HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 PC Staff Report 05.10.20001 •
PC 5/10/00
PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS
REQUEST: A request for review of a Sketch Plan for a three (3)
lot subdivision on fifty-one (51) acres.
APPLICANT: Gaye Leo
ENGINEER: Colorado River Engineering
LOCATION: Parcel lies on Taughenbaugh Mesa, southwest of
Rifle. Section 20, Township 6 South, Range 93
West
WATER: One shared well
SEWER: Individual sewage disposal systems (ISDS)
ACCESS: CR 320 (parcel C) and CR 321 (parcels A&B)
EXISTING ZONING: AJR/RD
ADJACENT ZONING: A/R/RD, with O/S to the southwest
RELATIONSHIP TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
According to the Garfield County Comprehensive Plan of 1984, this site lies in "District C
— Rural Areas / Minor Environmental Constraints". District C is described as having a
moderate ability to absorb growth. This district includes all lands which are not
serviceable from an existing municipality or subdivision with water or sewer services.
Since this site is located within one (1) mile of District A it is considered to be a
transitional area between rural and urban densities. The suggested density is no more than
one (1) dwelling unit per two (2) acres subject to the mitigation of environmental
constraints.
II. PROJECT INFORMATION
A. Site Description: The site slopes about 5% from the highpoint at the southwest down to
the northeast. The site is gently rolling pastureland. The dominant vegetation is grass and
sagebrush.
Page 1 of 7
• •
B. Development Proposal: The applicant is proposing to divide a fifty-one (51) acre parcel
into three {3) single family lots: parcels A, B, & C. Parcel A is five (5) acres in size.
Parcel B is thirty-six (36) acres and is currently occupied by a single family house. Lot C
is ten (10) acres in size.
C. Adjacent Land Uses: Agricultural and residential land uses surround the site.
III. REVIEW AGENCY AND OTHER COMMENTS:
Referrals of the site plan were sent to the following:
A. City of Rifle: See comments received 4/17/00. The overall concern is that
Taughenbaugh Mesa is not a good location for residential development due to lack
of water. The City requests to know if they would be expected to provide water if
the well runs dry and if the development could include more residences in the
future. The City is also concerned about the possibility of the septic systems
leaching into Rifle's water treatment plant, which abuts the property. Other
concerns are that there is no large source of water for fire fighting purposes and
that viable agricultural land will be fragmented. For these reasons the Rifle City
Council, at their 4/5/00 meeting, moved to recommend denial of this application to
Garfield County.
B. Bookciiff Soil Conservation District: The Board expressed concern about the
maintenance and protection of any irrigation ditch and about animal control in
areas with livestock and wildlife. {see page - )
C. RE -2 School District: Stated on 3/30/00 "no comments or concerns at this time".
D. Holy Cross Energy: No response
E. Public Service Company: On 3/22/00 stated no objections.
F. U.S. West Communications: On 3/31/00, returned application without any
comment.
G. Garfield County Road & Bridge: In a memo dated 3/29/00 (see page /3 ), stated
that a better description of the access to the three (3) parcels was needed. It is
unclear if Parcel C will be accessing CR320.
H. Rifle Fire Protection District: See letter dated 4/20/00, page / 7 . Makes some
specific recommendations concerning removal of vegetation, road construction,
and posting of addresses. Also notes that the water supply in the area has limited
fire flow capabilities. Although the proposal meets the District's minimum
requirement of having an approved water source within 2 miles, fire flow
capabilities would likely not be available to extinguish a fully involved structure
fire.
I. Colorado Dept. of Public Health: No response
J. Colorado Div. of Water Resources: See letter dated 4/4/00. The state engineer
has found that the proposed water supply will not cause injury to decreed water
rights, and based upon sustained yield and with appropriate storage capacity, the
Page 2 of 7
• •
use of the proposed well should be adequate for a potable water supply.
K. Colorado Div. of Wildlife: no response
L. Garfield County Sheriff: See memo dated 3/28/00. At this time, not enough
information has been included in the application (such as location and dimension of
roads, locations of dwellings, county road access, etc.) to make any comments.
M. Garfield County Vegetation Management:
N. Colorado State Forest Service: no response
IV. STAFF COMMENTS
A. Comprehensive Plan: The proposed density is one (1) dwelling unit per seventeen (17)
acres, which is much less dense than the Comp Plan's suggested density of one (1)
dwelling unit per two (2) acres. The proposal appears to generally conform to the Comp
Plan. The applicant should be aware of the performance standards contained in pages 27-
40 of the Plan as the subdivision process proceeds.
B. Zoning: A single family dwelling is a use by right in the A/R/RD zone district. Accessory
uses are allowed if they are agriculturally related uses. The applicant should be aware of
the following zone standards:
Minimum Lot Area: Two (2) acres.
Maximum Lot Coverage: Fifteen percent (15%).
Minimum Setback:
(1) Front yard: (a) arterial streets: seventy-five (75) feet from street centerline or fifty (50)
feet from front lot line, whichever is greater; (b) local streets: fifty (50) feet from street
centerline or twenty-five (25) feet from front lot line, whichever is greater;
(2) Rear yard. Twenty-five (25) feet from rear lot line;
(3) Side yard: Ten (10) feet from side lot line, or one-half (1/2) the height of the principal
building, whichever is greater.
Maximum Height of Buildings: Twenty-five (25) feet.
Additional Requirements: All uses shall be subject to the provisions under Section 5
(Supplementary Regulations).
C. Subdivision: The application states that no impact on lakes, streams, and topography is
anticipated. The lot design appears to generally meet the standards set forth in the
Subdivision Regulations. Some applicable general site standards (from section 9:00 of
GarCo Sub. Regs) which the applicant should be aware of are as follows:
9: 12 Land subject to identified natural hazards, such as falling rock, land slides, snow
slides, mud flows, radiation, flooding or high water tables, shall not be platted for any
Page 3 of 7
• •
use other than open space or an uninhabitable portion of a lot over two (2) acres, unless
mitigation is proposed by a Colorado registered professional engineer qualified to do
such design.
9:13: Development plans shall preserve, to the maximum extent possible, natural features
such as unusual rock formations, lakes, rivers, streams and trees. Where appropriate,
the subdivider may be required to dedicate lands to lot owners to preserve these features.
In no case shall lots be designed such that a dwelling unit will be located closer than
thirty feet (30) to a live stream, lake or pond, regardless of the fact that floodplain
regulations may allow dwelling units located closer in some instances.
9:15: One (1) dog shall be allowed for each residential unit within a subdivision; and
the dog shall be required to be confined within the owner's property boundaries. The
requirement shall be included in the protective covenants for the subdivision, with
enforcement provisions allowing for the removal of a dog from the subdivision as a final
remedy in worst cases. (99-096)
9:16: No open hearth, solid fuel fireplaces are allowed anywhere within a subdivision. One
(1) new solid fuel burning stove, as defined by C.R.S. 25-7-401,et.seq., and the regulations
promulgated thereunder, shall be allowed in any dwelling unit. All dwelling units shall be
allowed an unrestricted number of natural gas burning stoves and appliances. (99-096)
9:17: Each subdivision shall have covenants requiring that all exterior lighting shall be
directed inward, towards the interior of the subdivision. (99-096)
9:18: No further subdivision of a recorded subdivision shall be allowed, except where it
is provided for in an approved Preliminary Plan. (99-096)
9:22 In no case shall a lot be created with accesses onto a public or private road with
less than twenty-five feet (252 of street frontage.
D. Soils/Topography: The soils on the site are identified as Potts loam, 6-12% slopes. This
deep, well drained, moderately sloping soil is typically found on mesas, benches, and sides
of valleys. It is formed in alluvium derived from sandstone, shale, or basalt. Permeability
is moderate, and available water capacity is high. Community development and recreation
are limited by low strength, shrink -swell potential, and slope.
F. Road/Access: The application proposes Parcels A & B to access CR 321 via an access
easement over the adjacent property owned by the Swallows. The easement shown has a
thirty (30') foot width. Parcel C will have direct driveway access to CR 320.
The preliminary plan application will have to comply with Section 9:00 regulations. The
road servicing Parcels A & B must meet the "primitive residential" standard in Section
Page 4 of 7
• •
9:35 of the Subdivision Regulations. This standard calls for a minimum thirty (30') foot
right of way (an easement will not be acceptable) with a single lane at least twelve (12')
feet in width with a native surface. Other applicable road standards (from section 9:00 of
GarCo Sub. Regs) which the applicant should be aware of are as follows:
9:33: Cul-de-sacs and dead end streets may be designed under the following
circumstances:
A. Cul-de-sacs may be permitted provided they are not more than six hundred feet
(600) in length and have a turnaround radius of not less than forty-five feet (459 from
the center of the cul-de-sac to rad edge and fifty foot (50) right-of-way for residential
development ...The Board may approve longer cul-de-sacs for topographical reasons and
it can be proved that fire protection and emergency egress and access is provided as a
part of the longer design; and
9:31 Access to all subdivisions shall be from a public street system.
9:34 All streets are dedicated to the public but all streets will be constructed to standards
consistent with these Regulations and repair and maintenance shall be the
responsibility of the incorporated Homeowners Association of the subdivision.
The applicant will need to work with the Rifle Fire Protection district to ensure that the
proposed access to CR321 meets emergency access standards, since it is excess of 1,300
feet in length. The applicant should meet with the Road & Bridge Department, prior to
preliminary plan application, to discuss any access/sight distance issues with them and to
clarify the proposed point of access from CR320 to Parcel C.
G. Fire Protection: The site is located in the Rifle Fire Protection District (RFPD). The RFPD
notes some specific recommendations concerning removal of vegetation, road
construction, and posting of addresses. The water supply in the area has limited fire flow
capabilities. Although the proposal meets the District's minimum requirement of having
an approved water source within 2 miles, fire flow capabilities would likely not be
available to extinguish a fully involved structure fire. Staff encourages the applicant to
work with the Fire District to resolve any problems and find the best solutions to ensure
safety from fire.
H. Water: The application states: "An exempted well will be shared between three parcels.
A well sharing agreement has been submitted... The well is already in place and is
producing 7+ gpm of potable water... Chris Manera of Colorado River Engineering has
been retained to develop supplemental information regarding this well if needed". The
application also contains a letter dated 3/14/00 from Sherry Caloia, Esq., stating that,
according to the State Engineer's Office, an exempt well can be used to service no more
than three lots of a subdivision. The well, permit #221943, states that use is limited to fire
protection, ordinary household purposes inside up to three (3) single family dwellings, the
Page 5 of 7
• •
irrigation of not more than one (1) acre of home gardens and lawns and the watering of
domestic animals.
The state engineer has found that the proposed water supply will not cause injury to
decreed water rights, and based upon sustained yield and with appropriate storage
capacity, the use of the proposed well should be adequate for a potable water supply.
The applicant should be aware that the Preliminary Plan phase will require the water
source be evidenced to be sufficient in terms of quality, quantity, and dependability (see
section 4:90 of the Sub. Regs.). The covenants will need to address the limitation on
irrigation of outside areas.
Wastewater: Individual sewage disposal systems (ISDS) are proposed for each lot. The
applicant should be aware that the covenants must contain provisions for ISDS
maintenance, including a detailed maintenance plan. A good maintenance guide to
reference is Pipeline, Fall 1995, Vol. 6, No. 4, which is available from the Planning
Department or can be found at the National Small Flows Clearinghouse at
http://estd.wvu.edu/nsfc.
Wildlife: The application does not contain any discussion of wildlife impacts and the
DOW did not comment on the application. Staff encourages the applicant to make use of
the County's GIS capabilities in finding out about wildlife habitat and encourages the
applicant to contact the DOW in order to gain their input in the project.
M. Assessment / Fees: As determined by Section 9:80 of the Subdivision Regulations, the
applicant will be required to dedicate a portion of the gross land area for open space,
parks, or schools, or pay fees in lieu thereof ($200 per each newly created parcel). The
property owner should be aware that the current agricultural valuation status of the
property will change following subdivision. This area appears to lie in traffic study area 1
of the capital improvements plan. The applicant can expect to pay about $2,800 per single
family dwelling, minus the appropriate discounts. In the event any fees increase before the
time of final plat, the increased fees shall be paid.
Utilities: The application states that Holy Cross has erected an additional power pole to
serve the two homes on CR321. The lot on CR320 has power located directly across the
road. Public Service will provide natural gas and a gas main will be extended from CR321
to the parcel. U.S. West will provide telephone service. No cable t.v. is available. All
utilities shall be buried.
O. Ditches: Easements shall be provided for all existing and proposed ditches.
P. Recommended Plat Notes and/or Covenants: The following are typically included on
plats and/or in covenants:
Page 6 of 7
• •
1) Indicate the maintenance responsibilities of the road.
2) All irrigation ditches and ditch easements are to be recognized and maintained as
existing and in place, in the usual manner.
3) One { 1) dog will be allowed for each residential unit and the dog shall be required to be
confined within the owners property boundaries.
4) No open hearth solid -fuel fireplaces will be allowed anywhere within the subdivision. One
(1) new solid -fuel burning stove as defied by C.R.S. 25-7-401, et. sew., and the regulations
promulgated thereunder, will be allowed in any dwelling unit. All dwelling units will be
allowed an unrestricted number of natural gas burning stoves and appliances.
5) All exterior lighting will be the minimum amount necessary and all exterior lighting will
be directed inward, towards the interior of the subdivision, except that provisions may be
made to allow for safety lighting that goes beyond the property boundaries.
6) No further divisions of land within the Subdivision will be allowed.
7) Colorado is a "Right -to -Farm" State pursuant to C.R.S. 35-3-101, et seq. Landowners,
residents and visitors must be prepared to accept the activities, sights, sounds and smells of
Garfield County's agricultural operations as a normal and necessary aspect of living in a
County with a strong rural character and a healthy ranching sector. All must be prepared to
encounter noises, odor, lights, mud, dust, smoke chemicals, machinery on public roads,
livestock on public roads, storage and disposal of manure, and the application by spraying or
otherwise of chemical fertilizers, soil amendments, herbicides, and pesticides, any one or more
of which may naturally occur as a part of a legal and non -negligent agricultural operations.
8) All owners of land, whether ranch or residence, have obligations under State law and
County regulations with regard to the maintenance of fences and irrigation ditches, controlling
weeds, keeping livestock and pets under control, using property in accordance with zoning,
and other aspects of using and maintaining property. Residents and landowners are
encouraged to learn about these rights and responsibilities and act as good neighbors and
citizens of the County. A good introductory source for such information is "A Guide to Rural
Living & Small Scale Agriculture" put out by the Colorado State University Extension Office
in Garfield County.
The Sketch Plan comments shall be valid for a period not to exceed one (1) year from the date of
the Planning Commission review (valid until 5/10/01). If a Preliminary Plan for the proposed
subdivision is not presented to the Garfield County Planning Commission by 5/10/01, the
applicant will have to submit an updated Sketch Plan application to the Planning Department for
review and comparison with the original application.
/•/-utic
/461,t,L=
.-4)a '4
jjr(VJ141--- etith/
GARFIELD COUNTY
Building P[anningDepartmen!
GARFIELD COUNTY
Building & Planning Department
Review Agency Form
11)
RCElVFp qPR 1 700D
Date Sent: 3/21/00
Comments Due: 4/21/00
Name of Application: Leo Subdivision Sketch Plan
Sent to: City of Rifle
Garfield County requests your comments in review of this project. Please notify the staff
in the event that you are unable to respond by the date listed above. This form may be
used for your response, or you may attach your own additional sheets as necessary.
Written comments may be mailed or faxed to:
Garfield County Building & Planning
Staff contact: Planner
109 8th Street, Suite 301
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Fax: 970-384-5004
Phone: 970-945-8212
General comments: This application was sent to all Rifle Planning Commissioners,
Rifle City Council Members and pertinent staff. The overall concern was that
Taughenbaugh Mesa was not a good place for residential development due to the fact that
there is not much water. The proposal suggests that three single-family dwellings could
effectively use one well. This proposal begs the questions: "What if the well runs dry;
would the City of Rifle be expected to serve these residences, and could the development
include more residences in the future?" The City of Rifle Water Treatment Plant abuts
this property, and discussion was had as to possible seepage occurring around the septic
tanks of these residences into the Water Treatment Plant. The Rifle Fire Marshall Mike
Morgan was concerned about putting out a fire at this site, since there is no large source
of water within two miles of this site, except the Water Treatment Plant. Yet another
concern was the apparent fragmentation of viable agricultural land.
On April 5, 2000, Rifle City Council approved a motion to recommend to Garfield
County Building and Planning denial of the Leo Subdivision Sketch Plan. The minutes
of this meeting are enclosed in this referral form. Should you have any questions about
this review, please don't hesitate to call Patricia F. Hopkins, Director of Planning and
Development, at 625-6253, Monday through Friday, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
This review agency recommends (circle one): Approval / Den al
The following are suggested conditions of approval, or are the reasons for denial:_
Stated above are reasons for concern, and therefore reasons for denial.
Name of Review Agency: City of Rifle Planning and Development Department
By: Patricia F. Hopkins, Director of Planning and Development Date: April 6, 2000
Bookcliff Soil Conservation District
P.O. Box 1302 - Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
Dr -
April 14, 2000
Garfield County Planning Department
109 8th Street, Suite 303
Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
Dear Sir:
2
3
nnnr
4,344.1
At the regular monthly meeting of the Bookcliff Soil Conservation District, the
Board reviewed the application and plan for the Leo Subdivision.
Of prime concern to the Board is the proper maintenance and protection of any
irrigation system which is on the site. Liability of the ditch owners is always
something they question, and the ability to maintain the right -of-way easement
for use by the owners of the water rights should continue.
The board is always concerned about animal control in an area where there is the
potential for wildlife or domestic livestock and recommends animal control
within the subdivision.
Sincerely,
Charles Ryden, President
Bookcliff Soil Conservation District
CONSERVATION - DEVELOPMENT - SELF-GOVERNMENT
I Ir111 JU LUUV 111U 11 • 1 V 1111 V11111 11 -LU JVIIVUL L 1J 1 111LL
rnn I'nU. JIUULJIULJ
410
GARFIELD COUNTY
Building & Planning Department
Review Agency Form
Date Sent: v91/no
Comments Due: 4/21100
Name of ap iccaation: �° Sul visica Sketch Plan
Sent to:
Garfield County requests your comment in review of this project. Please notify the staff
contact in the event you are unable to respond by the date listed above. This form may be
used for your response, or you may attach your own additional sheets as necessary.
Written comments may be mailed or faxed to:
Garfield County Building & Planning
Staff contact: planner
109 8th Street, Suite 301
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Fax: 970-384-5004
Phone: 970-945-8212.
General comments:
This review agency recommends (circle one): Approval / Denial
The following are suggested conditions of approval, or are the reasons for denial:
Garfield
1 • •
•
time_
Name of review agency: Garfield School District No. ke--9
$y: Lennard Eckhardt Date: M9rch 10. 2000
/0-
RPvicwri inn/nn
f. U1
-,-
li L F.- N (7)0 `f w.. , 1--- t to , CO 52,-i of
P!?1 7 7 )Jr' - A I! n -7\1
fG° tJ `e't . is t..1
SS GO
GARFIELD COUNTY
Building & Planning Department
Review Agency Form
Date Sent: -V21 /Ci()
Comments Due: 4/21/00
Leo Subdivision Sketch Plan
Name of application:
Sent to- - ADUUG- S(1/c CID
Garfield County requests your comment in review of this project Please notify the staff
contact in the event you are unable to respond by the date listed above. This form may be
used for your response, or you may attach your own additional sheets as necessary.
Written comments may be mailed or faxed to:
Garfield County Building & Planning
Staff contact: Planner
109 8`h Street, Suite 301
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Fax: 970-384-5004
Phone: 970-945-8212.
General comments:
This review agency recommends (circle on a Approval 1 Denial
The following are suggested conditions of approval, or are the reasons for denial:
Name of review agency:?? .i, G ,'e YY« c
By ) Date: 3 - 22-0o.
R rvisril 1nainn
** TOTAL PAGE.01 **
GARFIELD COUNTY
Building & Planning Department
Review Agency Form
IllteEIVED .APR 0
Date Sent: .1/71 /nn
Comments Due: 4/21/00
Name of application: r --e° Subdivision Sketch Plan
Sent to:�
Garfield County requests your comment in review of this project. Please notify the staff'
contact in the event you are unable to respond by the date listed above. This form may be
used for your response, or you may attach your own additional sheets as necessary.
Written comments may be mailed or faxed to:
Garfield County Building & Planning
Staff contact: Planner
109 8th Street, Suite 301
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Fax: 970-384-5004
Phone: 970-945-8212.
General comments:
This review agency recommends (circle one): Approval / Denial
The following are suggested conditions of approval, or are the reasons for denial:
Name o: vi w a .encs . .� S C
By: /= / ' /�.-�✓
Date:
RevicM 3/,(1/n l
Memo
To: Building & Planning
From: Jake Mall
Date: 03/29/00
Re: CR 320 & CR 321
Garfield County Road
& Bridge
9 204v
After reviewing your sketch plan for the Leo Subdivision on CR 320 & CR 321 it was
determined that a better description of the access to the three parcels was needed. We found no
access location noted for parcel C that listed as accessing CR 320.
Please resubmit a more detailed plan to Garfield County Road & Bridge department.
• Page 1
- /3-
�...,v� r, IF Vc r ir\c rr‘.V� rt-ilaC VL
RIFLE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
April 20, 2000
Garfield County Building and Planning Department
109 8th Street
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81603
Attention: Jeff Lourien
Reference: Leo Subdivision
Mr. Lourierr,
' E C Fz P1 APR 2 Mil
The Rifle Fire Protection District bas reviewed the proposed Leo Subdivision on County
Road 320 near Rifle_ It is the District's understanding that the proposal is to take one 51 -
acre parcel and subdivide it into three parcels for construction.. of one single family
dwelling per parceL The area is within the boundaries of the Rifle Fire Protection District
and fire and emergency itiedical services will be provided. In order -to assist the District in
its ability to provide services: we would make the following recoPmmendations:
1. Vegetation should lie removed from near any structures lln or i to provide a safe
zone in tbele4*nt.of ti wild land fire:
2. Road cons mctitin: When constructing access roadvays iin4 the parcels,
considerat n stxauld be given to the weights of fire apPerat *accessibility
during advw a v►ieather conditions.
3. Posting of the address: The addresses of the properties are tob`posted where the
driveway intersects tike County Road and on the resilience itself if shared
driveways are used. Letters are to be a, minimumlof 4 Niches in height, 14 inch in
width and contrast with background colors.
4. It should be noted that the waiter supply in the area is limited and fire flow
capabilities would likely not be available -to extinguish a fully involved structure
fire. The proposal does however meet the District's minimum rcquin meats of
having an approved water source within two miles.
As the time draws closer to construction of structures on the parcels the District would be
happy to set down with the owner/developer to address these items in greater detail.
Thank you and feel free to contact me if you have any additional questiona,.
Sincerely,
Mike Morgan
District Chief
Cc: Gaye Leo
Telephone (970) 625-1243 • Fax (970) 625-2963
1850 Railroad Avenue • P.O. Box 1133 • Rifle, Colorado 81650
•
STATE OF COLORADO
OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER
Division of Water Resources
Department of Natural Resources
1313 Sherman Street, Room 818
Denver, Colorado 80203
Phone: (303) 866-3581
FAX: (303) 866-3589
http://water.state.co.us/default.htm
April 4, 2000
Mark Bean
Garfield County Building and Planning Department
109 8th Street, Suite 301
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Re: Leo Subdivision
W 1/2, SW 1/4, Sec. 20, T 6 S, R 93 W, 6th P.M.
Water Division 5, Water District 45
Dear Mr. Bean:
Bill Owens
Governor
Greg E. Walcher
Executive Director
Hal D. Simpson, P.E.
State Engineer
We have reviewed the above referenced proposal to subdivide approximately 51 acres into three
residential Tots of 5, 10, and 36 acres. Each lot is proposed to have one single-family dwelling. The water
supply for the three lots is to be provided by a shared well. An estimate of water use for the three lots was not
provided in the submittal materials.
Well permit no. 221943 was issued on January 12, 2000 pursuant to CRS 37-92-602(3)(b)(II)(A) which
provides a rebuttable presumption that there will not be material injury to the vested water rights of others or to
any other existing wells. Permit no. 221943 was issued as the only well on a tract of land of approximately 51
acres and limits the pumping rate of the well to 15 gallons per minute. The use of water from the well is limited
to ordinary household purposes inside three single-family dwellings, the irrigation of not more than one acre of
home gardens and lawns, and the watering of domestic animals. The permit also requires the return flow from
the use of the well must be through individual waste water disposal systems of the non -evaporative type where
the water is returned to the same stream system in which the well is located. The well construction report for
this well was submitted on March 13, 2000 and indicates the well was constructed to a depth of 130 feet on
February 4, 2000. In a two-hour pump test, the well is reported to have produced 8 gallons per minute. The
drawdown and recovery of the well during the pump test was not reported.
Pursuant to Section 30-28-136(1)(h)(I), C.R.S., it is our opinion that the proposed water supply will
not cause injury to decreed water rights, and based on a sustained yield at the above reported rate, and with
appropriate storage capacity, the use of the proposed well should be adequate for a potable water supply. If
you or the applicant has any questions concerning this matter, please contact Jeff Deatherage of this office
for assistance
Sincerely,
Kenneth W. Knox
Assistant State Engineer
KW K/J D/Leo.doc
cc: Orlyn Bell, Division Engineer
Bob Klenda, Water Commissioner, District 45 RECEIVED APR 1 aig
THOMAS P. DALESSANDRI
Sheriff of Garfield County
March 28, 2000
To: Garfield County Building an
From: Jim Sears, Undersheriff
Re: Leo Subdivision Sketch Plan
GARFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT.
P.O. Box 249 • Glenwood Springs, CO 81602
(970)945-0453
Fax (970)945-7651
loft
The Sheriff's Office has received the above referenced Sketch plan. There is not enough
information presented (i -e. location and dimensions of access roads, locations of dwellings, access
onto county roads, etc.) to make any comments, at this time, on this request.
die
/G