Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.02 Application Part 3• Sketch Plan preliminary Plan Final Plat SUBDIVISION A . PLICATION FORM G +i..'=ILD COUNTY SUBDIVISION NAME: Fain Mile Ranch M -R Colorado Investors, Inc. and One And A Quarter Ranch, Inc. CIWNERF/oFour K±le RanchDevelopment C©mPanv, Inc., 'Mana•in• Joint Venture Partner KNGTNMER/PLA R/SURVETOR: = •h . _. -,. .. . LOCATION: Sections 27 & 34 Township 6 South WATER SOURCE: Pumped S toraae System SEWAGE DISPOSAL METHOD: Ci_z of Glenwood Sor mos Publig System PUBLIC ACCESS VIA: Co my Road_ 117 and dedicated public streets EXISTING ZONING: AAD E SF! .ON S: Utility _ as shown on plat. _ . Ditch •` Range $9 West TOTAL DEVELOPMENT AREA: (1) Residen '.ial Single Family (2) Nunlbe- 58 Duplex n/a Mul ti -Family n/a Mobile Home n/a CQmmerci41 (3) ICrsdu za1 (4) pub lic/Quasi--;'ub1ic ( roads ) Floor Area Acres 127.23 n/a n/a n/a Acres n/a sq.ft. n/a n/a sq.ft. n/a (5) Qpen Spa.ge/Comma Are,: Dedicated Easement (included in single-family lot area: TOTAL: IIIPARKING SPACES: Residential: On individual lots only Commercial: Norte Industrial: None 9.28 2.26 60.65) 138.77 • • NYL - LYt 1 z f Noi - -aasi JJ 1 MHJ-FOS NOZU -Nn 0 • DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS FOR FOUR MILE RANCH SUBDIVISION THIS DECLARATION OF PROTECTIVE COVENANTS FOR FOUR MILE RANCH SUBDIVISION is made and entered into this day of , 1997. ARTICLE I GENERAL PURPOSE OF COVENANTS, SUBMISSION, DEFINED TERMS, DESCRIPTION 1. Purpose. These Covenants shall govern and be applicable to that certain real property situated primarily within Garfield County, Colorado, known as Four Mile Ranch Subdivision (hereinafter "Subdivision" or "Four Mile Ranch"), as defined and described in the Final Plat (hereinafter "Final Plat") therefor recorded in Book at Page — as Reception No. in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado, which Final Plat is incorporated herein by reference. It is the intention of M -R Colorado Investors, Inc. a Colorado corporation, and One And A Quarter Mile Ranch, Inc., a Colorado corporation (hereinafter "Declarant"), expressed by its execution of this instrument, that the lands within Four Mile Ranch be developed and maintained as a highly desirable scenic residential area. It is the purpose of these Covenants to preserve the present natural beauty and character of the property along with the views and setting of the Subdivision to the greatest extent reasonably possible, and the lots therein shall always be protected as much as possible with respect to uses, structures, landscaping, and general development as permitted by this instrument. 2. Property Submission. Declarant hereby submits the real property described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, together with all easements, rights-of-way, and appurtenances thereto and any buildings, fixtures, and improvements thereon (hereinafter "Property") to the provisions of the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act, which is set forth at C.R.S. §38-33.3-101 et seq. (hereinafter "Act") and to this Declaration. In the event the Act is repealed, the provision of the Act on the effective date of this Declaration shall remain applicable hereto. Declarant further declares that the Property shall be held, leased, mortgaged, sold, and conveyed subject to the following terms, easements, reservations, restrictions, covenants, and conditions. Declarant further declares that this Declaration shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all parties having any right, title, or interest in the Property or any part thereof, their heirs, devisees, legal representatives, successors, and assigns and shall inure to the benefit of each and every Owner. 3. Pre -Annexation Agreement. On September , 1997, Declarant entered into a Pre -Annexation Agreement with the City of Glenwood Springs, which agreement is recorded in Book at Page as Reception No. in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Garfield County, Colorado (hereinafter "Pre -Annexation Agreement") which Pre -Annexation Agreement is incorporated herein by reference. The Pre -Annexation Agreement relates to the • possible annexation of the Subdivision to the City of Glenwood Springs and sets forth the terms and conditions thereof. The Declarant, the Four Mile Ranch Homeowners Association and all C:IF[L ESICOLODNY.1 PC September 22. 1997 • • • persons or entities who own or acquire title in fee to any of the fifty-eight (58) single family lots in the Subdivision hereby acknowledge the provisions thereof and agree that in the event the Subdivision is annexed to the City of Glenwood Springs, each lot within the Subdivision shall be benefitted and burdened by the provisions of the Pre -Annexation Agreement. 4. Defined Terms. Each capitalized term not otherwise defined in this Declaration shall have the mealting specified or used in the Act. 5. Name of Common Interest Community. The name of the Common Interest Community is "Four Mile Ranch." 6. Type of Common Interest Community. The type of Common Interest Community is a planned community. 7. Association Name. The name of the Association is the "Four Mile Ranch Homeowners Association," a Colorado nonprofit corporation (hereinafter "Association"). 8. Property Location. The Property constituting the Common Interest Community is located within the County of Garfield, State of Colorado. 9. Property Description. The Property shall consist of fifty-eight (58) single-family lots (hereinafter "Lot" or "Lots") which are more particularly described on the Final Plat of the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision. ARTICLE II OWNERS - HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 1. Membership. All persons or other entities, including Declarant (hereinafter referred to as "Owners"), who own or acquire the title in fee to any of the Lots in Four Mile Ranch by whatever means acquired shall automatically become members of Four Mile Ranch Homeowners Association, a Colorado non-profit corporation, in accordance with the Articles of Incorporation of Four Mile Ranch Homeowners Association, as may be duly amended from time to time and which Articles and any amendments thereto shall be filed with the Colorado Secretary of State and recorded in the real estate records of the Garfield County, Colorado, Clerk and Recorder. The Articles of Incorporation shall be filed no later than the date of conveyance of the first Lot in Four Mile Ranch. 2. Purpose. The Association, through its Executive Board, shall be authorized and empowered to take each and every step necessary or convenient for the implementation and enforcement of the Covenants contained in this Declaration. The Association shall have the right and responsibility to maintain, preserve, repair, insure, and otherwise protect and promote the interests of the Owners with respect to all common properties and interests of the Owners and the Association. The Association shall be governed by its Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws as may be amended from time to time. C:1EILESICOL.ODMY.1 PC September 22. 1997 -2- 3. Common Elements. The Association shall own, operate, and maintain all common elements within the Subdivision. These common elements shall include, among other things, the potable water system, the raw water irrigation system, the portion of the internal trail system not dedicated to Garfield County as shown on the Final Plat, the sewage lines located within the Subdivision until such time as the City of Glenwood Springs requests said lines be dedicated to it, the fitness equipment and landscape nodes located at stations along the internal trail system (as shqwn on Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference), any sidewalks within the Subdivision, and any landscaping undertaken by Declarant or the Association in accordance with Article VI, Paragraph 5 hereof. The roads and the public trail (located along the western property boundary) located within the Subdivision shall be dedicated to Garfield County but shall be maintained by the Association. Road "E," the emergency access easement as shown on the Final Plat, shall be maintained year round. 4. Limited Common Elements. The portion of each Lot which is burdened by the Open Space Easement, as described in Article III, paragraph 4, below, and as shown on the Final Plat for the Subdivision, shall be deemed a Limited Common Element as it is privately owned but reserved for the benefit of each Owner for the limited purposes of perpetuating open space and the rural character of the Subdivision and to access any and all Recreational Facilities located therein. This Limited Common Element shall be subject to any reserved rights of the Declarant or the Association as set forth herein. 5. Executive Board. The affairs of the Association shall be governed by an Executive Board consisting of three (3) members elected by the Owners. 6. Declarant Control. The Declarant shall have the reserved power, pursuant to the Act, to appoint and remove officers and members of the Executive Board. This period of Declarant control ("period of Declarant Control") terminates no later than the earlier of (a) sixty (60) days after conveyance of seventy-five percent (75 %) of the Lots to Owners other than the Declarant or (b) two (2) years after the last conveyance of a Unit by the Declarant in the ordinary course of business to an Owner other than Declarant. During the period of Declarant Control, the Declarant's Control shall be subject to the following limitations: A. Not later than sixty (60) days after conveyance of twenty-five percent (25%) of the Units that may be created to Owners other than the Declarant, at least one (1) member and not less than twenty-five percent (25 %) of the members of the Executive Board must be elected by Owners other than the Declarant. B. Not later than sixty (60) days after conveyance of fifty percent (50%) of the Units that may be created to Owners other than the Declarant, not less than thirty-three and one-third percent (33 1/3%) of the members of the Executive Board must be elected by Owners other than the Declarant. C. The Declarant may voluntarily surrender the right to appoint and remove officers and members of the Executive Board before termination of the period of Declarant Control, but in the event the Declarant may require, for the duration of the period of Declarant Control, that specified actions of the Association or C:IFTLFSICOLODNY. IPC September 22. 1997 Executive Board, as described in a recorded instrument executed by the Declarant, be approved by the Declarant before they become effective. 7. Indemnification. To the full extent permitted by law, each officer and director of the Association shall be and is hereby indemnified by the Owners and the Association against all expenses and liabilities, including attorneys' fees, reasonably incurred by or imposed upon them in any proceeding to which they may be a party, or in which they may become involved, by reason of being or having been an officer or director of the Association, or any settlements thereof, whether or not they are an officer or director of the Association at the time such expenses are incurred; except in such cases wherein such officer or director is adjudicated guilty of wilful misfeasance or malfeasance in the performance of his or her duties; provided that in the event of a settlement the indemnification shall apply only when the Executive Board approves such settlement and reimbursement as being in the best interests of the Association. 8. Notice to Owners. Notice to an Owner of matters affecting Four Mile Ranch by the Association or by another Owner shall be sufficiently given if such notice is in writing and is delivered personally, by courier, or private service delivery or on the third business day after deposit in the mails for registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, at the address of record for real property tax assessment notices with respect to that Owner's Lot, ARTICLE III EASEMENTS AND LICENSES I. Unit Owners' Easements. Every Owner shall have a right of enjoyment and easement for access to their Lot through or over the Common Elements, and such easement shall be appurtenant to and shall pass with the title to every Lot, subject to the following provisions: A. The right of the Association to promulgate and publish rules and regulations with which each Owner and their guests shall strictly comply. B. The right of the Association to suspend the voting rights and rights to use the Common Elements by any Owner for any period during which any assessment against their Lot remains unpaid and for a period not to exceed sixty (60) days for any infraction of its rules and regulations. C. The right of the Association to grant easements, leases, licenses, and concessions through or over the Common Elements. D. The right of the Association to convey or subject a Common Element to a Security Interest in accordance with and to the extent permitted by the Act. E. The right of the Association to close or limit the use of the Common Elements while maintaining, repairing, or replacing such Common Elements. C:1RLESICOL.ODNY.1 PC September 21 1997 -4- F. Any Owner may delegate their right of enjoyment to the Common Elements and facilities to the members of their family, their tenants, or guests who reside on or rent their Lot. 2. Easements Shown on Final Plat. The Association is entitled to use such easements as are reflected on the Final Plat for the Subdivision. Except by agreement with a property Owner, the Association shall have no obligation to pay any amount for the use and enjoyment of such easement. The Association shall pay for the cost of maintaining and repairing any improvements which it places on any easements. 3. Easements for Access and Repairs. The Association shall be entitled to an easement across any of the Lots within the Subdivision, including the Open Space Easements located thereon, for the purposes of accessing any of the Association's property, protecting any Association property, or for necessary repairs or emergency circumstances. The Association may access all Lots within the Subdivision at reasonable times to determine compliance with the conditions of approvals of the Subdivision granted by the Garfield County Commissioners and to determine and enforce compliance with all of the provisions of these Covenants. 4. Open Space Easement. Each Lot within the Subdivision shall be burdened by an easement designed to perpetuate open space and the rural character of the Subdivision ("Open Space Easement"). Each and every Lot Owner is hereby granted an easement for the access, use, and enjoyment of any and all Recreational Facilities located in the Open Space Easement as more specifically identified and shown on the Final Plat for the Subdivision and Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Lot Owners may not place or construct any structures or fences within the Open Space Easement portion of their Lot, except as specifically provided herein or as may be approved by the Architectural Committee. Except as otherwise approved by the Architectural Committee, Lot Owners shall be required to maintain the Open Space Easement portion of their Lot in a manner consistent with the historic use of each Lot. The Declarant and/or the Association shall have the right to construct recirculation ponds, lakes, and underground utility lines within the Open Space Easement as generally shown on Exhibit B. A. Driveways. Any Lot Owner within the Subdivision whose Lot contains an Open Space Easement contiguous to an internal access road shall have the right to construct a driveway across the Open Space Easement. The location and specifications of any such driveway must be approved by the Architectural Committee prior to the commencement of construction thereof. B. Recreational Facilities, The Association shall have the right to construct recreational facilities, including but not limited to a fitness course, landscape nodes, and an internal trail system, on or across the Open Space Easement and, except as specifically provided herein, shall thereafter be responsible for the repair and maintenance of such facilities. 5. Homeowners Association Easement. The Homeowners Association easement, as shown on the Final Plat, is hereby granted to the Association for the purposes of accessing and C: F1LESICOLODNY.SFC September 22, 1997 -5- maintaining certain potable water and raw water irrigation facilities, including the irrigation • ponds, ditches, water storage tank and related treatment facilities, potable water wells, and pump house. The Irrigation Easement, as shown on the Final Plat, is included within the Homeowners Association easement. All improvements located within the Homeowners Association easement shall be deemed common elements as defined in Article II, Paragraph 3, above. • • ARTICLE IV USE RESTRICTIONS 1. Permitted Uses. Only one (1) single-family dwelling, together with structures appurtenant thereto, shall be constructed on any Lot in Four Mile Ranch. The minimum size of a residential, single-family dwelling shall be 2000 square feet, exclusive of open porches, decks, carports, and garages. 2. Duplexes/Multi-Family Structures. Duplexes and multi -family structures are strictly prohibited in Four Mile Ranch. 3. Outbuildings. Pursuant to the approval by Garfield County of the Final Plat as evidenced by Reception No. in Book �. at Page Owners shall be permitted to build detached garages and other customary accessory buildings, which buildings shall not exceed 1,000 square feet. All such improvements must comply with the Garfield County Subdivision Regulations and be reviewed by the Architectural Committee, as more particularly described in Article V, below. Greenhouses shall be permitted within the Subdivision, provided that they do not exceed 500 square feet. No greenhouse or auxiliary building shall exceed 16 feet in height. The design and location of all outbuildings shall be approved by the Architectural Committee. No accessory building shall be constructed prior to the construction of the primary residence. 4. Modular/Mobile Homes. No modular, mobile, or manufactured homes shall be constructed or placed within the Subdivision. This prohibition shall not apply to construction trailers which shall be permitted for eighteen (18) months from the date of commencement of construction, or until the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, whichever first occurs; provided, however, construction trailers may only be used for construction, office, and storage purposes and shall not be occupied as a residence for any period of time. All other trailer homes or temporary structures of any kind shall be prohibited. ARTICLE V ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE 1. Architectural Committee. The Architectural Committee shall be composed of between three (3) and five (5) persons. Prior to Declarant's sale of eighteen (18) Lots in the Subdivision, Declarant may appoint the members of the Architectural Committee which may include officers, directors, or shareholders of Declarant, in Declarant's sole discretion, and the Executive Board of the Homeowners Association shall have no authority to remove any member C.1FI L ESIC O LO D NY.1 PC September 22, 1997 -6- • • so appointed. Upon the sale of the last Lot in the Subdivision. or at an earlier time as determinedby Declarant, the members of the Architectural Committee shall be appointed by the Executive Board of the Association. The persons serving on the Architectural Committee shall serve at the pleasure of the Executive Board who may remove a member of the Architectural Committee, except a member appointed by Declarant, and appoint a new member at any time, provided there shall at all times be at least three (3) persons serving on the Architectural Committee. The, members of the Architectural Committee may also be directors of the Association and need not be Owners. The Architectural Committee shall have and exercise all the powers, duties, and responsibilities set out in this instrument. 2. Approval by Architectural Committee. No improvements of any kind, including but not limited to dwelling units, garages, accessory buildings, swimming pools, ponds, parking areas, fences, walls, driveways, antennae, satellite dishes, and walks shall be constructed, erected, altered, or permitted to remain within Four Mile Ranch, nor shall any excavating, tree cutting, and clearing or landscaping be done within Four Mile Ranch, unless the complete architectural plans and specifications, and a site plan showing the location and orientation thereof, for such erection or alteration and landscaping are approved by the Architectural Committee prior to the commencement of such work, except as Declarant may be specifically permitted to do by these Covenants or required to do by any subdivision improvements agreement between the Declarant and Garfield County. Revegetation of all in£ills and cuts will be required. Plans addressing the revegetation of infills and cuts will be submitted to the Architectural Committee prior to any excavation. At Least three (3) complete sets of the architectural and site development plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Architectural Committee along with a complete list of all exterior materials and colors to be used. All copies of the complete plans and specifications shall be signed and dated for identification by the Owner or the Owner's architect. The Architectural Committee shall have the right to request whatever additional specification information, plans, reports, and the like it deems necessary to evaluate the development proposal throughout the approval and construction process. In addition, the Architectural Committee may adopt rules and regulations which shall specify the information, reports, plans, specifications, and the like required to be submitted to the Architectural Committee. In the event the Architectural Committee fails to take any action within forty-five (45) days after three (3) copies of the complete architectural and site development plans, specifications, materials, and colors have been submitted to it and the submittal has been certified in writing by the Architectural Committee as complete, then all of such submitted architectural plans shall be deemed to be approved. The Architectural Committee shall not unreasonably disapprove the architectural plans. The majority vote of the members of the Architectural Committee shall be required for approval of plans. In the event the Architectural Committee shall disapprove any architectural plans, the person or entity submitting such architectural plans may appeal the matter to the next annual or special meeting of the members of the Four Mile Ranch Homeowners Association where a vote of seventy-five percent (75%) of the members' votes entitled to be cast at said members' meetings shall be required tochange the decision of the Architectural Committee. 3. Improvements - Site Location. Pre -approved building envelopes for the primary • dwelling structures for each Lot shall be identified on the Final Plat. Site review by the C;1FILES \COLODNY.1 PC September 22. 1997 -7- Architectural Committee for the primary dwelling structure is not required if the structure is to • be located, entirely within the approved building envelope. Site review for any and all other structures and improvements must be undertaken by the Architectural Committee. Site locations are subject to Article V.6.C. herein. • • 4. Building Permits. An Owner may apply for a building permit from the Garfield County Building Department at any time; provided, however, the plans approved by the Building Department shall not differ in any substantial way from the plans approved by the Architectural Committee. If the plans approved by the Building Department differ in any substantial way as determined by the Architectural Committee, then all approvals of the Architectural Committee shall be deemed automatically revoked. Owners must comply with all Garfield County zoning and subdivision regulations relating to off-street parking. S. Varianceq. The Architectural Committee may, by an affirmative vote of a majority of the members of the Architectural Committee, allow reasonable variances as to any of the covenants and restrictions governing architectural control contained in this instrument and/or policies or rules promulgated by the Architectural Committee, on such terms and conditions as it shall require. No variance shall be granted which contravenes any provisions of these Covenants required by an approval obtained by Declarant from Garfield County for Four Mile Ranch or which violate the Garfield County Land Use and Building Codes. No variance shall be granted without written notice of the request for such variance provided ten (10) days prior to the hearing for said variance to all Lot Owners within the Subdivision. Notice to such Lot Owners shall be deemed complete when placed in the United States Mail, first-class postage prepaid, to the last known address for each Lot Owner as provided to the Association. 6. General Requirements. The Architectural Committee shall exercise its best judgment to see that all improvements, construction, landscaping, and alterations within Four Mile Ranch harmonize to the greatest extent possible with the surroundings and with other structures as to design, materials, color, height, grade, finished ground elevation of neighboring lots, and other design features. The Architectural Committee shall strive to protect the seclusion and view of each Lot insofar as possible (taking into account final buildout of all Lots in the Subdivision) in the development of Four Mile Ranch pursuant to these Covenants and shall endeavor to protect and preserve the visual character of the property and preserve and maintain any trees in Four Mile Ranch, A. Soils and Foundation Report, and Grading and Drainage Plan. Prior to the issuance of a building permit by Garfield County, a Lot Owner shall cause to be prepared and submit to Garfield County and the Architectural Committee a soils and foundation report and a grading and drainage plan prepared by a professional engineer. All improvements and structures shall be constructed in accordance with the recommendations and conditions of such report and plan which are included by Garfield County as conditions of the building permit or are made requirements or conditions of the approval of the Architectural Committee. B. Materials and Landscaping. In its review of any proposed development activity, the Architectural Committee shall evaluate, among other things, the materials to C:1FT LFSICO LODNY.1 PC September 22. 1997 • be used on the outside of buildings or structures, including exterior colors, location with respect to topography and finished grade elevations, and harmony of landscaping with the natural setting and native trees and other vegetation within Four Mile Ranch. The Committee shall encourage "xeriscape" landscaping which emphasizes the use of indigenous foliage and decreased water consumption. C. Site,Location. In reviewing the proposed location of any structure to be placed or built on any Lot, the Architectural Committee shall exercise its judgment so as to maximize the view plane of each Lot while preserving to the greatest extent possible the natural characteristics of each Lot and all natural vegetation, including trees and bushes and the natural setting of each building site. Except as set forth in Paragraph 3, above, the Architectural Committee must approve the location of all structures and improvements to be located on each Lot. No above grade structures whatsoever shall be approved for placement within fifty (50) feet of the ridgeline, shown as a setback line on the Final Plat on Lots 15 through 25 of the Subdivision. D. Fencing. The Architectural Committee must approve all fencing prior to installation. The type and location of all fencing must be approved by the Architectural Committee. One basis for consideration by the Architectural Committee of fencing will be how it affects the movement of wildlife throughout the Subdivision. Fencing shall be constructed to Colorado Division of Wildlife specifications, shall be of a round or split rail variety, shall not exceed forty-eight (48) inches in height, shall not have more than three (3) horizontal poles, the bottom pole of which shall be at least eighteen (18) inches off the ground, and no two poles shall be less than eighteen (18) inches apart. The Colorado Division of Wildlife shall not be liable to any Owner for any damage to gardens, flowers, shrubs, trees, or any other greenery caused by the actions of any wild animal. E. Wildfire. The Four Mile Ranch Architectural Committee shall follow the recommendations of the Colorado State Forester wildfire prevention guidelines, specified by the pamphlet "Wildfire Protection in the Wildland Urban Interface" prepared by the Colorado State Forest Service (CSFS #143-691) attached hereto as Exhibit D, wherever practical, in granting approvals for construction of residences and other structures submitted to it for approval. The Architectural Committee shall, wherever practical, incorporate the guidelines set forth in that pamphlet into the plans approved for Lots in the Subdivision to protect the Subdivision, and all of the buildings constructed therein, from the danger of wildfire. The Architectural Committee will consider the guidelines in the most current wildfire publication by the Colorado State Forest Service. No shake or "treated" shake roofs will be allowed in the Subdivision. Metal roofs or other fire resistant roofs will be required. Siding of all structures shall be either (1) constructed of fire retardant materials or materials "treated" to be fire retardant, or (2) have an internal sprinkler system for fire protection. C:1F1LES1COLODNY.1 PC September 22, 1997 _g_ • • • F. Water. The Homeowners Association will provide domestic water from a common distribution system to all residences constructed within the Subdivision. The Homeowners Association will have the power to own, operate, maintain, and repair the potable water system that will serve the Subdivision. The Homeowners Association will also have the power to levy assessments on each Lot to cover the costs of such system. Additionally, the Homeowners Association shall allocate specific quantities of irrigation water to the open spaces and to specific Lots in the Subdivision and shall allocate irrigation costs accordingly. The potable water supply and raw water irrigation rights and restrictions are more specifically discussed in Article VI, below. G. Lighting. The Architectural Committee shall consider exterior lighting plans and will require that all exterior lighting (with possible exceptions for lighting necessary for safety) be directed towards each applicant's property and consist solely of down lighting. It will also require that all Lot Owners make every effort possible to limit the use of exterior lighting at night. It shall require Owners to build in such a fashion that all light sources not be directly visible from outside of the Owner's property. The intent behind these considerations is to preserve the rural character of the Subdivision by limiting exterior lighting as much as possible while maintaining a safe atmosphere. 7. Preliminary Approvals. Lot Owners who anticipate constructing improvements on lands within Four Mile Ranch may submit preliminary sketches of such improvements to the Architectural Committee for informal and preliminary approval or disapproval. All preliminary sketches should be submitted in at least three (3) sets and should contain sufficient general information on those matters required to be in the complete architectural and site development plans and specifications to allow the Architectural Committee to grant an informed preliminary approval or disapproval. The Architectural Committee shall never be finally committed or bound by any preliminary or informal approval or disapproval until such time as complete architectural and site development plans, specifications, materials, and colors are submitted and approved or disapproved, The preliminary approval is offered as an accommodation only, and the Architectural Committee may set fees for this service. 8. Architectural and Site Development Plans. The Architectural Committee shall disapprove any architectural and site development plans submitted to it which do not contain sufficient information for it to exercise the judgment required of it by these Covenants. 9. Architectural Committee Not Liable. The Architectural Committee shall not be liable for damages to any person or entity submitting any plans for approval, or to any Owner or Owners of land within Four Mile Ranch, by reason of any action, failure to act, approval, disapproval, or failure to approve or disapprove with regard to such plans. The Architectural Committee shall have no liability or responsibility for any representations made to any Owner or prospective Owner by any third parties. The decisions of the Architectural Committee shall be governed by these Covenants and any rules or regulations duly adopted by the Architectural Committee pursuant to these Covenants. C:1FILFSICOLODNY.1 PC September 72. 1997 -10- 10. Written Records. The Architectural Committee shall keep and safeguard for at • least five (5) years complete permanent written records of all approved applications, including one (1) set of the final approved architectural and site development plans, and of all actions of approval or disapproval and all other formal actions taken by it under the provisions of this instrument. • 11. Authority to Promulgate Design Guidelines. Rules and Regulations. The Architectural Committee may promulgate and adopt design guidelines and rules and regulations necessary to implement these Covenants. The design guidelines may include requirements relating to acceptable building materials, architectural styles, allowable colors for home exteriors, and the like. The rules and regulations may include submission requirements concerning the type of information, reports, plans and specifications, and other information necessary to make an informed decision regarding requests for development, modifications to buildings, and the like. ARTICLE VI PROPERTY USE RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS 1. No Further Subdivision. No Lot described on the recorded Final Plat of Four Mile Ranch Subdivision shall ever be further subdivided into smaller Lots or conveyed or encumbered in less than the full dimensions as shown on the recorded Final Plat of Four Mile Ranch; provided, however, conveyances or dedications of easements for utilities if approved by the Architectural Committee may be made for less than all of one (1) Lot. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Lot line adjustment between two (2) Lots in Four Mile Ranch shall be deemed a permitted subdivision, subject, however, to any reviews or approvals that may be required by the Garfield County Land Use Code and to the prior approval of the Architectural Committee. 2. Domestic Animals and Livestock. Except as expressly limited herein, domestic animals shall be permitted within the Subdivision and shall be subject to any rules and regulations which may be promulgated by the Executive Board or Garfield County. No livestock, including horses, shall be permitted within the Subdivision. A Lot Owner shall be entitled to keep a maximum of one (1) dog on his property. For the purposes of this Article, the definition of "Dog" or "Dog(s)" shall not include dogs under the age of six (6) months. Dogs shall be kept under the control of the owner at all times and shall not be permitted to run free or to cause a nuisance in the Subdivision. No dog shall be allowed beyond the boundaries of the Lot owned by the persons where the dog is housed unless accompanied by a person in full control of such dog. Dogs shall be leashed, chained, fenced, "electric fenced," kenneled, or housed at all times. Location of kennels shall be subject to review of the Architectural Committee. The Homeowners Association shall have the right to assess and enforce penalties against Owners violating these restrictions applying to dogs as follows: One Hundred Dollars ($100,00) for the first violation committed by an Owner's dog, and One Hundred Dollars • ($100.00) plus an additional Fifty Dollars ($50.00) for each subsequent violation, such that the C:1F1LES\COLODNY_ 1 PC September 22. 1997 -11- fine increases in Fifty Dollar ($50.00) increments for each succeeding violation. If any dog commits four (4) violations or any dog is caught chasing or molesting deer, elk, or any domestic animals, the Homeowners Association shall be authorized to prohibit the property Owner from continuing to maintain the offending animal on the Owner's property. Areas where an Owner keeps any animals shall be kept reasonably clean and free of refuse, insects, and waste at all times. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no animal(s) may be kept within a Lot or a dwelling which, in the good -faith judgment of the Executive Board, result(s) in any annoyance to residents in the vicinity or to Lot Owners within the Subdivision. Except as expressly limited herein, domestic animals shall be permitted subject to any rules and regulations which may be promulgated by the Executive Board. 3. Underground Utility Lines. With respect to the new construction or extension of any utilities, all water, sewer, gas, electrical, telephone, cable television, and other utility pipes or lines within the limits of Four Mile Ranch shall be buried underground and not be carried on overhead poles or above the surface of the ground. Any areas of natural vegetation or terrain in Four Mile Ranch disturbed by the burying of utility lines shall be revegetated by and at the expense of the Owner or Owners causing the installation of the utilities no later than the next growing season following installation. 4. Mining. Drilling,_ or Ouarrying. Mining, quarrying, tunneling, excavating, or drilling for any substance within the earth, including oil, gas, minerals, gravel, sand, rock, and earth, shall not be permitted within the limits of Four Mile Ranch. Individual wells shall not be permitted on any Lot, and no Owner shall be permitted to drill for water on his Lot, unless prior approval shall have been obtained from the Architectural Committee. 5. Trees. Each Owner shall be required to plant a minimum of three (3) trees on their respective Lots in the area between the road fronting their Lot and the adjacent sidewalk in accordance with the Landscape Plan developed by the Architectural Committee. No Owner shall remove any healthy, living trees without first having obtained the approval of the Architectural Committee. All construction, landscaping, and development on any Lot shall seek to minimize the removal of trees and to preserve the natural trees and vegetation to the greatest extent possible while bearing in mind wildfire considerations. Declarant and the Association shall retain the right to landscape the boundary of the Open Space Easement, as said easement is defined in. Article IX below and as shown on the Final Plat, to minimize impacts on wildlife. This landscaping shall include native vegetative screening in and around wildlife foraging areas, the placement of a berm along the boundary of the Open Space Easement on Lots 37 through 40, and the planting of trees and shrubs thereon. 6. Shiny Materials. No building or improvements shall contain exterior roofs or siding materials which are reflective or shiny. 7. Hunting and Wildlife Control. Hunting shall be prohibited within the Subdivision. • With the approval of the Association, and upon prior consultation with the Colorado Division C:\FILES1COLODNY.IPC September 22. 1997 -12- of Wildlife, a Lot Owner may, consistent with the requirements of law, destroy or remove wildlife which constitutes a nuisance or which may die on their property. In the event bears become a nuisance with respect to trash containers kept on any Lot within the Subdivision, the Association will require Lot Owners to install bear -proof garbage containers. The Colorado Division of Wildlife is not responsible for the removal of bears and mountain lions just because they are spotted or seen in or near the Subdivision. 8. Addresses. Number, and Location of Buildings. No buildings shall be placed, erected, altered, or permitted to remain on any Lot except as approved by the Architectural Committee. All addresses shall be posted in conspicuous locations for ease of identification. 9. Completion of Construction. Any construction activity on any Lot in Four Mile Ranch shall be completed, fully cleaned up, and landscaped within eighteen (18) months from the issuance of a building permit, unless the Lot Owner shall first obtain a variance from the Architectural Committee to allow for a longer period of construction upon proof of due diligence. In the event a variance is not secured and eighteen (18) months from issuance of a building permit has passed, the Association may assess penalties in any amount it deems appropriate. 10. Enclosure of Unsightly Facilities and Equipment. All unsightly structures, facilities, equipment, and other items, including but not limited to those specified below, shall be enclosed within a solid structure sufficient to screen such things from view from the common roads and neighboring homes to the greatest extent possible. Any motor home, trailer, boat, tractor, motorcycle, snow removal or garden equipment, and any similar item shall be kept at all times, except when in actual use, in an enclosed garage. Any refuse or trash containers, utility meters, propane tanks, fuel storage tanks, or other facilities, service area, or storage pile shall be enclosed within a structure or appropriately screened from view by planting or fencing approved by the Architectural Committee and adequate to conceal the same from neighbors, streets, and private roads. No lumber, metals, bulk materials, scrap, refuse, or trash shall be kept, stored, or allowed to accumulate on any Lot except building materials during the course of construction and only for such reasonable periods of time as are necessary prior to the collection of or disposal thereof. 11. Noxious or Offensive Activity or Sounds. No noxious or offensive activity or sounds shall be conducted or transmitted upon any portion of the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision at any time nor shall anything be done or permitted which may be or become a nuisance to other property or to the Owners thereof by sight or sound. 12. Common Areas and Open Space. All common areas and open space within the Subdivision shall be restricted to recreational, irrigation, and utility uses only, and shall not be used for residential purposes. The Association shall be responsible for the repair and maintenance of common areas and, except as specifically provided herein, shall require Owners of private open space to maintain such areas in a manner consistent with the nature and character of the Subdivision. In the event any Owner fails to adequately maintain the private open space appurtenant to the Owner's Lot, the Association shall maintain the open space and assess the C:\FELES C©LODNY.1PC September 22. 1997 -13- • • Owner any charges or expenses associated therewith. 13. Adjacent Agricultural Uses. The historic agricultural uses of property adjacent to the Subdivision shall be deemed compatible with the rural residential character of the Subdivision. No Owner may object to the dust, odors or noise associated with normal agricultural uses of said adjacent property as noxious or offensive, and neither the Association, Garfield County, or any other municipality shall attempt to enjoin adjacent landowners from customary agricultural practices merely because an owner has registered a complaint. 14. Unauthorized Vehicles. No snowmobiles or all -terrain vehicles (ATVs) shall be operated within the Subdivision. No snowmobiles, boats, or inoperable motor vehicles shall be stored within the Subdivision unless stored within an auxiliary building permitted in accordance with Paragraph IV.3, above. 15. Satellite Dishes. Satellite dishes shall be allowed within the Subdivision. Location and size of all satellite dishes shall be subject to Association approval, but in no event shall any satellite dish exceed three (3) feet in diameter. Any dish exceeding eighteen (18) inches in diameter shall be screened from view of any adjoining Lot or street within the Subdivision. 16. Commercial Activities. No commercial activities shall be permitted on any Lot in the Subdivision. The storage of materials, goods, equipment, and other items used or associated with commercial activities shall not be permitted on any Lot in the Subdivision; provided, however, personal vehicles with a business name placed thereon shall not be prohibited. If permitted by applicable zoning, Owners shall be permitted to maintain an office within their residences so long as it does not provide services to the public which result in the public going to and from such residence on a regular basis. 17. Signs. Real estate sales signs shall be limited to one sign per Lot, which sign shall be no larger than one (1) square foot. No real estate sign shall be located anywhere else within the Subdivision. This restriction shall not apply to the Declarant or to the initial sale of any Lot within the Subdivision. 18. General Restriction. All Lots in the Subdivision shall comply with restrictions contained in any other section of these Protective Covenants. ARTICLE VII WATER SUPPLY AND WATER RESTRICTIONS 1. Irrigation Water and Rights. A. Irrigation Rights. Declarant will convey to the Homeowners Association the following irrigation water rights: Four Mile Ditch water rights located on Four Mile Creek tributary to the Roaring C:IFILESICOLODNY. 1 PC Seprember 26, 1997 -14- • • • Fork River, Water Division No. 5, State of Colorado, as follows: FOUR MILE DITCH Adjudication Date Appropriatio n Date Civil Action Grantor's Ownership Interest in c. f.. s. Total Amount of Decree Number 5/11/1889 12/29/1913 8/25/1936 10/24/1952 11/6/1881 12/7/1903 5/15/1919 6/1/1920 19 1475 3082 4033 1.6 0.8 2.0 2.72 3.2 1.6 4.0 5.44 which rights shall be held by the Association for use pursuant to this Article VII.1. All water rights referred to in this paragraph shall be appurtenant to the Property and may not be conveyed or transferred separately therefrom. Each Lot Owner shall have the right to access the raw water irrigation system at no charge. The Association may also irrigate any open space and common areas within the Subdivision with the Association's irrigation water pursuant to this Article VII.1. At the first annual meeting, and at every subsequent annual meeting thereafter, the Association shall designate an Association member who shall be the designated contact person concerning all irrigation issues within the Subdivision and with whom all other users, as well as the Colorado Division Engineer, may communicate. B. Irrigation System Maintenance. The Association and each and every Owner receiving an allocation of irrigation water pursuant to Paragraph A, above ("Irrigation Owners"), shall bear the cost of operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of the irrigation system in accordance with their pro rata right of use as determined by the Homeowners Association. The Irrigation Owners shall consult with each other regarding operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of the raw water irrigation system and, to the greatest extent possible, shall reach unanimous decisions regarding such costs; however, an agreement of a majority of the Irrigation Owners is sufficient to make decisions in this regard. In the event the Irrigation Owners fail to reach a majority decision regarding any issue related to operation, maintenance, repair, or replacement of the raw water irrigation system, the Association's Executive Board shall have the authority to make such decision that will be binding on all of the Irrigation Owners. Any improvement to the raw water irrigation system exceeding the amount of $1,000.00 requires the prior approval of a majority of the Irrigation Owners. In an emergency situation, any of the Irrigation Owners may make a decision concerning the raw water irrigation system and act thereon, so long as the remaining Irrigation Owners are given notice of such action within a reasonable time. The Association shall keep an accurate account of the costs and expenses incurred in operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of the C:1F1L] SICOLODNY.1 PC September 22. 1997 -15- system and, upon the completion of the work, shall deliver to each of the i Irrigation Owners an itemized statement of such costs and expenses. The Irrigation Owners shall maintain the raw water irrigation system in good order and repair so far as can be accomplished by the exercise of reasonable care and diligence. The Irrigation Owners shall have the duty of maintaining all headgate structures, ditches, laterals, pipelines, and appurtenant structures and keeping such in good working order throughout the year. All Owners within the Subdivision shall be prohibited from dumping, diverting, or in any way depositing any trash, wastewater, or other foreign substances into the ditch. All. Owners, with the exception of the Irrigation Owners, shall be prohibited from accessing the raw water irrigation system and/or diverting water from the system at any time. C. Special Assessments for Irrigation Water. Prior to each annual meeting of the Executive Board of the Homeowners Association, the Irrigation Owners and the Board, on behalf of the Subdivision open space and common area, will convene and discuss the costs involved in the operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of the raw water irrigation system for the previous year. As special assessments may be levied from time to time in connection with the Subdivision irrigation water, the Association shall maintain records of such accounts, yet keep a separate accounting of any costs incurred in connection with routine operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement. All provisions of Article VII, below, shall be applicable to said assessments. D. Lien for Raw Water Irrigation Assessments. All Irrigation Owners shall promptly pay any and all assessments for costs of operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of the raw water irrigation system in the proportions set forth above. In the event that such assessments are not paid promptly, the co-owners of the raw water irrigation system shall have a lien pursuant to C.R.S. §38-23-101 et seq.., which may be enforced pursuant to said statute, and the Association shall have the right to turn off irrigation water to said Lot Owner's property. 2. Subdivision Water System. A. Potable Water Supply. Water will be provided to the fifty-eight (58) Lots planned for the Subdivision from wells to serve the domestic needs of the proposed single-family subdivision, which wells shall be known as the Four Mile Wells. These wells have been certified by an engineer as a sufficient source by which to supply the Subdivision with an adequate quantity of water and shall be owned and maintained by the Association. Each Lot Owner shall have the right to access the potable water system at no charge. The Association shall have the power and authority to require each Lot Owner served by the subdivision wells, at their sole expense, to install a meter to measure all water used by that Lot and to curtail or restrict, as deemed necessary C:1F1i FSICOLODNY. I PC September 22. 1997 -16- • • by the Association, water usage by a Lot Owner from the Four Mile Wells. The Association's authority to meter and curtail water usage in the Subdivision shall be utilized to ensure 'that the total diversions for the Subdivision from the Association's well(s) for in-house uses and lawn and garden irrigation not exceeding 2500 square feet per Lot do not exceed an average daily usage of 750 gallons per Lot. Said water supply is based on an approximation that there will be rip more than fifty-eight (58) single-family homes within the Subdivision. The Association shall maintain and pay the costs of the Basalt Water Conservancy District Water Allotment Contract. ARTICLE VIII COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS ENFORCEMENT 1. Assessments. All Lot Owners shall be obligated to pay any assessments lawfully imposed by the Executive Board of the Association. To the extent the Association is responsible therefor, assessments may be lawfully imposed for any items of common expense which may include, among other things: expenses and costs of maintaining, repairing, and plowing of roads within and accessing the Subdivision; expenses for maintaining, improving, and preserving the Association's common property; expenses of the Architectural Committee; and insurance, accounting, and legal functions of the Association. Such assessments shall be deemed general assessments and shall be borne pro rata by all Owners. Assessments for water and water -related services shall be assessed separately based upon the allocation of such services by the Homeowners Association to the Owners. The Executive Board may establish contingency and reserve funds for the maintenance and improvement of the Association's common property and any other anticipated costs and expenses of the Association to be incurred in pursuit of its purpose. Contingency and reserve funds shall be in such an amount as the Executive Board may deem necessary and appropriate for the aforesaid purposes. Each Owner shall be required to pay his pro rata portion of these funds. As used herein, an Owner's pro rata portion of common expenses shall mean a fraction formed by the number of Lots purchased and held by the Lot Owner (numerator) and the number of Lots in the Subdivision (denominator). The Executive Board shall have the right during any calendar year to levy and assess against all of the Owners a special assessment for such purpose or purposes, in accordance with these Covenants, or the Articles or Bylaws of the Association, as may be necessary. Such special assessment shall be paid for in equal portions by the Owners obligated to pay such assessment and shall be due and payable as determined by the Executive Board. 2. Lien for Non -Payment of Assessments. All sums assessed by the Executive Board, including without limitation the share of common expense assessments chargeable to any Lot Owner, any fines which may be levied on a Lot Owner, and unpaid utility fees and assessments charged to a Lot Owner shall constitute a lien against such Lot superior (prior) to all other liens and encumbrances, excepting only: A, Tax and special assessment liens on the Lots in favor of any governmental assessing unit. C:IFYLESICOLODNY.1 PC September 22, 1997 -17- • • B. All sums unpaid on a first mortgage of record, including any unpaid obligatory sums as may be provided by encumbrance. C. Each Owner hereby agrees that the Association's lien on a Lot for assessments has hereinabove described shall be superior to the Homestead Exemption provided by C.R.S. §38-41-201 et seq., and each Owner hereby agrees that the acceptance of the deed or other instrument of conveyance in regard to any Lot within Four Mile Ranch shall signify such grantee's waiver of the homestead right granted in said section of the Colorado statutes. D. Any recorded lien for non-payment of the common expenses may be released by recording a release of lien executed by a member of the Executive Board. If any assessment shall remain unpaid after thirty (30) days after the due date thereof, such unpaid sums shall bear interest from and after the due date thereof at the maximum rate of interest permitted by law, or at such rate as is determined by the Executive Board, and the Executive Board may impose a late charge on such defaulting Owner as may be established by the Board. In addition, the Executive Board shall be entitled to collect reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in connection with any demands for payment and/or collection of delinquent assessments. To evidence such lien, the Executive Board shall prepare a written notice setting forth the amount of such unpaid indebtedness, the name of the Owner of the Lot, and its legal description. Such a notice shall be signed by one (1) member of the Executive Board and shall be recorded in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of the County of Garfield, Colorado. Such lien may be enforced by foreclosure of the defaulting Owner's Lot by the Association in like manner as a mortgage on real property, upon the recording of a notice of claim thereof. In any such foreclosure, the Owner shall be required to pay the costs and expenses of such proceedings, the costs and expenses for filing the notice or claim of lien, and all reasonable attorneys' fees. The Owner shall also be required to pay to the Association any additional assessments against the Lot during the period of foreclosure, and the Association shall be entitled to the appointment of a receiver to collect the same. The Executive Board, for the Association, shall have the power to bid on the Lot at foreclosure sale and acquire and hold, lease, mortgage, and convey same. The Association, at its election, and in addition to any other remedies it may have at law or in equity, may also sue an Owner personally to collect any monies owed the Association. 3. Enforcement Actions. The Association, acting by and through its Executive Board, shall have the right to prosecute any action to enforce the provisions of all of these Covenants by injunctive relief, on behalf of itself and all or part of the Owners of the lands within Four Mile Ranch. In addition, each Owner of land within Four Mile Ranch, including the Association, shall have the right to prosecute any action for injunctive relief and for damages by reason of any violation of these Covenants. The prevailing party in any enforcement action shall be entitled to an award of its reasonable costs and attorneys' fees. The Executive Board shall be entitled to assess penalties for late payment of assessments due the Association and to collect interest thereon at rates to be determined from time to time by the Executive Board but not to exceed 1.5 percent per month. After thirty (30) days, written notice to any Owner of a violation of these Covenants, and the Owner's failure to eliminate or cure said violation, the Association may levy, in addition to the other remedies set forth herein, a penalty of $25.00 per C:117L E.SICOLODNY.1 PC September 22. 1997 -18- day for every day the violation exists or continues after the expiration of said 30 -day period. 4. Limitations on Actions:In the event any construction or alteration or landscaping work is commenced upon any of the lands in Four Mile Ranch in violation of these Covenants and no action is commenced within one (1) year thereafter to restrain such violation, then injunctive or equitable relief shall be denied, but an action for damages shall still be available to any party aggrieved. This one-year limitation shall not apply to injunctive or equitable relief against other violations of these Covenants. ARTICLE IX INSURANCE 1. Types of Insurance. The Association shall obtain and keep in full force and effect the following insurance coverage: A. The Executive Board, at its discretion, may elect to secure fidelity coverage against the dishonesty of employees, destruction or disappearance of money or securities, and forgery. This policy shall also cover persons who serve the Association without compensation. B. Coverage for members of the Board and officers of the Association, including committee members, against libel, slander, false arrest, invasion of privacy, errors and omissions, and other forms of liability generally covered in officers and directors liability policies. C. Coverage against such other risks of a similar or dissimilar nature as the Board deems appropriate. ARTICLE X GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Covenants to Run. All of the covenants contained in this instrument shall be a burden on the title to all of the lands in Four Mile Ranch, and the benefits thereof shall inure to the Owners of the lands in Four Mile Ranch and the benefits, and burdens of all said covenants shall run with the title to all of the lands in Four Mile Ranch. 2. Termination of Covenants. In the event these Covenants have not been sooner lawfully terminated pursuant to any applicable laws of the State of Colorado and Garfield County, Colorado, and the provisions herein contained, these Covenants may be terminated on January 1 of the year 2036 by a vote of seventy-five percent (75%) of the votes entitled to be cast by the members of the Association. If these Covenants are not so terminated, then they shall continue to be in full force and effect for successive twenty-five (25) year periods unless, at the close of a 25 -year period, the Covenants are terminated by a vote of seventy-five percent (75%) of the votes entitled to be cast by the members of the Association C:IF1LESNCOLODNY.1 PC September 22. 1997 -19- at a meeting of the members duly held. In the event of any such termination by the members, ,a properly certified copy of the resolution of termination shall be placed on record in Garfield County, Colorado, not more than six (6) months after the meeting at which such vote is cast. 3. Amendment of Covenants. These Covenants may be amended by a vote of seventy-five percent (75%) of the votes entitled to be cast by the members of the Association, said°vote to be cast at a meeting of the members duly held, provided a properly certified copy of the resolution of amendment be placed on record in Garfield County, Colorado, no more than six (6) months after said meeting. In addition, the prior written consent of Garfield County shall be required prior to amending these Covenants, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. In the event the Subdivision is annexed to the City of Glenwood Springs in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Pre -Annexation Agreement, the consent of Garfield County shall not be required to amend these Covenants. Rather, upon annexation of the Subdivision, in addition to the vote set forth hereinabove, the prior written consent of the City of Glenwood Springs shall be required to amend the Covenants. 4. Severability. Should any part or parts of these Covenants be declared invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining covenants. 5. Paragraph Headings and Underlining. The paragraph headings and underlining within this instrument are for convenience only and shall not be construed to be a specific part of the covenants contained herein. 6. Limited Liability. The Association and the Board shall not be liable to any party for any action or for any failure to act with respect to any matter if the action taken or failure to act was in good faith and without malice. The Owners jointly and severally agree to indemnify the Association and the Board against loss resulting from such action or failure to act if the Association and the Board acted or failed to act in good faith and without malice. 7. County as Third -Party Beneficiary. Garfield County shall be a third -party beneficiary to this Declaration and may, at its option and in its sole discretion, enforce any provision in this Declaration, as amended, which affects County residents or property within the County. In the event the Subdivision is annexed to the City of Glenwood Springs, Garfield County shall cease to be a third party beneficiary to this Declaration and the City of Glenwood Springs shall be the third party beneficiary hereto with the right to enforce any provision contained herein. C:\RLES4CO1MDNY.1 PC September 22. 1997 -20- • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Declaration of Protective Covenants for Four Mile Ranch has been executed as of the day and year first written above. STATE OF COUNTY OF By By DECLARANTS: M -R COLORADO INVESTORS, INC. A Colorado Corporation Milford S, Pepper, President ONE AND A QUARTER MILE RANCH, INC. A Colorado Corporation Jack Silver, President Acknowledged, subscribed, and sworn to before me this day of 1997, by Milford S. Pepper, as President, on behalf of M -R Colorado Investors, Inc. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: STATE OF COUNTY OF ) ) ss. Notary Public Acknowledged, subscribed, and sworn to before me this day of 1997, by Jack Silver, as President, on behalf of One And A Quarter Mile Ranch, Inc. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: C:1 E•l LES1CO LODN Y.1 PC September 22. 1997 -21- Notary Public DRAINAGE PLAN FOR FOUR MILE RANCH PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO HCE JOB NO. 96098.01 Revised: April 25, 1997 January 21, 1996 4, Leslie A. Hope, E.1. Project Engineer VPrD 4. ern; °Pop , P.E.• Pro]ett Manager • • 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 - FAX: (970) 945-2555 • • • TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 OFF-SITE BASINS 1 HYDROLOGY 1 DRAINAGE PLAN 1 SUMMARY 2 DRAWINGS: Vicinity Map (8.5" x 11") Floodplain Map (8.5" x 11") SCS Soils Survey Map (8.5" x 11") Grading and Drainage Plan (11" x 17") APPENDIX: Calculations • • INTRODUCTION The proposed Four Mile Ranch Development is located one half mile south of the Cardiff Road and Four Mile Road intersection, adjacent to the east side of the Four Mile Road (County Road 119) in the City of Glenwood Springs. More specifically, it lies in Sections 27 and 34 of Township 6 South, Range 89 West, of the sixth Principal Meridian_ The proposed residential development is approximately 138.7 acres with 58 single family residencies. See the enclosed Vicinity Map for site location. OFF-SITE BASINS The Roaring Fork River flows north along a portion of the easterly edge of the property. According to the Flood Insurance Rate Map ,(Community Number 080205, Panel Numbers 1434, 1445, 1453 and 1465, January 3, 1986) produced by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the project is not affected by either the 100 -year floodplain for the Roaring Fork River or Fourmile Creek. A copy of the pertinent portion of the floodplain map is included in this report. The main off-site basin affecting this project lies to the south. This includes the adjacent irrigated pasture which drains to the north, onto the proposed development. The on-site culverts are designed to accommodate both the storrnwater runoff from the basin and the tailwater from irrigation. HYDROLOGY The hydrologic methods for this study are outlined in the Soil Conservation Service publication "Procedures for Determining Peak Flows in Colorado" (1980) and the Soil Conservation Service's TR55. Peak flows for this site will be primarily rainfall derived since the whole site is below 8000 feet in elevation. Therefore, the storm drainage system should be more than adequate to handle spring snowmelt runoff. The drainage structures will be sized to accommodate the 25 year 24 hour flows. The 100 year flows were also determined for the site to verify that the storm drains or overflow areas can accommodate the runoff The calculations are provided in the Appendix. DRAINAGE PLAN The on-site drainage will be, in general, captured by curb and gutter, discharged to curb openings and conveyed by culverts and grass lined channels off-site. The historic flow pattern is mostly sheet flow to a wide, poorly defined channel along the westerly portion of the site. The discharge point for the channel will stay the same for the developed condition. The existing four mile ditch is proposed to be abandoned at the southern property line. The irrigation flows from the ditch will be routed to an irrigation pond (or ponds) located in the south western portion of the development. We recommend that the required detention volume be included with the design of the irrigation ponds. • • 2 The estimated flows for the 25 year and 100 year events were calculated for the existing condition and the proposed condition. The increase in runoff for the 25 year storm will be detained as noted above. The size and calculations for the detention facility are shown in the Appendix. The proposed culverts were sized based on the 25 year storm. These calculations are also provided in the Appendix. SUMMARY The Drainage Plan for the Four Mile Ranch Development includes a variety of drainage improvements, all designed to work together to mitigate the expected impacts on the site and downstream properties_ [17 20 GLENWOOD SPRINGS 22 33 • VICINITY V AP SCALE: 1" = 2000' b O n Vl FOUR MLLE RANCH. DEVELOPMENT, CO. GLENw000 SPRINGS, CO FOUR MILE RANCH FEMA MAP 1-11O1-1COWTRY ENGONEERNO, HC. 423 COOPER AVEt•A,E C L.E►AVOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 Nan) FX (WA 445-2555 D. NO. DAiti DR. 0K. RE41SION DAM FILL DT '�A" `,,,t5 ^ +-+ _y .F� .i,- - 'F Y `.e�';N �w.'r.., ' P %.` r . e , i -rt reo%c .. ,%• r � _ � • � ,L.4 i ' • f'� r rl• i - -' e i 'ter' z ...•13.. Yom_ vrt _ •p ,/ iii' .s�+, . 6• fir; st„0i „ r} r' F/ " f 4 y L• ,•_ i t.. .s 'Y.. .s` — ‘ N., ti• fi. �i .. _ a -`•,••r�ta°+`h# ,� :! aye . ' r, > s _ •CG w� ,• r'.. t� yy � •��L'J•..•1i t _ � '; ,!' ter f y4,• y 7 • 4 L •. .d1-- lir « y- � - • �' am ' �P efi •J27sx>a YiJ ig1 ifP X .! 1 ._ fL f.. ��.' 7M� 4� i1 �A s}*Y1 f .1,i - COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. 923 COOPER AVENUE SPRINGS, CO 81601 945-8676 FX.(970) 945-2555 - ,pJ Y 4 r ti $ X71 f"FT'� ;fig 't.-- MSF ` t - k� - j .�' is • _ �y Yr `4 ,> 2., FORK SCS SOILS SURVEY MAP POUR MILE RANCH H C E #96C98.01 SCALE 1."=2000` 12/24/96 Gw FR' Y HIGH GLEMNOOD PH.(970) c--.: = i I A j: \sdskpro) \9 098\dwglafAl N1 Fri Apr 25 10: 41; 20 1997 NIC.i COWRY BCCIR23 COOPER AVEINLE i C. OLFM*O0O 5PFi..7i C:0 11601 PROM e45,-eam FM970) R45-7263 DES. JTM DR. Jai PUN DATE DI -70-97 FILE: GR -711 DATE RCv,51ON loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 27 inches and calcareous below that depth. Included in this unit are small areas of Showalter, ivtorval, Cushool, and Evanston soils. included areas make up about 10 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is slow in the Acree soil. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate to severe on the steeper slopes. This unit is used mainly for irrigated pasture or as hayland. It also is used for homesite development or as rangeland. The potential plant community on this unit is mainly prairie junegrass, western wheatgrass, bluebunch wheatgrass, mountain big sagebrush, and Saskatoon serviceberry. Other plants that characterize this site are Indian ricegrass, mo untainmahogany, and Douglas rabbitbrush. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 900 pounds per acre. if the range condition deteriorates, mountain big sagebrush, rabbitbrush, and annual weeds increase in abundance. These plants are dominant when the range is in poor •condition; therefore, livestock grazing should be managed so that the desired balance of the preferred species is maintained. Grazing should be delayed until the soil is firm and the more desirable forage plants have achieved sufficient growth to withstand grazing pressure. Loss of the surface layer severely reduces the ability of the unit to produce plants suitable for grazing. This unit is well suited to hay and pasture. A seedbed should be prepared on the contour or across the slope where practical. Proper stocking rates, pasture rotation, and restricted grazing during wet periods help to keep the pasture in good condition and protect the soil from erosion. Fertilizer is needed to ensure the optimum growth of grasses and legumes. if properly managed, the unit can produce 4 tons of irrigated grass hay per acre annually. This unit is poorly suited to hornesite development. The main limitations are a high shrink -swell potential, low strength, and the slow permeability. Population growth has resulted in increased construction of homes in areas of this soil. This map unit is in capability subclass IVe, irrigated and nonirrigated. It is in the Loamy Slopes range site. Soil Survey annual air temperature is 40 to 42 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 95 to 105 days. Typically, the upper part of the surface Layer is dark grayish brown very stony sandy loam about 3 inches thick. The lower part is clay loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is clay about 13 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or More is clay loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 27 inches and calcareous below that depth. Included in.this unit are small areas of Showalter, Morval, Cushaol, and Evanston soils. Included areas make up about 10 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is &ow in the Acree soil. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate or severe on the steeper slopes. This unit is used mainly as rangeland. 1t also is used as wildlife habitat. The potential plant community on this unit is mainly prairie junegrass, western wheatgrass, bluebunch wheatgrass, mountain big sagebrush, and Saskatoon serviceberry. Other plants that characterize this site are Indian ricegrass, mountainmahogany, and Douglas rabbitbrush. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 900 pounds per acre. if the range condition deteriorates, mountain big sagebrush, rabbitbrush, and annual weeds increase in abundance. These plants are dominant when the range is in poor condition; therefore, livestock grazing should be managed so that the desired balance of the preferred species is maintained. The suitability of this unit for range seeding is poor. The main limitation is the slope. Grazing should be delayed until the soil is firm and the more desirable forage plants have achieved sufficient growth to withstand grazing pressure. The slope limits access by livestock. The limited accessibility results in overgrazing of the less sloping areas. Livestock grazing should be managed to protect the unit from excessive erosion. This map unit is in capability subclass Vle, nonirrigated. It is in the Loamy Slopes range site. 2—Acree very stony sandy loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes. This deep, well drained soil is on alluvial fans and valley side slopes. It formed in alluvium and residuum derived dominantly from redbed sandstone and shale. Elevation is 6,500 to 8,200 feet. The average annual precipitation is 16 to 18 inches, the average 3---Acree loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes. This deep, well drained soil is on alluvial fans and valley side slopes. It formed in alluvium and residuum derived dominantly from redbed sandstoneand d annual shale.preat Elevate is 6,500 to 8,200 feet. The average io is 16 to 18 inches, the average annual air temperature is 38 to 42 degrees F, and the average frost -free perk is 95 to 105 days. Typically, the surface layer is dark grayish brown loam about 10 inches thick. The upper 4 inches of the subsoil is clay loam. The lower 13 inches is clay. The next layer is clay loam about 7 inches thick. The • • • 18 mainly by the slope. Corrugation irrigation is suited to this unit. If furrow or corrugation irrigation systems are used, runs should be on the contour or across the slope. Because of the slow permeability in the subsoil, the application of water should be regulated so that water does not stand on the surface and damage the crops. The content of organic matter can be maintained by using all crop residue, plowing under cover crops, and using a suitable rotation. Crops respond to applications of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer. If properly managed, the unit can produce 80 bushels of barley per acre annually. This unit is poorly suited to homesite development. The main limitations are the shrink -swell potential, low strength, and the slow permeability. Structures, sanitary facilities, roads, and landscaping should be designed and planned to reflect these limitations. Population growth has resulted in increased construction of homes on this soil. This map unit is in capability subclass IVe, irrigated and nonirrigated. It is in the Mountain Loam range site. 5—Acree loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes. This deep, well drained soil is on alluvial fans and valley side slopes. It formed in alluvium and residuum derived dominantly from redbed sandstone and shale. Elevation is 6,500 to 8,200 feet. The average annual precipitation is 16 to 18 inches, the average annual air temperature is 38 to 42 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 95 to 105 days. Typically, the surface layer is dark grayish brown loam about 10 inches thick. The upper 4 inches of the subsoil is clay loam. The lower 13 inches is clay. The next layer is clay loam about 7 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is clay loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 27 inches and calcareous below that depth. Included in this unit are small areas of Showalter and Morval soils. Also included are small areas of soils that are similar to the Acree soil but are coarser textured. Included areas make up about 15 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is slow in the Acree soil. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. This unit is used mainly as rangeland. It also is used as wildlife habitat. The potential plant community on this unit is mainly Letterman needlegrass, Idaho fescue, western wheatgrass, mountain big sagebrush, and Saskatoon serviceberry. Other plants that characterize this site are slender wheatgrass, lanceleaf rabbitbrush, elk sedge, Soil Survey and Gambel oak. The average annual production of air- dry vegetation is about 1,500 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, mountain big sagebrush, lanceleaf rabbitbrush, Kentucky bluegrass, and annual weeds increase in abundance. The suitability of this unit for range seeding is fair. The main limitation is the slope. This unit is poorly suited to homesite development. The main limitations are the slope and the shrink -swell potential. This map unit is in capability subclass Vie, nonirrigated. It is in the Mountain Loam range site. 6 --Almy loam, 1 to 12 percent slopes. This deep, well drained soil is on fans and uplands. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from calcareous redbed sandstone and shale. Elevation is 6,000 to 7,800 feet. The average annual precipitation is 12 to 14 inches, the average annual air temperature is 42 to 46 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 85 to 105 days. Typically, the surface layer is reddish brown loam about 8 inches thick. The upper 3 inches of the subsoil is fine sandy loam. The lower 15 inches is sandy clay loam. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is fine sandy loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 11 inches and calcareous below that depth. Included in this unit are small areas of Empedrado soils. Included areas make up about 20 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is moderate in the Almy soil. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. This unit is used as rangeland or hayland. The potential plant community is mainly bluebunch wheatgrass, Indian ricegrass, bottlebrush squirreltail, Douglas rabbitbrush, and Wyoming big sagebrush. Prairie junegrass, needleandthread, and Sandberg bluegrass also are included. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 950 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, Wyoming big sagebrush, Douglas rabbitbrush, cheatgrass, and annual weeds increase in abundance. The suitability of this unit for range seeding is good. Loss of the surface layer severely reduces the ability of the unit to produce plants suitable for grazing. This unit is well suited to hay and pasture. It has few limitations. Grasses and legumes grow well if adequate fertilizer is used. If properly managed, the unit can produce 5 tons of irrigated grass hay per acre annually. This unit is well suited to homesite development. This map unit is in capability subclass IVe, irrigated and nonirrigated. It is in the Rolling Loam range site. Aspen-Gypsum Area, Colorado 7— imy loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes. This deep, well drained soil is on fans and uplands. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from calcareous redbed sandstone and shale. Elevation is 6,000 to 7,800 feet. The average annual precipitation is 12 to 14 inches, the average annual air temperature is 42 to 46 degrees F, and the average frost-free period is 85 to 105 days. Typically, the surface layer is reddish brown loam about 8 inches thick. The upper 3 inches of the subsoil is fine sandy loam. The lower 15 inches is sandy clay loam. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is fine sandy loam. The sail is noncalcareous to a depth of 11 inches and calcareous below that depth. included in this unit are small areas of Empedrado soils and soils that are similar to the Almy soil but are calcareous within a depth of 10 inches. included areas make up about 20 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is moderate in the Almy soil. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. This unit is used as rangeland. The potential plant community is mainly btuebunch wheatgrass, Indian rice rass, bottlebrush squirreltail, Douglas rabbitbrush, F oming big sagebrush. Prairie junegrass, nt,, andthread, and Sandberg bluegrass also are included. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 950 pounds per acre. if the range condition deteriorates, Wyoming big sagebrush, Douglas rabbitbrush, cheatgrass, and annual weeds increase in abundance. Range seeding may be needed if the range is in poor condition. The suitability of this unit for range seeding is fair. The main Limitation is the slope. Brush management improves deteriorated areas of range that are producing more woody shrubs than were present in the potential plant community. In areas where brush is removed by prescribed burning or by chemical or mechanical methods, the hazard of erosion may increase. If this unit is used for homesite development, the main limitation is the slope. This map unit is in capability subclass Vie, nonirrigated. It is in the Rolling Loam range site. 8—Ansel-Anvik association, 12 to 25 percent slopes. This map unit is on fans, foot slopes, and mountainsides. Elevation is 7,500 to 9,500 feet. The average annual precipitation is 18 to 22 inches, the age annual air temperature is 38 to 40 degrees F, a. pie average frost -free period is 70 to 80 days. This unit is about 70 percent Ansel soil and 20 percent Anvik soil. The Ansel soil is on fans and foot slopes, and the Anvik soil is on fans and mountainsides. 19 Included in this unit are small areas of Skylick, Sligting, and Gothic soils. Included areas make up about 10 percent of the total acreage. The Ansel soil is deep and well drained. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from material of mixed mineralogy. Typically, the surface layer is light brownish gray loam about 23 inches thick. The upper 25 inches of the subsoil is stony clay loam. The lower part to a depth of 60 inches is clay loam. Permeability is moderately slow in the Ansel soil. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. The Anvik soil is deep and well drained. Lt formed in alluvium and colluvium derived dominantly from material of mixed mineralogy. Typically, the surface layer is grayish brown loam about 12 inches thick. The subsurface layer is light gray foam about 6 inches thick. The subsoil is cobbty clay loam about 24 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is cobbty clay loam. Permeability is moderate in the Anvik soil. Available water capacity also is moderate. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. This unit is used as woodland (fig. 3) or as wildlife habitat. it is well suited to the production of Douglas fir. Based on a site index of 91, it can produce about 8,700 cubic feet, or 52,200 board feet (International rule), of merchantable timber per acre from a fully stocked stand of even -aged trees 100 years old. This unit is poorly suited to homesite development. The main limitations are the slope and the hazard of slumping in areas where excavations or road cuts are made. This map unit is in capability subclass Vle, nonirrigated. It is in the Spruce -Fir woodland site. 9—Ansel-Anvik association, 25 to 45 percent slopes. This map unit is on fans, foot slopes, and mountainsides. Elevation is 7,500 to 9,500 feet. The average annual precipitation is 18 to 22 inches, the average annual air temperature is 38 to 40 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 70 to 80 days. This unit is about 70 percent Ansel soil and 20 percent Anvik soil. The Ansel soil is on fans and foot slopes, and the Anvik soil is on fans and mountainsides. Included in this unit are small areas of Skylick, Sligting, and Gothic soils. Included areas make up about 10 percent of the total acreage. The Ansel soil is deep and well drained. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from material of mixed mineralogy. Typically, the surface layer is light brownish gray loam about 23 inches thick. The upper 25 inches Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado Ai range condition deteriorates, mountain big ligebrush, Douglas rabbitbrush, cheatgrass, and annual weeds increase in abundance. This unit responds well to applications of fertilizer, to range seeding, and to proper grazing use. Areas that are heavily infested with undesirable plants can be improved by chemical or mechanical treatment. This unit is well suited to hay and pasture. A seedbed should be prepared on the contour or across the slope where practical. For successful seeding, a seedbed should be prepared and the seed drilled. Applications of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer improve the growth of forage plants, Proper stocking rates, pasture rotation, and restricted grazing during wet periods help to keep the pasture in good condition and protect the soil from erosion. Furrow, border, corrugation, and sprinkler irrigation systems are suited to this soil. Pipe, ditch lining, or drop structures in irrigation ditches facilitate irrigation and reduce the hazard of ditch erosion. This unit is well suited to irrigated crops. If properly managed, it can produce 80 bushels of barley per acre annually. This unit is well suited to homesite development. This map unit is in capability subclass IVe, irrigated od nonirrigated. It is in the Deep Loam range site. 33—Earsman-Rock outcrop complex, 12 to 65 percent slopes. This map unit is on mountainsides and ridges. Elevation is 6,000 to 8,500 feet. The average annual precipitation is 14 to 16 inches, the average annual air temperature is 42 to 44 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 80 to 105 days. This unit is about 45 percent Earsman very stony sandy loam and 35 percent Rock outcrop. The Earsman soil is on the less steep slopes, and the areas of Rock outcrop are in the steeper convex areas throughout the unit. Included in this unit are small areas of Arle and Ansari soils and soils that are similar to the Earsman soil but are deeper over bedrock. included areas make up about 20 percent of the total acreage. The Earsman soil is shallow and somewhat excessively drained. It formed in residuum and colluvium derived dominantly from calcareous redbed sandstone. About 5 to 10 percent of the surface is covered with flagstones, and 5 to 15 percent is covered c with channery fragments. A thin layer of partially decomposed needles, twigs, and leaves is on the surface in many places. Typically, the surface layer is reddish brown very stony sandy loam about 5 inches lick. The substratum to a depth of 19 inches is very .:hannery sandy loam. The depth to hard, calcareous sandstone ranges from 10 to 20 inches. 35 Permeability is moderately rapid in the Earsman soil. Available water capacity is very low. The effective rooting depth is 10 to 20 inches. Runoff is rapid, and the hazard of water erosion is slight to severe on the steeper slopes. This unit is used mainly as rangeland or as wildlife habitat. It also is used as a source of firewood and posts. The potential plant community on this unit is mainly pinyon pine, Utah juniper, bluebunch wheatgrass, bottlebrush squirreltail, Indian ricegrass, and western wheatgrass. The potential production of the native understory vegetation in normal years is about 500 pounds of air-dry vegetation per acre. The slope limits access by livestock. The limited accessibility results in overgrazing of the less sloping areas. if the plant cover is disturbed, protection from flooding is needed to control gullying, streambank cutting, and sheet erosion, This unit is suited to limited production of firewood. The average annual production is 5 cords per acre. The average stocking rate is 100 trees per acre. Special care is needed to minimize erosion when the stands are thinned and when other forest management practices are applied, This unit is severely limited as a site for homesite development. Limitations include the shallow depth to bedrock, the exposed bedrock, the slope, the rapid runoff rate, and the very high hazard of water erosion. This map unit is in capability subclass Vile, nonirrigated. It is in the Pinyon -Juniper woodland site. 34—Empedrado loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes. This deep, well drained soil is on fans and upland hills. it formed in alluvium and eolian material. Elevation is 6,500 to 9,000 feet. The average annual precipitation is 15 to 18 inches, the average annual air temperature is 40 to 44 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 75 to 95 days. Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is clay loam about 35 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is clay loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 38 inches and calcareous below that depth. Included in this unit are small areas of soils that are similar to the Empedrado soil but have a darker, thicker surface layer. Also included are small areas of soils that are similar to the Empedrado soil but are silt loam or silty clay loam. Included areas make up about 20 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is moderate in the Empedrado soil. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is slight. 36 This unit is used as hayland or for craps. It is well suited to hay and pasture. Grasses and legumes grow well if adequate fertilizer is used. If properly managed, the unit can produce 5 tons of irrigated grass hay per acre annually. The potential plant community on this unit is mainly western wheatgrass, needleandthread, prairie junegrass, mountain big sagebrush, and Douglas rabbitbrush. Other plants that characterize this site are muttongrass, Letterman needlegrass, common snowberry, Utah serviceberry, and antelope bitterbrush. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 1,500 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, mountain big sagebrush, Kentucky bluegrass, Douglas rabbitbrush, and annual weeds increase in abundance. This unit is well suited to alfalfa and small grain crops. It has few limitations. Maintaining crop residue on or near the surface helps to control runoff and soil blowing and helps to maintain filth and the content of organic matter. If properly managed, the unit can produce 90 bushels of barley per acre annually. This unit is suited to homesite development. The main limitations are the shrink -swell potential and the moderate permeability. The shrink -swell potential can be minimized by thoroughly prewetting foundation areas. The moderate permeability can be overcome by increasing the size of the absorption field. This map unit is in capability subclass fVe, irrigated and nonirrigated. It is in the Deep Loam range site. 35—Empedrado loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes. This deep, well drained soil is on fans and upland hills. It formed in alluvium and eolian material. Elevation is 6,500 to 9,000 feet. The average annual precipitation is about 15 to 18 inches, the average annual air temperature is 40 to 44 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 75 to 95 days. Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is clay loam about 35 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches is clay loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 38 inches and calcareous below that depth. Included in this unit are small areas of soils that are similar to the Empedrado soil but have a darker, thicker surface layer. Also included are small areas of soils that are similar to the Empedrado soil but are silt loam or silty clay loam throughout. Included areas make up about 20 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is moderate in the Empedrado soil. Available water capacity is high. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is moderate. This unit is used as hayland or for crops. It is well Soil Survey suited to hay and pasture. Grasses and legumes grow well if adequate fertilizer is used. If property managed, the unit can produce 4 tons of irrigated grass hay per acre annually. This unit is well suited to alfalfa and small grain crops. It is limited mainly by the slope in some areas. Limiting tillage during seedbed preparation and controlling weeds help to control runoff and erosion. Al: tillage should be on the contour or across the slope. If properly managed, the unit can produce 75 bushels of barley per acre annually. The potential plant community on this unit is mainly western wheatgrass, needleandthread, prairie junegrass, mountain big sagebrush, and Douglas rabbitbrush. Other plants that characterize this site are muttongrass, Letterman needlegrass, common snowberry, Utah serviceberry, and antelope bitterbrush The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 1,500 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, mountain big sagebrush, Kentucky bluegrass, Douglas rabbitbrush, and annual weeds increase in abundance. These plants are dominant when the range is in poor condition; therefore, livestocl' grazing should be managed so that the desired balancE of the preferred species is maintained. This unit is suited to homesite development. The main limitations are the shrink -swell potential and the slope. The shrink -swell potential can be minimized by prewetting foundation areas. The slope is a management concern if septic tank absorption fields an installed. Absorption lines should be installed an the contour. This map unit is in capability subclass IVe, irrigated and nonirrigated. It is in the Deep Loam range site. 36—Empedrado loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes. This deep, well drained soil is on fans and upland hills. It farmed in alluvium and eolian material. Elevation is 6,500 to 9,000 feet. The average annual precipitation is 15 to 18 inches, the average annual air temperature is 40 to 44 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 75 to 95 days. Typically, the surface layer is brown loam about 5 inches thick. The subsoil is clay loam about 35 inches thick. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more i. clay loam. The soil is noncalcareous to a depth of 38 inches and calcareous below that depth. Included in this unit are small areas of soils that are similar to the Empedrado soil but are silt loam or silty clay loam. Also included are small areas of sails that are similar to the Empedrado soil but have a darker, thicker surface layer. Included areas make up about 15 percent of the total acreage. Permeability is moderate in the Empedrado soil. APPENDIX Project Four J ,. re ah Job No. q(00178,0/ By 4 Date 1/22/g7 Ck'd by Subject ORA [A)AGE Page of Date Dra inctFe fawn W ffIt,e 3331-75 dere4 p o[e boundary re. cored .;..de -few -1 Cfl'/o!uro: . .. `. F)pea= rte. 773 acres purrpcises or dQ4errrnir -09 -1, xrre . o Canc . Ti an A •.. lJrs ¢nct- '140o 0,.31 ,h.r _. Cw ve N n hee- P5sc e.. ser p.2Ca a procedures Fria LOS '4" _ p.12 QF above_ ..t`e rr lion = ., a twce i s t 3Q; reeip-faf+oo 25 BOJ' r f -F = to 4 year rune) _. 2. cry 3 Pou d cover. _ C'!' : � ... o 25 ar - 0. ,' 0, Qz� 438.,773 /rte JO. $ . v gave :..................: 1400 c3inx7 _ dzg,773'Lc 404i)( 630 20.x) 1oc-s c -Fs. 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 • Fax: (970) 945-2555 Project FEiir- Hue Ranch Jab No. 96098.0/ By Subject DR./4161,96C Date 1/20/9-1 Ck'd by Date Page tair)cyt 1±45in will be 'considerezi prole& hondapy for poses ck!-te!:-frilni63 requiteq *-14,!_n-hfor Lookune5. ciic,101 r IONS reel /28. 775 CLCCE 5 . -• ate of an 4 FJ,-ev, 0,-342 hr . ipeckk_.;...(A00c5nt 1"' Curve Nufrther =- Exishi-A3 ±ori CK -628 (ripe r 0 uS. Areas 1.-. ..... -78 22: - /24..1q6 106pq-',.. 20' - 2,123o. hou5e5 tc4 4-3acoc-tz 68_/ driVeocky. il-ted Chi= e_e_C-7,-7Jci C428Y/ $_.773 9). 6=8,17 ie )S2 .-7-73 Occe..1:1;11.*-1-lon Ru.no-F-C 2.5 ye 4.r I00. i 11 .50 of re Vi005 0./.5 038,773 ac haLt0)(CaCOcsrgn XaZ14"1) 310 3cf5 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 • Fax: (970) 945-2555 PON0-2 Version: 5.20 S/4: »»> OUTFLOW HYDROGRAPH ESTIMATOR <cc« Inflow Hydrograph: e:\pondpack\96098TMP.HY0 Qpeak = 31.0 cfs Estimated Outflow: e:\pandpack\ESTIMATE.EST 4peak = 26.0 cfs Approximate Storage Volume (computed from t= 12.00 to 12.50 hrs) 0.2 acre -ft BT2ft3 POND -2 Version: 5.20 S/N: Plotted: 01-22-1997 •Flow (cfs) 0.0 4.0 8.0 12.0 16.0 20.0 24.0 28.0 32.0 36.0 40.0 44.0 1 1 1-----1 1-----1 1 1 11.7 - * * 11.8 - * 11.9 - * * 12.0 x 12.1 - 12.2 12.3 - 12.4 - 12.5 - 12.6 - 12.7 - 12 12.9 - 13.0 - 13.1 - 13.2 - 13.3 - 13.4 13.5 - 13.6 - 13.7 - 13.8 - TIME (hrs) x x * x x~* ile: e:\pondpack196098TMP.HYD Qmax = 31.0 cfs x File: e:\pondpack\ESTIMATE.EST Qmax = 26.0 cfs \JrZEO 4125/cr7 Project FEgi r Hie Ranch Job No. Cho 098101 By ckt,14/ Date 1/2-14)7 Ck'd by Date Subject A./4 0,1146E Page of Area.-- /27. ac -1-7rneCcn thci. . A Eilv„-• 12' 7L- Di54- 3Lioo' 3-Lc.v.e.....N.Lkother I i51143 Vec12-1-ailot) 2.9 „Ii- p.2.10" Pc4r-Ourc.5 C%4c..1>tterrnin; coso p. Fre0S- tos kn-Colorctio' 68 imper,vtQUS Ar ect)- CN -9753 1r0..),Se5 cir(vet4.)ays 32.034, 115, 4 -ed CAJ 98)(G.43) 2.5 25 veal- 0,24 100 (:)./- - Li " 2 . 50 ÷ (o 2-7.'-i-/ 12.7,g/ - (465) 170 i00 yew' - 2, oi above r:Jererico P150 -1-60:11.43cittiL- -Pr-cm t�±r 11o'n 1 h) katii !Oa :10 Trahii !reedi.3 12..cf5.; a:s•sturcP caAl)'e e t/411, b4; 41\terk 10 */10. Uri -OIL ji)14 MOS* 11.140." i5 tzt" G80 0.400 = 1 ',)0080 cnt-,znX 0" 0.1qP 12.7(...111 ac4,40)+ to u cf5 = 6,0 c -Cs 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 • Fax: (970) 945-2555 --r-4 • P -v/SEb 4/2C Proyect {maru-M;62._ Ra,tCI) Job No. 960`)A,0/ By Ail- Date 12//47 j47 Ck'd by Date Subject A/,VE _ Page of 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 • Fax: (970) 945-2555 ROA SE4`4__/25/q i Project �Cactr M/e ROAN) J?O Job No. Citgna,O1 By fid-- Date IziI r -i Ck'd by Cate Subject )JNA Page of 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 • Fax: (970) 945-2555 REvis v q/zs/c3-7 Project C1 Li.X`" M LQ Q C' 7_ Job No. '(Q5 0/ By AllDate -7? Ck'd by Date Subject D'ell-li►W46E Page of Pre0p.ose� C 3 -. Cal vRT c 1,\G /-A = 28 .ia4 ar (PIus C , C2,CLI) 43 Gley-. ;11. ar5tL..= 2050' ve; IVu�ber )4S-6153 iVio;• an /niper.viou.. Nala.. uses c -/ LJcx $ -- /3 4' 32.00 mods 385-7 K./V .- 42.207 Z ed Pckeip 40 --lion. .7,same 124A..r1QC ' 25 year= 0.21/ ICS year- .0.4 " (98X/,924 + C S 28. =..924)_ 2S,toLr4i Plus: ha . cnnfrf'buii ...-PloP ,... csY , v 2 )C $c4s aoa _ CCS=`�`i+' ._.}C ..._).... cf5..=••_51:.ef&- • /Via) + (02..cf -f 0, 82 cPs_ 5. t..ch=.85 c -s use Q f2": CMP Cor; 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Tele hone: (970) 945-8676 • Fax: (970) 945-2555 VOLUME 2—PROCEDURES Florida Department of Transportation Drainage Manual f E U 2* 1- LU z A . • . I 2 N A Y 1 . Y t . I 0 1331 HI IH1 4Y31.1 s� 1.1 • A• w a e r o e a a 0 0 0 e - w A 0 wf d r . 0. a Y + A SA M N M [ i 1 1 1 L ! f 1 t. 1 1 1 ! I 1 I 1 • s3H0td NI tat 1i3,�,f1L3nY10 g 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000# o a 0 - • • Y ✓. • A • # h . say NI to mon-cows M Vl [ w a • 0 0 e n 621-... - C -208-a Page 37 of 82 0 •r..• •11 ! r 1 a.a i .. « w NC .1O 2-6 r �[+ 111 S143131'SYI❑ HI H1.138 1:131VMOY3H o °o 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 A r Vf - O 0 Y 0 N .‘ +P w �4 O. 1 z W I1 J • o nj 714E 1.001704AS 0 0 A 4 n SAO Hs tel 3eadx'] S3HONI HI I81 1a3A1fla !8 031314010 7 CMY111111.L 00 4 MILE RANCH PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMITTAL April 25, 1997 GENERAL: The proposed 4 Mile Ranch Subdivision is located up 4 Mile Creek along the west side of CR 117. Only one of the proposed lots will access directly onto CR 117. The other lots will access CR 177 via a private easement. The property is currently zoned AR/RD, Agricultural. Residential/Rural Density, and no change in zoning is requested.. The proposed use consists of one single family residence per lot. All lots are a minimum of 2 acres in size. UTILITIES: Shallow Utilities: Electrical service will be provided by the City of Glenwood Springs. They have indicated that they have adequate service available to provide service to this project. Phone service will be provided by U.S. West Natural Gas Service will be provided by KN Energy. Water: Water will be provided by a well (or wells) and pumped to a 300,000 gallon storage tank. The tank would be located at elevation 6200± and will provide working pressure at the highest fire hydrant of approximately 20 psi. Fire flow protection provided by the tank will be 1000 gpm for two hours. Hydrants will be located as shown on the utility plan. Sewage Disposal: Sewage disposal will be provided by a sewage collection system. The City of Glenwood Springs has agreed to provide sewer service to the project. Please see attached letter from the City dated January 17, 1995. The Sanitary sewer system will be designed and construction per the City of Glenwood Springs specifications. Since the exact tie in location to the city system and the extent of offsite improvements have not been determined at this time, the offsite sewer system design is not included with this submittal. 00 • Location of Utilities: - All standard rural utilities are already available adjacent to the site, including underground electric and telephone. Extensions can easily be made to service each proposed lot. Cable TV is not available at this time. Other utilities serving the project, with their consent, will be Glenwood Electric, U.S. West Communications, KN Energy, and City of Glenwood Springs Public Works. We understand that copies of this plat will be submitted to these utilities by the County and comments will be requested. GRADING AND ROADS: Grading - No mass overlot grading is proposed by the developer, and none is envisioned to be necessary. Roads/Traffic - All lots will have access directly to a public right-of-way. All roadways within the project will be public access roads privately maintained by the HOA, but will be built to City of Glenwood Springs Roadway standards. Plan and Profile drawings for the major access roads for the subdivision are included with this package. All roads within the subdivision will be maintained and repaired, including snowplowing. Surfacing on all roads within the subdivision will be 3" asphalt on 6" class 6 aggregate base course which is consistent with the adjacent access roads. Offsite Roadway Improvements - The developer has agreed to improve CR 177 from just south of the Midland Avenue intersection to the main entrance into the project to current county standards to the extent that the existing RIW will allow in lieu of paying county roadway impact fees. The cost of said improvement will exceed the county roadway impact fees for the project. LEGAL ACCESS: This subdivision is accessed via CR 117 from which our single access road enters the property. In the event of need for emergency egress from the site a separate emergency access road will be constructed near the northern boundary of the project. Lot 41 will also access via this roadway. PROPOSED USES: The proposed uses for the property will be single family residential lots. DRAINAGE ON SITE See the attached Drainage Study prepared by High Country Engineering, Inc., dated April 25, 1997. • • Lincoln DeVore,Inc. Geotechnical Consultants 1000 West Fillmore St. Colorado Springs, CO 80907 TEL: (719) 632-3593 April 17, 1997 FAX: (719} 632-2648 4 -Mile Ranch, JV c/o Frontier Development 1205 South Platte River Drive, Suite 101A Denver, CO 80223 Attn: Mr. Harry Hart Re: General and Engineering Geology and Soils, Four -Mile Ranch, Glenwood Springs, Colorado; Lincoln DeVore Report No. 29874, Dated September 4, 1979 Dear Mr. Hart: As requested, personnel of Lincoln DeVore have reviewed the above referenced geologic and geotechnical report again in 1997. In addition, personnel of Lincoln DeVore have again conducted a visual observation of the site. The purpose of both actions was to determine any major changes in site soils or conditions which may have occurred since the date of the original report in 1979. Any changes on the site appear to have been minor. The site appears to be in essentially the same condition as it was in 1979. The discussion in the referenced report concerning on-site geology and engineering geology is considered to be still valid. The 10 exploratory borings drilled in 1979 and the analysis of the soils conditions found at shallow depths also appear to remain valid in 1997. In our opinion, the sail conditions on the site have not changed appreciably, and the data concerning the site soils still appears valid. We note that the type of structure planned appears to have changed since the 1979 report was written. This will not change the recommendations made for foundation design in general. However, the original report, consisting of ten borings, found three to four moderately different soil conditions on the site. these different conditions have a potential requirement for site specific foundation design. We therefore add the recommendation that each building site be investigated to determine the site specific bearing value and design recommendations required. In addition, we note that, during the time since the referenced report was written, a number of advances in geotechnical con- struction methods have taken place. Specifically, we recommend 4 -Mile Ranch April 17, 1997 Page -2- that the advances in the use of foundation geofabrics be consid- ered for the site. Use of new fabric supported earth retaining structures is also highly recommended if the plan requires use of retaining strtictures. The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are based on a review of the referenced report, review of more recent area reports and a visual observation of the site. The on-site obser- vation was visual only, and was conducted without excavation or probing on the property. Lincoln DeVore makes no warranty, either expressed or implied, with relation to the recent observa- tions and professional opinions except that they were accom- plished and prepared in accordance with generally accepted pro- fessional engineering practices in the fields of foundation engineering, soil mechanics and engineering geology. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact the undersigned engineer at your convenience. Respectfully submitted, 0-,ito a K'+ 2051 7 * By: o .fie D LINCOLN DeVORE, INC. GDM / L a b LD Job No. 97-2542-C cc: Lincoln DeVore, Grand Junction • Lincoln DeVore,lnc. Geotechnical Consultants IlePig • a q •1 !8 1000 West Fili'more St. TEL: (719) 632.3593 Colorado Springs, C0 80907 January 26, 1994 FAX: (719) 632.2648 Land Design Partnership F. O. Box 517 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 Attn: Mr. Ron Liston Re: Four Mile Ranch, Glenwood Springs, Colorado, Lincoln DeVore Report No. 29874, Dated September 4, 1979 Dear Mr. Liston: As requested, personnel of Lincoln DeVore have reviewed the above referenced report entitled "General and Engineering Geology and Soils, Four Mile Ranch, Glenwood Springs, Colorado." Visual observation of the site did not note major identifiable fill on the site, although a more extensive comparison of data will be required to determine if cuts and fills have been made on the site. The site appears to be in essentially the same condition as when it was studied in 1979. The discussions of soils found in the exploratory borings and of the geologic hazards on the site are still valid. The 1979 study was intended to be a general study of the site and, in our opin- ion, remains a valid discussion of the various geologic hazards found on the site and in the immediate vicinity. We note, however, that the City of Glenwood Springs has enacted at least two ordinances since the issuance of this report, which will require some additional study. Definite identification of areas which may be subject to potential rock fall and potential debris flow are the most important of these. We recommend further study to determine if these hazards actually exist at this time and the probabilityof such movement. In addition, advances in the state of geotechnical art and im- proved geogrid and geofabric construction methods now exist which were not in existence in 1979. Specifically, the use of special foundations and geofabric construction to mitigate potential hydrocompaction at some places on the site is greatly improved. We recommend that these methods be considered for foundation design at some points on the site. We recommend grading and drainage recommendations, special foundation recommendations and earth retaining structure recommendations be revised to take advantage of the new technologies and City Regulations where such changes are found to be applicable. Four Mile Ranch January 2.6, 199+ Page -2- In-general, the majority of : the site is covered by -the• various recommendations given in the report. Some site specific data is needed concerning the locations of areas of probable rock fall and debris flow --if any such locations exist on the site. It further recommended that advantage be taken of technology im- provements since 1979. •Other than this, we find the subject report to be generally applicable to the- site. The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are based on a visual review of the referenced property and review of the refer- enced report. This review of the property is limited to observa- tion without probing or excavation on the property. For this reason, Lincoln DeVore makes no warranty, either expressed or implied, as to the recent observations, recommendations or pro- fessional advice except that they were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practices in the fields of foundation engineering, sail mechanics and engineering geology.. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact the undersigned engineer at your convenience. Rt-spectfully submitted, LINCOLN DeVORE, INC. By: CDM/lab Enclosure .E. GENERAL Sr ENGINEERING GEOLOGY & SOILS FOUR MILE RANCH GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO? PREPARED FOR Four Mile Ranch Company 0520 127 Road Glenwood Springs, Colorado PREPARED BY 51601 Lincoln DeVore, Inc. 1000 W. Fillmore St. Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907 a • drc P`.3l 144 118.0 Linen DeVtirf sCOQ Wei t Fiu+nixs 3r Colorado So v''qs, Colorado .4407 (3.031O.32 -354l3 '1O*N OfIICM Four Mile Ranch Company 0820 127 Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81.601 Attn: John Ray Res GENERAL & ENGINEERING GEOLOGY & SOILS FO(JR MILE RANCH GLENWOCD SPRINGS, COLORADO Gentlemen: September 4, 1979 Transmitted herewith is a report concerning the general and engineering geology and soils of the proposed Four Mile Ranch located in Glenwood Springs, Colorado, This report has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of Colorado Senate Bill 35 (30-28-133 C.R.S. 1973 as amended) and Garfield County Subdivision Regulations. Respectfully submitted, LINCOLN-DeVORE TESTING L?3ORATORY, Sys Robert L. Bass Civil Engineer e1SSCtcQ Reviewed by vfb LDTL JoL. as -1133 1i .e.y�� 'i1 S P.O. Boa 1427 Gsrrwood %onrcra, tido 111101 I3011 $45 - ancy 3. Lassa rofessionai Geologist Michael T. Weaver Professional Geologist for Pos«Y1 Masi P.O. is 11111 f.o. t+lsa 44/-11041 11x�t (I Coo IziOt rr}e r�1101 2 At the ceqsast of Mr. John Ray, Lincoln-DeVore conducted an on site geologic and subsurface roils inv.stigstIon of a parcel of Land known as the Four Mile Ranch. Thia property it located in the South half of Section 27 and the $Orth half of S.ctxon 34, Townahip 6 South, Ring. 89 Kest of the 6th Principal Meridian, approximately 2 1/2 miles south of Glen- wood Springs in Garfield County, Colorado. It is our understanding that municipal water and a central sewage system ars planned. Lincoln-DeVore did, however, conduct a limited number of percolation testa along the upper portions of the site in the event that on- site waste disposal is needed in this area. The Four Mile Ranch is located on a relatively level terrace above the Roaring Fork River. The rite is bordered to the west by the Four Mile Road and the steeper slopes of the wester side of the Roaring Fork VIll.y. The rite is bordered to the east by the terrace edge, consisting of a steep drop off into the lower Roaring Fork Valley. The majority of the site consists of a broad open terrace, gently sloping to the west. Four Mile Creek flow into the Roaring Fork south of the site, although indications are that at one time it may have crossed the lite and flowed into the Roaring Pork to the north of the site. Current land use of the -site is primarily agricultural with the majority of the site in alfalfa and pasture. Vegetation on the remainder of the site oonsists of sage and grasses. Numerous unlined irrigation ditches cross the sit. ry-- carrying water at the time of site investigation. -1- Bedrock benelth the site is the ft Eagle Valley Evaporite (Pelt) at Pennsylvanian Age, a sequence of gypsum and shale with scimixtilrei of mitt and sett. The Eagle Valley rvaporite underlies the terrace deposits and outcrops in places along the roast of this terrace where it is not obscured by slope wash. Beneath, and to the w.st of the site, the Eagle Valley Evaporate intertongues with the Maroon Formation (PPrn) of Permian -Pennsylvanian Age. The Maroon Formation outcrops as the distinctive red cliffs that border the site to the west. Overlying the Maroon Formation and to the west of the site, the exposed bedrock consists of upturned sedimentary beds, dipping steeply to the west and forming the Grand Hogback_ These up -- k turned beds are capped regionally, and to particular, immediately above the Four Mile Ranch, by faulted blocks of Quaternary basalt. The regional aspect of the bedrock geology iel in direct relation to the surficial deposits found on the Four Mile Ranch site. Overlying the Eagle Valley Evaporite on the elite is a sequence of rounded cobbles, gravels, and sands, mapped as older Quaternary terrace deposit (Qt2) of the Roaring Fork River. These cobbles and gravels consist of a varied mix- ture of sedimentary and crystalline rock. Overlying this terrace deposit is another terrace -like deposit comprised almost exclusively of basalt cobbles and boulders (Qtb). The majority of the cobbles and boulders in the deposit are rounded although some Large ang- ular boulders were noted. The char distinction between the overlying I'+'-lt terrace and the underlying river terrace d.poelit is explained by the apparent source area for the basalt. On the hillslopts immediately above the Four Mile lunch, several large landslides ars mapped on the Garfield County House Bill 1°40 Lane! -2- ilea Maps. Those landslides are Located i r:ediately below area. of existing be -.alt outcrops and pomsibly were planes of slippage along which large blocks of basalt moved down into the Roaring Fork Valley and onto existing terrace: deposits. The rounded appearance or the basalt cobbler and boulLers on the rite is probably due in part to weathering and, in pert, to reworking by the Roaring Fork River and Four Mile Cr..akThin Layer of basalt material probably once covered the entire Four Mile Ranch area, but at present, covers only about half of the site.. From a review of the topography and geomorphology of the area. it is probable that Four Mile Creak once flowed along the western portion of the site and could have tranmported Much of the basalt debris away from the site. Surficial materials ov.r much of the western portion of the site are a silty clay overlying sand and some gravel: these materials are indicative of a stream envisnnrnent. At sorae point in the re- latively recent geologic past, headward erosion pirated Four Mile Creek, which than down cut to its present channel south of the terrace and east into the Roaring Fork Rive_. Colluvial deposits from the steeper slopes west of the site have farmed a wedge along the base of the I-illslop.s west of the mite. Debris from the Maroon Formation, including several large boulders, comprise this colluvial elope wash. The :ngin.erinc significance of this and the occurrence of the basalt will be discussed in the Erujineeriug Geology portion of this report. 1 E9Gt iz RtNC CEotoG'r Slope $tabilit- Alt sough, at one time, there eras apparently larce scale .mass movement onto the site, indications are that this [Haws movement ii not an active phenomenon. 'fh . basalt debris on the sis.e appears for the most part uniformly rounded and weathered and no indications of recent movement were noted. Much of the basalt material appears to have been tran- ported away from the mite and no apparent mase wasting has occurred since then. A rockfall hazard. does exist along the western boundrtry of the site, and in particular, along the southwestern end, where rocks up to 4 feet in diameter were noted. It is felt that the rocks have probably lost much of their mom- entum by the time they reach the site; nevertheless, this hazard should be considered in the proposed development. It is recom- mended that homemites be located away from the western boundary of the site, and same measure taken to mitigate the rockfall hazard. Some suggested measures to slow the velocity of moving rocks would be the construction of an open trench or Rutschver-- hinderung barrier or fence -like structure to catch or slow the momentum of moving boulders. There is no indication on the site of other forma of mass wasting from the steeper slopes west of the site. F" loo¢vrav t The site is located well above the floodplain of the Roaring Fork River. In additaon, flooding from Four Mile Creek is not considered a hazard on ,the site. IDE rtifical qa;a''ds There are no known man-made or artificial hazards that should preclude development of the site. A number of unlinccd irrigation ditches croaa the si'e but their presence should not sigr1ificantly affect the proposed development. Uoil Conditions Tern test borings were drilled by Lincoln-DcVore to determine subsurface sail conditions. The re- sults of the soil tasting as well as foundation recommendations will b■ discussed in detail in the soil engineering portion of this report. In general, no soil conditions were noted on the site that would preclude the proposed development. A caliche Ilya.: was noted in Test Borings 1 and 6 and may be assumed to unde.:lie a portion of the site. The presence of thiecaliche will affect subsurface drainage and may pose some difficulty in excavation. Sulfates were noted in most of the test borings. The presence of these sulfates are indicative of soil conditions corrosive to Type I C•mentr a sulfate resistant cement is recommended for contact with these soils. !later Table Free water was encountered at a depth of 17' in Twit Boring No. 9. This'test boring is located in a shallow basin -like feature in the southwest portion of the sitc. A seasonal shallow water table can be expected in this area, due primarily to irrigation practice in the area. Cessation of irrigation and lining of existing irrigation ditches will help to a21.-".%1 this shallow water table condition. In general, how- ever, the majority of -the site appeared well drained at the time of the site inspection and no free motor was •ncountered in the remaining test borings. r it §27.9.21A eA Slopes on the site are, for the most part, gentle and range from about Z% to about 11%. The degree of slopes s,e.p.n greatly in the northwest cornet of the sit:,and to a marked extent along the eastern boundary of the site. Construction Jr not recommended in theae areas of excessive elopes Although the steep slope along the eastern boundary of the site is stable in its present condition, it is recommended that con- struction be set back from the edge of this slope to avoid loading the top of the slop.. Rippahl.l.ity and gr,asian Excavation is not aspected to be a problem on the site. The majority of the subsurface appears to consist of fin. grained material or rounded cobbles, which should pore little difficulty in excavating. Erosion is not currently a problem om the Four Mile Ranch and, with good land practices, ■hauld not be a problem after development. Drainage and runoff should be carefully controlled and vegetation should be retained ss much a* iiiatrAl_attrut atsnuut The pres.nce of the gravel terrace material provides a source of aggregate material, but its location beneath the -layer of basalt material would appear to limit its economic value. The presence of this gravel terrace should not preclude the proposed development. Two percolation tests were conducted on the Your !tile Ranch site; the resuits aro tesulatod on tho following page. 1 2 aaLt4A.9..A.LAtt Nut Boring 01 Teat Boring 03 Minutes to 2z22.21t.1.110, 13 Test kralthaattik Aafusal on cobbles at 10' 20 Refusal on cobbles at 7' Bath percolation test results fall into the acceptable range for standard leach fields. Na free water was encountered in either test baring nor was bedrock encountered or expected. From the resuLti of these preliminary teats, standard leaching fields wild probably be acceptable, however, it is r.comaand.d that individual testing be conducted in ar.a4 where individual septic Ju stems are desired. kMI L 2 q+ 'i TOSS , A=i7_42TuUlta T.n test borings were driLled an this site at locations indicated in the enclosed Geologic Map fPlatalj+ The tett borings were located in such a manner as to provide 4 reasonably wood profile of the subsurface soils beneath this site. White same variations were noted from point to point; sufficient information was obtained that no further test borings were deemed necessary. All test borings were advanced with a power driven continuous drill. Samples were taken with the Stan- dard split-spoon sampler, with thin-wailed Shelby tubes, and by bulk methods. The soil profile encountered can bt ly be characterised as ■ two layer system. The upper layer of thin system conaist.d of a Layer of silty clay. This silty clay was quite variable in density, and contained a considerable portion of sand -raised particle■ at many locations. Zones of cal- iche were also encountered in this material in Test Borings 1 and 6. Below this upper silty clay layer was encountered dense, terrace gravel and cobbles. The depth to these terrace materials ranged from 7 to 19 feet depending upon location. Terrace material was not encountered in Test Borings 7 and 9. In Test Borings 7, S. and 9 a layer of very sandy silt was encountered imm.dietely below the silty clay. With a very slight change in grain-sisa characteristics this silt would have classified as fined grained, silty sand. The silt materials were generally of moderate density. The samples obtained during our field exploration program have been grouped into four soil types. Wil Types 1 and i are representative of the upper silty clay materials. Sctl rypn No. 2 is representative n,' the coats., silty, sandy matrix,, surrounding gravel and cobbles in the terrace deposits. Bail Type No. 4 is representative of the sandy i il. t ■nca'.snt. r.d in Test Springs 7, 8, and 9. more pre- cise engineering characteristics of these 4 sail types are given on the enclosed summary sheets. The following dicusiion will be general in nature. as Soil Types 1 and 3 both classified silty clay (c1,/,) and ere representative of the surficiaL depcysits on this site. Soil Type No. 1 contained significantly more sand-si ed particles than Soil Type Na. 3. However, the properties of these two materials as foundations soils wiLl be quite slmi1ar and, therefore, they are grouped together here for purposes of discussion. Generally, Soil. Dypes Nie. 1 and 3 are slightly plastic, of low permeability, and were encountered in density states ranging from moderately low to high. In higher density stater, these materials can be expected to expand upon the addition of moisture with expansion presiares of 900 to 1200 psf being measured. In lower density states, these material, can be expected to experience Iona -terra conso lida then upon loading. Due to the variation in consistency of these materials, it 11 considered important that proper maximum and minimum bearing cap- *city values be determined for the foundation soils at each buiid- inq location. Additionally; balancing, reinforcing, and drainage recommendations are considered important. The bearing capacity value, for these materials wire noted to range from 2000 psf of maximum allowable bearing capacity, with ■ minimum rscomeended dead load pressure of :..: oaf, to 4000 psf maximum allowal.le b.etr- ing capacity, with a minimum recommended dead load pressure of 1200 pet. Intermediate variations between these two extremes can also be expected. Soil Types I anal 3 contains sulfates in detrimental quantities. Soli type No. 2 classified as silty sand (moi) of coarse grain ease. This material is re- presentative of the slaty ■and matrix. surrounding gravel, cobble, and boulder -rased particles in the alluvial and basalt terrace deposits. Oeiarally, Soil Type so. 2 is non -plastic, permeable, and was encountered in a moderate to high density condttion. The terrace deposits will have no tendency to expand upon the addition of moisture, nor any tendency to long -team consolidation upon loading. Granular materials such as these often experience settlement upon application of loading, but it is anticipated that settlement will be relatively minor under the proposed re- sidential loads. At any rate, any settlement will be fairly rapid and will probably be complete by the end of construction. The terrace materials were encountered beneath this site at depths ranging from 7 to 19 feat at the time of drilling. At this depth, it felt that the majority of the foundation aystesas will not rest on the material of Boil Type No. 2. Nowev.t, should foundations rest in this material they may ba proportioned on the basis of a maximum allowable bearing capacity of 4000 psf, with no minimum pressure required. soil Type No. 2 contains a slight amount of sulfates. Soil Typo No. 4 classified as silt (XL) with a considerable portions of sand -eased particles. With only a atightthange in grain -rise characteristics, this material would have classified as fine grained silty sand. Generally, Soil Type No. 4 is non -plastic, of low to moderate per a ability,•and was encountered in a moderate density condition, it will have no tendency to expand upon the addition Qt. moisture, flat any,, appreciable tendency to true long-term consolidation. This mat - oriel may settle som■what upon application of fo.:ndation load' and may be subject to loss of strength upon saturation. However, the detrimental prop. rties of this material should not create any difficulties if proper attention is paid to balancing and reinforcing of foundations and to control surface and subsurface drainage. Sail Type No. 4 was encountered at depths ranging from 9 to 20 taae below the ground surface at the time of drilling. At this depth, it is likely that foundations will rest in this material. However, should Soil Type No. 4 be encountered at foundation level, foundations resting in it may be proportioned on the basis of a maximum allowable bearing capacity of 3000 pit, with no minimum pressure required. fates in detrimental quantities. Free water war encountered in Test 9 at a depth of 17 fust below the ground surface. This level is'believed to be the result of current irrigation on the *its and of the presence of numerous unlined boring No. free water practices irrigation ditches. Additionally, soil conditions such as cal- iche zones and sulfate stringers encountered at various locations across this site would indicate a potential for periodic subsur- face seepage. Therefore; it is recommended that full and half beeement foundations be well sealed. Additionally, subsurface drains may be required in many instances. Soil Type Deo.. 4 contains sul- Ca jug25uridiagn r Since the magnitude and nature of the proposed foundation Loads are not precisely known to Lincoln- De/ore at this time, the recommendations contained herein must be soa+ewhet general in nature. Any special Loads or unusual design conditions should be reported to Lincoln-DeVors so that changes in recommendations can be made if necessary. However, based upon our analysis of the soil conditions and project charac- teristics previously outlined, the following recommendation' are It is recommended that shallow foundation systems consisting of continuous foundations beneath bearing walls and isolated spread footings beneath columns and other points of concentrated load be used to carry the weight of the proposed structures. All of the materials encountered in the test borings are considered suitable for shallow found- ation support. However, considerable variation in bearing cap- acity values were noted across this site. Bearing capacl.ties for the upper silty clay materials were noted to range from 2000 gsf maximum, with a :minimum recommended dead load pressure of 500 psi, to 4000 psf maximum, with a minimum recommended dead load.pressure of'1200 gsf. Intermediate variations be- tween these two extremes can also be expected. The terrace materials of Soil Type So. 2 will have a maximum allowable bear- ing capacity of about 4000 paf, with no minimum pressure required. The coarse grained, sandy Milt of Soil Type Ho. 4 will have a maximum allowable bearing capacity on the order of 3000 pef, with no minimum pressure required. Bearing capacity values for any given structure should be established by inspection of the open foundation excavation prior to construction. The bottoms of foundstiorx should be Iocated a minimum of ] 1/2 feet below finished j:cde or greeter if dictated by local building codes, for frost protection. Wh.ra the upper silty clay materials are encountered in a high density expensive condition, special techniques in foundation construction rill be necessary. an. type of foundation which would be suitable for these soils, would be the no -footing it wall on grade foundation, with strategically placed voids, to help balance contact 'tree's' and maintain the recommended minimum dead load pressures. Another type of suitable foundation system for expansive conditions would utilise a series of isolated pad*, spanned by voided. reinforced concrete grads bears-', around exterior foundations. With either of these two typos of foundation systems, isolated interior pads should be carefully Proportioned to satisfy the maximum and minimum bearing values of the foundation soils. It is recommended that the proposed foundation systems be well balanced, Residential structures typ- ically are mote aeavily loaded on some walls and columns than oc others, and the amount of variation can be quits significant. Bal- ancing can be accomplished by placing larger footings beneath heavier loadr and 'mallow footings beneath lighter leads. AA has been discussed previously, the judicious use of voids may be inatru- mental in obtaining, the desired balanced condition as well as in maintaining thi recommended minimum pressures for expansive .oils. The criteria for balancing will depend somewhat upon the aatu.ra of the structure. Bingle --story slab on grad.- structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load only. Multi -story structures or structures with bas +asnis or crawl spaces should be belanoed on • the basis of dead load plus appcexizetely cr,s-half the Live Load. 'Using whichever criteria is applicable, foundations beneath ax- - tenor walls should be balanced to within . 500 psf at all paints. Isolated interior footings should be designed for unit Loads of about 200 psf greater than the average of those selected for the `xterior walls. It is recommended that all Item walla for continuous foundations be designed as grad• beams cap- able of carrying their loads over a clear span of at least 12 feet. Horizontal reinforcement should be placed continuously in found- ation walls with no gaps or breaks in the reinforcing steel, unless specially designed. Foundation walls should be reinforced at both top and bottom, with the reinforcing being appraximit.ly balanzed between these two locations. Where foundation walls will retain soil, in excess of 4 fest in height, vertical reinforcing may be necessary and should be designed. For use in designing this reinforcing, the equivalent fluid pressure of the soil may be taken as about 45 pcf in the active state. Where concrete slabs are used, they may be placed directly on grade or over a compacted gravel blanket of 4 to 6 inches in thickness. If the gravel blanket is Chosen, however, it must be provided with a free drainage outlet tc the ground surface,' so as not to act as a water trap beneath the floor slab. Floor slabs should be constructed in such a manner that they act independently of columns and bearing walla. These ■labs should be placed in sections no greater than Z5 feet on a side. Deep construction or contraction joints could be placed at these lines to facilitate even breakage. This will keep to a minimum any unsightly cracking which would be caused by differential movement. Me.uate drainage moat be maintain.4 around the structural bath during a -+d after construction to prevent the ponding of water. The ground surfaca around the ■tructuras-__. rause, be graded such that surface water will be carried q•_ickly away. Minimum gradient within 10 feet of any structure will. depend .span surface landscaping. Bare or paved areas should have a minimum gradient of 2%, while landscaped areas should have a minimum gradient of 7%. Roof drains 'should be carried across all backfilled areas and discharged well away from the structure. The overall drainage pattern should be such that water directed away from one structure is not directed against an adjacent structure. As has bee- discussed previously thane is a potential for periodic subsurfacs seepage on this site. Therefore, it is recommended that full or half basanent foundations be well sealed.. In some instances, subsurface peri- pheral drains may be necessary. Subsurface drains would be de- sirable for all of the structures as a precautionary measure against water from rubsurface seapaga, and from poor surfaca drainage conditions. Subsurface drains should consist of an adequate discharge pipe, gravel collector, and sand or fabric filter. The discharge pip. .hould be provided with a free gravity outfall to the ground surface if at all possibls. If'gravity out- fall is not possible, .then a linad sump and pump should be used. Backfill around the proposed struc- tures and in utility trenches leading to the structuresshould ba compacted to at least 9Y% of the maximum standard Proctor dry dernsity, ASTM D-598. The native soils on this site may be used for back2i11ing purposes with the exception of any organic top- soil. materials. Backfill should ha placed in lifts not to exceed 6 inches co+apected thickness and at the proctor optimum mois- ture content ± 2%. Backfill must be compacted to the required density by mechanical means and no water flooding technique■ of any type should be used in the placement of fill on this sits. Any topsoil or debris should be removed from the construction area prior to beginning of con- struction of foundations. Additionally, should any pockets of debris, organic material or othsrwisre unsuit::b1e material be encountered during excavation for footings, this materlaL should be removed and replaced with suitable backfill compacted to 95% of the maximum standard Proctor dry density, using the procedures previously outlined. The open foundation excavations should be inspected prior to the construction of forms or place- ment of concrete to determine the proper maximum and minimum bearing capacity values and to establish that no debris, soft spots, or other unsuitable materials are located in the found- ation area. The finer grained soils on this site contain sulfates in detrimental quantities'. Therefore, a sulfate resistant cement such as Type II Cement is recommended for use in all concrete which will be in contact with the found- ation soils. Under no circumstances should calcium chloride ever be added to a Type II Cement. In the ecs±that Type II Ce- ment is difficult to obtain, a Type I Cement Aay be used pro- viding chs concrete is separated from the sails by water resistant membranes. It is believed that all pertinent points concerning the subsurface soils on this site have been covered in this repc•rt. It moll types and conditions other than these Q•;tlinsd herein are noted during construction on this site, these should be reported to Lincoln-De/ore sc that changes in recap+ndstiona can be made if necessary, If questions -arks or further infaroltian La required,pisas. feed fraa to contact dur office, ri 1 1 TM HOLE A44, iv& ELEVATION 10 15 r-30 —64 -35 1 ir- 1 .1 4 Atop., A' Aor ,st.-dor dmr • 416....eg Aieri PO I 64 "Ord t .4.0[01600, •• 4'17404 AC05, a' A.,. .4%•••••1 A61111.-4 Aida? • "her oker oaf .41•01..." .rAgwv•ve Ar e4P-pt, dartdre )6.1 e6-4464rs 41=meAl 4.46. .011.4-okiVele rr DRILLING LOGS LINCZLN DeVORE SKI1111.1ERI, 1110LOOISTS C-OLORADOJ COLORADO tP111101-sS PUtILO • 114-11NV30D 'PICKS" , O!AO JUNCTION , liGNTRO-IC TTOSITNIII R9pc fpritxt3 _ qw-m A TCST P-t0Le P4.. T. -yr ELIvATiON 10 t5 20 16 40 J II I" A *PIA 14 .4%.,4w1 ral 4. 4. 4. -4. 4. OF. 1 4. 4. 4. 4. 4. aMm ,W6 4. Or. 41. +Ad AP DRILLING LOGS - • • A.044t ..64.11.1 LINCOLN DIYORE I,COLOSISTI 4. 411. 4. 0.04..04AD4r GOLORADO Piano ,114.1DrifoOD spotlit' VIAND JWiaTiom , liOSTI-011 • WIN t I PRIN 1 • SLAAMA.0 4 He °T ' cis Soil Semi, l • r_r.,r“. f tasea1yc__ r.. i r:o . _ i.c Gl1_ Di .,1 i g— r;"- - L c et I can -+ - huh 'TYrte 4 Raring b , l D•p+ SQmr I. Na 1 Natural Water Contenw) g' 1- % p+cl fl c Gr®v i ty (Gs) SIEVE ANALYSIS; Sieve No. % Pasting Its" I" :I4" I/2u 4 10, 114.1 20 �cr 40 r sL 103 At.? 1-tYDROMSTElt ANALYSIS; Grain ewe (mm) *Er left '-3 SOIL ANJ.LYSIS • IA IfIci L./amity (r.) _af Plastic Limit P L lr1% Liquid Limit L. Plasticity index P.I. A,, _% Shrtnku Limit 11't % Flow Index Shrinkage Ratio Vr5lUM! trio Change. Lineal Shrinkage MOISTURE DENSITY: ASTM METHOD Optimum Moisture Content Arrauimurn Cry Density -> pd California Searing Rats Sw.II' 1'f Itg_ 1 % Sw+II nst t.t tntr We 4ain-tom % aEA.RING: i -b is.l P■Aatrvmeter (cry) /14:f Llnconfin.d Comprsretlon (t4Q) Def Plate Bearing. _ Inches Settlerront Con ed: da t i ort % under PERMEABILITY: K at 20°C) Void Ratio SulraInts "0.4 • LINCOLN-DO/ORE TESTING L.A.1101tATORY COLORADO] SPRINGS, COLORADO "� rR r _c;- •-•:•• • 'c; Soil Sample Pro jactLiA.eezedt.r_ Lcap e LocA t 1 on 77..sea.zia• -. /se '...2904.4 1.0 t 4 5 6 50 40 30 20 1U 0 e e t No. 41 -"II Da t e Test by 1 GVEL S.A N D St LT Tci CLAY Cc. Ci PL.LLC inungsmu 1 mouumnimmuum RENE .._ ,. •i mummumus= • , • ! i 111111•1111111= 111111111W . i .'' i . 1 111111111111M MO MIME ii '. i , -1 ° 11111111.10111116. - ' in11111111; • 11111111111111111= n1 NMI ° 11111111110/4"11111= Milli 1111011111•1;'! III MINEMIllik... 111E11. Minn IhmefflIMM 11M111•11111i1 1 11111111111111111 1111111111111 , LI f.' biame r-(4: 1 - 4 *4 010 ;020 N40 siC0 $2 00 - i-ve Ho. 1 Sample No. ape c f ic Gravity Yfoisture Content If fact ive Sir ' CU Cc '-7, ?themesModulus L.L. I yve 11441._ pst Sive Size % Passing 1- 1/2" 3/4 - 1/2 /MO IA 1.1 . 7 4 10 20 40 ,iikm • 4 11 / AFIJI gLf loo 200. 0200 Ai 7 Sulfates GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS L INCOLN- De VORZ TZ ST I gO LkSORATORY COLORADO SP I NG S , COLORADO ' ' ' ' • ' r • • • • 3 Soil Sample -Jr, Li, L./e.; SUMMARY c E.: Tao No. Location Pk Ale 1"4/r 1"r_eriA BorEn Na 1 Depth r' Sample N . Natural Water Content (w)-_/.. _iar__9sts Specific Gravity (Gs) it+, fJr SIEVE 'ANALYSIS: Sieve No. % Poising 1 1/2" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 4 10, 20 ria 40 100 200 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS: Grain sixe (mm) 96 ! 7t# a:1' Z7- 7 SOIL ANALYSIS ' Test :�5• SfJrtom' t rf lac l)enslty (r,) pcf Plastic Limit P.L sa_I 1 Liquid Limit L. L A 4_ % Plasticity Index PJ,�., _ 9b Shrinkage Limit el s 9 Flow Index Shrinkage Ratio °6 s�-:Iurnetric Change 9G Lineal Shrinkuge 46 MOISTURE DENSITY: !STM MFTI-4O0 Optimum Moisture Content - w^�% Maximum Dry Density -rd pcf California gearing Ratio (av) 9ra Swe1E t []ays 1 % Swe11 ogainst1psf Wa Qainsl # -"6 BEARING: i`busel Penetrometer (av) Psi Unconfined Compression (qu) f Plats Bearing• p f Inches Settlement Consolidation % under Psi PERMEABILITY: K (at 20°C) Void Ratio Sulfates 141". Ppm. LINCOLN -De VOR E TESTING LA3C}RATORY COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO 5UMMARY Sof! Scr'pI■_ o,��♦I /�yY�✓--��' L. catfo•, A darfN�pp to At Oaprh_ rsa Samip l e No. - Tett r . D. Test �y .tZr ilrt Nctural Water Cont►nt Specific Gravity (Gt) � i t In Ioti Density fo)f Pc SIEVE ANALYSIS: Steve Nilo. 1 1/2" 1 % Passing 3/4" 1 Ire 4 1Q ,,Joel 20 -Td 40 er. 100 r t= •.# 200 r A HYDROMETER ANALYSIS: Grain sire (mm) 96 he dr - •tet ff4 Plastic Limit P.L _% Liquid Limit L. L -..% Plasticity Index P.1 eY' % Shrinkage Lfrmit roil 96 Flow Index Shrinkage Ratio g{, V.sfumetrio Change % Lineal Shrinkage % MOISTURE- DENSITY: ASTM METHOD Optimum MD/Ours Content - Mo_Aimum Dry Density -rte_ pc California Bearing Ratio (cv). qfa Sweall• _Day' Swell ogainst_psf Wo gain-% BEARING:. House PenetromeF.r (ase l rsso „psf Unconfined Cornprw ion (qu) psi' Plate Becrfng• psi Inches Settlement Consolidation % ur:der Joel PERMEABILITY: IC (ot 2CPC) Void Ratio Sulfates enew • pp -1. SOIL ANALYSIS LINCOLN- %eVORE TESTING LABORATORY COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO GO p t 1 r r „ �( i 1J 'J I.J LEAVENWORTH & ASSOCIATES, P.C. • ATTORNEYS AT LAW • • LOYAL E. LEAVENWORTH CYNTHIA C. TESTER SHANE 1. HARVEY DONALD H. HAMBURG Of Counsel Mr. Joe Hope High Country Engineering 923 Cooper Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Four Mile Dear Joe: January 7, 1997 1011 GRAND AVENUE P.O. DRAWER 2030 OLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 TELEPHONE: (970) 945-2261 FAX: (970) 945-7336 Enclosed are copies of the title policies that were issued at the time of the sale of the ranch. One portion is owned by M -R Colorado Investors, Inc., and the balance is owned by One And A Quarter Mile Ranch, Inc. Both are Colorado corporations. At the time of the sale of the property to the corporations, the seller, Four Mile Ranch Development Company, a Colorado corporation, also entered into a joint venture agreement with these two corporations, which provides for the development of the property and appoints Four Mile Ranch Development Company the managing joint venture partner for that purpose. If you bave any questions, feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, LEAVENWORTH & ASSOCIATES, P. LEL: rib Enclosures CAFILESIHOPE. 1 LT E l : 7 .3a4 S4 794 ADE0_23--9e i 422 FROM : LANO TITLE LAND TITLE_ GUARANTEE CG,_-cPANY RECED JAN 0 8 1997 • M -R .COLORADO INVESTORS, INC. C/O LISA =MEL 3500 S. YOSEMITE #789 DEAR, CO 80237 Dear Customer: Land Title Guarantee Cothp,e4ly is pleased to provide you with your Title Insurance Policy. This valuable document insures good and marketable title to your procerty_ Please reviet the policy in its entirety_ We at Land Title Guarantee Company believe in providing you, our customer, with a cr aiity product which will serve your needs. Alin the even you do find any discrepancy, or if -you have any Wilestions or comments regarding. your final policy, please contact the following department and we will gladly handle, any request you may have as efficiently and quickly as oossible. TITLE DEPARTMENT TELEPHONE # (303)945,-26'10 FAX #(303)945-4784 PLEASE REFER TO ORDER NO. GW220895 Should you decide to sell the property described in Schedule A, or if you are required to furnish a new title commitment for mortgage purposes, you may be entitled to a credit coward future title insurance expenses. Land Title Guarantee Company will retain a copy of the enclosed title policy, and in the event you do need future services, ' we will be in a position to acain serve you promptly and efficiently. Thank you very much for giving Land Title Guarantee Company the opportunity to serve you. PACE Itl2 DEC -23-96 14 22 FROM LANC TITLE (' :arra AO 4/95 )rder GTF22089S • SC1 ±DULE A 1D:9709454764 PACE Policy 14,..;: LT E220895 Amount $1,267',000.00 Address GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO 1. Poiicy.Date: Jane 26, 1995 at 5:00 P.M. 2. Name of Insured: • M -R COLORADO INV STORS , INC. 3, The estate or interest in the land described in this Schedule and which is covered by this policy is: A wee Simple 4. Title to the estate or interest covered by this policy at; the date hereof is vested in: •1-.R COLORADO INVESTORS, INC. 5 The land referred to -in this policy is situated in GARFI LD County, Colorado, and is described as follows: PARCEL A A PARCEL OF LAND SITtiAFEL IN SECTION 27 AND IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, GAR FIELD COUNT`, COLORADO; SAID PARCEL CREAT V BY SUBDIVISION OF A, BOUNDARY PLAT OF PORTIONS OF SAID SECTIONS 27 AND 34 DAMD MAY 23, 1973 AND REVISED AUGUST 8, 1978 AND SIGNED 'AND SEALED BY JACK W. JOHNSON, COLORADO R.L.S. NO. 4551; SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE COMMON Soca QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27 AND NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34, THENCE S. 85 DEGREES 54'20" W. MORE OR LESS 872.66 FEET MORE OR LESS TO i` TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N. 11 DEGREES 28'30" W. MORE OR LESS ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE 415.76 FEET MORE OR LESS; THENCE N. 81 DEGREES 00'44" E. MORE OR LESS 644.97 FEET MORE OR LESS; LH ,NCE'N.'50 DEGREES 05'16" E. MORE OR LESS 1368.53 FEET MORE OR LESS; IllpENCE ESS; rTCE S. 88 DEGREES 24'24" E. MORE OR LESS 338.03 FEET MORE JR LESS; THENCE S. 01 DEGREES 26'34"' W. MORE OR LESS 750.30 FEET MORE LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY Page 1 This Policy valid only if Schedule B is attached. 2/12 DEC -23-96 I422 FROM:LAND TITLE ora A0.4/95 Dr :der No. C,i1220895 • SCE DJLE A ID.3721644764 Policy No-.' LTE 220895 PAGE Aounc $1,267,000.00 OR LESS; TENS S. 88 DEGREES 24'24" E. MORE OR LESS 290.80 FEET MORE OR LESS; THENCE S. 01 DEGREES 29'118 W. MORE OR LESS 123.21 i't,E1 MORE OR LESS; ; THENCE S. 75 DEGREES 54'54" W. MORE OR LESS 1622.27 FEET MOR OR LESS; THENCE S_ 81 DEGREES 00'44" W. MORE OR LESS 644.97 FEET MORE OR LESS TO TEE TRUE PONT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPTING FROM THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION THE PLOTrE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE COUNTY ROAD LEADING DIRECTLY TO GLENWOOD AIRPORT. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO }.PARCEL 3 A PARCEL OF LAND S TUA' D IN THE S1/2 OF SECTION 27 AND IN THE N1/2 OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST OF } nE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, GARB IELD COUNTY, COLORADO; SAID PARCEL CREATED BY SUBDIVISION OF A BOUNDARY PLAT OF PORTIONS OF SAID SECTIONS 27 AND 34 DATED MAY 23, 1973 ?1D REVISER IkUGUST 8, /978 AND SIGNED AND SEALED BY JACK W.- JOHNSON, COLORADO R.L.S. NO. 4551; SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT TEE COMMON SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27 AND NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34, TEENCE 5. 85 DEGREES 54'20" W. MORE OR LESS 872.66 FEET MORE. OR LESS TO A _REBAR AND CAP SET IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF FOUR -MILE COIThTY ROAD, TEE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Tki NCI. N. 81 DEGREES 00'44" E. MORE OR LESS 644.97 PEET MORE OR LESS TO A R.EBA.R AND CAP; THENCE N. 75 DEGREES.54'54" E. MORE OR LESS 1522.27 FEET MORE OR LESS TO 'rib EAST LINE OF THE SW1/4SE1/4 OF SAID SECTION 27; THENCE S. 01 DEGREES 29'11" W. OR LESS TO THE S.E. CORNER OF THENCE S. 08 DEGREES 35'18" W. OR LESS; THENCE N. 79 DEGREES 38'39" W. THENCE N. 84 DEGREES 09'51" W. THENCE N. 83 DEGREES 37/267 W. THENCE N. 83 DEGREES 45'47" W. THENCE N. 83 DEGREES 37'23" W THENCE N. 84 DEGREES 01'09" W. POINT IN SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LIQ d . 412.87 FEET MORE OR LESS TO MORE OR LESS 469.77 FEET MORE SAID SW1/4SEI/4; MORE OR LESS 691.22 FEET MORE 444.88 FEET MORE OR LESS; 254.28 F.R T; 279.76 FEET; 395.98 FEET; 309.58 FEET; 354.18 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A FOUR -MILE COUNTY ROAD; NE N. 10 DEGREES 08'57" 1 112 TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY Page 2 This Policy valid only if Schedule B is attached. 3/12 oEc-23-a6 14:23 FRUM =LAND r1 iLr. Foria A0'4/95 k 4-:S709454794 Policy LC LTAH220395 PACE Order No. GTF220895 Amount $1,267,0170,00 • • SCEOiLE A COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO = LAND TITLE cUARANTBE COMPANY Page 3 This Policy valid only if Schedule B is attached_ 4/12 1 i4 : Ls Form AO 4/9S • rKLJM=LNaYU L 1 • L G Order' No. GTF22089S SCI-DUTLE S/12 Policy No. LTHH220895 This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following: 1. Rights or cla.imsQ of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown.by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by tb.e public records_ Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, unposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. GENERAL OR SPECIAL TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS REQUIRED TO BE PAID IN THE YE 1997 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS. 1 . UD OF TRUST DATED June 20, 1995, FROM M -R COLORADO INVESTORS, INC. T O: LSC TRUSTEE OF GARFIELD COUNTY FOR TRE USE OF FIRST UNITED BANK TO SECURE THE SUM OF 51,267,000.00 RECORDED June 25, 1995, IN BOOK 983 AT PAGE 99 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 494973. EFFECT OF INCLUSIONS IN ANY GENERAL OR. SPECIFIC WATER CONSERVANCY, FIRE PROTECTION, SOIL CONSERVATION OR OTHER DISTRICT OR INCLUSION IN ANY WATER SERVICE OR STREET IMPROVEMENT AREA. 3. WATER RIGHTS OR CLAIMS TO WATER RIGHTS. .. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE.HIS ORE raE±.EFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT 'LriE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED June 20, 1893, IN BOOR 12 AT PAGE 233, RECORDED APRIL 30, 1894 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 318, RECORDED JULY 29, 1895 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 375, AND.RECORDED MARCH 4, 1935 IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 194. .0. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCJ .D BY ihE AUTHORITY OF TEE [TNI L'. STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED June 20, 1893, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 233, RECORDED APRIL 30, 1894 IN BOOR 12 AT PAGE 318, RECORDED•JuLY 29, 1895 TN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 375, RECORDED NOVEMBER 18, 1912 IN BOOK 71 AT PAGE 576, AND RECORDED MARCH 4, 1935 IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 194. 1. EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY FOR CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF AIIMMUNICATION AND OTHER FACILITIES AS GRANTED TO THE MOUNTAIN STATES ...LEPHONE AND TEL TELEGRAPH COMPANY BY WILL LAM F. STEVENS IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED APRIL 28, 1972 IN BOOK 430 AT PAGE 139. age 4 DEC-23-9G 14123 FRAM LAND T i TTLLE Crek. Na. GTF220895 ?orm AO 4/9s • SCi "ULE 1[]: 9 7094 54 764 PAGE Si 12 'Policy No. LTHH220895 12. MAP AND STATEMENT OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATURAL GAS COMPANY TRANSMISSION LINE RECORDED IN ROAD BOO 13 AT PAGE 128. 13. UNDIVIDED ONE-FOURTH INTEREST IN ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER MINERAL RIGHTS AS RESERVED BY FRANCIS W. CBRISTENSEN IN DEED RECORDED JUNE 10, 1950 IN BOOK' 251 AT PAGE 25, AND ANY AND ALL ,ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF OR INTERESTS TatRE IN . • 14. UNDIVIDED ONE-FOURTH INTEREST IN ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER MINERAL RIGHTS AS RESERVED BY RAYMOND SMALTS IN DEQ.D RECORDED NOVEMBER 1, 1951 IN BOOK 250 AT PAGE 546, AND ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF OR INTERESTS THEREIN. t.I(g t i S OF . WAY FOR ROADS ACC ROSS SUBJECT PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON SURVEY EY JACK W JOHNSON, DA.L'IsL) MAY 23, 1973. '5. A. EXISTING LEASES AND TENANCIES, IF ANY. 7. ENCROACHMENT O4 FENCE 'ONTO COUNT? ROAD 117 RIGHT OF WAY AS SHOWN ON SURV Y PREPARED BY HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, DATED JA N A_RY 10, 1994. • �ge 5 )d=4547i1,4 LAND T I TLE GARANTEE C O (PAN Y ONE ANDA QUARTER°MILE RANCH, INC. C/O LISA SMIMEL 3500 S. YOSEMITE #789 DENVER, CO 80237 Laud Title Guarantee Company is pleased no provide you with 'your Title Insurance Policy. This valuable document insures good and marketable title to your property. Please review the policy in its entirety. We at Land Title Guarantee Company believe in nrovid±ng you, our customer, with a quality product which will serve your needs. 'i che event you do find any discrepancy, or if you have any questions or comments regarding your final policy, please contact the following department and we will gladly handle any request you may have as efficiently and quickly as possible. TITLE DEPARTMENT r LJEPEONE x (303) 945-2610 FAX #(303)945-4784 PLEASE REFER TO ORDER NO. GW220890" Should'you decide to sell the property described in Schedule A, or if you are required to furnish a new title commitment far mortgage purposes, you may be entitled to a credit toward future title insurance expenses_ Land Title Guarantee Company will retain a copy of the enclosed title policy, and, in the event you do need future services, we will be in a Position to again serve you promptly and efficiently. Thank you very much for giving Land Title Guarantee Company the opportunity to serve you. PAGE 2 DEC -23-=a 14,24 r xu M= L.m.siu L i 1 L.G Fork AO 4/95 m / 444 m4 !a -i Policy No LT {220895 Order No. GTF220896 Amount $1,233,000.00 SCHEDULE :A Address G RF I T r) COUNTY, COLORADO 1. Policy Date: June 26, 1996 at 5:00 P.M. 2. Name of Insured ONE AND A QUART.' MILE RANCH, INC. 3 The estate or interest in the land described in this Schedule and which is covered by this policy is: A -Fee Sirrle Title: co the estate er interest covered by this policy at :he dace hereof is vested in: :3NE AND A QUAR'ml.t MILE RAANCE, LNC. 5_ The land referred Co in this policy is situated in GARFIELD Courcy, Colorado, and is described as follows .PARCEL A A PARCEL OF LAND SITUA1L,D IN SECTION 27. TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE X39 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, GA_RFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO; SAID PARCEL CREATED BY SUBDIVISION OF A BOUNDARY PLAT OF PORTION OF SAID SECTION 27 AND OF SECTION 34, SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE, DAi'D MAY 23, 1973 AND REVISED AUGUST 8, 1978 AND SIGNED AND SEALED BY JACK W_ ° JOHNSON, COLORADO R.L.S. NO. 4551; SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CENTER SECTION CORNER. OF SAID SECTION 27, THENCE N. 88 DEGREES 28'35" W. ALONG THE EAST -WEST CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 27 1127.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF FOUR -MILE COUNTY ROAD, THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N. 18 DEGREES 56'44" W. 35.69 FEET; THENCE N. 73 DEGREES 20'59" E. 38_23 FEET; THENCE N. 82 DEGREES 06'12" E. 63.31 FEET; THENCE N. 86 DEGREES 20'37" E. 270.00 FEET; ''INCE N. 85 DEGREES 10'08" E. 785.86 FEET; ler.'HarcE S. 54 DEGREES 17'37" E. 186.62 FEET; THENCE S. 53 DEGREES 49'22-g E. 151.66 FEET; LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY Page 1 This Policy valid only if Schedule B is attached. Qi 1 JE; -4—=e3 1 "+ arzn AO 4/95 LV r elUM : LAPAL. �.r )rder Na. GTF220896 Policy No`7. LTh2220895 Amount $1,233,000.00 THENCE S. 43 DEGREES L7'21' E. 231.65 FEET; THENCE S. 13 DEGREES 45'28" E. 432.09 FEET; THENCE S. 09 DEGREES 31'33" E. 326.76 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A REBAR AND CAP SET IN AN EXISTING FENCE LINE; THENCE S. 89 DEGREES 27'55" W. MORE OR LESS 1382.73 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A REBAR AND CAP SET IN SAID EASTERLY LINE OF FOUR - MILE COUNTY ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE N. 19 DEGREES 25'01" W. MORE OR LESS 1043.52 1.6E•i MORE OR LESS TO TEE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; COUNTY OF GARFIELD 'STATE OF COLORADO . PARCErL S A PARCEL OF LAND SITUAlEu IN THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUm, RANGE 89 WEST OF 'k'rk; SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO; SAID PARCEL CREATED 3Y SUBDIVISION OF A BOUNDARY PLAT OF PORTIONS OF SAID SECTION 27 AND OF SECTION 34, SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE, DATED MAY 23, 1973.AND REVISED AUGUST 3, 1978 AND SIGNED AND SEALED BY JACK W. JOHNSON, COLORADO R.L.S. NO. 4531; SAID PARCEL BEING MORE IIIPARTICULARLY DESCRIBE AS FOLLOWS COMMENCING AT THE CENTER SECTION CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27, . THENCE S. 39 DEGREES 1.5'27" W. MORE OR LESS 1232,64 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A REBAR AND CAP SET IN rhE EASTERLY LINE OF FOUR - MILE COUNTY ROAD, THE TRUE POINT OF B EG LNNING THENCE N. 89 DEGREES 27'55" E. MORE OR LESS 1382.73 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A REBAR AND CAP SET IN AN EXISTING FENCE LINE; THENCE S. 09 DEGREES 31'33" E. 425.47 FEET MORE OR LESS TO 'BE SOUTH LINE OF TEE 1!i1/2SE1/4 SAID SECTION 27; THENCE S. 50 DEGREES 05'16" W . MORE OR. LESS 1368.53 FEET MORE OR. LESS TO A REBAR AND CAP; THENCE S. 81 DEGREES 00'44" MORE OR LESS 644.97 L T MORE OR LESS TO A REAR AND CAP SET IN SAID EASTERLY LINE OF FOUR - MILE COUNTY ROAD; THENCE{ ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE ALONG A LU:ZVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 680.30 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 37 DEGREES 20'20", A DISTANCE OF 443.34 FEET MORE OR LESS; THENCE ALONG -SAID EASTERLY LINEN_ 25 DEGREES 51'50" E. 316.05 r'tak;"i' ; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 881.92 FEET AND CFL ANGLE OF 44 DEGREES 40'10", A DISTANCE OF 687.57 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; s�r2 COUNTY OF GARFIELD ,TATE OF COLORADO LAND TITLE -GUARANTEE COMPANY Page 2 This Policy valid only if Schedule E. is attached. uC.L. --4s-== Form AO 4/95 �Y x Order No. GTF220896 SEUL£ r AL;h 10/12 } Policy No. LTEZ220896 LAND TITLE GUARANTEE TEE COMPANY Page' 3 This Policy valid only if Schedule S is attached_ OJEc - z,s-=a rRil(-t:Lr�' ) 1 iLt. ?ora AO 4/95 Order No. GTF220896 • 1U:�"/dam-a ti7tr�1 P '+ is c 1 1 l L 2 (: Policy No_ LTEE220896 This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following: 1. Rights or 'claims' of parties in possession not shown by the public records_ Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any "facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. GENERAL OR SPECIAL TAKES AND ASSESSMENTS REQUIRED TC) BE PAID IN THE YEAR 1997 AND SUBSEQUENT YEAS . 411ED OF TRUST DA!'w June 20, 1996, FROM ONE AND A QUARTER ?BILE RANCH, INC. TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF GARFIELD COUNTY FOR THE USE OF FIRST UNITED BANK TO SECux.E THE SUM OF $1,233,000.00 RECORDED June 26, 1996, IN BOOK 983 AT PAGE 131 UNDER RErEPTION NO. 494977. THE EFFECT OF INCLUSIONS IN ANY GENERAL OR SPECIFIC WATER CONSERVANCY, FIRE PROTECTION, SOIL CONSERVATION OR OfiER DISTRICT OR INCLUSION IN ANY WATER SERVICE OR STREET IMPROVEMENT AREA. WATER RIGHTS OR CLA.IMS TO WATER RIGHTS. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SANTE BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED June 20, 1893, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 233, RECORDED APRIL 30, 1894 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 318, RECORDED JULY 29, 1895 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 375, AND RECORDED MARCf 4, 1935 IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 194. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRLTLi'Izu BY THE ALTEHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED June 20, 1893, IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 233, RECORDED APRIL 30, 1894 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 318, RECORDED JULY 29, 1895 IN BOOK 12 AT PAGE 375, RECORDED NOVEMBER 18, 1912 IN BOOK 71 AT PAGE 576, AND RECORDED MARCH 4, 1935 IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 194. A SEME"NT AND RIGMT OF WAY FOR CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF T INICATION AND OTHER FACILITIES AS GRANTED TO THE MOUNTAIN STATES r:LEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY BY WILLIAM F. STEVENS IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED APRIL 28, 1972 IN BOOK 430 AT PAGE 139. age 4 OEC -23-3& 14+25 FRQt9:LAND rlrLE Form AC '4/9S • 1D:7713454784 PAGE 12/12 Order No. GTF220896 QZicy No. LTH3220896 Scam= S 12. MAP AND STATEMENT OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATURAL GAS COMPANY TRANSMISSION LINE RECORDED IN ROAD BOOK 3 AT PAGE 128. 13. UNDIVIDED ONE-FOURTH INTEREST IN ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER MINERAL RIGHTS AS RESERVED BY FRANCIS W. CHRISTENSEN IN DEED RECORDED JUNE 10, 1950 IN BOOK 251 AT PAGE 25, AND ANY AND ALL ASSISTS THEREOF OR INTERESTS THEREIN_ • 14. UNDIVIDED ONE-FOURTH INTEREST IN ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER MINERAL RIGHTS AS RESERVED BY RAYMOND SMALTS IN DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 1, 1951 IN BOOK 260 AT PAGE 545, AND ANY AN]) ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF OR INTERESTS THEREIN. L5. RICiArS OF WAY FOR ROADS ACCROSS SUBJECT PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON SURVEY BY JACK W. JOHNSON, DATED MAY 23, 1973.. 16. EXISTING LEASES AND TENANCIES, IF ANY_ _7. ENCROACHMENT OF FENCE ONTO COUNTY ROAD 117 RIGHT OF WAY AS StOWN ON SURVEY PREPARED 3Y HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, DATED JANUARY 10, 1994_ • • :ge S • LEAVENWORTH & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOYAL E. LEAVENWORTH CYNTHIA C. TESTER SHANE J. HARVEY JOSLYN V. WOOD* 'Admitted in Hawaii and Texas only DONALD H. HAND3URG Of Counsel Mr. Sunny Vann Vann Associates 230 East Hopkins Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 April 11, 1997 1011 GRAND AVENUE P.O. DRAWER 2030 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 TELEPHONE: (970) 945-2261 FAX. (970) 945-7336 Re: Four Mile Ranch Subdivision: Preliminary Plan Submittal Dear Sunny: This letter will serve to clarify any questions you might have regarding the ownership of the land proposed for development in connection with the above -referenced matter. M -R Colorado Investors, Inc. and One And A Quarter Mile Ranch, Inc. each own a parcel of land which together comprise the 138 -acre development property commonly known as the Four Mile Ranch. These two owners entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with Four Mile Ranch Development Company, Inc. on or about June 20, 1996. The Joint Venture Agreement provides that Four Mile Ranch Development Company, Inc. shall provide the management and supervision necessary for the development of the land as a single-family home residential subdivision. As such, Four Mile Ranch Development Company, Inc. is often referred to as the "Developer" or the "Developer Venturer." As you may be aware, Harry Hart is currently the President of Four Mile Ranch Development Company, Inc. Thus, any references to Mr. Hart in the prior subdivision submittals were in his capacity as a representative of the Developer Venturer. office. Should you have any further questions in this regard, please do not hesitate to contact our • LEL: rlb C:\FILESWANN.lLT Very truly yours, LEAVENWORTH & ASSOCIATES, P.C. L t yal :. Leavenworth • • • PRE -ANNEXATION AGREEMENT FOUR MILE RANCH SUBDIVISION ANNEXATION THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 1997, by and between the CITY OF GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO, a Colorado home -rule municipality (hereinafter "City") and , M -R COLORADO INVESTORS, INC. and ONE & A QUARTER MILE RANCH, INC., both Colorado corporations (hereinafter "Owner" or "Developer"); WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Owner is the owner of certain real property currently located in unincorporated Garfield County, Colorado, commonly known as the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision and more particularly described on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (hereinafter the "Property"); and • WHEREAS, the Owner desires to annex and connect to the City's sewer system; and WHEREAS, C.R.S. 31-12-121, as amended, authorizes the City and Owner to enter into a Pre -Annexation Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City and Owner desire to enter into the Pre -Annexation Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement") to set forth their agreements in writing concerning the terms and conditions of annexation of the Property to the City. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the City and Owner agree as follows: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the terms and conditions of the annexation of the Property to the City. Except as expressly provided for herein to the contrary, all conditions herein are in addition to any and all requirements concerning annexation contained in the Municipal Code of the City of Glenwood Springs (hereinafter "City Code") or the Municipal Annexation Act of 1965, as amended, C.R.S. §31-12-101 et seq. This Agreement is intended to provide a contractual relationship between the City and Owner to ensure compliance with the City code, state statutes, and all terms and conditions set forth herein. This Agreement includes additional terms and conditions for the purposes of the Municipal Annexation Act. 2. Effective Date. Developer has made application to Garfield County for approval of a subdivision to be located on the Property. Approval of the final plat by Garfield County shall be a condition precedent to the effectiveness of the terms and conditions of this Agreement by either party hereto. In the event Developer has not received final plat approval from Garfield County within eighteen (18) months of the date hereof, then this Agreement will automatically terminate and be of no further force or effect. • Nothing contained herein constitutes an endorsement of the Developer's land use proposal or shall preclude the City from commenting on or objecting to the approval of the Four Mile Ranch subdivision project before the Garfield County Planning and Zoning Commission or Garfield County Board of County Commissioners, and the City expressly reserves all right to comment in any manner regarding said project. 3. Annexation, The annexation of the property shall be in accordance with the Colorado Municipal Annexation Act of 1965, C.R.S. 31-12-101, 5sa., as amended. 4. e- exatio Fr S eci D` trict I cludi F' e ervice. Owners shall petition for exclusion from any taxing districts, including the Glenwood Springs Rural Fire Protection District, which provide services to the property which the City is capable of providing, at such time as such service is made available to the property by the City. All costs of de -annexation shall be borne by Owners. 5. Fees. Owner agrees to pay the following fees related to the Property development: a. Upon the Owner's payment of Garfield County Transportation Impact Fees ("TIF") in an amount roughly equivalent to that required by the City's Municipal Code. Pay of the City TIF will not be required so long as Owner complies with this Paragraph 5(a). b. Within sixty (60) days of Final Plat approval by Garfield County of the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision, Developer shall pay the City a fee to be used by the city to repair or provide capacity increases to certain segments of the city's sewer infrastructure which will convey wastewater from the Four Mile Ranch project to the City's treatment facilities (hereinafter "Infrastructure Upgrade Fee"), The Infrastructure Upgrade Fee to be paid by the Developer shall be in the amount of $250,000.00. Developer further agrees that, following approval of the preliminary plan for the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision by Garfield County, Developer shall, at its sole expense, cause the preparation of plans & specifications for the reconstruction of the City's sewer transmission line from Manhole 20B to Manhole A-23 (behind the South Park Subdivision and Safeway). Such plans shall be prepared by a Colorado professional engineer to city specifications and standards and, once completed, submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Such plans shall be approved by the City prior to Final Plat approval by Garfield County. c. All actual costs incurred for notice publication, recording, etc. related to the annexation; and d. All other fees not expressly addressed herein and required by the Glenwood Springs 2 • Municipal Code. Such fees shall be paid in the amount and at the time provided for by the Glenwood Springs Municipal Code. 6. Development Plan. The parties agree and acknowledge that the Owner is currently undergoing the subdivision plat process with Garfield County. The pending plat provides for 58 single-family lots. Upon approval of subdivision by Garfield County, Owner shall provide the City with two (2) reproducible copies of the plat as approved. 7. Easements. Owner shall secure, at its own cost, all easements necessary for streets, roadway, water and sewer facilities and the trail to be constructed along Four Mile Road and any other subdivision improvements, and the City shall be named as "Grantee" on the final plat or easement documents. 8. Sewer Service. The City agrees to provide sewer service to the number of lots in the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision approved by Garfield County, not to exceed 58, upon completion by Developer of the terms and conditions contained herein. Within sixty (60) days of Final Plat approval by Garfield County of the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision, the Developer shall pay the City system improvement fees in the amount of $1,736.44 per single-family lot for all lots approved on the Final Plat. Upon receipt by the City of the system development fees pursuant to this paragraph and the infrastructure upgrade fee pursuant to Paragraph 4, the City shall make sewer service available to, and reserve sufficient capacity for all single family lots approved on the Final Plat without further payment of system development fees, tap fees, or similar charges. Developer shall provide the City with Mylar "as built" drawings of all sewer lines installed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. In addition, Developer shall provide the City with a certification from a professional engineer that all construction was completed according to the plans and specifications approved by the City. All internal sewer lines constructed within the Four Mile Ranch subdivision property shall be constructed within the utility easements shown on the final plat and shall be constructed to City specifications. The City may inspect the sewer main and internal lines during and after construction to ensure compliance with City specifications and the approved plans. Upon completion of construction of the internal sewer lines, said lines shall be conveyed to the Four Mile Ranch Homeowners Association, which Association shall own and maintain the lines until such time as they may be dedicated to the City. Said internal sewer lines shall be dedicated to the City upon the City's request for such dedication. Developer agrees to construct a sewer main which will connect to the Property beginning at a location originating near Three Mile Creek at the City's existing sewer line and continuing up Midland Avenue, then along County Road 117, and terminating at the entrance to the four Mile Ranch project. Plans and specifications for the sewer main and internal sewer lines referred to in Paragraph 6 shall be prepared by Developer at its sole cost and shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. Said main sewer line shall include an 8 -inch stubout beneath Road A at MH - 3 A7 for use in future development. Construction of said line and internal lines shall be at Developer's sole expense in accordance with City specifications, and Developer agrees to secure all permits and easements as may be required and to pay all applicable fees for connection to the City sewer system. Upon completion of construction of the main sewer line, said line will be conveyed to the Homeowners Association. The Homeowners Association shall be responsible for the repair and maintenance of the sewer main. One (1) year after conveyance to the Homeowners Association, the Homeowners Association shall dedicated the main line to the city and shall provide a one-year warranty thereon. Thereafter, City shall own, operate, repair and maintain such main line. 9. Water Service. Owner shall provide water service to the Subdivision including all required lines and connections. Upon annexation the City may request dedication of such water facilities to the City. Upon such request the facilities shall be transferred forthwith. At such time, the City will be responsible for all repairs and maintenance necessary for the safe operation of the water system facilities, a. Water Rights Dedication. Owner is required to dedicate any water rights appurtenant to the Property upon the exercise by the City of its right herein to require dedication of the water system. Upon dedication, such water rights shall be held by the City solely for the use and benefit of the Subdivision, and the users of the water system shall be billed for potable water at the same rate as is effective for all in -City water users at that time. In addition, the City shall be bill and the Homeowners' Association shall pay all annual fees associated with the West Divide Water Conservancy District allotment contract for the Subdivision. b. Water flows shall be adequate for fire protection purposes. c. Fire hydrants shall meet City standards and specifications as to, among others. location. 10. Access to Four Mile Ranch Subdivision . Owner shall provide access adequate and satisfactory for sufficient police and emergency services to all of the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision, such services to be provided by the City upon annexation. 11. Roads. All driveways and roads constructed on the Property shall meet Uniform Fire Code requirements, as adopted by the City, including, but not limited to, road widths, grades, surfaces and turnarounds. Owner shall provide the City proposed road plan and profile for approval. by the City prior to any such construction being initiated. All roads shall be constructed to all City standards and specifications. 12. Parkland Dedication. Owner agrees to convey to the City the 2.3 acres parcel of land described in attached Exhibit "A" (hereinafter "Dedicated Open Space") upon approval by Garfield County of the final plat of the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision. Developer shall retain an easement across the Dedicated Open Space to access the Roaring Fork River for water supply purposes. 4 The conveyance of the Dedicated Open Space to the City shall be contingent upon said parcel being used for park and recreation purposes and other public uses and any purpose specifically reserved herein by Developer. Recreation purposes shall include public access and other public uses to the Roaring Fork River by the public for purposes of fishing. The City agrees to convey to Owner, at the request of the Owner and upon approval of the final plat of the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision, a 25 -foot (25') easement across City property to access the Roaring Fork River for water supply purposes. Said easement shall be located in a mutually agreeable location, the approval of which shall not be unreasonably withheld. At such time as Developer desires to utilize said easement for the permitted purposes, Developer shall submit plans and specifications for Developer's proposed water diversion and water supply facilities to be located within the easement for review and approval by the City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. Said plans and specifications shall include provisions for the burial of any lines located within the easement. Upon conveyance of the space, Owners shall construct two (2) gravel parking spaces for access to the Roaring Fork River for recreation purposes. In addition, Owner agrees to construct and dedicate to the public an eight -foot wide asphalt pedestrian/bicycle path along the entire length of the Subdivision on the County Road 117 boundary, as described Exhibit "B" attached hereto. The path plans and specifications shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction.. 13. Electric and Other Utilities. The Owner shall comply with the City Code as it is in effect and amended from time to time, concerning the provision of electricity, cable, and other utilities not specifically provided for in this Agreement. 14. Provisions Exclusive. The City and Owner acknowledge and agree that this Agreement contains all requirements of the Owner concerning the provision of water and sewer service to the Property, parkland dedications, utilities, and transportation impact fees, water system infrastructure upgrades, water rights dedications, and other matters expressly addressed under this Agreement. No additional substantive requirements shall be imposed upon the Owner with regard to these enumerated items. 15. Zoning and Subdivision. The parties agree that, upon annexation, the Property shall be zoned with a City zone district classification which is no less restrictive than the current county zoning, and which permits subdivision of the nature described herein. If such zoning is not effected, the parties agree that the Property may be de -annexed upon the petition of the Owners pursuant to paragraph 16 below. 16. De -annexation. The parties agree and stipulate that the express provisions of this agreement are a material consideration of the agreement of Owners to annex the Property to the City. Therefore, in the event the City fails to perform under the terms of this agreement as stated, the parties stipulate and agree, pursuant to C.R.S. 31-12-501, that it shall be in the best interest of the City that the Property be disconnected from the City. in such event, the City agrees to enact an 5 • • ordinance affecting such disconnection and will speedily act upon any application for disconnection submitted by Owners. The City further agrees that such disconnection is authorized by the Charter of the City of Glenwood Springs and the applicable ordinances enacted by the City and that it shall take no action amending either its Charter or ordinances which would preclude such disconnection. 17. Election. Owner agrees that it is voluntarily entering into this Agreement. Owner represents and submits that, to the extent an election would be required pursuant to C.R.S. §31-12- 112, as amended, to approve the annexation or to impose terms and conditions upon the Property to be annexed, Owner owns 100 percent of the Property to be annexed, and would vote to approve the annexation and all terms and conditions as set forth herein. Thus, any election would necessarily result in a majority of the electors' approval to the annexation and the terms and conditions. 18. Assignment. The parties agree and acknowledge that the rights and obligations of the Owner under this Agreement may be assigned by the Owner to persons or entities acquiring title to the Property without the prior consent of the City; provided, however, such assignee agrees in writing to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and the Owner shall give notice to the City pursuant to Paragraph 30, below, of any such conveyance, together with the assignee's written agreement to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 19. Waiver of Defects. In executing this Agreement, Owner waives all objections it may have concerning defects, if any, in the formalities whereby it is executed, or concerning the power of the City to impose conditions on Owner as set forth herein, and concerning the procedure, substance, and form of the ordinances or resolutions adopting this Agreement. 20. Final Agreement. This Agreement supersedes and controls all prior written and oral agreements and representations of the parties and is the total integrated agreement between the City and the Owner. 21. Modifications. This Agreement shall not be amended, except by subsequent written agreement of the city and Owner. 22. Release of Liability. It is expressly understood that the City cannot be legally bound by the representations of any of its officers or agents or their designees except in accordance with the city code, City ordinances, and the laws of the State of Colorado, and that Owner, when dealing with the City, acts at its own risk as to any representation or undertaking by the city officers or agents or their designees which is subsequently held unlawful by a court of law. 23. Captions. The captions in this Agreement are inserted only for convenience and in no way define, limit, or prescribe the scope or intent of this Agreement or any part thereof. 24. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors, and assigns. 6 25. Invalid Provision. If any provisions of this Agreement shall be determined to be void by any court of competent jurisdiction, then such determination shall not affect any other provision hereof, all of which other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. It is the intention of the parties hereto that, if any provision of this Agreement is capable of two constructions, one of which would render the provision void, and the other of which would render the provision valid, then the provision shall have the meaning which renders it valid. 26. Governing Law. The laws of the State of Colorado shall govern the validity, performance, and enforcement of this Agreement. should either party institute legal suit or action for enforcement of any obligation contained herein, it is agreed that the venue of such suit or action shall be in Garfield County, Colorado. 27. Attorneys' Fees: Survival. Should this Agreement become the subject of litigation between the City and Owner, the prevailing party shall be entitled to attorneys' fees and costs of suit actually incurred, including expert witness fees. all rights concerning remedies and/or attorneys' fees shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 28. Authority. Each person signing this Agreement represents and warrants that he is fully authorized to enter into and execute this Agreement and to bind the part it represents to the terms and conditions hereof. 29. Counterpats. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which, when taken together, shall be deemed one and the same instrument. 30. Notice. All notices required under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be hand -delivered or sent by facsimile transmission or registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, to the addresses of the parties herein set forth. All notices by hand delivery shall be effective upon receipt. All facsimile transmissions shall be effective upon transmission receipt. all notices by mail shall be considered effective seventy-two (72) hours after deposit in the United States mail with the proper address as set forth below. Either party by notice so given may change the address to which future notices shall be sent. Notice to City: With copy to: City of Glenwood Springs 806 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Fax (970) 945-2597 Teresa Williams, Esq. Michael Copp, Manager City of Glenwood Springs 806 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, C 7 • Fax (970) 945-2597 • Notice to Owner; With copy to, M -R Colorado Investors, Inc. and One & A Quarter Mile Ranch, Inc. cio Four Mile Ranch Joint Venture 1205 South Platte River, Suite 101A Denver, CO 80223 (303)733-9787 Leavenworth & Associates, P.C. 1011 Grand Avenue P.O. Drawer 2030 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 31. Gender. Whenever the context shall require, the singular number shall include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of any gender shall be applicable to all genders. WHERLFORF., the parties hereto have executed duplicate originals of this Agreement on the day and year first written above. ATTEST: Robin S. Clemons, City Clerk LO d ZO86-€£L (£o€ CITY OF GLENWOOD SPRINGS. COLORADO. a Colorado municipal corporation By: Marc Adler, Mayor FOUR MILE .RANCH JOINT VENTURE: M -R COLORADO INVESTORS, INC. By: 8 1 Milford S. Pepper, Pr, i,$ent tits =oS -daS Secretary ONF & A QUA B STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss_ COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) T.L RANC!I. INC. Silver, President Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 1997, by , as Mayor, and by , as Clerk, on behalf of the City of Glenwood Springs, Colorado. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: STATE. OF COLOR ADO COUNTY ()F CrAR!' 1JiL,17 )ss. ) Notary Public Subscribed and sworn to bcibre me this 11't day of C L 9 8D'd 2096 -EEL (EIDE) 1997, by 'dzs = or L6-SZ-daS • • LO "d Milford S. Pepper, as President, and by of the M -R Colorado Investors, Inc. WITNESS niy hand and official seal. My coninlission expires; as Secretary, on behalf" Donald E. Barney NOTARY PLISL1C=STATE OF COLORnr)O My Commitvion Expired, oc r 1 7,2000 STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY n=it, tittulivAve. ) Subscribed and sworn to before me tlii ~ 7 day o1 Jack Silver, as President, and 'by 57146. -. 14tp & A Quarter Mile Ranch, Inc. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: MY � E 1140.199P ZO86-EEL (EOE) Notary Public 10 , as Secretary, on , 1997, by behalf of the One dfD ZI L6-5'Z-daS • LEAVENWORTH & ASSOCIATES, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOYAL E. LEAVENWORTH CYNTHIA C. TESTER DAVID E. LEAVENWORTH. JR. JOSLYN V. WOOD' GREGORY J. HALL "Admitted in Hawaii and Texas only DONALD H. HAMBURG Of Counsel Don DeFord, Esq. Garfield County Attorney 109 Eighth Street, Suite 300 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 September 25, 1997 Re: Four Mile Ranch Subdivision Dear Don: 1011 GRAND AVENUE P.O. DRAWER 2030 GLENWOOD SPRINGS. COLORADO 81602 TELEPHONE: (970) 945-2261 FAX: (970) 945-7336 On behalf of Four Mile Ranch Development Company, Inc. and in accordance with the provisions of C.R.S. §30-28-133.5(5), please be advised we agreed that the public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners on the Four Mile Ranch Preliminary Plan submittal shall be scheduled for January 12, 1998, at 2 p.m. This should allow adequate time for review • by the Garfield County Planning and Zoning Commission. The public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners may be scheduled for an earlier date in the event the Planning and Zoning Commission completes its review of the project submittal in time to notice the public hearing on an earlier date. • Unless I hear from you to the contrary, I will assume you agree with this schedule. Should you have any questions in this regard, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, LEAVENWORTH &. ASSOCIATES, P.C. Loyal E. Leavenworth LEL:IIn cc: Mark Bean Sunny Van Four Mile Ranch Development Company, Inc. F:IDEFORDB.2[.T • • Exhibit 14 deleted (see Exhibit 12) April 18, 1997 Sunny Vann Vann & Associates 230 E. Hopkins Avenue Aspen, CO 81615 FAX NO: 920-9310 RE: 4 -Mile Ranch - Traffic Impact HCE Project No, 96098.03 Dear Sunny: At your request, I have analyzed the impact of the referenced project on the existing County Road 117 infrastructure, and have made recommendations for improvements to reduce the impact of the proposed development on the roadway. • I attempted to determine the exact impact for this project per the Garfield County impact fee regulations, unfortunately, according to Mark Bean, the values required to utilize the impact fee worksheet have not been determined at this time. Therefore, 1 was unable to make any determination of impact fee, However, Lee Leavenworth has estimated the fee at approximately $2,500.00 per lot or $145,000.00. Based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual 5th Edition, the total trip ends generated by this use will be approximately 10 trip ends per_lot or 580 trip ends daily. All the trips, except for a small percentage, will turn north on County Road 117, therefore, the area of most impact on County Road 117 will occur from the main entrance to the project to the County Road 117/Midland intersection, Consequently, it is my recornrnendation that the developer improve County Road 117 from just south of the County RoadlMidland intersection to just south of the 4 -Mile Ranch Boulevard/County Road 117 intersection. • County Road 117 should be improved to the following standards: • Two 12' driving lanes * Two 6' shoulders. • Barrow ditches on both sides for positive drainage. * The shoulders should be reduced to a minimum of 2' where the existing right-of-way will not allow more. 923 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone: (970) 945-8676 • FAX: (970) 945-2555 Mr. Sunny Vann Paget April 18, 1997 I estimate that the cost of these improvements will exceed the estimated impact fee of $145,000.00. However, I must emphasize that these are only estimates and exact figures cannot be determined until the roadway improvements have been designed. If you have any questions, or I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. • • Joe D. Hope, P.E. Project Manager IDH:rjh April 4, 1997 Garfield County Planning 109 8th Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 RE: Four Mile Ranch Preliminary Plan Dear Mark, DEVELOPISENT I have had an opportunity to meet with Kevin Wright with the Division of Wildlife. We discussed the issues that were addressed in his letter to you on 2/12/97, and I wanted to share with you our findings. We have addressed each of Mr. Wright's 11 original recommendations as follows: 1. We have agreed to berm from excavated materials along the open space boundaries of lots and 38-41. We will plan trees and shrubs on top of the berm to create a small screen to help maintain the integrity of the wildlife travel routes to the north. The berm will help the vegetative screening be more effective. Lots 15-22 building envelopes are limited by covenants at least 50' the ridge line, and a natural berming is created from the contours of the ridge. This would prevent land scars and distraction of existing foliage 2. We will landscape along the open space boundaries of lots 23-37. 3. We have incorporated into our Subdivision covenants restrictions on the numbers (1 dog/home), and behavior of Dogs. The covenants outline strong fines, and ultimate removal for dogs not abiding.,to the rules and regulations. 4. We have rearranged the site plan to keep building envelopes back at least 50' from ridge lines on the entire north side of the property. 5. All utilities .will be buried. 6. We will maintain native vegetation in the open space areas along the north and east sides of the development. Additionally we will preserve as much native vegetation in the remainder of the project, as the development of infrastructure will allow. Homeowners rules prohibit the removal of any trees without approval of the Homeowners architectural review committee. 7. All fences will conform to Mr. Wright's recommendations, and are outlined in the Homeowners covenants. 8. Horses will not be permitted to be kept in the subdivision. 2500 North Military Trail, Suite 175, Boca Raton, FL 33431, Telephone (407) 241-3200 Fax (407) 241-1098 1205 South Platte River Drive, Suite 101A, Denver, CO 80223, Telephone (303) 733-9787 Fax (303) 733-9802 • • • 9 Homeowners are advised in the Homeowners Covenants that they will be responsible for preventing damage to their property which may occur from wilflife and remove wildlife which may die on their property. Homeowners will also be made aware that bears or lions are not removed just because they may be in the vicinity or observed in their neighborhood. 10. Additionally Homeowners are advised in Homeowners Covenants that if bears become a problem with trash/garbage then the homeowners WILL be required to install bear proof garbage containers.. 11. Because of the terrain on the north end of the project, we have not been able to create a workable situation to install a deer/elk underpass or overpass. Even in some conceivable areas for the installation, we do not feel that we can devise a deer/elk motivation for using the improvements. Mr. Wright has assured me that if he, or the Division of Wildlife have any other recommendations, they will share thein with this process. Sincerely, Bryan P. Barnes Subject to final review of the site plan, and Homeowners Documents, the Four Mile Ranch Preliminary Plan has substantially conformed to my most recent recommendations. Recomynendations may vary depending upon the final site plan and proposal. / L L, Kevin Wright District Wildli Manager Carbondale' P.O. Box 1908 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood springs, CO 81602 • Z,4MC4MELL4 4140 4S'SOCI4TES, Inc. EMGIME S1MG COMSULT4M1S March 17, 1997 Mr. Don Barnes Frontier Development Corporation 1205 S. Platte River Road #101-A Denver, CO 80223 Re: Four Mile Ranch Well Dear Mr. Barnes: (970) 945-5700 (970) 945-1253 Fax Enclosed are the test results from Barringer Laboratories. These results are for tests performed on samples from Four Mile Ranch Well #1 on January 20, 1997. Although many parameters were tested we have only summarized those parameters which were above the detectable limit Listed below are the concentrations found in the samples and the maximum concentrations permitted by the Colorado Department of Health. Four Mile Ranch Samples Barium 0.12 mg/L Sodium 29.0 mg/L Fluoride 0.4 mgfL Sulfate 44.0 mg/L Turbidity 12.0 NTU Nitrate/Nitrite 1,2 mg/L Total Dissolved Solids 398.0 mg/L Dis (2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate 0.77 ,ug1L CDOH limits 2,0 mg/L 20.0 mg/L * 4.0 mg/L 500.0 mg/L * 5.0 NTU 10.0 mg/L 500.0 mg/L* 6.0 i..cg/L (a micron AI is 1f1000t' of a milligram(mg) suggested maximum levels) The only test that did not pass the Colorado Department of Health maximum contaminant levels was the test for Turbidity. Sodium exceeds the suggested limit, this is not a mandatory maximum. High Turbidity in a new well is riot unusual, due to the disturbances of constructing a new well. This well was constructed as a test well using slotted pipe. We believe that with continued pumping the turbidity levels will drop to acceptable levels. it maybe possible to use the well as a back up supply well for the proposed water system. We recommend that stainless steel well screen be placed in the primary well and adequate development be performed an the well to produce turbid free water. If the well can not be constructed to produce turbid free water then a filtration system can be installed to address the problem. A sample was also taken and tested for gross alpha and gross beta. 'Four Mile Ranch Well #1 State requirements Gross Alpha 9.6 pCi/l (± 3.7) Gross Beta 3.9 pCi/l (± 3.8) 15 pCi/l 50 pCi/1 This information concludes our testing and indicates that the Four Mile Ranch Well #1 can meet the requirements of the Colorado Department of Health Drinking Water Section. If you have any questions please call our office at (970) 945-5700. Very truly yours, Zancanella & Associates, Inc. Thomas A. Zancanella P.E. President cc: Lee Leavenworth Mark Bean L:193505193505.11LA BRSLT.W P❑ BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC. 15000 W. &H AVE„ SUITE 300 GOLDEN, CO 80401 (303) M.1687 FAX (303) 277-1689 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES P.O. Box 1908 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Attn: Project: 93505.1 PO #: Job: 971142E 25 -Feb -97 Received: 21 -Jan -97 09:35 Status: Final ANALYTICAL REPORT PACKAGE CASE NARRATIVE i ANALYTICAL RESULTS... R-1 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Q-1 Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing World Since 1961 BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC 15000 W. b"#'H AVE.. SUITE 300 GOLDEN, Co 80401 (303) Z77-1667 FAX (303) 277.1685 25 -Feb -97 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES Page: ; P.O. Box 1908 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Attn: Project: 93505.1 PO #: Job: 971142E CASE . NARRAT I VE Received: 21 -Jan -97 09:35 Status: Final A total of 2 Water samples were received on 21 -Jan -97. As stated in the chain of custody, the samples were run for the following analyses: Sb, As, Ba, Be, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Hg, Ni, Se, Na, Tl, CN, F, 804, Turb, NO3+NO2, TS, Gross Alpha, Gross Beta, Semi-VOC, Trihalomethanes, Carbamate Pesticides, Diquat, Volatiles, Endothall, EDE & DBCP, Pesticides and PCB's and Herbicides. A table, to cross reference your sample ID to ours, is attached. Our procedures are summarized on the Quality Control Data Sheet. Quality control standards for organic and inorganic analyses followed the appropriate. SW -846 or EPA methodology. Quality control standards for radiochemistry followed our standard operating procedures or contractual requirements. Signed: Signed: Inorganic Radiochemistry Or "ic Manager Manager Manager Project R'view Meeting The Analytical Challenges OfA Changing World Since 1961 BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC. 15000 W. 517H AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN, CO 80401 (303) 277-1687 FAX (303) 277-1689 25 -Feb -97 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES Page: ii P.O. Box 1908 Glenwood Springs, CO 81501 Attn: Project: 93505.1 Job: 971142E PO m: Received: 21 -Jan -97 09:35 Status: Final Lab -ID Matrix Client Sample ID Sampled 971142-1 Water 971142-2 Water 4 Mile Ranch Trip Blank Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of Changing World Since 1961 20 -Jan -97 NA BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC 15000 W. !TH AVE.. SUITE 300 GOLDEN, CO 30401 (303) 277-1687 FAX (303) 277-1689 Sample Id: 4 Mile Ranch Lab Id: 971142-1 Date Sampled: 20 -Jan -97 Analyte Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Mercury Nickel Selenium Sodium Thallium Cyanide Fluoride Sulfate Turbidity Nitrate+Nitrite Total Solids ZANCANELLA &. ASSOCIATES Fraction Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Project: 93505.1 Matrix: Water Method 200.9 200.9 200.7 200.7 200.7 200.7 200.7 200.9 245.1 200.7 200.9 200.7 200.9 335.4 340.2 375.4 180.1 353.2 150.3 Concentration U mg/1 U mg/1 0.12 mg/1 U mg/1 U mg/1 U mg/1 U mg/1 U mg/1 U mg/I U mg/1 U mg/I 29 mg/1 U mg/1 U mg/l 0.4 mg/1 44 mg/1 12 NTU 1.2 mg/1 398 mg/I 25 -Feb -97 Page: R-1 Job: 971142E Status: Final MDL 0.003 0.003 0.02 0.002 0.002 0.01 0.01 0.002 0.0002 0.04 0.005 1 0.001 0.01 0.1 5 1 0.1 10 Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing World Since 1961 Date Analyzed 5 -Feb -97 3 -Feb -97 24 -Jan -97 24 -Jan -97 24 -Jan -97 24 -Jan -97 24 -Jan -97 3 -Feb -97 3 -Feb -97 24 -Jan -97 5 -Feb -97 24 -Jan -97 3 -Feb -97 23 -Jan -97 4 -Feb -97 14 -Feb -97 22 -Jan -97 28 -Jan -97 27 -Jan -97 BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC 25-:eb-97 R-2 15000 W. 6TH AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN, GQ•30441 (303) 277-16437Page:1 FAX (303) 277-1689 Job: 971142E Status: Final Analyte: Gross Alpha Fraction: Total Method: 900.0 Units: pCi/l Date ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES Project: 93505.1 Date Analyzed: 01/27-01/30 LLD: 9 Lab Id Sampled Matrix Sample Id 4 Mile Ranch 971142-1 20 -Jan -97 Water Analyte: Gross Beta Fraction: Total Method: 900.0 Units: pCi/1 Date Concentration+ 2a 9.6+3.7 Project: 93505.1 Date Analyzed: 01/27-01/30 LLD: 8 Lab Id Sampled Matrix Sample Id 971142-1 20 -Jan -97 Water 4 Mile Ranch Concentration+ 2a 3.9+3.8 Meeting The Analytical Challenges OfA Changing World Since 1961 LLD 9 LLD 8 li__BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC 15000 W.'fiTH AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN, CO.80401 (303) 277-1687 FAX (303) 277-1689 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES Sample Id: 4 Mile Ranch Lab Id: 971142-1 Date Sampled: 20 -Jan -97 Date Extracted: 21 -Feb -97 Date Analyzed: 24 -Feb -97 Analyte Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Dimethylphtha1ate Acenaphthylene 2-Chlorobiphenyl Diethylphtha1ate Fluorene Propachlor Trifluralin 2,3-Dichlorobiphenyl Hexachlorobenzene Simazine Atrazine Pentachlorophenol Lindane Phenanthrene Anthracene Metribuzin 2,4,5-Trichlorobiphenyl Alachlor Heptachlor Metolachlor Di-n-butylphthalate 2,2,4,4-Tetrachlorobiphenyl Aldrin Heptachlor Epoxide 2,2,3,4,6-Pentachlorobiphenyl gamma -Chlordane Butachlor alpha -Chlordane trans-Nonachlor Pyrene 2,2,4,4,5,6-Hexachlorobiphenyl Endrin Butylbenzylphthalate bis(2-ethylhexyl)adipate Benzo(a)anthracene Chrysene 2,2,3,3,4,4,6-Heptachlorobiphe Methoxychlor 2,2,3,3,4,5,6,6-Octachlorobiph bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate Semi-VOC Project: 93505.1 Dilution Factor: 1:1 Matrix: Water Method: 525.2 Concentration 4a/1 U U U U U U U tJ U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 0.77J CAS Number 77-47-4 131-11-3 208-96-8 2051-60-7 84-66-2 86-73-7 1918-16-7 1582-09-8 16605-91-7 118-74-1 122-34-9 1912-24-9 87-86-5 58-89-9 85-01-8 120-12-7 21087-64-9 15862-07-4 5972-60-8 76-44-8 51218-45-2 84-74-2 2437-79-8 309-00-2 1024-57-3 60233-25-2 5103-74-2 23814-66-9 5103-71-9 39765-80-5 129-00-0 60145-22-4 72-20-8 85-68-7 103-23-1 56-55-3 218-01-9 52663-71-5 72-43-5 40186-71-8 117-81-7 25 -Feb -97 Page: R-3 Job: 971142E Status: Final Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing World Since 1961 MDL 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 3.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 U.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.8 il_BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC. 15000 W..frTH AVE.. SUITE 300 GOLDEN, CO 90401 (303) 277-1687 FAX (303) 277-1689 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES Semi-VOC Sample Id: 4 Mile Ranch Lab Id: 971142-1 Date Sampled: 20 -Jan -97 Date Extracted: 21 -Feb -97 Date Analyzed: 24 -Feb -97 Analyte Benzo(b)fluoranthene Benzo (k) fluoranthene Benzo(a)pyrene Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene Dibenza(a,h)anthracene Benzo(g,h,i)perylene Surrogate Perylene-d12 25 -Feb -97 Page: R-4 Job: 977,142E Status: Final Project: 93505.1 Dilution Factor: 1:1 Matrix: Water Method: 525.2 Concentration ug/1 U U U U CAS Number 205-99-2 207-08-9 50-32-8 193-39-5 53-70-3 191-24-2 Recovery U U 109% Meeting The AnalyricaI Challenges Of A Changing World Since 1961 MDL 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 Limit 65-120% ilk__BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC. 150W W. 6TH AVE.,SURE 300 GOLDEN, C0.90<01 (30�) �/-�� FAX (303) �'�� 15000 W. h1H AYE., SUITE GOLDEN, CO.80401 (303) 277-1687 FAX 277-1689 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES Trihalomethanes Sample Id: 4 Mile Ranch Lab Id: 971142-1 Date Sampled: 20 -Jan -97 Date Extracted: NA Date Analyzed: 22 -Jan -97 Analyte Chloroform Eromodichloromethane Dibromochloromethane Bromoform Total Trihalomethanes Surrogate p-Brcmof luorobenzene 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene -d4 2J 25-Feb-97 Page: R-5 Job: 971142E Status: Final Project: 93505.1 Dilution Factor: 1:1 Matrix: Water Method: 524.2 Concentration ug/1 TJ U U CAS Number 67-66-3 75-27-4 124-48-1 75-25-2 Recovery 111% 106°% U U Meeting The Analytical Challenges OfA Changing World Since 1961 MDL 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 Limit 75-1250 75-125°% BAER LABORATORIES, INC 15000 W. "6TH AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN, CO.80401 (303) 277.1587 FAX (303) Z77-1589 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES Carbamate Pesticides Sample Id: 4 Mile Ranch Lab Id: 971142-1 Date Sampled: 20 -Jan -97 Date Extracted: NA Date Analyzed: 23 -Feb -97 Analyte Aldicarb Sulfone Aldicarb Sulfoxide Oxamyl Methomyl 3- Hydroxycarbofuran Aldicarb Propoxur(Saygon) Carbof uran Carbaryl Methiocarb 25 -Feb -97 Page: R-6 Job: 971.142E Staves: 7•7-1 Project: 7 - Project: 93505.1 Dilution Factor: 1:1 Matrix: Water Method: 531.1 Concentration ugll U U U i3 U U U U U U CAS Number 1646-87-4 1646-87-3 23135-22-0 16752-77-5 16655-82-6 116-06-3 114-26-1 1563-66-2 53-25-2 2032-65-7 Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing World Since 1961 MDL 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.5 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 4.0 ii! B'ARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC !. y- 7';77 46 .7,7 _ 303) 277-1689 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES Diquat 25 -Feb -97 Page: R-7 Job: 9711,42E Status: Final Sample Id: 4 Mile Ranch Lab Id: 971142-1 Project: 93505.1 Date Sampled: 20 -Jan -97 Dilution Factor: 1:1 Date Extracted: 22 -Jan -97 Matrix: Water Date Analyzed: 22 -Jan -97 Method: 549.1 Concentration CAS Number ua/1 MDL Analyte � Diquat 85-00-7 5.0 Paraquat 1910-42-5 LF 5.0 Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing World Since 1961 iliBARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC 15000 W.'6TH AVE.. SUITE 300 GOLDEN, CC 60401 (303) 277.1587 FAX (303) Z77-1689 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES Volatiles Sample Id: 4 Mile Ranch Lab Id: 971142-1 Date Sampled: 20 -Jan -97 Date Extracted: NA Date Analyzed: 24 -Jan -97 Analvte Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride Bromomethane Chloroethane Trichlorofluoromethane 1,1-Dichloroethene Methylene Chloride trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloroethane 2,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,2--Dichloroethene Chloroform Bromochloromethane 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 1,1-Dichloropropene Carbon Tetrachloride 1,2-Dichloroethane Benzene Trichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane Dibrornomethane trans-1,3-Dichlorapropene Toluene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane 1,3-Dichloropropane Tetrachloroethene Dibromochloromethane 1,2-Dibromoethane Chlorobenzene 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane Ethylbenzene m,p-Xylene ortho-Xylene Styrene Isopropylbenzene Bromof ortn 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 25 -Feb -97 Page: R-8 Job: 971142E Status: Final Project: 93505.1 Dilution Factor: 1:1 Matrix: Water Method: 524.2 Concentration ugll MDL CAS Number 75-71-8 74-87-3 75-01-4 74-83-9 75-00-3 75-69-4 75-35-4 75-09-2 156-60-5 75-34-3 590-20-7 156-59-4 67-66-3 74-97-5 71-55-6 563-58-6 56-23-5 107-06-2 71-43-2 79-01-6 78-87-5 75-27-4 74-95-3 10061-02-6 108-88-3 10061-01-5 79-00-5 142-28-9 127-18-4 124-48-1 106-93-4 108-90-7 630-20-6 100-41-4 M+P 95-47-6 100-42-5 98-82-8 75-25-2 79-34-5 96-18-4 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 11 1.0 U 0.5 U 0.5 I.2B 0.5 tJ 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 0.5 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 rJ 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 [7 0.5 U 0.5 1 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 rJ 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing World Since 1961 • BAR 2I. GER LABORATO. IES, INC. 15000 W. 5'N AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN, CO.90401 (303) 27'-1687 FAX (303) 277-1689 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES V oLc.L1... 9 Sample Id: 4 Mife Ranch Lab Id: 971142-1 Date Sampled: 20 -Jan -97 Date Extracted: NA Date Analyzed: 24 -Jan -97 Analyte n-Propylbenzene Bromobenzene 1,3,5-Trim,ethylbenzene 2-Ch1orotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene tert-Butylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene p- Isopropyltoluene 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene n-Butylbenzene 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Naphthalene 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene Surroaate p-Bromofluorobenzene 1,2--Dichlorobenzene-d4 25 -Feb -97 Page: R-9 971:42E 42E Status: Final Project: 93505.1 Dilution Factor: 1:1 Matrix: Water Method: 524.2 Concentration uq/1 CAS Number 103-65-1 108-86-1 108-67-8 95-49-8 106-43-4 98-06-6 95-63-6 135-98-8 99-87-6 541-73-1 106-46-7 104-51-8 95-50-1 96-12-8 120-82-1 87-68-3 91-20-3 87-61-6 Recovery U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 99% 104%. Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing World Since 1961 MDL 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Limit 75-125% 75-125% BA.IINGR LABORATORIES, INC'. 25 -Feb -97 R-10age : 15000 W.;ztH AVE.. SUITE 300 GOLDEN, CO;SO4O1 (303) 2T7-1687 FAX (303) 277.1689 LP ; 971142 E Status: Final ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES Volatiles Sample Id: Trip4 Blank Lab Id: 971142-2 Project: 93505.1 Date Sampled: NA Dilution Factor: 1:1 Date Extracted: NA Matrix: Water Date Analyzed: 24 -Jan -97 Method: 524.2 Concentration Analyte CAS Number ILgll MDL Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 U 1.0 Chloromethane 74-87-3 U 1.0 Vinyl Chloride 75-01-4 U 1.0 Bromomethane 74-83-9 U 1.0 Chloroethane 75-00-3 U 1.0 Trichlorofluoromethane 75-69-4 U 0.5 1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 U 0.5 Methylene Chloride 75-09-2 0.6B 0.5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 U 0.5 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 U 0.5 2,2-Dichloropropane 590-20-7 U 0.5 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-4 U 0.5 Chloroform 67-66-3 U 0.5 Bromochloramethane 74-97-5 U 0.5 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 71-55-6 U 0.5 1,1-Dichloropropene 563-58-6 U 0.5 Carbon Tetrachloride 56-23-5 U 0.5 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 U 0.5 Benzene 71-43-2 U 0.5 Trichloroethene 79-01-6 U 0.5 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 U 0.5 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 U 0.5 Dibromomethane 74-95-3 U 0.5 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 U 0.5 Toluene 108-88-3 U 0.5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 U 0.5 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane 79-00-5 U 0.5 1,3-Dichloropropane 142-28-9 U 0.5 Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 U 0.5 Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1 U 0.5 1,2-Dibromoethane 106-93-4 U 0.5 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 U 0.5 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane 630-20-6 U 0.5 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 U 0.5 m,p-xylene M+P U 0.5 ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 U 0.5 Styrene 100-42-5 U 0.5 Isopropylbenzene 98-82-8 U 0.5 Bromoform 75-25-2 U 0.5 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 U 0.5 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 96-18-4 U 0.5 Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of Changing World Since 1961 BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC. �saao w.8ir� AVE.,SUITE 300 GOLDEN, cO,9oam (303) zn-tsar FAX (303) m-�se9 15000 W.1 i- AVE., SUITE GOLDEN, CQ; 80401 277.1687 FAX 277-1689 Sample Id: Trip Blank Lab Id: 971142-2 Date Sampled: NA Date Extracted: NA Date Analyzed: 24 -Jan -97 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES Volatiles 25--Fab-97 Page: R-11 Job: 971142E Project: 93505.1 Dilution Factor: 1:1 Matrix: Water Method: 524.2 Concentration L T11 Analyte CAS Number n=Propyibenzene Bromobenzene 1,3,5-Trmethylbenzene 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene tert-Butylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene sec-Butylbenzene p- Isopropyltoluene 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene n-Butylbenzene 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene 1,2 -Dibroano-3-Chloropropane 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Naphthalene 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 103-65-1 108-86-1 108-67-8 95-49-8 106-43-4 98-06-6 95-63-6 135-98-8 99-87-6 541-73-1 106-46-7 104-51-8 95-50-1 96-12-8 120-82-1 87-68-3 91-20-3 87-61-6 Surro•ate Recovery p-Bromofluorobenzene 107% 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene -d4 113% U U U U U U i7 U U U U U U U U Ll Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing World Since 1961 MDL 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 Limit 75-125% 75-125% ARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC 15000 W. oTH AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN. CQ,80401 (303) 277-16137 FAX (303) 2T7-1689 ZANCANELLA EL ASSOCIATES Sample Id: 4 Mile Ranch Lab Id: 971142-1 Date Sampled: 20 -Jan -97 Date Extracted: 28 -Jan -97 Date Analyzed: 28 -Jan -97 Analyte Endothall Endothall 25 -Feb -97 Page: R-12 Job: 9717.42E Status: Final Project: 93505.1 Dilution Factor: 1:1 Matrix: Water Method: 548.1 Concentrat ion CAS Number uc i 1 145-73-3 U Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing World Since 1961 MDL 20 BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC. 15000.WATH AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN, CQ, 80401 (303) 277-1687 FAX (303) 277-1689 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES EDB & DBCP Sample Id: 4 Mil°e Ranch Lab Id: 971142-1 Date Sampled: 20 -Jan -97 Date Extracted: 27 -Jan -97 Date Analyzed: 27 -Jan -97 Analyte 1,2-Dibromoethane 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 1,2,3-Trichioropropane Surrogate Bromofluorobenzene Project: 93505.1 Dilution Factor: 1:1 Matrix: Water Method: 504.1 Concentration ugli U U U CAS Number 106-93-4 96-12-8 96-18-4 Recovery 106%- Meeting 06 25 -Feb -97 Page: R-13 Job: 9717.42E Status: Final Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing World Since 1961 MDL 0.025 0.025 0.050 Limit 83-1410 BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC 15000 W.'6rH AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN, CQ 80401 (303) 277-1687 FAX 003) 277-1589 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES Pesticides and PCB's 25 -Feb -97 Page: R-14 Job: 971142E Status: Final Sample Id: 4 Mile Ranch Lab Id: 971142-1 Project: 93505.1 Date Sampled: 20 -Jan -97 Dilution Factor: 1:1 Date Extracted: 27 -Jan -97 Matrix: Water Date Analyzed: 28 -Jan -97 Method: 505 Concentration Analyte CAS Number ttct/1 MDL Alachlor 5972-60-8 U 0.60 Aldrin 309-00-2 U 0.075 Atrazine 1912-24-9 U 2.5 Chlordane 57-74-9 U 2.0 alpha -Chlordane 5103-71-9 U 0.085 gamma -Chlordane 5103-74-2 U 0.065 Dieldrin 60-57-1 U 0.055 Endrin 72-20-8 U 0.070 Heptachlor 76-44-8 U 0.15 Heptachlor Epoxide 1024-57-3 U 0.055 Hexachlorobenzene 118-74-1 U 0.027 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 77-47-4 U 0.15 Lindane 58-89-9 U 0.040 Methoxychlor 72-43-5 U 0.25 cis-Nonachlor 5103-73-1 U 0.055 trans-Nonachlor 39765-80-5 U 0.092 Simazine 122-34-9 U 4.0 Toxaphene 8001-35-2 U 3.0 Aroclor 1015 12674-11-2 U 0.50 Aroclor 1221 11104-28-2 U 0.50 Aroclor 1232 11141-16-5 U 0.50 Aroclor 1242 53469-21-9 U 0.50 Aroclor 1248 12672-29-6 U 0.50 Aroclor 1254 11097-69-1 U 0.50 Aroclor 1260 11096-82-5 U 0.50 Surrogate Recovery Limit TCX 100% 64-141% DCB 94% 59-131% Meering The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing World Since 1961 IIIBARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC 15000 W.'6TH AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN, Ca .30401 (303) 277-1687 FAX (303) 277-1689 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES Herbicides 25 -Feb -97 Page: R-15 Job: 971142E Status: Final Sample Id: 4 M±fe Ranch Lab Id: 971142-1 Project: 93505.1 Date Sampled: 20 -Jan -97 Dilution Factor: 1:1 Date Extracted: 29 -Jan -97 Matrix: Water Date Analyzed: 31 -Jan -97 Method: 515.1 Concentration Analyte CAS Number ug/1 MDL Dalapon 75-99-0 U 1.0 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic Acid 51-36-5 U 0.125 4-Nitrophenol 100-02-7 U 0.16 Dicamba 1918-00-9 U 0.16 Dichlorprop 120-36-5 U 0,43 2,4-D 94-75-7 U 0.38 Pentachlorophenol 87-86-5 TJ 0.10 2,4,5 -TP (Sib -ex) 93-72-1 U 0.12 Chloramben 133-90-4 U 0.10 2,4,5-T 93-76-5 U 0.12 2,4 -DD 94-82-6 U 0.50 Dinoseb 88-85-7 U 0.30 Bentazon 25057-89-0 U 0.26 Picloram 1918-02-1 U 0.10 DCPA 1897-45-5 U 0.20 Acifluorfen 50594-66-6 U 0.18 Surrogate Recovery Limit DCAA 97% 38-158% Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing World Since 1961 .BARRINGER LABORATORIES INC 15000 W. erH AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN, CO 40401 (303) 27-1687 FAX (303) 277.1E89 Sample Id Blank LCS (True) LCS (Found) LCS o Rec Duplicate Duplicate RPD Spike % Rec Sample Id Blank LCS (True) LCS (Found) LCS % Rec Duplicate Duplicate RFD Spike s Rec Sample Id Blank LCS (True) LCS (Found) LCS a Rec Duplicate Duplicate RPD Spike % Rec ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Antimony Total ma/1 U 0.050 0.044 89.0 U U NC 105 Chromium Total mg/1 U 2.00 1.97 98.5 U U NC 100 25 -Feb -97 Pace: Q-1 Job: 971142E Status: Final Arsenic Barium Beryllium Cadmium Total Total Total Total mg/1 mg/1 ma/1 ma/1 U U U U 0.050 10.0 1.00 1.00 0.048 9.96 0.98 0.93 95.2 99.6 97.6 93.2 U 0.12 U U U 0.12 U U NC 0.5 NC NC 75.2 102 100 97.2 Copper Lead Total Total mg/1 ma/1 U 2.00 1.92 96.2 U U NC 103 Selenium Sodium Total Total mg/1 mq/1 U 0.050 0.046 91.2 U NC 97.0 U 20.0 19.1 95.4 29 28 0.7 NA U 0.050 0.054 109 U U NC 86.0 Thallium Total ma/1 U 0.050 0.051 102 U U NC 79.6 Mercury Nickel Total Total ma/1 mg/1 U U 0.0050 5.00 0.0049 4.88 97.0 97.7 U U U U NC NC 101 98.3 Cyanide Fluoride Total ma/1 mg/l U 0.20 0.21 106 U U NC 93.0 Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of Changing World Since 1961 U 5.00 4.96 99.2 3.20 3.16 1.3 104 BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC. 15000 W. "t AVE„ SUITE 300 GOLDEN, 00,80401 (303) 277-1687 FAX (303) 277-1689 25 -Feb -97 Page: Q-2 Job: 971142E Status: Final ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Sulfate Turbidity Nitrate+Nitrite as N Sample Id ma/1 NTU mall Blank U U U LCS (True) 75.0 5.00 1.00 LCS (Found) 72.3 5.00 0.999 LCS a Rec 96.4 100 99.9 Duplicate 36.1 12 1.24 Duplicate 36.4 12 1.25 RPD 0.6 0.0 0.6 Spike % Rec 89.6 NA 118 Total Solids Sample _Id mg/1 Blank U LCS (True) 1480 LCS (Found) 1410 LCS o Rec 95.5 Duplicate 398 Duplicate 390 RPD 2.0 Spike 6 Rec NA Meering The Analytical Challenges OfA Changing World Since 1961 BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC 15000 W.`6TH AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN, CO•80401 (303) 277-1687 FAX (303) 277.1689 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Sample Id Gross Alp::a Total pCi/l + 2a Beta Total tCi/1 + 2a 25 -Feb -97 Page: Q-3 Job: 971,142E Status: Final Duplicate 2.3 ±2.2 -0.3 ±4.3 Duplicate 3.6 +2.2 3.1 ±4.1 RER 0.43 0.52 Std (found value) 79 ±3 91 ±2 Std (true value) 97 92 Std % rec. 82 99 Blank 1.7 ±0.6 1.1 ±0.6 Spike °s rec. 86 91 Meeting The Analytical Challenges OfA Changing World Since 1961 BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC. 15000 W. 6TH AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN, CO 80401 (303) 277-1687 FAX (303) 277-1689 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Lab Id: 1142 -ME Date Sampled: NA Date Extracted: 21 -Feb -97 Date Analyzed: 24 -Feb -97 Analyte Project: 93505.1 Dilution Factor: 1:1 Matrix: Water Method: CAS Number 525.2 Concentration gall 25 -Feb -97 Page: Q-4 Job: 971142E Status: Final Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Dimethylphthaiate Acenaphthylene 2-Chlorobiphenyl Diethylphtha1ate Fluorene Propachlor Trifluralin 2,3-Dichlorobiphenyl Hexachlorobenzene Simazine Atrazine Pentachlorophenol Lindane Phenanthrene Anthracene Metribuzin 2,4,5-Trichlorobiphenyl Alachlor Heptachlor Metolachlor Di-n-butylphthalate 2,2,4,4-Tetrachlorobiphenyl Aldrin Heptachlor Epoxide 2,2,3,4,6--Pentachlorobiphenyl gamma -Chlordane Butachlor alpha -Chlordane trans-Nonachlor Pyrene 2,2,4,4,5,6-Hexachlorobiphenyl Endrin Butylbenzylphthalate bis (2-ethylhexyl) adipate Benzo(a)anthracene Chrysene 2,2,3,3,4,4,6-Heptachlorobiphe Methoxychlor 2,2,3,3,4,5,6,6-Octachlorobiph bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 77-47-4 131-11-3 208-96-8 2051-60-7 84-66-2 86-73-7 1918-16-7 1582-09-8 16605-91-7 118-74-1 122-34-9 1912-24-9 87-86-5 58-89-9 85-01-8 120-12-7 21087-64-9 15862-07-4 5972-60-8 76-44-8 51218-45-2 84-74-2 2437-79-8 309-00-2 1024-57-3 60233-25-2 5103-74-2 23814-66-9 5103-71-9 39765-80-5 129-00-0 60145-22-4 72-20-8 85-68-7 103-23-1 56-55-3 218-01-9 52663-71-5 72-43-5 40186-71-8 117-81-7 Meeting The Analytical Challenges OfA Changing World Since 1961 MDL 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 3.0 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.8 ii"-- BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC 15000 W. 6TH AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN. CO 80401 (303) 277-1657 FAX (303) Z77-1689 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES QUALITY CONTROL REPORT z 25 -Feb -97 Page: Q-5 Job: 971142E Status: Final Lab Id: 1142 -MB Project: 93505.1 Date Sampled: NA Dilution Factor: 1:1 Date Extracted: 21 -Feb -97 Matrix: Water Date Analyzed: 24 -Feb -97 Method: 525.2 Concentration Analyte CAS Number gull MDL Benzo(b)fluoranthene 205-99-2 U Q.3 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 207-08-9 U 0.3 Benzo(a)pyrene 50-32-8 U 0.1 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 193-39-5 U 0.1 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 53-70-3 U 0-1 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 191-24-2 U 0.1 Surrogate Recovery Limit Perylene-d12 1045 65-120; Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing World Since 1961 111118600-4(1) RINGER LABORATORIES, INC W. 6:1'7}4AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN. CO•80401 (303) 277.1687 FAX (303) 277-1688 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES QUALITY CONTROL REPORT 25 -.Feb -97 Page: Q-6 Job: 971142E Status: Final Lab Id:. VELK479 Project: 93505.1 Date Sampled: NA Dilution Factor: 1:1 Date Extracted: NA Matrix: Water Date Analyzed: 22 -Jan -97 Method: 524.2 Concentration Analyte CAS Number 4q/1 MDL Chloroform 67-66-3 U 0.5 Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 U 0.5 Dibromochloromethane 124-48-1 U 0.5 Bromoform 75-25-2 U 0.5 Total Trihalomethanes U 1.0 Surrogate Recovery Limit p-Bromofluorobenzene 1114 75-125% 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene -d4 105d 75-125% Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing World Since 1961 BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC. 15000 W. 671-1 AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN, c(;),60401 (303) 277-1687 FAX (303) 277-1689 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES QUALITY CONTROL REPORT 25 -Feb -97 Page: Q-7 971142E Status: Final Lab Id: 'MB 1/23 Project: 93505.1 Date Sampled: NA Dilution Factor: 1:1 Date Extracted: NA Matrix: Water Date Analyzed: 23 -Feb -97 Method: 531.1 Concentration Analyte CAS Number Aq/1 MDL Aldicarb Sulfone 1646-87-4 U 2.0 Aldicarb Sulfoxide 1646-87-3 U 2.0 Oxamyl 23135-22-0 U 2.0 Methomyl 16752-77-5 U 0.5 3-Hydroxycarbofuran 16655-82-6 U 2.0 Aldicarb 116-06-3 U 1.0 Propoxur(Baygon) 114-26-1 U 1.0 Carbofuran 1563-66-2 U 1.5 Carbaryl 63-25-2 U 2.0 Methiocarb 2032-65-7 U 4.0 Meeting The Analytical Challenges 0f A Changing World Since 1961 ii_IARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC: 15000 W. FTH AVE., SUITE 300 GOLOEN, CC7.0i0401 (303) 277-1687 FAX (303) 277-1659 ZANCANELLA 8 ASSOCIATES QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Lab Id: MB 1/22 Date Sampled: NA Date Extracted: 22 -Jan -97 Date Analyzed: 22 -Jan -97 Ana1vte. Di qua t Paraquat Project: 93505.1 Dilution Factor: 1:1 Matrix: Water Method: 549.1 Concentration ug/1 TJ U CAS Number 85_00-7 1910-42-5 Meeting The Analytical Challenges OfA Changing World Since 1961 25 -Feb -97 Page: Q-8 Job: 971142E Status: Final MDL 5.0 5.0 • • BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC • 15000 W. S?H AVE., SLATE 300 GOLDEN. CCl8fld01 (303) 277-1687 FAX (303) 277-1689 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Lab Id: VBLK509 Date Sampled: NA Date Extracted: NA Date Analyzed: 24 -Jan -97 Analyte Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride Bromomethane Chloroethane Trichlorofluoromethane 1,1-Dichloroethene Methylene Chloride trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloroethane 2,2-Dichloropropane cis--1,2-Dichloroethene Chloroform Bromochlorome t hane 1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 1,1-Dichloropropene Carbon Tetrachloride 1,2-Dichloroethane Benzene Trichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane Dibromomethane trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Toluene cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1,1,2 -Trichloroethane 1,3-Dichloropropane Tetrachloroethene Dibromochloromethane 1,2-Dibromoethane Chlorobenzene 1,1,1,2 -Tetrachloroethane Ethylbenzene m,p-Xylene ortho-Xylene Styrene Isopropylbenzene Bromoform 1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane Project: 93505.1 Dilution Factor: 1:1 Matrix: Water Method: 524.2 Concentration CAS Number Lq/1 75-71-8 U 74-87-3 U 75-01-4 U 74-83-9 U 75-00-3 75-69-4 75-35-4 75-09-2 156-60-5 75-34-3 590-20-7 156-59-4 67-66-3 74-97-5 71-55-6 563-58-6 56-23-5 107-06-2 71-43-2 79-01-6 78-87-5 75-27-4 74-95-3 10061-02-6 108-88-3 10061-01-5 79-00-5 142-28-9 127-18-4 124-48-1 106-93-4 108-90-7 630-20-6 100-41-4 M+P 95-47-6 100-42-5 98-82-8 75-25-2 79-34-5 96-18-4 25 -Feb -97 Page: Q-9 Job: 971142E Status: Final MDL 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 U 1.0 U 0.5 U 0.5 1.6 0.5 U 0.5 U 0,5 U 0.5 U 0.5 tJ 0.5 L7 0.5 0.5 [� 0.5 i3 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 Z] 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 U 0.5 0.5 U Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing World Since 1961 15000 W. FH AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN. CO 80401 (303) 277-1687 FAX (303) 277-1689 BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES QUALITY CONTROL REPORT 25 -Feb -97 Page: Q-10 Job: 971142E Status: Final Lab Id: VBLK.509 Project: 93505.1 Date Sampled: NA Dilution Factor: 1:1 Date Extracted: NA Matrix: Water Date Analyzed: 24 -Jan -97 Method: 524.2 Concentration Analyte CAS Number ,ug/l MDL n-Propylbenzene 103-65-1 U 0.5 Bromobenzene 108-86-1 U 0.5 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 U 0.5 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 U 0.5 4-Chlorotoluene 106-43-4 U 0.5 tert-Butylbenzene 98-06-6 U 0.5 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 U 0.5 sec-Butylbenzene 135-98-8 U 0.5 p-Isopropyltoluene 99-87-6 U 0.5 1,3 -Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 U 0.5 1,4 -Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 U 0.5 n-Butylbenzene 104-51-8 U 0.5 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 U 0.5 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 96-12-8 U 1.0 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 U 0.5 Hexachlorobutadiene 87-68-3 U 0.5 Naphthalene 91-20-3 U 0.5 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 87-61-6 U 0.5 Surrogate Recovery Limit p-Bromofluorobenzene 97% 75-1250 1,2 -Dichlorobenzene -d4 101° 75-125.!5- Meeting 5-125= Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing World Since 1961 BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC 411 15000"W.'i•TH AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN, CO 80401 (303) 277.1687 FAX (303) 277-1589 ZAivSTELLA & ASSOCIATES QUALITY CONTROL REPORT 25 -Feb -97 Page: Q-11 Job: 971142E Status: Final Lab Id: 1142 -MB Project: 93505.1 Date Sampled: NA Dilution Factor: 1:1 Date Extracted: 28 -Jan -97 Matrix: Water Date Analyzed: 28 -Jan -97 Method: 548.1 Concentration Analvte CAS Number uall MDL Endothall 145-73-3 U 20 Meering The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing World Since 1961 BA.RRINGER LABORATORIES, INC. 15000 W. iit11 AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN, CO 80401 (303) 277-1687 FAX (303) Z7T-1689 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Lab Id: MB Date Sampled: NA Date Extracted: 27 -Jan -97 Date Analyzed: 27 -Jan -97 Analyte 1,2-Dibromoethane 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 1,2,3-Trichloropropane Surrogate Bromofluorobenzene Project: 93505.1 Dilution Factor: 1:1 Matrix: Water Method: 504.1 Concentration. ug/1 U CJ CAS Number 106-93-4 96-12-8 96-18-4 Recovery 110% 25 -Feb -97 Page: Q-12 Job: 971142E Stats : Final Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing World Since 1961 MD L 0.025 0.025 0.050 Limit 83-141% BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC. 15000 W. if 14 AVE., SUITE 300 GOLDEN, C©: E0401 (303) Z77-1697 FAX (303) 277-1689 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Lab Id: MB Date Sampled: NA Date Extracted: 27 -Jan -97 Date Analyzed: 28 -Jan -97 Analyte Alachlor Aldrin Atrazine Chlordane alpha -Chlordane gamma -Chlordane Dieldrin Endrin Heptachlor Heptachlor Epoxide Hexachlorobenzene Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Lindane Methoxychlor cis-Nonachlor trans-Nonachlor Simazine Toxaphene Aroclor 1016 Aroclor 1221 Aroclor 1232 Aroclor 1242 Aroclor 1248 Aroclor 1254 Aroclor 1260 Surrogate TCX DCB Project: 93505.1 Dilution Factor: 1:1 Matrix: Water Method: 505 Concentration q/1 U U U U U U U U U U U U U LJ U U LT U U U U U U U CAS Number 5972-60-8 309-00-2 1912-24-9 57-74-9 5103-71-9 5103-74-2 60-57-1 72-20-8 76-44-8 1024-57-3 118-74-1 77-47-4 58-89-9 72-43-5 5103-73-1 39765-80-5 122-34-9 8001-35-2 12674-11-2 11104-28-2 11141-16-5 53469-21-9 12672-29-6 11097-69-1 11096-82-5 Recovery 101% 114% 25 -Feb -97 Page: Q-13 Job: 971142E Status: Final Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing World Since 1961 MDL 0.60 0.075 2.5 2.0 0.085 0.065 0.055 0.070 0.15 0.055 0.027 0.19 0.040 0.25 0.055 0.092 4.0 3.0 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Limit 64-141% 59-131% IJBARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC. 15000 W. SiH AVE.. SUITE 300 GOLDEN, C0.84M1 (303) a/-16� FAX (303) 91.16&9 15000 W. 6 }� AVE., SUITE 300 C0 80401 277-1687 FAX 277.1689 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIAT=2, QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Lab Id: MB Date Sampled: NA Date Extracted: 29 -Jan -97 Date Analyzed: 31 -Jan -97 Analyte Dalapon 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic Acid 4-Nitrophenol Dicamba Dichlorprop 2,4-D Pentachlorophenol 2,4,5 -TP (Silvex) Chloramben 2,4,5-T 2,4 -DE Dinoseb Bentazon Picloram DCPA Acifluorfen 25 -Feb -97 Page: Q-14 Job: 971142E Final Project: 93505.1 Dilution Factor: 1:1 Matrix: Water Method: 515.1 Concentration LL /1 U U U u U U U U U U U U U U U CAS Number 75-99-0 51-36-5 100-02-7 1918-00-9 120-36-5 94-75-7 87-86-5 93-72-1 133-90-4 93-76-5 94-82-6 88-85-7 25057-89-0 1918-02-1 1897-45-6 50594-66-6 Surroaate Recovery DCAA 81°s Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing World Since 1961 MDL 1.0 0.125 0.16 0.16 0.43 0.38 0.10 0.12 0.10 0.12 0.50 0.30 0.26 0.10 0.20 0.18 Limit 38-1580 BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC. 15000•W..r fH AVE, SUITE 300 GOLDEN, CO 80401 (303) 277-1687 FAX (303) 277-1689 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES P.O. Box 1908 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Attn: Project: 93505.1 PO #: Job: 971142E 25 -Feb -97 Page: Q-15 Received: 21 -Jan -97 09:35 Status: Final Abbreviations: Methods: MSP : 108-38-3 m -xylene, 106-42-3 p -xylene Units: mg/1 : milligrams per liter NTU : Nephelometric Turbidity Units pCi/1 : picoCuries per liter g,g/1 : micrograms per liter : percent Quality codes: 3 : Present in method blank J : Estimated value NA : Not Analyzed U : Undetected NC : Not Calculated Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing World Since 1961 • • • ii__BARRINGER LABORATORIES, INC. 1'M W..6fH AVE.. SUITE 300 GOLDEN, CO80401 (303) 277-1687 FAX (303) ZP.t W9 15000•w..CarH AVE., CO FAX (303) 277.1689 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES P.O. Box 1908 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Attn: Project: 93505.1 Jab; 971142E PO #: 25 -Feb -97 Page: Q-16 Received: 21 -Jan -97 09:35 Status: Final Received by: cs QUALITY CONTROL DATA SHEET Via: UPS Sample Container Type: 6 11 amber, 13 40m1 vials, 5 500m1 pl Additional Lab Preparation: None Parameter Method Sb As Ba Be Cd Cr Cu Pb Hg Ni Se Na Ti CN F SO4 Turb, NO3+NO2 TS Gross Alpha Gross Beta Semi -Volatiles Trihalomethanes Carbamate Pesticides Diquat Volatiles Endothall EDB & DBCP Pesticides 200.9 200.9 200.7 200.7 200.7 200.7 200.7 200.9 245.1 200.7 200.9 200.7 200.9 335.4 340.2 375.4 180.1 353.2 160.3 900.0 900.0 525.2 524.2 531.1 549.1 524.2 548.1 504.1 and PCB's 505 Preservative Analysis Init Dates HNO3 HNO3 HNO3 HNO3 HNO3 HNO3 HNO3 HNO3 HNO3 HNO3 HNO3 HNO3 HNO3 4°C/NaOH 4°C 4°C 4°C 4°C/H25 4 4°C HNO3 HNO3 4°C/Na2S03/HC1 4°C/Ascorbic 4°C/MCA3 4°C/Na2S03/H2SO4 4°C/HC1/Ascorbic 4°C 4°C/Na2S203 4°C/Na2S2O3 FV FV JH JH JH JH JH AW AW JH FV JH FV CE AW JW AW JW GH JN JN RH JG RH RH JG RH RH RH Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing World Since 1961 02/05 02/03 01/24 01/24 01/24 01/24 01/24 02/03 02/03 01/24 02/05 01/24 02/03 01/23 02/04 02/14 01/22 01/28 01/27-01/29 01/27-01/30 01/27-01/30 02/24 01/22 02/23 01/22 01/24 01/28 01/27 01/28 lJ .RRINGR LABORATORIES, INC 15000 W,831-1 AVE.. SUITE 300 GOLDEN, GO 80401 (303) 277.1687 FAX (303) 277-1689 ZANCANELLA & ASSOCIATES P.O. Box 1908 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 25 -Feb -97 Page: Q-17 Attn: Received: 21 -Jan -97 09:35 Project: 93505.1 PO #: Job: 971142E Herbicides Status: Final 515.1 4°C/Na2S203 TB 01/31 Barringer Laboratories, Inc. will return or dispose of your samples 30 days from the date your final report is mailed, unless otherwise specified by contract. Barringer Laboratories, Inc. reserves the right to return samples prior to the 30 days if radioactive levels exceed our license. Meeting The Analytical Challenges Of A Changing World Since 1961 4-24-97 DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY SERVICES EMS • FIRE • RESCUE Mr. Tom Zancanella Zancanella & Assogiates P.G. Box 1908 Glenwood Springs, CO. 81602 Dear Tom, I have reviewed the plans for the Four Mile Ranch project and it appears that all of our requirements have been met as fax as water supply, access, hydrant locations and other minor details. The proposed water system will deliver the necessary G.P.M. and pressures to all areas of the project. Please consider this letter as an approval of the proposal. There is one item that I feel needs to be addressed and should be brought to the attention of the developer. Glenwood Park has a street named Red Bluff Lane. This could cause confusion with dispatching when Four Mile Ranch is proposing a Red Bluff Circle. Although developers names care different, they are close enough to cause confusion. I would suggest ge the name. These are the only comments I have at this time. Thanks for your time in working out these details in advance. Sincerely, Jack Jones Asst. Chief, Glenwood Springs Emergency Services cc: file 806 Cooper Avenue • Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 • (970) 945-2575 • Fax (970) 945-2597 •1 rar P.O. Box 1908 1005 Cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs, 41(] 81602 Mr. Sunny Vann Vann Associates 230 East Hopkins Ave Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Four Mile Ranch Dear Sunny: Z4MCAMELL4 AND 4550CI41E5, IrIC. Et1Or EEt 1NG COMSULT4MT5 April 8, 1997 (970) 945-5700 (970) 945-1253 Fax At the request of Four Mile Ranch, Zancaneila and Associates, Inc. has reviewed the current Geologic Hazards information for the area. The attached mapping showing the approximate property location was copied from the Colorado Geologic Survey, Department of Natural Resources 1974 publication Environmental Geology No. 8 titled Roaring Fork and Crystal Valleys and Environmental and Engineering Geology Study. This information was reviewed in regards to the Geologic Hazards located on Four Mile 410 Ranch. The mapping shows mostly Quaternary Terrace Deposits underlain by Eagle Valley Formation, there are no areas of Rack Fall or Potential Rock Fall shown on the property. • If you have any questions, please call our office at (970) 945-5700. Very truly yours, Zancanella & Associates, Inc. 4-'t/' 7 Terri L. Lance Geologist 5 cc: Joe Hope Lee Leavenworth L:\93505\93505.1\geohazards.wpd Y= rI . t 'r_....� �� CQ F f t.� 4 \ Qot 36 .17 • _l� March 28, 1997 Ivir. Tom Zancanella Zancanella & Associates 1005 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Subject: Four Mile Ranch Water Tank Dear Tom: The City has considered your verbal offer to participate in an effort to enlarge the water storage tank that will initially serve the Four Mile Ranch Development. As the City is not the water service provider to the proposed Four Mile Ranch Development, and we do not have the financial ability presently to participate at this time we have to decline your offer. As you are probably aware, a Southern Service Area Water and Wastewater Master Plan was developed for the City by Schmueser Gordon Meyer, Inc., in 1994. The proposed tank location for the Four Mile Ranch Development could possible serve as a future location for treated water storage for the City's distribution system. If -this site were selected in the future, presumably there would be room to build a second tank, which is desirable from our perspective for maintenance considerations.. Thank you for your consideration regarding the tank site. lam sure the City will have ongoing discussions with the developers of Four Mile Ranch as the development plans continue to evolve. Sincerely,, i lichael Cop City Manager XC: Robin Millyard, Public Works Director Larry Thompson, City Engineer Buddy Burns, Water Superintendent 806 COOPER. .AVENUE G1.ENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81001 970/945-2575 Staller&±Ie MEMORANDUMI TO: Brian Barnes FROM: Sheldon Emery ‘J(.1,25'.1---), SUBJECT: Four Mile Ranch Specifications For Landscape Zones DATE: April 11, 1997 Landscape zones for the Four Mile Ranch development include 'Landscape Nodes' and' Enhanced Landscape Areas'. Landscape Nodes should include a minimum of one tree and five shrubs per 750 square feet. Enhanced Landscape Areas should include a minimum of one tree and five shrubs per 1500 square feet. Both areas shall be seeded with native grasses with areas of perennials and boulders. Recommended plant materials include; Trees: Aspen, Cottonwood, Pinon Pine, Juniper, Douglas Fir, Blue Spruce, Ponderosa Pine, Hawthorn, Wild Plum Shrubs: Mountain Mahogany, Gambel Oak, Serviceberry, Chokecherry, Mountain Maple, Mountain Ash, Ninebark, Wild Rose, Willow, Cinquefoil, Dogwood, Western Sand Cherry, Blue Mist Spixea, Rabbitbrush, Sage, Cliffrose, Currant, Sumac, Snowberry i35G LAWRENCE 57. SUITE 100 • DENVER. COLORADO ::2:4 • 3n 446-1'368 FAX 446-0958 March 29, 1997 Shannon Pefand Finance Director Roaring Fork School District RE -1 1405 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, Colorado 80601 Dear Shannon Pelland: This letter is to confirm that the owners of Four Mile Ranch Project shall pay a site acquisition. fee of $200 per unit, consistent with the County's collections on behalf of the District in the past. The fees will be paid upon approval of the project by the County, and upon assessment. 2500 North Military Trail, Suite I75, Boca Raton, FL 33431, Telephone (407) 241-3200 Fax (407) 241-10S8 1205 South Platte River [hive, Suite 101A, Denver, CO 80223, Telephone (303) 733-9787 Fax (303) 733-9802 LOYAL E. LEAVENWORTH CYNTHIA C. TESTER DAVID E. LEAVENWORTH, JR. 1OSLYN V. WOOD* ',Admi[[ed in Hawaii and Texas only DONALD H. HAMBURG Of Counsel LEAVENWORTH & ASSOCIATES, F.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW April 25, 1997 Mr. Mark Bean, Director Garfield County Regulatory Office and Personnel 109 Eighth Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Four Mile Ranch Subdivision; Water Rights 1011 GRAND AVENUE P.O. DRAWER 2030 GLENWOOD SPRINGS. COLORADO 81602 TELEPHONE: (970) 945-2261 FAX: (970) 945-7336 Dear Mark: As you know, we represent the Four Mile Ranch Development Company, the Managing Joint Venture Partner, for the proposed Four Mile Ranch Subdivision_ The Four Mile Ranch Subdivision's physical supply for its potable system will be provided by wells. Out -of -priority diversions from these wells will be augmented with an existing, approved West Divide water allotment contract in the amount of 8.98 acre-feet. Pursuant to the approved substitute water supply plan for the West Divide District, well permits will be issued by the State Engineer's office to allow for the development of the proposed subdivision of 58 single-family residences, including .500 square feet of lawn per unit. In my opinion, there is an adequate legal water supply for the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision as proposed in the preliminary plan submission. If you need any additional information, I will be happy to provide it. Very truly yours, LEAVENWORTH & ASSOCIATES, P.C.. LEL:rlb cc: Four Mile Ranch Development Company Joe Hope Sunny Vann Tom Zancanella C:\FILES113EAN.ILT Loyal E Leavenworth P.Q. Box 1908 1005 cooper Ave. Glenwood Springs, CO 816172 tief Zr4t4C4NELL4 4140 ASSOCIATES' • • • ENGtNEEflING CONNSULT4NTS January 22 1997 q Four Mile Ranch Don Barnes Frontier Development 1205 S. Platte River Drive Suite 101-A Denver, CO 80223 Re: Four Mile Ranch Well #1 (970) 945-5700 (970) 945-1253 Fax Dear Don: At your request, Zancanella and Associates, Inc. has conducted groundwater investigations to determine the water resources available for your proposed Four Mile Ranch Subdivision, located in the Four Mile Creek area southwest of Glenwood Springs. The results of our investigation have been summarized in this letter report. A test well was constructed to investigate water availability on the property. The test well is currently registered as a monitoring hole with Division of Water Resources under permit No. MH -29828 and is locatedthe in 6the e NE 'TThef the W 1/4 of Section 34, Township 6 South, Range 89 West of d location of the well is 2029 feet from the West section on line antd433 fet tached Sete map fromthe Nrth section line. The location of the well is show (Figure 1). Four Mile Ranch Well #1 was constructed by Shelton Drilling Corporation on January 15, 1997. The well was drilled to a depth of 112 feet and constructed with a 7 -inch diameter steel well casing installed to a depth of 92 feet; the last 30 feet of the well was perforated ( 62 ft to 92 ft). The water bearing portion of the well is in Basalt gravels and alluvial deposits associated with wash out from 1997 he Four Mile Creek area. The static water level in the well on January 17, 50.6 feet below the top of the well casing. The available drawdown rdown in Figure Mile Ranch Well #1 is approximately 41 feet (50.6 ft - 92 ft).The has been prepared to illustrate the well construction details and the geologic log. The well was pump tested during the period of January 17, 1997 through a unary 220, 1997 by Samuelson Pump Company. A 5 horsepower pump powered electric generator was installed for the test. A pumping rate of 50 gallons per Page 1 LEAVENWORTH & TESTER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOYAL E. LEAVENWORTH CYNTHIA C. TESTER GREGORY J. HALL DAVID H. McCONAUGHY KELLY D. CAVE TOM KINNEY SUSAN W. LAATSCH JAMES S. NEU January 31, 2000 City of Glenwood Springs Planning and Zoning Commission 806 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 R i;CEIVEU N 3 1 2000 1011 GRAND N[ AYEIE -. P. O. DRAWER 2030 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81602 TELEPHONE: (970) 945-2261 FAX: (970) 945-7336 ltlaw®sopris.net Re: Special Use Permit for the Fain- Mile Ranch Subdivision Off -Site Improvements to County Road 117 Dear Planning and Zoning Commission: I am writing on behalf of The Four Mile Ranch Development Company ("Four Mile"). Four Mile is applying for a Special Use Permit ("SUP") from the City of Glenwood Springs to re -grade approximately two acres of property located adjacent to and east of County Road 117 (hereinafter referred to as "GLC's Property") which is owned by the Glenwood Land Company, LLC ("GLC") and zoned Hillside Preservation District ("HPD"). Four Mile shall not be constructing any structure or facility on GLC's Property or in the HPD. Rather, Four Mile is merely re -grading GLC's Property in conjunction with Four Mile's improvements to CR 117 as detailed in the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision's Off -Site Improvement Plans, dated January 26, 2000, nine sheets (the "Plans"), prepared by High Country Engineering, Inc. Attached for your review are the following exhibits: A. A completed application form with a check for fifty dollars ($50.00) for filing fees. B. Written authorization from GLC and proof of ownership. C. The Plans, which depict existing and proposed slope configuration. D. Plan for reclamation and revegetation. E. Letter from High Country Engineering, Inc. addressing the need for the project and addressing the requirements of the Glenwood Municipal Code Section 070.040.030.A.7. As depicted in the Plans, Four Mile will be improving the safety on CR 117 by constructing larger driving lanes, shoulders, barrow ditches, and by reducing the existing roadway F:120001 Lewers- Memos\COLODN Y -4M [LE -SUP -1-I tr. wpd LEAVENWORTH & TESTER, P.C. City of Glenwood Springs Planning and Zoning Commission Page 2 January 31, 2000 grade from 13% to 7%. Additionally, with the re -grading of GLC's Property, drivers sight distances will no longer be hindered. Since Four Mile has decided to re -grade GLC's Property and revegetate with natural landscaping, instead of building large and aesthetically displeasing retaining walls which would scar the hillside, the natural features of GLC's Property shall be preserved and the re -grading shall visually harmonize with the natural surroundings in accordance with the Glenwood Municipal Code Section 070.040.030.A.7. Four Mile, therefore, respectfully requests that the City of Glenwood Springs approve its Special Use Permit at the February 22, 2000, Planning and Zoning Commission's meeting. Please call me if you have any questions regarding this matter. Very truly yours, LEAVENWORTH & TESTER, P.C. LEL: Enclosure cc: High. Country Engineering, Inc., wfenc. The Four Mile Ranch Development Company (Denver and Florida), w/enc. Andrew MacGregor, wienc. Mark Bean, w/enc. Don DeFord, Esq., we/enc. F:120001Lette rs- MemuslCO LOD N Y-4 M 1LE-5U P -1 -lir. wpd 01-21-2000 1210PM DUNRENE 1 970 925 9076 P.02 LV,1 PLANNING crrYOYG B06 COONS &VENVE,GL 970/945-2515 001) SPRINGS, CO 810/1 APPUICAXIVOROMIT Thelour NUIe Ranch Development Coo_Ipm_ GlenwoOd Land ompany, Appliata 1 Reb101164111:i P91123r 1205;S.:Platte Eiver:Tftive, Suite GL -100 MpliMell'OdIOSS*Piar (40 MIS (3O3)733-97 (303)133-9802 FAXNumber is Acne Nurber •.1.1011, Ow Ow= tat CooparLAve., II *WM i • 97i 25-9046 9'7O-9254076 Is 111021 Nrider lIAXr N'tizipeti 1 LLC Pen c.ar. 81611 INFOSMASION 1 • • P1274124.000CIZESCIMMION •lo Mbtain a at&l uae permit for ac e, sea in con jahs irith tat hnd Block li+ber Ecistbsi Land Us util t re t'a and gli,1 dine eh to da ad "T.C. GNA.11.11iES . The Ovrae# or be oppgieket nemt be Tema at die Waring, Aft pithii0 hos** malt * smutty, tieticat amass to ! G,S.M.C.. seam c7o.00030. sigeskani at riantgi; So voggirgY mug aPPgar War• • e I the' oiplioercei xepapS. Perszorebto or impovacione rbv31, boo outherized point ponner ar capons Aker 1 dal " (selob�a1iI d oSeemr). I cia+ze we* Omar er*Ejory dal The above Infornationt 1. it woe 00 =direct To du lid of ley knowbsige. - 01-21-2000 1.:13PM P. 03 TOTAL P.02 81/31/00 15:22 JAN. 31, 2000 11; 0501 LEAVENWORTH & TESTER PLANNING APPLICATION CITY OF GLENWOOD SPRINGS 886 COOPER AVENUE, GLE NOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 910/9454575 NO. 293 NO. 193 UO2 P. 2 APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION The Four Mile Ranch Development Company Applicant Relationsiiip tO Owner 1205 S. Platte River Drive, suite GL -10D Applicant's Address Denver, CO 80223 (303)733-9787 (303)733-9802 Applicant's Phone Numb* FAX Number Glenwood Land Company, LLC Owner Owner 525 East Cooper Ave., Aspen CO 816.11 Owner's Address 970-925-9046 970-925-9076 Owner's Phi Number FAX •NuraSer PROPERTY INFORMATION Address Subdivision il181d� �r Aeryarjc,l,.� 9trirt Zone 2185--272-00-00 Parcel Number Lot miBlock Number o �aesnt Existing Land Use GENERAL PROJECT DESC R PTION To obtain a ur Dees in enlg n .e ink special use permit for accean, utility, re-grading_and maintenance con `unt:z=ion will t e va d road tmoravememta as d i c in t<hp plans enUsled Femur 11111A.lipneh riff to i to 7mprrmamPntR,, nine sheets. daSed January 2=f.. 2QQC,rgpared hY 1}4rGd'nery FrIgina+arina Ivr SIGNATURES The owner or We applicant must be present at the hearing. All public henringa must be properly noticed a eordirig to G.S.H.C. Section [l7O.Q14,03O. Si tsatures of all owners of the property mint appear before We application is accepted. Parmersbips or carporaaans may Appli�artt - D t The Four Mile Ranch Development Company have the authorized general paraaer or corporate officer sign Owner the applicasion (arr+ch anal Fat [ declare under penalty or perjury that the above information is ave and correct to the best of my knowledge. Date Owner Date 01-21-2000 12:17Pfl DLINRENE 1 970 925 9076 P.01 1 ty of Gel:wood Springs Planting and Znning Commission 806 Cooper Avenue . Gemmed $paingsr CO $1601 Re= fiihriguinscaurle UnPravamealtiogatml AMU/7 pear Manning and' Zoning Commission: 1 am IvrOing on bell& of Glenwood Land Compeny, LLC wlich owns properly out and lediactet to Cot* Road 117 in Glenwood Spririp, Colokado, u genailly depicted onthe !schematic prePtOrby HWh Country ihigineeriegi Ino wish is part oriheattacluid specal use applichereinaffer rethrred to as the!"PropFr, The Propitty is annexed to the aty CaersiTood Sprinss and zoned billidde pressevsion 1spoke with tepresenteives from The Feitr' Mile Ranch Development Comely Clout Wel cc hutuary 17,2000, and 1 authorize froUrr, Nide to submit a apodal use permit application the Property f5a seem, utility, es -grading, tepair, and maintenance ptuposcs in conjunction the propose:dined improvements as depicted m the plane entitled Foci hfile tRan tit Subcaviaioiks 0E -Site Improvement 1114 nine sheets, idled *nary 20,2000; 1PraPued bY aiiii,P3antsYrEogineelin& Inc- ubslistiskiLOIrtSit4 • I • if I ca Loyal Leavenworth, Esq. racceueloNeivecouray,' .samour4T-1-9.0 . 1 I • O1-21-2000 1213PM • 1 d Laud COmpany, LLC Recorded at . 2C) o'clock ! M UEC 3 1�9 Reception No. 472482 MILDRED ALSDORF, RECORDER GARFIE•LD COUNTY, COLORADO CORRECTION WARRANTY DEED Bnf1KUJe5, m 316 4Et 1 3 1593 r QARFIELD State Doc. Fee THIS DEED, Made this 22nd day of July, 1994, between Glenwood, Ltd., a Joint Venture consisting of the Zinko Family Partnership, a Limited Partnership, and Valley View , Ltd., a Joint Venture, granlor, and Glenwood Land Company, LLC, whose legal address is do Robert Macgregor, 525 E. Cooper, Aspen, Colorado $1611, grantee: WITNESSETII, that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars and other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey, and confirm, unto time grantee, its successors and assigns forever all the real property, together with improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the County of Garfield, State of Colorado, described as follows: All of the real property described an Exhibit "A" annexed hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Together with, but without warranty whatsoever, any and all water and water rights, ditches and ditch rights, springs, seeps and wells appurtenant to or used upon or in connection with the lands described on Exhibit A hereto. This deed is given to correct certain errors in the legal descriptions of Parcel 1 and Parcel 3 as described in the Warranty Deed recorded July 22, 1994, as Reception No. 466209 in Book 909 at Page 587 of the records of Garfield County, Colorado. All other terms, covenants and provisions of said Warranty Deed, as well as the descriptions and conveyances of all other real property described therein are hereby ratified and confirmed. TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the grantor, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described with the appurtenances, unto the grantee, its successors and assigns forever. And the grantor, for itself, its successors and assigns, does covenant, grant, bargain, and agree to and with the grantee, its successors and assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents, it is well seized of the premises above conveyed, has sure, perfect, ubsolule and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has good right, full power and authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all Fortner and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments, encumbrances, end restrictions of whatever kind or nature soever, except taxes for 1994, due in 1995 and except those reservations, conditions, easements, covenants, declarations and other matters set forth on Exhibit "13" annexed hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The grantor shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above-hargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the grantee, its successors and assigns, against all and every person or persons lawfully clairning the whole or any partthereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor has executed this deed on the date set forth above. GLENWOOD, LTD., A JOINT VENTURE By: 'the Zinko Family Partnership, By; VALLEY VIEW, LTD, A JOINT' VENTURE A Colorado Limited Partnership By: By: Otto Zinko, Ge,rPal Partner ezfi-pa4;, ,c;).-f-Azi Catherine Zinko, Gendl Partner Return to: Leonard M. Oates Oates, Flushes & Knezevich, P.C. 533 East1iopkins Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 By: u ene E.11t�as alit indrviduaJoint t Venturer CAROL COOK Eugene E. 1.alli, Her Attorney -in -Fact STATE OF eliii4sfoRstrBe) i M.D4-. ss. COUNTY OF SINN) 66.42-&,t ,,2te,t ' The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /4 day of August, 1994, by Eugene E. Lalli, Individually and as President/Trustee of E.E. Lalli & Associates Profit Sharing Plan, and as Attorney -in -Fact for Carol Cook, Robert P. Paunovich, Marie DeLuca, Kay Horsley and Dalrie Berg, all as Joint Venturers of Valley View, Ltd. By: By: Eugene E. Lalli, Her Attorney -in -Fact m301(0925 I'm 390 Eugene E. Lalli, tier Attorney -in -Fact ROBERT P. PAI7NOVICH dth ugene . La t, His Attorney -in -Fact MARIDe LUCA By: By: By: KAY HORSLEY Eugene Lalli, Her Attorney -in -Fact DALRIE BERG Eugene E. Lalli, His Attorney -in -Fact E.E. LALLI & ASSOCIATES PROFIT SHARING PLAN Eugene CZ,: Lalli, President/Trustee JOINT VENTURERS OF VALLEY VIEW, LTD. Witness my hand and official seal. My commi SEAL: STATE OF COLO ) ss. COUNTY OF GARFIELD) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this y of August, 1994, by Otto Zinko and Catherine Zinko as General Partners of the Zinko Family Partnership, a Colorado Limited Partnership. Witness my hand and officiAl�j �aa�l,,, My commission exp onetk, r "i'� '' ` 9.5 • — SEAL: �`'�`.'-t-"... ,. _[3O,� (� / NOTARY \i PUBLIC s 0 fe" .,'FeleCp + �'p `��t,,. 2 1. r .ESr1.4r--d Notary Public I+ XIIIBIT A TO CORRECTION WARRANTY DEED PARCEL I: E(O925!c391 A parcel of land located in the south one half of Section 22 and the north one half of Section 27, Township 6 South, Range 89 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado. Said parcel is more particularly described as follows, to wit: Beginning at a point ori the southerly boundary of Glenwood Park Subdivision from which a witness corner set for the north one quarter corner of Section 27, said township and range bears N 89'53'39" E 1218.02 feet distant; thence along the southerly boundary of Glenwood Park Subdivision the following three (3) courses: 1) North 80 degrees 59 minutes 45 seconds East (N 80°59'45° E), a distance of 943.29 feet; thence 2) North 67 degrees 54 minutes 13 seconds East (N 67°54'13" E), a distance of 106.84 feet; thence 3) North 47 degrees 32 minutes 42 seconds East (N 47°32'42" E), a distance of 833.44 feet; to the intersection with the westerly line of a parcel of land described at Book 792, Page 658, Garfield County Records; thence along the westerly and southerly line of said parcel on the following five (5) courses: 1) South 42 degrees 27 minutes 50 seconds East (S 42°2.7'50" E), a distance of 422.51 feet; thence 2) South 36 degrees 15 minutes 48 seconds East (S 36°15'48"' E), a distance of 615.57 feet; thence 3) South 38 degrees 37 minutes 12 seconds East (S 38°37'12" E), a distance of 568.26 feet; thence 4) South 00 degrees 36 minutes 05 seconds West (S 00°36'05"' W), a distance of 354.65 feet; thence 5) North 89 degrees 09 minutes 21 seconds East (N 89'09'21" E), a distance of 120.41 feet to a point on the easterly line of the northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 27; thence South 00 degrees 49 minutes 01 seconds East (S 00'49'03." E)a distance of 509.71 feet to the southeast corner of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 27; thence North 89 degrees 04 minutes 54 seconds West (N 89°04'54" W), a distance of 266.66 feet along the southerly line of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 27 to a point where an extension of the easterly line of the Glenwood Springs Municipal Airport intersects said southerly line of the Northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 27; thence along the boundary of said airport parcel and along said extension the following four (4) courses: 1) North 27 degrees 01 minutes 38 seconds West (N 27°01'38° W), a distance of 1882.11 feet; thence 2) South 63 degrees 41 minutes 22 seconds West (S 63041'22" W), a distance of 430.00 feet; thence 3) South 27 degrees 00 minutes 38 seconds East (S 27°00'38' E), a distance of 260.20 feet; thence 4) South 27 degrees 01 minutes 13 seconds East (S 27001'13" E), a distance of 327.60 feet EXHIBIT A TO CORRECTION WARRANTY DEED PARCEL 1 CONTINUED: u0014O925 ptc.; 392 to a point on the centerline of a 45.00 foot right of way as shown on the Hughes Addition to Cardiff; thence South 01 degrees 22 minutes 11 'seconds West (S 01°22"11" W), a distance of 226.79 feet along said centerline; thence North 68 degrees 37 minutes 49 seconds West (N 88°37'49" W), a distance of 88.50 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 12, Block 4, Hughes Addition to the Townsite of Cardiff; thence South 01 degree 22 minutes 11 seconds West (S 01°22'11" W) 120.00 feet along the westerly line of Lot 12 and its extension to the center of Third Street as shown on said Hughes Addition; thence South 88 degrees 37 minutes 49 seconds Fast (S 88°37'49" B) 66.00 feet along said centerline to the easterly line of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 27; thence South 01 degrees 22 minutes 11 seconds West (S 01°22'11" W) 445.00 feet along said easterly line to a point on the northerly line of the south 20 feet of Lots 6 and 7, Block. 2, Hughes Addition No. 2; thence along said northerly line North 88 degrees 37 minutes 49 seconds West (N 88°37'49" W), a distance. of 39.91 feet to the intersection with the northwesterly line of a parcel of land described at Book 408, Page 241, Garfield County records; thence North 78 degrees 48 minutes 00 seconds West (N 78°48'00" W), a distance of 123.89 feet along said northwesterly line; thence South 32 degrees 46 minutes 00 seconds West (S 32°4.6'00" W) a distance of 130.90 feet to a fenceline marking the northerly right of way of a County road; thence North 69 degrees 17 minutes 37 seconds West (N 69°17'37" W) 27.43 feet along said fenceline; thence North 71 degrees 51 minutes 52 seconds West (N 71051'52' W) 40.39 feet along said fenceline to the intersection with the northerly right of way of Midland Avenue; thence along said northerly right of way the following eight (8) courses: 1) North 59 degrees 54 minutes 30 seconds West (N 59"54'30" W), a distance of 258.59 feet; thence 2) South 30 degrees 05 minutes 30 seconds West (S 30'°05'30" W), a distance of 50.00 feet; thence 3) North 59 degrees 54 minutes 30 seconds West (N 59°54'30" W), a distance of 660.69 feet; thence 4) North 67 degrees 24 minutes 02 seconds West (N 67°24'02" W), a distance of 257.20 feet; thence 5) North 52 degrees 23 minutes 02 seconds West (N 52°23'02" W), a distance of 145.08 feet; thence 6) North 39 degrees 27 minutes 48 seconds West (N 39°27'48" W), a distance of 94.34 feet; thence 7) South 50 degrees 32 minutes 12 seconds West (S 50°32'12" W), a distance of 20.00 feet; thence 8) North 39 degrees 11 minutes 17 seconds West (N 39°11'17" W), a distance of 189.87 feet to a point on the southerly line of a parcel of land described at Book 510, Page 614, Garfield County Records; thence North 80 degrees 59 minutes 42 seconds East (N 00°59`42" E), a distance of 237.55 feet along said southerly line; thence North 09 degrees 00 minutes 18 seconds West (N 09°00'16" W), a distance of 406.09 feet along the easterly line of said parcel and along the westerly line of the Glenwood Park Subdivision to the true point of beginning; and containing 60.223 acres, or 2,623,293 square feet. EXHIBIT A TO CORRECTION WARRANTY DEED PARCEL 3: Ft -10925M393 Al parcel of land located in the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter and in the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 27, Township 6 South, Range 89 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, Garfield County, Colorado. Said parcel of land is more particularly described as follows, to wit: Beginning at a stone found in place for the west one quarter corner of said Section 27 from which a witness corner set for the north one quarter corner of said Section 27 bears North 42 degrees 48 minutes 40 seconds East (N 42°48'40" El 3562.80 feet distant; thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 08 seconds East IN 00°00'08" El along the westerly line of said southwest quarter of the northwest quarter, a distance of 1335.20 feet to the northwest corner of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter; thence South 88 degrees 35 minutes 03 seconds East IS 88°35'03" EJ along the northerty line of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter, a distance of 1122.00 feet to a point on the westerly line of a parcel of land described at Book 296, Page 417, Garfield County Records; thence along the westerly line of said parcel the following four (4) courses: 1 } South 19 degrees 37 minutes 11 seconds West (S 19°37'11" W), a distance of 114.02 feet; thence 2) South 00 degrees 36 minutes 45 seconds East (S 00°36'45" E), a distance of 305.37 feet; thence 31 South 06 degrees 25 minutes 00 seconds East (S 06°25'00" E), a distance of 289.78 feet; thence 4) South 31 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds East (S 31°15'00" E), a distance of 585.02 feet; to a point on the easterly extension of a fence line described at Book 401, Page 409, Garfield County Records; thence South 60 degrees 35 minutes 44 seconds West IS 60°35'44" W), a distance of 52.04 feet; along said fence line and its easterly extension; thence South 81 degrees 15 minutes 11 seconds West (S 81°15'11" W), a distance of 46.80 feet along said fence fine to a point on the easterly line of said southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 27; thence South 00 degrees 41 minutes 12 seconds West 15 00°41'12" W}, a distance of 108.57 feet along said easterly line to the southeast corner of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter thence North 88 degrees 30 minutes 34 seconds West (N 88°30'34" W) along the southerly line of said southwest quarter of the northwest quarter, a distance of 1330.93 feet to the west one quarter corner of Section 27, the paint of beginning; and containing 36A 14 acres, or 1586176 square feet. BooKO925nr; 394 EXHIBIT B TO CORRECTION WARRANTY DEED. DATED JULY 22. 1994 FROM GLENWOOD LTD.. GRANTOR TO GLENWOOD LAND COMPANY. LLC I. The effect of inclusions in any general or specific water conservancy, fire protection, soil Conservation or other district or inclusion In any water service or street improvement area. 2. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted, as reserved in United States Patent recorded as follows: BOOK PAGE REC. J PROPERTY AFFECTED PARCEL. NO. 12 140 .13945 S1/2SW1/4 AND SW1/4SE1/4 SEC. 22 1, 2 !: 5 12 310 17230 E1/2NE1/4, EW1/4NE1/4 AND IIW1/4SE1/4 SEC.27 4 71 631 91306 SW1/4NW1/4 EEC. 27 3, 4 12 375 10560 SE1/4UW1/4, NW1/4NE1/4 AND N1/2NW1/4 SEC.27 1, 3, 4 3. Right of way for ditched or canals constructed by the authority of the united States, as reserved in United States Patent recorded as follows' BOOK PAGE RECEPTION NO. PROPERTY AFFECTED PARCEL NO. 12 310 17230 ,(SEE AB0V151 4 71 631 91306 - (SEB ABOVE) 3, 4 12 375 10560 (SEE ABOVE) 1, 3 & 4 4. Easement and right of way for water pipelinea and tanks granted to The Cardiff Light and Hater Company by Ed S. Hughes by instrument recorded December 9, 190'1 in Book 67 et Page 523 aa Reception No. 34376. 5.'. Easement and right of way for road purposes granted to Paul J. White and Betty M. White by George W. Somers by instrument recorded October 10, 1950 iu Book 254 at Page 327 as Reception No. 173763. 6 Agreement relating to removal, construction attd maintenance of fence as set forth in ietatruntent recorded October 11, 1950 in Rook 254 at Page 327 as Reception No. 173763. 7 Easement and right of way for water pipeline purposes granted to The City of Glenwood Springs by George W. Su6nere by instrument recorded March 19, 1952 in !look 263 at. Page 305 as Reception No. 170027. 0.. Easement and right of way for communication facility, as granted to The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company by Congregation of the holy Cbost Western Province, Inc., in the instrument recorded April 26, 1972 in Book 430 at Page 140 as Reception. No. 253513. 9. Easement for roadway in the Southeast• portion of the NW1/4NE1/4 of. Section 27 as shown on map recorded April 30, 1963 in flat Book 3 at Page 11, as Reception No. 221264. 10. Right of way for the uninterrupted flow of Three Mile Creek. 11 Existing right of way on Easements for sewer, gas, water, ditch, canal, electrical, telephone or other utility purposes as reserved in the Vacation Ordinance Resolution No. 09-125 recorded September 7, 1969 in Book 762 at Page 555 as Reception No. 405390. 800K0925=395 EXHIBIT B TO CORRECTION WARRANTY DEED. DATED JULY 22.1994 FROM GLENWOOD LTD.. GRANTQI; TO GLENWOOD LAND COMPANY, LLC Continued: 12. Terms, conditions, obligations and effects of the easement agreement between the City of Glenwood Springs, and Glenwood Limited recorded May 24, 1978 in Book 510 at Page 436 as Reception No. 285763. 13. Terms and conditions of County Sub -Exemption Resolution No. 79-151 recorded December 4, 1979 in Book 540 at Page 436 as Reception No. 299961. 14. Right of way and Easement as granted to Rocky Mountain Natural Gas by Glenwood Ltd. in Document recorded in Book 742 at Page 448 as Reception No. 395970. 15. Terms and conditions of Zoning Ordinance No. 26 Series 1989, recorded July 29, 1989 in Book 758 at Page 839 as Reception No. 403628. 16. Subject to any and all easements, encroachments, or other conditions, whether or not evidenced by recorded instruments, as disclosed on survey plat prepared by Schmueser, Gordon, Meyer, Inc. and dated July 1, 1994. 17. As to Parcel 5 described on Exhibit A hereto, subject to any possessory rights, uses or claims of third parties. 18. As to Parcel 1 described on Exhibit A hereto, subject to all streets and alleys depicted on Plat of the Hughes Addition to the Townsite of Cardiff and the Hughes Addition No. 2 to the Townsite of Cardiff, recorded as Reception Nos. 76128 and 81450 of the records of Garfield County Colorado, and including any portion of a 45 -foot right -of way dedicated as a public roadway on the aforesaid Plat of the Hughes Addition No. 2 to the Townsite of Cardiff, which may be included in the description of Parcel 1. 1,9. Subject to any conflicts with lands deeded to the Board of County Commissioners by deeds recorded in Book 67 at Page 288 as Document No. 33593 and recorded in Book 159 at Page 421 as Document No. 114634. January 26, 2000 Four Mile Ranch Development Company c/o Leavenworth & Tester, PC attn: Kelly Cave 1011 Grand Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Four Mile Ranch —Off -Site Improvements HCE Project No. 96098.04 Dear Kelly: The purpose of this letter is to discuss the proposed design for the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision's Off -Site Improvements. On January 10, 2000, The Four Mile Ranch Development Company ("Four Mile") met with the Garfield County Board of County Commissioners ("BOCC") to discuss the future improvement of County Road 117 ("C.R. 117"). As you know, the current C.R. 117 is a safety concern since it only has 10 -foot driving lanes, 2 -foot shoulders, no barrow ditches, grades approaching l3%, and limited sight distance. The proposed C.R.117 improvements, which have been approved or are presently being reviewed by the City Engineer and Garfield County, will include two 11 - foot asphalt lanes. two 6 -foot asphalt shoulders, barrow ditches and improved horizontal and vertical alignments (hereinafter referred to as the "Improvements"). Due to the right-of-way constraints, the BOCC agreed to two (2) viable options to improve C.R. 117 from the entrance of the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision ("Subdivision") to one hundred feet south of the intersection with Midland Avenue. The BOCC agreed that Four Mile can improve C.R. 117 by either constructing 4700 square feet of aesthetically displeasing retaining walls up to 20 feet in height, or obtain an easement from the owner of the property located adjacent to and east of C.R. 117 (the "Easement Property"), Glenwood Land Company, LLC ("GLC"), to re -grade up to two (2) acres of the Easement Property with a 2:1 catch slope. Since 4700 feet of retaining walls would permanently scar the landscape and hinder the driver's sight distance, Four Mile and the County agreed that the preferred option is re -grading the Easement Property. In comparison to the retaining walls, the 2:1 catch slope will be much easier to maintain and revegetate and will be safer to drivers since it will not impede site distances. Additionally, upon completion of revegetation of the catch slope, the public will not know that the re -grade has occurred. Retaining walls would remain an eyesore forever and be an on-going maintenance issue. Under the 2:1 catch slope option, Four Mile will only be re -grading the Easement Property. No underground utilities, drainage improvements or paving will be constructed on the Easement Property. High Country Engineering, Inc.'s (HCE) design for the Improvements reduces the existing roadway grade from 13% to 7%, straightens the horizontal alignment to improve sight distance, constrains the desired roadway section within deeded and prescriptive right-of-way, and provides a maintainable catch slope of 2:l within the Easement Property. Since the Easement Property is zoned hillside preservation, 923 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 phone 970 945-8676 • fax 970 945-2555 14 Inverness Drive East, Ste 8.144 Englewood, CO 80112 phone 303 925-0544 • fax 303 925-0547 Kelly Cave — Leavenworth & Tester. PC Re: Four Mile Ranch — Off -Site Improvements HCE Job No. 96098.04 Pawae1of2 January 26. 2000 Four Mile, upon written authorization of GLC, is required to apply for a Special Use Permit (SUP) from the City of Glenwood Springs for the slope adjustment. As you know, Four Mile met with GLC and obtained GLC's written authorization to apply for the SUP last week. In compliance with the Glenwood Municipal Code Section 070.040.030.A.7, HCE designed its plan such that all practical means shall be used to preserve drainage patterns, minimize vegetative and soil impact, and maintain the natural physical features of the hillside. The re -grading shall harmonize visually with the natural surroundings. Enclosed for your review is the Four Mile Ranch Subdivision's Off -Site Improvement Plans, dated January 26, 2000, nine (9) sheets (the "Plans"), and proposed landscape and revegetation plans ("Landscaping Plans"). The Landscaping Plans restore all hillside excavations to match existing vegetative conditions. HCE recommends that the City of Glenwood Springs provide irriggaton water from its new tank to ensure that the revegetation process is accomplished in a timely fashion. Please note that the Plans include utility stub -outs, grading and drainage improvements and a new paved driveway and apron for potential future use and access to GLC's property. GLC's proposed driveway and apron Nvouid be located where flatter grades exist near the Emergency Access Road to the Subdivision. Finally, the completion ofthe Improvements is assured since these public improvements are secured by a performance guarantee in accordance with the terms and conditions ofthe Subdivision Improvement Agreement between Four Mile and Garfield County. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, HIGH COUN i ENGINEERING, INC. ra1,0 '.1,, . ..•i#/�2'-e',;'. 'Y e 1T....Cop�e. i:. ./ . • Projii -IVlana J o-2 // (.1.0., _ O -..1 j . JDHA:FiV - , 3, ' {.: '7' r' , ,ee Learen►.ii cc: orth. The Four Mile,Ranch Development Company