Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 ApplicationPRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION FOR THE LOUGH SUBDIVISION A DIVISION OF PARCEL A OF THE COLOHAN EXEMPTION OWNER / APPLICANT: Brent and Roxanne Lough 1655 County Road 109 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Ph. (970) 947-9908 PLANNER: Land Design Partnership Ron Liston, Planner 918 Cooper Avenue Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Ph. (970) 945-2246 SURVEYOR j., _� ,p•o Schmueser Gordon Meyer Inc. Gc: • 118 W. 6th Street, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Ph. (970) 945-1004 CIVIL ENGINEER Jerrry Law 0335 Donegan Road Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Ph. (970) 945-2769 August 26, 1998 LOUGH SUBDIVISION TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER OF APPLICATION SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM VICINITY MAP EXISTING CONDITIONS PRELIMINARY PLAN BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED RESUBDIVISION RELATIONSHIP TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ENGINEER'S STATEMENT Water Supply, ISDS, Drainage Attachements: Ruling of Referee Tap Purchase Agreement Easement Agreement GEOLOGIC AND SOILS REPORT SCS SOILS MAP SCS SOIL TYPE DESCRIPTION & TABLES TITLE POLICY LAND DESIGN PARTNERSHIP 918 Cooper Avenue, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970-945-2246 / Fax 970-945-4066 August 26, 1998 Mark Bean Garfield County Planning Dept. 108 8th Street Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Re: Lough Subdivision Preliminary Plan Application Dear Mark: Attached herewith are twenty copies of a Preliminary Plan and supplemental information as required for prelimianry plan review and a check for the application fee of $675 for the above referenced property. Also enclosed is a check for $485 for the Colorado Geologic Survey review fee. The proposed subdivision divides Parcel A of the Colohan Exemption Plat into two lots. On behalf of the Applicant Brent and Roxanne Lough, I request that this application be reviewed for completeness and scheduled for the Planning and Zoning Commission agenda of October 14, 1998. If you have questions or require any additional information please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Ronald B. Liston Sketch Plan Preliminary Plan XXXX Final Plan SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FORM SUBDIVISION NAME: LOUGH SUBDIVISION OWNER: BRENT and ROXANNE LOUGH ENGINEER/PLANNER/SURVEYOR: Planner: LAND DESIGN PARTNERSHIP, Ron Liston LOCATION: Section: 12 Township: 7S Range: 89W WATER SOURCE: TELLER SPRINGS SUBDIVISION WATER SYSTEM SEWAGE DISPOSAL METHOD: ISDS PUBLIC ACCESS VIA: COUNTY ROAD 109 EXISTING ZONING: AGRICULTURE / RESIDENTUAL / RURAL DENSITY EASEMENTS: Utility TELEPHONE & WATER LINE Ditch NONE TOTAL DEVELOPMENT AREA: (1) Residential Number Acres Single Family 2 6.5 Duplex Multi -family Mobile Home (2) Commercial Floor Area Acres sq.ft. (3) Industrial sq.ft. (4) Public/Ouasi-Public (5) Open Space / Common Area TOTAL: PARKING SPACES: Residential Commercial Industrial 10 6.5 LLI 7064 32 BM 595 oiq 36 `,.. \6982 ==c ( �\ _oa- x 4373 5. • 59.35 A\ H • f\ Cr • �l\1 L• c„, 6000 ao 6986+ r 65 r. 7S /' 5 WEST BANK •312 '11 0 \ x 00 \ o I . 1 LOUGH SUBDIVISION WIDA TELLER SPRINGS SUBDIVISION 4310 27'30' • II II 672 11 n 1! \ \\ \ \ \\ 0 ASPEN GLEN \-1`) 7232 1A1 \1�• I�� 1 \ \f , VICINITY MAP `\ ' I"\� SCALE V=42,000' _ Q Xi \ I o\\ �G \ 2 = 11 ,\ o 44 1-. 111' 111 I o Q 6704 LOUGH SUBDIVISION, Resubdivision of Parcel A, Colohan Exemption Preliminary Plan BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED RESUBDIVISION The Colohan Exemption was approved in 1990 on thirteen acres of land that was originally acquired from the Rose Property. The Applicant, Brent and Roxanne Lough purchased the 6.5 acre Parcel A in march of this year and also purchased two residential water taps from the Teller Spring Subdivision community water system and began construction of a residence which they will occupy upon its completion. They desire to divide Parcel A into two lots, one 2 acre lot and one 4.5 acre lot. The proposed lots will use the existing drive as a common point of access from County Road 109. Each lot will have one tap from the Teller Springs water system, with each tap allowing a single family residence, accessory dwelling, landscape irrigation and livestock water. Proposed Lot A-2 is not large enough to qualify for an accessory dwelling but an accessory dwelling unit allowance is requested for Lot A-1. Neither lot will be allowed livestock. Sewage treatment will be by ISDS. A permit for a septic tank and leach field has been issued by Garfield County for the residence that is under construction. The attached Soils report and Engineer's Statement validate the ability of the site to accomodate these uses. RELATIONSHIP TO THE ROARING FORK VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The following describes how the proposed Lough Subdivision is in general conformance with the new Garfield County Comprehensive Plan for the Roaring Fork Valley as identified by Section III Goals, Objectives, Policies and Programs of the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan dated September, 1994. Section III -1.0 Public Participation Goal: An integral part of County land use planning is the opportunity for citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning process. 1 The project proposal will be reviewed at two publicly noticed hearings a which the public will be given the opportunity to comment on the proposed project. Section III -2.0 Housing Goal: To ensure the availability of housing including affordable housing in the County where in short supply, subject to regulations, which ensure safety, appropriate site designs, compatibility, and protection of the natural environment. The proposed division creates a lot that is compatible with the surrounding residential uses. Section III -3.0 Transportation Goal: Ensure that the County transportation system is safe, functional, appropriately designed to handle existing and future traffic levels, and includes options for the use of modes other than the single -occupant automobile. Traffic from the additional residence will use County Road 109 which is a relatively newly asphalt paved road. The property is located in Traffic Study Area 9 and each residence will be required to pay an Off-site Road Impact Fee. Section III -4.0 Commercial and Industrial Uses Goal: Commercial: Garfield County will encourage the retention and expansion of convenient, viable, and compatible commercial development capable of providing a wide variety of goods and services to serve the citizens of the County. No commercial uses are proposed. Section III -5.0 Recreation and Open Space GOAL: Garfield County should provide adequate recreational opportunities for County residents, ensure access to public lands consistent with 2 BLM/USFS policies, and preserve existing recreational opportunities and important visual corridors. The spacious lots and access to natural areas will meet many of the recreational needs of the development residents. The property does not control access to any public lands. Section III -6.0 Agriculture Goal: To ensure that existing agricultural uses are allowed to continue in operation, and compatibility issues are addressed during project reviews. None of the property has served any past agricultural function. Section III -7.0 Water and Sewer Services Goal: To ensure the provision of legal, adequate, dependable, cost effective, and environmentally sound sewer and water services for new development. Sewage treatment will be by ISDS in soils well suited for this type of system based on percolation test on the site. Water will be provided by the Teller Springs community water system. Section III -8.0 Natural Environment Goal: Garfield County will encourage a land use pattern that recognizes the environmental sensitivity of the land, does not overburden the physical capacity of the land, is in the best interest of the health, safety and welfare of Garfield County. The Comprehensive plan designates this area for High Density Residential with one dwelling per two acres or Tess. Section III -9.0 Natural Resource Extraction Goal: Garfield County recognizes that under Colorado law, the surface and mineral interests have certain legal rights and privileges, including the right to extract and develop these interests. Furthermore, private property owners also have certain legal rights and privileges, including the right to 3 have the mineral estate developed in a reasonable manner and to have adverse land use impacts mitigated. There are no natural resources on the property that would be desirable for extraction. Section III -10.0 Urban Areas of Influence Goal: Ensure that development and overall land use policies occurring in the County that will affect a municipality are compatible with the existing zoning and future land use objectives of the appropriate municipality. The property is not located in the urban area of influence of any municipality. Section IV METHODOLOGY Purpose and Applicability of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map: This section identifies the property as bing within the High Density Residential Land Use District. This district proposes one dwelling unit per two or fewer acres. The density of the proposed division is 1 single family lot per 3.25 acres. If it is assumed that an accessory dwelling were added to Lots A-1, the total dwelling unit count would be 3 and the density would be 1 dwelling per 2.17 acres. We believe this review finds the the proposed subdivision to be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. 4 Jerry C. Law, P.E., DBA: JC3, 335 Donegan Road, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-2769 August 25, 1998 Reference: Engineering topics for the Lough Subdivision, Garfield County Water Supply The Lough Subdivision has purchased two water taps from the Teller Springs Water District. Each tap has a quantity of water allocated to it by the District to provide adequate service for one main residence and one guest house. The Teller Springs Water District system was designed for 26 single family residences and 26 guest houses within the District's boundary and an additional 5 single family residences and 5 guest houses outside the District's boundary. The water is supplied by a well near the Roaring Fork River and pumped through 6" diameter main lines to a 20,000 gallon tank on the hill side to the west of County Road 109. The tank gravity feeds water to the residences. The Loughs have tapped into the 6" main pipe with a 1.5" diameter service line to feed a 1,500 gallon surge tank which will pump water to both lots within the Lough Subdivision. The tank and pump were installed to provide higher water pressure to the Lough Subdivision and a temporary supply when the Teller District is shut down for maintenance. The tank system was designed by Dodson Engineered Products. A recent test, conducted by the Teller Springs Water Board in July of 1998, showed that the average consumption rate for the District is 72,000 gallons per week. The well is producing 25 gallons per minute, which equals 1500 gph, which equals 36,000 gpd, which equals 252,000 gpw. The Lough's Subdivision is located at an elevation and distance from the 20,000 gallon water tank that adequate fire flow can not be obtained from the Teller Springs Water District. The rural fire district chief said that this is not a problem since his pumper trucks responding to a fire in this neighborhood plan to use water out of the Roaring Fork River. There is a greater danger from grass fires in the area than a house -made fire which is built to today's UBC standards. Recommend the Loughs landscape their residence to prevent damage due to grass fires. Stormwater Drainage and Debris Flow There are no natural problems in this area unless someone builds directly in a gully, and even then there wouldn't be much water due to the extremely small drainage basin. See attached topography map. The existing terrain is steep above the Lough property, but stable due to the rock composition and trees. The main source of storm debris could possibly be man made excavations left laying loose. Recommend keeping the excavated soils tamped and vegetated as soon as practical to reduce mud flows. ISDS The soils within the Lough Subdivision are ideal for septic systems. The percolation rates of 5, 6, and 7 minutes per inch obtained by HP Geotechnical demonstrate the soils' ability to handle leach field water. See attached handouts for recommended septic maintenance. Conclusion The Lough Subdivision will provide two excellent building sites when constructed within the guidelines of the Garfield County Building Department. Respectfully Submitted, Jerry C. Law, P.E. 25044 Encl.: Topo of site ISDS maintenance handout 1 .II- 14Ni J 7,1P • 1 (\ 0 Nr )77 j 4 -1i • 1 H Ppe Care ForYo Home 3 L. •1 't, .. • •i'._ _ ���� `�� • • • i • i 1 '''� • •' r .t \\\.\.. . •1 • Understanding and caring for your hog Daily Tips For Long Lasting, Trouble•Free Service HOW OFTEN SHOULD THE SEPTIC TANK BE PUMPED? Every 1 - 3 years, when the sludge in the tank is approaching the 1/3 full mark. If more than this amount of sludge builds up, there is a chance that particles can get into the disposal field and clog the system. To ensure regular service, keep a mainten- ance record of your system. -3110 HOW DOES THE USE OF HOUSEHOLD WATER AFFECT THE SYSTEM? Conserve water. The more water that is used, the more that must be disposed of by the septic system drain. fields. Buy water -conserving appliances such as dishwashers and washing machines. Install water -conserving showerheads and faucets. Avoid unnecessary flushing of the stool. Wash only full loads of clothes, and fix leaky faucets. WHAT ARE SOME OF THE COMMON HOUSEHOLD HABITS THAT CREATE PROBLEMS IN A SEPTIC TANK? When homeowners use their septic tank as a disposal. Grease is the worst thing in a system. Coffee grounds, boxes, cooking fats., filter cigarette butts, disposable diapers, paper toweling, tissues, etc. should not be put into the system. CAN A GARBAGE DISPOSAL BE USED? Garbage disposals are not recommended, because the food particles fill up the septic tank faster,and food particles tend to clog the system. If a garbage disposal.is used, plan to pump the septic system twice as often or increase the tank size by 1/3. WHAT EFFECT DOES RAIN WATERT RUN-OFF HAVE ON THE SYSTEM? It overloads the system. Since all water must be disposed of, do not have storm or clear water from the basement or roof go into the sewage treatment system. WHAT ABOUT THE USE OF HOUSEHOLD CLEANING PRODUCTS? Moderate use of bleaches, cleansers and other household products will not harm your septic tank. IS THERE ANY SPECIAL TYPE OF TOILET PAPER REQUIRED? White toilet paper designed for septic -tank use is best because there are no dyes that need to be broken down in white paper. WHAT ELSE CAN I DO TO PROTECT Th. SYSTEM? A properly designed and installed system will give you years of trouble-free service if you protect the system with good daily habits and pump the septic tank regularly. WHAT SAFETY PRECAUTIONS SHOULD BE TARFN? Absolutely never go into a septic tank. Lethal gases build up in the tank that are overpowering and deadly. Call professional if you have a problem with your system. Know. where the manhole cover to the septic tank is located. It should be earth .covered or locked at all times. Septic tanks that are no longer being used should be filled with earth or rocks. • IMPORTANT - CHECK WITH THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT IN YOUR COMMUNITY FOR LOCAL REGULATIONS AND .REQUIREMENTS CONCERNING HOME SEPTIC SYSTEMS. -septic system . ..helps atloid problems. How Can 1 Insure A Trouble•Free System Building A Home. When ? r Before purchasing any property, obtain a soilboring and percolation test. This test shows the suitability of the soil for a conventional private septic system. If the test reveals that the property is not suitable for a conventional system, you will be informed of alternate designs available. There is a charge for the test but this investment insures you'll be able to install a private septic system on your land. Have a professional licensed installer or engineer design and lay out your private septic system. The proper elevation, design, construction and maintenance will ensure that the life of your septic sys- tem will be prolonged. Capacity deserves important consideration and at least a 1,000 gallon tank is required for an average family home, or more depending on number of bedrooms. No part ofthe system should be under heavily travelled areas such as a driveway or patio. Obtain septic tank and sanitary permits. Local regulations require a permit before any building can begin. Often you must provide a sketch or plot map of the sys- tem, showing building specifications meeting requirements such as distances from the house, well, etc. Have a qualified, properly trained person install your system. Inspect the system regularly. Keep both a record of the com- plete system and a maintenance record for easy reference in the event problems occur with your system. 1.,' .,• .L NEW HOME CONSTRUCTION CHECKLIST Obtain a soil boring and percolation test before purchasing property. Check with local authorities to ensure compliance with local requirements. Properly locate the septic system. Have easy access to the septic tank for pumping. CHECKLIST WHEN PURCHASING A HOME WITH A SEPTIC SYSTEM Ask questions. Age of the system? Size of the system. Any previous problems? Ever backed into the house? When was the septi. tank last pumped? Make sure the septic tank is accessible f pumping. Locate the soil absorption bed and check the grounds for seeping effluent. Have a professional check to make sure the septic system is properly sited. Determine what needs to be done, if any- thing, before you buy the house. IF YOU FOLLOW THESE GUIDELINES AND ASK QUESTIONS BEFORE YOU PURCHASE . OR BUILD A HOME, YOU SHOULD HAVE A NEARLY TROUBLE-FREE SYSTEM.. What Are The Benefits Of Precast Concrete Septic Tanks? • water tight • proven long lite • durability - strength increases with age • locally produced • cold or hot weather placement • will not corode, rust or puncture KNOWING THE COMPONENTS OF A TYPICAL PRIVATE S EWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM SEPTIC TANK The septic tank is a separating tank with 2 functions. The first is to separate solids from liquids. Septic tanks digest and break down solid wastes, 40Z being reduced by anaerobic bacteria. The second function is having liquids get to the drain field (trench, bed or seepage pit) where they are purified. First, liquids from the house go into the septic tank, then to the distribution box, finally reaching the drain field to be purified. Most areas require a two-compartment septic tank. A riser or risers may also be used to bring the tank opening closer to ground level. DRAIN FIELDS/ABSORPTION SYSTEMS After being separated from the solids, the liquids which come from the septic tank effluents are disposed of in the soil absorption system. The effluent is puri- fied by the soil before reaching ground water. You may need a lift pump station if the effluent cannot flow by gravity to the bed. WHAT ARE ALTERNATIVES TO A TYPICAL SYSTEM? A pressure discharge system is an efficient design to dispose of septic tank effluent. This system is designed with 2 tanks for maximum cleaning of waste water. A pump in the final compartment of the second tank forces liquid through perfor- ated pipe in controlled doses, so liquid discharges at the same time. This spreads the liquid evenly, allowing the field to dry out between dosings. This system is economical, non-pollu- ting, low maintenance, and a big help to most problem sites as well. A pressure discharge system is recommended for areas with high perc rates, high water table or unlevel ground. The discharge can be pumped to a leaching field 25'- above the pump level. The field is a closed loop with a lateral tied together. There is no compaction. on trenches. All surface draining is diverted off the leaching field. HOME ' S • • SOMMEMIMOMMOMPUIN SCUM 1:1710.7.1771; y_..c • r - -« - , • 1 'O -C • '. �" 4- �_ . -rte _. • CRC55-SECT1oN Os apESSURE CtSCHARGE LEACHING F GROUND LEVEL , \\' ' SOIL FILL QU_c`:t:.a�r+� 4OR 6' et.veen 4 'PVC, P! E PERFORATED'IVrTH HOLES ON BOTTOM - 244'0 C. HOLDING TANKS A holding tank is not a septic system. Holding tanks wastewater disposal system cannot be installed on the shallow ground water, etc. A holding tank stores all is filled, it must be pumped, and the wastes taken to municipal treatment plant. are used only when an onsite property due to shallow bedrock. household wastes. When the tank an approved disposal field or DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION NO. 5, COLORADO Case No. 94CW81 RULING OF THE REFEREE IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR AMENDED PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION OF: TELLER SPRINGS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, in Garfield County, Colorado The above -entitled Application was filed on April 29, 1994, and was referred to the undersigned as Water Referee for Water Division No. 5, State of Colorado, by the Water Judge of said Court, in accordance with Article 92 of Chapter 37, Colorado Revised Statutes 1993, known as the Water Right Determination and Administration Act of 1969. And the undersigned Referee having made such investigations as are necessary to determine whether or not the statements in the Application are true and, having become fully advised with respect to the subject matter of the Application, does hereby make the following determination and Ruling as the Referee in this matter, to -wit: 1. The statements in the Application are true. 2. Timely Statements of Opposition were filed on behalf of James L. Rose and Union Oil Company of California. 3. Name, address, and telephone number of Applicant: Teller Springs Homeowners Association 1752 County Road 109 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 c/o Leavenworth & Caloia, P.C. 1011 Grand Avenue P. O. Drawer 2030 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 (970) 945-2261 4. Applicant requests that the following claims be approved by the Court: F:\FILES\TEL TELLER. 1 RU June 20, 1995 Ruling of the Referee Case No. 94CW81 FIRST CLAIM APPLICATION FOR AMENDED PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION FOR DECREE ENTERED IN CASE NO. 90CW267 5. Complete Statement of Amendment to Decree entered in Case No. 90CW267, Water Division No. 5, on February 11, 1993. A. Paragraph 8 is amended as follows: F: \FILES \ TELLER. 1 RU June 20, 1995 8. The plan for augmentation is outlined as follows: A. The Teller Springs Subdivision is a 21 -lot subdivision located on the west side of the Roaring Fork River, approximately seven miles south of Glenwood Springs, Colorado. The subdivision encompasses 175 acres (approximately) and consists of 21 single-family residential lots. Domestic in-house water, livestock water, and water for lawn and garden irrigation will be provided through a community water system that will serve the development. The water system is designed with the capacity to serve up to five additional single-family residences, which are in addition to the 21 -lot subdivision. Such additional residences are or will be located near to but not within the subdivision. The amendment is to allow each of the 26 residential lots to include a guest house for a maximum potential total of 52 residential units that may be served by the water supply system. The irrigation acreage for each unit in the previous decree was 6,000 square feet per unit, and the maximum number of livestock was 104. By this amendment, the Applicant will reduce the amount of irrigation and/or reduce the number of livestock to allow for guest units to be added. In order to accommodate one guest unit, a reduction of 875 square feet of irrigated lawn must be made or three livestock must be eliminated, or a combination thereof. The water supply for the development will continue to be diverted from either or both the Teller Springs Well Nos. 1 and 2, as decreed in Case No. 90CW267. B. Diversion requirements for the development and depletions caused by use of water by the development will be recalculated as each guest unit is approved. -2- Ruling of the Referee Case No. 94CW81 C. No change in the yearly amount of depletions of water from the amount decreed in Case No. 90CW267 will occur. However, the monthly distribution will be affected. The following unit depletions will occur. See Table I, below. TABLE I UNIT DEPLETIONS In -House (per unit) Law n (per acre) Livestock (per head) Initial Reading January February March April May June July August September October November December 0.0040 0.0036 0.0040 0.0039 0.0040 0.0039 0.0040 0.0040 0.0039 0.0040 0.0039 0.0040 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.105 0.439 0.535 0.515 0.341 0.289 0.115 0.000 0.000 0.0014 0.0013 0.0014 0.0014 0.0014 0.0014 0.0014 0.0014 0.0014 0.0014 0.0014 0.0014 Annual Total 0.047 2.339 0.0170 F: \Fl LES \TELLER 1 RU June 20. 1995 Such is based upon an in-house unit demand of 280 gallons/residence/day, consumptive use at fifteen percent (15%) for all units (both main residence and guest house), 3.34 acre-feet per acre with a consumptive use of 2.34 AF/acre for irrigation, and livestock at 15 gallons per head per day with 100 percent consumptive use. D. The Applicant will tabulate the total number of units, the total number of livestock, and the total irrigated acres, and will be limited to an annual depletion amount of 11.347 acre-feet as decreed in Case No. 90CW267 based on the consumptive use as identified in Table I, above, for all such -3 1. - Ruling of the Referee Case No. 94CW81 uses. The mix of such uses will be variable and will necessarily be limited by the number of units in existence. SECOND CLAIM APPLICATION FOR AMENDED PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION FOR DECREE ENTERED IN CASE NO. 91CW61 6. Complete Statement of Amendment to Decree entered in Case No. 91CW61, Water Division No. 5. A. The Applicant seeks to add the Teller Springs Extension Ditch No. 1 to the Kaiser and Seivers Ditch, and the Teller Springs Extension Ditch No. 2 to the Kaiser and Seivers Ditch, as those structures and water rights are more fully described in Case No. 93CW274, Water Division No. 5, as water rights to be augmented by the sources as set forth in Case No. 91CW61. These two ditches as applied for in Case No. 93CW274 are applied for to irrigate 80 acres as is the Teller Springs Ditch No. 1, as adjudicated in Case Nos. 90CW266 and 91CW61. B. These three ditches and water rights will be used to irrigate the same acreage within the subdivision, and the Applicant intends that all three ditches and their water rights be augmented by the water rights and in the amounts as set forth in Case No. 91CW61. No change in the consumptive use or total number of irrigated acres will occur. 7. No other changes in the Decrees entered in Case Nos. 91CW61 and 90CW267 are sought. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 8. Timely and adequate notice of the filing of this Application was given as required by law, and this Court has jurisdiction of the parties and subject matter of this action. 9. The requested amendments to the above-described plans for augmentation meet the statutory criteria as set forth in C.R.S. §37-92-103(2), -302(1), and -305(8), as contemplated by law and, if operated and administered in accordance with the conditions hereof, will not cause material injury to any vested water right or decreed conditional water right in the Roaring Fork River and the Colorado River. F: \FILES\TELLER. 1 RU luau 20, 1995 -4- Ruling of the Referee Case No. 94CW81 above. JUDGMENT AND DECREE 10. The requested claims described above are hereby approved as more fully set forth 11. The Applicant, its successors and assigns, shall continue to be bound by the terms and conditions of the decree entered by this Court in Case No. 93CW274 (the decree for the Teller Springs Extention Ditches Nos. 1 and 2 to the Kaiser and Sievers Ditch. 12. The Applicant, its successors, or assigns shall install, operate, and maintain any and all such adequate measuring devices as may be reasonably required by the Division Engineer to facilitate the administration of these plans and to ensure compliance herewith. In addition, the Applicant, or its successors in interest, shall prepare and submit yearly reports with monthly readings to the Division Engineer. 13. It is accordingly ORDERED that this Ruling shall be filed with the Water Clerk subject to judicial review. 14. It is further ORDERED that a copy of this Ruling shall be filed with the appropriate Division Engineer and tie ate Engineer. Dated this % y day of iiel , 1995. Copy of the foreq.oing mailed t! e o Counsel of rocrdv—Water , ,, Mata Engi'Ier---/pate /(� (Y c;epuly Clerk, 41(ar:r ;;;v ro. 5 Water Referee, Water Div 5 No protest was filed in this matter and, accordingly, the foregoing Ruling is confirmed and approved, and is made the Judgment and Decree of this Court; provided, however, that the approval of these amendments in plans for augmentation shall be subject to reconsideration by the Water Judge on the question of injury to the vested rights of others during any hearing commencing in the two years following the construction and occupying of the last residence provided for as described above. Dated this :ice;/ day of 17,7 F: \ FILES \ TELLER. 1 R lune 20, 1995 ,1995. -5- Water Judge March 23,1998 Agreement It is hereby agreed and understood, that Ross Jeffery, for the sum of 10,000 dollars, is releasing two full water taps from the Teller Springs water system to Brent and Roxanne Lough on the above mentioned date. All standard required maintence fees, dues and related expenses shall be paid by Brent and Roxanne Lough for the two taps being released from March 23, 1998 foward. All fees incurred prior to this date shall be the responsibilty of Ross Jeffery. Signe oss Je Signed Brent Lough Signe /., o anne oug WATER LINE EASEMENT AGREEMENT This agreement dated this 16th day of March, 1998, between Jack L. Sylman and Jennifer L. Sylman (owners of Parcel B, Colohan Exemption) AND Brent L. Lough and Roxanne Lough (owners of Parcel A, Colohan Exemption), is for the sole purpose of establishing a water line easement across the entire width of Parcel B, Colohan Exemption for a water line tied into the Teller Springs Water System, to be installed and maintained by the owner of Parcel A, Colohan Exemption, their successors, heirs or assigns of Parcel A or any portion of Parcel A, Colohan Exemption. This water line easement shall run adjacent and parallel to the existing Power Line Easement which is shown on the Colohan Exemption Plat by Schmueser, Gordon, Meyer of Glenwood Springs, Colorado, recorded March 21, 1990 and recorded as reception no. 410851 in the Garfield County records. The water line easement shall be ten (10) feet in width and shall run along the west side of the power line easement referenced above. The water line easement shall be connected to the power line easement so that there is no land between the easements. Upon installation of the waterline or any subsequent maintenance of the waterline, the owner of Parcel A, his successors, heirs or assigns, shall be responsible to repair any damage caused to Parcel B and revegitate with native grasses, all areas damaged by excavation or maintenance. This agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their successors, heirs or assigns and shall run with the land. ./.. ck L. yiman owners of Parc B ennif r L. Sy an Bren Lou r..0 'R.xanne Lo owners of Parcel A STATE OF COLORADO )SS COUNTY OF GARFIELD THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME TH MARCH, 1998 BY BRENT L. LOUGH AND ROXANNE LOUGH. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL: S I,► J. ABOSSI NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO �J My C®tmtff111§10n giros 05/23/2001 `� n� bay >*. 0 ARY PUBLIC HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. 5020 Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 August 14, 1998 Brent and Roxanne Lough 1655 County Road 109 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Fax 970 945-8454 Phone 970 945-7988 Job No. 198 538 Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Test, Proposed Residence, Lot A-2, Lough Subdivision, A subdivision of Parcel A of Colohan Exemption, County Road 109, Garfield County, Colorado. Dear Mr. And Mrs. Lough: As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study and percolation test for foundation and septic disposal designs at the subject site. The study was conducted in accordance with our proposal for geotechnical engineering services to you dated July 15, 1998. The data obtained and our recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions encountered are presented in this report. Proposed Construction: The proposed development will be a single family residence located in the building envelope as shown on Fig. 1. There were no building plans at the time of our study. Foundation loadings for a wood frame residence typical of the area are assumed to be relatively light. Cut depths for the residence are assumed to be up to one level, about 10 feet. The septic disposal system is proposed to be located downhill from the residence. When building conditions and foundation loadings have been developed, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in this report. Site Conditions: Lot A-2 is located along the west side of County Road 109 about 11/2 miles south of its Junction with Road 154. The ground surface in the building area slopes strongly down to the east at grades of 10 to 15%. Further to the west is a steep shale bluff of Eagle Valley Evaporite. Several small dry drainages that originate from the steep slope cross the area. The lot is vegetated with grass and sage with juniper and pinion trees in the higher elevation above the lot. Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by observing two exploratory pits in the general building area and one profile pit in the septic disposal area at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. The logs of the pits are presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, below about '/ foot of topsoil, consist of mixed silt and sand with variable gravel content. Results of consolidation testing performed on relatively undisturbed samples of the silt soils, presented on Figs. 3 & 4, indicate relatively low compressibility under existing low moisture conditions and light loading and a moderate to high collapse potential (settlement under constant load) when wetted. Results of a gradation analysis performed on samples of Brent and Roxanne Lough August 14, 1998 Page 2 the more gravelly soils (minus 3 inch fraction) obtained from the site are presented on Fig. 5. No free water was observed in the pits and the soils were relatively dry. Geologic Conditions: The site is underlain by Pennsylvanian Age Eagle Valley Evaporite bedrock. The Evaporite contains gypsum deposits and dissolution of the gypsum under certain conditions can cause sinkholes and localized areas of subsidence. Sinkholes were not observed in the immediate area of the subject lot nor were indications of voids encountered in the exploration pits. Based on our present knowledge of the site, it cannot be said for certain that sinkholes will not develop. However, in our opinion, the risk of ground subsidence throughout the service life of the project is low. The site is located on a strongly sloping bench formed by coalescing debris fan deposits from relatively small ephemeral drainages. Due to their small size, the potential for debris flow from the steep slope located to the west of Lot A-2 is considered low but the owner should be made aware of the potential. Surface drainage and grading design typically used for this type of terrain should be provided to direct potential runoff around the development. Foundation Recommendations: The subsoils encountered at the site are highly compressible when wetted and could result in building settlement and distress. Considering the subsoil conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed construction, spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil and designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 800 psf can be used for support of the proposed residence. The magnitude of post -construction differential settlement will depend on the depth and extent of wetting but could easily be 3 inches or more. Precautions should be taken to prevent wetting below the structure. The foundation should consist of continuous heavily reinforced and interconnected foundation walls rather than isolated column pads to help limit the effects of some differential settlement. Footings should be a minimum width of 20 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. Loose disturbed soils encountered at the foundation bearing level within the excavation should be removed to expose the undisturbed natural soils. The exposed subgrade should then be moistened and compacted. Two to 3 feet of on-site soil compacted to at least 95 % standard Proctor density could be provided below the footing bearing level to further help reduce the settlement risk. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 36 inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation walls should be heavily reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 15 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcf for the on-site H -P GEOTECH Brent and Roxanne Lough August 14, 1998 Page 3 soil as backfill. Floor Slabs: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. The soils could settle when wetted, similar to that described above. To reduce the effects of some differential settlement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of free -draining gravel should be placed beneath basement level slabs to facilitate drainage. This material should consist of minus 2 inch aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95 % of maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock. Underdrain System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration, it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such as retaining walls and basement areas, be protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an underdrain system. Shallow crawlspace area should not need an underdrain provided there is proper backfill placement and surface slope away from the building. The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of 2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 11 feet deep. An impervious membrane such as 20 or 30 PVC should be placed beneath the drain gravel in a trough shape and attached to the foundation wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing soils. Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed: H -P GEOTECH Brent and Roxanne Lough August 14, 1998 Page 4 1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be avoided during construction. 2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and compacted to at least 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in pavement and slab areas and to at least 90 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in landscape areas. Free -draining wall backfill should be capped with about 2 feet of the on-site, finer graded soils to reduce surface water infiltration. 3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement and walkway areas. A swale and berm should be provided uphill to direct storm water and site runoff around the residence. 4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. 5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at least 10 feet from the building. Preferably, xeriscape should be used to limit potential wetting due to irrigation. Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted on August 7, 1998 to evaluate the feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. One profile pit and three percolation holes were dug at the locations shown on Fig. 1. The test holes (nominal 12 inch diameter by 12 inch deep) were hand dug at the bottom of shallow backhoe pits and were soaked with water one day prior to testing. The soils exposed in the percolation holes are similar to those exposed in the Profile Pit shown on Fig. 2 and consist of gravelly silt and sand. The percolation test results are presented in Table II. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered and the percolation test results, the tested area should be suitable for a conventional infiltration septic disposal system. Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the locations indicated on Fig. 1, the assumed type of construction and our experience in the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made. H -P GEOTECH Brent and Roxanne Lough August 14, 1998 Page 5 This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during construction to review and monitor the implementation of our recommendations, and to verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. / \''''"-V Steven L. Pawlak, P. SLP/ksm attachments cc: Land Design Partnership - Attn: Ron Liston H -P GEOTECH 6095 6090 6085 6075. APPROXIMATE SCALE 1"=50' 1 1 ACCESS EASEMENT LOT A-1 l\ 6100 - LOT BOUNDARIES _____ _,6105 __-6100 /r/ / \\ ��----- - - - 1 �/ ) r - • BUILDING 1 /1 ( PIT 2 ENVELOPE 6100 / \ r r \ 1 LOT A-2 , �� \� _--____l - r _-_------ 1 rPIT 1 1 I f\ 1 1 \ 1 P 3 PROFILE 1 r1'--- P 1 1 I r 1 P2 1 1 1 J ,,I 1 _ _ _ 1 6080 r -__-_ - r _�- r r - - 1 1 1 6095 - _J 6075 COUNTY ROAD 109 198 538 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS GEOTECHNICAL, INC. AND PERCOLATION TEST HOLES • 608- 0 6090 6085 It Fig. 1 198 538 0 5 10 LEGEND: rte/ PIT 1 PIT 2 ELEV. = 6088' /isWC=2.8 DD=82 .. -200=82 1 WC=2.0 n 1+4=44 _ 1-2027 -0= 'moo• PROFILE PIT ELEV. = 6098' ELEV. = 6086' WC=2.3 DD=98 -200=76 1+4=54 _ _ -200=27 TOPSOIL; sandy silt, organic, medium stiff to stiff, slightly moist, dark brown. SILT (ML); sandy, gravelly, medium stiff, slightly moist. light brown. 0 5 10 SAND AND SILT (SM—ML); gravelly, medium stiff, slightly moist, light brown, angular rock fragments. GRAVEL AND SAND (GM—SM); silty, medium dense, slightly moist, light brown. 2" Diameter hand driven liner sample. I Disturbed bulk sample. NOTES: 1. Exploratory pits were observed on August 6 and 7, 1998 with a backhoe. 2. Locations of exploratory pits were measured approximately by pacing from features on the site plan provided. 3. Elevations of exploratory pits were obtained by interplolation between contours on the site plan provided. 4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was observed in the pits. Fluctuations in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content ( % ) DD = Dry Density ( pcf ) +4 = Percent retained on No. 4 sieve —200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS Fig. 2 Compression 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0.1 .0 0 Moisture Content = 2.8 percent Dry Density Weight = 82 pcf Sample of: Sandy Silt From: Pit 1 at 2 Feet 0 Compression upon wetting 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 198 538 HEPWORTH — PAWLAK SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 3 GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Compression Moisture Content = 2.3 percent Dry Density Weight = 98 pcf Sample of: Sandy Silt From: Pit 2 at 6 Feet 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Compression upon wettin g 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 198 538 HEPWORTH - PAWLAK SWELL -CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 4 GEOTECHNICAL, INC. [• RCENT PASSIN' ' ERCENT PASSIN HYDROMETER ANALYSIS TINE READINGS 24 HR. 7 HR 45 MIN. 15 MIN. 60 MIN.19 MIN. 4 MIN. 1 MIN. 1200 100 90 80 70 50 50 40 30 20 10 0 U.S. STANDARD SERIES 00 11 SEW ANALYSIS CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 6 f6 143!8-1 /2.3 4- 11 /2' 0 1 1 11111110 .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .0.37 .074 .150 •300 .600 1.18 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 samaillkiaCHIL- 90 100 2.36 4.75 9.512.5 19.0 37.5 76.2 12752 203 IN MILLIMETERS CLAY TO SILT FINE SAND 1 MEDIUM GRAVEL IGOARSE I FINE 1 COARSE COBBLES GRAVEL 44 % LIQUID LIMIT SAND 29 SAMPLE OF: Silty Sandy Gravel SILT AND CLAY 27 % PLASTICITY INDEX FROM: Pit 1 at 4 to 6 Feet HYDROMETER ANALYSIS TME READINGS 24 HR. 7 HR 45 MIN. 15 MIN. 60 MIN.19 MIN. 4 MIN. 1 MIN 100 90 60 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 .001 1200 00 U.S. STANDARD SERIES 150 6 SIEVE ANALYSIS CLEAR 50UARE OPENINGS 14 3911/2-3/4• 11(2• r 5-6- 8.0 1 E F 1 1 .002 L .005 .009 .019 CLAY TO SILT GRAVEL 54 % LIQUID LIMIT SAMPLE OF: Silty Sandy Gravel { .037 .074 .150 .300 .600 1.16 2.36 4.75 9.512.519.0 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS FINE SAND l MEDIUM SAND 19 % .I 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 37.5 76.2 12752 203 GRAVEL ICOARSE FINEI COARSE COBBLES SILT AND CLAY 27 % PLASTICITY INDEX FROM: Pit 2 at 7 to 8 Feet ' ERCENT RETAIN 11 198 538 HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. GRADATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 5 O Z 0 SUMMARY OF SOIL OR BEDROCK TYPE Sandy Silt Silty Sandy Gravel Sandy Silt Silty Sandy Gravel UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (PSF) PERCENT ATTERBERG LIMITS PASSING LIQUID PLASTIC NO. 200 LIMIT INDEX SIEVE 196) (%) 82 27 cso 27 j NATURAL GRADATION DRY GRAVEL SAND DENSITY 1961 1%1 (pcf) a) N 44 LO N 00 00 0) CO N O N CO N N CO T' 00 N HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. TABLE II ULTS JOB NO. 198 538 Note: Percolation holes were dug and soaked on August 6, 1998. The percolation tests w August 7, 1998. HOLE NO. HOLE DEPTH (INCHES) LENGTH OF INTERVAL (MIN) WATER DEPTH AT START OF INTERVAL (INCHES) WATER DEPTH AT END OF INTERVAL (INCHES) DROP IN WATER LEVEL (INCHES) AVERAGE PERCOLATION RATE (MIN./INCH) P-1 51 15 13 1/4 7 1/4 6 5 10 7 1/4 5 1/2 1 3/4 5 refill 12 1/4 10 1/4 2 10 1/4 8 3/4 1 1/2 8 3/4 7 1/2 1 1/4 7 1/2 6 1/2 1 refill 10 1/2 9 1/4 1 1/4 9 1/4 8 1 1/4 8 7 1 P-2 59 15 10 5 refill 10 3/4 6 3/4 4 7 6 3/4 4 1/4 2 1/2 11 10 1 10 8 3/4 1 1/4 8 3/4 8 3/4 8 7 1/4 3/4 7 1/4 6 1/2 3/4 6 1/2 5 3/4 3/4 5 3/4 5 3/4 P-3 44 15 10 5 refill 12 7 1/2 4 1/2 7 1/2 5 3/4 1 3/4 12 10 3/4 1 1/4 10 3/4 9 1/4 1 1/2 9 1/4 8 1/4 1 8 1/4 7 1/4 1 7 1/4 6 1/4 1 6 1/4 5 1/4 1 5 1/4 4 1/2 3/4 6 Note: Percolation holes were dug and soaked on August 6, 1998. The percolation tests w August 7, 1998. SCS SOIL TYPE DESCRIPTIONS & TABLES 108—Uracca, moist-Mergel complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes, extremely stony. This map unit is on alluvial fans and valley side slopes. Elevation is 6,800 to 8,400 feet. The average annual precipitation is 16 to 19 inches, the average annual air temperature is 40 to 43 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 75 to 95 days. This unit is about 50 percent Uracca soil and 40 percent Mergel soil. Included in this unit are small areas of soils that are similar to the Uracca and Mergel soils but have a thicker surface layer and a lower content of coarse fragments. Included areas make up about 10 percent of the total acreage. The Uracca soil is deep and well drained. It formed in alluvium derived dominantly from mixed igneous and metamorphic material. About 3 to 15 percent of the surface is covered with boulders, stones, cobbles, and gravel. Typically, the surface layer is brown cobbly sandy loam about 3 inches thick. The upper 5 inches of the subsoil is cobbly sandy loam. The lower 7 inches is very cobbly sandy clay loam. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is extremely cobbly loamy sand. The content of coarse fragments ranges from 35 to 85 percent, by volume, in a major part of the surface layer and subsoil. Permeability is moderately rapid in the Uracca soil. Available water capacity is low. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is slight. The Mergel soil is deep and well drained. It formed in glacial outwash. About 3 to 30 percent of the surface is covered with boulders, stones, cobbles, and gravel. Typically, the surface layer is grayish brown cobbly loam about 8 inches thick. The upper 12 inches of the substratum is very cobbly sandy loam. The lower part to a depth of 60 inches is extremely stony sandy loam. The content of coarse fragments ranges from 35 to 80 percent, by volume. Permeability is moderate in the Mergel soil. Available water capacity is low. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of water erosion is slight. This unit is used mainly for pasture or as rangeland. It also is used for homesite development or limited rock quarrying. The potential plant community on this unit is mainly Letterman neediegrass, bluebunch wheatgrass, Indian ricegrass, Saskatoon serviceberry, and antelope bitterbrush. Other plants that characterize this site are western wheatgrass, mountain big sagebrush, and scattered Gambel oak. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 1,200 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, mountain big sagebrush, Kentucky bluegrass, cheatgrass, and annual weeds increase in abundance. The suitability of this unit for range seeding is poor. The main limitations are the stones and boulders on the surface. Suitable management practices include proper range use, deferred grazing, and rotation grazing. Aerial spraying is suitable for brush management. Because of the hazard of seepage, this unit is limited as a site for livestock watering ponds and other water impoundments. If this unit is used for hay and pasture, the main limitation is the low available water capacity. Frequent irrigation is needed. Applications of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer improve the growth of forage plants. Proper stocking rates, pasture rotation, and restricted grazing during wet periods help to keep the pasture in good condition and protect the soil from erosion. Irrigation water can be applied by corrugation, sprinkler, and flooding methods. Pipe, ditch lining, or drop structures in irrigation ditches facilitate irrigation and help to control erosion. If this unit is used for homesite development, the main limitations are the large stones and boulders on and below the surface. Population growth has resulted in increased construction of homes in areas of this unit. Preserving the existing plant cover during construction helps to control erosion. The pebbles and cobbles in disturbed areas should be removed if the site is landscaped, particularly in areas used for lawns. The effluent from septic tank absorption fields can surface it downslope areas and thus create a health hazard. If the density of housing is moderate or high, community sewage systems are needed to prevent the contamination of water supplies resulting from seepage from onsite sewage disposal systems. Areas adjacent tc hillsides are occasionally affected by runoff, which may be accompanied by the movement of rock debris. This map unit is in capability subclass Vle, irrigated and nonirrigated. It is in the Stony Loam range site. • T 65 i /J SCS SOILS MAP Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado 189 TABLE 9. --WILDLIFE HABITAT --Continued Soil name and map symbol Potential for habitat elements I Potential as habitat for -- 1 Grain I I Wild 1 1 and 'Grasses 1 herba-IConif- I seed 1 and 1 ceousl erous I crops 'legumes 1 plantslplants 1 I Open- 1 Wood - Shrubs i WetlandlShallow I land 1 land plants I water I wild- 1 wild- ' areas I life 1 life 1 Range - Wetland' land wild- I wild- life 1 life 101*: Pinelli 102*: Tanna Pinelli 103*: Tanna Pinelli 104*: Torriorthents Camborthids Rock outcrop. 105*: Torriorthents Rock outcrop. 106*: Tridell Brownsto 107*: Uracca Mergel Poor Poor Fair Fair Fair (Fair Poor Poor (Fair Poor Poor Fair Poor Poor Fair Poor Very (Fair poor. 1 Poor Very (Fair poor. Poor Very Fair poor. Very Very Poor poor. poor. 1 Very Very (Fair poor. poor. 1 Very Very Poor poor. poor. Poor Fair Fair Very poor. Poor Poor Fair Poor Very Poor poor. Fair Very Very Fair poor. poor. Fair Very Very Poor poor. poor. Fair Very Very Poor poor. poor. Fair Very Very Poor poor. poor. Poor Poor Very Poor poor. Poor Poor Very Poor poor. Poor Poor Fair Fair Fair Poor Very poor. Very poor. Poor Very poor. Very poor. Very poor. Very poor. Poor Very poor. Poor Very poor. Fair Poor Poor Fair Very poor. Very poor. Very poor. Very poor. Very poor. Very poor. Very poor. Poor Very poor. Very poor. Very poor. Very poor. Fair. Fair. Fair. Fair. Fair. Fair. Poor. Fair. Poor. Fair. Poor. Fair. 108*, 109*, 110*: I Uracca (Very I poor. Mergel (Poor Very poor. Fair Poor Fair Poor Fair Fair IVery (Very I poor. I poor. Very (Very poor. 1 poor. Fair IVery I poor. Poor. Fair. 111 IVery Vandamore 1 poor. 112 (Very Woodhall I poor. 1 Very poor. Very poor. See footnote at end of table. Fair Fair IFair IVery (Very I poor. I poor. I I I Poor IFair (Very (Very 1 I poor. I poor. I I I Poor Poor IVery I poor. (Very I poor. Fair. Fair. Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado 199 TABLE 10. --BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT --Continued Soil name and map symbol Shallow excavations Dwellings without basements Dwellings with basements Small commercial buildings I I Local roads I and streets I Lawns and I landscaping 106*: Brownsto 107*: Uracca Mergel Severe: cutbanks cave, slope. Severe: cutbanks cave, large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: large stones. Severe: large stones. (Severe: I slope. (Severe: I large stones. !Severe: I large stones. !Severe: I large stones, I slope. (Severe: I large stones, I droughty. IModerate: I large stones, I droughty. 108*: Uracca Mergel Severe: (Severe: cutbanks cave,large stones. large stones. 1 Severe: large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope, large stones. I (Severe: 1 large stones. 1 (Severe: I large stones. 1 [Severe: 1 large stones, I droughty. (Moderate: I large stones, I droughty, 1 slope. 109*, 110*: Uracca Mergel 111 Vandamore 112 Woodhall 113 Woosley 114 Yamo 115 Yamo 116 Yamo 117*: Yeljack Severe: cutbanks cave, large stones, slope. Severe: large stones, slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: depth to rock, large stones, slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: cutbanks cave. Severe: cutbanks cave. Severe: cutbanks cave, slope. Severe: slope. See footnote at end of table. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Slight Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope, large stones. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Slight Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Slight Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. (Severe: I slope, 1 large stones. (Severe: 1 slope, I large stones. !Severe: 1 slope. !Severe: I slope, I large stones. 1 (Severe: I slope. (Slight (Moderate: 1 slope. !Severe: I slope. !Severe: I low strength, slope. (Severe: I large stones, 1 droughty, I slope. !Severe: I slope. !Severe: I slope. (Severe: 1 slope, I large stones. 1 (Severe: I slope. (Slight. 'Moderate: I slope. !Severe: I slope. (Severe: I slope. Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado TABLE 11. --SANITARY FACILITIES --Continued 209 Soil name and map symbol Septic tank absorption fields Sewage lagoon areas Trench 1 Area sanitary 1 sanitary landfill 1 landfill Daily cover for landfill :03*: Binel l i :04*: Torriorthents Camborthids Rock outcrop. 105*: Torriorthents Rock outcrop. 106*: Tridell Brownsto 107*: Uracca Mergel Severe: percs slowly, slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Variable Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: poor filter, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: poor filter, large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Variable Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: seepage, slope, large stones. Severe: seepage, slope, large stones. Severe: seepage, large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Variable Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: seepage, large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Variable Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: seepage. Slight Poor: slope. Poor: depth to rock, small stones, slope. Variable. Poor: depth to rock, small stones, slope. Poor: slope. Poor: small stones, slope. Poor: seepage, large stones. Poor: large stones. 108*: Uracca Mergel Severe: poor filter, large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: seepage, slope, large stones. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: Severe: seepage, I seepage. large stones. 1 Severe: (Moderate: large stones. 1 slope. Poor: seepage, large stones. Poor: large stones. 1C9*, 110*: Uracca Mergel Severe: poor filter, slope, large stones. Severe: slope, large stones. See footnote at end of table. Severe: seepage, slope, large stones. Severe: seepage, slope, large stones. Severe: Severe: slope, 1 slope, large stones. 1 large stones. Severe: seepage, slope. Severe: slope. Poor: seepage, large stones, slope. Poor: large stones, slope. Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado TABLE 13. --WATER MANAGEMENT --Continued Soil name and map symbol Limitations for -- Pond reservoir areas Features affecting -- 229 Embankments, I dikes, and I Drainage I Irrigation levees 1 I Terraces I and I diversions I Grassed waterways 103*: 'anna ?inel l i :04*: Torriorthents---- Camborthids Rock outcrop. :05*: Torriorthents---- Rock outcrop. 106*: Tridell Brownsto 107*: Uracca Mergel Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Variable Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: seepage, slope. Severe: seepage, slope. Severe: seepage. Moderate: seepage, slope. Severe: thin layer. Severe: piping. Severe: piping. Variable Severe: piping. Severe: large stones. Severe: seepage, large stones. Severe: seepage, large stones. Severe: piping, large stones. Deep to water Deep to water Deep to water Variable Deep to water Deep to water Deep to water Deep to water Deep to water Slope, percs depth Slope I I I I (Slope, IToo arid, slowly, I depth to rock,1 slope, to rock.I erodes easily.I erodes easily. (Too arid, I slope, I erodes easily. IToo arid, I large stones, I slope. (Variable. 'Too arid, stones, I large stones, to rock.) slope. (Too arid, stones. I large stones, I slope. IToo arid, stones. I large stones, I slope. stones---ILarge stones, I droughty. Slope, droughty, depth to rock. Variable ISlope, I erodes easily. ISlope, I large stones, I depth to rock. (Variable Slope, ISlope, droughty, I large depth to rock.) depth ISlope, I large Large stones, droughty, slope. Slope, large stones. Large stones, droughty, slope. Large stones, droughty, slope. ISlope, I large ILarge I I I I ILarge stones---ILarge stones, I droughty. I I 108*, 109*, 110*: I Uracca (Severe: I seepage, I slope. Mergel Severe: slope. Severe: seepage, large stones. (Severe: I piping, I large stones. Deep to water Deep to water Large stones, droughty, slope. Large stones, droughty, slope. ISlope, I large stones. ISlope, I large stones. 111 Vandamore 112 Woodhall 113 Woosley Severe: seepage, slope. Severe: slope. (Severe: I slope. See footnote at end of table. (Severe: I seepage. (Severe: I piping, I large stones. 'Severe: I slope. Deep to water Deep to water Deep to water ILarge stones, I slope, I droughty. ILarge stones, I slope, I droughty. Droughty, ISlope, depth to rock,1 large slope. I depth Large stones, depth tc rock, slope. Depth to rock, slope. ILarge stones, stones, I slope, to rock.I droughty. ILarge stones, I slope, I depth to rock. ISlope, I depth to rock. ISlope, I large stones, I depth to rock. ISlope, I depth to rock. /OOfG LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY BRENT L. LOUGH and ROXANNE LOUGH, as Joint Tenants C/O VICKI LEE GREEN & ASSOC. 930 GRAND AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 Dear Customer: Land Title Guarantee Company is pleased to provide you with your Title Insurance Policy. This valuable document insures good and marketable title to your property. Please review the policy in its entirety. We at Land Title Guarantee Company believe in providing you, our customer, with a quality product which will serve your needs. In the event you do find any discrepancy, or if you have any questions or comments regarding your final policy, please contact the following department and we will gladly handle any request you may have as efficiently and quickly as possible. TITLE DEPARTMENT TELEPHONE # (303)945-2610 FAX #(303)945-4784 PLEASE REFER TO ORDER NO. GW223570 Should you decide to sell the property described in Schedule A, or if you are required to furnish a new title commitment for mortgage purposes, you may be entitled to a credit toward future title insurance expenses. Land Title Guarantee Company will retain a copy of the enclosed title policy, and in the event you do need future services, we will be in a position to again serve you promptly and efficiently. Thank you very much for giving Land Title Guarantee Company the opportunity to serve you. Form AO 4/95 Policy No. LTHH223570 Order No. GW223570 Amount $152,000.00 SCHEDULE A Address VACANT LAND 1. Policy Date: March 17, 1998 at 5:00 P.M. 2. Name of Insured: BRENT L. LOUGH and ROXANNE LOUGH, as Joint Tenants 3. The estate or interest in the land described in this Schedule and which is covered by this policy is: A Fee Simple 4 Title to the estate or interest covered by this policy at the date hereof is vested in: BRENT L. LOUGH and ROXANNE LOUGH, as Joint Tenants 5 The land referred to in this policy is situated in GARFIELD County, Colorado, and is described as follows: A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN LOTS 6 AND 14 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHENCE THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 12 BEARS N. 01 DEGREES 45'44" E. 2460.82 FEET; THENCE S. 09 DEGREES 22'32" E. 457.94 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF A COUNTY ROAD; THENCE S. 88 DEGREES 02'40" W. 779.22 FEET; THENCE N. 17 DEGREES 29'11" E. 402.54 FEET; THENCE N. 80 DEGREES 47'53" E. 590.81 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO KNOWN AS: PARCEL A COLOHAN EXEMPTION ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED MARCH 21, 1990 AS RECEPTION NO. 410851. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY Page 1 This Policy valid only if Schedule B is attached. Form AO 4/95 Order No. GW223570 Policy No. LTHH223570 SCHEDULE B LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY Page 2 This Policy valid only if Schedule B is attached. Form AO 4/95 Order No. GW223570 Policy No. LTHH223570 SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not ,shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. TAXES FOR 1998 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS ONLY, NOT YET DUE AND PAYABLE. 6. DEED OF TRUST DATED March 16, 1998, FROM BRENT L. LOUGH and ROXANNE LOUGH, as Joint Tenants TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF GARFIELD COUNTY FOR THE USE OF ALPINE BANK TO SECURE THE SUM OF $100,000.00 RECORDED March 17, 1998, IN BOOK 1058 AT PAGE 109 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 521949. 7. THE EFFECT OF INCLUSIONS IN ANY GENERAL OR SPECIFIC WATER CONSERVANCY, FIRE PROTECTION, SOIL CONSERVATION OR OTHER DISTRICT OR INCLUSION IN ANY WATER SERVICE OR STREET IMPROVEMENT AREA. 8. WATER RIGHTS OR CLAIMS TO WATER RIGHTS. 9. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED June 03, 1953, IN BOOK 269 AT PAGE 307. 10. EXCEPTING AND RESERVING, ALSO, TO THE UNITED STATES, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT OF AUGUST 1, 1946 (60 STAT., 755), ALL URANIUM, THORIUM OR ANY OTHER MATERIAL WHICH IS OR MAY BE DETERMINED TO BE PECULIARLY ESSENTIAL TO THE PRODUCTION OF FISSIONABLE MATERIALS, WHETHER OR NOT OF COMMERCIAL VALUE, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF THE UNITED STATES THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES AT ANY TIME TO ENTER UPON THE LAND AND PROSPECT FOR, MINE, AND REMOVE THE SAME AS RESERVED IN PATENT RECORDED JUNE 5, 1953 IN BOOK 269 AT PAGE 307. 11. RESERVING UNTO THE UNITED STATES, ITS PERMITTEE OR LICENSEE, THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON, OCCUPY AND USE, ANY PART OR ALL OF LOTS 6, 13, 14, AND 15 OF SAID SECTION 12, FOR THE PURPOSES PROVIDED IN THE ACT OF JUNE 10, 1920 (41 STAT. 1063), AND SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS OF SECTION 24 OF SAID ACT AS AMENDED BY THE ACT OF AUGUST 26, 1935 (40 STAT. 846) AS CONTAINED IN PATENT RECORDED JUNE 3, 1953 IN BOOK 269 AT PAGE 307. Page 3 Form AO 4/95 Order No. GW223570 Policy No. LTHH223570 SCHEDULE B 12. ALL OIL AND GAS AND MINERALS OF EVERY KIND IN AND UNDER THE LAND AS RESERVED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED MAY 10, 1966 IN BOOK 376 AT PAGE 172, AND ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF OR INTERESTS THEREIN. 13. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, WHICH CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, BUT OMITTING RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED May 10, 1966, IN BOOK 376 AT PAGE 172. 14. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY AS GRANTED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED APRIL 28, 1972 IN BOOK 430 AT PAGE 131. 15. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 90-34 RECORDED March 20, 1990 IN BOOK 774 AT PAGE 847. 16. EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND OTHER MATTERS AS SHOWN ON THE COLOHAN EXEMPTION PLAT RECORDED MARCH 21, 1990 AS RECEPTION NO. 410851. 17. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY FOR ROADS, STREETS, HIGHWAYS, DITCHES, CANALS, PIPELINES AND UTILITY LINES AS CONSTRUCTED AND IN PLACE. Page 4 EXHIBIT A A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN LOTS 6 AND 14 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHENCE THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 12 BEARS N. 01 DEGREES 45'44" E. 2460.82 FEET; THENCE S. 09 DEGREES 22'32" E. 457.94 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF A COUNTY ROAD; THENCE S. 88 DEGREES 02'40" W. 779.22 FEET; THENCE N. 17 DEGREES 29'11" E. 402.54 FEET; THENCE N. 80 DEGREES 47'53" E. 590.81 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO KNOWN AS: PARCEL A COLOHAN EXEMPTION ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED MARCH 21, 1990 AS RECEPTION NO. 410851. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO ATTACHMENT A TITLE POLICY LEGAL DESCRIPTION LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY BRENT L. LOUGH and ROXANNE LOUGH, as Joint Tenants C/O VICKI LEE GREEN & ASSOC. 930 GRAND AVENUE GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 81601 Dear Customer: Land Title Guarantee Company is pleased to provide you with your Title Insurance Policy. This valuable document insures good and marketable title to your property. Please review the policy in its entirety. We at Land Title Guarantee Company believe in providing you, our customer, with a quality product which will serve your needs. In the event you do find any discrepancy, or if you have any questions or comments regarding your final policy, please contact the following department and we will gladly handle any request you may have as efficiently and quickly as possible. TITLE DEPARTMENT TELEPHONE # (303)945-2610 FAX #(303)945-4784 PLEASE REFER TO ORDER NO. GW223570 Should you decide to sell the property described in Schedule A, or if you are required to furnish a new title commitment for mortgage purposes, you may be entitled to a credit toward future title insurance expenses. Land Title Guarantee Company will retain a copy of the enclosed title policy, and in the event you do need future services, we will be in a position to again serve you promptly and efficiently. Thank you very much for giving Land Title Guarantee Company the opportunity to serve you. Form AO 4/95 Policy No. LTHH223570 Order No. GW223570 Amount $152,000.00 SCHEDULE A Address VACANT LAND 1. Policy Date: March 17, 1998 at 5:00 P.M. 2. Name of Insured: BRENT L. LOUGH and ROXANNE LOUGH, as Joint Tenants 3. The estate or interest in the land described in this Schedule and which is covered by this policy is: A Fee Simple 4. Title to the estate or interest covered by this policy at the date hereof is vested in: BRENT L. LOUGH and ROXANNE LOUGH, as Joint Tenants 5. The land referred to in this policy is situated in GARFIELD County, Colorado, and is described as follows: A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN LOTS 6 AND 14 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHENCE THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 12 BEARS N. 01 DEGREES 45'44" E. 2460.82 FEET; THENCE S. 09 DEGREES 22'32" E. 457.94 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF A COUNTY ROAD; THENCE S. 88 DEGREES 02'40" W. 779.22 FEET; THENCE N. 17 DEGREES 29'11" E. 402.54 FEET; THENCE N. 80 DEGREES 47'53" E. 590.81 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO KNOWN AS: PARCEL A COLOHAN EXEMPTION ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED MARCH 21, 1990 AS RECEPTION NO. 410851. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY Page 1 This Policy valid only if Schedule B is attached. Form AO 4/95 Order No. GW223570 Policy No. LTHH223570 SCHEDULE B LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY Page 2 This Policy valid only if Schedule B is attached. Form AO 4/95 Order No. GW223570 Policy No. LTHH223570 SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. TAXES FOR 1998 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS ONLY, NOT YET DUE AND PAYABLE. 6. DEED OF TRUST DATED March 16, 1998, FROM BRENT L. LOUGH and ROXANNE LOUGH, as Joint Tenants TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF GARFIELD COUNTY FOR THE USE OF ALPINE BANK TO SECURE THE SUM OF $100,000.00 RECORDED March 17, 1998, IN BOOK 1058 AT PAGE 109 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 521949. 7. THE EFFECT OF INCLUSIONS IN ANY GENERAL OR SPECIFIC WATER CONSERVANCY, FIRE PROTECTION, SOIL CONSERVATION OR OTHER DISTRICT OR INCLUSION IN ANY WATER SERVICE OR STREET IMPROVEMENT AREA. 8. WATER RIGHTS OR CLAIMS TO WATER RIGHTS. 9. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED June 03, 1953, IN BOOK 269 AT PAGE 307. 10. EXCEPTING AND RESERVING, ALSO, TO THE UNITED STATES, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT OF AUGUST 1, 1946 (60 STAT., 755), ALL URANIUM, THORIUM OR ANY OTHER MATERIAL WHICH IS OR MAY BE DETERMINED TO BE PECULIARLY ESSENTIAL TO THE PRODUCTION OF FISSIONABLE MATERIALS, WHETHER OR NOT OF COMMERCIAL VALUE, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF THE UNITED STATES THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES AT ANY TIME TO ENTER UPON THE LAND AND PROSPECT FOR, MINE, AND REMOVE THE SAME AS RESERVED IN PATENT RECORDED JUNE 5, 1953 IN BOOK 269 AT PAGE 307. 11. RESERVING UNTO THE UNITED STATES, ITS PERMITTEE OR LICENSEE, THE RIGHT TO ENTER UPON, OCCUPY AND USE, ANY PART OR ALL OF LOTS 6, 13, 14, AND 15 OF SAID SECTION 12, FOR THE PURPOSES PROVIDED IN THE ACT OF JUNE 10, 1920 (41 STAT. 1063), AND SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS OF SECTION 24 OF SAID ACT AS AMENDED BY THE ACT OF AUGUST 26, 1935 (40 STAT. 846) AS CONTAINED IN PATENT RECORDED JUNE 3, 1953 IN BOOK 269 AT PAGE 307. Page 3 Form AO 4/95 Order No. GW223570 Policy No. LTHH223570 SCHEDULE B 12. ALL OIL AND GAS AND MINERALS OF EVERY KIND IN AND UNDER THE LAND AS RESERVED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED MAY 10, 1966 IN BOOK 376 AT PAGE 172, AND ANY AND ALL ASSIGNMENTS THEREOF OR INTERESTS THEREIN. 13. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, WHICH CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, BUT OMITTING RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED May 10, 1966, IN BOOK 376 AT PAGE 172. 14. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY AS GRANTED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED APRIL 28, 1972 IN BOOK 430 AT PAGE 131. 15. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 90-34 RECORDED March 20, 1990 IN BOOK 774 AT PAGE 847. 16. EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND OTHER MATTERS AS SHOWN ON THE COLOHAN EXEMPTION PLAT RECORDED MARCH 21, 1990 AS RECEPTION NO. 410851. 17. EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY FOR ROADS, STREETS, HIGHWAYS, DITCHES, CANALS, PIPELINES AND UTILITY LINES AS CONSTRUCTED AND IN PLACE. Page 4 EXHIBIT A A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN LOTS 6 AND 14 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 89 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHENCE THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 12 BEARS N. 01 DEGREES 45'44" E. 2460.82 FEET; THENCE S. 09 DEGREES 22'32" E. 457.94 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF A COUNTY ROAD; THENCE S. 88 DEGREES 02'40" W. 779.22 FEET; THENCE N. 17 DEGREES 29'11" E. 402.54 FEET; THENCE N. 80 DEGREES 47'53" E. 590.81 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO KNOWN AS: PARCEL A COLOHAN EXEMPTION ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED MARCH 21, 1990 AS RECEPTION NO. 410851. COUNTY OF GARFIELD STATE OF COLORADO ATTACHMENT B WATER DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION NO. 5, COLORADO Case No. 94CW81 RULING OF THE REFEREE IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR AMENDED PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION OF: TELLER SPRINGS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, in Garfield County, Colorado The above -entitled Application was filed on April 29, 1994, and was referred to the undersigned as Water Referee for Water Division No. 5, State of Colorado, by the Water Judge of said Court, in accordance with Article 92 of Chapter 37, Colorado Revised Statutes 1993, known as the Water Right Determination and Administration Act of 1969. And the undersigned Referee having made such investigations as are necessary to determine whether or not the statements in the Application are true and, having become fully advised with respect to the subject matter of the Application, does hereby make the following determination and Ruling as the Referee in this matter, to -wit: 1. The statements in the Application are true. 2. Timely Statements of Opposition were filed on behalf of James L. Rose and Union Oil Company of California. 3. Name, address, and telephone number of Applicant: Teller Springs Homeowners Association 1752 County Road 109 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 c/o Leavenworth & Caloia, P.C. 1011 Grand Avenue P. 0. Drawer 2030 Glenwood Springs, CO 81602 (970) 945-2261 4. Applicant requests that the following claims be approved by the Court: F:\FILES\TE TELLER_ 1 RU )une 20, 1995 Ruling of the Referee Case No. 94CW81 FIRST CLAIM APPLICATION FOR AMENDED PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION FOR DECREE ENTERED IN CASE NO. 90CW267 5. Complete Statement of Amendment to Decree entered in Case No. 90CW267, Water Division No. 5, on February 11, 1993. A. Paragraph 8 is amended as follows: 8. The plan for augmentation is outlined as follows: A. The Teller Springs Subdivision is a 21 -lot subdivision located on the west side of the Roaring Fork River, approximately seven miles south of Glenwood Springs, Colorado. The subdivision encompasses 175 acres (approximately) and consists of 21 single-family residential lots. Domestic in-house water, livestock water, and water for lawn and garden irrigation will be provided through a community water system that will serve the development. The water system is designed with the capacity to serve up to five additional single-family residences, which are in addition to the 21 -lot subdivision. Such additional residences are or will be located near to but not within the subdivision. The amendment is to allow each of the 26 residential lots to include a guest house for a maximum potential total of 52 residential units that may be served by the water supply system. The irrigation acreage for each unit in the previous decree was 6,000 square feet per unit, and the maximum number of livestock was 104. By this amendment, the Applicant will reduce the amount of irrigation and/or reduce the number of livestock to allow for guest units to be added. In order to accommodate one guest unit, a reduction of 875 square feet of irrigated lawn must be made or three livestock must be eliminated, or a combination thereof. The water supply for the development will continue to be diverted from either or both the Teller Springs Well Nos. 1 and 2, as decreed in Case No. 90CW267. B. Diversion requirements for the development and depletions caused by use of water by the development will be recalculated as each guest unit is approved. F:\FILES\TEL ER. 1 RU June 20. 1995 -2- Ruling of the Referee Case No. 94CW81 C. No change in the yearly amount of depletions of water from the amount decreed in Case No. 90CW267 will occur. However, the monthly distribution will be affected. The following unit depletions will occur. See Table I, below. TABLE I UNIT DEPLETIONS In -House Lawn Livestock (per unit) (per acre) (per head) Initial Reading January 0.0040 0.000 0.0014 February 0.0036 0.000 0.0013 March 0.0040 0.000 0.0014 April 0.0039 0.105 0.0014 May 0.0040 0.439 0.0014 June 0.0039 0.535 0.0014 July 0.0040 0.515 0.0014 August 0.0040 0.341 0.0014 September 0.0039 0.289 0.0014 October 0.0040 0.115 0.0014 November 0.0039 0.000 0.0014 December 0.0040 0.000 0.0014 Annual Total 0.047 2.339 0.0170 F:\FILES\TELL ER 1RU June 20, 1995 Such is based upon an in-house unit demand of 280 gallons/residence/day, consumptive use at fifteen percent (15%) for all units (both main residence and guest house), 3.34 acre-feet per acre with a consumptive use of 2.34 AF/acre for irrigation, and livestock at 15 gallons per head per day with 100 percent consumptive use. D. The Applicant will tabulate the total number of units, the total number of livestock, and the total irrigated acres, and will be limited to an annual depletion amount of 11.347 acre-feet as decreed in Case No. 90CW267 based on the consumptive use as identified in Table I, above, for all such -3- Ruling of the Referee Case No. 94CW81 uses. The mix of such uses will be variable and will necessarily be limited by the number of units in existence. SECOND CLAIM APPLICATION FOR AMENDED PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION FOR DECREE ENTERED IN CASE NO. 91CW61 6. Complete Statement of Amendment to Decree entered in Case No. 91CW61, Water Division No. 5. A. The Applicant seeks to add the Teller Springs Extension Ditch No. 1 to the Kaiser and Seivers Ditch, and the Teller Springs Extension Ditch No. 2 to the Kaiser and Seivers Ditch, as those structures and water rights are more fully described in Case No. 93CW274, Water Division No. 5, as water rights to be augmented by the sources as set forth in Case No. 91CW61. These two ditches as applied for in Case No. 93CW274 are applied for to irrigate 80 acres as is the Teller Springs Ditch No. 1, as adjudicated in Case Nos. 90CW266 and 91CW61. B. These three ditches and water rights will be used to irrigate the same acreage within the subdivision, and the Applicant intends that all three ditches and their water rights be augmented by the water rights and in the amounts as set forth in Case No. 91CW61. No change in the consumptive use or total number of irrigated acres will occur. 7. No other changes in the Decrees entered in Case Nos. 91CW61 and 90CW267 are sought. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 8. Timely and adequate notice of the filing of this Application was given as required by law, and this Court has jurisdiction of the parties and subject matter of this action. 9. The requested amendments to the above-described plans for augmentation meet the statutory criteria as set forth in C.R.S. §37-92-103(2), -302(1), and -305(8), as contemplated by law and, if operated and administered in accordance with the conditions hereof, will not cause material injury to any vested water right or decreed conditional water right in the Roaring Fork River and the Colorado River. F:\FILES \ TELLER. 1 RU lune 20. 1995 -4- Ruling of the Referee Case No. 94CW81 above. JUDGMENT AND DECREE 10. The requested claims described above are hereby approved as more fully set forth 11. The Applicant, its successors and assigns, shall continue to be bound by the terms and conditions of the decree entered by this Court in Case No. 93CW274 (the decree for the Teller Springs Extention Ditches Nos. 1 and 2 to the Kaiser and Sievers Ditch. 12. The Applicant, its successors, or assigns shall install, operate, and maintain any and all such adequate measuring devices as may be reasonably required by the Division Engineer to facilitate the administration of these plans and to ensure compliance herewith. In addition, the Applicant, or its successors in interest, shall prepare and submit yearly reports with monthly readings to the Division Engineer. 13. It is accordingly ORDERED that this Ruling shall be filed with the Water Clerk subject to judicial review. 14. It is further ORDERED that a copy of this Ruling shall be filed with the appropriate Division Engineer and t.e /ate Engineer. Dated this ! y day of �,,� , 1995. Copy of the foreoing mailed t Counael of rocoro✓g—Water f is r-e—"—C'', 71,g;n9Pr• atpte Engine� ; ate -r Depots Clerk. VIartr 0 5 Water Referee, Water Div 5 No protest was filed in this matter and, accordingly, the foregoing Ruling is confirmed and approved, and is made the Judgment and Decree of this Court; provided, however, that the approval of these amendments in plans for augmentation shall be subject to reconsideration by the Water Judge on the question of injury to the vested rights of others during any hearing commencing in the two years following the construction and occupying of the last residence provided for as described above. Dated this .7/7day of F:\IIISS\TE7R. I RU Junc 20. 1995 , 1995. /» VZ/' -5 - Water Judge March 23,1998 Agreement It is hereby agreed and understood, that Ross Jeffery, for the sum of 10,000 dollars, is releasing two full water taps from the Teller Springs water system to Brent and Roxanne Lough on the above mentioned date. All standard required maintence fees, dues and related expenses shall be paid by Brent and Roxanne Lough for the two taps being released from March 23, 1998 foward. All fees incurred prior to this date shall be the responsibilty of Ross Jeffery. Signe Signed Brent Lough Signed 0 WATER LINE EASEMENT AGREEMENT This agreement dated this 16th day of March, 1998, between Jack L. Sylman and Jennifer L. Sylman (owners of Parcel B, Colohan Exemption) AND Brent L. Lough and Roxanne Lough (owners of Parcel A, Colohan Exemption), is for the sole purpose of establishing a water line easement across the entire width of Parcel B, Colohan Exemption for a water line lied into the Teller Springs Water System, to be installed and maintained by the owner of Parcel A, Colohan Exemption, their successors, heirs or assigns of Parcel A or any portion of Parcel A, Colohan Exemption. This water line easement shall run adjacent and parallel to the existing Power Line Easement which is shown on the Colohan Exemption Plat by Schmueser, Gordon, Meyer of Glenwood Springs, Colorado, recorded March 21, 1990 and recorded as reception no. 410851 in the Garfield County records. The water line easement shall be ten (10) feet in width and shall run along the west side of the power line easement referenced above. The water line easement shall be connected to the power line easement so that there is no land between the easements. Upon installation of the waterline or any subsequent maintenance of the waterline, the owner of Parcel A, his successors, heirs or assigns, shall be responsible to repair any damage caused to Parcel B and revegitate with native grasses, all areas damaged by excavation or maintenance. This agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto, their successors, heirs or assigns and shall run with the land. k L. yiman (--.ennit r owners of Parc- B an Bren Lou STATE OF COLORADO r�C R.xanne Lo owners of Parcel A )SS COUNTY OF GARFIELD THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME TH MARCH, 1998 BY BRENT L. LOUGH AND ROXANNE LOUGH. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL: S My C®MIiipin €xpiros 05/23/2001 Wk. . J. ABOSSI NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO 0 ARY PUBLIC ATTACHMENT C SCS SOILS MAP SCS SOIL TYPE DESCRIPTION & TABLES T 6 S I /� ttle Creek/, /.. 0 n . r ff L'S SCS SOILS MAP SCS SOIL TYPE DESCRIPTIONS & TABLES 108—Uracca, moist-Mergel complex, 6 to 12 percent slopes, extremely stony. This map unit is on alluvial fans and valley side slopes. Elevation is 6,800 to 8,400 feet. The average annual precipitation is 16 to 19 inches, the average annual air temperature is 40 to 43 degrees F, and the average frost -free period is 75 to 95 days. This unit is about 50 percent Uracca soil and 40 percent Mergel soil. Included in this unit are small areas of soils that are similar to the Uracca and Mergel soils but have a thicker surface layer and a lower content of coarse fragments. Included areas make up about 10 percent of the total acreage. The Uracca soil is deep and well drained. it formed in alluvium derived dominantly from mixed igneous and metamorphic material. About 3 to 15 percent of the surface is covered with boulders, stones, cobbles, and gravel. Typically, the surface layer is brown cobbly sandy loam about 3 inches thick. The upper 5 inches of the subsoil is cobbly sandy loam. The lower 7 inches is very cobbly sandy clay loam. The substratum to a depth of 60 inches or more is extremely cobbly loamy sand. The content of coarse fragments ranges from 35 to 85 percent, by volume, in a major part of the surface layer and subsoil. Permeability is moderately rapid in the Uracca soil. Available water capacity is low. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is medium, and the hazard of water erosion is slight. The Mergel soil is deep and well drained. It formed in glacial outwash. About 3 to 30 percent of the surface is covered with boulders, stones, cobbles, and gravel. Typically, the surface layer is grayish brown cobbly loam about 8 inches thick. The upper 12 inches of the substratum is very cobbly sandy loam. The lower part to a depth of 60 inches is extremely stony sandy loam. The content of coarse fragments ranges from 35 to 80 percent, by volume. Permeability is moderate in the Mergel soil. Available water capacity is low. The effective rooting depth is 60 inches or more. Runoff is slow, and the hazard of water erosion is slight. This unit is used mainly for pasture or as rangeland. It also is used for homesite development or limited rock quarrying. The potential plant community on this unit is mainly Letterman needlegrass, bluebunch wheatgrass, Indian ricegrass, Saskatoon serviceberry, and antelope bitterbrush. Other plants that characterize this site are western wheatgrass, mountain big sagebrush, and scattered Gambel oak. The average annual production of air-dry vegetation is about 1,200 pounds per acre. If the range condition deteriorates, mountain big sagebrush, Kentucky bluegrass, cheatgrass, and annual weeds increase in abundance. The suitability of this unit for range seeding is poor. The main limitations are the stones and boulders on the surface. Suitable management practices include proper range use, deferred grazing, and rotation grazing. Aerial spraying is suitable for brush management. Because of the hazard of seepage, this unit is limited as a site for livestock watering ponds and other water impoundments. If this unit is used for hay and pasture, the main limitation is the low available water capacity. Frequent irrigation is needed. Applications of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer improve the growth of forage plants. Proper stocking rates, pasture rotation, and restricted grazing during wet periods help to keep the pasture in good condition and protect the soil from erosion. Irrigation water can be applied by corrugation, sprinkler, and flooding methods. Pipe, ditch lining, or drop structures in irrigation ditches facilitate irrigation and help to control erosion. If this unit is used for homesite development, the main limitations are the large stones and boulders on and below the surface. Population growth has resulted in increased construction of homes in areas of this unit. Preserving the existing plant cover during construction helps to control erosion. The pebbles and cobbles in disturbed areas should be removed if the site is landscaped, particularly in areas used for lawns. The effluent from septic tank absorption fields can surface in downslope areas and thus create a health hazard. If the density of housing is moderate or high, community sewage systems are needed to prevent the contamination of water supplies resulting from seepage from onsite sewage disposal systems. Areas adjacent to hillsides are occasionally affected by runoff, which may be accompanied by the movement of rock debris. This map unit is in capability subclass Vie, irrigated and nonirrigated. It is in the Stony Loam range site. Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado 189 TABLE 9. --WILDLIFE HABITAT --Continued Soil name and map symbol Potential for habitat elements 1 Potential as habitat for -- Grain I I Wild I I I I 1 Open- I Wood- I and 'Grasses I herba-lConif- IShrubs I WetlandlShallow I land 1 land (Wetland seed 1 and I ceousl erous I 1 plants 1 water 1 wild- 1 wild- 1 wild - crops 'legumes I plantslplants I I ( areas 1 life 1 life ( life Range- land wild- life 101*: Pinelli 102*: Tanna Pinelli 103*: Tanna Pinelli 104*: Torriorthents Camborthids Rock outcrop. 105*: Torriorthents Rock outcrop. 106*: Tridell Brownsto 107*: Uracca Mergel Poor Poor Fair Fair Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Very poor. Poor Very poor. Poor Very poor. Very poor. Very poor. Poor Very poor. Very poor. Very poor. Very poor. Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Poor Fair Poor Fair Very poor. Poor Poor Fair Poor Very Poor poor. Fair Very Very Fair poor. poor. Fair Very Very Poor poor. poor. Fair Very Very Poor poor. poor. Fair Very Very Poor poor. poor. Poor Poor Very Poor poor. Poor Poor Very Poor poor. Poor Poor Fair Fair Fair Poor Very poor. Very poor. Poor Very poor. Very poor. Very poor. Very poor. Poor Very poor. Poor Very poor. Fair Poor Poor Fair Very poor. Very poor. Very poor. Very poor. Very poor. Very poor. Very poor. Poor Very poor. Very poor. Very poor. Very poor. Fair. Fair. Fair. Fair. Fair. Fair. Poor. Fair. Poor. Fair. Poor. Fair. 108*, 109*, 110*: Uracca Mergel Very poor. Poor Very poor. Fair Poor Fair Poor Fair Fair Very (Very poor. 1 poor. Very poor. Fair Very poor. Very poor. Poor. Fair. 111 Vandamore 112 Woodhall Very poor. Very poor. Very poor. Very poor. See footnote at end of table. Fair Fair Poor Fair Fair Very poor. Very poor. Very !Poor poor. I Very IPoor poor. I Very poor. Very poor. Fair. Fair. Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado 199 TABLE 10. --BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT --Continued Soil name and map symbol Shallow Dwellings Dwellings Small Local roads I Lawns and excavations without with commercial and streets I landscaping basements basements buildings 106*: Brownsto 107*: Uracca Mergel Severe: cutbanks cave, slope. Severe: cutbanks cave, large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: large stones, slope. Severe: large stones, droughty. Moderate: large stones, droughty. 108*: 1 I Uracca Severe: Severe: I cutbanks cave, large stones. I large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: large stones, droughty. Mergel Severe: Severe: (Severe: (Severe: (Severe: Moderate: ( large stones. 1 large stones. 1 large stones. ( slope, 1 large stones. 1 large stones, I I I I large stones. 1 1 droughty, i I I slope. 109*, 110*: Uracca Mergel 111 Vandamore 112 Woodhall 113 Woosley 119 Yamo 115 Yamo 116 Yamo 117*: Yeljack Severe: cutbanks cave, large stones, slope. Severe: large stones, slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: depth to rock, large stones, slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: cutbanks cave. Severe: cutbanks cave. Severe: cutbanks cave, slope. Severe: slope. See footnote at end of table. Severe: (Severe: (Severe: (Severe: slope, 1 slope, 1 slope, 1 slope, large stones. 1 large stones. 1 large stones. I large stones. Severe: (Severe: Severe: (Severe: slope, I slope, 1 slope, 1 slope, large stones. 1 large stones. 1 large stones. 1 large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: (Severe: depth to rock, slope. slope. Severe: (Severe: depth to rock, slope, slope, 1 large stones. large stones. 1 Severe: slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: Severe: Severe: Severe: slope. 1 depth to rock, slope. 1 slope. I slope. I I Slight Slight (Slight (Slight Moderate: Moderate: Severe: Moderate: slope. 1 slope. 1 slope. 1 slope. Severe: Severe: Severe: (Severe: slope. 1 slope. 1 slope. 1 slope. Severe: Severe: Severe: (Severe: slope. 1 slope. 1 slope. 1 low strength, slope. Severe: large stones, droughty, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Slight. Moderate: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado 209 TABLE 11. --SANITARY FACILITIES --Continued Soil name and map symbol Septic tank absorption fields Sewage lagoon areas Trench sanitary landfill Area sanitary landfill Daily cover for landfill :03*: ?inelli 109*: Torriorthents Camborthids Rock outcrop. 1D5*: Torriorthents Rock outcrop. 106*: Tridell Brownsto 107*: Uracca Mergel A 108*: Uracca Severe: percs slowly, slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Variable Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: poor filter, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: poor filter, large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Variable Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: seepage, slope, large stones. Severe: seepage, slope, large stones. Severe: seepage, large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Variable Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: seepage, large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Variable Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: seepage. Slight Poor: slope. Poor: depth to rock, small stones, slope. Variable. Poor: depth to rock, small stones, slope. Poor: slope. Poor: small stones, slope. Poor: seepage, large stones. Poor: large stones. Mergel Severe: poor filter, large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: seepage, slope, large stones. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: seepage, large stones. Severe: large stones. Severe: seepage. Moderate: slope. Poor: seepage, large stones. Poor: large stones. 4 109*, 110*: I 1 Uracca Severe: Severe: Severe: 1 poor filter, 1 seepage, 1 seepage, 1 slope, I slope, 1 slope, I large stones. 1 large stones. 1 large stones. Mergel Severe: slope, large stones. See footnote at end of table. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: slope, large stones. Severe: seepage, slope. Severe: slope. Poor: seepage, large stones, slope. Poor: large stones, slope. Aspen -Gypsum Area, Colorado TABLE 13. --WATER MANAGEMENT --Continued Soil name and map symbol Limitations for -- Features affecting -- 229 Pond reservoir areas Embankments, 1 dikes, and levees Drainage I Irrigation 1 I Terraces and I diversions Grassed waterways 103*: :anna :14*: Torriorthents---- Camborthids Rock outcrop. 105*: Torriorthents---- Rock outcrop. 106*: Tridell Brownsto 107*: Uracca Mergel Severe: slope. Severe: slope. Severe: depth to rock, slope. Variable Severe: depth to rock, slope. Severe: seepage, slope. Severe: seepage, slope. Severe: seepage. Moderate: seepage, slope. Severe: thin layer. Severe: piping. Severe: piping. Variable Severe: piping. Severe: large stones. Severe: seepage, large stones. Severe: seepage, large stones. Severe: piping, large stones. Deep to water Deep to water Deep to water Variable Deep to water Deep to water Deep to water Deep to water Deep to water Slope, peres depth Slope !Slope, slowly, I depth to rock, to rock.I erodes easily. 'Slope, 1 erodes easily. 1 'Slope, I large stones, I depth to rock. (Variable 1 Slope, (Slope, droughty, I large stones, depth to rock.' depth to rock. Slope, droughty, depth to rock. Variable Large stones, droughty, slope. Slope, large stones. Large stones, droughty, slope. Large stones, droughty, slope. Too arid, slope, erodes easily. (Slope, I large stones. 'Slope, I large stones. (Large stones --- 1 ILarge stones --- I Too arid, slope, erodes easily. Too arid, large stones, slope. Variable. Too arid, large stones, slope. Too arid, large stones, slope. Too arid, large stones, slope. Large stones, droughty. Large stones, droughty. 108*, 109*, 110*: I Uracca (Severe: seepage, slope. Mergel (Severe: I slope. Severe: seepage, large stones. Severe: piping, large stones. Deep to water Deep to water Large stones, droughty, slope. Large stones, droughty, slope. 'Slope, I large stones. !Slope, I large stones. 111 Vandamore 112 Woodhall 113 Woos ley Severe: seepage, slope. Severe: slope. Severe: slope. See footnote at end of table. Severe: seepage. Severe: piping, large stones. Severe: slope. Deep Deep IDeep to water to water to water 4 Large stones, slope, droughty. Large stones, slope, droughty. Droughty, (Slope, depth to rock,' large slope. I depth Large stones, (Slope, depth tc rock,' large slope. I depth Depth to rock, 'Slope, slope. I depth (Large stones, stones, 1 slope, to rock.droughty. (Large stones, stones, 1 slope, to rock.' depth to rock. 'Slope, to rock.I depth to rock.