HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.01 Application Part 2Our Order No. GW231128-2
tEGAt DESCRTPTION
l) N 89 DEGREES 04' 09" W ALONG THE SOUTH LrNE OF SAID LOT 13 A DISTANCE OF
563.29 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 13:
2) S 89 DEGREES s}', 42" W ALONG THE SOUTH LrNE OF LOT 19, SECTION 29 A DISTANCE
OF 159.34 FEET TO A POINT ON AN EXISTING FENCE LINE;
3) N 70 DEGREES 04' 19" W ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 409.84
FEET;
4) N 70 DEGREES 07' 10" W ALONG AN EXTSTING FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 354.35
FEET:
5) N 69 DEGREES 32', 49',W ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 188.80
FEET:
6) S 28 DEGREES 47', 45" W ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 306.75
FEET;
7) 529 DEGREES 02', 13" W ALONG AN EXTSTTNG FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 66.15 FEET
TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 19;
8) S 89 DEGREES 58' 42" W ALONG THE SOUTH LrNE OF SAID LOT 19 A DISTANCE OF
295.33 FEET TO A POINT ON AN EXISTING FENCE LINE:
9) N ll DEGREES 04' 00" E ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 309.81
FEET:
l0) N 13 DEGREES 46', 33" W ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 305.85
FEET:
ll) N 54 DEGREES 09'. 32" W ALONG AN EXISTTNG FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 258.77
FEET;
12) N 66 DEGREES 16' s0" W ALONG AN EXTSTING FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 398.62
FEET;
13) N 45 DEGREES t7', 45" W ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 213.59
FEET;
14) N 45 DEGREES 20'. s9" W A DTSTANCE OF 2r7.78 FEET TO A POINT ON AN EXISTING
FENCE LINE:
15) N 45 DEGREES 04', 44" W ALONG AN EXTSTTNG FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 451.97
FEET:
16) N 71 DEGREES 47', t5" W ALONG AN EXTSTTNG FENCE LrNE A DISTANCE OF 278.62
FEET;
17) N 44 DEGREES 16' 50" W ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 273.66
FEET;
l8) N 39 DEGREES 08' 00" W ALONG AN EXTSTTNG FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 326.72
FEET TO n iwrliT ON THE WEST LINE OF LOT 13 OF SAID SECTION 29;
19) N 00 DEGREES 3l' 38' E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 13 A DISTANCE OF
3IO.II FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 8 OF SAID SECTION 29:
20) N 02 DEGREES 03' 17" E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SArD LOT 8 A DISTANCE OF
1167.25 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK
M9 AT PAGE 571 OF THE RECORDS OF SAID GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER:
THENCE N 89 DEGREES 30' 03" E ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF
LAND A DISTANCE OF I5I.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND:
THENCE N 30 DEGREES 20' OO" E ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL
OF LAND A DISTANCEOF 367.79 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE ROARING FORK RIVER:
THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID ROARING FORK RIVER THE FOLLOWING 15
COURSES:
t) s 22 DEGREES 57' 15', E A DISTANCE OF 214.22 FEET:
2) S 48 DEGREES 00' 46" E A DISTANCE OF 403.61 FEET;
Our Order No. GW23l128-2
tEGAt DESCBIPTION
3) N 70 DEGREES Ol' 0l; E A DTSTANCE OF 292.62 FEET;
4) N 43 DEGREES 09' 09' E A DISTANCE OF 219.32 FEET:
5) N 30 DEGREES 15', 23" E A DISTANCE OF 347.31 FEET;
6) N 39 DEGREES 33' 35" E A DISTANCE OF 298.33 FEET;
7) N 55 DEGREES t4'. 39', E A DISTANCE OF 298.20 FEET;
8) N 73 DEGREES 08' 07" E A DISTANCE OF 265.41FEET:
9) S 84 DEGREES 57' 03" E A DISTANCE OF 249.97 FEET;
l0) s 57 DEGREES 59' 41" E A DISTANCE OF 235.85 FEET:
l l) s 47 DEGREES 45', 29" E A DISTANCE OF 256.33 FEET;
l2) s 39 DEGREES 49', 03'E A DISTANCE OF 418.28 FEET;
13) s 29 DEGREES 05' 00" E A DISTANCE OF 293.00 FEET:
14) s 36 DEGREES 34' 00' E A DISTANCE OF 330.00 FEET;
15) s 4l DEGREES 30' 00" E A DTSTANCE OF 225.00 FEET TO A POrNT ON THE EAST LINE
OF SECTION 29: THENCE S 00 DEGREES 27' 51" W ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID
SECTION 29 A DISTANCE OF 623.64 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
COUNTY OF GARFIELD
STATE OF COLORADO
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ALTA COMMITMENT
(Requirements)
The following are the requirements to be complied with:
Our Order No. GW23l128-2
Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the esate or interest to be
insured.
Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or intere$ to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to-wir:
THIS COMMITMENT IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY, AND NO POLICY WILL BE ISSUED
PURSUANT HERETO.
t r.
'z-
ls.
14.
ls.
lo.
7.lr.
le.
I
ALTA COMMITMENT
@xceptions)Our Order No. GW23ll28-2
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed
of to the satisfaction of the Company:
Rights of claims of panies in possession nor shown by the public records.
Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shonage in area. encroachments. and any facts which a correct survey and
inspection of the premises would disclose and which are nor shown by the public records.
Any lien. or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and
not shown by the public records.
Defects, liens encumbrances. adverse claims or other marters, if any, created. first appearing in the public records or
attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date rhe proposed insured acquires of record for
value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commiunent.
Taxes and assessments not yet due or payable and special assessments not yet cenified to the Treasurer's office.
Any unpaid to(es or assessments against said land.
Liens for unpaid water and sewer charges, ifany.
THE EFFECT OF INCLUSIONS IN ANY GENERAL OR SPECIFIC WATER CONSERVANCY, FIRE
PROTECTION, SOIL CONSERVATION OR OTHER DISTRICT OR INCLUSION IN ANY WATER
SERVICE OR STREET IMPROVEMENT AREA.
IO. WATER zuGHTS OR CLAIMS TO WATER RIGHTS.
RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE
THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES
AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED MARCH I I, 1892, IN BOOK 12 AT
PAGE l16; APRIL 27,1892IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 140; AND APRIL ll, 1892IN
BOOK L2 AT PAGE I32
RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE
UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED MARCH II, 1892,
IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE I 16: APRIL 27 , 1892lN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 140: AND APRILII. 1892IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE I32
EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE SOUTHARD AND CAVANAUGH DITCH AS SET FORTH
IN STATEMENT AND MAP RECORDED DECEMBER 2. I89O AS RECEPTION NO. 11062.
ll.
12.
13.
I ,0.
I
I
15.
I
16.
I
17.
I
I ,r.
I
19.
I
I ,0.
I
I 2t.
I
ALTA COMMITMENT
(Exceptiors)Our Order No. GW23LL28-2
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed
of to the satisfaction of the Company:
EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE KAISER AND SIEVERS DITCH AND ANY AND ALL
ENLARGEMENTS OR EXTENSIONS THEREOF AS EVIDENCED BY STATEMENTS RECORDED
DECEMBER 2. 1885IN BOOK 9 AT PAGE IO9 AND RECORDED DECEMBER 9, 1886IN
BOOK 9 AT PAGE 387, AGREEMENT RECORDED AUGUST 25,I896IN BOOK 39 AT PAGE
268. AND PLAT RECORDED DECEMBER 2, 1885IN BOOK 9 AT PAGE 1IO.
EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE CAVNAUGH-SOUTHARD DITCH AS SET FORTH IN
STATEMENT RECORDED MARCH 23. 1885 IN BOOK IO AT PAGE 15.
EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE CAVNAUGH DITCH AS SET FORTH IN STATEMENT
AND MAP RECORDED MARCH 21, 1887 IN BOOK 9 AT PAGE 453.
EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY AS GRANTED TO THE MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND
TELEGRAPH COMPANY IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 8, 1936IN BOOK I83 AT
PAGE 254.
EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS PURPOSES AS GRANTED TO
MITCHELL DYER AND LUCILE DYER IN DEED RECORDED JUNE 20. 1949IN BOOK 243
AT PAGE 39I.
EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY FOR NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION LINES OF ROCKY
MOUNTAIN NATURAL GAS COMPANY. INC., AS EVIDENCED BY MAP RECORDED MAY 4,
1962 IN ROAD BOOK 3 AT PAGE 126 AS RECEPTION NO.217444.
SEVEN PERCENT ROYALTY FROM AND OUT OF ALL OF THE OIL. GAS AND OTHER MINERAL
PRODUCED AND SAVED FROM SAID LANUS As RESERVED BY LILLIAN I. CoRYELL.
PERRY C. CORYELL AND PERRY L. CORYELL IN DEED RECORDED JANUARY 5, 1965 IN
BOOK 363 AT PAGE 33.
RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO THE MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND
TELEGRAPH COMPANY IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED MAY 8, 1972IN BOOK 430 AT PAGE
322.
RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO GEORGE H. REDDING, JR. AND MARGARET W.
REDDING IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1973IN BOOK 449 AT PAGE 574.
)1
ALTA COMMITMENT
@xceptions)Our Order No. GW23ll28-2
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed
of to the satisfaction of the Company:
23. EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY AS GRANTED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO AS SET FORTH IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER
21, 1983IN BOOK 637 AT PAGE 678.
24. EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO PERRY L. CORYELL AND LILLIAN I. CORYELL IN
INSTRUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER I, 1983 IN BOOK 638 AT PAGE226.
|"'
I
26.
I
I
29.
I
| ,0.
I
RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AS GRANTED TO THE MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND
TELEGRAPH COMPANY IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER IO, I99O IN BOOK 788 AT
PAGE 626.
.
ANY QUESTION, DISPUTE OR ADVERSE CLAIMS AS TO ANY LOSS OR GAIN OF LAND AS A
RESULT OF ANY CHANGE IN THE RIVER BED LOCATION BY NATURAL OR OTHER THAN
NATURAL CAUSES, OR ALTERATION THROUGH ANY CAUSE. NATURAL OR UNNATURAL, OF
THE CENTER THREAD. BANK, CHANNEL OR FLOW OF WATERS IN THE CRYSTAL AND
ROARING FORK RIVERS LYING WITHIN SUBJECT LAND: AND ANY QUESTION AS TO THE
LOCATION OF SUCH CENTER THREAD. BED, BANK OR CHANNEL AS A LEGAL
DESCRIPTION MONUMENT OR MARKER FOR PURPOSES OF DESCRIBING OR LOCATING
SUBJECT LANDS.
EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY FOR THE CONTINUED UNINTERRUPED FLOW OF WATER IN
THE ROARING FORK AND CRYSTAL RIVERS.
TERMS. CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF AGREEMENT RECORDED AUGUST 19, 1994IN
BOOK 912 AT PAGE 973.
EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND OTHER MATTERS AS SHOWN ON THE CORYELL RANCH
BOUNDARY SURVEY PREPARED BY CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS, INC.. DATED MAY 2I.
1996.
EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND OTHER MATTERS AS SET FORTH ON THE SURVEY OF
SUBJECT PROPERTY DATED OCTOBER 1998 PREPARED BY SCHMUESER, GORDON. MEYER
AS JOB NO. 98081.
27.
28.
3I. EXISTING LEASES AND TENANCIES. IF ANY.
tt"1"r.ffi1ffi
-*"7"tifi;';':'i:::"" ffimIffiffiffi
ii,;
" ',:1i.,
." "tr..-
. i_..:1-
-.,r':;***W
; :.,a1- .,.
.t t,:1. -., t
1, ' t;,:
, ,,,t ,n ,i,
1 ; '"..,:i t'
:i;:: ''-'*'t""' l; '1'
: ':,
'i?"; !i:',"'i'i', ti', it.rffiEffiffiffil,t
',/li/r'.
',mlffiffiffi
,1 ,"r:::..,--..*r '' "ffi I'l
,t
t*,,r,l 1, ii[*,, I
r:' i;'. z, .,
i;i:i it, ,
ril'
,,,,.*,''*::::4:""":"' ffi8ffi*ffir'ir'1ffiffiffi: ffififfiti;t*.iii;'{&#ffiffi;r
r.I,..Jl.l
. ,t' ,.,
'it
,
u,;'.t ' ,,'r 'r':r;'.t,'' 7, 'txi.;:,
'1,'; i
,li',,,:,,ii:.,.....,':'..'.HffiEtffiffiffi
, i4.:,'i.
,'i:: J -' .'i.j::' 1 ).. 1',
',;, .'.ri'' ;',ir ;', i; ;,1{ffffiffi{ffi,8!,,lrln,,'
"'a',.:', t,
r
:.
:,, 1;r1. .', "',, . :',,',', t,,, i". |'- 1fui;,,--ffi.,ffiffi[i ::: F "'
*
, ' r:tl: .. ,
,t ,.',
:i' ,.: I
;,...1,ir:,r,r':ii-:,I ":
)i
lL,.. :
1.a,; ."1:..'-',.,.
.'.'ii ; .
'.:.'j,\ t'i
.:_._ ;. .
t.. ;';1 .r':
l(r:,i,:'
,- ',,:l,t;l', i., ' :"lt:^'r';;i,1."1',i;i,:,'t,t";it,fiiOO'gFAO*al.rlli,:i,i
,.,, . tr, i,"j''r,,",,'i,,"'l "r,l'.];
tr:ffi;ffi:,-
: . '. ,:,.i,[;-'ii,'i'i.!',l.iii:li."iiif....irL:,tr..
f ,'l t - :',,i,;',',1,:, i.rr,ji',,:l,rl,i.,tr.!,.l.;, ;1
3.02
3.02.01
3.02.02
3.02.03
3.02.04
3.02.05
3.02.06
3.02.07
3.02.08
A/R/RD .. AGRICI.ITURAURESiDENTIAL/RURAL DENSITY
Uses. bv rieht: Alricultural including farms, garden, greenhouse, nurseqv, orchard, ranch,
GiiEnfiATar; for production of-poultry, -tlsh, fir--beanng or other 5-mall aninlals-and
cr:stcrmarv acressoru rsei including Uuilaingi
'for
shelter or enclosure of persons., animals orr
*#'tt;ilaiot.a ln *r'of the ab-ove uses]retail establishment for sale of goods processed
hom riw mateiiats produced on the lot;
Guiding and outEtting, and park;
Single-family dwelling and customar.v accessory uses' (A- 86-09)
Accessorv dwelline unit aporoved as a part of a public hearing or meeting on a subdivision
;;;rbaiiis,ooEimption-5r guest houie specidl use approv& after 7195 and meeting the
standards in Section 5.03.02.
Uses. conditional: Aircraft landin-e strip, church, commlnigv buildings, dry nurser.v and
sch-ooi; group-home for the elderlv.-(A. 97-60)
Boarding or s6r6ming house, studio for conduct of arts and crafu, home occupation, water
i-potrndments. (A. 86-09;87- I08)
Uses- soecial: Aimort utiliw. feedlot as principal use of the lot, 6g11161361irrrn, agriculture-
iEiffid tl-'ess. resorrs. kennel. ndin'g srable, and veterinilr,' slinis, shooung range
faciliry(A.98- 108);
Two-family dwelling, camper parlq ski lift aod uails; broadcastingstudio, communication
facilitv, coriections ftrti -r; stoiage, storage of heavy egurPn€trt. golf cor:rsedtY9ilang!,
g"6pil616 runge ara a.c.ssor-v ficriiues, &mmercial re&eiruon faEriitv/park;(A. 97 '60; 97 '
I l2)
Pubtic eatherines: storaee of oil and eas drilling eguipment; Site for extraction, processing,
storasi or matErial han'dline of natuial resourdes: re,creational support faciliues and guest
lotii](C. zglj2rso-e+;go-i80;80-313,81-145; 8L-263;84-78; 86-9; 86-84; 86-106; 87-
73)
Accessorv dnelline unit mestine the standrds in Section 5.03.02 for ary- lot not created after
i-p"6tiC l."r"g t-r meetrniEe" 2195.
Kennel
Minimum Lot Area: Two (2) acres.
Mar:mum Lot Covaage: Fifteen percent (15%).
Minimum Setback:
(1) Front vard: (a) artsriai streets: seventv-five (75) feet from street ctnterline or fift,v (50)
ieit Aom ftont lbi hne, whrchwer is grdater; O) local strets: fifcy (50) feet from street
cederline or narentv-five (25) feet from front lot line, whichevsr is greater;
(2) Rear yard: Twenw-five (25) feet from rear lot line;
(3) Side yard: Ten (i0) feet from side lot [ine, or one-half (1/2) the height of the principai
building, whichever is greater.
Maximum Heieht of Buildines: Twenty-five (25) feet.
Additional Reouirernents: All uses shall be zubject to the provisions under Section 5
@s).
l9
',.-\
CORYELL RANCH
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Prepared for:
Aspen Glen
9929 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
Prepared by:
Felsburg Holt & Ullevig
7951 East Maplewood Avenue
suite 200
Englewood, CO 801 11
Project Engineers: Christopher J. Fasching, P.E.
Debra L. Zermuehlen, E.l.
FHU Reference No. 99-022
February 1999
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
LIST OF FIGURES
Vicinity MaP
Existing Traffic Volumes
Existing Lane GeometrY and LOS .
Site Generated Traffic Volumes
Year 2OO1 Background Traffic Volumes
Year 2OO1 Total Traffic Volumes
Year 2OO1 Total Traffic LOS and Lane Geometry ' '
Year 2O2O Background Traffic Volumes
Year 2O2O Total Traffic Volumes
Year 2O2O Total Traffic LOS and Lane Geometry
LIST OF TABLES
1. TriP Generation
4
6
,9
10
11
12
14
15
16
Paqe
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Paoe
l.INTRODUCTION.
EXlSTING CONDITIONS
A. Existing RoadwaY Network
B. Existing Traffic Volumes and lntersection Operations
III. FUTUBE CONDITIONS
A. Trip Generation
B. Site Trip Distribution and Assignment .
C. Short Range Traffic Volumes and Operations
D. Long Range Traffic Volumes and Operations . ' ' ' ' ' 13
E. Relativelmpacts ""'17
IV. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . 18
3
3
3
7
7
I
I
ll.
APPENDIX A -
APPEND]X B -
APPENDIX C -
EXISTING CONDITIONS
CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS
YEAR 2OO1 TOTAL TRAFFIC
CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS
YEAR 2O2O TOTAL TRAFFIC
CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS
I. INTRODUCTION
The Coryell Ranch residential development is planned for an area northwest of the Town of
Carbondale, Colorado. As shown on Figure 1, the site is planned to be located between
County Road (CR) 109 and the Roaring Fork River, north of the intersection of CR 109 and
CR 1OB, with all access planned onto CR 109. The development is planned to include 72
dwelling units, 66 of which are planned to be single family homes and the remaining six are
planned to be affordable housing units.
The purpose of this report is to analyze the impacts of the proposed traffic from the
develcpment on the roadway network in the vicinity of site. For this report, two future
scenarios have been considered:
Short Range Future - this scenario analyzes traffic impacts associated with the
forecasted traffic projections for the year 20O1.
Long Range Future - this scenario analyzes traffic impacts associated with the
forecasted traffic projections for the year 2O2O.
Additionally, any improvements identified as a result of the analyses are recommended as part
of this report.
Recently, traffic studies for two nearby developments have been prepared:
the Rose Ranch development, proposed to be located along the east side of CR 1Og
south of CR 154 (prepared by High Country Engineering in February1998), and
the Carbondale Commercial Area, proposed to be located in the northwest quadrant of
the intersection of Main Street and SH 133 (prepared by Felsburg Holt & Ullevig in
November 1998).
lnformation presented in these studies served as a basis in conducting this study for Coryell
Ranch.
2re'ly.g1 ULLEVIG
GLENWOOD SPRINGS
CARBONDALE
Figure 1
Vicinity Mapn
No rth
Corycll Rarch TIA g*O2. A 1 A eg
[.
A.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Existing Roadway Network
The existing roadway network in the vicinity of the proposed site is shown in Figure 1 and
described below:
State Hiohwav (SH) 82 is a four-lane arterial extending from Glenwood Springs southeast to
Carbondale, and continuing southeast to Aspen.
SH 133 is a two-lane north/south arterial beginning at SH 82 in Carbondale and continuing
south over McClure Pass.
Countv Road (CR) 1O8/Main Street is an east/west roadway which is a county road at the
intersection of CR 109 (just south of the proposed Coryell Ranch site) and meets with Main
Street in Carbondale at SH 133.
CR 109 is a north/south county road extending south f rom SH 82 past the proposed Coryell
Ranch site to CR 108.
B. Existing Traffic Volumes and lntersection Opentions
Existing traffic counts were obtained at the following locations and are summarized on Figure
2:
. CR 1O9 north of CR 1O8,. CR 108 between CR 109 and the Crystal River bridge, and. the intersection of Main Street and SH 133.
The counts at the intersection of Main Street and SH 133 were recorded during the AM and
PM peak hours. The counts at CR 109 north of CR 1O8 and on CR 108 between CR 109 and
the Crystal River bridge were recorded as daily counts by Garfield County; the peak hour
turning movements shown in Figure 2 were estimated from the daily traffic counts on CR 108
and CR 1O9. Currently, the intersection of SH 133 and Main Street is signalized, while the
intersection of CR 108 and CR 1Og is STOP sign controlled.
The existing traffic operations at these two intersections were analyzed utilizing methods
documented in the Hiohwav Caoacitv Manual, Transportation Research Board (TRB), Third
Edition, 1985 (Updated 1997). The result of such an analysis is a level-of-service (LOS) rating,
which is a qualitative assessment of the traffic f low based on the total delay per vehicle at a
controlled intersection. Level of service are described by a letter designation ranging from "A"
to "F", with LOS A representing essentially uninterrupted flow, and LOS F representing a
breakdown of traffic f low with excessive congestion and delay. For a signalized analysis, the
entire intersection receives a LOS rating, while for the unsignalized intersections a LOS rating
is calculated for each critical movement.
3
2re','lx1 ULLEVIG
.3."::i,^ \\"" ,,,F.,=-\
LEGEND
XXX(X)(X) = AM(PM) Peak HourTraffic Volumes
;.J""/
SITE
\..
I
i
Avcraoe DailY Count:
, t996iby Garlield GountY
80O Averagc Daily Count;
May 1996;tY Garlield CountY \
;.lt$&
(,,
lG)lct
NN5@J \l (,
J(rJJ
O NOJ(DO)@
JlI t-rr5(1F3).- 29(82){-- 32(81)
,1\t U"U stez(gg) -J \ai}(48)-
ss(+z| ----r.
I
Figure 2
Existing Traffic Volumesn
No rth
Corycll Ranch TIA g*0?22112195
-----------t...
,-9
)\t\i\
%o*\
i,'iifir %\Peak Hour Turning movemont
were eatimated lrom available
data on CR 108 and CR 109
\\i
The signalized intersection of SH 133/Main Street currently operates at LOS B during both the
nU anO pM peak hours given the existing signal timing plan. The unsignalized intersection
analysis of CR 109 and CR 108 reported that all critical movements are operating at LOS A
during both the AM and PM peak periods.
The results of these analyses and the current lane geometry are shown in Figure 3, and the
capacity analysis worksheets are included in Appendix A'
2 re','y-gI ULLEVIG
LEGEND
xlx
x/x
-.l-
H
AM/PM Signalized Peak Hour Levelof Serv'rce
AITTUPM Unsignalized Peak Hour Levelof Service
Stop Sign
Traff'rc Signal
sH 8z
)N
r\r @st.
Figure 3
Existing Lane Geometry and LOS
\..
I
i
\../
,,5
ds
(,,
-
Itrl(.)
B/B
\_
NY
Cf ' I-%\. -e.L,,q\
n
No rth
Coryrll Banch TIA gS-oZZllllrS
&-\
\
''l'-t"/
\ j srre \\
ilt.FUTURE CONDITIONS
A. Trip Generation
The traffic volumes projected to be generated by the proposed Coryell Ranch development
were estimated based on trip generation rates documented by the lnstitute of Transportation
Engineer's (lTE) in their publication Trio Generation, Sixth Edition, 1997. As previously
mentioned, the residential development is expected to include 66 single family dwelling units.
Thirty-six of these units are projected to be constructed on one-quarter to one-third acre lots,
and the remaining 30 units are projected to be larger homes. All 66 of these homes are
expected to have the same trip generation rates based on ITE definitions. There are also six
affordable housing units (most likely townhomes) expected to be built that do have different
documented trip generation rates. Table 1 summarizes the estimated trip generation for the
identified housing types.
Table 1
Trip Generation
As seen in Table 1, the proposed residential development is expected to generate
approximately 670 vehicle-trips per day. Of this daily volume, an estimated eight percent (53
vehicle-trips) are expected during the AM peak hour and 1O percent of the daily volume (7O
vehicle-trips) are expected during the PM peak hour.
. :r - ..ili' Ir',,1. l ' ' Trip Generation*,t.: .{*".i ,
Enter Exit Tdtal
::i:: , il: :
Eht6r+r
.iNit:,:frt: ;'..
EXrt.Tcital
Single Family
Homes 210 66 dull)632 12 37 50 43 24 67
Townhomes 230 6 du(1)35 1 2 3 2 1 3
Total 72 dU(1)667 13 39 53 45 25 70
{1)dwelling unit
B. Site Trip Distrihution and Assignment
The site trip distribution patterns are shown on Figure 4, and are based upon existing traffic
patterns and the development's relative location to surrounding business and commercial
developments. The following distribution percentages were identified for the Coryell Ranch
projected traffic volumes:
a
o
a
a
a
4O percent to/from the north on CR 109
25 percent to/from SH 133 from/to SH 82
20 percent to/f rom the east on Main Street (CR 1OB)
10 percent to/from the south on SH 133
5 percent to/f rom the west on CR 108
The site generated traffic volumes were derived by applying these trip distribution percentages
to the trip generation estimates shown in Table 1. Figure 4 illustrates the results.
C. Short Range Traffic Volumes and Operations
Background traffic volumes represent all traffic on the roadways without the proposed site
generated trips. The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) has estimated a 20 year
growth factor of 1 .6 on SH 133, which equates to an average annual growth rate of
approximately two percent per year. lt is also estimated that the traffic volumes on Main
Street would increase approximately 2O percent over the next 20 years, which reflects an
average annual growth rate of approximately one percent. lt is assumed that traffic on CR
108 and CR 109 will increase at approximately the same rate as traffic on Main Street, an
average of one percent per year not including trips from the Coryell Ranch development.
The short range future for this study is defined as the year 2OO1. Therefore, the background
traffic volumes were increased as explained above, using the appropriate number of years of
growth. The resulting traffic volumes are illustrated in Figure 5.
Totaltraffic volumes are a summation of the site generated traffic volumes (as shown in Figure
4) and the background traffic volumes (as shown in Figure 5). Figure 6 shows these projected
traffic volumes for the year 2001. At the intersection of SH 133 and Main Street, Coryell
Ranch trips are projected to constitute between two and three percent of the total intersection
traffic. As a component of the CR 1OB (Main Street) approach to SH 1 33, Coryell Ranch trips
make up approximately 1O percent of the traffic.
LOS were again calculated for the key intersections as well as the site access intersection at
CR 1.O9 for "year 2OO1 conditions using existing lane geometry and signal timing. The
signalized intersection and the critical movements at the two unsignalized intersections are
projected to continue to operate at LOS B or better during both the AM and PM peak hours.
The results of these analyses, and the lane geometry, are shown in Figure 7, and the capacity
analysis worksheets are included in Appendix B.
I
2ffe'#.gI ULLEVIG
LEGEND
x)(x(xvJ()
XXVo
AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
Site Generated Tnp Distlibut'lon Percentages
sH 82
*- 3(9)
\'.
I
I
),*,
",_\%\
(,)
I <.r
IGD
J{
J-
s1o1---t\
8(5)--'->+(sl--\Qa
Figure 4
Site Generated Traffic Volumesn
No rth
roi-o
Corycll Hanch TIA S*022A11199
{oo^".4f"
F;
2re'ly.eI ULLEVIG
LEGEND
X)O\(XXX) = AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
j..
\r,*,
"NrS
,-9
NIN(D @NIU (D
rG) JJASJ55N(ro)
.\,/
JL
t- rrs(rsa)e30(84)
r* 33(83)
A$-%","\e.L,,
t^\'.Ln)z-9
Figure 5
Year 2001n
No rth
Corycll Rsnch TIA 9*0?2?,11199
Background Traffic Volumes
(,,I
r(r)tGl
__t
------>
,6
\o,r^...3^
\"+
2ffe'ly.gI ULLEVIG
LEGEND
)OO\()O(X) = AM(PM) Peak HourTraffic Volumes
{r* \
..o.. .<\
\"+ ;1:----:7 ,i--..-\'
;=Z' \.'..\
\,.ss\ \"N.rry ll'
V€, /\ti\
.4K,,
il
sH 8?
-.--' ----
(,)
iG)lgu
J(.)JlN55'
.s9gr9JII <- 33(93){-- 33(83)
uB%"">
e.L,,
t-\
L- rrB(1-s8)
llain St.
Figure 6
Year 2001
Total Traffic Volumesn
North
Cory.ll Banch TIA 99-OZA11Eg
\
\
sslr oa1 -} \
52(54) +
ot (+o) -----r
\
2ratl.sI ULLEVIG
LEGEND
\(,.
\..
I
I
xD(
:r/x
l-
H
C!l2r-\ =.--6- \. \
e.L,,q\
= All/PM Signalized Peak Hour Levelof Service
= AII/PM Unsignalized Peak Hour Level of Service
= Stop Sign
= Traffic Signal
sH 82
)N
r\r
Figure 7
Year 2001
Total Traffic LOS and Lane Geometry
\.
(,)
l(.)l(/|
B/B
\_
tv
No rth
Cory.ll Ranch TIA S*0?2. 2l11l9g
D. Long Range Traffic Volumes and Operations
Background traffic volumes at the SH 133/Main Street intersection for the year 2O2O were
taken from the Carbondale Commercial Area Traffic lmpact Study (TlA) (prepared by FHU in
November 1998). That study shows total traffic volumes for the year 2O2O, which were
obtained by increasing the existing traffic volumes by the CDOT growth rates (explained' above) and adding the site generated traffic volumes from the proposed commercial
development located in the northwest quadrant of the SH 133/Main Street intersection. At
the CR 1O8/CR 109 intersection the volumes were factored in accordance with CDOT growth
rates and projected volumes from the Rose Ranch development (located further north up CR
109) were accounted for. The projected background traffic volumes are shown in Figure 8.
Total year 2O2O traffic volumes for this analysis were then obtained by adding the projected
Coryell Ranch site generated traffic volumes (shown in Figure 4) with the background traffic
t volumes (shown in Figure 8). These volumes were rounded to the nearest five vehicles per
I hour, and are illustrated on Figure 9.
Adding the Coryell Ranch site generated traffic volumes to the background traffic volumes
(taken from the Carbondale Commercial Area total traffic volumes) may be considered a
conservative approach as some trips from the Carbondale Commercial Area or from the Coryell
Ranch development (or perhaps some of both) could already be incorporated into the regional
growth factors used. To maintain conservatism in forecasting traffic volumes, trips from both
developments have been included in the total traffic volumes above and beyond the regional
growth factors used in the analysis.
The capacity analyses indicate that the signalized intersection of SH 1 33 and CR 1O8/Main
Street is expected to operate at LOS C during the AM peak hour and LOS D during the PM
peak hour given existing lane geometry. The critical movements at the CR 1O8/CR 109
intersection are projected to operate at LOS A in the year 2O2O. The LOS results and lane
geometry are illustrated in Flgure 10, and the capacity analysis worksheets are included in
Appendix C. The results of the LOS analyses indicate that intersection improvements are not
needed for caPacity Purposes.
13
2ff',T.e1 ULLEVIG
\_tr'O
I
I
I
!
i
\.
)(XX()o(X) = AM(PM) Peak HourTrafficVolumes
L- rsslzzsl
xoi
N)*ar\))./
"$- 1
(,,
ItrlG)
-tilllooro I
J (,tN I
CD(,IN1199
JIL <- 80(220)r 4o(1 oo)
,-y
r r s(t so) ---i \75(165)-so(rzo)---\
Figure 8
Year 2020
n
North
& -\\ |J" \'
SITE \
Corycll Banch TIA g*OZA11Dg
Backg rou nd Traff ic Volu mes
\
SI,
2re'#-e1 ULLEVIG
{."::i,^
Y+ ,,[-.,=-\
SITE \\
XXX()00() = AM(PM) Peak HourTraffic Volumes
J (,I JU\l or N(,ro (,r
\\.
)-
(gf"
'60\
,-y t- rss(zzs)<- 85(230)t{-- 40(1 oo)
u$
JiL
q. ''. tzs(tss)--J\'"o"> 33[13}-
C-L,,q\
Figure 9
Year 2020
Total Traffic Volumesn
No rth
Corycll Ranch TIA g*OnZ11lgS
LEGEND
\
\
sH 82
@n st
ttttt
2re'#-gI ULLEVIG
3\a
SITE
,yv
x/r( =
x/x =
-.l- =
H=
%,_\
C.L,,9^\
AM/PM Signalized Peak Hour Levelof Service
AWPM Unsignalized Peak Hour Level of Service
Stop Sign
Traffic Signal
)N
$r
M"n St.
Figure 10
Year 2020
Total Traffic LOS and Lane Geometry
\'.
I
i
\a/^qt
".9
C/D
\_aT
I'i
n
North
Corycll Ranch TIA 9S'o?22111199
LEGEND
(,,I
L(rD
IGJ
E. Relative lmPacts
As shown in Table 1 previously, the Coryell Ranch development is expected to add
ajproximately 670 vehicle-trips per day to the surrounding roadway network. Approximately
SS of these trips are expected to occur during the AM peak hour (eight percent of the
projected daily volume) and approximatety 7O trips during the PM peak hour (1O percent of the
projected dailY volume).
At the intersection of SH 133/Main Street, the Coryell Ranch development is expected to
contribute an estimat ed 28 vehicles per hour (vph) during the AM peak hour to the traffic
volumes in the intersection, and 39 vph during the PM peak hour. lf the projected site
generated volumes were added to the existing AM and PM peak hour volumes at this
Intersection, the Coryell Ranch would contribute less than three percent of the traffic volumes
traveling through the intersection during each of the AM peak and PM peak hours. On the CR
1Og approach irom the west, the relative impact is approximately eleven percent relative to
existing traffic volumes. This is significant in that the State Hiqhwav Access Code stipulates
that a new access permit is necessary if the approaching traffic along a state highway cross-
street increases by 20 percent or more. with only an eleven percent increase, a new access
permit is not necessary.
Comparing the projected Coryell Ranch site generated volumes to the projected year 2O2O
total traffic volumes, the site generated volumes are estimated to contribute less than two
percent of the traffic volumes projected to enter the intersection during each of the AM and
PM peak hours.
Additionally, capacity analyses were performed at the intersection of SH 133/Main Street f or
year 2O2O background traffic conditions which were compared to the delay results forthe
totaltratfic capacity analyses. The delay projected under total traffic conditions during both
tf," Ann and pM peak hours is projected to be less than one second more than the projected
delay with only background traffic conditions. The Coryell Ranch development is not expected
to have a significant impact on the intersection of sH 133/Main Street.
17
IV. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Coryell Ranch, a proposed residential development, is planned to be located along CR 109
northwest of the Town of Carbondale, Colorado. The development is planned to include 66
single family dwelling units and six affordable housing units (most likely townhomes). The
development is expected to generate approximately 670 vehicle trips per day (vpd) with
approximately 55 expected to occur during the AM peak hour and 70 during the PM peak hour.
Based on the growth expected in the area, the analysis of the impacts of the proposed
development site for the years 2001 and 2O2O resulted in the following findings:
By the year 2001 , the signalized intersection of SH 133/Main Street, and the two
unsignalized intersections at CR 108/CR 109 and CR 1Og/the site access are expected
to operate at LOS B or better during both the AM and PM peak hours.
By the year 2O2O, the signalized intersection of SH 133/Main Street is projected to
operate at LOS D or better during both the AM and PM peak hours; at the unsignalized
intersections, it is expected that the critical movements will operate at LOS A during
both the AM and PM peak hours.
The Coryell Ranch development is expected to increase the volume of traffic traveling
through the intersection of SH 133/Main Street by less than three percent relative to
existing traffic volumes and by less than two percent relative to projected year 2O2O
traffic volumes.
Relative to existing volumes, traffic along the CR 108 approach from the west to SH
133 is projected to increase by eleven percent as a result of the additional Coryell
Ranch trips. This is significantly less than the 20 percent criterion stipulated in the
State Hiohwav Access Code which requires a new access permit to be obtained.
At the intersection of SH 133/Main Street in the year 2O2O, comparing background
traffic delays (traffic through the intersection, not including site generated traffic
volumes) and totaltraffic delays (background traffic volumes plus site generated traffic
volumes) the addition of the Coryell Ranch development traffic to the intersection is
expected to increase the total delay per vehicle through this intersection by less than
one second per vehicle during both the AM and PM peak hours comparing delays .
18
APPENDIX A EXISTING CONDITIONS
CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS
Coryell Ranch (FIIU Ref . No. 99-0221
SH 133/Main Street
AII Peak Hour, Existing Conditions
03/ o8/ 9e
15: 35 : 17
SIGNAI.9T/feApaClVer 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Sumnary
Intersection Averages for Int # 0 - sH 133/Main Street
Degree of Saturation (v/cl 0.26 Vehiele Delay 11.5 Level of Service B+
Sq 11**/**
zir
I
I
Nortlr
I
++++++
<+++>
v
I Phase 1 Phase 2
++++
<++++
++++
v
<+++>++++++
I ++++
| ++++>
I ++++
lv
G/c=o.5oo
G= 30.0tt
Y*R= 5.0r1
OFF= 0.Ot
G/c=o.333G= 20.0"
Y*R= 5.0r1
OFF=58.3t
c= 60 sec G= 50.0 sec = 83.3t Y=10.0 sec = 16.7t Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0t
Lane
Group
lwidrh/ I
I Lanesl
S/c I Service Ratel Adj IReqd used I @c (vph) GE lvolumel
I HCxvI lLv/clDeJ.aylS l90t Maxl
I Queue I
N Approach 9.4
A
A
A
RT
TH
LT
L2/L
L2/L
L2/L
0 .053
0.199
0.158
0.500
0.s00
0.500
744
891
450
792
931
501
23 | 0.029
274 l'O.29492 | 0.184
7.7
9.6
9.1
2s frl
116 frl
39 frl
S Approach
===============================L2/L 1 0.062 1 0. s00
L2/L lto.223 lo. soo
L2/L lO.L27 10. s00
9.6
31
32t
64
RT
TH
LT
144
891
493
792
931
543
0.039
0.345
0.118
7.1
10.1
8.4
Al 2sfrl
B+l 135 frlAl 27ftl
E Approach
L28 10.242 I58 | 0.132 I
15.2 B
1s.6lBl 72fLl
14.s I B+l 38 frl
======:IRT
I LT+TH
l t2/L
I L2/L
4s3 I
44O I
s28 Is1s I
| 0.139 | 0.333 I
| 0.0e8 | 0.333 I
W Approach 15.8 B
============================================================================:I Rr I L2/L lO.O9O 10.333 | 4s3 | s28 I 51 10.116 | 14.3 I B+l 34 ftl
lLr+rH I L2/t 10.164 10.333 | 4O2 | 476 | 14s 10.30s I 16.s lB I 82 ftl
A
Coryell Ranch (EIIU Ref . No. 99-0221
SH 133/Main Street
AI'1 Peak Hour, Existing Conditions
SIGNAI9T/TEAPAC[Ver, 1.OO] - Display of Intersection Paranneters
115 12.o 1
03/ 08 / ee
15:35:21
Norttr
I
SEgt ENCE 11
PERMSV NNNN
O\IERLP YYYY
LEADI,AG LD LD
2L
L2.O
1
/
-=====-======--===81 0.0 0
43 L2.O 1 --
s5 L2.O 1 \
247
L2.O
1
83
L2.O
1
\
+
\
58
L2.O
1
29 Lz.O 1
32 0.0 0
I
289
L2.O
1
/
28
t2.o
1
Phasing:
I WTDTHS
I,ATIES
Key:
APPENDIX B YEAR 2OO1 TOTAL TRAFFIC
CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS
Coryell Ranch (Flru
SH 133/Main Street
AM Peak Hour, Year
Ref. No. 99-0221
2001 Total Traffic Conditions
03/08/ee
LSz32:29
SIGNAL9T/TSapRClVer 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Sumnary
Intersection Averages for Int # 0 - SH 133/Main Street
Degree of Saturation (v/el O.28 Vehicle Delay 11.8 Level of Service B*
Sq11 I Phasel I Ptrase2 I**/**
,\
++++
<++++
^ ++++++++ v
++++>
++++
v
6/a=0.500
G= 30.0rt
Y*R= 5. Ort
OFE= 0.0t
c/c=o.333
G= 20.0"
Y*R= 5.0n
OFF=58.3t
C= 60 sec F 5O.O sec = 83.3t Y=10.0 sec = 16.7t Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0t
rir
I
I
North
I
++++++
<+++>
v
^l<+ + +>l+++l+++l
Lane lwidth/ I
Group I Lanesl
S/c I Service Ratel Adj IReqd Used I GC (rrlrh) GE lVolumel
I HCI}I
v/c I De1ay
l90t Maxl
I Queue 1
lLls
N Approach 9.5
25
L23
4L
A
A
A
2A
29L
98
748
891
432
RT
TH
LT
L2/L I 0.0s9
L2/L lO.2O7L2/L I 0.180
0.500
0.500
0. s00
792
931
483
0.03s
0.313
0.203
7.1
9.8
9.3
frlfrlfrl
S Approach 9.8
Al 25frl
B+l 144 ftlAl 30frl
RT
TH
LT
t2/L 10.06s 10.s00L2/L 10.233 10.s00L2/L 10.137 10.500
748
891
477
792
931
528
33
341
70
0.o42
0.366
0.133
7.8
10.3
8.6
E Approach
===============================================I Rr I L2/L 10.141 10.333 | 4s3 | s28 I
ILT+rH I L2/L 10.103 10.333 | 438 I s13 I
15.3
frlfrlBl
B+l
131
74
1o.248 I
| 0.144 I
1s.7 IL4.6 I
14
42
W Approach L6 .4
IRT
I LT+TH
I L2/L 10.0e6 10.333 II L2/L I 0.182 | 0.333 I
4s3 I
397 I
528 I
47L I
L4 .4
L7.2
38 frl
94 ftl68 | 0.129
168 I 0.3s?
I B+l
lBl
A
============:==============================================================:=
Coryell Ranch (EHU Ref.
SH 133/t'tain Street
AI"I Peak Hour, Year 2001
No. 99-0221
Total Traffic Conditions
118 L2.O 1
03/08/99
15:34:56
zir
I
INorth
I
SEQUENCE 11
PERMSIV NNNN
OVERLP YIYI
LEJADI.AG LD LD
SIGNAL9T/feapaC[ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Par=meters
25
L2.O
1
/
262
L2.O
1
88
L2.O
1
\
+
\
63
t2.o
1
33 L2.O 1
99 0.0 o /33
/
30
t2.o
1
0.0 0
52 Lz.O 1 --
61 Lz.O 1 \I
307
L2.O
1
Phasingr:
I WTDTHS
I.A}IES
Key:
Coryell Ranch (FHU Ref.
SH 133/Main Street
PM Peak Hour, Year 2001
No. 99-0221
Tota1 Traffic Conditions
03/08/ 99
15:35:02
SIeNALgT/tSepaClVer 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Summary
rntersection Averages for rnt # 0 - sH 133/Main Street
Degree of Saturation lv/cl 0.34 Vehicle Delay 12.1 Leve1 of Service B+
Sq11 | Phasel I Phase2 |**/**
North
I
v
<+++>++++++
l+++l+++\ l<+++>
^l
++++ I
<++++ |^ ++++l++++ v I++++> I++++ 1vl
G/c=o.5oo
G= 30.0"
Y*R= 5.Ott
OFE= 0.0t
c/c=o.333
G= 20.0'r
Y*R= 5.Otr
OEE=58.3t
c= 60 sec G= 5O.O sec = 83.3* Y=10.0 sec = 16.7t Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0*
I Lane lwidth/l Slc I Serwice Ratel Adj I I HcNt Ij e=orp lLanesl Reqd Used I GC (rrtr>h) @E lVolr.rmel w/c lDelay I
L
s
I 90t Maxl
I Queue I
N Approach
============================================
10.4
58
161
68
RT
TH
LT
L2/L 10.14s 10.s00t2/L l o.2s3 l o. soo
L2/L 10.249 10.500
748
891
426
792
931
417
8.7
10.8
11.0
Al
B+l
B+l
frlfrlfrl
L37 I 0.173
381 | 0.409
L62 | 0.340
S Approach 9.8 A
Al
B+l
Al
RT
TH
LT
L2/L
L2/L
L2/L
0.099
o.236
0.012
0.500
0. s00
0.500
8.1
10.4
8.1
31 frl
L47 ftl
25 frl
748
891
396
792
931
448
73 10.092348 I 0.374
33 I 0.074
E Approach
==============================================I Rr I L2/t 10.170 10.333 I 4s3 | 528 I
lLr+rH I L2/L 10.197 10.333 | 407 | 481 I
t7.4
t76 10.333 I
195 I 0.40s I
L6.7 IL7.9 I
99 frl
110 frlBl
Bl
W Approach L7.6 B
==============================:============================:==:==============:I Rr l L2/L 10.081 10.333 I 4s3 | s28 I s1 10.0e7 | 14.1 I B+l 29 ftl
ILT+TH I L2/L 10.208 10.333 I 3s2 | 425 | 180 !,O.424 I 18.6 lB I 101 ftl
I
I
I
I
I
===============================================================================
SrGNAL9T/TEAPAClver 1.001 - Display of rntersection pararueters
Corye1l Ranch (FIIU Ref .
SH 133/Main Street
PM Peak Hour, Year 2001
No. 99-0221
Total Traffic Conditions
03/oe/99
15:35:05
I WIDTHS
v I"AI'IES
zir
I
1
North
I
L23
L2.O
1
/
343
L2.O
1
t46
L2.O
1
\
+
\
30
L2.O
1
158 L2.O 1
93 t2.O 1
108 0.0 o /83 0.0 0
54 L2.O 1 --
46 L2.O 1 \I
313
L2.O
1
/
66
L2.9
1
Phasing: SEQTENCE 11
PERMSV NNNN
O\IERLP YYYY
LEADI.AG LD LD
Intersection:cR 108/CR
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
109 AM Peak Hour Year 2001 Total Traffic
1 1 1000IL, LJJJ
Page 1Anafvsis Date:Februar
HCS: Unsignalized
TWO-WAY STOP
Intersection Release 3.1
CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS
Analyst: d1z
Intersection: CR 108/CR 109
Time Period: AM Peak 2001
fntersection Orientation: East-West Major St.
Vehicle Volume Data:
Movements: 1 2 5 6 10 12
Volume:
HER:
PHF:
PHV:
65257242165251242'71.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 00
Pedestrian Volrme Data:
Movements:
Flow:
Lane width:
Walk speed:
t Blockage:
Median Type: None
# of vehicles: 0
Flared approach Movements :
# of vehicl-es: Northbound
# of vehicles: Southbound
Lane usage for movements 1,2c3 approach:
Lane 1 Lane 2LTRLTRL Lane 3
Channelized: N
Grade: 0.00
Lane usage for movements
Lane 1
LTR
4, 5c6 approach:
Lane 2LTRL Lane 3
Channelized: N
Grade: 0.00
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
Intersection: CR 108/CR 109 AM Peak Hour Year 2001 Total TrafficAnaly+ qglej qelr qfy 11, 7999
Page 2
Lane usage for movements
Lane 1
LTR
7, Bc9 approach:
Lane 2LTRL Lane 3
N
Channelized: N
Grade: 0 .00
Lane usage for movements
Lane 1
LTR
10,11&12 approach:
Lane 2
LTRL Lane 3
R
NN
Channelized: N
Grade: 0.00
Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles:
Shared In volume, major th vehicles:
Shared l-n volume, major rt vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major th vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major rt vehicl-es:
Number of major street through lanes:
Length of study period, hrs:
Eastbound
52
0
1700
1700
1
Westbound
0
U
1700
17 00
1
0.25
Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and FoIlow-up tj.me calcuLation.
Critical Gap Calculations:
Movement 1 10 t2
t c, base
t c, hv
Phv
t c,g
G
t 3, rt
1 stage
tc
1 stage
Follow Up Time
Movement
4.L 1.t 6.21.0 1.0 1.00.00 0.00 0. 000.2 0.10.00 0.00 0.000.0 0.7 0.0
0.00 0.00 0.00
s .t 6.4
Calculations:
6.2
11012
t f, base
t f,HV
Phv
tf
2.2 3.5 3. 30.9 0.9 0.90.00 0.00 0. 002.2 3.5 3.3
Intersection:cR 108/CR 109
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
AM Peak Hour Year 2001_ Total Traffic
1999
Page 3AnaLysis Date:Eebruary 11,
Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations
Step 1: RT from Minor St.72
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
11
707 5
1.00
107 6
0. 99
Step 2: LT from Major St.
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Movement Capacity
Probability of Oueue free St.Maj. L Shared ln. Prob. Queue Free St.
77
1613
1. 00
1613
1.00
1.00
Step 4 : LT from Minor St.10
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor
Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor.
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvrnnt
Movement Capacity
75
933
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
931
Viorksheet B Shared Lane Calcul_ations
Shared Lane Calculations
Movement 1110
v (vph)
Movement Capacity
Shared Lane Capacity
t------
I
I
42
931
949
1
707 6
Worksheet
Movement
10 delay,queue length,
1
and LOS
4 121110
------l
I
Iv (vph)g p (vph)
v/c
958 queue length
Control De1ay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
61613 7561
0. 00
1.2
A
49
949
0.05
9.0
A
9.0
A
fntersection:CR 108/CR
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection ReLease 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
109 AM Peak Hour Year 2001_ Total_ Traffic11, lggg
PageAna.l-ysis Date:Februar
Worksheet 11
Rank l- Delay
Movement
Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay
CalcuLations
2
Pojvi1
VL2si1si2
P* 0j
D maj left
N number major
Delay, rank 1
' st lanes
mvmts
1. 00 1.00520001700 17001700 17001.00 1.00
't .2 0.0110.0 0.0
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Rel_ease 3.1
Two-Way Stop ControJ- (TWSC) Analysis
rntersection: cR 108/cR 109 PM peak Hour year 2001 Total TrafficAnal-ysis Date: February 11, 1999
Page 1
Analyst: dlz
fntersection: CR 108/CR 109
Time Period: PM Peak 2001
Intersecti.on Orientation :
Vehicl-e Volume Data:
Movements: 1 2
HCS: Unsignalized
TWO-WAY STOP
Intersection Release 3.1
CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS
East-West Major St.
1210
Volume:
HFR:
PHF:
PHV:
1
1
1.00
0. 00
2L
27
1.00
0.00
42 46 1942 46 191.00 1.00 1.000.00 0.00 0.00
6
6
1.00
0.00
Pedestrian Vol-ume Data :
Movements:
Flow:
Lane width:
Walk speed:
t Blockage:
Median Type: None
# of vehicles: 0
Flared approach Movements :
# of vehicl-es: Northbound
# of vehicles: Southbound
Lane usage for movements 1,2c3 approach:
Lane 1 Lane 2LTRLTRL Lane 3
Channelized: N
Grade: 0.00
Lane usage for movements
Lane L
LTR
4,5&6 approach:
Lane 2LTRL Lane 3
Channelized: N
Grade: 0. 00
Intersection:cR 108/CR
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Rel_ease 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
109 PM Peak Hour Year 200L Tota1 Traffic
1'l 1 000LL, LJJJ
Page 2Analvsis Date:Eebrua
Lane usage for movements
Lane l-
LTR
7,8c9 approach:
Lane 2LTRL Lane 3
NNN
Channelized: N
Grade: 0.00
Lane usage for movements
Lane 1
LTR
10,11&12 approach:
Lane .2
LTRL Lane 3
N
Channelized: N
Grade: 0.00
Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicl_es:
Shared In volume, major th vehicles:
Shared In volume, major rt vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major th vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles:
Number of major street through lanes:
Length of study period, hrs:
Eastbound
2t
0
1700
1700
1
Westbound
0
0
17 00
17 00
1
0.25
Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and
Critical Gap Calculati.ons:
Movement 1 10
Follow-up time calculation.
72
t crbase
t c,hv
Phv
t cr9
G
t 3,It
t crT:
1 stage
tc
1- stage
Foll-ow Up Time
Movement
4.7 7 .t 6.21.0 1.0 1.00.00 0.00 0. 000.2 0. 10.00 0.00 0.000.0 0.7 0.0
0.00 0.00 0.00
4 .7 6.4 6.2
Calculations:1 10 t2
t f, base
t f , HV
Phv
tf
))2()a J.J J.J0.9 0.9 0.90.00 0.00 0.002.2 3. s 3.3
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Rel-ease 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
fntersecti-on: CR 108/CR 109 PM Peak Hour Year 2001 Total Traffic
Analysis Date: Eeb:gery Ll, 1999
Page 3
Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations
Step 1: RT from Minor St.t2
Conflicting Flows
Potential- Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue
Factor
free St.
65
1005
1.00
1005
0. 99
Step 2: LT from Major St.
Conflicting Elows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Eactor
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
Maj. L Shared l-n. Prob. Queue Free st.
88
t520
1.00
1520
1.00
1.00
Step 4: LT from Minor St.10
Confllcting Flows
PotentiaL Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Eactor
Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor
Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor.
Cap. Adj, factor due to Impeding mvmnt
Movement Capacity
100
904
1.00
1.00
1.00
1. 00
900
Worksheet I
Shared Lane
Movement
Shared Lane CaLculations
Calculations
t211L0
t------
I
I
v (vph)
Movement Capacity
Shared Lane CapacitY
19
900
923
6
10 05
worksheet
Movement
10 delay,queue length, and LOS
L47 T21110
v (vph)g 6 (vph)
v/c
95t queue Length
Control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
1
t520
0.00
1.4
A
25
923
0.03
9.0
9.0
A
1 608
------l
I
I
fntersection:
Analysis Date
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Rel_ease 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
CR 108/CR 109 PM Peak Hour Year 2001 Tota1 Traffic: February 11, 7999
Page 4
Worksheet l-1
Rank 1 Delay
Movement
Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay
Calcul"ations
2
Pojv il-vi2s i1si2
P* 0j
D maj left
N number major
De1ay, rank 1
st lanes
mvmts
1.00 1.00270001700 17001700 1?001.00 1.001.4 0.0110.0 0. 0
Intersection:
Analysis Date
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
CR 109/Site Access AM Peak Hour year 2001 Total Traffic page 1: February 11, L999
HCS: Unsignalized
TWO-WAY STOP
Intersection Release 3.L
CoNTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS
Analyst: dIz
Intersection: CR 109/site access
Time Perj-od, Y Peak 2001
Intersection Orientation: North-South Major St.
Vehicle Vo1ume Data:
Movements: 2 3 4 5 7
Volume:
HFR:
PHF:
PHV:
10
10
1.00
0. 00
I
I
1.00
0. 00
J
5
1. 00
0. 00
26 23 1625 23 161.00 1.00 1.000.00 0.00 0.00
Pedestrian Vo1ume Data:
Movements:
Flow:
Lane width:
Walk speed:
t Blockage:
Median Type: None
# of vehicles: 0
Elared approach Movements :
# of vehicles: Eastbound
# of vehicl-es: westbound
Lane usage
L
for movements
Lane 1
approach:
Lane 2
TRL
1,2&3
L
Lane 3
N
Channelized:
Grade:
Lane usage
L
for movements
Lane 1
4, 546 approach:
Lane 2LTRL
N
0.00
Lane 3
Y
Channelized:
Grade:
N
0.00
Intersection:
HCS: Unsignalized fntersection Rel_ease 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
CR 109/Site Access AM peak Hour year 2001 Total Traffic PageAnalysis Date:February 11, 1999
Lane usage for movements
Lane 1
LTR
1,8&9 approach:
Lane 2LTRL
Channelized: N
Grade: 0. 00
Lane usage for movements
Lane 1
LTR
10,11&12 approach:
LaneLTR
Lane 3
Lane 3
Channelized: N
Grade: 0.00
Data for Computing Effect of Delay to
Shared In volume, major th vehicles:
Shared ln volume, major rt vehj.cles:
Sat flow rate, major th vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles:
Nunlcer of major street through lanes:
Major Street Vehicles:
Northbound
0
0
1700
1700
1
Southbound
26
0
1? 00
17 00
1
Length of study period, hrs:0 .25
Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and EoILow-up time calculation.
Critical Gap Calculations:
Movement 4 7 9
t c, base
t c, hv
Phv
t cr9
G
t 3,It
1 stage
tc
1 stage
Follow Up Time
Movement
t f, base
t f,HV
Phv
tf
1.7 6.21.0 1.00.00 0.000.2 0. 10.00 0.000.7 0. 0
0.00 0.00
4.7
1.0
0. 00
0.00
0.0
0. 00
4 .1 6.4 6.2
Calcul-ations:
479
2.2 3.5 3.30.9 0.9 0.90.00 0.00 0. 002.2 3.s 3.3
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Rel-ease 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
Intersection: CR l-0glsite Access AM Peak Hour Year 2001 TotaL Traffic page 3Analysis Date: February 11, 7999
Worksheet 5 fmpedance and capacity equations
Step 1: RT from Minor St.1,2
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue
Eactor
free St.
t4
701 2
1.00
L0'72
n oo
Step LT from Major St.
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
Maj. L Shared ln. Prob. Queue Eree St.
18
\612
1.00
L6t2
1.00
1.00
Step 4: LT from Minor St.10
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Maj, L, Min T Impedance factor
Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor.
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
Movement Capacity
50
964
r_.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
962
Worksheet I Shared Lane Cal-culations
Shared Lane Calculations
Movement L21110
v (vph)
Movement Capacity
Shared Lane Capacity
23
962
1004
------t
I
I
16
L01 2
Worksheet
Movement
10 delay,queue length, and LOS
I41 t21011
v (vph)
c m (vph)
v/c
958 queue length
Control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
5 391612 1004
0. 00 0. 04
1.2
A
8.7
A
8.'l
------l
I
I
Intersection:
Analysis Date:
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Rel"ease 3
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
CR 109/Site Access AM Peak Hour Year 2001 TotaL
February 11, L999
Traffic Page
Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and De1ay
Rank 1 De1ay Calculations
Movement 2
Poj
vil
vL2si1si2
P* 0j
D maj left
N number major st lanes
Delay, rank I mvmts
1. 00 1.00026001?00 17001700 17001.00 1.000.0 '7 .2110.0 0.0
HCS : UnsignaJ-i zed Intersection Rel-ease 3 . 1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
Intersection: CR 109/Site Access PM Peak Hour Year 200L Tota1 Traffic Page 1-
Analysis Date: February 11, 1999
HCS: Unsignalized
TWO-WAY STOP
Intersection
CoNTROL (TWSC)
Rel-ease 3 . 1
ANALYSIS
Analyst: dlz
Intersection: CR L09lsite access
Time Period: PM Peak 2001
Intersection Orientation: North-South Major St
Vehicle Volume Data:
Movements z 2
Volume:
HFR:
PHF:
PHV:
zo
26
1.00
0.00
21
21
1.00
0. 00
18 1018 101.00 1.000.00 0.00
15 1015 101.00 1.000.00 0.00
Pedestrian Volume Data:
Movements:
Flow:
Lane width:
WaIk speed:
B Blockage:
Median Type: None
# of vehicles: 0
F1ared approach Movements :
# of vehi-cles: Eastbound
# of vehicLes: Westbound
Lane usage for movements
Lane 1
LTR
1, 2c3 approach:
LT
Lane 2
RL
Lane 3
N
Channefized:
Grade:
N
0. 00
Lane usage for movements 4,5c6 approach:
Lane L Lane 2
LTRLTRL
Lane 3
Channelized: N
Grade: 0.00
5
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
lntersection: CR 109/Site Access PM Peak Hour Year 2001 Total Traffic
Anal-ysis Date: February 11, 7999
Page 2
Lane usage for movements
Lane 1
LTR
7,8&9 approach:
Lane 2
LTRL
Lane 3
Channelized: N
Grade: 0. 00
Lane usage for movements
Lane 1
LTR
10, 1l- & 12 approach:
Lane 2LTRL Lane 3
RT
NNNNN
Channelized: N
Grade: 0.00
Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles:
Shared In volume, major th vehicles:
Shared In volume, major rt vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major th vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles:
Number of major street through Ianes:
Length of study Period, hrs:
Northbound
0
U
17 00
l-700
1
Southbound
10
0
L7 00
1700
1
0.25
Worksheet 4 Critical GaP and
Critical- Gap Calculations:
Movement 4 1
FoIlow-up time calculation.
9
t c, base
t c,hv
Phv
t crl
Gt 3, rt
L stage
1 stage
Eollow Up Time
Movement
1.7 6.21.0 1.0
0. 00 0. 000.2 0.1
0. 00 0. 000.? 0.0
0. 00 0.00
4.1
1.0
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.00
4.1 6.4 6.2
Calculations:
419
t f, base
t f , HV
Phv
rf
2.2 3.5 3.30.9 c.9 0.90.00 0. 00 0. 002.2 3.5 3.3
HCS: Unslgnalized Intersection Release 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
fntersection:CR 109/Site Access PM Peak Hour Year 2001 Total- Traffic Page 3
Anafvsis Date:Eebruary 1 L,1999
Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations
Step 1: RT from Minor St '12
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Eactor
Movement CapacitY
Probability of Queue free St.
40
1038
1.00
103I
0. 99
Step 2: LT from Major St.
Conflicting Elows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Movement CapacitY
Probability of Queue free St.
Maj. L Shared In. Prob. Queue Free St.
53
1565
1.00
1566
0. 99
0.99
Step 4 : LT from Minor St.
Conflicting Flows
Potential CaPacitY
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Maj. L, Min T ImPedance factor
Maj. L, Min T Adi. ImP Factor.
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvrnnt
Movement CapacitY
86
92t
1,.00
n oo
0. 99
0.99
913
Worksheet I Shared Lane Calcul-ations
Shared Lane Calculations
Movement 1,2
v (vph)
Movement CapacitY
Shared Lane CaPacity
15
913
959
10
1038
Worksheet 10 delay,queue
Movement
length, and LOS
141 L210
v (vph)
6 6 (vph)
v/c
95t queue length
Control DeIaY
LOS
Approach DelaY
Approach LOS
18 25
1566 959
0.01 0. 03
'7 .3 8.9
AA
8.9
A
l_0
10 11
11
------t
I
I
Intersection:
Analysis Date
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
CR 109/Site Access PM Peak Hour Year 2001 Total- Traffic Page 4
: February 11, 7999
Worksheet 11
Rank 1 Delay
Movement
Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay
Cal-culations
2
Pojvi1
vL2si1si2
P* 0j
D maj left
N number major
De1ay, rank L
st l-anes
mvmts
1.00 0. 990 10001700 17001?00 17001.00 0.990.0 't.3
L10.0 0.1
APPENDIX C YEAR 2O2O TOTAL TRAFFIC
CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS
Coryel1 Ranch (FHU Ref. No. 99-0221
SH 133/Main Street (110 second cycle)
AIvI Peak Hour, Year 2020 Background Traffic Conditions
02/04/99
13:37:11
SIGNAL9T/TEApaClVer 1.001 - capacity Analysis Sumnary
Intersection Averages for Int # 0 - SH 133/Main Street
Degree of Saturation (v/cl 0.39 Vehicle Delay 20.3 Level of Service c+
Sq11l Phasel I Phase2 |** /**
****
****>
++++
v
^l
++++ |
<++++ |
++++ |
v
I
I
I
++*++*<++*>
v
<+++>++++++
zir
I
I
North
I
G/c=o.527G= 58.0"
Y*R= 5.0r1
OEF= 0.0t
Glc=o.382G= 42.0n
Y*1,= $.9't
OFP=57.3t
c=110 sec e100.0 sec = 90.9t y=10.0 sec = 9.1t ped= o. o sec = o. ot
Lane lwidth/ IGroup I Lanesl S/C I Service Ratel aai IReqd Used I Gc (raph) GE lVolurnel
lHculv/c I Detay I
l9Ot Maxl
I Queue I
L
s
N Approach L't.7
44
450
133
835
982
333
730
874
25L
RT
TH
LT
L2/L 1O.222 lO.s21LzlL 10.360 lo.s21LzlL 10.384 1o.527
0.0s3
0.458
0.399
L2.8
L7.7
19. 1
B+l 32 frlB I 329 frl*B I 97 frl
S Approach 18.3
B+lBl
B1
83s
982
389
730
814
303
RT
TH
LT
L2/L
L2/t
L2/t
o.220
0.387
0.331
o.527
0.527
0.527
39
522
111
0.047
0.532
0.285
L2.7
19. 1
16.3
29 fEl
382 frl
81 frl
E Approach 24.3 c+
L2/L 1O.276 10.382L2/L 10.260 10.382
420 I4L9 I
60s I604 I
L72 l.0.284133 lO.22O
24.8 I C+l
23.8 I C+l
164 frl
L21 fLl
IRT
I LT+TH
W Approach 25.9 c+
89 | 0.147
2LL | 0.406
22.8 I c+l27.2 l*C+l
========8s frl
2O2 fEl
IRT
I LT+TH
t2/L lo.24L 10.382t2/L 1 0. s11 1 0.382
42O I349 I
605 Is2o I
Coryell Ranch (FHU Ref. No. 99-0221
SH 133/Main Street (110 second cycle)
Al'I Peak Hour, Year 2020 Background Traffic Conditions
SIGNAIgT/TEAPAC [VEr 1 . OO]of Intersection Pararneters
\ 155 L2.O 1
80 L2.O 1
40 0.0 0
02/04/ 99
13:37:18
I WTDTHS
v LAIIES
/l\
I
I
Nort}t
!
Displ
L20
L2.O
1
ay
I
I
I
I
I
Key:
40
L2.O
1
405
L2.O
1
115 0.0 o /+
\
100
L2.O
1
I
410
L2.O
1
/
35
L2.O
1
75 t2.O 1 --
80 L2.O 1 \
Phasing: SEQUENCE
PERMSV
OVERLP
LIADI,AG
i11
NNNN
YYYY
LD LD
Coryell Ranch (FHU Ref. No. 99-0221
SH 133/Main Street (110 second cycle)
PM Peak Hour, Year 2020 Baekground Traffic Conditions
SIGNAL9T/TEAPACIVeT 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Sunmary
fntersection Averages for Int # 0 - sH 133/t'lain Street
Degree of Saturation (v/cl 0.63 Vehicle De1ay 35.0
Sq11 | Phasel I Phase2 |**/**
02/04/ ee
13:37:36
Level of Service C
zir
I
I
North
I
++*++*<++*>
v
A
<++++++
****
****>
++++
v
^l
++++ |
<++++ |
++++ |
v
+>l+l+l
G/C--O.464e 51.0"
Y*R= 5.Ott
OFF= 0.0t
G/C=O.445e 49.0"
Y*R= 5.0t1
OEF=50.9t
C=110 sec G=100.0 sec = 90.9* Y=10.0 sec = 9.1t Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0t
Lane lWidth/ IGroup I Lanesl S/C I Service Ratel Adj IReqd Used I GC (rryh) GE lVolumel
lHct}rlv/c I De].ay I
l90* Maxl
I Queue I
L
s
N Approach 46.0
B
c
*E
RT
TH
LT
L2/L
L2/L
L2/L
0 .281
0 .42L
0. 619
o .464
0 .464
o .464
o.249
o.707
1.073
18.7
28.4
109. 2
152 frl
s07 frl
2O7 ftl
598
720
149
734
864
226
183
611
2so
S Approach 27.L c+
RT
TH
LT
t2/L
L2/L
L2/L
0.238
0.397
0.483
o.464
o .464
o .464
s98
720
LL2
734
864
L78
83
s50
L22
| 0.113
I 0.637
| 0.649
17.0
26.O
38.7
Bl 69frlc+l 455 frl
D+l 101 frl
E Approach
I Rr I L2/L 10.309 10.44s I ss9 I
lLr+rH I Lz/t lo.42L 10.445 | 394 I
27.t c+
70s I
524 I
250
3s5
I 0.3ss I
l'o.677 I
2L.5 I C+l31.1 | c I
2L4 fEl
304 frl
W Approach 33.1 C
=============================================================================:I Rr lt2/L 10.26010.44s1 ssgl 70sl 13310.1891 19.1lBl114ftl
ILT+TH I L2/L 1O.462 10.44s | 328 I 449 | 3s0 lO.78O | 38.5 l*D+l 300 frl
Coryell Ranch (FHU Ref. No. 99-0221
SH 133/Main Street (110 second cycle)
PM Peak Hour, Year 2020 Background Traffic Conditions
SIGNAI9T/TEAPAC[Ver 1.00] - Display of Intersection Parn'neters
165
L2.O
1
/
===================150 0.0 0
165 t2.O 1 --
L20 L2.O 1 \
Is50 | 22s
L2.O | 12.011 1
I
+
\
110
L2.O
1
225 L2.O 1
02/ 04/ ee
L3:37:47
I WrDTrrS
v LAIIES
zir
1
I
North
I
220 L2.O 1
100 0.0 0
I
495
L2.O
1
/
75
L2.O
1
Phasing: SEQUENCE
PERMSV
O\/ERLP
LEADI.AG
11
NNNN
YYYY
LD LD
CoryeJ.J. Ranch (EHU Ref. No. 99-0221
SH 133/Main Street (60 second cycle)
ADI Peak Hour, Year 2020 Total Traffic Conditions
North
I
02/04/ee
13: 14 : 48
SIGNAI9T/TEAPACIVeT 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Sumnary
Intersection Averages for Int # 0 - sH 133/Main Street
Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.43 Vehicle Delay 13.7 Level of Service B+
Sq11 | Phasel I Phase2 I**/**
^l
++++ |
<++++ |^ ++++l++++ v
++++>
++++
v
++++++<+++>
<+++>++++++
G/C=o.500e 30.0"
Y*R= 5.0rr
OEF= 0.0t
G/C=o.333
G= 20.0tt
Y*R= 5.Ort
OEF=58.38
lLlsI Lane
I Group
C= 60 sec G= 50.0 sec = 83.3t Y=10.0 sec = 16.7t ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0t
f width/l g/c I Service Ratel Adj II Lanesl Reqd Used I GC (rryh) GE lVolr:mel
I HcI.{
v/c I De1ay
l90t Maxl
I Queue I
N Approach
L2/L
L2/L
L2/L
LL.7
RT
TH
LT
0.081
0.287
0.299
0.500
0.500
0.500
748
891
280
Al 2s
B+l 190B+l 56
792
931
332
so | 0.063
450 | 0.483
133 I 0.401
7.9
LL.7
13.0
frlfrlfrl
S Approach t2.2
Al
B+l
B+l
39
522
111
RT
TH
LT
L2/L
L2/L
L2/L
0.070
0.322
0.233
0.500
0.500
0.500
748
891
338
792
931
390
I 0.049
| 0. s61
| 0.28s
7.8
L2.9
10. 6
2s fEl
22O fEl
47 ft-l
E Approach L6.2
I Rr I Lz/L 10.158 10.s33 I 4s3 I s28 | L72 10.326lLr+rH I L2/L 10.14s 10.333 I 4ss I s30 I 138 10.260
15.6 I1s.8 I
Bl 97
Bl 78
frlfrl
W Approach 18.6 B
==============================================4s3 | s28 I 94 10.178 | 14.9 I B+l 53 frl
385 | 4s9 | 233 10.s08 | 20.0 I c+l 131 frl
IRT
I LT+TH
I t2/L 10.11s 10.333 II L2/t 10.232 10.333 I
v
B+
Coryell Ranch (FIIU Ref . No. 99-0221
SH 133/Mai.n Street (50 second cycle)
AI'1 Peak Hour, Year 2020 Total Traffic Conditions
srGNArgT/rAApaC [Ver 1 . 00 ]- Display
tt
of Intersection Paranneters
02/04/ee
13:15:06
Key:
I WIDTHS
v LAIiIES
Phasing: SEQITENCE 11
PERMSV NNNN
OVERLP YYYY
LEADI.AG LD LD
45
L2.O
1
/
40s | 120 IL2.O | 12.0 |11 1ltt
+
\
100
L2.O
1
\ rss L2.o 1
85 L2.O 1
zir
I
INorth
1
L25 o.o o /40 0.0 0
85 t2.O 1 --
85 t2.O 1 \I
I
I
I
I
I
470
t2.o
1
/
35
L2.O
1
I
I
I
Coryell Ranch (FIIU Ref . No. 99-0221
SH 133/Main Street (110 second cycle)
AII Peak Hour, Year 2020 Total Traffic Conditions
02/o4/99
13:30:04
zir
I
I
North
I
SIGNAIgT/TEAPACIVeT 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Sr:mmary
Intersection Averages for fnt # 0 - SH 133/Main Street
Degree of Saturation (v/cl 0.40 Vehicle Delay 20.5 Level of Service C+
Sq11 | Phasel I Phase2 |**/**
+*+*+*>
v
<++++++
+>l+l+l
**** 1r****>
++++
v
elc=o.527e 58.0"
Y*R= 5.Ort
OFF= 0.0t
c/c=o.382
Y*R= 5.Ort
OFE=57.3t
C=110 sec e100.0 sec = 90. 9t Y=10.0 sec = 9.18 Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0t
Lane lwidth/ I slc IGroup I Lanesl Reqd Used I
l+l+
l<+
I
I
++++ |
<++++ |^ ++++l
Service
Gc (vph)
Ratel Adj I
GE lVolunel
I HClrw/c I De].ay
90t Maxl
Qrrerre I
lLllsl
N Approach t7.6 B
B+lBl*Bl
RT
TH
LT
L2/L
L2/t
L2/L
o.224
0.360
0.384
o.527
o.527
o.527
730
874
25L
83s
982
333
50 | 0.060
4s0 | 0.4s8
133 | 0.399
L2.8
L7 .1
19.1
37 frl
329 frl
97 frl
S Approach
39 | 0.047
s22 | 0. s32
111 | 0.285
18.3 B
L2.7
19. 1
16.3
B+l 29 frlB I 382 frlBl 81frl
835
982
389
RT
TH
LT
L2/t lo.22OLzlt 10.387L2/t | 0.331
o.527
o.527
o.527
730
874
303
E Approach 24.4 C+
IRT
I LT+TH
L2/L 10.276 10.382L2/L 10.262 10.382
42O I418 I
50s I603 I
L72 1O.284138 1O.229
24.8 I C+l 164 frl23.9 I C+l 132 frl
W Approach 26.1 c+
IRT
I LT+TH
L2/L l'0.243 10.382L2/L 10.323 10.382
42O I347 I
60s Is17 I
94 | 0.1s5
233 | 0.4s1
22.9 I C+l 90 frl
28.2 l*c | 223 fEl
Coryell Ranch (EHU Ref. No. 99-0221
SH 133/Main Street (110 second cycle)
AI'I Peak Hour, Year 2020 Total Traffic Conditions
SIcNAIgT/fnepaClver 1.001 - Display of Intersection Pararneters
155 L2.O 1
02/o4/ee
13:30:07
I WTDTHS
v LAI.IES
North
I
Key:
45
L2.O
1
/
405
L2.O
1
L20
L2.O
1
\
+
\
100
t2.o
1
85 L2.O 1
L25 0.0 O /0.0 0
85 Lz.O 1 --
85 Lz.O 1 \I
470
L2.O
1
/
35
t2.o
1
Phasing: SEQLTENCE
PERMSV
O\TERLP
LEADI.AG
i11
NNNN
YYYY
LD I.D
Coryell Ranch (FIIU Ref . No. 99-0221
SH 133/Main Street (60 second cycle)
PM Peak Hour, Year 2O2O loBal Traffic Conditions
02/04/99
13:31:50
SIGNAI9T/TEAPACIVeT 1.001 - Capacity Analysis Sunmary
Intersection Averages for Int # 0 - SH 133/Main Street
Degree of Saturation (v/cl 0.68 Vehicle De1ay 36.8 Level of Service D+
Sq11 | Phasel I Phase2 I**/**
****
****>
++++
v
^l
++++ |
<++++ |
++++ |vl
e/c=o.5oo
G= 30.0rr
Y*R= 5.0t'
OFF= 0.0t
e/c=o.333e 20.0"
Y*R= 5.0'r
OFF=58.3t
C= 60 sec @= 50.0 sec = 83.3t Y=10.0 sec = 16.7t Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0t
zir
I
I
North
I
++*++*<++*>
v
A
<+++>++++++
Lane lWidth/ IGroup I Lanesl S/C I Service Ratel Adj IReqd Used I GC (vph) GE lVoh:rael v/e I HCNI lL
I Delay I S
| 90t Maxl
I Quetre I
N Approaeh t7.9
82 frl
2s8 frl
105 frl
A
B+*c
194
611
250
792
931
310
748
891
258
RT
TH
IT
L2/L
L2/t
L2/L
0.181 | 0.500
0.36s I 0. s00
0.489 | 0. s00
o.245
0. 656
0.806
9.3
14 .8
32.3
S Approach 13.3
A
B+
B
a
83
550
L28
RT
TH
LT
L2/L
L2/L
L2/L
0.107
0.336
0.354
0. s00
0.500
0.500
748
891
2L2
792
931
263
0.105
0.591
0.487
8.2
13.4
L6.2
sL.2
35 frl
232 fLl
__:1_::l
E Approach
IRT
I LT+TH
I L2/L 10.216 10.333 I
I t2/L I 0.401 I 0.333 I
453 I287 I
s28 I359 I
18.9 I13.3 I
141 frl
206 frl2so l|o.473 I361 lL.O22 I
Bl
El
W Approach 94.6
=======IRT
I LT+TH
L2/L 10.146 10.333 IL2/L lO.4s2 10.333 I
4s3 I239 I
528 I309 I
| 0.263 I
| 1.168 I
15.8
L24.9
78 frl
203 frllBl
l*E l
139
361
B
Coryell Ranch (FHU Ref. No. 99-0221
SH 133/Main Street (60 second cycle)
PM Peak Hour, Year 2020 Total Traffic Conditions
SIGNAI$T/TEAPACIVeT 1.001 - Display of Intersection Paraneters
225 L2.O 1
02/04/ ee
13:31:55
I WIDTTIS
v LAI{ES
North
I
175
L2.O
1
/
550
L2.O
1
225
L2.O
1
\
+
\
115
L2.O
1
I
t
I
\
230 L2.O 1
155 0.0 0 /
170 L2.0 1 --
L25 L2.O 1 \
100 0.0 0
I
495
t2.o
1
/
75
t2.o
1
Phasing: SEQTENCE
PERMSV I
O\TERLP
LEADI,AG
11
NNNN
YYYY
LD LD
Coryell Ranch (FIIU Ref . No. 99-0221
SH 133/Main Street (110 second cycle)
PM Peak Hour, Year 2020 Total Traffic Conditions
SrGNAL9T/TEAPAC [Ver 1 . 00]
Intersection Averages for
Degree of Saturation
- Capacity Analysis Surnmary
Int # 0 - sH 133/Main Street(v/cl 0.64 vehicle Delay 35.7
02/04/ ee
L3232:37
Leve1 of Service D+
sq11 I Phasel I Phase2 |** /***
*
*>
v
<+ + *)l****1'
+ + + l+++++++l v
l+l+
l<+
+
+
+
v
++++ I
<++++ |
++++ |
rir
I
INorth
I
****
e/c=o .464e 51.0"
Y*R= 5.OtroEF 0.0t
c/c=o.445
G= 49.0tt
Y*f,= $.gtt
OFF=50.9t
C=110 sec c=100.0 sec = 90.9t Y=10.0 sec = 9.1t ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0t
Lane lwidth/ IGroup I Lanesl slc IRegd Used I
Service Ratel Adj 1
GC (rryh) GE lVolumel
lHculv/c I Delay I
L l90t l4axlS I Queue I
N Approach 45. 8
ftlfrlfrl
B
c
*ll
RT
TH
LT
L2/L 10.28st2/L lo.42LL2/L | 0.619
s98
720
L49
o .464
o .464
o .464
734
864
226
194
611
250
o.264
0.707
1.073
18. 9
28 .4
109.2
161
507
207
S Approach 27.6
RT
TH
LT
L2/L | 0.238
L2/L | 0.397
L2/L 10.494
o .464
0 .464
o .464
598
720
L]-2
134
864
178
83
550
L28
0.113
0. 637
o. 681
17.0
26.0
41.3
Bl
c+l
D+l
69
456
106
ftlfrlfrl
E Approaeh 28.L
IRT
I LT+TH
L2/L 10.309 10.44st2/L 10.432 10.44s
ss9 I389 I
70s Is18 I
25O I 0.3ss
367 | 0.708
2t.5
32.7
I C+l 2L4
lcl31s frlftl
W Approach 36.2
IRT
I LT+TH
L2/L 10.262L2/L I 0.478
I 0.44s
| 0.44s
ss9 I318 I
70s I438 I
I 0.197
| 0.824
L9.2
42.7
119
310
frlfrllBl
l*D+l
139
361
Coryell Ranch (FIIU Ref .
SH 133/t'tain Street (110
PM Peak Hour, Year 2O2O
No. 99-0221
second cycle)
Total Traffic Conditions
02/04/ee
13232:46
SrGNAL97,/TEAPAC [Ver 1 . 00]of Intersection Para^neters
225 L2.O 1
230 L2.O 1
100 0.0 0
175
L2.0
1
/
550
L2.O
1
Displ
225
L2.O
1
+
\
115
L2.O
1
ay
I
I
I
I
I
155 0.0 0 /
170 L2.O 1 --
L25 L2.O 1 \
North
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
495
L2.O
1
/
75
L2.0
1
Phasing:SEQUENCE
PERMSV
O\/ERLP
LE;ADI.AG
i11
NNNN
YYYY
LD LD
Key:
I WTDTHS
I,AI{ES
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1-
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
Intersection: CR l-08/CR 109 AM Peak Hour Year 2020 Total- Traffic
Analysis Date: February 11, 1999
Page L
HCS: Unsignalized
TWO-WAY STOP
Intersection Release 3.1
CONTROL (TWSC) ANALYSIS
Analyst: dIz
Intersection: CR 108/CR 109
Time Period: AM Peak 2020
fntersection Orientation: East-West Major St.
Vehicle Volume Data:
Movements: L 2 5 5 10 12
VoIume:
HFR:
PHF:
PHV:
10 60 1010 60 101.00 1.00 1.000.00 0.00 0.00
15 50 1015 50 101.00 r-.00 1.000.00 0.00 0.00
Pedestrian Volume Data:
Movements:
FIow:
Lane width:
Walk speed:
I Bl-ockage:
Median Type: None
# of vehicLes: 0
Elared approach Movements :
# of vehi.cles: Northbound
# of vehicles: Southbound
Lane usage for movements
Lane 1
LTR
1,2c3 approach:
LT
Lane 2
RL
Lane 3
-
Channelized: N
Grade: 0. 00
Lane usage for movements
Lane 1
LTR
4,5&6 approach:
LT
Lane 2
DT
Lane 3
Channelized: N
Grade: 0. 00
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
Intersection: CR 108/CR 109 AM Peak Hour Year 2O2O Total Traffic
Analysis Date: February 11, 1999
Page 2
Lane usage for movements 7,8c9
Lane 1
LTRL
approach:
T
Lane 2
RL
Lane 3
Channelized: N
Grade: 0.00
Lane usage for movements 10, LLaL2
Lane 1
LTRL
approach:
Laoe 2
RL
Lane 3
T
Channelized: N
Grade: 0.00
Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles:
Shared ln volume, major th vehicles:
Shared In volume, major rt vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major th vehicles:
Sat fLow rate, major rt vehicl"es:
Number of major street through lanes:
Length of study period, hrs:
Eastbound
60
U
1700
1700
1
Westbound
0
n
1700
17 00
1_
0.25
Worksheet 4
Critical Gap
Movement
Critical Gap and Eo11ow-up time cal-culation.
CalcuLations:1 10 72
t crbase
t c, hv
Phv
t cr9
G
t 3,ft
1 stage
tc
1 stage
Follow Up Time
Movement
4.7 1.71.0 1.00.00 0. 00
u.l0.00 0.000.0 0 .'t
0.00 0.00
6.2
1.0
0. 00
0.1
0.00
0.0
0.00
4.1 6 .4 6.2
Calculations:
1 10 t2
t f, base
t f,HV
Phvrf
1a?r22Z.' J.J J.J0.9 0.9 0.90.00 0.00 0.002.2 3 .5 3.3
N
I
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Rel-ease 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
Intersection: CR 108/CR 109 AM Peak Hour Year 2020 Total Traffic
Analysis Date: Eebruary 11, 1999
Page 3
Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations
Step 1: RT from Minor St.T2
ConfLicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Eactor
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
L8
10 67
1.00
10 67
0. 99
Step 2: LT from Major St.
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Eactor
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
Maj. L Shared ln. Prob. Queue Free St.
25
1 603
1 .00
1603
0. 99
0.99
Step 4 : LT from Minor St.10
Conflicting Elows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Eactor
Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor
Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Eactor.
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
Movement Capacity
98
907
1. 00
0. 99
1 .00
1. 00
902
Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations
Shared Lane Calculations
Movement
v (vph)
Movement Capacity
Shared Lane Capacity
Worksheet
Movement
10 delay,queue length, and LOS
141 l-0
v (wph)
C m (vph)
v/c
958 queue length
Control Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
101603 1555
0.01
7.3
A
I
I
60
926
0.06
9.2
A
t210
I
I
10
1067
t2
9.2
A
HCS: Unsignalized fntersection Release 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
Intersection: CR 108/CR 109 AM Peak Hour Year 2020 TotaL TrafficAnalysis Date: February 11, 1999
Page 4
Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay
Rank 1 Delay Calculations
Movement
Pojvi1vi2si1si2
P" 0j
D maj left
N number major st lanes
De1ay, rank 1 mvmts
0. 99 1.00600001700 17001700 1700
0. 99 1.00'7.3 0.0110.0 0.0
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Rel-ease 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
Intersection: CR 108/CR 109 PM Peak Hour Year 2020 Total Traffic Page 1
Analysis Date: February 11, 7999
HCS: UnsignaLized Intersectj-on Release 3.1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS
Analyst: dlz
Intersection: CR 108/CR 109
Time Period: PM Peak 2020
Intersection Orientation: East-West Major St.
VehicLe Volume Data:
Movements: l- 2 5 6 10 12
' Volume: 10 25 50 55 25 10
HFR:
PHE:
PHV:
10 25 50 55 25 101.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pedestrian Volume Data:
Movements:
Elow:
Lane width:
Walk speed:
t Blockage:
Median Type: None
# of vehicles: 0
E1ared approach Movements:
# of vehicles: Northbound 0
# of vehicles: Southbound 0
Lane usage t.rr*""""i*"nts 1-,2c3 approa.h'"".r"
2
LTRLTRLTR
Lane 3
YYNNNNNNN
Channelized: N
Grade: 0. 00
Lane usage for movements 4,5c5 approach:
Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3
LTRLTRLTR
NYYNNNNNN
Channefized: N
Grade: 0. 00
fntersection:
Analysis Date:
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
CR 108/CR 109 PM Peak Hour Year 2020 Tota] Traffic
February 1-1-, 1,999
Page 2
Lane usage for movements
Lane 1
LTR
7,8&9 approach:
Lane 2
LTRL
Lane 3
Channelized: N
Grade: 0. 00
Lane usage for movements
Lane 1
LTR
10,11&12 approach:
Lane 2
LTRL
Lane 3
Channelized: N
Grade: 0. 00
Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles:
Shared In volume, major th vehicl-es:
Shared In volume, major rt vehic.Les:
Sat flow rate, major th vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles:
Number of major street through l-anes:
Length of study period, hrs:
Eastbound
25
0
1700
1700
1
Westbound
0
0
17 00
17 00
1
0.25
Worksheet 4
Critical Gap
Movement
Critical Gap and Eo11ow-up time calculation.
Calculations:
1 10 L2
t c, base
t crhv
Phv
G
t 3,ft
t crT:
1 stage
tc
1 stage
Follow Up Time
Movement
4.1 7 .l1.0 1.00.00 0. 00
0.20.00 0. 00
0. 0 0.7
0.00 0.00
4.1 6.4
Calculations:
6.2
1.0
0.00
0.1
0. 00
0.0
0. 00
6.2
1 10 L2
t f, base
t f,HV
Phvrf
2.2 3. 5 3.30.9 0.9 0.90.00 0. 00 0. 00
aa?c)a..L J.J J.J
Intersection:CR 108/CR
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection ReLease 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
109 PM Peak Hour Year 2020 Total Traffic11, L999
Page 3Analysis Date:Februar
Worksheet 6 fmpedance and capacity equations
Step 1: RT from Minor St.12
Conflicting Flows
Potential- Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St
'18
989
1. 00
989
0. 99
Step 2: LT from Major St.
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Movement Capacity
Probabilj-ty of Queue free St.
Maj. L Shared Ln. Prob. Queue Free St
105
L499
1.00
1499
0. 99
0. 99
Step 4 : LT from Minor St.10
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Eactor
Maj. L, Min T Impedance factorMaj. L, Min T Adj. lmp Factor.
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
Movement Capacity
1,23
878
1. 00
0. 99
0. 99
0. 99
873
Worksheet I Shared Lane Calculations
Shared Lane Calculations
Movement T211
v (vph)
Movement Capacj.ty
Shared Lane Capacity
25
873
903
I
I
10
989
Worksheet
Movement
10 delay, queue length, and LOS
L2
v (vph)
C m (vph)
v/c
95t queue length
ControL Delay
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
10L499 1603
0. 01
1.4
A
35
903
0. 04
9.1
A
I------
I
I
------t
I
I
HCS: Unsignalized lntersection Release 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
Intersection: CR 108/CR 109 PM Peak Hour Year 2020 lota] Traffic
Analysis Date: February 11, 7999
Page 4
Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT
Rank 1 Delay Cal-culations
Movement
Impedance and Delay
Pojvi1vi2si1si2
P* 0j
D maj left
N nunlcer major st lanes
Delay, rank 1 mvmts
0. 99 1.00250001700 1?001700 1700
0. 99 1.00't.4 0.0110.1 0.0
Intersection:
Analysis Date:
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Rel-ease 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
CR 109/Site Access PM Peak Hour Year 2020 Total Traffic
February 11, 1999
Page 1
HCS:Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1
TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS
Analyst: dIz
Intersection: CR 109/site access
Time Period: PM Peak 2020
Intersection Orientation: North-South Major St.
Vehicle volume Data:
Movements:. 2
Volume:
HER:
PHF:
PHV:
35
35
1.00
0.00
30 2030 201.00 1.000.00 0.00
20 15 1020 15 101.00 1.00 1.000.00 0.00 0.00
Pedestrian Volume Data:
Movements:
FIow:
Lane width:
WaJ-k speed:
B Blockage:
Median Type:
# of vehicles: 0
Fl-ared approach Movements:
# of vehicles: Eastbound
# of vehicfes: Westbound
Lane usage
L
for movements
Lane L
approach:
Lane 2TRL
1,2&3
L
Lane 3
Channelized: N
Grade: 0. 00
Lane usage for movements
Lane 1
approach:
Lane 2
TRL
4, 5&6
L
Lane 3
Channelized: N
Grade: 0.00
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Rel-ease 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
Intersection: CR 109/Slte Access PM Peak Hour Year 2020 Tot-al Traffic Page 2
Analvsis Date: February 11, 1,999
Lane usage for movements
Lane 1
LTR
7, 8c9 approach:
Lane 2
LTRL
Lane 3
RT
NNNNY
Channelized: N
Grade: 0. 00
Lane usage for movements
Lane 1
LTR
10,11&l-2 approach:
Lane 2
LTRL
Lane 3
T
NN
Channelized: N
Grade: 0.00
Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles:
Shared In volume, major th vehicles:
Shared 1n volume, major rt vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major th vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles:
Number of major street through lanes:
Length of study period, hrs:
Northbound
0
0
1700
1700
1
Southbound
20
U
t-7 00
1700
1
0.25
Worksheet 4
Critical Gap
Movement
Critical- Gap and Fo1Iow-up tj.me calcul-ation.
Calculations:
t c, base
t c, hv
Phv
t cr9
G
t 3,lt
1 stage
tc
1 stage
Foll-ow Up Time
Movement
Cal-cul-ations :
4't
4.1
1.0
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.00
4.t
'7 .I
1.0
0.00
0.2
0.00
0.1
0.00
6.4
6.2
1.0
0.00
0.1
0. 00
0.0
0.00
6.2
9
t f, base
t f,HV
Phvrf
2.2 3.50.9 0.90.00 0.002.2 3.5
<{
0.9
0.00
Intersection:CR l-09/Site
HCS: Unsignatized Intersection Release 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
Access
1000
PM Peak Hour Year 2020 Total Traffic Page 3
Analysis Date:Februarv 11
Worksheet 5 Impedance and capacity equations
Step 1: RT from Minor St.
Conflicting Flows
Potential CaPacitY
Pedestrian fmPedance
Movement CaPacitY
Probability of Queue
Factor
free St.
50
7024
1.00
r024
0. 99
Step 2: LT from Major St.4
Conflicting Flows
Potential CaPacitY
Pedestrian ImPedance Eactor
Movement CaPacitY
Probability of Queue free St.
Maj. L Shared Ln. Prob. Queue Free St-
Step 4 : LT from Minor St.10
Conflicting Flows
Potential CaPacity
Pedestrian ImPedance Eactor
Maj. L, Min T ImPedance factor
Maj. L, Min T Adj. ImP Factor.
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
Movement CapacitY
Worksheet I Shared Lane Calculations
Shared Lane Calculations
Movement
55
15 50
1.00
1 550
0. 99
0.99
110
892
1.00
0.99
0. 99
0.99
883
v (vph)
Movement CaPacitY
Shared Lane CaPacitY
t------
I
I
15
BB3
934
10
L024
Worksheet
Movement
10 delay,queue length, and LOS
141 11
v (vph)g 6 (vph)
v/c
95t queue length
Control DelaY
LOS
Approach DeIaY
Approach LOS
.EZV ZJ1550 9340.01 0. 03
1.4 9.0
AtI
9.0
A
L2
------l
I
I
HCS: Unsignalized fntersection Refease 3'1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
Intersection:CR 109/Site Access PM Peak Hour Year 2020 Total Traffic Page 4
Analysis Date : FebruarV 11, 7999
Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay
Rank 1 DelaY Calculations
Movement
Pojvi1vi2si1si2
P" 0j
D maj left
N nunber major st lanes
Delay, rank 1 mvmts
1.00 0. 99020001700 17001700 17001.00 0. 990.0 1.4110.0 0.1
Corye].l Ranch (FHU Ref.
SH 133/Main Street
PM Peak Hour, Existing
03/08/ee
15:35:31
Analysis SumnarY
SH 133/Main Street
Vehicle Delay L2.4 Leve1 of Service B+
No. 99-0221
Conditions
SIGNAI9T/TEAPAClver 1.001 - Capacity .
fntersection Averages for Int # 0 -
Degree of Saturation (v/cl O -32
Sq11 I Phasel I Phase2 |
** /**
rir
I
I
Norttr
I
l+++l+++
l<+ + +>
v
^l
++++ |
<++++ I
++++ |
v
<+++>++++++
| ++++
I ++++>
| ++++
lv
c/c=o.500
G= 30.0tt
Y*R= 5.Ott
OEE= 0.0t
G/C=o.333
G= 20.0tt
Y*R= 5.0't
OEF=58.3t
C= 60 sec e 5O.O sec = 83.3t Y=10.0 sec = 16.7t Ped= 0'0 sec = 0'0t
I Serviee Ratel Adj I I HClr I L l90t l,laxlI Lane lwidth/l S/C I Serviee Ratel Adj | | Ho{ I IJ leut Iuaxl
i erorrp lLanesl Reqd- Used I GC (rph) GE lVolumel w/e lDelay lS l9ueue I
N Approach 10.1 B+
RT
TH
LT
L2/L | 0.132
L2/L 1O.242L2/L l|O.228
0.500
0.500
0.500
748
891
443
792
931
494
118
359
148
0.149
0.386
0.300
8.5
10.5
10.4
Al s0frl
B+l 151 ftlB+l 62 fEl
9.7 AS ApProach
================L2/L
L2/L
L2/L
AI
B+l
Al
RT
TH
LT
0.096
o.226
0.000
0.500
0.500
0.500
748
891
415
792
931
467
69 | 0.087
328 | 0.352
27 I 0.0s8
8.1
LO.2
8.0
29 frl
138 frl
25 frl
E Approach 17.0
==================================
I Rr lL2/t t0.15610.3331 4s3l s28l 17010.322 | 16-slBl 96ftl
i:::i:__ _!_!?.1!-19:111-19::::-l--1:l-l--i:i-l--1:i-19:ll!-l--11-l-l-:-l-1:3-::l
W Approaeh 17.0 B
I Rr I L2/L lo.o78 10.333 | 4s3 | s28 I 47 10.089 I 14-1 I B+l 26 fLl
i:::i:-- _!_:?l:-l!-1ti-le-itt-l--:::-l--:::-l--1!3-13-ll3-l--11-:-l-:-l- -??-'-:!
Corye1l Ranch (FIIU Ref . No. gg_O22)SH 133/Main Street
PM peak Hour, Existing Conditions
srcNArgT/reApac[ver 1.00J - Display of rntersection paraneters
03/08/ee
15:35:33
106
L2.o
1
/
133
L2.o
1
\
323
L2.o
1
153 12. O 1
I wrDTHs
/t\
I
INorth
I
SEQUENCE 11PERMSV NNNNOVERLP YYYYLEADI.AG LD LD
Key:
82 L2.o 19e 0.0 o /+
\
24
L2.o
1
I
295
L2.O
1
/
62
L2.o
1
Phasing:
81 0.0 o48 t2.o 1 _-
42 L2.O 1 \
\
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection ReLease 3'1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
Intersection: CR 108/CR 109 AM Peak Hour Existing Traffic
Analysis Date : FebruarY 1-1-, 1'999
Page 1
HCS: Unsignalized
TWO-WAY STOP
Intersection
CONTROL (TWSC)
Release 3. L
ANALYSIS
Analyst: dlz
Intersection: CR 108/CR 109
Time Period: AM Peak Existing
Intersection Orientation: East-West Major
Vehicle Volume Data:
Movements: 1 2 5 6
st.
10 12
Vol-ume:
HFR:
PHF:
PHV:
5505 501.00 1.00
0.00 0.00
5555
1 .00 1.000.00 0.00
2052051.00 l-.00
0.00 0.00
Pedestrian Volume Data:
Movements:
FIow:
Lane width:
Walk speed:
B Blockage:
Median TyPe: None
# of vehicles: 0
Elared approach Movements:
* of vehicles: Northbound
# of vehicles: Southbound
Lane usage for movements
Lane 1
LTR
1,2&3 approach:
LT
Lane 2
RL
Lane 3
Channelized: N
Grade: 0. 00
Lane usage for movements 4,5c6 approach:
Lane 1
LTRLT
Lane 2
RL
Lane 3
N
Channeli zed:
Grade:
N
0. 00
0
0
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3'1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
Intersection:CR 108/CR Hour Existing Traffic109 AM Peak
11, 7999
Page 2
Lane usage for movements 7,8c9 approach:
Lane 1 Lane 2
LTRLTRL
NNNNNNNNN
Channelized: N
Grade: 0 .00
Lane usage for movements 10,L1c12 approach:
Lane 1 Lane 2
LTRLTRL
Lane 3
T
YNYNNNNNN
Channelized: N
Grade: 0 . 00
Data for computing Effect of Delay to Major street Vehicles:
Analysis Date:Februar
Shared In volume, major th vehicles:
Shared ln volume, major rt vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major th vehicles:
Sat ffow rate, major rt vehicles:
Number of major street through lanes:
Length of studY Period, hrs:
Lane 3
T
Eastbound
50
0
17 00
1700
1
Westbound
0
0
1700
1700
1
0.25
worksheet 4 Critical Gap and FoIlow-up time calculation.
Critical GaP Calculations:
Movement I 10 I2
t c, base
t c, hv
Phv
I Cr9
Gt 3, rt
t C, T:
1 stage
LL
t f, base
t f , HV
Phv
4.L '1 .L 6.21.0 1.0 1.00.00 0.00 0.000.2 0.10.00 0.00 0.000.0 0.7 0.0
0.00 0.00 0. 00
aa?q22L.' J.J J.J0.9 0.9 0.90.00 0.00 0.00
1 stage 4.L 6 .4 6.2
Follow UP Time Calculations:
Movement I t0 L2
t f 2.2 3.5 3.3
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3'1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
Intersection:CR 108/CR 109 AM Peak Hour Existing Traffic Page 3
Conflicting Flows
Potential CaPacitY
Pedestrian ImPedance Eactor
Movement CaPacitY
ProbabilitY of Oueue free St.
Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 L
Conflicting Flows
Potential CaPacitY
Pedestrian ImPedance Factor
Movement CaPacitY
ProbabilitY of Queue free St.
Maj. L Shared In. Prob. Queue Free st'
Step 4: LT from Minor St.1 10
Conflicting Flows
Potential CaPacitY
Pedestrian ImPedance Factor
Maj. L, Min T ImPedance factor
Maj. L, Min T Adj. ImP Factor.
Cap. Adj. factor due. to Impeding mvmnt
Movement CaPacitY
Analvsis Date:Februar 17, 1999
Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations
Step 1: RT from Minor St.
Worksheet I Shared Lane Calculations
Shared Lane Calculations
Movement
y (vph)
Movement CaPacitY
Shared Lane CaPacitY
I 9 10 11 t2
20
940
965
and LOS
4'78910 11
I
1081
1.00
10 81
1_. 00
10
7623
1. 00
L623
1.00
1.00
72
68
943
1.00
1. 00
r_. 00
1. 00
940
Worksheet 10 delaY, queue length,
5
10 81
t2Movement
v (vph)
C m (vph)
v/c
958 queue length
Control DeIaY
LOS
Approach DelaY
Approach LOS
EJ
r623
0.00
1.2
A
157 0
25
955
0.03
8.8
A
8.8
A
il ------llll
------t
I
I
HCS: Unsignalized fntersection Release 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
Intersection:CR 108/CR 109 AM Peak Hour Existing Traffic Page 4
Anal-ysis Date:Februar 77, 1999
Worksheet 11
Rank L Delay
Movement
Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay
Calculations
z
Pojv il_vi2si1si2
P* 0j
D maj left
N number major st lanes
De1ay, rank 1 mvmts
1.00 1.00500001700 17001700 17001.00 1.007.2 0.0110.0 0.0
Intersection:
Analysis Date
HCS: Unsignalized fntersection Release 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
CR 108/CR 109 PM Peak Hour Existing Traffic
: February 11, 7999
Page 1
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.1
TWO-VIAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS
Analyst: d1z
Intersection: CR 108/CR 109
Time Period: PM Peak Existing
Intersection Orientation: East-West
Vehicle Volume Data:
Movements: L 2 5
Major St.
L210
Volume:
HER:
PHF:
PHV:
2052051.00 1.000.00 0.00
5 20 405 20 401.00 1.00 1.000.00 0.00 0.00
tr
5
1.00
0.00
Pedestrian Volume Data:
Movements:
Flow:
Lane width:
Walk speed:
? Blockage:
Median Type: None
# of vehicles: 0
Elared approach Movements :
# of vehicles: Northbound
# of vehicles: Southbound
Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach:
Lane 1 Lane 2
LTRLTR
Lane 3
Channelized: N
Grade: 0. 00
Lane usage for movements
Lane 1
LTR
4,5s6 approach:
Lane 2LTR Lane 3
Channelized: N
Grade: 0.00
HCS: Unsignalized lntersection Release 3.1
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
Intersection: CR 108/CR 109 PM Peak Hour Existing Traffic
Analysis Date: Pebruary 11, L999
Paqe 2
Lane usage for movements 7,8c9
Lane l-
LTRL
approach:
Lane 2
TRL
Lane 3
T
NNNN
Channelized: N
Grade: 0 . 00
Lane usage for movements
Lane 1
LTR
approach:
Lane 2
TRL
10,11&12
L
Lane 3
T
NN
Channelized: N
Grade: 0. 00
Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicl-es:
Shared l-n volume, major th vehicles:
Shared 1n volume, major rt vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major th vehicles:
Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles:
Number of major street through l-anes:
Length of studY Period, hrs:
Eastbound
20
0
1700
1700
1
Westbound
U
0
1?00
17 00
1
0.2s
Worksheet 4 Critical GaP and
Critical Gap Calculations:
Movement I 10
Follow-up time cafculation.
I2
t crbase
t c, hv
Phv
t cr9
G
t 3, l"t
t crT:
1 stage
1 stage
Fol1ow UP
Movement
4.7 't .71.0 1.00.00 0.00
0.20.00 0. 000.0 0.7
0.00 0.00
4 .t 6.4
Time CafcuLations:1 10
6.2
1.0
0.00
0.1
0.00
0.0
0.00
6.2
I2
t f, base
t f , HV
Phv
tf
2.2 3. 50.9 0.90.00 0.002.2 3. 5
3.3
0.9
0.00
Intersection: CR 108/CR
Analysis Date: FebruarY
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 3.l-
Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) Analysis
PM Peak Hour Existing Traffic
L999
109
11,
Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations
Step 1: RT from Minor St.t2
Conflicting Flows
Potential Capacity
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
50
L024
1 .00
t024
1. 00
Step 2: LT from Major St.
Conflicting Elows
Potential CapacitY
Pedestrian Impedance Eactor
Movement Capacity
Probability of Queue free St.
Maj. L Shared ln. Prob. Queue Free St.
60
155 6
1.00
r.556
1.00
1.00
Step 4: LT from Minor St.10
Confficting Elows
Potential CapacitY
Pedestrian Impedance Factor
Maj. L, Min T ImPedance factor
Maj. L, Min T Adj. ImP Eactor.
Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt
Movement Capacity
80
921
1 .00
1.00
1.00
1.00
925
Worksheet B
Shared Lane
Movement
Shared Lane Calculations
Calculations
10
v (vph)
Movement CaPacitY
Shared Lane CaPacitY
Worksheet 10 de1aY, queue
Movement
Iength,
1
and LOS
4
v (vph)
c m(vph)
v/c
95% queue length
Control DelaY
LOS
Approach Delay
Approach LOS
5
1556 1609
0.00
'1 .3
10
912
0.01
I .'7
A
Page 3
q
925
912
q
1024
L210
8.7
HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Rel-ease 3.1
Two-Way Stop ControJ- (TWSC) Analysis
Intersection: CR l-08/CR 109 PM Peak Hour Existing Traffic
Analysis Date: Eebruary 11, 1999
Page 4
V{orksheet 1l- Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay
Rank L Delay Calculations
Movement
volv i1vi2si1si2
P* 0j
D maj left
N number maior
Delay, rank 1
st lanes
mvmts
1.00 1.0020000l_700 17001700 17001.00 1.00
7 .3 0.0110.0 0.0
,f . ....'. ',,:-,.r,'
,::' . r. , '.. ;, "
;r. -:tll. ;.1il::
Fo:m No.
GWS.25
OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER
COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203
(303) 866-3s81
634
APPLICANT
CORYELL RANCH CO LLC
% IAN HAUSE
9929 HWY 82
CARBONDALE CO 81623-
(970)e63-6277
PERMTT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL
Lot: Block: Filing: Subdiv:
APPROVED WELL LOCATION
GARFIELD COUNTY
SE 114
Twp 7S
NE 114 Section 29
RANGE 88 W 6th P.M.
DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES
1734 Ft. from North Section Line
832 Ft. from East Section Line
WELL PEBMIT NUMBER
DIV. 5 CNTY. 23
o5x.-147 E__
MDWD 38 DES. BASIN
1)
3)
4)
ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT
CONDMONS OF APPROVAL
This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material iniury to existing water rights. The tssuance of the permit does
not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right
from seeking relief in a civil court action.
The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a
variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump lnstallation Contractors in
accordance with Rule 18.
Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2) for the construction of a well, appropriating ground water tributary to the Colorado River,
as an alternate point of diversion to the Avalanche Canal and Siphon, on the condition that the well shall be operated qly when
the west Dividewater conservancy District's substitute water supply plan, approved by the State Engineer, is in effect and when
a water allotment contract between the well owner and the west Divide water conservancy District for the release of replacement
water from Ruedi Reservoir is in effect, or under an approved plan for augmentation. WDWCD contract #99O220CRC(a).
The use of ground water from this weil is limited to service for 75 single famifi cnrelling unils (EAR's), and the irrigation of not
more than Cf ,SOO square feet (1.18 acre) of garden and lawn. All use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment
contract or a plan tor augmentation is in effect.
Themaxlmumpumpingrateshall notexceedll2GPM. Thiswell istobeknownastheCoryell RanchWell No. l3,whichisalso
noted in pending case 98CW3t0, Water Division No. 5.
The annual of amount of ground water to be appibpriated shall not exceed 38.12 acre'feet (12,420,000 gallons).
A totalizing llow meter must be installed on this well anc.l maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diverstons
must be maintaineo by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Ertgineer upon request.
This weil shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit, and at least 600 feet from any
other existing well, unless the other existing well is owned by the applicant, or a waiver has been obtained.
The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), and court case number(s) as appropriate The
owner Shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings.
NOTE: Monitoring hole notice MH3536-/, was acknowledged for construction of a monitoring and observation hole
for this applicant, in this '/., v,, on 12123198n A4t4 a,.175'U
6)
7)
8)
e)
APPROVED
TLC !t A
a
r?.i-
State Engrneer
Receipt No. 0441 108 l"ii,iiDATE ISSUED lrr,*olo* fi.+,tm 0I
2)
s)
---)
Form l.Jo.
GWS.25
OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER
COLORADO DIVISION OF WATEIT RESOURCES
818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St.. Denver, Colorado 80203
(303) 866-3s81
634
APPLICANT
CORYELL RANCH CO LLC
% IAN HAUSE
9929 HWY 82
CARBONDALE CO 81 623-
(e7o)s63-6277
PERMTT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL
Block: Filing:Subdiv:
APPROVED WELL LOCATION
GARFIELD COUNTY
SE 114
Twp 7S
NE 114 Section 29
RANGE 88 W 6th P.M.
DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES
1734 Ft. from North Section Line
832 Ft. from East Section Line
WELL PERMTT NUMBER
Drv. s cNw. 23
o5l,+47 E__
WD 38 DES. BASIN MD
1)
2)
3)
ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT
CONDMONS OF APPROVAL
This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no nnaterial injury to existing water rights. The issuance of the permit does
not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right
from seeking relief in a civil court action.
The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2, unless approval of a
variance has been granted by the State Board of Exanriners of Water Well Construction and Pump lnstallation Contractors in
accordance with Rule 18.
Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2) for the construction of a well, appropriating ground water tributary to the Colorado River,
as an alternate point of diversion to the Avalanche Canal and Siphon, on the condition that the well shall be operated qjy when
the west Dividewater conservancy District's substitute,water supply plan, approved by the state Engineer, is in etfect and when
a water allotment contract between the well owner and tne west Divide water conservancy District for the release of replacement
water from Ruedi Reservoir is in effect, or under an approved plan for augmentation. WDWCD contract *990220CRC(a).
The use of ground water from this well is limited to service for 75 single famity clwelling units (EAR's), and the inigaion of not
more than 51,S00 square fe€t (1.18 acre) of garden and lawn. All use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment
contract or a plan tor augmentation is in effect.
Themaximumpumpingrateshall notexceedl12GPM. Thiswell istobeknownastheCoryell RanchWell No. 13,whichisalso
noted in pending case 98CW310, Water Division No. 5,
The annual of amount of ground water to be appropriated shall nol exceed 38.12 acre-feet (12,420,000 gallons).
A totalizing flow meter must be installed on this well and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions
must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request
This well shall be constructed not more than 2OO feet from the location specified on this permit, and at least 600 feet from any
other existing well, unless the other existing well is owned by the applicant, or a waiver has been obtained.
The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), and court case number(s) as appropriate. The
owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings.
NOTE: Monitoring hole notice MH3!t:t6l, was acknowledged for construction of a monitoring and observation hole
for this applicant, in this v., 't,, on 12123198j-. A4tg^ =.173.o
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
e)
APPROVED
TLC
Receipt No.
State Engrneet
0441 1 08 DATE ISSUED
ri^f:l"lru t
tli a
U ':J ',,.'a i -d{AR 0 I
(
Form No.
GWS-25
APPLICANT
OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER
COLOHADO DTVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203
(303) 866-3s81
Block: Filing:
634
APPROVED WELL LOCATION
GARFIELD COUNTY
SE 114 NE 114 Section 29
Twp 7 S RANGE 88 W 6th P.M'
DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES
1734 Ft. from North Section Line
832 Ft. from East Section Line
CORYELL RANCH CO LLC
% IAN HAUSE
9929 HWY 82
CARBONDALE CO 81623-
(970)963-6277
PERMTT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL
WELL PERMTT NUMBER
DIV. 5 CNTY. 23
o51,447 E__
MDWD38 DES. BASIN
1)
2)
ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT I]OES NOT CONFER A WATEH RIGHT
CONDMONS OF APPROVAL
This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no rnaterial injury to existing water rights. The issuance of the permit does
not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right
from seeking relief in a civil court action.
The construction of this well shall be in compliance witlh the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402'2, unless approval ot a
variance has been granted by the State Board of Exarniners of Water Well Construction and Pump lnstallation Contractors in
accordance with Rule 18,
Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(2) for the construotion of a well, appropriating ground water tributary to the Colorado River,
as an alternate point of diversion to the Avalanche Canal and Siphon, on the condition that the well shall be operated qly when
the West DivideWater Conservancy District's substitute water supply plan, approved by the State Engineer, is in effect and when
a water allotment contract between the well owner and the west Divide water conservancy District for the release of replacement
water from Ruedi Reservoir is in effect, or under an approved plan for augmentation. WDWCD contract #990220CRC(a).
The use of ground water from this well is limited to service for 75 single famif cnrelling units (EAR's), and the inigation of not
more than 51,5O0 square feet (1.18 acre) of garden and lawn. All use of this well will be curtailed unless the water allotment
contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect.
Themaximumpumpingrateshall notexceedll2GPM. Thiswell istobeknorrnastheCoryell RanchWell No. l3,whichisalso
noted in pending case 98CW310, Water Division No. 5.
6) The annual of amount of ground water to be approprierted shall not exceed 38.12 acre'feet (12,420,000 gallons).
A totalizing flow meter must be installed on this well ancl maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions
must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request.
This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit, and at least 600 feet from any
other existing well, unless the other existing well is owned by the applicant, or a waiver has been obtained.
The o,rrner shalt mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), and court case number(s) as appropriate. The
owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings.
NOTE: Monitoring hole notice MH€5i:!6/, was ackno'wledged for construction of a monitoring and observation hole
for this applicanl, in this v., v,, on 12123198n A4t4, a,,173;'u
4)
s)
7)
e)
APPROVED
TLC tt ,(J'$*;6'tt'A
State Engrneer
Receipt No. 0441 108 i,i
irl a:,arri'r r.r JDATE ISSUET)
'.t.!.'; -i
EXPIRATION ,d,lAR 0I
8)
Form No.
GWS.25
OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEE:R
COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
818 Centennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 80203
(303) 866-3581 634
APPLICANT
CORYELL RANCH CO LLC
% IAN HAUSE
9929 HWY 82
CARBONDALE CO 81623-
(970)963-6277
PERMTT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL
Filing:
t., !:1
4 --1' I
APPROVED WELL LOCATION
GARFIELD COUNTY
SE 114 NE 114 Section 29
Twp 7 S RANGE 88 W 6th P'M'
DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES
1734 Ft. from North Section Line
832 Ft. from East section Line
WELL PHRM]T NUMBER
DIV. 5 CNTY. 23
0s1,.147 E__
MDWD38 DES. BASIN
1)
2)
3)
4)
s)
7)
ISSUANCE OF THIS PEHMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT
CONDMONS OF APPROVAL
This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no nlaterial iniury to existing water rights. The issuance of the permit does
not assure the applicant that no injury will occur to anotner vested water right oi preclude another owner of a vested water right
from seeking relief in a civil court action'
The construction of thls well shall be in compliance with the water well construction Rules 2 ccR 402-2, unless approval of a
variance has been granted by the state Board of Exanriners of water well construction and Pump lnstallation contractors in
accordance with Rule 18'
Approved pursuant to cBS 37-90-137(2) for the construction of a well, appropriating ground water tributary to the colorado River,
as an alternate point of diversion to the Avalanche canal and Siphon, on the condition that the well shall be operated qly when
the west Divide water conservancy District's substitute water supply plan, approved by the state Engineer, is in etfect and when
a water allotment contract between the well owner and the West Divide Water Conservancy District for the release of replacement
water from Ruedi Reservoir is in etfect, or uncter an approved plan for augmentation. wDwCD cortract #99(20CRC(a)'
The use of ground water from this well is limited to service for 75 single family drrelling units (EoR's), and the inigaion of not
morethan5l,s(x)squ€uefeet(1 .lBacre)ofgardenandlawn. All useofthiswell will becurtailedunlessthewaterallotment
contract or a plan for augmentation is in effect.
The maximum pumping rate shall not exceed 112 GpM. Thiswell is to be kno,vn as the coryell Ranch well No' 13, which is also
noted in pending case 98CW310, Water Division No' 5.
6) The annual of amount of grouncl water to be appropriated shall nof exceed 38.12 acre'feet (12,420,000 gallons)'
A totalizing flow meter must be installed on this well anct maintained in good working order' Permanent records of all diversions
must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request'
This well shall be constructed not more than 2OO feet from the location specified on this permit, and at least 600 feet from any
other existing well, unless the other existing well is owned by the applicant, or a waiver has been obtained'
The owner shalt mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), and court case number(s) as appropriate The
Owner Shall take necessary means and precautions tO preserve these markings'
NoTE: Monitoring hole notice MH3536/, was acknowledged for construction of a monitoring and observation hole
for this applicant, in this v., v,, on 121231982t .,4lg-, .r,.11
!,'u
s)
APPROVED
TLC
Receipt No.
tl,r
State Engineer
0441 1 08 DATE ISSUET)l"i,ll( t i ':t.'r'4q
fordlAR
8)
STATE OF COLORADO
OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER
8'18 CEntennial Bldg., 1313 Sherman St., Denver, Colorado 802O3
FOR INSTBUCTIONS, SEE REI/ERSE SIDE
STATEMENT OF BENEFICIAL USE
WELL PERMT NUMBER
1/4 ot tne
-1h,
Sec.- TwP.E *. o, flr., Ranse E =.
o,flw.
-P.M.Ft. from E *. o, E a. 4,n",Ft. from E =.
o, fl*. un".
The well is being used for the following purpose(s):
Water from the wellwas first used beneficially
under trb permit number, for the above described purposes on
(Do not rePort a date which is before the issued date of this permit)
The pumping rate claimed is
-
gallons per minute'
The average annual amount of water diverted is
-d(watered)bywaterfromthiswellis:-no",""o,ISquarefeet,
(Number)
described ""' Groa orrtt'F,'--)
@atementsmadeherein,knowthecontentsthereof,andstatethattheyaretrUetomy(our)
knowledge. [pursuant to seaion z44-1}i'liEtil c.n.s , the making of false statements herein constitutes periury
in the seiond degree and is punishable as a Class 1 lrnEqerne
Name/Tltle (Please tYPe or Print)
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
BY Date
Div. Co. WD Basin MD Use
Lic. No:
Lic. No:Pump installed bY:.
Fomr
No. GW92
4t97
DrvtsroN I
800 8th Ave Rm 321
Greeley CO 80631
(303) 3s2-8712
DIVISION 5 Box 396
50633 US Hwy 6 &24
Glnwd Spgs CO 81601
(e70) e4s-s665
DIVISION 2 Box5728
310 E Abriendo Suite B
Pueblo CO 81004
o19) s42-3368
DIVISION 3 Box 269 DIVISION 4 Box 456
422 4th Sl 1540 E Niagara
Alamosa CO 81101 Montrose CO E1402
o19) s8e-6683 (e7o) 249-6622
NON.EXEMPT
STATE OF COLORADO
DTVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER
2 1 c e nte n n''',?,33;'
Ju'J3.?1 ?li ?,,?!i 33318'"
o I o rad o 802 0 3
WELL PERM]T INFORMATION, PERMITS APPROVED PURSUANT TO CRS 37-90-137(2)
Garefully read the conditions of approval on your wel! permit. The conditions and the information on this
information sheet must be complied with in order for the permit to remain valid.
THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT
THE WELL PERMIT EXPIRATTON DATE IS ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE ISSUED. Evidencc Of thE USE MUSt bE
received in the form of a Statement of Beneficial Use (Form No. GWS-I0) PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE OF
THE PERMIT. The well must be construc{ed, the pump installecl and water from the well must be used for the approved
purposes prior to the expiration date of the permit. Beneficial use is the use of water that is reasonable under reasonably
efficient practices to accomplish, without waste, the purpose for which the appropriation of water is made. There are
penalties if the evidence of use is not received prior to the expiration date. lf the well will not be in use by the expiration
date, an extension of the expiration date should be requested if it is anticipated that the well will be in use within one more
year.
The well permit number is located in the upper right hand comer of the permit, and the expiration date is located in the lower
right hand comer. The expiration date of the permit may be extended for a marimum time of one year at the discretion of
the State Engineer for good Gause shown. lf an enension of time is necessarv to construct and put water from the well to
use. vou must file a written request for the e)dension. alono with a $60.00 filino fee. which must be rceived bv this office
orior to the exoiration date. The request must state why the wel! has not been completed, must include an estimate of time
required to complete the well, and put the water to beneficial use.
Water well and pump installation contractoni are specifically licensed in Colorado to perform these specialized
tasks. lt is illegal for contactors who do not hold these licenses to construct wells and install pumping equipment
in or on wells. The well must be constructed and the pump installed by contractors with current license(s) issued
by the State of Colorado unless exempted as described on the reverse side. The well construction and pump installation
reports including testing of well yields and pumping systems must be submitted to the office of the State Engineer by the
respective contractors within sixty (60) days of completion of the work or within seven days after expiration of the permit,
whichever is earlier. The contractor(s) must provide you with a copy of the work report(s) filed with the State Engineer. The
Well Construction and Test Report, Form Number GWS-31 and the Pump lnstallation and Test Report, Form Number
GWS-32 are available from the Division of Water Resources offices. Additional information regarding well construction,
pump installation, required testing and well plugging and sealing regulations are found on the reverse side of this sheet
You have been provided with copies of the well permit. The ownels copy is for your records. There is also a copy for
the pump installation contractor. Copies have been sent to the driller if you indicated a driller license number on the
application, or those two copies are also enclosed. You nnay make additional copies for the well construction contractor if
you select a different contractor. DO NOT GIVE YOUR'OWNER'S COPY'TO THE WELL CONTRACTOR.
The original permit is on file in our Denver office Records Section. Copies may be obtained for a fee of 50 cents per page.
Statutes require that any change of mailing address or ownership be reported to the State Engineer. Form number GWS-11
is used both by new owners to report ownership changes and cunent owners to report address changes.
lf you have questions, contact the Denver Office, or the Division Office in the area where your wetl is located.
DIVISION 6 Box 773450 DIVISION 7 Box 1880 DENVER OFFICE
625 So. Lincoln Ave. 1474 Main St Rm 821
Stmbt Spgs CO 80477 Durango CO 81302 1313 Sherman St
(970) 879-0272 (97O\ 247-'1845 Denver CO 80203
(303) 866-3s81
O0roH+,mNcH#-il
HIHIS'RESOURCEP==85+ffi
Phone:(970) 945-6777
Fax:(97O) 945-1 137
memo
To:
of:
Date:
Re:
REI File No. 752-3.0
cc:
lan
Coryell Ranch Co. LLC
February 4, 1999
Well Permit
Enclosed are:
Cover Letter to the State, Well Permit Application
Sign the application
a
WDWCD letter transmitting the West Divide Contract
WDWCD contact application
Application filed in 98CW310
Lori Satterfield, Esq. letter to WDWCD outlining for West Divide how the Coryell Ranch
development water rights operation.
Coryell Ranch legal description
WDWCD map showing Coryell Ranch location
Signed contract with WDWCD
Map (Figure 1) showing location of the wells
a
a
a
Sign the application and send to the attention of Tamara Cunningham at the address shown on
the top of the well permit application. lnclude a check payable to the Colorado Division of Water
Resources for $60.
I was going to send this ovemight mail to emphasi= _tl1j!is is important to us.
Please make a complete copy of this package and return it to me for my file. lwill follow up with
the State to make sure that this application does not fall through the cracks
From the desk of...
John M. Currier, P.E.
Water Resources Engineer
Resource Engineering, lnc.
t\Y/
\
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITII
FIESOUFICE
ENGINEEFIING INC
Ms. Tamara Cunningham
Colorado Division of Water Resources
1313 Sherman St., Room 818
Denver, CO 8O2O3
RE: Well Permit Application; Coryell Ranch Company LLC
February 4, 1999
Dear Tarnara:
Enctosed please find a well permit application for the Coryell Ranch Company LLC.
Also enclosed is a check payable to the Colorado Division of Water Resources for $60
to cover the application fee.
The Coryetl Ranch Company, LLC will operate under the State approved West Divide
Water Conservancy District Substitute Supply Plan. The applicant has obtained a
contract from the West Divide Water Conservancy District for an amount equal to the
applicant's diversions ptus 5% conveyance loss between Ruedi Reservoir and the
applicant's property.
The Coryelt Ranch Company LLC requests that a well permit be issued requests that
the welt permit be issued pursuant to the approved substitute supply plan and the
applicants contract with West Divide Water Conservancy District.
Should have any questions or need any additional information please give me a call.
Sincerely,
RESOURCE ENGINEERING, INC.,//,LNA
Jphn M. Currier, PE
Water Resources Engineer
JMC/jmc
r:t^. -tr1 I ^." j . :.-.; i filc;75.-r.l.Lr\waitp.rrf,ilcovcr.wpf"z--'4'j*1'E.,
enclosure
Mr. lan Hause
Consulting Engineens and Hydnologists
9O9 gotonado Avenue I Glenwood Spnings, Cl3 B160'1 I (g7O)945-6777 I Fax [97O] 945,-'1137
COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOIIRCES
, DEPARTMEIYT OF NATTIRAL RESOURCES
1313 SHERMAN ST., RM.818, DEI\wER CO E0203
phone - info: (303) E66-35E7 main: (303)E66-35E1
GENERAL PURPOSE Water Well Permit Application
(pleas€ note: otrer tormB are arailable for speeifc uses including - r*idential, liv*tock, monitoring/obaerv., gravel Pits, flglsfirdoa of old rvelle)
Review instructions prior to completing form Must be completed in black ink
or
t. APPLICANT INFORMATION 5. USE OF WELL (please attach detailed description)
NarnccrapPllc trt
Coryell Ranch Company, LLC
c/o Mr. lan Hause
El tttousrnnl El o*ten:
E couuencnu See application filed in
E rrlur.ttctplu Case No. 98CW310
El rnRroRlOu (attached)
E FEED LOT - numbef of he.d: __. _.
7. WELL DATA
M.iling AddrE
9929 Hwy 82
qtv ffi Z?Cod.
Carbondale CO 81623
Luimum pumping fln
25opm
Annual anount
38.12 acrefeei
Totrl d.Ptr
60 feet
Aqulr.t
Roadng Fork Rtuer AllwiumT.l.pho.r. nunb.r (incluOa .E 6.1.)
(970) 963-6277 8. LAND ON WHICH GROUND WATER WILL BE USED
2. TYPE OF APPLICATION (check applicable box(es))A LEGALEESCRImON (may bc provided e. sn sttechment):
See legaldescription in attached West Divide Water
Conserva ncy District Water Al lotme nt C o ntract
(Exhibit C in attachment)
E Construcl new well El Use existing well
El Replace existing well E Change or lncrease Use
E Change (source) Aquifer El Reapplication (epired pemit)
El Othen T-'for crop itgatton, attrach $elcd m.p that shov\6 itrigetod ere..)
3. REFER TO (if applicable):B. #.cr.r C. Oumcr
waler Goutt caaa,
9ECW310 (oendins;
PermilI
D. Llrt .ny othct wGllt or wrtcr rlght. utcd on thl. lrnd:
@ Application in Case No. 98CW310Emergencl Velbal I
-vE-
illoniloring hol6 eckno$,lodgmsnt t
MH-35367
Wcll namcorl
Corvel! Ranch Well No. 13
9. PROPOSED WELL DRILLEE (optionf
Namc
Collins Drilling Co.
Licanaa numbar
6344. LOCATION OF WELL
County
Garfield
Ouaner/qued€?
sE%NE7.
Ouartor 10. SIGNATURE of applicant(s) or authorized agent
The making of false statements herein constitutes perlury
in the second degree, which is asaclasslmis-
Demeanor pursuant to C.a);rtn/104(13Xa). I have read
the statements hereia, kfSw lh{contents thereof, and state
that they ar e)ryfu{yP*(ease.
29
S€ction Torvnship t{orS
7 trE
Range EorW
8E trE
Principal Meridian
^tho
Distance of rvell from s€c'tion linG6
t733.54nrromEINE s Ein.9sfirrcmEl etr w
Ectt tocaoon roorur, l,.ll{t t mrro,n rPplElm lddrt.t (t lppllcabl.l
Coryell Ranch _,-::,-,-
Fot tapl.camant wallt onu - dlatrnca atlo dlrt(ton ttom oto rall to n.u srll
-.r-.*
- llr
I a4/1999
feet direction oPTIoNAL tNFOnuenor,t
5. TRACT ON WHICH WELL WILL BE LOCATED USGS mrp nemc uwR maP no.SurtE.bv.
A LEGAL DESCRIPTION (may bo providad as an attachm€nl):
See legaldescription in attached West Divide Water
Conservancy District Water Allotment Contract
(Exhibit C in attachment)
Use Only
DIV
usE(s)
co-
WD-
BA-
MD
B. STATEPARCEL
IIH (oPtlonal):
C. trcr.r ln tsrct
259.438+-
D. Ownal
Coryell Ranch Companv. LLC
E. Wallthis be the only well on this tract?
tr YES E NO (f other u,ells are on this tract, see instructions)
Fonn GWS45 (LZl95)
0fficers
President.876-2821
Kel ly Couey
4145 C.R. 315
si lr. c0 8i652
Vice Pnesident
Samuel B. Potter
0598 C.R. 323
Rifle. C0 81650
Tr"easuren/Al ternate Sec.
LaVerne Starbuck
3106 c. R. 342silt. c0 81652
Secreta Iv
l.lillram M. Zilm
0090 Sunlight Dr.
Glenwood Springs. C0 81601
Coryell Ranch Company,
c/o John Currier
Resource Engineerirg,
909 Colorado Avenue
Glenwood Springs, CO
Ladies and Gent.lemen:
WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVAIISY DISTRIET
124 WBST TSIRD STREBT
P. O. BOX 1478
RrFr,E, COLORADO 81550-1478
TBLEPHONE AIqD FA)( (97O) 525-545L
ftil 0 i i5:5
iij: ;i.:.C: ! *:..'i='-' "'r r,C'
Februar:y 2, 1999
.*./
Board of Directors
Kel lY Couey
4745 C. R. 315silt. c0 81652
tli l l iam M. Zi lm
0090 Sunlight Dr.
Glen'i'ood Spri ngs. C0 81601
Laverne Starbuck
3106 C.R. 342silt. c0 81652
Larry S. Axthelm
1002 CooPer Ave.
Glenvood Sprlngs. C0 81601
Samuel B. Potter
0598 C.R. 323
R'ifle, C0 81650
LLC
Inc.
I 1601
Enclosed is your approved contrilct #990220CRC(a) . Please read Ehe
contracE carefully if you havel not already done So, buE please
especially noEe paragraph 2 con.cerning availability of wat,er.
West. Divide obtains its sEoralJe water from a number of sources
including Ruedi Reservoir and Green Mountain Reservoir which are
Bureau of Reclamation projects. Federal policy relaEing to
endangered species, among othe:r environment,al concerns, provides
that suppiies 'f -uor.r -^.Js. rus--rvoi-rs may be' -'incer'luplf-bie .
Moreover, Lhe forces of nature are always such t.hat no source of
water can be guaranteed from year Eo year. West, Divide continues
Eo make good-faith efforts Eo obtain alEernaEive long-tetrn supplies
in an effort, to make reliable and predictable the waEer supply
anticipated by your conLract wiEh us.
This wat,er allotmenE contracE may require you E,o obEain a well
permit, from t,he St,aEe Engineer's of fice. Once your well is drilled
you are required E,o install a measuring device and submic a meEer
teading Eo West. Divide. You will be provided wiEh a special form
for t,his purpose upon noEificat,:Lon that your well has been drilIed.
L-.
Corye11 Ranch Company, LLC
February 2, L999
Page 2
Non-compliance with measurJ-ng and reporEing requiremenEs are
grounds tor cancellation of your water allotmenE conEract with WesE
Divide. This could result in act.ion by the St,aEe Engineer which
could prevent. your furE,her use of your well .
Sincerely yours,
O--.r* i* [] \ ctr:i A c .J-
,IBnet Maddock
Administrat,ive Assist,anE
Enclosure
cc The SEaEe Division of waEer Resources w/enclosure
Division No. 5 Water Resources w/enclosure
Edward J. Currier, P.E. w/enclosureLori J. M. Satterfield, Esiq. w/enclosure
Current Ll01199
APPLICATION AIID DATA
WEST DIVIDE WATER
APPLICA}TT
Nilng Corvell Ranch Company, Lrc
Mailing Addressc/o Balconb & Green, i,Q.
B.WATER RIGHT OWNED BY APPLICAIVT OR BEING APPLIED FOR
Name of RighE See E<tribit A hereto atpil;-rFT-ip.l? 9. pp- 7-F-'fype of SEruct,ure or Right, wel-1s, resenroirs, ditehesLocation of PoinE of Diversion (description fromLocation of PoinE of Diversion (description from Aecree or permi-tl
See Exhibit A hereto-
FORM TO LEASE
CONSERVAI{CY
Contract No.
Map ID No.
Oate ActivaLed
WATER FROM
DTSTRICT
990220CRC ( a )
307
L /28 /99
A.
Telephone _Number 970 / gAS -55,16 Balconrb & Green, p.C.
Authorized AgenE or Represent,at.ive Lori J.M. Satterfielrlr attorncy for aEf,tir.ant
C.
WaE,er Court Case No. 980il310. Application
well Permit No. N/A
INTENDED USE OF LEASED WATERLocation of Area of Use ( fncluclepr@erty on which water righE is
is E<hribit A hereto.(AEtach copy of permiE)
met,es and bounds
Eo be used. May be
1egaI descripEion of
aEEached as Exhibit,)
Description of propertv is Exhibit C herei,o-
Total acreage of above-referenced parcel 25Q ac-res
Address of above-referenced property
DescripEion of Use See Exhibits A and B.
Total Number of Dwelling Units
Number of Constrrrcted Units -0-
Number of Vacant, Lots 75
Potable Wat,er System Avafanche Canaf and Syphon. diverting at one or ec"nhination*
Wast,e-Water Treatment Syst,em Central treatnent fr'lan.t-T}Ee of Meter o_r Measuring Device f]ow meters on wells: parsha'll flume or otherqevLce accepted by Division Eegineer on surface diversions.
Proj ect,ed Monthly volume of Leased waEer Needed in .Gallons :
''rrFqR FTGTJRES AFE X- - :l'-I-fI: nTlT?S:[]l-: 3X. _ r
75
D.
(Actual diversions must be used unless contractee has an augrnentation plan)
Jan. Zjr !Q0- _ I.!. !B?,QoQ_ Mar. ef6,.so0 Apr. esc?slt. May
June . 1,179J349 .Tu1y l[gl-fizq Aug. L7Ta,,oqs s6pr.rbgz,-zoo oclNov. 945.-000 _ Pg". q76,qoo
Annual ToE,aI Gallons i,Ezo-qtt Acre Feet, 38.12
OTHER REMARKS Please to. TheDistrict PIan f
.,1 3r'IL'..
1 .153.781
. 1--092ile
Applicant
By:applicant,
Maximum rnst,anEaneous Demand __LlZ_g[pm
of Coryell Ranch Well Nos. 1 15, -arrd/or the Corye11 Ranch Roaring Fork River Diversion.
rt { r1j-D.----jif#xrriq?.,",c.l*ErErB&l[fi%
DISTRICT COURT, WATER DTVISION NO. 5, STATE OF COLO
caseNo. Qfu^lZt)
DEc e r iggg
APPLICATION FOR SI]RFACE WATER RIGHTS, WATER STORAGE RIGHTS,
CHANGE OF WATER RIGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAI\ FOR AUGNIENTATION
AND EXCIIANGE
CONCERNING Ti{t APFLICATION FoR wATER RIGHTS oF CoRYELL RANCH
COMPA}IY, LLC,
in GARFIELD, PITKIN, and EAGLE Counties, Colorado
Name and address of Applicant:
Coryell Ranch Company, LLC
c/o The Melrose Company
400 Main Street
Hilton Head Island, SC29926
c/o Scott Balcomb, and
Lori Satterlield
Balcomb & Green, P.C.
P.O. Drawer 790
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
CLAIM FOR SURF'ACE WATER RTGHTS
A. As decreed in Case No. W-291[0, the headgate is situated in lot 6 of Section 33,
Township 7 South, Range 88 West of the 6th P.:M., located at a po:nt rvhorc" the Nnrthwest comer
of,-sa:.ci --'3[icL 33 'ucurs ironu 5z-'27'17" West a distiricgof 3,Lt1.n i ivl-',,auo rhg .^version point
is situate in Lot 6 of said Section 33 located at a, point whence the Northwest corner of said Section
33 bears North 51"3L'22 west a distance of 3,299.29 feet, Garfield county.
B. Source: Crystal River
C. Date of initiation of appropriati,on: November 20, 1999
How appropriation was initiated: By field investigation and formation of intent to
i
I
,I
I
t
II
I
I
I
I
2.
D(HIBIT A
-_.-++.
appropriate and proceed with ttre project
D. Amount claimed: l0 cfs, conditional
E Proposed use: To fill and refill the Coryell Ranch Lakes, plus replace seepage and
evaporation losses outside the historic irrigation season, and provide occasional soil moisnge
recharge
J.
1r" Legal description: As decreed in Case No. W-2910, the headgate is situated in Lot
Fourteen of Section 33,'Township 7 South, Range 88 west of the 6u\ P.M., loca-ted at a point whence
the Northwest comer of said Section 33 bears Norttr 31 o58'47" West a distance of 4,203.g7 feet and
diversion point is situated in Lot For.rteen of Section 33, Township 7 South, Range 88 West of the
6'h P.lvl. located at a point whence the Northwest corner of said section 33 bears North 30o56,40,,
West a distance of 4,595.91 feet, Garfield County.
B. Source: Crystal River
C. Date of initiation of appropriation: November 20, l99g
How appropriation was initiated: By field investigation and formation of intent to
appropriate and proceed with the project
D. Amount claimed: l0 cfs, conditional
E. Proposed use: To fill and refill the Coryell Ranch Lakes, plus replace seepage and
evaporation losses outside the historic irrigat,ion season, and provide occasional soii moisture
recharge
CLAIM FOR WAT'ER STORAGE RIGHT
4.
A. All lalies are located in Section 29, Torvnshin 7 South. Pange 88 West, 6'h P.M. in,
J:..(- -. --'j:^./ -
---r5---
-
Case No. Water Division No. 5
APPLICATION FOR SUMACE WATER RIGHTS, WATER STORAGE zuGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER
zuGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION AND EXCFIANCE
Applicant: Coryell Rancy Company, LLC
Page 2 of 12
Lake No.Volume
(AF)
Area
(Acres)
Quarter,
Quarter
Location in
Section 29
Distance from
North line of
Section 29
Distance from
East Line of
Section 29
I 20 3.5 NW,SE 3244 t929
2 20 3.5 NW,SE 2799 2500
)20 3.0 SW,NE L7t4 t7t4
All storage is active.
The as-built locations of the lakes may be somewhat different from or reconJigured from the
above-descriptions. However, the total volumes and surface area will be within the limits described
herein. All the lakes will be constructed within Applicant's properry.
B. Source: the source of water to fill the lakes is the Crystal River, through the Southard
and Cavanaugh Ditch Coryell Ranch Enlargement and Kaiser and Sievers Ditch Coryell Ranch
Enlargement, and the following interests in the Southard and Cavanaugh Ditch and Kaiser and
Sievers Ditch:
Case No. Water Division No. 5
APPLICATION FOR SURFACE WATER zuGHTS, WATER STORAGE RIGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER
zuGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION AND EXCHANGE
Applicant: Coryell Rancy Company, LLC
Page 3 of 12
gh
Structure Priority
No.
Decreed
Amount
Amount
Owned by
Applicant
Adj. Date App. Date Decreed
Use
Case No.
(Garfield
County
Dist. CL)
Southard &
Cavanaugh
Ditch
106 1.5 cfs l.l0 cfs 5/l l/l 8E9 3n3n885 Irrigation c.A. 132
Southard &
Cavanaugh
Ditch l"
Enlargement
170 1.2 cfs 0.88 cfs 5/l l/l 889 4t4n887 lrrigation -.c.A. 132
Southard &
Cavanaugh
Ditch 2"d
Enlargement
206 1.0 cfs 0.73 cfs
2.'i I cts
u9^892
8125t t936
4lvt889
+ns^s;-
Irrigation c.A.420
c.A.308;oouthard &
Cavanaugh
Ditch 3d
Enlargement
298 3.7 cfs Irrigation
ote: caPaclty t Southard and Cavanar c
Structure Priority
No.
Decreed
Amount
Amount
Owned by
Applicant
Adj. Date App. Date Decreed
Use
Case No.
(Garfield
County
Dist Ct.)
Kaiser &
Sievers Ditch
136 4.0 cfs 0.70 cfs 5/l l/1889 I l/2/l 885 Irrigation c.A. 132
Kaiser &
Sievers Ditch
lx
Enlargement
166 3.6 cfs 0.63 cfs 5/l l/t889 l0/12ll 886 Inigation c.A. 132
Kaiser &
Sievers Ditch
znd
Enlargement
& Extension
2I7AA 2.0 cfs 0.35 cfs 8126/t9t0 4lrst1902 Irrigation c.A. 1432
Note: Capacity of Kaiser ana Sievers pircU: ZZrt cfs"
D.
Date of appropriation: November 20, 1998
How appropriation was initiated: By field investigation and formation of intent to
appropriate and proceed with the project
Date water applied to beneficial use: Water has not yet been applied to beneficial rse.
c.
The Applicant seeks conditional water rights for the lakes.
E. Use: The lakes will be used within the Coryell Ranch P.U.D. for multiple uses
including, but not limited to: irrigation, recreation, aesthetic, fue protection, water quality
enhancement and piscatorial.
Surface area at high water line: see paragraph 4.A. above
Ma.ximum height of dams: less than l0 feet
H. Length of dams: The lakes will generally be constnrcted below Erade and wil! "nthave *.he traditie::d.g. ,- , '.,, - .' . ,i,. Tii, .--.ive capacity of the idhes wnr.* - -rL --ii:.-..3, *.-
outlet featues for each lake.
CI IM FOR CHANGF OF WATFR RIGHT
5. Decreed name of stn:ctures for which changes ate sought:
Case No. _, Water Division No. 5
APPLICATION FOR SURFACE WATER zuGHTS, WATER STORAGE RIGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER
RIGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FORAUGMENTATION AND EXCHANGE
Applicanu Coryell Rancy Company, LLC
Page 4 of l2
F.
G.
A.
B.
Southard and Cavanaugh Ditch, see paragraph 4.B. above.
Kaiser & Sievers Ditch, see paragraph 4.B. above.
Avalanche Canal and Syphon:C.
(1)Source: Crystal River
A.djudication Date: June 20, 1958
Appropriation Date: April 22,1957
Case No.: C.A. 4613, Garf,reld County Distict Court
Decreed amount: 830 cfs
(2)
(3)
(4)
(s)
6.Legal descriptions of water rights to be changed:
Southard and Cavanaugh Ditch: see plra$aph 2.A.
Kaiser and Sievers Ditch: see paragraph 3.A.
Avalanche Canal and Syphon:
Headgate No. 1 being the initial point of diversion of said Avalanche Canal and Syphon is
located on the right bank of the Crystal River at a point whence the witness comer of the SW comer
of Section 9, Township 10 South, Range 88 West of the 6'h P.M. bears North 3o9'West 546 feet.
Said point is located 4,730 feet from the North Section line and 50 feet fiom the West Section line
of said Section 9 and is located in the SW%SW% of said Section in Pitkin County, Colorado.
Headgate No. 2 being the second point of diversion of said Avalanche Canat and Syphon is
located on the right bank of Avalanche Creek at a point whence the W% Corner of Section 28,
Township 9 South, Range 88 West of the 5t\ P.M. bears Norttr 67"15'West a distance of 4,538.1
feet. Said point is located 4,570 feet from the North Section lins e-,1
^ 200 f:et from the West_
Su-l!'.,,- . . '-
Colorado.
'.;: ;rUii 28 zr.rd rs located in tEe !iEYesL',. i;f sa^.j. lj-;;^-r^ ^r^ r.rtl(tn Coilty,--
7.Decreed uses of rights to be changed:
Southard and Cavanaugh: irrigation
Case No. Water Division No. 5
APPLICATION FOR SUR.F'ACE WATER RIGHTS, WATER STORAGE zuGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER
RIGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION AND EXCHANGE
Applicant: Coryell Rancy Company, LLC
Page 5 of l2
A.
B.
C.
B. Kaiser and Sievers Ditch: irrigation
C. Avaianche Canal and Syphon: generation of electric energ:y, domestic, municipal, and
industrial purPoses including but not limited to the production of oil from shale, irrigation purposes,
and stock watering purposes
8. Proposed changes:
A. Avalanche Canal and Syphon:
(l) Applicant requests alternate points of diversion for a total of 3.75 cfs of the
Avalanche Canal and Syphon right at any one or combination of the Coryell Ranch
Wells and/or the Coryell Ranch Roaring Fork River Diversion, which are located as
follows:
All wells are located in Section 29, Township 7 South, Range 88 West, 6,h P.M. in Garfield
County.
Case No. Water Division No. 5
APPLICATION FOR SURFACE WATER zuGHTS, WATER STORAGE zuGHTS, CI{ANGE OF WATER
zuGHTS' AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FORAUCMENTATION AND EXCHANGE
Applicant: Coryell Rancy Company, LLC
Page 6 of 12
Well No.Quarter, Quarter
Location in Section 29
Distance from North line
of Section 29
Distance from East Line
of Section 29
I NE, NE t268.54 102 r.95
2 SW, NE 1849 20il.t2
J SE, NE 2086.54 86.95
4 SE, NE 1808.54 301.95
5 SE, NE 1508.54 486.95
6 NE, NE 1218.54 666.95
7 NE, NE 928.54 966.95
8 NW, NE 774 t284.t2
9 sw, NE 1469 t284.t2
' 8Wi'IfJ 1666ffi
ll SW, NE t739 l 839. l2
t2 NW, NE 879 t6t9.t2
l3 SE, NE 1733.54 83 r.9s
l4 SE, NE 1873.54 971.95
l5 NE, SE 2883.54 66 r.95
The Coryell Ranch Roaring Fork River Diversion is located on the West bark of the Roaring
Fork River in the NE%NE%, Section 29, Township 7 South, Range 88 West, 6th P.M., at a poini
whence the NE corner of said Section 29 bears North 53 o 18' East, a distance of 1,357.4 feet.
(2) Applicant seeks to.rse the said 3.75 cfs of the Avalanche Canal and Syphon
within the Roaring Fork Water and Sanitation District, formerly Aspen Glen *ater
and Sanitatio::;is:ici. However, depletions from the subjectwells or uoryelr xanch
Roaring Fork River Diversion to serye areas other than the Coryell Ranch will be
covered by other augmentation plans. The Coryell Ranch is located generally within
the NE% of Section 29, Township 7 South, Range 88 West, 6'h P.M. (Gariield
County).
B. southa.d and curanaugh Ditch and Kaise. and Sier..s Ditch:
(l) Applicant requests altemate points of diversion of these rights at the Coryell
Ranch Wells and the Coryell Ranch Roaring Fork River Diversion (described above)
for irrigation use through the potable system for the Coryell Ranch.
(2) In addition, Applicant requests a change of the Southard and Cavanaugh
Ditch and Kaiser and Sievers Ditch rights from direct application for irrigation to
storage and subsequent application to beneficial use in and through the Coryell
Ranch Lakes.
(3) Applicant requests a change of use of these rights to add augmentation use
to the historic irrigation use.
CLAIM FOR APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION
AND EXCHANGE
9. Name of sttrctrues to be augmented:
=. 4*.. Avalanr'!'- n^-.t - -i Syphon cliverting at'.fh=alu.....:., po:r,
denominated the Coryell Ranch Well Nos. I through 15 and the Coryell Ranch Roaring Fork River
Diversion.
B. Coryell Ranch Lake Nos. I through 3
Case No. ___, Water Division No. 5
APPLICATION FOR SURFACE WATER zuGHTS, WATER STORAGE RIGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER
zuGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FORAUGMENTATION AND EXCHANGE
Applicant Coryell Rancy Company, LLC
Page 7 of l2
10.
C. Southard and Cavanaugh Ditch Coryell Ranch Enlargement. Other water rights are
diverted from this structure.
D. Kaiser and Sievers Ditch Coryell Ranch Enlargement. Other water rights are diverted
from this structure.
Previous decrees for water rights to be used for augmentation:
A. Southard and Cavanaugh Ditch (see paragraph 4.8. above)
B. Kaiser and Sievers Ditch (see paragraph 4.B. above)
C. Ruedi Reservoir:
(l) Previous Decree: Case No. 4613 entered June 20, 1958, in Garfield County
District Court
(2) Location: Ruedi Reservoir is located in parts of Sec. 7,8,9,!1,14,15,16,17
and 18, T. 8 S, R. 84 W. of the 6th P.M. in Pitkin and Eagle Counties. The darn
thereof is located in the NW % of Sec. 18, T. 8 S., R. 84 W., 6th P.M., its exact
location being described as follows: The initial point of survey of said dam is on the
right abutnent thereof at a point whence the SW corner of Sec. 7, T. 8 S., R. 84 W.
6th P.M. bears North 68"58' at a distanc e of 426 feet.
(3) Appropriation Date: luly 29,1957
-
(4) Decreed Amount: 102,369 acre feet
(5) Source: Frying pan River
(6) Decreed Use: The generation of electricity, irrigation, domestic, mr:nicipal,
stock watering, piscatorial and industrial
11. Statement of plan for augmentation: Applicant contemplates a residential development of
approximately 70 units, three lakes (applied for herein), and irrigation of lawn, parden .,rr{ nDen
space under the Katser anci Srev-tr Li.,^r anc L.rutharq and CevanJujiiDitch.
A. Domestic/municipal. Water service is contemplated to be from any one or
combination of the Coryell Ranch Well Nos. I through 15 and/or the Coryell Ranch Roaring Fork
River Diversion. Municipal diversions will be under the Avalanche Canal and Syphon by contract
through the West Divide Water Conservancy District. The development is located in the
Case No. Water Division No. 5
APPLICATTON FOR SURFACE WATER zuGHTS, WATER STORAGE zuGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER
zuGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION AND EXCHANGE
Applicanu Coryell Rancy Company, LLC
Page 8 of l2
Conservancy District's service area All out-of-priority depletions of in-house domestic/municipal
use rvill be augmented by releases from Ruedi Reservoir or other supply source available to the
Conservancy District under the direction of the Division Engineer in the course of administering the
Conservancy District's water supply program. Wastervater teatment will be by a central treatnent
plant. The estimated annual reservoir releases, assuming year-round augmentation, for the
domestic/municipal uses are 1.7 acre feet annually. However, augmentation is required only rvhen
the Avalanche Canal and Syphon water right is out of priority.
The Coryell Ranch Wells have not been constructed. Tentative locations are adjacent to the
Roaring Fork River, and most of the locations are within 100 feet of the river. Some well locations
are more than 100 feet from the river, and for those wells a delayed impacts analysis (if required)
will be conducted after the wells are constructed and tested.
B. Lake evaooration. The net annual lake evaporation from 10 surface acres of the
Coryell Ranch Lake Nos. 1 through 3 is estimated at 28 acre feet per year. The lakes are all located
on land historically irrigated by the Southard and Cavanaugh Ditch and Kaiser and Sievers Ditch.
Applicant contemPlates that druing the historic irrigation season, the net evaporation from the lakes
will be approximately 23 acre feet, and, therefore, approximately 23 acre feet of consumptive-use
credits available under the Southard and Cavanaugh Ditch and Kaiser and Sievers Ditch righs will
be dedicated to the lakes. If after the lakes are constructed Applicant finds that the actual surface
area differs from the planned surface acreage, then irrigation consumptive-use credits will be
allocated to the actual lake acreage at the :ate of 2.29 acre feet per surface acre.
, During the non-inigation season, out-of-priority depletions from the lake evaporation will
be replaced by releases from Ruedi Reservoir under a contract with West Divide Water Conservancy
Distict. The macimum contemplated Ruedi release requirements during the non-irrigation season
for this purpose are approximately 5.2 acre feet, assr:ming a 57o tansit loss; however, augmentation
is required only when the lake rights, the Southard and Cavanaugh Ditch Coryell Ranch
Enlargement, and Kaiser and Sievers Ditch Coryell Ranch Enlargement are out of priority.
C. Inigation. Historically, 150 acres have been irrigated within the Coryell Ranch
properfy by the Kaiser and Sievers Ditch, and Southard and Cavanaugh Ditch. The extent of the
irrigation and the resulting 274.5 acre feet of consumptive-use credits (based upon a factor of 1.83
acre feet per acre) were decreed in Case No. W-2206, and confirmed in Case No. 95CW180, Water
Division No. 5.
No augmentation will be required for any inigation within the Coryell Ranch development.
The Coryell Ranch Well Nos. I through 15 and/or the Coryell Ranch Roaring Fork River Diversion
will be altemate points of diversion for the Kaiser and Sievers Ditch and Southard and Cavanaugh
Ditch water rights. Inigation will continue under those rights, subject to the 150 acreage limit (as
decreed in W-2206), and subject to the dedication of Southard and Cavanaugh Ditch and Kaiser and
Case No. _, Water Division No. 5
APPLICATION FOR SURFACE WATER zuGHTS, WATER STOMGE zuGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER
zuGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION AND EXC}IANGE
Applicant: Coryell Rancy Company, LLC
Page 9 of l2
Sievers Ditch credits for replacement of evaporative losses from the Coryell Ranch Lake Nos. I
through 3, as above-described.
12. Operation of the subject plan for augmentation and exchange will allow for the diversion and
use of the subject augmented rights without injury to other senior vested and decreed conditional
water rights.
13. To ensure the proper operation of the augmentation and exchange plans, Applicant will
install and maintain such water measuring devices and implement such accounting procedures as
may be required to verify that the amount of augmentation and exchange water equals or exceeds
the amount of out-of-priority depletions resulting from the Applicant's development.
14. If any supplemental or replacement wells are required or desired for any of the Coryell Ranch
Well Nos. I through 15, Applicant requests that such wells be automatically incorporated into this
plan for augmentation, provided that they are subject to all of the terms and conditions set forth
herein.
WHEREFORE, Applicant requests a decree which:
(i) confirms and decrees a water right for the Southard and Cavanaugh Ditch Coryell
Ranch Enlargement, more particularly described in paragraph 2;
(iD confirms and decrees a water right for the Kaiser and Sievers Ditch Coryell Ranch
Enlargement, more particularly described in paragraph 3;
(iii) confirnrs and decrees water rights in and to the Coryell Ranch Lake Nos. I through
3, more particularly described in paragraph 4;
(iv) approves the changes of water rights for the Avalanche Canal and Syphon, Kaiser and
Sievers Ditch, and Southard and Cavanaugh Ditch, as above-described;
apProves the plan for augmentation and exchange described in paragraphs 9 through
(vi) finds that as a result of the subject changes of water rights and augmentation and
e:<changc plan, therewili-oe no irrjurl' tc en) v*,Li .,r or p€rSons enriiiidri6-iiiE'watei unuer
a vested water right or a decreed conditional right; and
(vii) orders the State Engineer to issue well permits for the wells described in paragraphs
8 and 14.
Case No. Water Division No. 5
APPLTCATION FOR SURFACE WATERRIGHTS, WATER STORAGE zuGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER
RIGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION AND EXCTIANGE
Applicant: Coryell Rancy Company, LLC
Page l0 of 12
(v)
t4;
Dated ,nirfauyof December, 199g.
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
Tel: (970) 94s-6546
Fax: (970) 945-8902
Case No. Water Division No. 5
APPLICATION FOR SURFACE WATER zuGHTS, WATER STORAGE RIGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER
RIGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FORAUGMENTATION AND EXCHANGE
Applicant: Coryell Rancy Company, LLC
Page ll of12
Scott #t376
Attomeys for
\/ERIFICATION
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF GARFIELD
' I, John Currier, professional engineer for Resource EngineerinB, hc., being frst duly sworn,
upon oath, depose and say that I have read the foregoing APPLICATION FOR SUMACE WATER
zuGHTS, WATER STORAGE RIGI{TS, CHANGE OT WATEN RIGIITS, A}ID APPROVAL OFPLAII FOR AUGMENTATION AIID EXCI{ANGE, know the contents thereof, anil th,i the same
is tnre to the best of my information, koo*t.Jgi *a'u.ii.r.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this ^t'_ day of
Ad,dress:
M;r Commissicn expires:818 Colorado Avenue
Glenwood Springq CO 8160,
lly Cornmission expres May 1, 20Ol
Case No. _, Water Division No. 5
APPLICATION FOR SUPSACE WATER RIGHTS, WATER STORAGE RIGHTS, CHANGE OF WATER
zuGHTS, AND APPROVAL OF PLAN FORAUGMENTATION AND EXCTIANGE
Applicant Coryell Rancy Company, LLC
Page 12 of 12
)
)ss
)
NOTARY P
JoHN A. THULSoN
EowARD MULHALL. JR.
Scotr BALCoMB
LAWRENCE R. GREEN
TrMorHY A. THULSoN
LORI J. M. SATTERFIELD
EowARo B. OLszEwsr
OavtD SaNDovaL
DENDY M. HEI5EL
CHRts"oPH:R L. CoyLE
Bar,coMB & GREEN, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT IJA.W
(FORMERLY DEUTXEV E BALCOMB' P.C.)
P. O. DRA\dER 79O
818 COI,ORADO A\rENT.IT
GT,ENWOOD SPRTNGST COT,OR^DO a16()2
Telephone: 970.945.6546
Facsimile: 970.945.8902
January 19,1999
OF CoUNSEL:
KENNEH BALCOMB
Board of Directors
West Divide Water Conservancy District
P.O. Box 1478
Rifle, CO 81650-1478
RE: Coryell Ranch Co.. LLC
Dear Ms. Starbuck and Gentlemen:
The purpose of this correspondence is to describe in more detail how the applicant, Coryell
Ranch Co., LLC, intends to use the water to be supplied by contract from the West Divide Water
Conservancy District.
The water will be used within the Coryell Ranch P.U.D., which is located generally within
the NE% of Section 29, Township 7 South, Range 88 West, of the 6'h P.M. (Garfield County), across
the Roaring Fork River from the Aspen Glen P.U.D. (which is also served, in part, by contract with
West Divide).
As described more fully in the application in Case No. 98CW3l0 (a copy is Exhibit A to this
contract application), the applicant contemplates that after the decree is entered in 98CW310, the
contract waterwill be used to augment in-house domestic depletions (when the Avalanche Canal and
.;,;.t.nr. i1. arrl 6f pli"rrity), And.tO allsment cVf,nnr2ti.-:-;. c,.f +'.'o t t,,.'r /)le1 La\g.NOa I Jhf.OUgh
: during the non-irrigation season. Upon entry oI the oecree, art oi'the irrigation use will be
provided under the senior irrigation rights associated with the property, the Southard and Cavanaugh
Ditch and the Kaiser and Sievers Ditch. During the irrigation season, dry up credits under those
ditches will also be used to augment the evaporative losses from the lakes. The applicant projects
that upon full buildout of the P.U.D., the augmentation needs under the West Divide contract will
be approximately 7.47 AF annually (of which approximately 2.27 AF are associated with in-house
uses. and 5.2 AF with evaporation during the non-irrigation season).
While the application in 98CW3l0 is pending, the applicant would like to be included within
West Divide's substitute supply plan. The water requirements described in paragraph C of the
DHIBIT B
I BAr,coMB & GREEN, P.C.
ATTOITNEYS AT I/A\,V
Board of Directors January 19,1999
Page2
application to West Divide are for purposes of the substitute supply plan (a total of approximately
38.12 AF annually). Those numbers reflect diversions for the potable water system for both
irrigation and domestic uses, but do not include replacement of lake evaporative losses. After the
98CW3l0 decree is entered, the applicant intends to amend its application with West Divide to
provide for replacement of the depletions for the above-described in-house uses and the non-
irrigation season lake evaporation only (a total of approximately 7.47 AF annually).
You will undoubtedly note that the application to West Divide contemplates 75 dwelling
units, while the 98CW3l0 application contemplates 70. The applicant may add an additional 5 units
to the development plan to be submitted to the county. The applicant understands that if the county
approves the 75 units, then ii may need to amend its application in 98CW3l0 to identiff the
additional units. In the interim, however, the applicant requests to include the 75 units in the
substitute supply plan.
Thank you for your consideration of this application.
LS/mmg
EXHIBIT B
Satterfield
LTG Policy No. CTHH22{613 I
Our Order No. GW224613
LEGAT DESCHIPTION
A PARCEL OF LAND SMUATE IN LOTS 12 AND 13, SECTION 28 AND IN LOTS
I,2,8,9,I0,II,12,13 AND 19, SECTION 29, ALLIN TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 88 WEST
OF THE SIXTH PzuNCIPAL MEzuDIAN, COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT A FOUND B.L.M. ALUMINUM CAP IN PLACE FOR THE EAST 1/4 CORNER FOR
SECTION 29, WHENCE A FOUND BRASS CAP L.S. 7734 IN PLACE FOR THE NORTHEAST
CORNER FOR SAID SECTION 29 BEARS N OO DEGREES 27' 5I' E A DISTANCE OF 2677.86
FEET, WITH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN BEING RELATIVE THERETO; 'IHENCE N OO
DEGREES 27' 51" E ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 29 A DISTANCE OF 154.77
FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING FOR THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN; THENCE
ALONG THE NORTH, EAST AND SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF A PARCEL OF LAI.ID DESCzuBED AS
IN BOOK 9I8 AT PAGE 366 TO 367 OF THE RECORDS OF THE GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND
RECORDER THE FOLLOWING 8 COURSES:
I) N 88 DEGREES 47' II'W ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 343.54
FEET;
2) S 03 DEGREES 08' 57" E ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 287.71
FEET;
3) N 76 DEGREES 59' 2T'E ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 9.75 FEET;
4) S 03 DEGREES 5I'05" W ALONG AN EXISTING EENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 130.73
FEET;
5) S 30 DEGREES 25' 57'E ALONG AI{ EXISTING FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 75.33 FEET;
6) S 39 DEGREES 4I' IO" E ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE A DISTAI{CE OF 193.84
FEET;
7) S 3I DEGREES 14' 48" E ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE A DISTAIVCE OF 7I.04 FEET;
8) S 23 DEGREES 2L' 25' E ALONG AI{ EXISTING FENCE LINE A DISTAI.ICE OF 73.27 FEET;
THENCE S 79 DEGREES 33' 53" E ALONG AI{ EXISTING FENCE LINE A}ID SOUTHERLY
BOUNDARY OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL A IN BOOK g2g AT PAGE I58 TO
159 OF THE RECORDS OF SAID GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER A DISTANCE OF
257.61FEET TO THE END OF SAID FENCE LINE; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID
SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY.S 79 DEGREES 33' 53' E A DISTANCE OF 7I.OO FEET TO THE
CENTERLINE OF THE CRYSTAL RIVER; THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID CRYSTAL
RIVER THE FOLLOWING 4 COURSES:
rr q .c -\-ai- -'c ^." r.rr F A htoTAl--rr r.Fi/ .; .U .-.'!ui -.'.;t .' v. ^ ^ iii.,rAi.,u.t, OFzti2.U2 h.b,E-l;
2) S 12 DEGREES 30', 00'E A DTSTANCE OF l68.00 FEET;
3) S 26 DEGREES 00',00' E A DTSTANCE OF 2r9.OO FEET;
4) S 4I DEGREES 35' 02" E A DISTANCE OF 206.26 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE
OF LOT 13 OF SECTION 28; THENCE S Ol DEGREES OO' 52" W ALONG THE EAST LINE OF
SAID LOT 13 (SAID EAST LINE ALSO BEING THE COMMON BOUNDARY LINE AS AGREED UPON
BY UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA AND JOHN K & BARBARA M. SNOBBLE, SAID
AGREEMENT BEING RECORDED IN BOOK 933 AT PAGE 836 TO 838 OF THE RECORDS OF SAID
GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER) A DISTANCE OF 909.31 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF SAID LOT 13; THENCE ALONG A COMMON BOUNDARY LrNE AGREED UPON By
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNTA AND THE CRYSTAL RMR RANCH (SArD AGREEMENT
BEING RECORDED IN BOOK 9I2 AT PAGE 785 TO 789 OF THE RECORDS OF SAID GARFIELD
COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER) THE FOLLOWING 20 COURSES:
DGrIBIT C
LTG Policy No. CTHH2246I3
Our Order No. GW224613
LEGAL DESCBIPTION
l) N 89 DEGREES 04' 09'w ALoNc THE sourH LINE oF SAID Lor 13 A DISTANCE oF563.29 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 13;
2) S 89 DEGREES 58' 42" W ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 19, SECTION 29 A DISTANCEOF 159.34 FEET TO A POINT ON AN EXISTING FENCE LINE;
3) N 70 DEGREES 04' 19" W ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 409.84FEET:
4) N 70 DEGREES 07' IO" W ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 354.35FEET:
5) N 69 DEGREES 32' 49" W ALONG A}I EXISTING FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF IEE.8OFEET;
6) S 28 DEGREES 47' 45'W ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 306.75FEET;
7) s 29 DEGREES 02' 13" w ALONG AN EXIsTING FENcE LINE A DrsrANcE oF 66.15 FEETTO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 19;
8) S 89 DEGREES 58' 42'W ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 19 A DISTANCE OF295.33 EEET TO A POINT ON AI.r EXISTING FENCE LINE:
9) N II DEGREES 04' OO" E ALONG A}I EXISTING FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 309.8IFEET;
IO) N 13 DEGREES 46' 33'W ALONG AI{ EXISTING FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 305.85FEET;
II) N 54 DEGREES 09' 32" W ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE A DISTANCE OF 258.77FEET;
12) N 66 DEGREES 16' 50" W ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE A DISTA}ICE OF 398.62FEET;
13) N 45 DEGREES 17' 45" W ALONG AN EXISTING EENCE LINE A DISTAI{CE OF 213.59FEET;
14) N 45 DEGREES 20' 59" W A DISTANCE OF 217.78 FEET TO A POINT ON AI{ EXISTINGFENCE LINE;
p_I4s DEGREES 04', 44" W ALONG AN EXTSTTNG FENCE LrNE A DTSTANCE OF 4s1.97
ts.E.E l;
16) N 7I DEGREES 47' 15'W ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE A DISTA}ICE OF 278.62FEET;
17) N 44 DEGREES 16' 50" W ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE A DISTAIICE OF 273.66FEET;
18) N 39 DEGREES 08' OO" W ALONG AN EXISTING FENCE LINE A NISTANCE OF 326.72FEFI rn I "OINT ON Ti{E WEST LINE OF LOT ir ai, .S .,.-.., _,..-,i r..),r .,
19) N OO DEGREES 3I' 38" E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 13 A DISTAI{CE OF3IO.I1 FEET TO THE SOUTTMEST CORNER OF LOT 8 OF SAID SECTION 29;
20) N 02 DEGREES 03' 17' E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 8 A DISTANCE OF1167.25 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK49 AT PAGE 57I OFTHE RECORDS OF SAID GARFIELD COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER;THENCE N 89 DEGREES 30' 03'E ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL OFLAND A DISTANCE OF I5I.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND;THENCE N 30 DEGREES 20' OO" E ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OT SAP PARCELOF LAND A DISTANCE OF 367.79 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE ROARING FORK NVER:THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID ROARING FORK RIVER THE FOLLOMNG 15COURSES:
l) s 22 DEGREES 57' 15" E A DTSTANCE OF 2t4.22 FEET;
2) S 48 DEGREES 00' 46" E A DISTANCE OF 403.61 FEET;