The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About5.C Minutes from December 3, 1979 BOCC'�: fl:: • Proceedings of the Board of County .Comm sioners;'Garfield County, Colo.,i! : December Larry Kontour, Park Rangerlfor,ltfie:':,Divi'sion of Parks and Outdoor Recreation, 'spoke too•th'el,Board about parking areas for snowmobilers. ,Road .Supervisor:;Leonard Bowlby was also present;, Mr. Kontour:77said critical •areas • 'i include the Buford Road, the•Cline+:top, and Prince Creek. Mr. Cerise teld him that th'e.tiPrince Creek area is in Pitkin County•and he,'' should`Rcontactithe Road Department there. ' Ron': Liston who::iivesa•t'the!to r'• • Buford Road,joined the: n: p of the discussionl:ii; +{: • I, Ron Liston presented an' application•forithe'Four Mile Ranch PUD. consisting of 370:units on l38acre5.•'• This was the Martino=Stevensi ro crt �re �!F++��'' ' owned Mr. Baldwin•said„that with continu'e•ldeyelopmentlon Four and iMiles �, something twill he ohave ur ito bendone'tonthehroad''' d' p , down to the stop 'sign. He saidlthe,developer has agreed to look at it and do some work on the:rbad'!. iThey . . do not have the total amount :of wate ythat'will be needed. They will be able to hook ,onto Glenwood Springs' sewer line and hope to'negotiate for''water. Mr. Velasquez moved that tho'PUD application be'referred to • the Planning Commission. Seconded by,Mr.'iJolley and carried unanimousl'. I il•.':'t i 1 Mr. Jolley moved that vouchers for;;the'month of November be approved!' i i� !! :� �'� ; and carried unanimously..jI14 •.:ir ' I . • '' „>y..” asJsubmittod. Seconded by Mr!,.1/elasquez Greg Trainor and Dave Crane appeare%d•;before !the Board in regard to the 4.Housing Task;.Force! and'' ro posed' They have met with Ray Baldwin and�have';made a,, few changes to the grant' application,;W p p g .gram. _tentative approval by the Departm rj ,of•:.Enernor .... h Ich • sea • aila evso ;i; place, but it has never alll,been'•'puv{toge.ther. The assistant splanner d twill of tbe•ablehe rto'tdonsoniesofithe. lworkmj r. :along with Silt's'and .Rifle's planners Mr: Velasquez asked if the County's action On this'would''endorse''i:1 anything else or ensure the perpetuity.bf;the!'existing committee. He was assured, it wduld n ,..i i Mr. Velasquez moved that!.the`following subdivision exemption resolutions, bei • ! ' rl,'.;,i : G...'; • Jeanne McPherson;;' N79-150,zLarry=`A: 8! Bernice Kindall; #79-151, Otto Zinko.- Seconded:,by7Mr1 Jolleyeand. - carried unanimously. , a'1i:i::: , ,:;10' F, ,i : Y! i. '••• �'.il� 44_Y • ' '+. �' it . Mr. Velasquez made a motion, .to but or•ie the,'count attorneyto initiate proceedin•s'•forhe collectionfof S'�...Iz y g L';',.'t , I.. 6.'I. 1978 taxes due in 197,9 .on ,federal•ipropertyjleased by the U.S. government! to De elopnient'' Engineering`, Inc. (Paraho) . Seconded bye Mr, Jolleyi:..andE'carried':.unanimousl ,,..' Y• . i'L/O L'v it '„� ✓2.i,;7/Q�°jcYf'►s' Randy Brown' and Bill Jochems appeared. before ithe Board in regard to t i(A r`,!, 1', �' ', , . ,Ire ,' :'i Mr. Jochems 'said the school can assurelcattle<drive rights to the necessary I j!�• county custodian of. the' rightftor!.b7•,icontracting individually with those i olvediesMr:; Abplanalp disagreed saying'it would be, a.' restricted right,_of=way•;and he does not feel there=is any authoziity1for;.thati.::: He•said � P disagreed, the road could be torn!`upaand!�restricted'l'to motorized traffic. Mr. Jochems said vaaati,on',of'thelroad,•is more attractive to , theschool lyecaii0heyl"could use the land. Mr. Abplanalp' responded• that 'soineday'it • : could be necessary to- re -.open'. the'i'oad.i;and•then'the county would not have,' the'right of=pay: Mr:i Brown said' it is only fair, since' the''county i 'iil'(be°getting land:for the new road Mr. Velasquez said} that the school ' might relocate someday andith'e:'roa woul'd•be re -opened, but that as long'as the schogl�ii'there, motorized • traffic -could be prohibited,'grdwn:said that the school is portion of -the road land'asked.if ,,J�nej,county''would be willing to ship aand''seal:uit''s portionnstTetCominissioners agreed to do• both..•i'Mr•.iBerwn'',.:thelr'�•asked._if 'the county would do the construction if the.!schoolipaid for it. Mr. Abplanalp said there would be,ao.�legalproblein since it is a public road, however -Leonard Bowlby and the . Board expressed reluctance.!becauseofcriticism'from private contractors:. Mr: Brown saidlhe thought it would be cheaper. .Mr•...Velasquez ;toldFhim "the. county is considering con&acting out 'work because ,it 'can be done faster'and cheaper.privately I;Mr,:4o11ey,said he would rather the school contract the work' out'4and 'the other Board members' agreed . with; himl i Mr:: Brown said they will begin work_as. •soon as possible: next • spring: Mr. Velasquez moved that that,portiWof Ro4106 be removed from the county primary road system and restrict it to non -motorized traffic, that':that.portion of the road be torn up by county forces''i•that the county chip and seal the new road and furnish';fencing'materials for it. Seconded by',Mr. Jolley and.carried''unanimously. L. Meeting adjourned at 5 p.m. I ATTEST: �ne1 gar -'777 Dep22Qty Cl k of the Bojd :. i -, i.:..Monday, December 10, 1979 The regular meeting of.the:Garfield..County Board of Commissioners was held on Monday, December 10, 1979, beginning at 8 a.m. Roll call was7taken; present were Chairman Pleven Cerise and Commissioner Larry Velas- quer. Commissioner Dick Jolley absent due to.a death in the family. Also present were County Attorney Art Abplanalp and Deputy- Clerk :of.{,(the Board, Nancy Page. v. Bob Chaffin presented a'request,fora.time extension for the Westbank Metro District: •,• Also attending were Lyle Beattie, John Huebingeri1.and'County Planner Ray Baldwin. Mr. Chaffin explained that'the.Commissioners' approval of the district waslconditigaed in part upon approval of westbank IV and the Hillview'PUD before December 42, 1979. He said;that•'since the;projects have not yet been approved, a six-morithtime extension is needed. Mr. Velasquei inoved that"the-resolution prepared by the county attorneY.2amending•the approval of the 'district, be'adopted•ana that'.the;?cl?airman be authorized to sign it."• Mr. Cerise st to second the motion.'' ;•Carried ' ,�.,i"+'" ' ':!':' is • p gpped: down as chairman •' sa p''t 1d 40ESOLUTION NO. 79-152 1'� I i { I ' � !' 1 • 11 1I 1 . G �Liii jY!, SLI �ysS+ a .:. ti::, ,.;: z. err I ,I ; T. , • ::, WHEREAS, the Board of, CounC C 'mmiss !` ! conditionally approvedY Q... 4nera of Garfield County, Colorado, by1.70717:0:77.8. its,Resolu 7 No: 79-23, 9 the proposed;serviceiplai�'of.Westbank Netropolitali District; upon; the condition that final plat approval of certain'propos'ed''subdivisions occur prior to the;'12th day of,'Deceinber,' 1979 otherwise provided to said date,,'and c "' .'y. .. a , ; unles¢ WHEREAS, the Boardehas been.,reguested by Petitioners to extend said date for a and°;' • S 4 i ! I: _periodjo1 I Irmonthai" WHEREAS, theBoard is satisfied'that progress is being made toward'the submittal Of the required final plats, but that consideration thereof may not occur prior to the 12th day of June, 1980, and BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO 1 GARFIELD COUNTY Board of County Commissioners P.O. Box 640 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Telephone (303) 945 9Z 9158 FLAVEN J. CERISE RICHARD C. JOLLEY LARRY VELASQUEZ April 10, 1980 Randolph R. Brown, Director Colorado Rocky Mountain School 1493 106 Road Carbondale, Colorado 81623 Re: Relocation of County Road 106 Dear Mr. Brown: This letter will confirm that the Board of County Commis- sioners of Garfield County has reviewed your survey of the proposed relocation of Garfield County Road 106, north of the Colorado Rocky Mountain School, and consider the proposed relocation acceptable. In accordance with the actions of this Board taken on the 3rd of December, 1979, Garfield County will assist in the relocation of the road in the following manner: (1) applying a chip -and -seal surface to the County portion of the roadway after construction to county specifications; (2) removal of the existing road between the entrance to CRMS and the new construction from the county primary system, and classifying the same as county secondary road restricted to non -motorized traffic; (3) removal of the present hard -surfaced roadway from the non -motorized secondary road; and (4) fencing mat- erials to prevent use of the non -motorized secondary road by motorized traffic and to fence the new roadway which fencing will be installed by CRMS if requested by the County. The reclassifications of the affected portion of existing County Road 106 will be accomplished upon completion of the new roadway between State Highway 133 and the existing County Road. Should your understanding of the agreeement between CRMS and Garfield County be any different than that outlined above, please contact the County Attorney at the above telephone number. BCC/mrd XC: Mr. William Jochems, Attorney at Law Post Office Box 195 Glenwood Springs, CO Sincerely BOARD OF COUNTY COMMI,IONERS GARFIELD COUNTY, CO .��DO Richard C. Chairman 81601 Jolle