Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application- Permit
{ 1 8646 GARF ELD COUNTY BUILDING, NVR� cr — 1E3.05-- Q{� aand PG DEPARTMENT £ 109 8th, Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601(970) 9454212 • Job Address � , "k"..) Nature of Work &i.ldin Use of Buildin Amount ofPermit$ Vbak,„ Clerk 1 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION GARFIELD COUNTY (GLENWOOD SPRINGS), COLORADO TELEPHONE: (970) 945-87,12 EI, ERMPr NO. �C "[E n IOB.ADDBESS: off u 1 j — !!! G:t Q ��u�C.u `C Copt BLOCK NO. f 0 1 LOT NO. 6 2 3 OWNER�7r'CLCC [a W\ Cr TIN CCTOR GraCe LW, eS ThS", ADDRE99 ALDRERS 4 ctmzcnFrrcmisit Y 1 S T t Cr+q,' e.eel 5 9Q Ft OFDURL@x1 35F0 INSPECTION LINE: (970)384-50 03 -: PARCELASCHEDULE N D5-604 SUBDIVISIONWEIQ?MPTION - r' F1L.I'w"$vt--� CeeK 013(3 E kl-Eewr kalf-09 ti '7856 liraI]eY Cot/r t16* —Si ��431-759241- 65 Illi -�t5as' �i -2S6 VaIlei C.° ' Z ADDRESS.2,77-7 Cr ass''aa1s'-31a4,'6a' q:a s21 mss 910-2*F.-2 2 v3 sQ.Fr.OFLar EREOP MALMO U1GU/6 {S/ S i h 1 e d m 1�y cl A.,.e t &, kf-ae, t000, -� ,C. d 6 Dascsmaw"x. C" 5" 1� -2 x. r� /e 4 1y yt C s •fi ���. C to t �� 4�1a e a/ l r- . 8 fi.A9S OFW!'ORx: ]k7FW OALDiIION 4AL-[F1tKFLON :{ifOC�$' �rCTro; u 20"Thci No.oFFLCORs i 9 GARAM ERNOL6 D1)0IF6LE CARPORT: WANGLE 10 a DRIVEW'AYPRRIRE aQN SNE SEWAOEDISPOSAt (BEPIID) VAWAIIONOVWORE:9 AMMER VALLAT= 3ES 68EcIALCQ2+DMON9: NOTICE A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT is REQUIRED AND NUST E$ mum BY TEE STATS OF COLORADO THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTIIORIZFID IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 110 DAYS, ORM CONSTRUCTION OIL WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FORA PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND E,ICAMEN.ED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT, ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT, THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONS 10,'eztp.i" ,rATE PERNrl1T ISSUED: ter-'' g OCC: GROUP: D2.3 i ZONING. CONST: TYPE: V N SETBACKS: MANU.IIOME: AUNT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO TETE APPLICANT A3 OWNER, CONTRACTOR ANFIJOR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE A: DETAILED ONFFLANS ANO SPB02kICATIONS StIB14IITTET3 TO AND REVIEWED BY THE EUILDINGDEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF TEE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNERREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODS ANI) LAND USE (REGULATIONS ADOPTED BS GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN1N 30.28,201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURIBER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT F(3LL1 COMPLIED WITH IN THE LOCATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, T3E PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM THE COUNTY AND THATTHEN AND THERE TT MAIL BECOMEN ULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT TBE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THER:i.AFTERREQUIRING TIF CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID .PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER. DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WEEN IR VIOLATION OF THIS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE ORREGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION, T3IB REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONSAND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED TREREAFFER-DOES NOT CONSTII ITE AN ACCEPTANCE OF AN' BESPONs fl1LITIES OR:LIABILITiES BY GARFIELD COUNTY TOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DJSCCEPANCIIES- TLIE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMI?LEMENTATIOI DURING COIYB•TRUCTIONRESTS SPECIKOALLYWIT1ITIi8ARCHITECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDEDTOBE s SERVATIVEAND INSUPPOW OF THE OWNERS INTEREST. Gerfaon.oa3 ISDS N;7XI: IHEREBY ACKNOWLEDG£rTHAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE MIRE MEN'T ABOVE. A T,5 ce)SAb 6tlgQtaCor The following hems are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; S. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1997 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY`OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAYBE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occuparic�use44:e issuance of a Certi c.te of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # ' Signature Date Bpcont0S2002 TI 3 VALiJATION/FEE DETERMINATION ApplicantQ94.0 Address' _ Date /-3A-0.3 cJ �2 7044 Wthe Finished (Livable Area): Main 132.4 q Upper Lower Other Total Square Feet Valuation Basement: Unfinished Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Plan Check Fee for Conversion Valuation Garage: Crawl Space: Valuation 3`1 Valuation 1321 `L Decks/Patios: Covered Valuation Open Valuation Subdivision flUviA€'t CCCl((fi d 1�3. Lot/Block & 1ccJ /u Toeiv1e4-r—se< Contractor Q(kC(Dunes 1 1c 911 g -1)81 9 Ii, (pie --- Total Valuation 11244)/2 Building Permit Fee / D 4,4 • SE Plan Review Fee c) 3 2.4 VISTA ENGINEERING CORP. CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS September 8, 2003 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING DEPT. 109 8th Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 • RE: Foundation frost protection at 42 Juniper Lane, Battlement Mesa, CO Dear Sirs, Over the past several days we have been in discussions with Mr. Darin Carei of Grace Homes Construction regarding .frost protection that is being provided at the above referenced address. From these discussions, it is our understanding that 36 -inch depth required. by Garfield County for this 'protection is not quite met in the area where the driveway adjoins the garage. It is also our understandingthat the as -constructed depth provided for frost protection is approximately 32 -inches. Given the fact that this is only a few inches short ofthe required depth and that this area is covered by conerete flatwork for the driveway which will help provide additional frost protection, it is our opinion that the installation of the foundation as constructed will provide adequate frost protection to meet or exceed minimum standards forlong term performance ofthe structure. If you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, VISTA ENGINEERING CORP. David E. Chase, P.E. 'President/Office Manager D.EC/dc, ;00 REGI 11I fY 0024991• , Al I oo'a .• +ifs s'0 Yj xc: Mr. Darin Carei, Grace Homes Construction 2777 CRossROAos BOULEVARD • GRAND J,uNCTIoN, CO 8'1506 • (970) 243-2242• FAX: (970) 243-3810 .4 Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house - rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, an 80 M.P.H. windshear, wind exposure B, windload of 15 pounds per square foot, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 1997 UBC, UMC and 1997 UPC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure(s) prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. Yes IJ kf .) 2. Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, setback easements and utility e sements? Yes V E . 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes V 4. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes 5. Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design?j Yes 6. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and d the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes 11 7. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roof joist spaces's an soffits? Yes 8. Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes e1 9. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes 10. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes ✓ 11. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns and beams? Yes t� 12. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the cave down to existing (undisturbed) grade contours? Yes 13. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes e/ No 14. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Building Code Chapter 37? Yes No V 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code? Yes [[ No 3 16. Does the plan h 1ude a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and vent' ration for all habitable rooms? Yes No 17. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surf ce; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes �,/ No 18. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated.7-the plan? Yes No 19. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes No 20. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the architectural c nimittee deny or reject your building plans? Yes No 21. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes ,/ No If no -Explain: 22. Have two (�jdrnplete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes 23. Do you understand that the minimum size a home can be on a lot is a 20ft. x 20ft.? Yes e� No 24. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction ode requirements? Yes No 25. Does the plan ac urately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection b e Garfield County Building Department? Yes No 4 26. Do you understa • d that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the applicatio of these changes? Yes No 27, Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application submittal and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "Road Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building pe it? Yes No 28, Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoons. All inspections must be called in by 3:30 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay your inspection one (I) day, Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes ./ No 29, Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and -occupancy of the building? Yes No 30, Are you aware that the person signing the Permit Application, whether the "Owner", "Agent of the Owner", "General Contractor", "Contractor" or otherwise, is the party responsible for the project complying with the Uniform Building Code? Yes 17"-` No 31, Are you aware that prior to issuance of a building permit you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & l3ridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. Yes ' '`_t✓' No 32, Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at tim of -applicable inspection. Yes V No 5 33. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to issuance of a building permit? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes No Y hereby acknowledge that f have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of my ability. Wi‘k Cg-^ Signature Phone: 1'719 5) s (days); Project Name: RANCL,_\ Project Address: *(1 Notes: Date Si c © 2'.22 -LE 47 Err --(evenings) If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in. proceeding with construction. bpminreq 08/2002 6 } PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant Qp....4efp4-44..Date /-,2 2:- 63 Building -✓ Engineered Foundation 444. Driveway Permit iurveyed Site Plan Septic Permit and Setbacks Grade/Topography 30% 04. Plan review -File Notes Attach Residential Plan Review List Minimum Application Questionnaire Subdivision Plat Notes �►�. Fire Department Review Valuation. Determination/Fees -Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker Oma Attach Conditions ty'Application Signed c. --Plan Reviewer To Sign Application Parcel/Schedule No. L1, 40# Snowload Letter- Manf, Hms. GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning Property Line Setbacks 30ft Stream Setbacks Flood Plain Building Height Zoning Sign -off • Subdivision Plat Notes Road Impact Fees PIOAtDRC Approval Grade/Topography 40% Planning Issues DEC 02 2002 1G:16 , FR 84 LUMBER GRAND ICT 9702412293 TO 5230103 Sent By1113 LaserJet 3100; 007; AWER,4610711RbSS ri9To: 6, itiwy .50 DMA CO 8146 ,t1 LUMBER 111904:.: 970474-7870 Par 910474-7060 Oa. CO Pr: GRAM HOMES CoritA0t: Site: NItme: Phony, FAN!' 810cklkla: Ito N9; Mixt. RANDY * 4.1.7111ittr, Deliver To: Nov -21-02 9:02PM; P.03/05 Page 3 0/tri1.8551.:NT MA Deflyery List Job Number: P4gc1 avre 1-2•1-2002 7t1944 PM Proleallx j200-16 A0C0111ii 279610431 21 $411E7Palx,irl: 89.10 WADING 413-10-10 Profile: Truss !d: Span: Truss Typo! Slope: LOR ROH Load By: „. • 112 113 cr.at 0 611btM11 30 ltit (1) 7Tly /0 - 10 4 RCQF TAM 6-4-0 20 .11-11-0 16 - 1bft. us4 21(4,3X6 (1) 2 -Ply 121 thh t 12 I ttt. tad., 304.8 RoOlt 71k1/X$ ROOF MOM moms ROarlitUss I-10-10 0 .0 • 1 10 10 CO 1.4.0 0.00 3-4-4 sA/0 1.4.0 -3-9 4.00 010 5-14 115 RA oth -1.0" J1 20 113s...t.11 30 0 -fi 30 .0 -11 7 - 8 - 14 1.4.0 0-0-0 1 • 4.11 1.4.0 0.9.0 ROW' TRUSS 5,00 1 - a .. 0 0 - 0 - 0 14 - 1 • 1 0.00 .. 9.1 ROOF TR irgi .5.1111 - 41j 0-11-0 -0- 0 212mv.61..4 Ilinift DP -7.1 R(.1(>11 -TRUSS 3.00 1.4.0 0-0-0 1 Rcar LatBnce 0.00 ROOF TRUSS 500 1 • 4 • 0 0 - 0 - 0 .1-8V-Lltref5V-... . 0,00 14 - .2 5,00 . 1 .4 - 0 0 - 0 - 0 0.00 ROOF TRIM .22 4 end.' RIX11--SAUSS 1.4.111 5.011 J.4.9 0 0-9 0.09 J3 4 14 ,,Allf;14-14.-Ic.z,g 1 :s1 S2 11 0411c4l0 15 lin e20. 1.19042 telt 1101hx. ,e4;521> •1 1 101bs. e84.11 4 - 0 - 7 RO1NU!.1$. 2-0 -10 MR 1 , a . o 0.00 • 0-0-0 30.0-0 3 -4 - 10 ROOFTRUSS 5.00 11•4.0 0,00 ROOF' MUSS $44 4 Rve.11..1.11EaN) 20Q 0 g ROOF 7111,T8S 3 nt ROI TOWS , 1 Roziru 119 lbs each 34.. 0 - 8 ROOF TRIA15 StK 30-0-8 SSA 30-0-8 S6 8.0uPT21U2s 122.1)o 41 - 9-A 5.40 2.00 .1.2 5.00 1.8n 0 -0 - 0 9 - -9 x0,11i X 0 .9 -31 00-10-1( 0-0-0 - c0.I0- 9-11-9 3X41 muss SIX/ ;00 74.5 ROOF TRUSS 0.09 203' 74-5 5.00 7 00 .411 .10 .8 0 . -0 - _ 03-U-0 1.4.0 1111" ...ma DEC 02 2002 18t16 ,FR 84 S&It 14? HP LasetJet blUU; OVERUOLT TRUSS 1796 OW 6ir =LTA ,' 0) 81416 rhogc;$10-e(74-70/0 Par: 970 -S74 -706S ftnimt(WaHOMES 1:1Wk No! Lt1� Cotrl= Site: LUMBER GRAND JCT 9702412293 TO 5230103 OW; Nov -21-02 9:82PM; P.04/05 Page 4/e 421t363: RANDY ' Profile! Qty: Truss xd: To: • 84 I.11MTPR GI, CO Dcilver To: DATIUMENT MESA This Type: slope: Delivery List 30 Numb., Pao: 2 D0: 11-21-2002 71191-44 PM Projw j21193.p A:multi*); 22962X4ST Designial 29 Salesperrem: MAN LOADING 44.1040 1.01I ROR Load By: T1 es lbs. N4er. 7 71A 154 Ilet each 0/24V 7 T7 „oetCVN/VYA 23416 901 1 13 2 T4 2 Lal kw tea 0 - 20-0 - 0 30 0 - 11 - o Rr,OF TPA 9.(3e..V112t7S..t 6 • • 7 5.1141 • ilo0 $.40 01)0 ▪ 1.2 ROOVTRigM 344 1 .4 - 0 1-4-0 t.4.0 0 - 11•1 1010f, MISS 5.00 1.4.0 w Bre= U.00 F.04 1 -4-.0 ono .1-10 ROOF -MUSS 'Soto 0 - . q 000 1.). 13 MO0-0-0 0.00 4-4-4 5,00 0-0-0 0.00 1•403 22 lbe (Itch (1) 2.Ply 101{91 eele-0 ita. CSIGh - -0 5 - 7- 9 P.001 -Muss R.AusLaRtiee 176A 11 .11- 0 n1te 0.1a. 1.`61:1 ROUrrigin ROOF TRUSS 34 Itel eleb, MYSC 1711MS 3 d • CI 0- S 0.0,0 0-0 • 0 1-4,41 ROOF TRUSS &Du - 4.0 1 .4.0 (00 gLie.ktity. TRUSSYS ARE DESIONY,I) FOR 40 SNOW ZIMPH WINDOSPSF WIND WAD AS PER •NG/NEER01) DRAWINGS. PRE-ENGINEERED RF TRUSSES HAVE ENGINEERING FOR INSPECTOR AT TIME OF FRAME INSPECION VADvikmA 4a41. /3/0,11,.S siaatxtb, NW 21 2002 19:41 007 DEC 02 2002 1.6:16 ,FR 84 LUMBER GRAND JCT Sent By0 HP,.LaserJet 3100; 1 • • 9702412293 TO 5230103 Nov -21- :u,erm; 43-7-0 34-6-0 P.05/05 I -age *!es 9-1-0 4-9-8 11-11-0 tl it 1 .r 6-10-8 1 20-0-0 OVERHOLT TRUSS 77g7Tigv—cri DELTA, CO 81416 Telephone: 9?4-974-7070 Fax: 874-874-7069 game: t}e i IIMsaF�R Name: Address: City: GRAND JUNCTION State: , Phone; HOU 21 2AMP 1t41 rn 9 Jots; J 2080—X I. , uvanM• l;yds.wro ekoav in Sut1e: 1 : BS 1141.4t: !/Z7/02 i Drawn By: aR!ek narr anr_c ac sI K TOTAL PAGE.05 ** 12/02/02 3.4:21 V2448310 BOISE CASCADE £J 'THIS DRAW1N6 MUST 9E CHECKED BY THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR fl $84m TiTTEc m Ao C Ommr� 1 ¢C/ a•:_s .. J 's i t 10* VTif� R T y RIiii "uuul n • { • 44 • 4.If � 7111111111 R K r r n R R. 1i 919 a Y 195,IQ4411d 1 4+ r d fi 1 iriACT WaMEGA age nn� vommivs'd nmlhid Cam .iaMpMpn Waft, Oi 71. Wand, mitaa's blo int TN. 40.141al6eMdaH,eC6lWm *AT Audr.comeitairovro noisy' DEC 02 20Fi? 13174 S0/E0'd g0TEi 25 01 E6EZTPEOL6 tai' QNUNO aamni 178 NA ST:9T e04Daf •'l4 IfIrldl T --DEC. 3.2002 4•'0SPM BATTLEMENT MESA CO NO.694 BATTLEMENT MESA SERVICE ASSOCIATION ARCPIITECTUIZAL COMMITTEE APPLICATION & arEacusT (for New Home Construction projects) Homeowner: Cr ha. ce (-[e ., x Cpt. r ■ 9,:, H c . �o yrs Home Mailing Address: a [ I e C�. r�-k d �� ►� r Home Phone: orkPhone (if desired): c� Project Address: 004.19_ n e pr oductioni'Iome PlarNarce (ifapplicable): P. 2 Lot: _6a Block: Id _Subdivision: ,t., f evxs k -Vim e /3 Pjomebtt r: 6r' o- Ct `L.o rn t Cosa � v ttn c 7 i t c Bum' essMa ingAddress: Vca, �.�'I^. k ‘ vie fxp i Co t Seo Business Phone: 9 S D s .5-3— Fax(i£desired): — S, 3 014 % Submittal Date: EstxmatedStartDate: Estimated Completion late SUBMITTAL EZQU1REMENTS: Two Copies zeac acomiasindicated.) need to be submitted, (Check -off items attached to the Application.spaces V 1. Site Plari Drawing (1" =10' or 1" — 20' scale) with the following information shown: ✓ Lot, Block & Subdivision tie. ---7" Street Address of Project. 'eta the b Building Setback Lines (also fill-in the shortest distance between property lin exterior wall closest to that property line), 'lease be aware that all Building Setback Lines are taken from your property Line Pins.! Your property Line is NOT the Curb Linter! Front Setback: Left Side Setback: Right Side Setback: Rear Setback: Utility Easements, 55' Clear Site -Line at intersection Corner Lots. Site Girding Elevations & Drainage. First (main) Floor Height in relation to top 0/street curb at front -center of lot. Driveways (including width of driveway), Wallmays, Patios, etc. Outbuildings. adapted and Cicely I'cbruary A ZOOZ DEC. 3.2002 4:05PM BATTLEMENT MESA CO 7 NO.694 P.3 __-- 2. Architectural Drawings (114" =1' or 1I8" = 1' scale) with the following information shown. Floor Plau(s) with overall. dimensions (01i -in the following square foot areas). First3 square feet Floor Finished Living Area: ) square feet Second Floor Finished Living Area: square feet Lower Floor Fhgished"Living Area: ! S` t square feet Total Finished Living Area: Total Unfinished Living Area: -- ,----- square flet gf o square feet v Garage Area; Building Elevations Plans bndicatig doors, windows, exterior materials, building height, roof pitch, roof -mounted evaporative coolers, etc. (fill-in maximumheight below). Maximum building height to highest ridge line or building structural projection feet above top of street curb at front -center of your lot i f Engineered (stamped) Fotmdation Plan, Outbuildings indicating dimensions, elevations and overall height to ridge line, 3. Exterior Materials (fEll-in the selections below): RoofmgMaterial: ' re Color: Primary SidhigMial:' iCr'd416-t1 I" Calor-- Accent Siding Material: �kU, rreive. Color_ Ng Oct .---.- TrimMateriei C r YL?.I.J Tei - Color Masonz3rMatcr1al: I?r e-1.- urea S Color: Colo Stucco Materials: _ FrontDoor Material: _ Garage Door Material: COLOR SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE £to— ,(dop&' anaffec8+he February I, 2002 Color: _ COLOR SAMPLE COLOR. SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE COLOR SAMPLE lot_ we 0GL-4 de& DEC. 3.2002 4:05PM BATTLEMENT MESA CO NO.694 P.4 4. Landscapellzrigation.Plaas with the following information}: Planting Plan (indicate areas of irrigated lawn, tree placement, shrub beds, ground cover, etc.). Plant Material listing by species of trees, shrubs and grasses. Groundcover Material with weed control barrier. Fences, fl etc). Other Landscape improvements (decks, site lighting, flag poles, , 5. Variance Request (if -applicable) Give details below: 6. Residential Construction Monetary Deposit: Me hereby acknowledge and understand that our fagure to completeied in Cundorne aus ctio2.n, & p, On Page rovement Projects or Landscaping Construction within the time constraints a fax a Hearing before the BMSA Board of 6 of this Application will result in a Notice and Opportunity g e Directors. If IJWe are found in violation of these Conditions at the Rearing it aM resultcompletionineto the Owner of not less than 5540.04 per month for each fuss month in excess of frame, W herebyaclnowledge that Home Construction or Improvement Projects ts orCon3uct ien features which are built in non-conformance with tfullapplication, fug the tions of � BMSA/AC in written cYtatian form at the Approves Hated on Wage 6 of 6 herein, ]`!'We will be cited by be requested from the BMSA/AC, time of discovery. In extenuating circumstances a Variance may jurisdiction s ch Variance request item is within the purview and approval ms are of corrected within provided u If a variance is not granted by the BMSA/ACe a� b the eer�ed Notice of Hearing before the DMSA Board 60 days after the date of written citation, 1/We and if Me are found in violation of these Non -Conforming Mems the Iffe aingY e be Dire of 5500.04per NonnConform g Item.. Notwithstanding ie al fined a minimum pursue any g 'acknowledge that the BMSA Board of Directors and/or Architectural Committee may p remedy available in the event of a non-compliance. Adopted cord itgadye February f,2002 DEC. 3.2002 4:06PM BATTLEMENT MESA Co NO.694 P.5 Prpayfines levied as determined at the Hearing may also result in a Lien being placed on your Failure to Property or litigation. Process initiated by the BMSA Board of Directors to secure conformance with this full Application and its respective Conditions Of Approval 1/We understand that ArchitecturalCommittee approval does not constitute approval of the local building department, drainage design or structural soundness, nor does it constitute assurance that the plans comply with an applicable codes, regulations, ordinances and laws. 1/We further acknowledge that any subsequent field chsnges which liWe may desire to the Home Application Submittal and th ©rigivai Conditions Construction or Improvement Projects of this original an additional Revised Application Submittal on our of Approval issued by the BMSA/AC will require behalf, and that f/We will not proceed with any subsequent field changes until a Revised Conditions of Approval have been issued to us by the BMSA/AC. Owner's Signature(s): Owner' s PrintedNa1mes: Builder's Signature: Date: fl Builders P rinte d Name; ,4daprrd and Effective Fxbruary 1,207 Date: -DEC. 3.2002 4:06PM BATTLEMENT MESA Co NO.694 This portion of the Application Form is to be completed by the Architectural Committee (not the Applicant). P.6�. CQND ONS OP' ApP�OV AL or pISAPPIt 'ilAL 1. Ido sitework or building construction. may proceed on any Lot (including uo preliminary site clearing, grubbing, rade alteration, storing of material, foundation excavation, extension ofunderground utilities, etc.) until the Project has received a Project approval from the Architectural Committee and has been issued a Building Permit (as required by Garfield County for new home or Renovation projects). 2. All general building and site improvements construction for any Project shall be cont pl tno ae r nthan ond shall �11 e issued a Certificate of Occupancy from the Garfield County Building'y vcaX after the issuance date of this Arc ' ectm� Committee A rawal, 3. The complete landscaping and revegetation of the improvedLot, to specifically date de the e the Certificate of side and rear yard areas, shall be completed no later than six (6) months from Occupancy. 4, If the selection of colors and for landscaping plans are not included with this application they must be submitted for approval before any action is taken to install the missing items. a.sf k 1. 5. 6. 7. Application A • royal (Initials of Archie By; Application Ap By Chairman; Committee Members): o•the above conditions: Date; Application Denied (Initials of Architectural Committee Members): By; Application Denied for reason(s) stated above: By Chairman: Page 6 of 6 Date: Grace Homes Inc. 786 Valley Court Grand Jct. CO. 81508 October 30, 2002 Fax 245-4006 Dear Sir, Garfield County 1 BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT Before a plan review can be done on both your building permit applications, the following items must be submitted: 1. Surveyed site plan. —2. Framing plan including header sizes, beams and girts. —3. Roof framing plan. —4. Notations verifying 40psf snow load to foundation, floor loading, wind and seismic loading, and compliance to the 97 UBC IPC and UMC. Insulation values for floor, walls, and roof. ~V6. Home owners association approval. Lot., re cei Vim- Lo fi ✓ 7. Signed and initialed application. ✓8. Completed Questionnaire. -- Lo -t1,, 4- 1 Other items may become evident once we do the plan review. Also please verify if the building will be on a crawl space or basement. Please call if you have any questions. Andrew Schwaller Building Official 108 8th Street, Suite 201, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 (970) 945-8212 (970) 285-7972 Fax: (970) 384-3470 GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN DeVORE, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL 1441 Motor St. Grand ]unction, CO 81505 April 2, 2003 Grace Homes 786 Valley Ct. Grand Junction, CO 81506 Re: Open Excavation Observation 42 Juniper Ln., Battlement Mesa, CO TEL: (970) 242-8968 FAX: (970) 242-1561 As requested, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel have completed a foundation excavation evaluation at the above referenced site on 3-13-03. The purpose of this observation and evaluation was to determine the type and condition of the soils on the site and to relate their engineering characteristics to foundation reactions ofthe proposed structure. This letter contains general recommendations for construction of a residential foundation, but is not a foundation design and may not be used as such. Our conclusions and recommendations for this site are presented below. Soil Classification: The soils on this site consist of an alluvial debris -fan deposit which is quite thick and extremely stratified. This debris fan originates on the middle and upper slopes of Battlement Mesa to the east southeast, along the Battlement Creek and Monument Gulch Drainages. The stc atification within This debris fan feature ranges from silt, sandy silt and silty day in the finer portions and gravely silty clays to silty gravel, cobbles and boulders in the coarser portions. Many sit ata of the finer -grained soils are of low to very low density and exhibit compressible and metastable (collapsible) properties. The soils at foundation level on this site visually classified as nonplastic and occasionally very low plastic silt of slight to occasionally moderate compressive and slight to moderate collapsible properties. This upper soil is believed to be in excess of 20 feet thick below the foundation excavation. The allowable bearing capacities ofthe upper soils on this site, after over excavation, wetting and compaction, are 1600 psf maximum and 150 psf minimum. In-place soil density tests were taken within the building over excavation on 3-13-03 and 3-24-03. These 8 in-place soil density tests indicate the wetted, reworked subgrade soils have a dry density ranging from 105 to 106 pounds per cubic foot. Densities ofthis magnitude indicate these reworked soils, in near proximity to the footings, do not possess moderate compressible or possible collapsible properties. No soft areas were indicated by the final density tests taken on the subgrade 3-24-03 nor were soft areas observed by personnel of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore on that date. Unless specifically noted, this site observation, any associated testing and the reworking/compaction of the soils at foundation level, addresses only the soils within 1 to 2 feet below the bottom of the building foundation excavation. It is possible that soil conditions which may affect the performance ofthis foundation system are present below the depth of soil compaction by the contractor and the testing performed by Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore. The grading and drainage recommendations are considered very important for the long term stability ofthis foundation system and the structure. Man-made Fill: Soils within the original excavation appear to be native to the site. Personnel of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore observed the recently placed structural fill on the above referenced site on 3-31-03. The structural fill was found to consist of approximately 12 inches of reworked native soils placed over reworked subgrade soils. In-place soil density tests taken on the structural fill indicated that compaction was either equal to or in excess of 90% of the modified proctor density (ASTM D-1557) for these materials. 1 Grace Homes Open Excavation Observation, 42 Juniper Ln., Battlement Mesa, CO April 2, 2003 Page 2 Soil Moisture Conditions: The soils at foundation level within the original excavation were believed to be dry to darnp, based upon site conditions and our experience in this area. No free water was noted in the excavation. Some moisture was added to the soils in the excavation by the contractor in order to obtain proper compaction. Foundation Type Recommended: Assuming that some amount of dif erential movement can be tolerated, then a conventional shallow foundation system, underlain by at least 12 inches of structural fill, placed in accordance with the recon unendations contained within thus report may be utilized. The foundation would consist of continuous spread footings beneath all bearing walls and isolated spread footings beneath all columns and other points of concentrated load. Such a shallow foundation system, resting on the properly constructed structural fill, may be designed on the basis of an allowable bearing capacity of 1600 psf maximum. A minimum bearing of 150 psf is recommended. Recommendations pertaining to balancing, reinforcing, drainage, and inspection are considered extremely important and must be followed. Contact stresses beneath all continuous walls should be balanced to within + or - 200 psf at all points. Isolated interior column footings should be designed for contact stresses of about 150 psf less than the average used to balance the continuous walls. The criteria for balancing will depend somewhat on the nature of the structure. Single -story, slab -on -grade structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load only. Multi story structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load plus one half live load, for up to three stories. Voids Beneath Foundation Walls: Voids are not requiredto mitigate expansive pressures, but may be used to attain proper balance around the structure. Reinforcing: The foundation shall be reinforced as shown on the foundation design. No changes shall be made to this placement of reinforcing without written approval of the design engineer or architect. All foundation stem walls should be designed as "grade beams" capable of spanning at lust 12 feet. Where the foundation stein walls are relatively shallow in height, vertical reinforcing will not be necessary, However, in the walls retaining soil in excess of 4 feet in height, vertical reinforcing may be necessary to resist the lateral pressures (restrained case) of the soils along the wall exterior. To aid in designing such vertical reinforcing, an equivalent fluid pressure (E.F.P) on the order of 45 pcf would be appropriate for the native soils. Floor Slabs: Non -Structural floor slabs on grade, if any, should be positively separated from all structural portions of this building and allowed to float freely. Frequent scoring (control joints) of the slabs should be provided to allow for possible shrinkage cracking ofthe slab. These control joints should be placed to provide maximum slab areas of approximately 200 to 360 square feet. Any manmade fill placed below floor slabs on grade should be compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density, ASTM D-1557. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually Proctor optimum moisture content +2%). Drainage arid Grading: Adequate site drainage should be provided in the foundation area both during and after construction to prevent the ponding of water and the wetting or saturation of the subsurface soils. We recommend that the ground surface around the structure be graded so that surface water will be carried quickly away from the building. The minimum gradient within 10 feet of the building will depend on surface landscaping. We recommend that paved areas maintain a minimum gradient of 2%, and that landscaped areas maintain a minimum gradient of 8%. It is further recommended that roof drain downspouts be carried at least 5 feet beyond all backfilled areas and discharged a minimum 10 feet away from the structure. Proper discharge of roof drain downspouts may require the use of subsurface piping in some areas. Under no circumstances should a 'dry well discharge' be used on this site, Grace Homes Open Excavation Observation, 42 Juniper Ln., Battlement Mesa, CO April 2, 2003 Page 3 unless specifically sited by a Geotechnical Engineer. Planters, if any, should be so constructed that moisture is not allowed to seep into foundation areas or beneath slabs or pavements. The existing drainage on the site must either be maintained carefully or improved. We recommend that water be drained away from structures as rapidly as possible and not be allowed to stand or pond within 15 feet of the building or foundation. We recommend that water removed from one building not be directed onto the backfill areas of adjacent buildings. Should an automatic lawn irrigation system be used on this site, we recommend that the sprinkler heads, irrigation piping and valves be installed no less than 5 feet from the building. In addition, these heads should be adjusted so that spray from the system does not fall onto the walls of the building and that such water does not excessively wet the backfill soils. It is recommended that lawn and landscaping irrigation be reasonably limited, so as to prevent undesirable saturation of subsurface soils or backfilled areas. Several methods of irrigation water control are possible, to include, but not limited to: * Metering the Irrigation water. * Sizing the irrigation distribution service piping to limit on-site water usage. * Encourage efficient landscaping practices. * Enforcing reasonable limits on the size of high water usage landscaping within 5 feet of the building or foundation. * Incorporating `xeriscaping' landscaping and irrigation techniques. A plastic membrane placed on any Crawlspace ground surfaces may retain/trap excessive amounts ofwater beneath the membrane. If future moisture problems develop or are anticipated, the Foundation Design Engineer or the Geotechnical Engineer may require that the membrane be partially or completely removed from the crawlspace area. Provided all recommendations found herein pertaining to site surface drainage, grading and soil compaction are closely followed, a perimeter foundation drain would not be required. For fully finished basements, however, the use of a perimeter foundation drain would significantly reduce potential moisture related problems which can arise from subsequent area development. Backfill: To reduce settlement and aid in keeping; water from reaching beneath this building, all backfill around this building should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density ASTM D-1557. The only exception to this would be the components of the perimeter foundation drain, if any. All backfill should be composed of the native soils and should not be placed by soaking, jetting or puddling. All backfill placed in utility trenches around this structure or below foundation walls should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density ASTM D-1557. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually Proctor optimum content ±2%). Cement Type: Type II, Type I-II or Type II -V cerncnt is recommended for all concrete which is in contact with the soils on this site. Calcium chloride should not be added to a Type II, Type I-II or Type IITV cement under any circumstances. Remarks: We recommend that the bottom of all foundation components rest a minimum of 3 feet below finished grade or as required by the local building codes. Foundation components must not be placed on frozen soils. 1 Grace Homes Open Excavation Observation, 42 Juniper Ln., Bafflement Mesa, CO April 2, 2003 Page 4 Senate Bill 13 (CRS 6-6.5-101) Discussion; This particular residence is being constructed on foundation soils which do not possess a "significant potential for expansion". We recommend that the owner receive a copy of this summary report of our soil analysis and site recommendations. Limitations: This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the architect and engineer for the project, and are incorporated into the plans. In addition, it is his responsibility that the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and his subcontractors carry out these recommendations during construction. The findings of this report are valid as ofthe present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in acceptable or appropriate standards may occur or may result from legislation or the broadening of engineering knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalid, wholly or partially, by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be relied upon after a period of 3 years. The recommendations of this report pertain only to the site investigated and are based on the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate from those described in this report. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction or the proposed construction wilt differ from that planned on the day of this repolt, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be provided, if appropriate. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore makes no warranty, either expressed or implied, as to the findings, recommendations, specifications or professional advice, except that they were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practice in the field of geotechnical engineering. Respectfully submitted, GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN-DeVORE, INC. Qrr .PQ WI. A1pA %4'% i w 30590 �r 4)) -• �) 41- s-DDya/144 By: Edward M. Morris, PE Principal Engineer GJLD Job # 90052 -GJ X r CRITICAL ORNNACE ZONE 115EL THE *TOM OF THE MORAL E4CAVAt1ON tAV11 OAKS - MOOMUN Of 5 fft! 7900 9U509.0 ROOF 00NNSPCU7� 50[ PRCPAREO E• TO E• ACIP 10 EA1,05CA7C, 05£ 1017 :PATER USC• 17PE r 0+115 and/or 'xEPoSCAPAI0- ?COrN1A0EF 104401 THC Th444CAC 0AANA(C zo.e: 4 OCJ00 SLOPE 4711015 10440500955 -.-----001511 LUTT R 40 EVE 171E 440719E 5005 000040 1440 5 111CAL GA*54900 AM' 10 97 00900100 t 0099AC0E07040 A 1.145511111.1 OF 18 5471175 SIX &coot M09.10100 *Wawa WATER SELPACE TO THE F0057.11404 5705 LINDSCAP£ (A800 8f44E000 ERAVE[M4004 COVER I ` [pa TNKwN£SS i LLE t 1145D(N7S 1 STRUCTURAL FILL . a o o x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °o 0 FILL 70 EXTEND 9£NEATH •' °t.°.• ° • •'•; o •' ' ' RLL FOUNOATTON [CEMENTS one roo o d°' °•oo •pan 5EE NOi£S >, v o•o v0v o•0'no vvv v0° 0 ` A a A a ,°7;7;.;•.; a J �•.° A ...� e good o a00� 000 00 / suc EXTiCE FABRIC e.'rt^:^ � ; o ;p,•;. • such as Contech C-180 or ¢fra£t 500-x AS REQUIRED EXCAVATION tMRT 45STAEL DRAJN A5 RE001RED Br ElVtICER• SEE 907£4 FOR DETAILS. DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT 'NO WATER ZONE' DY FOUNDATION 7511T0,4 5001900E 2097 1W10E 750 010171 Cr THE 0,7175f At 75CAVATION [TAUT ( 1AR.77 - 051000 0n 5 FEEL FROM 5[0510445 1014 PREPARED 6- !a D• OEE1 TO LATt557APE. LSC 10W WATER USE' TYPE PLANTS and/0r •47117005w0 7ECHN40II£s 4514101 144E "[108[01 04041407E 10440: ROOF 00404SFOu7--..,, 750044) SLOPE 59055 LANOSCAPrN7 CUT1E47 505 8AC41N1 714E 440710E 501414 0E5040 144E 7097.407E0 10144440,87 •CREECAE DRA44407 ZONE' TO 87' W41E1? SEEPAGE T5 8[4450710 R 07NPA71E5 FOR 191' TDUNOAIIOw 5055 A 1.441111.1 57 17 111040 PVC ORNNAr ^—a APL �— E5CAVAN7'154011 --• - €.n[1 hnGxNESs LIfN[ a -'°("S3.1 STRUCTURAL nu ti 195fAL[ DRAIN AS REWIRED DY 77749EER.. SEE NOTES FOR DE141LS. 0 0 0 0 o o 0 6 0 o 000.00 0 on ./ Flu TO EXTEND BENEATH o u°°Oen o o o 0 oe oo .o — • ,0 ALL FOUNDATION ELEMENTS. �� °An•. 0.070•, •a• SEE NOTES \ 0.0 0.1 000.000 000.0.00 .• .4 ° 1"..; a QUITEXTILE FABRIC •'o°' :o ............2.... ; I7 such os Convech C-180 0000000 0000000 0000000 or MVroii 500-X AS REQUIRED DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT 'NO WATER ZONE' BY FOUNDATION GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN— DeVORE, Inc. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS --GEOLOGISTS EXTERIOR DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT OAT@: SCALE: NONE Fye r 1 1 —5-99 D—DRAIN2 105 Juniper Lane Parachute, CO 81635 July 28,2003 To: President Terry Lawrence To: Darin Carei, V.P. Grace Homes Real Estate & Construction Inc. To: Battlement Mesa Partners Inc. President Tom Beard Battlement Mesa Homes Inc. President William Wilde Battlement Mesa Partners Inc. Vice President Lynn Shore Battlement Mesa Service Association President Chuck Hall Chairman of Battlement Mesa Architectural Committee Charles Haberman Garfield County Commissioners John Martin, Tresi Houpt & Larry McGowan Garfield County Planning Commission This letter is in answer to Mr. Carei's letter sent to Battlement Mesa Grace Homes Real Estate, Construction Inc., Subcontractors, Employees and delivered to Peggy Rawlins, Battlement Mesa Service Association member representing Monument Creek & the Battlement Mesa Architect Committee Inspector. When the foundation was laid for the home on Juniper Lane and the home on Ponderosa in Monument Creek by Grace Home Builders there were complaints that the foundation wall was too high and during the rainy season water would pour down the steep slope and cause the neighbors problems. After several calls concerning this problem, the wall was lowered and the neighbors were pleased. However, there was much construction mess around and no dumpster in sight. After phone calls, a dumpster and a porta potty were installed. Then during the most windy week of the summer, the men laid tar paper on the roof and went home. Nothing was protecting the paper from the wind , so for weeks the tar paper has blown all over our neighborhood. To this day, July 21, 2003 the tar paper is still blowing off of the house on Ponderosa. A truck arrived, parked on Ponderosa and proceeded to make ruts in the pavement. Other trucks have dripped large round circles of oil on both Juniper and Ponderosa. I have taken pictures of this unnecessary damage and called Mr. Carel about this. The result was the afore mentioned letter sent out June 23, 2003. The problem also concerned the loud swearing, yelling , urinating onsite and trash not put in the dumpster. So the letter stated the sites would either be cleaned up by the end of the week, or the workers would be fined $50.00. The next problem concerned the workers smoking around the house at 2:00a.m. At the Ponderosa sight, the truck left on the street all night, the air compressor running all night and the cooler left on the sidewalk for two days and two nights. We understand Mr. Carel talked to the workers on Ponderosa and they indicated they did not sleep overnight. However, the sheriff was called previously for the same issue and workers were warned that they could not sleep overnight in the house. It is the neighbors contention that after the sheriff left, the workers did sleep overnight. This house construction is shoddy, poorly built with cheap material and not up to standards of other homes in the surrounding area. It is our contention that if this construction continues in this vein, our home values will drop and more importantly, will affect all Battlement Mesa homes when the builders begin their planned Valley View homes on Battlement Mesa, located off of Battlement Mesa Parkway and Stone Quarry Road. Sincerely, Pqv 'IReutA,, Peggy Rawlins JA.,-4-44.Lroj C t M Grace Homy. IOS,' onderosa Cir. General comments: From the start there seems to be very little co-ordination of the work plan. Weeks go by without any activity. The site continues to be unorganized. My concern is that this builder does not meet the standards of the other builders in this area. Potential buyers could be turned off with this area because of the messy site and our home values could be affected. Problem items: 1. The garage opening was too high for proper access. I called the Garfield County inspection department to see what could be done. The inspection department said they had no responsibility for this. 2. I called the Rifle Road and Bridge depaztc nt and was informed that they had no responsibility for this. They suggested that I contact the Battlement Mesa Management for their input 3. I called Bill Wilde and was told that they had no responsibility for this item. Bill referred me to the architectural committee. 4. I called Grace Homes and talked with Terry Lawrence and informed him ofthe ST) dt, FAA r problem. He came out and agreed to correct the problem bycuttingout foundation opening to improve access. � e foundation was fly cut out to improve access.' 5. Framers: The framers were using so much four language that we home owners had Ki -0 7,-'x4p request them to tone it down. °4,c` 6. Trash container Trash and scrap lumber were left in front ofthe structure for several 1)— weeks weeks causing a severe eye sore. I contacted Grace Homes to request that a trash container be put on site. Thery said that there should have been one a week ago. Finally a trash container was put on site. I had to make another call to Terry Lawrence to see who would be picking up the trash and putting it into the container. Terry said that he would send up a cleaning crew to do this. A crew was sent out and the trash picked up. 7. Roofers: A crew of three men and one woman arrived early in the day and did nothing until late in the day. They used a lot of foul language and had to be requested to tone it down. One of the men urinated on the side of the house instead of using the port -a potty on site. The roofers had a pick-up truck with a camper on it. They asked the owner at 89 Ponderosa if they could borrow an extension cord so they could have coffee in the morning. The neighbor refused and told them they should not be staying over night on site. I contacted the Garfield County Sheriffs department to report the foul language and the fact that the roofers planned to stay over night on site. The sheriff's department reported that the roofers didn't intend to spend the night. How ever they did spend the night. 8. Roofing paper: The wind ripped off all of the paper. Since then the shingles have been delivered and stacked on the roof. Concern: will new paper be put down before the shingles are installed?? 9. Building wrap: Partially installed. Very little action occurring on site. Siding material has been delivered but no further action taking place. Signed: Neil Fechner, 98 Ponderosa ,cir. Parachute, Co July 14, 03 What's Wrong with Grace Homes/114 Ponderosa Cir: They excavated three times for the foundation and backfilled twice. Although they tamped it both times with a robot tractor, that is not sufficient for foundation footings. Since the periphery was not tamped with a pneumatic tamper, it is very likely that the house will develop far more than normal cracks from settling. The house is too high on the lot. (One of the owners himself was heard to say that.) One result is that the original level intended for the garage would have created a drive -way with a dangerous 20 to 25% slope. A vehicle backed out of that garage onto an icy or snow packed drive could have slid directly across the street and almost into the garage of 110 Ponderosa. To (partially) correct the driveway problem, they cut out a piece of the foundation to lower the garage floor approximately 2 1/2 feet, and then backfilled the garage to that level. But there is no evidence so far that they are going to tamp that fill, and if they do not, the garage floor is almost guaranteed to cave in. The crew who put the tarpaper underlay on the roof were indecently foul-- mouthed, yelling profanity and obscenities which could be heard a half block away,' and one of the men urinated on the neighbor's property. They camped there overnight illegally. And they used such cheap material and installation that 90% of it blew off the next couple days and all over the neighborhood -- winds that were not at all unusual for this area. Most recently, they have loosely installed what is supposed to be an exterior vapor barrier, using a very thin plastic film that no reputable contractor would ever use; and it too has started to blow off. Their equipment has made gauges in the street and partially blocked the sidewalk. Their construction area has been cluttered and cleaned up only after neighbors have registered complaints. I have never in my life seen such disorganization and ineptitude in a construction job. If I were in the market for a new house, I wouldn't give 50 cents for that house. I have seen no county inspectors on this construction, and Grace Homes apparently has no quality control. One of the men on the roofing debacle asked me if my house was built by Grace Homes. I consider that as an insult. t9-6(41,__ C!, Rollin Ives 110 Ponderosa Circle• Renaia & Sonny Busch X ?/96,40,62o,r/9- 01 R Following are just some of the unacceptable practices we have witnessed during the building of the new house next door. Granted, we cannot prove that cigarette butts and stolen items from our property are a direct result of the workers on that site - but, what a coincidence... • • • • • • Trash Noticeable amount of cigarette butts in our yard after workers have been there. Workers were there attempting to put tar paper on roof; they spent the night in a camper on the property they were very foul mouthed -- noticeable alcohol smell on worker when he came to our house to want to hook up to our electric — worker urinated on the side of house being built (there is a porta-potty located on that property) Items have been stolen out of the back of our truck parked in our driveway since work has started Tar paper comes off roof and several times we have had to remove it from our yard House wrap is incomplete and is not secure, thus making loud noises when windy An air compressor was left on and made loud noises through out the night Progress on this house has been very slow and shoddy and the lack of quality is apparent all around. They should be called DIS -Grace Homes. As homeowners, we are very disappointed, to say the least, with what has taken place next to our home. O .O COs. 44 13 o r I as 0 aCil mi N WI C w tin 0. o 41 30 01 L c�0n �� 0w �° o Tr to . -� L t7 c 0 Ca 0 y,. ti : 2 ...r 1 Q: s cis E 4:1) Q S -0 N Z N 13 ) 'CD� tO �r- a3 .5.. in' ON CD qui O. 15 003 4 Q 0 Q d r. to L w ,v L p ? 0 �• c 00 o c c co .Q a a }' r - ‘.,t4 © M -0 cu v � 0 as 0 ca -i:i U co o il v = 0 - i N C ca O F+ (0 L v 0 v -V o L v \ 1 Job Pe 0 You are hereb have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. 0 V C s Phone (970) 945-8212 0 ma L f O 0 N CO 13O N 0 gtt CD CI) 0 0) 0 0 _c 11,:n"3n- N N N o co G Z W 2 a a Z m u. cc 4 I!. 0 M O V CORRECTION NOTICE z Job located 0 0 0 1 0 2v CUC N L = C CO _ ,O i v 13.} L s. 7:30 N N 0 N_ _c ca 3 a0 *' C 0) LC 13 • .3 0ami 0c Or O CO C1) M p. A 13 .1'C.. CU c N 1' N Ts it G I tam Z H coo o 0 a; a) *"' "7 ®. tL 2 o ma L. • a. E .3 e ,-.4.1"."--* n a ra F I E 11 i �, �,ca c o c .11 O V U ai ar 0' Tsco al E 1 a J II An la Ma c ma ta r P 0 02 = c = = G1 >. •5 8 0 Phone 945-8212 Phone (970) 945-8212 C } J COUNTY OF GARFIELD - BUILDING DEPARTMENT --CORRECTION--,NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 201--•- - Glenwood Springs, Colorado --- -Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at 47 Permit No. (OL -7'_ I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: 1;17 }U _ n C Q - 70 You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date 9`/ — 20 Building inspector Phone (970) 945-8212 0 a 0 0 B �NSPEC 1'tON WILL RIOT BE MADE UNLESS " r T iIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS Date Issq BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO k Zoned Area Permit No.Y144/1(2 AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the.. applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning; location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. Use5Are)r) C Address or Legal Descriptio Owner`itt.51:21(00144"NkititthAvrouougavimvp Setbacks Front Side Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing & 0-1-0 3 Pyr Foundation 5'- /'- o 3 ----117\ Underground PIumbing Insulation 3-44 5 /14-t-itz.if Rough Plumbing 7- 4-693 Drywall 8147-03 't— Chimney & Vent c� V� p� �.,• Gas Piping '` a/-�j.� /3 Electric Final��^ (byS#atelnspector� r Final g-,..2.-63 _ Electric Rough (By State Inspector)g,. Septic Final ,t) Framing i�/_SQ,3 1--- (To include Roof in place and Windows and Doors installed). 111111111=1111. 111•1111111111•MMI Notes: ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phone 384-5003 109 8th Street County Courthouse GIenwood Springs, Colo'"do, APPROVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD F PLACED OUTSIDE - COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC