Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1.0 ApplicationSite Name: CO3 Newcastle (AWS) 4PINNACLE Ni CONSULTING, INC January 5, 2016 David Pesnichak, AICP Senior Planner Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th St Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 dpesnichak@garfield-county.com RE: Antenna Modification for Verizon Wireless Site: CO3 Newcastle (AWS) Site Address: 319 County Road 138, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Parcel #:2123-351-00-1201 Zoning Code: Rural Dear Mr. Pesnichak, Verizon Wireless is a leading provider of wireless services with over 116 million subscribers and is in need of upgrading its antennas at the existing facility located at 319 County Road 138, Glenwood Springs, CO 81601. In order to ensure that adequate and uninterrupted service is maintained at all times per their License Agreement with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as well as provide the residents, businesses, and traveling public in the area with new and faster voice and data services through the deployment of LTE/4G technology and now AWS. This site remains a critical component to the overall Verizon Wireless network and carries a high volume of call traffic every day making this an important site to receive these technological upgrades and remain in service. Verizon Wireless is seeking approval from Garfield County to upgrade its antennas and accessory equipment at the above referenced existing telecommunications facility. Verizon Wireless is submitting the following Administrative under the FCC ruling of Section 6409 (a). The above referenced telecommunications facility qualifies under 6409 (a) because the facility is existing and all of the requested upgrades to the facility will not substantially change the physical dimensions of the tower or base station. Per Section 6409 (a), Verizon Wireless will be monitoring the shot clock. If there is no response within 60 -days of this submittal, they will deem this project approved. If you need any further information or have any questions, please call me at (720) 460-2090 or by email at Jennifer.jisa ® oinnacleco.net. Please forward any correspondence/permits to my attention at the address provided below. Thank you for your assistance in with this project. Sincerely, Jenny Jisa Site Acquisition & Zoning Pinnacle Consulting, Inc. Consultant to Verizon Wireless Page I of 2 She Name: CO3 Newcastle (AWS) Verizon Wireless proposes to modify its antennas, communication equipment, cables, accessories and any other items necessary to achieve the successful secure and ongoing operation of its telecommunication facilities. Per the enclosed drawings titled CO3 — New Castle — Zoning Drawings, dated December 21, 2015, Verizon Wireless will be modifying its communication facility in the following way: • Installing additional equipment inside Verizon Wireless' existing leased equipment shelter. This equipment will not be visible from outside the room. • Remove two (2) existing Omni Antennas and replacing them with six (6) new panel antennas. These antennas will utilize new sector frames. In total there will be three (3) new sectors. Over all facility height will not be increasing. • Install three (3) new remote radio heads to a mount behind the antenna mount on monopole. Total of three (3) remote radio heads. • Install one (1) over -voltage protector on monopole to provide surge protection. Two (2) DC power will run to new over - voltage protection. • Remove and add any necessary cables. • Remove un -necessary equipment inside Verizon Wireless's existing leased equipment shelter. Page 2 of 2 Garfield County Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 www.earfleld-countv.com LAND USE CHANGE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM TYPE OF APPLICATION _ ❑ Administrative Review 1- 0 Development in 100 -Year Floodplain ❑ Limited Impact Review • Development in 100 -Year Floodplain Variance • Major Impact Review 0 Code Text Amendment B Amendments to an Approved LUCP 0 Rezoning ■ LIR ■ MIR ❑ SUP ❑ Zone District ■ PUD ■ PUD Amendment 0 Minor Temporary Housing Facility 0 Administrative Interpretation ❑ Vacation of a County Road/Public ROW • Appeal of Administrative Interpretation ❑ Location and Extent Review • Areas and Activities of State Interest 0 Comprehensive Plan Amendment • Accommodation Pursuant to Fair Housing Act ❑ Pipeline Development 0 Variance • Time Extension (also check type of original application) INVOLVED PARTIES Owner/Applicant Name: Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC Phone: ( ) Mailing Address: 3131 S. Vaughn Way, 5th Floor City: Aurora State: CO Zip Code: 80014 E-mail: Stacey.Bell-Brower@Verizonwiireless.com Representative (Authorization Required) Name: Pinnacle Consulting c/o Jenny Jisa Phone: (720 )460-2090 Mailing Address: 8480 E. Orchard Road, Suite 3650 City: Greenwood Village State: CO Zip Code: 80111 E_mail:jennifer.jisa@pinnacleco.net PROJECT NAME AND LOCATION Project Name: CO3 Newcastle Assessor's Parcel Number: 2 1 2 3. 3 5 1 _ 0 0. 1 2 0 Physical/Street Address: 319 County Road 138 Legal Description: Lot 3, Senor Mesa Exemption Plat as Recorded at Reception Number 429625 Northeast 1/4 of section 35, Township 5 South, Range 90 West of the 6th principal meridian Zone District: Rural Property Size (acres): PROJECT DESCRIPTION. Existing Use: Telecommunications Facility Proposed Use (From Use Table 3-403): No Change in Use Description of Project: Verizon would like to further modify the telecommunication faality by Removing 2 existing Omni antennas and replacing with 6 new panel antennas, 2 per sector, and to add 3 new sector frames Verizon will also need to add accessory equipment such as new cables- 3 Remote Radio Heads, and 1 Overprotection Unit. REQUEST FOR WAIVERS Submission Requirements 0 The Applicant requesting a Waiver of Submission Requirements per Section 4-202. List: Section: Section: Section: Section: Waiver of Standards 0 The Applicant is requesting a Waiver of Standards per Section 4-118. List: Section: Section: Section: Section: 1 have read the statements above and have provided the required attached information which is correct„ nd accurate to the best of my knowledge. /75-71-0 t(:,=' Signat of Prop Owner Date OFFICIAL USE ONLY File Number: ____ ____ Fee Paid: $ Jennifer Jisa From: Bell -Brower, Stacey <Stacey.Bell-Brower@VerizonWireless.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 1:52 PM To: Jennifer Jisa; dpesnichak@garfield-county.com Subject: CO3 New Castle AW5_Letter of Authorization_Address: 319 Country Road 138, Glennwood Springs, Co_1.5.2016 Dear Mr. Pesnichak: Please let this correspondence serve as consent for Jenny Jisa, with Pinnacle Consulting, Inc., to submit necessary correspondence and negotiate on behalf of Verizon Wireless with regard to the proposed AWS modifications at the telecom facility captioned above. Please feel free to contact me if you need anything further. Sincerely, Stacey L. Bell -Brower Real Estate Specialist— Contractor yG1 Verizon Wireless 3131 5 Vaughn Way #550 Aurora, CO 80014 Cell: (303) 901-3092 Stacey.Beil-Brower@Verizon Wi reless.cont Garfield County l Community Development Department 108 8th Street, Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 www.earfield-countv.com PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY DATE: December 8, 2015 PROJECT: Amendment to an approved Special Use Permit PROPERTY OWNER: GAMBELL, THOMAS R REPRESENTATIVE: Jenny Jisa of Pinnacle Consulting, Inc. PARCEL NUMBER: 212335100120 LOCATION: 319 138 COUNTY RD, NEW CASTLE ZONING: Rural TYPE OF APPLICATION: Minor Amendment to an Approved Special Use Permit (Admin) I. GENERAL DESCRIPTION Pinnacle Consulting, representing Verizon, is seeking a modification to a Special Use Permit issued to GAMBELL, THOMAS R for an existing telecommunications facility. The facility was approved for a telecommunication tower in 1993 and memorialized under Resolution 93-109 (Reception Number 456219). The conditions of approval included Number 8, which states: "Any and all expansion or modification of the facility will require an amendment to the SUP." This SUP was modified in an amended Land Use Change Permit through a Director's Decision issued on February 1, 2013 and allowed for the "installation of two additional omni -whip antennas to the existing tower." Verizon would now like to further modify the telecommunication facility by "Removing 2 Omni antennas and replacing with 6 new antennas, 2 per sector, and add 3 new sector frames. This is a re-sectorization project (Adding a sector). This is adding antennas but the height of the tower will remain the same." II. REGULATORY PROVISIONS APPLICANT IS REQUIRED TO ADDRESS An amendment to a previously approved Special Use Permit is reviewed by the County pursuant to Section 4- 106 of the Land Use and Development Code. Page 1 of4 III. REVIEW PROCESS To process a request for an Amendment to an Approved Land Use Change Permit, the applicant shall schedule a pre -application conference. Within 10 days of the conference and after receiving all necessary information, the Director shall make one of the following determinations: a. Minor Modification b. Substantial Modification. c. Determination by the BOCC IV. DETERMINATION In reviewing the information submitted (attached), the Director has determined that the Review Criteria (Section 4-106.C) for determining this proposed amendment to be a Minor Modification, has been met, as follows: 1. Comply with all requirements of this Code; The Amendment continues to meet al! requirements of the Code. 2. Do not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan; The Amendment does not conflict with the County's adopted Comprehensive Plan. 3. Do not change the character of the development; The Amendment does not change the character of the development 4. Do not alter the basic relationship of the development to adjacent property; The Amendment does not change the basic relationship of the development to adjacent properties. 5. Do not change the uses permitted; The Amendment does not change the uses currently permitted. 6. Do not require amendment or abandonment of any easements or rights-of-way; The Amendment does not require abandonment of any easements or rights of way. 7. Do not increase the density; The Amendment does not increase the density of the project. 8. Do not increase the zone district dimensions to an amount exceeding the maximum dimension in the applicable zone district in Table 3-201; and The Amendment does not increase the zone district dimensions to an amount exceeding the maximum dimensions in the Rural Zone District. 9. Do not decrease the amount of the following to an amount below the minimum required in the applicable zone district: a. Amount of dedicated Open Space; b. The size of or change in the locations, lighting, or orientation of originally approved signs; c. Any zone district dimensions in Table 3-201. The Amendment does not decrease any of the previous items to an amount below the minimum required in the Rural zone district. In addition, staff has reviewed these proposed changes in light of the conditions of approval associated with the original SUP and the amended permit and finds that, so long as the colors of the new antenna are consistent with the prescribed paint color and there is no increase in height, staff does not believe this proposed amendment constitutes a substantial change to the approved Special Use Permit. Page 2 of 4 V. APPLICATION REVIEW A. Reviewed by: Staff for technical completeness and compliance with standards B. Public Hearing(s): None C. Referral Agencies: None VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS The request for an Amendment to an Approved Land Use Change Permit shall submit all of the material consistent with Table 4-201, as well as any other information deemed necessary by the Director. Submittal requirements include the following for this Minor Modification: A. General Application Material (4-203.B), including a. Application Form b. Letter of Authorization, for any consultant acting on behalf of the owners and/or leaseholder (See attached memo) c. Statement of Authority, authorizing an agent to act on any corporation, LLC, trust or other entity (See attached memo) d. Deed or title commitment e. Legal Description of Property f. Fees and Payment agreement form B. Copy of previously approved Land Use Change Permit and amendments C. Vicinity Map (4-203.C) D. Revised Site Plan (4-203.D) clearly showing the proposed modifications as they relate to the existing approved telecommunication facilities. E. Elevation drawings of proposed modifications as they relate to the existing approved telecommunication facilities. VI. APPLICATION REVIEW FEES This application will be subject to the following fees and deposit requirements: Planning Review Fees: $ 300 Amendment to a Land Use Change Permit Plus any additional Staff time charged at staff hourly rate of $40.50 Referral Agency Fees: $ TBD (includes consulting engineer fees billed at an hourly rate) County Surveyor: $ N/A Recordation: $ N/A Total Deposit: $300 Page 3 of 4 Disclaimer The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the County. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. This summary does not create a legal or vested right. This summary is good for 6 months from the date of signature. Direct s Findin: of Minor Modificati 1 December , 2015 Fred Jarman, Director • .mmunity Development Date Pre -application Summary Prepared by: avi • Pesnichak, Sg r ,5 e December 8, 2015 Date Page 4 of 4 mately 1 month if submittal is complete e a a D. Section 4-106 Amendment to an Approved Land Use Change Permit Garfield County Amend an Approved Land Use Change Permit (Section 4-106) bILWIG •Submission of Information pertaining to the requested amendment *Applicant has 6 months to submit application its AfIr- Yti : 5t±p2: DIrci ect7)121r. 1ri ,ir..- i *Within 10 days the Director will make one of the following determinations: Minor Modification BOCC Determination Substantial Modification Step 3: Application Submittal Step Z: l.oniplE'teriess i2E viow 110 business days,to review *if Incomplete, 60 days to remedy dsficlenaes Stoop 5: f_valuatirin by Director Step o: Director's Decision +Call-up Period : within 10 drys of Directors Decision •Applicant has 1 year to manta -fly conditions of approval if needed to determine substantial or minor modification Step 3: BOCC Decision •ata public meeting +If BOCC determines it to be a minor modification • proceed with Administrative Revkw for Minor modifications •if BOCC determines it to bee Substantial MOB Modification, proceed With new application Sten 3: New Land Use Change Application •see picicea for Land U3e Change Permit 0 0 (SECTION 2-02. APPLICATION FEES Garfield County EXHIBIT A To Resolution 2014-60 - PLANNING REVIEW PROCESS FEE SCHEDULE i - 6.,3:r"1: Review Pr1ce.,5 Land Use Charge Permits ) sr'zfist.' 4-103 Administrative Review $250 4-105 Limited Impact $400 4-106 Major Impact $525 4-107 Minor Temporary Employee Housing $250 4-107 Amendment to an approved LUCP $300 4-108 Vacation of a County Road or Public ROW $400 1 4-109 Development in 100 -year Floodplain $400 4-110 Development in 100 -year Floodplain Variance $250 4-111 Location and Extent Staff Hourly Rate 4-112 Call-up to the BOCC Staff Hourly Rate 4-113 Rezoning $450 4-114 Code Text Amendment $300 4-115 Variance $250 4-116 Administrative Interpretation $250 4-117 Administrative Interpretation Appeal $250 4-118 Waiver of Standards •Part of Application 4-119 Accommodation Pursuant to the FFHA $250 6-202 PUD Zoning $500 6-203 PUD Zoning Amendment $300 7-707 Small Temporary Employee Housing $50 9-101 Pipeline Plan $400 14-302 1041: Areas & Activities of State Interest: Minor Permit $1,000 14-303 1041: Areas & Activities of State Interest: Major Permit $2,500 Takings Determination Staff Hourly Rate Chapter 4 Comprehensive Pian Amendment $450 Divisions of Land 5-202 _ Public/County Road Split Exemption $300 5-203 Rural Land Development Option Exemption $400 5-301 - Minor Subdivision T 5400 5-302.6 Sketch Plan (Major or Conservation) $325 5-302.0 Preliminary Plan (Major or Conservation) $675 5302.0 Final Plan/Plat (Major or Conservation) $200 5-304 Preliminary Plan Amendment $325 5-305 Final Plat Amendment $100 5-306 Common Interest Communit rySubdivision - $400 5-307 Vacating a plat $250 Staff Hourly Rate _ _ Director/Manager $5050 Senior Planner 540.50 Administrative Assistant $30.00 Other Fees (Application agency review fees and outside consultant review fees, as authorized pursuant to the Regulations, such as the Colorado Geologic Survey) TBD - 6 The following guidelines shall be used for the administration of the fee structure set forth above: 1. All applications shall be submitted with a signed Agreement for Payment form set forth below. 2. County staff shall keep accurate record of actual time required for the processing of each land use application, zoning amendment, or subdivision application. Any additional billing will occur commensurate with the additional costs incurred by the County as a result of having to take more time that that covered by the base fee. 3. Any billings shall be paid prior to final consideration of any land use permit, zoning amendment, or subdivision plan. All additional costs shall be paid to the execution of the written resolution confirming action on the application. 4. Final Plats, Amended or Corrected Plats, Exemption Plats or Permits will not be recorded or issued until all fees have been paid. 5. In the event that the Board determines that special expertise is needed to assist them in the review of a land use permit, zoning amendment, or subdivision application, such costs will be borne by the applicant and paid prior to the final consideration of the application. All additional costs shall be paid prior to the execution of the written resolution confirming action on the application. 6. If an application involves multiple reviews, the Applicant shall be charged the highest Base Fee listed above. 7. Types of "Procedures" not listed in the above chart will be charged at an hourly rate based on the pertinent planning staff rate listed above. 8. The Planning Director shall establish appropriate guidelines for the collection of Additional Billings as required. It -51 iI' 4 ; % RECORDED T 00 [Lott( 1,0i. DEC 07 1993 otc 1 456219 MILDRED ALIDORFip COME CLERK GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO STATE OF COLORADO) )114 County of Garfield 4 a At a meeting ;be Board of C.ounty Conunissioners for airfield County,' Colorado, held in the Connnissioners' Meeting Room, Garfield County Courthouse., in Glenwood Springs On 1 Monday the 6th day or December A.D. 19_21.. these lifele present Elmosr (Bucky) Arbaney Arnold L. MackleY Marian I. Smith Don Derord Mildred Al•dorf Chuck Deschenee Commissioner Chairman . Commissioner , Commis' stoner • County Attorney • Clerk of the Board • County Administrator when the following proceedings, among others 'tem had and done, to -wit: RESOLUTION NO. 93-109 A RESOLUTION CONCERNED WITH THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR THE US WEST NEW VECTOR GROUP. WHEREAS, the Board ofCounty Commissioners ofGarfield County, Colorado, has received application from US WEST NEW VECTOR GROUP for a consatmication tower (cellular phone site) in the AIR/RD Zone District on the following described tracts of land: ; (See Attached) (in the State of Colorado and the County of Garfield); and WHEREAS, the Board held a public bearing on the lat day of November, 1993, and the 15th day ofNovember, 1993, upon the question orwhether the above-described Special the Permit abotikl be granted or denied, at which hearing the public and interetted persons were given the opportunity to empress their opinions regarding the issuance amid Special Use Permit; and ' - WHEREAF4 the Board on the basis of substantial competent evidence produced at the, aforementioned hearing. hu made the following determination of fact: 1. That prow publication and public notice was provided u required by law for the hearing before the Board of County Commiasioness. • 1001108851tPfil 2. That the hearing before the Board or County Commissioners was extensive and complete, that all pertinent rads, matters and issues were submitted and *it i01 3. That the application Is in compliance ij with the Garfield County 7Andrig Basol interested parties were heard it that hearing. 1978, as amended, 4. That the proposal Special Use Permit, with mitigating factors, is in leneral cornpl knee With surrounding land uses and zoning in Garfield County. ' 5, For the above stated and other reasons, the proposed use is in the ten interest of the'. health, safety, monde, convenience, order, prosperity and welfare or the citizens', or Garfield County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board ofCounty Commbnionern ofOrtfieid County, Colorado, that the Special Use Permit be and hereby b authorized permitting the use nor the above described bare of land for a cellular phone site. upon tie follosing specific conditions! 1. All representations of the applicant shall be considered conditions of apsrroval union stated otherwise by the Board of County Commusionen. 2. All utilities AO be placed imderground. 3. All structures shall be painted in earthtone. 4. All noise generation shall be accordance with state law. 5. All new cut slopes or grading shall be revegetated with certified waxl-free seed.' A reveptionierosion protrction plan shall be !submitted prior to any excavation bemgt ,conducted. Control of noxious weeds is the responsibility of the property owner. 6. No maternal lighting shall be alloy ed. 7. All conditions set forth in a November 12,1993 letter from the Walter's Group to adjacait property owners are considered conditions of approval. 1 , r ie, 1 1 8. Any and all expansion or modification of the facility wall requhe an amendment to the i SUP. , f 9. Tree planting will occur on Mr. Dieter Sander's property consistent with an agreement reached on November 15, 1993, with an expenditure cap of $9000.00. P : 1 10. ' Prior to the issuance of an SUP, the applicant shall submit documentation regarding i any FCC approvals necessary for the facility. 1 ' 11. Snow removal will be funded consistent with representations in a November 1211993 •rr t L letter from Dave Rutter (The Walter's Group). 12. USFS Wildfire Protection Guidelines will be followed in the construction If _ .. ... v.,-..-,•- • - 13. • kcurrent nailing address and phone number will be distributed to all adjacent proPril, ,,i.... ! l' — ,,i • ' ,1 ), structures. owners to report interference. i* 7, 14. Landscrping shall be aged for two years ftom the date of plating. If ese■smsy, planting shall be repbced the knowing spring. 15. Mummery report, describing the status of required landscaping shall be IltitpitiadeEt one and two-year Intervals to the Darfield County Planning with the one and two-year anniversary of the initial planting. Dated this 6th day or december , A.D. 19.22—.. GARFIELD COUNTY BOARD Oil COMMISSIONERS, GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: • of the Board .0400, Chairman Upon motion duly made and seconded the foregoing Resolution was adapted by the following vote. Elmer Mackey) krbeney Arnold L. Macklkv Marian Smith Ara Aye ,Aye STATE OF COLORADO ) lve County or Garfield County Clerk and ex -officio Clerk of the Board of Co®ty Comttineas in and for the County and State aforesaid do hereby certify that the annexed and foregoing Resolution is truly copied from the Records of the Proceeding of the Board of County Commissioners for said Garfield County, now in my off= IN WITNESS WHEREOF, have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said County, at Glenwood Springs. this __day of A.D. 19_, • County Cleric and a x-olFicio Oerk of rhe Board of County. Commiesloners Et t 100* 068S PAO. 062A 69Ck1PTION - LEAST PA10EL Eta L 0P LAND SITUATED 111 A PO19110Il Or 101 3, BENOIt MESA 1011 PLAT AS flECOWUEU AT ftcNUMMIj10N NUMMI 429026, t1E1Nd A PORTIONPORTION OR T119 NORTHEAST 011E-0UARTE Or SECTION 36, II1WNtITIIP 8 ' $0UTH,'U!AN06 90 WEST OF TIIE SIXTH PIIIIIC1PAL HEfl1UtAN, COUNTY or GARFIELD, SIAM OF COLOfADO, Hunt PAnt1CULAI1LY mammal AC POL.LOWBI COMMENCING At THE NOITIIIWEBT CORNEfl or SAID Lot 3• THENCE BOUPI s10'80'S1" CAST A DISTANCE OF 362.40 rest 10 INF 111UE Pol it or t100L11N11r0: THEME SOWN T0041'13" E1.51 A UIs1ANCE or 90.01 rut; 1711ENCE SOUTH 13'18'40" WEST A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET; Mktg NOfl1H 7141'1!'. WEST A UL6TANCE OF 60.00 FEET: THENCE 110111N '131181474 SAM A UI8TANCS OF 40.00 FEET 10 1HE 1RUE P01NT OF BEGINNING. CONTAIIII110 2,000 SQUARE FLET 110111 011 Less. LEGAL[bE$Cfl1Pl2OH - t1IGRi8S-EGRESS 1 UTILITY EASEMENT RAN 149EMEH1. 10.00 AND 20.00 FEET 1M WIDTH, OVER AND ACROSS A POfl110N OF LOT 3, 8011011 MEGA EXEMPTION PLAT AS moonlit') AT motion IIUMBEfl 429026, BrINO A POnn1014 OF 111E NORTHEAST OIIE- ._t DUARTETI or SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 6 MIN, RANGE 90 WE8T OF 111E SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY Or QARrIELU, STATE OF COL111ADo, BEING 1.00 rIET AND 10,00 FEET on 0111150 S10E Or THE FOLLQWIH0 DESCRIBED CENTEUL1tIEt COHHENCIN0 AT THE OOUINEASI CORNETT or 111E AROVE-DESCRIBED LEASE PAncEL; THENCE 11011111 13.10'4/' EAST A1000 111E EASIEIILY LATE OF SAID LEASE PARCEL A DlSIATIcE or 11.50 rCET 10 THE TRUE POINT OF BEOIIIIIIIIG; 1IIENGE 111E FULLOWII.ti TIIIIEE (31 COURSES ALONG THE •CEIIIERL[IIE or SAID EASEIIEIII, SAID EASEMENT BEING 20.00 MET IN tWIDITI: '1. THENCE SUU1II 02.12'20- EAST A DISTANCE OF 31.30 FEET; 2♦ 111E1ICE UUTII 30"00'10" WEST A UISTAHCE OF 42.20 rEE1: 3. 111EIICE W111 40641'31' WEST A DISIAIICE Or 26.60 rEET; ',HENCE INC rOLLOWITlG CCUI1SE ALONG TIIE CENIEnLINE OF SATO EASE- MENT. SA11j EASEHEHt BEING 10.00 FEET IN WIn11I: t ,. 4. 'THENCE ROUTH 40'41'31' WEST A DISTANCE OF 29.08 FEET; THENCE lilt FOLLOWING NINE (9) COURSES AL0140 THE CENTERLINE OF ,SAID EASE11ENT;SA10 EASEMENT BEING 20.00 FEET IN 1410111: 6. THENCE SOUTH 40'41'31- WEST A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; 0. ,11ENC1 SOUTH 00'4:'30 West A U151ANIE of 31.03 FEET; • •T. THENCE SOUTH 81'22'51" WEST A DISTANCE OF 143.79 FEET; .0. TItENCC 50U1H 55832'29' WEST A DI9TAIICE OF 69.89 FEET: 9. TI(ENCr SOUTH 32.01'42' WEST A DISTANCE OF 60.31 FEET; 10. THEM- 50UT11 234'54'14" WEST A DISTANCE OF 54.71 FEET; • "1:11. 1HENCT WWII 10'10'59" WEST A DISTANCE OF 10.29 FEET; 12. THEIIC SOUIII 15.35'21" SASI A.OIBTAHCE OF 39.66 FEET; 13. THERE SOUTH 10'00'29' EAST A DISTANCE OF 11.31 FEET TO IRE . 11 ME OF lEflHINUS 0E NORTHERLY LINE OF THE 35 FOOT ACCESS, " UTILITY A�10 DITCH EASEHEH1 As 5110WN CH SAID 'mon MESA EXEMPTION PLAT. i LEGAL DEf RIPTIOII - 10' UIItITY EASEMENT AM EA9E11 AT, 10.00 FEET 111 WIDTH, OVEN AND ACROSS A PORT1011 OF 1,4M LoT 3, 0 1011 MESA EXEMPTION PLAT AS RECORDED AT RECEPTION HUMBER 1 1';'421625, E11I0 A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION +>i` 06, TOM HIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 90 WEST OF 1HE SIXTH PRINCIPAL NERIDIAII, COUNTY OF GARFIELO, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING 5.00 FEET °NAME' SLOE OF TIIE FOLLOWIIIO DESCRIBED CEHTETILIHE: COHMEHC1110 AT 1HE SOUTHWEST CORIIER OF THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED LEASE ' PARCEI;:THENCE'SOUTH 76.11'13' EAST AL0N0 1011: SOUTH LIRE OF SA10 jLEA8E.PARCEL A DISTANCE OF 0.00 FEET PO THE TRUE POINT OF 'BEGINNING; ?HENCE THE FOLLOWING THTIEE (3) COURSES AL0110 THE P�CENTERLINE OF, SAID EAIEHENT: t 1. .I f THEME SOUTH 51'04'36" WE9T A D19TAIrCE OF 70,15 FEET; , 2. THENCE 5001H 32'34'59" EAST A DISTANCE OF 00.42 FEET; �.• 113. IHENCE SOUTH 47'07'34" WEST A DISTANCE OF 48.41 FEET 10 THE P0LHT OF TERMINUS OF SAID EASEMENT, BEING ON AN EXISTING �1 ELEPHO IE• POLE. 1 e.r , ri."4a 1'9 li 1;1 February 1, 2013 Garfield County BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT Bradley Johnson Black and Veatch Corporation 304 Inverness Way South, Suite 400 Englewood, CO 80112 RE: Director's Administrative Interpretation Verizon Wireless Minor Modification Request Dear Brad: This Administrative Decision is provided in response to your request to consider a minor modification of an existing Special Use Permit. The request is in regard to the approved Telecommunication Tower for the U.S. West New Vector Group on a site located at 319 County Road 138, in Section 35, T5S, R9OW, Parcel No. 2123-351-00-120. The request letter and associated plans are attached to this Director's Determination. As provided, your proposal includes the installation of two additional omni -whip antennas to the existing tower. The antennas will not increase the tower height and will not result in the addition of any new structures on the site. Additional underground cables including fiber optics will be installed and connected to the existing equipment shelter. New equipment will also be installed within the existing equipment shelter but will not be visible from or result in any outside changes to the shelter. The original tower was approved pursuant to a public hearing conducted by the Board of County Commissioners and memorialized in Resolution No. 93-109. This amendment request is being reviewed in accordance with Section 4-106 of the Unified Land Use Resolution of 2008, as amended and in accordance with Condition No. 8 of Resolution No. 93-109. The request has also been reviewed and found to be consistent with a Departmental Policy on co -location of telecommunication facilities dated April 18, 2008 (see attached). Director's Determination Your installation of two additional omni -whip antennas and related support equipment/cables below grade and connected to or within the existing equipment shelter is approved as a Minor Modification to an approved Land Use Change Permit (Special Use Permit) on your existing site and tower at 319 County Road 138 subject to the following conditions/findings: 108 Eighth Street, Suite 401 • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 • Fax: (970) 384-3470 Findings; • A finding that the request complies with Section 4-106(B)(1)(a) Review Process and with Section 4-106(C) Review Criteria as a Minor Modification. Conditions: • Continued compliance with all existing conditions of approval contained in Resolution No. 93-109. • Compliance with all representations contained in the Land Use Change Permit Amendment request and associated plans. Any further modification to your approved Land Use Change Permit will require additional review by the County. Please contact this office if you have additional questions or need clarification of the Director's Decision. Very truly yours Director Community Dev yopment Department CC: Cary Gagnon, Assistant County Attorney Andy Schwaller, Chief Building Official ATTACHMENTS: Land Use Change Permit Amendment Request (dated 2/1/13) Resolution No. 93-109 Site Modification Plans dated 12/4/12 Policy Memo Dated 4/18/08 Glenn Hartmann From: Johnson, Bradley W [JohnsonBW2@bv.com] Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 12:04 PM To: Glenn Hartmann Subject: RE: US West New Vector (Verizon Wireless) - Resolution No. 93-109 (CO3 New Castle) Attachments: VZW LOA B&V (Leasing&Zoning-VAW Markets). pdf Hi Glenn, Per our telephone conversation this morning, Verizon Wireless (formerly US West NewVector Group, Inc.) is requesting the County's administrative approval of a Minor Modification per Section 4-106 of the County's Land Use Code to allow the addition of 2 new omni/whip antennas, underground fiber optics line and new equipment inside the existing Verizon Wireless equipment shelter. Through mergers and acquisitions over the years, US West NewVector Group is now known as Verizon Wireless and holds all of the FCC licenses that US West NewVector Group used to operate under. Verizon Wireless has authorized Black & Veatch Corp. to handle all real estate, zoning and building permit matters as technical consultants acting on behalf of Verizon Wireless. Please see attached Letter of Authorization from Verizon Wireless authorizing Black & Veatch to submit this Minor Modification request to Garfield County. Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional information to process this request. Thank you. Brad Johnson 1 Site Acquisition & Zoning Specialist, Telecommunications Black & Veatch Corporation 1 304 Inverness Way South, Suite 400, Englewood, CO 80112 USA +1303-229-4681 N 1 +1303-799-4856 F 1 Johnson8W2@BV.com Building a World of Difference.° Please note my new email address: JohnsonBW2@BV.com Please consider the environment before printing my email Please note that the information and attachments in this email are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient. please do not forward, copy or print the message or its attachments. Notify me at the above address, and delete this message and any attachments. Thank you. From: Johnson, Bradley W Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 3:36 PM To: 'ghartmann@garfiekl-county.com' Subject: RE: US West New Vector (Verizon Wireless) - Resolution No. 93-109 (CO3 New Castle) Hi Glenn, We finally have finalized plans for this project I would like to run past you and see what review process, if any, is required. See attached plans. Verizon Wireless has an existing site located at 319 County Road 138 (parcel #2123-351-00-120). The 40 foot tall pole currently has 4 omni/whip antennas at a max height of 51 feet. The proposal is to add two (2) new omni/whip antennas to provide 4G/LTE service from this site. The two (2) new antennas will not exceed the existing antenna height of 51 feet. 1 In addition, Verizon Wireless is looking to install new equipment inside the equipment shelter that will not be visible from the outside or require an expansion to the existing tower compound. Also a new underground fiber optics line is proposed and will run inside utility easements. Please let me know what review process, if any, will be required for the 2 new antennas. Thank you. Brad Johnson 1 Site Acquisition & Zoning Specialist, Telecommunications Black & Veatch Corporation 1 304 Inverness Way South, Suite 400, Englewood, CO 80112 USA +1303-229-4681 nn 1 +1303.799-4856 F j JohnsonBW2C)BV.com Building a World of Difference.° Please note my new email address: JohnsonBW2W1 V.com Please consider the environment before printing my email Please note that the mforrnaticn and attachments in this email are Intended fn r the exclusive me of the addressee and may contain confidential or privileged information. lfyou are not the intended recipient. please do not forward, copy or print the message or its attachments. Notify me at the above address, and delete this message and any attachmenes. Thank you. From: Johnson, Bradley W Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 4:02 PM To: 'ghartmann@garfield-county.com' Subject: US West New Vector (Verizon Wireless) - Resolution No. 93-109 Hi Glenn, Per our telephone call, see attached approval resolution for an existing Verizon Wireless tower that we are looking at upgrading the antennas on. The upgrade includes adding 2 new omni/whip antennas to the tower (going from 4 omni antennas to 6), see attached draft plans. The new antennas will be at a lower height than the existing antennas. I'm concerned since the attached approval resolution has a condition (#8) that states: "Any and all expansion or modification of the facility will require an amendment to the SUP." Does this mean to co -locate these 2 new antennas, we have to go back through the SUP hearing process? Also, according to Fred's 2008 memo regarding co -location, how do you interpret #1 that states "The new installation does not increase the height of the existing facility". Does this refer to raising the height of the tower and any appurtenance like antennas or just raising the support structure height (tower)? If omni/whip antennas are generally mounted above the top of the tower support structure and frequently need to be upgraded, what happens when the newer omni/whip antennas are taller than the existing antennas? Does that trigger an amendment to the SUP for 6"-8" of difference in antenna height? Thanks! Brad Johnson 1 Site Acquisition & Zoning Specialist, Telecommunications Black & Veatch Corporation 1 304 Inverness Way South, Suite 400, Englewood, CO 80112 USA +1303-229-4681 ne 1 +1303-256-4037 F 1 JohnsonBW2@BV.com Building a World of Difference.° Please note my new email address: JohnsonBW2(a(-),,BV.com Please consider the environment before printing my email 2 Letter of Authorization To Whom It May Concern: veipwireless Verizon Wireless Network Department 3131 South Vaughn Way, Ste. 550 Aurora. CO 80014 Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, hereby authorizes Black & Veatch Corporation, its attorney's, agents, or representatives to represent Verizon Wireless in real estate transactions and make any necessary zoning petitions including the filing of building permit applications. ft Matt tier Its: Real Estate Manager Date: Sworn to before me this day of Notary Public: My Commission Expires: i$\ \�— ,2009 DENISE FULLER NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO '. County of Garfield At a. regular .meeting of the Board of County Oammissioners for Ottdield County, Colorado, held in the Commissioners' Meeting Room, Garfield County Courthown, in Olenwood • Songs on Monday the 6th day or December A.D. 19 93 there wese ptrsent; liner ($uctlay) Arbaney 4rnaid L. tfaoklOY Marian Y. Snick Don DePord . Itildred AZedorf 1:974,41. Cuuk DCeche . Commissioner Charas . Commoner , • • 1Commissioner County Attorney - -.. Clerk of the Board :,• '.,, ` . Counly Administrator1:1;:1;:i1,71;; ;; 1 ;'�'' �• • �f, Whe�n�{yth�e fonowfng procee�ag. aa:omg others wee Lad and doses to -win j. 3' :ir ,��} i ���qq�� R. _ L.t RESOLUTION NO 93-1o9 r' `_ ,^ ` �. A RESOLUTION CONCERNED WITH THE APPROVAL OF 11 SPECIAL. USE PERMIT. r' �'` PLICATION POR THE US WEST NEW !AMOR GROUP. 7;. . , ,, 'I7r`. �,, 1.•- _•a'''a.'.- :° n '27::::1=..�;... 73..1+•,.4. . . }.e -s �'� .. . � . dent, :j�f"': f"r ,5rj �: i s�•-.; •tet•."• " � �• . . .' ,;-141'..$ �. FWHEREA,S,Ihe8oardofco 3y/UdIDmr onatiofaarGeldf~oanty,colorad4.ltaSra eiyed r; } : �� , applicationfaunUSWESTNBWVECIORGROUPfaramaoa'nmirationtower(cellularpboee , - in the AJR/RD Zoon District en the Mewing described tracts offend: -} x may_- ' i.. • ' ,. j.:). t . W.: •Ct.: i', - AZ. t ..'✓7.�.' yf `gee Attached} ';f% -ya'- :;,i �: -gic tr: ,'�f.��+'�} l • ..•_• , � a� •.°•+', •'I. .. f .s }.al"`T�' 14*iJ` e% }z..-• a -i7 it.• e WHEREAS, the Boardbeld a publ"icluWring an the 1st day olrovember.1993, and the 1Sth, , day ofNovember,1993.uponthe tiuesllo�aofwhstheriltc ti . �y1SiatalUsePenttitsbould =► I! granted or'dealed, at with hearing ilia psrblio and fate pgisons ��^^11..�� b van the opportrmity M'• ,: I ` 1,40:0.{61= =:y.` if'u-0 :1%. • (in the State of Colorado and the County orC arfieldp and .r.=' s(:w3 Mr:f;iV~flee; i 4t i. cpm, the issnauca ofsaid Use P a - int ±je�:^�:r � ,'F..�i-� ,a s,, ..f �. , �Tr'�{`� }r:` $peciai � xY" _, WHEREAS, the Board on the- • ; .• of substantial patent atbrelmeatioi ed heathrg, has made the foilowhng determination otra rte 'ltali• rr ••rr ... �, .S'i" 7.� ;•: 2:4r$1 44.r�,.7 My� } 1� ' '!j .5074 k+ l - k::7 -• I. ;T'hM proper publication and public notice was hearing before the Board of e• Ind Commissione& .1 4 �I ' 11 41 . 4 .i.{' y; r. ' • •'.;% d at the ' •.r:r by law for thel ;# f. 4r•5 r • • . cr. • •-.1.• A Sentneryospolt, deezribing the snug olted landscaping be submitted at Doe and broyear intervals to the GarBent county Planning Depirisnat. enineicrtog ir with the one and tmo-year anrdretsaty tbo initial Diming& ' Dined this -!E da December ATTEST; albs Board GARFIELD COU2417 BOARL; COMMISSIONERS, GARFIELD cowry. coLottao rote: Upon am lion duly made and seconded the &regains Resolution seas adopted by theft:Cowing . Hackle - :4; ..e:14 • • - • e • STATE OF 0,x0RADO C°1114:. Or Garfield , !"-• 28 •L' • 44."41' . I:4.14461 • ; • „,, i• • - , • t 401naliaiOnew or Ma cbtraly and ooPied Born igtie;tAr AlTyLeidli71" 41Int3: • .4°W •- .F% . Aye , • ' Aye . Aye. ri.l.r 1 .... v.- I. - . "-....?;•44,7;'..it'rq - '.''a ',. -. 3ti*.,,..,J, ., . 2_ .1 • ' er 7 'Jr, i. -...,,s'i ...-.:Ift,t,▪ ..; • • Slate eibitiaid do btreb tatty Clerk and ex-olacto det BOeiti orCOOitY trb Or the Proceeding of thiboaid h rey office. r. the Race Y cad* thieale"af6cliiii and . or County .r,. ,„:. 2r. v''' ' 12tWalfEss. r'l -u-' 41 #7-%..7..-,J• ' WHEREOF _ , . _ 1...t. kt` T ,7...,? -, i •-lf!-.14. 7 . CReaRPOOd • ••''' . NI I , . IP 'haft 1!Crelin. 10 .45 QUI* 2144 ...Irk v Alrfiri • T :It1C24111) C 1.3._ • } 11V ott.A...1/zo • r7a.7.., • kr..: f;t:•TiFf.. • '411 ar • -•:7w •14 Pfloito. .14"*.clay of It a,7 .1j;:•'LlY • sot loY handan Dd ;diked theisieat ((said Coungy • If , •gre.1% 4. 40' or 4re/..f • I*: and et -officio Cleslof..the Board of*Couniy4(CisO. .tt ILAr' eL: •••••' 4 • ,t.$ :11“ • •i4P' P I • II +Lk. V{ : 4 .3 -4. LFrrel "!'k." , • 11?. ity:Pt9 Lui E c==, g 0 camEi 00U, we IT 8 E clogv11 �33 e �'8 13y S eg tbsa e8 a _ itOW 41111g 116111Igli11 111111 1tiza b ; at X co IN! a e 1 1 t I K„ lyL[u. p;-• .ew '.. a j3 P,� AAA uo ! ItI!!!I4DU: I hli$l 06T a v Z� R� 1 z `" tiI g 1 Lui E c==, g 0 camEi 00U, we IT 8 E clogv11 �33 e �'8 13y S eg tbsa e8 a _ itOW 41111g 116111Igli11 111111 1tiza b ; at X co IN! a e 1 r Ls I• �\ R \AD 4\ I41. 2 \ 41, ij 0 \"e _ 1 o I 40 \ 1 AON a I 4 �N. li 2 s + r '.,.�\ At I X ass b iQ PRELIMINARY POT fOM CIINITIMX110.1 I1EI ,�• wibiIF.�,�Is anomie DECEMBER 4, 2012 a ill t# 9 I I t i it I 1v w!LI jb 6 1 1 1 1 s i z i x t 1 1 1 1 z r Ls I• �\ R \AD 4\ I41. 2 \ 41, ij 0 \"e _ 1 o I 40 \ 1 AON a I 4 �N. li 2 s + r '.,.�\ At I X ass b iQ Litv PRELIMINARY I ?6,11!:".• :e; ��•� �i tLL2!c T �y M7MtYmr.w YW """'!""l"�� 11' Ilil 011 1 1 I!!4H: l'io' J• 77��y ma�i. Litv nr PRELIMINARY ION MN raNIT1 I �� _p- s i . a iii Iii iM a.v..� 1��'W��er�'n � i'� _....� r wrr.rI g a o -'tIx s 11111 � -.'f' 1 alit:0:i I I �.� SII I I fi li. i blRi1L l il _i trianzamm ui sumu 11111Ll■.[0l111111l 1 hi lei! ! . r 4 l p f 1111.1 1 0 n • nn FIBER CONDUIT LENGTH BREAKDOWN I s i . a iii Iii 00 I11 II :1 W ' 1 0 0a MO 1 14 1 iiii 1!i I 81 00 1'4'111 FIBER CONDUIT LENGTH BREAKDOWN I 1111 111111 inttifi 1 IDMIN 1!i I 1 z PRELIMINARY Nor FOR CCRIFRICROM I1L c , w 1 �: N #w s o 9 agl 8 s , $ eggsas ii i 9 l1 I�IL a ` wi gIII 3;iiiiii E z III OI NM 0 I 1! rn a a 0 uI 0 LI PRELIMINARY]MOT root CO ITwct I �S. v a ',r.; "ry"''';'��!!'�� .0,1.1........= WM Pi u �' F !!! ¢5§8111 !4: I I I,KI S u a _ a y i a 1 1 l III OI NM 0 I 1! rn a a 0 uI 0 LI 4NTERtOR_YIEW: COAX PORT 5 O ulrmrrauluur:sulnunlminu it UJ Ilrrlrllr,IUIU !IIrgr111UIU 1 1 7 1 4NTERtOR_YIEW: COAX PORT 5 O ulrmrrauluur:sulnunlminu it UJ Ilrrlrllr,IUIU !IIrgr111UIU Garfield County April 18, 2008 BUILDING & PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE: Guidelines and Recommendations for co4ocation of telecommunication facilities It has been determined by Garfield County Planning Department that the co -location of "Communication Facilities' my occur without obtaining a Special Use Permit approval if the following standards are met 1. The new installation does not increase the height of the existing facility; 2. The new Installation does not increase the footprint (total disturbed area) of the existing facility; 3. The new installation complies with the radio frequency emission requirements of the Federal Communications .Commission; 4. Garfield County Board of Commissioners has approved the existing facility during a public hearing in which the public and interested persons were given the opportunity to express their opinions regarding the request. 108 Eighth Street, Suite 401 • Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-8212 • (970) 285-7972 • Fax: (970) 384-3470 91 R .t .T 0 L X . m P r 11 F I 1 J 4A A gdAg h61/ 8 1511 061 0 R aN3D3l 1YId31VW 'S 1O VIAS o= Q-1 10 51 g a ,Y) ggs 6 om¢ Y ww 6 9m m cm7 p Tfflb m� )T Z �ii pv� fa 0) m m W W g g 6 - >0 zz p; A WR :14. I sz ilg 1!1IA 11 dxl ha A 61 ; 81 $ / p ig g'r ; 51 P°21 8 ql g m ill!: 1 11 9 9 1PP 2g gg � Z VCS co Il� LI 4 ©0) c4). n "z 0 , ,(7) [HAI_ wiz nil S AmmZ a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 'I 1 1 1 '�dillli�i n m , i D;a› D r 8 n r m a F? o rn r2 n1 III [Ot alI (i m o� 6 O Z rrT1 o 1.1 1 1 1 1����ii��� ~ PERMIT SUBMITTED REVISIONS BID SETS 1 ZD APPROVAL CO PRELIMINARY / REVIEW mi ;,. a o wirelessi���i_gi.l p inn ort�Wiw,w�r,sur . xx �r�iF .411 Mai . v; u' n m u . : aNp X ,` Sl9r y� �CT�`,'`• 00 0 00— 0 m 0 z 14 SIN 3 SliNN3INV HOIH31. m x m 0 m 0 m 0) 0 F.: El 8E r,LimZ ,-. -2. E .-.7m . y, . 0 . uo- r, m 3A i iligiiiiin m 0 N rpm% i ',- , 1...1 r' m m 0 -11,-.< z 0. •• 0 (1).<0i. i > Q71 9 It 22 a rn- 0) g 12 . CO i -1 0 _1 m or 0 g - E z w r T1• Fs PERM T S WITTED REVS ONS 8 1 ;, p T m g isi itSff. g " 0 E „, -c-, ii.olimil . .-r'l n co D m m 11011111 . . 0. 04 M -. " Vel'IM- wireless -" ii, liallaill ° .4./ IV , AVRORA. CO 10014 30.114/4-12S1 Iiiigailli 0 313/ 11 VAUGHN IMAT. SUM 550 _uo X N —• tit 0 — BD co m 0,0. CO r m QS),0) RET casted IN Im 4 Ira 1• 4 0 _J z —t Tm TN C) 0 0 ra• n mrp y 1 1 1 Ji 1 {fix• Fp n 1 s n' nmmz I ANTENiA _wren 4 i " PM J.MERS 4 � I U- ti "ADI 4 K4a� y U' IR ER 4 pQ� Y. Xii HYBRID CABLE LENGTHS I aim ps A pip 2 pmo A 1 SECTOR 1 N qqq 7 ti pap JO d x ora 7r n im b e, A TOTAL LtiM h.i 1 $ i li X Pi op IA ] O CYY f: tY aC 7C� L Ira e Ira 1`` Ira y w w , —,—` . 0 1- t A 0 Rt t k h SA_i i R e TOTAL LENGTH - - - 0 - 0 _J z —t Tm TN C) 0 0 ra• n mrp y 1 1 1 Ji 1 {fix• Fp n 1 s n' nmmz I l 1 a 1 1 I I s Q'I I I I n „'� kl 1911127' 0 °.,1 * 4 D ag MI n m I o ��°,es ��nQ T.n * 2= CO0 L 0 S CA w SAffi s G O I i1 z I I I I I I I PERMIT SUBMITTED REVISIONS - FINAL SET m 11 W ZD APPROVAL CD PRELIMINARY 1 REVIEW 1� :l co o r � 'Pith' ra ii��, lr m .rr id wiill 0 j wireless dihr it�r' = ui� R • „°, °-, an ::(1; J N°N a r ( 59rF n` ? O Trt 6i q N STs/ S. VAUGHNmr. surtesm ; tOpill o N o % , iD 0 Q AURORA, co Orals 306/1 :31 iiAhli m a. -Co Li 0 §0 rn r C ■ ■l IEEE • go i 11 11 m8 111 1 T \‘':17c\7 7s\‘:1= Rig O rn oR 1m 0 ;N co rn 0 0 m 1 m 0 110 i 0 - >03 mmmZ P Opp 3— Ocnc r ASI o*211=1n Om PE tcou rin 03 G8 ozm s m c m ]1711. VAUGHHWAY, SUIT! SSD AURORA CO 80314 m 4 �C 0) m 0 0 --i m r rn 0 rn z ,4z z a ir 1 111 sI €14 l wireless > 0 co r z G) • / /� ' e r e #..M.•1.r■ �•• \ I ' , ''— \lk\sti.. • k I) ' 1--r—, )1•• I\!)ti:-- il . .11-.11 ., _ s ¢ --- '/ -11 -11 III r' 'l \ \ �� i'}p/ ' - - - . = - .. \ Ili 'Ate - CO ems 1 11 11I I I I I! al r OM zgo 41- za Oz mZ ay 1 cn �� e'-� e / e , �, '-.Cir , 111 a 0> cN zm —10 013 m s u, �0-, mm m 2 0 m F 1 m z 0 v m 1 v m 03 v m u LJ 1c: b 11 li A t!h L`F1 g` 4 a ,S A Li n G 11 n ki' N lqi np a� IlC l I 1 I r•IIIIII ! I 1111 i 1 • III i 1 rn a, u LJ 1c: b 11 li A t!h L`F1 g` 4 a ,S A Li n G 11 n ki' N A -n .) 1 l l I 1 I 111 u LJ 1, . 37 2' 0)0 n n m Z a I I I l l l l s 111 l rn a, A _ fq fq A■r i .io aF'H Wireless rrilo r• w_(}r m O o 7 rt a x /` awnG ma ti r" ST qtm Oa -I rn -i r I N m D �m ,_1cri _, Zm6 l f l l l I I I ? F g; O 5r m g CD PRELIUINARY$ REVIEW 91D SETS ry g war.W 550