Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutObservation of Excavation 05.13.13~~Ip> ~tech HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL May 13, 2015 Kelly West 2410 Howard Drive Rifle, Colorado 81650 lilaulicldscrviccs@umnil.com ll.:1'''"11li-l'ml1l (1,o11uh111, ol, Inc )L12t' l 'illll\11 1\ ..... 1 I;! nk 111111.1,I o.;'J rmc-t .. J111 1.J.i '>I t-l' I l'h<11t\ Jit'-'J-li ; ,,., F.": 117t'-'.l-li-~-;;-1 .:m.ul h1i::.;11'' h1·~c· lcch L"lll Job No . 1 t 5 056A Subject: Observation of Excavation, Proposed Residence, Lot 25, Sun Meadow Estates, South Meadow Drive, Garfield County, Colorado Gentlemen: As requested, a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the excavation at the subject site on May 11, 2015 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. We previously conducted a subsoil study for design of foundations at the site and presented our findings in a report dated March 9, 2015, Job No. 115 056A. The proposed residence is essential I y the same as that described in our previous report. Spread footings placed on the natural soils and sized for an allowable bearing pressure of 1,500 psfwere designed for the foundation support. The residence area will be above crawlspace and the garage will have a slab-on-grade floor. At the time of our visit to the site, the foundation excavation had been cut in one level from 2 to 4 feet below the adjacent ground surface. The soils exposed in the bottom of the excavation consisted of silty sandy clay. Results of swell -consolidation testing performed on a sample taken from the site, shown on Figure 1, indicate the soils have low to moderate compressibility potential under conditions ofloading and wetting. No free water was encountered in the excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist. The perimeter footings and interior pads had been formed at the time of our site visit. The soil conditions exposed in the excavation are consistent with those previously encountered on the site and suitable for support of spread footings designed for the recommended allowable bearing pressure of 1,500 psf. Loose disturbed soils in the footing areas should be moistened and compacted or removed to expose the undisturbed natural soils. Other recommendations presented in our previous report which are applicable, especially those to keep the bearing soils dry, should also be observed. The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils exposed within the foundation excavation and the previous limited subsurface exploration at the site. Variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation could increase Parker 303 -S-ll-il 19 • Col~ml ~h) Sprin!-!" 719 -6)).)562 • <:;1Iverchornc 970-468-1989 KeJlyWest May 13, 2015 Page2 the risk of foundation movement. We should be advised of any variations encountered in the excavation conditions for possible changes to recommendations contained in this Jetter. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibiJity of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. lfthe client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of pr actice should be consulted. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. SLP/ksw Attachment: Job No. II S OS6A ~h