HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 ApplicationI
I
T
I
t
I
T
I
I
I
I
t
t
I
7
I
I
I
t
-n
'rY
,APR 2'l I
@\fftc-o
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAN I
APPLICATION
FOR
ENGLUND/NIOORE, SUBDIVISION
OWNER / APPLICANT:
Charles Englund, Luther E' Moore, Diana G. Moore
16613 Hwy 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
Ph. (970) 963-0442, 963-4462
PLANNER:
Land Design PartnershiP
Ron Liston, Planner
91 8 CooPer Avenue
Glenwood SPrings, CO 81601
Ph. (970) 945-2246
ENGINEER & SURVEYOR
SoPris Engineering, lnc.
Yancy Nichol, Engineer; Mark Beckler, Surveyor
502 Main Street, Ste. A-3
Carbondale, CO 81623
Ph. (970) 704-0311
APRIL 22,1998
r*1
I
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
ll
lr
lr
ll
ENGLUND / MOORE SUBDIVISION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM
LETTER OF APPLICATION
EXISTING CONDlTIONS DESCRIPTION
EXISTING CONDITIONS MAP (reduced scale)
PLAT MAP (reduced scale)
SUBDTVISION DESCR!PTION & RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
SUMMARY OF PRELIM!NARY PLAN REQUIREMENTS
Section 4:50A-O
Section 4:60A-H
Section 4:70A-D
Section 4:80A-D
Section 4:90
Section 4:91 A-E
Section 4:92A-E
Section 4:93
Section 4:94
ATTACHMENT A - DEEDS
ATTACHMENT B - SOILS & GEOLOGY
Soils Engineer's RePort
SCS Soils Descriptions
ATTACHMENT C - SEWER & DRAINAGE
Engineer's Report
ATTACHMENT D. WATER
Engineer's Report
Well Permits
State Engineer's Letter
Basalt Water Conservancy District Contract
ATTACHMENT E . 404 PERMIT
ATTACHMENT F . CDOT ACCESS PERMIT APPLICATION
Sketch Plan
Preliminary Plan
Final Plan
xxxxxx
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM
SUBDIVISION NAME:ENGLUND / MOORE SUBDIVISION
OWNER:-CHARLESENGLUND,LUTHERMOORE,DTANNAMOORE
ENGINEER/PLANNER/SURVEYOR:
-SOPRIS
EN G INEERING & LAND DESIG N PARTN ERSHIP-
LOCATION: Section: -32-Township:
-7S-
Range:
-87W-WATER SOURCE:
-INDIVIDUAL
WELLS
SEWAGE DISPOSAL METHOD :
-ISDSPUBLIC ACCESS VIA: HWY E2 FRONTAGE ROAD
(2)
I
I
I
I
!
lrlr
lr
lr
lr
llll
lr
t:
ll
EXISTING ZONING:
EASEMENTS: Utility
_AGRICULTURE/RESIDENTIAL/RURAL DENSITY
TOTAL DEVELOPMENT AREA:
( I \ Residential
Single Family
Duplex
Multi-family
Mobile Home
Commercial
(3) Industrial
(4) Public/Ouasi-Public(RAILROADROw)
(5) Open Space / Common Area
TOTAL:
PARKING SPACES:
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Number
2
Acres
L3.964
Acres
4.378
4.284
22.625
Floor Area
.sq.ft.
sq.ft.
I
t
t
lr
lr
lrII
lr
l:
lr
ll
LAND DESIGN PARTNERSHIP
"' """H'o11?;"r'08ily39 f-tllX'63'"
8 1 60 1
April22, 1998
Mr. Eric MccaffertY
Senior Planner
108 8th Street
Glenwood SPrings, CO 81601
Re: Englund/Moore Preliminary Plan
Dear Eric:
Attached herewith are fifteen copies of a Preliminary Plan and supplemental
information ., ,"qrir"O tot preliminary plan review ind a check for the applicatiol fee
.
of $675 for the Englund/Moore Subdiri.ion. I request that this application' when found
to be complete, o" pl.."J on the etanning and Zoning Commission agenda for their
regular June meeting. The owners of the property are:
Luther E. and Diana G' Moore
16613 HwY 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
970-963-0442(Residence)970.963.4462(Business)
Fax#:704-1874
Charles Englund
2205 Shalimar Dr.
Colorado SPrings, CO 80915
7 1 g _57 4_2iS S (-neside n ce) 7 1 9-632-4462 ( B usi ness)
Fax#:719'475-7221
lf you have questions or require any additional information please contact myself or
Luther (Lou) Moore'
Ronald B. Liston
Diana G. Moore
T
I
I
t
I
lr
lr
lrll
lr
lr
lr
t:
lr
lr
ll
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The subiect propefi is Iocated south of Hwy 82 and adjacent to a p_ortion of the east
boundary of the new Waldorf School. The irontage on Hwy 82 is 37 feet wide and
extends south toward the river for 150 feet beforJwidening out in the main body of the
propefi. This narrow connection to Hwy 82 is part of a driveway shared by two
residences in addition to the Moore/Engiund property. These residences, on two lots'
are owned by Luther Moore, a co-owne-r of the proposed subdivision property' The
property widlns to about 800 feet and extends south over the Roaring Fork River
Across the rail road right-of-way ts a 4.2 acre parcel that is part of the gnginal property
description. The propirty, exctudlng the rail road right-of-way, totals 18.2 acres'
Topographically, the site has three levels' The access link to Hwy 82 is the upper
level, the mid level is about S feet lower and about half the acreage of the site. From
the mid level, a slope drops quickly 10 feet to wetlands along the Roaring Fork River'
The acreage south of the rail road right-of-way rises very sharply up the valley wall and
is unusable except for visual open space.
A few decades ago, five ponds were constructed on the mid level of the site' Waters
from Blue Creek flow through all five ponds which, over the years, has caused the
easterly two ponds (Johnsin's Pond and S Pond) to accumulate large volumes of
sediment. Portions of these two ponds are now quite shallow and in need of
rehabilitation. A narrow ribbon (i'-3') of wetlands characterize much of the shore line of
all five ponds. Various patches of brushy willow are scattered about the site' The only
Lrg" trees on the site are located along ihe river and at the very northerly end of the
sitJ. Many of the descriptive characteristics contained in the SCS Soils Descriptions
for soil tvpe # g2 Redrob Loam found on the pond level are not entirely accurate due to
the gross site disturbance created during construction of the five ponds' There is no
known potential radiation hazard at the site'
waterfowl, song birds and small mammals are common on the site although the limited
land area minimizes the total number of animals on the pond terrace-. Deer are
frequent visitors to the lower terrace areas adjacent to the river but the pond area has
historically been fenced to exclude deer'
SITE REHABILITATION IN PROCESS
Attached is the 404 Permit Application for the dredging of the Johnson's Pond and s
pond with the defosition of thL dredge material in the most southwesterly pond (River
pond). This permit also includes gra--vel fill for two access drives, one along the west
bank of the ponds and one between the ponds The permit applic.ation.notes that the
filled area oi Rirer pond is intended to be used for two building sites. The
rehabilitation work described by this permit was completed in April of 1998'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
T
I
I
A PARCEL OF LAND SITdEST OF THE 6th P. M.
,/t ,;o,Ll Elr' CEIIDffi
PROFtrt]/. tntt sourtnr
PROP,NUttttllt-tt
gmtflfni llsamiRNm 4Jra*+ssflfil {0rcr
rtA- riEA ,ll8 rc t
'Dffr lrl LoJs s' ,r-tg DrffRrPlmfi
Y,';'**'Y,Y"*Y,tri#Yhry;"'ffi tffi-':il#-iEt-ioiiittt e, ,, tilD ,a, Ltrvc
dfiar ar srtru Elqrra!-lL N-8-''i#[f #'*:;!Hiie{rn:ffi"#.:ffi^**fft?,i*F"Wnt,trt";i&:rttffi*'ffi.^W::,?x,:"Jffi Eilii"*;*'*l;;,wf w;,,ffi '*o'
FUSMTE
crP ts ,rfl
---Pl
(-'//-d
,t s ,r'63'16' t zile.ac ,Er', N t POIIU tN a cfi/fi uill
:, r,rii HfYtrh^#,{,8#L csia',.' , z,.t ,,tr to
", f,ff#":'fr"Trtifn"i"f' arclt Po',o N s,.rD
Itfcr:o {itiv'r,r' f, sr.r1 rafi to ar utcl' Poqtt ut ral
6) 'il?rto'ro' J a.ra ,tt m N )fiet' Potfr n ,r'D
s) !'!Fi'*' f, ?e.oo t tt ro tl tilc''E Pollt'" 'N stttD
?'#*i#gr6:,ffiffi i#*l+:'#u,*
R--
ff i,tf ",$i*!ff ff 'ffi ::iff ;L*"ffi ff#**,!###,
r
[lf#";;,ffi^RYJn"l,"*Y;.*'*'*P'E'Lf) ilE c * *t * n'rr,.r"o tfl* po,,tnx ot tz, D',Nl,,t Nt Em c*rlD' un,o D R'eEt-
4 sEGEaffi JErtlf.
' H#.ffi&g#ir*r or anurr.t
ina eLa nr3 crr!, s ,tflrt ol cor,oa,Dlt
N63trrEn GComurerEElE ffi, (cEra[rilcrEDr€lE BEffimmffiil& 3 i5a E$EEXurffiilEOqn^d2*IIAElIilYiqffi fiE I.ITIFOIED frIffi tE cE,z oAlE tffi
EffiT!lrDEctril[SAEACl
ffitliuffiGslED6EruEUglmdsEfcuYA6EruffiIffro rtcEarlrt [5
SCAI,E
( !:[E)
1td- l@ n
5)
o
"gL.--
rclEE tlnx vxlEYwrwx.rs
);$
!
I
I
rrillra I? TgI gNITEBIS}
f,EAASt COEllrl ol sactm)
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A PARCEL OF I,AND
surGlrr',ruI,
DOa&Nrf ,firuD*
,I',i? @W UW. Wtffi Dt I4rf,4 w144, ttt!!,,Nilruw@uilcullfuJ)BDMuwg@oamru,BUNr@vwrcDaM
S,EST OF THE 6th P. M.
_---D rB.
,/,,rd, @1, r Pu
w ru cwil" DD rilt nf M t& tu M E grtB'
-eiflnks a, ,,[,'irc Fo,6?!t? ro c.tr, ,rr:L Hr-to, B,u (Dat) D 84
matEMNwufrwJilwfrmiiuww.w,fi-qry---ra N fr
-
ll ol
-
r.* B ,,ilPl'ot a
,)
,)
t)
4t
c)
.)
?)a)
wEU.*taNWwMD@mEa ffir w r rPirr', ffi N ffil rq@\?c,nfrfrwufrruEEwwNwwwJfirr'{'aNSMwB
lifcifu o rl ,,,fif tfi ata t *ttto' J rLs rD jo
7 w N rD lurwt w, u uD ul ,4 1o4aaN*awfrffima@u8ra@t,|M&,frf,Mwdw wNwa6frw,IaaG,
MiltmweilMDMwwarboFw
l?tt zD aru E/t am lr, lD BL lnalrt,t u zD fr?jmmtctosww-anMu
lWettBawfi, M/D,
6 I
2
flrragl
GWMt)El ,tt,'l ,
a8@
,,,,,dD,.Af.
DAL lEI
we@ffiaw EwgwuDtt wu@dBMxtw@.Gnaffiust ,lrr
w iffiN ww
amNwwuqwowmamaww-Nw-L\,u
MUCUM tbcutftuw )
D ffi&rfir uzgdeary ruN ula
-lf
t-:-L\rEtrEElrurewru.
frO,Eduffi.
ffiNWMru
om-EBAM
n M @u w m rB a.ED n tfr ,J ry ryfrrai,,{'ryD t r-!l'ar#1A rlr
tlrrucwn )bgutlcru@ )
ffi ru|. lrnDNrz aDo,a,']rawrld'ao|wiB oo*tt, ca,fl,n fi8
-
ar il 4 LtL -t*-ru-mmfrgEDwu@wrf Ntin-cimirnf,ffiafr@wM-w,wmmwtuf MlDfrlra@ffip-mrumwqffi@ffiffi@lt,,l,;llmffiu;ffiwtufrfr@wE@Nmnf,ruEffiw
NDUEN"AOMo&,''@ urDdoltt,o,!,,/,o
Dt'w
ffinru&fruuBMew
@ codlf aN
WIdEffi
LWLruJwfrDtutrYf wfriirmwwBvaoaafrolwD!tutM tutB t nE M&w 4qBtlEBlMWtri-*iffiiiffi,ffiffi ,,
n--n;o,/d,if n m*,N7r,d Nt cd,,crrt Mr rl, 4rrfrtl lDwi*il Mt,otl,ueffiNffiu @muwwo@wdwqwwwwwwBMUru
,a Umu1{,a u lnu
,ana /tL
zrfl kL"' lE
a.n, te)
.Lrll &
wl&
x ,F,do' u Lia Eli,,Ii'tra ilD dD gr m, ta'a' J llnB, iI MN ' MAB
'gUT 'D N ru8, 'IDM@MilfrWTM'OWIWEo,DN/,lry,dSDB l$gt
Ltr dret cEtn?
,tmolD cofrlz cE/an
.F&IULWB
uurl'Jtra Gn
NFfl"NAD
J tt.tl fD ,o al lr,, FMt lx llD
ftrtrafmNlruDN,il@
,LA BfrNffi afrD @
iMlmu@wuB-17u-&r4ttwa@
froMW ,/wfrw.D& ././
wwa
@
L
WreNlE
z'*'NsffitE-*I
1#
@4@eB
rm
I
T
I
I
t
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
l:
li
SUBDIVISION DESCRIPTION
The property is proposed to be divided into two parcels with the portion of the propefi
south of the rail road right-of-way being set aside as either publicly owned or privately
owned open space. Th]e o*ners OesirE is to dedicate the south parcel to the rail road
authority. A representative of the Roaring Fork Rail Authority has been contacted
about their willingness to receive the dedication but no formal submission has been
made to them. lf the land can not be given to a public entity, the tract will be platted
with a common use open space easement for the benefit of the lot owners' The
property is proposea io Ue split generally with a north/south line that nearly equally
divides the River Pond area of fill. This will provide two building sites, each in the area
of 15,000 to 16,000 square feet. The sketch plan shows the designated building sites'
a potential configuration for a residential footprint and space for an engineered
individual sewage treatment system. Tne ouitding envelopes are set back 15 to 20 feet
from the edge oi tne adjacent ponds to provide a buffer from the wetlands.
Access to the building sites is provided by the drives that are part of the 404 Permit
discussed above. gain drive is proposeo to ue 12leelwide. Drainage structures will
be provided under the drives where'water discharges from one pond into the next or
into BIue Creek. The drive to the westerly of the two lots will cross the adjacent Moore
property within an easement to be granted for that purpose by the Moores who are co-
owners in the proposed subdivisioni. tni. access alignment is adjacent to the west line
of the Moore propefi and will extend to a new intersection with the state highway
frontage road. This alignment was chosen and to avoid unnecessary disruption of the
north bank of the northwesterly pond (Moe Pond). Minimal grading is required along
the route of the two drives. The existing access drive will continue to serve two existing
residences as well as the proposed eaJterly lot. The common use portion of the
existing drive will be improved to a Semi-primitive Design Standard with two 8 foot
traffic lin".. A portion of the existing drive is currently paved with asphalt'
The dredge material used to fi|l the River Pond obviously will not provide adequate
support for typical spread footing foundations for the proposed residential structures' A
,oil, ,"port oulining the appropilate criteria for foundation designs is included in
Attachment B. lmp6rteO grir"i and topsoil will be used to complete the filling of the
building sites to facilitate vehicular circulation areas and landscape areas'
The existing rim of the River pond embankment is at the 6314 foot elevation and the
flood elevation adjacent to the River Pond is 6310. The entire terrace where the ponds
are located is above the 100 year Floodplain. An engineering review of the floodplain
conditions at the site is included in Attachment C'
The proposed site will have relatively small lawn areas so there will be minimal
influence on the ponds or the river fiom chemical fertilizers or pesticides. The wetlands
between the building sites and the Roaring Fork River will serve as an additional
natural cleanser forlny surface discharges from the residential sites.
I
I
T
I
I
Lou Moore talked with Division of wildlife District Manager, Kevin wright earlier this
spring by phone. fr4i. Wrignt was familiar with the site. They reviewed the proposed
activities and the r"nn"rTn which the "no net loss of weflands" was to be achieved.
Mr. Wright recommended the usual dog control measures and discussed ways to limit
the extent of damage to existing trees caused by beavers.
Ir
lr
lr
l:
l:
RELATIONSHIP TO THE ROARING FORK VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The following describes the general conformity with the new Garfield County
Comprehensive Plan for the-Roaring Fork-Va'-!"y.": identified by Section lll Goals'
Objectives, Policies and Progr... of the GarfieiO County Comprehensive Plan dated
September, 1994.
Section lll-1.0 Public Participation
Goal:Anintegratpa@eplanningistheopportunityforcitizenstobe
involved in att phases of the planning process'
The proposed subdivision will be reviewed at a public hearing during the preliminary
plan review. Also, the 404 permit was issued following an opportunity for pubic
comment to the CorPs of Engineers.
Section lll-2.0 Housino
Goal: To ensure tneffiSitny of housing including affordabte housing in the county
where in short supply, subiect'to regulatiins, which- ensure safety, appropriate site
Jesigns, co*patniiy, and protection of the natural environment.
The Englund/ Moore subdivision will provide two yery unique single family residential
building sites. The natural riparian "i""t of the site are preserved although through
the pond rehabiritation there will be some temporary loss of wetlands but there is no net
loss of wetlands.
Section lll-3.0 Transportation
Goal: Ensure that the county transportation system r.s safe, functional, appropriately
designed to nanite existing and fuiure traffic ievels, and includes opfions for the use of
,oi"t other than the single-occupant automobile'
The newly generated traffic from the two lots will have minimal impact on.county lolg'
since access is provided directly from a state maintained highway' This is reflectcd in
the county,s determination that new construction in this are is not required to pay an off
site road imPact fee'
T
I
I
I
t
T
t
I
I
T
I
I
t
I
T
T
I
T
I
Section lll-4.0 Commercial and lndustrial Uses
Goal: Commercial: Gartield County will encourage the retention and expansion of
convenient, viable, and compatible commercialdevelopment capable of providing a
wide vaiety of goods and services fo serve the citizens of the County.
The provision of residential lots at the Englund/Moore Subdivision will help supply the
demand by the construction industry for home sites.
Section lll-5.0 Recreation and Open Space
GOAL: Garfietd County should provide adequate recreational opportunities for County
residents, ensure access to public lands consisfenf with BLM/USFS poibies, and
preseve existing recreational opportunities and important visual corridors.
The site has historically been a private recreation amenity and will continue as such,
servicing two owners. lf we are successful in dedicating the area south of the rail road
to a public entity, it would open up public access to the BLM lands to the south. The
south bank of the Roaring Fork River lies within the rail road right-of-way and has the
potential of being open to public access depending on the policies of the new authority.
Section lll-6.0 Agriculture
Goal: To ensure that existing agricultural uses are allowed to continue in operation, and
compatibili$ rssues are addressed during proiect reviews.
The proposed subdivision site has no agricultural history.
Section lll-7.0 Water and Sewer Services
Goal: To ensure the provision of legal, adequate, dependable, cost effective, and
environmentally sound sewer and water serytbes for new development.
Domestic water is readily available from proposed wells into the Roaring Fork alluvium.
Sewer will be provided by engineered individual disposal systems.
Section lll-8.0 Natural Environment
Goal: Garfietd County will encourage a land use paftern that recognizes the
environmental sensitivity of the land, does not overburden the physical capacity of the
land, is in the best interest of the health, safety and welfare of Garfield County.
The rehabilitation of the silted in ponds improves fishing habitat
4
I
I
t
I
I
I
Section Ill-9.0 Natural Resource Extraction
Goal: Garfietd Courty ,e*gr',res that mder Colorado law, the surface and mineral
inferesfs have cefiain legalrights and priviteges, including the right to extract and
devetopfhese inferesfs. Furthermore', privaie property owners also have certain legal
rights and privileges, including the right to have the mineral estate developed in a
reasonabte manner and to have adverse land use impacts mitigated'
The site is underlain with gravel deposits but they would be difficult to extract since
they are primarily below the water table and would require extensive environmental
disturbance to extract.
Section Ill-10.0 Urban Areas of lnfluence
Goal: Ensure tnat aevenpment ana overall land use policies occurring in the County
that will affect a municipattty are compatible with the existing zoning and future land use
objectives of the appropriate municipality.
The subdivision is not located in the urban area of influence of any municipality.
Section lV METHODOLOGY
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
l:
describer tne Cornprefiensive Plan and Land Use Maps "as the foundation for
subsegue nt zoning or subdivision regulations that implement the goals and policies
deveto,ped by the Plan". lt further states "that the County Comprehensiue Plans are
advisory only, neither legislative nor judicial in nature, not the equivalent to zoning , and
not binding ipo, the zoiing discretion of any county or municipal legislative body".
: This section
The Englund/Moore Subdivision site is included on the map titled Prgoosed Land Use
Districtj Carbondale Area following the Methodology Section of the Comprehensive -ffithesiteasbeingintheLowDensityResidentialDistrict(10+
acres/ dwelling unit). The gross area of the original property description,22.6 acres
would place ttie proposed dLvelopment within the Low Density criteria with 11.3 acres
per lot. Exclusion oi tn" rail road right-of-way would place the density just below that
criteria with 9.1 acres Per lot.
A review of Table 30 "proposed Land Use Districts and Methodology" identifies the
criteria by which this classification was determined. Recognizing the necessarily
generaliied nature of the comprehensive plan analysis, the following is offered as a
i.ror" detailed review of this criteria as it retates to the body of information currently
available for the St. Finnbar Farm site.
DEVELOPMENT GONSTRAI NTS
According to this table, a site should be rated as having "Major" constraints to
t
T
I
I
I
warrant classification as Low Density Residential'
Slope Constraints: There are no excessive gradient stopes on this site and thereby
should be rated as a "Minor" constraint.
Soil Constraints: The soils described by the Hepworth-Pawlak report are not
characteristic of the soils conditions identified by the Comprehensive Plan Soils Hazard
descriptions. The building sites are created from depositions from the dredging
op"r"iion. The deposition-soils have a low bearing strength and will require engineer
designed foundations systems as defined by the Hepworth-Pawlak report' Soil
conditions at the building sites are entirely iontrolled and thereby any question of soils
hazards should be rated as "Minor".
ISDS Constraints: The entire building site including the ISDS leaching site is result of
controlled fill. The report attached *itn tnis application provides the preliminary design
for the sewer disposal systems for the proposed residences. This design provides for
the creation of filtering Ueas that will assuie the protection of the Roaring Fork Aquifer.
This is a condition not dissimilar to that recently approved for the adjacent Waldorf
School. Under these engineer controlled conditions this constraint should be listed as
"Minor" or at most "Moderate".
Floodplain Constraints: Lower portions of the site are within the 100 Year Floodway
and Fioodplain according to FEMA studies and mapping but the proposed building
sites and their access drives are entirely above the floodplain and floodway'
DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAI NTS SU MMARY:
The review of constraint conditions existing at the Moore/Englund site, based on
accurate site specific information, yields three "Minor" ratings and possibly one
,,Moderate" rating. This configuration of ratings readily accornrnodates the
proposed develipment density of 9 acres per_unit which is equivalent to the
Medium Density'Residential Land Use Classification ( 6-9 acres per dwelling
unit).
LAND USE CONSIDERATIONS
The Low and Medium Density designations should rate nothing higher than
Moderate rating in the area of land use considerations.
Land Use Compatibility: The proposed density is consistent with the residential
character generally adlacent and upstream from the site. Adjacent tothe west is the
Waldorf Scnoot *ni.n is obviously a much high intensity of land use than the two
residences on eighteen.
Road Conditions: Access is provide by the Hwy 82 frontage road which is maintained
by the State. This road is in excelleni conditions and provides direct access to Hwy 82
t
I
I
I
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
T
I
I
T
I
I
T
to the east and we$t.
lnfrastructure Needs: With only two tots, each serviced by individual well and sewage
disposal systems, there is no impact on existing service systems The adjacent ponds
wili providl ready source of fire protection water for the Fire District pumper trucks'
Distance from Urban Uses: With the exception of the services at the Catherine Store
which offers gasoline and convenience products, the Moore/Englund site is
approximatet! Rve to seven minutes from urban uses and the associated commercial
services at El Jebel. This factor is rated as being of "Minor" concern for both the Low
and Medium Density Residential classifications'
]AND USE CONSIDERATIONS SUMMARY:
The proposed uses and density are compatible with the area and should qualify
as being consistent with the nneOium Density Residential (6-9 acres/ du) land
use classification.
SUMMARY OF LAND USE DISTRICT CISSSIFICATION REVIEW
Utilizing the methodology identified by the Comprehensive Plan and data
specific to the Moore/Emglund site, it is our conclusion as presented in the
above analysis, that the [roperty would be more appropriately clarified as a
Medium Density Residential District (6-9 acres/ du)'
COMPREHENSIVE PIAN CONFORMANCE
Given that 9.1 acres/unit proposed density is so close to the Low Density Classification
and given the site specific analysis above, it is our conclusion that the Moore/Englund
Subdivision is cleariy in general conformity with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan'
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
PRELIMINARY PLAN REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
Section
4:50
4:50 A
4:50 B
4:50 C
4:50 D
4:50 E
4:50 F
4:50 G
4:50 H
4:50 I
4:50 J
4:50 K
4:5 L
Description
PRELIMINARY PLAN MAP
Name of Subdivision
Date, etc.
Boundary & Legal
Names of Owner, etc
Vicinity Map
Adjacent ProPertY Owners
Lot Areas
Easements
Setbacks
Land Use Summary
Existing Conditions
Common Open SPace
Evidence of Access
Otf Street Parking
Location in APPlication
Sheet 1
Sheet 1
Sheet 1
Sheet 1
Sheet 1
Sheet 1
Sheet 1
Sheet 1
Sheet 1
Sheet 1
Existing Conditions MaP
Sheet 1
Sheet 1
Sub. Application Form
T
I
I
I
I
T
I
I
4:50 M Public Land Dedication
No Land is proposed to be dedicated to the public at this time. At some point in
the future, t'ne bpen Space Tract may be given to a public entity' Cash
payments to the'school District are proposed in lieu of land dedications.
4:50 N Street Grades
Nopublicorprivate,commonusestreetsareproposed.
Existing Easements Sheet 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Terms of Dedication
No dedications are ProPosed.
4:60 B Phasing
Construction is proposed as a single phase'
I
T
t
t
I
I
4:50 O
4:60
4:60 A
4:60 C
4:60 D
4:60 E
4:60 F
Soils & Topography Hazard Attachment B
Radiation Hazard Attachment B
I
I
I
I
ll
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
l:
l:
lr
t:
l:
4:60 G Deeds
4:60 H Section Subdivision
Previously reviewed by County Serveyor'
Attachment A
N/A
Attachment B
Attachment B
Existing Conditions MaP
Subd ivision Descri Ption
Attachment D
Attachment D
Attachment D
Attachment D
Attachment D
Attachment D
N/A
N/4,
Attachment D
Basalt Contracts
4:70
4:70 A
4:70 B
4:70 C
4:70 D
4:80
4:80 A
4:80 B
4:80 A
4:80 D
4:90
4:91
4.91 A
4:91 B
4.91 c
4:91 D
4:91 E
4:92
Supplemental lnformation
Geology
Soils
Vegetation
Wildlife
DRATNAGE/WATER
Exisitng Water Courses
Tributary Areas
Tributary Flows
Design of Drainage Fac.
UTILITY PLAN
Water Supply
Quality & QuantitiY
Central SuPPIY
Existing SuPPIY
lndividual SuPPIY
Augmentation
SANITARY SEWER
N/A
N/A
N/A
I
I
I
I
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
t:
l:
lr
Ir
lr
t:
4:92
4:91
4:92
4:92
4:92
4:93
A
B
c
D
E
Public Sewer
Central
Existing District
Individual Sewage
ISDS
Attachment C
Attachment C
UTILTTIES AND ROAD PLANS N/A
There are no road or utility constrcution plans since there are no common use
facilites.
OFF.SITE ROAD IMPACT FEE
The site is not included in any zone with an identified impact. No Fee will be
assessed.
ATTACHMENT A
DEEDS
I
I
I
I
ir
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
l:
l:
lr
lr
t:
l,
I
t
I
I
I
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
T
I
T
t
q/t2,bJ
RECOtoET.
OEPIJIY.f i tcd ,or f*ord th. d.Y ol-
lacaption lo.
QUIT CIAIM DEED
IEIS DBED , r..d. thit d.v of J\rIy 17, 1!197
iffi E. lmRE ard Dnlq, c- !@RE RlD onRLEs E' ElcuDD
cency o, BREIELD d strl. of
ycrr f i rrt EboE rri tt6.
sign d, sotld and Drtlvrcd in th3 PFifE of
CqT tY o'
Th. forlgoing instngrt 5. Et'E ltt'd brfm r this dty of JuIy 17' 1997
,w LIIIHER E. t'@RE ard DIAIB' G' t'tORE AID ODRLES B' EIGLM
.Ultrns .t hid Jd oftlcirt r"t'
@.ssnE
*":;.,... .4r.' r. #f"rry$t}#,'t ffi..i :"?&'ft-11:i* rTio.oo
vlrrcssEtll. ,h.t th. tia ptii'ii iit rlii pttt' lor "l in carlc'r'tf6 ot th'
lEN E)LIARS
tothrsridp.?t(lr.)ofth.flr.tP.ftlnhdp.ilbY.l|...idp.ft(i.t,ofth.3rco.dD.rt,th.fcc.iPtdr..ofl.h.r..
tsy c6idr.d.rd acr*rcde.d,'irii i-i..a, roteitd, *aJilili['t--c[ri C.,*O'.ti b'' ti"t p.'6ta dc(t') rtr"'
rct..s., s.tt, cclwy rE *ii iilri -to inr ula p...ti..ifi-ii.3Eori P'rt'.(thcir) lrrir:' tr.Ecr'aofr 'd $risn'
,or!v.r, rlr rh. right, titri, int"r..t, sr.in.rd o--"-iiili i.-tiia pttiriil ol th3 f lr'r Prlt:lt' tt $RFISb
fottdins d.tcrib.d tot o. ptitti if tttd tit*tt' tvirr "d b'ins ln th'
H'"#Sff'ff' Ihiii&o HERtIo aro IBDE A PAtr HERw:
.t.o lrcrt st strcrt lrd nor GIREIEjD CCXNry
lo HAVE Alo Io HolD thG sn, togothGr rith att ai.5ingut.r th!.aurt6*?r.rrid Privitc0!3 thtr6to b'toTging or
in myrise rh.rasto.pp".t.iiliil ini-err tnr.rt"t", ,icni]-iiiti, iniit-t a'! ct'i!.rtrrttfficr' ol (h' s'id P'rt(iG')
of lhG first p.rt, .rrhGr rn tu-or.qrity, to thc onty p.q"t'*il'*-ilt "rr uatoot of th' s'id Prt(i!t) of tht "co'd
,.,.,l,liiilrl.lilr#,*il:^:.ll'ffii,-, or th. rtrst P.rr hr(s) h.rGiro 3cr rh.ir h.rd.rd r..t th. dry ri
Return to: Luther E. Moore
15613 HighwaY 82
Carbondale, C0 81623
@Tpt'IET C,TI CLAI,. OEED
a.c?d t Gtfi2224OO llttd er222400.I
4\g
of tha
ffiffiflHt#ffiE"e$fr' -Ed''
FNI.t-(t \:O r--t,E-
P:=9r-g'.
-
=H=:E=D-I+3-H5:nt o-l-
-
E' (,I
o(eIg- _
-
I
T
I
I
I
lt
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
l:
lr
lr
ll
EXHIBIT A
PARCEL A
TIIB EASTERLY 305.5 FEET OF LOT 13 A}ID TIIAT PART OF LOTS 6, 11
AI{D 12, LYING SOUTH OF THE SOTITH BOUNDARY LT![E OF STATE
HIGIIWAY NO. 82, IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 7 SOIJITH, RANGE 87
WEST OF TIIE STXltH PRINCIPAI MERIDIAI.I
EXCEPTING TI{EREFROM A PARCEL OE I,AIID DESCRTBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNTNG AT A POI}IT ON THE SOIITHERLY LINE OF STATE HTGHI{AY
NO. 82 WHENCE THE NORTT{WEST CORNER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 7
sourH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL !4ERIDIAN, BEARS
NORTIT 75 DEGREES 57' WEST, 6362.8 FEET;
TITENCE SOUTH 80 WEST 14' EAST 399.33 FEET AIONG THE SOIITHERLY
LINE OF STATE HTG}II{AY NO. 82;
TIIENCE SOUffi O DEGREES !4' EAST 321.3 FEET;
fiIENCE SOUTH 1.2 DEGREES 09' EAST 679.0 FEET TO TIIE CEIfIER OF
THE ROARING FORK RIIER;
THENCE SOIITH 69 DEGREES 51' WEST, 509.8 FEET AIONG THE CENTER
OF TIIE ROARTNG FORK RT\IER;
TTIENCE NORTTI 1 DEGREES OO' WEST 804.05 FEET;
THENCE NORTI{ 4 DEGREES 55' EAST 46L.9 FEET TO THE SOIIII{ERLY
LINE OF STATE HIGTIWAY NO. 82 , THE pOrNT OF BEGTNNING.
ATSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM A PARCEL OF I"AND DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGTNNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LTNE OF
SAID }IIGIIWAY WHENCE TIIE !{ITNESS POIMI TO fi{E NORTIIWEST CORNER
oF sArD sgcrroN ri BEARS: NoRTH 29 DEGREEs s7'02" wEST
284.84 FEET AND NORTII 47 DEGREES 04'L4'' WEST 2539.55 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 79 DEGREES 57'02' I}$t 5OO. OO FEET AIONG THE
SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SATD HIGIII{AY;
TIIENCE SOT]TH 05 DEGREES 05'50" WEST 150.56 FEET;
THENCE NORTI{ 79 DEGREES 57'O2II WEST 612.99 FEET;
TIIENCE NORTTI 10 DEGREES 02'53 '! EAST 150 .00 FEET, TO A POIIIT
ON TIIE SOT.ITHERLY RIG}flT OF WAY LINE OF SAID HIG}IWAY, THE POINT
OF BEGINNING.
AISO EXCEPTING TTIEREFROM A PARCEL OF I.A}TD DESCRTBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POTNT ON TIIE SOIJ:THERLY RIGHT OF WAY FENCE OF
SAID HIGI{WAY WHENCE TIIE WTTNESS CORNERS OF SECTION 29, 30,31, AI.ID 32 IN SAID TOWNSHIP Al{D RANGE BEABS: NORIII 48
DEGREES 03'54I' WEST 2620 .84 FEET i
TIiENCE SOLIMI 79 DEGREES 57'O2II f,}$I 154.35 FEET AIONG SAID
RTGHT OF WAY FENCE,.
THENCE SOIIIII 01 DEGREES 32'58'' WEST 156.07 FEET;
t
I
T
T
T
I
EXHIBIT A
TITENCE NORTTI 79 DEGREES 57'O2I' WEST 154'35 FEET;
TTIENCE NORTH O]. DEGREES 32';;'' Wgit 156'07 FEET' TO A POINT
oiisaip FENCE, rns PorNT oF BEGTNNTNG'
ffii.EI:r#rffiffiIiffi3H'* oo, 6 rN sEcrroN 32, rowNs*rp 7
SOIITH, RANGE
.A,-Wiit
OT TTTi SiXTTT PRINCIPAI' MERIDIA]'I'
GARFIELD COUMIY, COI'ORADO,
-T'ViiiC SOUTHEiiV OT THE SOUTHERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY igNCg OF COLROEOO STETE HIGII!{AY NO ' 82 ' MORE
ianilcuLARLY DEscRTBED As FoLLows :
BEGINNINGATAPoINToNTHESouTHERLYRIGHT-oF.WAyFENCEoF
sArD HIGIII{Ay iltlur'rcs rHs wrffiii-COnNsn-io sEcTIoNS 29' 30' 31
A}ID 32 IN SAID TOWNSHIP AITO..N'AIIES-BEARS_N' 48 DEGREES 03'54I'
w. 2620 .84 FEET;
THENCE s. or inenggs 32'58" w' 155'07'FEET;
THENCE S . zg pgcRges 57', Oz',t E ' 154 ' 35 FEET;
THENCE S. Or PgGiGEi 32'58N W: iI 'ZI FEET TO A POINT ON A
CIIAIN LINK TENCE ES EUTI..I AND IN PI'ACE;
TrTENCE ALONG laip cnerN Lri'il-riNCe oN rHE FOIJLOwTNG couRsES;
s. 83 DEGREES JEloz" w. z1'.it-rgst TO AI'I AI'IGLE POrMr rN SArD
FENCE;
THENCEN.74DEGREES03,45',w.Lo.72FEETToA}r[ANGLEPoINT
+il,f,tT"11!",,GREES 22'ilIN W. 31.14 FEET TO A}T N'IGLE POINT
+LiH""1"T9","NREES 30'57'' W. 3 .13 FEET TO AI{ ANGLE POINT IN
ffiiR.X'Il'ir DEGREES 4e,48,' w. 7e.oo FEEr ro AN Ar{GIJE PorNr
IN SAID FENCE; .
TTIENcE N. ra'igeREgs 11'15" w' 50'18 FEET;
TIIENCE I.EAVTNG_SiiO CIIAIN ITi* TgNCg ON A COURSE BEARING
N. 79 DEGREsd-si;02, w. roi--a' oisrnNCs or 72.99 FEET ro A
porlrr oN A piNcg As BurLT AliD rN PI"AGE;
THENCE N. OO'6icnsEs r+,ooii-w.-a.i'oue sArD FENCE 231'1s FEET
To A porNr ou-ilii--Eotmrsnlv nrosr-oF-e{AY FENCE OF SArD
HIGII9IAY NO. 82; tET ALONG SAID
THENcE s. zg-picngas 57'o2tt E' 8?'36 FE
sourHERLy RrcHT:OF-Wev rsics-io-THE POINT OF BEGTNNTNG'
COUNIY OF GARFIEIJD
STATE OF COLORADO
PARCEL B
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
III
EI
I
-II
I
I
II
I
I
I
-
II
II
II
(, rr
Or-iD o-{,orlN\FN.tIG'\Op(o
E,(o{o.o
GD-o"ol
-lt !o.EGlpooNG'{Dio'r,1l olts5lllFrC,01FtcCtrma
^
I
I
I
I
I
ATRACToFI,AI{DSITUATEDINLoTS].oA}ID19oFsEcTIoN32,
TOWNSHIP 7 SOIIEI, RANGE _EZ-.Wiii OF TIIE SIXTII PRINCIPAL
MERrDrAr.r osscRiiED-As FoLLofiE;- ail TEIT PoRrIoN oF ABo\rE
LOTS 10 AI{D ri-L,yrxe-wEsr 6i-rgg eor,r,owrue DESCRTBED LrNE:
BEGINNING AT A POINr ON fid- I'T6iiTT- iTNg -OE
ABOVE LOT 19 WHENCE
THE sourHEAst"coruwn or sBiti6ii-5g. TOWNSHTP 7 SOUrH' RANGE
T
I
T
I
I
T
I
I
I
I
t
I
T
I
T
I
I
T
t
EXHIBIT A
87 WEST OF TIIE SIXTII PRINCIPAI MERIDIATiI BBARS
ir'*5n E. 9000.391 FEET;
THENcE s. or iicisss 43' w' 1336'8 FEET To rHE
THE ABOVE LOT 10.
S. 58 DEGREES
SOUTH LINE OF
EXCEPT A PARCEI, OF I'A![D DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING At N POiIM OU ITTi-.S=OCTTENTV LINE OF SAID HIGHI{AY '
WHENCE THE WI;NiiS- POINT T6 UTE-NONTTN{PSI CORNER OF SAID
sEcrroN 32 gEAis,- NoRTII zi peGREEt-!?'-92" wEST 284'84 FEET
AND NoRTI{ +z ildeiggs o4'L4" wEST 2539 '5s FEET;
THENCE SourII ig-ogcRggS 5?,o;;-EASi EOO.OO FEET ALONG TIIE
SOUTHERLV NTGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID HIGHIIAY;
THENcE sotmr iii oseiEss o1'so" wEST 1s0's5 FEET;
TTIENcE NoRTIT i6 pgcRggs st'oz" wEsr 612'99 FEET;
TITENCE NORTIT io oscnsss oz,il, i.e'st rso.oo FEET, To A POINr
oN THE SOrmrsRlY-iieirr oF Wi'i i,rNe oe saip HIGH!{AY', rIIE POINT
OF BEGINNING.
COIINIY OF GARFIEI.'D
STATE OF COLORADO ===
a tl-
gE=o=-5{-,e=
N \-'tsNL. Itr.o \=^el tsD(OIL
E' (O_{:PoE8*=-H=
O:.
(9 ).-&oo-s!=z!-rt ot-,.4:mN-f -:.E' UIE^
9=E=Arr
=
ATTAGHMENT B
SOILS & GEOLOGY
I
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
l:
t:
lr
lr
t
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
t
I
T
I
t
t
I
I
I
I
t
Hrpwonrn-PewrRr G sorncHNlclt' Iruc'5020 Road 154
Glenwood SPrings, CO 81501
Fax 970 945-8454
Phone 970 945-7988
PRELINIINARY SLtsSOL STUDY
PROPOSED TWO LOT SUBDIVISION
166T3 STATE HIGHWAY 82
GARFMLD COIINTY, COLORADO
JOB NO. 198 152
MARCH 31, 1998
PREPARED FOR:
LOU MOORE
L66L3 HIGIIWAY 82
CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623
I
I
I
I
I
t;
lr
lr
l:
lr
l:
lr
l:
IIEPWORTH . PAWLAK GEOTECHMCAL, NC.
March 31, 1998
Lou Moore
16613 HighwaY 82
Carbondale, Colorado 81623 Job No. 198 152
Subject: Report Transmittal, Preliminary Subsoil Study, ProposedTwo Lot
subdivision, 16613 Sute Highway 82, Garfield county, colorado
Dear Mr. Moore:
As requested, we have conducted a preliminary subsoil study for the proposed
residences at the subject site.
The existing pond embankment and proposed backfill materials are not suitable for
support. ttre unOertying narural coarse gravels are relatively dense and suitable for
rupport of moderate foundation loads with relatively low settlement potential.
The proposed residences can be founded on a deep foundation system that extends
tnrougtit. fill and into the underlying natural gravels. We expect drilled or driven
piles io have load capaciries in the range of 10 to 30 kips. We should provide design
criteria for the selected deep foundation system.
The report which follows describes our exploration, summarizes our findings, and
presenrs our recommendations. It is important that we provide consultation during
iesign, and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation
of the geotechnical recommendations.
If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact us.
Sincerely,
- PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
David A. Y
Rev. By: SLP
DAY/ksm/RSO
I
I
T
I
I
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
l:
lr
lr
lr
lr
l,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PI.]RPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY . . . .
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
SITE CONDITIONS
GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS
FIELD EXPLORATION
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
PRELIMINARY DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
DEEP FOUNDATIONS
SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS
GROUND FLOORS
SITE GRADING
LIMITATIONS .
REFERENCE.....
FIGURE 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
FIGURE 2 - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
FIGURE 3 - LEGEND AND NOTES
FIGURE 4 - GRADATION TEST RESULTS
H.P GEOTECH
J
4
4
5
5
5
6
7
I
I
T
LI
lr
lr
lr
l:
lr
lr
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY
This report presents the results of a preliminary subsoil study for a proposed two
lot subdivision at 16613 Highway 82, east of Carbondale, Garfield County' Colorado'
The project site is shown on Fig. 1. The purpose of the study was to develop general
recommendations for the foundation design of the residences. The study was conducted
in accordance with our proposal for geotechnical engineering services to Lou Moore'
dated February 11, 1998 and as verbally amended by Mr' Moore on February 13' 1998
for us to use a track mounted drill rig'
A field exploration proglam consisting of exploratory borings was conducted to
obtain information on subsurface conditions. samples of the subsoils obtained during
the riercr exploration were resied in the iaboratory to derermine rheir classification. The
results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop
recorrmendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed
buitding foundations. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and
presents our conclusions, preliminary design recommendations and other -eeotechnical
engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsoil
conditions encountered.
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
The proposed construction was conceptual at the time of our srudy' The existing
pond in the proposed building areas is planned to be backfilled with material dredged
from the adjacent ponds. The backfilt is expected to be about 8 to 10 feet deep' The
residences are planned to be constructed in the pond fill areas, as shown on Fig' 1' The
residences will be L to 2 story Structures of wood frame construction' Ground floor
levels are assumed to be up to a few feet above the top of the existing pond
embankments (see Fig. 2). Ground floors will probably be structurally supported over
crawlspace with srab-on-grade garages. Grading for the stnrctures after backfilling the
pond is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths up to 3 to 4 feet' We assume
relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction'
H-P GEOTECH
I
t
I
t
ll
lr
lr
l:
lr
lr
t:
a
When building plans, grading and foundation loading information have been
better developed, we should be notified to reevaluate the recommendations presented in
this report.
SITE CONDITIONS
The site is in flat terrain adjacent the Roaring Fork River where there are several
existing shallow ponds that were constructed with fill embankments. The ponds were
reportedly previously used as a fish hatchery and are typically less than about 8 to 10
feet deep. River pond, which will be backfilled for the residence construction, is about
300 feet by 75 feet in plan size and from about 6 to 10 feet deep. Surface water level
of the pond, as provided, is about 6,312 feet with top of surrounding fill embankments
at about 6,3L7 feet. The fill pond embankment slopes where exposed on the downhill
south and west sides are estimated at about ZVz to 3 (horizontal) tol (vertical)'
GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS
The site is underlain by coarse gravel alluvium over the Eagle valley Evaporite
Formation (Tweto and Others, 1978). The Evaporite has been associated with
sinkholes due to dissolution of gypsum in the deposit in other areas of the Roaring Fork
Valley. We are not aware of sinkholes in the immediate area of the subject site ' There
may be a risk of subsidence if sinkholes exist below the building site' Our exploratory
borings were relatively shallow, for foundation design only, however, no evidence of
voids were encountered to the depths drilled. We believe the risk of subsidence at the
site within the service life of the proposed residences due to dissolution in the Evaporite
is low. It has been our experience that potential radiation exposure from narural
deposits is not typical in the area of the site. The lower part of the site is apparently in
the 100 year flood plain of the adjacent Roaring Fork River'
It should be possible to develop the property as proposed without encountering
severe constraints associated with the site geology. The potential for flooding of the
lower part of the lots should be considered in the planning and site grading design'
H.P GEOTECH
I
t
I
il
I
t
t
T
I
I
t
I
t
I
t
T
T
I
I
FIELD EXPLORATION
The field exploration for the project was conducted on February 25, L998. Four
exploratory borings were drilled at the locations shown on Fig. 1 to evaluate the general
subsurface conditions. The borings were advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous
flight auger powered by a track-mounted CME-45 drill rig. The borings were drilled
on the fill embankments surrounding the pond. The borings were logged by a
representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc.
Samples of the subsoils were taken with l% inch and 2 inch I.D. spoon
samplers. The samplers were driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows
from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches. This test is similar to the standard
penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values
are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which
the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Logs of
Exploratory Borings, Fig.2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review
by the project engineer and testing.
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
Graphic logs of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site are shown on
Fig.2. The subsoils consist of about 5 to 10 t'eet of variable quality and type
man-placed fill overlying relatively dense sandy gravel and cobbles with boulders
extending to the drilled depths of 8t/z to lZt/z feet. Drilling in the dense -qravels rvith
auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was
encountered in the deposit.
Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the borings included
natural moisture content and gradation analyses. Undisturbed sampling of the natural
gravel subsoils for consolidation testing was not possible due to the coarse material.
Results of gradation analyses performed on small diameter drive sampies (minus 172
inch fraction) of the fill and underlying coarse granular subsoils are shown on Fig. 4.
H-P GEOTECH
I
I
I
I
I
t
T
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
t
I
t
4-
Free water was encountered in 3 of the 4 borings at the time of drilling at depths
from 3 to 5 f'eet. The subsoils were highly moist to wet.
PRELINIINARY DESIGN REC ONI.I.VTENDATIONS
Development of the site for residential construction will require careful
planning, design and construction with respect to the geotechnical conditions. The
pond backfill materials will likely be wet silts and sands that are highly compressible
and not suitable to support foundations or slabs without a high risk of settlement and
distress. The backfill subgrade may also require stabilization for construction
equipment access. A deep foundation extending through the fill and into the natural
dense gravels should be used for building support' Properly placed and compacted
structural fill as the pond backfill could be used to reduce the risk of settlement and
probably allow the use of shallow foundation systems, such as heavily reinforced spread
footings or mats, for support of the buildings.
The pond backfill soils may contain organics which could decompose over time.
These soils should be capped with at least a few feet on non-organic, fine-grained soils.
Crawlspaces that overlie organic soils should be well vented and monitored for possible
meihane gas development.
presented below are geotechnical recommendations considered suitable for
planning and preliminary design. once preliminary plans have been developed we
should be contacted to provide geotechnical review and perform additional analysis as
needed. More detailed design criteria for the selected foundation type can be provided
at thar time. Additional borings in the pond backfill and proposed building areas may
be needed to evaluate the backfill and foundation bearing conditions'
DEEP FOUNDATIONS
A deep foundation system bearing in the natural coarse gravels should be
feasible for building foundation support. Suitable deep foundation types may include
drilled piers, helical piers, auger-cast piles and driven pipe piles' For the assumed
soft/wet backfill conditions, drilled helical piers, drilled auger-cast grout piles or driven
I
H-P Georecs
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
T
5-
pipe piles tilled with concrete should be feasibie. Straight shaft drilled piers will
probably encounter difficult construction requiring casing and dewatering.
The deep foundarion piles or piers should develop moderate end-bearing load
capacity and low settlement potential with proper design and construction. Allorvable
load capacities in the range of 10 to 30 kips can be assumed. Some down drag on the
piles or piers could occur as the pond backfill settles. Penetration into the natural
coarse gravels will probably be limited to a few feet for low capaciry piles or piers.
Difficult foundation construction should be expected due to soft caving soils, shallow
groundwater, and cobbles and boulders in the bearing soils.
SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS
Lightly loaded spread footings or monolithic slab (mat) foundations should bear
on properly placed and compacted strucrural fill. The strucrural filI should consist of a
well graded sand and gravel material compacted to at least 98% of standard Proctor
density at near optimum moisture content. The on-site coarse gravels, excluding topsoil
and plus 6 inch size rocks, or a similar processed pit run type material are suitable as
structural fill. Some settlement of the structural filt may occur over time but should be
relatively uniform.
GROUND FLOORS
The proposed dredged backfill soils below the building will be of variable
quality and highly compressible. Settlement of slabs placed on the compressible fill
will probably be excessive. Slab-on-grade construction is not recommended unless
compacted structural fill underlies the slabs. If the backfill below the buildings consists
of the compressible silts and sands, structurally supported slabs are recommended.
SITE GRADING
If structural fill is used below the building areas for foundation and slab support,
the fill should consist of a well graded sand and gravel material compacted to at least
98% of the maximum standard Proctor density near optimum moisrure content. Prior
to fill placement, the subgrade should be carefully prepared by removing all existing
fill, vegetation and topsoil, and compacting to provide a firm base.
H-P Georecn
I
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
T
I
I
I
t
-6-
The existing fill embankments at the site have not been evaluated for stability.
The risk of slope instability appears low provided the fill depths are limited and the
embankment slopes are laid back to a stable grade. The embankment fills should be
limited to about 10 feet deep, especially along the downhill sides of the pond where the
fill daylights on natural flat terrain. The fill slopes should be no steeper than2Vz
horizontal to 1 vertical and protected against erosion by revegetation, rip-rap, or other
means. The risk of slope instability rvill be increased if seepage develops. Flatter
embankment slopes would have a lower risk of instability and slumping. New
embankment fill should be benched into the existing embankment slopes.
Stabilization of the wet silt and sand subgrade condition should be expected.
The stabilization may consist of a geo-grid and/or few feet of coarse gravel aggregate.
LIMITATIONS
This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no
warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and preliminary
recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained tiom the
exploratory borings drilled at the locations indicated on Fig. 1, the assumed type of
construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and
extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory borings.
Additional subsurface investigation in the building areas may be needed for final
design. If conditions encountered during construction appear to be different from those
described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the
recommendations maY be made.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for planning
and preliminary design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations
by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued
consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the
implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recorrmendations have
been appropriately interpreted. Significant changes from the conceprual proposed
consrruction may require additional analysis or modifications of the recommendations
I H-P GeorecH
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
T
I
t
-7-
presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of foundation bearing conditions,
pile or pier installations and testing of structural fill by a representative of the
geotechnical engineer.
Sincerely,
HEPWORTH,
fu/,04J/-
Steven L. Pawlak, P.E.
DAY/ksm/ro
cc: Sopris Engineering - Attn: Yancy Nichol
Land Design Partnership - Attn: Ron Liston
REFERENCE
Tweto, O. and Others, 1978, Geology Map of the Leadville I "X 2 o Quadrangle,
lv'ortltwesrern Coloraclo. u.s. Geological surv'ey lv{ap I-999.
H-P GEOTECH
NICAL, I}JC.
Dav id " "'*u"k:j;3*:A{t5s
Reviewed By: 2
",iii:ii,i,\io*
rl
ll
J
J
J
i
II
lI
t
I
T
I
I
T
I
I
I
SIAIE HrcHWAY
82
APPROXIMA]E SCALE
1' = 2OO'
EXISTING
RIVER POND
I
t
BORING 3 BORING 2
PROPOSED
RESIDENCES _..._
ROAR/N6 FORK RlIER
1--'-
LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGSHEPWORTH _ PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.'198 152
I
t
I
I
t
I
T
I
I
t
I
I
I
BORING 1
ELEV. = 6317'
BORINC 2
ELEV. = 6517'
BORING 3
ELEV. : 6317.5'
BORING 4
ELEV. : 6316.5'
ASUMED GROUND FLOOR LEVEL = 6519'
s/12
742
5/12
412
5/12
20/12
+4:19
-200=16
ISLAND AND 5 POND
WATER LE\€LS
= 6J14.E' OJI )
RI\ER POND WATER
LEIEL = 6312.2'
14/6,5o/4
631 0
o
o)L
I
c
.9
o
o,tr
0)
c)L
I
c
.9
o
oil
LOT 1 LOT 2
Note: Explonotion of symbols is shown on Fig. 3.
LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGSHEPWORTH PAWLAK
GfCTECHNICAL, INC.198 152
t
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
T
I
I
m
ffi
F
I
L[G.END:.
FILL: monploced embonkment moteriol consisting of intermixed topsoil' silt, .sond ond grovel with
"ou!"y zones, loose ond soft, moist to highly moist, block to occosionolly brown'
GRA\EL AND COBBLES (GM-GP); with boulders, sondy to very sondy, slightly silty', dense to very
d"n"", wet. mixed brown, rounded to subrounded river rocks'
Relotively undisturbed drive somple; 2-inch l.D. Colifornio liner somple'
Drive somple; stondord penetrotion test ( Sef ), 1 S/S-inch l.D' split spoon somple' ASTM D - 1586'
Drive somple blow count: indicotes thot 9 blows of o 14o-pound hommer folling 30 inches were
9/12 iequired to drive the Colifornio or SPT sompler 12 inches.
Free woter level in boring of time of drilling'
Procticol rig refusol. Where shown obove bottom of lo9' indicotes multiple ottempts were mode
to odvonce the boring.
NOTES:
1. Explorotory borings were drilled on Februory 25, 1998 with o 4-inch diometer continuous flight power ouger
2. Locotions of explorotory borings were meosured opproxirnotely by pocing from feotures shown
on the site Plon Provided'
3. Elevotions of explorotory borings were obtoined by interpolction between contours on the site plon
provided.
4. The explorotory boring locotions ond elevotions should be considered occurote only to the degree implied
by the method used.
5. The lines between moteriols shown on the explorotory boring logs represent the opproximote boundories
between moteriol types ond tronsitions moy be groduol'
6. Woter level reodings shown on the logs were mo.de of the time ond under the conditions indicoted'
-' N;';."; woter encountered in Boring i. Ftuciuotion in woter level moy occur with time'
7. LoborotorY Testing Results:
WC:WoterContent(%)
*4 : Percent retoined on No' 4 sieve'
-2OO = Percent possing No' 200 sieve'
LEGEND AND NOTESHEPWORTH PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.198 152
I
I,
t
T
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
T
I
t
I
HR.
vr{.
21
/rs
rmEt*E
:E
roL
E*[
L'I
-t
t
:I
(9
=@a
(L
FzulOE
UJo-
? r{R ttO
t0
20
50
40
50
o
lrJ
=F
UJ
E,
Fz.
UJc)
E,
lrJc
GT'
70
ao
g0
l10
205
DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIME]ERS
GRAVEL 60 %
LIOUID LIMIT %
SAMPLE OF: Slightly Silty Sondy Grovel
% SILT AND CLAY 8
PLASTICITY INDEX %
FROM: Boring 2 ot 9 Feet
24 HR. 7 HR
IIIE REIDINGS
GRAVEL 19 % SAND 55
LIQUID LIMIT %
SAMPLE 0F: Silty Grovelly Sond (Fill)
u.s. sTx"lDARO SERIES
ffi 2.* +.7s e'srzs
DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIME]ERS
O-EAR SqJARE EE{INCS
% SILT AND CLAY 16
PLASTICITY INDEX %
FROM: Boring 3 ot 9 Feet
t00
e0
60
70
60
50
10
JO
20
t0
o
r0
20
3o
40
50
()z6a
o
FztdoE
UJd
o
UJz.
FulG
Fz
UJOE,
UJL
30
70
a0
go
roo
GRADATION TEST RESULTSHEPWORTH PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.198 152
.otg .o.ll7 .07.r .15o 'rm 'cm l'
SAND 32
R 88'/r R. 87 W
.' t95..
r -'::i't :
-r.:-5
Xt'i-"
SCS SOIL TYPE MAPPING
SCALE 1"= 2,000'
: :Jri r)CU f!5 |
T
I SCS SOIL TYPE DESCRIPTIONS
t
113-Atencio-Azeltine compter, 3 to 6 percent
lp"r.This map unit is on alluvial fans and terraces.
fie native vegetation is mainly grasses and shrubs.
tjvation is 5.900 to 6.500 feet. The average annual
Dcipitation is 15 to 18 inches' the average annual air
Jnperature is 44 to 46 degrees F, and the average
frost-tree period is 105 to 120 days'
lfnis unit is about 60 percent Atencio sandy loam and
! percent Azeltine gravelly sandy loam.
lncluded in this unlt are small areas of soils that are
inilar to the Atencio and Azeltine soils but are finer
f'r:uied. Also included are small areas of gravel bars.
lFo'roed areas make up about 1o percent of the total
fff;:i,"ncio soil is deep and well drained. lt formed
il alluvium derived dominantly from sandstone and
shale. Typically, the surface layer is reddish gray sandy
lam about 6 inches thick. The next layer is sandy loam
]out 4 inches thick. The subsoil is about 10 inches of
sandy clay loam over about 4 inches of gravelly sandy
-am.The upper 6 inches ol the substratum is gravelly
Endy loam. The lower part to a depth of 60 inches is
?ery grauelly sand. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth
-of 20 inches and calcareous below that depth. ln some
!r.r. the sur{ace layer is gravelly or cobbly.I Permeability is moderate to a depth of 30 inches in
ihe Atencro soil and rapid below thrs depth. Available
later capacity is low. The eflective rooiing depth is 60
Ircnes or more. Runotf is slow. and the hazard of water
e:'osion is slight.
r The Azeltine soil is deep and well drained. lt formed
] alluvium derived dominantly lrom sandstone and
lnate. Typically, the surlace layer is reddish gray
4ravelly sandy loam about 9 inches thick. The upper 7
*rches of the substratum is gravelly loam. The lower
aa.t to a depth ol 60 inches is extremely gravelly sand.
The soil is calcareous throughout. ln some areas the
]rrrface layer is cobbly loam or sandy loam.
I Permeability is rapid or very rapid below a depth of
i 6 inches in the Azeltine soil. Available water capacity
!s low. The ellective rooting depth is 60 inches or more.
]unoff is slow. and the hazard ol water erosion is
sliqht.
f This unit is used mainly for irrigated hay or pasture. lt
!a,ro. is used for crops, urban development. wildlife
-habitat. or rangeland.
, ll this unit is used for hay and pasture, the main
Itlmitations are the low available water capacity and
l:mall stones. Grasses and legumes grow well il
adequale fertilizer is used. Good management helps to
!marntain
optimum vigor and quality of forage plants.
Because these soils are droughty, apptications of
irrigation water shoutd be light and frequent. lrrigation
water can be spplied by corrugation. sprinkler. and
llooding methods. lf properly managed, the unit can
produce 4 tons of irrigated grass hay per acre annually.
This unit is moderately well suited to irrigated crops.
ll furrow or corrugation irrigation systems are used, runs
should be on the contour or across the slope. ll properly
managed, the unit can produce 70 bushels of barley per
acre annually.
The potential plant community on thrs unit is rnainly
western rvheatgrass, lndian ricegrass' needleandthread,
big sagebrush. and Douglas rabbitbrush. Nevada
Utuegrlss, prairie iunegrass, and bottlebrush squirreltail
also are included. The average annual production of air'
dry vegetation is about 800 pounds per acre. Suitable
management practices include proper grazing use and
a pianned grazing system.
lf the quality of range vegetation has seriously
deteriorated, seeding is needed. The main limitations
are cobbles and stones. For successful seeding, a
seedbed should be prepared and the seed drilled.
Brush management improves deteriorated areas of
range that are producing more woody shrubs than were
present in the potential plant community.
lf this unit is used for homesite development. the
main limitation is small stones. Population growth has
resulteC in increased ccns'.ruction of homes in areas of
this unit. Topsoii can be stockpiled and used to reclaim
areas dislurbed during ccnstruction. The gravel and
cobbles in disturbed areas should be removed il the site
is landscaped, particularly in areas used tor lawns' lf
the density ot housing is moderate or high, community
sewage systems are needed to prevent the
contamination of water supplies resulting lrom seepage
lrom onsite sewage disposal systems.
This map unit G in capability subclass lVe' irrigated,
and Vle, nonirrigated. lt is in the Rolling Loam range
site.
42-Fluvaquents, 0 to 10 percent slopes. This
broadly delined unit consists of deep. somewhat poorly
drained, nearly level soils on llood plains and alluvial
valley lloors, These soils formed in alluvium.
Ftuvaquents are stratified and vary widely in texture
and in depth to sand, gravel, and cobbles' Typically' the
surface layer ranges from loamy sand to tine sandy
loam or trom sitt loam to clay loam. The underlying
layers are generally sandy loam or loam stratilied with
sand, graret, and cobbles. ln some areas gravel and
cobbles are on or near the surlace.
The water table fluctuates between depths ol 0'5loot
and 2.0 feet during spring and summer. These soils are
occasionally flooded for briel periods in late spring and
it
ATTACHMENT C
SEWER & DRAINAGE
RE:
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'il 21,1998
Lou Moore
16613 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
2 Lot Subdivision, 16613 State Highway 82, Garfield County, Colorado
SE Job No. 97006.02
Dear Mr. Moore:
This letter comprises an engineering report for the subdivision application to Garfield County. I have taken site visits to
observe site conditions and review the work performed under your 401 permit.
Introduction
The project consist initially of 5 ponds which one pond has been filed in from dredging material out of two other ponds. The
pond tf,ut has been frled in is the proposed building sites for both lots. Each lot will be accessed by a separate driveway from
the old Highway 82 which know is a frontage road. The driveways will be constructed on the existing dikes around the ponds,
which historical acted as access to the ponds.
Wastewater Treatrnent Facilitv
Attached is a report prepared by Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. to determine the percolation rate at the proposed on site
wastewater facilities. The percolation rate of l6 to 45 minutes per inch is acceptable for a conventional infrltration septic
system. An engineered on-site wastewater teatment system would be requred. The wastewater treatrnent system needs to be
designed for the appropriate setback requirements and the size of the proposed home. Because of the potential high
gro.ird*.t., and ttre leach field being placed in fill material, a sand filter of the mounded type would be the recommended
iystem. The mounded system woutJneed to be designed with a minimum of 4 feet above the groundwater elevation. The
surface of the field shouid be seeded after installation of the fields. We recommend using a native seed mix' A native seed mix
doesn,t require irrigation. Irrigation, landscaping or plastic should not be installed over the fields. Livestock should not be
confined in tne netO areas. The owner must assume the responsibiliry for the maintenance of the wastewater facility. The
system is relatively maintenance free, but the septic tanks should be pumped every two years. Water usage should be monitored
sL toilet seals, which malfunction or other excess water usage which could flood the leach field and lead to malfunction of the
wastewater treatment system must be avoided.
Site drainage
The proposed site of the homes, driveways and improvements are not within the floodplain or floodway per the FEMA
flooiptaln maps for the Roaring Fork River in this area. The primary off-site drainage basin is to the east and is drained by
Blue creek along the eastern lot line of lot I to the Roaring Fork River.
Summary
It is our opinion that an on-site wastewater treatrnent system can be designed and constructed on the two residential lots that will
meet the Garfield County and Colorado State Board of Health regulations. The post-development flow for the proposed two lot
subdivision will not impede or change the historical flows either up-stream or downstream'
Sincerely:
SOPBIS ENGINEERING, LLC.
ancYl'{ichol, P.E.
SoPRls EuGllEERlllG o llG civil consultants
HepuorthPau I ak Geotech TEL :303-945-8454 Fpr 20 98 15:59 No.005 P .02
t
I
t
t
I
Hgpwonrn-Pawuar Georrcnxtclt., Iruc'
April20, 1998
Lou Moore
166t3 Highway 82
Carbondale, Cblorado 81623
!020 Rord r$
Glrnwood Sprlngr. CO 01$1
Frr y,0 9{541!il
Phonc 97t0 91979[t
Iob No. 198 152
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
l:
Subject: *fslli?3'$:i:1%[i5 f;m"fu'dihT,X3'jglir','331i*.3
Dcar Mr. Moore:
As reoucstsd, a representarivc of Hcpworth - Pawlak Gcotechnical pcrformed
#*i*F[:t,x"*$s,it'",r*ti"Y'*mi',':',$f itri,:dffi 'dT!11"ri1"""
perc'otaiion teiting is a supplement to the prtvious study.
Six shallow backhoe pits were excavated oqApril 15,-1998 at theplanned seP.u9.
disoosal sitcs located as shown on Fig. l. The subsoils observed !P the Pcrcolauon
h;f,.; i" ttil-d6g111oittre Uacfhoe pits consisted.of silty to verysilty san! an{ gravel
;iih *bb[ nii g"ner.tii simitar 1o'thosc. found in o111 ire.vioui Borings 2 and_ 3 in this
area. The till cinsisted of both older embankment fill and more recstllly placed
iiiii,riaTii, tr,c-pir,iali"a. ftre eieqsed soils were moist to highly mois131d 1et in tlre
ffi;;-t;cnriiptilo iiti' fF pre-vioyg bgrings iDrhe area eu6orintered from 5 to l0
feet of rhe older manptiieO fill'unOerlain by n-anrral coarse gravels and rypically shallow
groundwater level.
The ocrcolarion tests wcrc pcrformed on April 16, 1998 wirh the r-csulS provided in the
;rftiliii;bie ii. ftrc periolation results were variable, ranging from abour 16 to 45
;ilffid;-tnch-. Nii; *iioiition was measured at P-2, possluly due to wet soils and/or
wster seePage into the test hole.
The subsurface orofiles and the percolation test resuls indicate that conventional
rrrfrtr*ii* CDti[ svitems app"ui fcasiblc in the uppcr. dricr frll soils with ProPg
desiqn. ttre ttispoial systeir- should be designed by a civil engineer. Site .specrtlc
JuUrEit prohle, irouudivarer level and perco'iation iesting shotrld bc obtained at the
selected locations.
If you havc any qucstions or if we can of further assistance, please contact us.
Sincerely,
HEPWORTH. PAW
cc:
NICAL, INC.
David A. Young, t.E riolor-r,^u ! =
:l';:J.-'* =4iffi$
DAYiksm rrr11i1'l11rr'
attachmeut
HPR-2@-1998 1?:13 3@3 945 8454 P.62
Sooris Eneineerine - Ann: Yancv Nichol
Laho pcsi'sn Particrship - Attn:-Ron Liston
HepuorthPaulak Geotech TEL :503-945-8454 Fpr 20 98 15:40I
T
T
I
I
T
I
T
I
I
T
I
t
I
I
T
T
I
I
N0.005
LEGENO:
o
A
EXPLORAIORY BORING FoR
PRELIMINARY S,JBSOIL SruDY
OATED MARCH Jl. 1998.
PERCOLANON IEST HOLE
FOR CURRENT SIUOY.srarE
HtcHwAy
a2
APPROXIMATE SC^LEl'= 2O0'
EXISlING
RIVER POND
I
t
BORING 5 3HPp'2 t t"BoRlNG 2
RESIDENCES
r9E 152 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.LOCAION OF PERCOLAT'ION TESI HOLES Fig. 1
HPR-2A-1998 t?|74 3A3 945 A454
LOr 2
I
i,.'., ''.,',.'.,.,,,,:i i . . .:;:hi,:\... . :.:.:.:...:.:.:'..'..::. :....'.:..'J
\
RAhPTNG FOfrT RIIEft \r
LOT 1
t
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
T
t
I
t
I
t
T
T
t
Hep.uJ0rtnHauJlak be0tecn ltL:5u5-945-8454 Flpr 20 98 15 :4U No . UU5 P . U4
JOB NO. 198 1s2
HEPWOBTH.PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE I!
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS
1ol 2
HOIE nO.}IOLE DEPTH
INCHESt
LET{GTH OF
I]TTERVAL
(Mll{,
WATER DEPTH
AT START OF
ITTTERVAT
flxcl{Est
WATEF DEPTH
AT E'IID OF
I?{TERVAL
flitcHEsr
OROP IN
WATER
TEVEL
0rct{Esl
AVERAGE
PERCOIATIOfI
RATE
(Mlf{.flr{cHr
P-1
lLot 2l
24 15
(Fctlllcdl
{Befillcdl
GY.rt(U.
20
6rt 6Y.lt
,Y,4%%
o 6'A Y.
5Y.4Vt ,1.
6%6Yt T.
6lt 4Y.l.
P-2
(Lot 2l
30 16 I I 0
6 0 o
6 6 0
6 6 o
0 6 o
6 6 o
6 0 0
P.3
lLot Zl
39 15
(Rcllllcdl
lRrflllodl
lRclilledl
6%4Y.1Yt
16
7 6Y,1k
7%6 1Y.
6 4yt 1'h
en 8ra 1
5Yt 4%1
4%3.A U.
P-4
llor 1l
36 15
lRclillcdl
I 7y,,t
36
7\l 7 ,/t
7 6',h h
E 7%,ft
7Y.6!.A
g%ev,Y.
a%o %
APR-24-1998 L?tt4 3A3 945 A454 Oq+/P.A4
I
t
I
t
I
T
I
T
I
I
I
t
T
I
T
T
I
I
I
HeprrrorthPaulak Geotech TEL :303-945-8454 Fpr 20 98 15 :41 No .005 P .05
I{EPWORTH.PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE II
PERCOTATION TEST RESULTS JOB NO. 198 152
2ol 2
NOTE: Frrcolrtion tcathg gettotmod in nomlnal 12 inch dlrmatil by 12lnch drep hrnd dug hohe ln bolrom of thallowbtclhoo gits crcavatcd end prt-rotlcd on April 15, 199t. Ptrcohtlon la3t werc conducrrd on Apdl 16, 1998 bv
Hepworth - Pcwlclr Gtotochalcrl. lnc.
,J.i,;../tf,i.
RPR-28-1998 L?IL5 3A3 945 A454 95z P.AS
r{otE No.HOIE DEPTH
{rNcHESl
TENGTH OF
INTERVAL
(MINI
WATER DEPTH
AT START OF
O{TERVAL
rtrrcHEs,
WATER DEPTH
AT EITID OF
INTEiVAL
0r{cHEst
DROP IT{
WATEB
TEVEL
0NcHEsr
AVERAGE
PEBCOTANOil
RATE
lMlN./rf,cr{r
P-6
(Lot 1l
40 15
(Rcfillodl
E 6 1
45
8%7X 1
,x GY.1
AYc 0 v,
6 67.Y.
6%6Y.ta
5%5 Y.
P.6
(Lst 1l
36 16 I 7%Vt
30
7Y.SYt %
6y,6 h
6 6Yt ,t
5rA 5 h
5 4tA Yt
4%4 iT
ATTACHMENT D
WATER
I
I
t
I
t
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
l:
t
I
!
I
I
I
I
t
t
I
I
I
I
I
T
I
I
I
I
P.O. Box 1908
1005 Cooper Ave.
Glenwood Sprlngs,
co 81602
(970) 94s-s70o
(970) 945-1253 Fax
ZarcaxgLLA AttrD Assoqafs, tf{c.
April 21, 1998
Mr. Ron Liston
Land Design PartnershiP
918 Cooper Ave.
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
RE: Englund & Moore Well Test
Dear Ron:
At your request, Zancanella and Associates, tnc. has supervised the testing of the
Englund and Moore well, located southwest of the Catherine Store at the Roaring
Fork River Bed and Breakfast, near Carbondale, Colorado (Figure 1)' The well is
located in the SE1/4of the NW1/4 of Section 32, Township 7 South, Range 87
West of the 6th P.M., approximately 1550 feet from the East section line and 1880
feet from the North section line.
Water Ouantity
We have reviewed the Samuelson Pump Company's recent pump test on the
subject well (attached). The pump test report indicates that the well has a depth
of 40 feet and is constructed with a 7-inch diameter steel well casing. The water
bearing portion of the well is in the Roaring Fork River alluvium. The static water
level in the well on April 8, 1998 was 9.10 feet below the top of the well casing.
The available drawdown in the well is approximately 30.9 feet (9.10 ft - 40 ft).
The well was tested April 8, 1998 by Samuelson Pump Company . A % horse-
power electric pump was supptied by the property owner at the site and was
installed for the test. The pump was capable of pumping at a maximum rate of
7.8 gallons per minute (gpm), therefore this rate was used for the pump test. The
well was pumped continuously for a 4+ hour period at this rate. Drawdown and
time data were collected during the test and are presented in the attached Table
1a. The drawdown data can be used to project the yield of a well and associated
aquifer. The drawdown is the distance the water level drops from the initial static
water level and can vary over time, depending on the pumping intensity.
We have plotted the pump test data in a drawdown vs. time curve for the well.
The graph is shown on the attached Figure 2. The well drawdown was
approximately 5 to 6 inches over the first few minutes of the test and remained at
nearly that same level through the end of the 4-hour test. The water level while
6rr ofl emt r{c Cof{ gltLrAtrts
I
I
I
T
I
pumping at 7.5 gpm stayed well above the pump intake level of 40 ft during the
pumping test.
Based on the available drawdown the well should be able to pump continuously in
excess of 1OO days at the test rate of 7.5 gpm. lndividual wells are proposed to
serve each of the two lots. The above well should be typical of wells constructed
in the Roaring Fork River alluvium in this area.
Because of the relatively small amount of drawdown, recovery data for the well
was collected for only a 1-minute period after pumping had stopped. The recovery
data is presented in Table 1b.
Water Ouality
Water samples of the pumping discharge were taken from the subject well. As
requested, the samptes were tested for bacteria, nitrates and nitrites. The bacteria
test was performed by the colorado Department of Public Health and Environment.
The test results showed that the sample from the well was "absent" of bacteria. A
copy of the result is attached.
Nitrate and nitrite concentrations were analyzed by Grand Junction Laboratories.
Results are attached. The results for nitrites are below the laboratory's detection
limit of 0.01 mg/l and are not a concern. The nitrate concentration, although
detectable at1.42 mg/|, is well below the maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 1O
mg/l and is within acceptable limits.
lf you have any questions please call our office at (970) 945-5700.
Very truly yours,
Zancanella & Associates, lnc.
I
t
I
t
I
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
Thomas A. Zancanella, P.E.
cc:
Attachments:Figures 1 and 2
Tables 1a and 1b
Samuetson Pump Company Well Test Report
CDPHE Water BacteriologY RePort
Grand Junction Laboratories Analytical Report
L:\98507\Well Test Ltr.wpd
I
I
I
I
I
I
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
t:
lr
lr
lr
l:
t
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 1a
Englund & Moore
Roaring River Bed & Breakfast Well
PUMPING TEST DATA
TABLE lb
Englund & Moore
Roaring River Bed & Breakfast Wel!
RECOVERY TEST DATA
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
l:
lr
DATE TtlUIE LEVEL DOWI{t Uf
0E Apr-9E
0E-Apr€E
0E Apr.gE
0E"Apr€E
0&Apr-9E
o&Apr.96
OO+pr-98
0&Apr-96
g6"1pr-9E
O&Apr-gE
0&Apr-9E
o&Apr-gE
gE Apr€8
o&AprgE
0E Apr-gE
12:31 PM
12:32 PM
12:33 PM
12i3{PM
12:35 m,l
12:36 PM
12:38 PM
12:40 PM
12i42PM
12:45 PM
01:0O PM
01:10 PM
01:20 PM
01:30 PM
02:30 PM
04:40 PM
9.54
9.60
9.52
10.0E
9.54
9.54
9.52
9.52
9.50
9.54
9.54
9.54
9.52
9.5E
9.54
9.63
0.4
0.5
0.4
1.0
0.4
0.4
0.4
o.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0,4
0.5
I
2
3
4
5
6
E
t0
12
15
30
40
50
60
120
250
DATE T]iiE LEVEL DOWN t t'UT
gE.Apr-96 O4:41 PM 9.33 o.2 251 1 251.O
pumptst.wk4
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITI
Englund & Moore, B & B Well
Drawdown vs Time
.a-,oo]F
c
=oE
=ot-o
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
0.1 10
Time t (minutes)
100 1 000
Figure 2
4-Hour Pump Test 418198
a J )a .Al.\^.
\1
v
1
J
uat L'$,r op: I
o9r
XrtZ 9'L '4 2 -rL ozt
06
09 \ob-tbi Og
os \' ',1)- rL of
0t t' 7) -rb ot
0e ''/) -,A 0f
oz UitQ S'L 0u
sr (uol 9 -rb 9l
ZL \'2-tb zt
OL \u -44 -tb 0t
I tP,t2 -tb s
9 Yr1r29'L ca) -rb I
I -lD ,r/221 ob il 2-tb I
I al -1Ol t
I ,r 2- rb c
z )4L-tb t Iu?'tb t V, -tb I
VI-,b 0 ,r?b:b nhll'tb o -:-doi:v
13A31 'Nlhl ; 31ril1 nd9 13Al'l NIFI 3tlll
ABIIAOC3U iltoonvuo
dun3 pe1
- ,,qf tT l,loo^lEro --ErJs.,,f .zrsouFsc
*"*#",,o
frt{x/-4/7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o a(yg ruod3u lsf,J,1'I3il
(
o
IJ
iJ,
9l
3
l--T_--
I
I
r
tr{
I
t
I
t
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
t
I
I
t
I
LABORATORY & RADIATION SERVICES
SIOO LOWRY BOULEVAFID
US MAIL
PO BOX 17123
DENVEFI, CO 80217
98 0 0 27 07war*R
BACTEHIOLOGY G
SAMPLE INFORMATION: ! colauuHrry NON.COMMUNIry PBIVATE
fl nourrrue E naw tr
fi sr.c,o, PURPosE E rnrsHeo
OATE TIME
BEPEAT FOR THE MONTH OF
"orrr"',
ro 4-/ 8 / 70 .3 : 35 ad,Wfu
REcErvEo / /
-8il-RESULTS: SEE REVERSE FoR EXPLANATIoN
rorAL coLrFoRM fl ,".s.",
flnr..*,
MOST PROBABLE NO,
ORDERED BY:(SAMPLE MAY NOT BE TESTEO IF ALL INFORMATION IS NOT PFOVIDED)
1770t ?4€-570a
PHONE
c;a-/es
COLIFORi,VI0OML
Z,
TEST OBOEFED p sro toct E orne
puro.,c.
FEE STAMP
|,b'il
LAB 106 (07197)
c
EW"d-
I
I
I
ll
lr
lr
lr
l:
li
t:
[flAllI
POil
JtJ[lIIIOl'l LAflOflAIOflIIS
VEHUE . FHoN e ?A2'?6lE o GRANO JUNCTIoN' colaiADo ttlot
JOHN C. T.EPHART & CO.
4/9/94
AI{ALYTICAL R.EFORT
Zancanel 1a 3* Assoc'
t'lar k HaYes (970) 94a-'a7t)t)
PO Bo:* 19OB
Glenr.rood SPringsr CO B16Ct?
Lborrt<ry No.7?to
Rccricd born:
water
Srmph.Gstorncl No. -
Drt! Rcctitrud
4/Zri/98
SampI e
Ni trate (,rtj)
Ili tr i te (N)
Nitrate/Ni tri te (N)
7?10
Roar i ng For ll E{3'B
Gar{ield Cor-rntY
1.42 ngll
(r.0(:) m9/l
1.4? ng/l
t{e} } t4/A/9A 3:35 Pl'l
NOTE: SarnPles were not tal<en bY
#or ni trr te , 4/ i7 /i8 tor ni trate '
o{ AETM Standards"'
or composi ted i n 1 a'u ' Te='red 4/ LC/9e
itre'ui-rrf,d Df,A?6 -qi)?' +f oin "Annlral E-=c!l
fli rcr* ar : E - Etlr rFr -
l'' ,ill,i il'iL ';'i; ,. ;: ' r. ': I ' ,
Iht! RsDfiid
I
I
I
T
I
I
I
I
T
I
I
I
I
I
T
T
I
T
Colorado Dcpartment of Heslth - Ddnklng Watcr Sccdon
REPORTING FORM FoR NITRATE/NITRITE ar NlTRoGElu AI{ALYSES
SAMPIIR: PLEASE FILL OUT ONE FORM - FOR EACH INDIVIoUAL SOURCE/PI-ANT or COMpOSITE SET
1O.O D3867-908
l.o D38tr7'=9UE
(mgfll
t€b MOL
0.01
0.01
o-01
NT = Not T.srcd for oonfourrJ
I r Tha rodye tr ,olrld ta th. .raoar.t.d H.nt rr watt a ln fto rarrglt
mg/t r Mligrmr p.. Utor
MCL r Mrxirrnn ContryJnrrt Lrrrd
tsb MDL = L.$or.tory lr.thdd D.t.oiirn Urdt
H a llolding?kn h-b+rncxootdd
Title
4t20t98
Date
MAIL RESULTS TO: Colorado Departmerrt ol Health, WOCO-DW-B2,
Bevised 6 /94 - J:II,VP\I-ABFORMS\NTTRATE. FRM
4300 Cirerry Creek Drive South. Denver, CO 80222-tS30
pr;nh "*rNfinacfloN$DEnNITIONS ON BACXOF p1gX1v..tt
pvrrsrD t: ' iii it cow,rx; Garfi*l/ DArE coLLECTED:
coNrAcr eeesox: 6ra4 PeeL, pHoNE: to?o | ?z.<-.c?do
sAMpLE cor r scltD g,t, .-{t-*( ft€Z rtME corLECrEo:- 3 i SS ,@
WATER TYPE: RAW r.rct!,irrd,rrG!.{ l*{ q CHLORINATED I t or OTHER TREATMENT t I
YEs ( I otxo ul(THEsE REsl,rLTs ARE To BE usED To FULFTLL srATE sAMpuNG REoutREMENTs
4t I t?t
soaRCE(S):I0CAflON(S): - A&nss SAMPTB tufit\s):
(/;oq j z
alcrorHt
DO SAMPIES ilEED TO BE COMFOSTTED BY IIBOnATORY ? yES I I ot No U4
For Laborutoty Ute Only fubw Thb Ue
LABOMTORy SAMpLE 1 72LO CLTENT NAME or tD# ?_ancane I 1a r Assoc.
TABORATORY NAME Grand Jct. Laboratories rA8 PHONE ' | 970t 242-76t8
DATE HECEIVED lN I-ABORATORy 4 t 9 t 98 DATE ANALyZED see commenrs
COMMENTS:"Annual Book TM Standa " Tested 4
for nitrite, 4/L7/98 for nitrate.
PARA,I'ETER
NITBATENITRITE+'I
NITRATE+I
NITRITE.N
lmg/il
BEST.ILT
1.42
L.42-TTO0-
lmg/ll
MCL
ro.0
EPA
hlETtiop
D3867-908
SYSTEM/ESTAEI.ISH M ENT
;-ilffiffiI
200
OTFICE Of THE STATT ENGINEER
Division of Water Resources
Depdrtment of Natural Resources
131 I Sherrnan $rtqt, Rrnm 818
Denver, Coloradrr E0203
Phone (J03) 866-3581
FAX (3Ol) 86t -1589
I
I
I
ll
lr
lr
lr
l:
l:
ll
STNIE OF COLOTUDO
[ ,'n*
Cl.r., ,.-
January 16, 1998
Mart Bean
C"fi"fO County Building and Planning
1Og 8th St Ste 303
Glenwood SPrings CO 81e0l
RE: Englund /Moore Subdivision
Sr;NtJvy.& lrzswz. Ssc. 32, T7S, R87W' 6TH PM
W. Oirition 5, W- Distict 38 ;
Dear Mr. Bean:
This retter is in response to information received on December 1g,1gg7, during a phone conversation
wi, paur Bussone, the appricanrs conzuGni la, Bussone informed us that wett permit nos' 4928&F and
4gzg1_Fwere approved'for the Engrand/Moore subdivision, which is a proposalto subdivide a parcel of
approimate ry 22.6acres into 2 roti of 11.2 and 11.4 acr€s, with One singre famiry drre[ing on each lot'
There are several existing ponds on the pr-*"r rhe applbant proposeo to.eSyide water through individual
on lot welts pursu"nito "-*ntract
with tn" a"i"rt w"tii conservancy District (the District)' A coPy of the
contrect was provioe;. S;;9; oisposatwillbe through individual septic systams'
we have confirmad that the well permits were issued by this office on December 1. 1997' pursuant to
contracts with the District. The wells "r" "*n limited to ordinary housahold P..uPo:es inskle one single family
dweling with an attached carEtaker apartrnent and the inigation of not more than 6,0OO square feet of hOme
garden and rawns. However, we have not recerveo a wert compretion Report, pump rnstallation Report or
statement of Beneficiar Use for these weils. rf these documents are not receive prior to December 1, 1998'
the wett permits will expire and be of no effect
Based on the above, it is our opinion, pursuant to Section 3G2&136(1XhXl), that the proposed water
supply wlll not."rr" maeriil injury to decreed water 1ghts, so tong as the applicant maintains valid well
permats. Due to insutfrcient infoimation we cannot comment on the pnysical adequacy of the water supply' lf
you or the applicant n",
"ny
questions conceming this matter, please contasl Craig Lis of this office for
assistance,
Roy &rma
Cowtnx
lems S. Ludrhcad
txecutir,e D[ec-lo,
Hal D.9mpmn
$rta tn8n6)r
Sincerely,
\-offi.-"etry,\
Steve Lautenschlager
Assistant State Engine€r
SPUCMUenglundl-doc
cc: Orlyn Bell, Division Engineer
Joe Bergquist, Water Commissioner, District 38
Form Nd.
GWS-2s
OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER
COLORADO DMISION OF WATER RESOURCES
816 Contennl,al Bldg., 1313 Shcrmen St, Dcnvcr, Colotrdo E@3
(303) 86e3s0l
Lot: B Btoctc Fiting: SuMlu MOOBE ENGLUNO DGMPTION
I
I aeucANr
I APPROVED WELL LOCAT1ON
GARFIELD COUNTY
SE U4
Twp 7S
NW U4 Seaion 32
MNGE 87 W 6th P.M.I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
T
I
LUTHER E MOORE
16613 HWY 82
CARBONDALE CO 81623.
(970)963-0442
DISTANCES FROM SECT1ON LINES
7320 Fl. fiom North Section Line
1680 Ft. from west seaion une
WEIL PERMT NUMBEF
Drv. s cNw. a
o49281 .F ._
MOWD 38 DES. BASIN
PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL
1)
ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT
@NDMONS OF APPROVAL
Thls well shall be used in such a way as to cause no matsrial lnlury lo exlstlng water rlghts. The issuance of the p€rmll do€s
not assure the appllcant that no injury wlll occur to another vest€d wator rlght or preclude anothsr owner of a vssted water right
lrom seeking relief ln a ctvll coult action.
The construction o, thls well shall be ln compllance with th6 Waler Well Constructlon Rul6s 2 CCR 4{12'2, unless apprwal of a
varlance has been granted by th6 state Board ol Examiners of water well construction and Pump lnstallatlon Contractors in
accordance wilh Bule 18.
Approved pursuanr to cRS 37-90-137(2) for the construction ol a w6[, appropriating ground water trlbutaty lo the Roarlng Fork
River, as an alternate point of div€rsion to th6 Basalt Conduit, on th€ condition tnat the woll shall be operated qly when the Basal
water conservancy Distril's substitute water supply plan, approved by the state Engineer, is in eflecl @ when a water allotment
contract betwe€n ths well owner and th€ Basah water Conservancy oistrict lor the rsloase of replacementwaler lrom.Ruedi
Reservoir ls in Etfect, gg under an approved ptan tor augmentation. 'gwCo contract No. 3.3-5.297 (2 d 2 wdE @\'or€d by lhb
qrlracl).
The use of ground walsr trom this we1 is 1mired to o(dinary lrousehokl purycss ilsicte one. (1) sirElo family ctwelling !4h 8'l
dtach€d caretakor apartmont and th€ inigation of nct more lhan 6,(XX) square f€€t (0.14 rcre] d trorne garctens arld lswns All
use of this well will be curlailed unless th6 wat€r allotmenl contract or a Plan for augmentation is ln eflecl. This well ls to b€
located on two of two 11 acre residential tracts, being Traa B, of the (pending) Moore-Englund subdivision, Garlield county'
The maximum pumping rat€ shall not exceed 15 GPM' 1
The annual amount ot ground wder to be approprlated from thls well tn comtination with th€ well seNing Tracl A, of Moore'
Englund, Garfield County subdivision, shall not exceed two (2) acrs'fe€t (651,Em gdbns).
A toulizing tlow meter must bo lrstalled on this well and maintained in good working order, Permanent records of all cliversions
must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submined lo the Division Engineer uPon rsquest'
The woll must be constructed not more than 2OO fset from the location specilied on lhis permil.
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
n
8)
s)The owner shall mark fie well ln a conspicuous place with well permit number(s), name of the aquiter, and court case number(s)
as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to pres€rve these malk''^n/",,.r/rt7
Ou/NER'S COPY
DArE rssuED BEC 0 1 1997
Dlv. 5 cNw. t3 wo 38 DES' BASIN
E__
MD
-'i7
32
6th P.M.
Une
Une
\ --.:-r\- g' '- oFFrcE oF fiE srArE ENGINEER BpCEIVED\ U .?orm No.f :il;; colonapo DrvtstoN oF wArER REsouRcEs
I Y'!Y -'
?llffS:t$?
Brds..l3ro shorman sr, Dorucr, coro.do 6@03 ',Yi"
llr / L'!''
I l u{Errr 'E-
I AppLlcANr | ,,u. s cNw. t3 wo 38 DEs' BASIN MD
I
r APPRovEo wELLlgcATloN
I eenrte..o couNw
I - sw 114 Nw 1/4 sectiqt
I f i#fn':Jt?"-= rwP 7 s MNGE 87 w :
I t iacaorlonLE co 81623' prsrANcEs FR.M sEcrtoN LINEq
I I (e7o)e63'0442 egso rt' ltorn North seabn
I pEHMrro coNsrRucrAwEtr
1315 Ft' from west seajpn
lr
, m ;;,,rffi H x,TtllBTi;J:: s"'ffi'."Js:i
I r I tto, seeklng rellel ln a civll court actlon'tllr la ]h.^::.x:l|TrJ[ffi,f"ixL'3,L'3HffuH;i]:,xfi,i#:",,ff8::1'ilH',:f.?:1ffi;lillll3i',1i
ll l'mi'm*m
I I I ., ffi';, ground war* rr^ojn.rhis wer is rimit€d ro orctinary rro.senok p,.pG€s lrEide one (1) sngle fiamiv drel
lrl'iffifrffi,'ffitHtrH',*#y*,lrmff *=n**;{,":ift1"1'ffi,1T#rrtr
I I | ; U*ffi;ffi:T"*t.',**-H*:i,i*'.x** istffi'fi#,'ihe
we seNne rrac'i B
lr l, i::ll:xm,ffiif,ffiff;Y#,:l:}:J"Ii:$:#:xlii[3$#"-l:5'."1ffffi:r'trffi[:::'j;1i
I I I " The welt must be constructed not more rhan 2oo leet from th€ locailon sP€cilied on this permit'
II |; *:rm:jt:'ffri}"";,"l;:,i;i:"li::::il'fi"'#:H"J::lx'ulrfll^I"'il'l';1'-H#7m
lr I ouururn's coPYlIl lnppnovEo #il a. @ ==^^. ^*@It l*]]],r,*" *,,.,,P oo'='"*offittn'ffi'oE'
lrI
APPROVEO WELL LOCATIO
ffi-rteuo couNw
PEHMT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL
8)
e)
Thls well shall be usect ln such a way as to cause no material lnlury to exisling water rlghts.-^The issuanc€ of the p€rmit doos
not assure ths apprcad that no rnjury wi* occur to another vesred *r", ffi'oi pr*rrJ6 another owner or I vesitsd water right
lrom Seeklng r8llel ln a civll court acllon'
The constructlon of thls well shall be ln comptiance wlth the water well consrruclion Rules 2 C-CR 4@'2' unleSS approval ol a
varrance has been granred by rhe srare eoaro oiE irin.r, or warer ri.ri;;;rdion and PumP lnstallatlon contractors ln
accordance with Rule 18.
Approved pursuant ro c.s 37-90-137(2) ror rhe constructron of a wer, approprratlng gro-und water trrbuiary to the Roarlng Fork
River, as an arrernare pini oioiu.,.ionto rne a.".rr c"norit, on rne
"ono[6n
in.t tni ietr shall be operated su when tho Basalt
waer conseryancy Dtstrict,s substilure warer su;;i;ril;prroved by ,nl si"i.trgineer, is in eflecl 4glwhen a wator allotmont
conrract b€tw.en the we, owner and the Basa-n-*i", bon"rr""w oiLlJ'r- tri" rereas-e-oJ-reptliement water from Ru€di
Reservoir is in ofrecr, g under an approved pr.n roi.rg*niiiion. 'awdii-oonr,"a-xo. 3.g.5.292 (l G' 2 wdts co\'€r€d by ,.is
codracl).
Tho us€ of ground warer rrom rhis we1 is rimited to ordinary tro.senok purpTt |ISP T. (1) snsle fiamiv drell'm !4E an
drach€d caretak€r aparrmenr and rhe inigari<rn d nd rnoro'rhan t,* d"J" t*, to tt ^g^:) jJ hotn" gar&ns and hrns All
use of lhis we* wi* be curtaired unress the water arotment contracl or r prun pl auomlnralio-n rs in ettea' ms well ls to b€
rocated on one or two 11 acre residentiar tractsl'olin'j i..l-i ;i ,n" d"loingi uooie-Engtund subdivision' Garlield county'
The maximum PUmPing rate shall not €xceed 15 GPM' :
The annuar amount of ground warsr to be approprrated trom this we, rn combination wirh the well seruing Tract B' ol Moore'
Engtund, Garfteld Coun"t, su'oarr[ion, .rt"l i',ir g[o(l;two (Z) acre-leet (651'm galorls)'
Atdarizing,ow m€iler must bs ir*ilailoct on this we[ and maiilained in good working order' Perman€nt ]ecords of all cllverslons
musr be mainrained Dy rhe we, owner (recoro.o "tl"*i irnuatty) and-sGmineo io the Division Engineer upon requesl'
The well must be construcled not more rhan 2OO leet from th€ locailon sP€cilied on this permit'
The owner sha, mark the we, in a conspicuous prace wiih we, permil number(s), name or the aquiler, and courl case number(s)
as appropriate. The own€r shatltake necsssatl rt-" ""0
jrecautions to Pressrve lh6se markingfutt,g.'f7
OucNI[I'S COPY
ISSUANCE OF THIS PEBMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT
@NDMONS OF APPBOVAL
s)
6)
n
4)
3)
2)
1)
APPR.,ED
-lrl A 4'ry -{? = ','rLc gg7
Receipt No. M21a2fi OA
-
I
t
I
I
I
BASALT WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT
WATER ALLOTMENT CONTRACT NO. 297
hrrsuant to C.R.S. L973,5745-l3l
Luther E. Moore, Diana G. Moore and Charles E. Englund (hereinafter collectively referred
to as "Applicant") have applied to the Basalt Water Conservancy District (hereinafter the "District"),
a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, organized pursuant to and existing by virtue of
Colorado Revised Stautes, 1973,3745-101, gt seq., for an alloment Contract for beneficial use of
warcr rights owned, leased, or hereafter acquired by the District. By execution of this Contract,
Applicant agrees to the following tenns and conditions:
1. OUANTITY: In consideration of the covenants and conditions herein contained,
Applicant shail be entitled to receive and apply to beneficial use 0.067 cubic feet of water per second
from the District's direct flow rights and 2.0 acre feet per year of storage water owned or conrrolled
by the Districr.
2. SOURCE OF ALLOTTED WATER: Water rights allotted pursuant to this Contract
shall be from the District's water rights decreed to the Basalt Conduit, Landis Canal, Stockman's Ditch
Extension, or other decrees or water righB hereafter acquired by the District, including the District's
contractual right to receive storage water from Ruedi Reservoir. The District shall have the right to
designate the water right or Decree of the District from which the Applicant's alloned rights shall be
obtained. The Applicant's use of any of the District's warer rights shall be subject to any and all tenns
and conditions imposed by the Water Court on the use of ttre District's said rights. Exchange releases
made from the District's storage rights in Ruedi Reservoir or other works and facilities of the District
shall be delivered to the Applicant at the outlet works of said storage faciliry and release of warer at
such outlet works shall constirute full performance of the District's delivery obligadon. Delivery of
water from the District's storage rights in Ruedi Reservoir shall be subject to ttre Disrrict's lease
Contract with the United States Bureau of Reclamation and any rules and regulations promulgated
pursuant thereto.
3. PURPOSE AND LOCATION OF USE: Applicant will use the warers herein granted
for beneficial purposes limited to the augmentation of existing and future wells and orher warer sources,
within or through facilities or upon lands owned, operated, or served by Applicant, which lands are
described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto; provided that the location and purpose of Applicant's use
of said water shall be legally recognized and permined by the applicable govemmenul aurhoriry havingjurisdiction over the property served. Applicant's contemplated usage for the water alloned hereunder
is for the following use or uses:
Domestic/Municipal
-
Industriai/commercial _ Agricultural
Applicant acknowledges *tat usage of the District's water righrs as herein contemplated shall
be in lieu of or supplemental to Applicant obtaining or adjudicating, on irs own, the right to use certain
waters. It is acknowledged that certain locations within the District may not be susceptible to service
x
Other
I
t
I
I
t
t
I
I
I
I
I
T
I
I
I
I
t
I
t
I
t
I
t
I
T
I
t
I
I
t
I
t
I
solely by the District's water righs allonedhereunder or the Disuict's said water rights may not satisfy
Applicant's needs and purposes. To the extent that service cannot be achieved by use of the District,s
allotted water rights, or in the event said service is inadequate, Applicant rpay, utilize zuch other water
rights, by way of zupplementing the District's water rights, or otherwise, as is necessary to assure
water service zufficienfly reliable for Applicant's intended purpose or purposes. All lands, facilities
and areas served by water rights allotted hereunder shall be situated within the bouudaries of the
District. The District reseryes the exclusive right to review and approve any conditions which may
be anached to judicial approval of Applicant's use of the District's water righs allotted hereunder.
Applicant agrees to defray any out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the District in connection with the
alloment of water rights hereunder, including, but not limited to, reimbursement of legal and
engineering costs incurred in connection with any water rights adjudication necessary to allow
Applicant's use of such alloned water rights; provided, however, in ttre event any zuch adjudication
involves more of the District's water righs than are alloned pursuant to rhis Conrract, Applicantshall
bear only a pro-rata portion of such expenses. Applicant shall be solely responsible for provirling
works and facilities, if any, necessary to utilize the District's water rights alloned hereunder for
Applicant's beneficial use.
Water service provided by the District shall be limited to the amounr of water available in
prioriry at the original point of diversion of the District's applicable warer right and neither the District,
nor those entitled to utilize the District's decrees, may call on any greater amount at new or alternate
points of diversion. The District shall request the Colorado State Engineer to estimare any conveyance
losses benveen the original point and any alternate point and such estimate shall be deducted from this
amount in each case. The District, or anyone using ttre District's decrees, may call on any additional
sources of supply that may be available at an alternate point of diversion, bur nor at the original point
of diversion, only as against water rights which are junior ro the date of application for the alternate
point of diversion.
In the event the Applicant intends to develop an augmentation plan and instirute legal
proceedings for the approval of such augmentation plan to allow the Applicant to utilize the water
alloned to Applicant hereunder, the Applicanr shall give the Disrrict wrinen notice of such intent. In
the event the Applicant develops and adjudicates an augmentation plan to utilize the water allotted
hereunder, Applicant shall not be obligated to bear or defray any legal or engineering expense of the
District incurred by the District for the purpose of developing and adjudicating a plan of augmentation
for the District. In any event, the District shall have the right to approve the Applicanr's augmentation
plan and the Applicant shall provide the District copies of such plan and of all pleadings and other
papers filed wittr the Water Court in the adjudication thereof.
4. PAYMENT: Applicant shall pay annually for the water service described herein at a
price to be fixed annually by the Board of Directors of the District for such service. Payment of the
annual fee shall be made, in full, within fifteen (15) days after the date of a notice from the District ttrat
the payment is due. Said notice will advise the Applicant, among other things, of the warcr delivery
year to which the payment shall apply and the price which is applicable to that year. If a paymenr is
not made by the due date, written notice thereof will be sent by the Disnict to rhe Applicant at
Applicant's address set forth below. If payment is not made within thgry (30) days after said wrinen
notice, ttre District may, at its option, elect to terminate all of the Applicant's right, title, or interest
I
I
t
I
I
t
t
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
T
T
t
under this Contract, in which event the water right alloaed hereunder may be transferred, leased or
otherwise disposed of by the District at the discretion of its Board of Dfuectors.
In the event water deliveries hereunder are made by or purzuant to agreement with some other
person' corporation, quasi-municipal entity, or govenrmental entity, and in the event the Applicant fails
to make payments as required hereunder, the District may, at its sole option and request, authorize said
person or entity to curtail the Applicant's water service pursuail to this Contract, and in such event
neither the Distict nor zuch persons or entity shall be liable for such curtailment.
5. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS: The Applicant agrees that so long as this Contract
is valid and in force, Applicant will budget and appropriate from such sources of revenues as may be
legally available to the Applicant the funds necessary to rnake the annual payments in advance of water
delivery pursuant to this Contract. The Applicant will hold harrrless the District and any person or
entity involved in the delivery of water pursuant to this Contract, for discontinuance in service due to
the failure of Applicant to maintain the paymens herein required on a current basis.
6. BENEFIT OF CONTRACT: The water right allotted hereunder shall be beneficially
used for the purposes and in the manner specified herein and this Conrract is for the exclusive benefit
of the Applicant and shall not inure to the benefit of any successor, assign, or lessee of said Applicant
without the prior wrinen approval of the Board of Directors of the District.
In the event the water right alloned hereunder is to be used for the benefit of land which is now
or will hereafter be subdivided or otherwise held or owned in separate ownership interest by nvo (2)
or more uses of the water right alloned hereunder, the Applicant may assign the Applicanr's rights
hereunder oniy to a homeowners association, water district, water and sanitation disrrict or other
special district properly organized and existing under and by virnre of the laws of the State of Colorado
and then only if such association or special district establishes to the satisfaction of the Basalt Water
Conservancy District that it has the abiliry and authority to assure its performance of the Applicant's
obligations under this Contract. In no event shall the owner of a portion, but less than all, of the
Applicant's Property to be served under this Contract, have any righs hereunder, except as such rights
may exist through a homeowners association or special district as above provided. Any assignmentof the Applicant's rights under this Contract shall be subject to and must comply with such
requirements as the District may hereafter adopt regarding assignment of Contract rights and the
assumption of Contract obligations by assignees and successors, provided that such requirements shall
uniformly apply to all allottees receiving District service. The resnictions on assignment as herein
contained shall not preclude the District from holding the Applicant, or any successor to the Applicant,
responsible for the performance of ail or any part of the Applicant's covenants and agreements herein
contained.
7. OTHER RULES: Applicant's rights under this Contract shall be subject to the Water
Service Plan as adopted by the District and amended from time to time; provided that such Water
Service Plan shall apply uniformly throughout the District among water users receiving the same
service from the District. Applicant shall also be bound by the provisions of the Water Conservancy
Act of the State of Colorado, the Rules and Regulations of the Board of Directors of the Disrrict, the
plumbing advisory, water conservation, and staged curtailment regulations, if any, applicable within
T
I
t
I
t
I
T
I
I
I
T
I
t
I
T
I
I
I
I
the County in which the water alloned hereuuder is to be used, together with all amendments of and
zupplemerus ro auy of the foregoing.
8' CURTAILMENT OF USE: The water service provided hereunder is expressly zubject
to the provisions of that cenain Stipulation in Case No. 80 CW 253 on file in the District Coun in
Water Division 5 of the State of Colorado, which Stipulation provides, in part, for the possible
curtailment of out-of-house municipal and domesdc water demands upou the occrurence of certain
even6 and upon the District giving notice of zuch curtailment, all as more fully set forth in said Stipu-
lation.
9.: Applicant shall euter into an
'Operation and MainteluDce Agreement" with the District if and when the Board of Directors finds
and determines that such an agreement is required by reason of additional or special services requisted
by the Applicant and provided by the District or by reason of the delivery or use of water by the
Applicant for more than one of the classes of service which are defined in the Rules and Regulations
of the Board of Directors of said District. Said agreement may contain, but not be limited to, provision
for water delivery at times or by means not provided within the terms of standard allotment contracts
of the District and additional annual monetary consideration for extension of District services and for
additional administration, operation and maintenance costs, or for other costs to the District which may
arise through services made available to the Applicant.
10. CHANGE OF USE: The District reserves the exclusive right to review and approve
or disapprove any proposed change in use of the water right alloned hereunder. Any use other than
that set forth herein or any lease or sale of the water or water rights alloned hereunder without the prior
wrifien approval of the District shall be deemed to be a material breach of this Contract.
11. PRIOR RESOLUTION: The water service provided hereunder is expressly subject to
that certain Resolution passed by the Board of Directors of the Disrict on Septemb er 25, 1979, and
all amendments thereto, as the same exists upon the date of this application and allotment Contract.
12. NO FEE TITLE: It is understood and agreed that nothing herein shall give the
Applicant any equitable or legal fee title interest or ownership in or to any of the warer or water rights
of the District, but that Applicant is entitled to the right to use the warer right alloned hereunder,
subject to the limitations, obligations and conditions of this contract.
13. CONSERVATION PRACTICES: Applicant shall implement and use commonly
accepted conservation practices with respect to the water and water righs alloned hereunder and shall
be bound by any conservation plan hereafter adopted by the District, as the same may be amended from
time to time.
14. WELL SPACING REOLTIREMENTS: Applicant must comply with the wetl-spacing
requirements set forth in C.R.S. $37-90-137, as amended, if applicable. Compliance with said
stamtory well-spacing criteria shall be an express condition of the extension of service hereunder, and
the District shall in no way be liable for an Applicant's failure to comply.
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
T
I
t
T
I
15. RECORDING OF MEMORANDUM: In lieu of recording this Water Allotment
Contacr, a Memorandum of Water Allotment Contract will be recorded with the Garfield County
Clerk and Recorder's Office. The costs of recording the Memorandum shall be paid by Applicant.
Charles E.
Applicant's Address:
16613 Highway 82
Carbondale, CO 81623
srATE OF COLORADO )
GctYfuu. ) ss'
couNTY gp4sf,(tli- - )
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
Luther E. Moore and Diana G. Moore.
day of tr-.e Ycr*+r-b , 1999t bY
I
I
T
I
I
I
I
#'.t#<I lrivoA..;. GABOSSI
MTNESS mY hand and official seal.
My commission exPires:
STATE OF COLORADO )
) ss.
COUNTY OF EL PASO )
Subscribed and sworn to before me this Eday of f-. l-,. . ,, , 199!,by
Charles E. Englund. ' /
.
'\'.''c't' '., .- WITNESS my hand and official seal.
My commission exPires:
... 'i
,- a -t",
.l
t-
(
Diana G.
rTih-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
T
T
I
I
I
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ALLOTMENT CONTRACT
LUTIIER E. MOORE AIYD CEARLES E. ENGLI.IND
CONTRACT NO. 297
Application having been made by or on behalf of Luther E. Moore, Diana G. Moore and
Charles E. Englund ('Applicant') and hearing on said Application having been duly held, it is
hereby ordered that said Application be granted and that the attached Water Allotment Contract
for .067 cubic feet of water per second from the District's direct flow rights and 2.0 acre feet per
year of storage water owned or controlled by the District is hereby approved and executed by and
on behalf of the Basalt Water Conservancy Disrict, for the beneficial use of the water dlored in
the auached Contract, upon the terms, conditious and manner of payment as therein specified and
zubject to the following specific conditions:
1. The Applicant hes acknowledged that the land to be benefitted by the Contract is
described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
2. The Applicant shall provide the District proof that the proposed land use of the land
to be benefitted by the water allotted hereuuder has been approved by the applicable governmental
authorities having jurisdiction over such land use, including evidence satisfactory to the District
that each lot or parcel to be benefitted hereunder is legally subdivided.
3. The Applicants, and each of them, acknowledge for themselves and for their
successors in interest that the alloturent of water under this Contract is expressly conditioned upon
the full and timely performance of all obligations of this Contract.
4. By acceptance of this Contract, Applicant acknowledges that within rwo years of
the date hereof or such later date as the Disuict may approve, the Applicant shall file with the
Water Court of Water Division No. 5 a water rights plan of augmentation for utilization of water
allotted hereunder at the location and for the purposes hereinabove set forth or the Applicant's
water alloment as provided in this Contract shall be included in a water rights plan of
augmentation to be filed by the District with the expenses thereof to be shared prorata by the
Contract holders included in such plan; provided that inclusion of the Applicant's water allotment
in the District's plan of augmentation shall be at the District's sole discretion. The District may
establish an augmentation plan fee to be paid by the holder of any Contract to be included within
a plan of augmentation to be filed by the District, which fee shall be payable in advance of the
inclusion of such Contract in a Disrict plan of augmentation and may be based on the District's
good faith estimate of the anticipated expense of such plan of augmentation. If such augmentation
plan fee paid by a Contract holder exceeds the Contract holder's prorata poftion of the acual
expenses incurred by the District in completing said plan of augmentation, &e District shall refund
such excess to the Contract holder.
5. Any and all conditioru imposed upon the release and diversion of water allotted
hereunder in any water rights plan of augmeDtation or other water rights decree of the Water Court
for Water Division No. 5 shall be incorporated herein as a condition of approval of this contract.
Granting of this allotment contract does not constiftte the District's representation that the
Applicant will receive a well permit or water rights decree for the land to be benefitted hereby.
-1-
,r,O,fi 4 ,
-)_
I
t
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
T
I
t
t
I
I
I
6' If Applicanr rntends to divert water tbrough a well or wells, Applicaut shallprovide the District a copy of Applicanfs valid well permit for each such well before the Districtis obligated to deliver warcr for the benefit of Applicant hereund.r. eppri.anr must comply withthe well-spacing requirements set forth in c.it.s. $37-90-137, as lmended, if apitilaute.compliance with serd statutory well-spacing criteria shall be an express conditiou of theextension of service hereunder, and the Distiict shall in no way be liable for an Applicant;sfailure to comply.
7 ' In the event of the division of the properry served by this Contract into nro (2)or more parcels owned by different persons, ,n hppricant shail establish a HomeownersAssociation or other lutity acceptable to the District for the ongoing paymenr of charges due
9nde1 the approved contract, or Appliciut shalt appiy for selarale'Cbmracts to serve theindividual parcels' The Applictot thrli give notice a'*.h^ers of all or any parr of the zubjectproperty of the obligations of this Contract, and shall record such notice in the records of theclerk aud Recorder of Garfield county, colorado. Applicant and his successors and assigrsshall comply with all.rules and regulatior,r oo* existinf
-or
hereafter adopted by the District toenforce paymeil of charges due under the approved clntract by present and funrre owners ofall or any pan of the real property served unOe, this Contract.
Approved ,Li, tt day of
Attest:
-)
By, 1=')ia', u /.,+ ,,, ,h/) , .'/
Barbara Mick - Secretary-
BASALT WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT
llqrru&pW_ru
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
t
I
t
I
I
T
I
I
I
EXHTBIT A
PARCEL A
TIIE EASTERLY 305.5 FEET OF LOT 13 A}ID THAT PART OF LOTS 6, 11A}ID L2, LYING SOTJ:TH OF TIIE SOIITII BOUNDARY LINE OF STATE
HTGIIWAy No. 82, rN sEcrroN 32, To[.iNsHrp 7 soul[H, RANGE 87WEST OF TT{E STXIII PRTNCTPAI MERIDT.A.}I
EXCEPTING TTIEREFROM A PARCEL OF LA,IID DESCRTBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNTNG AT A POI}E ON THE SOU:THERtY LINE OF STATE HTGIIWAYNO. 82 WHENCE TI{E NOR$IWEST CORNER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 7soulTr, RANGE 87 wEsr oF THE srxrll PRrNcrpAt I,lERrDrAIv, BEARS
NORTI{ 75 DEGREES 57' WEST, 5352 .8 FEET;
THENCE SOUIIT 80 WEST 14' EAST 399.33 FEET AIONG T:{E SOIITHER].YLINE OF STATE HTGHWAY NO. 82;
THENCE SOUIII O DEGREES :.4' EAST 321.3
TI{ENCE SOUTII ].2 DEGREES 09' EAST 679.0
TIIE ROARING FORK RI\ER;
T!IEr{CE SOUU{ 59 DEGREES 51' WEST, 509.8 FEET
OF THE ROARTNG FORK RTVER;
TTTENCE NORTI{ 1 DEGREES OO' WEST 804 . 05 FEET;
THENCS NORTII 4 DEGREES 55' EAST 46L.9 FEET TO TITE SOUIIIERLYLINE OF STATE HIGTTWAY NO. 82, T:IE POIIST OF BEGINNING.
AIso EXCEPTING TIIEREFROM A PARCEL oF I"AI{D DESCRTBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POI}IT ON TIIE SOTM{ERI,Y RIGITT OF WAY LTNE OFSAiD IiIGI{WAY T{HENCE TIiE WITNESS POINIT TO TIIE NORTHWEST CORNER
OF SAID SECTION 3i BEARS: NORTTI 79 DEGREES 57' O2'' WES?284.84 FEET A}ID NORTLT 47 DEGREES 04'!4'' WEST 2539.55 FEET;
T:TENCE SOT'TH 79 DEGREES 57'O2I' f,!1,l$f 5OO. OO FEET AIONG THE
SOUTIIERIY RIGI{T OF WAY LINE OF SAID HTGIII{AY;
TT{ENCs SOtJItrI 05 DEGREES
TTIENCE NORTI{ 79 DEGREES
T:{ENCE NORfi{ 10 DEGREES
ON TTIE SOUTHERLY RIGIflT
OF BEGINNING.
TO THE CENTER OF
AIONG THE CENTER
i 05 / 50 " 9rEsT 150 .55 FEET;57'02|l WEST 6L2.gg FEET;
02'53 N EAST 15O. OO FEET, TO A POINT
OF WAY LINE OF SAID HTGHI{AY, TEIE POI}TT
AISO EXCEPTING TIIEREFROM A PARCEL OF I.A}TD DESCR.IBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POTMT ON THE SOUTHERIY RIGIflT OF WAY FENCE OFSAID HIGII!{AY WHENCE TIIE WTTNESS CORNERS OF SECTION 29, 30,31, AbID 32 rN sArD TosEIsHrP AIID RANGE BEARS: NoRTTI 48
DEGREES 03'54'' WEST 2620.84 FEET;
TIIENCE SOU:EI 79 DEGREES 57'O2't EASTRTGIII OF WAY FENCE,.
154 .35
156.07
FEET AIONG SAID
FEET;
o=-i b=!!A-!-
-rl- --5s-
Y-N\_FNI- (.l-(9 \:O r.I(o-
c, (o_
d-Po-$|-
-ITD-E-o:
S=r---- ilr
D --a
U.E-'ll O-H':mo-l-
-
tr, t llr
b-
o(c-
a-,rt I-^
-I
-
1,,
I EXHIBIT A
TITENCENORTTITgDEGREESST'02''WEST154'35 FEET;
FEET, TO A POINT
^ALSO EXCEPTING TIEREFROM:I iT;.iil-oi-r.o* srruArg rN Lor 6 rN sEcrroN 32' rowNSHrP 7
I SOT]TI{, RANGE 87 WEST OF TTIE SIXTT{ PRINCTPAI MERIDIA}I'
GARFTELD coulmY, colonaool-lirlrc sotmrgRtY oF THE sourHERLY
I }trH#ilti*u:i'iter;y'm:r'E IITGIIT{AY No 82' M.RE
r BEGTNNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUITHERtY RIGIff:9IIY FENCE OF
t !ff;-iiiAiryov ,oHENcE ,'rn winvsss comren ro sEcrroNs 2e ' 30' 31
A}ID 32 IN SAID To9,INSHIP A}ro nA}rcg gEARs N. 48 DEGREES 03,54||
I mEi':l-;i'li:ffi8:',1',z3ll I: 1!:,i3 iEEIi
TI{E]qCE S. 01 DEGREES gZ'i8'' W. 77 '37 FEET TO A POINT ON A
I fffii;"m,,:*1,"&,iY$"LH',!XgEti"+* FerroriyG couRsES ;
s. 83 DEGREES 35'O7n W. 11-.it FEET TO AN AI{GLE POrMr rN sArD
I lHfiEi -. 74 DEGREE' 03,4s" w. L0.72 FEE' ro Ar{ A.{GLE por}rr
- iil"iti'r1"ilit;TcREEs zz,sL,, lo. 31.14 FEET ro Ar{ Ar{cLE PorNr
I iN SAID FENCE;r TTTENCE N. G7 DEGREES 3l'57rr W. 3.13 FEET TO AII AI{GLE POIMr IN
r Hi"E'Iit;8 DEGREE' 4e, 48,' !{. 7s .oo FEE' ro ArI ANGLE Por}rr
r IN SAID FENCE;
TgENcE N. ia ogcREgs 11'16" w' 50'78 FEET;
I ffii,iryitdT:;ffim*tff:E,:i i?i:":*ffiiln.
I ilf"ti,r_:sx:il8:i:,#;ru t;"*:1F ;t+',xfiE;=.3'3;i3
FEE'
fl{E}IcES.?9DEGREES57'o2l'E.87.36FEETAloNGSAID
I i-.ffi;-iv nieit-or-wAY rsNca ro rHE PorNr oF BEGTNNTNG '
CCUNTY OF GARFIETD
I srArE oF coLoRADo
PARCEL B
=:--r
{r
6I
NI(.II
FI(oI
{:
s-5-e-$-
t-I
Nr-I
!-
Iolr
iaf--:
II
(,
o
5v
Nts
6to
E'
Poo
-
Poo
GlDv1ltsnlFC'
c,l.tllux
I
I
I
I
ATRACToFI.A}IDSITI]ATEDINLoTSIoA}IDIgoFSECTIoN32,
TowNsHIPlSotm{,RANGEazwgstoFTIIESIXTHPRINCIPAI
MERTDIAII oasCiiED AS roi,LOwS , ALL TIIAT PORTION OF ABO\E
LOTS 10 AI.ID rg-iviNe wEsT Oi-ffis FOLLowING DEsCS'IBED LINE:
BEcrNNrNc Ar A porMr ou rrd- uoiil_ LrNE-.OF ABO1E LOT 19 wHElIcE
THE SOUTnEAST COnNeR OF SAETiOU- jg, TOwNSIIIP 7 SOIXTE' RANGE
l,
I E}CIIBIT A
r s-*nrTtiilin; MERTDTAII BEAR' s' 68 DEGREES
I H$:; :: .i'BhiSir'l5T'*. 1336.8 FEE, ro rrrE sour* LrNE oF
THE ABO\'1E I"OT 10.
I *::ll-*n'ffi.i",8l^ffi BH'il!+Ertly'olliE'o, sArD HrcHr{Ay .
i *#tr-e;w*,iilFi? ffi#=iry;!i-:rffi.::x
3t'?"'
TEENCE souffi 7e DEGREES _;;, oi;-eAsT _e
60. oo FEET AIoNG $IE
I ffiii#'H Bx"r*;'isrll itii iliTi==::;
Tr{ENcE uonc ig oecness lt'oz" wESr 6'.2 '99 FEET;
I ffix=:E Istffi,il";liE#,g;;;,1' "ffs;"i;!;rg #8tu"I: +"E"IIT*
OF BEGINNING.
I s?ffi.g'"Bffixi3y ===
5
oi
5
v
NF
oo
E'
Po(9
o
GI
C9
6'Dv'll)am?
E,
orttl,-
T
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
u-
==5r-o:{L
QE:
N-,(t-\:-F3(o-_(o_{:
eEi=
!{-frr.:
tsEo:N]{=
arL
.5:
EUlf^F:
-.I.
=3
=
ATTACHMENT E
404 PERMIT
I
I
I
I
I
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
t:
l:
t:
l:
I
I
I
I
DEPART',IENT OF THE ARI,IY PERI,IIT
Penni ttee:
Permit Nnrber: 199Tn319
Issuing Office: U.S. Arflry Engineer District, Sacramento
Corps of Engineers
1325 'lJn Street
sacrarnento, Catifornia 95814'2922
NOTE: The term ryourt €rrd its derivatives, as used in this permit, rneans the permittee or any future
transferee. The term 'rthis officel refers to the appropriate district or division office of the Corps of
Engineers havinE jurisdiction over the permitted activity or the apProPriate official' of that office acting
under the authority of the cmrnanding officer.
you are authorized to perform work in accordance Hith the terms and conditions specified betow.
project Descriptior: To dredEe 2O,OOO cubic yards of sedinrent from ponds and fit[ another pond for the dual
purposes of inproving fish habitat and providing an area suitabte for the construction of txo personal
singte-fami ty homes.
A1, rork is to be colrpteted in accordance rith the attached ptans: Section 401 tJater Quality Certification
(rith conditions); Septerber 16, 199? Pubtic Notice; Drarings A-8 and A'9; Appendix B trettand lt'litigation
Ptan; and a Certification of Cotptetion.
project LoGatiqr: A 22.6-acre tract of Land tocated approximatety four mites east of the Toun of Carbondale
betneen the Roaring Fork River ard Highuay 82. The Roaring Fork Bed & Breakfast is at the north erd of the
property rhich is located xithin the NY 1/4 of Section 32, Tornship 7 South, Range 87 tJest, Garfietd County,
Co I orado.
Peruit Cqditiqts:
cenerel_leodi$losi
... The time timit for conpteting the Hork authorized ends on Febnrary 1, 2001. If you find that you need
more tinre to coNrptete the authorized activity, suhnit your request for a time extension to this office for
consideration at teast one npnth before the above date is reached.
2. you rrust maintain the activity authorized by this permit in good condition and in conformance rith the
terms and conditions of this permit. You are not retieved of this requirernent if you abandon the permitted
activity, atthough you npy make a good faith transfer to a third Party in corptiance rith General Condition
4 betor. Shoutd you rish to cease to rnaintain the authorized activity or shoutd you desire to abandon it
Hithout a good faith transfer, you rrust obtain a modification of this permit from this office, rhich may
require restoration of the area.
3. If you discover any previousty unknorn histonic or archeotogical renoins white acconpl'ishing the
activity authorized Uy tiris permit, you trust irmediatel.y notify this office of uhat you have found. tle ritI
initiate the Federal, and state coordination required to determine if the remains Harrant a recovery effort
or if the site is etigibLe for tisting in the National Register of Historic Ptaces.
4. If you setl. the property associated rith this pernit, you ril.rst obtain the siEnature of the neu orner in
the spsce provided and forrard a copy of the permit to this office to vatidate the transfer of this
authori zat i on.
5. If a conditioned rater quatity certification has been issued for your project, you nrrst conpty t{i.th the
conditions specified in the certification as special conditions to this permit. For your convenience, a
copy of the certification is attachd if it contains such cor'lditions.
Luther E. and Diana G. lloore
16613 Highxay 82
Carbondate, C0 81523
Chartes E. Engtund
and 2205 shatimar Drive
Cotorado SPrings, C0 80915
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
l:
t:
lr
T
I
I
t
I
T
t
I
I
I
T
I
T
I
I
T
I
I
I
-2-
O. you rrust atlox representatives frorn this office to inspect the authorized activity at any tinre deemed
necessary to ensure that it is beinE or has been accorptisirea in accordance rith the terrE and conditions of
your pernit.
Soecial Conditions:
t. Att asFcts of site caEtnEtidt stratt bc pctpancd llltit thc Cor?e of Etginn6 hr icceivd Gvi&EC
oi tfr. apropriate taat sd state .fProvats for trc rcai&ttial hca, acsaiotcd-nter rctts, rd
irdividral, scrgtc dispcat s)rste-. - lf ttt.Epcct of the eristing proposot is &ricd or rcqrirct . d=ig'
ndificatiqr, the FEittees slrett idcntify thcse to thc corF of Engirrcrs for rylpriate cori&ratisr'
rAiti-.tty, tn. b.tt acrc of capGnsatory rcttard dtigatian taated rprth of thc hcs cl thc satth ctd
of Istzd pad slratt b. protecte ifrrqftr rccodatiar (ilrctr.dins Pr*rty deee dd PlEts) idcntifyirrg it as
1j6rgtoFbtc lcstrictcd prggcrty setwillg .3 .itigotio for Dcparclt of the Atry Filit trdr ffnT75319'
the Frrittecs Crrtt fwi& thc CorF of Engirrcrs rith e GoPy orE lcg.tty fitcd'
Z- (h-site cop€rBatory litigstidt for the dtstrr.Etidr of 0.15 ccrc of cattail-&il5tGd Etltds rithin
JohrEqr pord is re+.rired at 61:l retio. This ritigaticr crr ecur or-site rithin cxisting Pads b,
exterding shoretirs to &rrctop crgcnt rcttard frirpes. A pt{l for sr.dr coPctE8tol? litigatior llst bc
r*.itU-"rU agsvcd t thc corp oi trrgir-.". prior to dre€irg of thc Jdurqr Pad EtLards'
3.Thepropcedrettardlitig|stimptan(s)(0.11*reildtheabvcrrqrircd0.l3*re)shattb
iptclied rithin the s- "rrst",-ii- period that the EttEd ipocts ritt T9{: Ite Ptzrtirrg or
secding of rettard vegctatidr Ey ccur et a tater date (i.e. the fotl'di]rg fatt) if Pr+ci8te to lrEune
$Ecess, hrt esrth *ik fo1. the litigatiqr rret ba cqurrent rith thc pcG dre€irrg-eld fittirtE rctivity'
lighty visibte ccEtnEtiqt fcrrirrg slralt be erected arurd prk ereas to PrBltrt indttrtent ilrct to
qiti" resq;1.ces &rirrg cmstrrrtiq'r activitis. Ihe ritigsticr pLm lrf! b. c4tetcd u*r the
erperwisiqr ot an qr-siie rettards sFcialist- The litigaticr pt4 sFcifies ! 3--Far.sritorinE priod
rith arrrrat rprts- These regorts slratt be srbitted ]D tater thgr loder I of eadr ycar ard drc corPe
of Engilrers ritt &ci& to redrce or exterd the sritorirrg Frid 88 ncced to etEurc ritigaticr sEceaa'
This corditicr is reqrired to ersure that the oitigatior ptur is coPteted in a. ti-ty ErEr ard to
estabLish the ftrEtidr of the created EttarG ssr after thG natural EtttG hrrc bcn iFctcd'
4. T1e pernittees slratt cordiriatc rith the Cotor* DeFrtGtt of tlcatth to 6tEin a cdEtrLEtidl
derateriqE (IPOES) peruit. fhe lcat cdltact is Ir. Drein tatsdl rJro oy b reacfied at tctePhdE <9m' UA'
7156.
5. Iotificaticr shatt b prwi6 to the CorF of Er€irEcrs 8t tel,ephaE (9rr0) 243-1199, ertersicr 16,
prior to project ooclEernt. Periodic site irEFctiqs ritt bc d to ctEure pili: caPtiarce' t'Fl
cryletiqr of the authorized rcrk, the pruitees slratL srllit a signed cql'iare certrficatiq'r irdicating
that the authorized rcrf ard ""+ri..d litigatiqr rcl'e dat in accordme rith thc tctr nd csditiqr of
this pemit.
6. Aditianat fitt for any other FrpG6 cr this prcFrty ritt b sr.lbiect to irdividJat perait roia d':
to the Ettsrd resor|rce3 potentiatiy aftectea by ditimat urforcseen facitities al this ProFrty'
Further Information:
1. Congressionat Authorities: You have been authorized to r,udertake the activity described above pursuant
to:
( ) Section 10 0f the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1699 (33 U.S.C.403).
(X) Section 104 ot the Cl,ean Uater Act (33 U.S.C. 1344)'
( ) Section 105 of the l,larine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1413)'
2. Limits of this authorization.
a. This permit does not obviate the need to obtain other Federat, state, or [oca[ authorizations
required by tar.
t
T
I
I
I
iT
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
lr
t:
lr
li
l:
-3-
b. This permit does not grant any property rights or exctusive priviteges.
c. This permit does not authorize any injury to thc property or rights of others.
d. This permit does not authorize interference rith any existing or proposed Fcdcrat Proiects.
3. LiDits of Federat Liabitity. ln issuing this permit, the Federat Govcrrurnt docs not assLlnc any
Liabitity for the foll,orinE:
a. Damages to the pGnnitted project or uses thereof as a rcsutt of other Fnrittcd or r,rnpermittd
activities or frcrn natural causes.
b. Damages to the pcrmitted projcct or uses thereof as a resutt of current or future activities
urdertaken by or on bchatf of the United States in the p$tic interest.
c. Oamagcs to pcrsons, property, or to othcr peraitted or r.npcnnittcd activities or structures caused
by the Ectivity authorized by this permit.
d. Oesign or construction deficiencies associated Hith thc pennitted rork.
e. DamaEe ctains associated rith any future nrodification, suspension, or revocation of this pennit.
4. Rctiance on Appticantrs Dat8. The determination of this offica that issuance of this permit is not
contrary to thc pr.6tic intere3t ras mqde in retiance on the information you provided.
5. Recvatuation of Permit Decision. Ihis office may reevatuate its decision on this permit at atry titne the
ci rcuastances Harrant.
Circustances that coutd rcquire a reevatuation inctude, Erut arc not timited to, the fottoring:
a. You faiI to cCIIPty r.ith the tenns and conditions of this permit.
b. The infonnation provided by you in sr.pport of your pernit apptication proves to have been fatse,
incorplete, or inaccurate (see 4 above).
c. Significant ner information surfaces rhich this office did not consider in reaching the originatpbtic interest decision.
Such a recvatuation may resutt in a deternination that it is appropriate to use the suspension,
npdification, and revocation procedures contained in 33 CFR 3?5.7 or enforcement procedures such as those
contained in 33 CFR 326.t, ati 326.5. fhe referenced enforcement procedures provide for the issuance of an
adninistrative order reqr.riring you corpty r{ith the tenns and conditions of your pcrmit and for the
initiation of tegat action rhere appropriatc. You ritt be required to pay for any corrective measures
ordered by this officc, and if you fait to corpty rith such directive, this office may in certain situations
(such as those specified in 33 CFR ?09.170) acconptish the corrective rnasures by contract or otherrise and
bitt you for the cost.
5. Extensions. Gencrat Cordition 1 estabtishes a time Limit for the conptetion of the activity authorized
by this pcrmit. Untess there are circrmstances requiring either a prorpt conptetion of the authorized
activity or a reevatuation of the pubtic interest decision, the Corps ritt normal,l,y give favorabte
consideration to a re$rest for an extension of this tinn l,imit.
Your signature belor, as permittee, indicates that you accept and agree to conpty r.ith the terms and
conditionsrof this pcrnit.
{
'- z-7t
I
t
I
t
I
This permit becomes effective Hhen the FederaI
has signed betor.
-4-
officiaL, designated to act for the secretary of the Arny,
I
I
I
T
t
t
I
I
I
tJhen the structures or Hork authorized by this permit are stil,t in existence at the tim the ProP€rty is
transferred, the terrns and conditions of this permit r.ilI continue to be binding on the neH orner(s) of the
property. To vatidate the transfer of this permit and the associated tiabitities associated rith curptiance
ritir its terms and conditions, have the transferee sign and dete betoH.
I
I
I
t
T
sued for and in behetf of Cotonet Dorothy F. Ktasse, Oistrict Engineer
empuntain RegutatorY
'lf
I
t
I
t
I
I
t
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
DEPAFTMENT OF THE ARMY
U.S. ARMY ENGINEER OISTRICT, SACRAMENTO
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
1325 J STFEET
SACBAMENTO. CALIFORNIA 95814.2922
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF
March 3, 1998
Regulat,ory Branch (1997753L9)
Mr. Luther E. and
16513 Highway 82
Carbondale, Colorado 81623
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Moore:
In response to a t.elephone call received from Mr. Mark Bean
of the Garfield County elanning Depart,ment, we have reevaluated
your request to modj-fy special conditj-on number 1 of Department
6f the Army permlt number L997753L9. ApparenElY, you and Mr.
Englund are in an impasse where you are required_by_the county to
p"ifor* percolat.ion Lests on the dredged material placed in River-pond for sept,ic purposes before the county can proceed with any
approvals f-r your request to subdivide the property. our
splcial cond.ition number I requires evidence of the appropriaLe
c-ounty and state approvals before any aspect of the project
construction may Proceed.
We recognize this conflict; and, therefore we are modifying
special condition number I to allow dredge and fill actiwities Eo
bL performed so thaE your requirements for the county may be met '
How-ever, if in the final analysis you are unable to begin
construction of the home(s) on the fill mat'eria1 within t'hree
years from the date of t.he permit issuance (February l, 2001-) ,
you must remove the fill maLerial from the pond and restore iE to
ire-project conditions. You are cautioned that. we st,i11 wish t,o
iee evidence of a1I appropriate approvals prior to the
consLruct.ion of your homeiites. If a design change is made or
aspects of your project are modified, You may also need Eo
re-quest a modif ilation of our permit. All other terms and
conditions of the permit remain in fuII force and effect.
If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Susan Na}1 in
our Grand Junctlon office at, telephone (970) 243- 1199.
Sinceq
Diana G. Moore
Regulatory Section
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
T
I
I
I
-2-
Copies Furnj-shed:
Mr. Charles Englund, 2205 Shalimar
Colorado 80915
Mr. Mark Bean, Garfield CountY, 109
Glenwood SPrings, Colorado 81501-
Drive, Col-orado SPrings,
8th StreeE, Suite 303,
ATTACHMENT F
CDOT ACCESS PERMIT APPLICATION
I
t
T
I
T
I
I
T
I
T
I
I
T
I
I
T
I
I
I
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
APPLICATION FOR STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERMIT
lssulng 6ulhorily
appllcatlon occoptenCo
dele
I nstruclions:
- contact the Deparlment ol Highways or your local governmenl to determine your issulng autholity.
- contact the issuing authority to delermlne what plans and other documents are required to be submitted with your
application.
- complele this f orm (some quesiions may nol apply to you) & attach all necessary documenls and submit it to the
issuing authority. Submlt an application for each access requesled.
il you have any quesllons conlact lhe issuing authorlty.Plaeae prlnl or lypc
I ) Properly owner (Permitl6e)
Lunlez E. lh00e{SA atr
street address, clly,lbttltS' tlutv 0z (rr{z6oNo4t€streel address, city,
state & zio ' IPbon€ tID 0/czs lhto\ lka-0442 slrio & zip Phone I
3) Address ol property lo be served by peilrit (il [nown]lbbt3 Hwv,9Z
tl) Legal descriptlon ol property:
counly I subdivlsion
6ALAEu) I I
r seclionlsz I 7w r''"n" f7sblocklottownship
I
5) What slale,hlghway ere you requesling access lrom?lfwv OL fuoNntts Koao
6) whar side or rhe hishway? o r.r I; s o E o w
7l How many ledl is th6 proposed accoss lrom lh6 nearest mile posi or cross slieel?
16oo oet1ruffiwlrrom
8)Check here il you are requesling a
E new access tr temporary access E improvemenl to exlsting access fl.change in access use
9) Whal is the approximale date you intend lo begin conslruclion? N fft
l0) Oo you have knowledge ol any Slsle Highwey access permlts serving lhis properly, of lor ediacent properlies ln whlch you heve I pioperty lnlerBsl.
tr yes I no lf "yes" - what are lhe permit number(s)?and/or, permit daie
11)Does the properly owner own or have any inlerests in any ediacenl property?
F y"t tr no ll "yes" - please describe:
5EE An-AcflA /r4A?
l2) Are lhere exisling or dedicaled public slreels, rosds, highways or access eas€ments bordering or wilhin the properly?
fl yes tr no lf "yes" - list them on your plans and indicaie the proposed and existing access points.
l3) llyouarerequsslingcommercialorlndustrialeccasspleaselndlcateth6lypesandnumberolbusinessasandprovidethelloorareasquare
tootage ol each?
business square loolage business square lootage
^t//n
'ld) ll you Ere requesling agricultural ljeld eccess
at /n how many acres will lhe access serve?
15) lt you aIe requesling residenlial development access. - whal is lhe type (single femily, aparlmsnl, townhouse) and number ol units?
type number ol units lype numbor ol units
Dtt srt u L, 12 el tosrr "6 I 3
Pzorosee EesroeN"e I I
l6) Provide the lollowing vehlcl6 counl €stimales lor vehicles thal wlll use the access Leaving property lhen relurnlng is two counts. lndlcate il
your counls ere peak hour volumes E or 6verage daily volumes tr.
I of passengers cars and light lruckgEvtsrtNt 7o 1)rnr-
fl ol multl unit trUcks , ol other v6hicles4o
I ol single unil vehiCles ln excess ol 30 ll I fl ol larm vehlcles (tield equipm€rrt)Yol.l Counl ol All V.hlclorb
Check with lhe issuing aulhorily to delermine which ol lhs lollowing documonts are required lo complele the revlsw ol your epplicatlon.
(plans should be no larger than 24" x 36")e) Property map lndlcating olher access, bordering roads and streelsa) Highway and driveway plan and prolile. l) Proposed access design.b) Drainage plan showing impacl to lhe hlghway right-ot-way. g) Parcel and ownership maps including easements.c) Map and letters detaillng ulility localions belore and alter h) Signlng and strlplng plans.
development in end along the righl-of-way. l) Trellic control ptand) Subdivision, zoning, or developmenl plan. i) prool ot tiabillty insursnce
171
ll an access permit is issued to you it will state the ternrs and conditions for its use- Any changes in lhe use of the
permitted access not consistent with the terms and condilions listed on the permit may be considered a violation ol
the permit.
THE APPLICANT DECLARES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJUBY IN THE SECOND DEGREE, AND ANY OTHER
APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, THAT ALL INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS FORM ANO
SUBMITTED ATTACHMENTS ARE TO THE BEST OF THEIB KNOWLEDGE TRUE AND COMPLETE.
Appricanr "'n""Yr,,*L- ( la/^''7^- . o. /gq o
I u. ^lgi/^nt is not the owner of the droperty, we require this application also to be signed by the property d*n", o,tlteir legally autholized representative (or other acceptable written evidence). This signature shall constilute
agreernent with this application by all owners-of-inlerest unless stated in writing. lf a permil is authorized, the
property owner will be listed as the pernrittee,
Properly owner siqlalue y/'tvwtt' "*'*' ""W' t d,bw,{ l/*.'frhni. a, /??e
I
I
I
I
T
I
t
t
T
I
I
t
I
I
I
t
T
I
T
t
COLOBADO OEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
APPLICATION FOR STATE HIGHWAY ACCESS PERM!T
lssuing aulhorily
applicalion acceplance
date
I nslructions:
- contact the Department ol Highways or your local government to determine your issuing authority.
- contact lhe issuing authorily to determine what plans and other documenls are required to be submiited with your
application.- complete this lorm (some queslions may not apply to you) & attach all necessary documents and submit it to the
issuing authority. Submit an applicallon tor €ach access requested.
- il you have any questions coniact the issuing authority. Please Prlnl ot lyPe
t) Property owner (Permilt€e)' L;;i€R- E.'" fti;' Dt*lA 4. Hooes
2) Applicanl
Snrrl{
streel addr€ss, city,t0bt3 theat^t*Y gZ, /ftRqoNoAtC
street address, city,
state & zip lPbone {co 0/023 lhto) 1b3-0+.lz stale & zip Phone I
3)Address ol property to be served by permit (il known)
V ftc*NT Lof
1) Legal descrlpiion o, properly:
counly I subdivision
6H-F\6LD I I
' seclionlvz I
lownshio ranoe14 1__3Eblocklot
I
5) What st6te highway are you requesting access from?ttwy. Bz he.orurrtld
^ono
6) What side ol the hishway? O N XS O E O w
?l How many leel is the proposod accsss lrom lh€ nearosl mile post or cross strsel?
l5Oo rcert N S'6tv )r,o. l4tErtlAv-KETL tb
8) Check her€ il you are requesling a
p, new access E temporary access E improvement io existing access E change in access use
9) What is the approximate dale you inlend lo begin construction?Jrq I l77a
Do you havo knowledge of any Sial6 Highway sccess permils ssrving lhis property, ol for adiacent properti€s ln which you heve a properly ilrleresl
tr yes I no lf "yes" - what are the permil number(s)?and/or, permit date
1l)Does ihe property owner own or have any inlerests in any adjacent property?
.(. y"t tr no ll"yes" - please describe: ,r., AfncHd) k1 l+?
12) Are there exisling or dedicaled public streels, roads. highways or access easemenl3 boldering or within the property?
[yes tr no ll "yes" - list them on your plans and indicate the proposed and existing access points
13) lfyouarerequestlngcommorcielorlndustrlalaccesspleaseindlcatelhelypesandnumberolbusinessesEndprovidelhelloorereasquers
lootage ol oach?
business Equare lootage business square lootage
N/
/*
14)ll you are requesling agricullural lield accessN/A how many acres will the access serve?
15) ll you are requesting residenlial development access, - whal is the type (single lamily, apaltmenl. lownhcuse) and numbel ol units?
lype number ol units lype number ol units
1/^t A LF FAn tut I I
16) Provide lha lollowing yehicla counl estimales lor vehlcles that will use the access. Leaving property lhen relurning ls lwo counls. lndlcale il
you, counts ar€ peak hour volumes E or average daily volumesI ltl
i of passengers cars and lighl trucks I d ol mulli unit truckstil f ot other v6hiclss
I ol single unil vehicles in excess ol 30 ll f ol larm vehicles (lield equipment)fohl Counl ol All V.hlclca
/o
Check wilh lhe issuing authority lo delermine which ol the lollowing documenls are required lo complele lhe revlew ol your application.
(plans should bo no larger lhan 24" x 36") e) property map indicaring orhsr acc6ss. bordering roads and srreers.
a) Highway and driv€way plan and prolile. l) Proposed access design.
b) Drainage plan showing impacl io ihe hlghway right-of-way 9) Parcel and ownership maps including easements.
c) Map and lellers detailing ulility localions before and aller h) Signing and slriping plens.
developmenl in and along lhe rlghl-ol-way. i) Trallic control plan
d) Subdivlsion, zonlng, ot developmenl plan. l) Prool of liability lnsuranc€
t7)
lf an access permit is issued to you it will state lhe terms and conditions for its use. Any changes in lhe use ot lhe
permilted access not consistent with the terms and conditions listed on lhe permii may be considered a violation of
the permit.
THE APPLICANT DECLARES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY IN THE SECOND DEGREE, AND ANY OTHER
APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, THAT ALL INFORMATION PROVIDEO ON THIS FORM AND
SUBMITTED ATTMHMENTS ARE TO THE BEST OF THEIR KNOWLEDGE TRUE AND COMPLETE,
App ican, ",e.")\(1 1aL_ ( //*.ilt*', I /'??8
n,n" lpp\r{nt is not the owner ol the pr5perty, we require this application also io be signed by lhe property owner or
their lt'ally aulhorized represenlative (or oiher acceptable written evidence). This signature shall conslitute
agreement with this application by all owners-ol-inleresl unless stated in writing. lf a permit is aulhorized, the
property owner will be lisled as lhe permitlee.
Properly owner signature
f),n'-,-o*y''/'72r.t o )
Dale
/) n,, (1 ,a /??8
llPr.vlour rdlllon. mry b. u..d untll tuppllat .t! !rh!u.l.d r/e9