Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3.0 Staff Report BOCC 08.03.98REOUEST: OWNER: LOCATION: SITE DATA: WATER: SEWER: ACCESS: EXISTING ZONING: ADJACENT ZONING: A. II. PROJECT II\TFORIT{ATION AI\D STAF'F COMMENTS BOCC 8t3t98 The Englund/IVloore Subdivision preliminary Plan Charles Englund, Luther & Diana Moore Atact of land situated in a portion of Section32, T7S, R87W of the 6th pM; more practically described as a tract of land located approximately one (l) mile east of State Hwy. 82 and County Road 100 intersection. The site consists of 13.964 acres. Individual wells Individual Sewage Disposal Systems (ISDS) Highway 82 Frontage Road A/R/RD A/R/RD The subject property is located in the Low Density Residential (10 and greater ac./du) Area St]ff]|ti:ld countv comprehensive Plan "frqei, pr"por.a LanJuse Districts Map, Site Description: The property is a vacant parcel generally located between theHighway 82 Frontage Road *i th. Roaring Fork Riirer th"r" are no dwelrings on lhe property on the property. There are fo,i (4) pondso, ,rr. prop.rty that used tobe a part of a private fishing club and a recently fifled pond. There are various 4-8-c- b- E. Hi{'{.!;*'Z)n7, co/u- ff{;'i,%T*"1.{1t 3nnl I 6 ' zE' t 5c /n/ ),,r4 -.l/- ot't' ay' ila*r /izc';- ii; - Lo-z 9x:/5n Pa,/a1*/rp-p/rlfu7- CZE- ka-/o + /au,^+ /< - 9 lz tr/a4 taaT A 615't $aYbor-,t 1a,ilcf Coh. f,a/qrL,j I. wetland habitats on the property, related to the ponds and the river. On the southern boundary of the property is the railroad right-of-way. Project Description: The applicants proposal is to subdivide a property originally identified as being 22.6 acres in size and now being 13.964 acres, into two (2) lots (See plan map /application pgs. I A' t # l. The lois are still proposed to be a.ql + andT .490 acres in size and will have only single family dwellings on them. Each ofthe proposed lots has a building envelope in an area of an existing pond, filled by dredged material from the other ponds. The 4.378 ac. of Roaring Fork Railroad Holding Authority (RFRHA) right-of-way and a tract separated from the proposed lots by the river and the RFRHA R.o.w. 4.283 acres, are no longer apartof the application . It was determined that the RI'RHA R.O.w. is a fee simple title, resulting in the other piece of property being legally separate already from the rest of the property on the north side of the railroad. The residential lots are to be served by water from individual wells. Each of the lots require an engineer designed individual sewage disposal system. Access will be directly off of State Hwy. 82 Frontage Road, using an existing drive and an additional access easement that crosses over an adjacent property owned by one of the applicants to widen the easement to meet the minimum right-of-way standards for such a road. III.MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCERNS Zonrng: Each of the lots proposed meets the two (2) acre minimum lot size required for lots in the A/R/RD zone district. The lots do contain very specific building envelopes, located in the area of the filled pond. The application states that there will be two building sites created as a result of this application. The well permits indicate a single family dwelling with an attached caretakers writ. The applicants have stated that there is no intent to place a caretakers unit on either of the proposed tracts. Comprehensive Plan: Until recently, the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan were only advisory and carried no legal weight as a basis for a decision in a standard subdivision that meets the zoning resolution requirements. In Larimer County vs. Conder, the court determined that the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan can be used as a basis for approving or denying a subdivision, even ifthe zoning resolution supports the application. One ofthe requirements noted in the decision is that the Subdivision regulations must include language requiring compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. The Garfield County Subdivision regulations in Section 4:33 does require "conformity or compatibility" with the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan. B. A. B. 2 One of the most significant issues addressed in Conder, that is subject to the most controversy is the applicability ofthe land use designations in a Comprehensive plan and the enforcement ofthose provisions over the underlying zoning. -The applicant,s planner has presented an argument that the designation ior ttre prop.rty'i. -opappropriately the medium density residential (6-9 ac.ld.t), rather than the low density residential (10 ac. /d.u.). He also notes that the Comprehensive plan is only intended to be advisory in nature by the language contained in the document. Staff acknowledges that the language in the Comprehensive Plan does state that the document is advisory, but this was based on the legal precedents in existence at timethe Comprehensive Plan was adopted. Conder supercedes those precedents and arguably negates the.language in the plan, particularly given the pieviously noted Subdivision Regulation language requiring "conformiry or co-putibility,, with the Comprehensive Plan. Staffcan identifr the location of the property in relationship with the proposed land use districts and can within a reasonable level of accuracy identify the property as being within the "low density residential" density area. The determination that needs to be made is general conformity with the Comprehensive Plan. All of the lots are over 2.0 acres each, which is consistent with the underlying zoning minimum lot size, but not consistent with the recommended low densityresidential. The applicant's planner has made a number of statements based upon "minor" constraints, as opposed to the "major" constraints identified as being a basis for the low density residential determination. Staffs response to the statements in the application are as follows: Soil Constraints: Staffwould argue that any time an engineer design is required, due to unusual soil conditions, that the constraints due to soils is significant, therefore a "major" constraint. Ifwe were accept the argument presented, there would only be "minor" constraints, since in theory, any problem can come up with an engineered solution. That, of course, assumes that money is no object. ISDS Constraints: Again, an engineered system is required to deal with the unusual soil conditions, due to the fill. Staffnotes that there may be other issues related to the use of ISDS, that will be discussed in the section Lf Urir report dealing with sewage. Stafl feels that any soil requiring an engineered ISbS is a "riajor" constraint. Floodplain Constraints: Staffconcedes that the property is outside of the 100 yearfloodplain' This is due to the property being on-filimaterial. The applicant's geotechnical engineer notes that the bank separating the pond that was nUea for tfre construction is not strong enough to support structures. Staffquestions, whether ornot the bank is stable enough to with stand the scouring action of flood waters, should the Roaring Fork river change course during a flood. While there is no identified flood threat, the closeness to the river of the houses, on fill. would indicate a potential for problems. This would arguably, be a "moderate" constraint. Land Use Considerations: Staff concedes that Road conditions and Distance toUrban Uses are minor constraints. In terms of Land Use Compatibility, theresidential use is consistent with many of the nearby ana aaioinirrj'tots. Infrastructure Needs is non-existent in terms of impacts to existing systems. If thesystems were available, it would be staffs opinion that a connection to a central sewage disposal system would be appropriate. As a group, these areas are minorto moderate considerations. It is staffs opinion that the physical criteria and the "major" constraints associatedwith these criteria, a reasonable basis for the "low densifr residential" designation.whether or not the applicant's density for the prop"rty is based upol tir" ur"uidentified by deed or the proposed lots, ress the RFRHA n.o.w. and hillside, is theissue by which compatibility with the land use map designations. If the p.op..tyoriginally included in the application were considered a pai of the determinatior, th.proposed subdivision could be found to be compatible with the land use -.p. ihi,property was 22.0 acres and the gross density of the project would be one (r; a..,.t 1 1'0 acres. Since the RFRHA ownership is considired a fee title, the p.op.rty i,already split and the subdivision is 13.9 acres or an average density of one (1) d'u'16.95 acres each. This would be consistent with the medium density designationproposed by the applicants planner. There is the additional argument that tt.." ur.lots in the area that are less than 10 acres in size and have submitted a copy of themap for the area that shows only the lots to the east of the project. Siatr hasdeveloped a GIS map that shows that there is a significant portion of the properrywithin a mile of the project that are in excess orten 1to; u.r.r. (See map p;. _ii)Many of the lots shown on the map were created in small increments^tfrri,rfr-tfr" exemption process, which required very little analysis of the cumulative impa-cts ofsmall lots on the floodplain and ground water through the use of ISDS. In addition to the Land Use Districts Map designations, the Comprehensive plan contains a number of goals, poricies and objectives applicable to the proposed subdivision. The following discussion focuses on the appiicable sections orur" pt*, HOUSING Goal - To provide all types of housing that ensures current and future residents equitable housing opportunities which are designed to provide safe, efiicientresidential structures that are compatible with and that protect the natural environment. Staff Comment: The applicant identifies the proposed sites as being unique building sites on which riparian areas are preserved. Siaffwould contend tfrat me gnique sites are being placed in a unique location, adjacent to the river, that represent a potential water quality problems and require expensive engineering soluiions to place the houses on the lot. These lots will represent expensive, high income lots. TRANSPORTATION: Obiective 3.3 Proposed developments will be evaluated in terms of theability of county roads to adequately handle the traffic generated by theproposal. Staff Comment: Staffagrees that the transportation issues are minor in the case ofthis proposed subdivision. Goal - Garfield County Should provide adequate recreational opportgnities forCotlrty residents, ensure access to public lands ionsistent with gfNriruSfS policies and preserve existing recreational opportunities and important visual corridors. Objective 5.1 - Encourage the location of active recreational opportunities that areaccessible to County residents. Objective 5.4 - Rafting and fishing access will be strongly encouraged during thedevelopment review process. Policy 5'3 - If physically possible, subdivision and PUDs will be encouraged todesign open space areas to become contiguous with existing and p.opor"jop"o spaces adjacent to the project. Staff Comment: The proposed development meets the previously noted objectivesand policies in terms of the proposed dedication to RFRFIA. The recreation opportunities created as a result of the dredging of the ponds is only a benefit to theapplicants, since the ponds have always been and wiliremain, private. OPEN SPACE AND TRAILS Goal - Garfield County shall develop, adopt and implement policies that preserve therural landscape ofthe Roaring Fork Valley, existing agricultural uses, wildlife habitatand recreational opportunities in a mutually beneficial manner that respects the balance between private property rights and the needs of the community. Staff Comment - The_applicants have proposed to dedicate the property south of therailroad to MRFIA. If RFRHA develops atrail along ttre right-of-way, the dedicatedland may provide an altemate access to BLM p.op".ty *J*r. river,s south side. 5 C.Soils/Topography: tncluded in the application is a ctrrent geology and soils study done prior to the dredging of the old ponds and frlling of the ,.River pond,,. All ofthe report is speculative, based upon a number of ass=umptions and minimal testingof the site, prior to the actual placement of the fill. The engineers state, ,.the conclusions and preliminary recommendations submitted in thi; report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory bores drilled at the locations indicated on Fig. 1, the assumed type of construction and our experience in the area.,, The applicant submitted additional statements from the enginier stating that the proposed "pile foundation is feasible,,. Road/Access: The proposed lots will have a single access point to the Highway g2 frontage road which is an access, shared by two adjacent rrrid.r"".. The alpficantspropose to improve the common use section of the roadway to two 8,widi drivinglanes, consistent with the Semi-primitive road standard required for 3 to l0dwellings. It is proposed to expand the right-of-way to 40' as required and meet the other requirements for ditches and shoulders. Cross sections were provided as a partof the plans to evaluate these criteria and as required by Seciion 4.93 of theSubdivision Regulations at the last pranning commission meeting. Lot2, the westerly lot will be provided a 25' easement across the adjoining property owned by one of the applicants. It is proposed to be a 12, wide,gaveled-drive^. As a driveway, it is not subject to the County Subdivision regulation road standards. Water: Enclosed with the application are two approved well permits for,.ordinary household use inside one (1) single family Owetting with an attached caretaker apartment and the irrigation of not more than 6,000 sq.ft. (0.14 ac.) of home gardens and lawns". These well permits were issued based upon WaterAllotment contracts approved by the Basalt water conservancy District. The applicants had Zancanella and Associates, Inc., review a pump test done by Samuelson Pump company, on a well on the applicants, property. It is not clear from the letter, whether the tested well is on an adjoining property or is supposed to !'e on9 of the two proposed wells. The location discription is not consistent with the descripions noted on the approved well permits. Regardless, the well test indicates that there is reason to believe there is an adequate physical amount of water available in the area and the approved well permits provide documentation of the legal right to the water. Prior to any Final Plat approval, all of the wells will need to Ue aritiea and the following documentation provided: 1) 2) 3) D. E. That a fow (a) hour pump test be performed on the well to be used; A well completion report demonstrating the depth of the well, the characteristics of the aquifer and the static wateilevel; The results ofthe four (a) hourpump test indicating the pumping rate 4) s) 6) in gallons per minute and information showing drawdown and recharge; A written opinion of the person conducting the well test that this wellshould be adequate to supply water to thenumber of proposed lots;An assumption of an average or no ress than 3.5 p.opG per dwelling unit, using 100 gallons of water per person, per dry; The water quality be tested by an "ppro*d testing raboratory and meet State guidelines concerning bacteria, nitrates, dissolved solids and is deemed fit for human consumption. F.W: The applicgJs are proposing to use krdividual Sewage Disposal systems(ISDS) for both of the lots. Percolation tests were performed by the appl-icant,sgeotechnical engineer, after the pond was filled. The percolation tests indicated thatconventional ISDS are feasible, in the ,,upper, arier hu soils with proper derigr.,,The-applicant's engineer reviewed the information and recommended that the leachfield be of the "mounded Bpo", due to the potential for high ground water and theneed to place the field on fill material. Whil; the applicant's engineers note the needto meet setback requirements, staffquestioned whether or not trri uuitaing envelopesare-going to be large enough to accommodate the residential structures, Jeptic tanksand leach fields. A leach field has to be 50 ft. from any water course or pond, 100ft from any well. There is an additional 8 ft. of setback for each 100 gallons ofdesign flow over 1000 gallons. The applicants submitted a site plan, thart shows aproposed house and septic system layout meeting these requirements at the lastPlanning commission meeting. (See enclos edpg. Jo_) A 1000 gallon septictank allows for a maximum of three (3) bedroo-ms. il-this limit is aiceptable, itshould be noted on a plat. Fire Protection: The applicants propose to use the remaining ponds for fre protectionpurposes' The Carbondale & Rural Fire Protection Distr[i ugrr", that this will beadequate. Floodplain: Staff acknowledges that the proposed lots are above the identifiedfloodplain, but they are placed on an artificiar nir. The geologic report is based ufonbores into the fill embankments surrounding the old por'a. Tire applicant,s engineernotes that the proposed sites sit above the 100 year flood elevation and does not feelthat there is any real threat from flooding. Staffhas seen a sudden change in thecourse of the river during high waters in the early 1980's, that resulted in-a directthreat to a residence due to scouring. The floodway is identified as being adjacentto the embankments, but only four (a) ft. berow the top of the embankment. This isan example of the river being a nice setting most of the year, but no real concemabout the potential hydraulic action that occurs during a fiood event. G. H. I.The following issues will need to be included in the covenants of the proposed subdivision: 1.one (1) dog will be allowed for each residential unit within a subdivision andthe dog shall be required to be confined within the owners property boundaries. The requirement will be included in the protective covenants forthe subdivision with enforcement provisions allowing for the removar of adog from the area as a final remedy in worst cases. No open hearth solid-fuel fireplaces will be allowed anywhere within anexemption. one (l) new solid-fuel burning stove as defied by c.R.S. 25-7_ 401, et. seq., and the regulations promurgated thereunder, will be allowed in any dwelling unit. All dwelling units will be allowed an unrestricted number of natural gas buming stoves and appliances. control of noxious weeds is the responsibility of the properfy owner. All exterior lighting be the minimum amount necessary and that all exteriorlighting be directed inward, towards the interior of the subdivisiurw(rrlr, Lrrw.lrus urv ulterlor or Ine subdrvlslon, except that provisions may be made to alrow for safety lighting that goes beyond thebeyond theproperty boundaries. All residential construction will be consistent with the Colorado State Forest Service (CSFS) recommendations for construction of homes contained in the CSFS publications "Wildfire Protection in the Wildland/Urban Interface,, and"Model Regulations for protecting people and Homes in Subdivisions andDevelopments. Garfield county has adopted a "Right to Farm,'provision in the Garfield county zonngResolution in Section 1.0g, which rtut., urnorrg other things, that "residents and visitors must be prepared to accept the activities, sighls, sounds and smells of Garfield county's agricultural operations as a normal and necessary aspect of living in a countywith a strong rural character and a healthy ranching sector. J.Other Comments: 1' Colorado Geologic Survey: Based on the documented geologic constraints,the Geologic survey agrees with the IIp Geotech report andrecommendations. After a conversation with stafi the CGS still agrees thatgeotechnical investigations of the actual fills will need to have further investigation, ifthey are to used for structural support. They do not see any 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 3- 4. 5. 6. geologic constraints that would prevent development, if the propergeotechnical design is done. (See letter pg. l-7*'l* l' Division of wildlife: Enclosed are letters noting that there will be a loss ofcritical habitat as a result of the dredging and filltg activities. A number ofrecommendations were made regarding silt fencing, dog restrictions andnotification ofproperty owners ofthe-potential problJms tiat can be createdby indigenous wildlife. (See pgs. /Q- At ) Roaring Fork School Dishict RE-l: The enclosed letter requests a school siteacquisition fee be collected as a part of the subdivision aiproval consistentwith a formula adopted by the District. (See pg. eef' : The Departrnent provided no written comment, which is technically approval of the proposed methodof sewage disposal. Colorado Division of water Resources: Based on the information providedto the Division, stated that there will be a legal and adequate water supplyavailable for the subdivision, provided tfral the water all,otment contract isproperly maintained.. (See letterpgs. 2l I IV.SUGGESTED FINDINGS A. B. fhatfte proper publication, public notice and posting were provided as required bylaw for the hearing before the Board of county coninissioners; and That the hearing before the Board of County Commissioners was extensive andcomplete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submiued and that allinterested parties were heard atthathearing; and That the proposed subdivision of land is in general compriance with therecofirmendations set forth in the Comprehensive Plan for the *h.o.po. ated, arcaofthe County; and That the proposed subdivision of land conforms to the Garfield County ZonngResolution; and !t1t {t data, surveys, analysis, studies, plans and designs as are required by the Stateof colorado, and Garfield county, have been submittld and, in adiition, -have beenfound to meet all requirements of the Garfield County Subiivision Regulations. C. D. E. 9 V. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommended APPROVAL of the proposed subdivision based upon the fact that the propefiy is adjacent to the Waldorf School and the lots are in a cluster configuration and subject to meeting the following conditions:1. All representations of the applicant, either within the application or stated at the public hearings before the Planning Commission shall be considered conditions of approval unless otherwise state by the planning Commission. 2. Within one (1) year of central sewer being available to the property, all lots will enter into agreements with the sewage system owners and connect to the sewage treatment facility. The applicant shall pay applicable School Site Acquisition Fees for the new lots, prior to the approval of the Final Plat. No accessory dwellings, guest houses or caretaker units will be allowed on either property. Prior to Final Plat approval, a well pump test shall be performed demonstrating the following: 1) That a four (a) hour pump test be performed on the well to be used;2) A well completion report demonstrating the depth of the well, the characteristics of the aquifer and the static water level;3) The results ofthe four (a) hour pump test indicating the pumping rate in gallons per minute and information showing drawdown and recharge; 4) A written opinion of the person conducting the well test that this well should be adequate to supply water to the number of proposed lots;5) An assumption of an average or no less than 3.5 people per dwelling unit, using 100 gallons of water per person, per day;6) The water quality be tested by an approved testing laboratory and meet State guidelines concerning bacteria and nitrates. A set of covenants will be submitted to the Courtypriorto the review of the BOCC, that demonstrates the proposed method of managing the common elements of the subdivision, particularly the water supply and road maintenance. At a minimum, the following language will be included in the covenants and as plat notes on any Final plat: A. One (1) dog will be allowed for each residential unit within a subdivision 3. 4. 5. 8. 10 B. and the dog shall be required to be confined within the owners property boundaries. The requirement will be included in the protective covenants for the subdivision with enforcement provisions allowing for the removal of a dog from the area as a final remedy in worst cases. No open hearth solid-fuel fireplaces will be allowed anywhere within an exemption. one (l) new solid-fuel burning stove as defied by C.R.S. 25-7- 401, et. seq., and the regulations promulgated thereunder, will be ailowed in any dwelling unit. All dwelling units will be allowed an unrestricted number of natural gas burning stoves and appliances. Each subdivision shall have covenants requiring that all exterior lighting be the minimum amount necessary and that all exterior lighting be directed inward, towards the interior of the subdivision, except that provisions may be made to allow for safety lighting that goes beyond the property boundaries. All residential construction will be consistent with the Colorado State Forest Service (CSFS) recommendations for construction of homes contained in the CSFS publications "Wildfire Protection in the Wildland/Urban Interface" and "Model Regulations for Protecting People and Homes in Subdivisions and Developments. Garfield county has adopted a "Right to Farm" provision in the Garfield county zonngResolution in section 1.08, which states among other things, that "residents and visitors must be prepared to accept the activities, sights, sounds and smells of Garfield County's agricultural operations as a normal and necessary aspect of living in a County with a strong rural character and a healthy ranching sector. Control of noxious weeds is the responsibility of the property owner. Building locations may be subject to geologic and hydrologic hazards. All structures shall require the submittal of an engineering report addressing soils and geology conditions, foundation design and drainage prepared by a shall be designed by a registered I engineer. All site development, including building construction,be conducted in accordance with D. C. engineer's stipulations." That a copy o f any Final Plat be formatted computer disk for transfer to E. F. G. 7.in both graphic form and on a properly County Assessor's records and GIS. \ a+-a L,t f-4-<,fw&,,.1,L-.> -1 +9''n't't't-'"Lq'+'tr^S /U/fu;^)1l"V;t /-^- /J 16*1 ii"', %6' ilo' /JB /5t"' A (*u- 11 M/p,tl, ,,fl,/ ,l +i 's ' , u' /-, t:.1,r-- registered professional engineer.individual sewage disposal systems LAND DESIGN PARTNERSHIP e 1 I c"%%1',"1';'03';ilTi':3ll$a3." I 1 60 1 June 17, 1998 Mr. Mark Bean Director of Planning 108 8th Street Glenwood SPrings, CO 81601 Re: Englund/Moore Preliminary Plan Dear Eric: Attached herewith is a revised preliminary plan subdivision application form for the gnglunO/Moore Subdivision with a revised iegal description for the boundary of the subdivision and a legal description for an access easement that is located outside the boundary of the sublivision. The revised boundary of the subdivision will invalidate the original public notice. The Applicant is proceedingto republish a notice for a public nelring on July gth, the date'to which our originallpplication was continued to by the planning and Zoning commission. The publi-cation.deadline for the July 8th neeting is tuesOa!, June Zg. itre revised plat drawings will be provide to the County by Tuesday, June 23th. The revised legal description excludes the land south of the railroad right-of'way. Don DeFord raised a question as to the appropriateness of including this tract in the subdivision since the railroad has afrliAi created this southerly tract as a separate parcel from the rest of the property. The most expeditious solution was to follow Don's recommendation and to rebuOlishitre public notice based on the new boundary description and the description of the proposed access easement' The revised subdivision now contains two single family residentiallots The lots are 6.414and 7.490 acres in size. This is a grosi density of one dwelling per 6'98 aclgs' No accessory dwelling units are requertel. Afthough it has no technical relationship to the revised subdivisio-n, the Applicant still proposes to dedicate the land south of the railroad to the rail authoritY' The proposed lots are not inconsistent with existing lots in the area. Attached is a copy of a portion of the county Accessor's map that reflects the general.size of lots in the area relative to the two proposeo lots. When all factors arJ considered, we believe that the proposed subdivision is appropriate and consistent with the character of development in the sunounding "i"", even though it may not be in strict compliance with alt elements of the Comprehensive Plan' - /)_- lf you have questions or require any additional information please contact myself or Luther (Lou) Moore. Sincerely, Ronald B. Listonfu{ry -/3 - I €!^Lfrc \ 9d\3\,\ $t o,orc e >- Roio B (o \At\ttDe s-;\ l. @ t, a oo I - )v- t, @ @t.t- la l= ra\lul @ o @ e /, @ 3,eo os @ ir g @ $ q I Ns il Nh $ $ as d iN Ni\ Srtt\ pl.ool4l TTXD DEIGX PABfXERSHIP 9l€ cooo!. avc. Glcnrood So.ingr, Cg 81601Ph 970-9.!-22a6 For 945-a066 H 1 : - TENCEUNElrl ltw.l Englund /Moore SKETCH PLAN or TcH(m.). ' 6Jro -lb- 8X 515 PG 6rr-tr2 rt1! JUN-a2-ea aE:sa AH coLo-GEo-suRV.rUfifrU!Y 303e942L74 P. AL STATE OF CCLOBADE COLORADO GEOLOGICAT SURVEY Divisiorr of Mincrals .rrrd (icolopy Ocpanment ol Nattrral Rt'stlutccs I )11 Sherm;lr Strcct, Room 715 f)srrvcr, Colorlrdr.r 80f Ol Plrone (10-l) 0(16-26 1 I l-Ax (301) E66 2461 Junc 2, 1998 Mr. Mark Bcun Post-iti Fax Noto 7671 oare g/2 lrdiL /ro fil**- l?r""o,*Fton --2'n L^z["''le Co/D€Pl.co. ffi9 Phoncr qI s- 7 7gg *ont'*.,-3 fi7/')-/6 7 Far I For t DEI'AI(I MENTOF NATUITAL RESOLIRCES Rriy Rttntct (icrsernnr l,rrrr.,. S. I or hhcarl Lrur lrlr\(' I)itq(l', ,\h< lrrrr:l li. LunH I )rviritrtr I )trtr lqrr Vr( ht Crr\lJrl 5t;llI Cjsol.,Airl .rrrl l)itslur Carlield County Dcpartnrent Buikling and Planning 109 8rh Strcct, Suitc 303 Glenu,ood Springs, OO 81601 RE:EnglundMoorcsubdivisionGcologicllazardRcvicw Dcar Mr. lJcan: Basc,d o, o*r convcrsa(ion Moptloy, Junc l, 1998, I rvcruld like to clarily and cxpotlnd on our rcvicw rlatcd May 26. 199g. As statcd inii,uii.nr.l'ririsoflicc hasrevic'rvcd the I'rclinlinary subsoils Study hy Ilp Geotcclr datetl March 3 l, l99E and w-c gcncrally concur with its contcnt. we agrcc tlrat thc backt-rll antl cnrhnnkmerrt nratcrials arc unsuitirblc for-residcniial structurc supPo-rt.!' l.atcr statetlcnts werc, ..|'rovidetl rhc dccp ltxrndatiorr ancl nroundeJ rype septic systenls rcco,T,,l',endations arc complicd with tbr this .sitc. this office rinai itn other nrajor g.r,toiic lrazartli that would prccltrdc dcvclopmcnt'" Our statenrcrrts trbove prcsume adtlitional site-spccific soils work will bc donc' Sinse thc backlilling has already occurrecl, sitc spccific gcotcchnicit invcstigotions witl b-91c1t1i1ed.to dc'tcnttire minir,um bearing clcvariqns of tlrc deep fountlltions and thc engirricring properties of tlre backfill' wc havr: presrrurcd that tlc..i'iounclariuns'*iiilr. rlesigncd-besaus;'we hivc no inlbrmation whethcr the backlill was propcrly pla.:cd antl cornpacted structu-ral fill, us rcquired in thc.preliminarysubsQils stutly to c.nrer,ptatc shaltow foundutions ryrt.*r. Erciittru,,gt, thc.rcsitlenccs witi bc tbuncletl on dcep pilcs bcari'g on thu. packed rivcr gravcl, b.to*, .nit, enginc&ing data is still rcquired of thc buckfill rvhcrc concrctc flar work and pavcmcnts are corrtcrnplutecl. -Trcsc niaterials, if not-plat:cd.as enginccrcd fill, will be soft. saturared, nnU fin*.itty cr.rmprcssitllc, and likely rcquire a period ofconsolidotion or surclrarging irl,ri tL construitinn.'provi<icd thc enginec:ring and invesiigatioirs tasks etrc dotte propcrly wc fintl no conrlitions that wouId prevt:nt dcvtrlopment. lf ygu havc any tluestiolts plcasc colltact this oflice at (303) 894-2167 ' Sinccrely, [re__-a_:_ Jonathan L. Wh Enginec'ring Ccologist #F - l1- STATE OF COLORADO COTORADO GEOTOCICAT SU RVEY Division of Minerals and Ceology Depa(ment of Natural Resources 1 31 3 Sherman Street, Room 71 5 Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone (303) 866-2611 . FAX (303) 866-2461 May 26,1998 Mr. Mark Bean Garfield County Department Building and Planning 109 8th Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 GA-98-0025 E:lr4I DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOI.'RCES Roy Romer Covernor lames S. Lochhead Executive Director Michael B. Long Division Director Vicki Cowan 5t.rte CeoloBist and Director RE: Englund/lVloore Subdivision Geologic Hazard Review Dear Mr. Bean, At your request and in accordance to Senate Bill 35 (1972) this office has reviewed the materials submitted for this proposed subdivision. A site inspection was conducted on Mray 20,1998. The site lies on river alluvium near Highway 82. Proposed residences are planned where ponds have been backfilled. This office has reviewed the Preliminary Subsoils Study by FIP Geotech dated March 31, 1998 and we generally concur with its content. We agree that the backfill and embankment materials are unsuitable for residential structure support. ISDS design must also be engineered on a site specific basis. Shallow ground water may be a concern so engineered, non-conventional, systems will be required. Provided the deep foundation and mounded type septic systems recommendations are complied with for this site, this office finds no other major geologic hazards that would preclude development. As stated in the Subsoils study there is low risk of potential bedrock dissolution and subsidence of the Eagle Valley Evaporite underlying the river gravel. Potential lot buyers or builders should be made aware of this risk. If you have any questions please contact this office at (303) 894-2167 . Sincerely, ML/ Jonathan L. White - 18- STATE OF COLORADO Roy Romer, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES i, joi.i,.i i ;r iI.rS ;iii .i i* i:D L{-rL;..-_-- .,*.,L,;i!qfiffElo -{#{TY ',f'r".BF..r Since Iy, nw Manager - lq- DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, James S. Lochhead, Executive DirectorWILDLIFE coMMlSSloN, Arnold Salazar, Chair o Rebecca L. Frank, Vice Chair o Mark LeValley, Secretary Louis F. Swift, Member o Bernard L. Black, Member Chuck Lewis, Member . John Stulp, Member o James R. Long, Member DIVISION OF WILDLIFE AN EOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER John W Mumma, Director 6060 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80216 Telephone: (303) 297-1 192 5-14098 Garfield County planning 109 8th St., Suite 303Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Distri Car Dear Mr. Bean: r refer you to my past letter to you dated 1,2-3-gz regarding theEnglund/Moore subdivision. the only additional comme;t I hive isthat the property ohrners do need to obtain a private lake licensefrom the colorado Division of wildlife. certain requirements ui"associated with this to prevent disease transmission- to the fishin.natural systems such is Blue creek ana tne n"iii"g Fork River.This ricense needs to be obtained prior to any fish Jtocring: - r have incruded a copy of my past retter for your convenience.Thank.you for the opportunily-to comment. rf you have anyquestions, please give me a call. t ildlife STATE OF COLORADO Roy Romer, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WILDLIFE AN EOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER John W. Mumma, Director 6060 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80216 Telephone: (303) 297-1 192 L2-3-97 Garfield County Planning 109 8th St., Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601- Dear Mr. Bean: The Englund/Moore property is mainly comprised of ponds and their associated wetlands and riparian type vegetation. A variety ofwildlife species utilize the area including small mammals(beaver, muskrats, raccoon, skunk, coyotesretc. ), song birds, andwaterfohrl. The proposed development area is most valuable towaterfowl. The siltation of the 2 easterly ponds have, in fact,created better wetlands for waterfowl with the variety of wetlandvegetation present. The property across the river on the steep hillside containswinter range for mule deer and elk. It is adjacent to otherparts of the Crown which contain critical winter range for deerand eIk. The current proposal designates this as open space which will continue to benefit wildlife. Impacts to wildlife will result from the dredging of the 2easterly ponds and fill of an existing pond. There will bedirect loss of valuable wetland habitat. Deepening the 2easterly ponds to create a better fishery does not mitigate theloss of wetland and riparian vegetation. If the proposal is approved as designed, the fotlowing recommendations wilI help to minimize wildlife impacts:l-. It would be best if there was a no net loss of wetlands.Creating new wetlands on site may not be possible due toproperty line constraints. Investigate the possibility ofcreating wetlands off site to replace those lost2. Maintain wetlands and riparian vegetation south of the proposed building envelopes and along the river as well as those along the westerly border and access route.3. Install silt fencing along the south edge of the development on the bench above the river and associatedwetlands (above the current chain link fence). This fencing should be in place before any surface disturbance, maintained throughout the development period, and removedonly after construction is finished and any disturbedsoils/sites revegetated. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, James S. Lochhead, Executive Director WILDLIFE COMMISSION, Arnold Salazar, Chair o Bebecca L. Frank, Vice Chair o Mark LeValley, Secretary Louis F. Swift, Member o Bernard L. Black, Member Chuck Lewis, Member o John Stulp, Me-'rber . James R. Long, Member-)o- 4. A11 utilities be buried in access driveways5. Restrict to L dog/horne with a kennel restriction. Kenne1 be constructed before the C.o. is issued. This wi}l help minimize irnpacts to wintering wlldlife across the river6. Homeowners be made alrare of problems associated withIiving and building within a riparian zone with the associated wildlife such as raccoons, skunks, beaver, deer, and geese. The DOW is not liab1e for damages to property caused bry these species, Thank you for the opportunity to comment. If you have anyquestions, please glve me a call. elY, KevinDistri Manager Ca -a[ - HAY-29-98 FRI 01r14 Pll ROARINC FORI( SCHOOL DIST FA){ N0, 9709459240 P, 0l May 27, 1998 Mark Bcatt Gatticld Courrty Planning Department 109 8th Stree! Suite l0l Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Englrrnd/IV[oorc Subdivislon F)ear Mark: The following is subnritted in responsc to your request for cotnments on thc linglund/Moore Suhdivision: As yon are aware, Itoaring F'ork School District has clcvclopcd a formuta for determining school sitc larrd dcdication or fees-in-lieu-of land cledication lor rcsidcntial devclopment within thc district's boutrdaries. The District is requesting caslr-in-licu of land dedication to be calculated irt accordancc with the attached resolution. Tlre District recognizes that this land dedication standarcl has not yet formally been adopted by tlrc County. At tltc Connty's rcquest we are working with Garfield Re'2 (Ritlc) and Garfield l6 (Paraclrytc) in an eft'ort todevetop a common standnrd which can be applicd for all three school rtistricts. Ttre neces.sary data has beeu collectetl and incorporatcd into Roaring Fork's resolution (attache<l) and has been provided ro Garlield Re-2 and Garftctd 16. Eaclr of their Boards of lxlgcntion witl nee<J to arlopt a resolution in support of the tbrnrula. Because we believe tlre attachctt rcsotution ctoscly approxirnatcs wlrqt you will see in the final resolution, we firc rcquesting application of ttrc fonnuta described thereitt. We hope to have a resolution lo you soon for all thrcc districts so that a unifonn land-dedication standard might formally bc adopted by tlrc Couttty for oll three schooldistricts. .---fu-. h inancc [)irector Enc. a)- I-TIIIrrttrrIIItrllttIrttttr ..,':,'.'; .. ., , . ,. l{AY-29-98 FRI 0l:15 P}l ROARING FORK SCHOOL DIST FA){ N0, 9709459240 EXHlBIT A Roaring Fork School District RE-l P, 04 Elementary School Middle School High School Totals Totalacres per student Elementary Middle School High School Reasonable Capacity 550 600 800 Recommended Acreage' 15.5 26.0 38.0 1950 79.5 + 1 acre per 100 students+ 1 acre per 100 students+ 1 acre per 100 students 0.04077 Total sq. feet per student 1,776 Recommended acreage for school sites is as follows according to the Guide For Planning EducAtional Facilities published in 1991 by the Councilof Educational Facility Planners. lnternational: 10 acres 20 acres 30 acres -)J - l{AY-29-98 FRI 01:15 PH ROARING FORK SCHOOL DIST FA}( N0. 9709459240 5. Application of the formuta results in thc following suggcsted Land Dedication Standards: P, 03 Single FanrilY Multi-family Mobilc Homc,'I'railer 870 sq. ft per unit or .020 acrcs 575 sq. ft per unit or .015 acres 1,261 sq. ft per unit or ,029 acrtts 6. At the District's discretion. a developer of rcsidcntial housing may nruke u cash payment in-lieu of dedicating land, or may utakc a cash paynrent in combination wittr a land dedication to cornply with the standards of this Resolution. Thc frrrnrulo to determine tlre cash-in-lieu payment is as lbllowsl Market value of the tanrt (per ucre) t l.arrd Dedication Standard * # of units = Cash'in'Licu For example, for a properly having a markct valuc of $50,000 pcr acrc and I single family unit on it, thc Paynlct)t would bc: $50,000 t,020 t I = $1,000 B. NOW. TIIEREFORE, TIIE I}OARD OF EDUCATION OF ROARING FORK SCTIOOL DISTRICT RE-l RESOLVES as follows: l. The Counties of Uaglc, Garficld and Pitkin, Colorado; thc City of (ilcrrwood Springs. Ctllorado; antl the Towns of Basalt zurd Cat'bondale, Colorado ("Errtitics") adopt a Land Dcdication Standard as sct forth in Part A of this Rcsolution. 2. Thc Entitics rcquire land dedication or a payrlent in lieu tlf [.and cletlication as .specified by the District in responsc to spccific subdivisiolt rcqucsts as sct forth in Parts A. 5 and 6 above fronr all residential land devclopers. 3, The provisions of this Rcsolution shall servc as tltc gencral critcria for the iurposition of school fbcs to bc rcquircd of all residential land developers as set forth in C.R.S. 30-28-101, et seq., as amended, with spccific rnodifications or dcviations herefrom to be madc as thc District responds to specitic subdivision requests as requircd by statutc. 4. 'I'his Rcsolution shall be amended periodically by the District to accurately rcflcct thc studcnt yields existing withiu the Disuict. -)V- l,lAY-29-98 FRI 01:15 P}l RoARING FoRK SCHooL DIST FA){ N0, 9709459240 RESOLI.ITION O['THE ROARING FORK SCHOOL DISTRICT RE.l BOART) OF EDUCATION RE,GARDING STANDARDS FOR LAND DEDICATION ANI) CASH IN LIEU OT LAND DETIICATION l99E N. ,I}ilS RESOLUTION IS PREMISE,D ON'I]IE FO[,I,OWING: l. Roaring Fork School District ("District") has experienccd annual stuclcnt cnrollrncnt increases ranging from 1.5% to 6.9% fiorn 1988 to 1997 and avcraging 4.4% during Lhat timc: Year Enrollmcnt t988/89 3301 1989/90 3495 1990/91 3708 l99lt92 3e2l 1992t93 4013 19e1194 428E r994t9s 4473 l99sl96 4668 t996t97 4737 1997t98 4863 2. 'l'hc District lccognizes the impact of new dcvclopnrcnt on thc need for public land fi>r new schools and has prcparcd tlrc following forntula to oalculatc a standard l'or .school land dcdication: Land arca providcd per student x students gcnerated per dwelling unit = Land Dedicatiorr Standard 3. Aocrlrding to cunent school site sizc rcconrmcudations and rcasonablc building capacities, the District has detemrined that t,776 square fcct ol land per student should be provided lbr future school .sites as reflcctcd in Uxhibit A, 4, The District has deternrined the numbcr of studcttts gcncratcd pct' type of dwelling unit according to data plovided by TIIK Associates as foll<tws: P, 02s1;s 1 "t D Single Family Multi-Farnily Mobile Honre, Trailer 0.49 0.38 0.7t -Jr- JUN-@1-1998 15:11 DIU UJATER RESOURCES 343 866 3589 P,A1,/A2 gTATE OF COLORADC OffICE OF THE SIATE ENGINEER Division of Water Resources Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Sreet, Room Bl8 Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone 603) E66-3s81 FA"\ (303) 85&).s89 May 29, 1998 Roy llomcr Cor,emor lsmee S t-ochhqid Executiw Direttor Hal D. Sim6on State EngincerMark Bean Gailield County Building and Planning 109 8th St Ste 303 Glenwood Springs CO 81601 Re: Englund /Moore Subdivision S%NW% & N%SW% Sec. 32, T7S, R87W, 6TH PM W. Division 5, W. District 38 Dear Mr. Bean: We have reviewed the additional information submitted in regard trc the above referenced subdivision proposal, The modified proposal is to subdivide a parcel of approximately 22-6 acres into 2 residential lots of 6.4 and 7.5 acres, with one single family dwelling on each of ttre these two lots. The remaining 8.7 acres is designated open space/common area and railroad right-of-way. There are several existing ponds on the parce,. The applicant proposed to provide water through individual on lot wells pursuant to a confict with the Basalt W?t9l Conservancy District (the District). A copy of the contractwas provided. Sewage disposalwill be through individual septic systems. Well permit nos. 49280-F and 49281-F were issued by this office on December 1, 1ggl, pursuant to contracts with the District. The wells are each limited to ordinary household purposes inside one single famity dwelling with an attached caretaker apa(ment and the inigation of not more than 6.000 square feet of home garden and lawns. However, we have not received a Well Completion Report, Pump lnstaltation Report, or Statement of Beneficial Use for these wells. lf these documents are not receive prior to December t, t g98, tfre well permits willexpiie and be of no effect. The April 21, 1998 report by Zancanella and Associates, lnc., indicates that the Englund and Moore wellproduced an average of 7.5 gallons per minute over a four hour period on April 8. 1998. -lf the additional welts have similar production rates the water supply should be physically adequate. Based on the above, it is our opinion, pursuant to Section 30-28-136(1Xh)(l), that the proposed water supply will not cause material injury to decreed water rights, so long as the applicant maintains valid wett permits, and is physically adequate. lf you or the applicant has any questions concerning this matter, please contact Craig Lis of this office for assistance. Sincerely, \St** Steve Lautenschlager Assistant State Engineer SPUCMUenglund2.doc cc: Orlyn Bell, Division Engineer Joe Bergquist, Water Commissioner, District 3g 1ra<b- H ent by:WORKCENTERzsO 97O 7O4 'l :nt 1 i:i:.I../; ,i':,-l::,-19!B lE:18 1874 =.r ,fi0RK.CEN I Eh?:;ri ; li:j SOFPI5 ENGII.EERIirri 12115198 14:19 Job 242 Page 1 \4ark []ean (iarfield Plannlng iilg I'h Street. t-iienwood Springs C() E1601 i'ill: Hnglund/ Moore Subdrvisron SE Job No.970O6.O2 i )*ar Mark: 'l'his le(ter is written to formally notiry the county of the cornpletion of any rrquirements tbr thc Ii.,r11lun&Moore Subdivision T have reviewed Rcxolution No. 98-86 and thc access permit ttom Colorrdo i.rr.:pa,rtmant of Transportation. i ri tlrr'.: trest of my knorvledgc, the construction of the driveways was completed ln accordance with (he rril(';nt of the plms that woro reviewcd and approved as part of Rccolution No. 9$ 86. I!'5.r;u have any questions or need artditional informatir:n, please call- :)rn(:cfcl-y. :i(-:IPRIS ENGTNEERING, LI.,C Ylney Nichol, P.E. l!rrrject Engineer / .4r l.,I:. 502 tlain Street ' Sulte A3 . (1r[ondale, C0 81523 ' (970) 704'0311 ' Fax (929i 204-0-il r i M,' 4 , l1o,p 0 $oPnls trel[Etntte . llG civil c.onsultunls, Il.,l,ii.- f'. l:i,., Post-it" Fax Not.r,r 104- /074 December i5,1998 i ,r to ,t4',:!*, *^, *' i':1., y.,r,., Oc,.iDept )t.t l'h0r)c li F.ex li r j' ,r' .. -- .a , -t /- t>./f:;-1/,,,'';t' 7 ":'o'- '. "'" '''#-' $ent by: WORKCENTER2SO 97O 7O4 1874 12115198 14=20 Job 242 PUmP CO. lilc. WATER SYSTEMS SALF:S, SERVICE & INSTALLATION 945-6309 Page 2 SAMUELSOlI P O. BOX 297 GLENWOOD SPRINGS coLoRADO 81602 i)ctober 20 r1998 i,()11 Moorc: r 661 3 IIwy 82 t"l.rrbondale r Co. 81623 A t" t rt; Lou on october !r'HSit well on the \.^", it s c.rbta i ned ,. 9, 1998 a well Moore property.t-est was c-onducl-ed <rn a newThe following informatior: WelI Depth- --30,-0"Casing size ( top) ---- 7 , ( stee.l" )Standing water level --7'-9 1/4,,Total test time- -----4 hrs. Drawdown to at 4 hrs -----8'-8 1/2"Production is greater- 2Ogpm 'Ihis test j(.| ti.l 1."esL pump. i l, you have any :i45--6309 - ,:ii.rrcereIyl ..,t) -ts t ./'.-,,r/ { /,r:;^^" J\.-4.-- t{;,run Samuelson was conducted wiLh a 3/4 HP 10This well recovered back toquestions please cal I me Raun gpm Goulds model. 7'- 9" in 1 nr i rr. SamueIson at $ent by: WORKCENTER2S0 970 TO4 1A74 12115198 14:20 Job 242 PUmP CO, lNG. WATER SYSTEMS SALES. SERVICE & INSTALLATION 945-6309 Page 3 SArlUELSON P.O. BOX 297 GLENWOOD SPRINGS coLoRADO 81602 i )q: t" ober 2rJ , 1 998 1.,<.rr.l Moore 1f,613 Hwy 82 ("1,r r"'bondale , Co . 81 52 3 Attn; lrou C)n October(iir9it wel-I on the'#,ils obtained; 9, 1 998 a well testMoore property. The was conduct-ed on a newfollowing informat-ion V'lel-I Depth--- 30'..,0',Casing size ( top) ----- *---7 , ( steel )Standing water leveL -4'-1 1/2"il'otal test time---- -----4 hrs.Drawdown to at 4 hrs -5, -4 1/2,,Production is greater- -2ggpm T'his test was conducted with a 1 I{p 13 Goul.<ls t-est pum[).'I!:.is well recovered back to 4, -4,' -tn 1 min_,-lr.lt:rstions please cal_I me Raun Samuelson at i:i.i rrcerely I ,-,) _-1- /i>-' ./f- 1---,'l/'n* h'aun Samuel SOn If ]rou have any 94s-6309. January 14,1999 Mark Bean Garfield Planners 109 8'h Street Glenwood Springs CO 81601 RE: England / Moore Subdivision SE Job No. 97006.03 Dear Mark: This letter is written to formally noti$/ the county of the status of the work required as part of the England / Moore Subdivision. I have done a field investigation and prepared a drawing showing the existing driveway and additional work to be done to the driveway. The following is an engineers cost estimate for the improvements that remain to be done to have a 12 foot gravel driveway to both lots 1 & 2. CLEARING & GRUBBING EXCAVATION CLASS 6 ABC SUBTOTAL 10% CONTINGENCY TOTAL s s00.00 $ s00.00 $ 720.00 $1720.00 $ 172.00 s1892.00 This opinion of probable construction cost was prepared for budgeting purposes only. Sopris Engineering, LLC cannot be held responsible for variances from this estimate as actual costs may vary due to bid and market fluctuations. To the best of my knowledge, all other improvements are completed as required and approved as part of Resolution No. 98-86. If you have any question or need additional information, please call. Project Engineer 502 Main Street . Suite A3 . CarbQndale, C0 81623 ' (970) 704-031 1 ' Fax (970) 704-0313 SoPRls tttclltEIRIltc 11G civil consultants ,LLC X \UAV ,V"B2 I , .-\-\\- Fl-- Irlt n - F-.L_ / I : .t) t /i E lt, ,' \,t , i!t; f' !', ,il l'll, I I xfh 7-1.-J/ t-gr 2 / ./ \, ---- | ELt V k;m ,\t\:: -r.-r:,- II,tr/t, --z'l .- -I--1\ - - l- a\ el-oro 97006 1 /13/9? SrTE.Dv'rG 5. CL{SS 6 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE COMPACJED TO 95' STANDARO PROCTOR SLOPE VARIES NOTE STRIP AII TOPSOIL UNDER NEW CONSIRUCTION' SCARIFY AND RECOMPACT q.ASS I SIJBGRADE TO 95T STANDARD PROCTOR * I SCALE: = 4o addition to anlremedigs available, the Declarant, the Owners of the Property, or the Architectural Control Committee shall have the right of entry on the Property owned by the party in violation, and maycure any.deficieqcy or violation ivithout jeop*di of any clilm of trespass, at the expense of the party in violation. 26. PENALTIES AND EXPENSES OF ENFORCEMENT: LIENS FOR NON.PAYMENT If any person shall violate any of the provisions of this instrument or of the rules and regulations promulgated by the Architectural Control Committee pursuant to this instrumenl, or causes expenses as to the Developer or the Architectural Conirol Committee as a result of such violations and./or in the enforcement of these Covenants, including the expenses incurred in curing any violation or deficiency, and fails to or refuses to [ay such gxpenses, thetsuch expenses, including reasonable attorneys fees, shall be chargbable to the -Qy.ntt of the Property on which the work has been done, including interest from the date of bill!1g at the highest permitted rate for a consumer loan or sale in the State of Colorado, and shall constitute a lien thereol superior to all other liens or encumbrances, except (a) tax and special assessment liens in favor of assessing unit, and (b) all sums unpaid on i fiidt mortgage or first deed of trust of record, including all unpaid obligatory sums aimay be provided b, - such encumbrances and including additional advances made thereon priorio th-e creation 6f such a lien. 27.SEVERABILITY Invalidation of any one of these Covenants by judgment or court order shall in no way affect any of the other provisions which shall remairi in dtt force and affect. Failure to insist upon the enforcement of any one or more of the Covenants or restrictions herein set forth shall not constitute a waiver of that Covenant or any of the remaining Covenants or restrictions. OWNERS DECLARANTS: - The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on the / ? il day of l\e-nnbn. ,1998, by Charles E. Englund. MyCommission exOres;fu srATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. couNTY oF EL PASO ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on the / 14 day of D-.r 6 - - , 1998, by Kathleen C. Engtund. My Commission expires: STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) ) ss. ) - The foresoins instrument was -{rq/u aZ{ ,refl,by My Commission expires: srATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. couNTY oF EL PASO ) STATE OF My Commisitxt Eryins llay 05, 2001 ,5" /{rlt\ Bocolved: 12l17tg'i 11:1li 71e O27 2299 => WoBKCENTEB25o; fl T ' DEC-1?-1998 1T:36 RE/MRX PROP. UEST fto. 70/- /*f4 PRoTEcTIvE COVENATITS OF MOORr-ENGLg,Np,SIIBDMSION TO WHOM IT IT{AY CONCERN: Prrt A. BBPAMBLE On this tlay of 1998, for tho purpose ofprotecting the prescnt and future pJ6fi-erty values ofi6c pro[@locatod,in Moo-re-Englund SiiUiiiiJiJrr il G*fi"Id Co*ty, Colorado, the riudersigned onincrs of said property hereby place the following rostrictionson tho uoo of said properties. AREA OI'APPLICATION The residential area Covenarrts iu their entirety shall apply to all of Moor+ Englund Subdivision, in Garfield County, State of Colorado' Pert B. RESIDEMIAL AREA SOVENAITITS I. LAND USE, BUILDING TYPE AI{D OCCTIPAIICY All of the lands above described strall bc used for single-family residcntial purposes only. No U*iiris*Er, piofession, or other activity,- whether-profit or non-profil' shall [i'&E,iO diiir *lttrin ani orlfie hnds abov*desc,ribed. No more tfian one dwclling shall be permitted on any lot as originally platted. No lot shall bc used ecccept for residential purposes. No building shall be erected, altered, placed orpermitted to rimain gn any lot, otlier than oue detaohed singlcl .fi*iiv lf**UG hot to eiriiA two stories in height fid a;r attaphcd private garage for not loss than fivo, nor riore than four, cars. Garages shall be used.ouly for th,e_sQrage.of lotortfi-i";;ilrfior"-tiii, iirri,."ui. Ouages strait Ug used.ouly fortfire-sQrage.of motor Jetricles'aod o".rrories, and shall not bJconverted to living Cpace. No buildiug stall be lrartrritfprl rin Anv lni rrnless such huildine he^c been dulv constructed thereon: and the rcmtp.rmittea on any lot unliss suoh building+as bryg duly construct{ thgrconi*d-1hr,T3?,u31 'of dwellines ot'structrues from otherlocations to lots in the p be permittEd, All buildings an$ oorctruction shau also be in r rly constructed thereon; and the rcmovi in the orooertv above described strall t o be in coirpliance with all applicablc 7L9 32? ?Zfr P.AL CaitieU County building requiroments. DWELLING QUALITY Al{D SIZE No dwelling shail be uected otr any lot unless such dweUing has at least 1,600 square feet of living space]sxclusive of garaga and dect, AII dwellingsstrouldbe of quality construction and appearance, and shall comply with all applioable Building Cod€ _ requirenrents, as imposed by and required by Gafficld Counly, Colorado. All rooling rniterislc and UuitOing and ioof coloi sha[ 6e firet approved by the Architcctural Control Corunrittee before installation. All resideatial constnrstion will be consietent with the Colorado State Forest Sewice ("CSFS") recommendations for corstnrction of homcs coutained iu the CSFS Eecelvecl: 12l17l98i 11 i12i EC-1?-1998 11:35 71ft 327 22gg => WoBKCENTER25o; flz RE/]'lRX PR0P. I^IEST ?19 3?7 ?zfi P.@ 3. ARCHTTECTUTTALCONTROL.GENERALPROYISIONS No building, f€Doc, wall or other struct$e shall be cofimelrced, e-rected or maintaiued on thc Proi;6i n# strntany addition, chango or alteration thorcto,-be madc until iii;';l*;-*iisiloinca:tioris'strowing thirratrue, kiid, shEpe, heigbt, matcrials, location and uiiffximiteli"t of such Etructue;6r the additions, ohanEos or altsrations thereto, end the s;ififfi;il;iiilE a, be built ripou, shall havc been suuml1tgn to 1od approved-in writing f,v-11lg"fit it"rtural Conbol Comniittel. The Comnrittee shdllave thc right torcfttsoto oip.u. *y such plsDs or specifications or grading plan, including final grado elsvations |.iffi;h *;ri"i ruiiiUtJoi diiirable in is opiiion foliesthetic or other rcasons, in conformance ",itti*oscific orovision of these Coreuanti, and in so passing upon such plaru, spccilications a*,**lirimu,;t*H5,*'#*?i'f-11*","'T',',fl #fi iii'tl?ff itT[]1r,": unon which itis proptsedt" d;rt tnirrrrrr, *a tba trarmouy of the extemal appearance with tlie suroundings-and the other buildinge in the arca Once tho plans and specilications fol a pa4iculg type of strrrcture have beon aoorovod Uv rrre arcilitejttrrA Contiot Committog it sfratt not be irircessary to-resubmit plans ilf,rprrfidations for approval prior to building substartially ttrg qqp tlpe of structurc on ilti-it;l;I inini ruta-iilrioqphvidcd, howcfu, the ownen or buildirrg-theteof shall submit a Gi;f .d;g* 6 itt"pi*r aidspecifioitions origiDslly approvcd, and idcntical tcsidences shall not bCin closs proximity to ach other. No buildins partially or completely finished, or of a Pel$?n9qt n^1tue urrt located elsewherc, may ba riroved tb or placed upon a lot, or-portion of a lot, ln trrlg ;bdil.iil. i6 r;.iiAiG;;.ti, f.rdof othcr siucturc stralt'ue commenced,-e,tected" nroved il66;A oh-a tot, or ffrUon'thereofl iu this subdivision uuless constnrcted of nelv materials. AII exterior tiehting shall be the minimum amount neces6ary, and all ort'erior lishtine be dirccted in;;d,-tfi,iis thc iuterior of the subdivision,-erl,,oryt that provisions may i8*"a"r to;U;; Ib-"fetylighting that goos beyond the propcfi boundaries , 4. ARCHITECTUNAL CONTROL COMMITTEE The Architectural Conhol Committce is composed of Luther Moore of 16613 Highway 82, G;helaCo-,y;Colorado,-and q:barlesE. En!{und of 980 Pico Poing Colorado SpfiritC":t'riado, 80906. A-majgrity of the Committee.may dgsignate a representative to act diit."6 tre evenfof death ioufitity to perfonn, reuroval or rosiguatiou of any member of thc Committee, the reinaiuing member ormemberc shall have firll^authority to designate a i*-Gii't' NCfthtthe mEmbersof the committee, nor its designated reprcsentativq shall be- eniiheaio u,y compensarion or serrricesperformed pursuant to-this Cov-euant. At any pd all times, the thecr reco.d ownors of a majority of the lo-ts subject to thcse Covenants shall havc ttre power, throueh a duly recorded wif$en iDsEunxcfi, to change the membership of the Corirmineb, or tiwitMriw from the Committee or restore to it any of its powers qrd duties. The Declarant and the mcmbers of the Architeatural Control Comnrittee shall not be liablc to any pErty whatsoever for auy aot or omission, unless the act or omission is in bad faith and amounts to a ftaud. Bocolvod: 12117tg'i 11i12i 715 327 22gg => IyoBKCENTEflzso; t3 DEC.1?-1998 11:3? RE,/I"1FIX PROP. UJEST ?79 32? ur99 P.A3 5. PROCTDURE Upon prcsentation oftwo tetr ofplurs and specifications for approval, and an address to which approval or disapproval may be maile4 the lot o\f,rer shall be issued a reccipt by the ^lrcliiiectural Contbi Committee memberbr its authorized agent who rcseives the sime, which receipt shall state the date, the documcnts aud othcr itsms r€coived, ud be signed by both the owner or his agent and for the Committee by thE individual issuing the rccipt. The fuchitoctural Contrrol CommiUee's approval or disapproval, as required in these Covenants, shall bo in uryiting. In tho event ths Commineo or its dcsignatod . ropresontative fflils to approve or &sapprove within thirff (30) days E^frer plans and specilications have been sub,nritted to it or if no suit to gnjoin the conatnrction has besr oommcuced prior to the completion thereofi, approval will not be rcquircd *d thg rclated Covenants sliatl be deemed ti have been fulgCornplied with. Unot approved, plans shrll be so signilicd in writing on the plans and specilicatiohs by thg Comsrittee with gr.re set be.rng relaiiled by the Comfrifiee aoiA tne ottrerbeing rehrnedio the owner. The Architectrrrd Control C6mmittee's reaDonae shall be decmed to havc bceu oommunicatcd to the applicant within thlrty (30) days if maile4 postagc E€pai4 to the applicant at the addree_s given by-the apyrlicant .f ttreiin e of his appli'citiotr-ifiefosited, postsge prcpei{ in the U.S. meil to the aaarcss given, within a tlirty(fOl day period In adriition tokeeping apprgved.pllry,-th. Comsritlee snil ano maintiid e iecoid- of the action taken on each fornrally subnrittod requeeted. 6. MINIMTJM SETBACIG No building shall be located on any lot nesrm t'o tha fr'ont lot line or nearer to the rcar lot line or Dearer t6 any side lot line than irny applioable nlinimurn buildins scrback lioe, which may be shown on the recorded plat or DlvClbpment plan, uor nearer E+ i. atlovred by auy applicablo City or County ioning requirernent. for ftgpruPose of this Covenani eaves, sieps, decks br open porches Eliflll uot bc constructed in suc'h mauner as to pe*ia;y p"rti"r oii building oi a tot to eocroach upon aily ottror lot or requircd setback. 7. LOT AREA AND WIDTII AND BUIIJ'ING LOCATION No building shall be orested or placed or sny lot which has an area or width less than is allowed by tlre-approved plat or thd Dovelopmeirt Plan for the subdivision. N_o.lqt, as s[own on the recofred p6[ or the ipproved Dwelopupnt Plau, shall be fi,uth*r eubdividcd, provided, however, that this $all not iiohibit thc c9m-bili'lg o{lggs_lo form_a larytr lot or iots, if sulcr oeu/ loi or lots are approvtd by the applicable Garfield County Plaming and 7.amng authoritics. Building locatiotrE ruay bc subjoct to geologic and hydrologic hazrds. All rtructures shall require-the submittal of an engineoririg rcf,ort addressing soile and geology conditions, foundation design and drainage preparp{ by Cregistcred professional emgineer end in accordance with the recoirmcadations mntaincd in the tIP Gmtechnical, Iuc., report and Job No. 1989152. AII individual scwage disposal systenu strall bc designed by a regietered professional engineer. AII Bit€ development, insludiry building conglruction, shell6e oonductcd in accordaose with engineeds stipulationo. Bocelved: 12117196i 1t:13; DEC-17-1998 11:38 719 327 2299 => IYoRKCENTER25o; 14 REI]'IAX PR0P. I^IEST ?19 3n ?299 P.U 8, WOOD SMOKE RESTRICTIONS No open heerth solid-fuel fireplace will bc allowod, Onc (f ) ucw solid-fuel bumiTg fireplace iusert or_stove, which co^mplies with thg reduced particuiate and minimized emissiors requiremeots of C.R,S. 25-7-401; et Eeg., and the regulatious promulgated thereunder, will bc allowed iu each dweflins unit. Each dwelling unit will bc allowed an unrestricted nunrber of natural gas burniug $toves, freplrces, anii applimces. 9. EASEMENTS AI{D UTILITY RIGHT.OF-WAY Easemeuts for installation and maintEnancs of utilities and drainage facilities aro rcserred as shown on the recoded plat and Dwclopment Plan. Within thesa eascmeutg, no stnircturo, planting or other rnaterial shall be placod or pcrmitted to remaiq which may in Eny manner iuterfere with the installation and maiutcnanoc of utilitics, or which may change tho dirrotion or flow of drainage channelg in the easomeuts. Tho cassmetrls on each lot shall be maintained continuously by the owner of ttrc tol excapt for those impmvononts for which the public auhority or utility oompary is rcsponsible. 10. IYUISIANCES No noxious or ofusive activity shall b€ carried on upon any lot, nor shdl snything be douc thereou which may become IIn Ennoyancc or nuisance to the neighborhood. Refuse piles or other rursightly mlterials or objects ehall not bc allowed to be placed or rernaiu in opem storage uponprenrisGs or oascmcuts. Confol ofnoxious woeds is the responsibility of the lot owner. ll. TRUCI(S, CALPERSI ASID TRAILERS No trucks. campert, trailers, rocreation vehicles, or boats shatl be stored or parked within the miuimum sstbaok lines, or ia ttre street right-of-wan and any stored &ucks, campers, trailers, rccreadon vehiclcs, or boats rtrirst bc within fencing or approval by tho Architcctural Control Committce. T2. TEMPORARY STRUCTURES . No shuctures of a temporary character, tailers, basernent, tent, shaclg sbed, or Etrqgc, barn or othcr out-building shCll bc used on any lot at any time as a residerce, cithcr tornporarily or p errnanent ly. 13. MECHANICAL WORK No mechanical work on urrserviceable automobilcs or other vehialcs shall.be allowedou tho sheet driveway ol yud se+ No commerrial vchiclc sba[ rcmaitr within publio vigw on any lo1 or on any stseet overniglrt. For purposes of this restriction, a tlrck ltauing 3/i ton manufacnueds rating cepacity, commouly known as apickup trrasb shall sot be dsemed a connnercial vehicle. 14. CLOTHESLINE AI{D STORAGE No slothcqlino,-drying ysrds, dog runs, soryiep yErd$ wood pilcs or storiryo areas shall be so locued eE to bc-visitle ftour any stre€t. Bocsivod3 12l17lSa, 1t:13; DEC-1?-1998 11:38 715 327 22gg -> IYOBKCENTER25o; #5 RE/]'4AX PROP. UEST A.DIENNAS 17. OIL AITID MINERAL OPENATIONS ?19 3n m P.6 I5. No exterior radio, short-wavq comnrunication or television antmna or satellite dish (cxccpt onc single dieh of not to exceed 18 inches in diameter), or otlcr reception or trausmission device or facility shall be permitted ttrat is visible from any sitq across the strect or f-rom any BtrEEt. 16. FENCES No non-wood fence may be ercctcd, and thc localiou and quality thereof need be cousistent with the rulcs and regulations as established by the applicabie zoiring authorities haviug zoning jurisdiction over any of the real property aforesaid in theso covenants. No fcnciug shall be allowed in the miuimum building setback areas in fnont of a rcsidential structurq exccpt wood farcing approvcd by the Architcctural Control Committee. tnnnels, mineral-oxcavations or ihafts be peimitted upoir or in aay lot. No denick or other strueturc designed for ue in boring for oil or natual gas shall be erocte4 maiutained or permitted orr any lot. No wind-powortd gcnerator or mill-tlpe device, nor any above or below ground gas storage tank, shall be crected, mtintained orpcrmitted on any lot. 18. SIGNS No sign of aoy khd strsll be displayed to thepublic vieu, on any lot, cxcept one sign for privacy or identification of not moie thau one square foot atea, oue sign of not tnore than five squarc fect advcrtisiug the property for rale or rent. Ihis docs not apply to any tcrnpofary signs ercctcd by builders to market homes to be constructed or under consbuction. 19. LIYESTOCK AND POULTRY No animals, livestock orpoultry of any kind shatl be raised, bred or kept upon any lot, except that one dog, one cat, two ridiug or driving horses, and one domesticated houeehold pet may be kcpt, provided thnt tlrcy are not kept, bred or maintained for any commerpial pulpo6e, and provided that they are kcpt withitr the comfines of the lot, except when on a leash. Violations of these provisions may rezult in the removal of the auinml fiom Lhc arca, which is hcrcby authorized. operations of ury kind, No oil drillings, oil dovelopment operations, oil rofining, qmrrying or mining ny kind. shall be uermitted upon or in any lot. Nor shall oil wclls, tanks.permitteilupon ofin any lot, Nor oil wclls,-tanks, Garftsld County has adopted a "Right to Farm" provision in the Gartield I Resolution in Secdon 1.08, whioh states, among other things, that. "Resj shall abids by this pmvision, so lous as it remains in eftccu 20. GARBAGE AT{D RETUSE DISPOSAL No lot shall be used or rnaiutained as a dumping ground for rubbish. Trash, garbage or other waste shall not be kept, except in mnitary-contfrners. All tash containerc or Corurty Zouine Resolution in 1.08, whio.h.states, arnong other things, that. "Residents strong a healthy ranching sector'. All lot owucrs, tbciiguests aud visitors, and visitors must be prepared to accept the activities, eights, soriude, and smelts of Garfield County's agrioulhual operations as a normal and necessary asp6t of living in a County with a strong nral character and a healthv ranchins sector'. All lot ouale(s. tbcir cuests aud visitors. Focelved: 1211719O; 1l:14; . DEC-1?-1998 11:39 719 327 22gg => WoBKCENTER25o; fl6 RE/]'|RX PROP. I^IEST ?L9 32? 2299 21,COMMERCIAL BNTERPRISES 22. IT{AINTENANCE O['FLOWING WATER SI'PPLY AND POIYDS other equipmeoi for thestorage or disposal or such material shall bc kept in a clean and sanitary condition and shall be kept concealed &om public view, orcept on day of collection No conunercial enterprises shall be conducted or maiutained upon, in ftont of;, or in connection witfu any lots, nor shall arry lot or lots in auy way be ued for othcr than strictly single-family residential purposes, cxcept that professional offi,ces may be maintained within the rnain dwelling upon specilic approval by the fuchiteotual Control Committee in each case, subject to local zoning ordinances, which will prevail, should the Architectural . Coutrol Commitrce give their approval. Each lot owrer sball bo responsible for and shalt pay one-half of tho cost aud €xpenso of the maintenance, rcpar, and upkeep of the flow ofwater supply eutering-upon_and cxiting the Subdivision propertics, including but uot limitcd to: dcsilting and operation of the water gates ott any or all of the foru pouds locatd on the lots (tlrere are two ponds on oach lot). T:Le upsheair lot ponds will fktty rquire nrorc ftequerrt desilting aud iepair, which will, however, benefft the dovmshaam lotpbnds, and this equal sharing of expenses is justified and fur, The fuchiteotural Control Comminee shall deterrflino what maintenance, repair, and upkecp is reasonably ndcessary, and whe,n and whorc it is to be pcrformcd, in order to piesene and maintain these foruponds, and to maintain the flouring water sup'ply througlq across, and exiting from the Subdivision property. 23, MAINTENANCE OF DRIYE}YAYS A}TD ROADS Each lot ownor shall bc rcsponsiblc for, and pay thc cost and exPense o.[, the msinisnance, repair, and upkcep of all drivewaye and toadways located upon that lot. Suoh expenscs with regard to ccrinmdn ecce66 driverriay.s or corumon access roadways, if any, shall bsborne one.quarter each by the owuer of eaoh ofthc two adjaoent lots (recorded in BooR 922, at pagos 266-267), aud on+qnarter each by the owncrs of Lot I .and of Lot 2. 24. COVENANTS TO RT]N WITE THE LAFID These Covenants aro to run with tho laud and shall bo binding on all parties and all pereons cleiming ownership of any portion ofthe described land for a period of tweuty-five years from the date these Cov€nanh are tecorded, aftorwhioh timo said Covenants shdl be autoruatically extended for successive periods of tea (10) vearq uuless au instnmrcut sigucd by thc then recorded owners of a majority of tho Iots oubjoot to thsse Covenants has bern recordd agreeing to chauge said co\rcnants in whole or in part. These Coveuante rrey be amended at any timo by the irnanimous ffiitton conseut of all record ourners of dl lote within the eubdivision 25. EhTFORCEMENT Enforcement of theee Protectiva Covenants, special conditions, stipulatious and agreements shall rest with the Declarant, OumErs of the Property and the Architectual Conhol Committee. If any person shall violate or threaten to violate auy of the provisions of this instrumcnL the Declarant, the fuchitectural Conlrol Committee, or any owner of any of the Property, in addition to all other available remedics, may enforce the provisions of this instrument by instituting such prooecdings at law or in equity, ss may be appropriate to enforce the provisions of this instnnrcrrt, including a dcmand for injunctivCrelief to prcvcnt orrcnedy thc tlueatened or eacistiag violetion of thoac Coveuants, and for daanagos, ihcluding all the attorney'e fees incurrpd by my nroh party. In the went of any violations,-and in Becslved3 12l17l9Ol 1l:15; 715 327 22gg => WOBKCENTERZSO; tz _ DEC-17-1998 11:39 RE/t'lFtx pRtF. TJEST ?79 327 m9 P.W additiou to uty remedies arailable, the Dcclarang thc Oymers of the Pruperty. or the Architectural Control Committee qhall have the right of entry on tho Pr;ba#ou,nA by the party in violation, and may-cure any.deliciency oriiolation ivithout jeop'ardi of anv cliim of tnespass, at thc expense of the party iu violation. 26- PENALTIES AllD ExpENsEs oF ENFORCEMENTT LrENS tr.OR NON-PAYMENT If any porson shall violate any of tho provisions of this instnrment or of the rules and regulations promulgared by the Architectuial Control Cornmittce pursuaut to this instrument, ot causeg €xpenses as to ths Developer or the Architecturat Conrol Comrnittec as a result of such violations and/or in the elforcement of these Covensnts, including the Expenses incurred in curing ury violation or deficimcy, a6 fails to or rcfuses to pay srrch e-xpenscs, thcrt such cxpenses, including roasouablc attorneys {ixs, shall be chargaable to the Qy.ner o[lhc.lropertybn which thc work hss beeu done, iricluding interest from the date of billhg at the highest permitted rate for a oousumer loan or salo in lhc Stato of Colorado, and shall constitute a lieu thereou superiorto all other licns or encumbrances, except (a) tax and special assessmeilt liens in favof of assessing tmit, and (b) all snms rmpaid on i first mortgago or first dced of tnrst of record, including all unpaid obligatory sumE nsmay be provided by - such eucumbrances and inoludiug addifronal arlvmces made thaeon prior to the creation6f euch a lien. 27. SEVERABILITY Invalidation of auyone ofthese Covonants by judgpEnt or court order shall in no way alfect any of the othcr prdvisions which shaU remain iD ftll force and affect. Failure !o insist upon the ecrforcement of any onc ormore of the Covcnauts or reskictions hercin sct forth shall not oonstihrte a waiver of that Coveruut qr any of the remaidng Covenants or restrictions. LutherMooao DiannaMoore Recolved: 12117196i 1l:15; 71e 327 22gg => UIORKCENTER2SO; - DEC-1?-1998 71t4A RE./]'lAX PR@. tiJEST ?1.9 3n m P.E srATE OF COIoRADO ) corJNrY oF GARFIELD i ss' The foregoing inetrument was acknowledged bofore rne on th" _ day of 1998, by Luthcr Moore. My Commission expirao: Notary Public STATEOFCOLORADO ) ) ss. couNTY oF GARFIEI.D ) The foregoing instrument was spklowledged before me ou the_ day of 199E, by Dianna Mobrs. My Couunission expires: Notary Public STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF DL PA,SO )' )ss' ) - The foregoing instnrment was acknowledged before me oa the . I )cz',-*t6*r -, 1998, by Charles E. Englund. My Commiesion orpires: MyCornmi eeionewirc.fu STATE OF COLOzu\DO ) corJNrY oF EL PAso i tt' l,*r-:r'*T;B"I# trffi;f3:f^?i#f.*" on the / n't dav of TT]Tfl-P.W /?il rhvor SAUUELSON P.O. BOX 297 GLENWOOD SPRINGS coLoRADO 81602 PUIIP CO. ING. WATEB SYSTEMS SALES, SERVICE & INSTALLATION 945-6309 October 20,1998 Lou Moore 16613 HwY 82 Carbondale, Co. 8'1623 Attnl Lou on october g, 1 998 a well test was conducted on a new east weII on the Moore pt"p"iiv. The following information was obtained i Lof * -/ WelI Depth--- ----30'-0" Casing iire (top)-------'-----7' (steel) Standlng water level----------4' -1 1 /2" Tota1 test time---- -----'4 hrs. Drawdown to at 4 hrs --5''4 1 12" Production is greater-------------28gpm This test was conducted with a 1 HP 1 3 This weII recovered back to 4'-4" in 1 min' questions please caII me Raun Samuelson at Sincerely;e* Raun Samuelson Goulds test PumP.If you have anY 94s-6309. JOHN C. KEPHART & CO. EflfiI'ID IUI-lITIOt'l LABOflAIOflItS ali lloPrH avEtur.rE a PHO]IE 2a2-76t8 . ItecriYcd lroru 9519 Clr.bmct No.--.-trbfiil*1. No. Drte RccGiY.d tuc/sg Sampl e Ni trate tN) Ni tri te (Nl TotaI trol i {orrn Bacteri a Ft-tbtic drlnking water suppllcti harre and for Nitrite o{ 1.O mg/l. These mqlr'l = fiilliErams per liter AT{ALY'IICAL IIEH)RT Elllrlultrl/lrlurrl a filrlrrli u i ri rrt.: Lotl Hoore 16613 HighwaY E2 Llrrbondale, Ctl RlA"3 tg70\9&3-044?, FAX lS7tJ',t7()4-1974 GFIAtID JUHCTION. CC,LC,RAE'C) 6I'OI 72/ L6lgB NOTESI f reatment {er bacterie iE nEedE}d be{ore hle hrould colrsirJlit t}iis wirt$lF Ea+t f Ol' Ctrlnl{lng. Fur- d wtrll, iL i= crrJvi:oerl tg add 1./t to I cr.rp o{ chlorine (cug;tr ae Clorox Bleactr) {nr each IrOOO EaIlDnB tr{ wqtg1rr Rnd let g,lt fnr a day dr two. Antrther bacteria te5t its EuggErEted Elf tEf thlE, p}-trtrEclure tU Ut{ sLlt ti Llre LrauLt:lr ir* ll.rg l-reert el r rnr nated, Ihb R:ortrd 9319 Lot *1 Enql und/l'lorrt-e Bubd I vi si on t.t.34 mg/I O. (rti mg/l 4 ccrl clniel=/ lDOml samFle a limit #or Nitrat+ of tO-O rng,/I; I irnits were nc,t extreeded. ilirectorl J. .Spuer r+ater .l..i.d-rx,.. 1.:. u 00';',.--ffi$ffi , .' li i rimfr F$lii:if r,. tit0uJl6e:gl iS6lsLlzl :Ps^racoU i!,Er-=l i e# iogzuglNlc)uoM <= 1-.. ' -: i''. " .;' .." . Ilecember 18, 1998 Garfield County Building & Planning Dept. Attn: Mark Bean Re: Water quality test on Dear Mark, #1 well concerning total coliform bacteria level. As suggested by you per our called and talked with John conversation on Wednesdayr l)ecember l6th I ir at the State flealth Dept. in Grand Junction about the coliform bacteria level in Lot#l well. IIis comments to me were as follows: 1.) this is a pretty low level improper well disinfectin g, total coliform bacteria that was probably caused by ishandling of samples when drawn from the well or tamination was probably caused by one of the reasons contamination at the testing ; 2.) bacteria in a well is one of the simpler problems to correct especia would want to see this total the matter considering that at this low level; 3.) the State or lending institution form bacteria level at 0 colonies, but his feelings on other adjacent wells tested out at 0 colonies and the low level of this one is that discussed above in #1. Sinperely, i .1, /l/-lu,/ (e,y L Lou Moore I PurtP iftJl"9'l*' ^-,,,n seres' ffi a rHsr nuurtot't october 20,1998 il?l:"Hl J,'"o' s1623 A t t n' J: : " . "b ?'* -e i^" "l'"' i ; ":?li'' " ii "* ? ="'i:ti:;t ?1':1 f 'El f"""'J"## '**"g[gf;"'..' ,#,#;"'x' 1hi*:'"' ;# :it1ti:* *1i'": "# i?r' {oTr supltli tr col o ng/l ro-ilP* !se:sr trurrl}1,'d.nr.."oLl, IOSZUS1H:CYUO, .= Raun Samuelson G >-.>-- JOITN G. TBPHART & II. GIAltI Julttttult LAgollArofllts ll*irrnl lPor Grobr:Nc.-. a!! ,aolBTll Avcl.gl3 L2/?/?e rsaa5aE ta,. 6ta Al'tAT.YrlGAL IEDOTT Enc I und/l'loore Subdi vi si on Luur iluul r 1661ts HighwaY E}2 Err lrr-rrrtlalcr CO 014e3 9320tturb l{c oiANO JUNCttoN, GoLORAO(, ttlol waterErapb --. Lzt L6/9e Dr!.D.!. Sarnpl e Ni trate (Nl Ni tri te (N) Totat trol i forli Bacterl a 9320 Lot lt3 Engl und/1"{oore Eubdt vl et on O.24 ngll O.OO mg/l O col oni e--l lOOml samPlc Director: B. BeUEf- {OTES: Thie water euFPIier frrr- any rli tri te 1. O mg/l i coleny Per lo0ml ng/l - milligraato did not exceed limit= for public drinking water of thar above testri. Limits are: Nitrate tCt'o ngll' Total Coli{ornr Bacteria must be ltss than one sampla. pEr liter r00 I^IO U Jls6lgLl?L :po^TeceB - \\ Ir\\ \1 \ 1\ \ t\ \ \\\ \\ \ \\ \ \L - ASSUMPTIONS: 1. 2. 3. 2. ILLUSTRATE ISDS SITE PIAN 4 BEDROOM 1250 GALLON SEPNC TANK 45 MIN/NCH PERC RATE 483 S.F./BEDROOM4 x 483 - 1932 S.F. LEACH FIELD REQUIRED SCALE 1,,: 30' BLDG. ENVELOPE (TYP.)Eoce-polllIJIB -L_ LOT I 50j I tr% \:\e \\<\ \)r.\e \'q\dl\^ l')(4\6 \--. ii li li li l1 l1 ,l { fr FLOODPLATN (ryP.) -\ -X X RI!€R OVERFLOW CHANNEL I I I I (il iii | ,i' lti l'\ Ir \ l+ \' .. tl, /r\ It\ [ ,' I -\-- ,\', \\\\\\t\ r', \\ ", -\ ,\ + t\ ',,t, \ ".\ \'- . $ t\\t ------ ,'. \. \_-\___ _ 50' 2,000 s.F. LEACH FIELD I:-:11-___ I 97006 6/O9/eE 06FTNALDWG *-& ,\p\ \ I LOT 2 \\ * \ \ ' -\_ \ N I I I I -- -.- -l 2 o|r) X ulzl ?\{ UJto &o 55' 2,125 S.F. A5/2?/98 15:19 CRRBONDRLE FIRE DISTRICT + 9?A 945 7785 NO. AA3 Gmlrondale & Runal FIre Pnoteotlon Dlctniot - 300 Meadowood Drive Carbondole, CO 81e23 (e7o) 9e92€t Fo(:(070) 90&0s69 May 27, 1998 Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Department 109 8th Street, Suite 303 Clenwood Springs, CO 8160'l RE: Englund/tfoore Subdivision - Preliminary Plan Mark: I reviewed the preliminary plan application for the proposed Englund/Moore subdivision. The proposal is essentially unchanged frorn the sketch plan. I have no addtional comments at this timc. Please call if you have any questions, Sincerelv-z /1 I6lilM Bill Gavette Fire Marshal +l D{A..-26-ea 1a : s6 PFr coLo-GEo-suRv - tttltI+ 3A38942L74 P-At STATE OF COLCMDO COTORADO CTOI OGIC^L SURVEY Division of Mirrerals trncl Gt:ololj) Dcplrtmcrtl o{ Nalrrrol Resources l:ll J Shutnr.\rl Strect, Nrxrnr 7I ! L)envr.'r, Colorado tj0l03 Pl:orrr: (l0ll) 866'2rrl I FAX (l0l) 66(r'24(rl May 26, I998 Mr. Mnrk Bean Garticld Cotrtty l)cpartment Building and Planning I09 Eth strcct, suitE 103 Glcnrvood Springs, (l(-) I I 601 RE,: EnglrrnrlMooro Subtlivision Gcologic Haerrrd Review Posl-it" l.)H' l{lMF.NT OF NATURAL RESOURC]ES Roy RnnlPr l'irr\ Or llO? t.r,rrcs S. I rr )rlrcrtl I rt'( Jli!c l)irc,.tor Mit:h,'lrl ll lorti I )iviriln Irlll l(n V;(Li ( otr,ld Sr.rtr'(,rulu1;isl ilil1 0rti(tur I)car Mr. Bcan, At your rc(luest and in ilccordance t() Senilte Bill35 (1972) this officc has rcvicwcd the nrlterials suhrniltcd llr this prc,poserl subdivision. A site irrspection was conducted ott May 20, 1998. The site lics orr rivcr alluviurn ncar Highw ay 82, Propr:sed residences are plannetl wherc ponds hitve bcen backlillecl- This officc ha.s rcvicwcd the Prelinrinary Subsoils Study by I IP Ceotech datcd March 31. 1998 and wc generally concur witlr its contr:nl. We agree that the backfill and cmbarrkrnclrt matct'ials arc unsuitablc lbr rcsidential strucrturc support. ISDS tlcsign rnust also be engineerccl ott tt site spccific basi.s. Shnllorv ground wnter nlily be n conccrn so cnginl'L'rcd, non-conventional, syslcnrs will be required. Provided the dccp ftrunrlation and rrrr.rundcd typc scptic syslenrs reootnnrcndatiorr.s are conrplied with fol this sitc, this ollrce llncls no otlrcr rnajor gccrlogic lrazartls that would prccludc dcvclopmc'nt. As state:d in thc Subsoils slutly therc is krw risk of potcntial bedrock tlissolution and subsidcrtcc of thc liaglc Vallcy F)vaporitc undcrlying thc rivcr gravel. I'otential lot buycrs or huildsrs shoultl bc rnadc awor!: of this risk. lf you havc any questi('rns please contnct this oft'icc at (303) 894-?167. Sinr.:crcly. M/,b Enginccring Gcologist Fax Note 7671 w ""^ -'L,^ QLrb Co./DePt.u$t9 Prrnet q,/S_-77A9 ffis,.r3 of/-A/6 7, Fax r 30r I ilr?i I ,l C'OLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT SH No/MP/Side: Local Jurisdiction: Dist/Section /Palrol: DOT Permit No.: Permit Fee: Date of Transmittal: 82A/OL6.230/RTGHT carfield 03/32/16 3 98055 50.00 os/07/e8 THE PERMITTEE; Luther E Moore 15613 Hwy 82 Carbondale, CO 8]-623 APPLICANT: Luther E Moore l-551-3 Hwy 82 Carbondale, CO 8L523 I-,uther E Moore - (970) geg -0442 I-,uther E Moore - (97Q) 963-0.4+? . is he;ab, granted peimissicin to ionstruct and use an access to the state highway at'the lcication noted below. The accesi shall be constructed, maintained and used in accordance with the terms and conditions ol this permit, including the State Highway,Access Code and listed attachments. Th/s permit may be revoked by the issuing authority if at any time the permitted access and its use violate any of the terms and conditions of this permit. The use of advance warning and construction signs, flashers, barricades and flaggers are required at alltimes during access construction within State right-of-way in conformance with the MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, Part Vl. The issuing authority, the Department and their duly appointed agents and employees shall be held harmless against any action for personal injury or property damage sustained by reason of the exercise of the permit. LOCATION: On the south side of S.H. 82F, a distance of 1,205 feet east from M.P. 16. ACCESS TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO: Single-Family Detached Housing (+ Each) PERCENT t_00.00 OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED SHEET(S) FOR TERMS AND CONDITIONS MUNICIPALITY OR COUNTY APPROVAL Required only when the appropriate local authority retains issuing authority. Bv (x)Date Title Upon the signing of this permit the permittee agrees to the terms and conditions and referenced attachments contained herein. All construction shall be completed in an expeditious and safe manner and shall be finished within 45 days from initiation. The permitted access shall be completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the permit prior to being used. The permlttee shall nollfy fiilii^"".El#"rffi Hffi"J;i:ffi l'".wlllllllEvUlUlou9vcPe.tllltil!t9llroll'P1,tlolll,lllIlffi at least 48 hours prlor to commenclng construction w-l[fiin"{hE State Hlghway rlghl The person signing as the permittee must be the owner or legal representative of the property served by the permitted access and have tyll aufrrilV to accept the permil jnd all it's terms and conditions. perminee ,*, *1 ,/i/,-- t Hn2( - Curlen- D ^r" d -26 -79 ( /'I)rrr* E /4co,,c This permit is not valid until signed by a duly authorized representative of the Department. o"r. ?161y'8 /t/' ,,,,"//rr,f/, /2r. -(6t" of ir*re)ffir COPY DISITfiBUTION: Required; Make copies as necessary for; / 1. District (Original) Local Authority lnspector Previous Editions are Obsolete and will not be used CDOT Form #101 MTCE Patrol Traffic Engineer TRANSPORTATION, STATE OF COLORADODEPARTM The following paragraph are pertinenl hlghlights ol the State Highway Access Code. These are provided lor your convenierce but do not alleviate compliance wilh all seclions ol the Access Code. A copy ol the State Highway Access Code is available lrom your local issuing authorily (local government) or the Colorado Deparlment ol Transportation (Department). When thi$ , permil was issued, the lssuing authority made its decision based in part on information submitted by the applicant, on the access calegory which is asslgned to the highway, what alternative access to olher publlc roads and streets is available, and salely and design standards. Changes in use or design not approved by the permit or the lssuing authority may cause the reyocatlon or suspension ol lhe permit.I Appeals 1. Should the permittee or applicant chose to object to any of the terms or conditions of the permit placed therein by the Department, an appeal must be filed with the Colorado Transportation Commission within 60 days of transmittal of the permit for permittee signature. The request for the hearing shall be filed in writing and submitted to the Colorado Transportation Commission,42Ol East Arkansas Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80222. The request shall include reasons for the appeal and may include recommendations by the permittee or applicant that would be acceptable to him. 5. The Department may consider any objections and requested revisions at the request of the applicant or permittee. lf agreement is reached, the Department, with the approval of the local issuing authority (if applicable), may revise the permit accordingly, or issue a new permit, or require the applicant to submit a new application f or reconsideration. Changes in the original application, proposed design or access use will normally require submittal of a new application. Regardless of any communications, meetings, or negotiations with the Department regarding revisions and objections to the permit, if the permittee or applicant wishes to appeal the Department's decision to the Commission, the appeal must be brought to the Commission within 60 days of transmittal of the permit. Any appeal by the applicant or permittee of action by the local issuing authority when it is the appropriate local authority (under subsection 2.4), shall be filed with the local authority and be consistent with the appeal procedures of the local authority. lf the f inal action is not further appealed, the Department or local authority may record the decision with the County Clerk and Recorder. ll Construction slandards and requirements 1. The access must be under construction within one year of the permit date. However, under certain conditions a one year time extension may be granted if requested in writing priorto permit expiration. The applicant shall notif y the off ice specif ied on the permit at least 48 hours prior to construction. A copy of the permit shall be available for review at the construction site. lnspections will be made during construction. The access construction within highway right-of-way must be completed within 45 days. It is the responsibility of the permittee to complete the construction of the access according to the terms and conditions of the permit. lf the permittee wishes to use the access prior to completion, arrangements must be approved by the issuing authority and Department and included on the permit. The Department or issuing authority may order a halt to any unauthorized use of the access. Beconstruction or improvements to the access may be required when the permittee has failed to meet required specilications of design or materials. lf any construction element fails within two years due to improper construction or material specifications, the permittee is responsible for all repairs. ln the event it becomes necessary to remove any rig ht-of -way fence, the posts on either side of the access shall be secu rely braced with an approved end post before the fence is cut to prevent any slacking of the remaining fence. All posts and wire removed are Department property and shall be turned over to a representative of the Department. A copy of the permit shall be available for review at the construction site. lf necessary; minor changes and additions shall be ordered by the Department or local authority f ield inspector to meet unanticipated site conditions. The access shall be constructed and maintained in a mannerthat shall not cause waterto enterontothe roadway, and shall not interfere with the drainage system in the right-of-way. Where necessary to remove, relocate, or repair a traffic control device or public or private utilities for the construction of a permitted access, the work shall be accomplished by the permittee without cost to the Department or issuing authority, and at the direction of the Department or utility company. Any damage to the state highway or other public right-of-way beyond that which is allowed in the permit shall be repaired immediately. Adequate advance warning is required at alltimes during access construction, in conformance with the Manual on Uniform Traff ic Control Devices f or Streets and Highways. This may include the use of signs, f lashers, barricades and f laggers. This is also requiredby section 42-4-501,C.R.S. as amended. The issuing authority, the Department and their duly appointed agents and employees shall be held harmless against any action for personal injury or property damage sustained by reason of the exercise of the permit. Changes in use and violations 1. lf therearechangesintheuseof theaccess,theaccesspermit-issuingauthoritymustbenotifiedof thechange.Achangein property use which makes the existing access design or use in non-conformance with the Access Code or the terms and conditions of the perm it, may req uire the reconstruction or relocation of the access. Exam ples of changes in access use are; an increase in veh icular volu me by 20 percent, or an increase by 20 percent of a directional characteristic such as a left tu rn. The issuing authority will review the original permit; it may decide it is adequate or request that you apply for a new permit. 2. All terms and conditions of the permit are binding upon all assigns, successors-in-interest and heirs. 3. When a permitted driveway is constructed or used in violation of the Access Code, the local government or Department may obtain a court order to halt the violation. Such access permits may be revoked by the issuing authority' Further informalion 1. When the permit holder wishes to make improvements to an existing legal access, he shall make his request by filing a completed permit application f orm with the issuing authority. The issuing authority may take action only on the request for improvement. Denial does not revoke the existing access. The permittee, his heirs, successors-in-interest, and assigns, of the property serviced by the access shall be responsible for meeting the terms and conditions of the permit and the removal or clearance of snow or ice upon the access even though deposited on the access in the course of Department snow removal operations. The Department shall.maintain in unincorporated areas the highway drainage system, including those culverts under the access which are part of that system within the right-of-way. The issue date of the permit is the date the Department representative signs the permit which is after the permittee has returned the permit signed and paid any required fees. The Department may, when necess ary tor the improved safety and operation of the roadway, rebuild, modify, remove, or redesign the highway including any auxiliary lane. Any driveway, whether constructed before, on, or after June 30, 1979, may be required by the Department, with written concurrence of the appropriate local authority, to be reconstructed or relocated to conform to the Access Code, either at the property owner's expense if the reconstruction or relocation is necessitated by a change in the use of the property which results in a change in the type of driveway. operation; or at the expense of the Department if the reconstruction or relocation is necessitated by changes in road ortraffic conditions. The necessity forthe relocation or reconstruction shall be determined by reference to the standards set forth in the Access Code. 4. 2. .r. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. ilt IV 3. 4. DATE. May 7, l-998 ACCESS PERMIT NUMBER 398055 - SHEET 2 ISSUED TO: Luther E Moore TERMS AND COND]TIONS 1. If there are any questj-ons regarding this permit., please contact .-James Nall at (970) 248-72L3. NOTE: If you are unable to contact t.he person listed on the front of the permit please use the following: For t,he Craig area ca11 Christy Beckerman, 97 0 -824- 2 03 0 For the Grand ,function area call the Maintenance office 97 0 -248-7360 2. The Permittee shall refer to all additional standard requirements on the back of this permit and any enclosed additional terms, conditions, exhibit.s and noted attachments. 3. This Permit is issued in accordance with the State Highway Access Code (Z CCR 601-1), and is based in part upon the informat.ion submitted by the Permittee. This permit is only for the use and purpose stated in the Application and Permit. Any changes in traffic volumes or t1pe, draj-nage, or other operational aspects may render this permit void, requiring a new permit to be applied for based upon existing and anticipated future conditions. 4. This permitted access is only for the use and purpose stated in the Applicat.ion and Permit. 5. Nothing in this permit shal1 prohibit the chief engineer from exercising the rlght grant,ed in C.R.S. 43-3-L02 including but not limited to resLricting left hand Lurns by construcLion of physical medial seperations. 6. Water, sanitary, sewer, gds, electrical, communication, landscaping, and telephone installatj-ons will require individual additional permits. 7. The Permit.tee is responsible for obtaining any necessary additional federaL, sLate and/or City/County permits or clearances required for construction of the access. Approval of t.his access permit does not constituteverification of t.his action by the Permittee. 8. Any work within State Highway right-of-way shalI begin after 8:30 A.M. and aII work and equipment shall be of f t.he highway BEFORE 3:30 P.M. each day. 9. No highway lane closures or one-way traffic will be allowed. 10. No work will be allowed at night., saLurddys, sundays, and Iega1 holidays without prior authorization from the Department. The Department may also restrict work wit,hinthe State Highway right-of -wa1' during adverse weather condit.ions. 1l-. It is the responsibility of the Permit.tee to prevent alllivestock from entering the State Highway right-of-way atthis access location. Any Lj-vestock that does enter t.he highway right-of-way shall be the sol-e responsibility of the Permittee. 1-2. In the event the landscaping becomes unsj-ghtIy or consideredto be a traffic hazard, The Department may require that itbe removed prompt,ly by the Permitt.ee and at no cosL to the Department. 13. Landscaping shaIl not obstruct sight distance at any StateHighway access point. L4 DATE. Vlay 7, 1998 ACCESS PERMIT NUMBER 398065 - SHEET 3 ISSUED TO: Luther E Moore l-5. 2L. No more than 5 feet of trench areas one time. Open trenches and other State Highway right-of-way shall be TERMS AND CONDITTONS (CONT'D) A FULLY EXECUTED COMPLETE COPY OF THIS PERMIT MUST BE ON THE JOB SITE WITH THE CONTRACTOR AT ALL TIMES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION. FAILURE TO COMPLY W]TH THIS OR ANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENT MAY RESULT IN THE IMMEDIATE SUSPENS]ON OF WORK BY ORDER OF THE DEPARTMENT INSPECTOR OR THE ISSUING AUTHORITY. Survey markers or monumenLs must be preserved in their original pos-itions. Notify the Department. at (970) 248-7220 immediately upon damage Lo or discovery of any such markers or monuments at the work site. Any survey markers or monumenLs disturbed during the execution of this permit shall- be repaired and/or replaced immediately at the expense of t.he Permittee. It shall- be the responsibility of the Permittee to verify the location of the existing utilities and noLify aIl utility owners or operators of any work that might involve utilities within the State Highway right-of-way. Any work necessary to protect existing permitted utilities, such as an encasement will be the responsibility of the Permittee. Any damage or disruption to any utilities during the construction sha11 be the Permittee's responsibility and sha11 be repaired or replaced at no cost to the Department. Highway and signed Control 15 L7. Any damage to any present highway facilities including traffic control devices shalI be repaired immediately at no cost to the Department and prior to continuing other work. Any mud or other material t.racked or otherwise deposited on the roadway shall be removed daily or as ordered by the Department inspector. Areas of roadway and/or right-of-way disturbed during this instal-Iation sha11 be restored to their origional conditions, to insure proper strength, drainage and erosion control. 19. Any incomplete construction activity on the Statethat must be left overnight, sha11 be barricadedin accordance with the Manual- on Uniform Traffic 18 Dewices and other applicable standards. 20. Open cuts which are 6 inches in dept.h, within 30 feet. of t.he edge of the State Highway traveled way wiII not be l-eft open at night, oD weekends, or on holidays. shal-I be opened at, any excavati-ons within the before 3:30 P.M. of each working day accordance w'i th the M. TJ. T. C . D . . backfilled and/or paved or be protect.ed in 22. The area around the new work shall be wel-I graded to drain,top soiled, fertilized, mulched and re-seeded in accordancewith the Department. sLandard specifications. 23. When it isfence, the be securely conformancethe fence isfence. A11 Depart.ment. necessary to remove any highway right-of-wayposts on either side of the access entrance shall braced with approved end posts and inwith the Depart.mentrs M-60'l-1 standard, beforecut, to prevent slacking of the remainingposts and wire removed shaIl be returned to the 24. A11 excavatj-ons for utility tines, culverts, trenches ortunnels sha1l meet the requirements of the Occupational,Safety and Healt.h Administration (OSHA), Colorado Industrial DATE: May 7, 1998 ACCESS PERMIT NUMBER 398065 - SHEET 4 fSSUED TO: Luther E Moore 25. TERMS AND CONDITTONS (COUI'O) Commission, Colorado Division of Mines or the Colorado Department of Transportation, whichever applies. The access shaII be constructed 25 feet wide, with 30 foot radii. 26. The access shal-l- be constructed perpendicul-ar to the travel l-anes of the State Highway for a minimum distance of 50 feet, and sha1l slope down and away fror'.r the adjacent pavement edge at a rate of 2? grade for a minimum of 20feet. If curb and gutter are present, the slope shal1 be calculated from pan line to pan line. Any revisions to this requirement shall be subject to Department review and approval prior to commencement of any work within the highway right. -of -way. 27 . The access shaIl be complet.ed in an expedit.ious and safe manner and shal1 be finished within 45 days from initiation of construction within State Highway right-of-way. 28. Pursuant to section 4.70.2 of the State Highway Access Code, the access roadway shal1 not exceed a maximum grade of l-0 percent within the highway right-of-wdy, as measured 50 feet beyond the pavemenL edge and extending to t.he right-of-way Iine. The access vertical grade sha1I be designed and constructed in conformance with the Department M & S standard M-203-1. 29. The design of the horizontal and vertical sight disEance shal1 be no l-ess than the minimum requir:ements, ds provided in section .1 . 9 of t,he State Highway Access Code, 2 CCR 601--1. 30. AIl require,f access improvements shall be instal-Ied prior tothe herein ,aut.horized use of this access. 31. The access shall be surfaced immediately upon completion of earthwork c,cnstruction and prior to use. 32. Compaction of subgrade, embankments and backfill shal1 be in accordance to section 203.07 of the Department's standardspecifications. 33 . The surf acing shal-l- meet the Depart.ment's specif icationswith the following mat.erial placed for final grade: 18 inches ABC, Class L; 5 inches ABC, Class 6 placed in the foll-owing lifts: 2 - 9 inch lifts C1ass Li 1- - 5 inch liftClass 6. 34. Slopes shaII be at a 5 to 1 ratio on the roadway and a 6 to1 ratio on the approach. 35. No drainage from this site sha11 enter onto the StateHighway travel lanes. The Permittee is required todetain al-I drainage in excess of historical- flows and timeof concentration on site. 36. A11 existing drainage structures shall be extended, modifiedor upgraded, as applicable, to accommodate al-l_ newconstruction and safety standards, in accordance with the Department I s standard specifications 31. The Permittee shaIl install a new 24 inch x 32 FOOTcorrugated metal pipe. 38. A11 culverts installed in open ditches shal1 have flared endsections. Roaring Fork Railroad Holding Authority P O. Box lZ7O, Carbondale, CO 81623 Raymond C. Lloyd Executive Director Mr. Mark Bean Garfi eld County Planning pepartmEnt 109 8th Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 FJUN 1 [! ll';-r StrELD 9 June 1998 In response to your request to review and comment on the Englund/Moore Sub Division Application, I offer the following: r During my site visit it lvas clear that this subdivision would not impact the Roaring Fork Railroad Holding Authority property adversely. . Under "Sub Division Description" mention is made that "a RFRHA representative was contacted about receiviirg tracts I and 2 as a donation for public/recreational use". I know of no such contact nor do$s Mr. Moore, whom I interviewed during my site visit on 8 June 1998, recall such a contact. We are open to discussion with the owners if they so choose. o No rail crossings or disfuptions are contemplated in this project. We have no objections. Dear Mr. Bean; Executive Director Ph97O- Fax: 97O-