Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application - Permit
I Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Offlce :970·945·8212 Fax: 970·384-3470 Inspection Line; 970·384-5003 Building Permit No. Parcel No : 2179-101-00-018 Locality: Job Address : 16th St, Silt ------------------------~---------------------- Use of Building: storage (8 bu ildings) --------------------=-~--~~---------------- Owner: Stark, Albert & Snode, Bruce ------------------~ Contractor: Hubbs Build ing Fees: Plan Check: $ 2,410.69 Septic: Bldg Permit : $ 3,708.75 Othe r Fees : Total Fees : $ 6,119 .44 Clerk: ~\f Date: J-()H-oS I 2 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 108 8th Street, Suite401 , Gle n wood Springs , Co 8 1601 Phone: 970-945-8212 I F ax: 970-384-3470 I Ins pection Line: 970-384-5003 www.!!arfie ld -county.com ,. .. ~~~"¥.) or and legal descri ption ~ou..-i;h of ~v~o-n [.;)(Q.J'Yl<lV'Id 3 Subd./ Exemption: 4 5 6 7 No. ·of F loors: OY7~ 8 9 Describe Work: 10 C lass of W o rk: ew o Alteratio n o Addition 11 Garage: S e ptic: N o Attached 0 D etached o i SDS o Communit 12 Driveway P e rmit G~l307-D -I D3 $ b00 1 000 , NOTICE Authority. Thi s applicati on for a Building Pe rmit mu st be signed by the Owner of the property, desc ribed above, or an a uthorized agent. If the signature bel ow is not that of the Owne r, a separate letter of authorit y, signed by the Owner, must be provided wi th this Application. Legal Acc ess . A Building Permit cannot be is sued without proof of lega l and adequate access to the prope rty for purposes of inspections by the Building Department . Other Permits. Multiple separate permits may be req uired: (I ) Sta te Elec trical Permit , (2) Count y ISDS Permit , (3) another permit requined for use on the property id entified above , e.g. State or Coun ty Hi ghw ay/ Road Access or a State Wastewater Di sc harge Permi t. Void Per miL A Building Permit becomes null and void if the work authorized is not commenced within I 80 days of the date of issuan ce and if work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days after commencement CERTIFICATION I he reby certify that I have rend thi s Appli cation and that the information contai ned above is true and corTecL I understand that th e Building Department accepts the AppliCIItion , along with the plan s and speci fi cations and othe r data sub mi tted by me or on my beha lf (s ubmittal s), based up on my certifi cati on as to acc ura cy. Assumin g completeness of the submi tta ls and approval of this Application, a Building Permit will be issued granti ng permission to me, as Owner, to construct the structure(s) and facilities de tailed on the submittals reviewed by the Build ing Department. In conside rati on of the iss uan ce o f the Building Permi~ I agree th at I and my age nts will comply with pro visions of any federal , state or local law re gulating the wor k and th e Garfield County Building Code, ISDS regulati o ns and appli cable land use regu lations (County Regula tion(s )). I acknowledge th at the Building Pe rmi t may be suspen ded or revoked , upon noti ce from the Co unty, if the location, construction or use of the stru cture(s) and facili ty (ies), descri bed above,. are not in compliance with County Regu lation (s) or any other app li cable law . I hereby grant permission to the Building Department to e nte r the property , described above, to inspec t the work . I furth er ackn owled ge th at the issuance of the Building Permit does not prevent the Buildin g Offic ia l from: (I ) requ irin g the correction of errors in th e submitta ls, if any , disco vered after iss uance; or (2) stopping constru ction or use of the stru cture(s) or facility(ies) if such is in vio lation of Co unt y Regulation(s) or any other appli cable law . Re view of th is Application, inc lud in g submittals, an d in spections of the work by the Buildin g De partment do not constitute an acceptance of responsibility or li ability by the County of errors, omi ss ions or di screpancies. As the Owner, I acknowledge th at re spo nsibi li ty for compli ance with fed era l, state and loca l laws and Cou nt y Regul ation s res t with me and my authori zed agents , including without li mi tatio n my architect de · ner, e ngineer and/ or buil der. I HEREBY ACKNOWLED THAT I HAV E READ AND UNDER STAND THE NOTICE & CERTIFI CATION ABOVE : ph()110-: ~-3'56 --f-107 Special Conditions: ~sti)-~~ 6\lt~.~ Manu home Fee: Mise Fees: Adjusted Valu ation: (o 0 0 Dlm • U'-0 Plan C h eck Fee: ~4\b l,q Permit Fee: ~ 70f5 7 ~ Total Fees: Fees Paid: Bal ance Due: BP No & Issue Da te: bl\q'\"i ~4J(). 37D~ 1 S"' \(JQ3 · Setbacks: OCCGroup: Const Type : Zoning : 5-L. 8 BLDG DEPT: PLNGDEPT: AP The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: 1) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at the structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to alllBC and IRC requirements including guardrails. 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issued conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any final sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a C.O. for the building identified in the Building Permit. 0 NRS SIGNATURE ~ DATE Bapplicationdecember2007 VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Star~node Subdivision ~~~~------------------- 16 th St. Lot/Block --------------------------- Applicant Address Date ...;;.5.;..;;/2.;..;;7.;..;;/2;;..;;0...;;..0.;;_8 -------------------Con tractor Hubbs Bui !ding Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Basement: Unfinished Square Feet Valuati on Convers ion of Unfinished to Finished Total Valuat ion Garage: Valuation Cra wl Space Valuation Decks/ Patios Valuation Covered Open Type of Construction: Occupancy: S-2 Valuation Total Valuation sf sf sf sf X $74.68 0 sf Commercial s f X $41.00 sf X $33.68 sf X $18 .00 sf X $9.00 sf X $24.00 sf X $12 .00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 1 sf X #7i:ffir~mt--S Vit1~N,rl"'IV"VL. sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X 600,000.00 600,000.00 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant W~rt&W (11 ~ 1 ?~Date ________ _ Building ~ineered Foundation --t,..L:.Driveway Permit ~urveyed Site Plan ~Septic Permit and Setbacks v Grade /Topography 30% ~ ~!tach Residential Plan Review List ~Minimum Application Questionnaire ¢Subdivision Plat Notes ~re Department Review ~So<V ~aluation Determination/Fees ~::. _0-ed Line Plans/Stamps/St icker ~Attach Conditions -t.L_ Application Signed .i.L..Plan Reviewer To Sign Application --lL_Parcel/Schedule No. ~ 40# Snowload Letter-Manf. Hms . L Soils Report GENERAL NOTES: Planning/Zoning ~operty Line Setbacks ~ft Stream Setbacks 0ood Plain }/.J /v rt~ ·/..r ~Building Height ~ '"'"'e.vt • ". _ ! t~ 0 ("'\ I ~ l cJ.VlM"J /zoning Sign-off -x:t- ~Road Impact Fees 4-HOA/DRC Approval ~Grade/Topo g raphy 40% ~gl s sues ~Subdivision Plat Notes GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL OR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if yon have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to he sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan and in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Plans to be included for a Building Permit must be on draft paper at least 18"x 24"" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade and original grade 1 line. A section showing in detail , from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheeting, house-rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations may be required. Check with the Building Department. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roofing framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40 pound per square foot up to 7,000 feet in elevation, a 90 M .P.H. windspeed, wind exposure B or C, and a 36 inch frost depth. All sheets need to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted must be incompliance with the 2003 IBC, IPC, IMC, IFGC, and IFC. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit completed checklist at time of application for a permit: 1. Is a site pl an included that identifies the location of the proposed structure, additions or other buildings , setback easements, and utility easements showing distances to the property lines from each corner of the proposed structure prepared by a licensed surveyor and has the surveyors signature and professional stamp on the drawing? Slopes of 30% or more on properties must be show on site plan. (NOTE: Section 1 06.2) Any site plan for the placement of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed building envelope on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed s urveyor and have the surveyors signature and professional stamp on th e drawing . Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a recorded subdivision plat, shall include a copy of the building envelope as it is shown on the fmal plat with the propot structure located within the envelope. Yes 2. Does the site plan when applicable include the lo cation of the I.S.D .S . (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and distances to the property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? This information must be certified by a licensed surveyor with their signature and professional stamp on the design. \t Yes Not necessary for this project~ 3 . Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the State, County or private road accessing the prop~Itj'? Yes_b_ 4. Is the I.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) designed, stamped and signed by a Colorado Registered Engineer? r)( Yes Not necessary for this project~ 2 5. Are the plans submitted for application review construction drawings and not drawings that are stamped or marked identifying them as "Not for construction, for permit issuance only", "Approval drawing~ only".'lr permit issuance only" or similar language? Yes Not necessary for this project __ _ 6 . Do the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accor}(:e with the building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes Not necessary for this project __ 7. If the building is a pre-engineered structure, is there a stamped, signed engineered foundation plan for this building? Yes X Not necessary for this project __ 8. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes __ . Not necessary for project~ 9. Do the plans indicate the size and location of the ventilation openings for the attic , roof joist spaces and soffits? V Yes __ Not necessary for this project~ 10. Do the plans include design loads as required under the IBC or IRC for roof snowloads, (a minimum of 40 pounQ.s;Per square foot in Garfield County)? Yes __ ~--Not necessary for this project __ 11. Do the pz include design loads as required for floor loads under the IBC or IRC? Yes Not necessary for this project __ 12. Does the~n include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor, and roof construction? Yes Not necessary for this project __ 13. Is the wip<jlspeed and exposure design included in the plan? Yes_x__ Not necessary for this project __ 14. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafteX' yr joists or trusses? Yes+ Not necessary for this project __ 3 15. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method of positive connection of all columns andbx? Yes Not necessary for this project __ 16. Does the elevation plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the undisturbed grade to the midpoint between the ridge and eave of a gable or shed roof or the top of a flat roof? (Chec){plicable zone district for building height maximum) Yes Not necessary for this project __ 17. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certification:><:hase II EPA certification? Yes __ Not necessary for this project 18 . Does the plan include a masonry fireplace incl7di -a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the IBC or IRC? Yes __ Not necessary for this project __ 19. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the r~<pMrements of the IBC or IRC? Yes __ Not necessary for this project____6_ 20. Does the plan include a window schedule or o7'he verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes __ Not necessary for this project __ 21 . Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass pan7ls; ower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes __ Not necessary for this project __ 22. Do the plans include a complete design for all mechanica.!_ s~tems planned for installation in this building? Yes __ No Not necessary for this project___,/'-. __ 4 23. Have all areas in the building been accurately identified for the intended use? (Occupancy as identified in the Il)?Chapter 3) Yes Not necessary for this project __ _ 24. Does the plan indicate the quantity, form, use and storage of any hazardous materials that may be in use in this building? X Yes __ Not necessary for this project __ 25. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? -.. / Yes __ Not necessary for this project_·('.,_ 26. Do the plans indicate the location and dimension of restroom facilities and if more than four employees and both sexes are employed, facilities for both sexes? Yes __ Not necessary for this project X 27. Do the plans indicate that restrooms and acces~he building are handicapped accessible? Yes Not necessary for this project 28. Have two (9') complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes '><-- 29. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requir)(ents? Yes 30. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the G~!)eld County Building Department? Yes l\ 31. Do your plans comply with all zoning rules and regulations in the County related to your zone district? For comet;.l<)is see supplemental section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution for setbacks . Yes 'K _ _,_____ 32. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the imple,.Il}intation of these changes? Yes )<, 5 33. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit" fee as well as any "Septic System" or "Roa~_Jzfipact" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes~ 34. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the IBC including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes X 35. Are you aware that the Permit Application must be signed by the Owner or a written authority be given for an A K nt and that the party responsible for the project must comply with the Uniform Codes? Yes 36. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection by 3:30 the business day before the requested inspection in order to receive it the following business day? Inspections will be made between 7:30 ~·91· and 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes l\ 3 7 . Are you aware that requesting inspections on work that is not ready or not accessible will result in a $50.Q.O ;e-inspection fee? Yes ___iS,_ 38 . Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application you are required to show proof of a legal and adequate access to the site? This may include (but is not limited to) proof of your right to use a private easement/right of way; a County Road and Bridge permit; a Colorado Dept. of Highway Permit including a Notice to Proceed; a permit from the federal government or any combination. You can ex act the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601 . See Phone book for other agencies Yes 39. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to pe!;f9rm installations and hookups? The license number will be required at time of inspection. Yes "-. 40. Are you aware, that on the front of the building permit application you will need to fill in the ParceV Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to submittal of the building permix:plication? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes 41 . Do you know that the local fire district may require you to submit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Yes_){_ (Please check with the building department about this requirement) 6 42. Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issua ~f a building permit that you will be required to obtain a grading permit? Yes Not necessary for this project __ 43. Did an Architect seal the plans for your commercial project? State Law requires any commercial project with occupancy of more than 10 persons as per Section 1004 of the IBC to prepare the plans and specifications for the project. \/' Yes Not Necessary for this project ___,;&__'----"'---- I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand, and answered these questions to the best of my ability. ~~ Date Phone: U I <6 · I () 16 (days); ($? l Cl, ---10 7:S (evenings) Project Name: l ,) die'CC\ \I'\(\\ -Sior"'-je__., Project Address: 113D \ ~ '-\~ S~, s~ \\; Note: On any of these questions you may be required to provide this information. If required information is not supplied, delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of the permit. *If you have answered "Not necessary for this project" on any of the questions and it is determined by the Building Official that the information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes , please expect the following: A. The application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review. B. Delay in issuance of the permit. C . Delay in proceeding with construction. BpcommDec2007 7 •.' GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING REQUIREMENTS Codes: 2003 IRC, IBC, IFGC, IMC, IPC, Setbacks: Check subdivisions and zone district for setback requirements. Snowload (measured at the roof): 40PSF up to 7000ft. elevation. 50PSF 7001 to 8000ft. Seismic design category: B 7 5PSF 8001 to 9000ft. IOOPSF 9001 to IOOOOft. Weathering probability for concrete: Severe Termite infestation probability: None to slight Wind speed: 90mph Decay probability: None to slight Wind Exposure: B or C (see section R301.2.1.4) Frost Depth: 36in. to 8000ft. elevation. 42in. 8001 and above. Winter Design Temperature: Minus 2 to 7000ft.; minus 16 over 7000ft. elevation. Air Freezing Index: 2500deg F-days to 7000ft.; over 7000ft. to be determined by Building Official. Ice shield under-layment required. Mean Annual temp.: Variable Insulation: Maximum glazing U factor: 0.50 Minimum R-Values: • Ceilings/roofs R values are: R-30 stick built structures. R-38 log construction and steel rafter construction. • Walls R values are R-19 wood frame; R-19 cavity R-3 sheathing steel studs. • Floors R-values are R-19. • • • Basement wall R-values are R-10 beTow grade, R-19 above grade. Slab perimeter R-value and depth is R- I0/36in. Crawl space wall R-values are R-IO below grade and R-19 above grade If floors over crawl spaces are not insulated, the crawl space walls must be insulated. Basement wall must be insulated to frost depth. Common walls garage to house must have R-19 insulation. Common ceiling/floor garage to house must have R -19. Take precautions to protect plumbing in these areas. 1f CTL I THOMPSON GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION WESTERN MINI STORAGE FACILITY PARCEL18 SILT, COLORADO Prepared For: WESTERN MINI STORAGE 918 County Road 352 Rifle, CO 81650 Attention : Mr. Bruce Snode Project No. GS05111-125 234 Center Drive I Gle nwood Springs , Colorado 81601 Telephone : 970·945-280 9 Fax : 970-945-74 11 October 26, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS SITE CONDITIONS ANTICIPATED CONSTRUCTION SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS SITE EARTHWORK Site Grading Fill Excavations Structural Fill Backfill FOUNDATIONS SLAB-ON-GRADE CONSTRUCTION BELOW-GRADE CONSTRUCTION SURFACE DRAINAGE PAVEMENTS LIMITATIONS FIGURE 1 -APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURE 2-SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS FIGURES 3 AND 4-SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS FIGURE 5-GRADATION TEST RESULTS APPENDIX A -PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS WESTERN MIN! STORAGE WESTERN M!N! STORAGE FACILITY CTLI T PROJECT NO. GS05111·125 S:\GS05111.000\1 Z5\2. Reports\GS051 t 1 125 R1.d{)t 1 1 2 2 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 8 9 9 10 12 SCOPE This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation for the Western Mini Storage facility proposed on Parcel18 in Silt, Colorado. We conducted the investigation to evaluate the subsurface conditions at the site and provide geotechnical recommendations for the proposed construction. Our report is based on data developed from our subsurface exploration, laboratory testing, and our engineering analysis and experience with similar conditions. The recommendations contained in the report were developed based on our assumptions about the proposed construction. We should be informed if actual construction will differ from the descriptions herein so that we can provide geotechnical engineering input and revise our recommendations and design criteria, if necessary. A summary of our conclusions is presented below. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1. Subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory pits TP-1 through TP-6 generally consisted of 6 inches to 1 foot of sandy clay "topsoil" underlain by silty sand or sandy silt. About 2 feet of sandy clay underlain by gravel was encountered at depths of about 7 feet in TP-4 and TP-6. Subsurface conditions in TP-7 through TP-10 generally consisted of 6 inches to 1 foot of sandy clay "topsoil", nil to 1.5 feet of silty sand, and 2 to 7 feet of sandy clay underlain by gravel. Ground water was encountered in all of our exploratory pits at depths between 5 and 9 feet. 2. Our subsurface information indicates silt, sand, and clay soils are present at foundation elevations across the site. We judge that the silt and sand soils are suitable for support of footing or mat foundations. Laboratory test results and our experience at nearby sites indicate the clay soils at this site possess the potential for large amounts of consolidation under building loads. Differential movement and associated damage to foundations and floor slabs is likely if the proposed buildings are constructed directly on the undisturbed, natural clay soils. After site grading is performed, we recommend sub- excavation of the clay soils below the planned building footprints to a depth of at least 2 feet below bottom of foundation elevations and replacement with densely compacted, structural fill to enhance building performance. Additional discussion is in the report. WESTERN MINI STORAGE WESTERN MINI STORAGE FACILITY CTL IT PROJECT NO. G$05111-125 S:\GS05111.000\125\2. ReportsiGS05111 125 R1.doc 1 • - ' 3. We recommend constructing the buildings on footing or reinforced mat foundations that are supported by the natural silt or sand soils or densely compacted, structural fill. Foundations should not be placed directly on the natural clay. Design and construction criteria for structural fill and footings are presented in the report. 4. We judge that slab-on-grade construction can be supported by the silt or sand soils with a low risk of differential movements. In areas where clay soils are present, after the sub-excavation and structural fill placement process is accomplished, we judge slab-on-grade construction can be supported by the structural fill with low potential risk of differential movement and associated damage. 5. Pavement alternatives include full-depth asphalt or asphalt and aggregate base course in auto parking and Portland cement concrete in heavy truck traffic areas. A geotextile will likely be required between soils and aggregate base course to improve performance. Design thickness and construction criteria are in the report. 6. Surface drainage should be designed to provide for rapid removal of surface water off of pavements and away from the proposed buildings. SITE CONDITIONS Parcel18 is located south of the Union Pacific Railroad and north of Interstate 70 in Silt, Colorado. The parcel is accessed by 161h Street (aka County Road 311). Ground surface on the parcel slopes down to the south and west at grades of less than 4 percent. Two irrigation ditches cross the property. Natural vegetation on the eastern and central portions of the parcel consists of natural grasses and is currently a pasture. Wetlands are on the western portion of the parcel. ANTICIPATED CONSTRUCTION We understand that seventeen one-story storage buildings are planned. Construction is planned in three stages. The approximate areas of the phases are shown on Figure 1. The storage buildings will be 30 feet wide by 200, 180 or 150 feet long. Six buildings are planned in Phases 1 and 2 and five buildings in Phase 3. WESTERN MINI STORAGE WESTERN MINI STORAGE FACILITY CTL IT PROJECT NO. GS05111-125 S;\GS05111.000\125\2. Reports\G$05111125 R1.doc 2 Based on our experience, storage buildings similar to those planned are constructed on reinforced mat foundations. The storage buildings will likely be built with steel-stud framing and steel-skin walls and roofs. We understand no below- grade areas are planned. Site grading will likely involve cut depths and fill thickness of less than 4 feet. Maximum foundation depths of about 4 feet are anticipated. Paved or gravel access drives will be adjacent to the buildings. If actual construction will be different than described above, we should be informed so that we can provide geotechnical engineering input and check that our recommendations are appropriate. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions across the site were investigated by excavating ten exploratory pits (TP-1 through TP-1 0) at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. Exploratory pits were excavated with a rubber tire backhoe. Excavation operations were directed by our laboratory/field manager who logged the soils encountered in the pits and obtained samples for testing in our laboratory. Graphic logs of the soils found in our exploratory pits are shown on Figure 2. Subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory pits TP-1 through TP-6 generally consisted of 6 inches to 1 foot of sandy clay "topsoil" underlain by silty sand or sandy silt. About 2 feet of sandy clay underlain by gravel was encountered at depths of about 7 feet in TP-4 and TP-6. Subsurface conditions in TP-7 through TP-10 generally consisted of 6 inches to 1 foot of sandy clay "topsoil", nil to 1.5 feet of silty sand, and 2 to 7 feet of sandy clay underlain by gravel. Ground water was encountered in all of our exploratory pits at depths between 5 and 9 feet. Our observations during excavation indicated that the clay was soft, the sand or silt was loose to medium dense, and the gravel was dense to very dense. Exploratory pits were backfilled immediately after excavation operations were completed. Samples of the soils obtained from our pits were returned to our laboratory where field classifications were checked. Two samples of the natural silt were selected for one-dimensional, swell-consolidation testing. During the testing WESTERN MINI STORAGE 3 WESTERN MINI STORAGE FACILITY CTL! T PROJECT NO. G$05111·125 S:\GS05111.000\12512. Reports\GS05111125 R1.doc ~ .. -- procedure the sample was loaded with 1,000 psf and then flooded. The resulting volume change (i.e. swell or consolidation) was measured. The samples tested exhibited between 0.2 and 1.2 percent consolidation. Results of swell-consolidation testing are shown on Figures 3 and 4. Two samples of the gravel were selected for gradation testing. Gradation results are shown on Figure 5. A sample of the silt selected for engineering classification testing contained 59 percent silt and clay sized particles (passing the No. 200 sieve) and was non-plastic. Two samples of the clay contained 60 to 85 percent silt and clay sized particles and exhibited liquid limits of 29 and 35 percent and plasticity indices of 13 and 17 percent. Laboratory tests results are summarized on Table I. SITE EARTHWORK Site Grading Fill Site grading and drainage plans were not provided to us. Some grading will be required. We expect maximum excavation cuts and fill thickness will be about4 feet. Areas which will receive fill should be stripped of vegetation, organic soils and debris. The resulting subgrade surface should be scarified to a depth of at least 8 inches, moisture-conditioned and compacted. Irrigation ditches that are abandoned should be over excavated to remove all organic soils. Care should be taken during fill placement in ditches to ensure that proper compaction is achieved. We recommend over excavating the ditches to a width sufficient to allow the use of a heavy sheepsfoot compactor during fill placement. The on-site soils or similar soils free of organics, debris and rocks larger than 6 inches in diameter can be used as fill. The on-site clay soils will be difficult to compact properly. The clay soils are best suited for placement in landscape areas. Fill should be placed in loose lifts of 10 inches thick or less, moisture-treated to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. Density and moisture content of the fill should be tested during placement. WESTERN MINI STORAGE WESTERN MINI STORAGE FACILITY CTL IT PROJECT NO. G$05111·125 S:IGS05111.000\12512. Reports\GS05111125 R1.doc 4 Excavations Our subsurface information indicates that excavations for foundations and utilities at this site can be accomplished using conventional, heavy-duty excavation equipment. Excavation sides will need to be sloped or braced to meet local, state and federal safety regulations. We expect that the soils encountered within anticipated excavation depths will predominantly classify as Type 8 soils based on OSHA standards governing excavations. Contractors should identify the soils encountered in excavations and refer to OSHA standards to determine appropriate slopes. Free ground water was found in our exploratory pits during this investigation at depths between 5 and 9 feet. Excavations for the proposed construction of buildings will not likely penetrate ground water. Utility excavation depths should be minimized to avoid the ground water. Excavations below about 4 to 5 feet will likely require dewatering. Buoyancy forces may need to be considered by the civil engineer depending on actual utility depths. Structural Fill Laboratory test results and our experience indicate the natural clay soils below the site in the areas indicated on Figure 1 possess the potential for large amounts of consolidation when wetted under building loads. Clay may be encountered in other areas of the site. Differential settlement and associated damage to foundations and floor slabs is likely if the buildings are constructed directly on the undisturbed clay soil. To enhance potential building performance, we recommend removal and replacement of the clay soils below the planned building footprints. Removal of clay should be to a depth of at least 2 feet below bottom of footing and mat elevations. The bottom of the area of clay removed below the buildings should extend laterally at WESTERN MINI STORAGE WESTERN MINI STORAGE FACILITY CTL IT PROJECT NO. GS05111-125 S:IGS05111.000112512. ReportsiGS05111 125 R1.doc 5 ~ ·11nr least 2 feet beyond the perimeter of the buildings. The bottom of the area should be scarified to a depth of at least 8 inches, moisture-treated and compacted. We recommend using the on-site sand, silt, or gravel for structural fill, provided they are free of organics, debris and rocks larger than 3 inches in diameter. Import of a COOT Class 6 aggregate base course for use as structural fill would also be appropriate and may expedite the fill placement process. Structural fill should be moisture-treated to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 98 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. Additional water required to increase the existing soil moisture content to the specified moisture content should be uniformly mixed into the fill soil prior to compaction. We recommend a maximum loose lift thickness of 8 inches. In order for the procedure to perform properly, close control of structural fill placement to specifications is required. Our representative should be called to observe placement and check compaction and moisture content of the structural fill. Backfill Proper placement of backfill adjacent to foundation walls and in utility trenches is important to reduce infiltration of surface water and subsequent settlement. Backfill soils should consist of the on-site soils, provided they are free of organic matter, debris and rocks larger than 6 inches in diameter. Backfill should be placed in thin lifts, moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM D 698) maximum dry density. Our representative should check density and moisture content of backfill during placement. FOUNDATIONS Our laboratory testing for this investigation and our experience at nearby sites indicate that the clay soils possess the potential for large amounts of consolidation when wetted under building loads. Differential movement is likely if the buildings are WESTERN MINI STORAGE WESTERN MINI STORAGE FACILITY CTL j T PROJECT NO. GS05111-125 S:\GSOS111.000\125\2. Reports\G$05111 125 R1.doc 6 ~ -f1111~ constructed directly on the undisturbed natural clay soils. Our subsurface information indicates these soils are present in the western portion of the planned building area, where TP-7 through TP-10 were excavated as shown on Figure 1. other areas of clay may be encountered. After the clay is removed, we believe the risk of differential movement of footings and mats will be low. We recommend constructing the buildings on or reinforced mat or footing foundations that are supported by the natural sand or silt or a minimum 2-foot thickness of densely compacted, structural fill. We believe the mat foundation is a better choice to reduce cracking in the slab and limit differential movement. Recommendations for structural fill were outlined in the Sub-Excavation section. Recommended sub-excavation depths and structural fill thickness are minimum values. Deeper sub-excavation and thicker granular structural fill placement would enhance performance. The mat or footings should be designed and constructed with the criteria below. 1. Footing and mat foundations should be supported on the natural silt and sand or an at least 2-foot thickness of densely compacted, structural fill. Soils loosened during the forming process for the footings should be removed or re-compacted prior to placing concrete. 2. Footings and mats should be designed for a maximum soil bearing pressure of 2,000 psf. 3. Continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of at least 16 inches. Foundations for isolated columns should have minimum dimensions of 24 inches by 24 inches. Larger sizes may be required, depending upon foundation loads. 4. Grade beams and foundation walls should be well reinforced, top and bottom, to span undisclosed loose or soft soil pockets. We recommend reinforcement sufficient to span an unsupported distance of at least 12 feet. Reinforcement should be designed by the structural engineer. 5. The soils under exterior footings should be protected from freezing. We recommend the bottom of footings and the edges of reinforced mats be constructed at a depth of at least 36 inches below finished exterior grades. The Silt building department should be contacted to verify frost protection depth requirements. WESTERN MINI STORAGE WESTERN MINI STORAGE FACILITY CTL IT PROJECT NO. GS05111-125 S:IGS05111.0001 12512. Reports\G$05111 125 R1.doc 7 SLAB-ON-GRADE CONSTRUCTION Unacceptable amounts of differential movement may occur if floor slabs are constructed directly on the undisturbed, natural clay soils. We recommend supporting floor slabs, if constructed, on the natural sand or silt or an at least 1-foot thickness of densely compacted, structural fill. Recommendations for sub-excavation and structural fill presented in the Structural Fill section should be followed. Exterior concrete flatwork and pavements should be isolated from the building. Frequent control joints should be provided, in accordance with American Concrete Institute (ACI) recommendations, to reduce problems associated with shrinkage and curling. The 20031nternational Building Code (IBC) or 20031nternational Residential Code (IRC) may require a vapor retarder be placed between the base course or subgrade soils and the concrete slab-on-grade floors. The merits of installation of a vapor retarder below floor slabs and PT slabs depend on the sensitivity of floor coverings and building to moisture. A properly installed vapor retarder (10 mil minimum) is more beneficial below concrete slab-on-grade floors where floor coverings, painted floor surfaces or products stored on the floor will be sensitive to moisture. The vapor retarder is most effective when concrete is placed directly on top of it. A sand or gravel leveling course should not be placed between the vapor retarder and the floor slab. The placement of concrete on the vapor retarder may increase the risk of shrinkage cracking and curling. Use of concrete with reduced shrinkage characteristics including minimized water content, maximized coarse aggregate content, and reasonably low slump will reduce the risk of shrinkage cracking and curling. Considerations and recommendations for the installation of vapor retarders below concrete slabs are outlined in Section 3.2.3 of the 2003 report of American Concrete Institute (ACI) Committee 302, "Guide for Concrete Floor and Slab Construction (ACI 302.R-96)". WESTERN MINI STORAGE WESTERN MINI STORAGE FACILITY CTL IT PROJECT NO. GS05111-125 S:\GS05111.0001125\2. Reports\GS05111 125 R1.doc 8 BELOW-GRADE CONSTRUCTION We understand that no below-grade areas are planned in the buildings. If plans change to include below-grade areas, we should be informed. Criteria for lateral earth pressures and subsurface drainage are required for the design of below-grade construction at this site. SURFACE DRAINAGE Surface drainage is critical to the performance of buildings. The irrigation ditch that crosses the eastern portion of the parcel will likely need to be abandoned or relocated. We recommend the following precautions be observed during construction and maintained at all times after the buildings are completed: 1. The ground surface surrounding the exteriors of the buildings should be sloped to drain away from the buildings in all directions. In general, we recommend providing a slope of at least 6 inches in the first 5 feet around the buildings in landscaped areas. 2. Backfill adjacent to foundation wall exteriors should be placed and compacted as described in the Backfill section. 3. The buildings should be provided with gutters and downspouts. Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of all backfill. Splash blocks and downspout extensions should be provided at all discharge points. 4. Plants used near foundation walls should be limited to those with low moisture requirements; irrigated grass or other landscaping requiring comparatively large amounts of irrigation should not be located within 5 feet of the foundation. Sprinklers should be at least 5 feet from building foundations and directed away from the building. Irrigation should be limited to the minimum amount sufficient to maintain vegetation; the application of additional water will increase the likelihood of slab and foundation movements. 5. Impervious plastic membranes should not be used to cover the ground surface immediately surrounding the building. These membranes tend to trap moisture and prevent normal evaporation from occurring. Geotextile fabrics can be used to control weed growth and allow some evaporation to occur. WESTERN MINI STORAGE WESTERN MINI STORAGE FACILITY CTL IT PROJECT NO. G$05111-125 S:IGS05111.000\125\2. Reports\GS05111 125 R1.doc 9 • . 1,., PAVEMENTS We collected samples of the subgrade soils from our pits. The silt and sand subgrade soils generally classified as AASHTO Group A-4 with a Group Index of 0. The clay soils classify as an A-6 with a Group Index of 8 to 9. We expect densely compacted fill constructed with the on-site soils will have similar pavement support characteristics as compared to the undisturbed, natural sand and silt. We estimated an R-value of 30 for the silt or sand and 10 for the clay. Removal of 1 foot of clay below the pavements and replacement with densely compacted structural fill would allow use of the pavement thickness appropriate for silt or sand subgrade over the entire site. We recommend that a geotextile fabric be provided as a separator between the silt, sand or clay soils and the aggregate base course if the combination aggregate base/asphalt is chosen. The pavement design is based on the AASHTO design method. We used an Estimated Daily Load Application (EDLA) of 5 for automobile parking and traffic areas. Based on our calculations, we recommend the following minimum pavement sections. If the anticipated traffic loads are considerably different than those assumed, we should be informed so that we can review our recommendations. Pavement Asphaltic Asphaltic Portland Classification Concrete Concrete & Cement Aggregate Base Concrete Course Automobile Access 4" 3" + 5" 5" Silt or Sand Subgrade Automobile Access 5" 3" + 7" 6" Clay Subgrade Truck Traffic Areas 5" Not 6" recommended Our experience indicates problems with asphalt pavements can occur in areas where heavy trucks drive and turn at low speeds. In areas of concentrated loading and turning movements by heavy trucks, we recommend Portland cement concrete WESTERN MINI STORAGE WESTERN MINI STORAGE FACILITY CTL IT PROJECT NO. GS05111·125 S:IGS05111.000\12512. Reports\GS05111 125 R1.doc 10 ~~ llll' pavement placed directly on prepared subgrade. We recommend 6-inch or thicker Portland cement concrete pads be constructed at areas where trucks will stop or turn. Subgrade soils that will support pavements should be scarified, moisture conditioned and compacted. The design of a pavement system is as much a function of the quality of the paving materials and construction as the support characteristics of the subgrade. If the pavement system is constructed of interior material, then the life and serviceability of the pavement will be substantially reduced. We have included construction guidelines for flexible and rigid pavements in Appendix A. Design of asphaltic concrete assumes a strength coefficient of 0.44. Asphaltic concrete should be relatively impermeable to moisture and designed with crushed aggregates that have a minimum of 80 percent of the aggregate retained on the No.4 sieve. Routine maintenance, such as sealing and repair of cracks and overlays at 5 to 7 -year intervals, are necessary to achieve long-term performance of an asphalt system. We recommend application of a rejuvenating sealant such as fog seal after the first year. Deferring maintenance usually results in accelerated deterioration leading to higher future maintenance costs. Our rigid pavement design is based on a modulus of rupture of 650 psi for Portland cement concrete. We recommend concrete contain a minimum of 610 pounds of cement per cubic yard and between 5 and 7 percent entrained air. A mix design should be prepared for this project using the aggregate and cement that will be used during construction. Control joints should separate concrete pavements into panels as recommended by ACI. No de-icing salts should be used on paving concrete for at least one year after placement. A primary cause of early pavement deterioration is water infiltration into the pavement system. The addition of moisture usually results in softening of base course and subgrade and the eventual failure of the pavement. We recommend drainage be designed for rapid removal of surface runoff from pavement surfaces. WESTERN MINI STORAGE WESTERN MINI STORAGE FACILITY CTL \ T PROJECT NO. GS05111-125 S:IGS05111.000\12512. Reports\GS05111125 R1.doc 11 Curb and gutter should be backfilled and the backfill compacted to reduce pending adjacent to pavements. Final grading should be carefully controlled so that design cross-slope is maintained and low spots in the subgrade which could trap water are eliminated. Portland cement concrete drainage pans with subsurface drains should be considered in areas where water will be flowing across pavement surfaces. Seals should be provided between curb and pavement and at all joints to reduce moisture infiltration. LIMITATIONS Our exploratory pits were located to obtain a reasonably accurate picture of the subsurface. Variations in the subsurface conditions not indicated by our exploratory pits will occur. Our representative should be called to observe the completed foundation excavations to check that subsurface conditions are as anticipated and suitable for support of the designed foundations. We should observe and test placement of fill. This investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by geotechnical engineers currently practicing under similar conditions in the locality of this project. No warranty, express or implied , is made. If we can be of further service or if you have questions regarding this report, please call. CTL I THOMPSON , INC. / /v.l: )£?. . . At?·~' Craig A. Burge~.~:P.E.: , · of ••• Project Man,&~ier · (·' '.)' .. , .. ! :I. I ~·: J \ 1 \l CAB :JM:cd \-1 ,_.: /. .., L n \ :''. {p-c,o•VT · :~#>'f..~ .. ·, '/ (5 copies sent)-:·:: .. '<:;,J ~, ,~ ' <":..:_,., . . ... .. '·~-· . W ESTERN MIN I STORAGE 12 W ESTERN MINI STORAGE FACILITY CTL I T PRO JEC T NO . GS0 5111 -125 S :IG$0511 1.000\12512. Rcp on s\G$0511 11 25 R1.doc scAl-f.: 1·~ 100' western Mini storaOe ..,_ .. ,,. -·acl'"' project No. GS05"\ 11-"\ 25 ---- Jl.ppro)(imate area where cloy is anticipated at ioundatlon elevations and removal and replacement Is recommended. Phase boundaries are appro)(\mate. ii .. ... .5 c 0 = ~ i;j 5440 5435 5430 TP-1 EL=5435 TP-2 EL=5432 TP-3 EL=5434 v v 5425 5420 5415 LEGEND: P.'7l IL.:::I v Sandy clay "topsoil". Sand, silty or slit, sandy, loose to medium dense, very moist to wet, brown. (St.l-t.ll) Clay, sandy, soft, wet, gray. (CL) Gravel, clean to silty, cobbles, dense to very dense, wet, brown. (GP-Gt.l) Project No. GS05111-125 v TP-4 EL=5432 v TP-5 EL=5436 lndlcah lndlcah Indicate mea sur excavat SUMMARY LOGS z 0 u; z < a. >< w ~ z 0 u; til w 0:: a. ::;;: 0 () 7 6 5 4 3 2 0 -1 -2 I I I I I -----,----------,---,-------,--------~----I---,---,--I-;--,--,- ' ' ' __ l----L--~--1-~-l-'-~-----__ -'-__ L--'--'-_,_ .!-_,_ L--_____ .!-____ L __ -'-_ -• _l _,_ l ' ' ' - --- - - -,_ - -..... - --- - ---1-+ ~ - - - - - -_,_ - - -_,-- -,__ -_,_ -f-_,_ -+ -I-,_ - - - - - - --- - - -+-- -... - -+ - - -+ -,_ - ! I I I I I L ' 1 1 I I < I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 -------;-----T---,--T--.-T -,--;---;--------,-----,---:----,--,-,-,-,-!"""-------;----I--~--T-..,-T -,-T ' ' _______ _,_ ____ .c__ ' ' - --,-__ , _____ 1 ___ !,_ __ 1 __ 1 __ ,_.)_1_'._____ I I I I I I I I I I I ---~----~--------- ADDITIONAL: COMRRESSION UNQER • ----c-CONSTANI PRESSURE DUE TO WETTING: I I I I 0 I 0 I I -------+----.L.---"---'---'-~-~~------- -,_ - - -_,_ - -1--_,_ -... _,_ -1 _,_ 1-- - - - - - -+ - - - -.L. - --" - --'---1 -+ -1-~ 1 L I I I I I I I I I I I L L •3 - - - -; - - - -,-- ---,-- - --, --:--~--; -, - - - - - - --,-- - --o-- -,---~--r--~--, -~--- - - - - - -T - - - -r-- --.---; --, -l" -~-~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I L I I I I I I I I I I I ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I -------,----r--~--,-,-,-~,,--------~--------~----~-~- L I I I I I I -~-~-------1----T ---~--I -1 -T-~-T -4 ___ .!. ____ L __ ...J __ .!. _ ...1 _ .J. _I_ .!. J ________ I _____ I ___ L __ I_ -L. _I_ ' ' ' _I_ L _______ .!. ____ L __ ...J __ .L _ ...1 _.!. _,_ ~ -5 -6 ----+ ----r-_ _, __ +-~ ---1-.,. --<-----___ , __ ---1---+---1-->--1-.. -1-<--------+ ----+------., I I I I I I I I I I ' ' ---,--------- ----T - --,--l" -I -i -.--•7 -------,----T---,--T-"i ---,---,--------~-----~---~--~- ' -sL--------------------------------.--------------------~ 01 Sample of SILT, SANDY (ML) From TP-2 AT 2 FEET PROJECT NO. GS05111-125 1.0 10 APPLIED PRESSURE -KSF NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT~ NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT~ 100 _--c1'=0-=0~ PCF 17.7 % ------'-'- Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. 3 z 0 iii z ~ (j '$. z Q Vl Vl w et: c.. ::;: 0 (.) ?r----------------------------------------------------------, 5 4 3 2 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 ' ' -----,-------------------------- ------------'---,--~-.,--·--'-. -~---'--.:--~-~ -:-.:--:---I I I I I ---,-----,---,---------,-i------------,----"T-"'i --;--,--:- --__ •• ______ L ___ , __ _!_ _ _! _ _!__I_~-'--------'-----'--_L __ I_ -'-.I • .l -'-----____ l_ ____ l_ ___ I __ l _ .J _ l _, _ _,_ I I I I I I I ------------------... ---_,_ _,_ +-<---__ , ___ --1---f--_,_ -<-_,_-_,_ ~--------'-- ' ' ' ' ' -7----r---,--T -~-T -,--;--.--------,-----,------,--,--,-,--i- ' ' ---T---_ _!_ _ _1 _ _!__1_ I I I I I--,--------,------------- ----~--...J--_,_--"-J. 1-_,_--'--------I-----1---~-_,_-'-_,_ -l _,_ ~- I I I I I I I ' ---,----,--,--,-,-r-,-, ________ _!_ __________ _ ' ' ------'----~--~--L---l--l-1-~ I I L I I I ' ----.----,--,---,-,--~-,-- - - - - - --~-----~---;---,--;--,---.1--- - - - - - -"; - - - -,-- --,--,---, -~ -,-T ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I ADEJITibNAL: OOMPRESSION UNDER: ..------:-CONS-rAN:T Pfl.~SSWRE DU~ TO WET~ING: -------,----,---~--~-~-,-~-~ -------~-----~---,---~--~---~--~------------,---~--'-,-'j- 0.1 ' ' ' ' I I I I ----_.J._-__ j_ __ _j __ .l_ _ _l_j__l_.l__j_-______ I __ -__ L __ I __ L _I_ .J. _I_ L _____ _ _j_ __ _j __ _l_ _ _j_.l__ ' ' ' ----------~---i--+--+-,--I-+__,_-------·-----1---~--•--r--·-~ -~-t-------------~---;--_,_-""- I I I I I t I ' I I 1 1 ' I I I I I I I I I I I > I 1 I I I I 1 -T ---,--~ -I - T -,-T -, - - - - - - --,-- - --,-- -;---,--,--,-c -,-- - - - - - - -T - - - -f - --, - -T -I - T -,-T 1.0 APPLIEDPRESSURE-KSF 10 ' 100 Sample of SILT, SANDY (ML) NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= _-cc9"-'9'c-_ PCF From TP-4 AT 3 FEET 21.4 % ---- Swell Consolidation PROJECT NO. GS05111-125 Test Results FIG. 4 HYDROMETER ANALYSIS 25HR 7HR 45 MIN 15 MIN 100 TIME READINGS 60 MIN. 19 MIN 4 MIN 1 MIN .200 SIEVE ANALYSIS U.S STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS "100 ·so ·4o "30 '16 "10 "2 318" 314" H>" 3" 5" 6" 8' -----------------.r--0 --------------------------------------- 0 70 ~~~~~~~~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~~~~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~~~~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~ct~~~~~30 z iii -----------------------------------------------------~ 60 :ccccc_~_c_c_c=_c_c_cc_c_cc_c_c_~_c_c_cc_c_c_cc_c_cc_c_c_~cccccc~cec_c_c_~_c_cc_c_c_cc_c_c_cc_c_c_cc_c_cc_c_c_cc_c_ce~~~cc~cc~fCcccc~~cc~"'o ~ 50 ffi " 10 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------1nn .001 0.002 005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .149 .297 .590 1.19 2.0 2.38 4.76 9.52 19.1 36.1 76.2 127 200 0.42 152 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS SANDS CLAY (PLASTIC) TO SILT (NON-PLASTIC} FINE MEDIUM Sample of From GRAVEL, CLEAN TO SILTY (GP-GM) TP-9 AT 7-8 FEET HYDROMETER ANALYSIS TIME READINGS U.S. STANDARD SERIES 60 MIN. 19 MIN 4 MIN 1MIN .200 .100 ·so •4o "30 '16 GRAVEL COARSE FINE COARSE COBBLES GRAVEL,--.-c;-----'-7-=-1 % SAND SILT & CLAY 5 % LIQUID LIMIT PLASTICITY INDEX SIEVE ANALYSIS CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 24% -% ----_% ·1o ·s ., 318" 3/4" 1 '/," 3" 5" 6" 8" 25 HR. 7 HR 45 MIN. 15 MIN 100 ~-~-~-~-ccc~-~-ccc-~-~-ccc-~--~~.cccccc~ccc~~~ccccccccc~~~ccc~cccccccccccc~~-~-~-~~-~-~,-ccc--cO :::::::::::::::::::;::::~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::---------- 90 ~:~:~:~:~:~:c:~:~:~:~:~:c:~:~:~:~:~:~:c:·~-~:~:~:c:~:~;~:";c:~:~:~-~--~-~:~:c:~:~:~:~:c:~!~~:~:~:~:c:c:c:~:~:~:c:c:c:~:c:~:~:~:~_~_c_~_~_~_~~~~~~~~10 -------------------;----f---------------~--------------------------- 80 20 10 0 ,---------------,----·---.------.----------------:--------------;--------------------100 .001 0.002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .149 .297 590 1.19 2.0 2.38 4.76 9.52 19.1 36.1 76.2 127 200 0.42 152 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS CLAY (PLASTIC) TO SILT (NON-PLASTIC) FINE Sample of From _GRAVEL, CLEAN TO SILT'\'_((3_P-GM) TP-10 AT 5-6 FEET SANDS MEDIUM GRAVEL COARSE FINE COARSE COBBLES GRAVEL 70% SILT & CCI\\""---6% PLASTICITY INDEX SAND 24% L1 au u5TIMIT_____ % -% PROJECT NO. GS051'11-125 Gradation Test Results FIG. 5 PROJECT NO. GS05111-125 TABLE I SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS NATURAL ATTERBERG LIMITS GRADATION TESTS PASSING TEST DEPTH NATURAL DRY SWELL• LIQUID PLASTICITY PERCENT PERCENT NO. 200 SOIL CLASSIFICATION PIT MOISTURE DENSITY LIMIT INDEX GRAVEL SAND SIEVE (FEET) (%) (PCF) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) TP-1 3 20.9 94 43 SAND, SILTY (SM) TP-2 2 17.7 100 -0.2 SILT, SANDY (ML) TP-3 3 14.3 103 51 SILT, SANDY (ML) TP-4 3 21.4 96 -1.2 SILT, SANDY (ML) TP-5 4 25.3 96 NL NP 59 SILT, SANDY (ML) TP-6 4 23.5 63 SILT, SANDY (ML) TP-7 2 28.7 91 29 13 85 CLAY, SANDY (CL) TP-8 2 30.8 35 17 60 CLAY, SANDY (CL) TP-9 7-8 11.2 71 24 5 GRAVEL, CLEAN TO SILTY (GP-GM) TP-10 5-6 8.3 70 24 6 GRAVEL, CLEAN TO SILTY (GP-GM) *Note: Swell due to wetting under an applied load of 1,000 psf. Negative values indicate consolidation. Page 1 of 1 APPENDIX A PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS WESTERN MINI STORAGE WESTERN MINI STORAGE FACILITY CTL IT PROJECT NO. GS05111·125 S:\GS05111.000\12512. Reports\GS05111 125 R1.doc FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS Experience has shown that construction methods can have a significant effect on the life and serviceability of a pavement system. We recommend the proposed pavement be constructed in the following manner: 1. Natural soils should be stripped of organic matter, scarified, moisture treated, and compacted. We recommend the top one foot of the subgrade be moisture treated to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content. Soils should be com- pacted to at least 95 percent of maximum standard Proctor dry density (ASTM D 698, AASHTO T 99). Moisture treatment and compaction recommendations also apply where additional fill is necessary. 2. Utility trenches and all subsequently placed fill should be properly compacted and tested prior to paving. As a minimum, fill should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum standard Proctor dry density (ASTM D 698, AASHTO T 99). 3. If areas of soft or wet subgrade are encountered, the material should be sub· excavated and replaced with properly compacted structural backfill. Where extensively soft, yielding subgrade is encountered, we recommend the excavation be inspected by a representative of our office 4. Asphaltic concrete should be hot plant-mixed material compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum Marshall density. The temperature at laydown time should be near 275 degrees F. The maximum compacted lift should be 3.0 inches and joints should be staggered. 5. The subgrade preparation and the placement and compaction of all pavement material should be observed and tested. Compaction criteria should be met prior to the placement of the next paving lift. WESTERN MINI STORAGE WESTERN MINI STORAGE FACILITY CTL IT PROJECT NO. GS05111·125 S:IGS05111.000\12.512. Reports\GS05111125 R1.doc A-1 ~.2- lTITr RIGID PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS Rigid pavement sections are not as sensitive to subgrade support character- istics as flexible pavement. Due to the strength of the concrete, wheel loads from traffic are distributed over a large area and the resulting subgrade stresses are relatively low. The critical factors affecting the performance of a rigid pavement are the strength and quality of the concrete, and the uniformity of the subgrade. We recommend subgrade preparation and construction of the rigid pavement section be completed in accordance with the following recommendations: 1. Natural soils should be stripped of organic matter, scarified, moisture treated, and compacted. We recommend the top one foot of the subgrade be moisture treated to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content. Soils should be compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum standard Proctor dry density (ASTM D 698, AASHTO T 99). Moisture treatment and compaction recommendations also apply where additional fill is necessary. 2. The resulting subgrade should be checked for uniformity and all soft or yielding materials should be replaced prior to paving. Concrete should not be placed on soft, spongy, frozen, or otherwise unsuitable subgrade. 3. The subgrade should be kept moist prior to paving 4. Curing procedures should protect the concrete against moisture loss, rapid temperature change, freezing, and mechanical injury for at least 3 days after placement. Traffic should not be allowed on the pavement for at least one week. 5. A white, liquid membrane curing compound, applied at the rate of at least 1 gallon per 150 square feet, should be used within 24 hours of placement. 6. Construction joints, including longitudinal joints and transverse joints, should be formed during construction or should be sawed shortly after the concrete has begun to set, but prior to uncontrolled cracking. All joints should be sealed. 7. Construction control and inspection should be carried out during the subgrade preparation and paving procedures. Concrete should be carefully monitored for quality control. The design section is based upon a 20-year Period. To avoid problems associated with scaling and to continue the strength gain, we recommend deicing salts not be used for the first year after placement. WESTERN MINI STORAGE WESTERN MINI STORAGE FACILITY CTL IT PROJECT NO. G$05111-125 S:\GS05111.000\12512. Reports\GS05111 125 R1.doc A-2 Jeff Kehr From: Sent: To: Cc: John Petaisto Upetaisto@sopriseng.com] Monday, April14, 2008 12:41 PM Jeff Kehr starkysmachine@hotmail.com Subject: Jason Stark Mini Storage Attachments: 04-14-08.zip Jeff, Page I of I I have attached a zip file that shows our findings regarding the flooding on the Proposed Mini Storage site near Silt, CO. The first folder (1 G&D) contains a plot of our Grading and Drainage plan which shows the location of the floodplain onsite. The next folder (2 FEMA Firm) displays the latest FEMA flood mapping onsite. The third folder (3 Silt Flood Study 1987) has exhibits from the 1987 study which established the flood line. The 1987 Flood Study was performed by the US Dept. of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, and was a global Study of flooding in Silt. The fiooding onsite is a result of split flow from the 16th street drainage channel. It appears that Section 1972.2, as shown on Sheet 6 of 14, models Interstate 70 and 16th street until it ends. The main channel flows under 1-70 in an existing tunnel, while some portion of the stormwater flows west along the south property line of our site. According to Table 1 of the 1987 study, there is a total of 381 cfs at Section 1972.2. The 1987 study does not indicate what portion of fiow splits off of the main channel and fiows west onto our site. A detailed analysis using fiood modeling software would need to be done to determine approximate split fiows, and the extent of fiooding onsite. Based on the information available to us at this time, we believe that the majority of the fiow goes south under 1-70. Also, a large portion of the split flow that comes to the west is within the COOT 1-70 ROW Our site grading has the finish fioor of the South building approximately 3' above the existing grade, and approximately Y. of the proposed building is in the floodplain. Based on our site Grading and the building location, we do not think that the building will be susceptible to flooding during the 100 year event. Please call or email with any questions or to discuss this matter further. Thank you, John Petaisto EI Design Engineer Sopris Engineering 970-704-0311 4/14/2008 250 MAP SCAlE 1" 500' 0 sao PANEL 1092C FIRM 1000 FEET FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) PANEL 1092 OF 1900 !SEE MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT) _M.IMBEI'L PM£!.. SUF.BX Hoole."' u-: ro. M.op _ .... """""' """~"" .~ld bo .....,.. ......., ploalnG mop ~•d...; '"" e..---.. N--<how~ ....... """"'" bo " ..... "~ .,ou, ..... ., ............ '"' .......... 1-t ............. lty. MAP NUMBER 0802051092C MAP REVISED: AUGUST 2, 2006 Federal Emergency MaiUigement Agency ( ~ --\""t:> 1:. ~ c-.. ~ ~ UJ \_)) J~ -.... ...r:.S:. T\ 0 01;)~ ~ 0 (.") ~c . 1--,r - D c ZOOIEJ ~NldOOl! lll!V~S tLSL St6 OL6 XVd zo:zl SOOZ/60/0l "" ' ;. ·I I ' ' l : ; ' October 8, 2008 Mr. Andy Schwaller Chief Building Official Garfield County, Co. 108 8th St. Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Co . 81601 <9. ~. ~ s~ ()_~ (~7-J l/1rP Co . A V1 r= ct G; ~ Dear Andy: CMtc..t. 1 1 ~? {Vt. This letter's purpose is to officially notify the county of Garfie~hat Western Mini Storage, LLC has 100% completion of the four northern most buildi-ngs of Phase I at the site location of 357 S. 16th St. Silt, Co. 81652 . We would like to close the permits out on buildings A, B, F and Gat this time. Our final inspection was p~rformed and accepted on 10/8/08 on these buildings. The southern four buildings of the project are underway and should be ready for inspections as they progress and finalize construction around the end of the year. As you may have known~ we are ready to start leasing these units that are complete and would appreciate our c/o as soon as it can be accomplished. Thank you a~ectfully yours, ~~#~ J on D. Stark PS Please see attached drawings of buildings layout. TOO~ ~NidOO~ }l~V.LS RECEIVED OCT 0 9 2008 GARFI ELD COUNTY BU ILD ING & PLANN ING tLSL St6 OL6 XVd zo:z1 SOOZ /60 /01 Inspection Report COLORADO STATE ELECTRICAL BOARD INSPECTION REPORT I CORRECTION NOTICE Date Received : 08-0CT -08 Contractor/HomeOwner: Address: Type of Inspection: Action: Comments or Correcticfns: Pennit Number: 654451 PROSPECT ELECTRIC 357 SO . 16th. St. Final Accepted Page 1 of 1 1) The 4 buildings on the far North side are OK for final , the other buildings not ready for final inspection Inspectors Name: Cyrus Tuchscher Phone Number: 970-625-5085 Date: 08-0CT-08 COLORADO STATE ELECTRICAL BOARD DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AGENCIES 1580 Logan St. Suite 550 Denver, Colorado 80203-1941 Phone : (303) 894-2985 RECEIVED OCT 1 3 2008 GARH ELO COUNTY BUILDI NG & PLANN ING http s://www.dora.state.co.us/pls/real!E p Web Inspection GUI.Pr oces s Page 10/10/2008 Jeff Kehr From: Andy Schwaller Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 1:02PM To: Jeff Kehr Subject: FW: western mini storage Jeff, Add this to the file and if you are ready, give it to Cathi to issue. Thanks, Andy From: jason stark [mailto:starkysmachine@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 12:45 PM To: Andy Schwaller Cc: stark@sopris.net; hogbackbs@hotmail.com Subject: western mini storage Dear Mr. Schwaller Thank you for getting to us as soon as you could. Page I of I The following is what Bruce Snode asked me to email you as to my results from the meeting burning mountain fire dept. I met with chief Mclinn in his office in silt, in the last week of March, 2008. We went over the layout, design of project, usage of bldgs., Etc. What he looked up is that storage bldgs., .49 IJPthave to be sprinkled because they are a simple steel structure with no human occupancy, no combustable building products, No combustable items stored in facilty, (i.e. gas, chemicals or paints.) No internal electrical wiring, hvac or heat sources of any kind, simply concrete and steel. The Chief has no problems with phase 1 of the project. His only concern was the width between the ends of the buildings from phase 1 to phase 2 (phase 2 will be in summer of 2009) so as he can turn a truck around in the center of the facility. This will be no problem to accommodate him and incorporate this in to the design of phase 2, as we have plenty of room to stretch the project from east to west. We will simply move the location of the buildings designed for phase 2 , twenty feet to the west. If for any reason phase 2 does not happen, then there will be no need to do anything or change anything. I called Jeff (garco )to relay the message that the chief has no issues with the project, and that is when jeff asked if he could get an ok in writing, even a note or an email. I asked the chief if he could put something in writing to this effect. He said he would, as i was submitting everything i had put together to the county bldg. dept. in two weeks. He then had to rush out to a fire call. I called back at least twice a day for the next week, to no avail. The following week I called until the dispatcher started to get frustrated with taking my messages. I told her i realized how busy they are and of course if they are busy, its because of an emergency somewhere. we agreed on the low priority of my situation verses someone with an emergency going on. I called Jeff back to tell of the difficulty i was having. His response was" well he has had time to object if he felt he needed too." Thank you for all your help on this project, Jason D.Stark 5/27/2008 SE.NTIN£L BUILDING SY"STEMS A DIVISION OF GLOBAL INDUSTRIES, INC. TWIN I BEAM STEEL PO BOX 2027 ELIZABETH, CO 80 1 07 Jobsite Address: 16TH STREET SILT , CO 81652 Date: 2/21/08 Re : Sentinel Building Systems Job Id: B2391 4 Dear Sir : This letter is to certify that a 20 ' span, 200 ' long gable symmetrical building with a 8.5' eave height as referenced above and manufactured by Sentinel Bui l ding Systems of Albion, Nebraska is designed in accordance with the following loads : Live Load: 20 .00 psf (roof system) Collateral Load : 0 psf Roof Snow Load: 40 psf Wind Load: 90 mph Exposure B Dead Load: 2 .200 psf (wt. of the buil ding) Seismic Zone/Design Category: C Seismic Coefficient : 0.655 (Ss*Fa) Loads are applied in accordance with the IBC 03 building code. The cerlifying engineer does not cerlify that the building code or loads specified are adequate or appropriate for the intended use or location of this building . The buyer is responsibl e to verify specified loads are in compliance with the local regulat ory authorities . Design is in accordance with the applicable sections of the 1989 AISC and the 1996 AISI specifications. This certification is limited to the steel framework, the meta l roof and the metal wall covering , and fasteners required for their installation . This certification specifically excl u des an analysis of the foundation and parts suppli ed by anyone other than Sentinel Building Systems . Sincerely , SENTINEL BUILDING SYSTEMS P.O. BOX 34B • 237 SOUTH 4TH STREET • ALBION, NE 6B620 PH: BIJ0-327-0790 I 402-395-5076 • F'AX: 402-395-6369 www.sentinelbuildings .com COUNTY OF GARFIELD-BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone(970)945~212 7 ~ //' 77-i Job located at 3Y .._.,;>, / fP I Permit No. /t:J 't'.s---? • I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: W!L (__ oK 0 Call for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date /-/ Z: 20 CJ? Building Inspector -~~P..~~~ .. .;.,:..L---'u/.~:_,~42~~~:'..__::::::::~=--- Phone (970) 945-8212 r==-=- COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at 3s;-7 50, /bZlZ_ Permit No. /t9 f.:;-?" I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: /1££12 SCI{£t.d.S M/ SC!111K t2C'<!JR ;::[A-MRS:>, flt:..L ~;t.cs 70 4Jc£e ~s;!S <PC!/. 071/11-A! Wts .r: E'?(A/?1/C:f-..Sf£//1/G-.~::y1 /?455 CJA/ 13(>{/?/)/A,/G.:j" {, Zy ~ "1-:. ~ 0 Call for Re·lnspection . 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date 9' -z:;. :<> 20 .?/ 8 Building Inspector ---~'7"'-==:::.:" _ _ju_.,·~Z""""'~"""""""";"';J_'_:<,..~ Phone (970) 945-8212 COUNTY OF GARFIELD -BUILDING DEPARTMENT CORRECTION NOTICE 108 8th St., Suite 401 Glenwood Springs, Colorado Phone (970) 945-8212 Job located at ;5...s-7 5O, /6 zy Permit No. ,/<:!?'?.£ z I have this day inspected this structure and these premises and found the following corrections needed: ?can for Re-lnspection 0 $50.00 Re-lnspection Fee must be paid prior to Re-lnspection You are hereby notified that the above correction must be inspected before covering. When correction(s) have been made, call for inspection at 970-384-5003. Date y-/8"' -20 0 2r Building Inspector _/Z.L.,~~,_,,.;..,~..___.AU~/,::d'/..::;,~,:;,-~,:Z--r=-:::::o::,,_..,.~-- Phone (970) 945-8212/ No: 10959 G-Ar-c Assessor's Parcel No. 2179-101-00-018 JoOAdd"~ 11)~ 0 7 / 9 b 0 0 7'J,D3Cf Date _ __::c5/=29"'"'/2:..::.:00e.::c8_ BUILDING PERMIT CARD os-'c:> 7{78 Owner ___ __..,_St...,ar_,..k,..oAu.lbe.,_,rt..,&'-"S'--"no""de..._. B=r,uc""-e __ Address 918 cr 352. Rifle Phone # 618-1075 Contractor Hubbs Building Address box 533, New Castle Phone # 948-0229 Setbacks: Front ____ Rear ____ RH ____ LH Zoning -~-- INSPECTIONS ;::rlf5&N' 3&'1-CJ1-9 3 storage (8 buildings) Soils Test--------- Footing _,. __J)_,j Foundation ?0"'" s:tlid Grout----------- Underground Plumbing ____ _ Rough PI umbing .----:-~-:=,..-- Framing Z t!fJ 51{!£ff Insulation---------Roofing _________ _ Drywall----------Gas Piping ________ _ NOTES Weatherproofing _________ _ Mechanicai ____ ~;:;-;;---,;--::::~-- Eiectrical Rough (State) ~ 4--4-?:1 Electrical Final (State) I-7 -e '7' Final/-27-09' /Checkli•' r.nm"lJll ted? @V Certificate Occupancy# frJD7(, {Q17"'/ '-- Date \SSIJFD tD·~· fiS"SUEP 22J. Septic System # 1 Date ----------Final _________ _ Other------------- (continue on back) --~---- No:' 10959 Assessor's Parcel No. 2179-101-00-018 Job Add,_ '/b~ BUILDING PERMIT CARD Owner ___ ___.s ... ta...,rk....,A:wlb.,.ert""&"'-'S"'-n""od,.e..._,. B.,ru""c,._e __ Address 918 cr 352. Rifle Contractor Hubbs Building Address box 533, New Castle Date __ :.:.5/:=c29'""/2=.:0"'0-=-8 _ Phone # 618-1075 Phone # 948-0229 Setbacks: Front Rear ____ RH, ____ LH ____ Zoning ___ _ storage (8 buildings) INSPECTIONS Soils Test Weatherproofing _________ _ Footing .,. __n____t Mechanical ___________ _ Foundation ?i'\Gi: SGUJ Electrical Rough (State)-------- Grout Electrical Final (State) ________ _ Underground Plumbing Final /Checklist Completed? __ _ Rough Plumbing Certificate Occupancy # _______ _ Framing Z tiP S'l:{£d Date _________ _ Insulation Septic System *---------- Roofing Date ---------- Drywall Final _________ _ Gas Piping---------Other------------- NOTES (continue on back) Parcel Detail Page 1 of3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information Assessor/Treasurer Prol)erty Search I AssessoLS].Ibs~tQuery I ;\J;_se~Qr Sales Search Ch:rk 8cR~c_Qr.Qer.Reception S(:wch Basic Building Characteristics I Tax Information I'illc~LD~tail I Yal!Ie Det'!il I Sales Detail I Residential/Conunercial lmJlrovement Detail Land Detail I Photogral)hs I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II 2007 Mill Levy I I o2o II R2oo375 II 21191o1ooo18 II 46.145 I Owner Name and Mailing Address ISTARK, ALBERT L. & SNODE, J. BRUCE IPOBOX7 INEW CASTLE, co 81647-0007 Assessor's Parcel Description (Not to be used as a legal description) lsECT,TWN,RNG:10-6-92 DESC: TR IN ITHE Sl/2S1/2Nl/2NE AND LOTS 1 & 2 IBK:0550 PG:0557 BK: 1946 PG: 179 IRECPT:727165 BK:0937 PG:0556 IBK:0937 PG:0555 BK:0914 PG:0937 IBK:0914 PG:0933 Location Physical Address: llsrL T Subdivision: I Land Acres: 118.95 Land Sq Ft: lio Section II Township II Range 10 II 6 I 92 http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=21791 01 00018 I I I I I I I 3/20/2008 Parcel Detail Page 2 of3 2007 Property Tax Valuation Information II Actual Value II Assessed Value I I Land: II 22,25oll 6,4501 I Improvements: II oil 0 I Total: II 22,25oll 6,4501 Sale Date: jj4/6/1995 Sale Price: jj75,000 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential lo I Buildings: Number ofCommllnd lo I Buildings: No Building Records Found Tax Information Tax Year Transaction Type Amount I 2007 Tax Payment: Whole ($297.64)1 2007 Tax Amount $297.641 2006 Tax Payment: Whole ($299.24)1 2006 I Tax Amount $299.241 2005 II Tax Payment: Second Half ($149.61)1 2005 II Tax Payment: First Half ($149.61)1 2005 II Tax Amount $299.221 2004 I Tax Payment: Whole ($335.74)1 2004 Tax Amount $335.741 2003 Tax Payment: Whole ($372.82)1 2003 Interest Payment ($11.18)1 2003 I Interest Charge I $11.181 2003 Tax Amount $372.821 2002 Interest Charge $10.811 I 2002 Tax Payment: Whole ($360.44)1 I 2002 Interest Payment ($10.81)1 I 2002 II Tax Amount $360.441 II II http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce1Number=21791 0100018 3/20/2008 Parcel Detail 2001 Tax Payment: Whole ($358.52)1 2001 Tax Amount $358.521 2000 Interest Payment ($11.08)1 2000 Interest Charge $11.081 2000 Tax Payment: Whole ($369.18)1 2000 Tax Amount II $369.181 1999 Tax Payment: Whole II ($367.46)1 I 1999 Tax Amount II $367.461 Top ofPag~ Assessor PJ!t!i:base Search Options I Treasurer_PJtlitbaseS_e.ar~h_Q):)tions Clerk & Recorder Damb.ase Search Options frarfield County Home Page Page 3 of3 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 -2008 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. http:/ /www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?Parce1Number=21791 01 00018 3/20/2008