Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application- Permit
No. 8102 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING, SANITATION and PLANNING DEPARTMENT 109 8th. Street, Suite 303 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601(970) 945-8212 a, gibs? -- Job Address 4 23 . aid (ao a. , Nature of Work Building Permit W/cP/j& qeyeahxua Use of Building ,):?-41-21,-C, �e� Owner � . Qac, Contractor er Amount of Permit$ c' pJ- r 9 • / Date 1A---"Ve" 150 • b). CJU - ia3g•a frizAAkdA, 159?, c;rWC-V6 c Clerk 02 010-b/ GARFILLD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION GARFIELD COUNTY (GLENWOOD SPRINGS), COLORADO TELEPHONE: (970) 945-8212 INSPECTION LINE: (970)384-5003 PERMIT NO. (FI0 V PARCEL/SCHEDULE NO. R KS -0 02 o TOB ADDRESS: £/,,3,73 C. ow1LLdr„ RD Lei/` S t �� 1 LOT NO. ,2a BLOCK NO. SUBDIVISION ON '�ID ffr '�S ,�<,�u/e 2 0 �4� Jam 0�}..� ADD SS /774 COti moi! 1t1_V PIL O/b� y. WK PH: 3 �rs►�.r,J � n. w�De.� ADDRESS I -r- RO Gri o 3c¢ Co ��H SS g- 9a9! UC. 0: . oio� ? 4axC fErBEN+GPiFnt l/OLICOGiu Pc(,tex ADanss /S"!/ i?orrtf S Pim er-eP D. 5.td PH: .24Q-8968' MVO: 5 SQ. PT. OFEUSYJP:G .1 DSI.£ Z ! 9L� T •a ..,, SQ. FF. OF LOT r J,L,.S t� HFIGF�I�t(NO.OFPIAOFS 3 _ 2 6 6 J USE OF RIS.��-A)r1.4 51F wj410.../ -KA-. 1-. �� 7 DESCRIBE WORK- 8 CLASS OPWORK: 14f7WDADDrr1ON DALTEHAT1ON [MOVE oRFMOVE 9 GARAGE oSII•I(H£ "VOUSLE CARPOxr. oSQNGIE °DOUBLE /� I0 l V AIAIMSITE SEW'AGE DISPOSAL ( 110) MITE PLAN RIVEWAY PEPAHFK: Ian ,[ i0 VALUATION OF WOR $ O' 007 r. ADJUSTED VALUATIONS $ aw Ci �[ L�L'S J � SPECIAL CONDITIONS: NOTICE A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF COLORADO. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR. CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF ISO DAYS AT ANY TIME WORK IS COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETTER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO OLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW GUL A Mi•=i''.NSTRUCi3ON OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRU Y'i Date � 0 % PLAN CHECK FEE: j8)C13- PERMIT FEE: I C Q l . Z. TOTAL FEE: �^ r / DATE PERMIT ISSUED: .FI e J . `t b 9.-7AFTER OCC. GROUP: CONST: TYPE: V t y'1 '3 U--( l' ZONING SETBACKS: . Sign. •. ,Owner. p ' •, or authorized agent having read and tmderstood n ce a , Q t f 670/ l 0 J MANU. HOME: ISDS NO. & FEE: IG I �i� . 0 a Building Dept. Approval/Date ate Planning Appr�aVDate AGREEMENT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND/OR THE AGENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE STRUCTURE AS DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT. IN CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER. HEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY GARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN 1N 3025201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER FURTHER AGREES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY COMPLIED WITH IN THE LOCATION, ERECTION, CONSTRUCTION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FRONT THE COUNTY AND THAT TEN AND THERE IT SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID. THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQUIRING THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WHEN IN VIOLATION OF THIS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF TIES JURISDICTION. THE REVIEW OF THE .SUBMITTED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDULd7:U THEREAFTER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACCRPIANCE OF ANY RESPONSIBILITIES OR LIABILITIES BY GARFIELD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPONSIBILTL`Y FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION DURING CONSTRUCTION RESTS SPECIFICALLY WITH THE ARCHITECT, DESIGNER, BUILDER AND OWNER COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND IN SUPPORT Garfonnoo3OF THE OWNERS T. s41.0 � rf T. 4' ;7 I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE. (INITIAL) l . The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection: 1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector; 2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily visible from access road; 3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all necessary plumbing; 4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door; 5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or decks over 30" high constructed to all 1994 UBC requirements; 6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building; 7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until all the required items are completed and a final inspection made. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ****CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a,. Certificate of S cupancy for the dwelling under building permit # Signature bpcont Date 7A/lif Cedar Hills Home Owners Association Architectural Committee July 30, 2001 irvE> t3lie c v art GoTc>.o eto44- er4dcr j3Coe_ �iylr�2.c�► Dear Steve: The Architectural Committee has approved the building plans that were reviewed with your contractor on Thursday July 26, 2001. for Lot 20 of Cedar Hills Subdivision. Kent Lohse Architectural Committee ti -4,>(18'6?.(b--._/Q0 6/a. -1, I8. a1)/Ai. o96. - 109k 96. - r x_79(11,_36-3 -_ ._._ %59 ...._ 50 d a7g',46 Garfield County Application for Driveway Permit Application Date: 7/17/01 Permit Number: 67 Permitee: Steve Rohs Termination Date: 5/25/01 County Road Number: 214 Inspector: Kraig Kuberry District: 2 Sub -Contractor: Don Borgman Steve Rohs hereby requests permission and authority from the Board of County Commissioners to construct a driveway approach (es) on the right-of-way off of County Road 214, adjacent to Applicant's property located on the side of road for the purpose of obtaining access to property. Applicant submits herewith for the consideration and approval of the Board of County Commissioners, a sketch of the proposed installation showing all the necessary specification detail including: 1. Frontage of lot along road. 2. Distance from centerline of road to property line. 3. Number of driveways requested 4. Width of proposed driveways and angle of approach. 5. Distance from driveway to road intersection, Wally. 6. Size and shape of area separating driveways if more than one approach. 7. Setback distance of building(s) and other structure improvements. 8. No unloading of equipment on county road, any damage caused to county road will be repaired at subdivision expense. 9. Responsible for two years from the date of completion. General Provisions 1) The applicant represents all parties in interest, and affirms that the driveway approach(es) is to be constructed by him for the bona fide purpose of securing access to his property and not for the purpose of doing business or servicing vehicles on the road right of way. 2) The applicant shall furnish all labor and materials, perform all work, and pay all costs in connection with the construction of the driveway(s). All work shall be completed within thirty (30) days of the permit date. 3) The type of construction shall be as designated and/or approved by the Board of County Commissioners or their representive, and all materials used shall be of satisfactory quality and subject to inspection and approval of the Board of County Commissioners or their representive. 4) The traveling public shall be protected during the installation with proper warning signs and signals and the Board of County Commissioners and their duly appointed agents and employee shall be held harmless against any action for personal injury or property damage sustained by any reason of the exercise of the Permit. 5) The Applicant shall assume responsibility for the removal or clearance of snow, ice, or sleet upon any portion of the driveway approach(es) even though deposited on the driveway(s) in the course of the County snow removal operations. 6) In the event it becomes necessary to remove any right-of-way fence, the posts on either side of the entrance shall be surely braced before the fence is cut to prevent any slacking of the remaining fence, and all posts and wire removed shall be turned over to the District Road Supervisor of the Board of County Commissioners. 7) No revisions or additions shall be made to the driveway(s) or its appurtenances on the right-of-way without written permission of the Board of County Commissioners. 8) Provisions and specifications outlined herein shall apply on all roads under the jurisdiction of the Board of County Commissioners of Garfield County, Colorado, and the Specifications, set forth on the attached hereof and incorporated herein as conditions hereof. Special Conditions: 1. 18" Culvert 30' 2. Gravel Back Minimuim of 50' 3. Responsible for Own Locates 4. Responsible for 2 Years After Completetion. In signing this application and upon receiving authorization and permission to install the driveway approach (es) described herein the Applicant signifies that he has read, understands and accepts the foregoing provisions and conditions and agrees to construct the y veway(s) in accordance with the accompanying specification plan reviewed and approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Signed: Address: Steve Telephone Number: Permit granted 7/17/01, subject to the provisions, specifications and conditions stipulated herein. For Board of County Commissi,pners' of Garfield County, Colorado: 1/1/h/ug Representative of Garfield County Road and Bridge Signature .y f� i Special Provisions for Excavation of Road Surface and Installation 1) Any oversized material, (larger than 10 inches in diameter), that is not utilized in backfill will be hauled off by permitee. Further, any frozen material will be removed from site by permittee. 2) When a paved or chipped surface is cut, it is to be replaced with a minimum three-inch (3") hot mix asphalt patch. Temporary patch with cold mix asphalt would be allowed, which would be replaced with hot mix asphalt when the weather or availability of materials allow the work to be completed. An asphalt or chipped surface cut would require the road to be straight cut and squared by means of a pavement cutter or saw. A chipped surface cut will require a seal coat of the patch, which will be full width or half width of roadway when trenches run with the road. For trenches across the road, the edges of the seal coat will overlap the existing edge. All seal coats will overlap edges by a two of the roadway in the vicinity of the excavation. Asphalt hot mix or cold patches will be completed in a maximum of five (5) working Days. Weather permitting. 3) When possible all installations should avoid the top edge of a fill slope. 4) Installations in drainages subject to flash flooding will have a minimum bury of 4 feet deeper than normal flow line at nearest abutment, wing wall, or culvert. 5) Installations at culvert crossings will be buried beneath the culvert with a minimum separation of 18 inches between installation and the bottom of the culvert. 6) Open trenches adjacent to the traveled roadway shall be backfilled daily to within 100 feet of the working area of the trench, and shall be barricaded with warning devices after dark. A 3 foot high orange plastic fence will be installed daily to keep livestock out of the open trench after hours. 7) In areas being disturbed where vegetation is established, reseeding with a mixture either by broadcasting, drilling and mulching with seed mixtures suitable to the climatic conditions or existing vegetation will be performed. Use only certified weed -free seed. Noxious weed control will be ongoing along with revegetation. 8) The permittee should check the R -O -W of surrounding landowners to see if other permits are required, i.e., BLM, Forest Service. C Representative for G. eld County Road and Bridge Steve Rohs s Specifications 1. A driveway approach is understood to be that portion of the county road right -of way between the pavement edge and the property line that is designed and used for the interchange of traffic between the roadway and abutting property. • 2. At any intersection, a driveway shall be restricted for a sufficient distance from the intersection to preserve the normal and safe movement of traffic. (It is recommended for rural residence entrances that a minimum intersection clearance of 50 feet be provided and for rural commercial entrances a minimum of 100 feet be provided.) 3. All entrances and exits shall be so located and constructed that vehicles approaching or using them will be able to obtain adequate sight distance in both directions along the county road in order to maneuver safely and without interfering with county road traffic. 4. The Applicant shall not be permitted to erect any sign or display material, either fixed or movable, on or extending over any portion of the county road right-of-way. 5. Generally, no more than one approach shall be allowed any parcel or property the frontage of which is less than one hundred (100) feet. Additional entrances or exits for parcels having a frontage in excess of one hundred 100) feet shall be permitted only after showing of actual convenience and necessity. 6. All driveways shall be so located that the flared portion adjacent to the traveled way will not encroach upon adjoining property. 7. No commercial driveway shall have a width greater than thirty (30) feet measured at right angles to the centerline of the driveway except as increased by permissible radii. No noncommercial driveway shall have a width greater than twenty (20) feet measured at right angles to the centerline of the driveway, except as increased by permissible radii. S. The axis of an approach to the road may be at a right angle to the centerline of the county road and of any angle between ninety (90) degrees and sixty (60) degrees but shall not be less than sixty (60) degrees. Adjustment will be made according to the type of traffic to be served and other physical conditions. 9. The construction of parking or servicing areas on the county road right-of-way is specifically prohibited. Commercial establishments for customer vehicles should provide off -the -road parking facilities. 10. The grade of entrance and exit shall slope downward and away from the road surface at the same rate as the normal shoulder slope and for a distance equal to the width of the shoulder but in no case less than twenty (20) feet from the pavement edge. Approach grades are restricted to not more than ten percent (10%). 11 All driveways and approaches shall be so constructed that they shall not interfere with the drainage system of the street or county road. The Applicant will be required to provide, at his own expense, drainage structures at entrances and exits, which will become an integral part of the existing drainage system. The Board of County Commissioners or their representative, prior to installation, must approve the dimensions of all drainage structures. Note: This permit shall be made available at the site where and when work is being done. A work sketch or drawing of the proposed driveway(s) must accompany application. No permit will be issued without drawing, blueprint, or sketch. Road and Bridge Department 902 Taughenbaugh Blvd., Ste 305 Rifle, CO 81650 Phone -(970)625-8601 Fax- (970)625-8627 Invoice Invoice Date: 7/17/01 Invoice Number: 67 Bill To: Steve Rohs 4323 County Road 214 Silt , CO 81652 Driveway Permit Number: $15.00 per Driveway Permit Driveway Permit Fee: $15.00 67 Total Due: Thank You! $15.00 �y Y • January 1, 1999 Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheating, house - rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material. A window schedule. A door schedule. A floor framing plan, a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40# per ft. up to 7,000 F.O.S. and an 80 M.P.H. wind. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of the above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. 1. Is a site plan included that indicates the distances of the proposed building or addition to property lines, other buildings, setback easements and utility easements? Yes X 2. Does the site plan include the location of the I. S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties), streams or water courses? Yes X- 3. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing the property? Yes X 4. Do. the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered design? Yes X 5. Do the plans indicate the location and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl spaces and the clearances required between wood and earth? Yes x 2 6. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roofjoist spaces's and soffits? Yes X 7 Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor loads and wind loads? Yes X' 8. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor and roof construction? Yes 9. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling joists, roof rafters or joists or trusses? Yes X 10. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method ofpositive connection of all columns and beams? Yes 11. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to existing grade contours? Yes j( 12. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification? Yes No )( G-,�S-�',r.� PZAcO ? 13. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to comply with the Uniform Building Code Chapter 37? Yes No X 14. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code? Yes X No 15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural light and ventilation for all habitable rooms? Yes X No 3 16. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors, glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for these areas? Yes x No 17. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters indicated on the plan? Yes )C No 18. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or covenants? Yes %� No 19. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the architectural committee deny or reject your building plans? Yes No 20. Will this be the only residential structure on the parcel? Yes X No If no -Explain: 21. Have two (2) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application? Yes 1C 22. Do you understand that the minimum size a home can be on a lot is a 20ft. x 20ft.? Yes X. No 23. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other construction code requirements? Yes x No 24. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final inspection by the Garfield County Building Department? Yes No 25. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are required prior to the application of these changes? Yes x No 4 b, y 26. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a "Plan Review" fee from you at the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any "School Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building permit? Yes K No 27. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections? Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoon. Morning inspections must be called in by 12:00 p.m. the day before; afternoon inspections must be called in by 4:00 p.m. the day before. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will delay your inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes No 28. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupancy of the building? Yes X No 29. Are you aware that the person signing the Permit Application, whether the "Owner", "Agent of the Owner", "General Contractor", "Contractor" or otherwise, is the party responsible for the project complying with the Uniform Building Code? Yes No 30. Are you aware that prior to issuance of a building permit you are required to show proof of a driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at 625-8601. G C;0/6 - Yes X No C !� — 31. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes No 32. Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to issuance of a building permit? Your attention in this is appreciated. Yes X No 5 >C hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the best of y ability. signattr��date 70 Phone: $S — ,O 7I (days); - 26P 9/ (evenings) Project Name: ©/AY Project Address: 5/3,? ?O .2 /II Notes: If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review, delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction. bpminreq 8/00 6 s r 0 - rz CA� moray gioj amug!sa( Aug -24-01 01:15P 9,3 Lincoln DeVore s GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN DeVORE, Inc. GEO"l1;CHHN(CAL ENGINEERS - GEOLOGISTS 970-242-1561 P.01 Gran Muga St. FAX: (s)70) 242-1561 Grand Junction, CO H1505 July 24, 2001 Distinctive Design 1255 21 Rd. Grand Junction, CO 81505 Re: Subsurface Soils Exploration Rohs Residence, 4323 Co. Rd. 214, Silt, CO As requested, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel have completed a geotechnical exploratory program at the above referenced site. Five shallow exploration pits were excavated in the vicinity of the proposed building pad as shown on the attached sketch. These exploration pits were excavated by the contractor, The exploration pits were excavated to a total depth of 2 to 5 '/s feet. These exploration pits were logged and sampled by personnel of Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore on 7-4-01. The purpose of these pits were to determine the types and character of the underlying soils and to relate these characteristics to the proposed foundation system. This letter contains general recommendations for construction of a residential foundation, but is not a foundation design and cannot be used as such. Our conclusions and recommendations for this site are presented below. Excavation Observation: Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore personnel should be contacted to observe the foundation soils after the excavation has been completed, and prior to placing forms or concrete. The purpose of this is to observe the type and condition of the foundation soils throughout the excavation. if the soils are found to differ from those encountered in our exploration pits or appear to be unstable, additional recommendations may be required, prior to construction of the foundations. Site Description: The site is located at the base of the foothills, approximately 1 mile south, southeast of the Grand Hogback. The site is approximately 2 miles east of the downtown business district of Silt, CO. The site has a physical address of 4323 Co. Rd. 214, Silt, CO. The site is located at the juncture of the foothills which lead up to the Grand Hogback to the north and the Ancient Colorado River flood plain to the south. The soils on this site were found to consist of 2 feet to over 6 feet of alluvial materials derived from the foothills and the Grand Hogback to the north. The site is immediately underlain by the Wasatch Formation of Tertiary age. These geologic units on this site and in the near vicinity are described in the Preliminary Geologic Map of the New Castle Quadrangle, Garfield County, CO, 1993, Green, Fairer and Shroba, U.S.G.S. Open File Report 93-310. Soil Classification: The surface soils on this site are alluvial in origin, being partially deposited by debris flow activity originating in the small gully which drains into the north portion of this site. The surface soils on this site were found to consist of a series of very silty sand and silty slightly clayey sand which are derived from the very weathered Wastacb Formation, exposed an the slopes north of the site. These soils also include gravel and small boulder sized fragments of sandstone, siltstone, mudstone and shale/claystone. For purposes of this report, these soils have been divided into 2 soil types. Soil Type I was classified as a silty sand (SM) under the Unified Classification System. These soils were found to be of low density, having a dry density from one sample of 97.7 pef. The moisture content was found to be 3.8%, indicating a relatively dry soil. This material is nonplastic, of moderate permeability, and was encountered in a low to occasionally Aug -24-01,01:17P G3 Lincoln OVor�? 970-242-1561 P_01 Distinctive Design Subsurface Soils Exploration, Rohs Residence, 4323 Co. Rd. 214, Silt, CO July 24, 2001 Page 2 medium density, dry condition. These soils were observed to be placed as thin to moderately thick strata and are interbeded with Soil Type II. This material will consolidate/collapse upon saturation or excessive loading. The samples obtained for laboratory testing were found to be non -cohesive and we were unable to prepare these samples for laboratory consolidation/collapse testing. These soils are believed to be collapsible (metastable) and will require over excavation, deep water soaking and recomapction of these soils as structural fill. The maximum allowable bearing capacity for these soils, if over excavated, water soaked and compacted as structural fill can be taken as 1800 psf. it is recommended that 250 psf minimum dead load pressure be maintained, due to the possibility of low plastic, slightly expansive clay soil strata. Soil Type 11 was classified as a silty, slightly clayey sand, poorly graded (SM -SC) under the Unified Classification System. The soils were found to be soft to slightly stiff and of low to occasionally medium density. The moisture content varied from 2.8% to 8.3%, indicating a dry to slightly damp soil_ This material is of very low plasticity. of moderate to moderately high permeability, and was encountered in a low to medium density condition. If this soil is found in a relatively dry, medium density condition, it may undergo slight expansion with the entry ofsmall amounts of moisture, but will undergo collapse/long-term consolidation upon the addition of larger amounts of moisture. This material will consolidate/collapse upon saturation or excessive loading. lane Dimensional Consolidation tests using the Consolidation Apparatus, ASTM D-2435, were performed on relatively undisturbed samples of the soil. Upon test saturation, collapse of 3.08% was measured, with 5.08% total consolidation occurring at an applied load of 1025 psf. Upon further test loading, 8.48% consolidation occurred at an applied load of 2050 psf. The maximum allowable bearing capacity for this soil, if all recommendations in this report regarding over excavation, deep water soaking and recompaetion as structural fill are followed, can be taken as 2000 psf, with 250 minimum dead load pressure required. The surface soils are deposited over the medium density formational material of the Wasatch Formation of Tertiary Age. The Wasatch Formation is described as interbeded reddish brown, reddish purple, yellowish brown, tan and while conglomerates, sandstones, siltstones, mudstones and claystones. Some of the claystones and mudstones exhibit slight to moderate expansive characteristics. Weathered sandstones and mudstones of the Wasatch Formation are exposed on the slopes immediately north of the building area and was encountered in exploration pit # 2 at depth of 2 feet. These sandstones, when broken down in the laboratory were found to resemble Soil Type II, silty, slightly clayey sand. Man-made Fill: The majority of this site contains low density, trashy man-made fill. This man-made fill is mixed with the native silty sands. The fill was found to range from less than 6 inches thick to almost 3 feet thick in exploration pit # 4. All building foundations must penetrate any man-made fills which are present at the site at this time, as well as any fills which result from the excavation process. Careful examination of the open excavation will be necessary to determine the presence or absence of man-made fills. The open excavation must be examined prior to the placement of concrete to establish that materials of proper design bearing capacity have been exposed and that no soft spots or debris are present in the foundation area. A 24 hour notice is required for all field examinations to enable Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore to schedule personnel and provide service when needed. Soil Moisture Conditions: No free water was encountered during excavation on this site. In our opinion the true free water surface is probably several feet below the foudnation elevation, and hence, should not affect construction. Seepage moisture may affect construction if surface drainage is not properly controlled. The small drainage immediately north of the building area is expected to generate both surface flow and subsurface flow during or immediately following periods of precipitation. Due to the proximity of the Wasatch Formation, there exists a possibility of a perched water table developing in the alluvial soils which overlie the Wasatch Formation. This perched • Aug -24-01 01 a k8P G3 Lincoln DeVore Distinctive Design Subsurface Soib Exploration, Rohs Residence, 4323 Co. Rd. 214, Silt, CO July 24, 2001 Page 3 970-242-1561 P.02 water would probably be the result of increased irrigation due to the presence of lawns, landscaping and roof runoff. This perched water would also be the result of area wide precipitation io the hills to the north of this site. While h is believed that under the existing conditions at the time of this exploration the construction process would not be effected by any free-flow waters, it is very possible that several years after development is initiated, a troublesome perched water condition may develop which will provide construction difficulties. In addition, this potential perched water could create some problems for existing or future foundations on this tract. Therefore it is recommended that the future presence ofa perched water table beconsidered in all design and construction of the proposed residential structure and improvements on this site. FoundationTvoeRecommended: Asslartingthatsome amount afditferentialmovement can be tolerated, then a conventional shallow foundation system, underlain by at least24 inches of structural fill, placed in accordance with the recommendations contained within this report may be utilized. The foundation would consist of continuous spread footings beneath all bearing walls and isolated spread footings beneath all columns and other points of concentrated load. Such a shallow foundation system, testing on the properly constructed structural fill, may be designed on the basis of an allowable bearing capacity of 1800 psf maximum. A minimum bearing of 250 psf is strongly recommended if the native soils are utilized as structure! fill. Recormnendations pertaining to balancing, reinforcing, drainage, and inspection are considered extremely important and must be followed. Contact stresses beneath all continuous walls should be balanced to within + or - 200 plat all points. Isolated interior column footings should be designed for contact stresses of about 150 psf less than the average used to balance the continuous walls. The criteria for balancing will depend somewhat on the nature of the structure. Single -story, slab -on -grade structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load only. Multi story structures may be balanced on the basis of dead load plus aro half live load, for up to three stories. Structural Fill/Soil improvement: For use in conjunction with a shallow foundation system. a structural fill is recommended to replace the Upper Metastable Soils. This structural fill may be placed in conjunction with structural fat! beneath concrete slabs on grade. The existing metastable soils should be removed to a depth of 2 feet below the proposed bottom footing elevation. The excavation/fill width is to =tend at least 20 inches front the interior and exterior of the proposed foundation wall or bearing pad in contact with thefrll. Once it is felt that adequate soil removal has been achieved, it is recommended dot the excavation be closely examined by a representative of Grand .3 unction Lincoln-DeVore to ensure that an adequate over excavation depth bas indeed occurred and that the exposed soils are suitable to support the proposed structural man-made fill. At the specific direction of the GeotodtnicalEngineer, it maybe appropriate to extensively Water soak the over -excavated portion of the site for up to 7 days, prior to the installation of any required perimeter drain and the structural fill. The purpose of this wetting or soaking is to provide initial settlement/collapse of the subgradc soils and to allow proper subgrade. This wilting or soaking must be controlled and not allowed to adversely affect nearby structures. After any required soaking has been accomplished, the subgradc soils are to be mechanically compacted to a minimum of S6% of the soils maximum Modified Proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557) for a depth of at lust 6 inches. Once this examination has been complexed, it is recommended that a coarse-grained. non -expansive, non -free draining rnan-made structural fill be imported to the site and placed on the property prepared subgrade soils. Non -Expansive. Native soils may be utifved as structural fill, if specifically approved by the Geotechnical Engineer. The upper 6" to Distinctive Design Subsurface Soils Exploration, Rohs Residence, 4323 Co. Rd. 214, Silt, CO July 24, 2001 Page 4 12"(minimum) of the fill is to be a sandy grave! (minus 3/4" & GM/GW) or a gravelly sand (minus 3/4" & SM/SW). The structural fill should be placed in the over excavated portion of this site in lifts not to exceed 6 inches after compaction. A minimum of 90% of the soils maximum Modified Proctor dry density (ASTM 0-1557) must be maintained during the sod placement. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually Proctor optimum moisture content± 2%). Very low expansive to non -expansive, native soils may be utilized as suuettval fill, if specifically approved by the Geotechnical Engineer. If thesenative soils have a slight expansive potential, thesoils should be placed as structural fill in lifts not toexceed 6 inches after compaction_ These soils must not beover compacted but, compacted wet of the soils 'optimum' moisture content. These soils should be placed at a minimum of 86% and a maximum of 92% of the soils maximum modified proctor dry density, ASTM D-1557. These soils must be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction while being wet of the 'optimum' moisture content- These soils must be placed at 'optimum' moisture content or up to 4% over 'optimum' moisture content. The granular material must be brought to the required density by mechanical means. No soaking, jetting or puddling techniques of any type should be used in placement of 1111 on this site. To confirm the quality of the compacted fill product, it is recommended that surface density tests be taken at maximum 2 foot vertical intervals. It is recommended that any required perimeter drain be placed in the exterior portion of the structural fi11, at the base of the fill, in order to prevent or at least minimize the collection of water in the soils and fell beneath the structure_ Re" ore All foundation sten walls shout(' be designed as "grade teams" capable of spanning at least 13 Feet. Where the foundation stern walls are relatively shallow in height, vertical reinforcing will not be necessary. v............:...u.......o.......:..:»....,,:r «........oe .,fA coo* ;., i,-;,, ..o:nr%+rtna may hw nverccary to mitt the lateral Aug -24-01 01:21.P OJ Lincoln DeVore Distinctive Design Subsurface Soils Exploration, Rohs Residence, 4323 Co. Rd. 214, Silt, CO July 24, 2001 Page 4 970-242-1561 P_O1 12"(minimum) of the fill is to be a sandy gravel (minus 314" & GM/GW) or a gravelly sand (minus 3I4" & SM/SW). The structural fill should be placed in the overexcavated portion of this site in lifts not to exceed 6 inches after compaction. A minimum of 90% of the soils maximum Modified Proctor dry density (ASTM D-1557) must be maintained during the soil placement. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually Proctor optimum moisture content ± 2%). Very low expansive to non -expansive, native soils may be utilized as structural fill, if specifically approved by the Geotechnical Engineer. If these native soils have a slight expansive potential, the soils should be placed as structural fill in lifts not to exceed 6 inches after compaction. These soils must not be over compacted but, compacted wet of the soils 'optimum' moisture content. These soils should be placed at a minimum of 86% and a maximum of 92% of the soils maximum modified proctor dry density, ASTM D-1557. These soils must be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction while being wet of the `optimum' moisture content. These soils must be placed at `optimum' moisture content or up to 4% over 'optimum' moisture content. The granular material must be brought to the required density by mechanical means. No soaking, jetting or puddling techniques of any type should be used in placement of fill on this site. To confirm the quality of the compacted fill product, it is recommended that surface density tests be taken at maximum 2 foot vertical intervals. It is recommended that any required perimeter drain be placed in the exterior portion of the structural fill, at the base of the fill, in order to prevent or at least minimize the collection of water in the soils and fill beneath the structure. Reinforcing: All foundation stem walls should be designed as "grade beams" capable of spanning at least 13 feet. Where the foundation stem walls are relatively shallow in height, vertical reinforcing will not be necessary. However, in the walls retaining soil in excess of 4 feet in height, vertical reinforcing may be necessary to resist the lateral pressures (restrained case) of the soils along the wall exterior. To aid in designing such vertical reinforcing, an equivalent fluid pressure (E.F.P) on the order of 40 pcf would be appropriate for the native soils. The foundation shall be reinforced as shown on the foundation design. No changes shall be made to this placement of reinforcing without written approval of the design engineer or architect. Floor Slabs: Non -Structural floor slabs on grade, if any, should be positively separated from all structural portions of this building and allowed to float freely. Frequent scoring (control joints) of the slabs should be provided to allow for possible shrinkage cracking of the slab. These control joints should be placed to provide maximum slab areas of approximately 200 to 360 square feet. Any man-made fill placed below floor slabs on grade should be compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density, ASTM D-1557. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually Proctor optimum moisture content ±2%. Drainage and Grading: Adequate site drainage should be provided in the foundation area both during and after construction to prevent the ponding of water and the wetting or saturation of the subsurface soils. We recommend that the ground surface around the structure be graded so that surface water will be carried quickly away from the building. The minimum gradient within 10 feet of the building will depend on surface landscaping. We recommend that paved areas maintain a minimum gradient of 2%, and that landscaped areas maintain a minimum gradient of 8%. It is further recommended that roof drain downspouts be carried at least 10 feet beyond all backfilled areas and discharged a minimum 15 feet away from the structure. Proper discharge of roof drain downspouts may require the use of subsurface piping in some areas. Under no circumstances should a `dry well discharge' be used on Aug -24-01 01:22P J Lincoln DoVoro 970-242-1561 P.02 Distinctive Design Subsurface Soils Exploration, Rohs Residence, 4323 Co. Rd. 214, Silt, CO July 24, 2001 Page 5 this site, unless specifically sited by a Geotechnical Engineer. Planters, if any, should be so constructed that moisture is not allowed to seep into foundation areas or beneath slabs or pavements. The existing drainage on the site must either be maintained carefully or improved. We recommend that water be drained away from structures as rapidly as possible and not be allowed to stand or pond within 15 feet of the building or foundation. We recommend that water removed from one building not be directed onto the backfill areas of adjacent buildings. Should an automatic lawn irrigation system be used on this site, we recommend that the sprinkler heads, irrigation piping and valves be installed no less than 10 feet from the building. En addition, these heads should be adjusted so that spray from the system does not fall onto the walls of the building and that such water does not excessively wet the backfill soils. It is recommended that lawn and landscaping irrigation be reasonably limited, so as to prevent undesirable saturation of subsurface soils or backfilled areas. Several methods of irrigation water control are possible, to include, but not limited to: * Metering the Irrigation water. * Sizing the irrigation distribution service piping to limit on-site water usage. * Encourage efficient landscaping practices. • Enforcing reasonable limits on the size of high water usage landscaping within 10 feet of the building or foundation. * Incorporating `xeriscaping' landscaping and irrigation techniques. A plastic membrane placed on any Crawlspace ground surfaces may retain/trap excessive amounts of water beneath the membrane. If future moisture problems develop or are anticipated, the Foundation Design Engineer or the Geotechnical Engineer may require that the membrane be partially or completely removed from the crawlspace area. Due to the presence of the drainage way to the immediate north of the building site and the shallow bedrock with the overlying collapsible soils, a combination of surface drainage improvements and an under ground drain will be required to protect this structure. The surface drainage improvements will carry away the surface waters which may enter the site from the gully to the north and the subsurface drain is to help protect the site from saturation of the foundation soils. It is recommended that the under ground drain be constructed several feet away from the structure, either at the outer limit of the structural fill over excavation area or in a separate trench beyond the limits of the residential structure. Backfill: To reduce settlement and aid in keeping water from reaching beneath this building, all backfill around this building should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density ASTM D-1557_ The only exception to this would be the components of the perimeter foundation drain, if any. All backfill should be composed of the native soils and should not be placed by soaking, jetting or puddling. All backfill placed in utility trenches around this structure or below foundation walls should be mechanically compacted to a minimum of 90% of its maximum Modified Proctor dry density ASTM D-1557. These soils should be placed at a moisture content conducive to the required compaction (usually Proctor optimum content ±2%). Cement Tyne: Type II, Type 1-I1 or Type IHV cement is recommended for all concrete which is in contact with the soils on this site. Calcium chloride should not be added to a Type 11, Type 1-1I or Type Il -V cement under any circumstances. Aug -24-01 01:22P GJ Lincoln DeVore r 970-242-1561 P.03 Distinctive Design Subsurface Soils Exploration, Rohs Residence, 4323 Co. Rd. 214, Silt, CO July 24, 2001 Page 6 Remarks: We recommend that the bottom of all foundation components rest a minimum of 3 feet below finished grade or as required by the local building codes. Foundation components must not be placed on frozen soils. Senate Bill 13 (CRS 6-6.5-101) Discussion: This particular residence is being constructed on foundation soils which overlie or are in near proximity to soils which may possess a slight to 'significant potential for expansion`. Therefore, in compliance with Senate Bill 13, (CRS 6-6.5-101) we recommend that you provide the owner with the following: 1) a copy of this summary report of our soil analysis and recommendations. 2) a copy of Special Publication 43, "A Guide to Swelling Soils for Colorado Homebuyers and Homeowners". This publication is available through the Colorado Geological Survey, 1313 Sherman St., Room 715, Denver, CO. 80203, or phone (303) 866-3340. Limitations: This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the architect and engineer for the project, and are incorporated into the plans. In addition, it is his responsibility that the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and his subcontractors carry out these recommendations during construction. The findings ofthis report are valid asofthe present date. However, changes in the conditions ofa property can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition. changes in acceptable or appropriate standards may occur or may result from legislation or the broadening of engineering knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalid, wholly or partially, by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should not be retied upon after a period of 3 years. The recommendations of this report pertain only to the site investigated and are based on the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate from those described in this report. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction or the proposed construction will differ from that planned on the day of this report, Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be provided, if appropriate. Grand Junction Lincoln DeVore makes no warranty, either expressed or implied, as to the findings, recommendations, specifications or professional advice, except that they were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practice in the field of geotechnical engineering. Respectfully submitted, GRAND JUNCTION * 99`- LINCOLN-DeVORE, 30590 =o Aug -24-01 01:27,P p...] Lincoln DeVore 970-242-1561 P.03 Soil Sample: SILTY SAND (SM) Geologic Origin: ALLUVIAUDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS Natural Water Content (w): 3.8% in -Place Density (pcf): 97.7 100 90 80 70 M ' "a 60 50 40 30 COBBLE to GRAVEL 1 Sample No.: I (Typical) Test by: LRS fro Ca 0 8 o_ 20 10 0 VP 125 75 Boring No.: 5 Depth: 5' Soil Specific Gravity (Gs): SAND 1 SILT to CLA. 50 37.5 25 1394 12.5 95 4.75 2 0.85 0.425 0.15 0.9R 0.02 0.005 Particle Grain tize {mm} % Passing Sieve (mm) 5" 3" 2" 1-1/2" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3J8" *4 *10 #20 #40 *100 #200 125 75 50 37.5 25 19 12.5 9.5 4.75 2 0.86 0.425 0.15 0.075 0.02 0.005 100 99 98 95 89 50 35.5 24 18 Maximum Size Allowed hair Sampler 2-112" Effective size Cu Cc Plastic Limit (PL) N.P. Liquid Limit (LL) nya Plasticity Index (PI) &E... Skemptores Activity Q9 Shrinkage Limit (SL) Shrinkage Ratio DIRECT SHEAR: CD Ult. Shear Angle: deg. Tart Shear: Cohesion: psf RIM MOISTURE 1 DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: ASTM Method: D498 A. D 4718 - 30% Rock Co Max. Dry Density pcf Optimum Moisture: HVEEM-CARMANY: Value @ 300 psi: Displacement 300 psi: Expansion © 300 psi: ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): Standard Penetration (SPT): Unconfined Compression (qu): pcf FHA Soil Swell: % Swell psf Remolded Sample psf by Consolidometer psf by Penetrometer psf CONSTANT VOLUME SWELL: COLLAPSE OF CONSOUDATION: CONSOLIDATION: SULFATE SALTS: PERMEABILITY: psf DURING SWELL PHASE <50 ppm Psf psf K (20 C) Remolded cM/seCpcf SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado ROHS RESIDENCE 4323 County Road # 214, Silt,Solorado DISTINCTIVE DESIGN Grand Junction, Colorado Date 7-12-2001 Job No. 88759-G.1 Drawn EMM Aug -24-01 0130P GJ Lincoln DeVor-e Sal Sample: SILTY SAND (SM) Geologic Origin: ALLUVIALJDEBRIS FAN DEPOSITS Natural Water Content (w): 5 5% In -Place DenrA (pcf): COBBLE to GRAVEL 100 a0 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 970-242-1561 P 0 Sample No.: la (Typical) Test by: LRS 5' Boring No.: 1 Depth: Soil Specific Gravity (GsJ SAND # SILT to CLAY r 125 75 Sieve 5" 3" 2" 1-1/2" 1" 314" 50 37.5 (mm) 125 75 50 37.5 25 19 25i 12.5 9 5 4.75 2 0.05 0.425 0.15 0.97A 0.02 0.005 Particle Grainbize {mm} % Passing 1/2" 12.5 100 3/8" 9.5 99 *4 4.75 91 010 2 78 #20 0.85 70 #40 0.425 66 *100 0.15 50 #200 0.075 35.2 0.02 22 0.005 14 Maximum Size Allowed By Sampler 2-1/2" Effective size Cu Cc Plastic Limit (PL) Liquid Limit (LL) Plasticity Index (PI) Skempton's Activity 000 Shrinkage Limit (SL) Shrinkage Ratio N.P. N.P. DIRECT SHEAR: CD Ult, Shear Angle: deg. Tan Shear: Cohesion: psf MOISTURE f DENSITY RELATIONSHIP: ASTM Method: Max. Dry Density : Optimum Moisture : HVEEM-CARMANY: 'R' Value @ 300 psi: Displacement 300 psi: Expansion g 340 psi: ALLOWABLE BEARING (net): Standard Penetration (SPT): Unconfined Compression (qu): psf COLLAPSE @ Wetting: CONSOLIDATION: CONSOLIDATION: SULFATE SALTS: <S0 PERMEABILITY: K (20 C) Remolded cm/sec fLsgf mm Rea D -69S A D 4718 - 30% Rock Correctk pcf pcf FHA Soil Swell: % Swell psf Remolded Sample psf by Consolidometer psf by Penetrometer Ppm psf psf psi GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY ROHS RESIDENCE 4323 County Road # 214, Siltt Colorado DISTINCTIVE DESIGN Grand Junction, Colorado Date 7-12-2001 Job No. 88759 -GJ Drawn EMM Arg -24-01 01:31 G.] Lincoln ❑eVoro 970-242-1561 Soil Sample: SILTY, SI. CLAYEY SAND, Poorly Graded (SM -SC) Sample No.: 11 (Typic, Geologic Origin: ALLUVIAUDEBRiS FAN DEPOSITS Test by: LRS Natural Water Content (w): , 7.0% Boring No.: 3 Depth: 4' In -Place Density (pcf): 957E Soil Specfic Gravity (Gs1: 1 O. COBBLE to GRAVEL 1 SAND i SILT to CLA' 90 80 _ _ _, 70 80 \\F\\14:1 . 50 40 — 30- 20 ' 10 0—. 125 75 50 37.5 Sieve (mm) 5" 125 3" 75 25 1LJ 42.5 9 Particle Grain' % Passing 5 4.75 2 0.85 ize (rnm} 0.425 0.15 00 0.02 0.005 MOISTURE 1 DENSIT ASTM Method: Max. Dry Density : 2" 50 1-112" 37.5 Maximum Optimum Moisture HVEEM-CARMANY: 1" 25 Size Allowed IT Value @ 300 psi: 3/4" 19 By Sampler Displacement 300 psi: 1/2" 12.5 318" 9.5 _ 100 2-1/2" Expansion a 300 psi: ALLOWABLE BEARII # 4 4.75 #10 2 97 95 Standard Penetration ( Unconfined Compressi 020 0.85 #40 0.425 92 85 COLLAPSE @ Wettin CONSOLIDATION: 1100 0.15 *200 0.075 53 32.6 CONSOLIDATION: SULFATE SALTS: 0.02 0.005 20 12 PERMEABILITY: K (20 C) Remolded P.02 Effective size Q mm Cu 50 Cc 5.2 Plastic Limit (PL) Liquid limit (LL) Plasticity Index (PI) Skempton's Activity Shrinkage Umit (SL) Shrinkage Ratio ittyt 0.2 DIRECT SHEAR: CD Shear Angle: deg. Tan Shear: Cohesion: RELATIONSHIP: psf Res. D-6911 A D 4719 - 30% Rock Correc pcf pcf FHA Soil Swell: % Swell Psf Remolded Sample psf by Consolidometer psf by Penetrometer psf G (net): PT): (qu): 3.08% 3.08% S.48% a �.i ppm 1025 psf 102.; psf 20Sf� psf cm/sec @0 acf SOIL ANALYSIS and SUMMARY GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado ROHS RESIDENCE 4323 County Road # 214, Silt, Colorado DISTINCTIVE DESIGN Grand Junction, Colorado Date 7-12-2001 Job No. 88759 -GJ Drawn EMM Aug -24-01 01:1p CJ Lincoln DeVore 0.8 A D 0.7 a 0 X0.6 0.5 100 1000 APPLIED TEST LOAD - psf J 1 J -1 u) -2 z -3 O -4 1- •5 0 7— -8 N -9 Z -10 0 11 -12 z -13 tJ -14 w -15 w -16 a- -17 A• 11111111iii 10000 100 1000 APPLIED TEST LOAD - psf 10000 970-242-1561 P.03 The Consolidation Test (ASTM D-2435) Was Run By Subjecting The Soil Specimen To A Seating' Load To Remove Slack From The Apparatus And To Provide M Accurate Point Of Beginning. The Test Begins With The Specimen At Approximate Natural Moisture Content But. The Porous Stories Ata Very Moist To Detect Soil Expansion Characteristics At The Light Test Loads. Prior To Inundation. The Sample Is Loaded To Approximately 1025 psf Or Overburden Pressure And Then inundated With Water. Any Swefl Or Collapse Of The Specimen Is Allowed To Ooar And The Loading is Continued. After The Maximum Test Load, The Sail Specimen la Unloaded To Measure Rebound And Any Swelling Potential After Consolidation_ LOAD SUMMARY 110 1025 3.68 0.00 1.74 16.63 8200 pit SEATING LOAD p31 SAMPLE SATURATED % SOL COLLAPSE % SOL EXPANSION f SWELL D-4546 8 % SAMPLE REBOUND Q UNLOAD % HAAMRA CONSOLIDATION of MAXIMUM TEST LOAD SOIL #: 11 SOIL TYPE : SM/SC, Qdf TEST HOLE #: 3 @ 4' SAMPLE Gs: 2.6 DIAMETER: 2.5" AREA (inches): .03409 SOIL CONSOLIDATION ASTM 0-2435 GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado ROHS RESIDENCE 4323 County Road # 214, Silt, Colorado DISTINCTIVE DESIGN Grand Junction, Colorado Date 7-6-2001 Job No. 88759 -GJ Drawn EMM INITIAL MAXIMUM LOAD FINAL LOAD SOIL DENSITY (pcf) 89.3 106.7 105.4 SOIL MOISTURE (96) 8.3% 19.3% 20.0% CONSOLIDATION (%) -0- 16.63% 14.89% VOID RATIO (e) 0.817 L 0.520 0.539 SATURATION (%) 26% 96% 96% pit SEATING LOAD p31 SAMPLE SATURATED % SOL COLLAPSE % SOL EXPANSION f SWELL D-4546 8 % SAMPLE REBOUND Q UNLOAD % HAAMRA CONSOLIDATION of MAXIMUM TEST LOAD SOIL #: 11 SOIL TYPE : SM/SC, Qdf TEST HOLE #: 3 @ 4' SAMPLE Gs: 2.6 DIAMETER: 2.5" AREA (inches): .03409 SOIL CONSOLIDATION ASTM 0-2435 GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN - DeVORE, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Grand Junction, Colorado ROHS RESIDENCE 4323 County Road # 214, Silt, Colorado DISTINCTIVE DESIGN Grand Junction, Colorado Date 7-6-2001 Job No. 88759 -GJ Drawn EMM Aug -24-01 OJ.:31R 0,1 Lincoln DaVor.e 1A E'WeCAE 00AroAGI tore_ !AoX 1.l *ON c, 1HF GRr011At ['Afoot:o0 tAAt :WPCS - uw,VLM d 5 Feel nor alARDOPGJ AOC, DetoV5 cur wt rrr"A.lo r ro r oee' 7.0 LAWSCAPe, ;me 1a. .Ar1.R 052' nor hoes MC1a -N ICAPSC 1avo.A.. Y Wr N( Tube 4 PM:ur*tr 12f' G11lar 1111°E ACP04. IAyGSCAA vG Pei R �5 i-:•: o•h, •541 u.: :lam.-.:.-��1.. 4AICSCAPC IARRrC PLKAOI I I GPA11.144 . C0141, .''IM1 vyS WIG* fid 1 '',CN Pr.Aw.<R Ma' 10 0E • AplArlO (. ',Chianti() 0t 150xw wrt,rl�rl7 :2/ K5 , r�u n1 s STRUCTURAL SGa aACArtt o A"'ES �I o ��MO /N1L7(lIE COVPAnm rt1 Chorale S o 0 0 o o o o 0 a 0 o AL FIEL wrra SEEPACE G .". o / FILL TD fkTfA1E) BENFAT,v r'e rMxO.WV 54115 i sl o� e o 0.0 o t" 'o tr o a0 c"'• ALL FOLINDA TON f!E-UENTS. 1;� ,......1“ SEE NOTES 970-242-1561 P.04 f.00.v0 g5y /Jar 1 o: 0 u000 ° o a . 9 0 .0 0. � v ..y ti ."'! s A n GEaTEXTILE FAV l oR a la a, a° as °°o oo oa //' G deVAce ORAN --- -......--:!.•!. ,•!' j / SLCh GS Contrch t-180 A; ACO(AF'EO 151 001015000. ar Kr..F, 500-x '+E0 NOTES e1y2 Of lA,ts •• A AS PL GRAPE Er DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT 'NO WATER ZONE' BY FOUNDATION CQ,1.01 ORAWACE 705E .yct rrq *050 a 1.0 GRKirA, EAcovAeoito torr 1 V4.1500 - Yw(..r OF 5 5051 IPOW M' ,P}.G 2 ..a PR0PAPea a- la a• OCCP 00 1.x•Cr5taa 4 7.0■ 05000 t150' r1PC PLAATS mi/a. -MnSCAP.e- 1C+.aOfaY 555520 in[ Otli1Cu prAMAOC 101(' kat, GDIHSPOor� warm, POPE 500010. LW.1SCAPb*J .ORAM CUM. M AA 0.150 SO4S 00500 0154 '0011021 MAouCC )41YF' 10 DI REMO'•fA * C01mACrr0 FOR A •A*drl/ Or r2. P005 =.PM WAPrAOC Aon Sm 1110trx1 COASPAC'Co 10 2M.s0 1YA 000 SfCSACC 10 o1E 70b.0A400 SOLS $I I H 11-1 EscscoosoA sag'--.--�� >re fr'"rnexNess� �ru1 Nllr5F1 STRUCTURALFILL FSU. TO EXTEND B[ke1TIh .; ▪ I. 7; .::.° • rAArAA • ' ' • ALL TDUNDA VON ELEMENTS. 0 " SEE NOTES AA. Y 3 � °o o v e O9 O 00010 66 00I.A0006••ueoo00. GEL'STf%TILE FABRIC V4 - .....:�-, �/ such os Cont POI C-180 or Kr Pi 500-x AS RCOLOIREL rlrsrxtL CRAW AS REOUrrtE0 Br EA'GIYEEN Mt NOTES 000 DErA105 DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT 'NO WATER ZONE' BY FOUNDATION GRAND) JUNCTION LINCOLN- DeVORE, Inc. GI?OTFCFINU.M. ENC INKERS— GEOLOC1ST5 EXTERIOR DRAINAGE / LANDSCAPING CONCEPT SCALL - NONE LO DATE: 015. ,5 1 1 —5-99 D-DRA1N2 4 ° > . ' ;0.11. • _w 2 P4IO CONTIN. IN RIM WALL N sN 8"1 6" 140 DOWELS ® 36" C/C MAY BE LOWER DOWELS, EXTENDED MATTE STEEL 130 @ 24" c/c EACH WAY 2—#40 CONTINUOUS #40 DOWELS ® 6' c/c STRUCTURAL FILL ° 0 .0474 o e e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °' >• e o pO ✓ FILL TO EXTEND BENEATH 0 0 00 0.0 0 0 o ee ao o e o 0o cpj0 ALL FOUNDATION ELEMENTS. SEE NOTES 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 eye V.,;.“..; p 0000000 0000000 000000° . �. AA: r . AA. .Orc . .o. . 4 f0 7d" FOOTING/SLAB @ COVERED PORCH STRUCTURAL FILL TYPICAL SECTION ENGINEERS' CERTIFICATE: 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PORCH FOUNDATION DESIGN. WAS PREPARED BY ME or UNDER 36590 MY DIRECT SUPERVISION. B y. EDWARD M. MORRIS, Registered Professional State of Coiorodo — Number 30590 Soil Type: ALLUVIAL, COLLAPSIBLE SILT 24" Thick STRUCTURAL FILL Soil Bearing: 1800 psf Maximum, 250 psf Minimum Engineer FOUNDATION DESIGN - ROHS RESIDENCE 4323 County Road 214, SILT, COLORADO DESITINCTIVE DESIGN, Grand Junction, CO. GRAND JUNCTION LINCOLN DeVORE 1441 MOTOR STREET GRAND JCT., COLORADO 970-242-8988 (rex 970-242-1581) DRAM 8Y. E. M. MORRIS CMEC*Z Dr:. M MORRIS SCALE: rift f OF 88759—GJ SHEET 3 3 DATE: 10-1-2001 FD88759P INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB 24 HOURS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Date Issued. . • t Zoned Area Permit N ())%4 AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed if. structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building Inspector and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NU L AND VOIDJ(oU?JRC USS riMekiti C.6 Ott ekkeile CoU. Add r Legal Descri tion is 1 z i t t Own 4 f Setbacks Front Side Side Rear This Card Must Be Posted So it is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection. Contracto INSPECTION RECORD Footing 1,4 7_01 / q"-28 - 0/ ,S, II Foundation j'. ,' a ,€) /41,,) Icy._ 2-._t 4,-,,,,., S C A ±3 7y t,,,- 2,z4:)1 ile,•� Underground Plumbing Insulation !Z'JZ-9 f 14_4_ Rough Plumbing n4_4)1 ks Drywalls Chimney & Vent A _4.aj 42_.i Electric Final (by State Inspector}_2_21_Q rc , Gas Piping l2,-6, -Di ,i.,) Final 4_22.. 6z A, •S . Electric Rough (By State Inspector) j1294 f 1 1 Septic Final 2-11 . 6.4, ;0 Framing 1.2 -6 -Di *• (To include Roof in place and Windows and Doors installed). Notes: ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING - WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND. Phone 384-5003 THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE 109 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado. DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD APPROVED Date By IF PLAC t('''' D OUTSIDE CO R WITH CLEAR PLASTIC