Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- PermitJob Address No. 8110 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING, SANITATION and PLANNING DEPARTMENT 109 8th. Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601(970) 945-8212 t20 " d� a -c. .f;e41-00 1l bs a—.. Nature of Work Building Permit Use of Buildin Owner (j,/& 1C y�{A) GU. Contractor f � -4 Amount of Feraait$ ((U la • 7 jrziz,,--; 3 25 f earvL_ ce,(2,‹A Wriz_e.. .al) -1 cro Date 422 ?D/ Clerk 1 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING. PERMIT APPLICATION GARFIELD COUNTY (GLENWOOD SPRINGS), COLORADO PERMIT NO. 15° iLEPHONE: (970) 945-8212 INSPECTION LINE: (970)3134_5003 PARCEL/SCHEDULE NO. OB ADDRESS: 0L 64) 65 T 't€ C+. Sr f t C t 65 - LOT NO. -2. BLOCK NO. SUBDIVISION/E7EMPTION VILA J GArcrc S ' r owls f i e > e i Dkev'- ��1 t l�e�j by a 14e1 tAitL. 7. De- od SpeT 1 Co p tbo i ,..3 s..4,26144 `%P 9 48 4 7 3 MaltACM t iCfiAll C.I.c.( 9 waiter ; (vi.G . ii QL;lenwo AID' .' RFK 112`i )Ste Steil C,od 4 616°1 P" 3484.2191. �.NO: 24g 6 1 8Q. FT. OPLOY q b 14 14 („2.4„ 4 2.1nuour 1 PH: LICNO: NO.OFSLOM i antes. ca NJP, .ADDRESS SQ. Fr. OFBUILDING • 20 4V P—"" 5 3 vsEGFeDBD�IG • ��.-. C DESCRIBEWORK: g CLASS OP WORK: 411=° DADDIT1ON DALTERATION DMOVE ORESIOVE 9 GABAGD. oewmE QM ll C"PORT: =MOLE dmuBLE 10 o DRIVEWAY PERMIT Ens SEWAGE DISPOSAL (SSE11 MITE PIAN 'f VALUATION OPW RI:S AMSTED VALUATIONS R / 'N � T7 M I SPECIAL COMMONS: A SEPARATE COLORADO. THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZED WORK IS AFTER WORK I HEREBY KNOW THE GOVERNING HEREIN AUTHORITY LOCAL CONSTRUCTION. NOTICE ELECTRICAL PERMTT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OP BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR P. PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME IS COMMENCED. CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LAW TING CONSTRU N OR THE PERFORMANCE OF (}„ ®1j✓j Date is 1• PLAN CHECK FEE: ww 2_10,1 `[ PERMIT FEE: q(� `A( 3 8 5—.7 5 TOTAL FRE: DATE PERMIT ISSUED: 1 V g LJ (4 9 OCC: GROUP: ��� r r CONST: TYPE: I L —' V ,— ZONING: SETBACKS: Signature of Owner, Contractor or authorized agent having read and n cc above. T + 7J 1� r 4. MANU. HOME: .4 2nd •1 Q t3 ISDS NO. & FEE: S 0 0CQ '+ Building Dept A , , a its PlaaniugDept. • A •�^ a a AGItEEMENT 'ERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS ]ETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUD.DINGDEPARTMENT. 14 CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SITTER HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY 3ARFTLD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.28201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER ACI EES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY :7.OMPLIED WITH IN THE LOCATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM i11E COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE 1T SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. ('CIE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN 'IOLATION OF THIS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUGIt ° THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCEPTANCE OF ANY 2ESPONSIBTLTTIES OR LIABILITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICALLY WITH THE ARCHITECT. DESIGNER, BUILDER AND OWNER. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE NVATIVE AND 114 SUPPORT )FTHE OWNERS INTEREST. ;,a>f'o iE, I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE I1N1TIALI T34�o� �1owll� �4AYA' The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1994 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # g' 1 © . hi4141-- e16/6 Signature Date bpcont b_o.(4 1 or Z- t.LDJ4c P3234. 1031. loot X1)5 3$n .75 VO/Ii/U1 7 r 11i11 lull CAA JIV LOI (0.1 August 7, 2001 rAl.'iuiSI ililw x nUUblnl. Surnmit Crest HOMES' Colorado Built Factory Direct Housing 2440 Airport Rd Rifle, Co 81650 Garfield County Building Department Customer: Ukele Acres Subdivision, Lots 1, 2, 3, 7, 9, Esther C.t, Silt To Whom It May Concern: The homes to be built for the Ukele Subdivision, model 439 -lot 1, model 266 -lot 9, model 835 -lot 2, model 572 -lot 3, model. 265-Iot 7 will be built to the UBC code with a 40Lb snow load and meets Zone 3 insulation requirements. Please see the attached sheet for UBC wind Zone requirements. These homes have R-44 ceiling insulation, and 2x6 walls with R-19. Please feel free to call if you have any questions. 1-800-818-2632. Sincerely, Michelle Anderson Zone Manager Summit Crest Homes 2221 Clayton Lane • P.O. Box 10 • Berthoud, C:oIorado 80513 (970) 532-2632 • Fax (970) 532-4352 , 1UVL Utf/14/U1 41)-Yi 11.1:3b PAA y!U 2t '1Nb/ FAU'1UK1 U1KtUY 11UUb11v1,, T e � ,.. 1 z ra = 6 cL :-J Ci` Cn A W !''7- `''" Z Me2 4-46 FIT n4 p n - x aQg1 1( Crinrn n Cl n4 rragiRtg§-174 6§qT OR -Or- '°2.81-1411NalW 4M0 nc.�i w" IEJ3 713/ mp Vz4-4 crnii-d-vs ppai 7o-,0rn�'� z m= cp aosmm7UE`z mz 0- cs*E -ROI nom, 11 1 m= '-'1 uw m 2 e m 11 F m SI 2 g vo(41i F nr � x x .mm aiat RCE _ra.r rnrn Qm WIN p�� A X 0 ti T>iDIH. Tn ,z 74a5 me PP 2 NV 1d el 001d m CULL; ;•-••• ;1 r • 000u — Pf a � > ._ TIT Fed Dr -n,0 m °o m -DO >1111'4a576 rrtT a 1-1" INt krir rr ■■■■iiAine■■ .■.I ■Nu■oRI �■ t° is■■Cls■■■■■ariri7■■ 2! ►9111111111 ; fl WWI P4 1 v 'mum :.%m■■■■■I ili EINE ,Ti . �f 11".11m111111118111 ,' .1. 1116 0 SZ/bt'd ZES 0L6 arta �S1 • • Ou r f"im Nfl T AWHH l 1.t G1 Tem? -Ci -flr!k Report Date: October 31, 2001 Client: Peter Waller Radon Test Address: 66 Esther Court, Silt, CO Overall Average: 2.9pCi/L This is the report of a radon gas screening measurement. The mea- surement was performed using a continuous radon monitor (CRM), and was performed in conformance with test protocols established by the US Environmental Protection Agency in the document entitled 'Protocols for Radon and Radon .Decay Product Measurements in Homes." The report in the adjacent column is a photocopy of the actual report that was obtained form the CRM upon completion of the measurement period. The measurement period was 48 hours. Test date Start: October 29, 2001 End: October 31, 2001 During the measurement period radon gas measurements were recorded once every hour. The serial number of the CRM deployed for this measurement is: 1826007 Explanation of Report Data: Tabular Data: This portion of the report provides a numerical listing of the radon gas measurements that were made throughout the measure- ment period. Average: This portion of the report gives the average radon gas concentration measured during the entire measurement period. This average is computed in two ways. The "Overall Average" is the simple average of all of the values listed in Tabular Data. The "EPA Average" is the simple average of all of the values listed in Tabular Data, except those values recorded during the first four hours of the measurement period. The "EPA Average" is computed in a manner consistent with the protocols cited above. Professional Radon Monitor Mart late /6/2,9 di Start Ti lei©:ja Serial # Location: 'Main Lev.4 Sisnature: • Data in pCi/I Time Interval 1 Hr 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.8 0.3 4.7 5.1 2.9 2.1 2.1 3.6 2.5 3.6 3.2 2.5 1.8 1.4 1.4 2.9 2.5 2.9 3.2 3.6 4.0 3.6 3.6 2.1 4.3 5. 1 2. 1 1.0 2.1 2.5 1.4 3.6 3.2 4.3 3.6 3.6 2.1 2.1 3.6 4.0 6.5 4.; 2. 1 2.1 Overall Av5.= 2.9 EPA Protocol Av.3.- 3.0 Other Information: In the printout, the letter "p" or "T" may appear next to a given value. The "p" indicates that, during this measurement interval, the power was disconnected from the CRM. The "T" indicates that, during this measurement interval, the CRM was disturbed or moved. The radon gas measurement was completed and there is no evidence that the CRM was tampered with in any way. Therefore, the average values contained in this report reflect the radon gas concen- tration at the time of the test and should not be construed as either predictive or supportive of a similar measurement conducted at another time in the same structure. 0 The radon gas measurement was completed and there is evidence that the CRM may have been tampered with during the measurement period. Therefore, the measurement values are not consid- ered valid, and further testing is recommended. Please consult the attached EPA guidelines to interpret the results of this measurement. Building Inspection Services, Inc. does not accept any responsibility for health, financial, or other issues that may arise form the disposition or interpretation of this measurement result. This result is confidential and will not be released to anyone else without you permission. If you have any questions on the results please contact Building Inspection Services, Inc. Interpretation of Radon Test Results There are two possible outcomes of a screening measurement: (1) if the result is at or above 4 pCi/L (picocurries per liter of air), mitigation of the radon concern is recommended; (2) if the result is below 4 pCi/L, no action is necessary. However, the EPA believes that any radon exposure carries some risk, therefore, follow-up testing four times in a year (once each season) is recommended to obtain a more accurate radon exposure picture of the home. The following recommendations are summarized from EPA's Home Buyer's and Seller's Guide to Radon: If your Screening Measurement Result is below 4 pCi/L: Follow-up measurements are probably not required if the screening measurement was made in the lowest livable area of your home under closed -house conditions. EPA estimates that the average indoor radon level is about 1.3 pCi/L. The U.S. Congress has set a long-term goal that indoor radon levels be no more than outdoor levels. EPA estimates that the average outdoor radon level is about 0.4 pCi/L. While this goal is not yet technologically achievable in all cases, most homes today can be reduced to less that 2 pCi/L. If your screening measurement results are 4 pCi/L or higher: The EPA recommends that a qualified radon mitigation company be contacted to make corrections. This test did not include a test for the amount of radon in the water supply. Note that federal standards may be imposed on public water supplies in the near future. Determination of the amount of radon in the water can only be determined by a separate testing methodology. This test was performed by Charles Lanci, Residential Measurement Provider ID#100321 RT KURTZ & ASSOCIATES, INC. 5012 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Date: November 16, 2001 RECEIVED Nov 9 2001 STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS Phone (970) 945 6305 Fax (970) 945 1093 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN Re: Foundation Design Ukele Acres Subdivision: Highway 6 and County Road 216, Garfield County, CO. Our office is the structural engineer of record for the foundation systems for modular homes to be placed on the following five lots: Lot 1, Lot 2, Lot 3, Lot 7, and Lot 9. Prior to commencing with design of the foundations we reviewed the following information provided by Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc.: 1. "Geologic Hazards Assessment, Proposed Smith Subdivision, Highway 6 and Road 216, Garfield County, Colorado' (October 25, 1999). 2. "Preliminary Geotechnical Study: Proposed Smith Subdivision, Highway 6 and County Road 216, Garfield County, Colorado' (November 11, 1999). The preliminary report included borings on four of the five subject lots: Lot 1, Lot 3, Lot 7, and Lot 9. Consequently, Hepworth-Pawlak provided our office with site specific soils information for those four lots. An allowable soil bearing pressure of 1200 PSF was provided, and utilized in the foundation design for Lot 1, Lot 3, and Lot 9. An allowable soil bearing pressure of 800 PSF was provided, and utilized in the foundation design for Lot 7. An assumed soil bearing pressure of 1200 PSF was provided and utilized in the foundation design for Lot 2. For this lot it is recommended that Hepworth-Pawlak examine the site to verify the assumed soil bearing pressure. \,\``01 III1111(Allq���i ,• Qau `. AVS Depe eoo0 `\ orf°'��u�ti:�� ;t0.\\\ ��e�`� Gtech December 4, 2001 Klomhaus & Waller Attn: Pete Waller P.O. Box 1727 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone: 970-945-7988 Fax: 970-945-8454 hpgeo@hpgeotech.com Job No. 199 751-2 Subject: Observation of Crawlspace, Existing Residence, Lot 2, Ukele Acres, Garfield County, Colorado. Dear Mr. Waller: As requested, a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. observed the crawlspace at the subject site on November 28, 2001 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our work and recommendations for the foundation design are presented in this report. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. previously conducted a geologic hazards assessment and preliminary geotechnical study for Ukele Acres (formally known as Smith Subdivision) and presented our findings in reports dated October 25 and November 11, 1999, Job No. 199 751. Additional percolation testing was performed for Klomhaus & Waller and presented ina letter dated September 5, 2001, Job No. 199 751-2. The existing residence is a single story manufactured structure over a crawlspace. A detached two car garage with a slab -on -grade floor is located to the east of the residence. Spread footings sized for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,200 psf had been assumed in the design. We understand that the foundation appears to be performing adequately and that there are no visible signs of building distress. At the time of our visit to the site, we observed the bearing soils exposed in the crawlspace. It appears that the foundation excavation had been cut in one level about 3 feet below the original ground surface. The crawlspace subgrade was covered with plastic. Where the plastic was pulled back, the soils exposed in the bottom of the crawlspace consisted of stiff sandy to very sandy clay and silt. Results of swelI- consolidation testing performed on a sample of the clay soil exposed in the crawlspace, shown on Fig. 1, indicate the soils have low compressibility under conditions of loading and wetting. The laboratory testing is summarized on Table I. No free water was observed in the crawlspace and the soils were slightly moist to moist. No indication of foundation movement, such as cracks in the foundation walls, was observed in the crawlspace. Klomhaus &Waller December 4, 2001 Page 2 Considering the conditions exposed in the crawlspace and the nature of the existing construction, spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,200 psf should be adequate for support of the residence. There could be some post -construction movement of the foundation if the bearing soils become wetted. Backfill placed around the structure should be compacted and the surface graded to prevent ponding within at least 10 feet of the building. The recommendations submitted in this letter are based 011 our observation of the soils exposed within the crawlspace and do not include subsurface exploration to evaluate the subsurface conditions within the loaded depth of foundation influence. This study is based on the assumption that soils beneath the footings have equal or better support than those exposed. The risk of foundation movement may be greater than indicated in this report because of possible variations in the subsurface conditions. If there are any questions or if we may be of further assistance, please let us know. Sincerely, HEPWORTH - PAWLAK G INC. AD,gyf.CO 97077 ;o / /Q: !�; �.`�s Z<•S, s'I0NAL E' Jordy Z. Adamson, J� , Rev. by: SLP JZA/ksw attachments cc: Kurtz and Associates - Attn: Brian Kurtz H P GEOTECH • Compression % Cil N - O Moisture Content = 8.4 percent Dry Density = 107 pcf Sample of: Very Sandy Silty Clay From: Crawlspace Subgrade in Site Control Area N\ No movement upon wetting 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf 199 751-2 HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC_ SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Fig. 1 N r— LL) N a) a) O z 0 U z J Q U_ Z 0 w 0 Lu O c.0 J a. Z 1- cc 0 a w SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SOIL OR BEDROCK TYPE very sandy silty clay very sandy clay UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH CPS FL ATTERBERG LIMITS PLASTIC INDEX [°/uI CO r-- PERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE 10 GRADATION 0 a - 'a e ac NATURAL DRY DENSITY Ipcf} b O t-• CO O r— NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT (°k1 d- pp LC? O r 11 SAMPLE LOCATION CRAWLSPACE SUBGRADE south central southwest corner INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIREDFOR INSPECTIONS 24 HOURS NOTICE FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued. .........Zoned Area Permit No AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME L AND VOID. Use ri iv‘t It4d f iltAddress or Legal Des nption Owner ,' cis ptractor Setbacks Front Side Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. INSPECTION RECORD Footing d/ (;z 4e. IF 9- 12 -01 Ar_11 Foundation t .../c' 'i .4 Underground Plumbing Insulation Rough Plumbing Drywall Chimney & Vent„. --Electric FinaAby State Inspector) yi.. pi Gas Piping Final ,/,./7453,/ Electric Rough y State Inspector) Septic Filial % � I /5/ c? Framing /O) (To inctud oof in place 1,13a9 Wdoivs and Doors installed). Notes: ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE Phone 384-5003 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. APPRQVEDDO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD Datt By 1\1144Likki C E IF PLACED OUTSIDE 1 COVER WITH CLEAR PLASTIC