Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5.0 Resolution 2013-10qui ♦Nig, �r ��,ri thILIVNI.14141114 11111 Receptions' 830406 01/23/2013 03:24:21 PM Jean Alberico 1 of 13 Rec Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss County of Garfield ) At a regular meeting of the Board of' County Commissioners for Garfield County, Colorado, held in the Commissioners' Meeting Room, Garfield County Administration Building in Glenwood Springs on Monday, the 7th day of January A.D. 2013, there were present: John Martin Mike Samson Tom Jankovsky Carey Gagnon Frank Hutfless Jean Alberico Andrew Gorgey , Commissioner Chairman , Commissioner , Commissioner , Assistant County Attorney , County Attorney , Clerk of the Board , County Manager when the following proceedings, among others were had and done, to -wit: RESOLUTION NO. .2)/.3- A 2„/3 - A RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL FOR A SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR THE PIONEER POINT SUBDIVISION, ON A 6.7 ACRE PROPERTY OWNED BY ROGER AND AMELIA ESHELMAN, LOCATED APPROXIMATELY SIX MILES NORTHEAST OF THE TOWN OF CARBONDALE IN SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 87 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., GARFIELD COUNTY PARCEL NO# 2391-181-00-027 Recitals A. The Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado (Board), received a request for a Subdivision Preliminary Plan Review for the Pioneer Point Subdivision to allow a three lot subdivision, located in Section 18, Township 7 South, Range 87 West of the sixth P.M., Garfield County. B. The Pioneer Point Subdivision is located on a 6.7 acre parcel of land owned by Roger and Amelia Eshelman. The ownership of this property is described in the Eshelman — Hogan Boundary Line Adjustment Affidavit found at Reception Number 638445 in the records of the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder. C. The subject property is located within unincorporated Garfield County in the Rural Zone District, at 7378 County Road 100, approximately six miles northeast of the Town of Carbondale. 1 111111g612.FriAWKIFT K51113%4.144 Pi 11111 Reception#: 830406 01/23/2013 03:24:21 PM Jean Alberico 2 of 13 Rec Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO D. On November 28, 2012 the Garfield County Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Application in accordance with the Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008 as amended and forwarded a recommendation of approval with conditions to the Board of County Commissioners on the Subdivision Preliminary Plan Review. E. The Board is authorized to approve, deny or approve with conditions a Subdivision Preliminary Pian Review pursuant to the Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended. F. The Board of County Commissioners opened a public hearing on the 7`h day of January, 2013 for consideration of whether the proposed Subdivision Preliminary Plan Review should be approved, conditionally approved, or denied, during which hearing the public and interested persons were given the opportunity to express their opinions regarding the request. G. The Board of County Commissioners closed the public hearing on the 7th day of January, 2013 to make a final decision. H. The Board on the basis of substantial competent evidence produced at the aforementioned hearing, has made the following determinations of fact: 1. That proper public notice was provided as required for the hearings before the Board of County Commissioners and the Planning Commission. 2. The hearings before the Board of County Commissioners and the Planning Commission were extensive and complete, that all pertinent facts, matters and issues were submitted and that all interested parties were heard at that meeting. 3. That for the above stated and other reasons the approval of the proposed Pioneer Point Preliminary Subdivision Plat is in the best interest of the health, safety, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County. 4. That with the adoption of conditions, the application is in general conformance with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, as amended. 5. That with the adoption of conditions and approval of applicable waivers, the application has adequately met the requirements of the Garfield County Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended. RESOLUTION NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, that: A. The forgoing Recitals are incorporated by this reference as part of the resolution. 2 1111 ri Ni1,14Ar, let inlet l'iiLlitri6,1L 11 111 Reception#: 830406 01/23/2013 03:24:21 PM Jean Rlberieo 3 of 13 Rec Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0 00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO B. The Subdivision Preliminary Plan Review for the Pioneer Point Subdivision is hereby approved subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1. All representations of the Applicant contained in the application shall be considered conditions of approval unless specifically modified by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Applicant shall maintain compliance with the Division of Water Resources Well Permit and related Water Court Decrees and any conditions contained therein. The Applicant and any future successors in ownership shall maintain the required contract with Basalt Water Conservancy District. A plat note outlining this requirement shall be included on the final plat. Irrigation water shall be allocated to each proposed lot pursuant to amendments to the shared well agreement. 3. The Applicant shall supplement the Water Quality Testing to include any additional tests and affirmative finding by a qualified water testing professional that the water meets the Colorado Primary Drinking Water Standards and/or provide a treatment solution should a compliance issue be noted by the test results. 4. Prior to Final Plat approval, the Applicant shall finalize and record at the time of Final Plat approval the well sharing agreement, road sharing agreement, covenants, and homeowner association documents for the subdivision. All of said documents shall be subject to final review and acceptance by the County Attorney's Office. 5. Compliance with the recommendations of the Applicant's Geotechnical Report by Yeh and Associates and the recommendations of the Colorado Geological Survey shall be required. These recommendations include site specific supplemental engineering and soils analysis for Lot 1 and supplemental engineering review of slope stability and grades for excavations associated with road cuts. Plat notes identifying the supplemental engineering requirements shall be included on the Final Plat. The Final building and driveway location on Lot 1 shall be designed to avoid or minimize impacts on areas with slopes steeper than 30% to the extent reasonably possible. The Applicant's slope analysis demonstrates that approximately 50% of the proposed Lot 1 is less than 30% slope. Compliance with slope development standards contained in Section 7-210(F) shall be required for Lot 1 and for any future expansion or additional development on Lots 2 and 3. 6. Compliance with the Carbondale and Rural Fire Protection District recommendations contained in their referral comments dated 8/4/06, 8/21/08, and 11/9/12 shall be required including but not limited to creation of defensible spaces for new structures pursuant to the State guidelines, water supply for fire protection, and location and construction of access/pull-outs at the time of construction of the new access road to serve Lot 1. Said letters are attached as Exhibit A, and a plat note outlining these requirements shall be included on the final plat. 3 X111 IYYr� P1�,V4�h� 1L L ' lr l� G�h�GN4R I,l ! �I 11111 Reception#: 830406 01/23/2013 03:24:21 PM Jean Alberico 4 of 13 Roo Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO 7. Waivers from submittal requirements are approved in accordance with the Review Criteria contained in Section 4-202 (C). 8. The proposed driveways and related waivers from roadway standards contained in Section 7-308 are approved in accordance with the Review Criteria contained in Section 4- 117(C) provided the following conditions are met prior to final plat approval. a. Provision of additional documentation from the Applicant's Engineer indicating the adequacy of the various driveways to safely serve the proposed units and in particular the steeper sections of access to Lot 1. b. Provision of additional upgrades to the Lot 1 access as determined necessary by the Applicant's Engineer including potential upgrades to surfacing and widening of the initial turn toward Lot 1. c. Review and approval of supplemental upgrades to the Lot 1 access by the County Consulting Engineer. d. Compliance with the recommendations of the Road and Bridge Department for additional access permitting the existing driveway for Lots 2 & 3 and additional improvements at both the access points onto County Road 100. e. Construction of the proposed driveway serving Lot 1 shall be subject to additional drainage and erosion protection in accordance with County regulations. f. The Applicant shall provide information on existing traffic counts for County Road 100, further demonstrating the minimal net traffic impact from the proposed subdivision. 9. A subdivision improvements agreement shall be submitted or improvements shall be completed prior to recording the Final Plat. 10. All new construction on the property shall be required to meet all Garfield County Building Code Requirements. At the time of building permit application the Applicant shall comply with all standard county requirements including erosion and sediment control during construction including driveway improvements, and shall address ongoing weed management on the site consistent with the County Weed Management Plan and the Colorado Noxious Weed Act. Re -vegetation of all driveway construction shall be required. 11. The Applicant shall provide bear proof trash containers for any outside storage of trash within the subdivision and shall comply with the wildlife compatibility recommendation contained in the Colorado Parks and Wildlife referral letter dated 11/13/12 attached as Exhibit B. 12. The Applicant shall pay required impact fees associated with the new Lot 1 for school land dedication and Fire Impact Fees prior to the recording of the Final Plat. County Road/Traffic Impact Fees shall be referenced on the Final Plat by plat note and shall be payable at the time of issuance of a building permit for Lot 1. 4 1111ri111,11VAIIMIVAlidLill, IN 11 H Reception#: 830406 01(23/2013 03:24:21 PM Jean Alberico 5 of 13 Rec Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO 13. The Final Plat shall be subject to review and approval by the County Attorney's Office including all certificates. The plat shall also include plat notes as shown on the attached Exhibit C except as may be edited by the County Attorney's Office as part of the final plat review. Plat notes #4 and #7 on the draft plat included with the Application submittal shall be deleted. S1 I Dated this day of ATTEST: Cler fl K f the Board GARFIELD COMM IS OUNT A.D. 20 t 3 . UNTY BOARD OF GARFIELD Upon motion duly made and seconded the fore: oing Resoluti following vote: COMMISSIONER CHAIR JOHN F. MARTIN COMMISSIONER MIKE SAMSON COMMISSIONER TOM JANKOVSKY n was adopt by the STATE OF COLORADO )ss County of Garfield , Aye , Aye , Aye 1, , County Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners, in and for the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that the annexed and foregoing Resolution is truly copied from the Records of the Proceeding of the Board of County Commissioners for said Garfield County, now in my office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County, at Glenwood Springs, this day of , A.D. 20 . County Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners 5 1111 In 6NIc ii t Maki 11111 ' Reception*: 830406 01/23/2013 03:24:21 PM Jean Alberico 6 of 13 Rec Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO Exhibit A — Fire District Referral Letters and Requirements Page 1 of 3 FMB • SMS • RESCUE November 9.2012 tileae (Hartmann Garfield Calmly Building d: Pla®ng 108 $th Street, Soho 401 tilemwood Sprint, CO 81601 RR: Eeiselman, Pioneer Int SaMlrieien Bear Glen: I have reviewed the application far the proposed Pioneer Point Subhvieioa I have previously met will the app ut wLd lay omenta are included in the submittal. I have no additions' Manes with the proposal. The newly armed lot is subject to development impart fees adopted by the District. The developer nth be moaned to eater into an epeeme nt with the District for the payment of development ilfatpsct fees. 13atecu don of the apoemcm and payme I of the fees aro due prior to The receding of the final pilar. Pees ale based upon the impact fees adopted by the District at the time the agte :meat u executed. The Omni fee for residential development is $730.00 per unit Please contact tae if you have eery questions or if I can be of any assimance. Bill Gowns Deputy Chief Canbaodele & )tidal Rim moa District 304Ithadowood Dive • Carbondale, CO 81623 . 970-963-2,491 Fax 970-963-0569 6 ■III i Y3t1Mikl6iLPitlI t I SWAIF NI 11111 Reception#: 830406 01/23/2013 03:24.21 PM Jean Rlberico 7 of 13 Rec Fee $0.00 Doc Fee,0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO Exhibit A — Fire District Referral Letters and Requirements Page 2 of 3 FIRE • EMS • RESCUE Aionit 21, 2008 Mc Roger Eshelman 7378 County Reed 100 Carbondale, CO 81623 RE: Site Visit Dear Roger - This Feuer is a follow up to my site visit this peg_ Friday. August 15, 2008. 1 would oft -ex flit following comments. Act t. During the visit, we drove to your existing building using aur Egan 8505 &nm oirr Station 5. which is located just to the south of your property. The engine was able to adequately access :tee existing builder tial tiro existing driveway and was able to adequately tarn around. 2, We also drove a pardon of the existing driveway at 7330 Corry Road 100 btlanging to Dan and Ann Hagan. The driveway would become part gibe access for the proposed new Lot 1. We wine able to adequately negotiate the existing grade smd turtle, acrd Were able to gain aixess to the proirn where the new driveway would oaatirsre on to Let I. L We looked at the rte of the existing 2,000 gallon water storage mak which is based m t1si: went side of the house on Lot 3. I would r Onlifl sld installing a dry hydrant in the tank with a 6 -inch trials national standard thread MST) along with a mini:man 1-1/2 inch vent pipe. The taoli is tapable of provii watts 5or both of the existing hadisrg, 2. It is ray understandinig that another 1,700 gallon mater iatric is proposed for Lot 1. Again, a-knroll dry hydrant sholdd be installed and the tank provide with adequate venting. DeTi I. The defensible specie around the existing buildings is 8,esterelly adequate. 1 would tccomrnend that some additioaai fuel modification be completed at the souilmnst carter of the existing let 3 house and in the southwest quer of the Lot 2 house. Weeds and gnisscd should he cut short ar mid the hem. 2. Defensible space arannd the proposed new home should be comp/deli using the guiders of Colorado Stale Forest Service (CPS) pamphlet 6.302 "Cela Wildfire - Defensible Zones". Please contact me if you have any questions. Sine rely &'i. Bili Gavette Deputy Chief Carbondale & Rural Fire Milan DiaMtct 300 Meadowood Drive • Carbostdale, CO 81623. 970-963-2491 Fax 97G-963-0565--' 7 Exhibit A — Fire District Referral Letters and Requirements Page 3 of 3 1111 riPr,M4f hA 1+ Blit 11111 Reception**: 830406 01/23/2013 03:24:21 PM Jean Alberico 8 of 13 Rec Fee:$0 00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO FERE EMS • RESCUE August 4, 2006 Roger Selman 7378 County Road 100 Carbon ie, CO 81623 RE: Proposed Subdivision Dear Roger, I appreciated die opportunity to meet with you to disvas your proposed subdivision. 1 would offer the following comme s regarding the proposal: 1. The Fire f*itr kt currently serves the property. The District provides both fire atld emergency medical services. Staff Ne. 5 is located directly to the south drat property. 2. Water supplies for lire protection would be prevkled by irsr respc dug fire apparatus with additional wrier provided by tanker shuttle. 3. p:opeeed DCW &iv'eR ys appear to be adequate i r eo r eoey appmems. TdII13ri63ts may need to be Incorporated into the driveways to allow vehicles to pass. 4. The new lots are subject to development impact fees adopted by the foe district. As agreement with the District will be required for the payment of development impact fees. Exoundon of the agreement and payment of the fees are dine prior to ibe recording of the final plat Pees are based upon the impact fres adopted by the District of the hme the agreement is executed. The current fee .for reeidentiei development is $437.00 per unit. Please comet me if you have any *teatime or if I may be of any assistance. 3 Bill Geectte Deputy Chief 8 1111 PrIl! W INI 161.NrOM 14I 1111.1Nii 11 II I Recept iontt : 830406 01/23/2013 03:24:21 PM Jean Alberico 9 of 13 Rec Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GRRFIELD COUNTY CO Exhibit B — Colorado Parks and Wildlife Referral Letter and Requirements Page 1 of 3 LULUKAUU YAKKS of W1LUL1kt 0088 Wildlife Way • Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone (970)947-2920 • FAX (970)947.2936 bar 13, lorme.state.coms • pe4esstate.ca.us Glenn Heron= Garfield County Building and Planning Department 108 ss' Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Pioneer Point Subdivision — SPPA 7391 Dear Mr. Hartmann_ Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) has reviewed the preliminary plan documents for the Pioneer Point Subdivision project located at 7378 Garfield County Road 100, Carbondale, Colorado 81623. CPW stair has visited the site and have the following comments with respect to wildlife, The vegetation on the site is comprised primarily of pinon-juniper woodland and sagebrush plant species. Various grasses and mountain shrubs associated with these plant communities are also present. This habitat type will sustain numerous wildlife species including mule deer, elk, wild tnikey, coyote, red fox, bobcat, Abert's squirrel, black bear, mountain lion, and numerous small mammals. Raptors, such as red-tailed hawks, American kestrels and golden eagles, may utilize the pinon-juniper habitat for hunting. Other songbirds may also be found in the area but no known threatened or endangered species or state recognized Species of concern arc uui0ntly known to be nesting in the area. The proposed project encompasses 6 — 7 total acres which includes three proposed 2+ acre brume site parcels. The project lists the existing mad onto the property as the continued access point. CPW supports the use of existing roads and recommends maiming motorized access as much as possible, especially during winter months when deer and elk will be using the area as winter range. The proposed 2+ acre lots arc specialty better for wildlife than smaller lots however, additional btuldings and increased disnubance from an additional home will still impact wildlife use of the property and surn„mdi areas. The proposed project is located in documented elk winter range, elk winter concentration area and severe elk winter range. .CPW designates elk winter range as areas where 90 percent of the individuals are located during the winter (five of ten years). Winter concentration areas are areas within a species' winter range where individual densities are at least 200 percent greater than surrounding winter range. Severe winter range is where 90 percent of the individuals are located when annual snow pack is at its maximum andfor temperatures arc at a minimum in the two worst winters out of ten. CPW takes STATE OF COLORADO John W. Nolienlboper. Governor • Mks King. &sculls.Deader, Department el Natural Resources Rick D. Cedes Deer tor, Colorado Pates and WUdifs Plaits and mos. Commlaion: David R. Bra)untam i • Gary DeasedOrat Vie—Choir • Boris Caaalhn Do,othss Fartla • Tlm Glean, Chat • Alan Jones . ell Kane • Gamper Pentane Jan Pdh„ • John Singletary mark S idr, Somata) • Robert Sadder • Lorna Watson • Oar MAW Ex Onto members: Mike King and Jan Samar 9 ®p»rr♦tiNKIWi ei•A1:11rOLY I'VelffI*rrrlllil11111 Reeeptiar*$: 830406 01/23/2013 03:24;21 PI! Jean Alberico 10 of 13 Rec Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee.0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO Exhibit B — Colorado Parks and Wildlife Referral Letter and Requirements Page 2 of 3 interest in the proposed project because winter range, winter concentration areas and seven winter range are critical areas of habitat for a species, These areas provide needed forage, cover from predators and retreat Emu stressors during the period of the year when the animals arc most vulnerable. Recent visits to the site have shown elk to be actively aging the property and surrounding properties as both winter range and winter concentration area. Elk sign in the area is significant with heavy browsing of the shrubs and scat abundant. Few habitats in the area meet the suitable requirements for elk winter range, winter concentration areas and severe winter range. In recent years CPW has observed the Toss of such habitats in the Missouri Heights and Spring Valley areas through development. Impacts to wildlife will occur in two ways. Direct loss of habitat will occur through removal or manipulation of vegetation used as forage, shelter or cover from predators. Wildlife will not be able to adapt to areas of direct habitat loss. Indirect habitat loss will be suffered through the effects of increased human related activity and the construction of movement barriers such as fences or walls. Wildlife may demonstrate limited resilience or adaptation to the impacts of habitat loss however reduction in native vegetation and introduced human activity will result in stressors that will negaitively wildlife. The proposed development will result in increased vehicle traffic, noise pollution, overall lntman presence and other related stressors throughout the area and will likely affect the surrounding areas of critical habitat not explicitly encompassed within the project boundaries, The following is a list of general recommendations that CPW would like to be taken inm consideration with this proposed development to avoid conflicts with wildlife. Pets: Pets should not be allowed to roam free, especially dogs. CPW recommends that dogs be leashed or kenneled at all times to prevent the illegal chasing and harassment of wildlife. lo areas such as this where mountain lions are a concern, the kennel should include a top pastel to prevent access to the kennel by the lion Dogs and cats chase or prey on various wildlife species. One benefit to keeping animals under control is that they are lass likely to become prey for mountain lions, coyotes, bobcats, foxes or raptors. Pets should not be fed outside and pet food should be stored in an enclosed area. CPW recognizes that in the proposed Pioneer Point covenants dogs are limited to two per household. Trash: Trash should be kept inside a secure enclosure until the Horning of trash pickup. Bears, skunks and raccoons are attracted to garbage and do become habituated. Individual bear - proof trash receptacles can be used by homeowner's to assist in mitigating these conflicts. STATE CIF COLORADO Jill W, FAtlestlooper, Governor • Mac Km, Es:soars'Arcola. Department of Neural Rtesowce/ 'Rick D. Cables. Metter. Colorado Parks end White Parka and Wddllre Commissiort David R. Brougham • Gary Butterworth, Vke•Chair e Chris Carlton Dorothea Fordo • Tar Glary. Choir • Wan Jones • 0111 Kane • Gaspar Penicone • Jim Prbyi • Jon Singletary Mark ambh, Secretary • Railed Sfrseter • Loma Watson • Dean WeglieM rs Dilicb llambar4' Lucks Kk•g and Jahn Salazar 10 -1111InfillikPACIRVICIJCIiMilfrkitill.4111111 Reception#: 830406 01/23/2013 03:24:21 PM Jean Rlberico 11 of 13 Rec Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO Exhibit B — Colorado Parks and Wildlife Referral Letter and Requirements Page 3 of 3 Feeding Wildlife: Feeding of all wildlife should be prohibited, with the exception of songbirds. Suet and hummingbird feeders are particularly attractive to skunks, raccoons and hears and their use should be discouraged or, if used, should be brought inside each night. It is illegal to feed big game animals including deer, elk, bear and lions as well as foxes and coyotes. Fencing: Woven wire or chain-link fences should only be used in areas where total wildlife exclusion is desired (i.e. around the immediate domicile or to protect trees and shrubs). Other ptrnneter and lot fencing should be prohibited where possible. Should perimeter fencing be required, recommended fencing should be no higher than 42 inches in height to allow adult animals to jump the fences without becoming entangled in the top wire. A 16 inch gap should exist between the bottom wire and the ground to allow _juvenile animals to pass under the fence. The nue of ornamental fencing with sharp vertical points or projections extending beyond the top rail should be strongly discouraged. CPW notes that fencing specifications are denoted in the proposed Pioneer Point covenants and supports the prohibition of new barbed wire fencing. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this prelirninaty plan_ If you have any questions or require additional information please contact District Wildlife Manager Matt Yamashita at 97O-947-2931 or via e-mail matt.yamashataOstate.co us, STATE OF COLORADO John W. Hick ntOct ef, (Reyna • take King, Executive (hector. Depart, cat of Natural Retovsoes Rick D. Cobbs. Director, Colorado Parke awl Milk Parka and WNAft Commission: 0041111. aroupilen • Goy Bitheni ith, Vlce-Cher • Chris Guinan Dorothee Farris. Tim (herr. coat. fist Jones • NM Kane • Gasper Pentecost • Jim Frit* • John KInpelsry Mark will, Secretary. Retort Sawesr• tonna Watson • Dean Wrivitild Ex Delon AAernberat AAA a KUg and John sap¢sr 11 ■III 14 101114:11:114rrl :U 11111 Reception#: 830406 01123/2013 03:24:21 PM Jean Rlberieo 12 of 13 Rec Fee:$0.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO Exhibit C - Plat Notes 1. Control of noxious weeds is the responsibility of the property owner in compliance with the Garfield County Weed Management Plan and the Colorado Noxious Weed Act. 2. No new open hearth solid -fuel fireplaces will be allowed anywhere within the subdivision. One (1) new solid -fuel burning stove as defined by C.R.S. 25-7-401, et.seq., and the regulations promulgated thereunder, will be allowed in any dwelling unit. All dwelling units will be allowed an unrestricted number of natural gas burning stoves and appliances. 3. All exterior lighting shall be the minimum amount necessary and all exterior lighting shall be directed inward and downward, towards the interior of the subdivision, except that provisions may be made to allow for safety lighting that goes beyond the property boundaries. 4. Colorado is a "RIGHT -TO -FARM" state pursuant to C.R.S. 35-3-1 1, Et. Seq. Landowners, residents and visitors must be prepared to accept the activities, sights, sounds and smells of Garfield County's agricultural operations as a normal and necessary aspect of living in a county with a strong rural character and a healthy ranching sector. Those with an urban sensitivity may perceive such activities, sights, sound, and smells only as inconvenience, eyesore, noise and odor. However, state law and county policy provide that ranching, farming and other agricultural activities and operations within Garfield County shall not be considered to be nuisances so long as operated in conformance with the law and in a non -negligent manner. Therefore, all must be prepared to encounter noises, odor, lights, mud, dust, smoke, chemicals, machinery on public roads, livestock on public roads, storage and disposal of manure, and the application by spraying or otherwise of chemical fertilizers, soil amendment, herbicide, and pesticides, any one or more of which may naturally occur as part of legal and non -negligent agricultural operations. 5. All owners of land, whether ranch or residence, have obligations under state law and county regulations with regard to the maintenance of fences and irrigation ditches, controlling weeds, keeping livestock and pets under control, using property in accordance with zoning, and other aspects of using and maintaining property. Residents and landowners are encouraged to learn about these rights and responsibilities an act as good neighbors and citizens of the county. A good introductory source for such information is "A Guide to Rural Living & Small Scale Agriculture" put out by the Colorado State University Extension Office in Garfield County. 6. The mineral rights associated with this property may not be transferred with the surface estate therefore allowing the potential for natural resource extraction on the property by the mineral estate owner(s) or lessee(s). 7. Dogs kept on the property shall be in a fenced yard, kennel or on a leash to prevent harassment of wildlife. Any outside storage of trash shall be in a bear proof container. Feeding of wildlife shall be prohibited with the exception of songbirds. Fencing on the property shall 12 1111mIticimciirNitkahrolinki RN 11111 Reception#: 830406 01/23/2013 03:24:21 PM Jean Rlberico 13 of 13 Rec Fee10.00 Doc Fee:0.00 GARFIELD COUNTY CO comply with the Division of Wildlife specifications for wildlife -friendly fencing contained in their 11/13/12 referral letter. 8. Engineer -designed foundations are required within this subdivision, along with compliance with requirements for supplemental geo-technical and soils analysis and recommendations of the Yeh and Associates Geotechnical Report (dated August 28, 2009) and the Colorado Geological Survey Referral Comments (dated November 14, 2012) for improvements including road construction. 9. Garfield County Traffic impact fees shall be paid for development of Lot 1 at the time of filing a building permit application for Lot 1. 10. Subdivision Improvement Plat Note to be prepared by the County Attorney's Office. 13