Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 Application Part 1FOUR MILE RANCH , 1 rV 4. • PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMITTAL Prepared For: FOUR MILE RANCH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. 2500 Military Trail, STE 175 Boca Raton, Florida 33431 Prepared By: HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 923 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 mot., • • • January 22, 1997 Garfield County Planning Attn: Mark Bean 109 8th Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 RE: Four Mile Ranch Preliminary Plan HCE Job No. 96098.01 Dear Mark: Enclosed is the Preliminary Plan submittal for Four Mile Ranch, submitted on behalf of the owner, Four Mile Ranch Development Company, Inc.. Included in the submittal are 20 sets of the following: Bound in booklet: 1. Application Form 2. Supplemental Information 3. Statements regarding Grading, Roads, and Utility Plan 4. Soils Information 5. Drainage Study 6. Water Supply Information 7. Title Commitments Drawings bound separately: 1. Cover Sheet 2. Plat 3. Plat • 4. Plat 5. Grading, Drainage and Road Profile 6. Road A and C Plan and Profile 7. Road B Plan and Profile 8. Road B Plan and Profile • 9. Road D Plan and Profile 10. Road E Plan and Profile 11. Master Utility Plan • 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 51601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 • FAX: (970) 945-2555 • Mr. Mark Bean • January 22., 1997 Page 2 12. Master Utility Plan 13. Master Utility Plan • 14. Sanitary Sewer Plan and Profile 15. Sanitary Sewer Plan and Profile 16. Sanitary Sewer Plan and Profile 17. Sanitary Sewer Plan and Profile 18. Sanitary Sewer Plan and Profile • 19. Chlorination and Pump Control Building 20. Water Tank Details 21. Water Detail Sheet • • • • • • • If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. Joe D. Hope, P.E. Project Manager APPLICATION ION FORM • • • • • Sketch Plan Preliminary Plan X Final Plat SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM GARFIELD COUNTY SUBDIVISION NAME: Four Mile Ranch OWNER: Harry Hart ENGINEER/PLANNER/SURVEYOR: High Country Engineering, Inc._ LOCATION: Sections 27 & 34 Township 6 South Range 89 West WATER SOURCE: Pumped Storage System SEWAGE DISPOSAL METHOD: City of Glenwood Springs Public System PUBLIC ACCESS VIA: County Road 117 and private access easements EXISTING ZONING: ARRD EASEMENTS: Utility Proposed - Telephone, Power, Gas Ditch TOTAL DEVELOPMENT AREA: (1) Residential Number Acres Single Family 59 127.931 Duplex Multi -Family Mobile Home (2) Commercial Floor Area Acres (3) Industrial sq.ft. sq.ft. (4) PublicJOuasi-Public 10.842 (5) Open Space/Common Area TOTAL: 138.773 PARKING SPACES: Residential: On individual lots only Commercial: None Industrial: None SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION i • • JAN. 21. 1997 1:22PM LEAVENWORTH & ASSOC NO. 0885 LOYAL E. LEAVENWORTH CYNTHIA C. TESTER SHANE Y. HARVEY DONALD H. HAMBURG Of Counsel LEAVENWORTH & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW January 21, 1997 Mr, Mark Bean, Director Garfield County Regulatory Office and Personnel • 109 Eighth Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 • 1011 GRAND AVENUE P.0. DRAWER 2034 GLENWOOD SPRINGS. COLORADO 61.602 TELEPHONE: (970) 445-2261 FAX: (970) 945-7336 Re: Four Mile Ranch Subdivisi9n; Legal Water Supply Dear Mark: As you know, I represent the Four Mile Ranch Development Company, a joint venture, in connection with the development of the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision As pan of the preliminary plan submittal, I am writing to advise you regarding the legal water supply that will • be obtained for the subdivision. Specifically, the developer has filed an application with the West Divide Water Conservancy District for 36 acre-feet of water from Ruedi Reservoir, together with an additional 10 percent for transit loss. Upon the approval of this application by the West Divide District, the developer will be able to obtain well permits to utilize the Four Mlle Ranch wells for up to the 59 lots proposed, including 2500 square feet of lawn. Additional raw water irrigation will occur utilizing the developer's one-half interest in the Four Mile Ditch • priorities, more specifically outlined in the sketch plan submittal. Based on the foregoing, it is our opinion that the developer will have a legal water supply in place prior to final plat for the proposed subdivision. • • 0 Very truly yours, LEAVENWORTH & ASSOCIATES, P.C. LEL:r1b cc: Torn Zancanella Four Mile Ranch Development Company Joe Hope (Dictated but not reviewed) • C.uquiskBEAN.1Lr Loyal E. Leavenworth i • • • i • • f JAN. 21. i997 4:22PM LEAVENWORTH & ASSOC ilit:;44044 AC ir'7. 1.,,k,r f; i : se \\...... Mr. Lester Colodny 4—Mile Rauch Z500 Norton Military Trail it75 Roca Raeon. 11. 33431 Dear Laster, Na 0872 F. 2111 laauary I1, 1995 This latter is id regard to your cwo requests concerning sever services to your proposed development as well as an access and utility easement across City property. The City does have adequate sewer capacity to serve your property should your project receive development approval from Garfield County, Row,ver, as you are aware from our previous discussions, the City's serer transmission lines have serious capacity problems between your development and the sewer treatment plant. You would be responsible for upgrading the line; it has an approximate cost of $750,000 — $300.000. Your development would also be responsible for running a serer line from the development to our existing ',ewer lime and build your lines within your system to City specifications. Also saver tap and system improvement fees are applicable. The City has maintained that all development within our City's 201 area use the City sever facilities whenever possible. Sever to your development it both feasible and practical.. Aa Ear as an easement through City property, only the City Council can approve that request. However. 1 sae easements both far your development end for the City as beneficial for both parties. Ac the appropriate time our attorney's can meet to work out the language necessary to bring this proposal, before our Council. Thank you for your time sad consideration. If you have further questions or comments please feel fres to call. c.c: Chris Daly Robin Milliard sincere chael C City Manager &06 COOPER AVENUE GLENwoon 3PRYNGS. CGLORAO0 51601 343/945-2575 FAX: 945-2597 STATEMENTS REGARDING GRADING, ROADS AND UTILITY PLAN • • • • • • 4 MILE RANCH PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMITTAL January 22, 1997 GENERAL: The proposed 4 Mile Ranch Subdivision is located up 4 Mile Creek along the west side of CR 117. Only one of the proposed lots will access directly onto CR 117. The other lots will access CR 177 via a private easement. The property is currently zoned ARIRD, Agricultural Residen- tiallRural Density, and no change in zoning is requested. The proposed use consists of one single family residence per lot. All lots are a minimum oft acres in size. UTILITIES: Shallow Utilities: Electrical service will be provided by the City of Glenwood Springs. They have indicated that they have adequate service available to provide service to this project. Phone service will be provided by U.S. West Natural Gas Service will be provided by KN Energy. Water: Water will be provided by a well (or wells) and pumped to a 300,000 gallon storage tank. The tank would be located at elevation 6200± and will provide working pressure at the highest building envelope of approximately 18 psi. • Fire flow protection provided by the tank will be 1000 gpm for two hours. Hydrants will be located as shown on the utility plan. Sewage Disposal: Sewage disposal will be provided by a sewage collection system. The City of Glenwood Springs has agreed to provide sewer service to the project. Please see attached letter • from the City dated January 17, 1995. The Sanitary sewer system will be designed and construc- tion per the City of Glenwood Springs specifications. Since the exact tie in location to the city system and the extent of offsite improvements have not been determined at this time, the offsite sewer system design is not included with this submittal. • • • • • • Location of Utilities: - All standard rural utilities are already available adjacent to the site, including underground electric and telephone. Extensions can easily be made to service each proposed lot. Cable TV is not available at this time. Other utilities serving the project, with their consent, will be Glenwood Electric, U.S. West Communications, KN Energy, and City of Glenwood Springs Public Works. We understand that copies of this plat will be submitted to these utilities by the County and comments will be requested. GRADING AND ROADS: Grading - No mass overlot grading is proposed by the developer, and none is envisioned to be necessary. Roads/Traffic - All lots will have access directly to a public right-of-way. All roadways within the project will be private access roads, but will be built to County Road standards. Plan and Profile drawings for the major access roads for the subdivision are included with this package. All roads within the subdivision will be maintained and repaired, including snowplowing. The roads within the project with the exception of the main entrance road are proposed to be built to rural access standards. The main access road will be constructed to secondary access standards. Surfacing on all roads within the subdivision will be 3" asphalt on 6" class 6 aggregate base course which is consistent with the adjacent access roads. Qffsite Roadway Improvements - The developer has agreed to improve CR 177 from just south of the Midland Avenue intersection to the main entrance into the project to current county standards to the extent that the existing RIW will allow in lieu of paying county roadway impact fees. The cost of said improvement will not exceed the county roadway impact fees for the project. '• LEGAL ACCESS: This subdivision is accessed via. CR 117 from which our single access road enters the property. In the event of need for emergency egress from the site a separate emergency access road will be constructed near the northern boundary of the project. Lot 41 will also access via this roadway. • PROPOSED USES: The proposed uses for the property will be single family residential lots. • DRAINAGE ON SITE See the attached Drainage Study prepared by High Country Engineering, Inc., dated January 22, 1997. • • SOILS INFORMA'TION • • Lincoln • • • • • • • 1000 Wast Foirnori St Coto(ado 9{rrinq,. Coloead)..0947 13931 632.3593 mom* Office Four Mile Ranch Company 0820 127 Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 ?ttnt John Ray Re' GENERAL & ENGINEERING GEOLOGY & SOILS FOUR MILE RANCH GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO Gentlemen: 217 September 4, 1979 Transmitted herewith is a report concerning the general and engineering geology and soils of the proposed Four Mile Ranch located in Glenwood Springs, Colorado. This report has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of Colorado Senate Bill 35 (30-28-133 C.R.S. 1973 as amended) and Garfield County Subdivision Regulations. Respectfully submitted, LINCOLN-D.VORE TESTING LADORATORY, INC. Syr Robert L. Base Civil Engineer ielssu.t Reviewed by vfb L IL O8-1153 D. 140 2051 Y • ''',/ -47: . C3 t . : o 1 , , r eabirMal v,„ Q03 PON ens 1154 •ncy R. Lamm of.ssional Geologist c a T. savor _-- prof..sional Geologist PO. dos 1427 ICS Bosom� pre�p 1� Pius .0. •9r IoM F.0- Oiserroa4gl. Du01 liroma CX 11101 Ns 11101 wow 0x31 b 111gado mr.nolatom! • • • • • • • • • aitEiaLLQIIILSISILBESIMODAMIU Since the magnitude and nature of the proposed foundation loads are not precisely known to Linaoln- D•Jo:e at thin time, the recommendations contained herein must be somewhat general in. nature. Any special loads or unusual design conditions ■houl4 be reported to Lincoln-DeVors so that changes in recommendations can be made if necessary. However, based upon our analysis of the soil conditions and project charac- teristics previously outlined, the following recommendations are made. It is recommended that shallow foundation systems consisting of continuous foundations beneath bearing walla and isolated ■pread footing■ beneath columns and other point' of concentrated load be used to carry the weight of the proposed structures. All of the materials encountered in the test borings are considered suitable for shallow found- ation support. However, considerable variation in bearing cap- acity values were noted across this site. Searing capacities for the upper silty clay materials were noted to range from 2000 psf maximum, with a minimum recommended dead load pressure of 500 psf,to 4000 psf maximum, with a minimum recommended dead load pressure of 1200 psf. Intermediate variations be- tween these two extremes can also be expected. The terrace materials of Soil Type do. 2 will have a maximum allowable bear- ing capacity of about 4000 psf, with no minimum pressure required. The coarse grained, sandy silt of Soil Type No. 4 will have a maximum allowable bearing capacity on the order of 3000 psf, with no minimum pressure required. Searing capacity values for any given structure should be established by inspection of the open foundation excavation prior to construction. she bottoms of • • • • • • • • • • • toundtt icra shou 1d be located a minimum of ] 1/2 fest below finished wads or greater if dictated by local building codas, for frost protection. Where the upper silty clay materials are encountered in a high density expensive condition, special techniques in foundation construction will be necessary. Ons type of foundation which would be suitable for these soils, would be the no -footing stem well on grade foundation, with strategically placed voids, to help balanus contact stresses and maintain the recommended minimum dead load pressures. Another typo of suitable foundation system for expsnaive conditions would utilise a series of isolated pada, spanned by voidad.reinforced concrete grade beans, around exterior foundations. With either of these two types of foundation systems, isolated interior pads should be carefully proportioned to satisfy the maximum and minimum bearing values of the foundation soils. It is recommended that the proposed foundation systems be well balanced. Residential structures typ- ically are mole .i.avily loaded on some walls and columns than on others, and the amount of variation can be quite significant. Sil- encing can be accomplished by planing larger footings beneath heavier loadrand smaller footings beneath lighter loads. As has been discussed previously, the judicious use of void■ ,car be inatru- mental in obtaining the desired balanced condition as well as in maintaining the recommended s►iniaum pressures for expansive soils. The criteria for balancing will depend somewhat upon the nature of the structure. Single -story slab on grad. structure• may be balanced on the basis of dead load only. Multi -story structures or structures with bssemenfs or crawl spaces should be balanced on • • • the basis of dasd load plus approximately one-half the live load. Using rrhiohsver aritsria is applicable, foundations beneath ex- terior walla should be balanced to within t 500 psf at all points. Isolated interior tootinge should be designed for unit loads of about 200 pit greater than the average of those selected for the •xterior wells. • It is recommended that all stem walls for continuous foundations be designed as grade beams cap- able of carrying their loads over a clear span of at least 12 feet. Horizontal reinforcement should be planed continuously in found- ation walls with no gaps or breaks in tis reinforcing steel, unless specially designed. Foundation walls should be reinforced at both top and bottom, with the reinforcing being approximately balanced '• between these two locations. Where foundation walls will retain soil in excess of 4 feet in height, vertical rsinforoing may be necessary and should be designed. For use in designing this • reinforcing, the equivalent fluid pressure of the soil may be taken as about 45 pcf in the active state. Where concrete slabs are used, they may be placed directly on grade or over a compacted gravel blanket of 4 to 6 inches in thickness. If the gravel blanket is chosen, however, it must be provided with a Erie drainage outlet tc the ground surface, so as not to act a■ a water trap beneath • he floor slab. Floor slabs should be constructed in such a manner that they act independently of columns and bearing walls. These slabs should be placed in sections no greater than 25 fest on a • side. Deep construction or contraction joints could be placed at these linos to facilitate even breakage. This will keep to a minimum any unsightly cracking which would be caused by differential movement. • • • • • • • • • • • • Adequate drainage must be maintained around the structures both during and attar construction to prevent the ponding of water. The ground surface around the structures must be graded such that surface water will be carried gi.ickly away. Minimum gradient within 10 feet of any structure will depend .upon surface landec.,ping. Sara or paved areas should have a minimum gradient of 2%, while landscaped areas should have a minimum gradient of 7%. Roof drains should be carried across all backfilled areas and discharged well away from the structure. The overall drainage pattern should be such that water directed away from one structure is not directed against an adjacent structure. As has been discussed previously there is a potential for periodic subsurface seepage on this site. Therefore, it is recommended that full or half basement foundations be well 'Foaled. In some instances, subsurface peri- pheral drains may be necessary. Subsurface drains would be de- sirable to all of the structures as a precautionary measure against water from subsurface seepage, and from poor surface drainage conditions. Subsurface drains should consist of an adequate discharge pipe, gravel collector, and and or fabric filter. The discharge pipe should be provided with a free gravity outfall to the ground surface if at all possible. If gravity out- fall is not possible, then a lined sump and pump should be used. Backfill around the proposed struc- tures and in utility tranches leading to the structures should be compacted to at' least 90%4 of the maximum standard Proctor dry density,. ASTM D-698. The native soils on this site may be used for bscklilling purposes with the exception of any organic top- soi2. materials. Backfill should be placed in lifts not to 'Forced • • 6 inches compacted thickness and it the Proctor optimum mois- ture content f 2%. Backfill must bi compacted to the required • density by mechanical means and no water flooding teohniques of any type should be used in the placement of fill on this site• Any topsoil or debris should be removed from the construction area prior to beginning of con- • struction of foundations. Additionally, should any pockets of debris, organic material or otherwise unsuitable material be encountered during excavation for footings, this material should • be removed and replaced with suitable backfill compacted to 95% of the maximum standard Proctor dry density, using the procedures previously outlined. • The open foundation excavations should be inspected prior to the construction of ,forms or place- ment of concrete to determine the proper maximum and minimum bearing capacity values and to establish that no debris, soft • spots, or other unsuitable materials are located in the found- ation area. • • • • The finer grained soils on this site contain sulfates in detrimental quantities. Therefore, a sulfate resistant cement such as Type II Cement is recommended for use in all concrete which will be in contact with the found- ation soils. Under no circumstances should calcium chloride aver be added to a Typo II Cement. In the ererthat Type I1 Ce- ment is difficult to obtain, a Type I Cement may be u■ed pro- viding the concrete is separated from the soils by water resistant membranes. It is believed that all pertinent points concern ng the subsurface soils on this ■its have been • • • • • • • • • vov.rid in this reprrt. If soil. typ.s ■nd conditions other thin those w:tlined herein are noted during construction on this site, these should be reported to Lincoln-D.Vore so that changes in recommendations can be made if neoesxary. If questions ariae or further information is required, please feel free to contact our office, -17- DRAINAGE STUDY • • • • • • • • • • DRAINAGE PLAN FOR FOUR MILE RANCH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO HCE J013 NO. 96098.01 January 21, 1996 te1lti11f 41 t t!llfx+�/� ?fi r.hi Qaof �a ;••• ?A�• nom. :;7•5' CZ.; (T_ 4 a ••I S m In, n �k an. se �'b co 1"~ {, Leslie A. ope, E.I. Project Engineer Timothy P. Beck, P.E. Principal Engineer • 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone. (970) 945-8676 • FAX: (970) 945-2555 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 OFF-SITE BASINS 1 HYDROLOGY 1 DRAINAGE PLAN 1 SUMMARY 2 DRAWINGS: Vicinity Map (8.5" x 11") Floodplain Map (8.5" x 11") SCS Soils Survey Map (8.5" x 11") Grading and Drainage Plan (11" x 17") APPENDIX: Calculations • 1 • INTRODUCTION The proposed Four Mile Ranch Development is located one half mile south of the Cardiff Road and Four Mile Road intersection, adjacent to the east side of the Four Mile Road (County Road 119) in the City of Glenwood Springs. More specifically, it lies in Sections 27 and 34 of • Township 6 South, Range 89 West, of the sixth Principal Meridian. The proposed residential development is approximately 138.7 acres_ See the enclosed Vicinity Map for site location. • • • • OFF-SITE BASINS The Roaring Fork River flows north along a portion of the easterly edge of the property. According to the Flood Insurance Rate Map ,(Community Number 080205, Panel Numbers 1434, 1445, 1453 and 1465, January 3, 1986) produced by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the project is not affected by either the 100 -year floodplain for the Roaring Fork River or Fourmile Creek. A copy of the pertinent portion of the floodplain map is included in this report. The main off-site basin affecting this project lies to the south. This includes the adjacent irrigated pasture which drains to the north, onto the proposed development. The on-site culverts are designed to accommodate both the stormwater runoff from the basin and the tailwater from irrigation. HYDROLOGY The hydrologic methods for this study are outlined in the Soil Conservation Service publication "Procedures for Determining Peak Flows in Colorado" (1980) and the Soil Conservation Service's TR55. Peak flows for this site will be primarily rainfall derived since the whole site is below 8000 feet in elevation. Therefore, the storm drainage system should be more than adequate to handle spring snowmelt runoff, The drainage structures will be sized to accommodate the 25 year 24 hour flows. The 100 year flows were also determined for the site to verify that the storm drains or overflow areas can accommodate the runoff. The calculations are provided in the Appendix. DRAINAGE PLAN The on-site drainage will be, in general, captured by roadside swales, discharged to culverts and • conveyed off-site via grass lined channels. The historic flow pattern is mostly sheet flow to a wide, poorly defined channel along the westerly portion of the site. The discharge point for the channel will stay the same for the developed condition. The existing four mile ditch is proposed to be abandoned at the southern property line. The • irrigation flows from the ditch will be routed to an irrigation pond (or ponds) located in the south western portion of the development. We recommend that the required detention volume be included with the design of the irrigation ponds. • • 2 • The estimated flows for the 25 year and 100 year events were calculated for the existing condition and the proposed condition. The increase in runoff for the 25 year storm will be detained as noted above. The size and calculations for the detention facility are shown in the Appendix. The proposed culverts were sized based on the 25 year storm. These calculations are also provided in the Appendix, • • • • • • • • • SUMMARY The Drainage Plan for the Four Mile Ranch Development includes a variety of drainage improvements, all designed to work together to mitigate the expected impacts on the site and downstream properties. • • • • • • • APPENDIX 17 20 16 GLENWOOD SPRINGS 22 SITE 29 33 VICINITY MAP SCALE : 1 " = 2000' 10110NAL FLOOD 1M501A%CE UIOGAAU Ili mein ire CP i v i 3 G Y I_ 33 >2.0 b y ja N m cCT i a [(- a • N W GO G ila a; 'an C) ri awe# a 90T nRI 217 .y9 e CZL b dYW 31Y8 33NYafISN (IIY10011117DY10S11 1001! 1YN0LLYD IBJ 1 JYw 31Y1f 3aNYKISNI INT N FOUR MILE RANCH DEVELOPMENT, CD. GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO FOUR MILE RANCH FEMA MAP 110H cawTRY ENCIPEEMN� H . 923 COOPER AVENJE °L9I# OOO BPFINGR co mai P-L(70)945-ed7e FX(VO)1i45-2555 DES. DR. CK. DATE FILE: NO. DATE REVISION BY 1 1 ��2 S; _ a s r Cop C c 4,0 -Cr of o :ti CC rIS "3 ~A a0 o xoa b , Il 95,10 a A C mr l., = 2. N. mer NAIIONAE FLOOD IMMUNE FNOGNAY} N FOUR MILE RANCH DEVELOPMENT, CD. GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO FOUR MILE RANCH FEMA MAP 110H cawTRY ENCIPEEMN� H . 923 COOPER AVENJE °L9I# OOO BPFINGR co mai P-L(70)945-ed7e FX(VO)1i45-2555 DES. DR. CK. DATE FILE: NO. DATE REVISION BY HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 923 COOPER AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 PH.(970) 945-8676 FX(970) 945-2555 SOS SAILS SURVEY MAP FOUR MILE RANCH HCE #96098J31 SCALE 1'=20001 12/24/96 16 loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 27 inches and calcareous below that depth. Included in this unit are small areas of Showalter, Morval, Cushool, and Evanston soils. included areas make up about 10 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is slow in the Acree soil. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate to severe on the steeper slopes. This unit is used mainly for irrigated pasture or as hayland. It also is used for homesite development or as rangeland. The potential plant community an this unit is mainly prairie junegrass, western wheatgrass, bluebunch wheatgrass, mountain big sagebrush, and Saskatoon serviceberry. Other plants that characterize this site are Indian ricegrass, mountainmahogany, and Douglas rabbitbrush. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 900 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, mountain big sagebrush, rabbitbrush, and annual weeds increase in abundance. These plants are dominant when the range is in poor condition; therefore, livestock grazing should be managed so that the desired balance of the preferred species is maintained. Grazing should be delayed until the soil is firm and the more desirable forage plants have achieved sufficient growth to withstand grazing pressure. Loss of the surface layer severely reduces the ability of the unit to produce plants suitable for grazing. This unit is well suited to hay and pasture. A seedbed should be prepared on the contour or across the slope where practical. Proper stocking rates, pasture rotation, and restricted grazing during wet periods help to keep the pasture in good condition and protect the soil from erosion, Fertilizer is needed to ensure the optimum growth of grasses and legumes. If properly managed, the unit can produce 4 tons of irrigated grass hay per acre annually. This unit is poorly suited to homesite development. The main limitations are a high shrink -swell potential, low strength, and the slow permeability. Population growth has resulted in increased construction of homes in areas of this soil. This map unit is in capability subclass lVe, irrigated and nonirrigated. It is in the Loamy Slopes range site. 2—Acree very stony sandy loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes. This deep, well drained soil is on alluvial fans and valley side slopes. It formed in alluvium and residuum derived dominantly from redbed sandstone and shale. Elevation is 6,500 to 8,200 feet. The average annual precipitation is 16 to 18 inches, the average Soil Survey annual air temperature is 40 to 42 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 95 to 105 days. Typically, the upper part of the surface layer is dark grayish brown very stony sandy loam about 5 inches thick. The lower part is clay loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is clay about 13 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or More is clay loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 27 inches and calcareous below that depth. Included in this unit are small areas of Showalter, Morval, Cushool, and Evanston soils. Included areas make up about 10 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is slow in the Acree soil. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate or severe on the steeper slopes, This unit is used mainly as rangeland. It also is used as wildlife habitat. The potential plant community on this unit is mainly prairie junegrass, western wheatgrass, bluebunch wheatgrass, mountain big sagebrush, and Saskatoon serviceberry. Other plants that characterize this site are Indian ricegrass, mountainmahogany, and Douglas rabbitbrush. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 900 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, mountain big sagebrush, rabbitbrush, and annual weeds increase in abundance. These plants are dominant when the range is in poor condition; therefore, livestock grazing should be managed so that the desired balance of the preferred species is maintained. The suitability of this unit for range seeding is poor. The main limitation is the slope. Grazing should be delayed until the soil is firm and the more desirable forage plants have achieved sufficient growth to withstand grazing pressure. The slope limits access by livestock. The limited accessibility results in overgrazir of the less sloping areas. Livestock grazing should be managed to protect the unit from excessive erosion. This map unit is in capability subclass Vie, nonirrigated. It is in the Loamy Slopes range site. 3—Acree loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes. This deep, well drained soil is on alluvial fans and valley side slopes. It formed in alluvium and residuum derived dominantly from redbed sandstone and shale. Elevatir is 6,500 to 8,200 feet. The average annual precipitatic is 16 to 18 inches, the average annual air temperature is 38 to 42 degrees F, and the average frost -free perk is 95 to 105 days. Typically, the surface layer is dark grayish brown loam about 10 inches thick. The upper 4 inches of the subsoil is clay loam. The lower 13 inches is clay. The next layer is clay loam about 7 inches thick. The • 18 mainly by the slope. Corrugation irrigation is suited to this unit. If furrow or corrugation irrigation systems are • used, runs should be on the contour or across the slope. Because of the slow permeability in the subsoil, the application of water should be regulated so that water does not stand on the surface and damage the crops. The content of organic matter can be maintained by using all crop residue, plowing under cover crops, and using a suitable rotation. Crops respond to applications of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer. If properly managed, the unit can produce 80 bushels of barley per acre annually. This unit is poorly suited to homesite development. The main limitations are the shrink -swell potential, low • strength, and the slow permeability. Structures, sanitary facilities, roads, and landscaping should be designed and planned to reflect these limitations. Population growth has resulted in increased construction of homes on this soil. This map unit is in capability subclass IVe, irrigated • and nonirrigated. It is in the Mountain Loam range site. 5—Acree loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes. This deep, well drained soil is on alluvial fans and valley side slopes. It formed in alluvium and residuum derived dominantly from redbed sandstone and shale. Elevation • is 6,500 to 8,200 feet. The average annual precipitation is 16 to 18 inches, the average annual air temperature is 38 to 42 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 95 to 105 days. Typically, the surface layer is dark grayish brown loam about 10 inches thick. The upper 4 inches of the • subsoil is clay loam. The lower 13 inches is clay. The next layer is clay loam about 7 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is clay loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 27 inches and calcareous below that depth. Included in this unit are small areas of Showalter and • Morval soils. Also included are small areas of soils that are similar to the Acree soil but are coarser textured. Included areas make up about 15 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is slow in the Acree soil. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 • inches or more. Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. This unit is used mainly as rangeland. It also is used as wildlife habitat. The potential plant community on this unit is mainly Letterman needlegrass, Idaho fescue, western • wheatgrass, mountain big sagebrush, and Saskatoon serviceberry. Other plants that characterize this site are slender wheatgrass, lanceleaf rabbitbrush, elk sedge, • Soil Survey and Gambel oak. The average annual production of air- dry vegetation is about 1,500 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, mountain big sagebrush, lanceleaf rabbitbrush, Kentucky bluegrass, and annual weeds increase in abundance. The suitability of this unit for range seeding is fair. The main limitation is the slope. This unit is poorly suited to homesite development. The main limitations are the slope and the shrink -swell potential. This map unit is in capability subclass Vie, nonirrigated. It is in the Mountain Loam range site. 6—Almy loam, 1 to 12 percent slopes. This deep, well drained soil is on fans and uplands. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from calcareous redbed sandstone and shale. Elevation is 6,000 to 7,800 feet. The average annual precipitation is 12 to 14 inches, the average annual air temperature is 42 to 46 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 85 to 105 days. Typically, the surface layer is reddish brown loam about 8 inches thick. The upper 3 inches of the subsoil is fine sandy loam. The lower 15 inches is sandy clay loam. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is fine sandy loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 11 inches and calcareous below that depth. Included in this unit are small areas of Empedrado soils. Included areas make up about 20 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is moderate in the Almy soil. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. This unit is used as rangeland or hayland. The potential plant community is mainly bluebunch wheatgrass, Indian ricegrass, bottlebrush squirreltail, Douglas rabbitbrush, and Wyoming big sagebrush. Prairie junegrass, needleandthread, and Sandberg bluegrass also are included. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 950 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, Wyoming big sagebrush, Douglas rabbitbrush, cheatgrass, and annual weeds increase in abundance. The suitability of this unit for range seeding is good. Loss of the surface layer severely reduces the ability of the unit to produce plants suitable for grazing. This unit is well suited to hay and pasture. It has few limitations. Grasses and legumes grow well if adequate fertilizer is used. If properly managed, the unit can produce 5 tons of irrigated grass hay per acre annually. This unit is welt suited to homesite development. This map unit is in capability subclass IVe, irrigated and nonirrigated. It is in the Rolling Loam range site. Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado 19 7—Almy loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes. This deep, •well drained soil is on fans and uplands. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from calcareous redbed sandstone and shale. Elevation is 6,000 to 7,800 feet. The average annual precipitation is 12 to 14 inches, the average annual air temperature is 42 to 46 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 85 to 105 days. , Typically, the surface layer is reddish brown loam about 8 inches thick. The upper 3 inches of the subsoil is fine sandy loam. The lower 15 inches is sandy clay loam. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is fine sandy loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 11 inches and calcareous below that depth. • Included in this unit are small areas of Empedrado soils and soils that are similar to the Almy soil but are calcareous within a depth of 10 inches. Included areas make up about 20 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is moderate in the Almy soil. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. This unit is used as rangeland. The potential plant community is mainly bluebunch wheatgrass, Indian ricegrass, bottlebrush squirreltail, Douglas rabbitbrush, and Wyoming big sagebrush. Prairie junegrass, • needleandthread, and Sandberg bluegrass also are included. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 950 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, Wyoming big sagebrush, Douglas rabbitbrush, cheatgrass, and annual weeds increase in abundance. • Range seeding may be needed if the range is in poor condition. The suitability of this unit for range seeding is fair. The main limitation is the slope. Brush management improves deteriorated areas of range that are producing more woody shrubs than were present in the potential plant community. In areas where brush is • removed by prescribed burning or by chemical or mechanical methods, the hazard of erosion may increase. If this unit is used for homesite development, the main limitation is the slope. This map unit is in capability subclass Vle, • nonirrigated. It is in the Rolling Loam range site. 8—Ansel-Anvik association, 12 to 25 percent slopes. This map unit is on fans, foot slopes, and mountainsides. Elevation is 7,500 to 9,500 feet. The average annual precipitation is 18 to 22 inches, the • average annual air temperature is 38 to 40 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 70 to 80 days. This unit is about 70 percent Ansel soil and 20 percent Anvik soil. The Ansel soil is on fans and foot slopes, and the Anvik soil is on fans and mountainsides. • Included in this unit are small areas of Skylick, Sligting, and Gothic soils. Included areas make up about 10 percent of the total acreage. The Ansel soil is deep and well drained. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from material of mixed mineralogy. Typically, the surface layer is light brownish gray loam about 23 inches thick. The upper 25 inches of the subsoil is stony clay loam. The lower part to a depth of 60 inches is clay loam. Permeability is moderately slow in the Ansel soil. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. The Anvik soil is deep and well drained. It formed in alluvium and colluvium derived dominantly from material of mixed mineralogy. Typically, the surface layer is grayish brown loam about 12 inches thick. The subsurface layer is light gray loam about 6 inches thick. The subsoil is cobbly clay loam about 24 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is cobbly clay loam. Permeability is moderate in the Anvik soil. Available water capacity also is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. This unit is used as woodland (fig. 3) or as wildlife habitat. It is well suited to the production of Douglas fir. Based on a site index of 91, it can produce about 8,700 cubic feet, or 52,200 board feet (International rule), of merchantable timber per acre from a fully stocked stand of even -aged trees 100 years old. This unit is poorly suited to homesite development. The main limitations are the slope and the hazard of slumping in areas where excavations or road cuts are made. This map unit is in capability subclass Vie, nonirrigated. It is in the Spruce -Fir woodland site. 9—Ansel-Anvik association, 25 to 45 percent slopes. This map unit is on fans, foot slopes, and mountainsides. Elevation is 7,500 to 9,500 feet. The average annual precipitation is 18 to 22 inches, the average annual air temperature is 38 to 40 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 70 to 80 days. This unit is about 70 percent Ansel soil and 20 percent Anvik soil. The Ansel soil is on fans and foot slopes, and the Anvik soil is on fans and mountainsides. Included in this unit are small areas of Skylick, Sligting, and Gothic soils. Included areas make up about 10 percent of the total acreage. The Ansel soil is deep and well drained. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from material of mixed mineralogy. Typically, the surface layer is light brownish gray loam about 23 inches thick. The upper 25 inches • Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado 35 the range condition deteriorates, mountain big sagebrush, Douglas rabbitbrush, cheatgrass, and • annual weeds increase in abundance. This unit responds well to applications of fertilizer, to range seeding, and to proper grazing use. Areas that are heavily infested with undesirable plants can be improved by chemical or mechanical treatment. This unit is well suited to hay and pasture. A • seedbed should be prepared on the contour or across the slope where practical. For successful seeding, a seedbed should be prepared and the seed drilled. Applications of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer improve the growth of forage plants. Proper stocking rates, pasture rotation, and restricted grazing during wet • periods help to keep the pasture in good condition and protect the soil from erosion. Furrow, border, corrugation, and sprinkler irrigation systems are suited to this soil. Pipe, ditch lining, or drop structures in irrigation ditches facilitate irrigation and reduce the hazard of ditch erosion. • This unit is well suited to irrigated crops. If properly managed, it can produce 80 bushels of barley per acre annually. This unit is well suited to homesite development. This map unit is in capability subclass IVe, irrigated and nonirrigated. It is in the Deep Loam range site. 33—Earsman-Rock outcrop complex, 12 to 65 percent slopes. This map unit is an mountainsides and ridges. Elevation is 6,000 to 8,500 feet. The average annual precipitation is 1.4 to 16 inches, the average annual air temperature is 42 to 44 degrees F, and the • average frost -free period is 80 to 105 days. This unit is about 45 percent Earsman very stony sandy loam and 35 percent Rock outcrop. The Earsman soil is on the less steep slopes, and the areas of Rock outcrop are in the steeper convex areas throughout the unit. • included in this unit are small areas of Arle and Ansari soils and soils that are similar to the Earsman soil but are deeper over bedrock. Included areas make up about 20 percent of the total acreage. The Earsman soil is shallow and somewhat excessively drained. It formed in residuum and • colluvium derived dominantly from calcareous redbed sandstone. About 5 to 10 percent of the surface is covered with flagstones, and 5 to 15 percent is covered with channery fragments. A thin layer of partially decomposed needles, twigs, and leaves is on the surface in many places. Typically, the surface layer is • reddish brown very stony sandy loam about 5 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 19 inches is very channery sandy loam. The depth to hard, calcareous sandstone ranges from 10 to 20 inches. • Permeability is moderately rapid in the Earsman soil. Available water capacity is very low. The effective rooting depth is 10 to 20 inches. Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is slight to severe on the steeper slopes. This unit is used mainly as rangeland or as wildlife habitat. It also is used as a source of firewood and posts. The potential plant community on this unit is mainly pinyon pine, Utah juniper, bluebunch wheatgrass, bottlebrush squirreltail, Indian ricegrass, and western wheatgrass. The potential production of the native understory vegetation in normal years is about 500 pounds of air-dry vegetation per acre. The slope limits access by livestock. The limited accessibility results in overgrazing of the less sloping areas. If the plant cover is disturbed, protection from flooding is needed to control gullying, streambank cutting, and sheet erosion. This unit is suited to limited production of firewood. The average annual production is 5 cords per acre. The average stocking rate is 100 trees per acre. Special care is needed to minimize erosion when the stands are thinned and when other forest management practices are applied. This unit is severely limited as a site for homesite development. Limitations include the shallow depth to bedrock, the exposed bedrock, the slope, the rapid runoff rate, and the very high hazard of water erosion. This map unit is in capability subclass Vile, nonirrigated. It is in the Pinyon -Juniper woodland site. 34—Empedrado loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes. This deep, well drained soil is on fans and upland hills. it formed in alluvium and eolian material. Elevation is 6,500 to 9,000 feet. The average annual precipitation is 15 to 18 inches, the average annual air temperature is 40 to 44 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 75 to 95 days. Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is clay loam about 35 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is clay loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 38 inches and calcareous below that depth. Included in this unit are small areas of soils that are similar to the Empedrado soil but have a darker, thicker surface layer. Also included are small areas of soils that are similar to the Empedrado soil but are silt loam or silty clay loam. Included areas make up about 20 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is moderate in the Empedrado soil. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is slight. 36 This unit is used as hayland or for crops. It is well * suited to hay and pasture. Grasses and legumes grow well if adequate fertilizer is used. If properly managed, the unit can produce 5 tons of irrigated grass hay per acre annually. The potential plant community on this unit is mainly western wheatgrass, needleandthread, prairie junegrass, mountain big sagebrush, and Douglas • rabbitbrush. Other plants that characterize this site are muttongrass, Letterman needlegrass, common snowberry, Utah serviceberry, and antelope bitterbrush, The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 1,500 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, mountain big sagebrush, Kentucky • bluegrass, Douglas rabbitbrush, and annual weeds increase in abundance. This unit is well suited to alfalfa and small grain crops. It has few limitations. Maintaining crop residue on or near the surface helps to control runoff and soil blowing and helps to maintain tilth and the content of • organic matter. If properly managed, the unit can produce 90 bushels of barley per acre annually. This unit is suited to homesite development. The main limitations are the shrink -swell potential and the moderate permeability. The shrink -swell potential can be minimized by thoroughly prewetting foundation areas. The moderate permeability can be overcome by increasing the size of the absorption field. This map unit is in capability subclass IVe, irrigated and nonirrigated. It is in the Deep Loam range site. 35—Empedrado foam, 6 to 12 percent slopes. This deep, well drained soil is on fans and upland hills. It formed in alluvium and eolian material. Elevation is 6,500 to 9,000 feet. The average annual precipitation is about 15 to 18 inches, the average annual air temperature is 40 to 44 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 75 to 95 days. Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is clay loam about 35 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is clay loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 38 inches and calcareous below that depth. Included in this unit are small areas of soils that are similar to the Empedrado soil but have a darker, thicker surface layer. Also included are small areas of soils that are similar to the Empedrado soil but are silt loam or silty clay loam throughout. Included areas make up about 20 percent of the total acreage. • Permeability is moderate in the Empedrado soil. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. This unit is used as hayland or for crops. It is well • • Soil Survey suited to hay and pasture. Grasses and legumes grow well if adequate fertilizer is used. If properly managed, the unit can produce 4 tons of irrigated grass hay per acre annually. This unit is well suited to alfalfa and small grain crops. It is limited mainly by the slope in some areas. Limiting tillage during seedbed preparation and controlling weeds help to control runoff and erosion. All tillage should be on the contour or across the slope. If properly managed, the unit can produce 75 bushels of barley per acre annually. The potential plant community on this unit is mainly western wheatgrass, needleandthread, prairie junegrass, mountain big sagebrush, and Douglas rabbitbrush. Other plants that characterize this site are muttongrass, Letterman needlegrass, common snowberry, Utah serviceberry, and antelope bitterbrusit The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 1,500 pounds per acre. if the range condition deteriorates, mountain big sagebrush, Kentucky bluegrass, Douglas rabbitbrush, and annual weeds increase in abundance. These plants are dominant when the range is in poor condition; therefore, livestock grazing should be managed so that the desired balance of the preferred species is maintained. This unit is suited to homesite development. The main limitations are the shrink -swell potential and the slope. The shrink -swell potential can be minimized by prewetting foundation areas. The slope is a management concern if septic tank absorption fields are installed. Absorption lines should be installed on the contour. This map unit is in capability subclass IVe, irrigated and nonirrigated. it is in the Deep Loam range site. 36—Empedrado loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes. This deep, well drained soil is on fans and upland hills. 11 formed in alluvium and eolian material. Elevation is 6,500 to 9,000 feet. The average annual precipitation is 15 to 18 inches, the average annual air temperature is 40 to 44 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 75 to 95 days. Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is clay loam about 35 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is clay loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 38 inches and calcareous below that depth. Included in this unit are small areas of soils that are similar to the Empedrado soil but are silt loam or silty clay loam. Also included are small areas of soils that are similar to the Empedrado soil but have a darker, thicker surface layer. Included areas make up about 15 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is moderate in the Empedrado soil. * • • • • ! x l \ \ y i1 \ 3 R . . ` 1 l 'k '•k 4 nnnnn QRRRRRRRRR 1%;:;;'01; MM MMMYMlr 1 1 TIV3S 31HdVdD Fi 2 23 . iw.taa sr. • a tta ACs X17:: { .45 'nil& Sr '. :yl3S ASA 4 MILE RANCH PRELIMINARY GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN HUH COUNTRY E3iCeHEE#MK1. NC. iZ3 COOPER AVU,LE CLFHNODO BPF*YC* CO e16o1 PH 1770] CHCS -sale MOM, 415-2565 DES. JnN DR. JTN CR. PBM DATE 0I-20-0 F:LE: DR -DI • • • • • Project F:otir Mi.ie Rai167 Job No. 9.0q8.01 By ok Date 1/22437 Ck'd by Date Subject ORA 1 AlfiGe Page of Di -canoe Bcisin wig be Onsidered bataialry -Rpr pu4nGes F cle4ermii)M9 re ored ciefeon vokinges, 1 ppel, /38.175 acr;es Tirre oP Coneartra-kon . A 4iev..= 87 1. hr p.2.4)o «P,ocedijre1s Deterouni'n9 Arik Rows atIsicas.da° %peak 6:100451" p o'F above. riPefefee 30-rve Number P5sL4(e sod .E.xt.st). ...v Pre p icuti on • 25 :year rupaff - /0 0 year rune') Pf - 2,4'.'.. kanorr 25 mar 0.2cYt p. or above • 0,35" pe 8/0 Liior- paSfure S h)/ 50° opeEzoodi'll:420 .... .... Iroumf c.ovr 0,1- J 1 • • • a25 13S .773 /4410X1000 c51tVia 0.2-09 cfs (138,713 az AL/Q)66,00 cfs 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 • Fax: (970) 945-2555 • • • i • • • Projec ENIP !Nle PacfCh Job No. 9(0093.0/ By Date ,'12Zkri Ck'd by Subject bkAi )A6E Page of Date Wthl r Win x,11 be srder ;profeel bo(Anc a 'y .'fir' P c&r,po$es 0r de-terminir requited chi -en± on Ublurnes. C)EVtwPr) C_toMO r T/01%4 Rrea 8 773 acres -rime of co 3C' n on c 0.362 hr~ . . ilk=-..62on. 1r i (uarrVV Nu.-nber- . limiorvious Areas `8.. weisii4ed CA Or'ee.,: i-icchon - tee... Qu,noC 25 year = '0,24" 100 year= .c ci - iZ site 4} 10`f'* 20' - 2r280 he use5 b9 * 32 o 8& p L+� drRVersx1y,-7.�t Cz7119 ) + .008]C/ S. -/-r -,yrs) ig 3 p,50 pre viovs rvf er-eri ci ose -70 Flows ao.s = Ci ,773 /( a)actooc /;n Xa24") 0190 (138,773 OC LI:t ...)40o.`ShI/r).-)(0.411, 3 i c 3..cfs 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 • Fax: (970) 945-2555 POND -2 Version: 5.20 S/µ: • »sa> OUTFLOW HYDR©GRAPH ESTIMATOR cc[cc Inflow Hydrograph: e:\pondpack96098TMP.HYD S speak = 31.0 cfs Estimated Outflow: e:\pondpack\ESTIMATE.EST Cpeak = 26.0 cfs Approximate Storage Votwme (computed from t= 12.00 to 12.50 hrs) 0.2 acre -ft • • • • • • • • POND -2 Version: 5.20 S/hl: Plotted: 01-22-1997 Flow (cfs) 0.0 4.0 8.0 12.0 16.0 20.0 24.0 28.0 32.0 36.0 40.0 44.0 1- I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I I- 11.7 - 11.8 - 11.9 - 12.0 - 12.1 - 12.2 - 12.3 - 12.4 - • 12.5 - 12.6- 12.7 2.6- 12.7 - • 12.8 - 12.9 - 13.0 - • 13.1 - 13.2 - 13.3 - • 13.4 - 13.5 - * * * * * 13.8 - x TIME (hrs) x * * * x * 11 it C7 (4 * E C7 , * File: a:\pondpack\96098TMP.HYD omax x File: e:\pondpack\ESTIMATE.EST 4max • 31.0 cfs 26.0 cfs • • • 0 • • • • • 0 • Project ro[u' Mit kanrh Job No.-16o98.Of By A Date 1/2-1/C11 Ck'd by Date Subject}�roifo.L .Q. Page of ProposedC L -role Coipn • LEtev= (0)17- (,100- -7' D isfancO. = 340' T - 0. ..hr peckk g90 csa ir1 p ( 2 LrV2 kiLimber Pssurrie Sort 7i e ale Ex.i51 i'rng. VV et i - pc>rs-ur e 6.9rxxi. fi 4108 case .w/3a/• mound cover "P ocetio.+re s.. r beker"rni"rni ... k F1Q w$ � , X I-- 403 lmper wiOUS Fes= CK)=` I SSume CrP house 4dr,uei &y= 3200 2 tdl ? .0.(5 1 L' Q7g3ae r9h-Fed CIV- (o, 304) 1s t C z os 7,OSf Pr'ecipi -fa-tion 25 year' 00 rods Si-prrn z - RL not : '7.5 yet e- Q. 100 year. = ©, roto os 025= (a,2 -7#X990 se. .CI= (a8 `T= 22, goo C+2 of.above. '"/ C l,08iac/0 ) 3 act IDESISN_STO \use o..rn 18" CMP 7 /640) " 8 cFFs 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 • Fax: (970) 945-2555 • • • • • • • • • Project f&u r H; k' P -inch Job No. (46078.0 By Date //2-1/9 7 Ck'd by Date Subject AI ,IPGE Page of P l)056 . C Prez a, 298 acres'....' alleififirrthbat AElev - 10' t�► hr (nvr,)penk . 9b cs•n1.n Crue..Alurn6r ex4`s1h'r Vel tccticr ) 04 toe impel -0'00s i4nea-CU= 98 road 546/A I!' = 5940 az - 0.042 cc CIV C98k3,134 a) Cos , 9s -y.__ 0.298. -SCUM as prey fogs izu. 1 Dci 25 yew arm - 0.(05 ICO yc S DrO 0.92" p.(o2 (DC ee+lious rderenee r=ro s ' coco5.y 990 /n).[ a,2g8"4/ o)J .„I: 3o cF CA1GO (0.92" )0990 `1,,),Ciz / )- 0,42 as Vie. S'f CMP 1 Crrzlnfmum per Cowi+y) 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 • Fax: (970) 945-2555 • • • • • • • • • Project Four M Pstneh Job No _941078,04 By eli•I Date 1/21/017 Ck'd by Date Subject r.,-)ini.icArgR Page of Pro pci&e.dC3 P rea-=" , 700 cteres cyC Cenci/Tim-hare) Aelev-- 29/ as+a-neit - 722." hr&"i) (6 Feat 990 csnt eve Number; Ext.'siting .C.&/ -61t€ inyeMbus arect cAj- 98 Goeihfed ()pad = 122 -7942 4Z Q..fZcre 6'9_fij- 7o- 0,432) -71 70 Pr,eci pi on same kunorf' 2,5 yeaiN 0.27" y�r' Q,1L1 Pio (A.)5 az5 Co, Z-7 909 csAtIlil X 744146) / 0 - (0,44" )(990 cm/,1)( Lv /446 an 18/' eMP cfs' DL5(A) 57-0.1et4 2 et's 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 • Fax: (970) 945-2555 • • • • • • • • Project EDur I t!e j atAneil Job No. 1!_?8,O) By T Date i1 2-r Ck'd by Date Subject bouALAGF Page Pro3poato d Cyt Via- 0.225 car 'r�v2 v f Cone Elev, 1/ 1 1)15.1 = 4067' 4 • I Inc .peak = } J `srrthn impervious R -- 9$ Y : .O(21Kif' = q4(04 frz- O,4Q3.'AC Lei ed CN'- p1 to tion -SGQ kcal 25 yr . 0.(05!" CO yr..' 0.92" q 0,08 0,225 $2. Flows 025 = 0.65#)(9 90 0, 5 OL o23cfs Q m0 ?2". X993 csota225ac/ e.... an....... 2'' CP 0►, 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 • Fax: (970) 945-2555 • • • Project rOtir Mae Pond) Job No. .6009.8_,0/ By d4ai4 Date 1/2-/ /GO Ck d by Subject PR1!W/46E Page Date of egQeca§Qaa. -11rne Cznes4fathon ; Len31-h 135O/ / hi iPeak 996 Crfile Kiwviber Ex/6405 V€96-ci-Eion CNI543 ... ...... _Impervious. Ov= cia rosci 600 "A-li h0u6e5 dn'oe(.cways 32004 83.-- 25, 6Do D 70 - weVed 04- .06Xcv-r90)+ (B)3 -a -m) 13,434p Preelpi /a/1Di -ScerzQ iet_kr)O-FP: • yr mc 0. 2411 100 0.4r! 18azir) -fi)r 6.0.1tie.rt • • • az5 C0rIO'Y -10 confribuies A-b-thiS bo.S11 13.434,Achoi..0 a 01007= (0,411* )(990 cs'n/A )(13604-4040) USe an I8P OAP z3ds = I a 32 cfs 5 8 2cs 8 cP5 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 • Fax: (970) 945-2555 • • • • • • • • • • • Project Fnjf' Mile PafiC.h Job No. C -6093,0/09.$,D/ By CAW Date ;Ig.1/47 Ck'd by _ Date SubjectIN1t1GF. Page of PREP ! l 1.6E30 o_c,rres 1.7n ' nc QIlt ioli Dts+, 1000 ._I hr- . ` 990 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 • Fax: (970) 945-2555 f_ o-� Project f ur KA° R0110h Job No. Cho o9R, 01 By (>6 + Date '/21, cr1 Ck'd by Cate Subject IW?46E Page of Brea= 91 ac. (Pios CIC 2'' 41 C Mme. of Con b-I:thcr' Dis-t. 3gbo' t`t1e...,.N f 1 .E16.11 -Y9 Ve t -cyan 72_, O.29 hrI a8. impersvi'ou.s Fret= _CN- T3 Preci weir(ecie ,3q4 sn„ti2..__. 1.4 . houses -I - driveways 3zo0= 4 ; roads 2Zl(,*1.1' 4. 2f1 JA.133 4.0 25 y,ea.r s Uza" f C]C3+ Qr O, 38" ins CICOf tr b (Lt ...-lo C7 f4f5o j l r -.-from irrr` o ,`r (-from M..e _Mile. ID1 Leh) ter i �t� ►nf 'b ct - -fes-PIou 7o cel .decreed 12,cf .1 asgkins oil. (a els to/ 11 be dr'VONled url r -OFht mon-ths Ju i' .fv9us mos+ /1'k 1_I y have a 5-f r-fr. event, ze 60, ZZ" 4,B0 j,r 91.3 a� 0440) -f-,• 3.0 c fs.. t 0,1o0 , = CO43811)C o '"/%X 41. 3 c fs. a`/ )-. $ c 4 + b 4t 3 cf,1_.f..fa 5 cfs cfs i 741 c Fs 562 e a. 30" C:M a 153. 1410= 3.951 cfs 4,c's Cfs 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 • Fax: (970) 945-2555 • • • • • • • • Project Thar- Mi62,.. R iieh Job No. 9609;43, 01 By Date 11,71 i—i 7 Ck'd by SubjectAyAlf#,SE Page Date of PrrvoseC C.$ -row .of.Ccnan t. of) = 1 E/e.v- CoQ': fJ ►: t-. - 803 G= Gfhr c mak. - 9?o !/ WOOS flisfap a�riVele0ayS 171,1k. 5200 = /z8o0 Wei d cW C 3.)y0412).- ...Cp)X'7 12g -t ,ttsz) l0 479 K e rVa--hare — t rrl° RuxoAr .._...._ ZS . year c V/' 1 D3 /ear— o,41* Cat" 00 – (OM 9x'0 c5►r� (7,g79ae 640)----- 2,8 cfs X q9b csnc j•n 7; "acA) 7C -F5 U.. an 18" e 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 • Fax: (970) 945-2555 Project Foul- H" /+6 �,,r d Job No. Ci qF .01 By CAA Date i liCri Ck'd by Date Subject lNeAIN116-E Page of Pr2Dicaseri Pim- 0,4285 ac -77r rtA oP Co n. cori"t 7 o r) 4 EIV - 45' f ►'St = 350' -O.lht i 97'0' Curve_ Mt.. cbeT- EK/511,5 .v.t'Q,v=_v l nip ervious ,Arm fIxtd =. 36,4=A- 106 60"- Prue - santa2 8 , 0.2111 f o 25 . year = 052'1' l do yeat--7 077'r (c, Z"X.9.945 cs ,li.O o,(n$5 l.4m) `. = . C c r .'' X990 crn%n)(°48 use 1(040)_ 0.55 cf's C ,$2.cfy x......18"'OW 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 • Fax: (970) 945-2555 Project F6 fU.1- M Job No. cf(207$. 0/ By 41:cL_ Date 1%2/ 57 Ck'd by Date Subject befi kV/ 6E Page of I POSea AREA Y 28 60/os. Ci- ):..... -Time a aon urrirl 'on .: aEfey= 116 2050' Lt' .:true Mc c. . 0, hr hr t- 910 csrl' E415*`rt .Vel-, .,f on .......'N= (08 1 mper-viou5 11 t + A1- g8 houxs -i akivet,oa1l 13 32ap - of4 ao ft refs = 383-7 f , 40207 -rf-z Wei e.d. 25 year = ©, zq ►► 100 year= Plus 4-h2 Infrkr.1301-ina'1v+r s From ►is 2i -Cq. -70. ) -r 3,Ocfs + 0.30ds t OE7fi's 023 cfs -F 5,2cr's +43 cfs;-f 35cfs t 2,8crx tG.5Gcrs (02.cf.s Qroa,`ff i" grpm" t%)(28.6,14ar 4740)+ X1.8 cps -s- o,iZc,s f I, 2 ers . 32c fs t 8,B cis rt- 1/ c.fs + 56 c is -r 41,7 c fS , 0< 82 c f3- 101 c 5 use a 4'2"" CMP (or Ur O W Y 1,n 414 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 • Fax: (970) 945-2555 19960 5-03H 'VMI -Id J.OGSl7 a UOJeJ91^1 0 39 io LC abed STANDARD C DIAMETER OF CULVERT 101 IN INCHES ARGE MI IN CFS O w • 0 T • 0 0 • O tr 0 STRUCTURAL 'LAT( C- 1. 1 _ I i l I•...I....1.,..1 . i •1,1 ''•••.1. . Y.1.1 1111 — N w u w Lo h. 0 J. LA 0 a— N V • it r. 0 0 p 0 - O 0 0 0 0 0' O C C 4 0 p O O G O p. 0 o 0 0 a 0 o G °IM 1E DSa T•7 3 - e P 0 X a o � n. ::: DISCHARGE 101 IN CFS I i' 1 •1.1 1 111 •. T T 1 ••'•1 1 T 1'1•1.1.1.1 •••T1,,,,1 ••••1••••J'• 1.1•i•1.1•I " I is Y S. u w 0 - n .i A. V w w •M k • Y w w — w O O 0 0 O co O co O O 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 O o DIAMETER 10Y IN INCHES • 1 i 1 1 1 1 i 1 i 1 T 1 l 1 1 1 7 w - is a - — As -.4 C. M 0 w U. • 0 0 0 A. * 5 O rY '414.41144 lw r Sa V a 1 ,e 4 .0 R� .- 4 ra sF. a is l 1 `=ol lb II- O i^% a e% R s o 0 o >3Aj Er o HEAD (HI IN FEET 1 7 i i i5 ' a w u B) OUTLET CHART --Flowing Full, n = 0.024 lenueyy a6euie.10 uoi cpodsueal;o ivawpedap epuo S3811433O0Hd—'' a onion l HEkDWA1R DEPTH 91 DIAIETER& HW%D1 \ 11 ( A 1 +A I f I ® 14 u T T 1 Ir.. I w C i 1, M . 1 ' J u f EI w , 1 y . 1 w 1 e . i- O .1 .. i a b , en—i I, . w 1 1 +r ... 1 : l. 1 v w A w a 'r • u r+ ♦ u w DISCHARGE 101 IN CFS I i' 1 •1.1 1 111 •. T T 1 ••'•1 1 T 1'1•1.1.1.1 •••T1,,,,1 ••••1••••J'• 1.1•i•1.1•I " I is Y S. u w 0 - n .i A. V w w •M k • Y w w — w O O 0 0 O co O co O O 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 O o DIAMETER 10Y IN INCHES • 1 i 1 1 1 1 i 1 i 1 T 1 l 1 1 1 7 w - is a - — As -.4 C. M 0 w U. • 0 0 0 A. * 5 O rY '414.41144 lw r Sa V a 1 ,e 4 .0 R� .- 4 ra sF. a is l 1 `=ol lb II- O i^% a e% R s o 0 o >3Aj Er o HEAD (HI IN FEET 1 7 i i i5 ' a w u B) OUTLET CHART --Flowing Full, n = 0.024 lenueyy a6euie.10 uoi cpodsueal;o ivawpedap epuo S3811433O0Hd—'' a onion LOYAL E. LEAVENWORTH CYNTHIA C. TESTER SHANE J. HARVEY JOSLYN V. WOOD* *Admitted its Hawaii and Texas pully DONALD H. HAMBURG Of Counsel LEAVENWORTH & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW March 26, 1997 Mr. Mark Bean, Director Garfield County Regulatory Office and Personnel 109 Eighth Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Four Mile Ranch Preliminary Plan Submittal Dear Mark: r�r ^- +J , I 1 I MAR 2 7 1991 1011 GRAND AVENUE P.O. DRAWER 2030 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 TELEPHONE: (970) 945-2261 FAX: (970) 945-7336 I am writing to confirm our telephone conversation of today in which I advised you that we will be submitting supplemental information to hopefully resolve the staff concerns regarding the preliminary plan application for the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision. However, to ensure that the supplemental information is complete, we will need additional time. Therefore, we would like to ask that consideration of the application by the Planning and Zoning Commission be deferred until the May 14, 1997, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. It is our hope that we will be able to provide you with the supplemental information no later than April 15, 1997, although if possible we will have the geotechnical report to you earlier. After you have had a chance to review the supplemental information, we would like the opportunity to meet with you to see what issues remain and how we might work with staff to resolve staff's concerns. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, LEAVENWORTH & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Lo al E.! Leavenworth LEL: rlb cc: Four Mile Ranch Joint Venture Joe Hope Sunny Vann Torn Zancanella C:\FILESIBEAN.1 LT Y WATER SUPPLY INFORMATION • • • LOYAL E. LEAVENWORTH CYNTHIA C. TESTER SHANE J. HARVEY DONALD H. HAMBURG Of Counsel LEAVENWORTH & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW January 21, 1997 Mr. Mark Bean, Director Garfield County Regulatory Office and Personnel 109 Eighth Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 1011 GRAND AVENUE P.O. DRAWER 2030 GLENWOOD SPRINGS. COLORADO 81602 TELEPHONE: (970) 945-2261 FAX: (970) 945-7336 Re: Four Mile Ranch Subdivision: Legal Water Supply Dear Mark: As you know, I represent the Four Mile Ranch Development Company, a joint venture, in connection with the development of the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision. As part of the preliminary plan submittal, I am writing to advise you regarding the legal water supply that will be obtained for the subdivision. Specifically, the developer has filed an application with the • West Divide Water Conservancy District for 36 acre-feet of water from Ruedi Reservoir, together with an additional 10 percent for transit loss. Upon the approval of this application by the West Divide District, the developer will be able to obtain well permits to utilize the Four Mile Ranch wells for up to the 59 lots proposed, including 2500 square feet of lawn. Additional raw water irrigation will occur utilizing the developer's one-half interest in the Four Mile Ditch • priorities, more specifically outlined in the sketch plan submittal. • • • Based on the foregoing, it is our opinion that the developer will have a legal water supply in place prior to final plat for the proposed subdivision. Very truly yours, LEAVENWORTH & ASSOCIATES, P.C. LEL: rlb cc: Tom Zancanella Four Mile Ranch Development Company Joe Hope (Dictated but not reviewed) C:1F1LES\BEA N.1LT Loyal E. Leavenworth i P,O. Box 1908 1005 Cooper Ave, Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 ZdNC#4NELL4 4N0 455OC14TE5 ENGINEEPING CONSULT4t4T5 January 22 1997 Four Mile Ranch % Don Barnes Frontier Development 1205 S. Platte River Drive Suite 101-A Denver, CO 80223 Re: Four Mile Ranch Well #1 Dear Don: (970) 945-5700 (970) 945-1253 Fax At your request, Zancanella and Associates, Inc. has conducted groundwater investigations to determine the water resources available for your proposed Four Mile Ranch Subdivision, located in the Four Mile Creek area southwest of Glenwood Springs. The results of our investigation have been summarized in this letter report. A test well was constructed to investigate water availability on the property. The test well is currently registered as a monitoring hole with Division of Water Resources under permit No. MH -29828 and is located in the NE 1/4 of the NW 'I4 of Section 34, Township 6 South, Range 89 West of the 6th P.M. The surveyed location of the well is 2029 feet from the West section line and 433 feet from the North section line. The location of the well is shown on the attached site map (Figure 1). Four Mile Ranch Well #1 was constructed by Shelton Drilling Corporation on January 15, 1997. The well was drilled to a depth of 112 feet and constructed with a 7 -inch diameter steel well casing installed to a depth of 92 feet; the last 30 feet of the well was perforated ( 62 ft to 92 ft). The water bearing portion of the well is in Basalt gravels and alluvial deposits associated with wash out from the Four Mile Creek area. The static water level in the well on January 17, 1997 was 50.6 feet below the top of the well casing. The available drawdown in Four Mile Ranch Well #1 is approximately 41 feet (50.6 ft - 92 ft). The attached Figure 2 has been prepared to illustrate the well construction details and the geologic log. The well was pump tested during the period of January 17, 1997 through January 20, 1997 by Samuelson Pump Company. A 5 horsepower pump powered by an electric generator was installed for the test. A pumping rate of 50 gallons per Page 1 Rng. 89 W. 1(- Park r1r r ))1t\‘,,) oy DJ Twp. 6 S. A 9. 15893 C Four Mile Ranch - \))))))) ?))) 111\31,�1 II'f 1 /1� V4 085 r .J „County Road 117 n Four Mile Ranch Well No. 1 fel ' til • 1i LOCATION MAP FOUR MILE RANCH SCALE: 1'-2ODO' DATE: January 21, 1997 SHEET: 1of5 REV NO - DATE 1 REVISION MADE EY CHID _ 8Y APPD BY DRAWN: TLL CHKD: APPD: PLAN: TAZ ,93505-ilmap 8u.r r.we ew AND 4..n+Syt .K; R Pa9 dae. 6.11(10. 11(5Caa—Annw c�r,.eee 5fl0. CO 1110 Ii]OICISST FIGURE N0: 1 PROJECT: 93505.1 • • • • • • • • GROUND LEVEL TOTAL DEPTH 112' CEMENT 5' to 20' 62' - ❑D PLAIN STEEL CSG STATIC WATER LEVEL. 50,6` 1/17/97 30' - 7" ❑D PERFORATED STEEL.CSG TOTAL DEPTH 92' OPEN HOLE REV NO. GATE BENSON MADE 9Y C1 -11K13 BYBY APP1) WELL DETAIL MT TO YALE 90111 ,041014Y 31, 11191 SWAT X 0r o..w4 811 rk ono IF [WPO 32. 0AC 7170, .0. 135W.4 W4439122 FOUR MILE RANCH FRONTIER DEVELOPMENT ZA, r4MtL L A ANO ASSOCIA r£S Ave LNG/hMCR/NC Crt'SA TANTS Prost wriC[ 900 11122 - 1041 14SP[n •NP1C =MOM 14*0 41.111000 111442 11101 11-740 0 SOIL 6 rY ... CLAY COBBLES 20 L _ RED DIRT 40 VOLCANIC BOULDERS 60- GRAVEL — CLAY LAYER 80- -- VOLCANIC OLCANICBOULDERS BOULDERS GRAVEL 100- x... 11?_ CEMENT 5' to 20' 62' - ❑D PLAIN STEEL CSG STATIC WATER LEVEL. 50,6` 1/17/97 30' - 7" ❑D PERFORATED STEEL.CSG TOTAL DEPTH 92' OPEN HOLE REV NO. GATE BENSON MADE 9Y C1 -11K13 BYBY APP1) WELL DETAIL MT TO YALE 90111 ,041014Y 31, 11191 SWAT X 0r o..w4 811 rk ono IF [WPO 32. 0AC 7170, .0. 135W.4 W4439122 FOUR MILE RANCH FRONTIER DEVELOPMENT ZA, r4MtL L A ANO ASSOCIA r£S Ave LNG/hMCR/NC Crt'SA TANTS Prost wriC[ 900 11122 - 1041 14SP[n •NP1C =MOM 14*0 41.111000 111442 11101 11-740 minute (gpm) was selected and the well was pumped continuously for a 72+ hour period. Drawdown and time data was collected during the test and is presented in the attached Table 1. The drawdown vs. time data can be used to project the yield of a well and associated aquifer. The drawdown is the distance the water level drops from the initial static water level during the pumping and recovery test. The drawdown will vary over time depending on the pumping intensity. We have plotted the pump test data in a drawdown vs. time curve for Well #1 as shown on the attached Figure 3. The well drawdown was approximately 10.3 feet over the first hour of the test. The well continued to drawdown with time to a level of 16.0 feet near the end of the 72 -hour test. As can be seen from Table 1 and Figure 3, the drawdown levels fluctuated upwards towards the end of the test. This period coincides with water quality monitoring equipment being attached to the pump and affecting the Iast two data points. Prior to these points the water level dropped 0.5 feet over a 3.5 hour period the morning of January 20, 1997. The Office of the State Engineer's Water Well Construction Rules (Rule 14.2) defines well yield as: "the yield of a well shall be determined as a stabilized production rate where the withdrawal rate and the drawdown do not change by more than 10% during the Iast hour of the test". The drawdown in the well in the last 3.5 hour period was 0.5 feet. The maximum drawdown was 16 feet. Therefore, the drawdown during this period was approximately 3% of the drawdown. (0.5 feet/ 16 feet) By the state's definition, the stabilized well yield for the pump test was 50 gpm. The pumping level at a rate of 50 gpm stayed well above the pump intake during the pumping test and utilized approximately 40% of the available drawdown (16 feet /41 feet). Recovery data for the well was collected for an 18 -hour period after pumping had stopped. The recovery data is presented in Table 2. The recovery plotted as residual drawdown is shown in Figure 4. Based on the residual drawdown curve, the well displayed normal recharge characteristics, or in other words the well recovered at the same rate at which it was pumped. it is estimated the well will return to the original static water level within 72 hours after pumping was terminated. The attached Table 3 presents the estimated water diversion requirements for the proposed 59 residential unit development. We have assumed that each residential unit will have 3.5 people, each using 100 gallons per person per day. The irrigated lawn and garden area for each unit was estimated to be 2500 ft2 for a total area of 3.39 acres. The irrigation consumption requirement was estimated to be 7.01 acre-feet and is distributed over the growing season based on plant demands. The irrigation application efficiency was assumed to be 70% resulting in a diversion requirement 10.01 acre-feet/acre. Page 4 • • • • • • • Table 1 Four Mile Ranch Well #1 Pumping Test Data WATER DRAW DATE TIME LEVEL DOWN t t" tit' 4 (ft) (ft) (min) - (min) (gpm) 17 -Jan -97 12:47 PM 50.6 0 0 -- - 0 17 -Jan -97 12:48 PM 56.9 6.3 1 --- - 50 17 -Jan -97 12:49 PM 58.0 7.4 2 - 50 17 -Jan -97 12:50 PM 58.6 8.0 3 - - 50 17 -Jan -97 12:51 PM 58.8 8.3 4 - - 50 17 -Jan -97 12:52 PM 59.0 8.5 5 50 17 -Jan -97 12:53 PM 59.2 5.6 6 - - 50 17 -Jan -97 12:55 PM 60.0 9.4 8 - 50 17 -Jan -97 12:57 PM 60.3 9/ 10 -- - 50 17 -Jan -97 12:59 PM 60.4 9,8 12 --- 50 17 -Jan -97 01:02 PM 60.4 9.8 15 - - 50 17 -Jan -97 01:07 PM 60.5 10.0 20 - - 50 17 -Jan -97 01:17 PM 60.6 10.0 30 --- --- 50 17 -Jan -97 01:27 PM 60.5 10.0 40 --- - 50 17 -Jan -97 01:37 PM 60.5 10.0 50 - --- 50 17 -Jan -97 01:47 PM 60.6 10,0 60 - - 50 17 -Jan -97 02:17 PM 60.8 10.3 90 --- - 50 17 -Jan -97 02:47 PM 61.0 10.4 120 --- - 50 17 -Jan -97 03:47 PM 60.9 10.3 180 -- - 50 17 -Jan -97 04:47 PM 61,0 10.4 240 -- --- 50 17 -Jan -97 05:30 PM 61.2 10.6 283 - --- 50 17 -Jan -97 09:47 PM 61.6 11.0 540 - --- 50 18 -Jan -97 05:47 AM 62.2 11.6 1020 - --- 50 18 -Jan -97 08:03 AM 62,3 11.7 1156 - -- 50 18 -Jan -97 05:00 PM 64.7 14.1 1693 - 50 18 -Jan -97 10:07 PM 65,0 14.5 2000 - - 50 19 -Jan -97 05:47 AM 65.4 14.8 2460 - 50 19 -Jan -97 02:30 PM 65.5 15.0 2983 - - 50 19 -Jan -97 05:30 PM 65,6 15.0 3163 - - 50 19 -Jan -97 09:30 PM 66.0 15.4 3403 ---- - 50 20 -Jan -97 05:45 AM 66.1 15.5 3898 --- 50 20 -Jan -97 09:15 AM 66.6 16.0 4108 50 -20-Jan-97 12:50 PM 65,3 14.8 4323 --- - 45 '20 -Jan -97 03:03 PM 65.3 14.8 4456 - - 45 ' Interuption of pumping rates duo to connection of water quality monitoring equipment. Table 2 Four Mile Ranch Well #1 Recovery Test. Data WATER DRAW DATE TIME LEVEL DOWN t t' tit` 4 (ft) (R) (rein) (min) (qpm) 20 -Jan -97 03:03 PM 65.33 14.8 4456 0 - 0 20 -Jan -97 03:04 PM 56.46 5.9 4457 1 4457,0 0 20 -Jan -97 03:05 PM 56,00 5.4 4458 2 2229.0 0 20 -Jan -97 03:06 PM 55.67 5.1 4459 3 1486.3 0 20 -Jan -97 03:07 PM 55,33 4.8 4460 4 1115.0 0 20-1an-97 03:08 PM 55.13 4.5 4461 5 892.2 0 20 -Jan -97 03:09 PM 54.92 4,3 4462 6 743/ 0 20 -Jan -97 03:11 PM 54.67 4,1 4464 8 558.0 0 20 -Jan -97 03:13 PM 54.50 3.9 4466 10 446.6 0 20 -Jan -97 03:15 PM 54.25 3.7 4468 12 372.3 0 20 -Jan -97 03:18 PM 54.21 3.6 4471 15 298.1 0 20 -Jan -97 03:23 PM 54.00 3.4 4476 20 223.8 0 20 -Jan -97 03:33 PM 53.71 3.1 4486 30 149.5 0 20 -Jan -97 03:43 PM 53.50 2.9 4496 40 112.4 0 20 -Jan -97 03:53 PM 53.33 2.8 4506 50 90,1 0 20 -Jan -97 04:03 PM 53.25 2.7 4516 60 75.3 0 20 -Jan -97 04:18 PM 53.17 2.6 4531 75 60.4 0 21 -Jan -97 09:05 AM 51.71 1.1 5538 1082 5.1 0 01/21/97 05:31 PM Zancanella & Assoc. PUMPTS2.WK4 f r i • • • PUMPTS2.WK4 Zancanella & Assoc. Recovery as Residual Drawdown Q ON) LIMO pima O w 1 z D) LL Following 50 gpm 72 -Hour Rump Test 1117/97 PUMPTS2.WK4 Zancanella & Assoc. 01121/97 09:37 AM 0 • • co co 1— • • • • Estimated Water Requirements - Four Mile Ranch rn 1 C 14 E a w 5 0 Pond Surface Area 0.00 acres Annual NetEvaporatlon 3.00 ft Livestock 15gatlday 0.00 units # gallons/day/unit 15.00 gallons Irrigated Open Space 0.00 acres Application Efficiency 70% Cro• Irri• re•mnt CIR 2.07 ft H V C raE W 0 Ts '2 .l E E a 0 # of Commercial Units 0.0 # persons/unit 3.5 # gallons/person/day 100 gpcd Percent Consumed 15% Lawn Irrigation 2500 sq-ftlunit Application Efficiency 70% Cro• Irrl• re•mnt CIR 2.07 ft Domestic Demands J # of Residences 59.0 units # persons/residence 3.5 cap/unit # gallons/person/day 100 gpcd Percent Consumed 5% Lawn Irrigation 2500 sq-ft/unit Application Efficiency 70% Crop Irrig regmnt (CIR) 2.07 ft ... asN d 7 7 N C co 0 (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) Domestic Commercial Dom%Comm Open Space Livestock Avg In-house In-house Irrigation Irrigation Total Total Flow (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (gaix1000) (gpm)' I- 66666 °moo ni 0 4 6 88888 00006 8488 O gSa8a 66660 ' oei000 nnl. N O 4 6 Opopp O ni () O 4 0 O or t O 0 6 6 �? r? � 4 0 0 P I�}} r �' 0.095 0.00 - 1.69 0.00 0.000 1.79 582.6 13.5 11 0.098 0.00 1.59 0.00 0.000 1.69 550.5 12.3 ij 0.098 0.00 1.19 0.00 0.000 1.28 418.1 9.4 1 0.095 0.00 0.91 0.00 0.000 1.01 328.8 7.6 nI- N00 cr?oo o N O§§ 6 O 000 N 0 8 0 co 8 000 mNm 40_ 0 OO ppG O 0 8 0 D 6 n c.,7VI 0 pp O [3 0 8 6 co 8 o1 ,Ly R d co ri csR d 0 6 C7. n o 6 e-- w N al P.2 a d cc 0 N 2.d (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Domestic Commercial DorniComm Open Space Livestock Average In-house in-house Irrigation Irrigation Total Flow (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (gpm) En C7 in Vd V SDI,- CD W n ®1 r r r,- 0 0 0 S$$ 0 0 0 Q p p o o o 6 d 0C]8$ 0 0 6 m►t.o r r r C! 0 CA 0 8 0 o o 0 o1 r !CS [D m I, m I^! O 6 0 N •Kt CD C1] f`7 N ID ei Y 4 tri O O 6 6 SS88 6 6 6 0 o' 1 W r N CV r 8888 6 0 0 0 O)ic CD rn r T r r 1.901 0.00 1.31 0.00 0.000 3,21 24.2 1.964 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.000 2.35 17.2 [r9 V 0 Cr)r r O d O d © 0 rn r 1.964 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 1.96 14,3 I 6 [V a 'o o ra O Q d o O r o 0 ti N r N C o 2- l7 > J r -2 k 2< 2 —2 -1 Q d to C7 0 4 Z C1 0 Z e R Lo 013 IJ • Based on the above assumptions, the peak diversion month would occur in June with a demand of 4.32 acre-feet or 32.6 gallons per minute. The annual diversion requirement is 33.14 acre-feet. The estimated annual water consumption • requirement is 8.17 acre-feet, with 1.16 acre-feet attributable to "in house" uses and 7.01 acre-feet from irrigation. • The entire 59 units will require a larger instantaneous peak demand than can be provided by the well alone. On site storage will be provided to supply peak domestic and fire storage demands. Sizing of storage facilities and associated distribution pipelines will be provided by High Country Engineering. However it is our understanding that a 300,000 gallon storage tank will be installed for peak demands and fire protection. • It is our opinion based on the existing hydrogeologic conditions, that with proper storage the well will be capable of serving the development's average domestic and irrigation needs. We recommend that the aquifer be monitored on a regular basis so that the water resource can be properly managed. During periods of low recharge (like a 1977 dry year), irrigation from the well at the proposed • development might require curtailment if seasonal recharge volumes are low. We recommend that a second well be constructed to provide mechanical reliability to the system. The current well and proposed well will be capable of providing the physical ! supply to the development. The legal water supply can be provided from contract water with the West Divide Water Conservancy District. The contract water enables use of district water rights to replace or "augment" diversions from the development, thus protecting any downstream water rights. Diversions from either well would initially be covered under a temporary exchange plan currently • approved by the Division of Water Resources. Use of the contract water will eventually require formal approval under a court approved augmentation plan at which time only the consumptive portion of water use will have to be replaced. Well permits from the Division of Water Resources will be approved subject to • being covered by the West Divide Water Conservancy District temporary exchange plan. The Four Mile Ranch Subdivision is located in area A of the West Divide District. During the pumping period of the test the well pumped some sand. Generally • suspended material (Turbidity) in a well will reduce to acceptable levels with continued pumping. Due to the weather conditions and the limited schedule only a small amount of time was allotted for well development. We recommend additional well development be performed for this well and that it be used as the backup well. The primary well should be constructed with a screened casing • which will require approximately 30 to 40 hours of rig well development. in most cases turbidity free water can be obtained. If this is not possible, it will be Page 9 • • necessary to provide additional filtration to meet Colorado Department of Health standards. • Finally, water samples of the pumping discharge were taken from Four Mile Ranch Well #1 but the analysis has not been completed by the investigating laboratory. We will make the results available to you as soon as we receive them from the lab. We estimate the laboratory results will be available on February 10th, 1997. • If you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office at (9701 945- 5700. • Very truly yours, Zancanella and Associates, Inc. • Terri L. Lance Geologist • A 7 .0"k t Thomas A. Zancanella, P. E. President • cc: Lee Leavenworth Joe Hope • F:193 505193505.11WELRPT. WPF.wpd • • Page 10 • • • 1 0 0 i 0 • CWs.ST 1199 NOTI Landowner's Nttn,1, Location: NE +/., NV HolaCc) to be Cortr:;ruct Purpcse of Mon;torin He Approximate Crate of Con .,Carl:;from or Tlriiidr Contra Terri Addre:, ; 1 CIO 5 iCoo +1 L V LUY-1 I:YrC. rC'-,,UL'r4,t.7 sem-) o*o Y.01/0.5 E OF INTENT TO. CO?sTKu'cT' MONITORING HOLE(S) Phase . cr . int legibly in black Ink RECEIVED r Mile Rano 4, Section 34. Township Nufnber 3 Lotim s(4 To monit ruction i7Crt pr fr ori aricane ,la & elDe fit: er Ave. l4y4Jner's Name / Fiongc �� 5Ay -kith Pat/17;A aEER —atirfaki DEC 1998 th 250 t Fx. Tyr,: and •lAntit I'fer Llc. Nc. iii applicable) 1095 Pl:anr: mss=s212.a._ rax Sifina ure CKNOWLEDGEr'�11Eta FROM STATE ENGINER'S GAF=iCrm F "R OF{;cE UsC ONLY D.'. -'c r'JorILZ 7(Ii:cL'v4fr s 0;v., J COLLAr s L. fr Ds,TE t,C'::,IC•.':LEDC i) (3 fou 1Q CC:`JDi t;OINS OF i .CP'•:l'DRUG 1 -1.. .. -LE Ai.KF'iiiWLtrCi'GENIEN 1 A c,PY Or T;,11E 4,fllrCr+1 NOTICE • T CE OP.. ACr44.104' 1 L)CiE:_TENIT fotiALLHe ",r.:1 rMati�C u• 1 AVAILABLE THE (MILLING'SfZk, 1 d: ArPvidad to :1e State Erpir.ecr DC IfjEC 3 .fir.r:,^,r. to ciAr•Ift.o-tti.;i1 G' fe�,)r:,..arlr;,a, 0 tlfJJ,.N.rtiC^, I•:,Rt!9l. Caratruetien of the hole a) m.st be camp:eced ,rhin days C. t`S1s date Notice walG •'v• S Tax-,r.;,l ar;df.�: .rm-in L t n f3 t. 1,, rate E;tu:r,ccr. p r 3 ,11011! re( exessd o oral ! 23 hou:c un,:,,o ;:ricr written approve' la cb1a; 1•Vatar G;vertrd Cturi � rr nod lra,°t the grata Cr.u;n;rc•;. n to tieu :i-n',i nor be vcsS.. :Dr 1•,^n.`'r:v'rol r ,,U;pc'seS. ing oivnr<• df the hs:.•,`;Sj +s rearpat .ola I -;r G4tN; + 1 r;, -,U pcvr71+Si51 er,r1 ce,.n..plyfni vAth all r.liis ar:-: rep] .iti'G ns partmlr",no to the s!i::vl:arga of ;luida produced t:urr;r feist:,1g. A,` w<a.l; rr,+.r:i cow,,F1, 1.14ji+ the V "ate•: Ii V' r• y'� �-+Jrs.., ..•;ir;n Rules, 2 CCR =02-2. MoLrur,^ vrns,rur'.+an st r., a variance tiotair:a J. 8 �rCs ttsvx[ ba fret o: Weil Cur+structien gnu To t Rep arts ;L;4ys-al) nil ,: bo t:Jbr.i:te:.d to thin office t y t• h u ! ..c asat1 c,a,strac-tor or au[4a:;eae' individual 9 k.irtiait CC day: +>} the.; cpicrt+Crs c! f1:± Narr r+leatien tape;::t ti .+zg hc :cs or.nz end Cb6arvat,on galas should rcfercnce1 tr.r 6,4H nUrnbar undsa• h+ch the rG P ° i wd5 i+l r d !�. . A �" v b co,�sp4ni: by r copy of t�,z ri art. L'r:+t. l.> a well Fat+rrnit k r� ai1at.�, the role'x1 r rap ort. 'f ;:lu5rjed and t;r,alvd w tf;in i:n.a (1; sra.:or titer construCf+an. An Abandonment Rcrl: t (form GI/VS-5) n•1 st to, subm+t:ed within 0 days of pfuQuing & ttaefrztg. The, e,, ner of eery llc,la(s) ,ould cr,eiratelo rozorl. o• 16,.:@t: quality tS'�t+r. G ltnr! cJ•]i[:it fhie .1,.t.7 to the Stott, :rp ;.n,i: cJrJn r.r.,s•x:t_ he r:` r;yt6l:rtfj holt; 1111,; r1c er, owner'..: J'rs.Gt v r+ �fw�, and held Owt, es ra9n:a and tlWrla':se ret.9: be r:ra+"ldar! .;r, s: II WI parrnh eDp•: •,tion(%), wail c:+r1, ruction and ab r,slo�r;,,e t r-.413. A r,'G:, Grim, holly CAR r;r,., b© cor'vort:.� to a cid+"` ,..l.i t,.4.:t l nrf�pn 1. Gara�, � Fr �:. ',+:ell i,.tl• 'r Than R rc+:cve;;r ti,r4:l} ynER�t~r 'rho rely or ►v,N vraC� Y - rUcS r. :.,. r, Iicoofu.A L"';l tams rL ;On CCr.1r3:47;1', 'Fl -Us ,ri Kr+1QV/L Et]. r1,1E1•r OP 1101-1C E DOEil4.'T Iti} :i Ci,T,: Tii.11"y ii . r+iLiri. f'ESli51 CAN t3 s Ad: 1::,al Ccr1.2r'•;.ur _�. L 1l q H SO Ukas-13 i 3 ;aH raf,1Ai4 8T -ANI 3' 7 -3fiNV E R.Cfl & 1'_03 3 J3 -86c-35. i frra'-t 30:,"..1-)1456-3589 • • • • P.O. Box 1908 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 "<\ Z414C4NELL4 4140 4SS+OCI4TE5 to, ENGINEERING CONSULT/11413' January 22, 1997 West Divide Water Conservancy District attn: Ms. Janet Maddock P.D. Box 1478 Rifle, Co. 81650-1478 RE: Four Mile Ranch - West Divide Water Conservancy District Contract Dear Janet: (970) 945-5700 (970) 945-1253 Fax On behalf of Four Mile Ranch Joint Ventures, we are requesting a contract with the West Divide Water Conservancy District to augment future depletions associated with well pumping at the proposed development located near Glenwood Springs. The • general location of the property and proposed wells are illustrated on Figure 1 and Figure 2 in the enclosed contract application. We have included a check in the amount of $210 to cover the application fee. The proposed development will consist of 59 lots served by two proposed wells • pumping into a central water system. We have calculated the estimated water requirements and depletions for the development as summarized on the attached Table 1. The development water requirements were calculated assuming 3.5 people per lot each using 100 gallons per day and a irrigated area of 2,500 square feet per lot. The unit irrigation water consumption was estimated to be 2.07 acre-feet per acre. • Assuming 5% depletions for in-house uses, the total depletions from the wells for the development is estimated to be 8.17 acre-feet annually. For accounting purposes Table 1 also summarizes depletions in gallons and gallons per minute. The contract application requests 8.98 acre-feet annually to account for a possible 10% transit loss charge by the Division 5 Engineer. • The two wells will be located on the Four Mile Ranch Property as shown on the attached Figures 1 and 2. It is our opinion that depletions from well pumping are tributary to the Roaring Fork River and are within the District's service area "A". Well permits will be requested from the Division of Water Resources following contract • approval by the District. Page -1- s • If you have any questions or require additional information please call our office at ■ (970) 945-5700. Very truly yours, Zancanella & Associates, Inc. (-. 97614--- Christop er Manera, P.E. CM:cm wlencl: cc: Mr. Lee Leavenworth, Leavenworth & Assoc. Mr. Don Barnes, Four Mile Ranch Joint Venture Mr. Joe Hope, High Country Engineering L.193505193505.11WDWCD1.W PD • • • • Page -2- • • • Contract No. Map ID No, Date Activated APPLICATION AND DATA FORM TO LEASE WATER FROM WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT A. APPLICANT Name Four Mile Ranch Joint Venture, c/o Frontier Development Address 1205 S. Platte River Drive, 101-A, Telephone Number 303 / 733 - 9787 Authorized Agent or Representative Lee Leavenworth Denver, CO 80223 B. WATER RIGHT OWNED BY APPLICANT Narne of Right Fourmile Ranch Well No. 1 and Well No. 2 Type of Structure or Right Wells * Location of Point of Diversion NEI/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 34, Twp. 6 S., Rnq. 89 W. Well #1 is 2029 ft. from the West Section Line and 433 ft. from the North Section Line. Well #2 will be 2100 ft. from the West Section Line and 380 ft. from the North. Section Line. • C. • • • Water Court Case No. n/a Well Permit No. (pending) INTENDED USE OF LEASED WATER Location of Area of Use (Include complete and accurate legal description of property on which water right is to be used. May be attached as Exhibit A) ---see attached Exhibit A Fi gu ps #1 and *2. Total Acreage 138.77 Description of Use Domestic uses within a residential development including irrigation and fire fighting uses. Number of Dwelling Units 5 Proposed Potable Water System Central water system supplied by Well Nos. 1 and 2. Proposed Waste -Water Treatment System Central Sewer Treatment Projected. Monthly Volume of Leased Depletions Jan. 35.20 Feb. 31.79 Mar. June. 640.82 July 605.55 Aug. Nov. 34.06 Dec, 35.20 • Annual Total Gallons , 2,926,400 Maximum Instantaneous Demand 150 (75 Water Needed in Gallons: ( x 1,000 gals) plus 10% (transit loss) 35.20 Apr. 34.06 May 520.61 459.93 Sept.361.71 Oct.132.28 Acre Feet 8.98 each)gpm D. OTHER REMARKS See attached Table 1 for breakdown of water use estimates and depletion rates. Depletion amounts include 10% transit losses to cover SEO administration. Date Si*_•%iii tr- _ .. / I r Signature //4 • Contract # Hap ID # Date Activated WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT Water Allotment Contract Name of Applicant: Four Mi le Rjncch ,Tni n#- VPntore Quantity of water in acre feet R.98 Applicant, hereby applies to the West Divide Water Conservancy District, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, organized pursuant to and existing by virtue of C.R.S. 1973, 37-45-101, et seq., (hereinafter referred to as the "District") for an allotment contract to beneficially and perpetually use water or water rights owned, leased, or hereafter acquired by the District. By execution of this application, and subsequent delivery and use of water, Applicant hereby agrees to the following terms and conditions: 1. Water Rights: Applicant shall own water rights at the point of diversion herein lawfully entitling Applicant to divert water, which will be supplemented by water leased herein. If Applicant intends to divert through a well, it must be understood by Applicant that no right to divert exists until a valid well permit is obtained from the State Engineer. 2. Quantity: Water applied for by the Applicant in the amount set forth above shall be diverted at Applicant's point of diversion from the District's direct flow water rights, and when water is unavailable for diversion pursuant to administration by the Colorado State •Engineer during periods when said direct flow water right is not in priority, the District shall release for the use of Applicant up to said quantity in acre-feet per year of storage water owned or controlled by.the District. .It is understood that any quantity allotted from direct flow, storage or otherwise, to the Applicant by the District will be limited by the priority of the District's decrees and by the physical and legal availability of water from District's sources. Any quantity allotted will only ,be provided so long as water is available and the Applicant fully complies with all of the terms and conditions of this contract. The District and the Applicant recognize that some of the District's decrees may be in the name of the Colorado River Water Conservation District, and the ability of the District to allot direct flow rights to the Applicant may be dependent on the consent of the Colorado River Water Conservation District. If at any time the Applicant determines it requires less water than the amount herein provided, it may so notify the District in writing, and the amount of water allotted under this contract shall be reduced permanently in accordance with such notice. Rates shall be adjusted accordingly in following water years only. 3. Beneficial Use and Location of Beneficial Use: Any and all water allotted Applicant by the District shall be used for the following beneficial use or uses: Municipal, domestic and related uses, or irrigation and commercial (except to the extent that Ruedi water may not be available for irrigation and commercial as those terms are defined on page 5 of Contract No. 2-07-70-W0547 between the UniteddtSsates andit euWestoDividyende ater ter Conservancy District) :App water allotted shall be within or'through facilities or upon }.and owned, leased, operated,. pr under Applicant's control. 4. Decrees and Delivery: Exchange releases made by the District out of storage from Ruedi Reservoir, or other works or facilities of the District, or from other sources available to the District, shall be delivered to the Applicant at the outlet works of said storage facilities or at the decreed point of -1_ • • • • f • • • r diversion for said other sources, and release or delivery of water at such outlets or points shall constitute performance of the District's total obligation. Delivery of water by the District from Ruedi Reservoir shall be subject to the District's lease contract with the 'United States Bureau of Reclamation. Releases from other facilities available to District shall be subject to the contracts, laws, rules, and regulations governing releases therefrom. Furthermore, the District hereby expressly reserves the right to store water and to make exchange releases from structures that may be built or controlled by the District in the future, so long as the water service to the Applicant pursuant ta this agreement is not impaired by said action. Any quantity of the Applicant's allocation not delivered to or Used by Applicant by the end of each water year (December 31), shall revert to the water supplies of the District. Such reversion shall not entitle Applicant to any refund of payment made for such water. Water service provided by the District shall be limited to the amount of water available in priority at the original point of diversion of the District's applicable water right, and neither the District, nor those entitled to utilize the District's decrees, may call on any greater amount at new or alternate points of diversion. The District shall request the Colorado State Engineer to estimate any conveyance losses between the original point and any alternate point, and such estimate shall be deducted from this amount in each case. The District, or anyone using the District's decrees, may call on any additional sources of supply that may be available at an alternate point of diversion, (though not at the original point of diversion) only as against water rights which are junior to the date of application for the alternate point of diversion. 5. Alternate Point of Diversion and Plan of Augmentation: Decrees for alternate points of diversion of the District's water rights or storage water may be required in order for Applicant to use the water service contemplated hereunder. Obtaining such decree is the exclusive responsibility of Applicant. The district reserves the exclusive right to review and approve any conditions which may be attached to judicial approval of said alternate point of diversion as contemplated or necessary to servo Applicant's facilities or lands. Applicant acknowledges and agrees that it shall be solely responsible for the procedures and legal and engineering costs necessary for any changes in water rights contemplated herein and further agrees to indemnify the Distriot from any costs or losses related thereto. Applicant is solely responsible for providing works and facilities necessary to obtain/divert the waters at said alternate point of diversion and deliver them to Applicant's intended beneficial use. Irrespective of the amounh of water actually transferred to the Applicant's point of diversion, the Applicant shall make annual payments to the District based upon the amount of water allotted under this agreement. In the event the Applicant intends to apply for an alternate point of diversion. and to develop an augmentation plan and institute legal proceedings for the approval of such augmentation plan to allow the Applicant to utilize the water allotted to Applicant hereunder, the Applicant shall give the District written notice of such intent. In the event the Applicant develops, and adjudicates its own augmentation plan to utilize the water allotted hereunder, Applicant shall not be obligated to pay any amount under paragraph 18 below. In any event, the District shall have the right to approve or disapprove the Applicant's augmentation plan and the Applicant shall provide the District copies of such plan and of all pleadings and other papers filed with the water court in the adjudication thereof. 6. Annual pa Ment: Annual payment tor the water service described herein shall be determined by the Board of Directors 0! th• District at a per aore-foot rate. The initial annual payment shall be made, in full, within thirty (30) days after the date of notice to the Applicant that the initial payment -2- Annual payment for the water service described herein shall be determined by the Board of Directors of e is riot atia per acre --foot Cate. The initial annual payment sh cull, within thirty (30) days after the date of notice to the Applicant that the initial payment is due.ethe Said er otideli ill l advise the Applicant, among other things, anthe pride which year to which the initial payment shall appy aznntsfor each hich is applicable to that year. Annual pay thereafter shall be due and payable by the Applicant on or before e each January 1. If an annual payment ie not thde by th odutoate, written be design notsuc thereof will be designateby the Applicant in re Applicant at such address as may nated in writing, then writing. (If no ddrens has been so Applicant's address set forth herein. said notice shall be sent to Ap, anent for Water use for any part of a water year shall require pay the entire water year. Nothing herein th$shall lnbelcrateonstrued its as ole dprevent iscretione District from for future years adjusting only. ting If payment ie not made within ten (10) days after the date of said written notice, Applicant halrintereskat District's this sole option have no further right, contract without further notice and delivery may be immediately curtaiwater s herein made m be trarate red,alnd the eased, oriotherwisef disposed a of at the diser�etivn of than the Board of Directors of the Distr at. the 1. Seou:— clt As security to the District, foregoing covenant oc annual payments in advance of water delivery, will be fully met by annual budget and appropriation of funds from such sources of revenues as may be ol he 1District,leto the the Applicant. As additional security person, hold harmless the District and any Applicant Gill oC othor governmental entit atifor quasi -governmental entitydue to , entity, for discontinuance in aervice herein the fail r ed fonhe Applicant to maintain the payments current basis. Applicant agrees to defray any out-of-pocket expenses incurred by thh_cDie e District in connection with the allotment of water including, but not limited to, reimbursement legate ndreugdne, costs incurred in connection with any water regal and engineering to allow Applicant's use of such rights and adjudication necessary allotted water rights. 8. Aesi n successorsioraassigns ofreement shall inure to the the parties hereto, beenefit of the e rs, in the event xcept that no ottedg hereunder shall bepermitted pbe mused dfor the benefitohe fwater right al hi interests by two (2) or more users of the water land which will be subdivided or otherwise held or ownedin separate ownership r Cq arty to be right allotted hereunder. in no ,vont shall the owner ofa portion, but less than all, of the Applicant's shereunder. Abe Applicant's rights under this contract shall be served under this contract, have any rig requirements as the assignment of the mu with, such req subject to and mutt comply assignment of contract District may hereafter adapt regarding by assignees and herein shall prevent successors to a portion rights and the assumption of contract obligationsthe District for of ?p 1Lcant'rgthproperty from applying to of App individual and separate allotment contracts. Applicant shall be bound by the 9, Other: Rules x APP the rules and all provisions of t e Water onservancy Act of Colorado/ by other and regulations aeofha d Board suppla erntsathereto the andstbycal amendments that applicable law, Applicant 10reeraant' with the poaratlon and Haim an�nananca a gmentt pp Dist arta[ under terms •pore ..on an• District of tDtst and ifnandiwhen, the Board of said District the Boacd of Directors of the District, -3 • determines in its sole discretion that sch ot an agreement ment i required. Said agreement may contain, connir teration ted 40 to, provisions for additional annual mocesta and for additional extension of District delivery or for cos taystoa the +Distr ictowhichd mays arise cthroughnance � other services made available to the Applicant. il. Chanoe at Uses The District roeexclusive right to review, reapprove cc disapprove anyny proposed change in use of the water allotted hereunder. Any use other than that set forth herein or any lease oC sale of the water or water of rights allotted hereunder without the prior written approval the District shall be deemed to be a material breach of thia contract. 12. Use and T+lacs of Use: Applicant agrees to use the water in the manner an on t e property described in the documents 4 submitted to the District at the time this agreements isreference executed (said documents are incorporated herein by thereto), or in any operation and maintenance agreement provided by Applicant. Any use other than as set forth thereon than as or any lease or ol the permitted sineparagraph a8eabove, hall rights ti deemed to behar material breach or this agreement. 13. Titles It is undsratood and agreed that nothing herein shall be nterpreted to give the Applicant any equitable or legal fee title interest in or to any nater or water rights referred to herein. 14. ConseCvationt Applicant shall use commonly accepted conservat on practices with respect to the water And water rights herein,' and hereby agrsea the toiskrict be and y any ny r conservation plan adopted hereafter by District owned QC controlled water or water rights. 15. Restrictionst Applicant shall restrict uses as ended to Violation (unless ftheses restrictions ace shalla be deemed to this be agreement). Violation of , , .� . . breach of.this agreamentil -.:,i, ......, :. Annual Haximum Olvvrsion 40 Use 1/3 acre foot Dorsestic omesticd 1 — 3 acre teat (includes lawn) 1 acre foot/104 head Livestock (cattle) 12 a 3 acro feet/acre Irrigation 16. Well Fermit: It Applicant intends to. divert through a well, ten APP cant must provide to District a copy of Applicant's 'valid permit before District is obligated to deliver any water hereunder. Re resentations: By executing this agreement, la a s not relying on any Applicant agrees that believe he has received from the Dengineering advice that he mays that District. -Applicant further act ft;om his evWnasourcaaeother d all necethan aCY legal and engineering advicethat the than the District. Applicant warranties, oroassura knowledcab whatsoever aistict makes no goarquaeelis abouttthe quantity or quality of water available pursuant e to this agreement. Should the District be unable to provide tins tater ter contracted for herein, no damages may be assessed ag iJistrict, nor may Applicant obtain a refund from the District. oa a no u e Applicant's contract 18. Casts of Water Court pilin s Should the District, he its awn disc a tor alternate point of diversion herein in a water court fthengApplicant hereby' agrees to pay ytto theh plan of augmentation,wenasaan additional fee repreeen ins t'e e r'sDistrict, when assessed, District's actual and idq Ceasanable costs and fees foo ApP share of the p • • -4- • • • • M • 19. Binding Agreements This Agreement shall not be complete nor binding upon the District unless attached hereto is the form entitled "Application for Purchase of Waters from the West Divide Water Conservancy District" fully completed by Applicant and approved by the District's engineer. Said attachments shall by this reference thereto be incorporated into the terms of this agreement. 20. Warning: IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO OBTAIN A VALID WELL PERMIT OR OTHER WATER RIGHT IN ORDER TO DIVERT WATER, INCLUDING THE WATER ACQUIRED UNDER THIS CONTRACT. IT IS THE CONTINUING DUTY OF THE APPLICANT TO MAINTAIN THE VALIDITY OF THE WELL PERMIT OR WATER RIGHT INCLUDING FILING FOR EXTENSIONS OF PERMITS, FILING WELL COMPLETION REPORTS, FILING STATEMENTS OF BENEFICIAL USE, OR OTHERWISE LAWFULLY APPLYING THE WATER TO BENEFICIAL USE ON A REGULAR BASIS WITHOUT WASTE. STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF GARFIELD ss. ) APPLI NTs , p By f, • AP NT ADDRESS /4/11,744z-vin-t-Rfr The fore oing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of r rte. 19 by Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: cj,-)-(fl i 00ndetu 0 liotAry pulAP--C) ORDER After a hearing by the Board of Directors of the West Divide Water Conservancy District on the gabovedapplicand ation, it is itait hereby ORDERED that said application be shall be and is accepted by the District. WEST DIVIDE WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT ATTEST; 40 Secretary • 40 By President Date This contract includes and is subject to the terms.and conditions of the following documents which must accompany this contract; • - 1. Hap showing location of point of diversion (use map provided)t 2. Application and Data Form fully completed and signed 3. Other -5- • • PROPERTY DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SW1/4NE1/4, THE SE1/4NW1/4, THE SW1/4 AND THE SE1/4 OF SECTION 27 AND IN THE NE1/4 AND THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN; COUNTY OF GARFIELD, STATE OF COLORADO; SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 27; THENCE N 88°28'35" W ALONG THE EAST -WEST CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 27 1127.60 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 117 (FOUR MILE ROAD), THE TRUE POINT QF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST - WEST CENTERLINE N 18°56'44" W ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY 36.69 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY N 73°20'59" E 38.23 FEET; THENCE N 82°06'12" E 63.31 FEET; THENCE N 86°20'37" E 270.00 FEET; THENCE N 85°10'08" E 785.86 FEET TO A REBAR & CAP L.S. #6973 IN PLACE; THENCE S 54°17'37" E 186.62 FEET TO A REBAR & CAP L.S. #6973 IN PLACE; THENCE S 53°49'22" E 151.66 FEET TO A REBAR & CAP L.S. #6973 IN PLACE; THENCE S 43°17'21" E 231.65 FEET TO A REBAR & CAP L.S. #6973 IN PLACE; THENCE S 13°45'28" E 432.09 FEET; • THENCE S 09°31'33" E 752.63 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE N1/2SE1/4 OF SAID SECTION 27, A REBAR & CAP L.S. #5447 IN PLACE; THENCE S 88°26'43" E ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 337.95 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE S 01°26'34" W 750.13 FEET; THENCE S 88°24'24" E 293.01 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE SW1/4SE1/4 OF SAID SECTION 27; THENCE S 01°25'47" W ALONG SAID AO EASTERLY LINE 593.22 FEET TO THE EAST 1/16 CORNER OF SECTIONS 27 AND 34; THENCE S 08°36'18" W 691.41 FEET; THENCE N 79°38'39" W 447.68 FEET; THENCE N 84°09'51" W 254.28 FEET; THENCE N 83°37'26" W 279.76 FEET; THENCE N 83°46'47" W 395.98 FEET; THENCE N 83°37'23" W 309.58 FEET; THENCE N 84°01"09" W 354.18 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SAID COUNTY ROAD NO. 117, A REBAR AND • ALUMINUM CAP IN PLACE; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FIVE (5) COURSES ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY: 1. N 10°48'50" W 828.56 FEET 2. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 680.30 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 37°20'20", A DISTANCE OF 443.34 FEET (CHORD BEARS N 07°11'40" E 435.54 FEET) 4' 3. N 25°51'50" E 316.05 FEET 4. ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 881.92 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44°40"10", A DISTANCE OF 687.57 FEET (CHORD BEARS N 03°31'45" E 670,29 FEET) 5. N 19°25'02" W 1043.51 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 138.773 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. • • Exhibit A • • • • .0 ca1— • • • • Estimated Water Requirements - Four Mile Ranch Water Use Inputs Consumptive Use (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) Domestic Commercial DomlComm Open Space Livestock Avg In-house In-house Irrigation irrigation Total Total Flow (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (gaIx1000) (gpm) I,- 600006" 0 VIN ¢ b' 0000 O 6666 8888888 66d3666d 8888P??,P) 8888888 66ci o a6aa60O W Ch O ci Q a C] CN] O 0 C] c) C] C) 0 CI O as 0 C) TJ. U) - Q 0 0 i,C.) eD 10 0) I� rr O 66 d o In 110 9) W O o 0 0.098 0.00 1.19 0.00 0.000 1.28 418.1 9.471 0,095 0.00 0.91 0.00 0.000 1.01 328.8 7.6 jI i- c'i n N N. {`7 Ci 6 888 o N88 888 ci 6 acro r- o C] 0 - Ci C✓ ci va ao 6 � 6 Cl CN) 0 C3 © c7 0 o vi 0 Ea N P+ l- Ca O 6 8 c O 8 o r 7 Diversion Requirements (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Domestic Commercial DomlComm Open Space Livestock Average In-house In-house Irrigation Irrigation Total Flow (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (ac -ft) (gprn) vs r.NN W r 0 8 0 d] 8 8 6 d) to r 1.774 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 1.77 14.3 1.964 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 1.96 14.3 1 r an in N Cr) pp Off) [S) C) r 64 0 6 0 8 8 Ci oao C7 r-- N 8 8 8 664 8 0 0 r r r 1.964 0.00 _ 2.27 0.00 0.000 4.24 30.9 11.964 0.00 1.69 0.00 0.000 3.66 26.7 Nro)C) . N P1 6cirr 6 6 C? C) aciaa r O 8 8 6 6 0) cn r r r 8p ( d) 0) 6 6 8 4 o 6 8 8 66 a) co r Y c in o SV r ri 0 8 0 0 N- 8 6 r N C A a d:1 a.. Pq n 7 7 di v O C d c Pti al 5 N • i • • • (i) 1-- V7 I 4� 581 Z rn '' 471 Baa HoaY36 M 68 Rng. 89 W. 1 1u Twp. 6S. 6.34 I Four Mlle Ranch ! )7P)),,P 724 / County Road 117 • 1 . . 1 • . EEV I BATE I REV,S,ON r] Four Mile Ranch Wells #1 and #2 LOCATION MAP FOUR MILE RANCH SCALE 1'=2C0I7 MADE CHKD APPD BRAWN: BY BY BY 71.1. DATE January 21. 1997 CHKO: 'RPM TAZ SHEEP: 1 of 5 PLAN: 93505.1k/ran P.x Ctlr� gen I O.. C'^`+OS^!n. CO I, KU PM MSS NO FIGURE NO: 2 PROJECT: 93545 1 TITLE COMMITMENTS • • LOYAL E. LEAVENWORTH CYNTHIA C. TESTER SHANE I. HARVEY DONALD H. HAMBURG Of Counsel LEAVENWORTH & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Mr. Joe Hope High Country Engineering • 923 Cooper Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 • • • • Re: Four Mile Dear Joe: January 7, 1997 • a iii ji 1011 GRAND AVENUE P.O. DRAWER 2030 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 TELEPHONE: (970) 945-2261 FAX: (970) 945-7336 Enclosed are copies of the title policies that were issued at the time of the sale of the ranch. One portion is owned by M -R Colorado Investors, Inc., and the balance is owned by One And A Quarter Mile Ranch, Inc. Both are Colorado corporations. At the time of the sale of the property to the corporations, the seller, Four Mile Ranch Development Company, a Colorado corporation, also entered into a joint venture agreement with these two corporations, which provides for the development of the property and appoints Four Mile Ranch Development Company the managing joint venture partner for that purpose. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, LEAVENWORTH & ASSOCIATES, P.C. y • i LEL.: r1b Enclosures • CAFI LESMOPE. 1 LT 1 El Leavenworth SEC -23-96 14t22 FROM: LAND TITLE ID:97094547e4 MI r^. im LAND T I TL'�' GUARANTEE C-PANY I ■ 1 RIECE IV , r ;t�.� -1:; (! tJ rjJf g ( 7 M -R COLORADO INVESTORS, INC. C/O LISA SHIMEL • 3500 S. YOSEMITE #789" DENVER, CO 80237 • Dear Customer: PAGE 1/12 Land Title Guarantee Company is pleased to provide you with your Title Insurance Policy, This valuable document insures • good and marketable title to your property_ Please review the Policy in its entirety_ We at Land Title Guarantee Company believe in providing you, our customer, with a quality product which will serve your needs_ In the event you do find any discrepancy, or if .you have any • questions or comments regarding your final policy, please contact the following department and we will gladly handle any request' you may have as efficiently and quickly as possible. TITLE iEPART E TZ' 41 TELEPHONE # (303)945.-2510 FAX #(303)945-4784 PLEASE REFER TO ORDER NO. GW220895 Should you decide to sell the property described in Schedule • A, or if you are required to furnish a new title commitment for mortgage purposes, you may be entitled to a credit toward future title insurance expenses. Land Title Guarantee Company will retain a copy of the unclosed title policy, and in the event you do need future services,'we will be in a position to again serve you promptly and efficiently. • • Thank you very much for giving Land. Title Guarantee Company the opportunity to serve you. Post -it- Fax Note 7671 Gd0 1 // 3 To EE F `P Co.Dept_ Co. Z %ti ., Face 9q 7g3 6:" Fax fp DEC -23-96 14=22 FROM:LAND TITLE Eko m AO 4/95 ' Order No. GTF220895 • SC.:tiEvULE A ID = 9 7054 54 784 Policy LTHH220895 PAGE 2/12 Amount $1,267000.00 Address GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO 1. Policy.Date: June 26, 1996 at 5:00 P.M. 2. Name of Insured: M -R COLORADO INVESTORS, INC. 3. The estate or interest in the land described in this Schedule and which is covered by this policy is: A Mee Simple 4 Title to the estate or interest covered by this policy at the date hereof is vested in: M -R COLORADO INVESTORS, INC. 5. The land referred to in this policy is situated in GARFIELD County, Colorado, and is described as follows: PARCEL A A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 27 AND IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO; SAID PARCEL CREATED BY SUBDIVISION OF A. BOUNDARY PLAT OF PORTIONS OF SAID SECTIONS 27 AND 34 DATED MAY 23, 1973 AND REVISED AUGUST 8, 1978 AND SIGNED 'AND SEALED BY JACK W. JOHNSON, COLORADO R.L.S. NO. 4551; SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE COMMON SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27 AND NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34, THENCE S. 85 DEGREES 54'20" W. MORE OR LESS 872.56 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N. 11 DEGREES 28'30" W. MORE OR LESS ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE 415.76 FEET MORE OR LESS; THENCE N. 81 DEGREES 00'44" E. MORE OR LESS 644.97 FEET MORE OR LESS; THENCE N.'50 DEGREES 05'16" E. MORE OR LESS 1358.53 FEET MORE • OR LESS; THENCE S. 88 DEGREES 24'24" E. MORE OR LESS 33803 FEET MORE OR LESS; THENCE S. 01 DEGREES 26'34" W. MORE OR LESS 750.30 FEET MORE LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY 40 Page 1 This Policy valid only if Schedule B is attached. DEG -23-96 14:22 FROM:LAND TITLE 'orm AO 4/95 ID:97094E4784 Policy b'_' LTEE!220895 PAGE 3/12 )rder No. GTF220895 Amount $1,267,000.00 SCHEDULE A • OR LESS; THENCE S. 88 DEGREES 24'24" E. MORE OR LESS 290.80 FEET MORE OR LESS; THENCE S. 01 DEGREES 29'1.1." W. MORE OR LESS 123.21 FEET MORE OR LESS; THENCE S. 75 DEGREES 54'S4" W. MORE OR LESS 1622.27 FEET MORE • OR LESS; THENCE S. 81 DEGREES 00'44" W. MORE OR LESS 644.97 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPTING FROM THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION THE PLOTTED RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE COUNTY ROAD LEADING DIRECTLY TO GLENWOOD AIRPORT_ • • COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO PARCEL B A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE S1/2 OF SECTION 27.AND IN THE N1/2 OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO; SAID PARCEL CREATED BY SUBDIVISION OF A BOUNDARY PLAT OF PORTIONS OF SAID SECTIONS 27 AND 34 DATED MAY 22, 1973 AND REVISED AUGUST 8, 1978 AND SIGNED AND SEALED BY JACK W . - JOTS ON , 40 COLORADO R.L.S. NO. 4551; SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE COMMON SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27 AND NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34, THENCE S. 85 i DEGREES 54'201T W. MORE OR LESS 872.66 FEET MORE. OR LESS TO A REBAR AND CAP SET IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF FOUR -MILE COUNTY ROAD, THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N. 81 DEGREES 00'44" E. MORE OR LESS €44.97 PEET MORE OR LESS TO A REBAR AND CAP; THENCE N. 75 DEGREES. 54'54" E. MORE OR LESS 1522.27 FEET MORE • OR LESS TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SW1/4SE1/4 OF SAID SECTION 27; THENCE S. 01 DEGREES 29'11" W. MORE OR LESS 469.77 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE S.E. CORNER OF SAID SW1/4SE1/4; THENCE S. 08 DEGREES 36118" W. MORE OR LESS 691.22 FEET MORE OR LESS; • THENCE N. 79 DEGREES 38'39" W. 444.88 FEET MORE OR LESS; THENCE N. 84 DEGREES 09'51" W. 254.28 FEET; `iii NCE N. 83 DEGREES 37'26" W. 279.76 FEET; THENCE N. 83 DEGREES 46'47" W. 395.98 FEET; THENCE N. 83 DEGREES 37'23" W. 309.58 FEET; THENCE N. 84 DEGREES 01'09" W. 354.18 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A • POINT IN SAID EASTERLY LINE OF FOUR -MILE COUNTY ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE N. 10 DEGREES 08'57" W_ 412.87 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY 0 Page 2 This Policy valid only if Schedule B is attached_ DEC -23-56 14:2.1 litUt.1,LANU LI ii}97054547E34 +arm. AO 4/95 }rder No_ GTF220895 SCHEDULE A • COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO • • • • • • • • AZ) Policy LT {220895 PAGE 4/12 Amount $1,267,00'0.00 LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY Page 3 This Policy valid only if Schedule B is atcached. 1 -Nue -1=1 -MNL •orm AO 4/95 Order No. GTF220895 pPolicy No. LTHH220895 10,104,4/C14 r'Ai;t b/12 • SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2_ Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3_ Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and 40 inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records_ 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. • GENERAL OR SPECIAL TAKES AND ASSESSMENTS REQUIRED TO BE PAID IN THE YEAR 1997 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS. DEED OF TRUST DATED June 20, 1996, FROM M -R COLORADO INVESTORS, INC_ TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF GARFIELD COUNTY FOR THE USE OF FIRST UNITED BANK TO SECURE THE SUM OF $1,257,000.00 RECORDED June 26, 1996, IN BOOK 983 AT PAGE 99 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 494973_ THE EFFECT OF INCLUSIONS IN ANY GENERAL QR SPECIFIC WATER CONSERVANCY, FIRE PROTECTION, SOIL CONSERVATION OR OTHER DISTRICT OR INCLUSION IN ANY WATER • SERVICE OR. STREET IMPROVEMENT AREA. ■ ige WATER RIGHTS OR CLAIMS TO WATER RIGHTS. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED June 20, 1893, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 233, RECORDED APRIL 30, 1894 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 318, RECORDED JULY 29, 1895 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 375, AND RECORDED MARCH 4, 1935 IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 194 RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED June 20, 1893, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 233, RECORDED APRIL 30, 1894 IN HOOK 12 AT PAGE 318, RECORDED JULY 29, 1895 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 375, RECORDED NOVEMBER 18, 1912 IN BOOK 71 AT PAGE 576, AND RECORDED MARCH 4, 1935 IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 194. EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF COMMUNICATION AND OTHER FACILITIES AS GRANTED TO THE MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY BY WILLIAM F. STEVENS IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED APRIL 28, 1972 IN BOOK 430 AT PAGE 139. 4 DEG -23 -se 14 23 FROM :LAND T L TLE 'torn. AO 4/95 • 10,97084E4764 84E4764 PAGE 6/12 (- Or c e`'r No. GTF220895 Policy No. LTHH220895 SCHEDULE B 12. MAP AND STATEMENT OF ROCtY MOUNTAIN NATURAL GAS COMPANY TRANSMISSION LINE RECORDED IN ROAD BOOK 3 AT PAGE 128. lip. 28. 3. UNDIVIDED ONE-FOURTH INTEREST IN ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER MINERAL RIGHTS AS RESERVED BY FRANCIS W. CHRISTENSEN IN DEED RECORDED JUNE 10, 1950 IN BOOK 251 AT PAGE 25, AND ANY AND ALL .ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF OR INTERESTS THEREIN. 14. UNDIVIDED ONE-FOURTH INTEREST IN ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER MINERAL RIGHTS AS RESERVED BY RAYMOND SMALTS IN DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 1, 1951 IN BOOK 260 AT • PAGE 546, AND ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF OR INTERESTS THEREIN. '-5. RltGai't'S OF WAY POR ROADS ACCRQSS SUBJECT PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON SURVEY SY JACK W. JOHNSON, DA 0 MAY 23, 1973. -6. EXISTING LEASES AND TENANCIES, IF ANY. . ENCROACHMENT OF FENCE ONTO COUNTY ROAD 117 RIGHT OF WAY AS SHOWN ON SURVEY PREPARED BY HIGH COUNTRY ENG IN EER ING , DATED JANUARY 10, 1994. • • • • 5 • • UbC.-24-b 1,4 = 2s rxLJCti: l,rh8}{U l l 1Lc 1J b/dbH�i/b4 l ..: LAND TITLE GUARANTEE C O (PAN Y ONE AND A QUARTER MILE RANCH, INC. C/O LISA SHIMEL 3500 S. YOSEMITE #789 DENVER, CO 80237 Dear Customer: 0 Land Title Guarantee Company is pleased to provide you with 'your Title Insurance Policy. This valuable document insures good and marketable title to your property. Please review the policy in its entirety. We at Land Title Guarantee Company believe in providing you, our customer, with a auality product which will serve your needs. In the event you do find any discrepancy, or if you have any questions or comments regarding your final policy, please contact the following department and we will gladly handle any request you may have as efficiently and quickly as possible. TITLE DEPARTMENT TELEPHONE ;# (303)945-2610 FAX #(303)945-4784 PLEASE REFER TO ORDER NO. GW220896 Should you decide to sell the property described in Schedule A, or if you are required to furnish a new title commitment for mortgage purposes, you may be entitled to a credit toward future title insurance expenses. Land Title Guarantee Company will retain a copy of the enclosed title policy, and in the event you do need future services, we will be in a position to again serve you promptly and efficiently. Thank you very much for giving Land Title Guarantee Company the opportunity to serve you. t-A(:E 7/12 OEC -2-3-6 14:24 r.roin:LmINcu 1 1i„c t orrrz AO 4/95 41-J:=/0 4:4eln4 Policy No. LTHH220896 Order No. GTF220896 Amount $1,233,000.00 SCHEDULE A • Address GARFIRLD COUNTY, COLORADO 1_ Policy Date: June 26, 1996 at 5:00 P.M. 2. Name of Insured: • ONE AND A QUARTER MILE RANCH, INC_ 3. The estate or interest in the land described in this Schedule and which is covered by this policy is: A -Fee Simple 4 Title to the estate or interest covered by this no? icy at the date hereof is vested in: s ONE AND A QUARTER MILE RANCH, INC. 5. The land referred to in this policy is situated in GARFIELD County, Colorado, and is described• as follows: • PARCEL A A PARCEL OF LAND SITUA2 D IN SECTION 27; TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, GARFIEz,D COUNTY, COLORADO; SAID PARCEL CREATED BY SUBDIVISION OF A BOUNDARY PLAT OF PORTION OF SAID SECTION 27 AND OF SECTION 34, SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE, DATED MAY 23, 1973 AND REVISED AUGUST 8, 1978 AND SIGNED AND SEALED BY JACK W_ JOHNSON, COLORADO R.L.S. NO. 4551; SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CENTER SECTION CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27, THENCE N. 88 DEGREES 28'35" W. ALONG THE EAST -WEST CENTER # LINE OF SAID SECTION 27 1127.60 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF FOUR -MILE COUNTY ROAD, THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N. 18 DEGREES 56'.44" W. 36.69 FEET; THENCE N. 73 DEGREES 20'59" E. 38.23 FEET; THENCE N. 82 DEGREES 06'12" E. 63.31 FEET; THENCE N. 86 DEGREES 20'37"T E. 270.00 FEET; THENCE N. 85 DEGREES 10'08" E_ 785.86 FEET; THENCE S. 54 DEGREES 17'37" E. 186.62 FEET; THENCE S. 53 DEGREES 49'22" E. 151.66 FEET; LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY Page 1 This Policy valid only if Schedule B is attached. 0= .-Ga- G i 4 = 44 rKUM , .LANLJ 114L -t. form AO 4/95 Order No_ GTF220896 YAl 5/12 Policy No LTHH220895 Amount $1,233,000.00 SCHEDULE A THENCE S. 43 DEGREES 17'21" B. 231.65 FEET; THENCE S. 13 DEGREES 45'28' E. 432.09 FEET; THENCE S. 09 DEGREES 31'33" E. 326.76 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A REBAR AND CAP SET IN AN EXISTING FENCE LINE; THENCE S. 89 DEGREES 27'55' W. MORE OR LESS 1382.73 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A REBAR AND CAP SET IN SAID EASTERLY LINE OF FOUR - MILE COUNTY ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE N. 19 DEGREES 25'01" W. MORE OR LESS 1043.52 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO PARCEL B A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST OP THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO; SAID PARCEL CREP_TED BY SUBDIVISION OF A BOUNDARY PLAT OF PORTIONS OF SAID SECTION 27 AND Or SECTION 34, SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE, DATED MAY 23, 1973 AND REVISED AUGUST 8, 1978 AND SIGNED AND SEALED 3Y JACK W. JOHNSON, COLORADO R.L.S. NO. 4551; SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CENTER SECTION CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27, THENCE S. 39 DEGREES 16'27" W. MORE OR LESS 1232.64 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A REBAR AND CAP SET IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF FOUR - MILE COUNTY ROAD, THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE N. 89 DEGREES 27'55" E. MORE OR LESS 1382.73 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A REBAR AND CAP SET IN AN EXISTING FENCE LINE; THENCE S. 09 DEGREES 31'33" E. 425.47 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE N1/2SE1/4 SAID SECTION 27; THENCE S. 50 DEGREES 05'16" W. MORE OR LESS 1368.53 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A REBAR AND CAP; THENCE S. 81 DEGREES 00'44" MORE OR LESS .644.97 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A REBAR AND CAP SET IN SAID EASTERLY LINE OF FOUR - MILE COUNTY ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 680.30 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 37 DEGREES 20'20", A DISTANCE OF 443.34 FEET MORE OR LESS; THENCE ALONG -SAID EASTERLY LINE N. 25 DEGREES 51'50" E. 316.05 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 883.92 FEET AND CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44 DEGREES 40'10", A DISTANCE OF 687.57 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY Page 2 This Policy valid only if Schedule 13 is attached. 'corm AO 4/95 emu 10/12 Order No. GTF220896 $ �oZicy Na. LTHH220896 SCHEDULE B LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY Page 3 This Policy valid only if Schedule B is attached_ U&L:.-24-1e 14 43 t -NUM LANL) i 1 1Lt. Order No. GTF220896 Form AO 4/95 i SCHEDULE B 1LI: /k1b4a47t]4 j-AL.:n 1 1/ 12 0 Policy No_ LTHB220896 This policy does not insure against loss or damage by .reason of the following: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the • public records_ 2_ Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3_ Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, • encroachments, and any. facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4 Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by 1aw • and not shown by the public records_ 3 GENERAL OR SPECIAL TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS REQUIRED TO BE PAID IN THE YEAR 1997 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS. - �. DEED OF TRUST DATED June 20, 1996, FROM ONE AND A QUARTER MILE RANCH, INC. TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF GARFIELD COUNT' FOR THE USE OF FIRST UNITED BANK TO SECURE THE SUM OF $1,233,000.00 RECORDED June 26, 1996, IN BOOK 983 AT PAGE 131 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 494977. THE EFFECT OF. INCLUSIONS IN ANY GENERAL OR SPECIFIC WATER CONSERVANCY, FIRE • PROTECTION, SOIL CONSERVATION OR OTHER DISTRICT OR INCLUSION IN ANY WATER SERVICE OR STREET IMPROVEMENT AREA. • WATER RIGHTS OR CLAIMS TO WATER RIGHTS. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED June 20, 1893, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 233, RECORDED APRIL 30, 1894 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 318, RECORDED JULY 29, 1895 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 375, AND RECORDED MARCH 4, 1935 IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 194. 40- RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED June 20, 1893, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 233, RECORDED APRIL 30, 1894 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 318, RECORDED JULY 29, 1895 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 375, RECORDED NOVEMBER 18, 1912 IN BOOR 71 AT PAGE 576, AND RECORDED MARCH 4, 1935 IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 194. EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF COMMUNICATION AND OTHER FACILITIES AS GRANTED TO THE MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY BY WILLIAM F. STEVENS IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED APRIL 28, 1972 IN BOOK 430 AT PAGE 139. •ge 4 DEG -23-96 14=25 FROM:LAND T1IiLE 10;9709454794 PAGE 12/12 Form AG 4/95 Order No. GTF220896 Policy No. LTHH220896 SCHEDULE s 12. MAP AND STATEMENT OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATURAL GAS COMPANY TRANSMISSION LINE RECORDED IN ROAD BOOK 3 AT PAGE 128. 13. UNDIVIDED ONE-FOURTH INTEREST IN ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER MINERAL RIGHTS AS 0 RESERVED BY FRANCIS W. CHRISTENSEN IN DEED RECORDED JUNE 10, 1950 IN BOOK 251 AT PAGE 25, AND ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF OR INTERESTS THEREIN. 14. UNDIVIDED ONE-FOURTH INTEREST IN ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER MINERAL RIGHTS AS RESERVED BY RAYMOND SMALTS IN DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 1, 1951 IN BOOK 260 AT PAGE 546, AND ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF OR INTERESTS THEREIN. 15 RIGHTS OF WAY FOR ROADS ACCROSS SUBJECT PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON SURVEY BY W. JOHNSON, DATED MAY 23, 1973. JACK 16. EXISTING LEASES AND TENANCIES, IF ANY. 1,7 _ ENCROACHMENT OF FENCE ONTO COUNTY ROAD 117 RIGHT OF WAY AS SHOWN ON SURVEY PREPARED BY HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, DATED JANUARY 10, 1994. xx� age • 5