HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication- PermitJoh Address
75-6
No. 7984
GARFIELD COUNTY
BUILDING, SANITATION,
and PLANNING DEPARTMENT
109 8th, Sheet, Suite 3O3
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601(970) 94S-8212
le(ep
Clerk
1 r GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION
GARFIELD COUNTY (GLENWOOD SPRINGS), COLORADO
TELEPHONE: (970) 945-8212
PERMIT NO. —19
INSPECTION LINE: (970)384-. 3470
PARCEL/SCHEDULE NO.
JOB ADDRESS:
UR
.0
Aire ._
AGREEMENT
ERMISSION IS HEREBY ( ANTP.D TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER CONTRACTOR AND!OR THE A ENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER ■ CONSTRUCT THE UCTURE AS
DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT_
1 CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER KEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WIIH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPT BY
ARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER F RTHER A GEES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY
OMPLI ED WITH IN THE LOCATION. ERECTION, CONST'RUCT'ION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM
HE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT &HALL BECOME NULL AND VOID.
HE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PLAN$, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQIJjp,]NG THE
ORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WH N IN
IOLATION OF THIS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION.
HE REVIEW OF TETE surimrrrED PLANS AND 3PEC1FTCATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED TIIEREAFFER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACL.LYIANCE OF ANY
ESPONSEBIIJrIES OR LIABILITIES BY GARFIELD LD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION
URING CONSYPUCITON RESTS SPECIFICALLY WEHI THE ARCIIITECT, DE&IGNER BUILDER AND OWNER.. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND .IN SUPPORT
FTHE OWilERS INTEREST.
[Dw-'P
V3/b1 Fob
rjAftcc
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE. (INITIAL)
LOT NO. (^� ! r5 BLOCK NO. SUBDIVISIONIR.XEMPTION
2
Qd�.v�
oA 'd"F �l�
�a y y T n
AD75 1 i-� O. E. U CSL ei
�}
' I (P-5 ' SCS
'ME PER
3
,
tlOMSWCtriA
C'Aldnr -a' a1-,.( r le
aw,nrce
LS 1 A d
PIR
5i,r,
LIC.N�D:
4
ARCEMEMPRIPNERR
ADDBERR
Tit
[LC NOc
5
1�
sq.n. om:a»nrroj 1 {
r �O
j 7 ]
ep.rr.ur• Lor I Ed IJ
�f! Y
��� ,
No.c
6
URaDPBtALDL+T(i
`-
es t c1 en.� � . P 0/cw-ft -,ate, Q_
7
: d
S�irc�Z=�' 2, Stuitsti aCe�i cl e n r o
O
_-
CLAPS OF WOW:1 oADDISION DAMMAI1D i.4LOVE URENOVE
9
CIARA6& D.wcJF- g CARPORT, aeaxsp oDoo■LE
V
Seat—
DDR[1rEWAYPHR.1�f r L'"" ',Lae y _ _ SIIH SEWAGE. DISPOSAL C LIC) 3/ o8F18P[AN y es
-
VAIAATKIN UV WORIC$ 25V }G. GP 1`......
AW6Tffi] VALLATION'.S d,65, 1 5-A. /
i� K?'
SPHG7AL =MUMS,
NOTICE
A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REiQUiRED AND MUST BE ISSUED BY THE STATE OF
THISPERMIT BECOMES NTIiL AND VOID W WORK OR CONSTRUCTION
AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 110 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR.
WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME
AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED.
1
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND
KNOW Tim SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF TAWS
GOVERNING THIS TYPE. OP WORK WELL BE COMPLIED WCTH WHETHER SPECIFIED
HEREIN OR NOT. THE GFJ NTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE
AIFTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR
LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF
CONSTRUr •N.
tea_ 1 a -5-3 ( /
PLANCHECK FEE:4
PERMIT PEE-I(
STHIS+(11&:2—t 7 ( ? _ ZS-
TOTAL FEE. . Q DATE PERMIT ISSUED:
2 S0 3 s L( C5
V
OCC 0UP: CONST: TYPE:
( u - ( li —
ZONIN
SETBACKS:
,
S atwB of own. Co13ICiGtOE Or au1hotized Arr. _ . • -
(1( IF,ht / ` //401r/ 1
HOME:
I3DS x0. &FEE �}
�`'r
—
]
Bnil�mg Dept. App val/Data / • . _Dept
AGREEMENT
ERMISSION IS HEREBY ( ANTP.D TO THE APPLICANT AS OWNER CONTRACTOR AND!OR THE A ENT OF THE CONTRACTOR OR OWNER ■ CONSTRUCT THE UCTURE AS
DETAILED ON PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SUBMITTED TO AND REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT_
1 CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT, THE SIGNER KEREBY AGREES TO COMPLY WIIH ALL BUILDING CODES AND LAND USE REGULATIONS ADOPT BY
ARFIELD COUNTY PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GIVEN IN 30.28.201 CRS AS AMENDED. THE SIGNER F RTHER A GEES THAT IF THE ABOVE SAID ORDINANCES ARE NOT FULLY
OMPLI ED WITH IN THE LOCATION. ERECTION, CONST'RUCT'ION AND USE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED STRUCTURE, THE PERMIT MAY THEN BE REVOKED BY NOTICE FROM
HE COUNTY AND THAT THEN AND THERE IT &HALL BECOME NULL AND VOID.
HE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT BASED UPON PLAN$, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA SHALL NOT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM THEREAFTER REQIJjp,]NG THE
ORRECTION OF ERRORS IN SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND OTHER DATA OR FRO PREVENTING BUILDING OPERATION BEING CARRIED ON THEREUNDER WH N IN
IOLATION OF THIS CODE OR ANY OTHER ORDINANCE OR REGULATION OF THIS JURISDICTION.
HE REVIEW OF TETE surimrrrED PLANS AND 3PEC1FTCATIONS AND INSPECTIONS CONDUCTED TIIEREAFFER DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN ACL.LYIANCE OF ANY
ESPONSEBIIJrIES OR LIABILITIES BY GARFIELD LD COUNTY FOR ERRORS, OMISSIONS OR DISCREPANCIES. THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE ITEMS AND IMPLEMENTATION
URING CONSYPUCITON RESTS SPECIFICALLY WEHI THE ARCIIITECT, DE&IGNER BUILDER AND OWNER.. COMMENTS ARE INTENDED TO BE CONSERVATIVE AND .IN SUPPORT
FTHE OWilERS INTEREST.
[Dw-'P
V3/b1 Fob
rjAftcc
I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THE AGREEMENT ABOVE. (INITIAL)
The following items are required by Garfield County for a final inspection:
1. A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector;
2. Permanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department posted where readily
visible from access road;
3. A finished roof, a lockable house, complete exterior siding, exterior doors and windows
installed, a complete kitchen with cabinets, a sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent
kitchen floor coverings, counter tops and finished walls, ready for stove and refrigerator, all
necessary plumbing;
4. A complete bathroom, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet stool, hot and cold running water,
non-absorbent floors and walls finished and a privacy door;
5. All steps outside or inside over three (3) steps must have handrails, guard rails on balconies or
decks over 30" high constructed to all 1994 UBC requirements;
6. Outside grading done to where water will detour away from the building;
7. Exceptions to the outside steps, decks and grading may be made upon the demonstration of
extenuating circumstances, i.e. weather, but a Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until
all the required items are completed and a final inspection made.
A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE
ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.
* * * *CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
(C.O.) IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE
CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING
PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET.
I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use d the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the dwelling under building permit # 5 0 -
Signature
bpcont
s o1
Date
C 0 C. o
n.,4cL IGZG�
Focif-4O- y L h q
CrGcl
y 6- a -`f- .. ( 5
0111
r ES
Pit
( 6 a G , 00
t? ' l 2 } ooG.o0.
t 2 tr = S- Goa ob
f2
L-042,3)-12 nNsi,Ppv
LO1 t'
January 1, 1999
Plans to be included for a Building Permit, must be on drafting paper at Ieast 18"x24" and drawn to
scale.
Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation pian, elevations all sides with
decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including the finish grade line. A
section showing in detail, from the bottom of the footing to the top of the roof, including re -bar,
anchor bolts, pressure treated plates, floor joists, wall studs and spacing, insulation, sheating, house -
rap, (which is required), siding or any approved building material_
A window schedule. A door schedule.
A floor framing plan; a roof framing plan, roof must be designed to withstand a 40# per ft up to
7,000 F.O.S. and an 80 M.P.H. wind.
All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All ofthe above requirements must be met oryour
plans will be returned.
1 Is a site plan included that indicates the distances of the proposed building or addition to
property lines _other buildings, setback easements and utility easements?
Yes
2. Does the site plan include the location of the I.S.D. S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System)
and the distances to property lines, wells (on subject property and adjacent properties),
streams or water courses?
Yes rf
3. Does the site plan indicate the location and direction of the County or private road accessing
the property?
Yes
4_ Do. the plans include a foundation plan indicating the size, location and spacing of all
reinforcing steel in accordance with the uniform building code or per stamped engineered
design? J'
Yes �!
5. Do the plans indicate the Iocation and size of ventilation openings for under floor crawl
spaces and the c arances required between wood and earth?
Yes
2
6. Do the plans indicate the size and location of ventilation openings for the attic, roofjoist
spaces's and so ts?
Yes
7_ Do the plans include design loads as required by Garfield County for roof snow loads, (a
minimum of 40 pounds per square foot up to & including 7,000 feet above sea level), floor
loads and wind cads?
Yes
S. Does the plan include a building section drawing indicating foundation, wall, floor and roof
construction?
Yes 1//
9. Does the building section drawing include size and spacing of floor joists, wall studs, ceiling
joists, roofrat els or joists or trusses?
Yes
10. Does the building section drawing or other detail include the method ofpositive connection of
all columns and beams?
Yes
11. Does the plan indicate the height of the building or proposed addition from the highest point
of the building or addition measured at mid span between the ridge and the eave down to
existing grade pontours?
Yes t,/
12. Does the plan include any stove or zero clearance fireplace planned for installation including
make and model and Colorado Phase II certifications or phase II EPA certification?
Yes No
13. Does the plan include a masonry fireplace including a fireplace section indicating design to
comply with the Uniform Building de Chapter 37?
Yes No
14. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that egress/rescue windows
from sleeping rooms and/or basements comply with the requirements of the Uniform Building
Code?
Yes rI No
15. Does the plan include a window schedule or other verification that windows provide natural
light and veintila j for all habitable rooms?
Yes 1No
3
16. Do the plans indicate the location of glazing subject to human impact such as glass doors,
glazing immediately adjacent to such doors; glazing adjacent to any surface normally used as a
walking surface; sliding glass doors; fixed glass panels; shower doors and tub enclosures and
specify safety glazing for these areas?
Yes (% No
17. Is the location of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnaces, boilers and water heaters
indicated o the plan?
Yes No
18. Do you understand that if you are building on a parcel of land created by the exemption
process or the subdivision process, are building plans in compliance with all plat notes and/or
covenants?
Yes No
19. Do you understand that if you belong to a homeowners association, it is your responsibility to
obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association, prior to
submitting an application for a building permit? If you do not have written permission from
the association, do you understand that the plan check fee will not be refunded should the
architectural co ttee deny or reject your building plans?
Yes _._.._ f No
20. Will this beefonly residential structure on the parcel?
Yes t No if no -Explain:
21. Have two (2,) complete sets of construction drawings been submitted with the application?
Yes y/
22. Do you under Land that the minimum size a home can be on a lot is a 20ft. x 20ft.?
Yes No
23. Have you designed or had this plan designed while considering building and other
construction ode requirements?
Yes No
24. Does the plan accurately indicate what you intend to construct and what will receive a final
inspection byr the Garfield County Building Department?
Yes �/ No
25. Do you understand that approval for design and/or construction changes are requiredprior to
the applicati of these changes?
Yes No
4
26. Do you understand that the Building Department will collect a `Plan Review" fee from you at
the time of application and that you will be required to pay the "Permit Fee" as well as any
"School Impact" or "Septic System" fees required, at the time you pick up your building
permit? `
Yes I/ No
27. Are you aware that twenty-four (24) hour notice is required for all inspections?
Inspections will be made from Battlement Mesa to West Glenwood in the mornings and
from Glenwood Springs to Carbondale in the afternoon. Morning inspections must be
called in by 12:00 p.m. the day before; afternoon inspections must be called in by 4:00
p.m. the day before.. Failure to give twenty-four (24) hour notice for inspections will
delay your inspection one (1) day. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003.
Yes No
28. Are you aware that you are required to call for all inspections required under the Uniform
Building Code including approval on a final inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of
Occupancy a occupancy of the building?
Yes No
29. Are you aware that the person signing the Permit Application, whether the "Owner", "Agent
ofthe Owner", "General Contractor", "Contractor" or otherwise, is the party responsible for
the project complying with the Uniform Building Code?
Yes /7 No
30. Are you aware that prior to issuance of a building permit you are required to show proof of a
driveway access permit or obtain a statement from the Garfield County Road & Bridge
Department stating one is not necessary? You can contact the Road & Bridge Department at
625-8601.
Yes No
31. Do you understand that you will be required to hire a State of Colorado Licensed Electrician
and Plumber to perform installations and hookups, unless you as the homeowner are
performing the work? The license number of the person performing the work will be required
at time of applicable inspection.
Yes No
32. Are you aware, that on the front ofthe Building Permit Application you will need to fill in the
Parcel/Schedule Number for the lot you are applying for this permit on prior to issuance of a
building permit? Your attention in this is appreciated.
Yes No
5
hereby acknowledge that Il have read, understand and answered these questions to the
best of my ability.
signature date
Phone% - ib 2r`kv3 (days);
Project Name: 001. 6,r1
Project Address:� 5 �j ��,� 'J� r�rr G t r 1+A A url Et7qS -
5/5
(evenings)
Notes:
If you have answered "No" on any of the questions, you may be required to provide this information
at the request of the Building Official prior to beginning the plan review process. Delays in issuing
the permit are to be expected. Work may not proceed without the issuance of a permit. If it is
determined by the Building Official that additional information is necessary to review the application
and plans to determine minimum compliance with the adopted codes, the application may be placed
behind more recent applications for building permits in the review process and not reviewed until
required information has been provided and the application rotates again to first position for review,
delay in issuance of the permit or delay in proceeding with construction.
bpminreq
8100
6
ea 48
u
q
O
•
2
4900'
8d•cao'
14v61:31M1165 Dk,
03!27/2001 02:46 6250627
ROAD AND BRIDGE PAGE 02
Cov copy
Garfield County?
Garfield County Road and Bridge Department
Match 27, 2001
Joseph acid Diana Colonna
Lot 18 (2 One Wuutbank Subdivision)
CC: Garfield County Biding and Planning Department
Dear Joseph. and Diana,.
The property you own is beyond the county road; therefore, you do not need a den eway
permit from Garfield County.
If you bare any questions or problems, please feel free to contact me.
Sineatly,
Kenny Gardner
District Foreman
Garfield County Road and Bridge Department
UZI LJ/ 40171. 11
•
ytd-�cb-7b15 A.5PEN RESEARCH GROLP
Iry ma Ng wILS 1 JEW IVA Ea a.611.
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CHECK LIST
/ - 42:3o} moi
Date pians or request submitted
Name of -applicant
Lot # or Address
Date of meeting of AAC.
Members present
:Members Voting
ACC Check List:
Site Pian & Set Backs
House square footage
Gaffe square footage
RaofMaterials and Pitch
Wall Materials
Color
Other
PAG,E 02IO2
efe040-0, ,E4166
r APPROVAL or DENIAL
gr
,,+.Cmn nts: to . T F • .AAA& FAILwkilAmewiroKT
F 7 ItiL STs F417.
t `+ T ows. 6n2.8ii
ILL N �► T� 1 ► � '� . 1.. .. a
! d T i dN . W i'E t5
..10.46Va 1450 4,
Phi% G1�er "1 s - 5
14i t
DitrNifi tot/ M!e'im4tliJ. ?
DM ACC Comments sent back to Applicant: ./0101
:iagnature of Chairman
Gtech
May 3, 2000
Colonna Construction
Attn: Bernie Colones
1710 Grand Avenue
Silt, Colorado 81652
Hepworth-Pa►vlak Geotechnical, Inc.
5020 County Road 154
Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601
Phone: 970-945-7988
Fax: 970-945-8454
hpgeo@hpgeotech.com
Job No. 100 334
Subject: Subsoil Study for Foundation Design and Percolation Test, Proposed
Residence, Lot 18, Westbank Mesa, Garfield County, Colorado.
Dear Mr. Colonna:
As requested, Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. performed a subsoil study and
percolation test for foundation and septic disposal designs at the subject site. The study
was conducted in accordance with our agreement for geotechnical engineering services
to Colonna Construction dated April 13, 2000. The data obtained and our
recommendations based on the proposed construction and subsurface conditions
encountered are presented in this report.
Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a two story wood frame
structure over a crawlspace located in the area between Pits 1 and 2, shown on Fig. 1.
The attached garage floor is proposed to be slab -on -grade. Cut depths are expected to
range between about 3 to 10 feet. Foundation loadings for this type of construction are
assumed to be relatively light and typical of the proposed type of construction. The
septic disposal system is proposed to be located about 30 feet downhill to the north of
the proposed residence.
If building conditions or foundation loadings are significantly different from those
described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations presented in
this report.
Site Conditions: The lot is located uphill of Huebinger Drive. The site was vacant at
the time of our field work. The ground surface is strongly to moderately sloping down
to the east. The lot is vegetated with sagebrush, grass and weeds.
Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions at the site were evaluated by
excavating two exploratory pits in the building area and one profile pit in the septic
disposal area at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. The logs of the pits are
presented on Fig. 2. The subsoils encountered, below about 2 to 21 feet of topsoil,
Colonna Construction
May 3, 2000
Page 2
consist of medium stiff to stiff sandy silt and clay. Results of consolidation testing
performed on relatively undisturbed samples of the silt and clay, presented on Figs. 3
and 4, indicate low compressibility under existing low moisture conditions and light
loading and a low collapse potential (settlement under constant load) when wetted. The
samples showed high compressibility upon increased loading after wetting. No free
water was observed in the pits at the time of excavation and the soils were slightly
moist.
Foundation Recommendations: The soils encountered at the site are low density and
compressible when wetted even under light residential loading. Considering the subsoil
conditions encountered in the exploratory pits and the nature of the proposed
construction, spread footings placed on the undisturbed natural soil can be used for
support of the proposed residence provided the risk of settlement and distress is
accepted by the owner. Footings should be designed for an allowable soil bearing
pressure of 1,000 psf and have a minimum width of 20 inches for continuous walls and
2 feet for colmnns. Settlements could be on the order of 1 to 2 inches or more
depending on the depth and extent of wetting and could cause post construction
structural distress. Loose and disturbed soils encountered at the foundation bearing
level within the excavation should be removed and the footing bearing level extended
down to the undisturbed natural soils. The exposed subgrade should be moistened and
compacted in footing areas. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate cover
above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Placement of footings at least 36
inches below the exterior grade is typically used in this area. Continuous foundation
walls should be heavily reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by
assuming an unsupported length of at least 15 feet. The foundation should be
constructed in a "box like" shape and minimize the use of isolated columns to help limit
the effects of some differential settlement. Foundation walls acting as retaining
structures should be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent
fluid unit weight of at least 50 pef for the on-site soil as backfill.
Floor Slabs: The natural on-site soils, exclusive of topsoil, are suitable to support
lightly loaded slab -on -grade construction. There is a risk of post construction
settlement and slab distress due to subgrade wetting_ To reduce the effects of some
differential movement, floor slabs should be separated from all bearing walls and
columns with expansion joints which allow unrestrained vertical movement. Floor slab
control joints should be used to reduce damage due to shrinkage cracking. The
requirements for joint spacing and slab reinforcement should be established by the
H -P GEOTECH
Colonna Construction
May 3, 2040
Page 3
designer based on experience and the intended slab use. A minimum 4 inch layer of
free -draining- gravel should be placed beneath the basement slab to act as a Ieveling
course and reduce capillary moisture rise. This material should consist of minus 2 inch
aggregate with less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No.
200 sieve.
All fill materials for support of floor slabs should be compacted to at least 95 % of
maximum standard Proctor density at a moisture content near optimum. Required fill
can consist of the on-site soils devoid of vegetation, topsoil and oversized rock.
Underdrain System: Although free water was not encountered during our exploration,
it has been our experience in the area that local perched groundwater can develop
during times of heavy precipitation or seasonal runoff. Frozen ground during spring
runoff can create a perched condition. We recommend below -grade construction, such
as retaining walls and below grade living areas more than 4 feet deep (if any), be
protected from wetting and hydrostatic pressure buildup by an. underdrain system.
The drains should consist of drainpipe placed in the bottom of the wall backfill
surrounded above the invert level with free -draining granular material. The drain
should be placed at each level of excavation and at least 1 foot below lowest adjacent
finish grade and sloped at a minimum 1% to a suitable gravity outlet. Free -draining
granular material used in the underdrain system should contain less than 2% passing the
No. 200 sieve, less than 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and have a maximum size of
2 inches. The drain gravel backfill should be at least 11/2 feet deep. An impervious
membrane such as 20 mil PVC should be placed beneath the drain gravel in a trough
shape and attached to the foundation wall with mastic to prevent wetting of the bearing
soils.
Surface Drainage: The following drainage precautions should be observed during
construction and maintained at all times after the residence has been completed:
1) Inundation of the foundation excavations and underslab areas should be
avoided during construction.
2) Exterior backfill should be adjusted to near optimum moisture and
compacted to at Ieast 95 % of the maximum standard Proctor density in
pavement and slab areas and to at least 90% of the maximum standard
Proctor density in landscape areas. Free -draining wall backall should be
capped with about 2 feet of the on-site soils to reduce surface water
infiltration.
H -P GEOTECH
Colonna Construction
May 3, 2000
Page 4
3) The ground surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be
sloped to drain away from the foundation in all directions. We
recommend a minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet in unpaved
areas and a minimum slope of 3 inches in the first 10 feet in pavement
and walkway areas. A swale will be needed uphill to direct surface
runoff around the residence.
4) Roof downspouts and drains should discharge well beyond the limits of
all backfill.
5) Landscaping which requires regular heavy irrigation should be located at
least 10 feet from the building. Consideration should be given to use of
xeriscape to help limit potential wetting due to irrigation
Percolation Testing: Percolation tests were conducted on. April 18, 2000 to evaluate
the feasibility of an infiltration septic disposal system at the site. One profile pit and
three percolation holes were dug at the locations shown on Fig. 1. The test holes
(nominal 10 inch diameter by 12 inch deep) were hand dug at the bottom of shallow
backhoe pits and were soaked with water one day prior to testing. The soils exposed in
the percolation holes are similar to those exposed in the Profile Pit shown. on Fig. 2 and
consist of about 3 feet of topsoil overlying medium stiff to stiff sandy silt and clay to the
profile pit depth of 8 feet. The percolation test results are presented in Table II. The
percolation test results indicate an infiltration rate between 13 and 17 minutes per inch
with air average of 15 minutes per inch. Rased on the subsurface conditions
encountered and the percolation test results, the tested area should be suitable for a
conventional infiltration septic disposal system.
Limitations: This study has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering principles and practices in this area at this time. We make no
warranty either expressed or implied. The conclusions and recommendations submitted
in this report are based upon the data obtained from the exploratory pits excavated at the
locations indicated on Fig. 1, the proposed type of construction and our experience in
the area. Our findings include interpolation and extrapolation of the subsurface
conditions identified at the exploratory pits and variations in the subsurface conditions
may not become evident until excavation is performed. If conditions encountered
during construction appear different from those described in this report, we should be
notified at once so re-evaluation of the recommendations may be made.
This report has been prepared for the exclusive use by our client for design purposes.
We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of our information. As
H -P GEOTECH
Colonna Construction
May 3, 2000
Page 5
the project evolves, we should provide continued consultation and field services during
construction to review and monitor the implementation of OUT recommendations, and to
verify that the recommendations have been appropriately interpreted. Significant design
changes may require additional analysis or modifications to the recommendations
presented herein. We recommend on-site observation of excavations and foundation
bearing strata and testing of structural fill by a representative of the geotechnical
engineer.
If you have any questions or if we may be of further assistanr;e, please let us know.
Sincerely,
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
Jordy Z. Adamson, Jr., P.E.
Reviewed by:
Steven L. Pawlak, P.E.
JZAlksm
attachments
H -P GEo7ECH
•
APPROXIMATE SCALE
1"=301
100 334
LOT 19
HUEBINGER DRIVE
P 1 P 2
A a
P 3
■ o
PROFILE
PIT
t
PIT 2
PIT 1
■
BUILDING
ENVELOPE
HEPWORTH - PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL., INC.
i
LOT 17
LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY PITS
AND PERCOLATION TEST HOLES
Fig. 1
D
5
,...._,
10
LEGEND:
N
NOTES:
TIT 1
ELEV. = 115.7'
WC=B.6
DD=84
-200=88
WC®9.4
DD=112
-200=72
LLa29
P1-=11
PIT 2 PROFILE PIT
ELEV. = 105.3' ELEV. = 100'
WC=7.7
DD=89
TOPSOIL, sandy silty clay. slightly organic, firm, slightly moist, brown.
5
10
SILT AND CLAY (ML—CL); sandy, scattered gravel, medium stiff to stiff, slightly moist, light
brawn, low plasticity, calcareous, porous.
2" Diameter hand driven liner sample.
1. Exploratory pits were excavated an April 17, 2000 with a baakhae.
2. Locations of exploratory pith were measured approximately by pacing from features on the site
plan provided.
3. Elevations of exploratory pits were measured by instrument level and refer to ground surface of
Profile Pit as elevation 100 feet, assumed.
4. The exploratory pit locations and elevations should be considered accurate only to the degree
implied by the method used.
5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory pit logs represent the approximate
boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual.
6. No free water was encountered in the pits at the time of excavating.
Fluctuations in water level may occur with time.
7. Laboratory Testing Results:
WC = Water Content ( % )
DD = Dry Density ( pcf )
—200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve
LL = Liquid Limit ( % )
P1 = Plasticity Index ( % )
Depth — Feet
100 3.34
HEPWORTH — PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
LOGS OF EXPLORATORY PITS
Fig. 2
s 5,
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
ti
Moisture Content = 7.7 percent
Dry Density = 89 pcf
Sample of: Sandy Silt and Clay
From: Pit 1 at 6 Feet
4
Compression
upon
wetting
0.1
100 334
1.0 - 10
APPLIED PRESSURE — ksf
HEPWORTH -- PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL., INC.
SWELL --CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
100
Fig. 3
a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1
0-1
100 334
1.0 10
APPLIED PRESSURE -- ksf
HEPWORTH — PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
100
Fig_ 4
Moisture Content = 8.6 percent
Dry Density = 84 pcf
Sample of: Sandy Silt and Clay
From: pit2 at 3.5 Feet
Ion
iIIIIiII.i-=u1uuuiI.
Compression
upon
wetting
III
0-1
100 334
1.0 10
APPLIED PRESSURE -- ksf
HEPWORTH — PAWLAK
GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
SWELL—CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
100
Fig_ 4
M
0
O
z
0
U
J J
d
V w
Z rr
1
U
W 1--
o
W0
C7 Lu
mCC
Q - COC)
J
d LL
a. 0
cc a
✓ 7
a
2
UNCONFINED
COMPRESSIVE SOIL OR
STRENGTH BEDROCK TYPE
(PSF1
Sandy Silt and Clay
rSandy Silt and Clay
Sandy Silty Clay
ATIEREERG LIMITS
PLASTIC
INDEX
I%1
r
f
a
05 -2 i
J
01
CV
NATURAL GRADATION PERCENT
DRY GRAVEL SAND PASSING
DENSITY (%) f%1 NO, 200
ipcH SIEVE
C
C
112 [ 72
CD
CO
Ci -
CO
—
gPx- cc
4 O O
x g v
co
¢
o
z
0
h
V
4
I.
J
4
1
g d
[D
M
W
CJ
2a
tz
r—-
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
TABLE 11
PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS
JOB NO. 100 334
HOLE NO.
HOLE DEPTH
(INCHES)
LENGTH OF
INTERVAL
(MIN)
WATER DEPTH
AT START OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
WATER DEPTH
AT END OF
INTERVAL
(INCHES)
DROP IN
WATER
LEVEL
(INCHES)
AVERAGE
PERCOLATION
RATE
(MIN.IINCH)
P-1
46
15
water added
11
9
2
13
9
7 '
1 '/
3/4
c 3/4
6
1
1
¢7 2/4
6
5 1/2
1 1/4
8 %
7 1/4
1 '/2
7Y4
61/4
1
6 '/4
5
1 1/4
5
4
1
P-2
52
15
water added
10
7 1/2
2 1/2
15
71/2
5%
1 s
5 3/4
•4 3/4
1
43/4
3 %
1
8 1
6 1/2
1 ,h
C
6 Y2
5 1/2
1
5 1/2
4 1/2
1
4 Yi
3 Yz
1
P-3
40
16
water added
11
9
2
17
9
7'h
1/
7Y2
6'h
1
6'/2
5'/4
1 'f4
B 3/4 .
7 +h
1 1/4
7 'h
6 'h
1
s 1/2
5 %
3/4
5 3/4
4 la
1
Note: Percolation test holes were hand dug in the bottom of backhoe pits and soaked an April
17, 2000. Percolation tests were conducted on April 18, 2000. The average percolation
rates were based on the last two readings of each test.
I�
NNW/
SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER
ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS
April 3, 2001
Mr. Joe Colonna
151 Floyd
El -Jebel, CO 81623
.._E.NWOOD `•G =Eti
18 IN, 6TH, SU TE 200 P.O. BOX 2155
GLENWOOD SPRINGS. CO 8 1 601 ASPEN, CO 5161 2
D70-945-1004 970.925-6727
FX: 970-945-5949 FX: 970-925-4157
Re: Proposed Residence Foundation/Framing Review
Lot 18, Westbank Mesa, Garfield County
Glenwood Springs, Colorado
Project No. 2001-143.001
Dear Mr, Colonna,
Per your request, we have reviewed foundation and framing information as shown on
drawings provided by you, 8 sheets (18x24) and 5 sheets (8 1 x 11), in conjunction with
the soils report by HP Geotech, Job No. 100 334, dated May 3, 2000. We reviewed roof,
wall and floor framing, foundation reinforcing, and footing widths_ VVe reviewed the
systems based on the following loads:
Roof 20 psf dead
40 psf snow
Floor 20 psf dead
40psf live/snow
Foundation 1000 psf maximum soil bearing pressure
Based on the member sizes and materials as indicated on the drawings, our analysis
indicates the systems will adequately support the loads as shown above.
Materials for the foundation will include 3000 psi concrete and grade 60 rebar. All
window and door headers will consist of (3) 2x12's, unless otherwise noted_ Attached is
a copy of the foundation plan you provided which has been modified to show the footing
widths and beams to support the main floor framing- A similar sheet labeled 2ND Level
Framing has been similarly modified to show the beams to support the second floor
framing. Also attached is a typical foundation section showing the reinforcing. All of the
footings that have been widened to provide bearing for concentrated Toads shall be
reinforced with a mat of #4 rebar c 12" O.C., each way, 3" clear from the bottom.
Should you have any questions concerning the above, please call me at 970-945-1004.
Sincerely,
Clay Goldberg, P.
Enclosures:
Foundation Plan
2ND Level Framing
Foundation Section
Reviewed by,
William B. Swigert, P.E.
October 29, 2001
Garfield County Building & Planning
109 Eighth Street, Third Floor
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
Re: ISDS for Lot 18; Westbank Mesa
HCE Job No. 2011057.59
To Whom It May Concern:
On September 27, 2001, High Country Engineering personnel observed the construction of the
ISDS for Lot 18, Westbank Mesa in Garfield County, Colorado. One 1250 -gallon septic tank and
28 standard Infiltrator units had been installed in a trench configuration. The waterline had been
sleeved and no additional backfilling had taken place. Theinstallation of the system was in
conformance with. the intent of the design. If you have any questions, or need additional
information, please contact us.
Sincerely,
HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC -4- t 4 ,.93 ,•e• a/,
r idx
pl.
Roger D. Ideal, P.E.
Project Manager
RDN/djw
• •ry'� •,
Si i•
N":"",
S � (
923 Cooper Avenue,
Gamed Springs, Co 81601
Telephone (970) 945.8676 - Fax (970) 945-2555
14 Inverness Drive East Suite B-140
Englewood, co 80112
Tckphcrie (3033925-0$44 - Fax (303) 92.5-0547
1
INSPECTION WILL NOT BE MADE UNLESS
THIS CARD IS POSTED ON THE JOB
i }Tit1J S NCiriCTRFAUIRED FOR INSPECTIONS 'li;NS -
BUILDING PERMIT
AR ELD COUNTY, COLORADO
Date Lssne(157.41..ained Area Permit No
rev -
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the issuance of this permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all
laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and erection of the proposed
structure for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations
are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above
described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building
Inspeaertnrtl IMMEDIATELY B COME LL AND VOID.
67-4166a
14/41 en6 MAP 'PF:wii%
n
•Co tractsr
Address : = , ll ription
Sethkelts Front Side Side Rear
This Card Must Be Posted So It is Plainly Visible From The Street Until Final Inspection.
INSPECTION RECORD
Footing ""ff d7rP AK
Foundation f„ ... f g --p) Ali
Underground Plumbing
Insulation V- -77 1keaj,
Rough Plumbing ! _La, 2, 14
Drywall IS'nP- /0i44 --
Chimney & Vent e( -
Electric Final (by State Inspector%,45a
Gas Piping 1 - `t g -- Z L ,v.....z--
Final 6 -1 4,-.0"i- 91,0„..._
1
-Electric Rough (By State Inspector)
Septic Final q.;. -7-0(p au.
Framing i — -,...e- ,.. , r
Notes:
_ r_
(To include Roof in place and Windows
and Doors installed).
ALL LISTED ITEMS MUST BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE COVERING -
WHETHER INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR, UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND.
THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE
9 8th Street County Courthouse Glenwood Springs, Colorado.
D DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD
v
F PLACED OUTSIDE - COVER WITII CLEAR PLA