Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.0 Staff Report PC 02.13.2013Planning Commission, February 13, 2013 Public Hearing Exhibits The Cottonwoods Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Sketch Plan Review ) ) ) ) ) ) • PUB LIC NOTICE TA K E NOTICE th a t #15 Ent e rpri ses, LLC has a ppli ed to the Pl a lmin g Commi ss io n, Garfi e ld Co unty , S ta te of Co lo ra do , to requ es t a pp rova l fo r a Maj o r C ompre h ensive Pl a n Am en dm e nt to des ig nate a n area as Edu ca ti o na l/In stituti o nal o n t he F uture Land Use M ap to all ow fo r furth er rev iew ofa resea rc h and edu ca ti o n fac ility re la ted to co nser vati o n effo rt s, a pro peliy s itu ated in th e Co unty of Ga r fi e ld , Sta te of Co lorado; to-w it: Leg al Descr ipti o n: A parce l of la nd sit uate in Sec ti on 9, 10 and 15. Tow nshi p 7 So uth, Ra nge 98 West orl he 6th Prin c ipal Me ri d ian , Garfie ld County, Co lorado, as demon stra ted by Recepti o n No. 742274 in th e Clerk a nd Recorde r's Offi ce of sa id Ga rfi eld Co unt y, bei ng more p3rt ic ul a rl y desc ribed as fo ll ow s: E 1/2 SE 1/4, SW 114 SE 1/4, SE 1/4 SW 1/4 of sa id Sect ion 9; SlY 1/4 o f sa id Sec tio n 10, EXCEPT ING that p0l1 ion ly in g cas t of th e eas ter ly ba nk or Roa n Creek as be in g demonstrate d in Boo k 208 at Page I 17 o f th e record s o f said Garfie ld CO ll ll ly; NE 1/4 NW of said Sectio n 15 ; NW 114 NE 1/4 of sa id Secti on 15, EXCEPT ING th e eas t 882.00 fec t Ulcrefrom : Said parcel conta ins 346.84 ac res more or less. Pra cti ca l D es cripti on : 347 Ac res on Kim ba ll Creek Road 10 mil es nor th of DeB eque via Roa n Cree k Road DES C RIPTION OF PROPOSAL - T he Hi gh Lo neso m e In stitu te is a m as te r platUl ed proj ec t o n 347 acres loc a ted adj acent to Kimba ll Creek R oad a nd w ill ho use a research , cl assroo m and a udit o rium fac ility. Ad di t io na l fac iliti es in cl ude sto rage a nd hous in g fac ilit ies fo r professo rs a nd gradu a te stud e nts. Additi o na l li v in g fa ciliti es include sma ll ca bin s a nd a te n roo m lo d ge with a s ma ll dinin g ro o m. Suppl e me nt a l u ses to th e cabin s inclu de a n exe rc ise buildin g a nd kid's camp . O utd oo r e leme nt s includ e pond s, we tl a nd s, st ream s, res tored mea dows a nd o rc hard s. T he la nd scape will al so includ e o utd oo r cl ass roo m s, ga rd ens, pa ti os, a s pl as h pl ay a re a, co mmunity law ns, areas for o utd oo r gam es, co mmunity fi re pit, e tc . A limited number of s in g le fa mil y ho mes it es w ill be in cl uded in th e projec t o n th e no rthe rn s id e of th e K imba ll Creek dra in age. H o mes it es a re located at th e toe of the s lop e a nd atl t ic ipa te d t o b e t wo ac res w ith a <1/2 ac re buildin g e nve lop e. A ll pe rso ns affecte d by th e propose d A PPLI C AT IO N TY PE are in vit ed to a pp ea r a nd s ta te th e ir views, pro tes ts or suppo rt. I f yo u can n o t appea r pe rso na ll y at s uc h hearin g, th e n yo u a re urged to sta te yo ur v ie ws by le tt e r, as the Pl a nnin g Co mmi ss ion will g ive co nsid erati o n to th e co mm e nts of surroun d in g pro pe rt y ow ne rs, a nd o th e rs affected , in dec idin g wh e th er to grant or de ny th e re quest. The appli cati o n may be rev iewed a t th e office of th e Pl annin g Dep artm e nt locate d at 10 8 8t h S t reet , Suite 4 0 1, Ga rfi e ld Co un ty P laza Buil d in g, G le nwoo d Springs, Co lorado betwee n th e ho urs o f 8:30 a.m . a nd 5 :00 p.m., Mo nd ay thro ugh Frid ay . A public hearing on the application ha s be e n s ch eduled for the Fe bruary 13,2013, at 6:30 P.M, in th e Co mmi ss io n Mee tin g Ro o m, Ga rfi e ld Co unt y Admini s t ra ti o n Building, 108 8 th S treet , G le nwoo d S prin gs, Co lorad o . Pl ar ming De pa rtme nt Garfi e ld C ounty Thu, Jan 03, 2013 8769901 Acct: 1008693 Phone: (970)945-8212 E-Mail: Client: Caller: Heather _Receipt Ad Name: 8769901 D Editions: 8CT! Start: 01/10/13 Color: Copyline: rct #15 Enterprises Lines: Depth: Columns: Discount: Commission: Net: Tax: 08:39:37 Ad Ticket #5 Name: Garfield County Building Address: 108 8th Street -Ste 401 45 3.77 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 City: Glenwood Springs State: CO Originalld: 0 Class: 0990 Stop: 01/10/13 Issue 1 Rep: PI Legals Pile! Ie NOTICE Zip: 81601 TAKE NOTICE that "'5 EnI«odns Lr.a,. il<l$ applied 10 the Pl.J;mil"(l Corrrnissi:m, Garfitkf Coli1Iy, SL.~It' ~f Color.:W. b request approv.:I ora jor Colll'rffiensive PL:m Amondment b desiQn.nle an oren as Edue.."II:ion..,l~n«~ution.:ll on the Future LMd Uta M.:tp to .:alow lor further review ola reGe...,~h.:lnc! ed~,," lion beir~y rel.:!l:ed 10 co~rv.:llion effort$. a proPHtr Gitu.,led in the County 01 G~-lield, Slate of Colomdo: kI-wit: I wi QtMripti:?O' A P'lrcd 01 bnd GitU!lle in 5«tion 9, lOaM 15, Town~ip 7 Soulh. R.."t~e iffl We~ of the 6th Prineip.:ll Meridbn, GMield County. Cobr.:tdo. osderroncolro1ted by ~eptj;,n No. 742274 in 1M CloMk Md R~u', Office of t,."l.i::I G.:Irfieid County. beil'9lmre p:!r1icwr~ dec-:ribedas folbws: E 112 SE 1/4, SW 1/4 SE 1/4, SE 1/4 SW 1/401 ~,Id S*etion 9: SW 1/401 c.'Ii:I S~tbn 10, EXCEPTING th.:lt portbn Iyhg *Nil oll~ e.:tslel~ b.:.nkofRo~ Creek «0 beoingd&n~n$tml«f in Book ~t1t Ptlge 117 01 the r~rds« 6.1i:1 Gorf~k:I County: NE 1/4 WJ of c..,id Se.::tbn 15: NW 1/4 NE 1/4 of t.:!id Section 15, EXCEPTING 1M etld .e82.00 leel Iherrfrom: s.,j;J ptll'\l:el eont..,i1ro 346.84 acres rmre Of less. PmC'iMI D,.§9rWlioo; 347 Acre, on Kimbril Creek RoM 10 miles nonh 01 DeBfque vo. Ao...., Creek RcOO OESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL· I T6tal' '. ' .. ,'>;.; "45,54 I The High LooeK"lOle In"iMe is .. m.1&ter pl..1nned proJeo;l on 347 acreG Iowtod ooj;Jcenl k> Kimb,,1 Creek Road and .... ill muu a rU(o..,rch, eburoom :I!U auditorium I .. eilily. Add~bMl belitie& Imlude etOf<lge nrd housing bell~iet for proleGtoOr&llnd grltdltlle GludentG. Add~bnal f;"ing I..~II~MG inellKfe sm.'" c.:IblM aid n len room ~e with C\ sm.,11 diniroq room. Supplenwnt.,' u&n to tho c:t>lns includo M exercise b~ldin1 Md kld'GcM"Ip. Outdoor tlon'ltnt$ Include P¢nd6, wetltlndG, slretlme;, re6lor«i ~lId¢w& and OrchMdG. The L,nd&C.:Ipe will alGO include outdoor cL'&Grooms, g:lrdens, p:lIioG, a spl.:lsh pby .. re:a, convnunily k""tIVno.. NOM /¢routdoor o:omu, ¢Omml,ln~y f'ep~, ole. A limil~ n(ll\berof Gngl6 l:.rify hometites will be inelud~ n the proJo:et on the nor1hem side of the Kimb.:dl Creek drllin.. ..... e. Homuhs Clre loctC«i:at the Ioe oflMo GIopt lind Mliei~'t~ 10 be twO Mrtt:. with" <1/2.x.!t buicfng cnv~Iop~, ; ." . . .......; i·' Payment 0.00 All perGOn5 tlHcctEd by!h& propo~oKI APPLICATION TYPE tire iwitro ., appe.:l! nnd &bt~ their viE-w&, protnts or Gupport. II you ctln not tlppe .. r peuondty tit weh h(o..'rng, then ~u «e urged 10 r.bte your views t¥ I~ter, M the PL,nl'lin.g CorrmlGoon wit give eonrneralion 10 tM eOl"lVl"ltlnl!. of ~urrourding prop- erly owner$, rod other&"lfected. In d-eeldi!'l;l v.tIether to gMt or deny th~ ro!qu-eGt. The ~pllc.:ttion n'l:ly be r~v~wednt the oHbe of the PL.· ... lnil"l-J OepnrtmMt Ioe.:at~ at 1M 6th Slr~t. Suit&401. GlIrfield c.ounty Plaza Building. GI-enVioW Spri"",:;. Color.;tdo between the hour:; of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p,m.. Monday throlQh Frid..-.y. A public homing on ttl!! application haa been acheduod for lhe Februl'lry 13,2013,.at 6:30 P.M. n the Corrmi&5ion Moeting Room. G.:Irfleld County Adminj~mtion Building, 108 8th Stroet. Glenwood Sprn.;.s, CobtaOO. Publit.hed in the Citizen T el.;<;jr.rn on J.lnu;uv 10. 201J. [S76mll Ad shown is not actual print size U.S. Postal Service"" CERTIFIED MAIL,,, RECEIPT urance Covera e Provided) I:() _por:: _ : r.!ti~X!tEi ·,{l¥r i t alit ,,,; M l ~ LI1 <0 ru CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ ~ ~":o~::p=o:~:g:o~&~.=~:s~,:~==::~,o~,~,~~==::,~V~.~'~.~~'~v~.~~~ ______ , r'I r'I CJ ['- " U.S. Postal Service,,, CERTIFIED MAIL"" RECEIPT r'I ['- m (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) :1 P~~f!1~ I A L r-=I I [ USE LI1 <0 ru CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Oelivery Fee (Endorsement Required) $ SO.45 0530 $2.95 01 P-$2.35 He", $0.00 ~ ~,,"'",--ThO'-~-~-'~---,'~--~-~I~~~~:'~~~'~"~'~~'~":''~'~-~'-:':':'~ ____ --, ~ S~~~n~(··--·aJ.~.c~'hj·~t-:FJ''''·------·-------------- Total POs1a\l9 & Fees I S; S5.7S I 01114/2013 .___ :;: o~,,-o.~~.N~: __ 25.?'.5. __ .U20.N.\ ____ J::Q __ .k.lS ________________ . C~State,ZIP+'1 1 A <--_. _ U.S . Postal Service"" CERTIFIED MAIL" RECEIPT r'I CJ U.S. Postal Service ", CERTIFIED MAIL" RECEIPT Domestic Mail Onl . No In r n . : r7~?;i~l88i rttC i t u~i+!..! r'I LI1 <0 JE ru CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ Postage $ Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) SO.45 0530 $2.95 01 Po stmark $2.35 Ho", SO.OO Total Postaoe & Fees I g; C.C:;;.75 I 0111412013 ~ r,,'U."c.,r7U>7~-="~._Q __ r ... __ ~,: .. :;:::::,==,==,~~==::=,_,~.~.~,~'~«~'~A~"~ __________ ., 1~'Th ~ tSi;8-e£Ai;rN~:(-----_L&J.!~~VV--~-?_~::>_t_k~~ ____ ----------_______ j ['-~~Pr?~X.No: .. rl..tt. __ .Wt&.~:l_.u= ____ s± ______________________ . roil" ~~.~ D ID. A • U.S. Postal Service", CERTIFIED MAIL"" RECEIPT ra e Provided OC~ci¥S1&3C I A L USE · a L I:U:tlWrSOOMls!Qj' 81401\ L U-S E Domestic Mail Onl . No Insurance Covera e Provided 3" ~ ~'~.;';';M~'i¢;i§;·;:;;!;'i~i.;!;~,i.e;·I;!!~.!;,i';;i;H~ii;.!;'!;i;,;1§;¥fl;~lii.\;i;~,:i ;~I;";+~&ij;9;·~!.~,;i, ii;;~ rn ~ .. __ m r'I U'1 '" ru CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ LI1 m to Postage $ SO P_go $ SO.45 0530 .45 0530 ru CertifredFee Certified Fee $2 "" 01 CJ $2 "" • 7.J Return Receipt Fee .7..J 01 Retum Receipt Fee Postmark CJ (Endorsement Required) Postmark (Endorsement Aequir&d) $235 Here CJ Restrict d . $2.35 Here 1--____ --'''''. ~--_l (E d e De/Nary Fee Restricted Delivery Fee 0 n orsement Required) (Endorsement Required) $().OO CJ $0.00 _ U') Total Postage & Fee $ Total P_go & Foes , $ $5.7S 0111412013 m i 0 __ . . s $5.7:i J 01114/2013 ~ f s~';:'i.~~N~~~\)·MILLL.:--\--\OM.!cl)'L------"--"------------j r-~~~;;~.-.-----~!:.-J?3;-:---:;~----------------------------Ai r'I r'I o ['- U.S. Postal Service", CERTIFIED MAIL"., RECEIPT Insurance Coverage Provided) ~ ,--0" rn .;.t§h'l§am!.Urrh'h '!';"W1.ii!i ,I§¥f11¥1C' t i ·.:s:H+jg.lm" rn =1'1_3- "," ~ ..... =.;;o r'l i U") <0 ru CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ ~ ~T~::,~P_==:~~&~~~~,:~~:::=,:"=,:,~::==,~,~,~,;,;,,~-=-:--~ ______ , a Sf':i.°:J.i?--JC;~tUf.'3.2':::::--~~S------------'.---------- ['-~'.Pr?~~.No: __ .!.k.L9.----W.tl:btif.------t"------------------------ ,."'. ~t ... 7/Pu • __ ~ I D J ) -11----- o 2.000 G 9 PROJECT SITE THE COTTONWOODS 16 G 200' RADUIS COnONWOODS ADJACENT OWNER INFORMATION 10 ACRES (GIS ) OWNER ADDRESS PARCEL 10# A 349.93 #15 Enterprise s, LlC 1218 Webster St, Houston , TX 77002 2413094(01))4 B 160 "23 Enterprise s, LlC IllS WebsterSt, Houston, TX 77002 2413162CXXX>6 C 2179 .64 #13 Enterprises, LlC 1218 WebsterSt, Hous ton, TX 77002 24 15134CXXXl2 0 244.59 Knirlberger, Erwin P. 010124 County Road 204,DeBeque, CO 81630 241304200003 E 810.07 Chev ron USA, In c. p.e Box 285, Houston, TX 77001 24131020CK)15 F 1949.64 Chevron USA, Inc . p.e Box 285, Hou ston. TX 77001 24132SHXX)16 ; Varies BlM 50629 HIGHWAY 6 & 24, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Varies ) RPM, Inc. SECTION: TOWNS HI P: 7S 157 Skipper Rd. 9,10&15 RANGE : 98W Belgrade. MT 59714 K1MBALL CREEK OAD F -R0<'l.t\ • 15 • • '0 ~ • ~eet < > ~ • " f R LEGEND ~ ::> r J. i HLR PROPERTIES i , PRIVA TE PROPERTY ~ 0 CO UN TY ROAD < , ~ RI VER /STREAM N ~ DITCHES 0 , N ;- TOWNSHIP N 2 SEC TI ON / ~ A u PROPERTY OWNER I D ~ COTTONWOODS FIGURE 2 VI CINITY MAP PROJECT : 12-037 (406) 599-4217 DES IGNER: RML DRAWN BY:RMl GARFlELD COUNTY, CO DATE: 12 2012 \10N1TY MAP + II I 'POSTlNDEI'tJIIDENI.CO~ "WEDNESDAY,FEBRUARY 27,'Z0137 a3 DuqeJ:~eli;looksto"expanQ'~~,~ De.B:eque .. a reare-'searcn " institLtte.prop6sed~;{" John Stroud , The 19~year~oldcommercial operation , includes a gUest/dude rancli,r,erreat and • 'n'entc~nter, : and ·hllnting.,andfishing , ,ground~!wjth a miXofpD,yate andpennit, tedbackcountry acreage. , " " But another maior focus for the ranch in • Post tndep~dent Staff tee'ent years haS been ill -ili:¢' ar:e~~ seryation,scientific reseai§h and educa-a tion,:'S~ew3rt s,airl.,", ",: ," ''.:'::'\li~~0'. In partner$p as the ' and such and . somelnstitut~prpje~treceive(fa:~O'mpre-,~ter~~~?~ce~._ '", ,: ' ... _,. h~nsiv~ lllap.ap1~eritllj1~:qtiilP1Wl'0!. and . . .,''We ,have, !"':.iJ.Icredible, Illixe<:l~use s~~chplan review; by!'h~,G"'iield,County' Iandsq~,p~llere wl).~rether\,is iii lot of Planning Cpll1ffiissiQnearlie" this,lllonth. , ll]l1IlanrecreatiGn, iiu:ludji).ghikirig. b~,. ,Aforinal applicatlond!,t3i!ingpl'insfGr irig. h()rseback riding, birc\'watching. a scientific research facility, including an ,,' hU1ltjng.,younruriei~,~Stewartsaid. auditorium,d(\s~m();ms,JaboratoIies, dor-.' ,:: /lW~' also. have' a c~rt3iti:am()Unt of min- mitq!,},accGmmodatiGIi,S fG~ gl::aduate stu' eralinierests,and ",e undetstand' me, dent~,and ',liY,ing 'l"lIi.jer~ f~r 'staff, 'isrespGnsibilltytG ,dGtile dghtthlngwjth expected tG ,be submitted l"ter this year, mineral pGlicyi' he said. "T.hissideofRoan accGrding toscottSt~g~,:!!,-r."!,!,aIJ.-'<::!e~k h,,~~e"»YHGlb~e? iIe"vilydevel, '''%t~~~~J;~~~~~*e.'~~r~:bii·e-·'~~1!!~t~~'!;1ii,~~li,1:!ii~~~::.:l Beque justGverthe Me~a/G:ru:Jieldcounty develG~lllent taI,<espla~~:~" , " line, The High LonesGme RanchencGm-The baseliriestudiesWill CG""r air;sGil passes abGut 350 acres at thecGrifluence and water qua!lty"a~ "",11 as.vu.dlife halli- ofRGan and Kimball creeks. t"t, includhlllthe ~ea:ter s":!le grGuse, ' at a drink, " departID.ent.."Thl' iIitention oitheCottGri~ ,'ThatwoWdallGw'lor.,wstifU,tii:iiial and WGGds project is to ~"vate the care .of educational uses related to a campus-style ,water iIl,theenyirGnmentand shGwthat "reSearch andeduc;ational facility, accordc 'thispteciGus I.esource ~an be extracted, ingt" the preliminary proposal: EXHfSIT r; Planning Commission February 13, 2013 CPAA-7453 PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS -THE COnONWOODS TYPE OF REVIEW APPLICANT (OWNER) PLANNER/CONSULTANT LOCATION ACRES ZONING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL Comprehensive Pl an Am endme nt 1115 Enterprises, LLC Scott Stewart, High Lonesome Ranch Heather Henry, Connect One Design; Gage Davis, Gage Davis Associates; and Robert Lee, RPM, Inc. North of the Town of De8eque on CR 202 (Kimball Creek Road), just west of CR 204 (Roan Creek Road) -Parcel II 2413 -094-00-004 Subject Parcel -349.93-acres Resource Lands -Gentle Slopes (RLGS) Residential Medium-High (2 to less than 6 ac/du) and Agricultural Production/Natural The subject property is located at the western end of the County north of the Town of De8eque and the Mesa County Line. The site is at the junction of Roan Creek and Kimball Creek in portions of Sections 9, 10 and 15 of Township 7 South, Range 98 West of the 6'" P.M. The existing uses on the site include agricultural activities and employee housing. This site is associated with the larger holding of a multitude of company-owned parcels located in the Roan Creek area known as the High Lonesome Ranch. This 'ranch' area consists of approximately 300 square miles of holdings, in both leased and fee simple ownership. Figure 1: Vicinity Map 1 I P i1 g e Plannin g Commission February 13, 2013 CPAA-74S3 The site is propo se d to fun ct ion as th e High Lon eso me In stitute (HLI), a ca mpus -s tyle research and education al f aci lity related to area -specific environmental iss ues. Th e pr opose d HLI will be loc ated on a portion of th e si te an d de ve lop ed in a campus-style with con feren ce space, cla ssrooms, lab or atori es, administrative uses and office space; res idential use s in cluding dormitori es, apa rtments, cabins and seve ral sin gle f amily lots will also be included. Th e Comprehensive Plan 20 30 Futur e Land Use Map (FLUM) de signati o n for thi s sit e is Re sidenti al Medium -High , interspersed with Agri cultural Produ ction/Natural Land s as shown on the map below. O pen S pace/Pub lic Lands Ag riculturo l Prod ucti on/Na tura l / Figure 2 HUM 2030 High l o neso m e Institute , , The existing FLUM d es ignati o n do es not co ntemplate the mix of use s proposed at the HLI , therefore th e reque st for the Comprehensive Plan ame ndm ent. Thi s requ est constitutes a M ajor Amendment a nd i s bein g proce sse d concurrently with a Subdivi sion Sketch Plan application. The Applicant is r eq uestin g a change of the FLUM to accommodate th is proposed development. Th e original request was to create a new center ca t ego ry, however discussions with staff has res ulte d in refining th e r eq ues t to des ignat e the site as "Neig hborh oo d Center". Thi s designation wou ld r eq uire that in st ituti ona l, e du ca tion al and civi c uses be added to the definition and th e category be renamed to 2 1 Page Planning Commission February 13, 2013 CPAA-7453 "Village Center". This proposed change is consistent with the current designation but is a more accurate name for the se areas. II. ADJACENT USES Adjacent properties to this site in clude public lands as well as large lot re si dential and agricultural parcels, some of which are also utilized for extraction ac tivities. BLM Hig h Lonoso me Institu to j BLM Figure 3 -Zone District Map The map, above, graphically denotes the location of Bureau of Land Managem ent (BLM) parcels . Land immediately to the east of the High Lonesome site is owned by Chevron USA Inc., while properties to the south and so uthwest are owned by corporate entities under the same management as the subject site. The Resource Land zone district is classified as Gentle Slopes/Lower Valley Floor for the subject site. III. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS The proce ss and standards required for amending the Comprehensive Plan 2030 are included in Chapter 4, Amending the Plan. The process first requires a determination of the degree of amendment with clas sifications including 'Compre hens ive', 'Major' and 'Minor'. Based on the description of this 3 I P " g e Planning Commiss ion February 13, 2013 CPAA-7453 proposa l th is app li ca ti on is a Majo r Am en dme nt as it "co nstitutes a significa nt change in th e v isio n, goa ls, po li cies and/or land uses o f t he Cou nty," a nd does no t co nv e rse ly "inclu de a sma ll p roj ect th at i s co nsist en t w it h th e surro un d in g a r ea," o r is "correct in g text o r m ap e rro r s" w hi ch desc ri bes a mino r ame ndment. Th e app lican t has respo nd ed t o thi s li st of stan d a rd s o f ap p rova l in t he i r app li ca t ion . Sta ff has p r ov ided a n eva lu at io n o f th ese r equ i red f ind i ngs i n th e St aff Ana lys i s sec ti on of thi s report. IV. REFFERAL AGENCY COMMENTS Ref e rra l co m me nts w e re se nt t o th e f o ll o wing age ncies as r equired by Col o r ado Rev i sed St atutes and th e ULU R. Ge nera l co mm e nts a r e in cl uded be low wit h add it io n al d e t ail ed com m e nts in co rpo r at ed into thi s repo rt w her e re leva nt. Town of Pa rachute: City of Rifle : Town of Silt: Town of New Castle: City of Glenwood Springs: Exhibit G No Response Exhibit H No Response No Response Town of Carbondale : Town of Basalt: Phone discussion, no comment No Response Mesa County: Rio Blanco County: Routt County: Eagle County: Pitkin County: Exhibit J No Respon se No Response Exhibit N No Response Garfield County Road and Bridge: Garfield County Sher i ff: Garfield County Vegetation Management: Garfield County Environmental Health : Mountain Cross Engineering: Colorado Pa rks and Wildlife: Grand Valley Power: Debeque Fire District: Bure au of Land Management: Exhibit L Exhibit K Exhibit 0 No Response Exhibit M No Response Exhibit I No Response No Response Additional referral comment requests were sent to the following agencies, of which no respons e has been received : V. STAFF ANALYSIS Th e adopt ed Comp r ehe nsive Pl an 2030 sets forth th at a Major Ame nd me nt shall be app r oved i f t he Planni ng Comm iss io n ma kes spec if ic f in d i ngs t hat: 4 1p age Planning Commission February 13, 2013 CPAA-7453 1. The existing comprehensive plan and/or any rel ated element thereof is in need of the proposed amendment; and Comments: Th e FLUM designations were defined in a broad mann er to include a wide range of potential densities and uses, however unique developments may not fit eosily within th ese categories. The request amend and rename the designation to "Village Center " may be appropriate to occommodate the development proposal. 2. The proposed amendment is compatible with the surrounding area (a), and the goals and policies of the Plan (b); and Comments: The area s urr ounding the proposed HLI is rurol in chara cte r including residential, agricultural and natural resource extraction uses. The intent of the HLI is to place this educationa l/in stitutional use within the context of the rural character particularly as the intent of HLI is to preserve and enhance natural resources, recreation and open space. i. Section 2 -Future Land Use A simple but fund amental theme of this Chapter, as highlighted in the Plan is that "most new growth should occur in areas that have , or can easi ly be served by, urban services." Comments: As proposed, this area does not and will likely not in the future have easily accessible urban type services. ii. Sec tion 2 -New Centers In an effort to make existing subdivisions more se lf-su fficient, a new center may be added to existing major residential subdivisions or other urban areas. Additionally, the center should be located at intersection s and interchanges, has access to centra l water and sewer through a special district, and is compact and designed to fully utilize the land. Comments : This is not an existing subdivision but the proposal is to add a center for designation of this si te . The requested change to "Village Center" designation, with the addition of in stitutional, educational, and civic uses would be appropriate for the proposed use of the site. Central water and sewer is proposed to serve the development, the site is located at an intersection, and is compact and designed to fully utilize the land. iii. Section 4 -Economics, Employment and Tourism Go al 111: Maintain a strong and diverse eco nomic base (for both employment a nd income generation. Comment: An institutional, educational, and civic development as proposed would provide div ersification in the economic base. The intent of the HLI is to utilize t h e rural landscape for research and education regarding protection of the environment ond 5 I II a r. e Planning Commission February 13, 2013 CPAA-7453 natural resources. Visiting prafes sors, researchers ond students would reside at the site for the purposes of studying and pratecting the unique western landscape . Action #4: Ensure that commercial/industria l developments are compatible with adjacent land uses and preserve the visua l quality of the county . Comments: Though this development does not fit neatly within a commercial/industria l category this action, to assure compatibili ty with adjacent uses and preservation of visual quality, certainly applies to this proposal. The clustered, low profile compus-style of development is proposed to be designed to fit within the existing landscape and adjacent uses. iv. Sec ti on 5 -Recreation, Open Space and Trails Goa l #5: Support the deve lopment of a county wide land conservation program to provide too ls fo r l and owners and the pub li c to conserve property. Comments: HU proposes a private educational and research facility with the main goal of conserving, preserving and protecting natural resources. The site itself will maintain a large irrigated hay field and the pinion-juniper hillsides. Per the applicotion, "High Lonesome Ranch, through HU, seeks to advance scientific and scholarly knowledge regarding ecologicol, economic, and social sustain ability and conservation of natural resources. " Po li cy #5: Encou r age deve lopment that con t r i butes to the continuation and en hance ment of commerc ial tourism in or near recreat ion areas. Comments: HU's goal of sus tainability and land stewardship will enhance commercial tourism by protecting and restoring western Colorado's important ranching heritage and natural resources . v. Sect io n 6 -Agricultu r e Goa l 1: Promote the continuation and expa nsion of agr icu ltura l uses. Goa l 2: Preserve a significan t rural character i n t he county. Goa l 3: preserve scenic and visual corridors in the county. Comments: The research and education of HU is intended 'to provide economic and ecological models that help landowners restore and maintain natural resources. ' vi. Section 8 -Natural Resources Vision: The county pas preserved and enhanced the habitat for wildlife, native vegetation, riparian corridors, scenic and other important features of the natura l env iro nment. 6 I P i1 g e Plannin g Commissio n February 13, 2013 CPAA-74S3 Comme nts: The intent of HLf is to provide research and education regarding the protection and preservation of naturo l resou rce . The po licies for this sec t ion include protection of cri tica l habitat, wate rshed, flood plains and riparian area and th is too is the policy of HLI. 3. The pr o pose d am endmen t w ill have no ma j o r nega ti ve im pacts o n t r anspor t at ion, serv ices, and fac iliti es; and Comments: This developme nt proposes to be se lf-s uffic ient with regard to public services and therefore will hove no major negotive impact to these services and facilities. 4 . Th e propose d ame ndme nt wi ll have mi ni m al effec t o n serv ice prov ision, in clud ing adequacy o r ava il abi li t y o f f ac iliti es and serv ices, and is co mpa t i bl e w ith ex istin g and plan ned serv ice prov ision; and Comments : The proposed deve lopment is located at t he confluence of Kimba ll and Roan Creeks where service provision is minima l. Grand Vo lley Power provides electric service to the area and will review and comment on infrast ruc ture os this project moves through the review process. Fire protection is provided to the area by De Beq ue Fire Protection District. S. Th e pro pose d am endm ent is co nsistent w ith th e log i ca l expa n sio n of serv ices; and Comme nts: No expansion of service is necessary for the proposed development. 6 . Th e co unt y o r th e ge ner al area i n wh ich an amend me nt is p r oposed has changed or is changing t o such a degree t hat th e amendment is i n th e pub li c i nterest; and Comments: Certainly a research and educational faCility with the main goal of preserving the naturo l resources and character of the area is in the public interest. Genera l pub lic know ledge and desire for s ustainability and conservation has increased substantially in the past decade. 7 . Stric t adh erence t o t he Pl an wou ld r esu lt in a situ ati o n n eit he r intended no r in kee p i ng w ith o th er key elements and po li Cies of t he Plan; and Comme nts: Strict ad herence to the plan wou ld requ ire maintenance of the Residentia l Medium High and Agricu ltural Production FL UM designations which would not be in keeping with the key element and policies of the Plan. 8. The propos ed plan ame ndme nt has a sign ifi can t publi c be nefit, w il l pr omote th e publ ic we l fare, and w i ll be co nsist e nt w ith t he goa ls and po li Cies of th e Ga rfi eld Coun t y Comp r e h ens ive Plan an d t he eleme nts th ereof. Comments: The proposed plan amendment for HLf will result in significant public benefit, wi ll promote the public welfare and is consistent with the goals and policies of the p lan. 71 P iI g (" VI. STAFF COMMENTS LA ND Us. DESI GNAT ION Neig hbor hood Center D [SCR IPTION Ccn c r.l l loc.:l1ion s fO I m i)'('(I·u sc centers pr ovidi ng com merc ia l to se rv e surroun ding IU r.)l popul ation; should incl ude 501 ,111 concc ntr.1li o n of resid erlli a!. Density of rE'sid enr i.l l ll se s : 5 dll per .J o e b.'lmple : COMPATI BLE ZON I NG Res id enti .ll Urb .lII mU) Comlllcrci.1ll.i m it c d (e l l Comme rc ia l Bu siness (CB) Pb nned U nit De vela men! (PUD ) Th e Pl annin g Co mmi ss ion Febru ary 13, 2013 CPAA -7453 propose d deve lop m ent see k s to change "Neighborho o d Ce nt er", as show n left, t o "Vill age Ce nter" and r edefin e th e desc ription t o include institution al, edu ca ti o nal and civic uses. Th e change o n th e Future Land Use M ap (FLUM) would allo w thi s pro pose d devel o pm ent to be in ge neral confo rman ce with th e Pl an. Re namin g t his des ignation to "Village Center" is a m o re use ful t erm rather th an 'neighb o rh oo d' whi ch has a co nn ot ation of urban and res id ential charac t eri sti cs. Thi s r edefinin g of th e des ignatio n would also co rres po nd more clo se ly w ith th ose ar eas cu rrently des ignat ed Neighb o rhood Cent er, such as Co lo r ad o M o untain Colle ge's Spring Vall ey Campu s. St aff prop oses, and th e Ap pli ca nt suppo r t s, th e f o ll owin g am endm ents t o th e Compre he nsiv e Pl a n: Land Use Des ignation Desc ription Compatible Zonin g Existing Definition (page 28) Neighb orhood Center General loc at ion s for mixed-u se Res id entia l Urb an ce nter s providing commercia l to Commerc ial Limit ed serve surrounding rura l Commercia l Bu sin ess popu lation; shou ld incl ude small PUD conc entrati o n of r es ident ial Proposed Modification Village Ce nt er Genera l loca tion s for a mix of Rural uses, such as sma ll commerc i al Res id ential Ur ba n facilities th at se rve surroundin g Comm e rci al Limit ed ne ighborhoods, con ce nt r ations Comm er cial Bu sin ess of r es id enti al develo pm ent, and PUD in st itutiona l, educa t ional or civic uses. 8 1 Pa g e Chapter 2. Future Land Use. Growth in Designated Centers (Page 20) Neighborhood Centers -Existing Description Planning Commission February 13, 2013 CPAA-7453 Neighborhood Centers are areas where there is a concentration of residential development and commercial development exists that is intended primarily for the convenience needs of surrounding residential development. This mix of uses may include small civic uses. Village Centers -Proposed Description Vill age Centers are areas where there is or is planned to be a mix of uses, such as sma ll commercial facilities that serve surrounding neighborhoods, concentrat ions of residential development, and i nstitutiona l, educationa l or civic uses . VII. SUGGESTED FINDINGS 1. That proper public notice was provided as required for the hearing before the Planning Commission. 2. That the hearing before the Planning Commission was complete and that all interested parties were heard at that meeting. 3. That the proposed amendment to the Future Land Use Map is a Major Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan 2030 because it constitutes a significant change in the vision, goals policies and/or land uses of the county. 4. That the proposed amendment to the Future Land Use Map is in the best interest of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Garfield County. VII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review this request and determine if it is appropriate to approve or deny the proposed major plan amendment that would include a modification to the Plan to rename and redefine Neighborhood Center, as well as to designate the subject property a new Village Center on the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan 2030, or continue the public hearing in order to receive additional information that the Planning Commission deems necessary to make a decision. If the Planning Commission moves to approve the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, a motion should follow to: 1) Recognize this request as a major amendment to the Comprehensive Plan 2030; 2) Authorize the Chair to sign a Resolution thereby amending the Comprehensive Plan 2030; 3) Authorize the Chair to sign the letters certifying the amendment to the BOCC, municipalities and the surrounding counties; and 4) Authorize the secretary to sign the Future Land Use Map, as amended. 9 I P (l g e Planning Commi ssion February 13, 2013 CPAA-7453 Upon completion of the Comprehensive Plan Public hearing the Planning Commission will have the opportunity to provide comments on a proposed Sketch Plan. VIII. PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION/DECISION 10j P age From: To : Subject: Date: Robert Knight Kathy A East ley The Cottonwoods Attachments: Monday, January 14, 2013 12:44:46 PM Robert J Knight yd Kathy The Town of Parachute has no objection on this application. Robert J. Knight Town Of Parachute Town Administrator (970) 285-7630 Work robertk~rachutecolorado.com EXHIBIT f& EXHIBIT I H From: To: Subject: Date: Hi Kathy: Janet At!!ise Kathy A Eastley The Cottonwoods Referral Tuesday , January 15, 2013 10 :59:16 AM The Town of Silt received "The Cottonwoods" referral recently. Since the site is 10 miles north of the Town of Debeque, the Town of Silt has no comment. Thank you for the opportunity to respond to this application. Jan et A/uise Community Development Director Town of Silt 231 N. 7th Street P.O. Box 70 Silt, CO 81652 (970) 876-2353 Ext. *814 (office) (970) 876-2937 (fax) jalujse@toWDofsjlt.org jaoet@towllofsjlt.org http://www .towoofsilt.org This electronic mail message . including all attachments, is for the sale use of the in tend ed recip ient(s) and may contain confidentia l andlor privileged information or otherwise may be protected from disclosure . Any unauthorized review , use, disclosure, distribution or actions which rely on the contents of this information is prohibited . If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. Thank you. EX"'IBIT IL GYP Review Comments for Garfield County Building and Planning Department SSPA7453 and CPAA7452 I. The project is in the Grand Valley Power service area. 2. Single-power is available for this project, along 202 Road and on site. 3. Need Grand Valley Power electric layout (showing the locations of streetlights, transformers, junction boxes and any other needed equipment) on FINAL Utility Composite Plan. 4. Please make application for service by calling 242-0040, to start the design process. A cost estimate will also be prepared. 5. May need easements along roads and on site for power lines. 6. Need Final Plat with addresses before going to Contract for Construction with Grand Valley Power. 7. Any relocation of existing overhead power lines , poles, guy /anchors , underground lines, transformers or any other Grand Valley Power equipment is at the developer 's expense. 8. Grand Valley Power allows solar photovoltaic interconnections to be net metered for up to 10 kw for residential services and 25 kw for commercial services. Please contact Grand Valley Power's Energy Services Administrator at 970-623- 8580 for information and interconnection guidelines. From: To: Subject: Date : Christie Barton Kathy A Eastley Th e Cottonwoods Comprehensive Plan Ame ndme nt Fri day, January 25, 2013 9:27:50 AM The Development Review Team consists of representatives from the Mesa County Department of Planning " and Economic Development, Mesa County Public Works Engineering Department, Transportation Planning and the Regional Transportation Planning Office (RTPO). We'd like to receive a copy of the traffic study that is prepared for this project in future steps since the project uses X 1/2 Road in Mesa County for access to the site . No objections to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Christie Barton Senior Planner Mesa County Planning Division PO Bo x 20000 -5022 Grand Junction, CO 81502-5001 (970) 244-7191 Garfie ld Coun ty Building and Planning Department 108 8th Street , Suite 40 I , Glenwood Springs, CO 8160 I (970) 945-82 I 2/Fax: (970) 384-3470 • .L -"'" "'le(s ) """ "umocr, n _, Name(s) SSPA7453 and CPAA7452 The Cottonwoods Staf(Planner: Kathy Ea stl ey (keastley@ garfield-county.com ) Applicant: # 15 Enterprises, LLC Contact Person: Heather Henry -Connect One Design Date Sent: January 10, 20 13 Return Requested: February I , 2013 ..... -11 II L !" Type of Annlit Comprehensive Plan .. ~'" (Major) and Sketch P lan review Phone: 970-945-1377 x 1580 Co ntact: hh@ connectonedesign .com Location: 10 miles north of the Town of Debeque approximate ly at the intersection ofCR 204 (Roan Creek) and CR 202 (Kimba ll Creek) Summary of Reques t: 347-acre site proposed for a mixed use campus for learning , research and livin g related to conservation and LL', of western' includin g conservation efforts. The Garfield County Planning Department ha s received a land u se request as referenced above. Your comments are an important part of the evaluation process . In order to review all appropriate agency comments and incorporate t h h S ffR b F'd FbI 2013 em mto t e ta eport, we request your res pon se oy n av e ruarv GARFIELD COUNTY Office or Division OrnER Number or Detail Road & Brid~e -Wyatt Ke es berv Paper (24" x. 36") En g in eerin g · Chris Hale MIn . C ro ss Electronic and Pape r (24 " x 36") Attorn ey /II) El ec troni c Plannin g Commi ss ion 12 She riffs De pt.-Jim Sc ar s Vd /!J~ ~ !llectr o";c ',J 0 C'.-, , """'101' -Pub lic Paocr Ve~c l a li on ManaRcr / I I Elec tronic Enviro nm ent al Health -Paul Re as er Elec troni c I COWRADOSTATE I I LOCAL TOWNS /CITIES I I Park s and Wildlife -GJ Office Electronic ri, nf row , Electron ic To wn of Ba sa lt Elec troni c Tow n of Dc Bequc Papcr Town of Ca rbondale Paper Town of Silt Ele ctronic C it y of Rifl e Elec tron ic To wn of Para chut e Elec troni c Tow n of New Cas tl e El ec troni c D1STRICTSIS ERVICES LOCAL COUNTIES I FED AGEN CIES Grand Valle y Power El ec troni c "" r, Electroni c Fir e Di strict -De be au e Elec troni c Mesa Co unt y Elec troni c Ri o Blan co C ounty Elec troni c Pitk in Count y Elec tron ic Routt Count y El ectronic uurcau 0 1 L8nu rv l8na gemcm Elec tronic From: To: Subject: Date: Kathy, Wyatt KeesbCry Kathy A East1ey The Cottonwood s Monday, January 28 , 2013 1:59 :24 PM I have met with the High Lonesome group and Connect One Design on this project. I have no objections to this plan, but I do have some requests that I have relayed to them. 1. Any vegetation planted in the right of way becomes county property and shall be maintained by the county. 2. They must get the proper permits from the county for driveways, buildings, and utilities. 3. Any road work or upgrades must be approved by Road and Bridge . If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at any time. WyattK~y Garfield County Road & Bridge 0298 CR 333A Rifle, Co . 81650 Office-970-625-8601 Fax-970-625-8627 Cell-970-309-6073 J~nuary 31 , 20 13 Ms. Kalhy Enstley Garfie ld County Planning 10 8 8'h Street , Suite 40 I (lien wood Springs, CO 8160 I MOUNTI\IN CROSS ENGINEERING. INC. Civil and E nvironmenla l "o ln5~_1IiI RE: Re v i ew of The Cottonwoods: SSPA7453 & C PAA7452 De a r Kath y: T his o ffic e h as p e rionned a rev iew of th e docllments provided for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application lllld Sketch Plan Review for The Cottonwoods. The submi ttal was fo un d to be th o ro ug h a nd w e ll organized . The followin g comments were ge nerated : I . The app licati on material s sho uld estimate anticipated traffic and address any anticipated impacts to the Co unty Road s. 2 . The Applicant does not mention if th ~y o wn wat e r ri g ht s to su pp ort th e propose d application . 3. The application mate ria ls p ro pose 12' w id e interi or roads. A 16' width wou ld be congruent with the Co unty road sta ndard s. A PUD or var ianc es fr o m the road s ta ndard s ma y b e necessary. Feel free to ca ll if yo u have any qu es ti ons o r co mment s. Sincerely, MOllntai C ro ss Eng ineer ng , II c . C h IS Hale, P E 826 y, Grand Av e nu e, Glenwo o d Spring s, CO 81601 P: 970.945.5544 F: 970.945.5558 www .mouniain cross·eng.co m EXHIBIT I b-I From : To : Subject: Date: Kathy, Clifford Simonton Kathy A EaSley Th e Cottonwoods Mon day, February 04, 2013 10:3 1:44 AM Thanks for the opportunity to comment on the proposed Cottonwoods Campus which, if approved, would be located north of Oebeque. We have reviewed the file, and would offer no specific comment, as this proposal should have minimal to no impact on residents and visitors in Eagle County . We hope the process runs smoothly for both you and the applicant. We value our partnership with Garfield County, and we hope that you will continue to keep us in the loop on matters of mutual interest. All the very best! Cliff Simonton , Senior Planner Eagle County Community Development P.o. Box 179 Eagle , Colorado 81631 970-328-8751 clifford simootoo@ea glecolJoty.u s EXHIBIT I () Garfield County V el!e/atiol1 M({I/({I!elll ent Feb ru ary 3, 20 13 Kat hy Eas tl ey Garfield Coun ty Buil din g & Pla nn in g De p art me nt RE : The Cott o nwoods SS PA 7453 & CPAA 7452 Dear Ka th y, As thi s proj ec t moves forwa rd thro ugh th e cou nt y process, sla ff will req uest th at the app lican t provide : • A Soil M anageme nt Pl a n • A Weed Manageme nt Pl a n • A Revege ta ti on Pla n Soil Ma n age me nt Pl a n. Includ es : (i) th e area of land d istu rbed a nd vo lum e of so il m o ved, (ii) prov isions fo r sa lv ag in g o n -s it e to psoi l, (iii ) a tim e ta bl e for elim in a tin g topso il an dlo r agg rega te pil es, (iv) pl an th a t provides fo r soi l cove r if a ny dis turb ances o r stoc kpil es s it exposed for a pe ri od of 90 days or more, and (v ) erosion co ntrol and dus t su pp ress io n m eas ures and management. Weed Ma nagem ent Pla n . In cl udes: (i ) A n i nve nto ry a n d sit e m ap of Th e Co tt onwoods projec t area that s h ows Co unt y Li s ted Nox io us Weed s a nd Co lorado Lis ted A & B N ox ious W ee d s. (Co ntac t Ga rfield Cou nt y Vege tatio n Manageme nt a t 9 70-945 -1 377 ex t. 43 05 for upda ted li sts .) (ii ) A W eed M an age m ent Plan th a t add resses inve ntor ied weeds in a tim e ly a nd e ff ec ti ve m a nn e r. Reve ge t at io n Pla n. In cl udes: (i) pla nt ma te ri al li st (be spec ifi c , scientific and co mm o n names req uired), (i i ) plan tin g schedu le (to incl ud e timi ng, m ethods, and prov ision s fo r wate ri ng, if app licable), and (i i i) a map o r in fo rm atio n , prio r to fina l p la t tha t qu an tifi es the area, in ter m s o f ac res , to be di stur bed a nd su bse quen tl y reseeded o n road c ut a nd ut ility dis turbance s. Tl1is inform a ti on wi ll help de termine the amount o f secu rit y th a t will held for r evege ta tio n. An y str a w or ha y use d as a mul c h o r as a n e rosio n co nt ro l ba rri er mu st be ce rtifi e d as w eed -fr ee by 1I1 e S t a te o f Co lo rado De partm ent of A g ri c ultur e. S incere ly, yC:;;t~9 S teve An th ony Ga r field County Vegetation M anager 0375 Co unty Road 35 2, Bld g 2060 Rifl e, CO 61650 Phon e: 970·945 -1377 x 4305 Fax: 970 -62 5-593 9 EXHIBIT I P Planning Commission February 13,2013 SPPS-7452 PROJECT INFORMATION AND STAFF COMMENTS -THE COnONWOODS TYPE OF REVIEW APPLICANT (OWNER) PLANNER/CONSULTANT LOCATION ACRES ZONING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION I . DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL Sket ch Pi al] #15 Enterprises, LLC Scott Stewart, High Lonesome Ranch Heather Henry, Connect One Design; Gage Davis, Gage Davis Associate s; and Robert Lee, RPM, Inc. North of the Town of DeBeque on CR 202 (Kimball Creek Road), just west of CR 204 (Roan Creek Road) -Parcel # 2413-094-00 -004 Subject Parcel -349.93-acres Resource Lands -Gentle Slopes (RLGS) Residential Medium-High (2 to less than 6 ac/du) and Resource Lands The subject property is located at the western end of the County north of the Town of DeBeque and the Mesa County Line . The site is at the junction of Roan Creek and Kimball Creek in portions of Sections 9, 10 and 15 of Town ship 7 South, Range 98 West of the 6th P.M. The existing uses on the site include agricultural activitie s and employee housing in association with a larger holding of parcels located in the Roan Creek area known as the High Lonesome Ranch. This 'ranch' area consists of approximately 300 square miles of holdings, both leased and fee simple ownership. Figur e 1: Vicinity Map II Pa ge Planning Commission February 13, 2013 SPPS-7452 The site is proposed to function as the High lonesome Institute (HlI), a campus-style research and educational facility related to area-specific environmental issues. The proposed Hli will be located on a portion of the site and developed in a campus-style with conference space, classrooms, laboratories, administrative uses and office space; residential uses including dormitories, apartments, cabins and several single family lots will also be included. If the Planning Commission approves the Major Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan 2030 and Future land Use Map (FlUM) this site would be designated Village Center. If the amendment is not approved then the proposed Hli site would not be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. The process and review required for Sketch Plan are located in the Unified land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended in Section 5-302 (B). II. ADJACENT USES Adjacent properties to this site include public lands as well as large lot residential and agricultural parcels , some of which are also utilized for extraction activities. BlM ----- Fi gure 3 -Zon e Di strict M ap / / , , ( BlM , I , ) H ig h l one some ln stitul e j 2 1 P age Pl annin g Comm iss io n Febru ary 13, 2013 SPPS -74 5 2 The map, above, graphic ally d eno t es th e loca tio n of Burea u of Land M anageme nt (BLM) par ce ls. Land imm ed iat ely t o th e eas t of th e Hi gh Lo neso m e site is owned by Chev ro n USA Inc. w hil e propert ies t o th e so uth and so uthwes t ar e o w ned by cor po r ate entities und e r t he sa me m anage ment as th e su bj ec t site. Th e Reso urce Land zo ne di stri ct is class ifi ed as Gentle Slo pes /Lowe r Va ll ey Fl oor fo r t he subj ec t site . III. REF FERAL AGENCY COMMENTS Re ferral requ es t s were se nt t o age ncies as r equired by St at e St atut e f o r th e asso ci at ed Com pr ehens iv e Pl an Am endm ent. Th e su bmittal doc ume ntati o n inclu de d th e Sket ch Pl an inform ati o n and, fo r th e purpo se of thi s r epo rt, staff has o nl y in clud ed the r es po nses spec ific t o th e Sket ch Pl an. Garfield County Road and Bridge: Garfield County Sheriff: Garfield County Vegetation Management: Garfield County Environmental Health: Mountain Cross Engineering : Colorado Parks and Wildlife: Grand Valley Power: Debeque Fire District: Bureau of Land Management: Exhibit L Exhibit K Exhibit 0 No Response Exhibit M No Response Exhibit I No Response No Response IV. SKETCH PLAN -CONCEPTUAL REVIEW Sec ti on 5-30 1 (B)(3) provid es Ske t ch Pl an review criteria. In co n sid ering a Ske t ch Plan proposa l th e follo w in g shall be con si dered : a. Feas ib il ity and des ign char ac t eri st ics base d up on co m p li ance w ith appli cab le st and ard s; and b. Gener al co nfo rma nce with th e Comp rehensive Pl an. The p r o pose d d evelop ment i s associate d w ith Hi gh Lonesome Ra n ch w hi ch ow ns and manages l an ds spannin g seve r al co ntinu ous ecosys t em s in th e No rth Dr y Fo r k Cr eek and Kim ba ll Cr ee k va ll eys . Th ese lands includ e hi gh m esa mo unt ain s and hi gh alpin e terr ai n. Co nse rv ati on, pr ese rva tion and r es t o r atio n o f th e wes t ern land sca pe is t he f ocus o f HLI . Th e lack of d edi ca t ed faci li t ies led to th e proposa l t o prov id e a co mprehensive cam pu s fo r resea r ch and ed uca ti o n, in cludin g labo rat o ri es and housin g . A. Proposed Uses Speci f ic uses pr oposed to occur at the f ac ility have bee n ca t ego r ize d as fo llo ws : Hig h Lo nesome In stitute -a mix o f adm inistrat ive o ffices, class roo m s, labo rat o ri es , and assoc iat ed u ses to includ e a visitor ce nt er, bo t ani ca l garde n, apar tm ent s and d ormi t o ries f or st aff and stu de nts. Tr ust ees Ar ea -Th is area is p roposed t o in cl ud e homesites f or sin gle fami ly res ide nt ia l uses , fo u nder ca bin s, a clu bho use , fitn ess ce nter and spa. 31 Pa ge Planning Commi ss ion February 13, 2013 SPPS-74S2 Employee Housing/Maintenance -Employee housing, manager residence and a maintenance barn. Landscape Elements -Outdoor recreational areas including owner lawns, firepit, sun and splash area, children play area and field, gardens, and recreational areas. Associated support infrastructure is also proposed which include access roads and trails, helipad, parking, water and wastewater treatment facilities, and utility areas which include electric, so lar, geothermal and compressed natural gas. The Applicant proposes to rezone the property as Planned Unit Development in order to define allowable uses, design characterist ics and dimensional standards applicable to the property. '_."-"-'-''''-'-'--"-"-"'-'--<-~-.. _ .. _ ... ,"" ...... _..,. ... _, -..... -~-----.-.. ... _ .. -.. "" ...... _----....... -..... _~ ... __ ..... a._ " .. __ . __ ____ Ronc h ._-._ ... _ ......... ~~, •• , ........... " •• ~" .. v .. · __ ftO·_-"'''_'~'.·'''' ........... _._' ........ ... ""' ...... _ ............ . _.-.._ ...... ,.,_ou .. ... #.~!r:JE.:::::!':;:'! .... N ~ ..... '_" .... _ .. ,~-..... -.~ ............ . _ ........... , ... _,., . .. , ................ _." .. N._' .............. _ ... _" ., ........ ""'~.,,-............ .. _" ............. " .... _ . ... _" ..... _. -t-:--. . -. . . 4 I P <l g e B. ARTICLE VII -STANDARDS 1. Access Planning Commission February 13, 2013 SPPS -7452 Access to the site from DeBeque is via Mesa County Roads to Garfield County Road 204 and 202, Roan Creek Road and Kimball Creek Road , which is located approximately 7 mile s north of the Mesa County and Garfield County border. --.v..~" 'T'4l..><*ID ....... ' ...... -'O ..c .... , .. "'< ....... --""'"A"""U <.I."""<>'oU __ ""'·AOI W .. IOO ' .. "'.""r ... ""oo. .... • _ ._ ........ -'"""'0 _ ,"''''''CIl •• A'''' ..... ''''' .. + ... "".II,U1A'''''' 11"'[ IVI'!' 11(,r .,,"o _ .. _ f'UA'\""___.IIoO." ,"".,. ...... ---.... , ........ _____ .__ ""","",,,,,,r _______ L ..... '~""tJ."'J IU ~II.1(.,..' THE I WM Inc CIRCUI ATi ON & EMS PLAN .' SK£TC H I'lAN REVlE\V At subsequent stages of the review process the Applicant will have to document the amount of traffic generated by the proposal and demonstrate that the existing road system has adequate capacity to serve the development. Garfield County Road & Bridge responded to the referral, EXHIBIT L that any work to County Roads requires approval of Road & Bridge, proper permits must be obtained for driveways, buildings and utilities, and that vegetation in the right-of-way becomes the property and maintenance responsibility of the County . Mesa County al so responded to the referral request, EXHIBIT J that a copy of the traffic study (required in subsequent review stages) be forwarded to Mesa County for review as access to this site is through Mesa County via X Y, Road. The proposed internal road network includes four entrances from Kimball Creek which will be reviewed through subsequent processes, and approval for these access points will result in permits issued by Road & Bridge . The intent of the development is to gain access to the site and then minimize vehicular use within the site. This may be accomplished through the provi sion of parking situated along the perimeter of the S I Pa ge Planning Commission February 13, 2013 SPPS-7452 project with a proposed trail network that will also function as emergency access. Engineering details have been provided regarding width of interior roads and trails and it appears, at this stage of the review, that internal circulation for HLI may be accomplished in a safe and adequate manner. A separate access point at the western edge of the development is proposed for the homesites via an existing roadway that would be re-aligned and upgraded. Access to main activity area would occur by use of a pedestrian/golf cart bridge with golf carts providing motorized access for the residents. Use of the existing road corridor has several benefits such as providing separation of the homes from the activity areas and minimizing disturbances that would result with construction of a new road over Kimball Creek. Chris Hale, reviewing engineer on behalf of Garfield County, EXHIBIT M stated that a traffic analysis estimating anticipated traffic generation and potential impacts will be required and that if the roads area constructed as proposed a waiver from the road standards may be necessary. 2. Landscape Six primary Landscape zones are proposed to exist within HLI that provide distinctive landscapes consistent with the adjacent uses and, in many cases, screening of uses from other areas of HLI. One of the zones will provide a transition to the native vegetation found in the area as well as to function as defensible space for wildfire protection. Steve Anthony, Garfield County Vegetation Manager responded to the referral, EXHIBIT 0 that a Soil Management Plan, Weed Management Plan and a Revegetation Plan will be required through subsequent County review processes. Weed free straw or hay, certified by the State of Colorado Department of Agriculture, is required for any use of mulch or in use for erosion control measures. 3. Grading and Drainage The site is fairly flat with an ascending slope to the west. The homesites are proposed to be located in the lower bench consisting of pinion juniper woodland. Minimal stormwater conveyances are proposed as drainage will utilize surface infiltration techniques. Positive drainage will be maintained along the roads. 4. Utilities i. Water/Wastewater -Significant senior water rights are owned by High Lonesome Ranch and this HLI proposes to develop water wells approximately 5 Y, miles up the Kimball Creek valley for conveyance to the site. Water quality is currently being evaluated to determine treatment options, if necessary. Wastewater is proposed to be provided by a "living machine" which 'utilizes gravel infiltration and native plant materials to treat wastewater for compliance with health standards. As this is an experimentation process the Applicant proposes to provide a standard ISDS system while continuing to work with CDPHE regarding necessary permits for the "living machine". 6 I P a g (' .-~ ... ~ ...... ,.",. tl GIND o · 0"' ,.oros:t>fOWflJ5fnc.u(n.oiJ ..........:I'>ID CUM .... 'I(,O.IO'oI>{ouU<>'i., I!l I<f'M . Inc, Ul lli HE S PLA N SK ETCH flLA:lj REVIEW Planning Commission February 13, 2013 SPPS -7452 ii. Electric -Grand Valley Power is the provider for elect ri city in thi s area. Th ey responded to th e referral, EXHIBIT I that a final utility plan which contains the electric lay out will be required, easements may be necessary, relocation of any existing facilities will be at the developer's expe nse, and that they allow solar photovoltaic interconnect ions to be net metered. iii. Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) -Natural gas act ivities exist in the vic inity of this proposed development and HLI is proposing exploration in the Kimba ll Creek va ll ey which wou ld all ow for CNG use in infrastructure and the sing le family homesites . Additional f acilities such as pressure boost tanks o r storage tanks may be required and will be eva lu ated as the development moves forward. iv . Geothermal-HLI seeks to utilize natural resources associated with the site and therefore proposes to construct a geothermal heating and cooling faci lity for the in st itute complex and the lodge. Further inform ation regarding this facility w ill be provided in subsequent stages of the review process. v. So lar -Installation of solar panel arrays are proposed at the maintenance facility south of Kimball Creek Road. This facility will need to be included in the PUD Guide as an all owab le use and will be further reviewed during that process. vi. Communications -Century link is the service provided for services in the area and a sate llite collection facility and optic line distribution is proposed to provide internet, te levis ion and other services. 7 1 P age 5. Visual Analysis Planning Commission February 13, 2013 SPPS-7452 A visual analysis is required to be submitted at Sketch Plan which includes a map of ridgelines in the project area along with a written statement regarding the initial investigation . This information has been provided and the map shown below indicates the ridge lines in the area. Photographs further demonstrate the relationship of the development area with the ridgelines. Staff would request that the Visual Analysis provided at Preliminary Plan/PUD include a review of the potential impact of Light Pollution on the Kimball Creek and Roan Creek valleys. RPM. Inc , SKETC H PlAN REVIEW l(G£NO ~ __ ._,,_,,_ ............ .........:>Al. ~ -'",01"""'; ..... ~ ou......af ... -.• -,,~ ....... ll """lI~" {1 ~f"""''''''Ol.'oI '''''''' l ----..cAiCVO t .-urr(M ... -.~ 81 P age C. Comprehensive Plan Planning Commission February 13, 2013 SPPS-74S2 As a companion to this Sketch Plan review a Major Comprehensive Plan Amendment was requested. This will have been determined prior to Planning Commission consideration on the Sketch Plan. Pending decision of that request a determination of general conformance of the project with the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) cannot be determined. The existing designations on the site are Residential Medium- High and Agricultural Production/Natural, neither of which contemplates a proposal of this type. The development does meet many of the goals and policies contained within the plan and amendment to the FLUM will allow a finding that the project is in general conformance with the plan. A full review of compliance is contained in the companion Comprehensive Plan Amendment Staff Report. V. STAFF COMMENTS Upon amendment to redefine the "Neighborhood Center" to "Village Center" and add in institutional, educational, and civic uses, as well as amend the designation of this site on the FLUM, it would appear that the project is in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan 2030, as amended. At this stage of the review process adequate information has been provided to meet the criteria of the Sketch Plan. Comments regarding additional information that may be necessary at subsequent phases, as well zoning information including architectural controls and property covenants, is appropriate at Sketch Plan. Staff will work with the Applicant in preparation of submittal of a PUD / Subdivision Preliminary Plan to advise them of code requirements including plat notes, covenants, and necessary agreements regarding development and improvements. VI. PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS 91 P age EXHIBIT 1 8 CONCEPTUAL LAND PLAN PRE-APPLICATION MEETING connect one DESIGN PRESENTED BY HIGH LONESOME RANCH TO THE CITY OF GLENWOOD SPRINGS NOVEMBER 2012 ENGINEERING: RPM, INC. ROBERT LEE, P.E. ~ (.ACE DAviS AS>OCIATES 1 " --"':; :! --21 ~; t'::~ ID :2 '" .s '" E o Q; c o ~ .r: Ol I .r: o c o 0- '" E ~ ID c o ~ .r: .~ I :; ~)