The Denver and Rio Grande 11111111111111111111111111111111 SIR 111111111111 IN Pago 4 at 6 17+ef+10 Ri9'5.20 00.00 001"MA COUK" 00 more or less, in Section 9, Township 6 South, Range 89 West, of the Sixth -Principal Meridian, said tract or parcel being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point from which the N4 corner of Section 9, TBS, R89W, bears N. 00007' E_, a distance of 2818.7 feet; 1. Thence S. 67'48' W. a distance of 58.0 feet to a point on the west line of Lot 3, Section 9; 2. Thence S. 1215' W. along the easterly border line of a release of land dated September 8, 1894, recorded in Book No. 35, Page 137 of the Garfield County Recorder's Office, a distance of 103.71 feet to the northerly line of Seventh Street extended; 3. Thence N. 58038' E. along the northerly line of Seventh Street extended, a distance of 49.02 feet; 4. Thence N. 20025'30" E. a distance of 58.5 feet; 5. Thence along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 423.5 feet, a distance of 44.9 feet (the chord of this arc bears N. 17°23'30" E. a distance of 44.9 feet), more or less, to the point of beginning." I 1111111111111111111111 II! 111111 1111111111111 1 104M 12/19/2w1 93,9" 91313 Pa97 X i9 ®: sae $a. as p ®, ALSOW &WIM.0 COLO Y co Page S of 6 Jeffery and Chester S. Morey, Trustees, recorded September, 23, 1896, in Book 20, page 487, records of the County of Garfield. Parcel 4 All of the land described in deed dated September 10, 1887, from John L. Noonan to The Denver and Rio Grande Railroad Company, recorded November 18, 1887, in Book 14, page 265, records of the County of Garfield. Excepting therefrom a portion of the land described in deed dated December 19, 1991, from The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company to the Holt Family Funeral Home as described in item 3 of the above described Parcel 2. Also excepting all of the land described in Release of Lands dated February 8, 1894, by the United States Trust Company of New York, as Trustees, recorded March 3, 1894, in Book 35, page 137, records of Garfield County. 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 'S of 19 R 12/is/2991 0315V 21313 PM m D 0.00 aWleW � CO Page 6 of 6 Garfield County BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT February 18, 2010 Michael Erion Resource Engineering 909 Colorado Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 merionp_resource-enq.com Reference: Request review of a Floodplain Development Permit Michael; I am forwarding you an application for a Floodplain Development Permit for TCI Land Ranch PUD. This application was submitted and initially reviewed by John Niewoehner, the Planning Engineer who sent a "not technically complete" letter to the applicant. With John gone the application has been re -assigned to me. I've enclosed the application and all related submittal documentation, the letter from John Niewoehner to the applicant, and the applicant's response. I would appreciate your review and comments, please feel free to contact me if you need any additional information. Thank you! Sincerely, athy Ea tley, AICP CC: File 108 Eighth Street, Suite 401 • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 • (970) 285-7972 • Fax: (970) 384-3470 RESOURCE ENGINEERING I N C. Kathy Eastley March 16, 2010 Garfield County Building and Planning Dept 108 8th Street, Suite 201 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 RE: TCI Lane Ranch Floodplain Permit Application FDPA -1-10-6264 Dear Kathy: At the request of Garfield County, Resource Engineering, Inc. (RESOURCE) reviewed the Floodplain Development Application of TCI Lane Ranch, LLC. The application is for proposed fill in the flood fringe to elevate several lots such that the lowest finished floor elevations will be at least 1.5 feet about the 100 year base flood elevation and for proposed construction of a pedestrian bridge over the Roaring Fork River. The materials reviewed include the "Floodplain Development Report for TCI Lane Ranch" prepared by Drexel Barrell & Co. dated January 11, 2010, the Technical Completeness Review Memorandum from John Niewoehner dated January 26, 2010, and a response letter from Drexel Bartell & Co dated February 15, 2010. RESOURCE review comments address the two elements of the application below. GENERAL BACKGROUND The proposed project is located on the Roaring Fork River approximately '% mile above the Catherine Bridge (CR 100). This reach of the Roaring Fork River has been analyzed in detail for delineation of the regulatory Flood Boundary and Floodway. The effective maps for the project area are the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel 080205 1880 and the FEMA Flood Boundary and Floodway Map Panel 080205 1880, both dated January 3, 1986. Since the floodway has been delineated, fill and encroachment activities that meet GARCO criteria can be approved in the Flood Fringe area. FILL ON RESIDENTIAL LOTS The proposed fill on residential lots located within the Flood Fringe is recommended for approval by the director. The lowest finished floors must be at least one foot above the 100 year Base Flood Elevation and the application proposes 1.5 feet. As indicated in the February 15, 2010 letter and the Application, the applicant can seek to have the residential lots removed from the Floodplain by a LOMR-F (Letter of Map Revision by Fill) process with FEMA. PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE The proposed pedestrian bridge includes abutment located in the Flood Fringe and a center prior located in the Floodway. The bridge abutments meet GARCO criteria and can be approved. The pier is located in the floodway and the applicant must address the Floodway encroachment criteria and regulations. The applicant must demonstrate, Consulting Engineers and Hydrologists 909 Colorado Avenue 0 Glenwood Springs, CO 81 601 ■ (970) 545-6777 ■ Fax (970)945-1137 Kathy Eastley Page 2 March 16, 2010 using the Floodway model for the Duplicate Effective FEMA model and the Existing Conditions Model, that there is no impact to the 100 -year flood elevations, floodway elevations, or floodway widths at published or unpublished cross sections in the vicinity of the proposed bridge. The applicant may need to consider innovative solutions such as compensatory excavation within the Floodway to offset the pier encroachment. Otherwise, as John Niewoehner pointed out, a FEMA CLOMR application would be required simultaneous with the County application. Please call if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, RESOURC E INEERING, INC. Michael J. P. E. ' Water R ources Engineer MJE/mmm/II 885-68.0 MC11enls1885 GARC0168.8TG LANE RANCMKathy Fmfleybodplain pen dt app fdpa 1.166264.dx 'RESOURCE AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 4-111 A.4.5 GARFIELD COUNTY UNIFIED LAND USE RESOLUTION ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: TCI Lane Ranch,16411 Old Highway 82, Carbondale, Garfield County, CO SCHEDULED DECISION OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT: May 7, 201.0 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) 1, Lindsay Logan, being or representing TCl Lane Ranch, LLC and the Roaring Fork Transportation Authority, an applicant to Garfield County, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 4-11 1 A.4. of the Garfield County Land Use Code in the following manner: Notice to Adiacent Property Owners. By mailing a notice obtained from the Garfield County Building and Planning Department, at least 15 calendar days prior to the date of the scheduled decision of the Director of the Garfield County Building and Planning Department (the "Director"), written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the owners of record ofall property adjacent to the property within a 200' radius and the mineral owners of record in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. As found on Exhibit A, the notice included a vicinity map, the property's legal description, a short narrative describing the current zoning and proposed land use change, the contact information and the date that the Director has to make a decision. A copy of the list of persons to whom the notice was sent is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 2010, by Avol /01 ,VnIXy Logan. "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 2s' l- day of April WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL St7 °RAMIE; s• rIACH € My commission expires: _k)/oq My CO, $JOB Expires INW2013 otary P blic Table, of Exhibits Exhibit —Copy of Notice to Adjacent Property Owners (including Exhibits A, B and C) Exhibit B — List of Adjacent Property Owners who Were Sent Notice Affidavit of Public Notice LES. Page I Initials PUBLIC NOTICE TATE NOTICE that TCI Lane Ranch. LLC and the Roaring Fork Transit Authority "RFTA")(joimIy, the "Applicant's) have applied to the Building and PIanning, Director, Garfield County, State of Colorado,; to request an Administrative Permit for Floodplain Development on a property situated in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado, to wit: Legal Description: (See Exhibit A— TCI Lane Ranch property, and Exhibit B— RFTA property, both attached by Applicant) Practical Location: TCI Lane Ranch is located on State ffighway 82 east of Carbondale in Sections 31 and 32 of Township 7 South, Range 87 West in Garfield County, The RFTA Parcel is located generally along the pedestrian and bike path generally located along the Roaring Fork River in Garfield County. General Project Description: As required by Condition No. 6 of Resolution No. 2009-81 of the Garfield County Board of County Cominissioners concerning approving the Planned Unit Development and Prelfirdnary PIan for the TCI Lane Ranch PUD, the Applicant requests approval of an Administrative Floodplain Permit for construction of pedestrian bridge across the Roaring Fork River connecting TCl Lane Ranch with the RFTA pedestrian path and for the deposition of fill material within certain of the lots proposed within the TCI Lane Ranch PUD. A vicinity map for the project is attached to this Notice as Exhibit C. All persons affected by the proposed Administrative Permit for Floodplain Development are invited to comment regarding the application:. You may state your views by Ietter or you may call the Building and Planning Department at (970) 945-8212 regarding the application. The Director will give consideration to the comments of surrounding property owners, and others affected, in deciding whether to grant or deny the request. The application may be reviewed at the once of the Planning Department located at 108 8th Street, Suite 401, Garfield County Plaza Building, Glenwood. Springs, Colorado between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. The Director will make a decision on this application on MAY 7. 2010. Any continents to be considered must be received prior to that date. Planning Department Garfield County Exhibit A Legal Description of TCI Il.ane Reich Property ATRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN LOTS 8,9AND 10 OF SECTION 31 AND IN LOTS 5 AND 13 OF SECTION 32, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO, LYING SOUTHERLY OF AND ADJACENT TO THE SOUTHERLY RIG] IT OF WAY LINE OF OLD STATE HIGHWAY 82 AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE WHENCE A STONE FOUND IN PLACE FOR THE WITNESS CORNER TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION BEARS N 26 DEGREES 00' 43 " E 1433.52 FELT; THENCE S 79 DEGREES 58' E 2125,37 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1013 AT PAGE 423 OF THE RECORDS OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL ON THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES. S 04 DEGREES 55'00" W461.90 FEET; THIENCE, S 01 DEGREES 00'00" E 861.25 FEET TO A POINT ON T14E NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE ROARING FORK TRANSIT AUTHORITY RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE 169.57 FEET ALONG SAID N'ORTI-JERLY RAILROAD RIGHT` OF WAY LINE ON THE ARC OF A 1565.69 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 54 DEGREES 3T 43" W 169.49 FEET TO A POINT ON T14E SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT 13; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 54'14" W 651.37 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT 13 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT I0; THENCE 8 00 DEGREES 10'37" E 354.80 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT 10 TO A POINT IN THE CENTER OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER, THENCE ALONG T14E CENTER OF SAID ROARING FORK RIVER ON THE FOLLOWING SEVEN (7) COURSES: S 86 DEGREES 53'04" W294.14 FEET; THENCE S 85DEGREES 32'23"W 117.60 FEET, THENCE S 78 DEGREES 29'25" W 123.94 FEET; THENCE S 89 DEGREES 17'47" W 118.54 FEET; THENCE S 67 DEGREES 42'27" W 386.40 FELT; THENCE S 62 DEGREES 48'18" W 124,67 FEET; THENCE S 57 DEGREES 58'42" W 235.29 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF BLUE CREEK RANCH RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO. 623535 IN THE RECORDS OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID BLUE CREEK RANCH ON THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: N 00 DEGREES 10'37" W 736.64 FEET; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 54' 14" W 231.46 FEET; THENCE N 00 DEGREES 02'13" W 167790 FEETTOTHE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN BOOK 333 AT PAGE 511 OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE S 79 DEGREES 52! 12" E 278.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF Tl -JE- PARCEL DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 333 AT PAGE 511 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL: THENCE N 00 DEGREES 02' I.3" W 156.69 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO. Exhibit B Legal Desefi tip on of RFTA Property Ail those certain parcels of land situated in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado, being a portion of the Aspen Branch of the former Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company, more particularly described as follows: Parcel 1 A strip of land 100 feet in width, lying 50 feet on each side of the center line ofthe westerly Wye track of said Aspen Branch, extending southerly from the intersection of said center line with a line parallel with and distant 6S feet southerly, measured at right angles; from the center line of main track of said Company to a line drawn South 66'1 5'West from the southwesterly corner of out - lot 40 in the Town of Glenwood Springs; said 100 feet wide strip of land being a portion of the land described in the following deeds: (1) Deed dated December 1, 1893, from John L. Noonan to The Denver and Rio Grande Railroad Company, recorded September 1, 1894, in Book 35, page 269, records of the County of Garfield. (2) Deed dated December 29, 1971, from the State Department of Highways, State of Colorado, to The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company; recorded February 9, 1972; being a portion of land described therein as Parcel No. 41 and Parcel No. 42, Rev. 3, recorded in Book 427, page 117; Parcel No. 43 Rev. recorded in Book 427, page 118, and Parcel No. 58, recorded in Book 427, page 121, all in the records of the County of Garfield. (3) Deed dated November 1, 1892, from. Clinton Reed to The Denver and Rio Grande Railroad Company, recorded December 13, 1892, in Book 29, page 597, records of the County of Garfield. Parcel 2 All of the land described in deed dated July 7,1887, from Elisha. B. Cravens to The Denver and Rio Grande Railroad Company, recorded August 26,1892, in Book 25, page 3 84, records of the County of Garfield. (1) Excepting therefrom a portion of the land described in deed dated March 18,197 1, from The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company to the United Lumber and Mercantile Company described therein as follows: "A tract or parcel of land containing 0.515 acres, more or less, in Lots 2 and'3 of Section 9; Township 6 South, Range 89 West, 6th. Principal Meridian, being apart of the station grounds of the Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad within the City of Glenwood Springs; Garfield County; Colorado; and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point in the southerly property line of the Railroad Company from whence the street corner monument located at the intersection of 8th Street and Pitkin Avenue bears South 442° 28'401, East 517.02 feet; thence South 58° 37` West along said southerly property line a distance of 1.5.26 feet; thence South 54° 19' gest along said southerly property line a distance of 184.68 feet; thence South 59° 09' West along said southerly property line a distance of 25.48 feet to a point that is 50 feet southeasterly at right angles from the centerline of Railroad Company's track ICC No: 102; thence along the are of a curve to the left of radius 520.92 feet, parallel to and 50 feet at right angles from said track: a distance of 258.5 feet, more or less, to the intersection of said curve with the northerly right of waylineof Railroad Company's original Main Track (the chord of this are bears approximately North 1 ° 59' West a distance of 256 feet more or less); thence easterly along said northerly right of way line and along the are of a curve to the left of radius 408.37 feet a distance of 256 feet, more or less, to the intersection of said curve and right of way line with the southerly property line' of the Railroad Company (the chord of this are bears approximately South 65° 03' East a distance of 252 feet, more or less), thence South 591 03' 35" West along said Southerly property line a distance of 40.47 feet to the point of beginning." (2) Also excepting therefrom all of the land described, in. deed datedJuly 15, 1967, from The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company to the United Lumber and Mercantile Company described therein as follows: "Lots A and B, in Block, 41, in the City of Glenwood Springs; together; with the Alley formerly located across said Block 41 and bounded on the South by said Lot A and on the North by Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 of said Block 41, which alley was duly vacated by Ordinance No.2, Series 1967, a certified copy of which Ordinance is recorded in Book383 at Page 128, Document No. 237478; of records in the office of the County Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado. Also; that certain tract or parcel of land situated in Lot 3 of Section 9, Township 6 South; Range; 89 West of the 6th P.M.; in the City of Glenwood Springs and described as .follows: Beginning at the Northwest Corner of Lot A, in Block 41,. in the City of Glenwood Springs; as the point of beginning; thence S. 41°33' W. 444.87 feet; thence S. 53042' W. 94.23 feet; thence S. 55°37' W. 74.75', thence 20.603 feet along the are of a curve to the right having a radius of 17.58 feet (the chord of said are bears S. 89°11'33'W 19.446 feet); thence N. 57°14'W. 5.83 feet; thence N. 46°31 `]3.630.19 feet to the West Line of said Block 41; thence S.1°32, W. 5.61 feet along the West Line of said Block 41 to the point of beginning." (3) Also excepting therefrom aporti.on of the land described in deed dated December. 19, 1991, from The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company to the Holt Family Funeral Home described therein as follows: "A tract or parcel of land containing 0.096 acres, more or less, in Section 9, Township 6 South, Range 89 West, of the Sixth Principal Meridian, said tract or parcel being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point from which the N'/< corner of Section 9, T6S, R89W, bears N.00°07' E., adistance of 2818.7 feet; Thence S. 67'48'W. a distance of 58.0 feet to a point on the west line of Lot 3, Section 9; 2. Thence S. 12°15' W. along; the easterly borderline of release of land dated September 8; 1894, recorded in Book No. 35, Page 137 of the Garfield County Recorder's Office, a. distance of 103.71 feet to the northerly line of Seventh Street extended; 3. Thence N. 5801&'E. along the northerly line of Seventh: Street extended, a distance of 49.02 feet; 4: Thence N. 20°25'30" E. a distance of 58.5feet; 5, Thence along the are of a curve to the left having a radius of 423.5 feet, a distance of 44.9 feet (the chord of this are bears N. 1.7 '23'30" E. a distance of 44.9 feet), more or less, to the point of beginning." Parcel 3 All of the land described in deed dated January 4,1896, from David N. Moffat and Walter S. Cheesman, Trustees, to Edward T. Jeffery and Chester S. Morey, Trustees, recorded September 23, 1896, in Book 20, page 487, records of the County of Garfield. Parcel 4 All of the land described in deed dated September 10, 1887, from John L. Noonan to The Denver and Rio Grande Railroad Company, recorded November 18 1887, in Book 14, page 265, records of the County of Garfield.. Excepting therefrom a portion of the land described in deed December 19, 1991, from The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company to the Holt Family Funeral Home as described in Item 3 of the above described Parcel 2. Also excepting all of the land described in. Release of lands dated February 8, 1894, by the United States Trust Company of New York, as Trustees, recorded March 3, 1894, in Book 35, Page 137, records of Garfield County, Parcel 5 All of the land described in deeds to- The Denver and Rin Grande Railroad Company recorded in the records of the County of Garfield, as ibllows: Recording Grantor Date Book Page Nellie A. Stows 4-10-1924 142 224 Flank Enzensperger 3-29-1888 3 302 Hiram P. Bennett 2-21-1888 19 44 Lewis Bailor 6-16-1888 3 313 Joseph & Reef, et al 5-3-1889 3 375 Thomas Flannery 2-21.1888 3 288 Howard B. Westover 2.21-1888 19' 35 Collins D. Fuller 2-21-1888 19 34 Myrtle E. Hardwick 2=21-1888 3 287 Hyreanus Staten 2-21-1888 19 33 John Gregory 2-21-1888 19 36 Andrew Thorson 2-21-1888 1 325 Delaney C. King 2-21-1888 19 37 Stephen Peebles 2-21-1888 19 42 Lather K. Crane 2-21-1888 19 43 Louis Lang 2-21-1888 3 292 Fred Childs 7-7-1887 3 208 William Wells 2-21-1888 3 291 Thomas Turpin 2-21-1888 19 41 Phillip E. Weaver 2-21-1888 19 40 Phillip E. Weaver 9-14-1891 26 339 Crystal River Land and 4-4-1898 44 273 Improvement Company Isaac Vosseller 3-21-1898 43 195 Ludoeia Moore 4-11-1.895 35 403 John F. Turner 2-21-1888 17 89 .Tames W. Campbell 6-16-1888 19 153 Milton D. Campbell 2-21-1888 17 89 James W. Zimmerman 2-21-1888 1.4 308 Alexander Paterson 2-21-1888 3 290 John Cummings 2-21-1888 19 39 Joseph Bogue 2-21-1888 19 338 Parcel 6 All those certain strips of land, 200 feet in width, lying 100 feet on each side of the original surveyed center line of said Aspen Branch, acquired by Act of Congress dated March 3;1875, within the following described subdivisions: SW'/< ofNW'/4, EI/2 of SW'/n, SETA Section 22; NE'fa ofNP'/ Section 27; Lot Nos. 9;,17,18 and 26 Section 35; Lot No. 2'Section 36, Township 6 South, Range 89 West; Lot Nos. 2, 3, 6 to 10 and 18 to 20 of fractional Section 1, Township 7 South; Range 89 West; Lot No. 13 of fi•actional Section 18; Lot Nos. 1 and 5 of Section 20; Lot No. 1 of Section 29; Lot No.5 and S'!2 of Section 28; Lot No.2 of Section 33, Township 7 South, Range 88 Wast; S'/x Section 31 (excepting the westerly 446 feet), NW'/ of SWl/4 and SE'/4 of Section 32 (original survey); NW% of'SW'/ of Section 33 (original survey), Township 7 South; Range 87 West, and NE"/a of NW'/o of Section 4 (original survey), Township 8 South, Range 87 West; Sixth Principal Meridian. Parcel 7 A strip of land, 100 feet wide, lying 50 feet eachside of the center line of the track of the Aspen Branch of the former Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company described as follows: Beginning at the point: of intersection of said center line of Aspen Branch with the North line of Lot No. 16 of Section 34, Township 7 South, Range 88 West, Sixth Principal Meridian; thence southeasterly, along said center line, to the west line of land described in said deed from Ludocia Moore, recorded April 11, 1895, in Book 35, Page 403, Deed Records of said County. EXCEPTING from the above described parcels of land all of the land described in deeds from The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company recorded in the records of the County' of Garfield as follows: Recording Grantee Date Book Page Colorado Dept. of Highways 4-6-1970 409 1.3 Colorado Dept. of Highways 1-14-1969 .399 6 Colorado. Meadows, Inc. 10-14-1975 479 666' Town of Carbondale 8-22-1995 950 861 American Tree and Cement, hie. 6-30-1995 945 464 American Tree 8s Cement, Inc. 10-22-1996, 997 904 C -Dale, LLC 10-22-1996 997 929 ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM a portion of the land described in deed from. Philip E. Weaver to The Denver and Rio Grande Railroad Company, recorded February 21, 1888, in Deed Book 19, Page 40, and recorded September 14; 1891, in Deed Book 26, Page 339, records of the County of Garfield, described as follows. A tract of land being a portion of that land described in deeds from The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad. Company to Southern Pacific Transportation Company recorded December 29,1993 in Book 888, Page 38, and recorded December 29,1993, in Book 888, Page 30; both Records of said County, situated in Lots 5 and 12 of Section 34, Township 7 South, Range 88 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Town of Carbondale, Garfield County, Colorado, and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Southwesterly right-of-way line of said Southern Pacific Transportation Company right-of-way, also being a point on the Westerly right-of-way line of Sixth Street extended Northerly in said Town of Carbondale, whence the street centerline monument located at the intersection of Eighth Street and Main Street in said Town of Carbondale bears S 41 000'21 " W 1068.46 feet; thence N 53°00'37" W 528.52 feet along said Southwesterly right-of- way line of said railroad; thence'N 62°10'51 " W 154.86 feet along said Southwesterly right-of-way line of said railroad; thence N 2149'09" E 25.00 feet to a point on a line which lies 25.00 feet Southwesterly of and parallel to the centerline of the Main Track of said Southern. Pacific Transportation Company; thence S 62'10'51 " E along said parallel line for a distance of 617.96 feet to a point on the Westerly right -Of -way line of said Sixth Street extended Northerly; thence - S 00025'00" 13123.94 feet along said Westerly right-of-way tine extended Northerly, to the point of beginning, containing 35,686 square feet, more or less. Legal Description of Wye Property All those certain parcels of land situated in the County ofGarfield, State of Colorado, being a portion of the Aspen Branch of the former Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad. Company, more particularly described as follows: Parcel I A strip of land 100 feet in width, lying 50 feet on each side of the center line of the westerly wye track of said Aspen Branch, extending southerly from the intersection of said center line with a line parallel with and distant 65 feet southerly, measured at right angles, from, the center line of the main track of said Company to a line drawn South 66°15' 5'West from the southwesterly comer ofout- lot 40 in the'Town of Glenwood Springs, said 100 Feet wide strip of land being a portion of the land described in the following deeds: (1) Deed dated December l; 1893, from John L. Noonan to The Denver and Rio Grande, Railroad Company, recorded September 1, 1894, in Book 35, page 269, records of the County of Garfield. (2) Deed dated December 29, 1971, from the State Department of Highways, State of Colorado, to The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company, recorded. February 9, 1972„ being a portion of land described therein as Parcel No. 41 and Parcel No. 42, Rev. 3, recorded in Book 427, page 117; Parcel No. 43 Rev, recorded in. Book 427, page 118, and Parcel No. 58, recorded in Book 427, page 121, all in the records of the County of Garfield. (3) Deed dated November 1. 1892, from Clinton Reed to The Denver and Rio Grande Railroad Company, recorded December 19, 1892 in Book 29, page 597, records of the County of Garfield. Parcel 2 All of the land described in deed dated July 7,1887; from Elishal3. Cravens to The Denver and Rio Grande Railroad Company, recorded August 26, 1892. in Book 25, page 3)84, records of the County of Garfield. (1 )' Excepting therefrom a portion of tlrc land described in deed dated March 18,1971, from The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company to the United Lumber and Mercantile Company described therein as follows: "A tract or parcel of land containing 0.515 acres, more or less; in Lots 2 and 3 of Section 9, Township 6 South, Range 89 West, 6th principal, Meridian, being apart of the station grounds of the Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad within the City of Glenwood Springs, Garfield County; Colorado, and more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point in the southerly property Iine of the Railroad Company from whence the street corner monument located at die intersection of 8th Street and Pitkin Avenue bears South 42° 28'40" Gast 517.02 feet; thence South 58° 37' West along said southerly property linea distance of 15.26 feet; thence South 54° 19' Westalong said southerly property line a distance of 184.68 feet; thence South 59° 09' West along said southerly property line a distance of 25.48 feet to, a point that is 50 feet southeasterly at right angles from the centerline of Railroad Company's track ICC No. 102; thence along the arc of a curve to the left of radius 520.92 feet, parallel to and 54 feet at right angles from said track a distance of 258.5 feet, more or less, to the intersection of said curve with the northerly right of way line of Railroad Company's original Main Track (the chord of this are bears approximately North 10 59' West a distance of 256 feet, more or less); thence easterly along said northerly right of way line and along the are of a curve to the left of radius 408.37 feet a distance of 256 feet, more or less, to the intersection of said curve and right of way line with the southerly property line of the Railroad Company (the chord of this are bears approximately South 650 03' East a distance of 252 feet more or less); thence South 59° 03'35" West along said Southerly property line 'a distance of 40.47 feet to the point of beginning." (2) Also excepting tberefrom all of the land described indeed dated July 15,1967, from The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company to the United Lumber and Mercantile Company described therein as follows: "Lots A and B, in Block 41; in the City of Gletnvood Springs; together with the Alley formerly located across said Block 41 and bounded on the South by said Lot A and on the North by Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 of said Block 41, which alley was duly vacated by Ordinance No. 2, Series1967; a certified copy of which Ordinance is recorded in Book 383 at Page 128, Document No. 237478, of the records in the office of the County Clerk and. Recorder of Garfield County; Colorado. Also, that certain tract or parcel of land situated in Lot 3 of Section 9, Township 6 South, Range 89 West of the 6th P.M., in the City of Glenwood Springs and described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest Conner of Lot A, in Block 41, in the City of Glenwood Springs, as the point of beginning; thence S. 41 °33' W. 444.87 feet; thence S. 53042' W. 94.23 feet; thence S. 55037' W. 74:75; thence- 20.603 feet along the are of a curve to the right having a radius of 17.58 feet (the chord of said are bears S. 89°11'33" W. 19.446 flet); thence N. 57114'W. 5.83 feet; thence N_46°31 VE. 630.19 feet to the West Line of said Block 41,; thence S. 1032 W. 5.61 feet along the West Line of said Block 41 to the point of beginning." (3) Also excepting therefrom a portion of the land described in deed dated December 19, 1991, from The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company to the Holt Family Funeral Home described therein as follows: "A tract or parcel of land containing 0.096 acres, more or less, in Section 9, Township 6 South, Range 89 West, of the Sixth Principal Meridian, said tract or parcel being more, particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point from which the NIA corner of Section 9, T6S, R89W, bears N. 00'07'E., a distance of 2818.7 feet; I . Thence S. 67'48'W. a distance of 58.0 feet to a point on the west line of Lot 3, Section 9', 2. Thence S. 12°15' W. along the easterly border tine of a release'of land dated September 8, 1894, recorded in Book No, 35; Page 137 of the Garfield County Recorder's Office; a distance of 103.71 feet to the northerly line of Seventh Street extended; 1 Thence N. 5838'E. along the northerly line of Seventh Street extended, a distance of 49:02feet; 4. Thence N. 20025'30" E. a distance of 58.5 feet; 5. Thence along the are of a curve to the left, having`a radius of 423.5 feet, a distance of 44.9 feet (tire chord of this are bears N. 17°23'30" E. a distance of 44.9' feet), more or less, to the point of beginning," Parcel 3 All of the land described in deed dated January 4,1896, from David N. Moffat and Walter S. Cheesman, Trustees, to Edward T. Jeffery and Chester S. Morey, Trustees, recorded September 23, 1896, in Book 20, page 487, records of the County of Garfield. Parcel 4 All of the land described in deed dated. September 10, 1887, from John L. Noonan to The Denver and Ilio Grande Railroad Company; recorded November 18; 1887, in, Book 14, page 265; records of the County of Garfield. Excepting therefrom a portion of the land described in deed dated December 19,1991, from The Denver and. Rio Grande Western Railroad Company to the Holt Family funeral Home as described in Item 3 of the above described Parcel 2. Also excepting all of the land described in Release of Lands dated February 8, 1894, by the United States Trust Company of New York, as Trustees, recorded March 3, 1894, in Book 35, page 137. records of Garfield County. I Drexel, Barrell & co. /T\ March 5, 2010 1. Application Form: Under 'Name of Property Owners' there needs to be two property owners — TCI Lane Ranch and RFTA. The application now lists both property owners, 2. Application Form: The application needs to include the entire application form including page 5, the signature page. Since there are two owners, there needs to be two signatories. The entire application form, including page 5, has been included with this resubmittal. The application form has been signed by both parties. 3. Statement of Authority from TCI Lane Ranch: Whoever signs the application must be authorized by TCI Lane Ranch to do so. A statement of authority has been attached. 4. Statement of Authority from RFTA: Whoever signs the application must be authorized by RFTA to do so. Thus, the County needs a Statement of Authority' that gives an individual the right to represent the organization. (This authorized person can either sign the permit application or provide a letter to the County through which they authorize someone else to sign the permit; i. e. the planner or the engineer.) Kathy Eastley, AICP Senior Planner Engineers/Surveyors Garfield County Building & Planning 108 8th Street, #401 Boulder Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Denver Via email to: keastleVCDaarfield-countV.com Colorado Springs Grand Junction Greeley Re: TO Lane Ranch Steamboat Springs Floodplain Development Permit 1800 38"' Street Technical Completeness Review Boulder, CO 80301-2620 Dear Ms. Eastley, 303.442.4338 303.442.4373 Fax In response to Mr. Niewoehner's memo dated January 26, 2010, we offer the following: 1. Application Form: Under 'Name of Property Owners' there needs to be two property owners — TCI Lane Ranch and RFTA. The application now lists both property owners, 2. Application Form: The application needs to include the entire application form including page 5, the signature page. Since there are two owners, there needs to be two signatories. The entire application form, including page 5, has been included with this resubmittal. The application form has been signed by both parties. 3. Statement of Authority from TCI Lane Ranch: Whoever signs the application must be authorized by TCI Lane Ranch to do so. A statement of authority has been attached. 4. Statement of Authority from RFTA: Whoever signs the application must be authorized by RFTA to do so. Thus, the County needs a Statement of Authority' that gives an individual the right to represent the organization. (This authorized person can either sign the permit application or provide a letter to the County through which they authorize someone else to sign the permit; i. e. the planner or the engineer.) Ms. Kathy Eastley Page 2 March 5, 2010 A statement of authority has been attached. 5. Application Submittal Requirements (Submittal Requirements Part 1, item 4) - Deed: A deed and legal description are needed for the RFTA property. A deed and legal description for the RFTA property has been included with this application . 6. Application Submittal Requirements (Part ///A, items 9 and 10) — Site Plan: An overall site plan is needed similar to the site plan, preferably 24"x36" size, which shows the subdivision improvements, floodplain, and the location of sections. The site plan must include at least 100 feet upstream and downstream along the Rio Grande Trail. An overall site plan has been included with the floodplain development report. 7. Application Submittal Requirements (Part 111 B4). Existina and Pronosed Base Flood Elevation: On cross sections, show both existing and proposed elevations. (Flood elevations will change due to fill being placed in the flood fringe and due to the placement of bridge abutments and path in the floodway.) The purpose of the hydraulic model included with the floodplain development application was to evaluate the impacts of the proposed bridge. The hydraulic model did not include a detailed analysis of fill along the length of the project. As outlined in Section II of the report, it is our intention to remove specific building lots or structures from the floodplain using FEMA LOMR-F process after the lots are graded. A hydraulic model is not required for a LOMR-F. Therefore, we cannot show existing and proposed base flood elevations at each lot without significantly expanding the scope and detail of the hydraulic model. 7. Floodplain Permit for Bridge and Other Development? It is unclear if this permit is for all proposed development in the floodplain or only for the bridge. The permit application is for the entire development, including the bridge. This has been clarified in the report. 10.. Increase in Flood Elevation - Page 13 of Drexel Barrell Floodplain Report: In accordance with County Land Use Code, Section 701 J 1, there can be no encroachment in the floodway that raises the base flood elevation unless an application is made for a conditional FIRM and floodway revision through FEMA. In order for the application to be technically complete, the 31912010H:IE5875. I 1Correspondence12010-03-05 response to comments.doc Ms. Kathy Eastley March 5, 2010 Page 3 County needs to see that the applicant has applied to FEMA for the revision. The County cannot approve the floodplain development permit prior to FEMA approval. We acknowledge the language in Section 701 of the Land Use Code, which is essentially identical to the language in the Federal Code. In this case, however, the "encroachment' within the floodway is limited to a bridge pier. The north bridge abutment and approach is outside the floodway. The change of flood elevation is primarily due to the abutment and approach (outside the floodway), and not the pier within the floodway. The pier itself has not been modeled separate from the abutment and approach, but if it were we believe the pier impacts would be negligible. Please refer to the attached report for additional discussion. Attached please find six (6) copies of the application and supporting documentation. We appreciate your attention to this project and would be happy to discuss these issues in greater detail. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, PB ll & Co.Ct icz, P.E. Department Head—Site and Infrastructure Development cc: Jon Fredericks 31912010H:IE5875.11Correspondence12010-03-05 response to comments. doc WL ED GENERAL INFORMATION (Please print legibly) D Name of Property Owner: TO Lane Ranch LLC ➢ Mailing Address: 401 Tree Farm Drive D City: Carbondale State: co D E-mail address: jon@landWESTcolorado.com Telephone: O 970-963-1521 Zip Code: 61623 Cell: (_) FAX: 970-963-1527 ➢ Name of Owner's Representative if any, (Attorney, Planner Consultant etc): Drexel, Barrell & Co. ATTN: Jim Brzostowicz ➢ Mailing Address ➢ City: Boulder ➢ E-mail 1800 38th Street State: Co jbrzostowicz@drexcibarrell.com Telephone: () 303-442-4338 Zip Code: 60301 Cell: O 3o3 -s19 -4s82 FAX: ( ) 303-442-4373 ➢ Description of Request: Floodplain-bevelopment Permit for fill of residential lot and construction of pedestrian bridge over Roaring Fork. ➢ Street Address / General Location of Property: South side of SH92 East of CR 100 Legal Description: see attached ➢ Assessor's Parcel Number: 2391-311-00-033 > Existing Use: Agricultural/Farm Residence ➢ Property Size (in acres) 100 Zone District: PUD Last Revised 111109 GARFIELD COUNTY Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970.945.8212 Facsimile: 970.384.3470 www.garfield-countV.com Last Revised 111109 FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION GENERAL INFORMATION (Please print legibly) ➢ Name of Property Owner: TCI Lane Ranch, LLC (primary); RFTA (secondary) ➢ Mailing Address: 401 Tree Farm Drive Telephone: O ➢ City: Carbondale State: Co Zip Code: 81623 Cell: O ➢ E-mail address: FAX: ( ) ➢ Name of Owner's Representative, if any. (Attorney, Planner, Consultant, etc): ➢ LANDWEST Attn: Jon Fredericks ➢ Mailing Address: 345 Colorado Ave. #106 Telephone: (`lio 963 Pill1 ➢ City: Carbondale State: Co Zip Code: 81623 Cell:( ➢ E-mail address: ion@landwestcolorado.com FAX: () ➢ Description of Request: - Floodplain Development Permit for fill of specific residential lots and for the construction of a pedestrian bridge over the Roaring Fork River. ➢ Street Address / General Location of Property: South side of SH82; East of CR 100 ➢ Legal Description: See attached application package. ➢ Assessor's Parcel Number: 2 3 9 1- 3 1 1- 0 0- 0 3 3 ➢ Existing Use: Agricultural / Residential ➢ Property Size (in acres) 100.43 Zone District: Rural / PIJD Last Revised 111109 I. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Any use to be developed in the floodplain shall be required to obtain a Development Permit, in accordance with the applicable regulations of Section 4-104, Section 4-501 (A) and Section 4-503 (A -F). All applications for a Floodplain Development Permit under this Regulation shall be reviewed by the Floodplain Administrator. As a minimum, specifically respond to all the following items below and attach any additional information to be submitted with this application: 1. Please submit three (3) copies of the completed application form and all required submittal materials with the application base fee of $400.00 to the Building & Planning Department. Also include the signed "Agreement to Pay Form" with the copies. (Staff will request additional copies once the Floodplain Development Permit Application has been deemed technically complete). 2. Please submit, in narrative form, the nature and character of the proposed use in the floodplain. Submit plans and supporting information (i.e. letters from responsible agencies). 3. Submit a vicinity map. An 8 '/2 x 11 vicinity map locating the parcel in the County. The vicinity map shall clearly show the boundaries of the subject property and all property within a 3 -mile radius of the subject property. The map shall be at a minimum scale of 1"=2000' showing the general topographic and geographic relation of the proposed exemption to the surrounding area for which a copy of U.S.G.S. quadrangle map may be used. 4. Submit a copy of the deed and a legal description of the subject property. 5. Submit the Pre -Application conference summary from the pre -application conference. 6. If you are acting as an agent for the property owner, you must attach an acknowledgement from the property owner that you may act in his/her behalf. If the property is owned by a corporate entity (such as an LLC, LLLP, etc.) please submit a copy of a recorded " Statement of Authority" demonstrating that the person signing the application has the authority to act in that capacity for the entity. II. PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS The following outlines the basic administrative process for an application requesting development within the 100 -year floodplain. (This is further detailed in Section 4-203 of Article IV.) 1. Pre -Application Conference (Section 4-103(A)) 2. Application (Section 4-601(A)) 3. Determination of Completeness Section 4-103(C)) 4. Evaluation by Director/Staff Review (Section 4-103 (E)) 5. Director Decision 6. Written Notice of Decision III. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS In addition to the general submittal requirements above, an application for development in the 100 -year floodplain is required to contain the following information which is more fully detailed in Section 4-503 of Article IV. A. Site Plan. In addition to the site plan requirements set forth in Section 4-502(C)(3), the site plan shall include the following elements. The Floodplain Administrator may require, or the applicant may choose to submit, a more detailed version of all or part of the site plan. (See Standards 7-701) 1. Base flood boundary and water surface elevations. 2. Floodway boundary. 3. Channel of the watercourse. 4. Existing and proposed topographic contours shown at vertical intervals of no greater than 2 feet. 5. Elevation of the lowest floor, including basement and garage, of each existing and proposed structure. 6. Proposed elevations to which structures will be flood proofed (if applicable). 7. Location, dimension and elevation of proposed landscape alterations. 8. Elevations of existing streets, water supply, and sanitation facilities. 9. Boundaries and total land area of all existing and proposed impervious surfaces, including structures. 10. Location of existing water supply ditches, irrigation ditches and laterals. B. Channel Cross -Section. A typical cross-section showing the following elements: 1. Channel of the watercourse. 2. Boundaries of floodplain adjoining each side of channel. 3. Area to be occupied by the proposed land use. 4. Existing and proposed base flood elevations. C. Construction Specifications. Specifications for construction and materials of buildings, flood proofing, filling, dredging, grading, channel improvements, storage of materials, water supply, and sanitation facilities as applicable. D. Alteration of Water Course. Description of the extent to which any water course will be altered or relocated as a result of the proposed development. E. Floodway Analysis. A floodway analysis prepared by a qualified professional engineer shall be required for all land use proposed to be located in a Floodway, and shall meet the following guidelines. If a detailed hydraulic floodway analysis has not been performed, the Floodplain Administrator shall require the applicant to provide the analysis necessary for determining the floodway boundary. 1. The Floodway Analysis shall be completed using methodology acceptable to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and Colorado Water Conservation Board: 2. The Floodplain Administrator may require a detailed hydraulic floodway analysis based on the identical hydraulic model used to develop the current engineering study adopted by the Board of County Commissioners, if available. 3. The hydraulic model shall be updated to reflect existing hydraulic conditions, to determine any increase in the 100 -year water surface elevation levels that has occurred as a result of development since the floodplain was established. a) Alternate floodway configurations may then be analyzed based on methods as outlined in the current U.S. Army Corps of Engineers HEC -RAS Water Surface Profiles Users Manual and submitted to the Floodplain Administrator for review and approval. b) The analysis shall provide a determination of the cumulative effects of the proposed development, plus the effects of development since the original flood hazard area was established, on the base flood elevation. c) At the Floodplain Administrator's discretion, where a regulatory floodway has been designated, it may not be necessary to determine the cumulative effects of existing development. 4. Floodway boundary configurations shall be examined and approved by the Floodplain Administrator. The following information shall be included for the stream reach 1000 feet upstream and 1000 feet downstream from the proposed encroachment: a) A copy of the printout for the hydraulic computer model representing the base flood profile run for conditions existing at the time the currently effective floodplain was developed. The printout must include the full input and output listing. b) A copy of the printout from the hydraulic computer model representing the floodway run for the proposed floodway configuration and including developments and other hydraulic changes within the floodplain since the currently effective floodplain was established. The printout must include the full input and output listing with all input changes from the original model highlighted. c) A copy of the floodway data table representing data for the proposed floodway configuration. d) A copy of the currently effective official engineering study showing the existing floodplain and the proposed floodway configuration. e) Certification from a Colorado Registered Professional Engineer that the proposed floodway configuration, in combination with current floodplain hydraulic conditions, meets FEMA and CWCB requirements when evaluated against flood elevations established when the original floodplain study was completed. F. Floodplain Impact Report. An engineering report addressing the standards set forth in Article 7, Section 7-701. I have read the statements above and have provided the required attached information which is correct and accurate to the best of my knowledge. re of Pr!6perty Owner) (Signature of Property Owner) Date Z a!o LEGAL DESCRIPTION -TCI LANE RANCH A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN LOTS 8, 9 AND 10 OF SECTION 31 AND IN LOTS 5 AND 13 OF SECTION 32, ALL IN, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO, LYING SOUTHERLY OF AND ADJACENT TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OLD STATE HIGHWAY NO. 82 AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE WHENCE A STONE FOUND IN PLACE FOR THE WITNESS CORNER TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 31 BEARS N26°00'43"E 1433.52 FEET; THENCE S79'58'52"E 2125.37 FEETALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1013 AT PAGE 423 OF THE RECORDS OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL ON THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES: 504'55'00"W 461.90 FEET; THENCE S01°00'00"E 861.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE ROARING FORK TRANSIT AUTHORITY RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE 169.57 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RAILROAD RIGHT- OF -WAY LINE ON THE ARC OF A 1565.69 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S54'32'43"W 169.49 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT 13; THENCE N89054'14"W 651.37 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT 13 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE S00"10'37"E 354.80 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT 10 TO A POINT IN THE CENTER OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER; THENCE ALONG THE CENTER OF SAID ROARING FORK RIVER ON THE FOLLOWING SEVEN (7) COURSES: S86°53'04"W 294.14 FEET; THENCE 585'32'23"W 117.60 FEET; THENCE S78°29'25"W 123.94 FEET; THENCE S89°17'47"W 118.54 FEET; THENCE S67°42'27"W 386.40 FEET; THENCE S62048'18"W 124.67 FEET; THENCE S57°58'42"W 235.29 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF BLUE CREEK RANCH RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO. 623535 IN THE RECORDS OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID BLUE CREEK RANCH THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: N 00°10'37"W 736.64 FEET; THENCE N89'54'14"W 231.46 FEET; THENCE N00002'13"W 1677.90 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN BOOK 333 AT PAGE 511 OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE S79052'12"E 278.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 333 AT PAGE 511 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE N00°02'13"W 156.69 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 100.449 ACRES AS SURVEYED. 76072012/29/2008 04:29:14 PM Page 1 of 1 Jean Alberico, Garfield County, Colorado Rec Fee: $6.00 Doc Fee: $0.00 eRecorded �. Statement of Authority (Section 38-30-172; CRS) I. This Statement of Authority relates to an entity named:TCI Lane Ranch, a Colorado limited liability company 2.. The type of Entity is a: - corporation _ nonprofit corporation limited liability company _ general partnership —limited.partnership . 3. The entity is formed under the _ registered limited liability partnership _ registered limited liability limited partnership limited partnership association government or governmental subdivisionor agency _ trust of the State of Colorado. 4. The mailing address for the entity is: 401 Tree Farm Drive, Carbondale, Colorado 81623. - i S. The name of the person authorized to execute instruments conveying, encumbering, or otherwise affecting title to real property on behalf of the entity is: Au lrew� N. (`'Ace'') Lane as Co -Trustee of tite William N, Lane Trust dated July 30, 1969 FBO Andrew N. Lane. I 6. The authority of the foregoing.perspn to bind the entity is not limited. 7. Other matters concerning the manner in which the entity deals with interests in real property: 8.' This Statement of Authority is executed on behalf ofthe entity pursuant to the provisions of Section 38-30-172, CR -S. 9. This Statement ofAuthorily amends and supersedes in all respects any prior Statement of Authority executed on behalf of the entity, - - Executed this Z3 day of December, 2008 Name: TCI LANE RANCH, LLC a Colorado limited liability company By: William N. Lane Trust dated July 30,1969 FBO Andrew N. Lane, Member BY: Aiitdrew . L� Co -Trustee STATE OF COLORADO ) - �. COUNTY OF - The'foregoing instrument was.acknowledged before me tbis-2.-3 day of December, 2008, by Andrew N. Lane, as Co - Trustee for the William N. Lane Trust elated July A 1969 FBO Andrew N. Lane as Member of TCI Lane Ranch, LLC, WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: .7— 7--o 9 Notar}/P l bit � r - GARFIELD COUNTY Building & Planning Department 108 8'h Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970.945.8212 Facsimile: 970.384.3470 www garfield-county.com PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 239131 100033 DATE: June 1 1, 2009 APPLICANT'S PLANNER: None PROJECT: TCI Lane Ranch PUD, Floodplam Development Permit supplemental to PUD application OWNER: TC Lane Ranch, LLC REPRESENTATIVE: Jon Fredericks, Planner, Noble Design Studio f- Curtis Stevens, Engineer, Drexel Barrell PRACTICAL LOCATION: Southeast of Intersection of 5H 82 and Catherine's Store Road TYPE Of APPLICATION: floodplain Development Permit application (an Administrative Permit per Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008) 1, GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project is an 88-l0t smgle family home PUD on an I00 acre parcel, Several of the lots are situated within the flood frmcje of the Roarmg fork and the project proposes a pedestrian bridcje over the river. TO Land ranch can submit separate floodplain permits for the lots/infrastructure and for the bridge. However, the Planning Dept Director will need to make a decision regarding whether any construction can begin prior to obtainment of both floodplain permits. IL REGULATORY PROVISIONS APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO ADDRESS (DEVELOPMENT CODE / COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, STATE STATUTES, ETC.) ➢ Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution Sections: Section 3-401: floodplain Overlay Section 4-203: Request for Designation of floodway or flood Fringe Area Section 4-503 Description of Submittal requirements for Land Use in floodplain Overlay District Section 4 -GO I Administrative Review flowchart Section 7-701 Standards Within floodplain Overlay Ill. REVIEW PROCESS As outlined on the application form - - Section II, Procedural Requirements Public Hearmg(s): X None _ Planning Commission —Board of County Commissioners Board of Adjustment Potential Referral Agencies: (Division of Water Resources, Colorado Department of Transportation, etc.) o US Corps of Engineers (with regard to wetland issues) o Roaring Fork Transportation Authority (for part of bridge on their property) • Garfield County Vegetation Manager (re -vegetation of disturbed areas) IV. APPLICATION REVIEW FEES Planning Review Fees: $ 400 base fee Referral Agency fees: $ O (est.) Total Deposit: $ 400 (additional hours are billed at hourly rate of $50.50) General Application Processing Planner reviews case for completeness and sends to referral agencies for comments. Case planner contacts applicant and sets up a site visit. Staff reviews application to determine if it meets standards of review: Case planner makes a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions, or denial to the appropriate hearing body. Disclaimer The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not bindmg on the County. The summary is based on current zoning; which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. This summary does not create a legal or vested right. Pre -application Summary Prepared by: G � eDate Applicant TCI Lane Ranch, LLC TCI Lane Ran, 401 Tree Farm DR Carbondale, CO 81623 Return to: Garfield County 108 8th Street Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 - Phone: (970)945-8212 Fax: (970)384-3470 Invoice Number: INV -1-10-19991 Invoice Date: 1/19/10 Plan Case: Flood Plain Development, FDPA-1-10-6264 Mem Garfield County TCI Lane Ranch, LLC 401 Tree Farm Dr. 108 8th Street Suite 401 Carbondale, CO 81623 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 - Fee Name Fee Type Fee Amount Flood Plain Development Fee Fixed $400.00 Total Fees Due: $400.00 Date Pay Type Check Number Amount Paid Change 01/19/2010 Check 1752 $400.00 $0.00 Total Paid: $400.0000 TCI LANE RANCH LLC 401 TREE FARM DRIVE CARBONDALE, CO 81623-9169 970-963-0744 ALPINE BANK BASALT, CO 81621 82-340/1021 Total Due: $0.00 1/13/2010 1752 PAY TO THE Garfield County @@ **400.00 "- ORDER OF W m a Four Hundred and 00/100.....*.*..*..*..,...**.**..*...****.*..*..*..*.*.....*,.....*,**......«*.*....***.....>.*..*.*..« _... DOLLARS Garfield County MEMO Floodplain Development Permit _ AUTHORIZED SIGNAA NATURE 11000 1 7 5 pill 1: lop 10 340 41: 5 5 2000 34 2 5n' i nursaay, iAugusi zb, 2u10 1111111 I I I I 1111111111111111.11111111111( 111 11111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 705845 09/01/2006 11:41A B1838 P333 M NLSDORF 1 of 4 R 21.00 D 500.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO GENERAL WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, made this $6 day of August, 2006, between Oscar Cerise and Wilma Cerise Main Ranch Company,.L.L1.P., a Colorado limited liability limited partnership ("Grantor") whose address is 0086 Country Road 104, Carbondale, CO 81623 and TCI Lane Ranch, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, ("Grantee") whose address is 19351 Highway 82, Carbondale, CO 81623 WITNESSETH: That the Grantor and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby aclmowledged, hereby sell, and conveys to the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, the following real property in the County of Garfield and State of Colorado: See rine attached Exhibit "A" incorporated by reference herein. TOGETHER with all its appurtenances and warrants title to the same and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in anywise appertaining and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the Grantor, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. - TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained mid described, with the appurtenances, unto the Grantee, its heirs, successors and assigns forever. And the Grantor, for itself, its heirs, successors and personal representatives, does covenant, grant, bargain and agree to and with the Grantee, its heirs,successors and assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents, it is well seized of the premises above conveyed, has good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has good right, full power and lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form aforesaid, and (hat the same are free and clear from all former and other giants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments, encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or nature so ever, SUBJECT TO AND EXCEPTING all real property taxes for 2006, due and payable in 2007 and those exceptions listed on the attached Exhibit "B". The Grantor shall warrant and defend the above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the Grantees, its heirs, successors and assigns, against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming the whole or any part thereof.The singular shall include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of any gender shall be applicable to all genders. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this deed on the date set forth above. Oscar Cerise and Wilnna Cerise Main Ranch Company, L. L. L. P., a Colorado limited liability limited partnership, Grantor. by: CI rd O. Cerise, General Partner by: Evelyn Showalter, General Partner by: Betty Hac�kl aiarth Gen�r ; a�lhatr STATE OP COLORADO ) rr COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) n5c;;nr- .. ,;•,. •,o ?±i00 � The foregoing was subscribed and sworn to before me this day of Jtt¢ rF:i PW by Clifford O. Cerise General 'Zr— Partner, Evelyn Showalter, General Panner and Betty Hackbarth, General Partner of the Oscar Cerise and L�. Wilma Cerise Main Ranch Company L.L.L.P.. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires:837- F ZAf I Notary Public ShR"S' a'OPa T S" irk zta qza E, toAiN sI 11111111111111111111111 lill 1111111111111111II1111111111 IN 705645 09/01/2006.11:41PI 81838 P334 M RLSDORF 2 of 4 R 21.00 D 500.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO EXHIBIT A A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN LOTS 8, 9 AND 10 OF SECTION 31 AND IN LOTS 5 AND 13 OF SECTION 32, ALL IN TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO, LYING SOUTHERLY OF AND ADJACENT TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF OLD STATE HIGHWAY 82 AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE WHENCE A STONE FOUND IN PLACE FOR THE WITNESS=CGRNZER-TO�THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION BEARS N 26 DEGREES 00' 43'11 1433.52'FEET; THENCE S 79 DEGREES 58' 52" E 2125.37 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LRLY RIGHT. -OF WAY LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNEROFA PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIHED-IN HOOK 1013 AT PAGE 423 OF THE RECORDS OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL ON THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES:,S 04 DEGREES 55' 00" W 461.90 FEET/ THENCE S O1 DEGREES 00' 00" E 861.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE ROARING FORK TRANSIT AUTHORITY RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE 169.57 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LINE ON THE ARC OF A 1565.69 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 54 DEGREES 32' 43" W 169.49 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT 13; THENCE N 89 DEGREES 54' 14" W 651.37 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY' LINE OF SAID LOT 13 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE S 00 DEGREES 10' 37" E 354.80 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT 10 TO A POINT IN THE CENTER OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER; THENCE ALONG THE CENTER OF SAID ROARING FORK RIVER ON THE FOLLOWING SEVEN (7) COURSES: S 86 DEGREES 53' 04" W 294.14 FEET, THENCE S 85 DEGREES 32' 23" W 117.60 FEET; THENCE S 78 DEGREES 29' 25" W 123.94 FEET; THENCE S 89 DEGREES 17' 47" W 118.54 FEET; THENCE S 67 DEGREES 42� 27" W 386.40 FEET, THENCE S 62 DEGREES 48• I8" W 124.67 FEET; THENCE S 57 DEGREES 58' 42" W 235.29 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF BLUE CREEK RANCH RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO. 623535 IN THE RECORDS OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER; TIiENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OP SAID BLUE CREEK RANCH ON THE FOLLOWING TIiREE (3) COURSES: N 00 DEGREES 10' 37" W 736.64 FEET, THENCE N 89 DEGREES 54' 14" W 231.46 FEET; THENCE N 00 DEGREES 02' 13" W 1677.90 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN BOOK 333 AT PAGE 511 OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE S 79 DEGREES 52' 12" E 278.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED IN SAID DOOR 333 AT PAGE 511 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID.PARCEL; THENCE N 00 DEGREES 02' 13" W 156.69 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLYBOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO GN249394 Formg 426, 430 E%NIOITAi 01/17/03 6'S 11111111111111111111111 IN 111111111111111 VIII1111IN 705845 09/01/2008 11:41A 81838 P335 M DLSDORF 3 of 4 R 21.00 D 500.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO EXHIBIT Our Order No. GW249394-4 RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED May 02, 1903, IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 167. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE 2 THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED August 11, 1894, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 333 AND RECORDED MAY 2, 1903 IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 167. RESERVATION OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS AS DESCRIBED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 11, 1894 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 333. RESERVATION OF AN UNDIVIDIED ONE-HALF INTERST IN AND TO ANY AND ALL C OIL, GAS RIGHTS IN OR UNDER SAID LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED W / BOOK 206 AT PAGE 584, ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF OR INTERESTS THEREIN (ITEM INTENTIONALLY DELETED) AN UNDIVIDED ONE-HALF INTEREST IN AND TO SAID OIL AND GAS RIGHTS IN OR, UNDER SAID LANDS IN DEED RECORDED APRIL 12, 1961 IN BOOK 333 AT PAGE 302, ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF OR INTERESTS THEREIN TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF EASEMENT RECORDED October 19, 1961 IN BOOK 337 AT PAGE: 229. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RIGHT OF WAY BASEMENT RECORDED ✓ January 31, 1974 IN BOOK 454 AT PAGE 457. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT RECORDED October 22, 1975 IN BOOK 479 AT PAGE 875. ANY QUESTION, DISPUTE OR ADVERSE CLAIMS AS TO ANY LOSS OR GAIN OF LAND AS A RESULT OF ANY CHANGE IN THE RIVER BED LOCATION BY NATURAL OR OTIiER THAN NATURAL CAUSES, OR ALTERATION THROUGH ANY CAUSE, NATURAL OR UNNATURAL, OF THE CENTER THREAD, BANK, CHANNEL OR FLOW OF j WATERS IN THE ROARING FORK RIVER LYING WITHIN SUBJECT LAND; AND ANY QUESTION AS TO THE LOCATION OF SUCH CENTER THREAD, RED, BANK OR C14ANNEL ASA LEGAL DESCRIPTION MONUMENT OR MARKER FOR PURPOSES OF DESCRIBING OR LOCATING SUBJECT LANDS. RIGHTS OF ACCESS INSTRUMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 27, 1993 IN BOOK 887 AT PAGE 640 AND INSTRUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 26, 1992 IN BOOK 840 AT PAGE 224. EASEMENTS FOR DITCHES AND OVERHEAD POWERLINE AS SHOWN ON PYLPROVEMENT� SURVEYDATED DECEMBER 27, 2005 PREPARED BY LINES IN SPACE. 111111 Hill 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 705845 09/01/2006 11:41R B1838 P335 M ALSDORF 4 of 4 R 21.00 D 500.00 GARFIELDCOUNTY CO r3aUB1T � Oiw Ordw No. GW2499394-4 POSSESSORY RIGHTS OUTSIDE OF FENCELINE ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY AS ✓ SHOWN ON IMPROVEMENT SURVEY DATED DECEMBER 27, 2005 PREPARED BY LINES IN SPACE. FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT REPORT for TCI Lane Ranch Catherine, CO January 11, 2010 Revised March 4, 2010 Prepared for: TO Lane Ranch, LLC 401 Tree Farm Drive Carbondale, CO 81623 Contact: Jon Fredericks 970-963-1521 Prepared by: Drexel Barrell & Co. 18003 81h Street Boulder, Colorado 80301 Contact: Jim Brzostowicz (303)442-4338 Drexel, Barrell & Co. Job Number: E5875 (H:\E5875.1\Reports\floodplain\E5875 Floodplain Report.doc FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT REPORT TCI Lane Ranch Garfield County, CO TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 4 A. Project Background...........................................................................................................................4 B. Project Location.................................................................................................................................4 C. Drainage Patterns..............................................................................................................................4 II. HOUSING SITE PREPARATION..................................................................................................... 4 III. PROPOSED BRIDGE................................................................................................................ 5 A. Bridge Description.............................................................................................................................5 B. Drainage Basin...................................................................................................................................5 C. River Channel and Floodplain............................................................................................................5 D. Flood Frequency................................................................................................................................5 E. Duplicate Effective Model (FEMA)....................................................................................................6 F. Existing Condition Model..................................................................................................................6 IV. DESIGN DISCUSSION.............................................................................................................. 7 A. Design Frequency..............................................................................................................................7 B. Freeboard..........................................................................................................................................7 C. Preventing Failure Due to Scour........................................................................................................7 D. Debris Blockage.................................................................................................................................7 V. PROPOSED BRIDGE ........................... .............. ............................... ........................................ I... 8 A. Bridge Design.....................................................................................................................................8 B. Hydraulic Analysis Approach.............................................................................................................8 C. Comparison to Existing Conditions....................................................................................................8 D. Freeboard........................................................................................................................................11 VI. CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS...........................................................................................11 VII. REVIEW CRITERIA FOR FLOODPLAIN REVIEW.........................................................................12 VIII. REFERENCES.........................................................................................................................16 TECHNICAL APPENDICIES VICINITY MAP, LEGAL DESCRIPSION, PUD APPROVAL RESOLUTION..................................APPENDIX A FEMA FLOOD MAP, PROFILE AND DISCHARGE SUMMARY...............................................APPENDIX B HEC -2 INPUT AND OUTPUT DATA................................................................................... APPENDIX C 1 Floodplain Development Report TO Lane Ranch DUPLICATE EFFECTIVE (FEMA) MODEL............................................................................APPENDIX D EXISTING CONDITION MODEL......................................................................................... APPENDIX E PROPOSED CONDITION MODEL...................................................................................... APPENDIX F PRE -APPLICATION MEETING NOTES................................................................................APPENDIX G PLANS, CROSS SECTIONS AND MAPS..............................................................................APPENDIX H Floodplain Development Report TO Lane Ranch ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION STATEMENT: I hereby certify that this Floodplain Development Report for the TCI Lane Ranch was prepared by me (or under my direct supervision) in accordance with the provisions of Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution for the owners thereof. SIGNATURE: 40551 James Brzostowicz, P.E.Al �' Department Head — Site and Infn� tN - ure De elopment Registered Professional Engineer State of Colorado No. 40551 Floodplain Development Report TO Lane Ranch I. INTRODUCTION A. Project Background TO Lane Ranch will create 89 single family lots on a 100 -acre parcel. Over 65% of the site will remain in its natural state of pasture land and riparian forest. Related site improvements will include neighborhood streets and stormwater detention facilities. The project will also include a bridge over the Roaring Fork River to create a pedestrian connection to the Rio Grande Trail on the south side of the river. Several of the proposed building lots lie within the flood fringe, and the minimum floor elevations will be set above the 100 -year flood elevation. The proposed bridge abutments and approaches will be constructed within the 100 -year floodplain, and the center pier will be constructed within the floodway. This report has been prepared in support of a Floodplain Development Permit application submitted to the Garfield County planning department. A pre -application meeting was held on June 11, 2009 (Appendix G). The overall Planned Unit Development was approved by resolution No. 2009-81 (Appendix A). The purpose of this report is to evaluate the effects of the proposed bridge and trail connection on the estimated water surface elevation along the Roaring Fork, and to discuss the approach for obtaining LOMR-F's for building sites within the regulatory floodplain. B. Project Location The proposed TO Lane Ranch, hereafter referred to as the site, is located approximately three miles northwest of EI Jebel, Colorado along highway 82. The site is located south of Hwy 82 and is bounded by Blue Creek Ranch on the west, the Roaring Fork River on the south, and agricultural/residential lands to the east. The site is located within portions of Sections 31, and 32 of Township 7 South, Range 87 West of the 6`h Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado. See Appendix A for a Vicinity Map of the project location. C. Drainage Patterns In general, the site drains from northeast to southwest. The southern portion of the site includes the Roaring Fork River. The balance of the site consists of relatively flat agricultural land that tiers down in stages towards the Roaring Fork River. It is assumed that large storm events may overtop the existing drainage ditches and cause shallow flooding across portions of the site before ultimately draining to the Roaring Fork River to the south. A complete Final Drainage Report for this project was completed as part of the subdivision application. Per the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Garfield County, Colorado Unincorporated Areas, Map number 080205 1880 B, portions of the property are within the 100 -year floodplain and floodway (Appendix B). II. HOUSING SITE PREPARATION Several proposed single family home sites on the southern portion of the site are located within the existing 100 -year floodplain. These sites will be elevated by placement of fill to a minimum of 1 -foot above the 100 -year base flood elevation. Designated finish floor elevations in this area will be a minimum of 1.5 -feet above the 100 -year base flood elevation. At the conclusion of the site grading, a 4 Floodplain Development Report TO Lane Ranch Letter of Map Revision based on Fill (LOMR-F) will be submitted to FEMA to remove these home sites from the 100 -year floodplain. No proposed home sites will be located within the designated 100 -year floodway. Selected cross sections of the lots are contained in Appendix H. The LOMR-F process does not change the regulatory base flood elevation (BFE) or floodway. Consequently, the LOMR-F process does not require hydraulic modeling. Following this line of reasoning, the hydraulics study contained herein did not model fill placement for the housing. if a CLOMR/LOMR study is required for the proposed bridge, it may be appropriate to increase the scope of (and area of study for) the hydraulic model to include the placement of fill for housing sites. This would reduce or eliminate the requirement to prepare separate LOMR-F's for each individual housing site. III. PROPOSED BRIDGE A. Bridge Description The proposed bridge will be constructed at the southeast corner of the project site and will provide pedestrian connectivity from the development to the Rio Grande trail on the south side of the Roaring Fork. The bridge will be a two -span steel truss bridge with timber decking. The center pier will be located within an island, which is above the normal high water elevation. B. Drainage Basin The Roaring Fork extends from the Continental Divide southeast of Aspen to the Colorado River at Glenwood Springs. Elevations range from over 12,000 feet (ft) at the headwaters to approximately 6,300 ft at the structure. Because the FEMA FIS has already established the flood flows, a hydrologic analysis of drainage area and coverage characteristics is not necessary for this report. C. River Channel and Floodplain The Roaring Fork is moderately sinuous throughout the study reach. There are braided side channels with islands along the project frontage. The average channel slope is 1.6%. The bank -to -bank width varies from 80 to 100 ft. This reach of the Roaring Fork is depicted on FEMA Garfield County Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel 080251880B, effective January 3, 1986 (refer to Appendix B). The banks consist of cobbles and boulders, with a wide size range of shrubs and trees. Mature trees are present above the bank. The floodplain generally varies in width from 150 to 300 ft. D. Flood Frequency The Garfield County Flood Insurance Study does not include a flood frequency relationship for the Roaring Fork River. However, the underlying backup HEC -2 data does list the discharge values through the study reach. For the purpose of this report, the following values were used: Table 1: Flood Frequency Relationships for Study Area Source Peak Discharge (cfs) forgiven Recurrence Interval 10 -Year 50 -Year I 100 -Year 500 -Year FIS Backup Data 1 6,680 10,430 12,280 18,430 5 Floodplain Development Report TO Lane Ranch E. Duplicate Effective Model (FEMA) A Duplicate Effective (DE) model was created using HEC -RAS, Version 4.0, and the 1983-84 HEC -2 input and output files obtained from the FEMA library. HEC -2 input and output files from the FEMA library are contained in Appendix C. Manning's n values were taken from the HEC -2 study. The entire reach contained in the HEC -2 model was not recreated in the Duplicate Effective model. Specifically, cross sections 94 through 97 were modeled in this study. The study reach length is approximately 4,000 feet. The HEC -2 data included additional cross sections not identified on the FIS map; however the studied reach did include cross sections CD (95), CE (96), and CF (97). The model was created using elevations based on 1929 datum, which is 4.51 feet lower than the project datum (NAVD 88). The downstream starting water surface elevation was taken from the HEC -2 output data at cross section 94. For the 100 -year event, the estimated water surface elevations at all modeled cross sections are within an eighth of an inch of the FIS values. The one minor discrepancy can be attributed to rounding error in reported results. Tnhlp 7- Comnarison of Effective (FEMAI and Duplicate Effective models Design Discharge Cross Cross WS Elevation (ft)* Difference Effective Duplicate Storm Section Section (DE - Eff) (cfs) ID Number Effective (feet) ` 94 6,284.85 6,284.85 0.00 } 00 CD 95 6,292.78 6,292.78 0.00 o CE 96 6,308.31 6,308.32 0.01 CF 1 97 6,318.63 6,318.63 0.00 * All elevations reference NGVD 1929. F. Existing Condition Model An Existing Conditions model (EC) was established by inserting four new cross sections at the bridge location (without the bridge), based on current topographic data. The four new cross sections were positioned following the procedures discussed in Chapter 5 of the HEC -RAS 4.0 Hydraulic Reference Manual. Additional cross sections were interpolated at roughly 200 -foot intervals between the upstream and downstream "bridge" cross sections and the bounding FIS cross sections (95 and 96) using the HEC - RAS interpolation feature. The FEMA FIS discharges and Manning's values were used, except that a horizontal variation in Manning's coefficient was applied to the four new cross sections to better reflect variable hydraulic roughness conditions across the in -stream island. In addition, levee stations were selected in the right floodplain (facing downstream) between Cross Section 95 and 96 to account for the accessibility of portions of the floodplain to upstream flood flows from the Roaring Fork River. It should be noted that the cross section inserted at the bridge location shows an increase of bed slope upstream of the bridge that is not accounted for in the FIS model. Based on a review of aerial photographs, it appears that there are rapids in the general vicinity of the bridge. Rapids could indicate a change of bed slope, therefore the revised bed profile was deemed to be reasonable and no further adjustments were made. 6 Floodplain Development Report TCI Lane Ranch IV. DESIGN DISCUSSION A. Design Frequency While this project is not funded or sponsored by CDOT, the CDOT Drainage Design Manual states that the design discharge in areas of 100 -year FEMA floodplain mapping is the 100 -year discharge. This purpose of this project is to provide a new pedestrian bridge where there is currently no structure. The hydraulic design criteria for this project (per CDOT) is to cause less than a 1.0 foot rise of water surface elevation compared to existing conditions. B. Freeboard The CDOT Design Manual provides criteria to evaluate bridges for freeboard. Figure 4.1 (from the CDOT Design Manual) and the following equation are used: Freeboard = 0.1Q°3 + 0.008VZ (imperial units) Bridge Superstructure �—s7o.f w--� Area orequired Freeboard The velocity for the freeboard assessment is determined as the numerical average of the velocity values just inside the upstream and downstream faces of the proposed pedestrian bridge, between Cross Sections 95.75 and 95.7, respectively. C. Preventing Failure Due to Scour As part of the final design for the bridge, scour depths will be estimated for the 100- and 500 -year floods. Scour recommendations can only be completed once geotechnical information is obtained regarding bed materials, depth and quality of bedrock (if encountered). The bridge foundations must be designed to withstand the 500 -year scour with structural design safety factors being met. D. Debris Blockage Because this is a new structure, there is no history of debris blockage at the site. However, due to the wooded nature of the floodplain area, it is possible that flood flows could carry debris through the study reach. The proposed bridge will have sufficient freeboard clearance to pass debris. Floodplain Development Report TO Lane Ranch V. PROPOSED BRIDGE A. Bridge Design The proposed bridge will be a two span steel truss bridge with timber decking. The pier will be placed on an island. The spans will be asymmetrical, with the south span of the main channel being 115' long and the north span of a side channel being 76'-10". Final design of the abutments will require a geotechnical investigation and scour analysis, which is beyond the scope of this floodplain development report. B. Hydraulic Analysis Approach The Proposed Conditions (PC) model is based on the Existing Conditions model with the proposed bridge and pier inserted between Cross Sections 95.75 and 95.7. Typical contraction and expansion coefficients for subcritical reaches are given in Chapter 3 of the HEC -RAS 4.0 Hydraulic Reference Manual as: • Gradual transitions: contraction coefficient = 0.1 and expansion coefficient = 0.3 and • Typical bridge sections: contraction coefficient = 0.3 and expansion coefficient = 0.5. For the PC model, typical coefficient values were employed for cross sections upstream and downstream of those bounding the proposed pedestrian bridge; those upstream of Cross Section 95.75 and downstream of Cross Section 95.7. Contraction and expansion coefficients at the bridge (Cross Sections 95.75 and 95.7) were set to 0.2 and 0.4, respectively. The justification for the lower values resides in the fact that major flow obstruction is caused only by the right abutment. (The left abutment is outside of modeled flood flows.) Since roughly half the "typical" obstruction occurs for the proposed pedestrian bridge, coefficients were selected to reflect half the expected increase over tabulated "typical" values. Ineffective flow areas were also simulated upstream and downstream of the proposed pedestrian bridge to accurately reflect areas of quiescent water with negligible channel velocity caused by the right abutment. C. Comparison to Existing Conditions Table 3 compares the estimated water surface elevations between existing and proposed conditions. Floodplain Development Report TCI Lane Ranch Tahle d- rmmnaricnn of FEMA Effective and Proposed Conditions Design Storm Discharge (cfs) Cross Section Number WS Elevation (ft) Difference (PC - EFF) (feet) FEMA Effective Proposed Condition } o N 97 6,318.63 6,318.65 0.02 96 6,308.32 6,308.32 0.00 95.95 6,306.38* 6,306.16 -0.22 95.9 6,304.44* 6,303.96 -0.48 95.85 6,302.51* 6,302.07 -0.44 95.75 6,301.88* 6,302.06 -0.10 Bridge 95.7 6,301.88* 6,301.59 -0.29 95.6 6,301.29* 6,301.38 0.09 95.45 6,299.16* 6,299.65 0.49 95.3 6,297.04* 6,297.97 0.93 95.15 6,294.91* 6,296.05 1.14 95 6,292.78 6,292.78 0.00 94 6,284.85 6,284.85 0.00 * These values were interpolated. Compared to the FEMA effective model, the Proposed Conditions model indicates a decrease of water surface elevation upstream of the bridge by a maximum of 0.48 ft and an increase of up to 1.14 ft downstream of the bridge. The discrepancies are due primarily to the differences in topographic accuracy between the two model representations between cross sections 95 and 96, and not due to the proposed bridge. Table 5 shows the estimated water surface elevations for proposed conditions in the current NAVD 88 Datum: 10 Floodplain Development Report TO Lane Ranch Table 4: Comparison of FEMA Effective and Proposed Conditions Design Storm Discharge (cfs) Cross Section Number WS Elevation (ft) Difference (PC - EFF) (feet) FEMA Effective Proposed Condition v >- o 00 N 97 6,318.63 6,318.65 0.02 96 6,308.31 6,30_8.32 0.01 95.95 6,306.38* 6,306.16 -0.22 95.9 6,304.44* 6,303.96 -0.48 95.85 6,302.51* 6,302.07 -0.44 95.75 6,301.88* 6,302.06 -0.10 Bridge 95.7 6,301.88* 6,301.59 -0.29 95.6 6,301.29* 6,301.38 0.09 95.45 6,299.16* 6,299.65 0.49 95.3 6,297.04* 6,297.97 0.93 95.15 6,294.91* 6,296.05 1.14 95 6,292.78 6,292.78 0.00 94 6,284.85 6,284.85 0.00 * These values were interpolated. Compared to the FEMA effective model, the Proposed Conditions model indicates a decrease of water surface elevation upstream of the bridge by a maximum of 0.48 ft and an increase of up to 1.14 ft downstream of the bridge. The discrepancies are due primarily to the differences in topographic accuracy between the two model representations between cross sections 95 and 96, and not due to the proposed bridge. Table 5 shows the estimated water surface elevations for proposed conditions in the current NAVD 88 Datum: 10 Floodplain Development Report TO Lane Ranch Table 5: Estimated Water Surface Elevations — NAVD 88 Design Storm Discharge (cfs) Cross Section Number WS Elevation (ft) Difference (88-29) (feet) 1929 Datum 1988 Datum L } o 97 6,318.65 6,323.16 4.51 96 6,308.32 6,312,83 4.51 95.95 6,306.16 6,310.67 4.51 95.9 6,303.96 6,308.47 4.51 95.85 6,302.07 6,306.58 4.51 95.75 6,302.06 6,306.57 4.51 Bridge 95.7 6,301.59 6,306.10 4.51 95.6 6,301.38 6,305.89 4.51 95.45 6,299.65 6,304.16 4.51 95.3 6,297.97 6,302.48 4.51 95.15 6,296.05 6,300.56 4.51 95 6,292.78 6,297.29 4.51 94 6,284.85 1 6,289.36 1 4.51 D. Freeboard The required freeboard estimated using the CDOT equation is 2.6 ft. The freeboard provided by the selected bridge will be approximately 2.7 ft during the 100 -year event. Freeboard calculations are included in Appendix F. VI. CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS Utility construction shall be in accordance with the Mid Valley Metropolitan District Rules and Regulations. Gasketed-bolted manhole covers shall be provided for the two sanitary manholes (#42 and #46) which have rim elevations less than the estimated flood elevations. Roadway construction shall be in accordance with Garfield County standard specifications. Soils placement for building pads shall be in accordance with recommendations provided in the project geotechnical report. Erosion control measures will be provided to minimize erosion and deposition within the Roaring Fork. The center pier will be constructed on an island which is normally dry, so no earth disturbance will occur within the normal high water area of the Roaring Fork. A preliminary erosion and sedimentation control plan has been provided with this report. The entire project will require a construction stormwater permit issued by the State of Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE). The erosion and sedimentation control information provided in this report will be incorporated into the overall permit. 11 Floodplain Development Report TO Lane Ranch Detailed construction specifications for the proposed bridge will be provided at a later date. VII. REVIEW CRITERIA FOR FLOODPLAIN REVIEW The following provisions of Section 7-701 of the Garfield County Land Use Resolution have been met A. Water Supply Systems: New and replacement water supply systems within floodplain overlay areas shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems. The proposed project will include a typical public water system, including pressurized mains. This type of system is generally not susceptible to infiltration of flood waters. 8. Sanitary Sewage Systems: New and replacement sanitary sewage systems within floodplain overlay areas shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and discharges from the systems into flood waters. On-site sanitary waste disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to them or contamination from them during flooding. The project has been designed with a typical gravity sewage collection system. Two manholes will be nominally located within the floodplain (Manhole 46 in Mayfly Bend and terminal Manhole 42 in Dragonfly Spur). Because the elevation of the manhole rims will be within 3 inches of the estimated 100 - year flood elevation, the risk of significant infiltration to these manholes is minimal. To further minimize the risk of significant inflow through these manholes, a gasketed-bolted cover shall be provided for these manholes. This project will not include on-site sanitary waste disposal systems C. Minimize Flood Damage: All new construction and improvements shall be constructed by recommended methods and practices that minimize flood damage, and using materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage. The proposed infrastructure (roadways, storm, sanitary and water systems) will be constructed of standard materials that are minimally affected by flood waters. This subdivision application does not contain plans for specific improvements such as buildings or bridges. However, all structures shall be designed in accordance with all codes. D. Cumulative Effect. The cumulative effect of any proposed development, when combined with all other existing and anticipated development shall not increase the water surface elevation of the base flood more than one foot at any point. There are no additional currently known developments proposed which would cause additional flood elevation increases within the study reach. Development on the south side of the Roaring Fork River is restricted by the existing Rio Grande trail. E. No Danger to Public. The proposed development shall not cause danger to persons upstream, downstream and in the immediate vicinity. 12 Floodplain Development Report TO Lane Ranch The proposed development is not anticipated to cause danger to any person upstream or downstream of the site due to changes of flood elevations or velocities. F. No Change in Flood -Carrying Capacity. Maintenance is provided within the altered or relocated portion of a watercourse so that the flood -carrying capacity is not diminished. This project will not alter or relocate any watercourses. G. General Standards: In all areas of special flood hazards the following provisions are required for all new construction and substantial improvements: 1. All new construction or substantial improvements shall be designed (or modified) and adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse; or lateral movement of the structure resulting from hydrodynamic and hydrostatic loads, including the effects of buoyancy; With the exception of the bridge, all structures will be constructed at least 18 inches above the Base Flood Elevation. The bridge will be designed to withstand all applicable loads. 2. All new construction or substantial improvements shall be constructed by methods and practices that minimize flood damage; The proposed infrastructure development will have minimal impact on the flood elevations as detailed in this report. 3. All new construction or substantial improvements shall be constructed with materials resistant to flood damage; See item C above. 4. All new construction or substantial improvements shall be constructed with electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities that are designed and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. These requirements will be met by construction all buildings at least 18 inches above the Base Flood Elevation. 5. All new and replacement water supply systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system; See item A above. 6. New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system and discharge from the systems into flood waters, and, See item B above. 13 Floodplain Development Report TO Lane Ranch 7. On-site waste disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to them or contamination from them during flooding. Not applicable to this project. 8. When a regulatory floodway has not been designated, the Floodplain Administrator must require that no new construction, substantial improvements, or other development (including fill) shall be permitted within Zones Al -30 and AE on the community's FIRM, unless it is demonstrated that the cumulative effect of the proposed development, when combined with all other existing and anticipated development, will not increase the water surface elevation of the base flood more than one foot at any point within the community; and, A regulatory floodway has been designated for this area; therefore this item is not applicable. 9. Under the provisions of 44 CFR Chapter 1, Section 65.12, of the National Flood Insurance Program regulations, a community may approve certain development in Zones Al -30, AE, AH, on the community's FIRM which increases the water surface elevation of the base flood by more than one foot, provided that the community first applies for a conditional FIRM revision through FEMA (Conditional Letter of Map Revision). The project will not increase the base flood elevation by more than 1.0 foot; therefore this item is not applicable. H. Specific Standards. In all areas of special flood hazards where base flood elevation data has been provided, the following provisions are required: (Base flood elevations have been determined for this site by FEMA.) 1. Residential Construction - new construction and substantial improvement of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor (including basement), elevated to one (1) foot above the base flood elevation. A registered professional engineer, architect; or land surveyor shall submit a certification to the Floodplain Administrator. All residential structures will have a lowest floor elevation at least 18 inches above the base flood elevation. The subdivision plans indicate a minimum allowable floor elevation for each lot. 2. Nonresidential Construction This project will not include any non residential construction (except for the bridge) within a special flood hazard area. 3. Enclosures This project will not include construction of any enclosures within a special flood hazard area. J. Floodway Floodways located within areas of special flood hazard are areas designated as floodways. Since the floodway is an extremely hazardous area due to the velocity of flood waters which carry debris, potential projectiles and erosion potential, the following provisions shall apply: 14 Floodplain Development Report TO Lane Ranch (Development within the floodway is required for installation of the bridge pier.) 1. Encroachments are prohibited, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements and other development within the adopted regulatory floodway unless it has been demonstrated through hydrologic and hydraulic analyses performed in accordance with standard engineering practice that the proposed encroachment would not result in any increase in flood levels within the community during the occurrence of the base flood discharge. The only portion of the bridge within the floodway is the center pier, which has a minimal impact on base flood elevations (0.07 feet). The total effect of the bridge, including floodway and floodplain encroachments is an increase of 0.41', which is less than the 1.0 foot rise allowed by the floodway concept. This estimated rise is confined to the area immediately upstream of the bridge, and the minimum required floor elevations for nearby lots have taken this rise into consideration. 2. All new construction and substantial improvements shall comply with all applicable flood hazard reduction provisions these Regulations. The proposed bridge will be designed in accordance with applicable portions of the regulations. All residential structures will be elevated a minimum of 1.5 feet above the Regulatory or proposed flood elevation, whichever is higher. 3. Under the provisions of 44 CFR Chapter 1, Section 65.12, of the National Flood Insurance Regulations, a community may permit encroachments within the adopted regulatory floodway that would result in an increase in base flood elevations, provided that the community first applies for a conditional FIRM and floodway revision through FEMA. While the above regulations do not provide any allowance for any rise due to obstructions in the floodway, no matter how small, the floodway effects of the proposed bridge are minimal and have been accounted for in the project design. Furthermore, the estimated water surface elevations under proposed conditions, upstream of the bridge are lower than the FEMA effective model. 15 Floodplain Development Report TCI lane Ranch VIII. REFERENCES 1. FEMA Flood Insurance Study, Garfield County Colorado, Flood Insurance Study 080205V001A, revised August 2, 2006. 2. HEC -2 backup data for Roaring Fork, provided by FEMA research library, various dates in 1983 and 1984. 3. FEMA Floodway Map, Community Panel Number 080205 1880, revised January 3, 1986 (current map) 4. Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution, effective January 1, 2009, 5. CDOT Drainage Design Manual, Chapter 10, revised 9-2-09. 16 Floodplain Development Report TO Lane Ranch rTIUAL1n► VICINITY MAP, LEGAL DESCRIPTION, AND PUD APPROVAL Floodplain Development Report TO Lane Ranch OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION -TCI LANE RANCH A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN LOTS 8, 9 AND 10 OF SECTION 31 AND IN LOTS 5 AND 13 OF SECTION 32, ALL IN, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO, LYING SOUTHERLY OF AND ADJACENT TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OLD STATE HIGHWAY NO. 82 AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE WHENCE A STONE FOUND IN PLACE FOR THE WITNESS CORNER TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 31 BEARS N26°00'43"E 1433.52 FEET; THENCE 579'58'52"E 2125.37 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1013 AT PAGE 423 OF THE RECORDS OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL ON THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES: SO4°55'00"W 461.90 FEET; THENCE S01°00'00"E 861.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE ROARING FORK TRANSIT AUTHORITY RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE 169.57 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RAILROAD RIGHT- OF -WAY LINE ON THE ARC OF A 1565.69 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S54032'43"W 169.49 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT 13; THENCE N89°54'14"W 651.37 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT 13 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE 500°10'37"E 354.80 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID LOT 10 TO A POINT IN THE CENTER OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER; THENCE ALONG THE CENTER OF SAID ROARING FORK RIVER ON THE FOLLOWING SEVEN (7) COURSES: S86053'04"W 294.14 FEET; THENCE 585`32'23"W 117.60 FEET; THENCE S78°29'25"W 123.94 FEET; THENCE S89°17'47"W 118.54 FEET; THENCE S67°42'27"W 386.40 FEET; THENCE S62048'18"W 124.67 FEET; THENCE S57°58'42"W 235.29 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF BLUE CREEK RANCH RECORDED AS RECEPTION NO. 623535 IN THE RECORDS OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID BLUE CREEK RANCH THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: N 00°10'37"W 736.64 FEET; THENCE N89°54'14"W 231.46 FEET; THENCE N00002'13"W 1677.90 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN BOOK 333 AT PAGE 511 OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE S79052'12"E 278.00 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 333 AT PAGE 511 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE N00°02'13"W 156.69 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 100.449 ACRES AS SURVEYED. mill Viii Reception#: 778758 12/09/7.009 10:25:06 Pr1 Jean Ptberioo 1 of 22 Rea Fee .$0.00 Doe Fee:0.00 6PRFIELD COUNTY CO STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss County of Garfield ) At a regular meeting of the Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County, Colorado, held in the Commissioners' Meeting Room, Garfield County Plaza Building, in Glenwood Springs on Monday, December 7, 2009, there were present: John Martin Commissioner Chairman Mike Samson , Commissioner Tresi Houpt , Commissioner Deborah Quinn Asst. County Attorney Jean Alberico Clerk of the Board Ed Green (absent) County Manager when the following proceedings, among others were had and done, to -wit: RESOLUTION NO. 2009-81 A RESOLUTION CONCERNED WITH APPROVING THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND PRELIMINARY PLANT FOR THE TCI LANE RANCH PUD .AND RETRACTING AND REPLACING RESOLUTION 2009-71 (IN ITS ENTIRETY) IN ORDER TO CORRECT SCRIVENERS ERRORS IN THE PUD GUIDE FOR THE TCI LANE RANCH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Parcel ID: 2391-311-00-033 Recitals A. The Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, received a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Application and Preliminary Plan Application from TCI Lane Ranch, LLC to rezone a 100.54 -acre property from Agriculture I Residential / Rural Density (ARRD) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) and then subdivide the property into 89 single-family and duplex residential lots as illustrated on the PUD Site Plan, PUD Guide, and Preliminary Plan attached as Exhibits A, B and C to this resolution respectively; B. The subject property is generally located approximately V2 miles east of Catherine Store in Sections 31 & 32, Township 7 South, Range 87 West, approximately 3 miles east of Carbondale on State Highway 82 on the Roaring Fork River in Garfield County and is legally described as shown on the accompanying Preliminary Plan attached as Exhibit C; 1v mill WA Pr, *1 Mq 11111 Rece77875R8M121ptionN0250& Jean Rlber(oo 2 of 22 Roo Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GRRF IEID COUNTY CO C. The subject property is located in Study Area I of the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan of 2000 and is designated as Residential -High Density on the Proposed Land Use Districts Map; D. The Planning Commission opened and continued a public hearing on February 25, 2009 on the proposed FUD and Preliminary Plan Applications and continued the public hearing until April 22, 2009 and then continued the public hearing until May 27, 2009 requiring the Applicant to re -notice for that hearing date; B. On May 27, 2009, the Garfield County Planning Commission opened a public hearing upon the question of whether the PUD and Preliminary Plan Applications should be granted, granted with conditions, or denied at which hearing the public and interested persons were given the opportunity to express their opinions regarding the issuance of said Applications; F. The Garfield County Planning Commission closed the public hearing on the May 27, 2009 and recommended "Approval with Conditions" for the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Application and Preliminary Plan Application to the Board of County Commissioners by a vote of 4 to 0; G. On September 8, 2009, the Board of County Commissioners (the Board) opened a public hearing upon the question of whether the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Application and Preliminary Plan Application should be granted, granted with conditions, or denied at which hearing the public and interested persons were given the opportunity to express their opinions regarding the issuance of said Applications; H. The Board of County Commissioners closed the public hearing on the September 8, 2009 to make a final decision; 1. The Board, on the basis of substantial competent evidence produced at the aforementioned hearing, has made the following determination of facts: 1. Proof of proper public notice was provided as required for the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The public hearing before the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners was extensive and complete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that all interested parties were heard at those hearings. The Planned Unit Development (PUD) Application and Preliminary Plan Application have met the requirements set forth in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution of 1978, as amended and the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations of 1984, as amended. 4. For the above stated and other reasons, the proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) Application and Preliminary Plan Application have been 2 11i6`i°i���ft"��'9� �1 1 `lr � 1iJg1%,tJ6%Qi1J milli fteceptaon#: 778758 '2/09/2009 '0:25:06 RM Jean Rlber lco 3 0f 22 Rec Fee:$0.00 Doo Fee:0.00 GRRFIEID COUNTY CO determined to be in the best interest of the health, safety, morals, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County. J. The purpose of this resolution is to retract and replace Resolution 2009-71 (in its entirety) with this resolution in order to correct scrivener's errors in the PUD Guide which was attached to Resolution 2009-71 as Exhibit B. This resolution contains all of the original conditions and exhibits without change except the changes in Exhibit B (the revised PUD guide). RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, that: A. The forgoing Recitals are incorporated by this reference as part of the Resolution. B. The Planned Unit Development (PUD) Application and Preliminary Plan Application from TCS Lane Ranch, LLC to rezone the subject property from Agriculture / Residential / Rural Density (ARRD) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) and then subdivide the property into 89 single-family and duplex residential lots as illustrated on the PUD Site Plan and PUD Guide attached as Exhibits A and B are hereby approved subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1. REPRESENTATIONS: That all representations made by the Applicant in the application, and at the public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners and Planning Commission, shall be conditions of approval, unless specifically altered by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. WILDLIFE: The Covenants shall contains the following provisions: a. Fencing should be held at a minimum and any necessary fencing should be wildlife friendly. For wire fencing, 42 inches for a maximum height, 4 wires at most with a 12" kick space between the top two strands. Rail fencing should be 48 inches or less with at least 18" between two of the rails. b. The riparian areas along both the Roaring Fork River and Blue Creek are extremely important to wildlife. Elk usage of the property has increased considerably during the winter months. Deer and elk conflicts are to be expected within the development and plantings of native vegetation are encouraged to help reduce some of those conflicts. Eliminating the plantings of any berry, fruit, or nut producing plants or shrubs will help discourage elk, deer, bears and other wildlife from feeding upon the landscaping. mill milli Reception#: 778758 12109, 2009 10:25:06 RM Jean Rlberloo 4 of 22 Rec Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee;0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY GO Homeowners need to be aware that the Division of Wildlife is not liable for any damage to landscaping by deer, elk, or bear. ii. Bear/human conflicts have increased within the Roaring Fork Valley and in the vicinity of Blue Creek Ranch and Catherine Store. This has the potential to be a reoccurring problem. It is important that certain measures be taken to minimize these possible conflicts: a. Homeowners have and use an approved bear -proof container for storing all trash/garbage; b. Pets should be fed indoors, and pet food or food containers should not be left outside; C. BBQs should also be securely housed in the garage or cleaned with a bleach solution when not in use due to the fact that leftover food and grease are an overwhelming bear attractant; d. Round door knobs on the outside of doors rather than lever - type can limit bear access into houses. iii. The proposed pedestrian bridge over the Roaring Fork River should be gated to prohibit access to the RF 1 A that during the winter closure period. iv. Due to the critical nature of wetland areas for wildlife, it is recommended that any proposed trails or paths be minimized and the public access into these areas should be limited in numbers. Access should be closed completely from December i through March 15 in order to limit the disturbance on big game and wintering bald eagles utilizing the riparian corridor. 3. VEGETATION/ WETLANDS a. As part of the public improvements to be constructed by the Applicant and secured in the Improvements Agreement as part of the Final Plat Application, the Applicant shall construct a fence to a design specification consistent with the BLM's needs regarding preventing disturbance of the Ute's Ladies Tresses on the BLM parcel in the southeast portion of the development. 4. AFFORDABLE HOUSING a. The Applicant shall be required to provide nine (9) deed -restricted single- family affordable housing units on Lots 1, 11, 12, 18, 25, 26, 28, 29, and 39. These units shall be governed / administered by the Garfield County Housing Authority. The Final Plat shall note these lots as AH Units on the Plat. RRecept non#: 778758 MT2009 t0:2G:06 PM Jean Plber ico G of 22 Rec Fee: 50.00 Doc Fee:0.00 CA RFIELD COUNTY CO b. The Applicant shall meet with the Garfield County Housing Authority prior to Final Plat to ensure that the required deed restriction meets the requirements of the Garfield County Housing Authority. a "One (1) affordable housing unit is required to be fully constructed and accepted by the Garfield County Housing Authority and the Garfield County Building & Planning Department (as evidenced by the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy) for every ten (10) "free market" lots developed within the subdivision." d. The Applicant proposes to provide a Letter of Credit to be held in escrow to the benefit of the County in the amount that it would cost for the County to cause the construction of the affordable housing unit. This security would stay in place until all units are built. e. Applicant shalt submit an Affordable Housing Plan and Agreement pursuant to Article VIII of the ULUR with the Final Plat Submittal. Security for completion of these units will be addresed in this document. Additionally, the Applicant shall submit the deed restriction and plan for the additional non -required employee units with the Final Plat. OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO CR 100 / STATE HIGHWAY 82 INTERSECTION The Applicant shall construct the improvements to the intersection of CR 100 and State Highway 82 as approved by CDOT which includes a new right tum lane from northbound CR 100 to the up valley direction of State Highway 82. Additionally, the applicant will construct a raised median between the northbound and southbound directions on CR 100 (within. the SI -182 ROW) adding additional safety to the turning movements. These improvements are to be paid for exclusively by the developer within the context of the improvements Agreement. (This final design approved by CDOT shall be included in the Final Plat Application.) 6. 100 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN The Applicant shall obtain an Administrative Floodplain Permit from the Building and Planning Department prior to the submittal of the Final Plat. The Final Plat shall show the first finished floor elevation (FFFE) on each building envelope on the Final Plat that are located within the 100 -year flood fringe. Bill 61 a ��g �°;�i�;il�lr�� 1 WA, MIN Milk 11111 Reception#: 778758 1210972009 i0: 25:06 RM Jean Rlber ico S of 22 Reo Fee: 80.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO 7. ZONING DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS This approval of the PUD shall allow the following variances from the dimensional standards in the ARRD Zone District and provisions in the Subdivision Regulations of 1984: A. Reduction in minimum lot size per the site plan; B. Allow duplex as a use -by -right instead of a conditional use; C. List pipelines under conditional use permit subject to pipeline regulations rather than list under use -by -right; D. Reduction in the ROW width on the main entrance roads (Haystack Road and Riverstone Drive) from 60 feet to 50 feet; E. Allowing "community building" as accessory use to the residential development; and F. Allowing Dragonfly Spur to exceed the 600 linear feet maximum for cul- de-sac by 200 feet. 8. DRAINAGE The Final Plat Application shall address the following drainage questions raised by the County Project Engineer: A. Watershed. The Historic Basin has been divided into six (6) existing sub - basins based on contour mapping, survey information and field investigations. This will generate runoff in addition to the volume calculated within the development on a pre -post calculation methodology using the rational method derived from the SWMM program of intensity, duration and frequency. B. Treatment of Stormwater Runoff. Water quality treatment for storm water is discussed within the Preliminary Plan. In order to protect the water quality in Blue Creek and the Roaring Fork River, it the county's expectation that all runoff from roadways, parking areas, roofs, and similarly developed areas will be treated using best management practices of retention basins and sedimentation swales as per the submitted improvement plans. C. Depiction of Offsite Water Pipeline to Development — These plans will be prepared by the Applicant's engineer and reviewed by the Mid Valley Metro District's engineer. The main issue to the County is proof that CDOT will allow the utilities in the Highway 82 ROW and whether there is adequate room in the ROW for both the water and sewer line. D. Depiction of Offsite Sewer: Same comment as for the offsite water lines. ®III Ri°IJxUVINJA W10 WNW7AU11111 III Reception#: 778758 IVO9f2009 10:25:06 RM Jean ALbe,ico V of 22 Ree Fee:$0.00 Doe Fee:O 00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO 4. GEOLOGY The Final Plat and Covenants shall contain the following plat note to address potential sinkholes: "If conditions are indicative of sinkhole related problems are encountered during site specific soil and foundation studies for the houses and other movement sensitive facilities, an alternative building site should be proposed or the feasibility of mitigation evaluated ... Prospective homeowners should be advised of the sinkhole potential, since early detection of building distress and timely remedial actions are important in reducing the cost of building repair and should an undetected subsurface void start to develop into a sinkhole after construction. " 10. IMPACT FEES A. The development is subject to development impact fees adopted by the Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District. The developer will be required to enter into an agreement with the District for the payment of development impact fees. Execution of this agreement and payment of the fees are due prior to the recording of the Final Plat. Fees are based upon the impact fees adopted by the District at the time the agreement s executed. The current fee for residential development is $704.00 per unit. B. The Applicant shall be required to provide a school land dedication or fee in lieu of dedication to the RE -I School District at the time of Final Plat pursuant to the requirements in the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended. This fee is collected at the time of Final Plat. 11. NOXIOUS WEEDS The Applicant shall include a provision of weed management in the Improvements Agreement to guarantee that weed management will occur in the future on undeveloped lots and for the open space areas. The County Vegetation Manager recommends an amount of $6,000 per year for four (4) years (524,000). 12. REVEGETATION SECURITY The County Vegetation Manager requires a revegetation amount of $2,500 per disturbed acre for the upland areas, which would total $60,000 for the 24 acres disturbed by the development. This fee shall be submitted to the County with the Final Plat Application and addressed within the Improvements Agreement. ®1116'1'° Y111M, *11 milli Reception#: 778758 12109/2009 10.26:06 NM Jean Alberico 8 of 22 Rec Fee:60.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO 13. CONSTRUCTED WETLAND SECURITY This area is 0.268 acres in total. The County Vegetation Manager requires that the applicant provide Garfield County with a cost estimate for this work. When this information is provided, Staff will recommended a security amount for the wetlands work. This estimate shall be submitted to the County with the Final Plat Application. 14. COVENANTS Wetlands are mentioned in the covenants (3.36.4). The County Vegetation Manager requires that additional language be added that would disallow landowners from adding fill material into designated wetlands within their lots. The Applicant shall address the issue of mosquito management in the neighborhood constructed wetlands area within the covenants. The Applicant shall provide protective covenants as part of the Final Plat application. Dated this 7 � day ofA.D. 2004. CorilffiH l`I COMMISSIONERS, Upon motion duly made the following vote: John Martin Aye Mike Samson Aye Tresi Hoot . Aye STATE OF COLORADO ) }ss County of Garfield ) OF FY, by 1116'i°��l��I��'�t'�'6�4�I �l'L t�Mr.I `T&I "i 11111 Ile—tion#: 77875& 12/0912009 70:20:06 AN dean Alberioo 9 of 22 Reo Foe:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO 1, County Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the Board of County. Commissioners in and for the County and State aforesaid do hereby certify that the annexed and foregoing Resolution is truly copied from the Records of the Proceeding of the Board of County Commissioners for said Garfield County, now in my office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County, at Glenwood Springs, this day of A.D. 2009 County Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners M Reception#: 775758 12/09/2009 10:25:06 AM Jean Plberico 12 of 22 Rec Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GPRFI ELD COUNTY CO TCI Lane Ranch PUD Guide Revised September 2009 TCI Lane Ranch Planned Unit Development Proposed Zone District Designations PURPOSE The purpose of this Development Guide is to define the zone districts within the TCI Lane Ranch PUD. The zone districts contained herein shall serve as the governing land use regulations within the PUD. The Guide replaces the current applicable zoning provisions of Garfield County with project specific regulations that are more appropriate to the goals and objectives of the TC€ Lane Ranch PUD. The zone districts contained in this PUD Guide establish a comprehensive framework for the development of TO Lane Ranch, including residential, open space, trails and access, and special utility uses. ENFORCEMENT The provisions of this Guide are enforceable by the authority and powers of Garfield County as defined by law. EXISTING ZONING: A/R/RD -- AGRICULTURAL/RESIDENTIAL/RURAL DENSITY: A. Uses by Right: Agricultural including farms, garden, greenhouse, nursery, orchard, ranch, small animal farm for production of poultry, fish, fur -bearing or other small animals and customary accessory uses including buildings for shelter or enclosure of persons, animals or property employed in any of the above uses, retail establishment for sale of goods Guiding and outfitting, and park; Single-family dwelling and customary accessory uses. (A. 86-09) Accessory dwelling unit approved as a part of a public hearing or meeting on a subdivision or subdivision exemption or guesthouse special use approved after 7/95 and meeting the standards in Section 5.03.02. & Uses, conditional: Aircraft landing strip, church, community buildings, day nursery and school; group home for the elderly. (A. 97-60) Pipeline (Subject to review and approval per procedure and requirements of Section 9.07) (Added 2005-53) 1111 F"I10Y1'liUCIV,10 NT111XVNI"Mm"i 11111 Receptionp: 778758 12109/2009 10:25:06 PM Jean Rlberioo 13 of 22 Ree Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO Boarding or rooming houses, studio for conduct of arts and crafts, home occupation, water impoundments. (A. 86-09;87-108) C. Uses, special: Airport utility, feedlot as principal use of the lot, crematorium, agriculture related business, resorts, kennel, riding stable, and veterinary clinic, shooting range facility(A.98-108); Two-family dwelling, camper park, ski lift and trails; broadcasting studio, communication facility, corrections facility, storage, storage of heavy equipment, golf course driving range, golf practice range and accessory facilities, commercial recreation facility/park;(A. 97-60; 97-112) Mass Transit Facility (added 2002-12) Public gatherings; storage of oil and gas drilling equipment; Site for extraction, processing, storage or material handling of natural resources; utility lines, utility substations; recreational support facilities and guest house. (A. 79-132; 80-64; 80-180; 60-313, 81-145; 81-263; 84-78; 86-9; 86-84; 86-106; 87-73; 99-025) Accessory dwelling unit meeting the standards in Section 5.03.02 for any lot not created after a public hearing or meeting after 7/95 Kennel Group Residential Facility for Children & Youth (Add 2004-62) D. Minimum Lot Area: Two (2) acres; except as otherwise approved in a Cluster Option E. Maximum Lot Coverage: Fifteen percent (15%) F. Minimum Setback: 1. Front yard: a. Arterial streets: L Seventy-five (75) feet from street centerline or fifty (50) feet from front lot line, whichever is greater b. Local streets: L Fifty (50) feet from street centerline or twenty-five (25) feet from front lot line, whichever is greater 2. Rear yard: Twenty-five (25) feet from rear lot line 3. Side yard: Ten (10) feet from side lot line, or one-half (1/2) the height of the principal building, whichever is greater G. Maximum Height of Buildings: Twenty-five (25) feet H. Additional Requirements: All uses shall be subject to the provisions under Section 5 (Supplementary Regulations). TCf Lane Ranch — Preliminary Plan / PUD September 2009 1111 Kill, Reception#: 778758 i2f091 OD9 10:25:06 AM Jean Fiber loo 14 of 22 Rea 0ee:$0.00 Doc Fee 0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO TCI Lane Ranch PUD LAND USE TotalLand Area............................................................................................................100.45 acres +/ Total Developed Area (Zones) 8 Single Family Residential; Duplex Residential; Community Utility ...........................31.46 acres Total Open Space Area (Zones) Single Family Affordable Community Center; Common Open Space; Conservation Easement ........................68.99 acres +J - TotalNumber of Residential Lots......................................................................................................89 3800sf TotalNumber of Dwelling Units........................................................................................................89 Single Family Total Area of Proposed Non -Residential Floor Space (existing buildings) 17 Community Center (1,450 sf); Ranch Cabin (650 sf); Log Shed (250 sf) ............................... 2,350 sf Total Number of Proposed Off -Street Parking Spaces (1 space per BR, min.).......................200-506 Total Proposed Density.................................................................................1.13 acres/dwelling unit Unit Type./_Max..Sq..Et.... Max. Sq.,F.t.... _Quantity . Half -Duplex 1900 sf 10 Half -Duplex Affordable 1900 sf 8 Single Family 2600 sf 10 Single Family Affordable 2600 sf 6 Single Family 3800sf 38 Single Family 5500 sf 17 TOTALUNITS 89 Zone District Single Family Residential Gross Acres +/- 26.372 Duplex Residential 4.109 Community Utility 0.979 Community Center 3.414 Private Common Open Space 33.178 Conservation Easement 32.397 TOTAL ACRES 100.45+/- TCl Lane Ranch — Preliminary Plan / PUD September 2009 Reception#: 778758 12!0912009 10:25:06 RM Jean Plba,ioo 15 of 22 Rec Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO DEFINITIONS A. Maximum Allowable Floor Area: The total net square footage permitted to be built on a Lot. The net square footage calculation shall include: heated living space, mechanical, stairways, and other traditionally non -habitable space, as measured from the exterior walls. Garages or accessory building(s), heated or non -heated, attached or detached, up to a combined total of 650 square feet shall be exempt from the maximum allowable floor area. calculation. Any floor area of these elements in excess of the exempt 650 square feet shall be included in the maximum allowable floor area calculation. Patios, decks, balconies, porches and exterior stairways shall not count towards the maximum allowable floor area unless the total square footage of these features is greater than 20% of the net square footage, in which case the excess of the 20% shall be counted towards the maximum allowable floor area. Landscaped terraces, trellises, and pergolas shall not be counted towards the maximum allowable floor area. TCI Lane Ranch PUD ZONE DISTRICTS A. Single Family Residential Zone District (Lots 1, 4-10, 13, 14,17-24, 27, 30, 31, 34-36; 39-82, 85, 88, 89) 1. Uses by Right:- Detached, single-family dwelling and.customary accessory uses 2. Development Standards a. Setbacks: All structures shall be located within building envelopes as identified on the Final Plat 1) Building foundations shall be fully contained with the platted building envelope 2) Roof overhangs shall be permitted to extend a maximum of three (3) feet beyond the platted building envelope 3) Up to 350 square feet of covered porch may extend ten (10') beyond the platted building envelope when said porch fronts the street from which the lot is accessed b. Maximum Height of Structures: Twenty-five (25) feet c. Minimum Lot Area: As defined on Final Plat d. Maximum Allowable Floor Area: 1)Lots 1, 4, 8, 13, 18, 19, 36, 39, 53, 67, 68, 72, 74, 81, 82, 89: 2600 Square Feet 2)Lots 6, 7, 9, 10, 14, 17, 20, 22, 23, 24, 27, 30, 31, 34, 35, 40, 41, 44, 45, 48, 49, 50, 52, 54, 56, 57, 60, 63, 69, 70, 71, 73, 75, 78, 79, 80, 85, 88: 3800 Square Feet 3) Lots 5, 21, 42, 43, 46, 47, 51, 55, 58, 59, 61, 62, 64, 65, 66, 76, 77: 5500 Square Feet e. Off -Street Parking: One (1) space per bedroom, minimum two (2) spaces required per lot. Garage, carport and driveway parking shall count toward off-street parking requirement TCi Lane Ranch - Preliminary Plan / PUD 4 September 2009 IIIRAW ISG"A11 G �id�P'�l P�m�l X1111 Reoept ioh#: 778758 127D9/2009 10:25:06 RN Jean 9lberico 16 of 22 Rea Fee:$0.00 Doo Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO B. Duplex Residential Zone District (Lots 2, 3, 11, 12, 15, 16, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 33, 37, 38, 83, 84, 86, 87), 1. Uses by Right: Attached, single family dwelling and customary accessory uses 2. Development Standards a. Setbacks: All structures shall be located within building envelopes as identified on the Final Plat 1) Building foundations shall be fully contained with the platted building envelope 2) Roof overhangs shall be permitted to extend a maximum of three (3) feet beyond the platted building envelope 3) Up to 350 square feet of covered porch may extend ten (10') beyond the platted building envelope when said porch fronts the street from which the lot is accessed b. Maximum Height of Structures: Twenty-five (25) feet c. Minimum Lot Area: As defined on Final Plat d. Maximum Allowable Floor Area: 1900 square feet e. Off -Street Parking: One (1) space per bedroom, minimum two (2) spaces required per lot. Garage, carport and driveway parking shall count toward off-street parking requirement C. Community Utility Zone (Tract A— 0.939 Acres +/-, Tract G — 0.021 Acres +/-, Tract H — 0.019 Acres +/-) 1. Uses by Right a. The construction, operation, maintenance, repair and replacement of community utilities and related facilities and structures b. To provide centralized utility facilities to benefit members of the TCI Lane Ranch Homeowners Association and other parties to whom the Association may decide to provide such service or conduct business with c. Installation and maintenance of photovoltaic panels, arrays, or other solar power generating systems or equipment d. Wastewater liftstation(s) e. Landscaping and irrigation f. Vegetation management necessary to facilitate construction and maintenance of community utilities g. Fencing 2. Development Standards a. Minimum Lot Area: 0.15 Acres b. Minimum Setbacks: 1) From Easements: Five (5) feet 2) From Lot Lines: Five (5) feet, except as noted below 3) From Residential Lots: Fifteen (15) feet c. Maximum Height of Structures: Twenty-five (25) feet d. Per Garfield County Supplementary Regulations 5.03, Conditional and Special Uses, 5.03.17 Solar Power Generating Systems, all proposed solar structures shall demonstrate the following : TCl Lane Ranch — Preliminary Plan / PUD September 2009 ll! 6Yf6��fjlliF{�fIPlk' �jGll°fir°flCl�"1 I ��� Reception#; 778758 1210972009 10:25:06 Am Jean Rlberi co 17 of 22 Roo Fee: $0.00 Doo Feo:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO 1) No impact to wildlife and domestic animals through the creation of hazardous attractions, alteration of existing native vegetation, blockade of migration routes, use patterns or other disruptions 2) Separated by sufficient distances, such use from abutting property which might otherwise be damaged by operations of the proposed use(s) 3) Comply with the volume of sound standards set forth in the Colorado Revised Statutes 4) The facility shall be operated that the ground vibration inherently and recurrently generated is not perceptible, without instruments, at any point of any boundary line of the property on which the use is located S) The proposed facility will be operated so that it does not emit heat, glare, radiation or fumes which substantially interfere with the existing use of adjoining property or which constitutes a public nuisance or hazard 6) Any repair and maintenance activity requiring the use of equipment that will generate noise, odors or glare beyond the property boundaries will be conducted within a building or outdoors during the hours of 8 a.m. to 6 P.M. 7) Any lighting of the facility shall be pointed downward and inward to the property center and shaded to Prevent dima reflection on adjacent property D. Conservation Easement (Tract 3-32.397 Acres +/-) 1, Uses by Right a. Private trails for the benefit of the Association, their assigns and guests b. Public trails, as signed for said access, being paved or unpaved c. Bridges for pedestrian and bicycle use d. Interpretive signing, displays and installations e. Actions intended to benefitwildlife and/or native species, such as habitat restoration, vegetation management and seasonal closures f. Agriculture, the keeping of livestock and accessory uses and structures related to said uses g. Drainage improvements h. Fencing 2. Development Standards a. Paved trails shall not exceed ten feet (10') in width b. Paths constructed with a aggregate surface, such as crusherfines, shall be a maximum of six feet (6') wide c. Natural surfaced trails shall be a maximum of two feet (2',) wide d. Fencing shall be "wildlife friendly', according to standards developed by the Colorado Division of Wildlife TCf Lane Ranch — Prefirninary Plan / PUD September 2009 mill AnioulAkfoll !illi Reception#: 778758 12!05!2009 10:25:06 Am Jean Rlber Sco is of 22 Rec Fee -$0.00 Doc Fee 0,00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO E. Private Common Open Space (Tract C — 31.514 Acres +/-, Tract D — 0.493 Acres +/-, Tract E — 0.995 Acres +/-, Tract 1— 0.176 Acres +/-) 1. Uses by Right a. Agriculture, the keeping of livestock and accessory uses and structures related to said uses b. Non -organized recreation c. Pedestrian and bicycle trails d. Public parking for the purposes of access to public fishing trails e. Bridges crossing ditches and drainage improvements f. Limited public access (restricted to designated trails/routes only) g. Community entry features/monumentation/signage h. Preservation/restoration/maintenance of existing log shed structure and ranch cabin I. Ponds and irrigation ditches j. Wetlands; maintenance and enhancements to existing wetlands and creation of new wetlands k. Landscaping and Irrigation I. Mail box facilities for the purposes of centralized mail drop-off and collection m. Picnic shelter or gazebo n. Barbecue o. Drainage improvements p. Utilities q. Fencing 2. Development Standards a. Minimum Lot Area: as depicted on Final Plat b. Minimum Setbacks: Ten (10) feet from adjoining tracts, lots, and easements c. Maximum Height of Structures: Eighteen (18) feet F. Community Center Zone (Tract F — 3.414 Acres +/-) 1. Uses by Right a. Building and/or buildings, including the following uses: 1) Meeting/gatheringspace 2) Office space for use by the Association 3) Recreational/fitness equipment, workout space and locker rooms 4) Swimming pool (indoor or outdoor) S) Kitchen facilities 6) Restroom facilities b. Sports fields/open turf areas c. Facilities for other outdoor sports, such as volleyball, par course, running trail, etc. d. Facilities for tennis or other court -based sports e. Community gardens and accessory uses and structures f. Storage and maintenance of equipment and materials used during, orto maintain, recreational and community garden uses; nonresidential structures for persons and equipment engaged in said activities g. Playground/play equipment h. Landscaping and irrigation TC1 Lane Ranch — Preliminary Plan / PUD September 2009 mill Reception#: 778758 12/09/2009 10:25:06 Pi'1 Jean Alber ico 19 of 22 Rec Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee :0.00 GPRFIELD COUNTY CO i. Ponds and irrigation ditches j. Wetlands; maintenance and enhancements to existing wetlands and creation of new wetlands k. Pedestrian pathways i. Parking m. Drainage and utility improvements n. Footbridges over irrigation ditches o. Fencing 2. Development Standards a. Building Setbacks 1) From Access Easements: twenty five (25) feet 2) From Residential Lot Lines: twenty five (25) feet b. Maximum Height of Structures: Twenty-five (25) feet c. Minimum Lot Area: as depicted on Final Plat d. Maximum Allowable Floor Area: none e. Minimum Off -Street Parking: fourteen (14) spaces, including one (1) accessible space f. Additional Off -Street Parking: future community facilities, or expansion of existing facilities, if any, shall provide a minimum of one (1) space per five hundred (500) square feet additional net floor area TCI lane Ranch — Preliminary Plan /PUD September 2009 11118 ,;WAERA,i#i I ��I �elri�P®l Pail a'k fIII Receptlont{: 778758 12!09!2009 10:25:06 AM Jean .l'G% coGARFIELD COUNTY CO 20 of 22 Rec Fee: $0. DO Doc Fe:0.00 g i i �, �R '�,Y �i� s, 1 �,�e� / i ; l,�I '"• � o e F. � _ =': URI' .B' r G �� } (n):m'nce : a.ecor.00u 3 �� ° zy: $ ' '•:'�' -1�r,:a1B��.B,BE a u Bs 5a t'rJ 1 fl i �'.. 11 }. �(_ I g •.i. , j,�`\yyi��) e "fig H : i1..._,l_ .--" Pa E� � � � `'P ,1 J P� jun' Vis. 5e P co —3 c Kc a ::a 'y'T" i§ T � 6 i �,yx s%z;;2B�SBdPB t n (( s >Ygr'a? GY tck; "fit :2 H �1 /ice ``j as. $nP..JSS qc cj� V ` n5' -�'"iF " qB i'• I"2 % 6rs �, (./vc"7;- .� �ki ss,.ea �//i f"}%�a°r"; 6• w, c- o-+ .y. . vd C M d a i'Z \ i y F2° u� Gq\, : e5���`f e'�1^ iUB �� A@� gum ,aa# ,fits r. R Ps t k 'cx$= a" %°u a`�_'�� •,� 9. �a„ 1 � A S ✓ ° lip ,`c° .yx a3 21 EvP� pp r9'" ioe�` ' '•R `` z �e {c� vys C �=) , pk g9 x Ja a4 F €:'•tea�„ �� t �� ply O B § x l ,ray _ . 1. sit - Id 2: F ip£" 24P -.1i CP!tB 1 z 1 ^s a '' \ ` A«',. o., �\ • 8°$ 'ct.� 5 "gar' P 4 °§°° & 9E \ "" I / dyB .w.=i `+-eC B @ F-9 fi P4 ctlsP. \ 1 ' i i' 1et`'x=Eh i n g C7 9 F, i x y {ix r, aAzS g j u"v tE R� .gab Kul A,R`1pa°_Xa�- enu,M: o C -+ -'-n a,.s°G°. n.x e. ,.P z : c:. Po r5..qz �� eaR...P2� + �� k:?p°x.ppRtl: a ��' ° 'm� 9'� �_G '�..,°g w,T r n'. rs kiia. !.=a • 55 :nq � @. � � ��.�'Aa, �'" t>- §P. g3.� € i�§'8 t:&is p '� x' '.j co ds .m Er� x SSR'' a �1 � �' ! ay . c z -p n1 icn..°y: x°e a uS 3 •s� k Y � 7 �Z 1 JIM 5;5eai x ee$"ie S ds r�'`�` u4i'PAs�'�j;g syn e dqg rt3 RI S Be g5 Pe-'spp,�€ r�.p S3e� 2 a adG r §x $6 4 PHI c� @ 9tltsq- A'p £y ltlaYl fib& €vE Jxi A�Six�V.`� `,sFy. g 6 sect a R' s .si pp xg,. i iC q )FB E q° 2PS Fy.� 53; s r_ai5^ F° r° 114 i Pbi b PL 4 qy ."n yd.a E$e x s `'�4 a I :a, r°B € ,g C�; P•b $,a -a^ E,a;;5§e¢ I ,vg lF �' a;a' pp Pd P.a.,1 E,aA zBrm@ v'Ox a BF R{ 2 4 A ;'R°R .,aim! o s.tl. @,'S' N E i '""a g `-Ys P? Di� € a sPR'B Ba gg cs`°Bs,. x P P4 " 'a is @P 5 ° ;€ k lip : x S @ °n ai di Sfi @' Se^ 6X?. ( Pq R E as-` �.sa 46k B 9' bi RaPd^.r °.. F s gi C t oW di a{ y i X55: ypg g:�% C;J3g 5"3 p'p.�'S pggSp g �Ex RCfi €y Ae ,0401 1 , B 'z EE S b E s Y{ ° e E`Will, Brf n ,v a r� + a 74 Fi a ,aiP.9� lip �� q �B R o " R4, �. tla ei•�r'"i`�`� �`aSp r & ; s..ae u5 �; l� °s'.4, ' 't'vSAe Br -§5 Xnj gttfi 3 B Bt " ; �' ' B x9:4 aBy° �ELsBa s aIE z I R ^fid $3 S a. g 7a c stl sRs a �Ea (� Igo, Pas 3 0,. a{ °°r, -at ;° ¢¢ s Will e�da¢pe-a y ` B`n i e x' gp` 5i; i:4°rx qq B 1° $e '!Y,' •k• gE" a L_.�'ic y t E g6 gg x p t e.y H 6 % 4s5"gb" 2ePd-?k'fi S°n t� !" "`fid q g€ A DRi 3, Bp sfi r [ �'. n E 3•s €° �a a. e 9 R X 3�3 tl3 " 1 £ 5 egfj pb (e 6 2�*+,� n, By. e� { S 5 ag `r •eye $5"'$ R.` f`'3� PtBa"nqi V'rBXa :n i s€s!B $''3g aPPx�Pc PP�Wr.a" g o. QLai o e y T i'j z t' �rdgL,. S3°fiC ,�xFy( a.� �P� •v'ago gez3g. B 2 ;k3, -:+''+i ' aS_° Rij gEra i"� rtf`-Vie;°'e:E%°t'byaP jB °B4itlyysa 3°°p "Bd I"cj� a ,4 e 1 ' 8 € €.a'F'd °1 a `3B P r S s" rax a.. Fn ee '£ F4i� t F" ha c B °fig"€ ag v" e4 g� 6yP 3Ba s`Bx a� B eta a'3 PF x�e rBr°� "° B 5B _'3,B.,S z �,% a P a X. ,siPes $'B 'Ii r s s` Ba';e g d e B ,Sa#RSAa 3 =� &€Rs &�r,'. PB 9xv'.[x " :a3 p �4 B 3B @. ,5 E z ti,,: ;x 63flNK s. J Sir P i';£ C cg k XXn Via, f.� , x sP F' A da •=2 i k�F ;F'vtrs,oR3Y 3P EfiP t Fis x € §tl r£bt r InM o -a x Saf'_ej.5 � ; 5. � fi2 , �9 g Y P P 4i S3 � �k'6•�tb°� ° a -P' � a BP P R5�? nF dtl 4 'y'♦ sx ��_ ¢° � ¢.-�� � ` ,•,.s'x ya, gt , e�€X s �9;,»�Px? u e5 €; `_ ,Bq`. pBeg�i�.q � t "� e'§� �.€ £vv=. �,'' v"rmm •tii'CE "� k i'c�'E;''de }~B?aa,B;, e y dP:BS?£ €z5 %°.aF`p ?t4°tBP n °sRi Iq° u2 •d' a 2 'E J Pn""ais P tl' xt I Y Sq�'BP" B atlSC . e °!si JPtYe•:s Ba:,,^i 6-. # 3 e1 3p� b aB .'rs yy55 asaa, a"s R4 :�' ;' s�p5. fi w,s c;B iig, : ;1 Bt $3 £ " 4 iB Mj%§'sa s ''e -d §3 9§ V4Pa S."utBt sw: a S ,tl s��'l z � :Nh;, r 3„tt�r , 9 f $ €c 3Q E Bi° y= 3 b £ bi? y 5gi fiij" S: EggygSMP vp'o ';� pf x Bx'-Pf? yy 4 .P ' u mill a°e6E��Idle�!�1:'�`a�i�t%�Poe«44i(� M11i ml8! Recepiion'tl: 778758 •a ��*�'=M�^�w^^K^-*Waa 12/09/2009 10:26:06 PM Jean Alberioo 21 of 22 Rec Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO r✓ ��E3 (f 3sgyg \� (/C�� �dd! t$ ��t ill. //'J R},J.-;j. i�o a wa JIM Y �. /1 �p 9 • 3 5 `gg j ('J �•5 �S. �i �9� : �%-' � �'"I�s aY.'\�\CY �, m'`'Fw"� '/e�$��� p _�, '', —'� ei•_c +� �`y'a i �`� C g6 � °' A � 1'", � \ j � e / � �� ��,'.,.t s'ES, 5' � 6 rrd y�eta � �, \. ' ,r _�Q. ', `, as,, • -;' _s �.''q� Y ��`�`� „€r " e .'§h, - a4 S..,n 'f/^ �4 � "4, moi•'✓Fi\-• �n "C 1•�^. 6yY .�. -m,., �{, M F 6� ¢f} m .,1"'t��" , s -� "-�i��i _ C lJ'V .\� t•,,, �� �£p Fgc'�5�����aP�d�1��a �(`��4 '`���� � "������ �"�\-'� f �� na ✓.fit yt` 1 t, ,�{ : t6 a_ a sRe y� 2 6� �i�l 'q Ji;s" a i I . , ,� , �r ! S.{ m� fei tt y_O\ IN o ytqq 21 k5da� C����m�` hC ,J ' � e�./.�• .«. Y, x�km �'� \ � 0 a C rTI 1 e .F eF F a€9i SAF S�i o m m p t \ 8 � �p3 � RecepiionN: 778758 i2l09f 2009 10:25:06 AM Jean Ajberico 22 of 22 Rec Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO TCI LANE RANCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION FEMA FLOOD MAPS FEMA Garfield County Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel 080205 1880 (in 1929 Datum) FEMA Firmette from Map Panel 080205 1880 (in 88 Datum) FEMA Floodway Map, Community Panel Number 080205 1880, revised January 3, 1986 Floodplain Development Report TO Lane Ranch L.. f �4 nP01[RAAW 61 ] EA WTT m =7--7 7- / 6210 ZONE E . ONEC ! 1 �yr ZONE X V. E1= Ilk 20NF8 ° ;�1ZNE I WA6vF AL b` ao.W.va lO W6 n 6 ^y' n aura 20NE8 6WL a ,2 F C ocrn;i[vsiva m pAavlvO 8 ZONE Wte I baa I 6tN LONER Mia L]6 v 6]N DO, ' 23 ZONE o a / ZONEA ZONCC A, d°r 24 fC/ °°r^•°°Lnnr 31 1 32 L..xaFx,W..nx I C I e o I 1 "' z cAnr zmu[mxus.mw .•... � v / �� uxox¢oananan xor nauv o � c� �" � ZONEC EC EB .ae*aluo 29 A �'Yi;a f �4 nP01[RAAW 61 ] EA WTT f I 1 6210 ZONE E . ONEC _ l ,..20N_} / 1 �yr ZONE X V. EC EB .ae*aluo 29 A �'Yi;a f �4 nP01[RAAW 61 ] EA WTT f I 1 6210 ZONE E . ONEC _ l ,..20N_} / 1 �yr 69il CNE. 4eMq ZONES E1= - 20NF8 ;�1ZNE I WA6vF AL b` ao.W.va lO W6 n 6 ^y' n aura 20NE8 6WL a ,2 F C ocrn;i[vsiva m pAavlvO 8 ZONE Wte I baa I 6tN LONER Mia L]6 v 6]N DO, ' a ZONE o a / ZONEA ZONCC A, ZONE B 35 36 °°r^•°°Lnnr 31 1 32 L..xaFx,W..nx I C I e o I 1 "' z cAnr zmu[mxus.mw .•... � v / �� uxox¢oananan xor nauv o � c� �" � ZONEC Iv.ro�l�la�i..ve awl 2 .— 6 ` �' 5 4,1 � �u�eIN wNaw �^ wrn uwL✓.Jm it me n 1 I NOTES I G USER 11 12 yonnuven�en / / ; mvmuus000uvowr wrAl.w»oxs. KEY TOMAP E1= n] 21 4 EXPLANATION OF LONE DESIGNATIONS I C an(� Iv.ro�l�la�i..ve awl �u�eIN wNaw �^ wrn uwL✓.Jm it me n 1 I NOTES I G USER I�I yonnuven�en / / ; mvmuus000uvowr wrAl.w»oxs. 33 Pa<d11 ® ZONE B RANAXAI FLUOR INSYNANCE MORA mvry ZONEA 1 FIRM �j FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP I �A a I 4 UARFIELD COUNTY. i P�COLORADO I NNINCORPORATED AREAS) 'i PANE L 18880 F 1980 Uo I! I. i!i 9y CBMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER {� . 8602051880 8 - ° MAP REVISED: JANUARY 1. 1111 Fnknl En:egry Nwgvxnl AB<nry 1 0 i i e 23 24 ! 19 r -- 1 I 26 25 30 II �' I � 0 n� s 20. 29 33 P nsu°v HEY TO MAP nx.oynv rvxxue ._......; rtw°vnv �� 35 z� 31 sw....r a .. .... M«w 21 ®XAiIUXFI FLUOU IXSUXAXEF PQUBAAX r`I NOi ES TO DEER FLOODWAY 21 - uen.vr. •.. e x'm.^` FLOOD BOUNDARY AND FLOODWAY MAP " ! •� ( siMem _ � GARFIELD COUNTY, .. .ur v, wau.v I <_< I i COLORADO (UNWCORPORATED AREAS) 33 Fn<mlEmegencYMwgemnrl A¢nry P nsu°v 35 31 ®XAiIUXFI FLUOU IXSUXAXEF PQUBAAX FLOODWAY 21 FLOOD BOUNDARY AND FLOODWAY MAP " 6 I 5 J 4 I _ GARFIELD COUNTY, <_< I i COLORADO (UNWCORPORATED AREAS) PANEL 1880 OF 1900 Al 12 �— 1 - % 1 $ 9 COMMUNITV,PAXEL NUMBER - ��.. '1. 0002051880 '` \ °I` �l \ \ \ `•-- �..._.�"\ �� REVISED: ro:»=..»<..•._ JANUAMAP RY 3, 1986 Fn<mlEmegencYMwgemnrl A¢nry 0 N U m EaL =w�� vo v E-. a E 0 0 Vv_°o°o C N+.LL ¢� d �' w C C] G b G O O Odoem m i aW00 =W eo w�wm: mwgzo 4 QI W LT. N ry' ii q o Cp D w z z a m'�w'CEE- o " a ifO i E E ? ocmv'i w (ZIOU J' C W .OL o„ c c Q���1yy1 a z O 2E ca oj£wo x W6 0U p wd EZ �wvv2 X35«a eleg r x V o LMui cMo OQ I / a 9629 N z6z9 z NO C3 N LLJ ry u, z On-u1 r r ZM 1 8929 l N a W N � APPENDIX C HEC -2 INPUT AND OUTPUT DATA Data obtained from FEMA Library Floodplain Development Report TCI Lane Ranch P P P P M A i! M• 4 x* N .! • Y#6fa## a K a # a a h h (Z } aylU ba Y pWz I;p #�•W m $ # npt# y �i .• # W O J W s p < i KttM +NOg# m 1 # � W 4 g s Jw ox �# O F> O C k +*5'+ 04YWP9lM+ O s <J G -tat- G��, 3�ua�ha�y'�`4 W .. -• {F;•' 4 � flf. aX%xK t K X .. x W m n• -• OO 11 Z Y x m u 1 Q C F b < � x x. � £ 'H2C .. •cx Xx - 4kt't i on t x4n iG'fla#i ib�oaa av�r•1 a7. ': e'n i k at FiTli P # ♦NY' a k M i K= tJ R `K. CI N � p h.0 Y p IM #Y b J W LLnxi#jI�ZOC IIkY W 1 Z � � U CI1{ K ## aN O ryOH p C# x •+ c. 333 V n a.Wga . 5 a '^.00K{ob p000b00000000 000000J00000gdog000000 0000000000 000 oP�pbopo goagao0000tl00000oboopo 9000000 00 O SR Nm)Et0111 ROJN Q^F Nm ePPPLL\O 0000000 mu1Ot :m M FmOOPLLA OOOM1QUS S N �:?.: .dm1.'1! N OLLrM Oaa9POIDaM1PW O.0 O� LPaatiam J .Sm m JaM9a4t NN hSA4NF j'y`I�M1haaFi"tOaa alLP O M1(�F 1`R -T -M1 M1M1 M1 _M1hFF NPmmm y , r .HrATiHH ISH a .1 i�riNHAti J N ry '1 r';i..H e�-iNN M1.-Ir-1HNH H'} o; ���.aa�aa aaaaaa a;uaa a:c a- � aaaaaaaaa a.ba aaaLaaa 1'vaaaaaaa > _0 0o VogOA 00000000 op000000o00a opoa00090 000000000s, > .00ory oo RbobDOoor000go opouobo0Pp000o00.00000 000000000p� > 0p0b0 R00000b 999909 og000OpooAOP oaoog0000 000000000 z ,a z • 3R e1.omR.RP pommlbm Niq.'1F.aNP P4}OO mOOmSOmPJaa00pr m OONOmNmSNaS'a f •+Y.4* POtlt m '�aNJ.AM ai`»M O.ONp P a0 'r P tOFa JOa N OMh O' aNNmNF�sJ b l.•'{�'aP a mM1PO41FP Jul a »M1P N amp +'F HNA Y O''a�9 MmYJJ 'N H'1.1HNNNNMmM H+r+ .+rNNNNNNNMmM r. Hwa Obi {AF ^ y}[: > M 00000 00000000000000 0000000000.00000.0.000 000900003 '.L.. OOOOo 090oC000CooObO 0ocoa00000a000oocoaogo OPpapoocOo e� i` Nt�mPJ OOJ (fiO aF P.CN QJ COOOOCNmP�1'aPJu..-.urP lVb'OnC 03urNJP } my� NPNHN OOTN90PmhaF mm OmHO<J .pM1FNaaa M1.CmTNN GYr CNmmJm Nrlrm` i - S�'ru�a "mM1M1.[�M1 aaaaamFP F�M1 M1h MFFM1Ni'�f`" F M1Ft+ mP1mW m �m . O'V.j aalOaa aaaaaaaaaaad as a.CataaLLaaaaaa.Lia dada aa2V Y Y1in'{ rcKttm ibHnrcCn na¢na¢d¢ rHN¢n Ku c'n nmcn¢n ttrs¢nnnn ur 9:. �" 00(9(99 Wxp Olvp t]U'{p00D V't^ wfCx Vtv V'V'(401.9M1]V V'p U'V'9N9'V'tD l" CmriVaON V'V'Va 3 H F' Ni '^ 00000 OOOOOOOOOg0000 OOOJOOO00000900000V000 OOgOJgOJ00 N _ � 4 }'>7 ODODO.bp000pO0000POo OOpOp 00pOgOp0000o00 0000000000000000000000 00000000000gO000000P00 0000000000 0000000000 h pl'f�: a VO _ OVM rinma�+uma Wa qulW M1pM1a r4mTD a 1119 9LL• JUPOWPIpN O �� 43i% `baf!n m NJtlSJ rJP�..11��P�mmH Y1N P JJNJ00NN aPaM9 PVvaM1V Nv.Y aP Q w mH a � fY. VSI61�r Ya �NNNNflIFI HN10YramP9tiMM1 '. .s TM1 .. :4h m 1FJ NH Qim .arJr+NNNNNNNmMMM N.v ti Y O 400ppDODpp0000 000906 .000 ogOOVOVnpO VJbVUOD00 � 0o O bbp0 00 0000 {'�OOP�mPf�S'n..IN OOOo00oo0000o00ooOg000 OC�OV OeiOJ9Nb. S P M N01 0UOo060000 qO DmOOmgJay 1 -Om�y`m0 OpdapP•YYV lFM1HWO OOOOm dI'.Vm C1u1 Nur NNOFa CIP aNNN O� `Y mltl .y 'i r.aq"a�HalOaa fT0 MHL1H FJHH t'1N h T^M1(».M1M1t� P' 1�M1rrP �eY HNHHH1e!1 H a4e4nN 9999 9 . i a aaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaa-0aaaaaaaa aca ma.oaaaa^ vE' o n �OVO.VO OOOOOOVOOVV — (fpODpOPOGOOVpn --:39.00 oVAVo VOVVggo OOOOOODOVOVOVOVOOpn000 > OOOJogao OODD VOO [" DOPOQOOOODO pD JOOOOOOOOOOODOO OOg000 >DOOOOOPOD �-.Fm mO�md pOmPSIDPap T.n*am OOOaPO YMOM1baM mSa.' : qP NO rp4'm.p(OiH"J 1�ryO P'PN P O. JMNFaM1 H. -IP M1S a$maam N.. MNmgJu\�P Pa4mJ aFPtl.•Nh damp P O rn. PM+O 1}� '1;0, 1`C`}IYa mm�S m mCl'1WO a!"N J!u'1 N- HH�(.1NNNNRI R1Mm m"% NNNN NNNTMn1M .: `3.00.00 OOOOOOOPOODO00 PPOOOOOOOOPDOO........ 0000000000 ._ Ropoef000ppoopo o0op00000gaoogog9poqoo 99909990 oo.. �.00$7bo y aT190p O��[Rim NplrYmM1t110 JOOOO DPS mPPmN fA1V MY\P •O *u'1h 000 m9Ta O t a0 `�' t 1imtVpPt1�l41p YLLrmPNb urYlOOm p6SJ MN JSf N JP .JOO P.M ON .. 1pa�Finaar'baaaua rr 1-FFrfirrvnnFF nFrF N ommm n' aayoa �lN aaaaaaRaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Naaaaaaa @ f .,r"r fq -00000 _00-00 OOOOOOp00000 �OOihOROODOgbO p000bppODOo00000pOOg00 gVPOG100000000000P0000 0900000000 VH00000000. �{`�'-;bO.�i>'gA .�'M000C{OOOR00000 HOOOOOOOOZYDODAAOOOOPOO HDDOOOA00 �{�'aS� a O MiNMN:/Q `ly1V r1 ?P M1NOTn P1�P N.yPM1O m'IO O.y O H M1NO Nah' }`j IM1 mm�JOHQ�am mF yIDNW�WON yJ`P NNN 9 -0P1fM1J-0OtnOM1 gPOlaTNO 9 aOS I.M1m prvT a NN m � NFMM1 m -m urM1ma mf '��., t0 �' ^IH M..N NNNNTMT H-. M.yNNNNNN Nm TIMm P � ~ a.Wga . 5 a '^.00K{ob p000b00000000 000000J00000gdog000000 0000000000 000 oP�pbopo goagao0000tl00000oboopo 9000000 00 O SR Nm)Et0111 ROJN Q^F Nm ePPPLL\O 0000000 mu1Ot :m M FmOOPLLA OOOM1QUS S N �:?.: .dm1.'1! N OLLrM Oaa9POIDaM1PW O.0 O� LPaatiam J .Sm m JaM9a4t NN hSA4NF j'y`I�M1haaFi"tOaa alLP O M1(�F 1`R -T -M1 M1M1 M1 _M1hFF NPmmm y , r .HrATiHH ISH a .1 i�riNHAti J N ry '1 r';i..H e�-iNN M1.-Ir-1HNH H'} o; ���.aa�aa aaaaaa a;uaa a:c a- � aaaaaaaaa a.ba aaaLaaa 1'vaaaaaaa > _0 0o VogOA 00000000 op000000o00a opoa00090 000000000s, > .00ory oo RbobDOoor000go opouobo0Pp000o00.00000 000000000p� > 0p0b0 R00000b 999909 og000OpooAOP oaoog0000 000000000 z ,a z • 3R e1.omR.RP pommlbm Niq.'1F.aNP P4}OO mOOmSOmPJaa00pr m OONOmNmSNaS'a f •+Y.4* POtlt m '�aNJ.AM ai`»M O.ONp P a0 'r P tOFa JOa N OMh O' aNNmNF�sJ b l.•'{�'aP a mM1PO41FP Jul a »M1P N amp +'F HNA Y O''a�9 MmYJJ 'N H'1.1HNNNNMmM H+r+ .+rNNNNNNNMmM r. Hwa Obi {AF ^ y}[: > M 00000 00000000000000 0000000000.00000.0.000 000900003 '.L.. OOOOo 090oC000CooObO 0ocoa00000a000oocoaogo OPpapoocOo e� i` Nt�mPJ OOJ (fiO aF P.CN QJ COOOOCNmP�1'aPJu..-.urP lVb'OnC 03urNJP } my� NPNHN OOTN90PmhaF mm OmHO<J .pM1FNaaa M1.CmTNN GYr CNmmJm Nrlrm` i - S�'ru�a "mM1M1.[�M1 aaaaamFP F�M1 M1h MFFM1Ni'�f`" F M1Ft+ mP1mW m �m . O'V.j aalOaa aaaaaaaaaaad as a.CataaLLaaaaaa.Lia dada aa2V Y Y1in'{ rcKttm ibHnrcCn na¢na¢d¢ rHN¢n Ku c'n nmcn¢n ttrs¢nnnn ur 9:. �" 00(9(99 Wxp Olvp t]U'{p00D V't^ wfCx Vtv V'V'(401.9M1]V V'p U'V'9N9'V'tD l" CmriVaON V'V'Va ' ',op 000oopoo00 od0o0aooP 0000p0000POOOpoOdoP p000 0a 0oo0000000q 00000000000000006 ' ,bP OOOOOOOOOON 000000000 0000080000000000000 P000P0000 OOOOOOOOPOOp0000009 POOOOVOOOOOoo000p K •» Ogb0000000 •.-If+0 C'JUO OY�HUVwptT W YEN N'J M1 •O ✓ UUVM1OTWNPr V %aTtiielPO... a a a0 OOODVY�NUM1a NY1 Pr•F mhY.F mOmY.� P�mmmM1srYs aaal.linJ rv��PJ im..�S.naNa a •J'FP -•NT nU '!fi MNTTY�a n nPN /.�,mPO LLYO P��N SY.�mPN -Y . 0000000000- 000000 V0 OOOOP00 OUOOVPOPUVO VVOO P O OOVOObd' Op00000000 OOOPO0000 OOP0000000000000000 OODOVOPV0000000a0�. IVNA!T.CmNtiO OOTOF a T eT9J ±SP 00•�W ama :N O TDPOW :O OOOmmmp�.-IN r aP O 0N•yS NSON Nm TYYtO <Y OpO11�i"-0O-0mM1i: M1�-•O NYWmPO O OVOmP PM1 aO P.'IO M1I,F M"9mm m mN Pm9 C V'V' �: OF„-0LawD` Y OnM1M1`OaM1h NNNNNNNN' NNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNNNN N oaDa-0aaa-0aa as I•INNNNfVN�" [aaa-0a.o-P' -0ada.tiaa a' aaaaaaabaaaaaa< APoacigciooP oadabgoob o0000000Pd000PPPPcq ogoaoo-P0000bop o c 0000bPaooppoogovo < p Aooaoobdga. ogdoogopb bobgoa000000d-PooaP 0000000000000000000 OOPOOUOOOOOOUPO00 iC OOOPOOAPOOO: E YF• ..•s• • OOOPOFQNT N.'. 000000000 •••.••••. •• aM10N00mF0 Opo OFm a f'+•TyPm NRb ON>• SMQ!a aOFF TYI < �Tmbi;n'0P'. m N0aT09mP NLLI9POON r.n aM1 SO +ti aor tiNmJTa 4Y•e NNNmJYi N..-•�N.nuN nmNN'.i HNN v H�N 3 p0000000000" UOOOOdOO OOCOOPOP POOO.00VOVO PNNi•O OO OOOOOVVOOU00000 C _Q MaOO bu.P mO OOOmONNi`•a ON N�O OPO O NPu1mNO00u�Nm 'i 0QO 0'Y5YIOr{N :TS OOM1OnM1nnOa mPm ^J mm99m mP PPP C OOr4F a;Oaa D a-0M1M1�aM1hO F mnmm9P NIJN NN rNNNN NNNNNNNNNNN C ' lJF'1 :TNNNNNN NNN NtSNNN �NNNIVNNNNNN aa aIODLLJLWDaa-0C alaDDaaWaDaDDDaaa i� .�.a aaa-0aY aaaLaDaD •CO 00000dJ00U00000000 JOOQ0000 JOP00000 11 O.f00000000 OOP000t100 O OOP00,0000 OL000J000g000000000 OOOOOOOJ6UOUOOD00 P.LC0000000-. J h00 OD PO F�nmOa hm^ a O P9N0 mSNF . OOma!nn 5>`N.ON pNa� •-10N�Mm aYln a00PNP.-•FV OTaO ha1M1 1" Na9P0�yy a V 1 NJMN .+f� .� ag0000000p OPOP OC -060 GVOUfiGOUGUOCVVOGPCV '00040 OOOPOrGaC P{J0000 -0000 '� � �O�OOGTNN pG0 m♦•rCGP OM1NOmSOP00�OVOONN OC�vNOTLe+N�" Itf OOfaIn NFMS06 mP 4r•P YIM1PP OOStitiM1Fr�M1 rfM1 Ffr`AM1mm •q ,pPmm Dm mr PPPP J'm "P �Y i�M1�aF+C N-0NNIVNNNN 1V N- NNNNNNNNNNN rNNNNNNNNNNN NNN. ���{ mNNN NNN 'aaa-0aaD, aaLDaDSaa NaLaa-0aaOLaLaa a.O aaa.aLaaDaaDaa�Oaav' "t� 4> OOPS 000-000 VO OJ UOOOOAO0POb00 .. OOAPOP4000 OO OOOOOOPO' OOOOOPOPO 000000400000 00 POOPSa UOJU?00-000-0000-0 0000 0OPOOO000000� • . • • Nmm YIOndJOI?PaDN VT(r n T!t� m�.T n.OST '. OOVItiP M1 OT Y..nJ N .+N aaNVJM1mPm RI -•L mPDa m. -1S0 i'1m Y•R ' O mTTN 'fJmTN hrn m -T P:+ •yN SFTOb'•m raM1mON m Nm SY. Yf afO NNrJaPb'. .+A.�N tlf~r•M ahP aFm NN.v.a.YN N tinl -'FNM "• 9m yF ~ OJg000PU0-0060P06� g0gd00,0000'. qp OOOOa00V0 OJOVOOg000000GODU00 OOOF �RO OPO Pa Nmo VOOOOFOOOOOOOO.. . •Y000OOIjO PJ'PJ:ONNPOPT ::OOmO ?a0"C!11T JY.N 9taP NaPNNrUaP VPOr•P OPF('•P rPPM1�'10?�Pj am9 hn Ff-"NrFF D^'� F M FmY�J NO`0�aaa aaM1 Ff-DFFM1 NNNNNNN NNN NN NNS �JDaav^aOaaDDaaJL NPNNrvNNNNN:YN NNNNn(`, 'DW _at NTNNNNNN NNNNNNNNN JODaJaLaadDOaa aaD-0aaa LaJJaaDaJa PJUOCY000�00000000'. 000p00000V OOOJSJUOVO OVOVOObtl'IVOVVP 00000 0 00000000 00000000:. A 00000000 a0oc.o �o 000000000 oababo�0o _` a0 Lmr L OOPhmQ'. � 4 bOm PI.PM a PUYlr ml�' oUFOomi•aa o-mY+ N m... F OtiM90 amDDO SP P Fmi.l;: J m.TNTNN' T PmNS� `f aP ONN Pi-• Fm r'N SJ.NL Yf O. PN.+ti-.»1.4N 4� Nrti SY\. � OhPTaM19P-i N r•.+^YtiN 1 -L OpOOP0000ll O-Oa00000 OOOJ^OOJPVOPPVOJ O J000000000000P06 q. -Y.OFShF¢nP0000Cm 0,:. O i"000O000G0 OOQP OgCOOPNmn�.•+aC6L00P.CM1 O� OOCTii NSa mY,CTN . .. .... •Y rY�.o c.+eme cc MY1c r xc r $ • • •� r mm Tm. Doo cP M�n� !� -0 �•+ m aDarrt.Grr Pa^ rFr 'F rFrC PrvP KW hh < .CPP. ,n.Nhhh NNN PNOraLa^ .=mmmo;rvNN 6 h t NNNNN^'^N.. i_.c 'L La s.a .a�tLac"saaaLaaa ,. D_�a.cLaa aasraaJJ.: La..ryL.. *%- nnn nn �.� nnnn nnnn nnnn nn nVmVdOpp6t9 vamgP 'o nnnnnn� w�c my^co®®.aco muPa��p` pn.n n'nncc n'n zn+xoogPmmu .n tl��-.a�^^..®®co z.'K i�p m ab i ® 0 y �i x y� a � F ry fS0 OOOOOOPJOOJODJOUJOJUJVOJJ JJOJOOVJJUJOV GOOOUPO00 N 00 000900000CCJ. 00 OO OOOOOJO000000 POPOPOOOOOOP.OUV `>00000000 �y0o Go 0000vvvvoov 000vvvoop000v a000uoa0000000J oa000000o W 'p.a m DIIINPOV�P M1WSwp ONNnVN1SJa^�VSTV UOn Ou�NNaanllVmSU 'JOum.n SY\u�h aD tDp ¢:'� UVmI(\a m[n N.D aSaS :am 9i saN�Vnnnn nrvmvunS mODM1 NFSmmmp a IRYY\ a9PHrvmS�f\vVVry n 6V+r -� .na n HH nrv.+Nry ^ n OOOVUUOOOU000 OOOOOVOUOUgU00 OOU OOOOVOOOvrO VO OOOOVO000 OOp000O000000 OJOOJOOO OOOOOV VOO OOVDJOOOUVOO OOOOVOVOJ NOA41[ItN NPOO JSO ONJOW NNS OY..... ............... ......... PO`,aaSN ate.... On u�NFM199F ON.tiO VOF' 9FU OOa 'iTPVtlUOniVH nOV0000HHNNN nNNNNm NNN NN aaaNNNNIm Ti�R1T mTmm mlrtm TM[n TmN mm aa a.oaaaaa mmaaaaaaaaaa maommmma mmm m��daaa fJO00VVV00[JV V'J OVVOVVOVVVO:>VV VVV VVOOOVOV:>VVV '.]OVVVVVOV otl0000a0000uo oi0000c0000000 ooq.......... .. �>ovpi000000 OOQ1S M1m mY\m M1NI`N O^ jTON9mmPY�-1 a.[\ OOVM1PAJJ1aNF aaHV JOA -0.n [OaJF ao A�`[N ['[Jrf\aJ JNN HMSu>DUmJHNma -+rN NS�a.v�JH-1 J OnmTS N.'\ VOOOOOOOOOOVV 900V000OVVV<>00 DOOOVVGOVVOVJOV VUOVOVVOO _ OOOOOOOOOOOVO OOOOOOPO VuJ0000 qOU OJ000J60o00V OPJOg0000 nM1NaPOONV\JaVGa OMNFI�N:nm N.n FA N['1 OpaRa.n J.nMDaMNuiO JOO LJ\N-uSD 1 u1J"4N ,Y Nw'>:yON YIT t>a TFM1NbFPVHS u>V ON-fFSJCr nNSJ J✓rT nSOmrnm PPAPPVOOOOei ryH Sn 000VOOHH-^NNN Hnr NNNNM PNNNr1 N.VN 'Y NNiV N[VNmmmMlnTM �TTMTmmmTrtlMmMM 'lTmmMTMTmm maasaJaJaaa -+OMmmmmMm i daaaaa�paaa.oaa aLaaaaaaaaaaa nL -.D aaaaa ' OOOOOOOOOVOOV OVUOOOOOOVOVOp OOO VOOOOVpO00v0 VVOVOOVOO OOCOOOOOOJ O.JU p00000UVU'JOJpq nOJbV 0000000L>OU .-v00000UpJ oOboopboo0000o00GOo0Uooag00 aoOpp000....... ....... d a[1[�..' f1J Nin0am NO`u1NS Lu\UVOmmF'V FPu1:[\SSmMN-[M DOJO NJmNPNv,O `TyPSO 9-fPNOFJ"]NNNM1a :nwfu Nm:n aap-.N JamNYNa9F?-�?9P ah Av n-. 9yyNm90'1\u�NCS m M1U J,+.� MOON N :n � ym OG'OOVGOOOVOOU OUOGOOOO Oc.<cVV 4GV OG'V"VC60C:O VOC GOOVVOCOU OG O,000OOOCO00 bC00000UGOCCOC CGC OGO G`O OOGO40G COOOUOOOC ^-O C>da NY\a nNflXVY1 Or+PnPOMaOmC K.N to OOmOP OnrNKONmCNC GOSFC N[n nm ��J Y>NNM1�aaJPPN OmSNV aM1Y\p�FO Cr*a' Ommr-rnvL -0O^r.fn JO O!1m a:VY\m['lh: P PIt`4 PPPOOU00� 0�6000OG N^n niVN n- r+^NN N[vM ¢ NNNM1NN J NNIV [VNNNMmm Frmm rm M[n Mf^[nmTKMm[nm Mmflm rtrMKTM[`\+'.m OmMMYiM (nM 4",. a�Daa ¢taaaaaaSa adadLaa.O.GSS d,: na -0.Ca �r {.p a.0 a..Cd aSaaLaL > �: OO.00OJOV000VO OppJO G'JUOUOOOV JVJUJOUJJpp000J VP>UOOJOO OObOOJ0000O00 OJ..l000UJ Oi>OVgJ '.>OJJObOOJ000000 :JOVJJCp00 >i OO�OQOOO O.70D0 OOOOOOOOOGO JOO• OOO OO OO Og000000 JOOOOGO00 mP MaPP-[-09P NaN J •-]NOJ JN •ti�hNSa�O b,i.v lnN JY\.v4 `IOMF-[ nyP P[[\h [OJOm M1.D m -aNmNOmrvY\anP af` NFD ^PPnF([\m DNaR Nm a..1 l 4>9fU0 N rN S. LFmPHrNm rrl _+J Ma_ a200nn N ^I^+mm Srn yylmyyPPON > OOQoopQGOO000 ...OVOJUOJ'JUOJ JVVu00JOUpoc DGU JooJ000O0 > OOOUOOOOPO O:>O Og0000000h.".rp0^>JOOGOOCJJ04"0000 JOpD0000V FO`OaFavmrn Y\m,9.Y OM OMO:>.nh [[\if\_' OS �UMrnaAOJaMNamF�r JONSOOanN O SJ'SmTF.pS SinFOm aNnNa mf-aSh TV^.+ >Lv UNSN.I/-PNO.�.nv >dUYf'.ISNNn ^ PJAPPJPOOOOnO P-fJ0000J'a.-r-�^.Nn mJr].+-.+.-r--[N.v NNn a✓)NNNNNN [vNNNNNMmmMmm mmmmmmmmmMMmn ~LOLaJJJLPLLJJ NDDmDLLLaDS�aJ D aaLLaaaadJaLD DaDamL-0 j 0000000 VOVVgO OU V:>U" VOOUO' JV'fJ JO J OVO,/O-> VUp O'JOJJV 7 00�000000pOJ0 J:UOG"OOU O'>40J" OO:JuO' ^JgOV00.>Op > OOOOOOOGO0000 oOJV 0019 O.. OUOJOVO OJVVp OOOUVOVpO n a-� 'iYIa JDLONHN[if0 v YOaS.(\-1HM1 p�r.Y✓`Y\1 NV JV:a-fYv nMNNVP-� Ja ONOmJ P. -T09 a J:'" N0V9FNaaY19 aFP. b ORMJaM1YIJF 't-0SJSr+[.l m.yLNF L 9mF \ S ViMONNmS a3JP ON -� Va .-r�Nnia..anr^nn nnmSu .. qv `; > OC00000000000 OOOOOOJOOJ JOOJ VO >.>4'JO:iJ J.]V'JOJ OOOVO0000 OC OOOOCOOG ,[G`'G C. ``OC CC. Oc pG OCOGGC GOCCGOG pC V �OOGOOOCOOOCC T NSNNNN6.O Su` Ou CKGSmSf"[. Cir .'C •m:"JlnV ml-u`a aa¢'.+O amnNT. N1+F mF2GN� CCn. F[r ay.S F2'.�C f:. u'.^ ¢.LC S.fNM1O M c'J T4 OCOnn PFpm40CC0-'nnNn m.NY' ¢r i 1� NhhNh.T NK dJ-asaaaL 6:daSs sa:a aJr �a�s¢:m . +++� ra fn.m �r.'accs q n 1: r ;) tO�VOU'UGt: Vg�4r aD 4^V a.O G^OOVVOOc9 a')V^u'\.^ ...Xv t®y 4l uan.^. U'n.t_t'v^U urc v"V'[:U'V^l^c.. _ - _ x ... i > . . � .. SELECTED PLANS, CROSS SECTIONS AND MAPS Floodplain Development Report TO Lane Ranch ,•-_ DUPLICATE EFFECTIVE MODEL Floodplain Development Report TO Lane Ranch \ \i \ ast z e p }}\ \ \ \gg \S! n me mmm m E m Lstmv9 vE>G• E mvmn mm m vm '"HIS Cu Rtci V`E� u0a cm m mmmmmm m c c .....•r•..dr• Ph mmmmmmmmm m �: - A�Fau gg; A� � Eli w • • m u. r•.•e..•£Va�G m.♦ s 3m u °• o .rrvrvmamCmmmm n' �� e C mmm mmmmvmmm cy .'v $q mmmmmmmm KCBEN • ..nnncmm .. e. .+n £ • 6 m o v" mmmm ,•••,•,,;•,•, F i .+ncmnm ,..nmmm n me mmm m E m Lstmv9 vE>G• E mvmn mm m vm '"HIS Cu Rtci V`E� u0a cm m mmmmmm m c c .....•r•..dr• Ph mmmmmmmmm m �: - A�Fau gg; A� � Eli w • • m u. r•.•e..•£Va�G m.♦ s 3m u °• o .rrvrvmamCmmmm n' �� e C mmm mmmmvmmm cy .'v $q mmmmmmmm KCBEN • ..nnncmm .. e. .+n £ • 6 ...r......... oR _ m .r .. .rnnrvr;�ume n 6 � ewvw w V v o 0 _ 2211.11 ON06 A tm ¢ Om u OS mH M ". oouo""° .eoNt of 90 ww OTbm NeNmmmme _ "E 9uVo his M M HIM we 9",A e _ -- goNx !Q HIS „ 8VIo C wvm ,mia tto m .. F. • O V. .. I I A Ir r 3 x x m S V u V ill ;Eo e H o mA Tv�V Eye w SFS n O O .♦ ♦e � rrr•••••rrr•♦ o >; qP PmP V yr O• W � V Z 6 u.+N2L SS Pill O p O pp O rmi vmi3 NG uVmyN; q5 ¢; p TTTT Vr.••.�OF?r•r••rr• y • N srr•••r•• r N C••••rrr ...r......... oR _ m .r .. .rnnrvr;�ume n 6 � ewvw w V v o 0 _ 2211.11 ON06 A tm ¢ Om u OS mH M ". oouo""° .eoNt of 90 ww OTbm NeNmmmme _ "E 9uVo his M M HIM we 9",A e _ -- goNx !Q HIS „ 8VIo C wvm ,mia tto m .. F. • O V. .. I I A Ir r 3 x x m S V u V O O v O O O O K N M U) m LL C v m (O m m O) W LL 0 W m W W C a L m v N m ami ami U a a a a C a p� T O � C � o T O O o o IF _ O O o M N O N 1 U W o 0 U p m N_ U C a a y, U aU o � O �E 0 LL N m � U C @ C I J U o I N o o m m 0 or (y) U01;eA913 a >' :4) m®s N i O O O O N � v O O N U o W � W o Y � w o rn m x m N 0 0 0 ca U U C (0 G � C � J i Y o o N 0 N O O O O O O O O O O O O O m m m cO co o to m <o m co 0 0 (}}) UOI}eA91B (y) UOlWai3 T p N liol p N � r N � O o QI � o i m c _ N O � p Q Op N � m m U U C C � C � C t6 J � I aJ O 1� O O CA P7 O O O O M N O W W M M M M N N (O (D p (O t0 (p N (O M M M M N N (D (9 (O t0 p tD N (9 (g) uoiyena�'� (g) uogene13 APPENDIX E EXISTING CONDITIONS MODEL Floodplain Development Report TO Lane Ranch \ ) {\\ j\\ } ) \ \ \ ) \ m mmmm mmmm m :Emrvm m rva � mmmm wx"$da"".... m mmmmmm m => m ..........212111, Ali I' mmmmmmmmm�9oW 33« ��' - C B.' At.J~ ............ Fm u O °n u ti m w� mm T ..rv...mmmm IgNpRiTIMAT ............. G mmm mmmmmmm � ••• - _ o0 INA "lqg om PUMP up _ ' m mmm mmmm EVE fig TV .,mry mama ., W AMT 9N = "o m �P TijVvi 44 ,. _ mmm mmmmmmmm => S ..........•.. °��9 m m = EMU arc of mmmmmmmm mm �ry �: ui $V � F`$'oFmF � x°ten _ "or°ao-"�c"w_ VZO loss Is 70444,40001 �7111nvl,� =`ow O �Oorrr• tltl �ia �rrrrr .......... pmv a - so rvrvNrvry nnnnnn¢¢aammm'm" 'mmmmmmnnrrrrrrrrn mmP s" m< " nrvry rvmm�n nn¢ « av„mm'm „"mm,m'rrrnFrn rnrmmmm r ;�q U9;o_ eao -ail udNeL' rvNnry nnnnmmnm¢aPammnm nnmmmmnnnrrrrrn nemmry V ha rrrr......... � Oi rrrr..r..r..• rvrvmnrvmmmnnnnmava' mm m'm "mmmm nn. rnrrnrrnnemm �n m m� bSu"1 DO��r .g c6 ry rvNNmmnnn nn¢¢ 11 T m]£4w ............r...• Pro mmm nm n m M m: 1199 Mmisk _ swis O ;m TOu��pUr 'mmm ¢ a°�w•'.'�a .. rva .. nnaaam „tin"""" "ry rcrvNry c 1 ail r�........r.. m .e m mmmm �i rvmm mm�aaa'm NMm„„"""nN rvrvrc 0 �• - Y�VF3- u9g� U mm %cm >P ryu*11149 � "Ai mmm . m V....r...V.�'GWr• V ¢¢ �+nm . •r •r .r .r .r ..nnnnrvtt ry 0 �n :6mrvr "" � mmmmm m o mmmm Nti ry ry M E �-,.rvrvnPmmrr E MR AR 2H okywhMss lot all ivil gh 13 «r..... hr rrrr u Rola 1 ..nrvrvnmwmnm mm mm mm '� C>: m o --o— .......... ry mmmmmomm „ti „ O: _ —_ Ou Om �+ �+rvry mmmrm WE us- 015.55,29900 yi VW�Np 1109 u,9c 8_ m m aSN mmmmmmmm tiH„„ £ • 0r•..«mtl�rrr;rt•.. ; pm �� �mN . .r .r .rrvrvnemmnn --------------- min. imoo—oo—ogo, O?m 1� m0> immm s' N mm m m Sig „„nrr„rvrvrv�vrvrvry nnnnnnnnnaa amammm�nm mmmnnrn P Ev Vaal mqq6q�- 11105em .ION 50» x \9!/9\®\; C9g\ \/\ 'Vi.m M<01 \\ out ill, Milk MUMISIMMS 5 11190 IM12 PS TP592 19 Imn 11 TAWANIZ man! Sm \\ \\\ \\ \\\\\\\\\\118i 9 loll a \\ P. \ 0A A\i) lg,g;, a:eesoaz... /1004 out ill, Milk MUMISIMMS 5 11190 IM12 PS TP592 19 Imn 11 TAWANIZ man! Sm �m moNm :oo E nmmmv av avggs 12 moo w�orrrrmmmmmmmm .n..�n.r.rrr.-�n.w V he m �O0000nv�`t 10 . ............ rc ronrorc ........... rorvry �: .•rr.......a � mmmmammmmmm � mmmmmmmmmmm 2v t Y- � n 2 — u.�. .• m— •£ i rc uiFV � •hT0.TTTTT T N Vrr...�.O. .T..rrr... S r vSi C..r........a..r.• • Cre•err....rra.rr• V he m �O0000nv�`t 10 . ............ ........... 2v t V W•,VVn ..... :+./. .� ig 3 em QAy m a emeee�m eee �- ., : � .! : : 4 i ;;:;!::.; , ; ,;_ ; s;g;s;sia;:G{2;\;:S]«r :x:«l�e;x� I `sag a I 8 \\\\`/`/`/i\`/`\)/`Big 82 V`BOB Qa/ 5 gaaJ«]QJ\g 9]QJJ9 «lsRJdd 2l5RJGd e! oy..,Aie%.i za»�vase�xr2! 5\G\\\\ji\«\\92lG6/\i.md M ...-H \\\g\§naclg&\/gG§G/av9P9g25»9g\\j\j \21/\Aa8—NO 9xv>§Q\C\\JE9»d9Jga=J in _, a ..za a : Q, 18 9 e : 9: 2!9 9 : Q. j§2§d:g!\49 .2:G!/§66)\}g«:j{§ ))j}ii]/ \\?peeve! O M? O) N O> O O> O1 O C U O O O O O O O O O O O O O I d I a O LL N h M. O N ifJ r m O'rn N N a m N M1 O V N M M I V W r m o I_J N V C O m m N O N <D h rn N (p N 6I M M N In m rn O M N O N (D N m m h N N N rn O1 r N W I o �n rn a mlv�r <o m m co- w w rn M1 M O< m N N h - C U � an m �o N n m N o m'T�, w cmJ m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v O O O O O O O O O O O O O m N m .�- M1 M CO b m 0 0 N -.. O Oi r 4i CJ NN N n h O O O O m rn m m m U m m m m m m m m co m m m co LII m m [O m m m N h r h m N m m (O rn O h m 0 O O O D7 r tD N V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o rn m rn m m m m m m m o o co m m m m m C U i < m m ai c� M of r co N v i W O o 0 0 0 0 o rn m m rn m O O r V O C N N O O O tU M V (O m N rn m O N O tU N W L O 6J W rn rn W OJ i 6> m m m h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 mlm 0 0 m o w �O m m m m m mem m m N N N N N N N N N J � rn m m r h m' v nJ � rn rn rn m: rn rn. m rn rn rn rn rn. m d' �. �. 2' D' W. d. CL @ N Er. N K. N T a a a a a a a a as a. as � o in o in U o in 0 in 0 uJ 0 in o w a in 0 in a in. in g two p� T O T O o0 0 N O N O G O G O m C o o M W L d � -a w Q � � U c � m � N O N J I _G F- r (}}) UOIPAaJD 6 (g) uogena�3 0 (u) uoi;enal3 0 0 N O o Iy1 T IO N�O W d � N I� (g) uogena�3 0 (u) uoi;enal3 0 0 N O o � O N O C O a c 0 U N X C" W N o m R n It D: N N o � 0 o N O m r U C C t6 1 J o p (g) uogena�3 0 (u) uoi;enal3 0 0 N a O p.. O_ O O v o �i¢�.��® N I} J m a O p.. O_ O O v o o N I} O p.. O_ O o r N I} N 7 Ipj �_ j 0 N C C O 0 a _.. oC ° � O U U X LLJ Lu(n C ui o w a m O O ° (D v m In c c o ry or: C ` (g) uoiyenal3 (y;) uoi}enaIB C O1 O G N p ®Y T N C O c (n N O^ p ® c � m O O o � o O C N c 0 o ON O . m p co o �G �72 Ov m N p m — 0.0 W W m 0 IL N rn M N rn N N h n � N co m U U C C � � r c J c i 0 M M M M M N (O t0 (O N cJ t9 N t0 M M M M M N c0 cD t9 <O 0 tO N cp (u) Uogenaj3 (u) uol}enala c J O O N ao c o c in a a O d O (V O O N N V c7 M '06 O Oo O N o C ON U .x o W W C iM rn o o N it � m x 0 O a 0 09 n N O N C N C J U FU- F - 0 O N O 7 cp (D cp t9 (O (D c0 (O c0 t0 (9 a0 t0 cO cD <D (g) UO1lene13 (g) UOgenaO o � � O O � O 4) a a y o m `6 C a C D7 C � o C 'X UJ 8 e-X in W v a� � N N a N a N m N � IM _ L O U C (6 C � � � 6 N I N o J J U i o o N N O O Ol m N N O O f7i m M CO M M M M M N N N M M M M N N N (g) uppenaj3 (11) Mlenalq 0 12 (14) UOI;eADJB OJ (14) UOI;eADJB APPENDIX F PROPOSED CONDITIONS MODEL Floodplain Development Report TCI Lane Ranch U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d a 0 ti N C M O M n V.N n IV S N n O OJ (D n C � OJ O m N UJ a " 0 F N r N M N t0 (9 O N r N r 10 r O M O H I0 0 M N M d (O m M M N r [O O CO (D t0 W O M LL o N o m N MF' fO0 trnp O O N U y v� m M r rn M m m N m N N 6) ¢J 0) n M N r N N N r rn p, O> R t0 M uJ M m O M N rn @ O> 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O (O 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W O d' N M h m O O uMJ tn0 m (09 N O rn n N M (V N N rn h t0 (O W N O O O O O O O O rn 01 rn M vM M M M M M M M N N N N N m m m m m m m m m m m m m W 1 _ vJ M t0 m u> CO m in o n m m rn o r m '� N ro r ao ci o 0 m r co N v 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m w m rn m C R1 N f0 (D n t0 M Wb h N w b j tp M W O O N M (0 m O h W N o? m Cn M N N O W r (O N O � W. O O O O O O W W rn rn CO 1� l7 M M M M M M M N N N N N Qj 3 i0 M d' m M N rn( O N O N N W N Gl (9 M M N N O) N [0 r L O @ OJ O1 W rn OJ W W ¢1 OJ I h T � i j O O O O O O W O 0 0 0 0 1 0 O O O O O O O m O O O O O OO H _ �p ... 0 0 0] 0M0 0 0N0 0 6 H M N N OJ W W m OJ OJ N M W V N N N N N N N N N N N N N C3 f I J @ J N g m m w r h n m iv � r �o ui vi vi ui iri. ui vi ui m vi ori iii v � � rn rn mrn rn rn rnm rnrn w rnrnrn =L � S U 0@ N ne C K }. J a. (� U) I7 V) (n (n Cn Cn U) O TG � C O� � 1-130): o O N O � O M U1 O N C O C O o � M � K W C � C L U � C a' s T U 0o N o p s LL o p D) m . m � C N C Jo U LO O F � <p N (g) uogenel3 � N N O N � • O O M M O O W N O O m a c O av N Orn .- X W X 6) ,-, W .-. a - a N N N 'O N o O m � 0 L U O C O � y � � N N C i C f6 J O U i o p O O O O O O O O O O O V N O of (O V O N O O O M N O m m r c0 f0 <O (O c0 O (O O [9 cD t0 [D c0 aD (O (g) UOi}eA91B (S) u011eneJ3 T I{ 715 -cc O O N 17 � ch o O 0 N CU m o 0 0 0 N c N c o 0 c 0 0 0 U U c N X io X m W w W M . N c c m m u u N N N @ O 0 O a m` m L U c C m ryU @ -o C (u) UogenajD (u) UOIJeA91D S I 1�{ (u) UogenajD (u) UOIJeA91D (g) uoi;eAa13 (g) uogenaiB c oc (n 0 0 F-2 c 0 0 O o N � a p O am cin o c � rn O N r O Mwa m m L V L O C C N @ N N C C N N J J o U o -0 Lor. �4 (g) uogena13 (g) uoyeAa13 E- �9 O C (A to O®�J � � m F- 0 O O p N N d O - »r p C oy U a Ir o _c X o W o N T c FL FL N m II a � U U C cc O V fy N � C C c6 @ j J J U U i 0 N O 'N O tm O N O N O � ON O O N O W 6J O tD O cJ (O O cD <O U �D (O cp tD c0 N O (g) UOIMAai3 (g) UOIJBAala 61 O J O 0, m O O O T v9 D7 ® C O O N O O O O 0 0 N N o � th M o 6 N a @ � N o N e C C C w u p N X M W W w � 0 N d m L A o a @ o 2i _ o m L U t C C @ � C N C o � @ O J U h � ~ 0 o „�.--� c a0 (O N (O N c0 t9 t0 t9 t0 M c0 (D cO N c9 (u) U01;RAOID (y) U01lenal3 N W O 3 J ®Y O C N O O N O O O Ci a 0 c 0 a c 0 0 C O -- U N X W � N O Df IL N N o_. o .... m o m U m c m U I o N O u> o 0 o m rn m (y) UOi>eAOG m 5: wi my.r9 mmH; SSi 3FV' m 6 Vr��3VwtlH>£U.aa£tcrr V m �=rvN , rvP Fc ............ d Oaf p >.�Q ✓I �i9 tnx V.�uE>N�. u u m O m 5: wi my.r9 mmH; SSi 3FV' m 6 Vr��3VwtlH>£U.aa£tcrr V Fc ............ u u m O 0 g� .. -2 O Ac Rkm vnoc u w.+u p _uEE u - 'wm Aw <.r...• .rrvrvnv�o� ry ♦..ruw.N ,o ..r ., ., ., E6 .rnnn p m nFOe. �.an Or y c eee.112, me -' mNU y�Him GnoYTG F£ 5 S_4: m 3Fu c H� Ec m C yo ..i vim nnnmmm „„„„„ mwa am n0 � m P'�oNO nam�onrmmm ^ rNM„„ E c O> , �aoNi ............. Fom = :omom m o= - ollc n u rvm � mem pow m5 mm vgsm u ....r........ 'c E: w...... V21: it �q m On u9 z .a o. •.rr....r. �.. m n0 a�� e.e mrmm FCC' s ui rc c mryiH �1 .y - N 4�V 'JU nmm�nvaemrmm NNNN.. �yrvn 3V�GOYYLVv m n rtOi0�4 TVa n rorvnrvnnnnrvmm�nnn <mvaa mmmi+nmmmmmmu mmmrmmm mmm �.�� _ ` m < Jy uI • a n nnrvrvnrvronnrvrvn nnncv¢e mm�n mm�ommmwmmmmmmnnmm mmm � _ - •w~wV�u6Na f0 m m NVV m n rvnnmaa¢awmmmmom nNnr�n rMrvmrvnnrvnrvmmnn p « <<amn wwHrvtirwwrrvn nrvrvrvmm�nn a « <anm Ou o` 5�w N ^nnmmaa¢mmmmmommm Z> � Nti r„ ..'..r .�nnrvnrvrvrvnm nna< c<c min •�e♦ mm . m n rtOi0�4 TVa n rorvnrvnnnnrvmm�nnn <mvaa mmmi+nmmmmmmu mmmrmmm mmm �.�� _ ` m < Jy uI • a n nnrvrvnrvronnrvrvn nnncv¢e mm�n mm�ommmwmmmmmmnnmm mmm � _ - •w~wV�u6Na .Or• ♦a - �p iuco m m n rvn mmminnm mmmmmmmnnr nnrmmm m mm Vry ..gym ,� .n nr.n mmmmmmm mmm rr rrvmmmemmm in HUM pty all AED mmnrmmmmmmmmmmmmrrr. nrmmmmmmmmit owhHerFwwhhm = m 00 mmmmm mmmm mm mrrrr r mmmmmmm m o mm nnrvnrvn„nn xS cmW nrmmmmmmmm mmmmmrrn. rnmm mmm _ rvrvnrvrvnrvrvn -m� �;oR>. sprig q s? m rvnnm,eemmmmmmmmm ,....rvnrvrvrvrvmnnnnnn,. s° vnne. mmmmmm mm ......... rvnnnmmnn,-. siPsTplanag si m m m m 2—A m nry m m Igo �y- nrvmmnvvan mmmmmmm nrvmm�nmm� m g; - ti„N„NNm„rrvry p q %a mm rc�n vfiEll wm q 11 off T a0vmi am Sisf 1ry „ .,n nnneePmmmmmmmmm �� �„ ,, ....nrvnrvrvrvrvnn mn..a Z> m HI a ¢K is .Or• ♦a - �p iuco m m n rvn mmminnm mmmmmmmnnr nnrmmm m mm Vry ..gym ,� .n nr.n mmmmmmm mmm rr rrvmmmemmm in HUM pty all AED mmnrmmmmmmmmmmmmrrr. nrmmmmmmmmit owhHerFwwhhm = m 00 mmmmm mmmm mm mrrrr r mmmmmmm m o mm nnrvnrvn„nn xS cmW nrmmmmmmmm mmmmmrrn. rnmm mmm _ rvrvnrvrvnrvrvn -m� �;oR>. _ u 3 0 oma' \!\ / \\\� \\\\\\ 1. }�p,. 252 { } \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ )!)!! !t 1. }�p,. 252 Pagnplowspow a rvb ¢mrVv vEr: �F ax s: As '00 x:m'_muzN�st:�.uEmcm xccM. _¢e.e a F any n nnnnnnaaammminmm mu+mm.nnm mmmummurrrrrrr rmmmmmm m �n 311 t sit 2MMIM :1 nnnnnnnnvaaau. v�nm v��nm nen �o vo m.n �o mmnnrrrrrnrrrmmmm m _ ocHHN .HHNNFF m m m nu.�nnnn n� nnnnnn nneo amm .n nrn vn u+m .n vim m.cm v.er r. rrr Alum" Y . m M rv'vnnnnnnn p D mG ^^rnn n..in.rnrvrvrvrvrvrvnnnmm�n`vaaavaeaa�n yr u�u+nm�n �o nom 0U Qo nnnnrvem rnmm nnnnnnrvry rvrvrvnnnm mnaa vavaavm n m�nm m p >i p �= a nnrvmm�mmrmm nn tinnrvnrvnrvrvnnmm�nnvaPP voa<v.m ninmmmmmm o dm m mm "9 V ;� 5U ..�.a .ynrvnammrrmm nnr„rvrvnrvrvrvrvnnmmnnnvaa vvaaa a�n mmm mmwm 0 .r.......... ............. 8 m m m�e mm m mm w mm ..........r . vvaeevmmmmmmimm�mwv+mr mmommmmommmm �n ry ry y naav aa.n �n u+vi in v. nmmm r. n. nm nO � __� nE0 mm mm m gry Aovbd i83 ad: maa vvaammm�n vim wmm mmrrrremmmmmmm mm nn nm j` - miVgg Hi k�ry mnaa aammmm�nm mmmmmmmrnr rm m mm mmm n,r gym• m s V..r..�rV ra..V.f.r.r F G 2 t §SJSdJ% IVA LOW } !}) }ig \} \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ }\\{ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ §\\\! \ \\\.-A-A \\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\} �����»�naas»svoa=oxsve:s= \ /) } \\\22223\\ggGA6g9ggGGGS§G/9G ] G 2 t §SJSdJ% REM E12-Hosm ac 0 0 �m �a ��n m „mmmmmrrrrmmmmmm Og E A __.. � �rvnnn nnn� Pemmmmm L0 63 C m pa nnm .n „„„N^ „rrvrvnnnnn v�avam nm�n vi �pmmmm�ar rrmmmmm o Fo N N« nPm ssx x� L o r ����” ^'”'^nmm�naawPmmmm u,m mmmerrrrmmmmm >� Som REM E12-Hosm ac /\8 J5325 \6\\\\\\ ' ra aa. •,�s. a. >.r aT PPaPaPmwPaatla o v�� :>, a.>arrrr>ararr 0 ............ Qo `EOq Emtl V _06 n C¢ F n •o yaw nne�o v. n n p EEi Otl'u _ ..n <�nwn ry .rWt4.H <..r.•• .+.w ..n.. .+nry `XPi 6 C e otivc .n .ue win �o � .� •....r...r•r. i.�a�O 6 .nn vv�m �e .r .. .+n n.•.rn tl u m0> V• 6b __ _ _ �o _ C+ OOfq, eeNddee ee�dde .� ��vy v'i �_tO3 Svc Fs 3w 3V u e �+�./� • E . o V.•.... ....•...... Freeboard Calculator HEC RAS PLAN Proposed; Bridge Pedestrian; Storm Year Flow through Bridge 11,000r cfs US Xsec DS Xsec Velocity through Bridge 10.965 ft/sec 11<62 s 10:3 Required Freeboard 2.59 Freeboard=0. I GN0.3 + 0.008V^2 WSEL Upstream 630207xatxs95.85 Low Chord Elevation 6304.7 Right �':; 63flNMll 1,`, Left 6306 02 Freeboard Provided 2.7 Elevations in 1929 datum 0.01 Span 192 Low Chord elevation for Freeboard (@0.67w) 6304.7 leT11114 7P(c PRE -APPLICATION MEETING NOTES Floodplain Development Report TCI Lane Ranch GARFIELD COUNTY Building & Planning Department 108 8' Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone: 970.945.8212 Facsimile: 970.384.3470 www Barfield-county.com PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY TAX PARCEL NUMBER: 239131 100033 DATE: June 1 1, 2009 APPLICANT'S PLANNER: None PROJECT: TO Lane Ranch PUD, Floodplain Development Permit supplemental to PUD application OWNER: TC Lane Ranch, LLC REPRE5ENTATIVE: Jon Fredericka, Planner, Noble Design 5tucho f- Curbs Stevens, Engineer, Drexel Darrell PRACTICAL LOCATION: 5outhea5t of Intersection of 5H 82 and Catherme'5 Store Road TYPE OF APPLICATION: Floodplain Development Permit application (an Admim5trative Permit per Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008) GENERAL PROJECT DE5CRIPTION The project 15 an 88-10t 51mgle family home PUD on an 100 acre parcel. 5everal of the lots are Situated within the flood fringe of the Roaring Fork and the project proposes a pedestrian bridge over the river. TO Land ranch can Submit separate floodplain permits for the lots/infrastructure and for the bridge. However, the Plannmg Dept Director will need to make a decision regarding whether any construction can begin prior to obtainment of both floodplain permits. 11. REGULATORY PROV1510N5 APPLICANT 15 REQUIRED TO ADDRE55 (DEVELOPMENT CODE/ COMPREHEN5IVE PIAN, STATE 5TATUTE5, ETC.) ➢ Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution 5ection5: Section 3-401: Floodplain Overlay 5ection 4-203: Request for Designation of floodway or Flood Fringe Area 5ection 4-503 Description of 5ubmittal requirements for Land Use in Floodplain Overlay Di5tnct 5ection 4-601 Administrative Review flowchart 5ection 7-701 5tandard5 Within floodplain Overlay III. REVIEW FROCE55 As outlined on the application form - - 5ection II, Procedural Requirements Public Hearmg(s): X None _ Planning Commission _board of County Commissioners _ Board of Adjustment Potential Referral Agencies: (Division of Water Resources, Colorado Department of Transportation, etc.) o U5 Corps of Engineers (with regard to wetland issues) ® Roaring Fork Transportation Authority (for part of bridge on their property) ® Garfield County Vegetation Manager (re -vegetation of disturbed areas) IV. APPLICATION REVIEW FEES Planning Review Fees: $ 400 base fee Referral Agency. Fees: $ O (est.) Total Deposit: $ 400 (additional hours are billed at hourly rate of $50.50) General Application Processmg Planner reviews case for completeness and sends to referral agencies for comments. Case planner contacts applicant and sets up a site visit. Staff reviews application to determine if it meets standards of review. Case planner makes a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions, or denial to the appropriate hearmg body. Disclaimer The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not bmdmg on the County. The summary is based on current zonmg, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. This summary does not create a legal or vested right. Pre -application Summary Prepared by: 6111167 Date APPENDIX G SELECTED PLANS, CROSS SECTIONS AND MAPS Floodplain Development Report TCI Lane Ranch ABUT #1 8' WIDE PATH BRIDGE DESIGN INFORMATION Sheet Revisions SPAN 1 SPAN 2 OVERALL LENGTH 76'-10" _ 115'-0" CLEAR WIDTH 8'-0" j 8'-0" CORROSION PROTECTION N/A N/A CAMBER NONE I NONE UNE LOAD 85 PSF 1 85 PSE VEHICLE LOAD 10 K 10 K WIND LOAD 35 PSF j 35 PSF SEISMIC ZONE 1 7 RUB RAILS N/A 1 NT TOE PLATE STEEL STEEL RAIL HEIGHT 4'-6" 4'-6" DECKING TIMBER 1 TIMBER TRUSS TYPE I H - TYPE ( H - TYPE STEP 1 2'-6' MAX 2'-6" MAX BREAKAWAY DEVICE NO NO CLOSURE PLATE REQUIRED REQUIRED SKEW 90' 90" 6320 6310 ------------ 6300 6290 TO LANE u SPAN GENERAL -11= A. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION, 2005 EDRION, AND PROJECT SPECIAL PROVISIONS; THE LATEST M&S STANDARDS; COUNTY OF GARFIELD STANDARDS; AND THE PROJECT CONTRACT BID DOCUMENTS. B. STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING ASTM SPECIRWONS: COLD FORMED WELDED SQUARE AND RECTANGULAR HOLLOW STRUCTURAL SECTIONS: ASTM A847 PLATES AND OTHER STRUCTURAL STEEL SHAPES: ASTM A588 ANCHOR BOLTS: ASTM A307 �n �o W� mw SPAN 193'-5" PIER2 11 V rL BRIDGE PLAN 0 5 010 ORIGINAL SCALE: 1" = 10"0' ABUT CD Li ry � W z T. PIER #2 ELEV 6309.00 _^ Z-0 Mac * 100 -YR ELEV 6301.83 LOW CHORD AT THIS \------------------- it END = 6302.8 MIN BRIDGE PROFILE — H—TRUSS 10 5 0 10 ORIGINAL SCALE: 1" = 10' BRIDGE SECTION — H—TRUSS 2 1 0 2 ORIGINAL SCALE: tfr' = V-0" ¢`o RIO GRANDE TRAIL ��� 6320 6310 LOW CHORD Al THIS P I� END .= 6308.52 MIN [ 6300 * 100 -YR ELEV BASED ON: F!.00D IBMTTS, EXHIBIT SHEET 1, JOB No. E-5875, MAY 21st 2008 (FROM DREXEL & BARRELL & CO. 1-11-10) 1 6290 Print Date: Sheet Revisions j TCI Lane Ranch Pedestrian Bridge Project NO. Code As Constructed No./Code _ Name: Date: Comments Init. ¢¢��,, LMsand A590CI�A5, IfIC. n — u GENERAL LAYOUT No Revisions: PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE STE M535-004 Revised: Designer. iStructure 16663 _ Noriz. Scale: _ Vert. Scale: As Noted Unit Information Unit Leoder Initials wwmcnwame.� 1 Detailer:Numbers, Void: Sheet Subset: 8X Subset Sheets: 1 Sheet Number - 0 ' )MIN FFE^ . 6307. OT 010 AI MIN F E 6307 4 LOT : E 031 ACF ,6T MIN FFE- �, 6307 4 LOT 0.32 ,1 'MIN FFE= ' 5304.1 I 1 m " sNF� Ik :�� � 969 fiJ12 ® \j .f 63D6'i�_ • 78 0.29.29 ACRES c X 6�63os.J "'o MIN FFE '•pr c x 630 6306 531194 95.6T ' 77 • � 0 30' 60 30 0 60 120 MIN FFE + a r ;, SCALE; 1"=60' ` .. '� LOT . 76 0.43 ACRES 11sr z q r v r s£ � �iT £ / �• ..+ ® '` } + ' 0.25 ACRES ) / 1 i _ �-� ♦ 3 t,.Y'+ j f � v d £r' q r:u I I I I MIN £ -0 t a,r > t t AI I MIN FFE= // LOT 74 `,0.34 ACR 6311 a,FC 'z 630926' '� >�.{-.,033 ACRES 1 3' rMIN ,rte Y....r-n - A > ✓ '' �� 't t MIN'FFE= 6310.2.2 , ..a �r/�� r 0.1119 hR A .nSv.m .. fr Ll .f �a .. � .x.'. i•n� • ` F. .1. . ..':. .. � .. H ` n.. I\... .. v9r=3 .. .. w . n • •. v""e .(,. , PRWMW t1NE EASEMENr ._... Fl.(=KMN DEVELOPMENT PFAM" CLAM SECTION # DEICE. wTERPOLATED CROs SECTON FEMA PS Mn SEC90N ID._. ..... ................. _....__../!`C\ MIN FiT................................ MiMMUM RWR E VAPON (INCLDDIN6 A..T) FlS CRDs S CMON LMA70N .......... ....... — IX ROOOWAT . IX FLODO AREA NOTE: 1. ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON NAV➢ 88 DATUM, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. CONVERSION: ELEV 100.0 (NAW 1929)=104.51 (NAW 1988) 3. FLOODPLAIN LIMITS PLOTTED FOR FEMA FIS MAPPING, NOT BY ELEVATION. 4, ELEVATIONS NOTED ARE REGULATORY FLOODPLAIN MODEL. HORIZONTAL V-60' VERTICAL NONE FLOODPLAIN SITE PLAN LOTS ON - SHEET: 1 OF 7 PREPARED BY. LOT 3 R .26 Ab .23 LOT : 3! 0 22 ACRE CRIES 0 ES `O' ACRESF ACRESLOT 33 , DWeRE11,11CO. LOT 40 0.31 ACRES' LOT 29 �LOT0.20 LOT 27 0 L _ACR 28 BE 41 0,0�7 ACRIE �42 CRE' OWNER DEVELOPER: 5185.1 SF ..'LOT a 32 0.19 ACRES ------19 4T 2 3 MIN riE= Si&S SF. LOT 02- ACR_62980 %BE 4�1 35nq SF, FIRE - MIN FFE LOT 50 628896 'a9'. 0,36 ACBP',,�� 6297D -T 49 If 0.35 ACRES' MIN LOT 48 1 6302 BE 44 t LOT 7 MIN FFE 6289 S9 -S, ---- I 1, LOT 46 6296 ""4128 0 SF Q,��AcN r MIN FFE- MIN FFE 0.34 ACRES A MIN FF�E 031 ACRES _ MIN FFE-MM I MI FF -,-IlIN FlE7-' 62930pa, 0 < -Sm /1\103TACR ------ .48 ACRES MIN FFE ISSUE DATE SUBMITTAL SET 12/23/091 .71 R??Z M", .20 L I IO ACRES HORIZONT CAAL V-60' �=A-: NONE '/O -T 62 FLOODPLAIN SITE PLAN MIN �rh, LOTS 1 03, ... ..... PROJECT NO. E -5875 DRAWING NOi SHEET: 2 OF 7 u FLOODPLAIN P�0�C C[/`T|��N 1 \/|\\/`].} .)L-\,||L/|� | 1"= 60' VERT, V -V LEGEND ,mnmnom'------ ..... '----....... ....... ...... -------- amx^w,..................... --'--�~_~.~~. �CRZONTAL V-60' WMAL V-5' FLOODPLAIN CROSS SECTION 1 60 30 0 60 120 SCALE: 1"=60' FLOODPLAIN CROSS SECTION 2 SCALES,HOR'Z' ":- 5 VERT. 1"= 5 I KEY MAP NO SCA� LEGEND PROPEM UNEI EASWENT.... I ...... - - - - - - - - - M MOOPWAY . . . .... ....... .................. M ROOD APPA z 00 < 6305 6305 0 0 t 6300 7xrsnNG GRAO�:-,:: 6300 t EtfVEZ, J3 6295 6295 7- 6290 6290 6285 - -- --- 6285 17GRADE= 6280 6280 6275 4 6275 A 6270 -GRAOF GRAPE 6270 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+001 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00 I KEY MAP NO SCA� LEGEND PROPEM UNEI EASWENT.... I ...... - - - - - - - - - M MOOPWAY . . . .... ....... .................. M ROOD APPA HORIZONTAL. FLOODPLAIN CROSS SECTION 2 z 00 < >: 0 0 HORIZONTAL. FLOODPLAIN CROSS SECTION 2 FLOODPLAIN CROSS SECTION 4 SCALES:HOR17- V'= 60' VERT. 1'=5' 0 60 30 0 so 120 --N== SCALE: I"=60' LEGEND ............... —, -- ......... - EASE4FNT ................................ --------- EK ftOWWAT ........ ...... m ROOD ARE . .............. NO SCA�KEY MAP PREPARED B HORIZONTAU MMAL FLOODPLAIN CROSS SECTION 4 SHEET: 6 OF 7