Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication - Permit2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 Parcel No: ~e:: Contrac~~ GARF IELD COUNTY BUILDING PERMlT APPLICATION I 08 8th Str eet, Suit e 40 I, Glenwood Sprin gs, Co 8 1601 Phone : 970-945-8212 I Fax: 970-384-3470 I In spec tion Lin e: 970-384-5003 www.garlield-counrv.co m S~·e -e.~ Rt> II) Ph: Arc hitect I Engineer: \ Add ress Ph: W r-re;u J... 'fh ~ Sq. Ft. of Buil ding: 786 Use of B uilding: I' b e.\ 'I''-' Describe Work : -s-J-·, t...K. Class of Work : New o A lterati on Addition Ga rage: Septic: ltsDs De tached Owne r s valuation of W ork: $ NOTICE AltPh : Alt Ph : o Communit Authoril)". Th is application for a Butlding Permit mu st be sign ed by the Owner of th e property, described above , or an authori zed age nt. If the si gnatu re below is not that of th e Owner, a se parate letter of authority, signed by the Owner, mu st be prov ided with th is Appl ication . Legal Access. A Buil di ng Permit cannot be issued without proof of legal and adeq uate access to th e property for purposes of inspections by the Buil ding Depart ment. Other Permit$. Multipl e separate permits may be required : (I) State Electrical Permi t, (2) Cou nty ISDS Pe rmi t, (3) another permit required for usc on the property ide ntified above, e .g. State or County Highway/ Road Access or a State Wa stewater Disc harge Permit. Void Pcrmll. A Bu ilding Permit becomes null and void if the work authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of is suance and if work is sus pend ed or abandoned for a pe riod of 180 days afier co mme nceme nt. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I ha ve read thi s Application and that the information conta ined above is true and correct. I understand th at th e Building Depart ment acce pts the Appl icat ion. a long with the plans and speci ficat ions and other dat a submitted by me or on my beha lf(s ubmittals);-boscd-upomny-ccrri1i c31ion"'I!S'Tlf11tCOracy. Assu ming compl eteness of th e submittals and a pprova l of thi s App lication, a Build ing Permit will be issued granting permission to me, as Owner. to construct the stmcrurc(s) and fac ilities detai led on th e submi ttals reviewed by th e Building Uepa rtment. In consi deration of the issuance of the Building Perm it , I a!,'l'ec that! and my agent s will comply wi th provisio ns of any federal , state or loca l law reg ulating th e work and the Ga rfield County Building Codc ,ISDS regulation s and applicable land use regulations (County Rcgul atio n(s)). I acknowledge th at the Building Permit may be s uspended or revoked. upon notice fr om the County, if the loca tion, construction or usc of the strucrure(s) and fac ility(ics), descri bed above , arc not in compliance with Co unty Regu lation(s) or any other a pplicable law . I hereby gra nt pe rmi ssion to the Building Depart ment to enter the property, described above, to inspect th e work . I furth er acknowledge that the iss uance of th e Bui lding Permit docs not prevent th e Bui ldin g Official from : (I ) requiring the correction of errors in the submitta ls, if an y, di scovered after iss uanc e; or (2) stopping constru ction or us c of th e stru cture(s) or facility(i cs) if such is in violatio n of Co unty Regulation(s) or any other applicabl e law . Review of this Applica tion, incl udin g submi ttals , and inspectio ns of the work by the Building Depa rt ment do not constitute an accep tance of responsi bility or liability by the Co unty of errors, omi ssio ns or discrepanci es. As th e Owner. I acknowledge that respon sibility for comp liance wi th federa l, state and local laws and County Reg ul ations rest with me and my au thori zed age nts , includin g without lim itation my arc hitect designer, engin eer and/ or builder . I HE ACKNOW~DG:.E\READ AND UNDERS TAND THE NOTICE & ~~T;~A:Iia ABOVE : STAFF USE' ONLY Special Conditions: Adjusted Valuation: ?-1 q '3o~1t- Permit Fee: ) 5-' '-t?.J Manu home Fee: Mise Fe es: Plan Check Fee: 'll Ll 0 I ISDS Fee: ~ ISD S No & Is s ued Date: Fees Paid: \\-2r O=\- j6}':\4oD\ BP No & Issue Date: /Oift-5 ~/Gft2 Balance Due: LJ "2 ,6 Setbacks: OCCGroup: C on st Type: Zoning: BLDG DEPT: PLNGDEPT: l l \, Qh S"-?.7 -o)r-(~~ UJ_ APP~~ 1 DATE APPR<f '4Ll DA TE vv 1, vv The following items are required by Garfield County for a final Inspection: 1) A final Electrical Inspection from the Colorado State Electrical Inspector. 2) Pennanent address assigned by Garfield County Building Department and posted at th e structure and where readily visible from access road. 3) A finished roof; a lockable building; completed exterior siding; exterior doors and windows installed; a complete kitchen with cabinets, sink with hot & cold running water, non-absorbent kitchen floor covering, counter tops and finished walls , ready for stove and refrigerator; all necessary plumbing. 4) All bathrooms must be complete, with washbowl, tub or shower, toilet, hot and cold running water, non-absorbent floors, walls finished, and privacy door. 5) Steps over three (3) risers, outside or inside must be must have handrails. Balconies and decks over 30" high must be constructed to all IBC and IRC requirements including guardrails . 6) Outside grading completed so that water slopes away from the building; 7) Exceptions to the outside steps, decks, grading may be made upon the demonstration of extenuating circumstances ., i.e. weather. Under such circumstances A Certificate of Occupancy may be issu ed conditionally. 8) A final inspection sign off by the Garfield County Road & Bridge Department for driveway installation, where applicable; as well as any fmal sign off by the Fire District, and/or State Agencies where applicable. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C.O.) WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. A C.O. MAY TAKE UP TO 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO BE PROCESSED AND ISSUED. OWNER CANNOT OCCUPY OR USE DWELLING UNTIL A C.O. IS ISSUED. OCCUPANCY OR USE OF DWELLING WITHOUT A C.O. WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ILLEGAL OCCUPANCY AND MAY BE GROUNDS FOR VACATING PREMISES UNTIL ABOVE CONDITIONS ARE MET. I understand and agree to abide by the above conditions for occupancy, use and the issuance of a C.O . for the building identified in the Building Permit. OWNERS SIGNATURE DATE Bapplicationseptember2007 GARFIELD COUNTY BUILDING AND PLANNING 970-945-8212 MINIMUM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS For SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING CONSTRUCTION Including NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITIONS ALTERATIONS And MOVED BUILDINGS In order to understand the scope of the work intended under a permit application and expedite the issuance of a permit it is important that complete information be provided. When reviewing a plan and it's discovered that required information has not been provided by the applicant, this will result in the delay of the permit issuance and in proceeding with building construction. The owner or contractor shall be required to provide this information before the plan review can proceed. Other plans that are in line for review may be given attention before the new information may be reviewed after it has been provided to the Building Department. Please review this document to determine if you have enough information to design your project and provide adequate information to facilitate a plan review. Also, please consider using a design professional for assistance in your design and a construction professional for construction of your project. Any project with more than ten (10) occupants requires the plans to be sealed by a Colorado Registered Design Professional. To provide for a more understandable plan in order to determine compliance with the building, plumbing and mechanical codes, applicants are requested to review the following checklist prior to and during design. Applicants are required to indicate appropriately and to submit the completed checklist at time of application for a permit. Plans to be included for a Building Permit, mnst be on drafting paper at least 18"x24" and drawn to scale. Plans must include a floor plan, a concrete footing and foundation plan, elevations all sides with I decks, balcony, steps, hand rails and guard rails, windows and doors, including th e finish grade line and original grade. A section showing in detail , from the bottom of the footing to th e top of th e roof, including re-bar, anchor bolts, pressure treated plates , floor joists, wall studs and spacing. insulation , sheeting, house-rap , (which is required), siding or any approved building material. Engineered foundations !Day be required. A window sc hedule . A door sc hedule. A floor framing plan , a roof framing plan , roof must be des igned to withstand a 40 pound per square foo t up to 7,000 fee t in elevation, a 90 M.P.H. wind speed, wind expo sure B or C, and a 36 inch fro st depth. All sheets to be identified by number and indexed. All of th e above requirements must be met or your plans will be returned. All plans submitted mu st be incompliance with the 2003 IRC. 1. Is a site plan included that identifies the location of the proposed structure or addition and distances to the property line s from each comer of the proposed structure(s) prepared b y a lic ense d surveyor and has the surveyors signature and profe ss ional stamp on th e drawing? Properties with slopes of 30% or greater must be shown on the site plan. (NOTE Section: J 06.2) Any site plan for the place ment of any portion of a structure within 50 ft. of a property line and not within a previously surveyed buildin g envelop e on a subdivision final plat shall be prepared by a licensed surveyor and have the surveyor's signature and professional sta mp on the drawing. Any structure to be built within a building envelope of a lot shown on a re corded subdivision plat shall in clud e a copy of the building env.elope as it is shown on the final plat with th e propo sed structure located within the envelope . Yes V: 2 . Does the site plan also include any other buildings on the property, se tback easements and utility easements? Please refer to Section 5.05.03 in the Garfield County Zoning Resolution if the prope1ty you are applying for a building permit on is located on a comer lot. Special setbacks do apply. Yes L----' 3. Does the site plan include when applicable the location of the l.S.D.S. (Individual Sewage Disposal System) and the distances to th e property lines, wells (on subject prope1ty and adjacent pprroo~p~ · s), streams or water courses? Yes V"" ---"'--- 4. D oes the site plan indicate th e location and direction of the County or private ro ad accessing the property ? 2 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12 . 13 . 14. Yes ----- Are you aware that prior to submittal of a building permit application yo u are required to show pro of of a dri veway ac ce ss permit or obtain a statem e nt from th e Garfield County Road & Bridge Departm ent sta tin g one is not necessary? Yo u can co ntact the Road & Bridge Departm ent at 625 -8601. Yes y-== D o the plans include a foundation plan indicatin g the size , lo cation and spa c in g of a ll reinforcin g steel in accordance with th e IR C or per stamped engineered des ign? Yes I.......-- Do the plan s indicate th e lo cation and size of ventilation ope nin gs for und er floor crawl spaces and the c learances required between wood and earth ? Yes -----.!,J'------ Do the plan s indicate th e size and location of ve ntilation openin gs for th e att ic, roof joist spac es and so ffit s? Ye s ~ D o the plans in clude d esign loads as r equired by Garfield Co un ty for roof snow load s , (a minimum of 40 poun per sq uar e foot up to & inc ludin g 7,000 feet above sea leve l), floor load s and w ind s? Yes ------ Do es the pl an inc! ud e a building section drawing indicating foundation , wa ll , fl oo r, and roof c onstructi on? Yes v --·- D oes the buildin g section drawin g includ e size and spa cin g of floor joists, wall stud s, ce ilin g joists, roo{/:r joi sts or tru sses? Yes · D oes the building sec ti on drawin g or oth er deta il includ e th e method of po siti ve co nn ection of all co lumn s ~d beams? Yes ~ __ ...;::::_ ____ _ Do es the elev ation plan indicate th e height of the building or pro pose d addition from the undisturbed g rade to th e midp oint b etween the ridge and eave of a gabl e or she d roof or the top of a flat ro g!2.-(Building hei ght measurement u sually not to exceed 25 fe et) Yes v-----=----- D oes the plan in clud e any stov e or zero clearance fir epl ace planned for in sta ll atio n including 3 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. make and model and Co lorado Phase 11 certifi cations or phas e II EPA certification ? Yes No ~ -------Doe s the plan includ e a masonry fireplace in clud in g a fireplace section indicat ing des ign to co mpl y with the IRC? Yes No y · - Do es the plan includ e a window sc hedul e or other ver ifi cation tha t eg ress /r escue windows from s leep in g rooms and/or ba sements comp ly w ith the re quirements of the IRC ? Yes \,..---No ------- Doe s the plan include a window sc hedul e or other ve rification that windows provide natural li ght and ve ntilation for all habitabl e rooms? Yes \..------No ------- Do the plan s indi cate th e location of gla zi ng subj ect to human impact such as glas s doors, g laz in g immedi ately adjacent to such doors; glaz ing adjacent to any surface normally used as a walking surface; s lidin g glass doors ; fixed g la ss panels ; show er doors and tub enclosures and specify safety glazing for th ese areas? Yes 1.---........... No ------- I s the locati on of all natural and liquid petroleum gas furnace s, boil ers and water h eaters indicated on t!y: p lan? Yes 1 ~ No ______ _ Do you understand that if you are bui lding on a parce l of land created by the exemption process or the subdiv isio n process , are buildin g plans in comp lian ce with all plat notes and /or cove~ Yes V No ------- Do yo u understan d that i f you belong to a Homeowners Association (BOA), it is your respo nsibil ity to obtain written permission from the association, if required by that association , prior to submitting an application for a buildin g permit ? The building p ermit applicat ion will be accepted witho ut it , but you run the risk o{ th e HOA b ringing acti on to enforc e the covenants, whi ch can res ult in revocat ion of perm it issued. Add iti ona ll y, your Plan Rev iew fee is not refundable if th e plans have b een reviewed by th e Building Departm en t prior to a ny action by the HOA that r eq uir es e ith er revocation or s ub stant ial mgdtfication of the p lans. Ye s V" No ------- Wi ll thi s be jbt:-e nl y residential structure on th e parcel? Yes v No lfno-Explain: ______ _ Have two 12) complete set s of construc tion drawings been subm itted with the application? Ye s V ----"'------- 4 24. D o you und erstand that the minimum dimen s ion a h ome can b e o n a lot is 20ft.w ide a nd 20ft. Ion~? ./"" Yes v-No ----- 25. H ave you designed or had t his plan de signed w hile con side1ing bui lding a.nd other construction code requirements? Yes \... ,..-../ No ------ 26. Do yo ur plans comply with a ll zoning rul es and regulati ons in the Coun ty re lated t o your propert ies zone c!J.s.trict? Yes ~ No ------- 27. Does th e plan accurate ly indicate what you inte nd to construct and what w ill r ece ive a final inspec tion by t~arfield County Building D e pmtment? Yes \.../" No ------ 28. Do you und erstand that approval for d esign and/or construction changes are required prior to the appli cati9n of th ese changes? Yes V' No ------ 29. Do yo u understand that th e Building Departm e nt wi ll coll ect a "Pl a n R eview" fee from you a t th e tim e of app lication submi ttal and t hat yo u w ill be required to pay the "P ermit F ee" as w ell as any "Road Impac t" or "Septic System " fe es r equired , at the time yo u pi ck up your building perrnit?_..- Y es ~ No ------ 30. Are you aware that you must call in for an inspection b y 3:30 th e bus iness day before the requested ins pection in order to receive it the following business day ? Inspections wiU be made from 7 :30 a.m . to 3:30p.m. Monday through Friday. Inspections are to be called in to 384-5003. Yes ~ No _____ ....:_ 31. Are you aware that requ esting inspecti on s on work that is not ready or not accessible wi ll result in a $50.g.!1-te-inspection fee ? Yes V No ------ 32. Are you aware that you a re r equired to ca ll for all inspections req uired und er th e IRC in c ludin g approval on a fi nal inspection prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy and occupan c~e building? Yes No ------,----- 5 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. Are you aware that the Permit Application must b e signed by the Owner or a written authority being given for an Agent and that the party respons ible fo r the proj ect mu st comp ly with the IRC?___.-· Yes ~ No ------- D o you understand that you will b e required to hire a State of Co lorado Licensed Electrician and Plumber to perform installations and hookup s, unless you as the hom eowner are performing the work? The li cense number of the person p erforming th e work will be required at time of applicable inspection. Yes ~-No ------- Are you aware, that on the front of the Building Permit Application y ou will need to fill ·in the Parcel /Schedule Numbe r for the lot you are app lying for thi s permit on priOJ·to submittal of a buil~ing..permit app li cation? Your attention in this is appreciat ed. Yes V No --------- Do you know that t he lo cal fire district may require you t~mit plans for their review of fire safety issues? Y es No ~ (please che ck with the building department about thi s r equirement) Do you understand that if you are planning on doing any excavating or grading to the property prior to issuance of a building permit that yo u will b e required to obtain a grading permit? Yes \~ Are you aware that if you wi ll b e connecting to a publi c water and/or sewer sys tem , that the tap fe es have to b e paid and the connections in sp ected by the service provider prior to th e issuance of a Cet1ificate of Occupancy? Yes ----- I hereby acknowledge that I have read, understand and answered these questions to the J :rA Y ~ to --CXo-o-:r S1gnature of Owne Date Phone: <1 /o ·-b \<l -5~'-1-3 (days); 9D:__9~S-]S 8q I (ev enings) Project Name: 31-ee\e._ ~ reS l Cl~ add \of\ GlY'(:.l gClr%1e__ Project Address: Aq~ Coufl±y f\ D \\3 CQYmrvlili C.d Notes: If you h ave answered "No" on any of the quest ions , you may b e required to provid e this 6 VALUATION FEE DETERMINATION Applicant Address Date ..:;S;;:te;::e;.:le'==::----------Subdivision 4985 CR 113 Lot/Block -=s"'/2;::7;,/2,::,0::,:0~8 =---------Contractor Finished (Livable Area): Main Upper Lower Other Total Basement: Unfinished Square Feet Valuation Conversion of Unfinished to Finished Total Valuation Garage: Valuation Crawl Space Valuation Decks/ Patios Valuation Covered Open Type of Construction: Occupancy: Valuation Total Valuation 186 sf sf sf sf X $74.68 186 sf sf X $41.00 sf X $33.68 780 sf X $18.00 Commercial sf X $9.00 sf X $24.00 sf X $12.00 sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X sf X Cottonwood Hollow 12 Owner 13,890.48 0.00 14,040.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27,930.48 PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST Applicant 5 }&..) <___ Date I I -I '3 · 6 '1 Building Planning/Zoning £Engineered Foundation -Vroperty Line Setbacks ~Driveway Permit Gx:~., ~~;v ~ _L30ft Stream Setbacks ~veyed Site Plan ~ood Plain Oe\.\.""t \ ~ / ~Septi c Permit and Setbacks Me( \ (; 1\-C-Ic. _V_ fBuildin g Height --l..L,_ Gradetropography 30% 0 uach Residential Plan Review List _LMinimum Application Questionnaire _Lsubdivision Plat Notes ..t4L-Fire Department Review ____t6aluation Determination/Fees ~Red Line Plans/Stamps/Sticker ~Attach Condition s d'Appli cation Signed _LPlan Reviewer To Sign Application _L.Parcel/Schedule No. ~ 40# Snow load Letter-Manf. Hms . _L Soils Report GENERAL NOTES: ---t,L_Zoning Sign-off ~R oad Impact Fees _LHONDRC App~·o val . / ' I'; ell--6t@O _v_Gradeffopography 40% / Re.p~- _____L P!anning Issues -t,.L:Subdivi sion Plat Notes To; Scott and Penny Steele After review of your plans for master bedroom addition and garage. we the architectural committee grant a variance for the garage to be built outside the building envelope and approve these plans as long as the new buildings match the color of the existing structure. Good luck with your project. o/1\.cu.e.__ G~ ,J{:~L~L Parcel Detail Page 1 of 3 Garfield County Assessor/Treasurer Parcel Detail Information A~~e~sorll):egsurerPmperty Sean::h I A~~essor SlJh~et ~_ry I Assessor Sales Search Clerl& &Recor<l_erRe_cep_tiQnSe<m:h Basic Building Characteristics I Tax Information Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Land Detail I Photographs I Tax Area II Account Number II Parcel Number II Mill Levy I I 011 II R111564 II 239312302012 II 63.103 I Owner Name and Mailing Address !STEELE, SCOTT & PENNEY I 1218 E VALLEY ROAD STE 104 NO 255 I !CARBONDALE, CO 81623 I Legal Description lsECT,TWN,RNG: 12-7-88 SUB:COTTONWOOD !HOLLOW SUB AMD L12 LOT: 12 IPRE:R050120 RECPT:729830 BK:0872 IPG:0075 BK:0779 PG:0661 BK:0575 IPG:0845 Location Physical Address: 114985 113 COUNTY RD CARBONDALE! s bd' . • • rOTTONWOOD HOLLOW SUB AMD 1 U I VISIOn. L 12 Land Acres: I 5.53 Land Sq Ft: I 0 Section II Township II Range I 12 II 7 II 88 I Property Tax Valuation Information http://www.garcoact.com/assessor/parcel.asp?ParcelNumber=239312302012 1112/2007 Parcel Detail Page 2 of 3 II Actual Value II Assessed Value I I Land: 155,oooll 12,3401 I Improvements: 309,91011 24,6701 II Total: 464,91011 37,0101 Sale Date: 117/31/2007 Sale Price: jj575,000 Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential 1 Buildings: Number of Commllnd lo I Buildings: I Residential Building Occurrence 1 Characteristics I TOTAL HEATED AREA: 111,632 I ABSTRACT CODE·IISINGLE FAM.RES- . IMPROVEMTS I ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: III 1/2 STRY I EXTERIOR WALL: i!MASONITE I ROOF COVER: IICOMP SHNGL I ROOF STRUCTURE: i!GABLE INTERIOR WALL: i!DRYWALL FLOOR: jjsHT VINYL I FLOOR: i!CARPET I HEATING FUEL: IiGAS I HEATING TYPE: i!FORCED AIR I STORIES: i!STORIES 1.5 BATHS: j2 ROOMS: j7 UNITS: II BEDROOMS: j4 YEAR BUILT: jj1990 I Tax Information TaxYear II Transaction Type II Amount j 2oo6 11 Tax Payment: Whole 11 ($!,773.2o)l http://www. garcoact.corn/ assessor/parcel.asp ?Parce!N umber=23 93123020 12 11/2/2007 Parcel Detail 2006 II Tax Amount II $1,773.201 2005 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($1,780.90)1 2005 II Tax Amount II $1,780.901 2004 II Tax Payment: Whole II ($1 ,687 .70)1 2004 II Tax Amount II $1,687.701 2003 I Tax Payment: Whole II ($1,418.88)1 2003 Tax Amount II $1,418.881 2002 Tax Payment: Second Half II ($745.82)11 2002 Tax Payment: First Half II ($745.82)1 2002 Tax Amount $1,491.641 I 2001 Tax Payment: Second Half ($749.95)1 I 2001 Interest Payment ($15.00)1 I 2001 I Interest Charge $15.001 I 2001 II Tax Payment: First Half ($749.95)1 I 2001 II Tax Amount $1,499.901 I 2000 II Tax Payment: Second Half ($711.83)1 I 2000 II Tax Payment: First Half ($711.83)1 2000 I Tax Amount I $1,423.661 1999 Tax Payment: Second Half ($702.16)1 1999 Tax Payment: First Half ($702.16)1 1999 Tax Amount $1,404.321 ToRofPage Assessor Database Search Options I Treasurer Database Search Options Clerk & Recorder Datab_ill\~.Sem·ch Options Garfield County Home Page Page 3 of 3 The Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices make every effort to collect and maintain accurate data. However, Good Turns Software and the Garfield County Assessor and Treasurer's Offices are unable to warrant any of the information herein contained. Copyright © 2005 -2006 Good Turns Software. All Rights Reserved. Database & Web Design by Good Turns Software. http://www .garcoact.cornlassessor/parcel.asp?Parce1Number=2393123020 12 1112/2007 SCANNED Design Data Foundation: A. General The foundation design was based on soils investigation by Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, Inc. Job no. 107-0861 dated January 29, 2008. Maximum allowable bearing pressure -1500 psf Lateral soil pressure 45 pcf B. Excavation 1. Owner/ contractor shall provide all necessary sheeting, shoring and bracing where required to properly and safely completes the work. 2. Avoid excessive wetting or drying of the foundation excavation during construction. Keep excavations reasonably free of water at all time and completely free of water during placement of concrete. Concrete: A . Concrete Requirements Concrete has been designed and shall be constructed in accordance with the latest editions; of the American Concrete Institute Building Code, ACI 318 and Specifications for Structural Concrete for Buildings, ACI 301 . Provide hot or cold weather protection per ACI 305 & 308 . 1. Concrete shall have a minimum compressive strength at 28 days of: 3000 psi. 2. Provide Type 11 cement throughout with 4% air entrainment. 3. Mechanical vibrate concrete. 4. No admixtures shall be used without approval by the engineer. 5. Addition of water to the batch material for insufficient slump is not permitted. 6. Do not place pipes, ducts or chases in the structural concrete without approval of the engineer. 7. Thoroughly clean all case and construction joints prior to placing concrete in adjacent pour. 8 . Concrete shall not be in contact with aluminum. B. Reinforcing Detailing, fabrication and erection of reinforcing steel bars shall comply with the ACI Manual of Standard Practice for Detailing Reinforced Concrete Structures ACI 315 . 1. Reinforcing Bars shall be ASTM A615 -Grade 40. 2. Welded wire fabric shall conform to ASTM A185. Furnish in flat sheet only. 3. Concrete protection for reinforcement: Cast against and permanently exposed to earth 3 in. Exposed to earth or weather ..... #6-#18 bar 2 in. #3-#5 bar 1112 in. Not exposed to earth or weather .. slabs & walls % in. Beams & cols. 11/2 in. 4. Reinforcing lap splices shall be a minimum of 36 bar diameters unless noted otherwise. Lap wire fabric reinforcement one full mesh plus 2" at sides and ends and wire together. 5. Splices in horizontal beams and walls shall occur at midspan for the top bars Andover supports for the bottom bars. 6. Provide corner bars of equal size and spacing around corners. 7. Provide 2-#5 bars with a minimum of 2' -0" projection beyond the sides of all openings in walls and slabs. Provide 1-#5 x 4' -0" diagonally at all re-entrant corners of slabs. 8. Provide accessories necessary to properly support reinforcing at the positions shown on the plans. 9. Reinforcing spacings are maximum on center and all reinforcing is continuous, unless noted. C. Slabs 1. Provide control joints at 12' -0" maximum spacing or as shown on drawings. 2. Provide minimum 4" compacted gravel under slab on grade. The material shall consist of minus 2-inch aggregate w /less that 50% passing the No. 4 sieve and less than 2% passing the No. 200 sieve. ~tech HEPWORTH -PAWLAK GEOTECHN ICAL January 29, 2008 Scott Steele 4985 County Road 113 Carbondale, Colorado 81623 I k]'ll <>llh P.llll ,ll ( iuJIL<hlll l.d ,l itc . 'il12t.1 l \ ,,,111 v R,,,,d I 5-l ( l lc nw"'"l "J'IIIl~'· l', ,j ,,r,l,lll ~I ('1\.1 ] Phone· 97l~-9-l 'i -/9'i'i F,,~ lJ70 -945-IH5 -l en1;1d : hpge c,~h pgc'lll c c h .cn m Job No . 107 0861 Subject: Observation of Excavation, Proposed Garage, 4985 County Road 113, Cottonwood Hollow, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Steele: As requested, a representative of Hepw01th-Pawlak Geoteclmical, Inc. observed the excavation at the subject site on November 1 6, 2007 to evaluate the soils exposed for foundation support. The findings of our observations and recotmnendations for the foundation design are presented in this rep01i . The services were performed in accordance with our agreement for professional engineering services to you, dated November 12, 2007. The results of our geologic site assessment will be provided under a separate cover. The proposed garage will be a single story, wood frame structure supp01ted by a thickened-edge slab. Rigid foam insulation will be used for shallow frost protection. The uphill cut slopes will be retained by a 10 foot tall, cast-in-place concrete foundation walL At the time of our visit to the site, the foundation excavation had been cut in 1 level between about 2Y2 to 22 feet below the adjacent ground surface. Basalt rocks up to small boulder size were loosely stacked on the uphill cut slopes. The soils exposed in the bottom of the excavation consisted of basalt gravel and cobbles in a sandy clay matrix below up to about 1 foot of loose, disturbed on-site soils. The results of a gradation analysis performed on a sample of sandy clay and gravel with cobbles matrix soils (minus 5 inch fi·action) obtained fi·om the site are presented on Figure 1. No ti-ee water was encountered in the excavation and the soils were slightly moist to moist. Considering the conditions exposed in the excavation and the nature of the proposed construction, a thickened-edge slab foundation placed on the undisturbed natural soil designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,500 psf can be used for suppot1 of the P<1r ke r 10 )-R4 1-7 1 19 • Cnlnradn Sprin g., 7 19 -6 B -516 2 • S i k cnhutn L' 97LL t 6R-1981.J Scott Steele January 29, 2008 Page 2 proposed garage. The exposed soils tend to compress when wetted and there could be some post-construction settlement of the foundation if the bearing soils become wet. Footings (if any) should be a minimum width of 18 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. The loose and disturbed soils in the footing areas should be moistened and compacted prior to constructing footing forms. The bearing soils should be protected against frost and concrete should not be placed on frozen soils. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 50 pcffor on-site soil as backfill devoid of topsoil, vegetation and oversized rock. A perimeter foundation drain should be provided to prevent temporary buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the uphill foundation retaining wall and prevent wetting of the lower level. Structural fill placed within floor slab areas can consist of the on-site soils compacted to at least 95% of standard Proctor density at near optimum moisture content. Backfill placed around the structure should be compacted and the surface graded to prevent ponding within at least I 0 feet of the building. Cut and fill slopes should be graded to 2 horizontal to I vertical or flatter. A swale may be needed on the slope above the building to route surface water around the building. The following slope treatments are recommended as alternatives to retaining the steep slope with the building walls. I) Timber crib retaining walls separate from the building. 2) Rock-filled wire baskets or gabions. 3) Mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls composed of compacted layers of soil reinforced with Tensar geogrid. These walls can be faced with timber cribbing, boulders or masonry. All retaining walls separate from the building should be designed for a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of 45 pcf. Drainage should be provided behind the walls to reduce potential hydrostatic pressure. A swale may be needed uphill of the walls to route surface runoff away from the face of the retaining walls. Job No. 107 0861 Scott Steele January 29, 2008 Page 3 The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the soils exposed within the foundation excavation and do not include subsurface exploration to evaluate the subsurface conditions within the loaded depth of foundation influence. This study is based on the assumption that soils beneath the footings have equal or better supp011 than those exposed. The risk of foundation movement may be greater than indicated in this repo11 because of possible variations in the subsurface conditions. In order to reveal the nature and extent of variations in the subsurface conditions below the excavation, drilling would be required. It is possible the data obtained by subsurface exploration could change the recommendations contained in this letter. Our services do not include detennining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. lfthe client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. If you have any questions or need fut1her assistance, please call our office. Sincerely, HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Trevor L. Knell, P .E. Reviewed by: TLK/vad attachment Figure 1 -Gradation Test Results Job No. 107 0 861 ~tech r· .. 0 w z ~ w "' r-z w () "' w !L I HYDROMETER ANALYSIS I SIEVE ANALYSIS J U.S. STANDARD SERIES I CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS I 24 1HR. 7 HR TIME READINGS I 0 45 MIN. 15 MIN. 60MIN19MIN.4 MIN. 1 MIN. #200 #100 #50 #30 #16 #8 #4 3/8" 3/4" 11/2" 3" 5"6" 8" 100 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .150 .300 .600 1.18 2.36 4.75 9.5 19.0 37.5 12.5 76.2 152 203 127 DIAMETER OF PARTICLES IN MILLIMETERS CLAYTOSU FINE SAND MEDIUM COARSE GRA FINE COAASE COBBLES GRAVEL 39 % SAND 17 % SILT AND CLAY 44 % LIQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % SAMPLE OF: Sandy Silty Clay and Gravel with Cobbles (Matrix) FROM: Bottom of Excavation, North side 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 (!) z Vi (/) < !L r-z w () "' w !L 107 0861 c~ GRADATION TEST RESULTS Figure 1 HEPWORTH·PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL I ~tech HEPW ORTH -PAWL AK GEO TEC HNI CA L March 31, 2008 Scott Steele 4985 County Road 113 Carbondale, Co lorado 81623 ~ ~~~RF,IELDCOUNTY BuilDING & PLANNING Job No. 107 0861 Subject: Geologic Site Assessment, Proposed Garage, 4985 County Road 113 , Lot 12, Cottonwood Hollow, Garfield County, Colorado Dear Mr. Steele: As requested , we perfonned a geologic site assessment for a proposed garage to be located on Lot 12 of the Cottonwood Hollow Subdivision. The project site and vicinity are shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the assessment was to evaluate ifthere are geologic conditions that could present unusually high risks or major constraints to the garage. A field rec01maissance ofthe project vicinity was made on March 7, 2008 to observe the geology and site conditions . In addition, we have reviewed published regional geology studies, looked at aerial photographs and reviewed our previous work in the vicinity. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical observed the garage excavation on November 16, 2007 and developed geotechnical recotmnendations for the foundation and cut slope stabilization (Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, 2008). This report summarizes the findings of our geologic site assessment and presents our conclusions and rec01mnendations. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS This study shows that the geologic conditions at the project site should not present unusually high risks or major design constraints for the proposed garage. There are several conditions of a geologic nature that should be considered in the garage design as discussed in the Geologic Site Assessment section of this report. PROPOSED CONSTUCTION It is our understanding that you plan to build a garage in the southeastern part of Lot 12, see Figure 1. The garage site is located near the existing driveway entrance off of County Road 113 to the southeast ofthe existing residence. The garage will be a single story, wood fi·ame building with a thickened-edge slab foundation system. Our January 29 , I I I I 'I Ill -' I I • d I I II Scott Steele March 31, 2008 Page 2 2008 excavation observation report may be referred to for geotechnical engineering recommendations for the garage (Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, 2008). SITE CONDITIONS Lot 12 is located on the north side of Cattle Creek about five and one-half miles upstream from the confluence with the Roaring Fork River. The topography in the area is shown by the contour lines on Figure I. At the project site, Cattle Creek has eroded a narrow, steep sided valley about 800 feet below the rolling uplands of Missouri Heights. The garage site is at the transition between the moderately sloping valley floor and the steep valley side. The ground slope over most of the garage site is less thanl5 percent. The valley side along the notih side of the garage site is steep, about 40 percent. At lhe limt: of our field reconnaissance on March 7, 2008 the garage foundation excavation had been completed for some time. The cut slope along the north side of the garage site is about 20 feet high and has a slope of around I: I (horizontal to vertical). Basalt cobbles and boulders were loosely stacked along the lower two-thirds of the cut slope. Vegetation on the valley side is mostly juniper trees and brush . GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS Geologic conditions that pertain to the proposed garage are described below. Regional Geology: The project site is in the Southern Rocky Mountains to the west of the Rio Grande rift and to the east of the Colorado Plateau, see Figure 2. The site is in the western Colorado evaporite region and is in the Carbondale collapse center, see Figure 3. The Carbondale collapse center has experienced as much as 4,000 feet of evaporite related regional subsidence during the past I 0 million years (Kirkham and Others 2002). The long term subsidence rates have been very slow, between 0.5 and 1.6 inches per I 00 years. It is uncertain if regional evaporite subsidence is still occurring, of if it is currently inactive. If still active, these regional deformations because of their very slow rates should not have a significant impact on the proposed garage. Geologically Young Faults: Geologically young faults less than 15,000 years old and considered capable of generating large earthquakes are not located close to the project site. The closets geologically young faults considered capable of generating large emihquakes are over 60 miles from the project site, see Figure 2. At this distance large Job No 107 0861 ~tech Scott Steele March 31, 2008 Page 3 earthquakes on the fault should not produce strong ground shaking at the project site that is greater than the ground shaking shown on the U. S. Geological Survey 2002 National Seismic Hazards Maps (Frankel and Others, 2002). Surficial Soil Deposits: Soil deposits in the project area consist mostly of colluvium and collapse debris formed by subsidence deformation in the Carbondale collapse center. Colluvium consisting of basalt rocks from gravel-to boulder-size in a sandy clay soil matrix is present in the proposed garage excavation. Formation Rock: Rock outcrops are not present in the project vicinity. As discussed above, the formation rock is covered by thick colluvium and collapse debris. Regional geologic mapping shows that tho ncar surface formation rock at the project site is most likely the middle Pennsylvanian-age, Eagle Valley Evaporite (Kirkham and Widmann, 1997). It is a sequence of evaporite rock consisting of massive to laminated gypsum, anhydrite and halite interbedded with light-colored mudstone, fme-grained sandstone, thin limestone and dolomite beds and black shale (Kirkham and Widmann, 1997). The evaporite minerals are relatively soluble in circulating groundwater and subsurface solution voids and related surface sinkholes are locally present in these rocks throughout the western Colorado evaporite region including the project site. The closest known sinkhole to the project site is located about one and one-quarter miles to the south (Kirkham and Widmann, 1997). Landslides: Regional geologic mapping shows that large landslide complexes are present on the Cattle Creek valley in the vicinity of the project site (Kirkham and Widmann, 1997). The locations of these landslides are shown on Figure I. The landslide boundaries shown are modifications of the regional mapping by Kirkham and Widmann (1997) based on our field observations. The proposed garage site is located about 1,000 feet to the west of the closest landslide. If this landslide were to reactivate in the future it should not present a risk to the proposed garage. GEOLOGIC SITE ASSESSMENT Geologic conditions that could present an unusually high risk to the proposed garage were not identified by this study. There are, however, geologic conditions that should be considered in the garage design. These conditions, their potential risks and possible Job No 107 0861 Scott Steele March 31, 2008 Page4 mitigations to reduce the risks are discussed below. The potential risks of geologic hazards impacting the garage site are similar to the nearby existing house site. Sinkholes: Geologically young sinkholes are present in the western Colorado evaporite region mostly in areas where the Eagle Valley Formation and Eagle Valley Evaporite are shallow, see Figure 3. In this region a few sinkholes have collapsed at the ground surface with little or no warning during historic times. Although geologically active in the region, the likelihood that a sinkhole will development during a reasonable exposure time at the garage is considered to be low. This inference is based on the large extent of sinkhole prone areas in the region in comparison to the small number of sinkholes that have developed in historic times. Because of the complex nature of the evaporite-related sinkholes, it will not be possible to avoid all sinkhole risk at the garage site. You should be aware of the sinkhole potential, since early detection of building distress and timely remedial actions are important in reducing the cost of building repair should a subsurface void start to develop into a sinkhole after construction. Earthquake Considerations: The largest historic earthquake in the project region occurred in 1882. It was located in the northern Front Range about 113 miles to the northeast of the project site and had an estimated magnitude of about M 6.2 and a maximum intensity of VII, see Figure 2. Historic ground shaking at the project site associated with the 1882 and the other larger historic earthquakes in the region does not appear to have exceeded Modified Mercalli Intensity VI (Kirkham and Rogers, 1985). Modified Mercalli Intensity VI ground shaking should be expected during a reasonable exposure time for the garage, but the probability of stronger ground shaking is low. Intensity VI ground shaking is felt by most people and causes general alarm, but results in negligible damage to structures of good design and construction. The garage should be designed to withstand moderately strong ground shaking with little or no damage and not to collapse under stronger ground shaking. For firm rock sites with shear wave velocities of 2,500 fj:ls in the upper I 00 feet the U. S. Geological Survey 2002 National Seismic Hazard Maps indicates that a peak ground acceleration of0.06g has a 10% exceedence probability for a 50 year exposure time and a peak ground acceleration of0.23g has a 2% exceedence probability for a 50 year exposure time at the project site (Frankel and Others, 2002). This corresponds to a statistical recurrence time of about 500 years and 2,500 years, respectively. The soil profiles at the garage site should be Job No 107 0861 ~tech Scott Steele March 31, 2008 Page 5 considered as a C lass D, stiff soil sites as described in the 2006 International Building Code unless site specific shear wave velocity st ud ies show otherwise. Limitations : This study was conducted according to generally accepted engineering geology principles and practices in this area, at this time. We make no warranty either express or implied . The conclusions and reconunendations submitted in this rep01t are based on our field observations and o ur experience in the area. The information presented in this report has been prepared exclusively for our client and is an evaluation of potential risk to the proposed garage associated with the geo logy. We are not responsible for technical interpretations by others of o ur information. If you have questions, or ifwe may be offiuther assistance, please let us know. Respectfully Submitted, HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. Ralph G. Mock Engineering Geo logist Reviewed by: D a niel E. Hardin, P .E. RGM/va d Enclosures: Figure 1 -Geologica ll y Young Fau lt s and Larger Historic Eatthquakes Figure 2 -Western Colorado Evaporit e Region Figure 3 -Lands lid es in Vicinity of Lot 12 Garage Site Job No 107 0861 ~tech Scott Steele March 31, 2008 Page 6 REFERENCES Frankel, A. D. and Others, 2002, Documentation for the 2002 Update of the National Seismic Hazard Maps: U. S. Geological Survey Open File Report 02-420. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical, 2008, Observations of Excavation, Proposed Garage, 4985 County Road II3, Cottonwood Hollow, Garfield County, Colorado: Prepared for Scott Steele, Carbondale, Colorado (Job No. I 07 0861, January 29, 2008). Kirkham, R. M. and Rogers, W. P., 1985, Colorado Earthquake Data and Interpretations 1867 to I985: Colorado Geological Survey Bulletin 46. Kirkham, R. M. and Widmann, B. L., 1997, Geology Map of the Carbondale Quadrangle, Garfield County, Colorado: Colorado Geological Survey Open File 97-3. Kirkham, R. M. and Scott, R. B., 2002, Introduction to Late Cenozoic Evaporite tectonism and Volcanism in West-Central, Colorado, in Kirkham R. M., Scott, R. B. and Judkins, T. W. eds., Late Cenozoic Evaporite Tectonisim and Volcanism in West-Central Colorado: Geological Society of America Special Paper 366, Boulder, Colorado. Kirkham R. M. and Others, 2002, Evaporite Tectonisim in the Lower Roaring Fork River Valley, West-Central Colorado, in Kirkham R. M., Scott, R. B. and Judkins, T. W. eds., Late Cenozoic Evaporite Tectonisim and Volcanism in West-Central Colorado: Geological Society of America Special Paper 366, Boulder, Colorado. Tweto, 0. and Others, 1978, Geology Map of the Leadville IE X 2E Quadrangle, Northwestern Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Map I-999. Widmann B. L. and Others, 1998, Preliminary Quaternary Fault and Fold Map and Data Base of Colorado: Colorado Geological Survey Open File Report 98-8. Job No 107 0861 I .. ~- I Explanation: ~ Younger Landslides: [§g) Older Landslides: --Contact: Approximate boundary of map units . Modified from Kirkham a nd Widmann (1997) 10 7 0861 ~tech HEPWOR!H -PA\\I.AK GEOTI:CHNICAI.. ~ .... ~ -~5.. //. .. iJl::-·;.;~" --! l Missouri · •.. t , I I •'•"'< <-• ~T •· I l ~-teigh~s I I Cottonwood Hollow Subdivi sion \ ...•. 0 . -~ '' I • I 2000 ft . I Scale: 1 ln. = 2000 ft. Contour Interval: 40 ft . March 2008 Landslides in Vicinity of Lot 12 Proposed Garage S ite Figure 1 Intermountain Seismic Belt M5.1 Wyomll)q 150miles Bas111 ~angely Rio Blanco \~faloslon) M5.7 * Axial Basin 1891 Cr: t;;:\ X!?t ~ '5 ~ 3 Glenwood o SP8ngs Eagle 0 • Project Rill Rulison* e (Explosion) 1969 M5.3 Grand J/il,ctlon UT. CO. Explanation: 0 Cortez "\ Post-Glacial Faults: '-.. Fault younger than about 15,000 years . Larger Historic Earthquakes: Delt'b Montrose 0 aiQ- 0 Earthquakes with maximum Intensity greater than VI or magnitude greater than M 5.0 from 1867 to present. * Nuclear Explos ion: M VI Sile t1"pen Historic Seismic Zones: Areas with historically high seismic activity. Local, surface wave or body wave mag nitude Modified Mercalli Intensity 0 I WY . co C reat D Trlnldad 50 mi . I Large underground nuclear explosion for natural gas reservoir enhancement. References: Scale: 1 ln. = 50 mi. 107 0861 ~tech HEPWORTH-PAI'I\.AK GEOTECHNICAL Widmann and Others (1998) U.S . Geological Survey Earthquake Catalogs Cottonwood Hollow Subdivision Lot 12 Proposed Garage Site Geologically Young Fau lts and Larger Historic Earthquakes Figure 2 ..... 0 ....., 0 (X) 0> ..... ., ce· c <il w Explanation: *Project Site D 10 Miles References: Shallow Evaporite in Eagle Valley Fonnation and Eagle Valley Evaporite. Basin Carbondale Collapse Center (460 sq. mi.) Tweto and Others (1978) Kir1<ham and Scott (2002) '---Marble / Eag le Collapse Cen ter van• l ) I I Garfield County Building & Planning Department 108 8th Street, Suite #401 Glenwood Springs, Co. 81601 Offic9:970·945-8212 Fax: 970-384-3470 Inspection Line : 970-384-5003 Building Permit No. Parcel No: 2393-123-02-012 Locality: Cottonw·ood Hollow Sub AMD L 12, Lot 12 ------- Job Address: 4985 cr 113 , Carbondale -----------~---------------- Use of Building: expanding bedroom to exi st ing residence & detached garage ---=------ Owner: Steele , Scott Contractor: Owner Fees: Plan Check: $ 27 4.01 Septic : Bldg Permit : $ 421.55 Other Fees : Total Fees: $ 695.56 Clerk: =..~ Date: _U_{_D j_Q~ I BUILDING PERMIT GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO AGREEMENT In consideration of the issuance of the permit, the applicant hereby agrees to comply with all laws and regulations related to the zoning, location; construction and eredion of the proposed strudured for which this permit is granted, and further agrees that if the above said regulations are not fully complied with in the zoning, location, erection and construction of the above described structure, the permit may then be revoked by notice from the County Building department and IMMEDIATELY BECOME NULL AND VOID. use b¥omi~ /Jerjlt!J(Jm 15 e/lillij !!eslrknee I~ t:jkW!ge. Addressor legal Description LfC/85 C/" //3; fJ:JebDIIdo~ @ Owner S/iele.~ SCCJH (}) INSPECTION RECORD Footing Underground Plumbing Rough Plumbing Rough Mechanical Gas Piping Driveway Insulation Drywall O O -~~ __.. I -t ·/3 -,~ Septic Final FINAL&£-: dn& o l< 4/~ (to include Roof in place lr Windows lr Doors Installed lr Flrestopplng in place) THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE DO NOT DESTROY THIS CARD , By DatAW1Drf.JJ~ PROTECT PERMIT FROM WEAT R DAMAGE (DO NOT LAMINATE) )-ifPB Bb~ /o Tow rJ 5c:.o~ :5--k::e...~ 1? D -6 I 8 -~s '-J ? tJ. R. ~ 71 ~tf-tlA} 1~~ to~~ l~. N o te; N e w ex piration dat e for thi s permit is been cha nged to 11 .26 .13. RECEIVED AUG 2 0 2013 GARFi l:LD COUNTY ~~'P I 'ELOPMENT A pplic an t has until 11 .26.13 to pass a in s pecti o ns, on ce insp ectio n passes th e perm it wi ll a uto mati call y be review fo r 180 d ays starting the inspecti on p ass d ate .